<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/items?output=omeka-xml&amp;page=956&amp;sort_field=added" accessDate="2026-04-09T13:02:46+00:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>956</pageNumber>
      <perPage>10</perPage>
      <totalResults>13078</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="10346" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="12041">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/cc298447724a6f0310d974e4a09aacc8.jpg</src>
        <authentication>c46a8f230c57a15daa493a7b2e0847fe</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="12042">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/fd7ff56cff5a59328389d1ae4d1b99ca.jpg</src>
        <authentication>6794a35135231ff1a615ab17d910bd3b</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="12043">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/b3a76303c8c6e269f0ae57e80e64ebdc.jpg</src>
        <authentication>fbd0ab118a82e91cce8a33b9857b2d56</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="1">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="1">
                  <text>Thunder Bay Finnish Canadian Historical Society Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Finnish-Canadians</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="3">
                  <text>Life in Thunder Bay</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4">
                  <text>Photographs collected by the Thunder Bay Finnish Canadian Historical Society from a wide range of collectors, documenting Finnish immigration to and life in Thunder Bay. </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="5">
                  <text>Thunder Bay Finnish Canadian Historical Society</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="6">
                  <text>Lakehead University Library</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85804">
                <text>Funeral procession in honour of Viljo Rosval and John Voutilainen</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85805">
                <text>Organizations</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="85806">
                <text>Labour and Labour Unions</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85807">
                <text>Funeral procession in honour of Viljo Rosval and John Voutilainen, Port Arthur, Spring 1930. 3 copies.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85808">
                <text>1930</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85809">
                <text>Public domain</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85810">
                <text>JPG</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85811">
                <text>Still image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85812">
                <text>MG8_D12Gi31&#13;
MG8_D12Gi31a&#13;
MG8_D12Gi31b</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="38">
            <name>Coverage</name>
            <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85813">
                <text>Canada - Ontario - Thunder Bay</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="85814">
                <text>Canada - Ontario - Port Arthur</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="10347" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="12044">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/5d187e4a6972d16b137d2af8c2102e43.jpg</src>
        <authentication>7bdd038b72fe3e5c6ef04b6d7bb43fcb</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="1">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="1">
                  <text>Thunder Bay Finnish Canadian Historical Society Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Finnish-Canadians</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="3">
                  <text>Life in Thunder Bay</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4">
                  <text>Photographs collected by the Thunder Bay Finnish Canadian Historical Society from a wide range of collectors, documenting Finnish immigration to and life in Thunder Bay. </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="5">
                  <text>Thunder Bay Finnish Canadian Historical Society</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="6">
                  <text>Lakehead University Library</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85815">
                <text>Funeral procession in honour of Viljo Rosval and John Voutilainen</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85816">
                <text>Organizations</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="85817">
                <text>Labour and Labour Unions</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85818">
                <text>Funeral procession in honour of Viljo Rosval and John Voutilainen, Port Arthur, Spring 1930.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85819">
                <text>1930</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85820">
                <text>Public domain</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85821">
                <text>JPG</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85822">
                <text>Still image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85823">
                <text>MG8_D12Gi32</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="38">
            <name>Coverage</name>
            <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85824">
                <text>Canada - Ontario - Thunder Bay</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="85825">
                <text>Canada - Ontario - Port Arthur</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="10348" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="12047">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/2aab51c56098bfbeb5d103006911347e.pdf</src>
        <authentication>7bb1f734a9dc806cd2045142ff376e0f</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="85827">
                    <text>ONTARIO, CANADA

�Thunder Bay, Ont.
108,048 (1970)
Population
156 sq. miles
*Square Miles
* ( includes waterlots).
January 1, 1970, Thunder Bay
emerged as a bright new city, the
sixth largest in Ontario. This historic
event occurred through the merging
of
The City of Fort William
The City of Port Arthur
The Township of Neebing
The Township of McIntyre

Co-operatively pro·duced by:

THUNDER BAY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
THUNDER BAY CONVENTION BUREAU
INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF THUNDER BAY INC.
For More Information Write:
P.O. BOX 2000
THUNDER BAY, 'F'
ONTARIO

June 23, 1969, the name Thunder
Bay was
chosen
by
plebiscite.
Simultaneously an election of a Mayor
and 12 Aldermen took place and the
following govern the City of Thunder
Bay, made up of four wards, Fort
William, McIntyre, Neebing and Port
Arthur:
Mayor Saul Laskin
Aldermen
Don Aedy
W. M. Assef
H. L. G. Badanai, Jr.
H. J. Cook, Jr.
Mickey Hennessy
C. M. Johnston, M.D.
T. J. Jones
Edgar Laprade
D. J. Lenardon
George Lovelady
W. M. Morgan
Grace Remus
The Council of Thunder Bay, to
remain in office until Dec. 31, 1972,
became operative in the latter months
of 1969 smoothing out administrative
and legal problems of uniting four
separate units on Jan. 1, 1970.
Previously elected officials of the
amalgamated communities continued
in office until Dec. 31, 1969, when
all assets and liabilities of the Corporation were officially turned over
to the new city.
As far back as the early 1900's, individuals had advocated the amalgamation of the two cities commonly
known The Lakehead. Now as one

unit, the historical background of the
communities will be retained with their
designation as Wards of the city.
Thunder Bay will continue to be
regarded as the capital city and administrative headquarters of the District of Thunder Bay.
The City of Thunder Bay is located
at the western Canadian end of Lake
Superior on the north shore of
Thunder Bay. Canada's newest city
is 861 road miles northwest of Toronto, 424 miles east of Winnipeg and
348 miles north of Minneapolis.
Third largest Canadian port in total
tonnage handled, Thunder Bay is the
western terminus of the Great Lakes
and St. Lawrence deep waterway.
Thunder Bay is a transportation
centre of mid-Canada and is served
by Trans-Continental Railways, three
scheduled airlines, intercontinental bus
service, the Trans-Canada Highway
and the St. Lawrence Seaway.
The vast district of Thunder Bay,
of which the city of Thunder Bay is
the hub, covers 52,471 square miles
extending from White River on the east
to English River on the west and
bounded on the north by the Albany
River and Lake Superior on the south.
The city rests on a delta of the Kaministiquia River, 18 miles downstream
from Kakabeka Falls and extends
northeastward upon a series of
natural terraces. From the terraces,
the shoreline, Mount McKay, Thunder
Bay and the giant elevators unfold a
panoramic view reminiscent of the
renowed Bays of Naples and famous
fiords of Norway.
Thunder Cape, a part -o f Sibley
Penninsula, resembles the unique
natural shape of a sleeping giant Nanabijou of Indian lore. The "Giant"
guards Thunder Bay 18 miles off
shore and rises 1100 feet and stretches 6½ miles long. From the mainland
it gives the impression of a mighty
Indian warrior resting on the water,
hence the popular designation - The
Land of the Sleeping Giant.

3

�HISTORICAL
Prior to the spreading French exploration through the Great Lakes
Basin from New France, the Ojibway
Indians inhabited the shores of
Thunder Bay and the inland lakes.
Even today, descendants of the Ojibway tribes live on reservations at the
foot of Mount McKay and Squaw Bay.
The District of Thunder Bay is steeped
in Indian tradition. "Kaministiquia",
the present name of the river flowing through Thunder Bay is Indian
and has been interpreted in two ways
'the long winding river' and 'the
river with three mouths.'
The famous French explorers, Radisson and Groseilliers, are credited with
the early explorations of the north
shore of Lake Superior, around 1659.
There is mention, also, of trading concessions being extended to a leading
fur trader of those days, Sieur Dupuy,
who explored the watershed of Lake
Nipigon, 60 miles east of Thunder Bay.
Missionaries and traders continued
to spread westward along Lake
Superior shore. The first recorded
trading post established, on the site
of the present city, was in 1679 when
Daniel Greysolon Sieur du Lhut
(founder of Duluth, Minnesota) built
a trading post and fort on the south

bank of the river near its mouth and
called it "FORT CAMINISTIGOYAN".
It flourished for a number of years.
With other interests taking the attention of French officials at the time,
the fort gradually had little use.
The only recorded use made in subsequent years was a visit in 1688 by
Jacques De Noyon, a trader from
Trois Rivieres, who was searching for
a route to China.
In 1717 a Canadian officer of the
time, Robertel De La Noue, was sent
to rebuild the trading post, but found
it advisable to make a fresh start. He
built a new fort on the north bank
opposite the old fort and called it
"FORT CAMINISTIGOYAN". This sec•
ond trading post was operated until
1758, the end of the French regime
in Canada.
La Verendrye wintered in the Fort
in 1731. His explorations for a western
route led him away from the established Kaministiquia River, Dog Lake
route, to the unknown Grand PortagePigeon River Canoe Highway. A
station and post were established at
the mouth of the Pigeon River in the
area now a part of the State of Minnesota. It attained considerable importance.

In 1798 Roderick McKenzie, of the
North West Company, moved northward
from
Grand
Portage
and
examined and reported the ruins of
old FORT KAMINISTIQUIA. Its location is now marked by granite monument at the foot of McTavish Street.
The famous FRENCH VOYAGEURS
and TRADERS continued to arrive in
their large heavily - laden canoes,
bringing much needed supplies to the
settlements, then returning to Montreal with bountiful cargoes of furs.
The North West Company and the
Hudson's Bay Gompany inhabited the
District amidst great rivalry. In 1802
the Fort was acquired by the North
West Company and called the "NEW
FORT".
In the summer of 1807 at the annual meeting of the Partners and by
a resolution of the Wintering Associates, the name of the Fort was
changed to "FORT WILLIAM", after
William McGillivray, Governor of the
North West Company, who was also
a member of the Quebec Legislative
Council and a prominent Montreal
merchant.
The struggle for control of the fur
trade on the North American continent is the most intriguing and
fascinating part of our history. Between 1816 and 1821 the two fur
companies carried on war-like activities against each other with the Fort
being occupied by each at various
times. Finally, the two companies
united in 1821. The Hudson's Bay
Post at Point de Meuron, a few miles
up river, was abandoned soon after
1872.

Meantime, three to four miles to
the north, a small settlement was
growing which in 1857 became known
as "THE STATION". This military
staging area later was to become the
City of Port Arthur. It was from this
point in 1870 that the first Red River
Expedition ventured to We st e r n
Canada.
On July 10, 1868, a small party of
prospectors, headed by Thomas MacFarlane, Montreal mining engineer,
working out of "The Station" discovered the area's silver mines. Silver
Islet Mines was one of the discoveries
which had a most famous history.
By the autumn of 1869, a 25 mile
military road was under construction
west of the "Station". In the following
year Colonel Sir Garnet Wolseley
(later Lord Wolseley) leading troops
from eastern Canada, disembarked
from the scenic anchorage. Enchanted
with the natural beauty of "The
Station", Wolseley renamed the post
"PRINCE ARTHUR'S LANDING" in
honour of Prince Arthur, son of Queen
Victoria, who was then in Canada. In
1884, the villagers changed the name
to "PORT ARTHUR" and had the
town incorporated. The year previous
William Van Horne, C.P.R. General
Manager, changed the name from the
Station to Port Arthur.

4

5

�It was about this time, the infant
Canadian Government, formed in 1867,
started to think of expanding the
country westward . A young civil
engineer, Simon J. Dawson was appointed to make a survey of a possible
wagon and water route to the Red
River Colony now Winnipeg, still
under the control of the paternalistic
rule of the Hudson's Bay Co. After
considering alternate routes, Dawson
finally recommended a wagon road to
Lake Shebandowan, then over the old
canoe water route to the west shore
of the Lake of the Woods and onward
over a wagon road to the Red River
Settlement .
Today the road is commemorated
w ith the name "THE DAWSON
TRAIL" starting at the harbour in Port
Arthur Ward and traversing Hwy.
17A-11A, then Hwy. 17-11 (TransCanada to Hwy. 11 and Shebandowan
Village , on the lake of the same name .
Fort William was also growing into
a large community and great impetus
to growth was supplied when the
Canadian Pacific Railway Company
was started in 1875, and commenced
building a railroad westwardly. Fort
Will iam became an incorporated town
in 1892 and later in 1907 a city with
John McKellar as first Mayor.
Unfortunately, the progress of the
community made it necessary to dismantle old "FORT WILLIAM" in 1881,

to make way for the steam railway.
The Ontario Government has announced a $16 million capital project
to restore the old fort on the
Kaministiquia River.
With the advent of a new mode of
transportation, a flood of settlers
arrived, some to stay and the remainder to continue west to a new
lan-d.
The first Mayor of Port Arthur in
1884 was Thomas Marks. Port Arthur
attained city status in 1906.
As the century closed, the present
day educational complex was started
when schools were built in both cities
between 1871 and 1894. Newspapers
were first printed in 1877.
The two cities were in the vanguard
of communities of the era experimenting with electricity. Port Arthur is
counted among the first cities in
North America to establish an electric
street railway system around 1888,
operated by a steam dynamo. This
railway line was extended into Fort
William in 1892. Distribution of
electricity is still under municipal control. Municipally-owned telephone systems were inaugurated in 1902 and
remain a city-owned utility. Fort
William lost its city hall by fire in
1903, but it was rebuilt in 1905 and
lasted until replaced by the modern
edifice in 1966. Port Arthur's town
hall also suffered the ravages of fire.

Electric power went hand in hand
with the growing industry of the
cities. The first steam plant in Fort
William was installed in 1898. In 1901
Port Arthur built the first hydro plant
on the Current River. Kakabeka Falls
(the Niagara of the North) 18 miles
up river from the cities was harnessed
for power in 1907-08 by the Kam
Power Co. This gave a powerful surge
to the power hungry industries in the
cities and brought new industry.
Records indicate 15 industries had
established by 1903 and 71 by 1913.
These included Port Arthur Shipbuilding &amp; Dry Dock Co.; Canadian Car
Co. Ltd.; Ogilvie Flour Mill; N. M.
Paterson &amp; Son, Grain and Shipping;
and numerous grain elevators, lumbering and logging companies.
The need for water supplies for
industry and citizens led both cities
to install underground systems. Port
Arthur pumped water from Lake
Superior. Later Fort William designed
a unique sytem to bring water by
gravity from Loch Lomond, 300 feet
above the city, south of Mount McKay.
These systems are in use today with
tremendous supplies available for the
future.
By 1920 the paper industry was
born with the advent of Great Lakes
Paper Co. Ltd. and the Fort William
Paper Co. ( later the Abitibi Paper
Co. Ltd.)
Grain elevators and rail trackage
continued to grow durin~ this period
to the present number of 23 elevators.
In 1947 street cars disappeared
from the streets to be replaced by
rubber-tired trackles trolleys and gas
buses. The cities turned to dial telephones in 1949.
In 1951 the large Fort William
Gardens ooened to provide an answer
to the problem of satisfying the many
avid hockey and sports fans and
players.

Natural Gas came to the cities in
1958, and in 1962 the first thermal
electric power station in Northwestern
Ontario was opened on the Mission
River to generate 100,000 kilowatts.
The first Kraft Mill in the cities
came in 1966 with the addition of
a $31,000,000 plant to the facilities of
Great Lakes Paper.
An advanced design automatic iron
pellet handling plant was opened in
1968 on the Mission River to receive
units trains containing 15,000 tons
of pellets from mines in the area.
Lakehead University, opened as a
college in the late 40's and soon outgrew temporary facilities in downtown
Port Arthur, and a large campus was
secured on the western limits of the
city. From a small beginning, attractive
modern buildings have sprung up
which now include a Teachers College, academic facilities, engineering
and
science
laboratories,
athletic
building and playing fields, dormitories
etc. In excess of $25 million has been
invested in the present facilities of
Lakehead University harbouring almost
4,500 students.
The Confederation College of Applied Arts &amp; Technology was the next
step in building area educational
facilities. Over $7½ million was invested in permanent teaching facilities .
In 1967 a start was made on the
construction of Lakehead Expressway
extending 19 miles from east of the
city to circle the populated areas and
join Trans-Canada Highway outlets
east and west and Hwy. 61 to the
south. Approximately $25 million was
required to complete the five year
construction program.
Planning for urban renewal of the
core areas of both main business
centres commenced in 1966. The Port
Arthur Ward plan has been accepted
and Stage One of a $15 million redevelopment scheme commenced in
the spri n~ of 1971 .

7
6

�LAKEHEAD HARBOUR
Best views of Thunder Bay and
the harbour are from Hillcrest Park
and the first ledge of Mount McKay.
Both may be reached by road, except
the latter in winter.
However, the best impression of the
massive size of the giant grain elevators, marching around the shore, must
be from the water side of the harbour.
Thunder Bay stretches 35 miles
from north to south. Through the bay
opening can be seen Isle Royale,
Mich., a United States Federal Park
38 miles from the harbour shore.
rock breakwater, one mile from shore
protects the docks stretching acros~
the harbour front.
The Thunder Bay Harbour, supervised by a five-man Harbour Commission, covers 27 miles of shore
installations. In front of Port Arthur
Ward, various industries and elevators
are martialed around the shore. In
Fort William Ward, the three river
openings offer secure dockage for
elevators, a modern iron ore storage
and shipping plant, bulk oil depots
etc. The main channel of the Kaministiquia River extends six miles upstream to a turning basin. Depth of
water in the harbour varies from 20
to 27 feet with major installations
running to Seaway depth. A shipyard
at the northern end of the harbour
is equipped to handle the largest seaway ships in dry dock. Grain elevators
extending into the deep water, permit
ships to glide right to dockside to
take on their loads of grain. The
~ecord grain loading in one ship is
in excess of 1,000,000 bushels. The
heaviest shipping year saw 500,000,000 bushels arriving from the west
being cleaned, processed, inspected:
certified by government inspectors
and shipped overseas.
At the top end of the famous Kaministiquia River channel, a paper mill
ships
rolled
newsprint in
great
quantities from dockside to port
destinations in the U.S.A.

A

8

Keefer Lakehead Terminal was
opened in 1962 and provides a massive general cargo shed and an overseas cargo shed. Ocean freighters and
fast lake boats can simultaneously be
loaded and unloaded. The terminal is
classed as one of the most modern
in the world with an investment in
facilities exceeding $15,000,000. In
1969 a $3,500,000 expansion of cargo
sheds and dockage area was completed. It is also one of the fastest
tran_sit terminals, with highly mobile
~quIpment handling material unloading around the clock. Over 700,000
tons of general cargo, steel, vehicles
etc. are transferred to and from Canadian and overseas vessels. Excellent
waterfront acreage is available for
industrial development near the Terminal an~ on the islands formed by the
three rivers in Fort William Ward.
Lumber mills also cluster near the
harbour for direct shipment of products
and retention of logs near the water.
A yacht club is established on the
Mission River and a Marina is being
developed on the waterfront in Port
Arthur Ward.
In all, four pulp and paper mills
operate on the shore of Thunder Bay
Harbour. In addition, a flour mill, malt
plant, wheat starch plant, petroleum
products plant, tar-processing plant,
chemical plants, etc. all operate near
the deep water of the harbour.
Iron ore (pellets), potash and coal,
loaded in many cases directly into
vessels are shipped in large tonnages.
A modern mechanized belting system
on the Mission River operates all year
to stockpile iron ore pellets for transfer
in the shipping season. Coal from the
Western Provinces is transferred from
unit rail trains to ships for transfer to
steel mills and hydro plants in the East.
1970 was a record shipping year for
the Thunder Bay port. 20,779,767 tons
were handled in 1,488 ships. Included
was 13,299,851 tons of grain; 5,357,056 iron ore and 587,685 of general
cargo.

Kakabeka Falls

CLIMATE
From June 1 to Oct. 31, the climate
of Thunder Bay is pleasant and mild;
humid days being exceedingly rare.
Summer is delightfully clear and
balmy with light winds off the great
expanses of Thunder Bay and Lake
Superior. Each year hundreds of hay
fever sufferers come to Thunder Bay
where they enjoy complete relief.
Normal summer mean temperature
(July, July, August) is 60.9 degrees
above zero. Normal winter mean
temperature ( Dec. Jan. Feb.) is 10.2
degrees above zero. The highest recorded
temperature
104 degrees
occured July 1936 and the lowest, 42
de~rees below zero, January 1951.
Fall days provide a kaleidoscope oi
colour as the leaves change. Poplar and
birch supply vivid contrast with the
fir and spruce. This is "THE SEASON
OF THE FLAMING LEAVES" and oc-

Giant Lake Freighter

curs normally the last two weeks of
September into October.
Winters are fresh and crisp with
limited periods of below zero temperatures. Snow-falls average 90.2 inches
annually in Thunder Bay but further
away from the Lake Superior, substantial snowfalls provide excellent
skiing, tobogganing and snowmobiling.
Lake shipping continues from April 1
to December 19 most seasons.
Thunder Bay citizens are healthy and
robust living in clear fresh air, with
modern health facilities and a great
relaxing, year round vacationland
close by.
9

�INDUSTRIAL GROWTH
A ~umber of new plants and
expansion of plants occurred in recent
years including Larson Woodland Research Ltd., B. &amp; B. Stone Ltd. (reinforced concrete bridging beams),
Coastal Steel Construction Ltd., Northwestern
Structural
Steel
Limited
Brayshaw S t e e I Ltd., Northland
Machinery Supply Co. Ltd., West
Coast Wire Works Ltd., Great Lakes
Steel Ltd., Superior Brick &amp; Tile Ltd.,
Lakehead ~battor Limited, Unitized
Manufa~turmg Ltd: ( prefab buildings).
. Kee~mg par with commercial and
industrial progress was the installation
of . new arenas, shopping plazas,
mannas and retirement homes.
INDUSTRIAL PARKS
Lakehead University Library
EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES
Thunder Bay is endowed with
excellent educational facilities including: 60 primary schools; 10 secondary
schools; 1 sheltered workshop fof
ret_arde~ adults; business college; 1
unIversIty; 1 teachers' college; 1 college applied arts and technology.
Also located here are an adult retraining school, providing training for
adults changing vocations, a retarded
children's nursery school and a school
for retarded children.
Lakehead University recently completed a $25,000,000 building and
expansion program with almost 4,500
students enrolled in a campus eventually to harbour 8,000.
The Confederation College of Applied
Arts &amp; Technology, established in late
1967, currently has 650 full time
students and 600 night students. A
campus building program totailing
$7,500,000 was completed in 1971
near Lakehead University.
'
Primary and secondary schools are
operated by a Board of Education and
Separate School_ Board, elected every
two years. Jointly, they supervise
10

2,100 employees who care for over
32,000 students.
Student graduates from Thunder
Bay halls of learning totalled 2 680 in
1970 including 1,904 from' high
schools, 151 from Teachers College,
560 from Lakehead University and 65
from business schools.
Three public libraries are strategically located. throughout Thunder Bay
t&lt;:&gt;get~er with a well equipped Univer~Ity Library and College Library. There
Is also a regional library with a moblie
book service.
Night school classes are provided
during the school season for those
wishing to upgrade their education
and knowledge. Lakehead University
and Confederation College of Applied
Arts_ &amp; Technology also provides
ser~Ices of night classes on many
subJ~cts. Artistic courses, pottery
making and many hobby arts are also
taught.
Extensive evening use is made of
sports equipment and facilities in
various school gyms for gymnastics,
volley-ball, weight-lifting, wrestling,
etc. A new Athletic Building at the
University is the largest and bestequipped sports palace in the area.

Beaverha/1 Industrial Park
Fort
Will!am Ward has excellent lots,
serviced and available for sale at
reasonable cost.
Intercity Industrial Park, Port Arthur
~ard, . is being developed into an
indu_stnal park complex of 160 acres,
serviced, and located in the Intercity
area.
Keefer Lake head Terminal Industrial
Park, extensive acreage in the central
~arbour area adjacent to the terminal
Is cu_rre_ntly under development.
Mission Island Industrial Park 15~. acres on waterfront in Fort
W1ll1am Ward, near Hydro Station and
accessible to river and lake dockage.

Ba/moral Industrial Park - serviced
lots, streets, occupied by light industry
and commercial enterprise.
INDUSTRIAL INCENTIVE GRANTS
Thunder Bay has been designated
by the Federal Government as an industry development incentive growth
area and eligible to participate in payment of financial grants to industry
constructing facilities in the city.
Grants range up to $12,000,000 in
cash ~o new secondary industry constructing and equipping a plant to
manufacture a new product line in the
area.
The Northern Ontario Development
Corportation offers financial and planning consulting service and forgiven
loans up to $500,000.
CHURCHES, HOMES, HOSPITALS
Most of Thunder Bay's 87 churches
of all denominations are conveniently
located in residential areas.
Three of the six hospitals are
modern general treatment institutes,
the remaining three include a psychiatric hospital, a tuberculosis sanatorium convalescent home and a
hospital for the aged.
Four well organized public senior
citizen homes provide company, care
and recreation for their residents.
A home for the blind is operated
a!'"ld maintained by the National
Council for the Blind.
11

�ENTERTAINMENT AND SPORTS
Lakehead Symphony Orchestra gives
numerous concerts during the year
and a Junior Symphony assures
future expansion of the experienced
symphony.
Three popular Pipe Bands are in
great demand. Numerous high schools
have student bands, baton twirlers,
and cheerleaders.
Cambrian Players stage popular
plays by local actors and actresses.
The Navy and Army Bands supply
martial music for special occasions.
Fort William Male Choir has won
world renown on tours to Europe.
They are in great demand in the cities.
The Annual Lakehead Exhibition,
the third largest in Ontario, extends
for nine days in the summer.
Numerous hotels, motels and nightclubs provide live entertainment by
local and out-of-town artists.
Rowing Clubs use the Kam River
for contests and practice runs.
YM-YWCA Clubs in Thunder Bay
maintain indoor pools and gyms for
the healthy training of young people.
In the summer, five filtered, out-door
pools are busy spots. Two motor
hotels have year-round indoor pools
for guests.
Four theatres in downtown sections
show the latest movies. An outdoor
movie operates in the Northwest section during the summer.
One lawn bowling green operates
in the summer and seven indoor
bowling alleys operate year round.
Five curling rinks are crowded from
early fall to late spring by the rock
enthusiasts.
During the summer five golf courses
cater to the outdoor swingers.
Three tennis courts attract many
teenagers and others.
Boulevard Lake and Chippewa Park
supply swimmers with sandy beaches,
clean water and playgrounds for oldsters and youngsters.

12

Car racing, both in summer on dirt
tracks and on Lake Superior ice in
the winter is a thrilling sport.
Over 100 outdoor hockey rinks are
provided to train youngsters from
Pee-Wee to Junior. Four artificial ice
covered rinks cater to senior hockey
championship games.
Tubing parties are popular in winter.
This is a modernization of old time
tobogganing or sleighing group parties.
Surplus rubber inner tubes, from huge
forest vehicles are fully inflated to
make a comfortable vehicle on which
a couple or group slide down a step
long, snowy hill. It is believed this
is the only such commercial fun
scheme in Canada.
Four Ski Hills of championship
category provide thrills for thousands
of local and visiting skiers. They are
within 10 miles of downtown city
hotels. Modern up-hill equipment gives
quick ascent. The hills are under careful constant grooming. A fifth ski
area is under development.
Three AM Radio and 1 FM Radio
Station plus a local TV station and
3 U.S. channel cable TV provides
world sport, entertainment and news
coverage. Three additional channels
are provided for local educational
programming.
A number of Finnish Saunas are a
delight to citizens and visitors alike.

g

J.
~-

//·.

j

\\'

0

13

�LOCAL POINTS OF INTEREST
Almost 100,000 travellers annually
visit the two Tourist Information
Reception Centres in the downtown
business sections of Thunder Bay.
Administered by the Thunder Bay
Chamber of Commerce. Competent and
courteous staffs are prepared to
answer inquiries concerning attractions
of the area, tours, points of interest
etc. One reception centre is located in
Paterson Park, the other, the Pagoda,
a unique and historical building is
located near the waterfront. Both information centres are opened annually
from May to October.
Known for its rugged scenic beauty,
Thunder Bay is situated in a river
valley with terraced hills on one side
and the picturesque Nor-Westers
mountain range on the other.
BOULEVARD LAKE - Situated in the
north eastern section of the city, this
beautiful lake is surrounded by a lovely
drive through a woodland setting.
Natural attractions include expansive
beaches, swimming under the watchful eye of lifeguards, boating and picnicking. Nearby is Centennial Park
where you may tour a complete bush
camp complex ( circa 1910) furnished
with authentic equipment. People of
all ages enjoy the Muskeg Express
train ride and a model farm for children
stocked with domestic animals. Close
by, beside Current River, is Trowbridge Tent &amp; Trailer Park.
CHIPPEWA PARK - In the South end
is a picturesque setting within the
shadow of the mighty Mountain
McKay.
Chippewa
Park
provides
pleasure spots and entertainment with
every facility to serve the family. This
natural playground has a small animal
zoo, supervised swimming, swings
and slides, amusement rides, a tent
and trailer camp and housekeeping
cabins.
CENTENNIAL BOTANICAL GARDENS
located near Chapples Park, this
vast glass three part enclosure displays
14

a year round world wide variety of
plant life. The main conservatory displays subtropical plants and the two
wings specialize in desert flora and
seasonal flower shows.
MOUNT McKAY - One of the finest
panoramic views of Thunder Bay may
be seen from the first ledge of Mount
McKay accessible by car or bus.
Mount McKay towers 1600 feet above
sea level.
IRON ORE AND PELLET HANDLING
FACILITIES
handle over five
million tons of iron ore and pellets
a year which are shipped from the
famous Steep Rock Lake, Atikokan,
and from Bruce Mines near Red Lake.
Appriximately 100,000 tons of potash
from Saskatchewan is trans-shipped
annually.

Paterson Park

Mount McKay

Thunder Bay Airport

EXCITING
CHAIRLIFT
RIDES
Thunder Bay has two thrilling chairlift rides - One up to the first ledge
of Mount McKay and the other to the
top of Mount Baldy.
TOURS - Both bus tours and harbour
cruises can be easily
arranged.
Directions for departure locations and
times may be obtained from the
tourist bureaus.
THUNDER BAY HISTORICAL MUSEUM The public Library, 216
South Brodie Street.
KAKABEKA FALLS - "Niagara of the
North" - 128 feet in depth - a sight
to behold - all camping facilities are
available such as over night tenting,
trailer park, picnic grounds, and a fine
supervised swimming area for all ages.
Located just 18 miles from the heart
of Thunder Bay.
THE INTERNATIONAL FRIENDSHIP
GARDEN - Nine different ethnic and
social groups contributed delightful
floral designs to entice people of all
ages to relax in a picturesque setting
beside a reflective pond encircled by
an ornamental pathway.

Great Lakes Paper Mill
Centennial Park Bush Camp

Sleeping Giant

�TRANSPORTATION
Thunder Bay citizens have reasonably-priced public transit, extending
across both cities by mainline trolley
buses and branch line gas or diesel
buses. In 1970, 5,035,887 passengers
used this convenient street side
service. Equipment includes 20 electric
trolley buses, 20 gas buses and 16
diesel buses.
Twenty
three
taxi
companies
operate fleets of cars throughout the
City.

Air Canada schedules three flights
daily east and one west.
North Central Airlines schedules a
return flight daily to and from Chicago
via Duluth, Minnesota.
Transair schedules two flights daily
to Toronto, two flights daily to Winnipeg via Dryden and Kenora.
Superior Airways Ltd. and On-Air
supply charter air service to all parts
of the continent.
Thunder Bay International Airport
equipped to service modern jet aircraft,
h a n d I e d 188,540 passengers on
scheduled airlines in 1970. Air cargo
handled was 3,710,026 lbs.

Canadian Pacific Railway provides
daily east and west mainline passenger service by the CANADIAN, as
well as fast merchandise and piggyback freight. Canadian National Railway supplies branch line passenger
service to Winnipeg and mainline
points. Both railroads handle tremendous quantities of bulk materials including grain, lumber, potash, paper
pulpwood and coal.
The CNR operates unitized trains
carrying iron ore and pellets from
Atikokan and Bruce Lake, to the
Thunder Bay Harbour, as well as
potash and coal from the prairies.
Greyhound Bus Lines supply daily
transcontinental passenger service.
Grey Goose Bus Lines offer passenger
service to Winnipeg and Northeastern
Ontario points.
Trans-Canada Highway threads its
way from coast to coast through
Thunder Bay.
A new EXPRESSWAY beginning 10
miles east of the city circles the north
and west section for 19 miles to join
Hwy. 17-11 (Trans-Canada) West,
and continues on to Hwy. 61 on the
south, leading to Duluth, Minnesota.
With excellent highway connections,
Thunder Bay is the base for 11 major
highway transport companies and five
moving van and storage companies.
Water routes bring to Thunder Bay
overseas ships of many nations. Most
often seen are British, German and
Norwegian vessels. Canada Steamships
Lines Ltd. ships are the most frequently seen Canadian ships. They operate
six fast package freighters shuttling
cargoes from eastern Canada and
returning with products of the Northwest.
Tug service is provided by two
companies operating in the Lakehead
Harbour.

POPULATION FORECAST

GOVERNMENT CENSUS

The last population count of the four
n:,unicipalities prior to their amalgamation on January 1, 1970 was:
City of Fort William
49 860
City of Port Arthur
.
48 989
Municip_ality of Neebing
3:592
Township of McIntyre ..
4,565
TOTAL
107,006
1

A population forecast by the Ontario
Water Resources Commission based
on natural growth, predicted. '
1973 1978 1988
2000 -

118,100
129,300
151 , 100
201,800

Ethnic Groups

British ........ .. ... .... ..... .... ..... ..... . 42.8%

6.2
German
3.7
Italian
8.6
Polish
4.9
Scandinavian
6.4
Ukrainian .... ...... ................. ...... _ 10.3
Other .... .............................. .. 17.1
French

Religions

57.8%
Protestant
......... .
Roman Catholic
. ... . ..... .. . 32.8

St. Joseph' s General Hospital
16

17

�ABITIBI PAPER CO. LTD. - Operates
three mills two newsprint mills
and a mill producing coated papers
for books, catalogues, magazines, for
Time - Macleans, etc.
CANAD IAN CAR A division of
Hawker Siddeley Canada Ltd. - engineering and manufacturing of woodlands logging equipment, highway
transport trailers, subway cars, transit
coaches, cargo containers and aircraft
components.
COASTAL STEEL CONSTRUCTION
LTD. Fabricator and erector of
structural steel.
DORAN'S NORTHERN ONT AR I 0
BREWERIES LTD. Oldest manufacturing industry in Thunder Bay.
Formed in 1876 as Diamond Brewing
Company produces beer and ale.
DOW CHEMICAL OF CANADA LTD.
- Supplies chemicals for paper mills.
GREAT LAKES PAPER COMPANY Produces large quantities of newsprint
mostly for export to the USA. A $31
million Kraft mill supplies domestic
and foreign markets. This company's
wood supply is trucked and railed
from abundant forest properties as
distant as 250 miles from the plant,
and consumes almost ¾ million cords
of wood annually. Shipments of
finished products approached 500,000
tons in 1970.
GREAT LAKES STEEL PRODUCTS
LTD . Suppliers, fabricators and
erectors of structural steel.
GREAT WEST TIMBER LTD.
Operates a large saw mill, planing
plant and kiln, producing up to 40
million board feet of lumber annually.

NORTHERN ENGINEERING &amp; SUPPLY
CO. LTD. - Manufacturers of woodlands equipment, suppliers of wholesale plumbing, electrical and heating
supplies.
Complete
machine
and
welding metal shops.

Forest
Harvesting
Equi pment

NORTHERN WOO D PRESERVERS
LTD. Has its own extensive forest
operation to supply two modern saw
mills that produce 45 million board
feet of railway ties, construction
lumber and timbers annually. In addition, poles, piles, ties, and lumber
are pressure treated with locally produced preservatives, and tar products.
NORTHLAND MACHINERY SUPPLY
CO. LTD. Designs, fabricates and
installs complete dust control systems.
Manufacturers
of
grain
cleaning
machines. Sheet metal contractors.
Distributors of
industrial
welding
supplies.
PORT ARTHUR SHIPBUILDING CO.
LTD. - Shipbuilders, ship repairs, 750
ft. dry dock - general and industrial
engineering - structural steel bridges
-iron and brass foundry castings to
25 tons millwork, plastic division,
and pulp and paper machinery division.

Pasco Shops

SUPERIOR BRICK &amp; TILE CO. LTD. Manufacture brick and clay products.
TEE-KAY APPAREL LTD. Major
manufacturer of teen clothing.
WEST COAST WIRE WORKS LTD. Produces four drinier wire mesh for
area paper mills.
WESTERN IRON AND METAL CO.
LTD. 60 year old iron and steel
scrap and wrecking contractor. Operates largest triple compression baling
press in Canada. Supplies new and
used structural steel.

LAKEHEAD INSULATION AND PLASTICS LTD. Produces special pipe
insulation and fibre glass plastic,
large diameter pipe for the paper mills
and others.

WOODS BAG &amp; CANVAS CO. LTD.
- Produces a wide variety of sporting
goods, including tents, trailers, sleeping bags, etc.

LARSON WOODLAND RESEARCH
LTD. Produces heavy forest harvesting machinery.

NEWPORT METAL INDUSTRIES LTD.
Produce air flow and pollution
control equipment.

Giant Paper
Making Machine

18
19

�MINING
The vast mineral wealth of Northwestern Ontario has hardly been
scratched. Most if not all this valuable material will channel through
Thunder Bay to various processors. It
is conceivable that at some future date,
secondary industries will be located
near the Lakehead to process the concentrated material into a solid state.
Iron ore shipments have recently
diminished with the installation of
concentrating plants which upgrade the
raw ore to pellets of high grade iron.
Steep Rock Iron Mines and Caland
Iron Ores, Atikokan, have installed
palletizing plants and currently are
making substantial shipments.
The Griffith Mine at Bruce Lake.
350 miles west of the Lakehead, ships
iron pellets through Thunder Bay
Harbour to Steel Company of Canada
Ltd., Hamilton, Ontario.
Over 5,000,000 tons of pellets was
shipped from these mines in 1970.
International Nickel currently is
constructing a large concentrator at
its mine located at Lake Shebandowan,
50 miles west of Thunder Bay, to
produce concentrated powder for shipment to the Sudbury smelter.
Great Lakes Nickel Co. and other
companies nearby, are exploring and
developing a mountain mass of nickel-

copper, 40 miles south of Thunder
Bay near the U.S. border. Over 140,000,000 tons of low grade ore have
been reportedly outlined. An ore to
smelter complex worth $100 million
dollars is currently being considered.
Silver has been known to inhabit
the Precambrian Shield around Thunder
Bay for 100 years, since Silver Islet
Mine was discovered and worked.
Today, with the price of silver at its
highest, a number of silver mines are
being re-examined.
Further north, as many as 150-200
miles from Thunder Bay, huge deposits
of rich iron ore have been uncovered
and moth-balled for the time being
while operating pits closer to market
are being developed.
In the Sturgeon Lake area, Mattabi
Mines is building a $36 million mining
complex and nearby Falconbridge
Mines is exploring additional interestin~ base metal ground. South Bay
Mines is investing $6 million in a base
metal mining complex at Confederation
Lake. Mayburn Mines near Kenora has
started production.
The future is bri~ht for expansion
of activities in the field of mining in
Thunder Bay area.

THUNDER BAY
Formerly
( Fort William - Port Arthur)
STATISTICAL INFORMATION
Population: Metropolitan Thunder Bay
108,048
Formerly Twin Cities of Fort William
and Port Arthur which amalgamated
Jan. 1, 1970.
Population: 108,048.
Altitude: Harbour, 601 feet above sea
level.
Mount McKay, 1600 feet.
Area: 156 square miles ( including
water lots).
Commercial Buildings: 1,175.
Streets: 399.1 miles.
Sidewalks: 165 miles.
Watermains: 276.7 miles.
Sewers: 230 miles; 218.8 sanitary,
43.2 storm.
Churches: 87, all denominations.
Financial Institutions: 40 bank, trust,
and loan offices.
Vehicle Registration: 1969, 47,965.
Households: 28,691, (1970).
Average Income: $6,085.
Per Capita Income: $2,740.
Hospitals: 6.
Newspapers: 2 dailies, 2 weeklies.
Libraries: 5.
Families: 22,646.
Police: City, 2 stations, 143 personnel,
21 cars.
RCMP, Ontario Provincial Police.
Harbour Police Units.
Railways. CPR, CNR.
Airlines: Air Canada, North Central ..
Superior, Transair and On-air.
Schools: 60 primary, 10 secondary, 1
business college, 1 university, 1
teachers' college, 1 community
college.
Medical: 11 clinics.
Telephones: 56,033, ( Dec. 1970).
Annual Precipitation: 27.62 inches.
Averaqe Temperature: 60.9°, summer.
10.2°, winter.
High Temperature: 104°, July 1936.
Low Temperature: -42°, Jan. 1951.

Elevators: 24; Capacity, 104,347,210
bushels.
Theatres: 4 plus 1 outdoor, summer.
Fire Departments: 5 stations, 160
personnel.
Curling Rinks: 5.
Golf Courses: 5.
Tennis Courts: 3.
Swimming Pools: 4 indoor, heated; 5
outdoor, 3 hotel; (2 indoor, 1 outdoor).
Hockey Rinks: 4 artificial, 100 natural.
Ski Hills: 5 ski areas; 3 chair lifts.
Radio-TV: 3 AM radio, 1 FM radio,
1 TV (CBC) local, 3 U.S. channel
cable TV. 1 community channel.
Saunas: 3.
Hotels - Motels: 55 with 1,936 rooms,
daily accommodations for 4,218.
Water Pumping Capacity: 31,500,000
gal. daily present consumption 13,768, 120 gal. daily.
.
Sewage Disposal: 7,500,000 gal. daily.
Transportation: City Transit 20
electric trolly buses, 20 gas buses,
16 diesel buses, 5,035,887 passengers in 1970.
Hydro: In excess of 130,000 KVA in
Thunder Bay.
Natural Gas: 12,305,000 M .C.F ., 270
miles of pipeline within city.
Building Permits (1970): $18,524,954.
PRIMARY INDUSTRIES:
-· 4 mills produce 813,237 tons of
paper products annually.
-· 60 million board feet of lumber
processed yearly.
1,925 tons of fresh fish processed
yearly.
5 million tons of iron-ore transshipped annually.
SECONDARY INDUSTRIES:
Brick and tile, castings, chemicals,
brewing, dust control systems, aircraft, rail and highway equipment,
plastics, shipbuilding, prefab homes,
recreation equipment.
21

20

�" MIKADO

22

II

A Lakehead Choral Group production.

��</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85831">
                <text>Thunder Bay, brochure</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85832">
                <text>Business and Industry</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85833">
                <text>Brochure promoting Thunder Bay, produced by the Thunder Bay Chamber of Commerce, Thunder Bay Convention Bureau, and Industrial Commission of the City of Thunder Bay. Likely 1970 or shortly after. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85834">
                <text>Thunder Bay Chamber of Commerce</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="85835">
                <text>Thunder Bay Convention Bureau</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="85836">
                <text>City of Thunder Bay</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85837">
                <text>1970</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85838">
                <text>PDF</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85839">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85840">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="38">
            <name>Coverage</name>
            <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85841">
                <text>Canada - Ontario - Thunder Bay</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="10349" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="12048">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/fae2d4572b976a053dcb9b2bcdd77492.pdf</src>
        <authentication>83c152759ec72773556331769ebf20eb</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="85828">
                    <text>THE CITY OF

U~&lt;!&amp;~
ONTARIO ·

VEVELOPMENT BUREAU
OF THE CITY OF THUNVER BAY,
19 3 Atr;thu.1t S:tlte.e;t,,
THUNVER BAY, P, ONTARIO.
807-344-2341

AN INVITATIQ TO EXPLORE THUNVER BAY

\

ThundeJt Bay be.eagte. .:the. 6.:th la.Jz.gu.:t wy in 0,n.:taJuo and
.:the. 15.:th levtgu.:t in Canada. on Ja.n,tfevty 1, 1970 .:t.Jvwugh .:the. amalgamation 06
.:the. 6otLmeJt C.lliu 06 Foll..:t W ~ and Poll..:t Atr;thwz. and .:the. Mun.lc..lpaliilu
06 Nee.bing and Mein.:tyJte..
I.:t ).,,6 ai.6 o one. o 6 .:the. levtg u.:t e,.,[;t.,[u, evte.a.w)-1&gt; e., in Canada. having 151.1 1.&gt;quevte. milu oft 99,977 a.Mu, aeeommodating a popui.ation
06 108,000 p~OM.
Vevt.loMly known in .:the. pM.:t M .:the. Twin C.lliu oft Canadian Lake.he.ad, .:the. poll..:t ).,,6 .:the. eonne.e.:t.lng unk be..:twe.e.n e.M.:t and wu.:t :tfta.de.,
wa,teJt and !tail. In e.xeu-6 06 20,000,000 .:toM 06 va.Jt.le.d eevtgo annually :tlta.Mli .:the. poll..:t inelud.lng gJta.ln, eoa.l, ,iJl,on oJte., mineJtai.6, papeJt, ge.ne.Jtal
eevtg o , e;t,e, .
ThundeJt Bay ).,,6 .:the. -6 Vtviee. ee.n:tlte. 6oJt a. vM.:t na,tu.1ta.l
JtU ou.Jtee. and Jte.Me.atio na.l evte.a e.neompMJ.&gt;ing 1I 4 mill.lo n -6 quevte. milu o 6
laku and 6oJtu.:t-6.
The.
a.w_v.luu u.ndeJtWa.y in
me.n.:t PJtogJtam indiea,tu
will inelude. 1.&gt;e.eonda.Jty
a.l 6a ~u .

6oliowing pa.gu au.tune. Jome. 06 .:the. de.ve.lopme.n.:t
.:the. Thu.ndeJt Bay evte.a. On.:taJuo '-6 Vuign 6oJt Ve.ve.lop.:the. Cliy ).,,6 a pft.lme. .:tevtge..:t 6oJt 6u..:twz.e. gJtow.:th, wh.leh
and pJt,tme, indM:tlty, J.&gt;Vtviee. indM:tlty and Jte.Me.ation-

You Me. invlied .:to eommu.niea.:te. wlih .:the. Ve.ve.lopme.n.:t
Bwz.e.au 06 .:the. Cliy 06 Thu.nde1t Bay i6 1.&gt;e.e.k,i,ng a.dd.lliona.l inooJtmation.

06 eou.Me., e.veJty.:th.lng

).,,6

ke.p.:t on a CONFIVENTIAL bM.l-6.

SineeJte.ly,

GWM/ap

G. W. Mc.Fadden,
V,iJr,e.e.:toJt.

�The City of Thunder Bay was chosen a "Prime Centre of Industrial
Opportunity" when the Ontario Government unveiled the results of a comprehensive study of Northwestern Ontario under the program "Design for Development" Phase II.
Industrial growth is to be strenuously encouraged but "Quality
of Life" is to be retained. It is contended life in Northwestern Ontario
now has many fine qualiti es not found elsewhere. This relates to low pollution, easy access to recreation and relaxed, healthy living.
The Design for Development Report recommends substantial Federal
and Provincial Government incentives for the establishment of new industry
over and above the current government incentive plans. It suggests Thunder
Bay is a choice spot for establishment of a smelter, refinery or primary
metal industry. Greater end use of forest products is encouraged.
The primary goal for increased employment in the next 20 years
should be a minimum of 18,000 and an optimum of 54,000 new jobs.
Implementation of the first phase of the development program
should commence early in 1972.
PLANNING FOR THE FUTURE
Thunder Bay, in addition to participating in the Design for Development Program, has been studiously looking to the future in its own
planning.
An Official Plan for Thunder Bay has been unveiled, to direct
proper growth of the City and its suburbs over the next 20 years.
A Transportation Study has been completed outlining a forecast
of how traffic can be channelled in the City up to 1990.
A Regional Water Supply and Pollution Control Study was completed
in 1969 by the Ontario Water Resources Commission to guarantee full use of
water facilities in the city, yet control adverse pollution of waterways.
This study required indepth review of past experience and the expected
growth to the year 2000.
A Survey of Internal Transit Facilities is currently underway as
well as a survey to determine expansion possibilities of the City-owned
Telephone system, one of the few and most profitable in Canada.
A Thunder Bay Urban Renewal Project was announced in October 1970
to rebuild the core business section of Port Arthur Ward.
Over $15 million dollars of private c~pital will be invested in
the Development and $4 million by governments.
The initial rebuilding will commence in the fall of 1971 with the
expansion totalling $3 million of the T. Eaton ComP,any store and the $1~
million Sayvette Store.
Included in this program is the installation of a connecting climate-controlled mall of all buildings.

�AND
---

R E S OURC E S

Historically, silver is the basic mim~ral found in Thunder Bay area.
However, technology has radically changed this and now iron ore is
King, followed closely by nickel, copper, zinc, etc.
IRON ORE
Atikokans 120 miles west is the base operation for
Steep Rock Iron Mines, Inland Steel and Caland Ore.
Steep Rock Iron Mines ships raw ore and pellets.
Bruce Lake, 315 miles west is the site of Steel Company of Canada iron ore operations.
Stelco ships only pellets.
The others ship both pellets and raw ore.
Most pellet shipments are processed through Valley Camp Coal Ltd.,
modern belt loading facilities on the Mission River, Thunder Bay.
The storage capacity exceeds 1½ million tons. Some pellets and all
raw ore is also shipped over a CNR ore trestle.
FUTURE RESERVES -- IRON
Anaconda Iron Company Limited uncovered and developed a massive iron .
ore body and mothballed it for the future. The open pit mine is located 40 miles north of Nakina. Steep Rock and Algoma own a large iron
ore body in the Lake St. Joseph area which very shortly will have to
be opened up by a massive operation including installation of railroad .
services and lifting of hugh quantities of overburden.
NICKEL
International Nickel Company is completing a $32 million mine site and concentrator at Lake Shebandowan, 50 miles west of
Thunder Bay and will likely go on stream early in 1972. Concentrates
will be shipped to Sudbury.
Great Lakes Nickel Ltd. is arranging finances preliminary to building a $100 million plus mine, smelting and refining complex, 38 miles south of Thunder Bay to process up to 140,000,000 tons
of nickel, copper, zinc, platinum and pladium ore.
URANIUM
Large areas near Dryden were staked in a uranium rush late in 1967.
Claims are currently being examined.

�*2*

COPPER AND OTHER BASE METALS
Mattabi Mines Limited has expended $36 million plus
other expenditures to construct a mill and concentrator to extract
12½ million tons of base metal ore from its property at Sturgeon
Lake, 185 miles west of Thunder Bay. The mill went on stream in
the fall of 1971.
South Bay Mines, Utchi Lake, southeast of Red Lake
went into production in the sumer of 1971 at 500 tons daily. Construction cost to get the mill into operation exceeded $5 million.
COAL SHIPMENTS
Substantial shipments of Alberta, B. C. and Saskatchewan coal are
forecast if test shipments arranged in 1970 through the Port of
Thunder Bay prove economically successful. Stelco is interested
in coking coal and Ontario Hydro for the thermal plants in Southern Ontario. Up to 5 million tons may be required.
FORESTRY
Eleven paper mills in Northwestern Ontario are assured of continuous wood supplies from the substantial forest cover.
Great Lakes Paper, for example, consume 800,000 cunits annually in
the largest paper and Kraft mill east of the Rockies.
•
New technology in wood harvesting has maintained extraction costs
in a rising cost market. Machines are used extensively.
New roads, new transportation systems in the future will undoubtedly open up unknown riches i~ the area.

�l!!!!!!!!f E.

! ~!

S T AT I S T I C AL
DAT A
(Obtained from FinanciaT Post Survey of Mai•kets 1970)
1970
Current Growth Rate Per Decade
Population (000) (April 1, 1970)
%Of Canadian Total
%Change Since 1961 - 1970
Market - Above National Average
Retail Sales - 1969 (Millions$)
%Canadian Total (Retail)
Per Capita (Retail Sales)
Income - Above National Average
Personal Disposable Income - 1969
%Of Canadian Total (POI)
Per Capita (PDI)
Building Pennits, Value (000)
MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES
No. of Plants
Employees
Salaries - Wages ($000)
Cost of Materials ($000)
Value of Shipments ($000)
Value Added ($000)
CENSUS INFORMATION
Population, Male
Population, Female
Total Population

1969

1968

1967

13%
12%
14%
7%
13%
108.0
105.8
98.6
97.9
95.2
0.50
o.~8
o. 51
0.48
0.48
+10.2 +8.95
+8. 18
+2.50
+5.1
15% 16%
18%
26%
24%
$i58.3M $149. lM $134. 9M $133.6M $120.SM
0.58
0.59
0.56
0.60
0.60
$1,420 $1 , 375 $1 2 385 $12290
$12480
11%
11 %
15%
13%
1if%
$294 .1M $163.6M $222.7M $205.6M $17a.OR
0.53
o.58
0.5~
0.56
0.57
$2 510 $2 27S $2 130 $1 2 910
$2 740
$28:427 {$22:047}$1s:121 s22:8oa $21,759
1967
98
6,878
$41,581
$95,900
$193,736
$90,816

1964
1962
1961
1966
99
100
71T
714
5,083
7,102
5,743
5,431
39,635 28,622 26,113 28, 131
100,434 64,768 61,188 56,477
196,446 141,113 125,353 116,021
87,211 70,234 59,657 52,946
1966
58,958
47,590
106,548

1961
46,359
44,131
90,490

1961
38,749
5,607
3,333
7,815
4,475
3,975
9,336

% of Total

AVERAGE WEEKLY EARNINGS
1962
1964
1966
1967
1968
1969

THUNDER BAY
$81.04
86.20
97 .71
102.36
105.68
117. 02

CANADA
$80.54
86.51
96.30
102.79
109.88
117 .63

RETAIL TRADE 1966 CENSUS
Total Sales ($000)
No. of Stores
Year End Inventory ($000)
No. of Employees
Payroll: Total ($000)

$130,295.1
642
15,705.0
4,383
13,271.6

RACIAL ORIGIN
British
French
Gennan
Italian
Polish
Scandinavian
Ukranian

1965

42.8%
6.2
3.7
8.1
4.9
4.4
10.3

�HYDRO - E L E CT R I C

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

1·

-

-

-

-

.....

General Rates -- Industrial Colllllercial (Monthly)
Loads from O -- 5,000 Kilowatts
Demand Charge
First 50 kilowatts of billing demand per month - nil
Balance at $1.60 per kilowatt of billing demand per
month
Energy Charge
4.0¢ per kilowatt-hour for the first
1 . 6¢ II
• II
II
II
II
next
1 • 3¢ U
II
II
II
II
II
0 • 5¢

II

II

II

II

II

11

50 kilowatt-hours per month

200
9 t 750

2 t 240 t 000

ti

II

It

II

II

II

II

II

H

II

11

Balance of monthly consumption at 0.3¢ per kilowatt hour.

II

•

Loads over 5 2000 kilowatts
Demand Charge
$2.50 per kilowatt for all kilowatts of billing demand per month
Energy Charge
, All consumption be billed at 0.3¢ per kilowatt-hour.
NOTE:

The general rate is based upon service at utilization voltage.
Where the customer provides transformation facilities the
authorized allowance of .25¢ per kilowatt of billing demand per
month for stepdown from sub-transmission voltage and .15¢ per
kilowatt billing demand per month for stepdown from distribution
voltage will apply.

Residential Service (Monthly)
1

4.0¢ per kilowatt-hour for the first 50 kilowatt-hours per month
1 . 4¢

0.9¢

II

II

II

II

11

11

11

11

II
"

next

200

II

II

II

II

all additional monthly consumption.

All rates are net and subject to a late payment charge of
5% if not paid on or before due date.

�WH A T
----

A !Q.!l T

l!!!l!!~~

R

WE A T H E R ?
--------The Mid-Canada Development Corridor Foundation Inc. is working to dispel
the myth that Canada's North is uncomfortable and unproductive. Some
day soon it is anticipated a new and exciting era will open up the north
with new growth centres and greater populations of people enjoying a new
and clean environment.
Thunder Bay is on the extreme southern edge of the contemplated development corridor on the Northwestern shore of Lake Superior, the largest
lake in the world. The lake, 601 feet above sea level, controls the winds
passing over it and tempers the climate of the City both winter and sunwner.
It could be named a "built-in air conditioner".
WEATHER RECORDS
Records have been kept since 1879 and indicate temperatures average over
a period 1921 - 1950 as follows: -- (Degrees)
Annual Average
January Average
April Average
July Average
October Average
Extreme Maximum
Extreme Minimum

36.8
7.6
35.4

63.4
42.6

(Ottawa Average 41.6)
(Montreal Average 15.4)
(Toronto Average 43.8)
(London Average 69.6)
(Calgary Average 42.1)

104

-42

Killing frost -- last in spring average June 4, first in fall average
September 7.
Average annual total precipitation -- 27.62 inches
Average annual total snowfall -- 68.8 inches (Montreal average -- 100.8)
Sunshine records show an average of 2174 hours per year making Thunder Bay
one of the brightest and sunniest cities in Canada.
•
Average yearly wind is 8.4 M.P.H. The prevailing winds in winter are west
and northwest and in surrmer easterly winds edge westerly for the prevailing
direction.
Humidity is extremely low at all times of the year and the area is a delightful refuge for sufferers of Hay Fever.
Thunder Bay is located in the centre of Canada as the hub city of what is
commonly known as Northwestern Ontario. Actually, this is a misdirection
as geographically it is in the southwestern portion of the Province of
Ontario -- Latitude 48.23 N. Longitude 89.16 W.
The City is in the Eastern Standard Time Zone, but reverts to Eastern Daylight Saving Time during the same period as other major cities.

�!! QR T !!IE.li

!l!!lAE.lQ

D E V E L O P ME N T

CO E.f..:.

P E R F O R MA N C E
----------~
The Northern Ontario Development Corporation, a Crown Corporation of the Province of Ontario, maintains a head office at 134 S. May
Street, Thunder Bay, F, Ontario. A subsidiary office is in Tinmins, Ont.
The purpose of the Corporation is to assist in the develop~
ment of secondary industry in Northern Ontario extending from the Manitoba
border to the Quebec border and approximately north of Hwy. 17. The City
of Thunder Bay is eligible for full qualifications for its business interests.
FORMULA FOR CALCULATING LOANS:
For Canadian companies qualifying for Perfonnance Loans, NODC
can assist with cash grants of up to 50% of capital costs of building and
equipment up to a maximum Perfonnance Loan of $500,000.
For companies other than those of Canadian registry, the formula is as follows:
33 1/3%

25%

of the first $250,000 of building and equipment cost.
of the balance of building and equipment cost up to
a maximum loan of $500,000.

1. Loans are progressively forgiven over a five-year period at 10% per
year. Final forgiveness is in the 6th year. No interest or charges
are involved.
2. Maximum $500,000 additional loan at regular interest rates can bearranged under certain circumstances for both categories of Canadian
and foreign companies.
3. The loans are income tax exempt.
Businesses establishing in Thunder Bay are eligible for
either the Federal Incentive Program and Grants or the Northern Ontario
Development Corporation Perfonnance Loans, but not both. In practice it
is desirable to approach the Federal Department of Regional Economic Expansion for financial assistance. Should this assistance be inadequate or
refused, an approach can then be made to the Northern Ontario Development
Corporation for their assessment of the application. For further infonnation on the Northern Ontario Development Corporation Perfonnance Loans,
contact the head office ~t 134 S. May Street, Thunder Bay, F, Ontario or:
I

I

DEVELOPMENT BUREAU OF THE
CITY OF THUNDER BAY,
193 ARTHUR STREET,
THUNDER BAY,P, Ontario.
807-344-2341.

�I NC E NT I V E

--------i-

10

September 19, 1967, the Ontario Government announced a
new incentive plan -- "Equalization of Industrial Opportunity", directed primarily to improve secondary industry in underdeveloped areas
of the Province. All industry in Northwestern Ontario is eligible to
participate in the program.
In June, 1971, the Ontario Equalization of Industrial
Opportunity changed certain terms of grants to industry.
Canadian companies are now eligible to receive 50% of
the cost of construction and equipping new plants. The old fonnula
of 33 1/3% and 25% continues for foreign-owned companies.
ELIGIBILITY
{l) Secondary manufacturing companies establishing new facilities
or making approved additions to existing facilities. The grants
will also be available to companies building a new plant. If
75% of the machinery installed is new, then the grant will also
apply on the machinery. Companies buying, . renting or leasing
a building and installing machinery can apply for a loan on the
machinery only, if such machinery is 75% new.
(2) Warehouses and other concerns of a closely related nature to
secondary industry, which can contribute substantially to the
local economy.
(3) Tourist developments that will effectively raise the occupancy
levels in local tourist establishments.
NOT ELIGIBLE
{1) Primary industries such as mining, logging, fishing and agriculture.
(2) Service industries.
(3) Companies transferring operations from other areas of the Province into an incentive area only to become eligible for the
grant.
(4) Those companies not organized on a businesslike basis and lacking management ability and proper financing.
(5) Companies receiving financial assistance under any other government program such as Federal Incentives, ARDA, etc.
CALCULATION OF GRANTS
For Canadian companies 50% of the full cost of construction and equipping of plant up to a total Performance Loan of $500,000.

�* 2*

FOR FOREIGN-OWNED COMPANIES
33 1/3% of the first $250,000 of the approved capital cost
of new buildings and equipment.
25% of the balance of the approved cost of these facilities.
The maximum grant will be limited to $500,000.
ADMINISTRATION OF GRANTS
Grants are administered by the Northern Ontario Development
Corporation, 134 South May Street, Thunder Bay, F, Ontario, and will be
made available to qualifying finns in the fonn of interest-free loans for
a period of six years.
Each year 10% of the loan will be forgiven through the 5th
year. At the end of the 6th year, provided the company has stayed in the
locality and perfonned satisfactorily, the balance of the loan is forgiven.
CONSULTANTS
Expert consultants are provided to assess applicants for
loans. This service is free. Advice is also supplied by consultants on
business matters, finances, etc., to any company. The Northern Ontario
Development Corporation may also provide Conventional loans to deserving
firms, ineligible for Perfonnance Loans, or unable to secure adequate
financing through nonnal banking channels.
Speculative enquiries to Northern Ontario Development Corp~
oration consultants for "Performance Loans" are not encouraged as it is
most difficult to assess a project without complete and factual information.
It is desirable to have a fully documented outline of the
projected installation, financial background and future planning, available for examination by the NODC consultants.
All inter.views are strictly CONFIDENTIAL.

�THE CITY OF

UJm;JgafZfUJP
ONTARIO

DEVELOPMENT BUREAU
OF THE CITY OF THUNDER BAY,
193 Arthur Street,
THUNDER BAY, P, ONTARIO.
807-344-2341
B.I§.10.[Ab_

DEVELOPME_ttT

I NC E NT I V E S

ACT
---

Bill C-202 creating the Regional Development Incentives Act was first read
May 26, 1969, and became law July 1, 1969.

HEREWITH ARE SOME EXTRACTS FROM THE ACT: DESIGNATION OF SPECIAL AREAS
The Governor and Council after consultation with the government of any province may by order designate as a special area for the period set out in the order, any area in that province that is detennined to
require by reason of the exceptional inadequacy of opportunities for productive employment of the people of that area or of the region of which
that area is a part, special measures to facilitate economic expansion
and social adjustment. (All NWO below the 51st parallel has now been designated.)

CO-OPERATION WITH PROVINCES
In fonnulating and carrying out these plans, the Minister
shall make provision for appropriate co-operation with the provinces in
which special areas are located and for the participation of persons, voluntary groups, agencies and bodies in those special areas, and the Minister
in co-operation with any province may fonnulate a plan of economic expansion of social adjustment in a special area and with the approval of the
Governor in Council and subject to the regulations, enter into an agreement with that province for the joint carrying out of such a plan.

DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVES
Upon application therefore to the Minister by an applicant
(company) proposing to establish a new facility or to expand or modernize
the existing facilities in a designated region, the Minister may authorize a provision to the applicant subject to this Act and upon such tenns
and conditions as prescribed by the regulations of:

�l!!Q!!iT.B.!

DEVELOPMENT

INCENTIVE

f.hA!i

All of Northwestern Ontario, including the City of Thunder
Bay, has been designated as a "Growth Area 11 and industry will qualify for
substantial ~ash grants.
I NDU S T R I AL
----------

I N C E NT I V E

PROGRAMS

This plan is administered by the Department of Regional Economic Expansion. Here is how it looks:
1. PRIMARY DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVE GRANT

$

2.

For establishment, expansion or modernization of
plants producing an established product line.
Minimum Capital Cost -- $30,000 for Expansion or
Modernization
-- $60,000 for a new plant
Maximum Grant
-- $6,000,000

SECONDARY DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVE GRANT
Not to Exceed
20%

5,000
per
Employee

Maximum Grant

Up to 25% and up to $5,000 per employee for construction and equipping new plant or expansion of an
existing plant to introduce a new
product line.
Cost -- $30,000 for modernization
or expansion
$60,000 for a new plant
$12,000,000 or $30,000
per employee.

a. New or used machinery purchased to equip plant will qualify for grant.
b. No contractural arrangements can be made ;prior to signing grant agreement.
c. The Secondary Development Incentive shall not exceed half of the capital employed in the operation.
d. The plan is aimed primarily to assist secondary industry.
Numerous other conditions are stitched into the plan to ensure good business practices are maintained.
Further infonnation can be obtained by contacting the Department of Regional Economic Expansion, 66 Slater Street, Ottawa, Ontario, KlA OM4 or by direct contact with the: \
DEVELOPMENT BUREAU OF THE
CITY OF THUNDER BAY,
193 ARTHUR STREET,
THUNDER BAY, P, ONTARIO.
PHONE: AREA CODE 807-344-2341.

�*2*
(a)

A primary development incentive by way of financial assistance
to the applicant for the establishment, expansion, or modernization of the facility and,

(b)

In the case of a proposal to establish a new facility or to expand an existing facility to enable the manufacturing or processing of a product not previously manufactured or processed in
the operation, a secondary development incentive by way of additional financial assistance to the applicant for the establishment
of the new facility, or the expansion of the existing facility
for that purpose.

MAXIMUM AMOUNTS
1.

The amount of a erimary development incentive shall be based on
the approved capital costs of establishing, expanding or modernizing the facility in respect of which the primary development
incentive is authorized and shall not exceed:

a.
b.

20% of those approved capital costs or
$6,000,000 whichever is the lesser amount.

2.

The amount of a secondary development incentive shall be based
on the approved capital costs of establishing or expanding the
facility in respect of which the secondary development incentive is authorized and on the number of jobs created directly
in the operation and shall not exceed:

a.
b.

5% of those approved capital costs plus
$5,000 for each job determined by the Minister to have been
created directly in the operation.

3.

A secondary development incentive in respect of any facility
shall not exceed an amount that when added to the amount of
the primary development incentive authorized, in respect of
that facility would result in a combined development incentive
that exceeds:

a.

$30,000 for each job determined by the Minister to have been
created directly in the operation.
$12 million or
Half of the capital to be employed in the operation which ever
is the least amount.

b.
c.

DETERMINATION OF AMOUNTS OF INCENTIVES
Subject to this act, the Minister may authorize the provision of development incentive in the maximum amount provided for by
this Act or in any lesser amount, and in detennining whether to authorize the provision of a development incentive in the maximum amount so
provided for, or in any lesser amount, the Minister shall take into con~
sideration the following factors:-

�*3*
a.

The extent of the contribution that the establishment, expansion or modernization of the facility would make to economic
expansion and social adjustment in the des . lgnated region.

b.

The probable cost of provincial, municipal or other public
authorities of providing service or utilities required for
in connection with the facility.

c.

The amount or present value of any federal, provincial or municipal assistance given or to be given other than under this
Act in respect of the establishment, expansion or modernization
of the facility.

d.

The probable cost of preventing or eliminating any significant
air, water or other pollution that could result from the establishment, expansion or modernization of the facility.

e.

In the case of any proposal to establish or expand a facility
constituting the necessary components of a processing operation
whether the resources to be exploited would be adequate or on a
sustained-yield basis to support the facility together with the
existing facilities that utilize the same resources and

f.

Such other factors relating to the economic and social benefits
and costs of the facility as the Minister considers relevant.

INELIGIBLE FACILITIES
No development incentive may be authorized under this Act
for the establishment, expansion or modernization of any facility if in
the opinion of the Minister:
a.

It is probable that the facility would be established, expanded or modernized without the provision of such an incentive
or

b.

The establishment, expansion or modernization of the facility
would not make a significant contribution to economic expansion and social adjustment within the designated region.

c.

No development incentive may be authorized under this Act for
the establishment, expansion or modernization of any facility
the capital costs of which would not in the opinion of the Minister exceed such minimum amount as is prescribed by the regulations.

LIMITING PROVISIONS
In calculating the amount of any development incentive for
the establishment, expansion or modernization of any facility, there may
be included in the approved capital costs of establishing, expanding or

�*4*

LIMITING PROVISIONS (Cont'd)
modernizing the facility, any capital expenditures made by the applicant to
provincial, municipal or other public authorities for the provision of services or utilities required for or in connection with the facility if the
Minister is of the opinion that the expenditures were reasonably and responsibly made, but no such expenditure shall be so included in excess of 20% of
the total amount of the approved capital cost of establishing, expanding or
modernizing the facility after deducting from those approved capital costs
all federal, provincial and municipal grants or other financial assistance
made or to be made in connection herewith or for which the applicant would
ordinarily have been eligible by reason of the establishment, expansion or
modernization of the facility.
In calculating the amount of any secondary development
incentive for the expansion of any facility there may be included in the capital to be employed in the operation only such part of that capital as is to
be employed in connection with the manufacturing or processing of a product
not previously manufactured or processed in the operation.
No development incentive may be authorized under this
Act for the establishment, expansion or modernization of a facility for
which a contractual comnitment was made whether or not the conwnitment remains in force before
a.
b.

The first day of July 1969 or
The day on which an application for the development incentive is
received by the Minister, whichever is the later date.

Where an application for a development incentive is received by the Minister before the first day of January, 1970 in respect of
a facility for which a contractual commitment was made on or after the first
day of July 1969 provision of the development incentive may be authorized
and the development incentive may be paid in accordance with this Act as if
the contractual co111Tiitment has not been so made.
No development incentive may be provided under the Act.
a.

For the establishment of a facility that is not brought into commercial production until after the 31st day of December 1976 or

b.

In the case of the expansion or modernization of a facility ff the
expanded or modernized facility is not brought into commercial production until after the 31st day of December 1976.

No development incentive may be authorized for the modernization of any facility in respect of which a development incentive has previously been authorized under this Act.

�*5*
PAYMENT OF INCENTIVES
1

When the Minister is satisffed that facility for the
establishment of which a primary development incentive only has been authorized, has been brought into conmercial production or in the case of a
facility for the expansion or modernizatio~ of whith a primary of which a
primary development incentive only has bee~ authorized, the expanded or
modernized facility has been brought into ·conwnercial production, the Minister shall pay to the applicant, an amount on account of the primary development incentive not exceeding 80% of t~e amount estimated by the Minister to be the amount of the incentive and the remainder of the incentive
shall be paid in such amounts and within such period not longer than 30
months from the day the facility or th~ expanded or modernized facility
was brought i_nto commercial production as are prescribed by the regulations.
COMBINED DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVE
When the Minister is satisfied that a facility for the
establishment of which a primary development incentive and a secondary development incentive have been authorized, has been .brought into co11111ercial
production or in the case of a facility for the expansion of which a primary development incentive and a secondary development have been authorized,
the expanded facility has been brought 1ntQ conmercial production, the Minister shall pay to the applicant an amount on account of a combined developnent incentive not exceeding
a. 80% of the amount estimated .by the Minister to be the amount of
the combined development incentive or
b. $24,000 for each job that the Minister estimates will be created
directly in the operation, whichever is the lesser amount and the
remainder of the combined incentive shall be paid in such amounts
and within such a period not longer than 42 months from the day
facility or the expanded facility was brought into comnercial production.
TAX PROVISIONS
An amount payable to an applicant on account of a development incentive under this Act is exempt of income tax.
GENERAL LIMITATIONS
Where in the opinion of the Minister, a development
incentive could be provided under this Act, in respect of an undertaking,
an agreement providing for a guarantee (loan and interest) may be entered
into only if in the opinion of the Minister the approved capital costs of
the undertaking would exceed

�*6*

GENERAL LIMITATIONS (Cont'd)
a. $75,000 for each job that the Minister estimates would be created
directly in the undertaking or
b. $30,000,000.

NOTE:
In Bill C-173, an Act re-organizing various departments
of the government there is an interesting section relating to the Department of Regional Economic Expansion and its relationship to co-operation with
the Provincial Governments.
One section reads as follows:
The Minister may provide for the payment to a province
of contributions in respect of the costs of the programs and projects to
which the agreement relates and are to be undertaken by the government of the
province or any agency thereof or any of those programs or projects and
11

a. May provide that Canada and a province may procure the incorporation
of one or more agencies or other bodies to be jointly controlled by
Canada and the Province for the purpose of undertaking or implementing programs or projects to which the agreement relates or any part
of such programs or projects."

�THE CITY OF

U~ef!J1UJP
ONTARIO

DEVELOPMENT BUREAU
OF THE CITY OF THUNDER BAY,
193 Arthur Street,
THUNDER BAY, P, Ontario.
807-344-2341
.EI.Q.IR~h

A!!i&gt;_

l!!fI!ill!fi

PROVINCIAL
TO

lNQ~iTR!

This outlin~ deals with major government incentives available to
manufacturers. It is intended as a guide only, and appropriate authorities
should be referred to for detailed infonnatfon and confirmation.
Federal Incentives to be dealt with -(1) (IRDIA) Industrial Research and Development Incentives Act
(2) Income Tax Allowances
(3)

(IRAP) Industrial Research Assistance Program

(4)

(PAIT) Program for the Advancement of Industrial Technology

(5) Federal Sales Tax -- Exemption/ Reduction
(6) Customs Incentives
(7) Tariff Relief -- Manufacturers
(8) Dies and Moulds
(9) Duty Drawbacks
(10) Defence Production
{a) (DIR) Defence Industrial Research
{b) Defence Development Sharing Program
(11) National Design Program
(12) {BEAM) Building, Equipment, Accessories and Materials

.Q.!!!~R 1.Q.

l!!f I!!!l! I

f.!:. A!!

(1) EQUALIZATION OF INDUSTRIAL OPPORTUNITY
The Development Bureau of the City of Thunder Bay is prepared to
assist any finn seeking participation in any of these incentive plans.

�* 2*

(IRDIA)

INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVES ACT

Initiated March 1967. Taxable Canadian Corporations may apply for
cash grants or credits against federal income tax equal to 25% of -(a)

All capital expenditures (other than for land) incurred in the
past fiscal year on research and development carried out ·1n
Canada; and

(b)

The increase in current expenditures in Canada for scientific
research and development over the average of such expenditures
in the preceding 5 years.

Grants made under the Act are not subject to Federal income tax
and are in addition to the normal 100% deduction of all expenditures for
scientific research under the Income Tax Act.
For details write:

IRDIA
Department of Industry
Ottawa 4, Ontario

INCOME TAX ALLOWANCES
Under Section 72 of the Federal Income Tax Act a corporation may
deduct from its income all expenditures of a current nature made in Canada
for scientific research and all expenditures of a capital nature (for the
acquisition of property other than land) for scientific research, in the
year in which they were incurred.
In some cases, expenditures to develop, test and evaluate a prototype are considered as scientific research expenditures.
(IRAP}

INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH ASSISTANCE PROGRAM

Program was initiated in 1962 by National Research Council. Assistance is in the fonn of grants on a 50-50 basis with industry, primarily
for applied research and development up to, but not including, pre-engineering preparation for production.
Financial assistance is concentrated mainly of relatively long tenn
research through the establishment of new industrial research teams or the
expansion of existing research groups. Conmercial security of industrial projects is,maintained and all title and rights to research results are retained
by industry.
For details, contact

Secretary,
NRC Comnittee on Industrial
Research Assistance
National Research Council
Ottawa, Ontario

�* 3*

{PAIT) PROGRAM FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY
Direct financial assistance, administered by the Department of
Industry, to stimulate sound industrial growth through the application of·
science and technology and upgrade technology and innovation in industry
activity by underwriting specific development projects which involve a
significant advance and if successful, offer good prospects for coRlllercial exploitation.
Under the program, for Canadian companies undertaking development projects, the Department can share up to 50% of the cost of special
equipment and prototypes.
When the projects have been successfully put into colTlllercial
use, the company will be required to repay the Department's contribution
with interest, on an arranged basis. If the project is not commercially
successful, the Department's contribution need not be repaid.
For details contact

PAIT Program Office
Department of Industry
Ottawa, Ontario

FEDERAL SALES TAX EXEMPTION/REDUCTION
Effective March 30, 1966, the following are exempt from federal
sales tax when for use by manufacturers or producers directly in the manufacture or production of goods.
(a)

Dies, jigs, fixtures and moulds
Patterns for dies, jigs, fixtures and moulds
(c) Tools for use in or attachment to production machinery that a_re
for working materials by turning, milling, grinding, polishing,
drilling, punching, boring, shaping, shearing, pressing or planing.
(b)

Effective June 2, 1967 the federal sales tax was removed on machinery
and apparatus sold to or imported by manufacture or production of goods.
CUSTOM INCENTIVES
Canadian customs legislation contains a number of concessions favourable to domestic manufacturing activity - including (a) Tariff Relief
With the intention of encouraging processing operations in Canada, certain items may be imported duty free if used in the manufacture
of merchandise in Canada.
The Minister of Finance can also authorize certain reductions
in duty on a temporary basis.

�*4

~

(b) Dies, Moulds
Authority may be obtained to import into Canada on a temporary
basis for a maximum of 12 months, plant equipment such as dies, moulds,
patterns, and related jigs and fixtures, paying·duty in Canada, subject
to a minimum $25.00 per entry.
(c) Duty Drawbacks
The customs Tariff includes several drawback items which permit
the return of duty to the importer when materials, machinery or equipment
are applied to specified uses. In addition, drawback provisions also apply in the case of goods imported for further processing in Canada and reexported. In such circumstances, a 99% duty drawback is nonnally available.
DEFENCE PRODUCTION
(a)

(DIR) DEFENCE INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH
Research projects are aided by the Defence Research Board to
ensure no such worthwhile projects are abandoned through lack
of funds.

(b)

DEFENCE DEVELOPMENT SMARING PROGRAM
Encourages developments which have commercial defence export
potential and is administered by the Department of Industry.

NATIONAL DESIGN PROGRAM
products.

The object is to promote the improvement of design of Canadian

This is achieved by clinics and selection of well-designed products on which awards are made. Also in co-operation with industry encouragement is given in the fonn of scholarships and exhibitions to designing
new products by professionals.
(BEAM) BUILDING EQUIPMENT, ACCESSORIES AND MATERIALS
Fonnulated by the Department of Industry, the program, in conjunction with the building equipment industry encourages increased productivity, efficiency, exchange of information, the adoption of modular co-ordination in the manufacture of building material, and the adoption of universal building codes.
Further infonnation

The Director
Materials Branch
Department of Industry
Ottawa, Ontario

�•

M I D - C A NA D A

D E V E L O P ME N T

f. o .B.ftlQQft

-C -O -N -C -E.-P -T
The first Conference to investigate the feasibility of
developing another coast-to-coast strip of land in Canada's Mid-North
took place at Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, August 18 - 22, 1969.
This first step is a long-tenn plan of development to
open up vast, inhabitable but untapped, potentially rich natural resources.
Problems are being attacked in a systematic manner and
long-held ideas that extracting the northern natural resources economica)ly was impossible are being rapidly discarded.
One hundred twenty-five industrialists, economists, and
academics discussed and argued the pros and cons of the initial concept at this week-long conference.
Since then, members assigned to special Task Forces have
spent 60,000 man-hours travelling 1,000,000 man-miles travelling and
examining the 4,000 mile arc stretching from coast to coast and 200 500 miles wide, and known as the "boreal forest" of Canada.
Officials have also visited Scandinavia and the Soviet
Union gathering information for further research.
A final Report of the Conference and travels is now prepared and in the hands of the Federal and Provincial Governments.
No ready-made answers are forthcoming but step by step .
progress is being made. The plan is long ter111 -- aiming at the need
in the year 2000 for more space to settle an ever increasing population demanding job opportunities and the necessities of life.
THUNDER BAY, being the only city in the entire corridor, stands to gain substantially from the initiation of this
pioneering effort.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85842">
                <text>An Invitation To Explore Thunder Bay</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85843">
                <text>Business and Industry</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85844">
                <text>Information package about Thunder Bay, to promote the new city for business and development. Created by the Development Bureau of the City of Thunder Bay, likely 1970. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85845">
                <text>City of Thunder Bay</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85846">
                <text>1970</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85847">
                <text>PDF</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85848">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85849">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="38">
            <name>Coverage</name>
            <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85850">
                <text>Canada - Ontario - Thunder Bay</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="10350" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="12049">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/17967a5471c388ac8165c4ea7dab0dd8.pdf</src>
        <authentication>d5b577d19281c16f6266aad8e4c17755</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="85829">
                    <text>BAY
--GREATEST GRAIN PORT

---- ---

-

11! THE WORLD

- -- ---

The statistics outlined on the attached sheets are a
condensation of the almost, overwhelming data, required to describe
the movement of grain out of Canad~ via the Seaport of Thunder Bay.
The iize of ships, particularly bulk carriers, used
on the Great Lakes is only_ deter-mined by the size of the canal locks
at Welland and St. Lawrence River. · New ships on the Upper Great
Lakes using only the Sault Ste. Mar.ie Locks ·will be 1000 feet long
and wi 11 carry iron ore to_U. S.. furnaces in Chi c~go ~nd area .
. Canada has set her sights on producing and exporting

a billion bushels of assorted grains. This ·will be approximately a
25% increase over current production. When it is visualized this is
a bulk-food product, the aim is st~ggering in its potential.
50,00"0,000 tons of grain moving overseas to -hungry
people will not only have a great impact on the h~alth of all countries, but, will require massive mobilization of finances, scheduling and control of v·ehicles such as_ rail cars, ships, ·storage fac•i 1i ti es," etc.
Thunder Bay's facilities are not presently overtaxed.
Current put~through 'is being handled on a 5½-day week. basis, one
· shift. lhcreasing the shifts even to two per day, 7 days a week will
still not tax the working capacity.
The greatest delay factor remains with obtaining sufficient rail cars to transport the grain upwards of 1000 miles from
the Prairies to the Terminal Elevators, and the availability of sufficient ships, at the right time.
(cont'd)

�. ,/

.... 2

Canada is also exploring the possibility of keeping
the Great Lakes and Seaway open for longer periods during the winter.
The 1971 Shipping Season was extended to January 3,
1972, when the last ship left.
I

Ice conditions are not heavy at this time as the
deeper build-up has not occurred.

Perhaps in the · immediate future,

the season can be extended to the end -of January -- making 10·-month
shipping possible.
Bubblers at docks, huge icebreaking ships and control
of Canal gates are a necessity.
Grain is the major commodity transported out of
Thunder Bay, but the Port also currently handles massive bulk quantities of iron ore and pellets, potash, coal and oil.

In addition,

Keefer Terminal, the western end of the Seaway ·handles many shiploads
• of general cargo moving east and west for Canadian and overseas destinations.

Approximately 300,000 square feet of covered warehousing

is provided· for transfer of goods by rail, truck or water.
Thunder Bay, the Po~t City, in the .exact geographic
centre of Canada -- and the continent --- has a population of 111,000
and services a land area of 255,000 square miles in Northwestern ·
Ontario, a vertiable empire of unspoiled recreati6nal and undeveloped
natural resource potential.

PREPARED BY:
DEVELOPMENT BUREAU
OF THE CITY OF THUNDER BAY

�GRA-I -N
TOTAL 1971 SHIPPING

S T AT I S T I C S
----------

540,725,000 Bushels

**********

**********

EMPLOYEES - ELEVATORS 1971
**********

**********

1500-1600
**********

**********

65 Hopper cars in unit train carries 186,260 bushels wheat Thunder Bay
Quebec City in two days.
10,000,000 bushels carried by unit train in 1972
**********

**********

**********

One of two highest seaports in World at 601 feet, sharing honour with
Duluth-Superior.
**********

**********

**********

1970 - 1971 CROP YEAR -- AUGUST 1 - AUGUST 1
SHrPMENTS FROM COUNTRY ELEVATORS -- 815.9 Million Bushels
Barley
Flax
Rapeseed
Wheat
Oats
Rye

222 Mill ion
29 Mi 11 ion
49 Million
-- 460 Million
44 Mill ion
1O Mi 11 ion

Bushels
Bushels
Bushels
Bushels
Bushels
Bushels

MOVED TO THUNDER BAY

-- 477 Million Bushels

(58.5%)

MOVED TO PACIFIC COAST

-.:. 429 Million Bushels

(30.6%)

MOVED TO CHURCHILL

-- 21 .2 Million Bushels

( 2.6%)

MOVED TO OTHER

-- 67 Mil 1ion Bushels

( 8.3%)

**********

**********

**********

9,000 Grain cars a week at 125 cars per train requires -- 70 full trains
and 70 empties
**********

**********

**********

�G'RAIN STATISTICS (CONT'D)
24 TERMINAL ELEVATORS
7 On Kaministiquia River
17 On Lakefront

RATED CAPACITY -- 105,376,400 Bushels
Saskatchewan Pool #7 has 9 Million Bushels Capa~ity
UNLOADING CAPACITY -- 8 hours

1421 cars

SHIPPING CAPACITY -- 8 hours

10,134,000 bushels

**********

**********

**********

1970 - 1971 CROP YEAR -- AUGUST l - AUGUST 1.

VESSEL SHIPMENTS FROM:
THUNDER BAY~- 498.5 Million Bushels DIRECT OVERSEAS (SALTIES) Inc. above

42.5 Million Bushels

SHIPMENTS FROM:
PACIFIC COAST

269.6 Million Bushels

CHURCHILL

23.4 Million Bushels

DOMESTIC USE

217 Million Bushels

**********

**********

**********

A farm yield of 51,000 acres requir~d to produce a million bushels cargo
- 5 trains totalling 566 cars required to transport this· grain
.- 1 lake freighter 730 feet long 75 feet wide will take a million bushels

**********

**********

**********

**********

**********

COST OF ALL WATER TRANSPORT
9¢ - 12¢ Bushel
COST OF ALL RAIL TRANSPORT
20¢ Bushel

**********

�GRAIN STATISTICS (CONT'D)
ASSESSMENT OF ELEVATORS

-- Approximately $20 Million

CITY TAXES PAID ON ASSESSMENT

-- Approximately $2 - $3 Million

WAGES PAID TERMINAL ELEVATORS

-- Approximately $10 Million

WAGES PAID RAILWAY EMPLOYEES

-- Approximately $6 Million

WAGES PAID IN SERVICE INDUSTRIES

-- Approximately $4 - $5 Million

• **********

**********

**********

THUNDER BAY HARBOUR -- RECORD SHIPPING YEARS
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
** 1971

-- 19,503,923 Tons
-- 15,629,208
-- 13,201 ,770
13,604,854
20,779,767
II

II

II

II

-- 22,164,923

II

(RECORD)

** INCLUDES:
15,461,077 Tons -- Grain
4,814,190 Tons
598,277 Tons

Iron Ore
General Cargo

211,210 Tons-~ Newsprint
1403 Vessels required to move cargo 1971
SHIPPING SEA?ON -- April 10, 1971 - January 3, 1972
TOTAL SHIPPING -- 54Q,725,000 Bushels
**********

**********

.**********

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85851">
                <text>Thunder Bay: Greatest Grain Port In The World</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85852">
                <text>Business and Industry</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85853">
                <text>Information package on grain shipment out of the Port of Thunder Bay. Prepared by the Development Bureau, City of Thunder Bay, likely 1972.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85854">
                <text>City of Thunder Bay</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85855">
                <text>1972</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85856">
                <text>PDF</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85857">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85858">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="10351" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="12050">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/724806812bf3d046c67dfa019bfcb246.pdf</src>
        <authentication>8ff18baf3e0b5cd5f1c62cb64fddac52</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="85830">
                    <text>�Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
THE CANADIAN LAKEHEAD
The City of Thunder Bay originated, January 1,
1970, and became the eighth largest city in
the Province of Ontario with a CMA population
of 111,492, residing in 155 square miles of
city area.
The City of Thunder Bay was formed by the
merging of the two larger Cities of Port Arthur
and Fort William and parts of the surrounding
Townships of Neebing and McIntyre. All the
mechanical adjustments of intregating the
communities were quickly resolved.
The Ontario Design for Development of
Northwestern Ontario names the City of Thunder Bay as a "Primate Centre" for development, and this is being forcefully carried out,
but the City has not forgotten its historic beginning. Back in the fur trading era of 1678,
it was a trans-shipping point of furs and trading goods. The famous Voyageurs used Fort
Kaministiquia at Fort William as a strategic
turnaround. Later, with the opening of the
lakes to sailing and motorized vessels, bulk
goods commenced flowing across the land,
until today, Thunder Bay, or the Lakehead as
the area is known, is the 3rd largest seaport
in Canada. Grain as well as natural resources
including iron, coal, potash and paper, contribute greatly to the 20,000,000 tonnage
flowing in and out of the huge, protected
harbour on the top step of the St. Lawrence
- Great Lakes Seaway, almost 2,000 miles
from the sea.
Being in almost the exact geographic centre
of a continent, Thunder Bay is the connecting
link in Canada for east and west trade, Water,
rail, road and air services converge at this
point to provide unequalled transport to any
place on the continent, or in the world.
Thunder Bay is the distribution capital of a

vast area of Northwestern Ontario, rich in natural resources, including forestry products,
minerals and tourist facilities. From these natural resources has grown an industrial complex comprised of pulp and paper companies,
mines, and in addition a large flourishing tourist establishment serving an increasing number of world-wide visitors.
Secondary industry has grown around these
primary industries to produce harvesting
equipment for the forests and mines. Service
industries supply facilities for shipping, transportation and the accommodation trade, etc.
There are currently 108 secondary industries
flourishing in Thunder Bay and numerous
service industries as well.
The City has been chosen as the focal point
- the centre of the projected development of
the Mid-Canada Development Corridor Concept. This plan visualizes development in future years of a 200-mile wide corridor across
Canada, north of the present developed areas.
Thunder Bay is the only city in the corridor.
Thunder Bay is blessed with an unpolluted
environment, with modern living accommodation and a growing educational complex. The
city boasts unparalleled entertainment and relaxed recreational opportunities. Thousands of
lakes are nearby in almost virgin territory.
Huge Lake Superior, the largest fresh water
lake in the world, not only provides abundant
water for consumption, but carries the largest
ships on the Great Lakes. In addition, it tempers the climate of the city in all seasons.
Government in Canada is notably stable and
the Province of Ontario has the most progressive economy in Canada. The City of Thunder
Bay enjoys a solid, imaginative, elected Council governing a growth area with vast potential.

INDUSTRY INCENTIVE GRANTS
Thunder Bay has been chosen a growth centre
and secondary industry, particularly, is entitled to share in cash grants up to $12,000,000
offered by the Federal Department of Regional
Economic Expansion.
In addition, the Province of Ontario cooperates in supplementing Federal assistance
where feasible, by offering cash grants up to
$500,000 under what is known as "Performance Loans''.
The Northern Ontario Development Corpo-

ration, through an office in Thunder Bay, administers grants for the Northwestern Ontario
area. It will assist industry with all forms of
financing, advice, including ''bridge financing"
up to $500,000 at current interest, where applicable.
Enquiries under the Federal or Ontario Incentive Grant systems can be directed to the
Development Bureau of the City of Thunder
Bay, 193 Arthur Street, Postal Station P,
Thunder Bay, Ontario.

�GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION
Situated on the north shore of Lake Superior,
THUNDER BAY is in the exact centre of Canada, at the western terminus of the St. Lawrence - Great Lakes Deep Waterway, and a
transportation point astride national rail, road,
air and water routes.
Toronto (water) . ... 903 road 865 Miles
Montreal (water) . . 1212 road 1039 Miles
Chicago (water) .. .. 686 road 692 Miles
road 335 Miles
Minneapolis ........ ..
road 450 Miles
Winnipeg ......... ... ..
Sault Ste. Marie
(water) .. .. .. .... .. 273 road 445 Miles
Altitude - Harbour-601 ft. above sea level.

MUNICIPAL SERVICES
Police - 2 stations, 143 personnel, 22 radio
equipped cars, rescue equipment, boats
Provincial Police - District Headquarters, full
staff, vehicle equipped, radio controlled
area
Harbour Police - Staff - launch
Railway Police - CNR-CPR Staff
Fire Protection - 6 stations, 143 personnel
Sewage Disposal - 2 primary plants,
7,500,000 gallons daily
Streets - 410 miles; Provincial Highways 36 miles; Sidewalks - 165 miles; Watermains 290 miles; Sewers - 220 miles sanitary, 46 miles storm.
Water Unlimited supply of pure, clean
water available through City Utilities. Pumping capacity 31,500,000 gallons daily
Zoning By-Law - Official Planning Act;
Urban Renewal underway

POPULATION
Thunder Bay (CMA 1971) ............
Thunder Bay District Market Area
Forecasts (City)
1973 .. ... .. ... .. .. ..
1978 ................
1988 ................
2000 .. ..... ... ... .. .

'{.
I

•

111,492
148,993
118,100
129,300
151,000
201,800

TRANSPORTATION
Road
11 Highway Transport Companies
5 National Moving Van and Storage
2 Motor Bus Companies
Air
- Served by Thunder Bay Airport:
- Air Canada
- North Central
- ON-Air
- Superior Airways Ltd.
- Trans Air
Rail
- Canadian National Railway
- Canadian Pacific Railway
Water
Keefer Lakehead Terminal
- Valley Camp Coal &amp; Ore Dock
- C.N.R. Ore Dock
City Transit
- 20 Electric Buses
17 Gas Buses
- 20 Diesel Buses
- 5,368,407 passengers in 1970

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Accountants 16; Architects &amp; Engineers 5;
Contractors - General 62; Dentists 41; Engineers 19; Lawyers 52; Optometrists 6; Physicians &amp; Surgeons 116; Surveyors 4; Veterinary Surgeons 4.

EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES
Lakehead University with a modern building
complex situated on a 300-acre campus offers
degrees and diplomas in Arts and Sciences,
Forestry, Engineering and Business Administration, to 3,000 full time and 3,000 part time
students.
Confederation College of Applied Arts and
Technology situated on a new 130-acre campus educates 3,500 full and part time students to attain proficiency in two and three
year diploma courses. Adult retraining provides upgrading in modern industrial techniques.

UTILITIES

NATURAL GAS

Electric Power
- lowest cost, high voltage hydro available
from Ontario Hydro Electric Commission,
1 distributed by Thunder Bay Hydro Electric
' Commission.

Natural Gas - Distributed by Twin City Gas
Co. Ltd. direct from Trans Canada Pipeline
running through area. Cost is very low due to
proximity of western source. Annual volume
12,305,000 MCF.

�COMMUNITY LIVING CONDITIONS

MARKET

Hospitals - 7
Churches - 104
Financial Institutions - 47
Households - 28,691
Libraries 5
Newspapers - 2 dailies, 2 weekly
Medical Clinics - 11
Telephones - 58,711
Theatres - 4 plus 1 outdoor
Golf Courses - 5
Curling Rinks - 4
Tennis Courts - 3
Ski Areas - 6
Swimming Pools - 4 indoor heated, 5 outdoor, 2 hotel indoor, 1 health pool-gym
Hockey Rinks - 5 artificial ice, covered, 100 natu ra I ice
Radio &amp; TV - 3 AM Radio, 1 FM Radio, 1 TV
(CBC) local, 3 U.S., 3 Educational chan.
cable TV
Hotels - Motels - 64 with 1916 rooms, daily
accommodation 4178 guests

Population growth rate per decade
11%
Income above National average
17%
Market above National average
14%
Average Income
$6,246
Retail Sales - City
$162.5 million
Retail Sales - Dist. Area
$304.1 million

INDUSTRIAL LAND
119 acres private serviced land
1390 acres private unserviced land
160 acres city owned serviced land
716 acres city owned unserviced land
2385 acres total
Serviced land with water, sewer, and utilities
is priced at $40 front footage, up
Unserviced land priced at $10 front footage,
up or can be leased
There are 7 industrial parks under active development at present.

MUNICIPAL TAXES
Industrial - Commercial
Fort William Ward Public School 133.13 mills
Fort William Ward
Separate School 133.00 mills
Port Arthur Ward Public School 111.92 mills
Port Arthur Ward
Separate School 115.23 mills
McIntyre Ward Public School
106.62 mills
McIntyre Ward Separate School
99.22 mills
Neebing Ward Public School
93.13 mills
Neebing Ward Separate School
89.21 mills
NOTE: Differing tax rates and assessment
methods will continue until assessment on
basis of market value becomes effective.
Basis of current industrial assessment - Land
- 50 % per acre value
Building - 30 - 35 % replacement
Average industrial real estate tax 25c per
square foot.

CURRENT INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION
. Some of the local manufactured products:
railway and subway cars
trailers
dust control systems
newsprint
stainless steel equipment kraft stock
fibre and plastic bags
starch
sodium hypochlorite
gluten
steel door frames
prefab homes ~
aircraft components
lumber
grey iron castings
poles
liquid alu. sulphate
railway ties
glazed fine papers
tar products
fourdrinier wire
sleeping bags
conveying buckets
trailer tents
boilers
caustic chlorine
barley
malt
camper trailers
fish processing
logging skidders
lockers
brick and tile
chlorine
fibreglas pipe
beer -- ale
teen clothing
forest harvesters

ENTERTAINMENT AND SPORTS
Lakehead Symphony and Jr. Symphony
3 Pipe Bands, 1 City Band, numerous school
bands
Cambrian Players amateur theatricals
Famous 40 member Male Choir
Sports car racing - summer and winter
Annual Exhibition
Jr. and Sr. Hockey - peewees and midgets
Fastball - Baseball
Service Clubs - 10
Fraternal Organizations - 42
Night-Clubs - Hotels &amp; Motels - 10

TEMPERATURES
June 1 - October 31 the climate is pleasant
and mild; humid days are exceedingly rare.
The area is a haven for hay fever sufferers.
Normal summer mean temp. (June-July-Aug.)
60.9 degrees above. Normal winter mean
temp. (Dec.-Jan.-Feb.) 10.2 degrees above.
Highest recorded temp. 104 degrees above,
lowest 42 degrees below. Average annual
snowfall 75 in. Average annual rainfall 27 in.

�CITY OF
THUNDER BAY
(FORMERLY PORT ARTHUR-FORT WILLIAM)
ONTARIO, CANADA

'/4

0

LEGEND

D
D
D

COMMERCIAL AREAS

~

10-15 YEAR URBAN RENEWAL

ESTABLISHED HEAVY -LIGHT INDUSTRY

INDUSTRIAL PARKS AND
AVAILABLE INDUSTRIAL AREA

��</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85859">
                <text>Thunder Bay: Centre of a Continent</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85860">
                <text>Business and Industry</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85861">
                <text>Brochure encouraging industry to locate in Thunder Bay. No creator attribution; probably 1970. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85862">
                <text>1970</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85863">
                <text>PDF</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85864">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85865">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="38">
            <name>Coverage</name>
            <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85866">
                <text>Canada - Ontario - Thunder Bay</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="10352" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="12051">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/18fd51ee65642289cfb33fc14030102e.pdf</src>
        <authentication>71db64055c86846756ee627afe76f091</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="85867">
                    <text>70th Annual Meeting
Institute on Lake Superior Geology
Houghton, Michigan

May 15-18, 2024

Proceedings Volume 70
Part 1 - Program and Abstracts

�70th Annual Meeting
Institute on Lake Superior Geology
Houghton, Michigan
May 15-18, 2024
Sponsored by:
A. E. Seaman Mineral Museum
Great Lakes Research Center
Department of Geological and Mining Engineering and Sciences
Michigan Technological University

Meeting Co-Chairs
Theodore J. Bornhorst, Erika C. Vye, Patrice Cobin, and James DeGraff

Proceedings Volume 70
Part 1: Program and Abstracts
Edited by Theodore J. Bornhorst and Erika C. Vye

Cover Photo: The only known color photograph of in situ colorless calcite crystals with inclusions of native copper. Vug is about 15 cm across and 30 cm
deep; located at the top of the Knowlton basalt lava flow at the 4 th level, 850 ft stope, of the Caledonia Mine, Michigan. Photo taken in 1994 soon after
the vug was blasted open. Native copper in the calcite crystals has not been visibly altered despite being about 1 billion years old.
Photograph by Theodore J. Bornhorst

i

�70th Institute on Lake Superior Geology
Volume 70 consists of:
Part 1: Program and Abstracts
Part 2: Field Trip Guidebook
Trip 1: Mesoproterozoic Midcontinent Rift-filling Strata and Native Copper Deposits of the Keweenaw
Peninsula, Michigan
Trip 2: Mining History and Geology of the Quincy Mine, Keweenaw Peninsula Native Copper District,
Michigan
Trip 3: Geoheritage of Buffalo Reef: Industrial Impact on Land, Culture, and Fish Sovereignty
Trip 4: Keweenaw Fault System Geometry and Kinematics: Clues to Its Nature and Origin
Trip 5: Geology and History of a Native Copper Mine: Adventure Mine, Ontonagon County, Michigan
Trip 6: Southern Complex Granitoids, Gneisses, and Migmatites: New Data, Discoveries, and
Perspectives
Trip 7: Landslides on the Ontonagon River at Military Hill
Reference to material in Part 2 should follow the example below:
Authors, 2024, Field Trip title, 70th Institute on Lake Superior Geology, Abstracts and Proceedings, v. 70, Part
2, Field Trip Guidebook, p. xx-xx.
Proceedings Volume 70, Part 1: Program and Abstracts and Part 2: Field Trip Guidebook are published by the
70th Institute on Lake Superior Geology and distributed by the Institute Secretary:
Peter Hollings
Department of Geology
Lakehead University
Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1
CANADA
peter.hollings@lakeheadu.ca

Some figures in this volume were submitted by authors in color but are printed black and white. Full color
imagery will appear in the digital version of the volume when it is available on-line at:

http://www.lakesuperiorgeology.org
ISSN 1042-99

ii

�Part 1: Program and Abstracts
Table of Contents
Institutes on Lake Superior Geology, 1955-2024 ............................................................. iv
Sam Goldich and the Goldich Medal ............................................................................... vii
Goldich Medal Guidelines ................................................................................................ ix
Goldich Medalists ............................................................................................................. xi
2024 Goldich Medal Recipient ......................................................................................... xi
Goldich Medal Committee ............................................................................................... xi
Citation for 2024 Goldich Medal Recipient..................................................................... xii
Honoring the Pioneers of Lake Superior Geology……………………………………….xiv
Citation for 2024 Pioneer of Lake Superior Geology Recipient………………………...xv
In Memoriam……………………………………………………………………………xix
Eisenbrey Student Travel Awards ................................................................................... xx
Joe Mancuso Student Research Award ........................................................................... xxi
Doug Duskin Student Paper Awards and 2024 Student Paper Awards Committee ...... xxii
Board of Directors and 2024 ILSG Meeting Volunteers .............................................. xxiii
2024 ILSG Meeting Volunteers and Session Chairs…………………………………..xxiv
Field Trip Leaders and Guidebook Authors .................................................................. xxv
Banquet Speaker Robert M Hazen ................................................................................ xxvi
Report of the Chair of the 69th Annual Meeting ........................................................ xxvii
Sponsors ........................................................................................................................ xxxi
Technical Program ....................................................................................................... xxxii
Abstracts ........................................................................................................................ xliii

iii

�Institutes on Lake Superior Geology, 1955-2024

#

Date

Place

Chairs

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

1955
1956
1957
1958
1959
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977

Minneapolis, Minnesota
Houghton, Michigan
East Lansing, Michigan
Duluth, Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Madison, Wisconsin
Port Arthur, Ontario
Houghton, Michigan
Duluth, Minnesota
Ishpeming, Michigan
St. Paul, Minnesota
Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan
East Lansing, Michigan
Superior, Wisconsin
Oshkosh, Wisconsin
Thunder Bay, Ontario
Duluth, Minnesota
Houghton, Michigan
Madison, Wisconsin
Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario
Marquette, Michigan
St. Paul, Minnesota
Thunder Bay, Ontario

C.E. Dutton
A.K. Snelgrove
B.T. Sandefur
R.W. Marsden
G.M. Schwartz &amp; C. Craddock
E.N. Cameron
E.G. Pye
A.K. Snelgrove
H. Lepp
A.T. Broderick
P.K. Sims &amp; R.K. Hogberg
R.W. White
W.J. Hinze
A.B. Dickas
G.L. LaBerge
M.W. Bartley &amp; E. Mercy
D.M. Davidson
J. Kalliokoski
M.E. Ostrom
P.E. Giblin
J.D. Hughes
M. Walton
M.M. Kehlenbeck

iv

�#
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56

Date
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010

Place
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Duluth, Minnesota
Eau Claire, Wisconsin
East Lansing, Michigan
International Falls, Minnesota
Houghton, Michigan
Wausau, Wisconsin
Kenora, Ontario
Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin
Wawa, Ontario
Marquette, Michigan
Duluth, Minnesota
Thunder Bay, Ontario
Eau Claire, Wisconsin
Hurley, Wisconsin
Eveleth, Minnesota
Houghton, Michigan
Marathon, Ontario
Cable, Wisconsin
Sudbury, Ontario
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Marquette, Michigan
Thunder Bay, Ontario
Madison, Wisconsin
Kenora, Ontario
Iron Mountain, Michigan
Duluth, Minnesota
Nipigon, Ontario
Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario
Lutsen, Minnesota
Marquette, Michigan
Ely, Minnesota
International Falls, Minnesota

57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023

Ashland, Wisconsin
Thunder Bay, Ontario
Houghton, Michigan
Hibbing, Minnesota
Dryden, Ontario
Duluth, Minnesota
Wawa, Ontario
Iron Mountain, Michigan
Terrace Bay, Ontario
Meeting cancelled
Virtual meeting
Sudbury, Ontario
Eau Claire, Wisconsin
v

Chairs
G. Mursky
D.M. Davidson
P.E. Myers
W.C. Cambray
D.L. Southwick
T.J. Bornhorst
G.L. LaBerge
C.E. Blackburn
J.K. Greenberg
E.D. Frey &amp; R.P. Sage
J. S. Klasner
J.C. Green
M.M. Kehlenbeck
P.E. Myers
A.B. Dickas
D.L. Southwick
T.J. Bornhorst
M.C. Smyk
L.G. Woodruff
R.P. Sage &amp; W. Meyer
J.D. Miller &amp; M.A. Jirsa
T.J. Bornhorst &amp; R.S. Regis
S.A. Kissin &amp; P. Fralick
M.G. Mudrey &amp; Jr., B.A. Brown
P. Hinz &amp; R.C. Beard
L. Woodruff &amp; W.F. Cannon
S. Hauck &amp; M. Severson
M. Smyk &amp; P. Hollings
A. Wilson &amp; R. Sage
L. Woodruff &amp; J. Miller
T.J. Bornhorst &amp; J. Klasner
J. Miller, G. Hudak, D. Peterson
M. Jirsa, P. Hollings &amp; T. Boerboom,
P. Hinz &amp; M.Smyk
T. Fitz
P. Hollings
T.J. Bornhorst &amp; A. Blaske
J. Miller &amp; M. Jirsa
R. Cundari &amp; P. Hinz
J. Miller, C. Schardt &amp; D. Peterson
A. Pace, A. Wilson &amp; T.J. Bornhorst
L. Woodruff, W. Cannon &amp; E.K. Stewart
P. Hollings &amp; M.C. Smyk
Cancelled by the COVID-19 pandemic
M. Jirsa, M. Smyk &amp; P. Hollings
R.M. Easton &amp; W. Bleeker
R. Lodge, E.K. Stewart, &amp; C. Ames

�#
70

Date Place
2024 Houghton, Michigan

Chairs
T.J. Bornhorst, E. Vye, P. Cobin, &amp;
J. DeGraff

vi

�Sam Goldich and the Goldich Medal
Sam Goldich received an A.B. from the University of Minnesota in 1929, a M.A. from Syracuse University
in 1930, and a Ph.D. from the University of Minnesota in 1936. During World War II Sam worked for the
U.S. Geological Survey in mineral exploration. In 1948, Sam returned to the University of Minnesota, and
became Professor and Director of the Rock Analysis Laboratory the following year. He rejoined the U.S.
Geological Survey in 1959 and was appointed as the first Branch Chief of the Branch of Isotope Geology.
Sam returned to academia in 1964 when he went to Pennsylvania State University. He left PSU in 1965
and moved to the State University of New York at Stony Brook, where he stayed for 3 years. Restless yet
again, he moved to Northern Illinois University in 1968 where he was a professor until his retirement in
1977. Sam’s final move was to Denver where he became an emeritus at the Colorado School of Mines.
Sam died in 2000, less than a month before his 92nd birthday.
In the late 1970s, Geological Society of America Special Paper 182, which included seminal
geochronological studies by Sam Goldich and coworkers on the Archean rocks of the Minnesota River
Valley, was nearing completion. At this time various ILSG regulars began discussing the possibility of
recognizing Sam for his pioneering work on the resolution of age relationships and thus the geology of
Precambrian rocks in the Lake Superior region. Three members, R.W. Ojakangas, J.O. Kalliokoski, and
G.B. Morey, presented the idea to the ILSG Board of Directors in 1978. The Board approved the creation
of an award, provided funding could be obtained. It was suggested that collecting one or two dollars at
registration for a dedicated account would provide resources for striking the medal. A general request was
made to the ILSG membership for donations and Sam himself offered a challenge grant to match the
contributions. In total, $4,000 was collected and thus began the work of creating the Goldich Medal.
The initial Goldich Award was presented to Sam by G.B. Morey in 1979 and consisted of a large paper
proclamation. For the actual medal, G.B. Morey consulted with the foundry on production details, while
Dick Ojakangas and Jorma Kalliokoski worked on the design of the award, suggesting that it be given for
“outstanding contributions to the geology of the Lake Superior region.” Simultaneously, a committee of
J.O. Kalliokoski, W.F. Cannon, M.M Kehlenbeck, G.B. Morey, and G. Mursky developed the Award
Guidelines that were approved by the ILSG Board. By 1981 all the elements of the Goldich Award had
come together, and the second recipient, Carl E. Dutton, Jr., received the Goldich Medal for 50 years of
significant contributions to the understanding of the geology of the Lake Superior region. Since the
beginning, the Awards Committee has consisted of individuals representing industry, government and
academia, with each member of the Committee serving for three years. The medal is now awarded every
year at the annual ILSG meeting.
Reference:
Morey, G.B. and Hanson, G.N. (editors). 1980. Selected studies of Archean gneisses and Lower Proterozoic
rocks, southern Canadian Shield. Geological Society of America, Special Paper 182, 175 p.

Prepared by various Goldich Medal Awardees, 2007

vii

�INSTITUTE ON LAKE SUPERIOR GEOLOGY GOLDICH MEDAL
viii

�Goldich Medal Guidelines
(Adopted by the Board of Directors, 1981; amended 1999)
Preamble
The Institute on Lake Superior Geology was born in 1955, as documented by the fact that the 27th
annual meeting was held in 1981. The Institute’s continuing objectives are to deal with those
aspects of geology that are related geographically to Lake Superior; to encourage the discussion
of subjects and sponsoring field trips that will bring together geologists from academia,
government surveys, and industry; and to maintain an informal but highly effective mode of
operation.
During the course of its existence, the membership of the Institute (that is, those geologists who
indicate an interest in the objectives of the ILSG by attending) has become aware of the fact that
certain of their colleagues have made particularly noteworthy and meritorious contributions to the
understanding of Lake Superior geology and mineral deposits.
The first award was made by ILSG to Sam Goldich in 1979 for his many contributions to the
geology of the region extending over about 50 years. Subsequent medalists and this year’s
recipient are listed in the table below.
Award Guidelines
1) The medal shall be awarded annually by the ILSG Board of Directors to a geologist whose
name is associated with a substantial interest in, and contribution to, the geology of the Lake
Superior region.
2) The Board of Directors shall appoint the Goldich Medal Committee. The initial appointment
will be of three members, one to serve for three years, one for two years, and one for one year.
The member with the briefest incumbency shall be chair of the Nominating Committee. After
the first year, the Board of Directors shall appoint at each spring meeting one new member
who will serve for three years. In his/her third year this member shall be the chair. The
Committee membership should reflect the main fields of interest and geographic distribution
of ILSG membership. The out-going, senior member of the Board of Directors shall act as
liaison between the Board and the Committee for a period of one year.
3) By the end of November, the Goldich Medal Committee shall make its recommendation to the
Chair of the Board of Directors, who will then inform the Board of the nominee.
4) The Board of Directors normally will accept the nominee of the Committee, inform the
medalist, and have one medal engraved appropriately for presentation at the next meeting of
the Institute.
5) It is recommended that the Institute set aside annually from whatever sources, such funds as
will be required to support the continuing costs of this award.
ix

�Nominating Procedures
1) The deadline for nominations is November 1. Nominations shall be taken at any time by the
Goldich Medal Committee. Committee members may themselves nominate candidates;
however, Board members may not solicit for or support individual nominees.
2) Nominations must be in writing and supported by appropriate documentation such as letters of
recommendation, lists of publications, curriculum vita’s, and evidence of contributions to
Lake Superior geology and to the Institute.
3) Nominations are not restricted to Institute attendees but are open to anyone who has worked
on and contributed to the understanding of Lake Superior geology.
Selection Guidelines
1) Nominees are to be evaluated on the basis of their contributions to Lake Superior
geology (sensu lato) including:
a) importance of relevant publications;
b) promotion of discovery and utilization of natural resources;
c) contributions to understanding of the natural history and environment of the region;
d) generation of new ideas and concepts; and
e) contributions to the training and education of geoscientists and the public.
2) Nominees are to be evaluated on their contributions to the Institute as demonstrated by
attendance at Institute meetings, presentation of talks and posters, and service on Institute
boards, committees, and field trips.
3) The relative weights given to each of the foregoing criteria must remain flexible and at the
discretion of the Committee members.
4) There are several points to be considered by the Goldich Medal Committee:
a) An attempt should be made to maintain a balance of medal recipients from each of the
three estates—industry, academia, and government.
b) It must be noted that industry geoscientists are at a disadvantage in that much of their
work in not published.
5) Lake Superior has two sides, one the U.S., and the other Canada. This is undoubtedly one of
the Institute’s great strengths and should be nurtured by equitable recognition of excellence in
both countries.

x

�Goldich Medalists
1979 Samuel S. Goldich

1998 Zell Peterman

2016 Mark A. Jirsa

1980 not awarded

1999 Tsu-Ming Han

2017 Philip Fralick

1981 Carl E. Dutton, Jr

2000 John C. Green

1982 Ralph W. Marsden

2001 John S. Klasner

2018 Val W. Chandler
2019 Mark Severson

1983 Burton Boyum

2002 Ernest K. Lehmann

2020 not awarded

1984 Richard W. Ojakangas

2003 Klaus J. Schulz

2021 Alan MacTavish

1985 Paul K. Sims

2004 Paul Weiblen

2022 Terrence J. Boerboom

1986 G.B. Morey

2005 Mark Smyk

2023 Peter Hollings

1987 Henry H. Halls

2006 Michael G. Mudrey

2024 Suzanne W. Nicholson

1988 Walter S. White

2007 Joseph Mancuso

1989 Jorma Kalliokoski

2008 Theodore J. Bornhorst

1990 Kenneth C. Card

2009 L. Gordon Medaris, Jr

1991 William Hinze

2010 William D. Addison &amp;

1992 William F. Cannon

Gregory R. Brumpton

1993 Donald W. Davis

2011 Dean M. Rossell

1994 Cedric Iverson

2012 James D. Miller

1995 Gene La Berge

2013 Tom Waggoner

1996 David L. Southwick
1997 Ronald P. Sage

2014 Laurel Woodruff
2015 Rodney J. Ikola

2024 GOLDICH MEDAL RECIPIENT

Suzanne W. Nicholson
Goldich Medal Committee
Serving through the meeting year shown in parentheses.
Dorothy Campbell (2019-2024) Ontario Geological Survey, Government Member (Committee Chair)
Dean Peterson (2022-2025) Big Rock Exploration, Industry Member
Marcia Bjornerud (2023-2026) Lakehead University, Academic Member

xi

�Citation for the 2024 Goldich Medal Recipient
Suzanne W. Nicholson
It is a pleasure and honor to present the 2024
Goldich Medal to our close friend and colleague,
Suzanne Nicholson, recently retired from a long
and fruitful career at the U.S. Geological Survey.
Suzanne began working for the USGS as a student
field assistant in 1978, and then, after completing a
master’s degree at the University of Massachusetts,
was hired as a full-time employee in 1981.
Suzanne’s interest in the geology of the Lake
Superior region began with her dissertation work
with Paul Weiblen at the University of Minnesota
on felsic magmatism in the Portage Lake Volcanics
in Michigan, part of the Mesoproterozoic
Midcontinent Rift System (MRS). This study included detailed mapping and sampling (typically
big samples that had to be carried long distances) followed by major and trace element whole
rock analysis and determination of a suite of radiogenic isotopes (Sr, Nd, Pb). Using modern
petrologic methods, her research documented the presence of two distinct felsic magma types,
one derived by partial melting of felsic basement and the other related to rift basalts through
partial melting and/or fractional crystallization. Suzanne also was one of the first to provide
comprehensive radiogenic isotope analyses of host basalts, documenting their distinctive isotopic
character and that of their mantle sources. Her 1990 seminal publication (Nicholson, S.W., and
Shirey, S.B., 1990, Midcontinent Rift volcanism in the Lake Superior region: Sr, Nd, and Pb
isotopic evidence for a mantle plume origin: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 95, p. 10,85110,868) described the unique geochemical character of rift magmatism around the Lake Superior
region. Her on-going interest in MRS geochemistry culminated in the 1997 paper that established
a rift-wide correlation of MRS basalts (Nicholson, S.W., Schulz, K.J., Shirey, S.B., and Green,
J.B., 1997, Rift-wide correlation of 1.1 Ga Midcontinent Rift System basalts: multiple mantle
sources during rift development: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 34, p. 504-520),
providing a foundation for future interpretations of MRS-related volcanic rock geochemistry.
Suzanne was also a leader in advancing an understanding of the spatial-temporal evolution of
MRS metallogeny (Nicholson, S.W., Cannon, W.F., and Schulz, K.J., 1992, Metallogeny of the
Midcontinent Rift System of North America: Precambrian Research, v. 58, p. 355-386), further
refined in a 2020 paper (Woodruff, L.G., Schulz, K.J., Nicholson, S.W., and Dicken, C.L., 2020,
Mineral deposits of the Mesoproterozoic Midcontinent Rift system in the Lake Superior region A space and time classification: Ore Geology Reviews, 103716).
Along with colleagues from the USGS, Suzanne helped produce a series of 1:100,000-scale
geologic maps for the MRS and adjacent rocks from the Keweenaw Peninsula, extending
through Michigan into northern Wisconsin to the Minnesota state line. These maps summarized
legacy mapping and, along with new fieldwork, resulted in interpretations and correlations that
xii

�are the current standard for understanding the distribution and origin of the MRS volcanic and
intrusive rocks of that area. Suzanne also initiated and continues to lead an on-going cooperative
government/academia effort to compile and digitize existing MRS geology, geochemistry,
isotope data, and age dates that will promote and direct future research of the region. Throughout
her career, Suzanne was a careful and meticulous researcher who held her own results to a very
high standard for accuracy, completeness, and thoroughly documented interpretations.
Through the years, Suzanne has been a strong supporter of the Institute on Lake Superior
Geology. She was a first or co-author on 17 abstracts presented at ILSG meetings from 1990
through 2019, a co-leader for two ILSG field trips, and co-editor for the 1996 Proceedings, Part
1- Program and Abstracts volume. Suzanne also was always willing and able to help with
anything needed at ILSG meetings (a common trait among ILSG participants), such as acting as
a session chair or serving on the student paper committee.
In 2015, Suzanne moved into increasingly responsible managerial positions within the USGS,
which curtailed her direct involvement with research in the Lake Superior region. In 2020, she
received the U.S. Department of Interior's second highest honorary award—the Meritorious
Service Award— in recognition of her scientific leadership and noteworthy contributions to the
USGS Mineral Resources Program. Suzanne retired from her position as Associate Program
Coordinator for the USGS Mineral Resources Program in 2021 but was retained for 2 years as an
annuitant to keep the Program on budgetary track during a time of transition. Her qualities as a
scientist transferred to her administrative duties, demonstrating the same dedication and skills
she brought to her research.
Now that Suzanne’s service to the Program has ended, we look forward to her return to MRSrelated research as a USGS Emeritus scientist. Throughout her managerial tenure, Suzanne never
lost her attachment to the Lake Superior region and was able to promote and maintain funding
for ongoing regional project work for her USGS colleagues. This support resulted in many new
and exciting discoveries, such as tracing the extent and nature of the Sudbury ejecta layer across
Michigan and Wisconsin, and tackling legacy seismic data to help understand the tectonicmagmatic evolution of the MRS. Through her thoughtful discussions, critical reviews, cheerful
field assistance, and friendship for the past 40-some years, Suzanne helped enrich the lives and
careers of many people, including those of her fellow USGS MRS aficionados. We remain a
convivial group and all of us look back fondly on the times we spent together in the field. Who
could forget death marches across Isle Royale, or raccoons swiping rhyolite samples in the
Porcupine Mountains, or six long weeks at the Hurley Holiday Inn, among our many other
adventures? So now, the three of us, all former recipients of the Goldich Medal, are joined by
Suzanne in that honor. In recognition of her decades of accomplishments and dedication to the
geology of the Lake Superior region and to the Institute on Lake Superior Geology, it is our
pleasure to present the 2024 Goldich Medal to its second female recipient, Suzanne Nicholson.
Citation by:
Laurel G. Woodruff, USGS, Goldich Medal Winner, 2014
Klaus J. Schulz, USGS, retired, Goldich Medal Winner, 2003
William F. Cannon, USGS, Emeritus, Goldich Medal Winner, 1992
xiii

�Honoring the Pioneers of Lake Superior Geology
(Adopted by the Board of Directors, 2016)
Preamble
At the suggestion of Gene LaBerge, the 2016 executive board agreed to implement a program
to recognize historic pioneers in the understanding of geology in the Lake Superior region.
Beginning with the 2017 annual meeting, nominations will be accepted from the membership
for geologists whose work was conducted primarily before the inception of the Institute in 1955.
Biographical sketches of those pioneers will be presented at future annual meetings so that all
may appreciate the value of their contributions. Selection of nominees will be decided in part
by the organizing committee of each year's annual meeting, in consultation with the Board, to
ensure equitable geographic representation in the selection process.
Award Guidelines
1) Nominations from the membership will be submitted via the Institute web site and
forwarded to the Chair of the next Annual Meeting. The nominations will be no more than
half a page in length and will summarize the contribution of the nominee.
2) The Organizing Committee will select one or two individuals to be highlighted at the next
Annual meeting and submit those names to the Board for approval.
3) The nominator will be requested to prepare a brief presentation to be given during the next
annual meeting with a summary to be included in the Proceedings volume.
4) Unsuccessful nominations will be kept by the Secretary for two years and forwarded to the
next meeting Chair; these nominations may be resubmitted at a later date.
The Board will review this award every five years.

Pioneers of Lake Superior Geology
2017 Douglass Houghton (1809-1845)
2018-20 not presented
2021 Newton Horace Winchell (1839-1914)
2022 Thomas Leslie Tanton (1890-1971)
2023 Thomas Benton Brooks (1836-1900)
2024 Roland Duer Irving (1847-1888)

xiv

�2024 Citation for the Roland Duer Irving
Pioneer of Lake Superior Geology
It is my great honor to nominate and promote Roland Duer Irving
(1847-1888) as the 2024 Pioneer of Lake Superior Geology.
I suspect that many ILSG members are unfamiliar with Dr. Irving
and his many truly pioneering contributions to our understanding of
various aspects of Lake Superior geology. Were it not for his
premature death at the age of 41, I have no doubt that his continued
work on the Precambrian geology of the Lake Superior region would
have ranked him as one of the greatest Lake Superior geologists of
his time. As it stands, his nearly two decades of mapping,
petrography, and geochemical studies and mentoring of students at
the University of Wisconsin provided a firm and rational foundation
for our further understanding of Lake Superior geology.
Roland Duer Irving

Roland Duer Irving was born in New York City on April 29th, 1847
(1847 – 1888)
as grand-nephew to the classic American novelist-essayist
Washington Irving and the New York State Supreme Court Justice,
John Duer. John Wesley Powell (2nd USGS Director 1881-1894) noted in his memoriam of Dr.
Irving (Powell, 1891) that in his youth, “Roland was subject to frequent and alarming attacks of
illness, also to a weakness of sight, which proved to be his greatest obstacle through life” and as
such “his early education was at home, his sisters and his father being his instructor”. Ultimately,
he enrolled at Columbia College School of Mines in 1863, and with the continued help of his
sisters, he graduated in 1868 with a degree in mining engineering. During and after his time at
Columbia, he worked for coal mines and smelters in Pennsylvania and New Jersey. In 1870, he
was offered a mining and metallurgy chair position at the University of Wisconsin.
Irving’s arrival at the University of Wisconsin in 1870 marked the emergence of the “Wisconsin
School of Precambrian Geology” (Dott, 2001). He quickly gained prominence within the
university as a faculty leader and outside the university as a research investigator (Curti and
Carstenson, 1949). Soon after his arrival, the Wisconsin Geological Survey was established by
the legislature in 1873 with Irving, T.C. Chamberlain, and Moses Strong serving assistant
geologists. By 1876, Chamberlin took the reins as chief geologist of the survey, a position he
would hold until its legislative termination in 1879. In 1880, Clarence King, first director of the
US Geological Survey, recruited both Chamberlin and Irving to join the USGS in an effort to
develop a geologic map of the entire United States. In 1881, Chamberlin was appointed director
of the Glacial Division of the USGS. In 1882, Irving was appointed to head the USGS’s Lake
Superior Precambrian Division, all the while continuing as head of the Department of
Mineralogy and Geology at the University of Wisconsin.

xv

�During Roland Irving’s teaching and research time with the University of Wisconsin, the
Wisconsin Geological Survey and the USGS, he came to mentor and collaborate with several
notable geologists who would make their own mark on Lake Superior geology (Dott, 2001).
Charles Van Hise arrived at UW as a geology student under Irving’s supervision in 1874. He
completed his BS in 1879, his MS in 1882, and his PhD in 1892 (1st PhD at UW). With the
passing of Dr. Irving in 1888, Van Hise became not only the principal geologist for the USGS’s
Lake Superior Division, but also the head of Wisconsin’s geology department. Another notable
student of Roland Irving’s at Wisconsin was Florence Bascom. She conducted a petrographic
study of the Mellen Complex under the supervision of Irving and Van Hise and received the
second ever MS degree in geology from UW in 1887. She later earned her doctorate degree
from Johns Hopkins in 1893, the first woman in the US to be awarded a PhD in geology.
Irving’s work with the Wisconsin Geological Survey (1873-1879) involved many aspects of
Wisconsin geology. In Volume 1 (actually published last in 1883), which was intended to be a
general summary of the geology, natural history and economic geology of the state for the
general education of the public, Irving contributed chapters on the minerals, rock types, and iron
ores of the state. In Volume 2 (1877), Irving reported on the Precambrian, Paleozoic, and
Quaternary geology of central Wisconsin. His descriptions of the general structure and lithologic
attributes of the Baraboo Quartzite and its unconformable relationship with adjacent “Silurian”
(Paleozoic) rocks is particularly noteworthy. Volume 3 (1880), which focussed on the geology
of Northern Wisconsin, included Irving’s summary report on the general geology of the Lake
Superior region (Part 1) and a more detailed report on the geology of the eastern Lake Superior
District (Part III). This work, which was based on field studies conducted between 1875 and
1878, formed the basis of his subsequent USGS work detailing the overall geology and structure
of the Keweenawan System in the Lake Superior region. It is noteworthy that the renown
petrographer, Raphel Pumpelly, contributed a chapter on the petrography of Keweenawan rocks
(Part II) collected by Irving and others. Irving relied heavily on petrographic examination of
field samples in his subsequent USGS work. In the final volume (#4, 1882) devoted to the
geology, paleontology, natural history, and glacial geology of the southern half of the state
Irving’s contribution focussed on the field and petrographic attributes of crystalline rocks of the
Wisconsin River valley. He recruited his MS student, Charles Van Hise, to carry out most of the
petrographic descriptions.
Joining the US Geological Survey in 1880 as head of the Lake Superior Precambrian Division,
Irving took advantage of being able to explore beyond the confines of Wisconsin and
immediately embarked on his long-standing desire to produce a “resume of the results obtained
in the Lake Superior country by other geologists up to the present” (Geology of Wisconsin,
Volume III (1880) Part 1, p. 3). Building on his own studies of the Keweenawan System in
northern Wisconsin, he reviewed and, where appropriate, integrated all former geologic studies
in the Lake Superior dating back to the Michigan surveys of Douglass Houghton (1831-1844),
the surveys of Upper Canada starting with Logan (1846), and the work of Joseph Norwood in
northeastern Minnesota as part of the D.D. Owen US Survey (1847-1852). Between July 1880
and March 1882, Irving conducted reconnaissance mapping, along with a crew of five assistant
geologists, in several poorly understood areas throughout the Lake Superior basin.

xvi

�In 1880, the Minnesota Geological Survey, headed by N.H. Winchell, was in its 9th year of
existence, but had only just begun to map the Precambrian geology of the state. As such, Irving
decided to spend much of his mapping efforts on the north shore of Lake Superior between
Duluth and Nipigon Bay to ascertain how it correlated with the south shore. This occurred at a
time when many frontier states were developing their own geologic surveys with the expressed
purpose of excluding the federal survey. The USGS already had a strong foothold in Michigan
and after the ending of the Wisconsin survey in 1879, developed a strong presence there as well.
Suffice it to say that Irving’s work in Minnesota was not well received or valued by the
Winchell’s Minnesota Survey.
Notwithstanding Winchell objections, Irving’s publication of USGS Monograph 5 - The Copperbearing Rocks of Lake Superior (Irving, 1883) proved to be a remarkably complete and accurate
picture of the geology and structure of Keweenawan System (Figure 1). The many important
observations and interpretations about Keweenawan geology put forth by Irving include:
• formalizing the lithostratigraphy of the Keweenawan System
•
•

defining the synclinal structure of the lavas in the Lake Superior area
recognizing that eruptive rocks consist of basic, intermediate, and felsic types

•

noting no obvious relation of volcanic type to stratigraphic position

•

interpreting that basic lavas were erupted subaerially from fissures, not ash-generating
volcanoes

•

recognizing that amygdaloidal zones capping basalts are themselves volcanic (not
sedimentary)

•

accurately estimating the thickness of the North Shore Volcanics to be about 18,000’

•

interpreting gabbroic and granitic rocks to be intrusive into the volcanic rocks (thus
younger) and likely formed in staging chambers that fed surface eruptions

Following on the publication of Monograph 5, Irving continued to apply his geologic and
petrographic expertise to studies of other Precambrian systems (greenstones, quartzites, and iron
formations) in collaboration with students and USGS colleagues. When Roland Irving
unexpectedly died (from “paralysis”, perhaps a stroke) on May 30, 1888, he was engaged with
Van Hise on another USGS monograph (#19) on the Gogebic Iron Range, which was published
posthumously (Irvine and Van Hise, 1892). This monograph launched Charles Van Hise on a
career path to becoming an internationally recognized expert on Lake Superior iron formations.
While Van Hise will ultimately be recognized as pioneer of Lake Superior geology, it is fitting
that we first acknowledge the remarkable accomplishments of his advisor and mentor, Roland
Duer Irving. One can only imagine the professional stature he would have attained were he not
struck down at the peak of his creativity and expertise.

xvii

�Figure 1: Plate 1 of USGS Monograph 5 by R.D. Irving, 1883

References
Curti, M., and Carstenson, V., 1949, The University of Wisconsin, A History, 1848-1925 (v. 1).
Madison, Wisconsin, University of Wisconsin Press, 739 p.
Dott, Robert H., Jr., 2001, The remarkable legacy of the Wisconsin School of Precambrian Geology.
Geoscience Wisconsin, v. 18, p. 27-40.
Irving, R.D., 1883, The Copper-bearing Rocks of Lake Superior. USGS Monograph 5, 464p.
Irving, R.D., and Van Hise, C.R., 1892, Penokee Iron-Bearing Series of Michigan and Wisconsin. USGS
Monograph 19, 534p.
Powell, J.W., 1891, Roland Duer Irving. Eleventh Annual report of the Director of the United States
Geological Survey, Part 1- Geology: 1889-1890 p. 38-42.

Citation by:
James Miller
University of Minnesota-Duluth

xviii

�In Memoriam
Louis Mattson
Obituary 12/31/2023
Louis A. Mattson, 89, of Pengilly, MN. passed away December 31,
2023, in Grand Rapids, MN. He was a long-time member of the Institute
on Lake Superior Geology.
The son of commercial fishermen, Lou was the last surviving member of
the Mattson Tobin Harbor Fishery on Michigan’s Isle Royale. The fishery on Isle Royale, and
family homesteads settled in the 1890’s at Larsmont, and the French River on Minnesota’s North
Shore were part of Lou’s DNA. If you knew Lou, you knew about the family legacy on Lake
Superior.
The landscape of northern Minnesota inspired Lou to pursue a BS in Geology from the
University of Minnesota Duluth and an MS in Geology from the University of Minnesota and the
Colorado School of Mines. This education would lead to a 30-year career highlighted by travel
around the world while working for M.A. Hanna’s Minerals Research Laboratory in Nashwauk.
Lou’s sharp mind did not rest in retirement. He extensively researched family genealogy
culminating in connections with relatives in Larsmo, Finland, enhanced his boat collection at the
home he and Peggy built on Swan Lake, supported the Isle Royale Friends and Family
Association (IRFFA).

xix

�Eisenbrey Student Travel Awards
The 1986 Board of Directors established the ILSG Student Travel Awards to support
student participation at the annual meeting of the Institute. The name “Eisenbrey” was
added to the award in 1998 to honor Edward H. Eisenbrey (1926-1985) and utilize
substantial contributions made to the 1996 Institute meeting in his name. “Ned”
Eisenbrey is credited with discovery of significant volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits
in Wisconsin, but his scope was much broader - he has been described as having unique
talents as an ore finder, geologist, and teacher. These awards are intended to help defray
some of the direct travel costs of attending Institute meetings, and include a waiver of
registration fees, but exclude expenses for meals, lodging, and field trip registration. The
number of awards and value are determined by the annual Chair in consultation with the
Secretary and Treasurer. Recipients will be announced at the end of the annual meeting.
The following general criteria will be considered by the annual Chair, who is
responsible for the selection:
1) The applicants must have active resident (undergraduate or graduate) student status
at the time of the annual meeting of the Institute, certified by the department head.
2) Students who are the senior author on either an oral or poster paper will be given
favored consideration.
3) It is desirable for two or more students to jointly request travel assistance.
4) In general, priority will be given to those in the Institute region who are farthest
away from the meeting location.
5) Each travel award request shall be made in writing to the annual Chair, and should
explain need, student and author status, and other significant details.
Successful applicants will receive their awards during the meeting.

xx

�Joe Mancuso Student Research Awards
The 2005 Board of Directors established the ILSG Student Research Fund with $10,000 US from
the Institute’s general fund to encourage student research on the geology of the Lake Superior
region. A minimum of two awards of $500 US each for research expenses (but not travel expenses)
will be made each year. Students are expected to present their research orally or during a poster
session at an ILSG meeting. The award winners will also be automatically eligible for the
Eisenbrey Travel Awards. To allow the fund to grow, the Fund will receive one-half of any
additional proceeds from each annual meeting, after all other commitments and expenses are
covered.
• The ILSG Board of Directors will be responsible for selecting a minimum of two awards each
year. The ILSG Treasurer will issue the awards.
• The ILSG Student Research Fund is available for undergraduate or graduate students
working on geology in the Lake Superior region.
• The applications are due to the ILSG Secretary by August 31st of each year. Awards will be
made by October 1st of each year.
• Names of the award recipients will be announced at the next annual meeting and posted on the
ILSG website.
• Details of the application process can be found on the ILSG web site.
• The proposal will need to be signed by the researcher’s supervisor.
The 2012 Board of Directors approved modification of the fund’s name, adding “Mancuso” to
reflect the many contributions of Joseph Mancuso to the organization and sizeable donations made
in his name. “Doc Joe,” as he was known by his students, taught geology for 36 years at Bowling
Green State University, Ohio. He advised many graduate students in field-oriented research, and
frequently brought them to Institute meetings. Joe was the 2007 Goldich Medalist.
In fall 2023, the ILSG Board of Directors selected two students to be granted research funding of
$500 each from the Joe Mancuso Student Research Fund. The awardees were:
Adrian Perez Avila
Lakehead University

Braxton Murphy
Michigan Technological University
Department of Geological and Mining
Engineering and Sciences

TOPIC: Characterization of the host rocks to
mineralization in the Shebandowan greenstone
belt in the vicinity of the Moss Lake deposit, NW
Ontario

TOPIC: Determine the relative paleostress state
and tectonic conditions that resulted in
formation and movement of faults making up
the Keweenaw fault system near Houghton,
Michigan, USA.

Zsuzsanna P. Allerton
University of Minnesota- Twinn Cities
TOPIC: Investigate the timing and genesis of
massive and semi-massive hematite ore bodies
located in the Neoarchean (~2.7 Ga) Lake
Vermilion/Soudan Underground Mine State
Park (SSP)

Farhan Ahmed Bhuiyan
University of Minnesota- Duluth
TOPIC: Evaluating post-depositional
mineral reactions in the 1.71 – 1.47 Ga
Freedom Formation, Baraboo, WI

xxi

�Doug Duskin Student Paper Awards
Each year, the Institute selects the best of student presentations and honors the presenters with a
monetary award. Funding for the award is generated from registrations of the annual meeting, and
from generous donations to the fund in honor of Doug Duskin—an exploration geologist and longtime friend of the Institute. The 2012 ILSG Board of Directors approved adding Doug’s name to
the award to acknowledge his contributions and distribute those donations in a manner that would
have pleased him. The Duskin Student Paper Committee is appointed by the Meeting Chair.
Criteria for best student paper—last modified by the Board in 2001—follow:
1) The contribution must be demonstrably the work of the student.
2) The student must present the contribution in-person.
3) The Student Paper Committee shall decide how many awards to grant, and whether
or not to give separate awards for poster vs. oral presentations.
4) In cases of multiple student authors, the award will be made to the senior author, or
the award will be shared equally by all authors of the contribution.
5) The total amount of the awards is left to the discretion of the meeting Chair in
conjunction with the Secretary, but typically is in the amount of about $500 US
(increase approved by Board, 10/01).
6) The Secretary maintains, and will supply to the Committee, a form for the numerical
ranking of presentations. This form was created and modified by Student Paper
Committees over several years in an effort to reduce the difficulties that may arise
from selection by raters of diverse background. The use of the form is not required
but is left to the discretion of the Committee.
7) The names of award recipients shall be included as part of the annual Chair’s report
that appears in the next volume of the Institute.
Student papers will be noted on the Program.

2024 Student Paper Awards Committee
Stacy Saari – Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (Committee Chair)
Paula Leier-Englehardt – HydroGeo Solutions LLC, Wisconsin
Dan Hirvi – Consulting Geologist, Michigan
Allison Severson – Minnesota Geological Survey

xxii

�Board of Directors
Theodore J. Bornhorst, Chair (2024-2027) — Michigan Technological University
Carysn Ames (2023-2026) — Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey
Mike Easton (2022-2025) — Ontario Geological Survey
Mark Smyk (2019-2024) — Lakehead University
Peter Hollings Secretary (2019-2024) — Lakehead University
Mark A. Jirsa Treasurer (2022-2025) — Minnesota Geological Survey
Board member through the close of the meeting year shown in parentheses.

xxiii

�2024 ILSG Meeting Michigan Tech Volunteers
Great Lakes Research Center
Daniel J. Lizzadro-McPherson

Student Volunteers: Affiliated with Michigan Tech
Jhuleyssy Liesseth Sánchez Aguilar
Gabriel Ahrendt
Katherine Langfield
Marie, Lansbery
Braxton Murphy
Abe Stone

2024 ILSG Meeting Session Chairs
Allan Blaske, GEI Consultants
Amy Radakovich Block, Minnesota Geological Survey
Patty Cobin, A. E. Seaman Mineral Museum, Michigan Tech
Mary Louise Hill, Lakehead University
Allan MacTavish, AGC GeoConsulting
Ashley Quigley, Michigan Geological Survey
Bernie Saini-Eidukat, North Dakota State University
Mark Smyk, Lakehead University

xxiv

�Field Trip Leaders and Guidebook Authors
Field trips have been the mainstay of the ILSG since its inception 70 years ago. We give special
thanks to the field trip leaders and guidebook authors who volunteered their time and talent in
carrying that tradition forward.

Trip 1: Mesoproterozoic Midcontinent Rift-filling Strata and Native Copper Deposits of the
Keweenaw Peninsula, Michigan
Ted Bornhorst (Michigan Tech)
Trip 2: Mining History and Geology of the Quincy Mine, Keweenaw Peninsula Native Copper
District, Michigan
Tom Wright (Quincy Mine Hoist Association)
Jim DeGraff and Ted Bornhorst (Michigan Tech)
Trip 3: Geoheritage of Buffalo Reef: Industrial Impact on Land, Culture, and Fish Sovereignty
Erika Vye, Charlie Kerfoot (Michigan Tech)
Stephanie Swart (Michigan Department of Environmental Quality)
Dione Price and Evelyn Ravindran (Keweenaw Bay Indian Community)
Trip 4: Keweenaw Fault Geometry and Kinematics: Clues to Its Nature and Origin
Jim DeGraff, Katherine Langfield, and Dan Lizzadro-McPherson (Michigan Tech)
Trip 5: Adventure Mine, Ontonagon County, Michigan: Geology and History of a Native
Copper Mine
Matt Portfleet (Adventure Mining Company)
Ted Bornhorst (Michigan Tech)
Trip 6: Southern Complex Granitoids, Gneisses and Migmatites: New Data, Discoveries, and
Perspectives
Chad Deering (Michigan Tech)
Trip 7: Landslides in the Glacial Lake Ontonagon Sediments
Stan Vitton and Mohammad Sadeghi (Michigan Technological University)

xxv

�Mineral Informatics: A New Frontier in Understanding Earth
Robert M. Hazen
Banquet Speaker
Senior Staff Scientist, Earth and Planets Laboratory
Carnegie Institution for Science, Washington, DC 20015
Email: rhazen@carnegiescience.edu

The story of Earth is a 4.5-billion-year saga of dramatic transformations, driven by physical, chemical,
and biological processes. The co-evolution of life and rocks unfolded in an irreversible sequence of
evolutionary stages. Each stage re-sculpted our planet’s surface, while introducing new planetary
processes and phenomena. This grand and intertwined tale of Earth’s living and non-living spheres is
coming into ever-sharper focus, thanks to advances in “mineral informatics” - a field that employs large
and growing mineral data resources to tell the deep-time stories of our evolving planet. Minerals are
remarkably information rich, holding dozens of trace and minor elements, scores of stable isotopes, solid
and fluid inclusions, chemical zoning, twinning, exsolution, countless defects, and a host of optical,
magnetic, electrical, and other properties. Every mineral specimen is a time capsule waiting to be
opened—waiting to tell its story. This lecture will explore some of the advanced data analytical and
visualization methods that are shining new light on the old field of mineralogy, while revealing in ever
greater clarity the co-evolution of the geosphere and biosphere.

A network diagram of all known minerals colored by the way the minerals form. For example, red indicates
high-temperature igneous minerals, while green indicates minerals formed by life.

xxvi

�REPORT OF THE 69th ANNUAL MEETING OF
THE INSTITUTE ON LAKE SUPERIOR GEOLOGY
Robert Lodge (University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire), Esther Stewart, and Carsyn Ames
(Wisconsin Geologic and Natural History Survey) hosted the 69th Annual Institute on Lake
Superior Geology on April 23 – 26, 2023 at the Lismore Hotel and Conference Center in Eau
Claire, Wisconsin. The meeting consisted of two days of technical sessions with pre- and posttechnical session field trips.
First, we would like to thank the meeting sponsors for their generous support, either through
direct funding or in-kind support, namely: Talon Metals, American Institute of Professional
Geologists, Geological Society of Minnesota, Crystal Cave, and Visit Eau Claire. We also thank
the Individual Contributors to the Student Travel Scholarship fund: Val Chandler, Jim DeGraff,
Thomas Erickson, Tom Fitz, Dave Good, Bob Mahin, Gordon Medaris Jr., Jim Miller, Steven
Pinta, Tod Roush, and Gerry White.
The 2023 meeting was the first conference held in the US since the 2018 Iron Mountain meeting,
the first in Wisconsin since the 2011 Ashland meeting, and the first meeting in Eau Claire since
1991. Total meeting registration was 126, including 19 students. Attendance from both Canadian
and United States was excellent despite other conferences in the Lake Superior region in April
and May (GAC-MAC, Sudbury; Northcentral GSA, Grand Rapids). The technical program was
nevertheless excellent with a good array of topics from Archean and Paleoproterozoic geology,
to Midcontinent Rift geology and mineralization, to Quaternary Geology, Geoscience Education
and Geoheritage. In addition, a student-industry networking lunch was held at the Riverview
Room in the Eau Claire Public Library and an evening social was held at Reboot Social.
Proceedings Volume 69 was published in two parts. Part 1 – Program and Abstracts, compiled
and edited by Carsyn Ames (WGNHS) contains 54 published abstracts for 34 oral and 19 poster
presentations. Students presented 8 oral and 10 poster presentations. Part 2 – Field Trip
Guidebooks, was compiled and edited by Robert Lodge (UWEC). It contains descriptions of two
pre-meeting and two post-meeting field trips. Hard copies of the Abstract Volume and Field Trip
Guidebooks for trip participants were printed by University Printing at the University of
Wisconsin-Eau Claire. Both volumes are available for download from the Institute on Lake
Superior Geology website.
The 69th ILSG marked only the third time in the Institute’s long history that its annual meeting
was held in Eau Claire, the last time being in 1991. Plans for another Wisconsin-based ILSG
meeting had been discussed for a while. With recent work in the Paleoproterozoic geology and
mineralization in the Penokean orogen in northwestern Wisconsin and the central location of Eau
Claire, it seemed appropriate to host the meeting there. Eau Claire sits on the boundary between
Precambrian Shield, Paleozoic Platform, and the terminus of the continental ice sheet and
allowed organizers to host four field trips examining billions of years of geologic history. Two
field trips focused on the Precambrian geology of the Penokean orogen exposed in the Chippewa
and Eau Claire River Valleys. While the preconference field trip got to see historic flooding on
the Chippewa River (there are not many days when a bunch of Precambrian geologists are

xxvii

�looking at the river rather than the rocks), waters receded for the post-conference field trip. Field
stops on this trip were originally (in some cases, exclusively) described in previous ILSG
meetings (Eau Claire, 1980; 1991) but benefitted from new research and analyses and new
viewpoints on the tectonics and metallogeny of the region. One fieldtrip visited classic exposures
Paleozoic stratigraphy around the Eau Claire and Menominee regions and enjoyed lunch in an
ancient meteorite impact structure. One field trip visited Quaternary geology and fluvial
geomorphology of the Chippewa River valley. All the field trips, and the meeting itself, were
blessed with good weather. Total field trip participation was 116 (excluding leaders and
volunteer drivers). A list of field trips is provided below:
Pre-meeting field trips (and leaders) on Tuesday, April 23.
1) Precambrian Geology of the Chippewa River valley: A Transect through the Marshfield
Terrane
(Robert Lodge, Bob Hooper, UW-Eau Claire)
2) Wisconsin’s Paleozoic stratigraphy and tour of Crystal Cave
(Carsyn Ames, Esther Stewart, Bill Batten, Eric Stewart, Ian Orland, WGNHS)
Post-meeting field trips (and leaders) on Friday, April 26.
3) Precambrian Geology of the Eau Claire River valley: Re-discovering the Eau Claire
Volcanic Complex
(Robert Lodge, Evan Weber, Bob Hooper, UW-Eau Claire)
4) Quaternary Geology and Geomorphology of the Eau Claire Region
(Doug Faulker, UW-Eau Claire; Elmo Rawling, WGNHS; Phil Larson, Minnesota State
University, Mankato)
Many registrants attended the welcoming reception on Tuesday evening. Furthermore, the vast
majority of registrants and invited guests attended the annual ILSG banquet on Wednesday night.
Although a Homer Award overview presentation was given, no “recipients” were identified
during the 2023 annual meeting, or in the previous 4 years!
As always, a highlight of the post-banquet activities was presentation of the 2023 Goldich
Medal. This year’s very deserving recipient was Dr. Pete Hollings. The Goldich Medal citation
was presented by Mark Smyk, his colleague for many years. Mark described Pete’s many
contributions to the ILSG, to the greater understanding of Archean and Proterozoic geology of
the Lake Superior region, and his commitment to students. Pete is indeed a worthy recipient of
this prestigious award.
The 69th ILSG continued the post-banquet guest speaker tradition. Curt Meine, a conservation
biologist, historian, and writer from the Aldo Leopold Foundation and Center for Humans and
Nature, gave a presentation entitled Imagining “Conservation Geology”: Lessons from the
Driftless Area. His talk provided an insightful viewpoint of how geology and landscapes
integrate with history and culture in the Driftless Area of central Wisconsin.
In 2023, the student paper committee remarked on the high quality of student research across all
participants and had a difficult time of selecting the best among the excellent oral and poster
presentations. The committee awarded four prizes for the best oral and poster presentations by

xxviii

�both undergraduate and graduate students. The best graduate oral presentation was awarded to
Justin Jonsson and his talk on “Petrogenesis of the mineralized horizons in the Offset and Creek
zones, Lac des Iles Complex, N. Ontario”. The best undergraduate oral presentation was awarded
to Blaize Briggs for his talk on “Quetico-Wabigoon Subprovince Boundary in the Superior
Province north of Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada”. The best graduate poster presentation was
awarded to Fransisca Nunez Ferreira for her poster on “Morphometry and formation process of
eskers developed under the Chippewa Lobe of the Laurentide Ice Sheet”. The best undergraduate
poster presentation was awarded to Lillian Glodowski for her poster on “Characterizing volcanic
host stratigraphy and syn-volcanic intrusions at the Lynne Zn-Pb-Cu deposit, Oneida Co.,
Wisconsin”. Eisenbrey Student Travel Grants were given to twelve students: Zsuzsanna Allerton,
Ryan Barkley, Blaize Briggs, Tianna Groeneveld, Justin Jonsson, Daniel Lizzardo-McPherson,
Francisca Nunez Ferreira, Jordan Peterzon, Sam Ghantous, Madeline Taylor, BJ Itai, and
Katherine Langfield.
The Institute’s Board of Directors met on Thursday, April 25, 2023, and a brief overview of the
meeting notes is provided below:
1. Accepted report of the Chairs for the 68th ILSG, as published in the Proceedings volume,
and minutes of last Board meeting, May, 2022 (Hollings)
2. Received, discussed, and accepted 2022-2023 ILSG Financial Summary (Jirsa).
3. Received, discussed, and accepted 2022-2023 report of the Secretary (Hollings).
4. Approved Carsyn Ames as on-going ILSG Board member
5. Discussed and approved Amy Radakovich Block as Assistant Treasurer in a non-voting role
(end of term 2026).
6. Discussed and approved replacing Steve Kissin as the “member from academia” on Goldich
Committee (end of term 2023) with Marcia Bjornerud
7. Approved Houghton as the site for the 70th annual ILSG meeting. The meeting will be
hosted by Ted Bornhorst.
8. Discussed the role of the Michigan Tech archives as the host of hard copies of the
publications of the Institute. A formal agreement has been signed with the Archives who
will request financial support as needed rather than the previous model of providing a
donation of $1 per attendee.
9. A number of future meeting locations were discussed. Peter Hinz has offered Kenora as a
future site and Mark Jirsa is keen to host the Mountain Iron meeting that was cancelled due
to the pandemic. Bernie Saini-Eidukat to be approached to see if he is still interested in
organizing a meeting in St Cloud.
10. The cost of insurance was again discussed and it was agreed that the Board of Directors
insurance should be maintained and that the costs would be included in the cost of each
meeting. Given the high costs quoted for field trip insurance the Board to investigate field
trip insurance options. Hollings to approach GAC. Amy to approach GSA and Carsyn to
approach a risk advisor. The Board discussed embedding a Liability waiver in the
registration process.
11. The Board discussed embedding a photo release in the meeting and/or field trip registration
process such that anyone registering for the field trip is aware they are agreeing to be
photographed and have their image used in ILSG publications/website etc. It was agreed
that the Institute does not want to turn anyone away from the meeting/trips simply because

xxix

�they do not want to be photographed, and the result is that before any photos are uploaded to
the website, someone on the Board (or a future social media position) will need to go
through the photos and make sure that no one who has NOT signed a photo release is shown
in a shot where they are identifiable.
The 69th ILSG meeting was a great success, and we wish to thank all the people who contributed
to that success, field trip leaders and drivers, UWEC student volunteers, and businesses and
organizations in downtown Eau Claire that hosted and entertained visitors. Patty Cobin and Ted
Bornhorst (A.E. Seaman Mineral Museum, Michigan Technological University) handled the premeeting registration and supplied the poster boards. Thanks also go to the staff at Lismore Hotel
and Conference Center who helped the meeting and banquet run smoothly and providing lunches
and snacks during the technical sessions. Thanks to Eau Claire Public Library for hosting our
student-industry luncheon, Reboot Social for hosting our post-meeting evening social, Eau Claire
Cheese and Deli for field trip lunches, and Eau Claire Student Transit for bus transportation for
fieldtrips.
Robert Lodge (UWEC), Carsyn Ames (WGNHS), and Esther Stewart (WGHNS)
Co-Chairs, 69th Institute on Lake Superior Geology

xxx

�Donations to Support Student Participation at the Annual
Meeting of the Institute on Lake Superior Geology

A SPECIAL THANK YOU TO OUR INDIVIDUAL CONTRIBUTORS
Roger Anderson

Aaron Hirsch

Wouter Bleeker

Allan MacTavish

Terry Boerboom

Bob Mahin

Ted Bornhorst

Gordon Medaris Jr.

Alex Brown

Jim Miller

Michael Carr

Rick Sandri

Val Chandler

Isabel Serrano

Kate Clover

Mark Severson

Abraham Drost

Jim Small

Thomas Erickson

Gerry White

Annia Fayon

Graham Wilson

Mary Louise Hill

xxxi

�TECHNICAL PROGRAM

xxxii

�Wednesday May 15, 2024
All field trips begin and end at the Michigan Tech Memorial Union Building
Parking tickets are given between 7 am to 4 pm weekdays.
Between ticketing hours all vehicles need a parking pass; these will be available from trip leaders.

Pre-meeting Field Trips May 15, 2024
8:00 am - 5:00 pm PRE-MEETING FIELD TRIPS
Trip 1: Mesoproterozoic Midcontinent Rift-filling Strata and Native Copper Deposits
of the Keweenaw Peninsula, Michigan
Ted Bornhorst (Michigan Tech University)
Trip 2: Mining History and Geology of the Quincy Mine, Keweenaw Peninsula
Native Copper District, Michigan
Tom Wright (Quincy Mine Hoist Association),
Jim DeGraff, Katherine Langfield, and Ted Bornhorst (Michigan Tech)
Trip 3: Geoheritage of Buffalo Reef: Industrial Impact on Land, Culture, and Fish Sovereignty
Erika Vye and Charlie Kerfoot (Michigan Tech)
Stephanie Swart (Michigan Department of Environmental Quality)
Dione Price and Evelyn Ravindran (Keweenaw Bay Indian Community)

Wednesday evening May 15, 2024
4:00 pm - 8:00 pm Registration (2nd floor, Michigan Tech Memorial Union)
6:30 pm - 8:30 pm Poster Setup and Viewing (2nd floor, Michigan Tech Memorial Union)
6:30 pm - 8:30 pm Welcoming Reception (2nd floor, Michigan Tech Memorial Union)

xxxiii

�* Denotes a student eligible for Best Student Paper Award. To be eligible students must have graduated
no more than one month before the ILSG meeting, be first author, and present the paper at the meeting
+ Denotes author that will present the paper if different than the first author.

Thursday - May 16, 2024
All vehicles need a parking pass between 7am to 4pm weekdays; these will be available from registration
7:15 am - noon Registration (2nd floor, Michigan Tech Memorial Union)

8:15 am

OPENING REMARKS (2nd floor, Michigan Tech Memorial Union)
Ted Bornhorst, Erika Vye, Patty Cobin, and Jim DeGraff
Co-Chairs, 2024 ILSG

TECHNICAL SESSION I – ORAL PRESENTATIONS
Session Chair: Mark Smyk
8:20

Jim MILLER
Roland Duer Irving - Pioneer of Lake Superior geology

8:35

Graham WILSON, Charles BUTT, Robert GARRETT and Heather ROBINSON
R.W. Boyle’s History of Geochemistry and Cosmochemistry

8:55

James DeGRAFF, Nolan GAMET, Katherine LANGFIELD, Daniel LIZZADROMcPHERSON, Sophie MUELLER, and Colin TYRRELL
Transpressional Nature of the Keweenaw Fault System, Lake Superior Region, and Its
Relationship to Grenville Orogenesis

9:15

Alex BROWN
Re-interpretation of hydrothermal alteration, mineralization and host-rock oxidation to form
the Keweenaw native copper lodes, northern Michigan

9:35

Esther STEWART, Michael TAPPA, Ann BAUER, Anthony PRAVE, and
Latisha BRENGMAN
Geochemical fingerprints from the late Mesoproterozoic epeiric seaway of the Nonesuch
Formation, Wisconsin and Michigan, USA

9:55

END OF TECHNICAL SESSION I

9:55-10:10

COFFEE BREAK

xxxiv

�TECHNICAL SESSION II – ORAL PRESENTATIONS
Session Chair: Ashley Quigley
10:10 Sarah GORDEE, Madison RIAN, Stacy SAARI, and Matthew CARTER
Description and application of the Consolidated Minerals Database to support geological
investigations: an example from the Cuyuna Range, central Minnesota
10:30 Stacy SAARI, Sarah GORDEE, Madison RIAN, and Matt CARTER
Compiled historical drillhole and geochemical data from the Cuyuna Range, Minnesota,
provides powerful new insights for geological and mineral potential investigations.
10:50 Bob MAHIN, Ashley QUIGLEY, John YELLICH, John ESCH, and Nolan GAMET
Critical Mineral Systems in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan, A Cooperative Effort Between
the USGS and the Michigan Geological Survey
11:10 Paul BEDROSIAN, Dana PETERSON, and Bennett HOOGENBOOM
Geophysical imaging of the Paleoproterozoic Animikie basin in Minnesota
11:30 Dan HOLLIS
Use of Ambient Noise Tomography for Mineral Exploration in the Lake Superior Region
11:50

END OF TECHNICAL SESSION II

11:50-1:10 LUNCH BREAK and ILSG BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING
- lunches not provided to conference attendees-

TECHNICAL SESSION III- ORAL PRESENTATIONS
Session Chair: Mary Louise Hill
1:10

*Demily THIBODEAU-BELLO, Mary Louise HILL, Andrew CONLY,
An evaluation of structural and mineralogical controls on gold mineralization on the
GoldRich property in the Abbie Lake area, Wawa, Ontario

1:30

Dean PETERSON and Alex STEINER
The geology and ore deposit model of the high-grade Emily Manganese Deposit, Cuyuna
Range, Minnesota: Results from the 2023 drilling program

1:50

*Gabriel AHRENDT and Aleksey SMIRNOV
Rock magnetic investigation of the Vulcan Iron Formation: Unveiling Paleoproterozoic
Paleoenvironments

2:10

*Zsuzsanna ALLERTON, George HUDAK, Christian TEYSSIER, Annia FAYON,
Martin DANIŠIK, Liam COURTNEY-DAVIES, and Phillip LARSON
Geochronology and geochemistry of hematite ore in northeastern Minnesota

xxxv

�2:30

Joyashish THAKURTA and Beau HAAG
Sulfur-isotope ratios in Paleoproterozoic Michigamme Formation at the Lake Superior
Region: Implications on basin evolution and ambient seawater composition in the Greater
Animikie Basin

2:50

*Jordan PETERZON, Noah PHILLIPS, Pete HOLLINGS, and Lionnel DJON
Deformation conditions, micromechanics, and fault zone development in mafic protoliths at
the Lac des Iles mine, northwestern Ontario

3:10

END OF TECHNICAL SESSION III

3:10-3:30

COFFEE BREAK

TECHNICAL SESSION IV – POSTER PRESENTATIONS
Session Chair: Allan Blaske and Patty Cobin
3:30-5:00

AUTHORS PRESENT AT THEIR POSTERS

5:00

END OF TECHNICAL SESSION IV

Thursday evening May 15, 2024
6:00 pm RECEPTION AND CASH BAR (2nd floor, Michigan Tech Memorial Union)
7:00 pm ANNUAL BANQUET (2nd floor, Michigan Tech Memorial Union)

2024 Goldich Medal Recipient: Suzanne W. Nicholson
Banquet Speaker: Robert M. Hazen, Carnegie Institution for Science

“Mineral Informatics: A New Frontier in Understanding Earth”

xxxvi

�Friday - May 17, 2024
All vehicles need a parking pass available from co-chairs
8:15

INTRODUCTORY REMARKS AND UPDATES (2nd floor, Michigan Tech Memorial Union)
Ted Bornhorst, Erika Vye, Patty Cobin, and Jim DeGraff
Co-Chairs, 2024 ILSG

TECHNICAL SESSION V – ORAL PRESENTATIONS
Session Chair: Bernie Saini-Eidukat
8:20

*Farhan Ahmed BHUIYAN, Latisha BRENGMAN, and Esther STEWART
Assessing depositional and post-depositional mineral associations in the &lt;1.71 Ga Freedom
Formation, Baraboo, WI, USA.

8:40

Jack MALONE, Ryan CLARK, Amira HARRIS-BOMMARITO, and David MALONE
Baraboo Interval Quartzites in Iowa: Reassessing the Origin and Provenance of the
Washington County Quartzite, SE Iowa

9:00

Gordon MEDARIS, Chloe BONAMICI, Phil BROWN, Laurel GOODWIN,
Brian JICHA, Brad SINGER, Michael SPICUZZA and John VALLEY,
The Evolution of Baraboo Interval Sedimentary Rocks: Deposition at 1.63 Ga
and Metamorphism at 1.47 Ga

9:20

Amy Radakovich BLOCK, George HUDAK, and Kate SOUDERS
Insights into the southwestern Superior Province: New igneous geochronology and
geochemistry in northwestern Minnesota, USA

9:40

Ryan CLARK, David PEATE, Allison KUSICK, Kenny HORKLEY, and Chris
MACFARLANE
Baddeleyite age reveals timing of the Northeast Iowa Intrusive Complex (NEIIC)

10:00

END OF TECHNICAL SESSION V

10:00-10:20

COFFEE BREAK

TECHNICAL SESSION VI – POSTER PRESENTATIONS
Session Chair: Allan Blaske and Patty Cobin
10:20-11:40

AUTHORS PRESENT AT THEIR POSTERS

11:40

END OF TECHNICAL SESSION VI

11:40-1:00

LUNCH BREAK

xxxvii

�TECHNICAL SESSION VII – ORAL PRESENTATIONS
Session Chair: Allan MacTavish
1:00

Jim MILLER and John GREEN
Two decades of teaching the geologic heritage of Minnesota’s North Shore at the North
House Folk School, Grand Marais

1:20

Erika VYE, Daniel LIZZADRO-MCPHERSON, and James JUIP
The Keweenaw Geoheritage Summer Internship Experience

1:40

Eric NOWARIAK, S, Allison SEVERSON, and Amy Radakovich BLOCK
Lithostratigraphy and Geochronology of the Lower Northeast Sequence of the North Shore
Volcanic Group, Cook County, MN, USA

2:00

Pete HOLLINGS and Mark SMYK
New Insights into the Geology and Geochemistry of the Osler Group and Related Rocks,
Midcontinent Rift System, Northern Lake Superior, Ontario

2:20

David GOOD
MCR Synthesis 1. Characterizing the MCR mantle plume

2:40

END OF TECHNICAL SESSION VII

2:40-3:00

COFFEE BREAK and TAKE DOWN POSTERS

TECHNICAL SESSION VIII – ORAL PRESENTATIONS
Session Chair: Amy Radakovich Block
3:00

Bill ROSE and James DeGRAFF
Lidar Topography: Bright opportunity for reading Keweenaw Landscapes

3:20

Wouter BLEEKER, Natasha WODICKA, Sandra KAMO, Michael HAMILTON,
Quinn EMON, and Jennifer SMITH
The Lake Superior area “event layer”: Testing the connection with the Sudbury impact

3:40

Tien GRAUCH, S. HELLER, Laurel WOODRUFF, and Esther STEWART
Revisiting geophysical interpretations of the Midcontinent Rift below Lake Superior—
Insights from GLIMPCE seismic-reflection line C

4:00

Aaron HIRSCH
Recent developments on the use of the Horizontal-to-Vertical Spectral Ratio (HVSR) passive
seismic method to determine depth to bedrock in Minnesota

4:20

END OF TECHNICAL SESSION VIII

xxxviii

�4:20

Presentation of Student Awards
Best Student Paper Awards – Stacy Saari
Student Travel/Participation Awards – Ted Bornhorst

4:40

Concluding Remarks and Field Trips
Ted Bornhorst, Erika Vye, Patty Cobin, and Jim DeGraff
Co-Chairs, 2024 ILSG

END OF TECHNICAL SESSIONS OF THE 70th ANNUAL MEETING

Friday Evening May 17, 2024
7 pm ATDC Building across the parking lot from the A.E. Seaman Mineral Museum

2024 Edith D. and E. Wm. Heinrich Lecture
“Mineral Evolution: A Case Study of a New Natural Law"
by Robert M. Hazen
Sponsored by the Edith D. and E. Wm. Heinrich Mineralogical Research Foundation
and the A. E. Seaman Mineral Museum

Saturday May 18, 2024
Field trips begin and end at the Michigan Tech Memorial Union
Parking pass not needed on weekend.
8:00 am – 5:00 pm POST-MEETING FIELD TRIPS
Trip 4: Keweenaw Fault Geometry and Kinematics: Clues to Its Nature and Origin
Jim DeGraff, Katherine Langfield, and Dan Lizzadro-McPherson (Michigan Tech)
Trip 5: Adventure Mine, Ontonagon County, Michigan: Geology and History of a Native Copper Mine
Matt Portfleet (Adventure Mining Company), Ted Bornhorst (Michigan Tech)
Trip 6: Southern Complex Granitoids, Gneisses and Migmatites: New Data, Discoveries, and
Perspectives
Chad Deering (Michigan Tech)
Trip 7: Landslides in the Glacial Lake Ontonagon Sediments
Stan Vitton (Michigan Tech)

xxxix

�POSTER PRESENTATIONS
* Denotes a student eligible for Best Student Paper Award. To be eligible students must have graduated
no more than one month before the ILSG meeting, be first author, and present the paper at the meeting
+ Denotes author that will present the paper if different than the first author.

Numbered Posters and Abstracts are in sequential order
Poster
Number
1.
withdrawn

2.

Sheree HINZ
GeologyOntario: a powerful search tool for Ontario explorationists

Therese PETTIGREW, Robert CUNDARI, Rebecca PRICE, and Manuel DUGUET
Identification of Fertile Parent Granitoid Units in the Superior Province of Ontario

withdrawn

3.

Mia MORSON and + Shannon ZUREVINSKI
Quartz trace element chemistry: Exploring the link between a fertile parental granite and
a mineralized pegmatite

4.

*Kevin MEXIA, Pete HOLLINGS
Geochemistry of Midcontinent Rift-related intrusive rocks of the Sunday Lake intrusion

5.

Justin JONSSON, Paul MALEGUS, Sophie CHURCHLEY, and Rebecca PRICE
Characterizing the geochemistry and nickel-copper-platinum group elements potential of
mafic and ultramafic intrusions in northwestern Ontario

withdrawn

6.

*Andrea Paola CORREDOR BRAVO, Pete HOLLINGS, Matthew BRZOZOWSKI,
and Geoff HEGGIE
Magmatic and hydrothermal evolution of the Mesoproterozoic Current ultramafic PGECu-Ni deposit within the Thunder Bay North Intrusive Complex: insights from trace
elements, Nd, Sr, O, and H isotopes

7.

Max LAXER and + David GOOD
Building a 3D model for Cu/Pd inflection points throughout the Marathon PGE-Cu
Deposit

8.

*Vlad SHESHNEV, Pete HOLLINGS, Noah PHILLIPS, Ryan WESTON,
Matt DELLER, and Dana CAMPBELL
Geochemistry and Petrology of the Eagle’s Nest Intrusion, McFaulds Lake Greenstone
Belt, Northern Ontario

xl

�9.

*Yiruo XU and Robert HOLDER
Cooling of an Archean metamorphic terrane: garnet diffusion study of the Quetico
Subprovince, Canada

10.

*Clare BEAUDRY, Madelyn HESS, Cristian PEREIRA, and
Bernhardt SAINI-EIDUKAT
Petrology and geochemistry of Precambrian basement rocks in Walsh County, North Dakota

11.

*Cristian PEREIRA, Timothy NESHEIM, Jeffrey D. VERVOORT,
and Bernhardt SAINI-EIDUKAT
Major element geochemistry and first zircon U-Pb age dates of Precambrian basement rocks
in eastern North Dakota

12.

Jamey JONES, Bill CANNON, Ben DRENTH, and Paul O’SULLIVAN
Geologic and tectonic implications of detrital zircon U-Pb ages from the Dickinson Group in
the western Upper Peninsula of Michigan, USA

13.

Bill CANNON, A. SOUDERS, Ben DRENTH, and Robert AYUSO
The Sacred Heart Orogeny in Michigan: Latest Archean Granites and the Great Lakes
Tectonic Zone

14.

A. SOUDERS, W. CANNON, B. DRENTH, R. SALERNO, J. THOMPSON, and P.
SYLVESTER
New LA-ICP-MS U-Pb geochronology of Archean rocks, central Upper Peninsula,
Michigan, USA: a step toward refining the final assembly of the Superior craton

15.

*Zsuzsanna ALLERTON, Annia FAYON, George HUDAK, Christian TEYSSIER,
Liam COURTNEY-DAVIES, and Martin DANIŠIK
Geochronology campaign in northeastern Minnesota

16.

Ross SALERNO, Bill CANNON, Amanda SOUDERS, Jay THOMPSON
Understanding the evolution of the upper Midwest Archean gneiss dome corridor using
apatite, titanite, and monazite LA-ICP-MS U-Pb geochronology and microstructural
analyses

17.

*Trent EDIGER and Marcia BJØRNERUD
Glimpses of a Paleoproterozoic landscape: Analysis of exhumed topography on Archean
basement rocks northwest of Marquette, Michigan

18.

Rebecca STOKES, Bill CANNON, and Ross SALERNO
Characteristics of graphitization across a metamorphic gradient in the Michigamme
Formation of the Marquette Trough and Baraga Basin, MI

19.

Tom BUCHHOLZ, Alexander FALSTER, and Wm. SIMMONS
Preliminary mineralogy of a pegmatite in the pyroxene syenites of the Stettin Complex,
Wausau Complex, Marathon County, Wisconsin

xli

�20.

*Katherine LANGFIELD, Nolan GAMET, James DeGRAFF
Cross-sectional Geometry of the Keweenaw Fault System between Hancock and Mohawk,
Upper Peninsula of Michigan

21.

*Braxton MURPHY, Katherine LANGFIELD, and James DeGRAFF
Geometry, Slip Kinematics, and Deformation along the Hancock Fault in the Quincy Mine
Workings, Upper Peninsula of Michigan

22.

*Kenz CARLTON, Basil TIKOFF, and Esther STEWART
The Honey Creek Structure, Sauk County, Wisconsin:
Asymmetric Faulting Associated with Seismic-Induced Fluid Escape

23.

*Alex LAWRENCE, Adam VANDERKIN, and Robert LODGE
Volcanic and Hydrothermal Reconstruction of the Paleoproterozoic Butler Zn-Cu
occurrence, Clark County, Wisconsin

24.

*Lyndsie VICKERS, and Robert LODGE
Petrology and Geochemistry of Felsic Magmatism in the Paleoproterzoic Eau Claire
Volcanic Complex, Northcentral Wisconsin

25.

*Dan SHAKKED, Lucas ROBARGE, and Robert LODGE
Analysis of deformation-related structures in the Eau Claire Volcanic Complex, Wisconsin

26.

*Gwendolyn MARTIN and Marcia BJØRNERUD
Investigating the origin of pervasive breccias in the Paleoproterozoic Saunders Formation
in northern Wisconsin

27.

Aaron HIRSCH, Emma SCHNEIDER
Lithostratigraphic discrimination of Quaternary core in Minnesota using magnetic
susceptibility

28.

Bill ROSE and Erika VYE
Michigan Coastal Path: A Social Commitment to Geoeducation

29.

Bill ROSE and Erika VYE
Jacobsville geoheritage is globally celebrated and locally loved

30.

*Alice MARTIN, Zsuzsanna ALLERTON, Emma JOHNSON, Annia FAYON,
Jim ESSIG, Sarah GUY-LEVAR,George HUDAK
The Soudan Geology Trail Project: Let’s talk about rocks in northeastern Minnesota

A tribute to Jean Peterman Kemp Zimmer and Jeanne Seaman Farnum
by the A.E. Seaman Mineral Museum: Trailblazers for Women in Geology

xlii

�ABSTRACTS

xliii

��Rock magnetic investigation of the Vulcan Iron Formation: Unveiling Paleoproterozoic
Paleoenvironments
AHRENDT, Gabriel1 and SMIRNOV, Aleksey1,2
1

Department of Geological Mining and Engineering Sciences, Michigan Technological University,

1400 Townsend Dr, Houghton, MI 49931
2

Department of Physics, Michigan Technological University, 1400 Townsend Dr, Houghton, MI 49931

The Paleoproterozoic (~1.88 Ga) Vulcan Iron Formation, located in the Southwestern Upper
Peninsula of Michigan, is a significant Superior-type Banded Iron Formation, comprising four
main members. The lower, Traders Member is characterized by banded ferruginous-siliciclastic
layers with distinct alternating layers of ferric iron. The middle, Brier Member is a fissile slate
with varying concentrations of magnetite from low to locally enriched. The upper, Curry
Member, is an oolitic iron formation enriched with specular hematite and lacking noticeable
banding. In some locations, the Curry Member is overlain by the ferric slate referred to as the
Loretto Member. We conducted comprehensive rock magnetic investigations of three lower
formation members, using thermal demagnetization of natural remanent magnetization, magnetic
hysteresis and first-order reversal curve measurements, and thermomagnetic analyses. Our
findings suggest that the members may be genetically distinct, reflecting shifts in depositional
regimes that dramatically affected their texture and mineralogy. The Traders Member,
characterized by abundant small paramagnetic grains, likely formed during a period of rapid
subsidence and soluble transport of ferrous iron into a euxinic basin, followed by alternating
periods of CO2 fixing and sulphide-oxidizing cyanobacteria. The subsequent transition to a
shallow, foreshortened basin as the Pembine-Wasau terrane accreted led to the increased silica
saturation and local concentration of superparamagnetic ferrous iron mud, forming the Brier
slate. A further evolution due to the flooding of a shallow sea inducing high turbidity and
increased oxygenation in the water column, resulted in the formation of the Curry Member,
marked by a mix of magnetically hard minerals, including specular hematite. We speculate that,
subsequently, a decrease in sea level, associated with the basin’s contraction, created conditions
conducive to high silica input from continental margins and a change in the biotic regime which
reduced the formation of granules and led to the creation of the Lorretto slate member.

1

�Geochronology campaign in northeastern Minnesota
ALLERTON, Zsuzsanna1, FAYON, Annia1, HUDAK, George1, TEYSSIER, Christian1,
COURTNEY-DAVIES, Liam2, and DANIŠIK, Martin3
1

Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
Geological Sciences, University of Colorado, Thermochronology Research and Instrumentation Lab,
Boulder, CO 80309-0399, USA
3
School of Earth and Planetary Sciences Department, John de Laeter Centre, Curtin University, Perth,
WA 6845. Australia
2

Northeastern Minnesota is known from volcanic rocks along the north shore of Lake
Superior and the intrusive suit of the Duluth Igneous Complex (DC) to its west with associated
Ni-Cu-PGE mineralization (Leu, 2015; Miller, 2002). These lithologic units are part of the
~1100 Ma Midcontinent Rift System (MRS). During the rifting event, the hot (~1000°C) DC was
emplaced into the “cold” Neoarchean (~2700 Ma) monzo-granitic Giants Range Batholith
(GRB) footwall, resulting in contact metamorphism, sulfide mineralization (Benko et al., 2015),
and hydrothermal activity. The focus of this project is to constrain the hydrothermal effect of DC
emplacement and other regional events by tracking isotopic, chemical, and textural changes in
accessory minerals zircon and apatite along a transect from the DC/GRB contact westward into
the Archean basement.
Samples in this study are collected from the GRB and the Purvis Lake tonalite. Six of the
GRB samples were analyzed for U-Pb dating of in-situ apatite, and twelve GRB samples and one
Purvis Lake tonalite sample were disaggregated to isolate individual zircon grains to acquire UPb radiometric dates (Figure 1). U-Pb data were obtained by Laser Ablation-Inductively Coupled

Figure 1: Simplified geologic map of Minnesota's arrowhead region showing the study area (yellow inset).
Samples are numbered within lithological units of the Giants Range Batholith (GRB) and Purvis Lake
tonalite. Maps are modified from Griffin and Morey (1969) and Peterson and Jirsa (1999).

2

�Plasma Mass Spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) at laboratories of University of Santa Barbara (in-situ
apatite) and University of Colorado, Boulder (zircon separates).
Results show bimodal dates signifying crystallization age and the timing of hydrothermal
alteration. In-situ apatite U-Pb yields 2594.3 ± 30.8 Ma ages at ~ 2 km from the contact, and the
rest of the apatite U-Pb dates suggest Pb-loss as a function of hydrothermal alteration from
~1067.24 ± 7.64 Ma to ~1084.89 ± 9.23 Ma within ~1 km of the contact. Zircons separated from
twelve samples yield U-Pb crystallization ages ranging from ~2640 to 2700 Ma, and lower
intercepts ranging from ~700 to 1200 Ma with uncertainties of ~4-200 Ma. The average lower
intercept is ~1150 Ma, and we interpret these ages to record hydrothermal activity-induced Pbloss. Crystallization age and error increase, and the timing of hydrothermally driven Pb-loss
becomes more elusive with distance from the contact. The tonalite ~20 km from the DC/GRB
contact yields a crystallization age of 2708 ± 25 Ma and displays Pb-loss at 1140 ± 116 Ma. The
large uncertainty associated with Pb-loss might be suggestive of multiple hydrothermal events.
These data are consistent with hematite (U-Th)/He dates of the massive hematite ore
bodies of Soudan Iron Mine, ~40 km (map distance) from the DC/GRB contact, that record
hydrothermal alteration at ~ 1100 Ma (see Allerton at al., 2024 “Geochemistry and
geochronology of hematite ore in northeastern Minnesota”, ILSG 2024).

References
Benko, Z., Mogessie, A., Molnar, F., Severson, M., Hauck, S., &amp; Raic, S., 2015. Partial melting processes
and Cu-Ni-PGE mineralization in the footwall of the South Kawishiwi Intrusion at the Spruce
Road Deposit, Duluth Complex, Minnesota. Economic Geology and the Bulletin of the Society of
Economic Geologists, 110(5), 1269-1293.
Leu, A., 2016. Geology and Petrology of the Wilder Lake Intrusion, Duluth Complex, Northeastern
Minnesota [thesis].
Miller, J., &amp; Minnesota Geological Survey, 2002. Geology and mineral potential of the Duluth complex
and related rocks of northeastern Minnesota. Report of investigations (Minnesota Geological
Survey; 58). Saint Paul: University of Minnesota, Minnesota Geological Survey.
Peterson, D. M., and Jirsa, M.A., 1999. Bedrock geologic map and mineral exploration data, western
Vermilion district, St. Louis and Lake Counties, northeastern Minnesota: MGS Miscellaneous
Map M-98, scale 1:48,000.
Griffin, W. L. and Morey, G. B., 1969. Geology of the Isaac Lake Quadrangle, St. Louis County,
Minnesota. Published in Cooperation with the Minnesota Department of Iron Range Resources
and Rehabilitation. Minnesota Geological Survey 5 P-8 Special Publication Series. University of
Minnesota.

3

�Geochronology and geochemistry of hematite ore in northeastern Minnesota
ALLERTON, Zsuzsanna1, HUDAK, George1, TEYSSIER, Christian1, FAYON, Annia1,
DANIŠIK, Martin2, COURTNEY-DAVIES, Liam3, and LARSON, Phillip4
1

Earth &amp; Environmental Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
School of Earth and Planetary Sciences, John de Laeter Centre, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6845,
Australia
3
Geological Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Thermochronology Research and Instrumentation
Lab, Boulder, CO 80309-0399, USA
4
Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN 55812, USA
2

The Neoarchean Lake Vermilion-Soudan Underground Mine State Park is known for its
Algoma-type banded iron formation (BIF). The BIF encloses lens-shape high-grade (63-65% Fe)
iron ore locally. The well-established view is that massive to semi-massive hematite ore bodies
are the product of hydrothermal alteration of BIF, during which process hydrothermal fluids
leached silica, resulting in volume reduction
(production of vug spaces) and Fe-replacement
(Gruner 1930; Klinger, 1960; Thompson, 2015).
Studies have postulated that ore mineralization was
syn- or post-depositional with BIF (Gruner, 1926;
Thompson, 2015), but the absolute timing of
hematite ore had not been established until now.

Figure 1: The diagram illustrates hematite
mineralization consistent with the timing of
Yavapai and Mazatzal orogenies based on
U-Pb ages, and Midcontinent Rift System
signatures overprint mineralization ages
with (U-Th)/He analysis.

Presented is a novel technique based on
coupled U-Pb and (U-Th)/He hematite radiometric
dating (Courtney-Davies et al., 2022) to determine
the formation age and thermal history recorded by
hematite. Initial electron probe microanalyses
(EPMA) allowed for hematite characterization
(microcrystalline and microplaty) that helped
locating inclusion-free mineral surfaces for
radiometric age dating. U-Pb Laser AblationInductively Coupled-Plasma Mass Spectrometry
results suggest Paleoproterozoic mineralization at
1740.4±72.5 Ma and 1640.8±47.2 Ma and (UTh)/He ages clustered at 1093.1±16.4 Ma, the latter
indicating a hydrothermal overprint of the original
mineralization event (Figure 1).
We propose a regional scale model that
describes the hydrothermal alteration of Archean
BIF at ~1700-1600 Ma with the formation of
hematite ore including the growth of
microcrystalline then microplaty textures, followed

4

�by a thermal overprint at ~1100 Ma associated with the development of the Midcontinent Rift
System (Figure 2).

Figure 2: Schematic diagrams display S-N cross-section starting with A) pre-D2, showing Gafvert Lake
sequence (GL) unconformably above the Soudan Member (SM) that is stratigraphically above the
Lower Member (LM) of Ely Formation. B) D2 regional transpression resulting in right lateral shear
zones within SM, constrained to 2685-2674 Ma from dating of regional metamorphic fabrics (Lodge et
al., 2013). C) Orogenic magmatism—depicted by a mafic dike (MD) at 1700-1600 Ma—generates
hydrothermal fluids, and shear zones are utilized for fluid flow and facilitate a 2-stage hematite ore
mineralization (microcrystalline and microplaty). D) The Midcontinent Rift System at ~1100 Ma
results in hydrothermal overprint of original mineralization recorded in hematite (U-Th)/He ages.

Whole-rock — including major, trace and rare earth elements—lithogeochemical analysis
has been performed on four iron formation and ore samples, and results are currently being
processed. Klinger (1969) proposed a volume-to-volume replacement mineralization, while
Thomson (2015) calculated 39% volume loss by silica leaching and 9% Fe mass gain with Fe
replacement. Additionally, isocon analysis (Grant, 2005) is underway to better understand the
relationship between mobile and immobile elements during ore mineralization and the
paragenesis of hematite.
References
Courtney-Davies, L., et al., 2022. Hematite geochronology reveals a tectonic trigger for iron ore
mineralization during Nuna breakup: Geology, v. 50, p. 1318-1323, doi: 10.1130/G50374.1.
Grant, J.A., 2005, Isocon analysis: A brief review of the method and applications: Physics and Chemistry
of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, v. 30, p. 997–1004, doi: 10.1016/j.pce.2004.11.003.
Gruner, J. W., 1926. Hydrothermal alteration of iron ores of the Lake Superior type—a modified theory:
Economic Geology, v. 32, p.121-130.
Gruner, J.W., 1930. Hydrothermal oxidation and leaching experiments; their bearing on the origin of
Lake Superior hematite-iron ores: Economic Geology, v. 25, p. 697-719.
Klinger, F.L., 1960. Geology and ore deposits of the Soudan mine, St. Louis County, Minnesota [thesis].
Lodge, R.W.D., et al., 2013. New U-Pb geochronology from Timiskaming-type assemblages in the
Shebandowan and Vermilion greenstone belts, Wawa subprovince, Superior Craton: implications
for the Neoarchean development of the southwestern Superior Province, Precambrian Research,
v. 235, p. 264-277.
Schulz, K. J., 1982. The magmatic evolution of the Vermilion greenstone belt of Minnesota:
Tectonophysics, v. 190, p. 233-268.
Thompson, A., 2015. A hydrothermal model for metasomatism of Neoarchean Algoma-Type banded iron
formation to massive hematite ore at the Soudan Mine, NE Minnesota [thesis].

5

�Petrology and geochemistry of Precambrian basement rocks in Walsh County, North
Dakota
BEAUDRY, Clare1, HESS, Madelyn1, PEREIRA, Cristian1, and SAINI-EIDUKAT,
Bernhardt1,2
1
Department of Earth, Environmental and Geospatial Sciences, 2Department of Chemistry and
Biochemistry, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102, USA
In 1977, thirty-two cores were drilled in eastern North Dakota and western Minnesota
along the Red River, for the purpose of evaluating uranium potential (Figure 1). The project was
funded by the Department of Energy and overseen by Bendix Corporation. A technical report
(Moore, 1978), a M.S. thesis that focused on the weathered horizon at the top of the Precambrian
bedrock (Kelley, 1980), and several ILSG abstracts were published.
For this study, three cores from Walsh County, North Dakota were sampled at the North
Dakota Geological Survey Drill Core Library (Grand Forks, ND). Samples were taken from
RRVD #17, RRVD #18, and RRVD #19A to focus the study to Walsh County, ND. Figure 2
shows the lithology of the three cores and outlines sample locations.

Figure 2: Stratigraphic column of RRVD drill
core Precambrian layers. Black Xs indicate
sample locations. Numbers to the left correspond
to the XRF analysis in Table 1. Data taken from
Moore (1979) and optical observations.

Figure 1: Location map of Eastern North
Dakota and Western Minnesota. Era of
Precambrian Bedrock is outlined. Red River
Valley Drill Cores are outlined.

Petrography and whole rock geochemical analyses (Table 1) were carried out on
Precambrian layers. Precambrian sediments are buried under younger layers in Eastern North
Dakota, the sampled areas are underlain by Archean gneiss, (Klasner and King, 1986). RRVD
#17 was characterized as quartz monzonite with heavier alterations of biotite and feldspar farther
up in the core. The alterations may be due to stronger weathering agents on the paleoweathered
horizon. RRVD #18 was characterized as a granodiorite with uniform foliation and mineral
percentages throughout the drill core. RRVD #19A was characterized as a gneissic granite with

6

�higher foliation as the sample increases in depth. The top of the cores is bleached, likely an effect
of paleoweathering processes. Analyses were plotted on AFM and TAS diagrams (Figure 3).
Table 1: RRVD #17-785, 2: RRVD #18-645.5, 3: RRVD #18-655.5, 4: RRVD #19A-1284.5, 5: #19A1291, 6: #19A-1296.5. Chemical data from NDSU XRF analysis.
wt%

1

2

SiO2

59.1

69.2

TiO2

0.58

Al2O3
Fe2O3
MnO

3

4

5

6

71

68.2

73.5

73.6

0.39

0.32

0.31

0.21

0.22

23.6

14.7

13.8

20.4

13.5

13.1

6.77
0.07

3.55
0.05

3.06
0.04

3.53
0.03

2.54
0.03

2.57
0.03

MgO

2.25

1.19

1.04

0.87

0.44

0.44

CaO

3.44

3.83

3.44

N.D.

3.12

2.8

Na2O

5.32

5.23

5.51

N.D.

4.82

4.32

K2O

1.84

1.46

1.32

6.4

1.36

2.47

P2O5

0.20

0.15

0.13

0.07

0.09

0.07

Total

103.1

99.75

99.66

99.81

99.61

99.62

Figure 3: Classification diagrams for measured samples.

REFERENCES:
Kelley, L.I., 1980, Kaolinitic weathering zone on Precambrian basement rocks, Red River Valley, eastern
North Dakota and northwestern Minnesota. M.S. Thesis, University of North Dakota. 85 pp.
Klasner, J.S. and E. R. King. 1986. Precambrian basement geology of North and South Dakota. Canadian
Journal of Earth Sciences. 23(8): 1083-1102. https://doi.org/10.1139/e86-109
Moore, W. L., 1978, A preliminary report on the geology of the Red River Valley Drilling Project,
eastern North Dakota and northwestern Minnesota: Bendix Field Engineering Company
Subcontract H77-059-E, 292p. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/6538603 doi:10.2172/6538603.

7

�Geophysical imaging of the Paleoproterozoic Animikie basin in Minnesota
BEDROSIAN, Paul A., PETERSON, Dana E. and HOOGENBOOM, Bennett E.
U.S. Geological Survey, Bldg 20, MS 964, Denver Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225

The 1.88-1.83 Ga Penokean orogen is preserved as a discontinuous fold belt stretching
nearly 1500 km from central Minnesota to eastern Ontario. In Minnesota, the supracrustal
sequence occupies a NW-facing salient broadly divided into a southern fold-and-thrust belt and a
northern tectonic foredeep. The former consists of volcanic and sedimentary rocks in several
structural panels while the latter - the ‘main bowl’ Animikie basin (AB) - consists of thick
sedimentary sequences and is one of the least deformed remnants of this former continentalmargin. Metasedimentary rocks of the AB include chemical sedimentary rocks (e.g., iron
formation of the Mesabi iron range) and turbidites of the Virginia and Thomson Formations. The
latter are an important source of sulfur for Ni-Cu mineralization within the intruding Duluth
Complex and satellite intrusions.
The USGS has been collecting geophysical data in the AB and surrounding areas,
including airborne electromagnetic, broadband and nodal seismic, and magnetotelluric data.
These data and resulting models reveal the main bowl AB to be more complex than suggested
from surface geological mapping. High-electrical conductivity is mapped throughout the basin,
including along its northern edge where it is linked to the gently dipping bedded-pyrrhotite-unit
and along the steeply dipping SW edge of the Duluth Complex, where it may reflect a hornfels
zone formed during contact metamorphism. At the basin scale, a discontinuous bowl-shaped high
conductivity zone extends to ~5 km depth. This intra-basin conductor shows some relation to
deformation boundaries, such as a demarcation between rocks exhibiting folding and cleavage
and those that do not.
Some deep (&gt;5 km) geophysical variations are likely related to structural variations
within the Archean basement or within thrust panels inferred to project some distance beneath
the basin. Where exposed, strong conductors within some of the adjacent thrust belts suggest a
correlation with metamorphic grade. Elevated conductivity can, in most cases, be related to a
combination of metallic sulfides and graphite. A 9-20 km deep, steeply dipping conductive band
is also imaged internal to the Duluth Complex and adjacent to modeled high-density bodies
interpreted as magmatic feeder zones. We interpret this conductor as a remnant of AB
metasediments preserved within the complex and speculate that the AB played an important
control on magma emplacement.

8

�Assessing depositional and post-depositional mineral associations in the &lt;1.71 Ga Freedom
Formation, Baraboo, WI, USA.
BHUIYAN, Farhan Ahmed 1, BRENGMAN, Latisha 1, and STEWART, Esther 2
1

University of Minnesota Duluth, Earth &amp; Environmental Sciences Department, University of Minnesota
Duluth, 1114 Kirby Drive, Heller Hall 229, Duluth, MN 55812.
2
Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey, University of Wisconsin-Madison Division of
Extension, 3817 Mineral Point Rd, Madison, WI 53705.

Some geochemical proxy records suggest that the period following Earth’s initial rise in
atmospheric oxygen ~2.4 billion years ago was marked by low, fluctuating oxygen levels (Lyons
et al., 2014; 2021). Such conditions would likely have made the ocean’s photic zone inhospitable
to multicellular life forms that require oxygen (e.g. Krause et al., 2022). Interpreting the
trajectory of Earth’s oxygenation is complicated due to uncertainties in the diagenetic effects on
redox proxy records and limited preservation, especially across the late Paleoproterozoic and
early Mesoproterozoic (e.g. Slotznick et al., 2022). To fill in critical knowledge gaps in surface
redox conditions and geochemical characteristics of Mid-Proterozoic depositional environments,
we investigated the Freedom Formation, a &lt;1.71 Ga and &gt;1.47 Ga iron-rich chemical
sedimentary unit preserved in historic drill cores near Baraboo, WI, USA (Stewart et al., 2021).
Our goal is to decipher primary redox information that links back to the depositing fluid. To
accomplish this goal, and separate primary depositional signatures from post-depositional
overprinting, we integrate core observations, mineral, petrographic, and geochemical datasets.
The Freedom Formation includes a lower unit composed of thin-bedded, interlaminated,
fine-grained clastic and chemical sediments and an upper unit composed of dolomite. We
document a coarsening upward sequence in the lower Freedom Formation, accompanied by
mineralogical changes in three drill cores (H122, H22, and H23). Two of the cores (H122 and
H22) show a transition in mineralogy from a base assembly of chamosite, quartz, and magnetite
to a Mn-carbonate and hematite-dominant assembly towards the top of the sections. This
mineralogical transition is accompanied by an increase in the proportion of sand-sized material, a
decrease in mud-sized material, and a noticeable transition to carbonate. Veining and disrupted
beds occur throughout all the cores. Whole rock geochemical samples targeting carbonate-rich
beds across the lower Freedom Formation indicate a decline in clastic contamination up section,
marked by falling Al2O3 concentrations and reduced Zr/Hf ratios. Positive shale normalized
Eu/Eu*SN anomalies indicate a role for hydrothermal fluids in precipitation of the authigenic
mineral phases. Throughout the lower units, anoxic conditions are dominant, indicated by
positive shale-normalized cerium (Ce/Ce*SN) anomalies.
Interpreting the observed mineralogical transition in drill cores and the geochemical
dataset requires detailed, systematic petrographic observation to distinguish the relative order of
events and develop a paragenetic sequence. We identify texturally early minerals based on
criteria outlined in LaBerge (1964) and separate those from post-depositional phases to interpret
the history of the unit. To classify as a texturally-early phase, minerals must meet the following
criteria: 1) be very fine-grained (where no grain size reduction can be attributed to
metamorphism); 2) form even and consistent grain size distributions throughout the sample; 3)
form the main component of granules or mud-sized particles in fine-grained layers characterized
by a granular or particulate textural pattern; and 4) be associated with sedimentary features like

9

�bedding. From this work, we identified quartz and chamosite as the texturally earliest phases in
the lowermost Freedom Formation. Towards the top of the lower Freedom Formation, carbonate
phases were most commonly identified as texturally earliest. Additionally, the following key
observations were made: (1) if quartz is not present, chamosite is the texturally earliest phase; (2)
if chamosite is not present, then carbonate is the texturally earliest phase; (3) nano-scale hematite
exists at boundaries of chamosite, quartz, carbonate, and stilpnomelane crystals, and within
veinlets; (4) euhedral magnetite
cross-cuts all other phases, and is
often associated directly with
chamosite; and (5) large hematite
sometimes crosscuts small
magnetite, or forms oxidized
rims on euhedral magnetite
crystals; (6) multiple generations
of quartz and oxides exist; and
(7) at least two types of
carbonate are present (Fe- and
Mn-rich and poor). Combining
core and mineral datasets, we
note that because multiple
generations of oxides are present Figure 1: Reflected light photomicrograph of slide no: H122 538
(Fig. 1), post-formational fluid
FF (50X) documenting oxidized hematite rims on magnetite
flow may directly connect to
crystals.
observed redox changes in oxide phases. The most critical of these post-depositional
observations is the oxidation of magnetite rims (Fig. 1).
Overall, across all the cores, independent of redox changes observed in oxide phases, we
note a transition in texturally early phases from reduced fine-grained, Fe2+- containing minerals
to Mn-Carbonate. This mineralogical transition is marked by anoxic geochemical signatures and
possibly indicates minor variations in oxygen conditions during the formation of the mineral
phases preserved in the Freedom Formation.
References:
Krause, A. J., W. Mills, B. J., Merdith, A. S., Lenton, T. M., &amp; Poulton, S. W. (2022). Extreme variability
in atmospheric oxygen levels in the late Precambrian. Science Advances. https://doi.org/abm8191
LaBerge, G. L. (1964). Development of magnetite in iron formations of the Lake Superior region.
Economic Geology, 59(7), 1313–1342.
Lyons, T. W., Diamond, C. W., Planavsky, N. J., Reinhard, C. T., &amp; Li, C. (2021). Oxygenation, life, and
the planetary system during Earth’s middle history: An overview. Astrobiology, 21(8), 906–923.
Lyons, T. W., Reinhard, C. T., &amp; Planavsky, N. J. (2014). The rise of oxygen in Earth’s early ocean and
atmosphere. Nature, 506(7488), 307–315.
Slotznick, S. P., Johnson, J. E., Rasmussen, B., Raub, T. D., Webb, S. M., Zi, J. W., Kirschvink, J. L., &amp;
Fischer, W. W. (2022). Reexamination of 2.5-Ga “whiff” of oxygen interval points to anoxic
ocean before GOE. Science Advances, 8(1), eabj7190.
Stewart, E. K., Brengman, L. A., &amp; Stewart, E. D. (2021). Revised Provenance, Depositional
Environment, and Maximum Depositional Age for the Baraboo (&lt; ca. 1714 Ma) and Dake (&lt; ca.
1630 Ma) Quartzites, Baraboo Hills, Wisconsin. The Journal of Geology, 129(1), 1–31.

10

�The Lake Superior area “event layer”: Testing the connection with the Sudbury impact
BLEEKER, Wouter1, WODICKA, Natasha1, KAMO, Sandra2, HAMILTON, Michael2,
EMON, Quinn1, and SMITH, Jennifer1
1

Geological Survey of Canada, 601 Booth Street, Ottawa, ON K1A 0E8; wouter.bleeker@canada.ca
Jack Satterly Geochronology Lab., University of Toronto, 22 Ursula Franklin St., Toronto, ON M5S 3B1

2

Following the initial publication of Addison et al. (2005) [1], there has been growing recognition of a major
“event layer” near the top of the Gunflint Formation in the Thunder Bay area [e.g. 2,3,4], and at equivalent
stratigraphic levels in the Marquette Range Supergroup of Michigan and Wisconsin [5,6]. Despite some
initial hesitation [7,8], a consensus quickly emerged that this event layer represents the local manifestations,
in the Lake Superior area, of the 1850 Ma Sudbury impact event that, ~600 km to the east, formed a multiring impact crater centered on the Sudbury area (see [9,10] for a recent review). The deformed and partially
preserved remnants of this crater are known as the “Sudbury Structure” and, with a reconstructed final
crater diameter of ~300 km, it represents the largest terrestrial impact crater known in the geological record
[9]. As such, it would have had far-reaching effects extending out to several crater diameters from “ground
zero”, in addition to a global fall-out layer of impact material (cf. the global K-Pg ejecta layer).
A curious question, raised in Bleeker &amp; Kamo (2022) [10], is why then this event layer is not more
widely recognized in Canada, in places where ca. 1850 Ma basinal stratigraphy is reasonably well preserved
(e.g., Mistassini Basin, Fox River Belt, Belcher Islands, Labrador Trough etc.)? Some of these localities
are not much farther away from a “ground zero” near Sudbury. This has prompted us to undertake further
tests of the putative link between the Lake Superior area event layer and the Sudbury impact structure.
Our first test is to more precisely date, by CA-ID-TIMS, felsic ash layers in the lowermost Rove
Formation, i.e. the first well-defined and well-preserved tuff layers overlying the event layer. Currently our
results suggest the oldest of these tuff layers is ca. 1842 Ma, thus tightening the permissible time interval
for the event layer to 1856-1842 Ma [cf. 1,2].
Our second test (in progress) is to attempt a precise CA-ID-TIMS zircon date of the ca. 1850 Ma
Peavy Pond Granodiorite (which currently has a SHRIMP age with ±11 Myr uncertainty, see [11]). This
granodiorite is known to intrude the lower Michigamme Slates, Baraga Group, in Michigan (W. Cannon,
pers. comm. 2023), thus constraining a minimum age for the event layer.
Our third and potentially most definitive test is to identify “tracers” in the event layer of the Lake
Superior area that can be uniquely tied to target rocks of the Sudbury area. One such tracer would be 2460
Ma zircons from the Copper Cliff Rhyolite and
its subvolcanic intrusions (Creighton and
Murray granites) that are unique to the area and
represent
the
final
felsic
rift
volcanism/magmatism of the lowermost
Huronian Supergroup [12,9,10]. For this test
we processed a large bulk sample (~7.5 kg) of
the event layer, with its diagnostic grey
accretionary lapilli, from the HWY 588 locality
west of Thunder Bay. Zircons were separated
and mounted for SHRIMP U-Pb analysis at the
Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa. Eighty
three zircon grains were spot dated, of which
71 returned high-quality results (Figure 1).
Figure 1: U-Pb concordia plot for spot dates by
SHRIMP on 71 zircon grains from the Gunflint
event layer, HWY 588 roadside outcrop.

11

�The age distribution shows several well-defined clusters with 2(3) of the dated zircons defining a
small but discrete subpopulation at ca. 2460 Ma. One of these zircons shows possible shock features (PDFs,
planar deformation features; see Figure 1 inset) identified during picking. Although this particular grain is
likely ca. 2460 Ma in origin, its result shows considerable discordance and should thus be treated with
caution. Nevertheless, we think the 2460 Ma subpopulation uniquely ties fall-out material in the event layer,
including rare shocked quartz grains [e.g. 2], to the Sudbury crater and its target rocks. In addition to the
conclusive result of the 2460 Ma zircons, the data also identify a distinct ca. 2310-2320 Ma subpopulation
of zircon grains that are known to first show up (in a regional stratigraphic sense) in the Gordon Lake
Formation of the upper Huronian Supergroup. These zircon grains could have been delivered to the Thunder
Bay area either as 1) ejecta from the Sudbury impact event, or perhaps more likely 2) as reworked detrital
zircons from widespread felsic ash material that was deposited across the wider Superior craton at 23102320 Ma. Finding shock features in these grains would favour the first scenario, whereas a total absence of
shock features would favour the second scenario.
To further constrain the impact event, we also subsampled the large sample from the HWY 588
event layer into 6 small slabs with varying abundances of 1–3 cm accretionary lapilli (i.e. from ~5 to ~95
vol% lapilli) and analyzed these for major and trace elements, and for low-level PGE abundances. Results
show a negative correlation between siderophile elements such as Ir (also Ru, Ni, Cr etc.) and lapilli
abundance, indicating that the lapilli consist largely of diluting material and are not the optimum target for
identifying the nature of the impactor [e.g. 13]. The highest Ir content of 0.3–0.4 ppb, i.e. ~1–2 orders of
magnitude above average crustal values, actually occurs in laminated, dark, fine sand- to silt-size sediments
that overlie the lapilli-rich horizon fall-out material (~0.5–1.0 m above). Future work will entail more
detailed sampling of this overlying stratigraphy to identify the Ir peak and define the detailed mineralogy
and Ir deportment in this material. Incidentally, values of 0.3–0.5 ppb Ir are also the maximum recorded
values in the upper Onaping Formation filling the Sudbury crater and overlying its melt sheet [14]. From
our initial results it appears that a maximum of impactor material condensed relatively late and was least
diluted in fine grained fall-out material near the top of the event layer, well above the accretionary lapilli.

References
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]

Addison, W.D., Brumpton, G.R., Vallini, D.A., McNaughton, N.J., Davis, D.W., Kissin, S.A., Fralick, P.W.,
and Hammond, A.L., 2005. Geology, vol. 33(3), p. 193–196.
Addison, W.D., Brumpton, G.R., Davis, D.W., Fralick, P.W., and Kissin, S.A., 2010. GSA Special Paper 465,
p. 245–268.
Jirsa, M.A., Fralick, P.W., Weiblen, P.W., and Anderson, J.L.B., 2011. GSA Field Guide 24, p. 147–169.
Huber, M.S., McDonald, I., and Koeberl, C., 2014. Meteoritics &amp; Planetary Science, vol. 49(10), p. 1749–1768.
Pufahl, P.K., Hiatt, E.E., Stanley, C.R., Morrow, J.R., Nelson, G.J., and Edwards, C.T., 2007. Geology, vol.
35(9), p. 827–830.
Cannon, W.F., Schulz, K.J., Horton Jr, J.W., and Kring, D.A., 2010. GSA Bulletin, vol. 122(1–2), p. 50–75.
Kissin, S.A., and Fralick, P.W., 1997. Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada, vol. 91(5), p. 216.
Kissin, S.A., Okamoto, M., Addison, W.D., and Brumpton, G.R., 2000. 46th Annual Meeting of the Institute on
Lake Superior Geology, vol. 46, part 1, p. 31–32.
Bleeker, W., and Kamo, S., 2022a. 68th Annual Meeting of the Institute on Lake Superior Geology, vol. 68, part
1, p. 5–6.
Bleeker, W., and Kamo, S., 2022b. 68th Annual Meeting of the Institute on Lake Superior Geology, vol. 68, part
part 2, Field Trip Guidebook, p. 4–57.
Ayuso, R.A., Schulz, K.J., Cannon, W.F., Woodruff, L.G., Vazquez, J.A., Foley, N.K., and Jackson, J., 2018.
64th Annual Meeting of Institute on Lake Superior Geology, vol. 64, part 1, p. 7–8.
Bleeker, W., Kamo, S.L., Ames, D.E., and Davis, D., 2015. Geological Survey of Canada Open File 7856, p.
151–166.
Mougel, B., Moynier, F., Göpel, C., and Koeberl, C., 2017. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, vol. 460, p.
105–111.
Mungall, J.E., Ames, D.E., and Hanley, J.J., 2004. Nature, vol. 429(6991), p. 546–548.

12

�Insights into the southwestern Superior Province: New igneous geochronology and
geochemistry in northwestern Minnesota, USA
BLOCK, Amy Radakovich1, HUDAK, George J.2, SOUDERS, A. Kate3
1

Minnesota Geological Survey, 2609 Territorial Road, St. Paul, MN 55114
University of Minnesota –- Twin Cities, 116 Church Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455
3
U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO 80225
2

The U.S. Geological Survey Earth Mapping Resources Initiative (Earth MRI) program recently
funded acquisition of new airborne geophysical (Allen Langhans and Drenth, 2023),
geochronologic, and geochemical data in a part of the Superior Province in northwest Minnesota
that is prospective for numerous Archean critical-mineral-producing systems. The study area
comprises three subprovinces of the Archean Superior Province (Fig. 1). Previous work in the
area (Jirsa et al., 2012; Jirsa et al., 1999) has been severely limited by an absence of outcrop,
sparse drill hole data, and the existence of only one geochronologic age. These new ages and
geochemical analyses, obtained through the Earth MRI program, represent the first highresolution geologic data in the Neoarchean subprovinces of the southwestern Superior Province.
Seven new U-Pb zircon LA-ICP-MS magmatic ages (Souders, in review) establish the timing of
intrusive activity in the southwestern extent of both the Wawa and Wabigoon subprovinces. A
biotite-hornblende tonalite in the Red Lake Falls pluton (207Pb/206Pb weighted mean age of 2701
± 4 Ma, 2s), a biotite tonalite in the Snake River batholith (207Pb/206Pb weighted mean age of
2738 ± 12 Ma, 2s), and a diorite in the Grygla pluton (207Pb/206Pb weighted mean age of 2771
Ma ± 8 Ma, 2s) define three distinct Neoarchean episodes of intermediate intrusive activity near
the present-day southern margin of the Wabigoon subprovince. A preliminary magmatic age
from a small hornblende monzodiorite stock in the Wabigoon indicates ca. 2727 intermediatemafic intrusive activity. In the Wawa subprovince, a 207Pb/206Pb weighted mean age of 2702 ±
6.5 Ma age (2s) from the Fertile pluton biotite granodiorite indicates Neoarchean intermediate
intrusive activity at the northern margin of the Wawa subprovince coincident with similar
activity in the Wabigoon. A small mafic body that intrudes a mafic volcanic sequence in the
Wawa yields a preliminary age of ca. 2690 Ma. Finally, a combined 207Pb/206Pb weighted mean
age from two closely spaced anorthosite samples confirms a Neoarchean (2737 ± 4.5 Ma, 2s) age
for the Mentor Anorthosite Intrusive Complex (MAIC).
High-precision CA-TIMS U-Pb zircon analyses provide age constraints on supracrustal rocks in
both subprovinces. Two trachyandesite lapilli tuff samples from the Wabigoon subprovince yield
207
Pb/206Pb weighted mean ages of ca. 2730 Ma and ca. 2733 Ma (Block et al., in prep. b), &gt;25
Ma older than the few other volcanic ages from the Wabigoon in Minnesota. Two feldspathic
wackes in the Wawa subprovince are still being processed for ages.
Newly dated intermediate intrusions are LREE enriched and have arc-like trace element patterns.
Discrimination diagrams indicate that these intrusions are generally I-type, calc-alkaline,
volcanic arc-granites. Samples from the MAIC exhibit complex REE patterns, and their
interpretation is less straightforward. The newly dated intermediate volcanic samples from the
Wabigoon are also calc-alkaline and exhibit arc-like signatures. In combination with ~130
additional geochemical analyses and detailed petrography, results presented here provide
significant insight into the tectonic evolution of the southwestern Superior Province and invite
comparison with well-studied rock packages in the Wabigoon and Abitibi provinces in Canada.

13

�Figure 1. Bedrock geology map of northwestern MN, USA. Units within the project area (Block et al., in prep.
a) are shown in the legend. Units outside the map area are from Jirsa et al. (2012). Newly obtained LA-ICPMS U-Pb ages are shown as yellow stars, and newly obtained TIMS U-Pb ages are shown as green stars.

References
Allen Langhans, A.D., and Drenth, B.J., 2023, Airborne magnetic and radiometric survey, northwestern
Minnesota, 2021: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P97D2JJE.
Block, Amy Radakovich, Drenth, Benjamin J., Souders, A. Kate, Hudak III, George J, Hirsch, Aaron C.,
and Saari, Stacy M., in prep. A, Geologic map of the Mentor Igneous Complex Focus Area,
Northwest Minnesota: Minnesota Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Map Series M-200, scale:
1:100,000.
Block, Amy Radakovich, Hudak III, George J, Souders, A. Kate, Drenth, Benjamin J., Schmitz, M.,
Hirsch, Aaron C., and Saari, Stacy M., in prep. b, Preliminary investigation of the geologic history
and critical mineral potential of the Mentor Igneous Complex Focus Area, Northwest Minnesota:
Minnesota Geological Survey, Report of Investigations 74.
Jirsa, M. A., Boerboom, T. J., Chandler, V. W., 2012, Geologic Map of Minnesota, Precambrian
Geology: Minnesota Geological Survey, Map S-22, 1:500,000.
Jirsa, M. A., Chandler, V. W., and Runkel, A. C., 1999, Bedrock geologic map of northwestern
Minnesota: Minnesota Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Map Series M-92, 1:200,000.
Souders A.K., in review. U-Pb geochronology of the Mentor Anorthosite Intrusive Complex (MAIC) and
regional plutonic units: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P9WMD477.

14

�Magmatic and hydrothermal evolution of the Mesoproterozoic Current ultramafic PGE-CuNi deposit within the Thunder Bay North Intrusive Complex: insights from trace elements,
Nd, Sr, O, and H isotopes
CORREDOR BRAVO, Andrea Paola1, HOLLINGS, Pete1, BRZOZOWSKI, Matthew1, and
HEGGIE, Geoff2
1

Department of Geology, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Road, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1 Canada
Clean Air Metals, 1004 Alloy Drive, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 6A5 Canada

2

The Mesoproterozoic PGE-Cu-Ni enriched
Current intrusion, part of the Thunder Bay North
Intrusive Complex, is located 50 km northeast of
Thunder Bay, Ontario. The northwest-trending
intrusion is a 3.4 km long conduit-type that
intruded the rocks of the Quetico Basin during the
early stages of the Midcontinent Rift System
(MRS; Woodruff et al, 2020). The intrusion has
four mineralized zones; the Current and Bridge
Zone in the northwest are characterized by shallow
and thin features; in the middle lies the BeaverCloud Zone, characterized by its substantial
thickness, while the southeast is the deepest 437Southeast Anomaly (SEA) Zone (Kuntz et al.,
2022).
The intrusion exhibits a primitive mantle- Figure 1. Schematic model of the Current
intrusion and the Quetico country rock.
normalized pattern resembling ocean island
Illustration compiled in Leapfrog using data
basalt, characterized by LREE enrichment and
provided by Clean Air Metals Inc.
small positive anomalies in Nb, La, and Ce,
consistent with minimal continental crust contamination. The La/Smn values in the Current
intrusion samples, ranging from 1.8 to 2.6, align with previous studies, indicating a basaltic
magma derived from an enriched mantle plume. The enriched nature of the magma in the
Current intrusion is consistent with other mineralized and unmineralized intrusions associated
with the MRS (Escape, Seagull, Lone Island intrusion, and Nipigon Embayment; Heggie, 2005;
Hollings et al., 2007b; Caglioti, 2023; Yahia, 2023). The intrusion has slightly lower Sri (0.7021
to 0.7043) and εNd (-1.18 to -4.02) values compared to typical the mantle source at 1100 Ma.
Therefore, it is suggested that the plume-derived magma interacted with an enriched
subcontinental lithospheric mantle, which may have contributed to the slightly negative εNd
values of the intrusion.The stable isotope analysis data from the Current intrusion indicates an
interaction between magmatic mantle-derived fluids (δ2H from −40 to −80‰, δ18O from 5.5 to
7.0‰), meteoric fluids (δ2H &lt;-80‰, δ18O &lt;5.5‰), and devolatilization/ dehydration fluids of the
Quetico country rocks (δ18O &gt;7‰).
Three distinct domains within the intrusion were identified based on alteration intensity
and micro-textural observations and each showing varying secondary mineral assemblages
Domain A consists of antigorite, tremolite, clinochlore, epidote, pyrite, cubanite, millerite,
secondary pyrrhotite ± chamosite ± sericite, and ± secondary magnetite, Domain B consists of

15

�lizardite-chrysotile, tremolite,
clinochlore, epidote, pyrite, cubanite,
millerite ± sericite, and ± secondary
magnetite Domain C consists of talc and
carbonates. Domain A and B have
characteristics of interaction with
meteoric, mantle, and/or subcontinental
lithospheric mantle -derived fluids,
whereas Domain C is associated with
fluids from devolatilization of the
country rock and is overprinted on
Domains A and B. The alteration
processes in the different domains
Figure 2. δ18O and δ2H values of bulk rock in the four
involved two distinct fluid types at
mineralized zones of the Current intrusion (Current,
varying temperatures, Domain A likely
Bridge, Beaver-Cloud, and 437-SEA) and the
involved higher temperatures (&gt;300°C)
surrounding country rock of the Quetico basin.
and fluids rich in H2O. In contrast,
domain B was altered by fluids at lower temperatures (&lt;300°C). Later CO2-bearing fluids of
Domain C overprinted earlier alteration at temperatures below 50°C.
The alteration of the intrusion also resulted in significant volume reduction of primary
sulfides and oxides that have been replaced by secondary minerals, such as chalcopyrite and
pyrrhotite were replaced by secondary magnetite and pyrite and primary magnetite was replaced
by pyrite and chamosite.
References
Caglioti, C. (2023). PGE–Cu–Ni sulfide mineralization of the Mesoproterozoic Escape intrusion,
northwestern Ontario (MSc). Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario.
https://knowledgecommons.lakeheadu.ca/handle/2453/5195
Heggie, G. (2005). Whole rock geochemistry, mineral chemistry, petrology, and Pt, Pd mineralization of
the Seagull Intrusion, Northwestern Ontario. Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario.
https://knowledgecommons.lakeheadu.ca/handle/2453/689
Hollings, P., Richardson, A., Creaser, R. A., and Franklin, J. M. (2007b). Radiogenic isotope
characteristics of the Mesoproterozoic intrusive rocks of the Nipigon Embayment, northwestern
Ontario. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 44(8), 1111-1129. https://doi.org/10.1139/e06-128
Kuntz, G., Wissent, B., Boyk, K., Harkonen, H., Jones, L., Muir, W., Buss, B., and Peacock, B. (2022).
NI
43- 101 Technical report and preliminary economic assessment for the Thunder Bay North
Project, Thunder Bay, Ontario
Woodruff, L. G., Schulz, K. J., Nicholson, S. W., and Dicken, C. L. (2020). Mineral deposits of the
Mesoproterozoic Midcontinent Rift system in the Lake Superior region–a space and time
classification. Ore Geology Reviews, 126, 103716
Yahia, K. (2023). Geochemistry, petrography, geochronology, and radiogenic isotopes of the weakly
mineralized intrusions in Thunder Bay North Igneous Complex (MSc). Lakehead University,
Thunder Bay, Ontario. https://knowledgecommons.lakeheadu.ca/handle/2453/5283

16

�Re-interpretation of hydrothermal alteration, mineralization and host-rock oxidation to
form the Keweenaw native copper lodes, northern Michigan
BROWN, Alex C.
13250 rue Acadie, Pierrefonds, Quebec, Canada, H9A 1K9, acbrown@polymtl.ca
The sandstone/conglomerate-hosted portions of the native copper ores of northern
Michigan (e.g., the Calumet and Hecla Conglomerate ores) occur mostly in deeply reddish
sediments. In the immediate vicinity of native copper ores, the reddish sediments appear to have
been hydrothermally bleached to salmon-red colors (Butler and Burbank, 1929; Cornwall, 1956;
White, 1968; Weege and Pollock, 1972). This communication notes that fine-grained salmoncolored clastic sediments may host fine-grained disseminations of native copper enclosed by
salmon-red aureoles, not unlike grey reduction halos commonly found in red sandstones (Figs. 1,
2). If the interpreted origin and preservation of reduction halos in red sandstones is applied to the
native copper-hosting aureoles in the Calumet and Hecla Conglomerate, the deep reddening of
the conglomerates hosting native copper of the Keweenaw Peninsula may be interpreted as a
post-ore event.
Redbed sandstones commonly show centimeter-scale reduction spots and blotches, e.g.,
rift-hosted Carboniferous clastic sediments of eastern Canada (Poll and Sutherland, 1976), the
Permian fluvial Abo Formation of New Mexico (Bensing et al., 2005), and the Jacobsville
sandstones of northern Michigan. Petrographic and chemical analyses of reduction spots in the
Abo Formation indicate that those reduction spots have never been reddened – ferrous clastic
grains within the reduction spots are still ferrous while similar grains in the enclosing red
sandstone are oxidized (Bensing et al., 2005). Interpretation: wood trash in the cores of reduction
spots maintained elliptical reducing conditions in the immediate vicinity of wood trash (i.e.,
within the grey halos), while oxidizing post-sedimentary water reddened all other portions of the
clastic sediments.

Figure 1. Carboniferous redbeds of
Dorchester Cape, New Brunswick, Canada,
showing abundant centimetric-scale
reduction spots with dark-greyish cores
centered on fossilized organic matter.

Figure 2. Close view of greyish reduction
spots in redbeds of Figure 1 (tip of hammer
for scale). Cores of reduction spots contain
fossil wood debris and base-metal sulfides
e.g., chalcocite, partially oxidized to
malachite).

17

�Native copper in the Calumet and Hecla Conglomerate occurs as interstitial fillings in
conglomerates and as fine-grained disseminations in finer sandy sediments. Curiously, very finegrained disseminations of native copper in fine-grained sediments are observed to be surrounded
by elliptical salmon-red sediment (Fig. 3). A possible, chemically justified interpretation: native
copper was deposited with salmon-red alteration, mostly within highly permeable conglomeratic
portions of the sandstone-conglomerates and also as very fine-grains in associated sandy
sediments. Subsequently, all sandstone-conglomerates were thoroughly oxidized to their classic
deep-red color during post-ore circulations of oxygenated ground water, except in the finergrained sediments where local salmon-red alteration was preserved against reddening by
reduction-inducing fine grains of native copper. Post-ore deep-red oxidation of copper in the
fine-grained sediment was inhibited by the poor permeability of this fine-grained sediment to late
deep-reddening groundwaters, but also by the reducing property of metallic copper.

Figure 3. Cut and epoxy-ed sample of
Calumet and Hecla Conglomerate native
copper ore. Upper half: Deep red, coarse
conglomeratic sediment with coarse-grained
native copper. Lower half: Fine-grained
clastic sediment containing fine-grained
native copper enclosed by “bleached”
salmon-red alteration halos. Bleached halos
and core native copper are equated here to
reduction spots with fossil wood debris
common in redbed sandstones (see text for
explanation).
References
Bensing, J.P., Mozley, P.S., and Dunbar, N.W., 2005. Importance of clay in iron transport and sediment
reddening: evidence from reduction features of the Abo Formation, New Mexico, U.S.A.
Sedimentary Research, 75: 562–571.
Butler, B.S. and Burbank, W.S., 1929. The copper deposits of Michigan. US Geol. Surv. Prof. Paper 144,
238 p.
Cornwall, H.R., 1956. A summary of ideas on the origin of native copper deposits. Economic Geology,
51: 615–631.
Weege, R.J. and Pollock, J.P., 1972. The geology of two new mines in the native copper district of
Michigan. Economic Geology, 67: 622–633.
White, W.S., 1968. The native-copper deposits of northern Michigan, in Ridge, J.D., ed., Ore Deposits of
the United States, 1933–1967 (Graton-Sales Volume 1), American Inst. Min. Metall. &amp; Petrol.
Eng., 303–326.

18

�Preliminary mineralogy of a pegmatite in the pyroxene syenites of the Stettin Complex,
Wausau Complex, Marathon County, Wisconsin
Buchholz, Thomas 1, Falster, Alexander 2, and Simmons, Wm 2
1

1140 12th Street North, Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin 54494
MP Research Group, Maine Mineral and Gem Museum, PO Box 500, 99 Main Street, Bethel, Maine
04217, USA

2

2

The Stettin Complex is the oldest (1565 +3-5 Ma, Van Wyck 1994) and most alkalic of the four
intrusions that comprise the Wausau Syenite Complex, and is composed of various syenite
phases. Recently an opportunity arose to examine the mineralogy of a pegmatite located in the
pyroxene syenites of the Stettin Complex.
Upper portions of the roughly horizontal pegmatite are below tilled soils but in-situ, are
weathered, and fragments are coated with Fe-oxides and clays. Excavations over the last several
years has exposed somewhat fresher material at depth and allowed better study. The pegmatite is
zoned, but numerous included syenite screens complicate evaluation. Pegmatite-host syenite
contacts are often sharp with no notable contact zones, suggesting relatively minor temperature
contrast between the two phases, but thin 2-3 cm reaction zones are also common, with minor
coarsening of feldspar and arfvedsonite compared to host syenite, small miaroles, scattered
patches of abundant, tiny pink zircons and yet unidentified minerals, and in the freshest material,
fluorite. The upper weathered portions of the dike, probably corresponding to border and
intermediate zones, consist of anorthoclase (often showing “moonstone” visual effects; the
recovery of these feldspars is the objective of those working the dike), highly altered former
pyroxenes(?) with-sparse remnant hedenbergite, arfvedsonite, quartz, abundant clear pink to
orange zircons and other accessory phases, including small miarolitic cavities. Per Medaris &amp;
Koellner (2010), pyroxenes in the Stettin complex range from Fe-rich diopside, to hedenbergite
and aegirine. In this pegmatite pyroxenes appear to have been affected by late-stage oxidizing
fluids, altering Fe2+-rich pyroxenes to Fe3+ rich smectite-group clays ± Fe-oxyhydroxides with
sparse remnants of hedenbergite, while aegirine is absent from the dike. Ca released by
pyroxene alteration may have contributed to the formation of various late-stage Ca-rich species.
Deeper interior zones are mostly anorthoclase with arfvedsonite and other accessory
minerals, with contact zones (or lack thereof) repeated around included syenite fragments.
Graphic quartz-anorthoclase intergrowths “graphic syenite” are locally common, as are small
miarolitic cavities. Several small-volume pegmatite units are: rare irregular patches of granular
albite +- larger anorthoclase crystals, with abundant pyrochlore(?) crystals and possibly other
species; and enigmatic thin 2-5 cm thick irregular veins or pods, mainly quartz, albite and
anorthoclase: these are confined to the pegmatite and do not enter the host syenite, and includes
sparse arfvedsonite, abundant cassiterite grains (≈2-4 μm), fergusonite, metamict zircons (some
showing Hf-enrichment), sparse microlite (Ta-dominant pyrochlore group), sparse tantalite-(Mn)
(Ta-Mn dominant columbite-group species), tiny grains of barite, and other yet-unidentified
species. These anomalous pods or veins may be derived from highly fractionated late-stage
differentiates. Perhaps high F activity supported unusual enrichment of HFSE in latecrystallizing melt.
.

19

�Other accessory mineralogy of the main dike includes: Aeschynite-(Ce): Elongated, dark greyblack crystals in anorthoclase. Synchysite/Parisite: Small red to pinkish hexagonal crystals.
High Ca contents suggest they are either synchysite or parisite. Bavenite(?): Small white bladed
crystals included in clear quartz crystals; tentative ID based on their morphology and presence of
Ca, Si and O (EDS). Calcite: White crusts and masses in vugs from lower portions of the
excavation. Chevkinite-group(?): Dark grains with white borders; often heavily altered to soft,
chalky, fine-grained niobian Ti-oxides with minor Th, Ca, LREE ± Si and Al. Columbite-group:
Sparse columbite-(Fe) noted as inclusions in a porous fergusonite-(Y) grain. Fayalite:
Uncommon gray radiating acicular crystals and glassy brown grains associated with
arfvedsonite. Fergusonite-(Y): Small yellowish to reddish-brown tapering crystals in
anorthoclase, arfvedsonite and miaroles. Ferro-anthophyllite: Uncommon, patches of white
acicular crystals in smectite-rich altered pyroxenes. Fluorapatite: Sparse crystals in vugs with
arfvedsonite. Fluorite: Late in vugs and isolated grains, likely often removed by weathering.
Graphite: Sparse Thin hexagonal platy crystals, typically showing thin hexagonal overgrowths.
Ilmenite: Common; thin black metallic plates with a pyrophanite component in anorthoclase and
miaroles. Kainosite-(Y)(?): One off-white crystal in pegmatite, appears to be a Ca-Y-LREE
silicate, may be kainosite-(Y). Magnetite: Common as irregular masses, rarely as well-formed
octahedral crystals. Molybdenite: Sparse as thin soft hexagonal plates. Monazite-(Ce):
Uncommon, small brick-red crystals in feldspar and in vugs. Niocalite(?): Yellow to pale
yellow-brown elongated crystals in anorthoclase. Very sparse. Some compositions strongly
suggest niocalite, others are yet-unidentified species. Pyrochlore: Rare: yellow-brown
octahedral crystals. Quartz: Common, generally as a later-stage mineral. Siderite: now absent,
but goethite pseudomorphs after probable siderite are common in small vugs. Thorite: Rare; red
to red-black grains associated with fergusonite-(Y). Titanite: Uncommon, as brown to redbrown grains. Zircon: Abundant in upper intermediate zone, less so in coarse interior zones.
As work continues, it is likely that additional phases will be identified, as there are a number of
unknowns awaiting further work, and much material awaits cleaning and study. Thanks are due
to Austin Gausmann, Bill Schoenfuss, and Trent and Shana Rebeck for access to the pegmatite.
REFERENCES:
Medaris, L. Gordon Jr., Koellner, Susan E., 2010. Ferromagnesian minerals in the Stettin Syenite
Complex, Marathon County, Wisconsin: compositions and contrasts with the Wolf River Batholith
(abstract): Institute on Lake Superior Geology Proceedings, 56th Annual Meeting, International
Falls, MN, v. 56, part 1, p. 42-43.
Van Wyck, N. 1994. The Wolf River A-type magmatic event in Wisconsin: U/Pb and Sm/Nd constraints
on timing and petrogenesis (abstract): Institute on Lake Superior Geology, 40th Annual Meeting, Part
1, Program and Abstracts, p. 81-82.

20

�The Sacred Heart Orogeny in Michigan: Latest Archean Granites and the Great Lakes
Tectonic Zone
CANNON, W. F.1, SOUDERS, A. K2, DRENTH, Benjamin J.2, AYUSO, Robert A.1
1

U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA 20192, 2U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO 80225

The Sacred Heart Orogeny, as defined in Minnesota (Schmitz, et al., 2018), is the terminal
Archean contractional and magmatic event during which the Minnesota River Valley
Subprovince (MRVS) was sutured to the southern edge of the Superior craton along the Great
Lakes Tectonic Zone (GLTZ), accompanied by voluminous granitic magmatism. The ages of
those granites are tightly clustered from 2.58-2.6 Ga. In Michigan’s Upper Peninsula voluminous
granites of the Southern Complex, the eastern extension of the MRVS, have ages very similar to
those in Minnesota and were emplaced near and within the GLTZ during suturing. The granitic
phase of the Bell Creek Gneiss (Cannon and Simmons, 1973), a coarse-grained, K-spar
megacrystic granite, is well dated (Petryk, 2019; Barth, 2023). The average of ten dates is 2.56
Ga. An additional age from SHRIMP analyses (Ayuso, presented here) is 2584+5.3/-2.79 Ma,
fully consistent with previous determinations. We have recently recognized and dated a
batholithic-scale intrusion of medium-grained, massive, K-rich granite, informally the New
Swanzy granite, that borders the granitic phase of the Bell Creek Gneiss to the east and is
adjacent to and interacted with the GLTZ during suturing. A regionally extensive negative
gravity anomaly south and southeast of the exposed granite suggests that the batholith is
substantially larger than its exposed portion (see map below). Both granites intruded an older
gneiss complex with ages ranging from 2.6-2.9 Ga. The Bell Creek granite has an internal
foliation defined by alignment of K-spar megacrysts broadly conformable with trends of adjacent
gneisses, and contains no angular xenoliths. In contrast, the New Swanzy granite, although
compositionally uniform as judged in outcrop, has numerous pegmatitic segregations and dikes.
It has sharp cross-cutting contacts with older gneisses and contains many xenoliths. These
characteristics and several instances of dikes of New Swanzy-like granites cutting the Bell
Creek, suggests that the New Swanzy granite post-dates the Bell Creek Gneiss, at least slightly,
and has an intrusive contact with it.
The New Swanzy granite has a complex interaction with sheared rocks of the GLTZ. The
GLTZ is a 2.5 km-wide, SW-dipping zone of dextral shear-thrusting where rocks of the MRVS
were thrust northward over the Superior craton (Sims, 1991). The age of suturing was suggested
to be about 2.69 Ga. Close to the GLTZ, the New Swanzy granite has a shear foliation parallel to
the GLTZ. Within the GLTZ areas of granite are enveloped in intensely sheared rocks whose
protolith is uncertain. Many dikes and stringers of granite cut mylonitic foliation. These show
varying intensity of deformation, but all were emplaced after the most intense shearing. An
undeformed granite dike was intruded across shear foliation at 2559±19.5 Ma (U-Pb apatite). We
consider this to set a minimum age for deformation in the GLTZ in this region. Thus, the New
Swanzy seems best interpreted as a syntectonic granite emplaced adjacent to the active suture
late in development of the GLTZ
The data summarized here indicate the latest Archean tectonic and intrusive events in
northern Michigan and Minnesota are correlative. Thus, we deem it appropriate to extend the
Minnesota-derived term “Sacred Heart Orogeny” to the culminating phase of development of the
Southern Complex in Michigan. Because rocks of the Southern Complex are exposed in direct
contact with the GLTZ, they present a unique opportunity to study the interaction of intrusion
and suturing of the MRVS to the Wawa-Abitibi terrane.

21

�A-Massive New Swanzy granite cutting country rock gneiss. B- GLTZ mylonite cut by granitic stringers
with varying degrees of deformation. C- undeformed 2.56 Ga granite dike cutting foliation of GLTZ.
References
Barth, E. G., 2023, Age and chemistry of the Bell Creek Batholith: Michigan Technological University,
M.S. Thesis https://doi.org/10.37099/mtu.dc.etdr/1589
Cannon, W.F., and Simmons, G C., 1973, Geology of part of the Southern Complex, Marquette District,
Michigan: Journal of Research of the U.S. Geological Survey, v.1, n.2, p. 165-173.
Petryk, B. 2019, The origin of an Archean batholith in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula: Michigan
Technological University, M.S. Thesis. https://doi.org/10.37099/mtu.dc.etdr/932
Sims, P.K, 1991, Great Lakes Tectonic Zone in Marquette Area, Michigan-implications for Archean
tectonics in north-central United States: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1904-E, 17 p.
Schmitz, M.D., Southwick, D.L., Bickford, M.E., Mueller, P.A., and Samson, S.D., 2018, Neoarchean
and Paleoproterozoic events in the Minnesota River Valley subprovince, with implications for
southern Superior craton evolution and correlation: Precambrian Research, v.316, p. 206-226.

22

�The Honey Creek Structure, Sauk County, Wisconsin:
Asymmetric Faulting Associated with Seismic-Induced Fluid Escape
Kenz CARLTON1, Basil TIKOFF1, &amp; Esther K. STEWART2
1
2

University of Wisconsin–Madison, Department of Geoscience, 1215 West Dayton Street, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey, UW-Madison Division of Extension, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, USA

The Honey Creek structure occurs in the Balfanz quarry in Sauk County, Wisconsin. It is south
of the Baraboo syncline and in the vicinity of the Denzer syncline. The Honey Creek structure is
dominantly a N dipping fault (striking ~250 and dipping ~30 using right hand rule) that deforms
the Ordovician Oneota Formation and underlying Cambrian Jordan Formation. The hanging
wall contains units that are stratigraphically younger than those immediately adjacent across the
fault; this geometry requires that the Honey Creek structure contains a normal fault. The
footwall side of the fault was deformed, such that the beds were rotated to a nearly vertical
orientation and occasionally overturned next to the fault. The folding in the footwall is
consistent with drag on a reverse fault, which is opposite to the direction of inferred stratigraphic
offset. Soft sediment deformation, interpreted as sand injection emanating from the Jordan
Formation, is prevalent alongside the fault on the footwall side, although a sand lens crosscuts
the fault in one place. A smaller-scale structure is located less than 30 m S of the Honey Creek
structure. This feature has a similar strike and dip, normal sense of offset, and folding of the
footwall. It differs from the Honey Creek structure insofar as there is brecciation but no sand
injection along the fault. Finally, there appears to be a recumbent fold located less than 40 m S
from the main Honey Creek structure, with a vergence away from the Honey Creek structure.
We interpret this recumbent fold to have formed in the same deformational event.
We consider two possible interpretations for this structure, both of which invoke significant
ground shaking. First, the deformation could result from intracratonic seismicity. The timing of
deformation (Early Ordovician) is broadly consistent with that of the Taconic orogeny, although
the orientation of the fault is at a high angle to the inferred regional shortening direction (EW).
Its location, directly south of the Baraboo syncline, could be consistent with reactivation of a
Proterozoic fault. Second, the deformation could result from a distant (&lt;200 km) meteor impact.
The timing of deformation is consistent with a swarm of meteorites that occurred at the same
time in the upper Midwest, and resulted in a number of craters (e.g., Decorah, Elm Creek, etc.).
This interpretation is consistent with regional soft-sediment deformation in the Oneota
Formation.

23

�Baddeleyite age reveals timing of the Northeast Iowa Intrusive Complex (NEIIC)
CLARK, Ryan1, PEATE, David2, KUSICK, Allison2,3, HORKLEY, Kenny4, and
MACFARLANE, Chris5
1

Iowa Geological Survey, University of Iowa, 300 Trowbridge Hall, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA
University of Iowa, Department of Earth &amp; Environmental Sciences, 115 Trowbridge Hall, Iowa City,
IA, 52242, USA
3
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Department of Geosciences, 3209 N. Maryland Avenue, Milwaukee,
WI, 53211, USA
4
University of Iowa, Materials Analysis, Testing and Fabrication Facility, 205 N. Madison Street, Iowa
City, IA, 52242, USA
5
University of New Brunswick, Department of Earth Sciences, 2 Bailey Drive, Fredericton, New
Brunswick, Canada
2

Recent geophysical surveys over portions of the entirely concealed Northeast Iowa
Intrusive Complex (NEIIC) have provided a clearer picture of the region’s Precambrian
basement geology (Drenth et al., 2015 and 2020). High amplitude magnetic and gravity
anomalies remain the focus of further research into their mineral resource potential, due in part to
the likelihood that the NEIIC is related to the ~1,100 Ma Midcontinent Rift System (MRS). A
core drilled into the northeast-trending Osborne Anomaly in Clayton County, Iowa provides the
only samples in the vicinity of the NEIIC. The Osborne core encountered 722 feet (220 m) of
mafic-ultramafic rocks that has been previously described as olivine-plagioclase cumulate.
Recent screening using a portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF) spectrometer revealed elevated
concentrations of zirconium (Figure 1) as well as aluminum and potassium in several discrete
zones of late stage melt (Clark et al., 2019). Datable minerals in the form of zirconolite and
baddeleyite have been identified in samples from these zones.
Obtaining a reliable age from the Osborne core has been paramount to making the
argument that the NEIIC is Keweenawan and thus possibly related to other magmatic intrusive
terranes in the Lake Superior Region. A recent study (Drenth et al, 2020) obtained an age of
~1,170 Ma from LA-ICP-MS analyses of apatite crystals from the Osborne core. However,
accurate U-Pb ages on apatites are often limited by the need for a precise correction for the
common Pb component. Here, we present new U-Pb ages on baddeleyite crystals from a depth of
2,416.3 feet (736.5 m) that were analyzed by LA-ICP-MS at the University of New Brunswick.
The U-Pb crystallization age of 1,148 ± 14 Ma (weighted average of six concordant baddeleyite
analyses) stands as the first reliable date to come from the NEIIC region. This age is comparable
with other intrusions outboard of the MRS, such as the Corson Diabase in eastern South Dakota
(1,149 ± 7 Ma), the Great Abitibi dike (1,141 ± 2 Ma), and the Inspiration diabase (1,159 ± 33
Ma) (McCormick et al., 2017 and references therein), and indicate a wider regional magmatic
event that pre-dated initiation of the MRS by ~50 Ma.
The general age of these intrusions has been interpreted as early stage magmatism related
to the onset of the MRS. The latest geophysical survey over the majority of the southern portion
of the NEIIC shows that the Osborne Anomaly is cut by NEIIC intrusions (Drenth et al., 2020),
thus providing a maximum emplacement age of ~1,150 Ma.

24

�Figure 1. Graph of Zr concentration by depth from two separate rounds of pXRF analyses illustrates two
distinct zones of Zr-enrichment. Inset backscattered electron image shows an elongated zirconolite crystal
(gray) with inter-grown baddeyelite crystal (white) from a sample at 2,614.3 feet depth.

References

Clark, R.J., Anderson, R.R., and Peate, D.W., 2019. The northeast Iowa intrusive complex: a magmatic
conundrum related to the Midcontinent Rift System. Geological Society of America Abstracts
with Programs, v. 51, no. 2.
Drenth, B.J., Anderson, R.R., Schulz, K.J., Feinberg, J.M., Chandler, V.M., and Cannon, W.F., 2015.
What lies beneath: geophysical mapping of a concealed Precambrian intrusive complex along the
Iowa-Minnesota border. Canadian Journal of Earth Science, v. 52: 279-293.
Drenth, B.J., Souders, A.K., Schulz, K.J., Feinberg, J.M., Anderson, R.R., Chandler, V.M., Cannon, W.F.,
and Clark, R.J., 2020. Evidence for a concealed Midcontinent Rift-related northeast Iowa
intrusive complex. Precambrian Research, v. 347.
McCormick, K.A., Chamberlain, K.R., and Paterson, C.J., 2018. U-Pb baddeleyite crystallization age for
a Corson diabase intrusion: possible Midcontinent Rift magmatism in eastern South Dakota.
Canadian Journal of Earth Science, v. 55: 111-117.

25

�Transpressional Nature of the Keweenaw Fault System, Lake Superior Region, and Its
Relationship to Grenville Orogenesis
DeGRAFF, James 1, GAMET, Nolan 2, LANGFIELD, Katherine 1, LIZZADROMcPHERSON, Daniel 1, MUELLER, Sophie 3, and TYRRELL, Colin 4
1

Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931
Michigan Geological Survey, Marquette, MI 49855
3
Nevada Gold Mines, Elko, NV 89801
4
Self-empoyed, Mass City, MI 49948
2

The Keweenaw fault system (KFS) is a connected set of faults that extends along the southern
margin of the Midcontinent Rift System from northwest Wisconsin to near Keweenaw Point in
Michigan. A component of reverse slip has thrust Portage Lake Volcanics (PLV, 1.1 Ga)
southeastward over younger, mostly flat-lying Jacobsville Sandstone (JS) on some faults in the
system (Fig. 1). This motion enhanced a regional northwesterly tilt to PLV strata, produced
counter-regional tilt near major fault segments, and locally tilted footwall JS strata to vertical and
overturned attitudes (1, 2). Regionally, the KFS azimuth changes by 65° from 35° near Houghton
to 100° at Big Bay, as does the strike of PLV layers. Locally, the Keweenaw fault on published
maps changes azimuth by up to 85° at unusual bends, some of which have been attributed to offsets
on transverse faults. These changes in fault azimuth are important clues to the geometry of faults
making up the KFS and to their individual and collective slip behavior. If opposing rock masses
across the KFS are relatively rigid, a reasonable assumption, the fault system cannot be pure dip
slip everywhere along its curved path, which inference also applies to its component faults.
Mapping along the KFS since 2017 reveals that the sinuous, mostly single fault trace on
published maps oversimplifies important structural relationships. In any part of the system, three
directional fault sets are recognized: (1) a dominant set that defines the KFS trend and locally
separates steeper dipping PLV layers to the northwest from shallower dipping PLV layers to the
southeast; (2) splay faults angled 15-30° clockwise from set 1; and (3) connector faults angled 3575° counterclockwise from set 1 that join footwall splays to the main fault trend (Fig. 1). The three
fault sets maintain these angular relationships as the curved KFS changes direction from near
Houghton to the tip of the peninsula. Interconnections between faults define fault-bounded blocks
with long dimensions roughly parallel to the local KFS trend. The fault-bounded blocks and
footwall splay faults defining their southeastern and southern edges are arrayed in a left-stepping
pattern along the KFS, suggesting a component of right-lateral strike slip.
Analysis of fault-slip data, i.e. slickenlines and slip-sense indicators, from the fault population
along the KFS indicates that the system’s slip characteristics change between Houghton and the
tip of the Keweenaw Peninsula. Near Houghton where the KFS trends northeasterly, the ratio of
strike slip to dip slip is about 1:1 and is bimodal, whereas the ratio is more than 2:1 and is unimodal
near Bête Grise Bay where the KFS trends easterly. Geologic relationships across some faults are
consistent with their northwest and north sides sliding to the right and upward relative to opposing
sides. Inversion of fault-slip data indicates that a strike-slip regime existed near Keweenaw Point
with an azimuth of maximum shortening of about 100°, which favors a component of right-lateral
slip on the KFS. Folding within and adjacent to the fault-bounded blocks exhibits two styles.
Multiple folds subparallel to shorter northeast and east ends of fault-bounded blocks (i.e. NE- to
N-trending axes) formed by shortening across such boundaries. In contrast, single folds subparallel
to longer sides of the blocks in footwall JS strata (i.e. NE- to ESE-trending axes) formed by drape

26

�of JS strata over steeply dipping, mostly strike-slip faults with little to no shortening across them.
Based on this evidence, we infer that oblique slip on the KFS becomes mostly right-lateral strike
slip near Keweenaw Point and that crustal shortening is along a line roughly perpendicular to the
Grenville front about 550 kilometers to the east-southeast (Fig. 1).
Acknowledgements: Funding was provided by the USGS EDMAP program, matched by MTU’s
Department of Geology and Mining Engineering and Sciences, and supplemented by grants from
the Michigan Space Grant Consortium, Keweenaw Community Forest Company, and the ILSG.
We thank the Michigan Geological Survey for its sponsorship and G. Hubbell, I. Gannon, G.
Hemmila, G. Ahrendt, J. Hawes, B. Murphy, B. Heusdens, and D. Breen for fieldwork assistance.

Figure 1: Keweenaw fault system (black lines) north of Portage Lake, Michigan. Five largest fault-bounded
blocks numbered 1 – 5. Black arrows show inferred maximum shortening direction. Inset map modified
from Northwestern University maps online (https://www.earth.northwestern.edu/spree/Maps.html).
References
1. Cannon, W.F. and Nicholson, S.W., 2001, Geologic Map of the Keweenaw Peninsula and Adjacent
Area, Michigan: United States Geological Survey, Map I-2696, Scale = 1:100,000.
2. DeGraff, J.M. and Carter, B.T., 2022, Detached structural model of the Keweenaw fault system, Lake
Superior region, North America: Implications for its origin and relationship to the Midcontinent Rift
System: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 135, no. 1/2, p. 449–466.

27

�Glimpses of a Paleoproterozoic landscape: Analysis of exhumed topography on Archean
basement rocks northwest of Marquette, Michigan
EDIGER, Trent and BJØRNERUD, Marcia
Geosciences Department, Lawrence University, Appleton Wisconsin 54911
Background and purpose: Northwest of Marquette, MI, between the Yellow Dog River on the
north, and Silver Lake and the Little Garlic River on the south, the modern land surface lies close
to the nonconformity between an Archean granite-greenstone complex (the ~2.7 Ga Compeau
Creek Gneiss and Mona Schist) and Paleoproterozoic metasedimentary rocks (the ~1.85 Ga
Michigamme Formation). High areas are underlain by Archean rocks, while lower ones are
underlain by the Michigamme Fm., suggesting that Michigamme sediments accumulated on an
ancient land surface of hills and valleys with up to 70 m of relief. Although the Archean and
Proterozoic rocks are locally in fault contact, good exposures of the nonconformity, together with
systematic fining of grain size in the Michigamme with distance from Archean highs, support the
interpretation that much of this area is an ancient exhumed landscape. Further evidence for a
regional Paleoproterozoic landscape with significant relief comes from observations that the
Sudbury ejecta layer in the region occurs at a wide range of stratigraphic heights above the base
of the Michigamme Formation, and locally directly on Archean rocks (Cannon et al., 2010).
The modern topography of this region is also qualitatively different - more rugged – than that
seen on Archean rocks exposed only 25 km to the south, along the Black River east of Republic,
even though the two areas share the same glacial history. In the study area, we suspect that the
primary effect of glacial erosion was to remove the soft Michigamme Fm. from high spots, reexposing the sub-Michigamme surface. In the southern area, either the Michigamme Formation
was never deposited or the pre-glacial landscape had been already been eroded to a level below
the nonconformity. We believe, therefore, that the study area preserves a low-fidelity version of a
Paleoproterozoic landscape and can provide insight into patterns of erosion and weathering at a
time before land plants and modern atmospheric conditions. On an Earth with no vegetation and
little to no soil, eroded sediments would have had a shorter residence time on landscapes and in
river systems. Bedrock rivers would have been more common than they are today, and the primary
mechanisms of landscape evolution would have been corrosion (chemical weathering) in a CO 2rich atmosphere, corrasion (abrasion of bedrock by entrained sediment), and cavitation (pitting of
bedrock surfaces by bubble implosion in turbulent waters). Faults, joints, and other bedrock
features would have been the primary influences on river channel location and potholes would
have played an important role in channel development (Wohl, 1998). The goal of the study was to
develop quantitative metrics to characterize the exhumed ancient landscape and contrast these with
modern topography in areas with similar bedrock in order to gain a better understanding of
geomorphologic processes in Paleoproterozoic time.
Methods: The boundaries of the 165 km2 study area -- the extent of the exposed Archean
nonconformity surface -- were drawn based on the provisional geologic map by Klasner et al.
(1979) in combination with field observations and visual assessment of the topography. The rocks
in the southern comparison area along the Black River are not a granite-greenstone complex like
those in the study area, but they do include a mix of felsic and mafic lithologies (Archean gneisses
and Paleoproterozoic dikes; Cannon, 1975) and thus serve as a reasonable analog. In order to
understand the role of climate in generating relief in granite-greenstone complexes, we also
analyzed the topography of two other granite-greenstone terranes: the Pilbara craton in the desert
of northwestern Australia (ca. 3.5-3.2 Ga) and the Umburanas complex in the rainforest of Bahia

28

�Province, Brazil (ca. 3.4-3.1 Ga). In both areas, the bedrock lies close to the surface and the regions
have been tectonically stable since at least Mesoproterozoic time.
Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) for the study site and comparison site came from LiDAR
data collected by the USGS 3D Elevation Program and were accessed via OpenTopography’s data
map. DEMs for the Bahia province in Brazil and the Pilbara craton in Australia were generated by
the Shuttle Radio Topography Mission and accessed through USGS EarthExplorer, and
Geoscience Australia’s data map, respectively. When necessary, DEMs were merged into a single
feature layer in Esri ArcGIS Pro 3.2.0 and clipped to the areas of interest. Roughness visualizations
were calculated by determining the difference between the highest and lowest elevation cell in
each 3x3 rectangular pixel neighborhood (Wilson et al. 2007). In ArcGIS Pro, focal statistics
(statistical operations on each pixel based on specified neighboring pixels), were used to generate
maximum and minimum elevation rasters. These intermediary rasters were then used to quantify
roughness and create visualizations using the raster calculator tool.
Results: By several measures, the topography of the study area is significantly more rugged
than that of both the Black River comparison site and the Pilbara Craton. The roughest 90 m2
parcel in the study area has 73 m of relief compared with 27 m for the Black River and 46 m for
the Pilbara. The study site also has a greater percent of land area in the highest roughness classes
(&gt;16 m of relief within 90 m2 parcels). The Black River area and Pilbara craton are surprisingly
similar in the distribution of elevations, despite representing very different erosional conditions
(glacial scouring and desert exposure, respectively). However, along the Black River, lithology
seems to have little control on topography while in the Pilbara craton, contacts between Archean
batholiths and volcanogenic sediments are the roughest areas. The Umbaranas site is much rougher
than the other three, with up to 392 m of local relief where greenstones are exposed, possibly
reflecting the wide range of volcanic and sedimentary lithologies in the Umburanas complex
(Barbosa &amp; Sabaté, 2002). In the study site NW of Marquette, topographic roughness is
concentrated along linear zones – presumably erosion-enhanced faults or fractures in the Archean
bedrock. These straight paleochannels differ from the meandering shapes typical of alluvial
(sediment-dominated) river systems. Moreover, some of these channels have scalloped edges, a
possible record of their evolution through linkage of bedrock potholes (Wohl, 1998). In summary,
the topography of the study area differs not only from that of the nearby Black River site, which
shared the same recent glacial history, but also from both the desert and rainforest sites. We
suggest, therefore, that the region northwest of Marquette represents a Paleoproterozoic bedrock
landscape that may have developed under warm, wet conditions in the absence of vegetation, a
combination that does not occur on Earth today.
References cited
Barbosa, J., &amp; Sabaté, P., 2002. Geological features and Paleoproterozoic collision of four crustal
segments, Sao Francisco craton, Anais Da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 74, 343–359.
Cannon, W.F., Schulz, K., Horton, J., &amp; Kring, D., 2010. The Sudbury ejecta layer in the
Paleoproterozoic iron ranges of northern Michigan, USA. GSA Bulletin, 122, 50-75.
Klasner, J., Cannon, W.F., &amp; Brock, M., 1979. Bedrock geologic map of Baraga, Dead River and
Clark Creek basins, Marquette County Michigan, USGS Open File Report 79-1305.
Cannon, W.F., 1975. Bedrock geologic map of the Republic Quadrangle, Marquette County,
Michigan. USGS Miscellaneous Investigations Series Map I-862.
Wohl, E. 1998. Bedrock channel morphology. Rivers Over Rock. AGU Monograph 107, 133-149.
Wilson, M., OConnell, B., Brown, C., Guinan, J., &amp; Grehan, A, 2007. Multiscale terrain analysis
of multibeam bathymetry data. Marine Geodesy, 30, 3–35.

29

�MCR Synthesis 1. Characterizing the MCR mantle plume
GOOD, David
Department of Earth Sciences, University of Western Ontario, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON N6A
5B7, Canada

The Midcontinent Rift (Keweenawan Large Igneous Province) contains the most diverse
assemblage of mafic rock types for any LIP on earth with 9 distinct basalt groups and more than
15 major Ni-Cu-PGE occurrences or deposits. The main objective of the MCR synthesis is to
build a coherent model to explain the vast array of observations, geochemical data and
interpretations presented by numerous researchers over the past four decades. The project is
subdivided into 4 related objectives: 1) Recognition of the key geochemical features of global
rift/LIP settings that we should see in the MCR; 2) Build a classification scheme for all basalts,
gabbros and ultramafic rocks using high-precision incompatible trace elements; 3) Apply
analytical tools and modelling to unravel petrogenesis of recognized groupings; and 4) Represent
the results in a model for the MCR that highlights spatial and temporal relationships in the rift.
This project was inspired by several key events over the past decade, each of which indicate the
project is feasible at this time. Proof of concept tests for objectives 2, 3 and 4 were presented in
2023 indicating a high degree of confidence for the success of this 4-to-5-year project.
A few researchers have identified various stratigraphic units in the MCR to have
originated by partial melting in the mantle plume and used their inherent isotopic or trace
element compositions to model melt-crustal interaction and the petrogenesis of various intrusions
that host Cu-Ni-PGE deposits. These plume-related basalt units include the lower Siemens Creek
and Kallander Creek basalt in Michigan and the lower Osler and Mamainse Point basalt in
Ontario. But these units each present slightly different trace element characteristics, so the
question arises as to what criteria are useful for distinguishing mantle plume magmas from those
generated in the upper mantle or at different depths within the plume. The main criteria for
identifying plume magmas are based on ocean island basalt-like trace element characteristics. In
this study, two MCR plume basalt types are identified (Groups 1 and 5) using the combination of
λ1-λ2 REE coefficients, TiO2/Yb, and Gd/Yb diagrams. The differences between groups 1 and 5
are best explained by partial melting at different depths, based on differences between majorite
(&gt;~300 km) and pyrope garnet fractionation, respectively. Group 1 includes basalts from the
Lower Osler and lower Kallander creek groups and the highly fractionated Devon volcanic unit.
Group 5 includes basalts from the lower series A and B units at Mamainse Point, Central Osler
Volcanic Group and the lower Siemens Creek basalt located at the Skinny, Bluff and Bond Falls
sites in Michigan.
A well-understood and fundamental characteristic of highly incompatible trace element
ratios is their use to correlate basalt and intrusive rocks. These typically unique trace element
signatures can be used in a manner like finger printing. However, in all cases, care must be taken,
particularly for TiO2, to evaluate clinopyroxene or spinel fractionation, as is the case for basalt
and intrusions in Group 1. Based on these comparisons, the Bovine, Current Lake, Disraeli,
Haystack, Hele, Kitto, Riverdale Sill, Seagull, Shillabeer, and Thunder Intrusions belong to
Group 1, whereas the McIntyre, Jackfish, and Logan sills belong to Group 5.

30

�Description and application of the Consolidated Minerals Database to support geological
investigations: an example from the Cuyuna Range, central Minnesota
GORDEE, Sarah 1, RIAN, Madison 1, SAARI, Stacy 1, and CARTER, Matthew1
1

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Division of Lands and Minerals, 1525 3rd Ave E, Hibbing,
MN 55746

Over the past ~50 years, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Lands
and Minerals Division has amassed numerous collections of mineral exploration-related
documents, amounting to well over 10,000 hardcopy materials containing geoscience and related
land data. Curating these collections has proven to be challenging given the sheer volume of
documents from multitudinous sources, necessitating a concerted solution to manage these
materials. The Consolidated Minerals Database (CMD) is under development by the DNR to
support the initiative to bring the agency’s collections of historical and contemporary documents
into digital format and to make them readily available for public use. It is a database of unique
collections containing cross-referenced documents with linkages to other internal and external
databases, including the Hibbing Drill Core Library (DCL) database, and a web map, where
geospatially linked documents can be retrieved from specific localities or regions.
The various collections comprising the CMD are designated by project, company, or other
relevant shared interest(s). Documents are individually entered into a particular collection and
assigned a unique numerical identifier, which is used to cross-reference to different databases.
Metadata (e.g., title, date, source) are recorded in a series of entries, and attributes of the document
(e.g., scope, subject, content, methods, materials, discipline) are classified in a series of dropdown
menus, enabling users to search and find documents meeting specific criteria relating to
documents’ contents and origin.
In the current initiative, the DNR utilizes the CMD intake application to produce digital
records of documents from the Cuyuna Range in central Minnesota, where exploration and mining
for iron and manganese ores was active throughout much of the early-middle 20th century. The
objective is to curate mineral exploration documents and compile geological data from these
records in a large database. A synthesis of these data will help to better understand the geological
architecture and extent of historical exploration in the region, and the compiled datasets will help
to evaluate the potential for additional iron, manganese, and other resources.
Historical documents from the Cuyuna mining district are stored in the Hibbing Lands and
Minerals office. Dozens of different exploration companies drilled at least 12,000 boreholes and
created thousands of documents spanning multiple decades of mineral exploration and mining in
this district. Relevant documents in this collection range from 1905 to the 1970s, and include
geological maps, surface maps with drillhole collars and associated metadata, mine maps (surface,
subsurface, infrastructure), tables with geochemical data, drillhole profiles with tabular
geochemical data, geological information and interpretations, geological cross-sections, field
notes, and notes and correspondences regarding property ownership, exploration results and
resource estimates. Because of the number of companies involved and diversity in the presentation
of data it is necessary to address certain challenges before curation into CMD.
Documents are first sorted by company and locality in the Public Land Survey System,
which allows for the identification and removal of duplicate maps and other documents shared

31

�among and across different companies. Once sorted, all relevant documents with clear datasets and
sufficient metadata to identify the source and locality are curated into the CMD. Following
curation, plan-view maps are converted to picture format and brought into ArcGIS, where they are
spatially located using georeferencing methods. This method helps to resolve problematic drillhole
locations, and to identify less obvious duplicate documents and datasets, including drillholes that
were renamed over time as operators changed hands. Drillhole collar locations can then be added
to a database of known drillholes in the region, and integrated and compared to cores from the
DCL database. Once correctly positioned, individual geospatial datasets, such as geological logs,
and geochemical and geophysical data, are extracted from each document.
Extracting and compiling geologic data such as geologic logs and assays into tabular format
has been a challenging endeavor. These data were hand-written or typed using a typewriter, and
utilizing optical character recognition technology to extract text is not straightforward. However,
transcribing the data by hand is a cumbersome and protracted process, and potentially introduces
errors that must be checked for quality assurance. With the advance of artificial intelligence (AI)
and machine learning, it is now possible to train an AI model to extract data into tables. Training
the AI data extraction model is an efficient process. First, pages (10 minimum) containing example
data listed in an internally consistent format are imported; then table(s) are delineated using the
associated headers, labels, and rows per each page. Once the model is trained, numerous
documents or pages of the same format are uploaded and the data are auto-extracted, and the output
reflects the model’s specified number of tables, columns, and rows. Before the outputted data are
extracted, they are enhanced within the model workflow to account for spelling errors, incorrect
symbols, etc., so that it is unnecessary to resolve errors individually by hand. Once a model is
trained for a specific table format, thousands of pages of tabular data can be extracted into a tabular
database en masse in a matter of minutes. Using MircoMine modeling software, the tabulated data
are visualized in a 3D model, where any remaining tabulation errors are identified and corrected.
This process is ongoing, as many still-uncurated documents remain in the Cuyuna
collection. To date, nearly 2,000 documents totalling over 20,000 pages have been scanned,
georeferenced and lodged in the CMD, and the drillhole database contains over 4,000 individual
drillholes with assay data totaling over 60,000 lines. Incompleteness notwithstanding, the current
database is a growing and ever-refining, data compilation from thousands of geological
investigations. Together, the newly compiled data are sufficiently expansive to make new
observations and interpretations pertaining to the geology and distribution and style of iron and
manganese resources, as well as the potential for other base and precious metal resources, in the
Cuyuna Range.

32

�Revisiting geophysical interpretations of the Midcontinent Rift below Lake Superior—
Insights from GLIMPCE seismic-reflection line C
GRAUCH, V.J.S.1, HELLER, S.J.2, WOODRUFF, Laurel G.3, and STEWART, Esther K.4
1

U.S. Geological Survey, MS 973, Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225
U.S. Geological Survey, MS 939, Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225
3
U.S. Geological Survey, 2280 Woodale Drive, St. Paul, MN 55112
4
Wisconsin Geological &amp; Natural History Survey, 3817 Mineral Point Road, Madison, WI 53705
2

The 1.1 Ga Midcontinent Rift System (MRS) has been investigated in the Lake Superior
region for more than a century, driven by mineral exploration, academic study, and, for a brief
time, oil and gas exploration. Limited outcrops on land and the extent of MRS rocks under the
lake have motivated many workers to use geophysical methods to investigate the nature and
extent of the rift. The most influential geophysical data for modern paradigms has come from
seismic-reflection profiles collected by the Great Lakes International Multidisciplinary Program
on Crustal Evolution (GLIMPCE) in the late 1980s. Notably, many previous workers have used
interpretations of GLIMPCE line C (Fig. 1, inset) to demonstrate the architecture of the MRS in
western Lake Superior. A recurring theme from the previous work is that syn-extensional basalt
flows accumulated in half-grabens bounded by normal growth faults, which then reactivated as
reverse faults in response to later compression (e.g., Cannon et al., 1989; Hinze et al., 1992;
Dickas and Mudrey, 1997; Stein et al., 2015).
We are revisiting GLIMPCE line C by constructing a detailed velocity model for
conversion of the seismic data measured in two-way travel time to a section plotted versus depth
(Grauch et al., 2023). This approach allows for digital verification of the modeled velocities and
more accurate depiction of thicknesses and dips of units to tie to geology onshore. We have
constructed an analogous gravity model along line C that provides independent evaluation of our
velocity model using velocity-density relations developed from analysis of region-wide rock
property compilations (Grauch, 2023).
Preliminary results from the velocity modeling, depth conversion, and ties to onshore
geology have led to a significantly different view of Line C as primarily a sag basin rather than a
half-graben, showing both syn- and post-magmatic subsidence (Fig. 1; Grauch et al., 2023).
Narrow intervals of high velocities, which indicate a composition of gabbro (Grauch, 2023),
emanate upwards along both sides of the sag basin from an inferred mantle bulge. The intervals
are associated with strong linear reflections that truncate sub-horizontal layers in the sag basin
and may obscure any minor faulting that occurred before or after intrusion. Cross-cutting mafic
intrusions provide an alternate explanation for the termination of layers that was previously
thought to indicate major faulting. This new view of line C implies that basin subsidence was the
dominant process in the development of rift stage troughs rather than major half-graben
structures.
Other important interpretations include the following.
• Portage Lake Volcanics show syn-magmatic basin subsidence
• The Lower Oronto Group section shows post-magmatic basin subsidence
• Onlap of Upper Oronto Group onto tilted Porcupine Volcanics suggest the
deformation pre-dated deposition of Oronto Group sediments

33

�•

Rocks of the lower northeast sequence of the North Shore Group may connect to
rocks of similar age from the south shore that lie underneath the sag basin.

Figure 1. Interpreted depth section for GLIMPCE Line C. No vertical exaggeration. NSVG, North Shore Volcanic
Group. PLV, Portage Lake Volcanics.

The new rendition of the Line C seismic data also raises several questions.
• How do the sedimentary sections correlate from north to south?
• What caused the truncation of volcanic layers at the volcanic-sedimentary contact
in the middle of the seismic section and was reverse faulting involved?
• What is the tectonic process that drove the syn-magmatic subsidence?
• Where does the reverse Keweenaw fault extend into the section from the south
shore and what was its influence?
These and other questions can be addressed through the construction of velocity models
and depth conversions of other seismic lines in the lake. Future insights will benefit from a
three-dimensional view that these additional seismic lines will provide.
Cannon, W.F., Green, A.C., Hutchinson, D.R., Lee, M.W., Milkereit, B., Behrendt, J.C., Halls, H.C., Green, J.C.,
Dickas, A.B., Morey, G.B., Sutcliffe, R.H., and Spencer, C., 1989, The North American Midcontinent rift
beneath Lake Superior from GLIMPCE seismic reflection profiling: Tectonics, v. 8, p. 305-332.,
https://doi.org/10.1029/TC008i002p00305 .
Dickas, A.B., and Mudrey, M.G., Jr., 1997, Segmented structure of the Middle Proterozoic Midcontinent System,
North America, in R.J. Ojakangas, A.B. Dickas, and J.C. Green (eds.), Middle Proterozoic to Cambrian Rifting,
Central North America: Geological Society of America Special Paper 312, 37-46., https://doi.org/10.1130/08137-2312-4.37 .
Grauch, V.J.S., 2023, Compressional wave seismic velocity, bulk density, and their empirical relations for
geophysical modeling of the Midcontinent Rift System in the Lake Superior region: U.S. Geological Survey
Scientific Investigations Report 2023-5061, 60 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20235061.
Grauch, V.J.S., Heller, Sam J., Stewart, Esther K., and Woodruff, Laurel G. 2023. Exploring the geology of the
Midcontinent Rift under western Lake Superior using a preliminary velocity model of seismic line GLIMPCE
C, in Ames, C. (ed.), 69th Annual Institute on Lake Superior Geology Proceedings—Part 1, Program and
Abstracts, p. 37-38.
Hinze, W. J., Allen, D. J., Fox, A. J., Sunwood, D., Woelk, T., and Green, A. G., 1992, Geophysical investigations
and crustal structure of the North American Midcontinent Rift system: Tectonophysics, v. 213, p. 17-32.
Stein, C.A., Kley, J., Stein, S., Hindle, D., and Keller, G.R., 2015, North America’s Midcontinent Rift: When rift
met LIP: Geosphere, v. 11, p. 1607-1616.

34

�GeologyOntario: a powerful search tool for Ontario explorationists
HINZ, Sheree1

Ontario Geological Survey, 435 James Street South, Thunder Bay, ON, P7E 6S7 Canada

W
ith

dr

aw
n

In March of 2023, the Ministry of Mines released a new online platform to search and query
Ontario Geological Survey data. The Ontario Geological Survey maintains and provides public
access to a wealth of geological information including maps, publications, assessment files,
mineral inventory points, miscellaneous data releases, geophysical data, abandoned mine site
information, and more. Though this information has been available online for many years, the
previous iteration of GeologyOntario had significant constraints, including a lack of spatial
search abilities, and users experienced challenges in finding relevant information. The new
GeologyOntario consists of separate text (Figure 1) and spatial search (Figures 2 and 3) tools
which provides ample opportunities to discover information. Geological information is often
dependent on spatial data, and the new spatial search tool runs on a powerful Esri-based system,
allowing clients to build queries to focus on the types of data relevant to their interests, within
the geographical areas they are working. The new GeologyOntario Search Hub is located at
https://geology-ontario-en-mndm.hub.arcgis.com/.

Figure 1. GeologyOntario text search page (https://www.geologyontario.mines.gov.on.ca/).

35

�aw
n
dr

W
ith

Figure 2. GeologyOntario spatial search page showing regional geology, mineral inventory, and the
results of a search for mineral inventory points listing lithium as a primary commodity in the area of the
Separation Rapids
pluton(https://mndm.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=66ee0efe4d3c4816963737dbdb
890708).

Figure 3. GeologyOntario spatial search page with regional geology, mineral inventory, assessment files,
Resident Geologist Program (RGP) site visits, and exploration activity layers active.

36

�Recent developments on the use of the Horizontal-to-Vertical Spectral Ratio (HVSR)
passive seismic method to determine depth to bedrock in Minnesota
HIRSCH, Aaron C.1
1

Minnesota Geological Survey, University of Minnesota, 2609 Territorial Road, St. Paul MN 55114

Bedrock depth is an important dataset for water resource management, hydrological
studies, mineral exploration, and general well planning. In Minnesota, bedrock depth is highly
variable; thin to nonexistent in the northeast, up to 250m+ in areas to the west, and irregular
elsewhere. In areas where bedrock depth is not known from existing water, exploration, or
scientific drilling, various geophysical techniques can be used. One of these methods is the
Horizontal-to-Vertical Spectral Ratio (HVSR) (Nogoshi and Igarashi, 1971; Nakamura, 1989)
which utilizes horizontal ambient noise surface wave frequencies that are excited and amplified
dependent on the depth to the basement bedrock below a less dense and seismically slower
velocity upper layer (i.e. unconsolidated glacial sediments).
The HVSR method has been utilized in Minnesota to estimate the depth to bedrock since
the late 2000’s (Chandler and Lively, 2014) and has become a standard measurement in the MN
County Geological Atlas program (e.g. Bauer et al., 2023; Mayer et al., 2023). The initial HVSR
dataset used 1647 passive seismic measurements with 303 locations with a known bedrock
depth, also known as control points, to develop parameters to accurately estimate the depth to
bedrock across Minnesota (Chandler and Lively, 2016). The Minnesota Geological Survey has
now collected a total of over 6000 HVSR measurements and 480 control points resulting in a
new assessment from the larger and more geographically and geologically widespread dataset.
Analyses has included a new quantitative data quality ranking using international HVSR
guidelines (SESAME, 2004) and new control parameters have been investigated. The shape of
the HVSR curve is now being captured in a passive seismic database due to its relationship with
bedrock depth topography, bedrock weathering, and the underlying velocity structure. Ongoing
evaluation of this database will help refine the HVSR depth to bedrock estimation and more
accurately identify potential bedrock valleys while future work will include measuring densities
and ultrasonic velocities of Quaternary cores to constrain the control point parameters more
accurately.
References
Bauer, E. J., Cicha, J., Radakovich Block, A., Jirsa, M. A., Hirsch, A. C., Meyer, G. N., Scott, S. B.,
Lively, R. S.. (2023). C-55, Geologic Atlas of Otter Tail County, Minnesota. Minnesota
Geological Survey. Retrieved from the University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy,
https://hdl.handle.net/11299/256920.
Chandler, V. W., Lively, R. S., 2016, Utility of the horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio passive seismic
method for estimating thickness of Quaternary sediments in Minnesota and adjacent parts of
Wisconsin, Interpretation, Vol. 4, No. 3, p. SH71-SH90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/INT-20150212.1.
Chandler, V.W., and Lively, R.S., 2014. OFR14-01, Evaluation of the horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio
(HVSR) passive seismic method for estimating the thickness of Quaternary deposits in Minnesota
and adjacent parts of Wisconsin. Minnesota Geological Survey. Retrieved from the University of
Minnesota Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/162792.
Mayer, J. A., Bradley, M. C., Retzler, A. J., Severson, A. R., Jirsa, M. A., Chandler, V.W., Conrad, D. R.,
Gowan, A. S., Radakovich Block, A., and Hamilton, J. D., 2023. C-58, Geologic Atlas of Lincoln

37

�County, Minnesota. Minnesota Geological Survey. Retrieved from the University of Minnesota
Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/260212.
Nakamura, Y., 1989, A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using microtremor on
the ground surface: Quarterly Report Railway Technical Research Institute, 25–30.
Nogoshi, M., and Igarashi, T., 1971. On the amplitude characteristics of microtremor (part 2) (in Japanese
with English abstract): Journal of the Seismological Society of Japan, 24, 26–40.
SESAME, 2004. Guidelines for the implementation of the H/V spectral ratio technique on ambient
vibrations. Measurements, processing, and interpretation: WP12 European commission —
Research general directorate project no. EVG1-CT-2000-0026 SESAME, report D23.12, 62,
http://www.gripweb.org/gripweb/sites/default/files/HV_User_Guidelines.pdf.

38

�Lithostratigraphic discrimination of Quaternary core in Minnesota using magnetic
susceptibility
HIRSCH, Aaron C.1, SCHNEIDER, Emma, L.1
1

Minnesota Geological Survey, University of Minnesota, 2609 Territorial Road, St. Paul MN 55114

Most of Minnesota is covered by Quaternary sediments deposited during multiple
glaciation events. This Quaternary stratigraphy is highly complex due to multiple glacial events
in which ice lobes emanated from differing locations north of Minnesota and deposited sediment
(diamict, till) of variable thicknesses (up to 250m), provenance, and morphology across the state
(Johnson et al., 2016). The Minnesota Geological Survey uses grain counts, color, sedimentary
structures, and composition to establish Quaternary lithostratigraphic units that distinguish these
deposits by lithology, stratigraphy, and geomorphology. Nine lithostratigraphic regions were
identified using cuttings, outcrops, and rotary sonic core (Johnson et al., 2016). Magnetic
susceptibility measurements were taken at 1-2 meter intervals from many of these rotary sonic
cores during core analysis by applying a magnetic field to the core and recording the magnetic
response. This study was conducted to determine if magnetic susceptibility measurements from
cores can aid unit correlation across Minnesota regions as part of a USGS funded data
preservation project. Over 11,000 measurements were recorded in a newly established
Quaternary magnetic susceptibility database with over 7,000 measurements assigned to a
lithostratigraphic formation and unit interpretation. Magnetic susceptibility logs were generated
for each measured core and statistics calculated for each unit. Analysis of this database has
identified lithostratigraphic units with distinctive magnetic susceptibility ranges as compared to
nearby and similarly aged units. Due to these results, this newly established database functions
as another tool for lithostratigraphic identification of Quaternary sediments and local and
regional correlations.
References
Johnson, Mark D., Adams, Roberta S., Gowan, Angela S., Harris, Kenneth L., Hobbs, Howard C.,
Jennings, Carrie E., Knaeble, Alan R., Lusardi, Barbara A., and Meyer, Gary N., 2016. RI-68
Quaternary Lithostratigraphic Units of Minnesota. Minnesota Geological Survey. Retrieved from
the University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/177675

39

�New Insights into the Geology and Geochemistry of the Osler Group and Related Rocks,
Midcontinent Rift System, Northern Lake Superior, Ontario
HOLLINGS, Pete and SMYK, Mark
Department of Geology, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Road, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1
Canada
Ongoing geological reconnaissance and lithogeochemical sampling were undertaken on parts of
the Black Bay Peninsula, St. Ignace Island and neighbouring islands in 2022 and 2023. New field
and geochemical data have helped to both distinguish lithostratigraphic units and suggest
common magmatic histories in developing a model for the Midcontinent Rift System (MRS)related Osler Volcanic Group and related intrusive rocks.
The Osler Group (1108-1105 Ma), a ~3 km-thick succession of predominantly basaltic flows and
clastic sedimentary rocks on the north shore of Lake Superior, represents some of the earliest
MRS magmatism. Previous studies have largely focused on the paleomagnetism (e.g. SwansonHysell et al., 2019; Halls, 1974) and geochemistry (e.g. Hollings et al., 2007; Keays and
Lightfoot, 2015) of the flood basalts in developing a stratigraphic sequence. However, only basic
mapping and some initial studies had been conducted on felsic extrusive and intrusive rocks (e.g.
St. Ignace Island Complex, Hollings et al., 2023, Smyk et al., 2006; geochronology, SwansonHysell et al., 2019 and references therein). Sampling efforts were most recently focused on these
felsic rocks in order to determine their geochemical affinity and to suggest how they, and related
mafic igneous rocks, may fit in with the provisional tectono-magmatic model for the Osler
Group.
Felsic rocks include the Agate Point rhyolite flows (1105.15 Ma); thin felsic fragmental units;
aphanitic felsite; and massive, subvolcanic(?), quartz-feldspar-phyric rocks (aka “quartz-feldspar
porphyry”/QFP). These red, brown or gray rocks occur predominantly on St. Ignace Island
(including in the core of the St. Ignace Island Complex (SIC)) and on smaller islands, south to
Agate Point. Rhyolites tend to be LREE-enriched (La/Smn= 5.20-5.47), have higher total REE
than the QFPs and more pronounced negative Ti anomalies. The majority of QFPs, including
those in the core of the SIC, tend to display a coherent, tightly grouped REE trend, characterized
by moderate LREE enrichment (La/Smn= 2.34-4.71, averaging 3.50), relatively flat HREE
patterns and pronounced negative Nb anomalies. This similarity in the REE distribution of both
extrusive and subvolcanic felsic rocks suggests that they may share a common magmatic and
fractionation history.
In contrast, the basaltic flows into which felsic rocks have been emplaced have flatter REE
distribution patterns (La/Smn= 1.61-3.51) than those of the felsic rocks, with less-pronounced
negative Ti anomalies. Mafic and felsic flows situated above an unconformity/conglomerate at
Bullers Bay, St. Ignace Island, display pronounced negative Nb anomalies whereas those below
do not. This suggests that the lower flows are part of the more primitive Lower Formation of the
Osler Group, while the flows above the unconformity resemble those of the more crustally
contaminated Central Formation (cf. Keays and Lightfoot 2015; Hollings et al. 2007) as
delineated on nearby Simpson Island.

40

�Gabbroic rocks occur at the margin of the SIC, in the Moss Lake Intrusion and as numerous
diabase sills and dykes with various orientations which intrude the supracrustal rocks. SIC and
Moss Lake gabbro samples display similar REE patterns, characterized by moderate LREE
enrichment (La/Smn= 2.59-3.23), moderate negative Ti anomalies and pronounced negative Nb
anomalies. By comparison, smaller, diabasic dykes and sills have relatively flat REE distribution
and less-pronounced negative Ti anomalies. Prominent, regional-scale mafic dykes (i.e.
McEachan, Shesheeb, Paps) display lower total REE and lack negative Sm anomalies.
Hollings et al. (2023) suggested that the rocks of the SIC likely formed as the result of
emplacement of a large mafic magma chamber at the base of the Osler volcanic pile that
triggered partial melting to generate felsic end members which then ascended to shallower levels
in the crust. The SIC QFPs are geochemically similar to both the massive, subvolcanic(?) QFPs
elsewhere on St. Ignace Island and nearby islands, as well as to the rhyolites at Agate Point,
suggesting a similar origin for all of these felsic rocks.

REFERENCES
Halls, H., 1974, A paleomagnetic reversal in the Osler Volcanic Group, northern Lake Superior:
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 11, p. 1200–1207, doi:10.1139/e74-113.
Hollings, P., Fralick, P. and Cousens, B. 2007. Early history of the Midcontinent Rift inferred
from geochemistry and sedimentology of the Mesoproterozoic Osler Group, northwestern
Ontario. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 44, 389–412, https://doi.org/10.1139/e06-084.
Hollings, P., Hanley, J., Smyk, M., Heaman, L., Cousens, B., and Zajacz, Z. 2023. The ~ 1.1 Ga
St. Ignace Island Complex, Northern Ontario, Canada: Evidence for Magma Mixing and Crustal
Melting in the Generation of Midcontinent Rift-Related Bimodal Magmas and Implications for
Regional Metallogeny, Journal of Petrology, Volume 64, Issue 6, June 2023, egad032,
https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/egad032.
Keays, R.R. and Lightfoot, P.C. 2015. Geochemical stratigraphy of the Keweenawan
Midcontinent Rift volcanic rocks with regional implications for the genesis of associated Ni, Cu,
Co, and platinum group element sulfide mineralization. Economic Geology, 110, 1235– 1267,
https://doi.org/10.2113/econgeo.110.5.1235.
Smyk, M.C., Hollings, P.N. and Heaman, L. 2006. Preliminary investigations of the petrology,
geochemistry and geochronology of the St. Ignace Island Complex, Midcontinent Rift, northern
Lake Superior, Ontario; 52nd Institute on Lake Superior Geology, Annual Meeting, Sault Ste.
Marie, Ontario, May, 2006, Proceedings Volume 52, Part 1, p.61-62.
Swanson-Hysell, N.L., Ramezani, J., Fairchild, L.M., and Rose, I.R. 2019. Failed rifting and fast
drifting: Midcontinent Rift development, Laurentia’s rapid motion and the driver of Grenvillian
orogenesis; GSA Bulletin 131 (5-6), 913-940.

41

�Use of Ambient Noise Tomography for Mineral Exploration in the Lake Superior Region
HOLLIS, Dan1
1

Sisprobe SAS, 831 Pacific Street, #1A, Morro Bay, California, 93442 USA

Abstract
Ambient noise tomography (ANT) is a relatively new passive seismic tool used in mineral
exploration. The method has been successfully used in the Lake Superior region in mapping
subsurface structure and rock properties. This presentation will provide a brief introduction to
the ANT method and review recent ANT work done in the Lake Superior region.
Introduction
Exploration for mineral resources uses a variety of geophysical methods to detect and delineate mineral
deposits and systems in order to optimize core drilling programs: gravity, magnetics, active-source
reflection seismic and electromagnetics methods to name a few. Ambient noise tomography is a
relatively new seismic geophysical tool that has seen increasing use in the past couple of years for mineral
resource exploration. ANT uses natural earth vibrations and human-generated seismic vibrations to
image subsurface structure and map physical properties of the subsurface. Four ANT surveys for mineral
resources in the Lake Superior region have been completed: three surveys within the Coldwell Complex
near the town of Marathon, Ontario, and one in the Duluth Complex in northeastern Minnesota.
Ambient Noise Tomography Method
The Earth is constantly vibrating. For the ANT exploration method, useful vibrations, sometimes referred
to as “ambient seismic noise”, are generated by hydrosphere-lithosphere interaction such as the oceanic
microseism caused by swell (a similar microseism is caused by swell in Lake Superior and the other Great
Lakes), and anthropogenic sources such as vehicular traffic, industrial sites, railroads, and other human
activity.
An ANT survey uses continuous passive seismic data collected with an array of nodal seismometers
(“nodes”) and uses surface waves to image the subsurface. The data recording duration is usually between
1 to 4 weeks. Surface waves are dispersive with different frequencies propagating at different velocities
related to the seismic velocities of subsurface lithology. Frequency-velocity dispersion curves are picked
for all receiver pairs. These dispersion curves serve as input for a tomographic process resulting in an
array of frequency-velocity points for each cell in a grid. All cells within the grid are inverted to produce
depth-velocity profiles and the result is a 3D shear wave velocity (Vs) cube where velocity is the seismic
velocity of the lithology and subsurface structure interpreted from the velocity model.
Case Studies
Coldwell Complex, Marathon Area, Ontario
The first Marathon ANT survey was collected in October 2017 in the Marathon area over a VMS target.
This first survey was intended as a noise test using 31one-component (vertical) 10 Hz nodes. The
purpose of the noise test was to characterize the spectral power, temporal variation and azimuthal
distribution of the local ambient noise. The collected data was also used to cross-correlate all receiver
pairs to assess the signal-to-noise ratio of surface waves in the virtual source gathers and processed to
produce a crude 3D velocity model which showed agreement with available core hole data. The positive
results of the noise test led to the go-ahead for an expanded survey over the target.

42

�An 8.6 km2 expanded ANT survey over the Marathon target was collected in November-December 2017
using 91 one-component (vertical) 10 Hz nodes. The resulting 3D velocity volume had usable imaging
down to 1500 meters and imaged the gabbro intrusion slab target. Details about the noise test and
expanded ANT survey and its interpretation can be found in Hollis et al.
In July-August 2018, the Sally ANT survey was conducted over an exploration target several kilometers
to the northwest of the Marathon surveys. The Sally survey was collected using 196 three-component 5
Hz nodes. This survey demonstrated the effectiveness of using three-component data to produce a more
accurate velocity model. Details of the Sally survey can be found in Lavoué et al.
With the good results of the expanded Marathon survey, funding was obtained through the European
Union Horizon 2020 program to conduct larger, higher resolution survey again over the Marathon target
in order to test the limits of the ANT method and to test other potential ANT analyses and passive seismic
methods. This survey was acquired in September-October 2018 using 983 one-component (vertical) 10
Hz nodes. This third Marathon ANT survey generated several publications on its results some of which
are listed in the Reference section.
Duluth Complex, Northeast Minnesota
In September 2023, a 32 km2 survey was collected over a helium exploration target in Lake County,
Minnesota. This survey used 183 three-component seismic nodes. Logging of a post-survey
confirmation well has helium shows between 533 – 671 meters which agrees with the interpreted
reservoir depth range from the ANT 3D data (Pulsar Helium).
Conclusion
Past work in the Lake Superior region has shown the ambient noise tomography is an effective tool for
mineral exploration in the area.
References
Dales, P., L. Pinzon-Ricon, F. Brenguier, P. Boué, N. Arndt, J. McBride, F. Lavoué, C. J. Bean, S.
Beaupretre, R. Fayjaloun, et al. (2020). Virtual Sources of Body Waves from Noise Correlations in a
Mineral Exploration Context, Seismological Research Letters XX, 1–9, doi: 10.1785/0220200023.
Hollis D., McBride J., Good D., Arndt N., et al (2019). Ambient noise surface wave tomography at the
Marathon PGM-Cu deposit, Ontario, Canada, CSEG Recorder, June 2019.
Lavoué A., Nicholas Arndt, John McBride, Aurélien Mordret, Florent Brenguier, Pierre Boué, Roméo
Courbis, Sophie Beauprêtre, Charles Beard, Dan Hollis, and Richard Lynch, (2020), Ambient noise
Rayleigh and Love wave tomography beneath the Sally Palladium-Copper Deposit (Ontario, Canada),
SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts : 2075-2079.
Pulsar Helium, https://files.elfsightcdn.com/eafe4a4d-3436-495d-b748-5bdce62d911d/2f2bca29-47e64d88-851e-d97bbca643b5/Pulsar_corp_deck_20Mar24x_FINAL-compressed.pdf. Accessed 3/29/2024.
Sharma H., Molnar S., Hollis D. and McBride J. (2018). Application of ambient-noise analysis and
velocity modeling in mineral exploration. SEG Technical Program, Expanded Abstracts, 3072–3076.
Teodor, Daniela &amp; Beard, Charles &amp; Pinzon-Rincon, Laura &amp; Mordret, Aurelien &amp; Lavoué, François &amp;
Beaupretre, Sophie &amp; Boué, Pierre &amp; Brenguier, Florent. (2021). High-frequency ambient noise surface
wave tomography at the Marathon PGE-Cu deposit (Ontario, Canada). 10.5194/egusphere-egu21-13152.

43

�Geologic and tectonic implications of detrital zircon U-Pb ages from the Dickinson Group
in the western Upper Peninsula of Michigan, USA
JONES, James V.1, CANNON, William F.2, DRENTH, Benjamin J.3
and O’SULLIVAN, Paul4
1

U.S. Geological Survey, Anchorage, AK 99508, USA jvjones@usgs.gov
U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA 20192, USA
3
U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO 80225, USA
4
GeoSep Services LLC, Moscow, ID 83843, USA
2

In the Lake Superior region of the northern United States and southern Canada,
Paleoproterozoic metasedimentary successions record the breakup of southern Superia (in
present coordinates) that began ca. 2.3 Ga and the eventual transition to long-lived accretionary
orogenesis along the southern Laurentia margin ca. 1.90–1.85 Ga. These successions are difficult
to correlate for reasons that include contrasts in thickness and facies at multiple scales,
similarities in depositional environment through hundreds of millions of years of sedimentation,
and polyphase tectonism that variably produced intense deformational and metamorphic
overprints. Detrital zircon U-Pb geochronology is useful for correlating siliciclastic strata that are
widespread throughout the successions and for identifying provenance patterns in space and
time. We present new data for samples collected from ca. 2.3–1.8 Ga strata across the western
Upper Peninsula of Michigan and northern Wisconsin that provide a baseline for regional
geologic mapping and correlations with similar strata regionally to globally. Our findings
provide new insights into stratigraphic relationships of the ca. 2.1 Ga Dickinson Group and
require revision of the depositional history, tectonic evolution, and regional significance of the
succession.
The Dickinson Group is a distinctive succession of metasedimentary and metavolcanic
rocks exposed only in the Felch trough area of the western Upper Peninsula. The strata are
bounded by the Randville Dolomite of the Chocolay Group to the north and Archean banded
gneiss to the south. These bounding contacts are mostly interpreted to be structural. The
lowermost unit of the Dickinson Group is the East Branch Arkose, a coarse cobble to boulder
conglomerate that contains rounded clasts of granite and quartzite in a matrix of feldspathic to
lithic wacke. The conglomerate is moderately sorted and generally matrix-supported. At a few
localities, the East Branch appears in unconformable contact with coarse-grained granite,
interpreted as one of the ca. 2.6 Ga batholiths that are common in the southern Superior
Province. At these basal localities, cobbles are strongly flattened and the entire unit contains a
well-developed foliation defined by the flattened cobbles and aligned biotite in the sedimentary
matrix. The East Branch Arkose is overlain by the Solberg Schist, the lower part of which
contains fine-grained mafic schist and amphibolite together with discontinuous calc-silicate
horizons up to 15 cm thick. Compositional layering in the Solberg is isoclinally folded with a
consistent foliation defined by fine-grained chlorite and amphibole. The middle Solberg contains
a ~100-ft-thick bed of iron-formation called the Skunk Creek Member that includes biotitehornblende schist and thinly bedded metachert with magnetite layers (James, 1958). The upper
Solberg is made up of interlayered biotite quartzite, massive gray quartz-mica schist, and
staurolite-biotite schist. The Solberg Schist is overlain by the Six-Mile Lake Amphibolite, which
is made up of fine- to medium-grained amphibolite with a strong tectonic foliation defined by
hornblende. As originally mapped, the Dickinson Group defines a subvertical, south-facing
homocline and was previously thought to be Archean based on an inferred gradational contact
between the Six-Mile Lake Amphibolite and the Archean banded gneiss (James, 1958; James et

44

�al., 1961). However, detrital zircon data published by Craddock et al. (2013) showed that the
East Branch arkose was deposited ca. 2.1 Ga or later, thus implying a Paleoproterozoic age for
the entire succession.
Our detrital zircon U-Pb data from the East Branch Arkose match previously published
data from Craddock et al. (2013) and are dominated by ca. 2.6 Ga grains interpreted to reflect
local granitic sources that are also observed as cobbles. Rare, but statistically significant ca. 2.1
Ga populations, confirm the Paleoproterozoic maximum depositional age. Mafic Solberg Schist
that overlies the arkose does not contain abundant zircon, although some small grains that were
recovered show a mix of ages ranging from ca. 3.1 to 2.6 Ga and a small ca. 2.1 Ga population.
Detrital zircon age spectra from upper Solberg exposures are distinctly different, though.
Samples of biotite quartzite and staurolite schist both contain prominent ca. 1.86–1.84 Ga age
populations together with more minor ca 2.5 and 2.3 Ga age populations. The upper Solberg age
spectra closely match samples of the Michigamme Formation from throughout the surrounding
region, suggesting that the upper siliciclastic component of the Solberg schist should, instead, be
mapped as Baraga Group. This revised interpretation raises the possibility that the mafic volcanic
rocks and iron formation of the lower and middle Solberg Schist could also correlate with the
lower Baraga and(or) Menominee Groups, though additional data are required to test these
possibilities. Furthermore, it raises questions about the age of the Six-Mile Lake Amphibolite,
the uppermost unit of James’ (1958) Dickinson Group. We suggest that the Six-Mile Lake may
be Archean as previously inferred by James (1958), in which case its concealed contact with the
upper Solberg or Michigamme Formation would be tectonic rather than depositional. We are
presently working to test this revised hypothesis through new geochronology and 40Ar/39Ar
thermochronology across the contact. The actual depositional age of the East Branch Arkose
remains uncertain, as it can be younger than the ca. 2.1 Ga detrital zircon age populations that it
contains. This age population overlaps with the ca. 2.1 Ga porphyritic red granite that crops out
among the western exposures of Dickinson Group strata, though cross-cutting relationships
between the Dickinson and porphyritic red granite are not observed. A ca. 2.1 Ga depositional
age for the arkose would require rapid unroofing of the coeval granite in a manner not presently
observed elsewhere in the region.
In summary, prior interpretations of a continuous ca. 2.1–2.0 Ga Dickinson Group
succession in the western Upper Peninsula of Michigan are not consistent with new detrital
zircon ages from siliciclastic strata previously mapped as the upper Solberg Schist. These units
correlate with the Michigamme Formation instead and raise new questions about the age, setting,
and tectonic evolution of multiple Archean and Paleoproterozoic units in the region.
References cited
Craddock, J.P., Rainbird, R.H., Davis, W.J., Davidson, C., Vervoort, J.D., Konstantinou, A., Boerboom,
T., Vorhies, S., Kerber, L., and Lundquist, B., 2013, Detrital zircon geochronology and provenance of
the Paleoproterozoic Huron (~2.4-2.2 Ga) and Animikie (~2.2-1.8 Ga) basins, southern Superior
Province: Journal of Geology, v. 121, p. 623–644, https://doi.org/10.1086/673265.
Drenth, B.J., Cannon, W.F., Schulz, K.J., and Ayuso, R.A., 2021, Geophysical insights into
Paleoproterozoic tectonics of the Superior Province, central Upper Peninsula, Michigan, USA:
Precambrian Research, v. 359, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2021.106205.
James, H.L., 1958, Stratigraphy of pre-Keweenawan rocks in parts of northern Michigan: U.S. Geological
Survey Professional Paper 314-C, 44 p.
James, H.L., Clark, L.D., Lamey, C.A., and Pettijohn, F.J., 1961, Geology of central Dickinson
County, Michigan: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 310, 176 p.

45

�Characterizing the geochemistry and nickel-copper-platinum group elements potential of
mafic and ultramafic intrusions in northwestern Ontario
JONSSON, Justin1, MALEGUS, Paul1, CHURCHLEY, Sophie1, PRICE, Rebecca1
1

aw
n

Resident Geologist Program, Ontario Geological Survey, Ministry of Mines, Suite B002, 435 James
Street South, Thunder Bay, ON P7E 6S7 Canada

Globally, magmatic sulphide deposits host significant resources of nickel, copper, cobalt
and platinum group elements (PGE). These deposits occur as concentrations of sulphide minerals
hosted within mafic to ultramafic intrusive rocks and are widespread across Ontario, occurring in
every Precambrian geologic terrane. Ontario is home to 10 operating mines in magmatic sulphide
deposits: 9 within the Paleoproterozoic Sudbury Igneous Complex and one within the
Neoarchean Lac des Iles Complex.

W
ith

dr

In 1999, Operation Treasure Hunt was initiated by the Ontario Government to stimulate
mineral exploration by acquiring new airborne geophysical data, surficial and bedrock
geochemical data, and development of new methods. In 2003, following completion of the
Operation Treasure Hunt project, the Ontario Geological Survey published a report (Vaillancourt
et al. 2003) that assessed 109 mafic to ultramafic intrusions across Ontario. The purpose of this
part of Operation Treasure Hunt was to characterize and publish data for intrusions known to be
prospective for PGE-dominated magmatic sulphide mineralization. Many of the intrusions
studied during Operation Treasure Hunt were host to significant known mineralization, including
current and past-producing mines, and several of these intrusions are the focus of ongoing
mineral exploration.
Despite the work by Vaillancourt et al. (2003), there are hundreds of mafic to ultramafic
intrusions in Ontario that have not been systematically assessed for magmatic sulphide
mineralization potential. Many of these intrusions have favourable characteristics for potentially
containing magmatic sulphide deposits, including geophysical anomalies (e.g., magnetic,
conductivity), overburden geochemical anomalies and known sulphide mineralization.
In 2023, the Resident Geologist Program of the Ontario Geological Survey initiated a
project to systematically characterize geochemistry of a subset of mafic-ultramafic intrusions in
northwestern Ontario that largely have not been subject to significant historical evaluation by
academic researchers, government surveys, or mineral exploration companies. Evaluating the
geochemistry of mafic to ultramafic intrusions can provide insight into the magma history,
tectonic setting and potential for economic metal endowment. Factors that may influence metal
endowment, that can be determined from the examination of geochemical data, include
determining magma source characteristics, the timing of sulphur saturation and the degree of
interaction of the magma(s) with their country rocks. Careful evaluation of physical
characteristics and whole-rock geochemistry can inform future mineral exploration and/or the
development of models for the emplacement of mafic to ultramafic intrusions and any hosted
mineralization.

46

�W
ith

dr

aw
n

Initial sample collection and analytical work took place during 2023. Areas of interest are
shown in Figure 1, and include the Red Lake, Onaman–Tashota, and Heaven Lake greenstone
belts. In this display, we provide examples of preliminary results and interpretations from areas
targeted in the first year of field work, including the Trout Bay intrusion (Red Lake greenstone
belt), Westwood intrusion (northeast of the Lumby Lake greenstone belt), and the Big Ghee Lake
intrusion (south of the Shebandowan greenstone belt).

Figure 38.1. Simplified bedrock geology map of a portion of northwestern Ontario, showing
project target areas: Red Lake greenstone belt (outlined in blue); Heaven Lake greenstone belt
(outlined in black); and Onaman–Tashota greenstone belt (outlined in white). Regional geology
modified from Ontario Geological Survey (2011).

References
Ontario Geological Survey 2011. 1:250 000 scale bedrock geology of Ontario; Ontario
Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Release—Data 126 – Revision 1.
Vaillancourt, C., Sproule, R.A., MacDonald, C.A. and Lesher, C.M. 2003. Investigation of
mafic-ultramafic intrusions in Ontario and implications for platinum group element
mineralization: Operation Treasure Hunt; Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Report
6102, 335p.

47

�Cross-sectional Geometry of the Keweenaw Fault System between Hancock and Mohawk,
Upper Peninsula of Michigan
LANGFIELD, Katherine1, GAMET, Nolan2, DeGRAFF, James1
1

Department of Geological and Mining Engineering and Sciences, Michigan Technological University,
Houghton, MI, USA
2
Michigan Geological Survey, Marquette, MI, USA

The Keweenaw fault system (KFS) is a major compressional feature along the Keweenaw
Peninsula near the southern edge of the Midcontinent Rift System (MRS). The MRS formed in
the Mesoproterozoic when a major extensional event split the ancient North American continent
across the Upper Midwest, yielding large volumes of basaltic lava such as the Portage Lake
Volcanics (1.1 Ga, PLV). The PLV strata were thrust southeastward over the Jacobsville
Sandstone (JS) along the KFS during post-rift compression by the Grenville Orogeny (1), and
some have postulated an earlier origin by normal faulting during rifting (2,3). A recent
interpretation based partly on cross-section modeling is that faults making up the KFS are parts
of a detached thrust system that formed during the Grenville Orogeny (4).
Faults of the KFS have been interpreted to have dip slip – recent reverse slip and possibly
earlier normal slip. Since 2017, bedrock mapping and analysis of fault-slip indicators have
revealed a significant component of right-lateral strike slip on the KFS, which at its northeast end
is inferred to have twice the magnitude of north-side-up reverse slip (5). The collective oblique
motion across the KFS is accommodated on fault segments with three distinct orientations that
overlap and intersect: (1) major segments parallel to the KFS trend, (2) splay faults striking
clockwise to major segments by less than 35°, and (3) shorter connector faults striking counterclockwise to major segments and splays by up to 75° (Fig. 1). The ratio of dip slip to strike slip
should vary among faults with such a range of orientations, as should the style of deformation in
their hanging walls and footwalls. To help understand these relationships, cross-sections were
constructed across various fault components of the KFS using recent mapping data, heritage data
from published maps, and drill hole data. Cross-section work employed the dip-domain-bisector
method and principles of detached thrust systems and conservation of volume.
The new cross-sections attempt to model the subsurface geometry of the segmented KFS and
to build on previous work in the area (4). Important unknowns are the JS thickness in the
footwall and how JS strata deform adjacent to major faults. A minimum JS thickness of 800
meters was assumed, based on Mayflower drill hole #41 that crosses the Keweenaw fault at 476
meters below sea level (Fig. 2). Ductile deformation of a poorly indurated, mud-prone section
near the base of JS was the method used to accommodate flexural slip in the overlying section,
but other mechanisms remain to be investigated. A common feature of cross-sections transverse
to the KFS trend is a thrust sheet with shallowly dipping PLV strata between a major fault
segment and a splay fault. The cross-sections are adding to our understanding of deformation
within the KFS and to the tectonic forces that created it.
Acknowledgements
This project was funded by the USGS EDMAP program (Award G21AC10681), Department of
Geological and Mining Engineering and Science of Michigan Tech, ILSG Student Research Fund,
Michigan Space Grant Consortium, and sponsored by the Michigan Geological Survey. We thank Tom

48

�Wright for access to Quincy Mine; Ian Gannon, Breeanne Heusdens, Jack Hawes, Braxton Murphy, and
Dillon Breen for field assistance; and Dan Lizzadro-McPherson for ArcGIS assistance.
References
1. Cannon, W.F., 1994, Closing of the Midcontinent rift ‒ A far-field effect of Grenvillian compression:
Geology, v. 22, p.155-158.
2. Cannon, W.F., Green, A.G., Hutchinson, D.R. and nine others, 1989, The North American Midcontinent
Rift beneath Lake Superior from GLIMPCE seismic reflection profiling: Tectonics, v. 8, p. 305-332.
3. Hinze, W.J., Braile, L.W., and Chandler, V.W., 1990, A geophysical profile of the southern margin of
the Midcontinent Rift System in western Lake Superior: Tectonics, v. 9, no. 2, p. 303-310.
4. DeGraff, J.M. and Carter, B.T., 2022, Detached structural model of the Keweenaw fault system, Lake
Superior region, North America: Implications for its origin and relationship to the Midcontinent Rift
System: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 135, no. 1/2, p. 449–466.
5. Lizzadro-McPherson., D.J., 2023, Structural Analysis and Slip Kinematics of the Keweenaw Fault
System between Bête Grise Bay and Gratiot Lake, Keweenaw County, Michigan: Michigan
Technological University M.S. thesis, 140 p.

Figure 1: Updated bedrock geologic map and
legend of study area, with fault segments
labelled: KF – Keweenaw Fault, HFHancock Fault, AGF – Allouez Gap Fault

Figure 2: Crosssection showing
Keweenaw (KF) and
Hancock Faults (HF)
at Douglass-Houghton
Falls. Main units: JS –
Jacobsville Sandstone,
PLV - Portage Lake
Volcanics

49

�Volcanic and Hydrothermal Reconstruction of the Paleoproterozoic Butler Zn-Cu
occurrence, Clark County, Wisconsin
LAWRENCE, Alex1, VANDERKIN, Adam1, and LODGE, Robert, W.D.1
1

Department of Geology, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, Eau Claire, WI 54701 USA

The Butler Zn-Cu occurrence is located in western Clark County, northcentral Wisconsin,
and is an example of a volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS) deposit. These VMS deposits are
mined globally for numerous metals including Zn, Cu, Pb, Ag, and Au, and are formed at or near
the seafloor in extensional submarine volcanic environments through the discharge of hot, metalrich hydrothermal fluids (e.g. Franklin et al., 2005). The Butler occurrence is hosted in the
Paleoproterozoic Eau Claire Volcanic Complex (1.8-1.9 Ga) within the Marshfield terrane of the
Penokean Orogen (Shultz and Cannon, 2007; DeMatties, 2022). Historically, the interpreted
setting for Penokean volcanism within the Marshfield terrane was a “continental’ setting with
younger magmas emplaced within older Archean crust. New data from the Eau Claire Volcanic
Complex suggests the absence of Archean crust during Penokean volcanism (Weber et al., 2023).
The goal of this project is to interpret the volcanic and hydrothermal setting of the Butler
Zn-Cu deposit and test whether the lithostratigraphic and petrochemical associations fit an
oceanic or continental model. Extensional environments that form VMS deposits can exist in
both oceanic and continental settings. This imparts unique lithostratigraphic (Franklin et al.
2005) and petrochemical (Piercey, 2011) characteristics on the host stratigraphy and alteration
styles. The lithostratigraphy of continental-associated VMS tends to be more felsic in nature with
a higher abundance of siliciclastic rocks relative to oceanic-settings. Mafic rocks are much more
abundant in ocean environments whereas are rare and largely intrusive in continental settings.
Chemically, felsic rocks in continental settings are HFSE- and REE-enriched while mafic rocks
are typically alkalic- to MORB-affinities commonly found in continental rift settings.
Approximately 2700 linear feet of drill core from the Butler occurrence were re-logged
and sampled for petrographic and geochemical characterization of the host volcanic and
hydrothermally-altered rocks. Petrography divided the host strata into three main units: 1) felsic
volcanic rocks, 2) amphibolite, and 3) metapelite. The felsic volcanic rocks are fine-grained,
foliated quartzofeldspathic schists (Figure 1A) that have layered volcaniclastic textures and local
stretched and flattened lapilli fragments. The amphibolite units (Figure 1B) are fine- to mediumgrained, homogenous, and largely unaltered suggesting an intrusive origin that post-dates the
main VMS-forming event. The metapelite units (Figure 1C) are made up of a micaceous matrix
composed of muscovite, chlorite, and biotite. The metapelite units are characterized by large
porphyroblasts of garnet, staurolite, and/or cordierite. Hydrothermally-altered rocks that host
sulfide mineralization are metamorphosed to biotite±chlorite±talc schists and calc-silicate
mineral assemblages. The sulfide mineralization is primarily pyrite with variable amounts of
chalcopyrite, and sphalerite. Massive sulfides (Figure 1D) are weakly banded with chloritic
gangue while semi-massive vein-type mineralization is found throughout altered rocks.
The relative abundance of the felsic and amphibolite units coupled with an intrusive
origin for amphibolite, suggests a bimodal-felsic type VMS, described in the paper Volcanogenic
Massive Sulfide Deposits that is typical of continental magmatism (Franklin et al., 2005). Mafic
units are interpreted to be island arc to MORB-type based on Ti vs. V discrimination plots. Felsic
volcanic rocks have an FII-type affinity on Zr/Y vs. Y discrimination diagrams and have within
plate affinities on Nb vs. Y discrimination diagrams. Geochemical abundances of the host rocks
support a continental petrochemical association.

50

�Figure 1. Photographs of core samples from the Butler deposit featuring the host rocks of the VMS.
White scale bar equals about 1 cm. (A) Foliated felsic volcanic rock that is the main host rock of the
Butler formation. (B) Amphibolite unit, image displays how homogenous the matrix is. (C) Metapelite
unit, tan staurolite porphyroblasts along with large purple to grey cordierite porphyroblasts found
throughout the matrix. (D) Massive sulfide unit containing pyrite and chalcopyrite.

References
DeMatties, T.A., 2022. Exploration-resource assessment of productive felsic volcanic centers in the
Paleoproterozoic Penokean volcanic belt of northern Wisconsin, Michigan and East-central
Minnesota, USA: Ore Geology Reviews, v. 141: 104489.
Franklin, J. M., Gibson, H. L., Jonasson, I. R., and Galley, A. G., 2005, Volcanogenic massive sulfide
deposits, in Hedenquist, J. F. H., Goldfarb, R. J., and Richards, J. P., eds., Economic Geology,
100th Anniversary Volume, p. 523-560.
Piercey, S. J., 2011, The setting, style, and role of magmatism in the formation of volcanogenic massive
sulfide deposits: Mineralium Deposita, v. 46, p. 449-471.
Schulz, K.J., and Cannon, W.F., 2007. The Penokean orogeny in the Lake Superior region: Precambrian
Research, v. 157: 4-25.
Weber, E.M., Lodge, R.W.D., Marsh, J.H. (2023). U/Pb geochronology and zircon petrochronology of
Paleoproterozoic magmas from the Marshfield terrane, Penokean Orogen, Wisconsin. Institute on
Lake Superior Geology Proceedings, 69th Annual Meeting, Eau Claire, Wisconsin, Part 1Program and Abstracts, p. 97-98.

51

�Building a 3D model for Cu/Pd inflection points throughout the Marathon PGE-Cu
Deposit
LAXER Max1, GOOD David1
1
Department of Earth Sciences, University of Western Ontario, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON N6A
5B7, Canada

The Marathon PGE-Cu deposit is hosted in the North American Midcontinent rift system,
a failed continental rift (Good et al., 2015). Magmatic activity in the area created an optimal
environment for the formation of economically significant sulphides (Smith et al., 2022) bearing
copper (Cu), and platinum group elements (PGE) at the Marathon deposit. The deposit lies in the
Two Duck Lake Gabbro, a subophitic, coarse-grained intrusion located at the eastern margin of
the Coldwell Complex. This study explores how Cu/Pd varies in 3D space at the deposit scale
and aims to use it as a vectoring tool to guide exploration. The ratio of Cu/Pd is a useful marker
of the enrichment of Pd relative to the mantle. Low Pd relative to Cu indicates previous Pd
depletion due to the early formation of sulphides in the intruding magma that formed the deposit,
whereas a relatively higher Pd concentration implies Pd enrichment (Barnes et al., 1993). The 3D
model helps to visualize the positions of the abrupt shifts (inflection points) in Cu/Pd ratio
throughout the Marathon deposit. Identifying and modelling Cu/Pd inflection points
facilitated the search for trends in mineralization. To create the model, a data filtration process
was employed to define wide mineralization intervals containing at least 80 ppm Cu and 0.15
ppm Pd. Zones of continuous mineralization of at least 16 m in length were identified. To
identify inflection points the difference in Cu/Pd ratio was evaluated at 10 m intervals. The
mineralized zones were searched for points that surpassed the thresholds found to constitute
trend reversals in Cu/Pd (ΔCu/Pd &gt;5000 or &lt;-5000). Approximately 1150 inflection points have
been identified in 404 drillholes from a dataset of 997 drillholes and 61960 assays.

Figure 1. Graphs showing the trends of concentration Cu and Pd in ppm, the ratio of Cu/Pd, and the 10 m
difference calculations used to identify inflection points, down drill hole M-20-541 (depth in m) at the
Marathon PGE-Cu deposit. The dashed lines indicate filtration cut-offs for Cu (80 ppm) and Pd (0.15 ppm)
and the inflection point thresholds in the Cu/Pd graph (at -5000 and 5000).

52

�Three zones of interest were identified within the model of the deposit with distinct
trends in the occurrence Cu/Pd ratio inflection points (Fig. 2). Area 1 included zones of high
grade Pd mineralization occurring independently of any high-grade copper or any inflection
points. In Area 2 the arrangement of inflection points suggests a boundary which aligns with the
paleosurface at the contact between the Footwall and the Main Zone. A fault runs through Area 3
(Good et al., 2015), along which there are no Cu/Pd inflection points, indicating that there may
be a link between faulting and the consistency of Cu/Pd ratio. The most prominent pattern
observed in the 3D model of the inflection points was that Cu/Pd correlates better with
lithological changes than with shifts in Cu and Pd grade.
Area 1

Area 2

Area 3

Figure 2. Views of the Leapfrog model of the Marathon deposit, including all Cu and Pd assays and all
inflection points. Showing plan views of the whole deposit, Areas 1 and 3 and a cross-section of Area 2.

References
Barnes, S.-J., Couture, J., Sawyer, E., &amp; Bouchaib, C., 1993. Nickel-copper occurrences in the BelleterreAngliers Belt of the Pontiac subprovince and the use of Cu-PD ratios in interpreting platinumgroup element distributions. Economic Geology, 88(6), 1402–1418.
Good, D. J., Epstein, R., McLean, K., Linnen, R. L., &amp; Samson, I. M., 2015. Evolution of the main zone
at the marathon Cu-PGE sulfide deposit, Midcontinent Rift, Canada: Spatial relationships in a
magma conduit setting. Economic Geology, 110(4), 983–1008.
Smith, J. M., Ripley, E. M., Li, C., Shirey, S. B., &amp; Benson, E. K. (2022). Magmatic origin for the
massive sulfide ores in the sedimentary country rocks of mafic–ultramafic intrusions in the
midcontinent rift system. Mineralium Deposita, 57(7), 1189–1210.

53

�Critical Mineral Systems in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan, A Cooperative Effort
Between the USGS and the Michigan Geological Survey
MAHIN, Robert2, QUIGLEY, Ashley2 YELLICH, John1, ESCH, John1, and GAMET,
Nolan2,
1

Michigan Geological Survey, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo MI 49008-5241
2
Michigan Geological Survey, Western Michigan University, Gwinn MI 49841

In 2018, the U.S. Geologic Survey (USGS) released a list of critical minerals defined as
“non-fuel mineral or mineral material essential to the economic or national security of the U.S.,
and which has a supply chain vulnerable to disruption” and updated it in 2022 to a total of 50
critical minerals (Burton, 2022). Since 2021, President Biden has made the domestic supply of
critical minerals a national priority. With federal funding, the USGS Earth Mapping Resource
Initiative (EMRI) is collaborating with State geological surveys on geologic mapping and critical
mineral assessments, as well as inventorying and characterizing mine wastes.
The USGS has identified broad focus areas within the United States to target critical
minerals (Hammarstrom and others, 2023). These focus areas are based on known mineral
occurrences and favorable geologic settings. The Precambrian of the Upper Peninsula (UP)
figures in 17 mineral systems. The Michigan Geological Survey (MGS) has narrowed the list to
nine systems in the UP to focus our future work (Table 1). With the support of the USGS,
forthcoming mapping and geochemical reconnaissance programs by the MGS over the next few
years will assess these systems.
Name of focus area
Midcontinent Rift magmatic
sulfide Ni-Cu-PGE
Manganese (Mn) in ironformations
Graphite in black shales

Mineral system

Deposit type(s)

Critical minerals in Critical minerals
the deposit types Identified

Mafic magmatic

Nickel-copper-PGE sulfide

Co, Ni, PGE, Te

Nickel, Co, PGE

Marine chemocline

Iron-manganese

Co, Mn

Manganese

Metamorphic

Graphite (carbonaceous sed)

Humboldt Granite

Porphyry Sn (granite-related) Porphyry/skarn

Humboldt Granite

Magmatic REE

Southern Complex pegmatites

Porphyry Sn (granite-related) Pegmatite LCT

Mesoproterozoic Phosphate

Marine chemocline

Peavey Pond Complex

IOA-IOCG

Western Upper Peninsula,
IOCG

IOA-IOCG

Peralkaline syenite/granite/rhyolite/
alaskite/pegmatites

Graphite
Be, Nb, Sc, Sn, Ta,
W
Be, Fl, Hf, Nb, REE,
Ta, Te, V, Zr
Be, Ce, Li, Nb, Sc,
Ta, Sn
Co, REE

Phosphate
Iron oxide apatite; Iron oxide copper
Co, REE
gold
Iron oxide apatite; Iron oxide copper
Co, REE
gold

Trace
Trace
Trace
Phosphate
Unknown
Unknown

Table 1: USGS-MGS Critical Mineral Focus Areas for the UP (modified from Hammarstrom and
others, 2023)

The existence of some critical minerals is well-established in the UP, such as magmatic
sulfide Ni-Cu-Pt-Pd-Co. Others, such as graphite, manganese, and phosphate have been
documented in small occurrences or as accessory minerals in larger deposits (Cannon and
Klasner, 1976: Hwang and others, 1986; James and others, 1968; Peterman and others, 1987,

54

�Mancuso, 1975). Evidence for critical minerals such as rare-earth elements, beryllium, and
fluorspar in pegmatites, granites, and iron-oxide-copper-gold/oxide apatite deposits (IOCG/IOA)
is sparse. A limited number of studies of UP pegmatites and the Humboldt granite have
identified trace REE, Be, and Ta minerals (e.g. Buchholz and others, 2014; Johnson and others,
2015; Moss, 1975, Schulz and others, 1988). Mineralization directly tied to IOCG/IOA has not
been identified, although the tectonic history and metal endowment suggests the UP is a
permissive, if not prospective region for them.
The USGS has also mounted a mine waste characterization program intended to identify
potentially recoverable critical minerals in historical mine stockpiles, waste piles and tailings and
prioritized by size, potential mineral resources. As part of the effort, the MGS has identified over
80 mine sites in the UP within EMRI critical mineral focus areas that have published references
to possible critical mineral content. Future assessments will involve representative sampling of
mine waste features and geochemical evaluations.
References
Buchholz, T. W., Simmons, W. B., and Falster, A.U., 2014: Accessory mineralogy of the Black River
Pegmatite and Humboldt granite, Marquette County, Michigan. In Fortieth Rochester Mineralogical
Symposium: Contributed Papers in Specimen Mineralogy, Part 1, Rocks &amp; Min., 89:4, 370-374.
Burton, J., 2022. U.S. Geological Survey Releases 2022 List of Critical Minerals:
https://www.usgs.gov/news/national-news-release/us-geological-survey-releases-2022-list-criticalminerals.
Cannon, W.F. &amp; Klasner, J.S., 1976. Phosphorite and other apatite-bearing sedimentary rocks in the
Precambrian of Northern Michigan: US Geological Survey Circular, 746, 6 p.
Hammarstrom, J.M., Woodruff, L.G., and Dicken, C.L., 2023, Critical mineral deposits of the United
States: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P9K1HBNT
Hwang, J. Y., Carlson, D. H., Johnson, A. M., and Van Alstine, J., 1986. Preliminary investigation of
graphite resources in Michigan, in Process Mineralogy VI: Applications to Precious Mineral
Deposits, Industrial Minerals, Coal, Liberation, Mineral Processing, Agglomeration, Metallurgical
Products and Refractories, with Special Emphasis on Cathodoluminescence Microscopy, (Ed. by,
Hagni, R. D.), p. 315- 327.
James, H.L., Dutton, C.E., Pettijohn, F.J. and Wier, K.L., 1968. Geology and ore deposits of the Iron
River-Crystal Falls District, Iron County, Michigan: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper
570, 127 p.
Johnson, Christopher M. and Van Daalen, Christopher M., 2015. Mineralogy and geochemistry of Late
Archean and Paleoproterozoic granites and pegmatites in the Northern Penokean terrane of
Marquette and Dickinson Counties, Michigan. University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations.
2088.
Mancuso, J.J., 1975. Carbonate-apatite in Precambrian cherty iron formation, Baraga County, Michigan.
Economic Geology, 70, p. 583-586.
Moss, Michael J., 1975. Some pegmatites near Gwinn, Michigan. Master's Thesis 2451, Western
Michigan University.
Peterman, J.F., Johnson, A.M. and Van Alstine, J., 1987. Geological and geophysical investigation of
graphite resources in Upper Michigan, in Institute on Lake Superior Geology, 33rd Annual Meeting,
Proceedings and Abstracts, p. 53-54.
Schulz, K.J., P.K. Sims, Z.E. Peterman. 1988. A post-tectonic rare-metal-rich granite in the southern
complex, Upper Peninsula, Michigan. in Institute on Lake Superior Geology, 34th Annual
Meeting, Proceedings and Abstracts, p. 34.

55

�Baraboo Interval Quartzites in Iowa: Reassessing the Origin and Provenance of the
Washington County Quartzite, SE Iowa
MALONE, Jack1, CLARK, Ryan1, HARRIS-BOMMARITO, Amira2, and MALONE,
David2
1

Iowa Geological Survey, 300 Trowbridge Hall, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242
Geography-Geology, Felmley Hall of Science, Illinois State University, Normal, Illinois 61790

2

The Washington County Quartzite (WCQ) in southeastern Iowa is the southernmost occurrence
of the Baraboo Interval quartzites in the midcontinent region (Figure 1). Two drill holes
encountered poorly sorted quartzite and phyllite at a depth greater than 2,300 feet, likely
deposited in a braided fluvial or deltaic environment near the Laurentian continental margin on
the Columbia supercontinent. One hundred new LA-ICPMS detrital zircon ages from the WCQ
show a prominent 1.78 Ga age peak, representing local Yavapai-aged basement, a secondary
peak at 1.8-1.9 Ga representing a distal Penokean source, and minor &lt;2.5 Ga peak derived from
distal sources in the Superior Province. Multidimensional scaling of other Baraboo Interval
quartzites and potential sources show that the WCQ is indistinguishable from the lower interval
of the Baraboo quartzite (Figure 2). Cumulative and stacked probability plots also reflect
principal source areas locally derived by erosion of underlying Yavapai-aged crust and distally
derived Penokean and older sources from the Pembine-Wausau Terrane or southern Superior
Province. The WCQ likely serves as the down slope equivalent during initial Baraboo deposition.

Figure 1. Geological map
of Precambrian basement
rocks in the northern
midcontinent (modified
from Medaris et al., 2021).
Baraboo Interval Inliers are
B = Barron, F = Flambeau,
M = McCaslin, T = Thunder
Mountain, R = Rib
Mountain, and N =
Necedah. SLTZ = Spirit
Lake Tectonic Zone, ECMP
= East-Central Minnesota
Batholith, GLTZ= Great
Lakes Tectonic Zone, and
NFZ = Niagara Fault Zone.

56

�Figure 2. Three-dimensional multi-dimensional scaling plot of Baraboo Interval strata in the northern
midcontinent. Included data compiled from Malone et al. (2022), Van Wyck and Norman (2004), Stewart
et al. (2018), Stewart et al. (2021), and Medaris et al. (2021). The red circle is the WCQ from this study.
The yellow cluster includes samples from the lower members of the Baraboo Quartzite in the Baraboo
Hills that are dominated by Yavapai-age zircons. The blue cluster includes the middle members of the
Baraboo Quartzite in the Baraboo hills, other quartzites north of the SLTZ, and Necedah reflects a
complex sedimentary provenance that includes proximal and distally derived zircons from the Penokean
Province, Superior Province, and Trans-Hudson belt. The purple cluster includes the Waterloo Quartzite
and the upper members of the Baraboo Quartzite in the Baraboo Hills that are dominated by southerly
derived Mazatzal-age zircons.
References
Malone, D.H., Craddock, J.P., Holm, D., Krieger, A., and Baumann, S.J., 2022. Continent‐scale
sediment dispersal for the Proterozoic Baraboo Interval quartzites in the Laurentian
midcontinent. Terra Nova, 34(6): 503-511.
Medaris, L.G., Jr., Singer, B.S., Jicha, B.R., Malone, D.H., Schwartz, J.J., Stewart, E.K., Van
Lankvelt, A., Williams, M.L., and Reiners, P.W., 2021. Early Mesoproterozoic evolution of
midcontinental Laurentia: Defining the geon 14 Baraboo orogeny. Geoscience Frontiers, 12:
101174.
Stewart, E.K., Brengman, L.A., and Stewart, E.D., 2021. Revised Provenance, Depositional
Environment, and Maximum Depositional Age for the Baraboo (&lt;ca. 1714 Ma) and Dake (&lt;ca.
1630 Ma) Quartzites, Baraboo Hills, Wisconsin. Journal of Geology, 129: 1-31 .
Stewart, E.D., Stewart, E.K., Walker, A., and Zambito, J.J., IV., 2018. Revisiting the Paleoproterozoic
Baraboo interval in southern Wisconsin: Evidence for syn-depositional tectonism along the
south-central margin of Laurentia. Precambrian Research, 314: 221-239.
Van Wyck, N., and Norman, M., 2004. Detrital zircon ages from early Proterozoic quartzites, Wisconsin,
support rapid weathering and deposition of mature quartz arenites. Journal of Geology, 112:
305-315.

57

�The Soudan Geology Trail Project: Let’s talk about rocks in northeastern Minnesota
MARTIN, Alice1, ALLERTON, Zsuzsanna1, JOHNSON, Emma1, FAYON, Annia1,
ESSIG, Jim2, GUY-LEVAR, Sarah2, HUDAK, G. H. 1
1

Earth and Environmental Science Department, University of Minnesota, 150 John Tate Hall, 116
Church St. SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
2
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, 1302 McKinley Park Rd, Soudan, MN 55782, USA

As part of a larger research endeavor within the Archean terrane of northern MN, we are
developing educational outreach content created to engage the public with portions of the
important geology of the region. Rocks exposed in the Lake Vermilion-Soudan Underground
Mine State Park, located near Tower, MN, record glimpses of environmental and tectonic
conditions from 2.7 billion years ago to the present, including mysteries of the early Earth,
complexities of modern history, and possibilities of the future. The planned content will be
designed to follow outcrops located along a paved trail that runs through the park (Figure 1).

Figure 1: This figure shows recently exposed units along the proposed trail (bold line in center of the
figure). Starting at the banded iron formation (A), the trail leads north then east (clockwise) to the
next units (B) consisting of pillow basalts and basaltic lava flows, followed by felsic tuff (C) and
lastly a large, exposed outcrop along the paved road is chlorite schist with intertwined with banded
iron formation (D).

58

�The chosen outcrops consist of well-preserved greenschist-facies metamorphosed igneous,
sedimentary, and sheared rocks. Selected rock units along the trail include Neoarchean basaltic
lava flows, pillow basalts, felsic tuff, gabbro, oxide-facies banded iron formation, and chloriteand sericite-dominant schists. These rock units represent an ancient submarine volcanic and
hydrothermal environment that was subsequently regionally deformed (Hudak et al., 2016).
The work being done will be included in educational materials designed to communicate the
scientific content in digestible ways. Plain language writing, paired with visuals, modern
analogues and analogies will present the information in a variety of ways with the intention of
supporting a range of learning styles. The materials will be available in physical forms (on paper
and/or trail signs) and with QR codes which will link to additional online content. Visual
illustrations will be designed in collaboration with a Minnesota high school student. Combining
educational material with the hands-on outdoor experience of visiting the trail and highlighted
outcrops aims to facilitate cognitive development and understanding of the long history and
importance of the regional geology.
This initiative is a collaboration among park officials Jim Essig (Park Manager) and Sarah
Guy-Levar (Interpretive Supervisor) from the MN Department of Natural Resources, the
University of Minnesota Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, and local and state
educators.
References
Hudak, G.J., Peterson, D.M., Radakovich, A., Pignotta, G., Schwierske, K., and Students from the
2010-2013 Precambrian Research Center Geology Field Camp, 2016, Bedrock geologic map of Lake
Vermilion/Soudan Underground Mine State Park – Report to the Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources: Natural Resources Research Institute, University of Minnesota Duluth, Technical Report
NRRI/TR-2016/20, 23 p.

59

�Investigating the origin of pervasive breccias in the Paleoproterozoic Saunders Formation
in northern Wisconsin
MARTIN, Gwendolyn and BJØRNERUD, Marcia
Department of Geosciences, Lawrence University, 711 E Boldt Way, Appleton WI 54911

The Paleoproterozoic Saunders Formation is an enigmatic unit with limited exposure along the
Brule River, which forms the border between northern Wisconsin and the Upper Peninsula of
Michigan. The unit occurs just north of the Niagara Fault zone, the Penokean-age (ca. 1.88 Ga)
tectonic suture between the Superior Craton and the Wisconsin Magmatic Terranes (Schulz &amp;
Cannon, 2007). Variously described as a “massive dolomite” (Allen 1910), a “silicified dolomite”
(Sims, 1992), and a “silica rock” (Cannon, 1986), the Saunders Fm. is thought to be part of the
lower Chocolay Group, correlative with the Randville, Bad River, and Kona Dolomites, and
possibly also the quartzites underlying these units (Sturgeon River, Sunday, and Mesnard Fms.).
Each of these carbonate formations is overlain by a major unconformity, at ca. 2.1 Ga.,
representing at least 100 million years of erosion.
Every published description of the Saunders Fm. mentions that it tends to be brecciated, yet
the nature of these breccias has not been explored in detail. Dutton &amp; Linebaugh (1967) suggested
that the Saunders Fm. represents a condensed section of basal Chocolay quartzite and dolomite,
related to the formation of the regional unconformity. James et al. (1968) similarly hypothesized
that “silcretes” within the Saunders had formed by Proterozoic weathering but also pointed out
that none of the other Chocolay Group carbonate units displays evidence of such deep weathering.
They speculated, therefore, that the Saunders breccias could have had a tectonic origin but did not
pursue that hypothesis further. The purpose of this study was to characterize and interpret Saunders
breccias in outcrops at Brule River Cliffs State Natural Area in Wisconsin.
At this site, outcrops of the Saunders Formation are of two types: 1) beige to orange-colored
dolostone with a ‘gritty’ but otherwise massive (unveined, unlaminated) texture; and 2)
dramatically fragmented dolostone with extensive ‘stockwork” quartz veins that constitute most
of the rock mass. Immediately southwest of the Natural Area boundary, large boulders of dolomite-matrix breccias with angular chert fragments are common. Although these are not in situ, we
suspect they come from the Saunders Fm., and were transported ca. 12 km by glacial ice. If so,
these chert breccias represent a third, distinct textural type within the Saunders.
The gritty dolomite, which is typically unveined, has a distinctive diamictic, granular texture,
with scattered mm-sized, rounded grains set in a much finer matrix. In thin section, the matrix also
appears granular, unlike the crystalline texture typical of most carbonate rocks. Similar gritty/
granular dolomites have been observed along a major upper crustal fault zone in Namibia. Rowe
et al. (2012) interpreted these unusual textures as records of decarbonation and fluidized granular
flow caused by rapid frictional heating during seismic slip in rocks that had been at ambient crustal
temperatures of around 200°C. (Carbonate rocks typically devolatilize, rather than melt, during
seismic slip, so pseudotachylyte is rare along faults cutting through dolostone). The absence of
talc or other calc-silicate metamorphic minerals in the Saunders Formation points to subgreenschist temperatures in an upper crustal setting comparable to the Namibian case.
The veined breccias have an ‘exploded’ look, with quartz veins in multiple orientations that
appear to have increased the volume of the rock mass more than 100%. The isolated fragments of
host dolostone have narrow, slab-like shapes that suggest fragmentation occurred partly along
bedding planes. In thin section, most of the veins have a coarse, blocky texture with no preferred
orientation of crystals. Fluid inclusions arrays are common, particularly in the interiors of the
crystals. Some of the vein quartz shows slight undulose extinction. The chert breccia boulders

60

�found southwest (in the down-ice direction) of the Saunders outcrops have the texture of
cataclasites. The angular fragments of chert within these breccias appear to represent thin silicified
stromatolitic layers that were fractured and dismembered.
We interpret these three textural types of the Saunders Fm. as distinct areas within a major
Penokean-age fault zone. The chert breccias may represent the outer part of the fault zone,
dominated by non-seismic cataclasis. The gritty dolomite, bearing evidence of co-seismic heating,
would have been closer to the fault core, together with the heavily veined dolostone, whose
‘exploded’ nature points to extreme dilational strain and forceful fluid influx with little cataclasis
or grinding. The large amounts of vein material relative to the host rock, as well the blocky texture
of the veins, are consistent with the introduction of large volumes of overpressured, silicasupersaturated fluids into the shallow crust during the propagation of a fault rupture upward from
depth. Such fluid influx can happen when co-seismic slip breaks the barrier between deep crustal,
low-permeability rocks in which fluids are at lithostatic pressures and overlying high-permeability
rocks with fluids at hydrostatic pressure (Cox and Munroe, 2016). Silica-rich fluids traveling
upwards from below this barrier would be far from chemical equilibrium in the shallow crust, and
they would rapidly precipitate their dissolved silica, easily overcoming kinetic quartz growth limits
that exist under equilibrium conditions (Williams and Fagereng, 2022). This interpretation of the
Saunders breccias is supported by oxygen isotope analyses of seven vein quartz samples, all of
which yielded 18O values between 15.94 to 17.46 VSMOW.
Although brecciated textures described in previous studies of the Saunders formation may be
related to deep weathering and the post-Saunders unconformity, the breccias exposed in the Brule
River Cliffs Natural Area are clearly tectonic -- and probably coseismic -- in origin. The Saunders
Formation thus provides further evidence for great earthquakes at various crustal depths along
major fault zones during the Penokean orogeny (Larson &amp; Bjørnerud, 2017; Taylor &amp; Bjørnerud,
2023).
References cited
Allen, R., 1910. The Iron River iron-bearing district. Mich. Geol. Biol. Survey Pub. 3, Ser. 2, 151 p.
Cannon, W., 1986. Bedrock geologic map of the Iron River 1º x 2º quadrangle. USGS Map I-1360-B.
Cox, S. &amp; Munroe, S., 2016. Breccia formation by particle fluidization in fault zones. Am. J. Science,
316, 241-278.
Dutton, C. &amp; Linebaugh, R., 1967. Map of Precambrian geology of Menominee district, USGS Map I-466.
James, H., et al., 1968. Geology &amp; ore deposits of Iron River-Crystal Falls District. USGS Prof. Paper 570.
Larson, M. &amp; Bjørnerud, M., 2017. Seismic slip, mylonitization and fluid flow along the Penokean TwelveFoot Falls shear zone, Marinette County, NE Wisconsin. Proc. Inst. Lake Superior Geol., 63, 56-57.
Rowe, C., Fagereng, Å., Miller, J. &amp; Mapani, B., 2012. Signature of coseismic decarbonation in dolomitic
fault rocks of the Naukluft Thrust, Namibia. Earth &amp; Planetary Science Letters, 333, 200-210.
Schulz, K. &amp; Cannon, W., 2007. Penokean orogeny in the Lake Superior Region. Precam. Res. 157, 4-25.
Sims, P.K., 1992. Geologic map of Precambrian rocks, southern Lake Superior region, USGS Map I-2185
Taylor, M., and Bjørnerud, M., 2023. Deciphering the metamorphic and deformational history of the
Hardwood Gneiss, Felch District, Michigan. Proc. Inst. Lake Superior Geol., 69, 89-90.
Williams, R. and Fagereng, Å., 2022. The role of quartz in the seismic cycle. Rev. Geophysics, 60,
2021RG000768.

61

�The Evolution of Baraboo Interval Sedimentary Rocks: Deposition at 1.63 Ga and
Metamorphism at 1.47 Ga
MEDARIS, Gordon Jr., BONAMICI, Chloe, BROWN, Phil, GOODWIN, Laurel,
JICHA, Brian, SINGER, Brad, SPICUZZA, Michael, VALLEY, John
Department of Geoscience. University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706

Supermature siliciclastic sedimentary rocks of the Baraboo Interval (Dott, 1983) were deposited
in the southern Lake Superior region following the 1.65-1.63 Ga Mazatzal orogeny and
subsequently experienced 1.47 Ga fluid-rock interactions related to the trans-Laurentian
Pinware-Baraboo-Picuris orogeny (Daniel et al., 2022). Metamorphic fluid-rock interactions
include dehydration and metasomatic varieties, the latter having been promoted by regional-scale
advective flow of brines along permeable channels in the various Baraboo Interval occurrences.
In the Baraboo Range, south-central Wisconsin, the supermature sedimentary rocks are
composed of five oxides, viz. SiO2, Al2O3, Fe2O3, TiO2, and H2O, with CaO, Na2O, and K2O
having been largely removed during weathering of the igneous basement. During metamorphism,
the original sedimentary mineral assemblage of kaolinite + quartz + hematite + rutile was
transformed to one of pyrophyllite + quartz + hematite + rutile through the dehydration reaction,
Al2Si2O5(OH)4 (kln) + 2SiO2 (qtz) = Al2Si4O10(OH)2 (prl) + H2O (fluid)
Note that in shale, which consisted mostly of kaolinite, the appearance of pyrophyllite is
accompanied by diaspore, as expressed by the dehydration reaction,
2Al2Si2O5(OH)4 (kln) = Al2Si4O10(OH)2 (prl) + 2AlO(OH) (dsp) + 2H2O (fluid)

Figure 1. Schematic cross-section of the Baraboo Range, indicating the various metasomatic
mineral assemblages; the numbers specify 40Ar/39Ar plateau ages for muscovite.
Folding and metamorphism in the Baraboo Range were accompanied by advective flow
of brines and potassium metasomatism along the base of the quartzite and in the overlying slate
(Fig. 1). At the base of the quartzite, kaolinite was replaced by muscovite in paleosol, kaolinite
was replaced by pyrophyllite and accompanied by precipitation of muscovite in metapelite
(pipestone), and thin diaspore hydrothermal veins (bordered by muscovite) intruded quartzite

62

�above the metapelite. Slate that overlies the quartzite consists of muscovite, chlorite, quartz,
hematite, and rutile and contains 4.7% to 6.4% K2O, due to potassium metasomatism, compared
to 3.5% K2O in average shale.
The paleosol at the base of the quartzite in Baxter Hollow (Fig. 1), which is 796 cm thick,
experienced a total flux of 0.46 mol cm-2 K2O during metasomatism. Five additional Proterozoic
paleosols in the southern Lake Superior region, ranging in thickness from 300 cm to 950 cm, also
experienced potassium metasomatism, with K2O fluxes between 0.22 and 0.73 mol cm-2,
respectively; for all six paleosols taken together, K2Oflux = 0.00066  thicknesscm + 0.06, for
which R2 = 0.82.
SiO2 was mobilized high in the quartzite section at the base of the metasiltstone and
metapelite horizon in the south limb of the syncline, where quartz was precipitated in several
bedding-parallel slickenfiber layers, 3 mm to 8 mm thick (Fig. 1). Individual slickenfibers are
cylindrical, having a:b:c fabric ratios of 8:1:1, in which the a-dimension is up to 4 mm in length.
Slickenfibers plunge down-dip approximately perpendicular to the fold axis of the syncline, and
slickenfiber steps record top-to-the-south shear.
SiO2 was also mobilized above the metasiltstone/metapelite horizon, where quartz was
precipitated in bedding-parallel quartzite breccia zones up to 100 m thick (Fig. 1). The breccia
zones consist of angular red quartzite fragments cemented by a stockwork of white quartz veins
that consist predominantly of coarse-grained quartz and small amounts of specular hematite and
locally, coarse-grained muscovite. Euhedral quartz crystals occur in late-stage vugs, some of
which are partly to completely filled by kaolinite. Values of 18O (-2‰ to +31‰ VSMOW,
SIMS) in euhedral quartz correlate with complex patterns of growth zoning and healed fractures
(SEM-CL) to reveal multiple fluid events, including high-T (~300 oC) and low-T (50-100 oC)
exchange with hydrothermal and meteoric fluids (Schranz et al., 2017).
The pyrophyllite + diaspore mineral assemblage in metapelite constrains the temperature
of Baraboo recrystallization to between 315 oC and 360 oC at a pressure of 2.0 kbar. An isochor
for fluid inclusions in quartz in a folded quartz vein in metapelite, combined with phase
equilibrium considerations, yields T-P conditions between 320 oC, 2.7 kbar, and 385 oC, 4.0
kbar, corresponding to a thermal gradient of ~30 oC/km. Expressed another way, the thermal
gradient for metamorphism of the Baraboo quartzite was ~1700 oC/GPa, which places Baraboo
metamorphism in the high T/P type of metamorphism (775 oC/GPa &lt; T/P &lt; 2000 oC/GPa), as
defined by Brown and Johnson (2019).
40
Ar/39Ar plateau ages for muscovite in paleosol (1467 ± 11 Ma), hydrothermal veins
(1478 ± 12 Ma), quartzite breccia (1472 ± 3 Ma), and four samples of slate (between 1493 ± 3
and 1473 ± 3 Ma) demonstrate that recrystallization and K-metasomatism in the Baraboo Range
were contemporaneous with emplacement of the 1476-1470 Ma Wolf River A-type ferroan
granitic batholith in Wisconsin. Such metamorphism and magmatism in Wisconsin represent the
local expression of the continental-scale geon 14 Pinware-Baraboo-Picuris orogeny, which is
characterized by high T/P metamorphism and A-type ferroan granitic batholiths.
References
Brown, M. and Johnson, T., 2019. Metamorphism and the evolution of subduction on Earth. Am.
Mineral., 104: 1065-1082; Dott, R.H. Jr., 1983. The Proterozoic red quartzite enigma in the north-central
U.S. – resolved by plate collision? Geol. Soc. Am. Mem., 160: 129-141; Daniel, C.G., et al., 2023.
Linking the Pinware, Baraboo, and Picuris orogens: Recognition of a trans-Laurentian ca. 1520-1340 Ma
orogenic belt. Geol Soc. Am. Mem., 220: 175-190; Schranz, L., et al., 2017, Stable oxygen isotopes,
fluid inclusions, and microstructures in Baraboo Quartzite breccia. Proc. ILSG, v. 63/1: 83-84.

63

�Geochemistry of Midcontinent Rift-related intrusive rocks of the Sunday Lake intrusion
MEXIA, Kevin1 and HOLLINGS, Pete1
1

Department of Geology, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Road, Thunder Bay, On P7B 1J4, Canada.

The Sunday Lake intrusion is located 25 km north of Thunder Bay, Ontario and hosts Ni-CuPGE mineralization. It has an age of 1109.0±1.3 (Bleeker et al., 2020), and is related to the ~1115
to 1106 Ma magmatic event of the Midcontinent Rift System (MRS; Heaman et al. 2007). The
intrusion is emplaced in Archean rocks of the Quetico Basin along the Crock Fault (Flank, 2017).
It is not exposed at surface but was first identified from airborne magnetic surveys. In 2008,
platinum and palladium mineralization was discovered by HTX Minerals Corp. In 2017 Impala
Canada Ltd. Partnered on a joint venture with more than 30 holes drilled to date.
The intrusion is funnel-shaped with a width of up to 1.5 kilometers and is 3 kilometers in
length. It varies from 350 meters to 1000 meters in thickness. The intrusion consists of maficultramafic layers divided into three series: the Upper Gabbro Series, the Lower Gabbro Series, and
the Ultramafic Series (Flank, 2017). Reef-style mineralization present in the lower zones of the
intrusion consists of disseminated to blebby chalcopyrite-pyrrhotite-pyrite bearing olivine
melagabbro (Fig. 1; Miller, 2020). One hole intersected the basal zones of the intrusion with more
than 20 meters of mineralization at 2.11 g/t Pt, 0.95 g/t Pd, 0.16g/t Au, 0.26% Cu, and 0.11% Ni
(Flank, 2017). The objectives of this project are to characterize the paragenesis of the Sunday Lake
intrusion and the Ni-Cu-PGE mineralization, investigate the effects of crustal contamination on
mineralization within the Sunday Lake Intrusion, and to place the Sunday Lake intrusion within
the evolution of the MRS.
This project utilizes two representative drill holes from which a total of 71 samples were
collected. A total of thirty polished thin sections were generated for petrographic studies. Rocks
were classified based on relative proportions of olivine, clinopyroxene, and plagioclase with modal
rock names such as melagabbro, olivine melagabbro, and wehrlites. Fifty-five samples were
analyzed for major and trace elements. Spider diagrams show different compositions within the
layered intrusion, with primitive samples having trends consistent with a plume-like composition
(Fig. 2A) while others suggest interaction with and contamination by host rocks (Fig. 2B).
Variation in the behavior of trace elements suggest contamination, assimilation, and fractional
crystallization processes were involved in the magmatic evolution of the intrusion. Sixteen samples
have been sent for Sm-Nd and Rb-Sr isotope studies. The results of this study will be used to assess
the source of mineralization and extent of contamination of the Sunday Lake Intrusion.

64

�A

SL23KM41

Cpy

Po

B

5 mm

Gangue

Figure 1. Photomicrograph in reflected natural light (PPL) of a
gabbroic sample containing pyrrhotite and chalcopyrite.
Polished thin section scanned using a Zeiss microscope.

References

Figure 2. Primitive mantle normalized REE
spider diagram of two samples. A: Sample
showing a plume-like trend. B: Sample
suggesting an interaction with the host rock.
Normalising values from Sun and McDonough
(1989).

9
Bleeker, W., et al. "The Midcontinent Rift and its mineral systems: Overview and temporal constraints of
Ni-Cu-PGE mineralized intrusions." Targeted Geoscience Initiative 5 (2020): 7-35.
Flank, S. (2017). The Petrography, Geochemistry and Stratigraphy of the Sunday Lake Intrusion, Jacques
Township, Ontario. School of graduate studies.
Heaman, L. M., Easton, R. M., Hart, T. R., MacDonald, C. A., Hollings, P., &amp; Smyk, M. (2007). Further
refinement to the timing of Mesoproterozoic magmatism, Lake Nipigon region, Ontario. Canadian
Journal of Earth Sciences, 44(8), 1055-1086.
Miller, J.D., Green, J.C., and Severson, M.J. (2002). Terminology, nomenclature, and classification of
Keweenawan igneous rocks of northeastern Minnesota. In Miller, J.D. Jr., Green, J.C., Severson,
M.J., Chandler, V.W., Hauck, S.A., Peterson, D.E., and Wahl, T.E., Geology and mineral potential
of the Duluth Complex and related rocks of northeastern Minnesota. Minnesota Geological Survey
Report of Investigations 58, p. 5-20.
Miller, J.D. (2020). Report on the Petrography, Geochemistry, and Lithostratigraphy of DDH SL10-026
from the Southern Sunday Lake Intrusion. JDM GeoConsulting.
Sun, S. S., &amp; McDonough, W. F. (1989). Chemical and isotopic systematics of oceanic basalts:
implications for mantle composition and processes. Geological Society, London, Special
Publications, 42(1), 313-345.
Wold, R.J., Hinze, W.J. (1982). Geology and tectonics of the Lake Superior basin. Geol. Soc. Am. Mem.
156, 280.

65

�TWO DECADES OF TEACHING THE GEOLOGIC HERITAGE OF MINNESOTA’S
NORTH SHORE AT THE NORTH HOUSE FOLK SCHOOL, GRAND MARAIS
MILLER, Jim1 and GREEN, John2
1
2

Department of Earth and Environmental Science, UMD – retired; current residence: Shuniah, ON
Department of Earth and Environmental Science, UMD – retired; current residence: Duluth, MN

Since 1997, the North House Folk School, located in Grand Marais, Minnesota, has been
promoting lifelong learning in the traditional arts and crafts and in knowledge about our northern
culture and environment - present and past. Starting with a dozen courses at its inception, North
House currently offers over 350 classes per year to over 3,000 students. From 2004 to 2010,
John Green lent his expertise to North House by offering weekend lectures and field courses
each year on basic geology and the geology of the North Shore and the Gunflint Trail. As a
bonus, he also compiled lists of the native plants seen on these field excursions.
In 2013, Jim Miller revived the course and has come to offer 2-3 courses per year that explore
the Midcontinent Rift geology of the North Shore (What’s This Rock series) and the diverse
geology at the end of the Gunflint Trail (Geology up the Trail series). By 2022, three different
North Shore classes are offered (two per year, rotating in May and August) that explore different
segments of the shore: What’s this Rock? – Grand Portage to Grand Marais, What’s this Rock
Too? - Grand Marais to Tettegouche State Park, and What’s this Rock 3? - Tettegouche to Two
Harbors (Fig. 1). From 2014 to 2019, a mid-October weekend field trip at the head of the
Gunflint Trail was run out of the Gunflint. We hope to reinstate this course this fall or next, but
will run it out of Grand Marais.
Due to the Covid pandemic, no in-person field courses were permitted during 2020 and most of
2021 (one WTR course was run in October 2021, but participants drove their own vehicles).
North House opted to host on-line webinars during the winter of 2021-22. Jim presented three
webinar series. In January 2021, three lectures were offered on North Shore geology which was
virtually attended by 104 students. During March 2022, three lectures were presented on the
geology of Minnesota State Parks and Waysides with 83 people logged in. Then, in January
2023, a two-lecture webinar on the geology of the Gunflint Trail was viewed by 50 people. With
the lifting of all Covid restrictions in the winter of 2022-23, North House reverted to only
offering in-person classes.
As currently taught, the three weekend WTR courses start with an introductory meeting on
Friday evening on the North House campus in Grand Marais to discuss trip logistics and provide
a geologic overview. Saturday is devoted entirely to a field trip that visits various classic
geological exposures along the North Shore. Travel has typically involved carpooling with
personal vehicles, but starting in August, 2023, the field trips have used a mini-bus. This or a 15passenger van will be the preferred method of transport going forward. In the evening,
participants have the option to gather for informal discussions or a special lecture on various
topics, especially at wood-fired pizza party held either Friday or Saturday evenings at the North

66

�House campus. The weekend concludes with a half-day field trip on Sunday morning, after
which the group gathers either on a cobbled beach on Lake Superior to practice their newfound
rock identification skills.
Each field course is limited to about 15 registrants. A total of over 400 students have attended
the field courses we have taught at North House over the past 20 years. Participants have ranged
in age from 10 to 80 and come from all over the US and Canada, though most are from
Minnesota, especially the Twin Cities. Their backgrounds range from those who have never
heard of plate tectonics, to those who have had a few geology courses in their past. The common
denominator among all participants is that they can all be characterized as being “rock curious”.

Figure 1: Geology of northeastern Minnesota showing the general locations of geology field courses
currently taught at North House Folk School - three “What’s this Rock?” courses and a Gunflint
Trail (GFT) course.

67

�Quartz trace element chemistry: Exploring the link between a fertile parental granite and a
mineralized pegmatite
MORSON, Mia, and ZUREVINSKI, Shannon
Department of Geology, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Road, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1 Canada

Recent studies have proposed the use of pegmatitic quartz trace element chemistry as an
indicator to lithium mineralization of potential economic pegmatite deposits (Müller et al.,
2021). Using Laser Ablation- Inductively Coupled Mass Spectrometry (LA-ICP MS), the trace
elements are determined in situ within a single quartz grain. Trace elements such as Al, Ge, Ti,
P, B, and Fe3+, can substitute for Si4+ at very low concentrations, and the elements H, Li, Na, K,
Fe2+ can enter the quartz crystal lattice via interstitial lattice positions (Götze et al., 2004). In this
study, quartz from the 2685 Ma fertile Ghost Lake granitic batholith (GLB) and related Mavis
Lake pegmatites group (Dryden, Ontario) were used to compare trends in quartz trace element
concentrations within a single system (Figure 1). The focus of this study was to test the
applicability of using quartz to (1) help identify fertile parental granitoid plutons and (2) help
decipher any internal fractionation trends in mineralized pegmatites. If trace element
concentrations in quartz from the granitic parent show any relationship to the mineralized
pegmatites, this would prove beneficial in other exploration programs where potentially enriched
Li pegmatites have not yet been identified. It could allow for an early assessment of an S-type
granitoid and show indication of a potential nearby mineralized pegmatite, essentially the
technique could be deemed a ‘fertility indicator’. Furthermore, if the quartz trace element
compositions in the pegmatite zones show enrichment trends similar to the proposed model of
Černý (1991), the technique would prove powerful in defining potential areas for further
investigation (i.e. following the trend of enrichment).

Figure 1: Study sample location through the zones of fractionation and enrichment, from the
Ghost Lake Batholith to the Mavis Pegmatites (modified from Breaks and Selway, 1991).

The results show correlations with increasing Li, Al, and Ge, and decreasing Ti from the
GLB fertile parent granite to mineralized Mavis Lake pegmatites (Figure 2). The quartz trace
elements can be used to form a simple fractionation model, similar to the pegmatite fractionation
model of Černý (1991) to show elemental enrichments in a fertile LCT pegmatite system upon
evolution (Figure 3). In summary, the quartz chemistry indicates fractionation and enrichment

68

�trends can be identified across the pegmatite zones. It is still unclear whether or not the technique
could be applied to granites in order to assess fertility, as more work is required to understand the
key differences in the quartz chemistry between a barren granite and a fertile parent granite.

Figure 2: Trends in quartz trace element concentration in the GLB granites, intermediate beryl
columbite zone, and mineralized Mavis Lake pegmatites. (a) Al vs Li bivariate plot. (b) Ti vs Ge
bivariate plot.

Figure 3: Fractionation model showing quartz trace element trends within the
GLB-Mavis Lake system (modified from Černý, 1991).
Breaks F.W., Selway, J.B., Tindle, A.G., 2005. Fertile peraluminous granites and related rare-element
pegmatites, Superior Province of Ontario. Rare-Eelement Geochemistry and Mineral Deposits:
Geological Association of Canada (GAC) Short Coarse Notes 17: 87-125.
Černý, P., 1991. Rare-element granitic pegmatites. Part 1: Anatomy and internal evolution of pegmatite
deposits. Part 2: Regional to global environments and petrogenesis. Geoscience Canada 18:49–
81.
Götze, J., Plötze, M., Graupner, T., Hallbauer, D.K., Bray, C. J., 2004. Trace element incorporation into
quartz: A combined study by ICP-MS, electron spin resonance, cathodoluminescence, capillary
ion analysis, and gas chromatography. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 68(18): 3741–3759.
Müller A., Keyser W., Simmons W. B., Webber K., Wise M., Beurlen H., Garate-Olave I., Roda-Robles
E., Galliski M. A., 2021. Quartz chemistry of granitic pegmatites; implications for classification,
genesis and exploration. Chemical Geology, 584:1-17.

69

�Geometry, Slip Kinematics, and Deformation along the Hancock Fault in the Quincy Mine
Workings, Upper Peninsula of Michigan
MURPHY, Braxton, LANGFIELD, Katherine, DeGRAFF, James
Department of Geological and Mining Engineering and Sciences, Michigan Technological University,
Houghton, MI, USA 49931

The Hancock fault is one of several major compressional features along the southern edge of
the Midcontinent Rift System. It forms part of the Keweenaw fault system (KFS) whose
connected segments follow the spine of Michigan’s Keweenaw Peninsula. The Hancock fault is a
splay in the hanging wall of the KFS that intersects the main Keweenaw fault zone at an acute
angle to define a thrust slice (Fig. 1). It extends along an azimuth of 55° for 17 kilometers from a
point west of Houghton to its intersection with the main Keweenaw fault zone between Calumet
and Lake Linden. Volcanic and sedimentary layers of the Portage Lake Volcanics (PLV, 1.1 Ga)
are shown on bedrock geology maps with left-lateral offset across the Hancock fault (1, 2).
Figure 1: Hancock (HF) and
Keweenaw (KF) faults shown
on USGS bedrock geology
maps (1, 2). Major layers:
pb-Bohemia conglomerate,
psc-Scales Creek flow, pkKearsarge flow, pgGreenstone flow, chc-Copper
Harbor conglomerate (base).

Like other faults of the
KFS, the Hancock fault
has a major component of
reverse slip that occurred
during compression related
to the Grenville Orogeny
(3). Recent mapping and
fault-slip measurements on the population of faults associated with the KFS reveal that the fault
system has a right-lateral component of strike slip. This raises the question of whether the leftlateral offset of units across the Hancock fault in map view can be reconciled with net reverse
and right-lateral slip along the KFS. The work reported here builds on previously reported work
on the Hancock fault in the Quincy Mine workings to address this and other questions about its
geometry, slip kinematics, and deformation (4).
An adit in east Hancock provides access to the 7th level of the historic Quincy Mine, whose
workings run along and across the Hancock fault at four locations (Figs. 1 and 2). The current
phase of the project focused on acquiring data from the fault southwest of the adit, which data

70

�were combined with data previously collected from the adit toward the northeast. Fault-slip
measurements were made on all accessible fault surfaces and consisted of fault attitude,
slickenline rake, and slip sense where possible. The Hancock fault’s strike and dip were
measured at well-exposed locations, and the thickness of its gouge and breccia were measured
where possible. Orientations were measured using the FieldMove Clino app as well as a Brunton
compass. Stereonet and FaultKin freeware were used to plot and analyze the orientation data.
Figure 2: Geology along the Hancock
fault in the Quincy adit and connected
mine workings.

The project is ongoing but some
results have emerged. The Hancock
fault cuts upward across stratigraphy
in the direction of thrusting at angles
between 4° and 18°, similar to cut-off
angles for the Keweenaw fault (5).
The low cut-off angles of both faults,
which have significant reverse slip,
are consistent with the properties of a
detached thrust system. Both faults
also have components of strike slip as
indicated by the population of nearby
faults, but right-lateral slip is slightly dominant over left-lateral slip. This implies that the
significant left-lateral offset of PLV layers seen in map view is the result of mostly reverse slip
on the Hancock fault as it cuts slightly clockwise to strike of the layers.
Acknowledgements
Funding for this work was provided by the ILSG Student Research Fund and is gratefully acknowledged.
References
1. Cornwall, H.R. and Wright, J.C., 1956a, Geologic Map of the Hancock Quadrangle, Michigan: U.S.
Geological Survey, Mineral Investigations Field Studies Map MF-46, scale 1:24,000.
2. Cornwall, H.R. and Wright, J.C., 1956b, Geologic Map of the Laurium Quadrangle, Michigan: U.S.
Geological Survey, Mineral Investigations Field Studies Map MF-47, scale 1:24,000.
3. Cannon, W.F., 1994, Closing of the Midcontinent Rift: a far-field effect of Grenvillian compression:
Geology, v. 22, pp. 155-158.
4. Langfield, K.M., DeGraff, J.M., and Gamet, N.G., 2023, Slip kinematics of the Keweenaw and
Hancock faults within the Midcontinent Rift System, Upper Peninsula of Michigan: Inst. on Lake
Superior Geology, 69th An. Meeting, Eau Claire, WI, Part 1 – Program and Abstracts, v. 69, p. 50-51.
5. DeGraff, J.M. and Carter, B.T., 2023, Detached structural model of the Keweenaw fault system, Lake
Superior region, North America: Implications for its origin and relationship to the Midcontinent Rift
System: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 135, no. 1/2, p. 449–466.

71

�Lithostratigraphy and Geochronology of the Lower Northeast Sequence of the North Shore
Volcanic Group, Cook County, MN, USA
NOWARIAK, Eric S., SEVERSON, Allison R., BLOCK, Amy Radakovich
Minnesota Geological Survey, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of
Minnesota-Twin Cities, MN, USA

The Lower northeast sequence (LNE) of the North Shore
Volcanic Group (NSVG) in northeastern Minnesota
represents some of the earliest known sedimentary and
volcanic rocks of the Midcontinent Rift System (MRS)
including the Puckwunge Formation (PF), Grand Portage
Lavas (GPL), Esther Lake Lavas (ELL), and the Hovland
Lavas (HL) (Miller and others, 2002). New 1:24,000 field
mapping in northern Cook County, paired with U/Pb
TIMS zircon geochronology have established an updated
lithostratigraphic sequence of the LNE and understanding
of its relationships with surrounding intrusive rocks,
providing new insights on magmatic evolution and
spreading rates during the Plateau Stage of MRS
magmatism.
The LNE is a shallow to moderately south dipping
bimodal volcanic sequence that youngs southward and is
segregated from the overlying Upper northeast sequence
by the cross-cutting Brule-Hovland Gabbro, a complex of
texturally and mineralogically varied gabbroic and
diabasic intrusions (Fig. 1). To the north, the LNE is
bounded predominantly by cross-cutting Early Stage
Duluth Complex granophyric intrusions and locally by
underlying Paleoproterozoic metasedimentary sequences.
The arenitic sandstones and conglomerates of the PF,
which forms the base of the LNE, lie unconformably on
top of Paleoproterozoic bedrock and forms the base of the
LNE on to which the NSVG rocks were erupted. GPL
volcanics were erupted disconformably atop the PF, and
consist of geochemically primitive basalts, as compared to
overlying LNE volcanics (Mattis, 1972). Basal units of the
GPL are defined by pillowed and fragmental olivine
basalts, transitioning to thick flows of massive to sparsely
amygdaloidal basalts with rubbly tops.
The boundary between the GPL and the overlying ELL is
marked by a distinct change from olivine tholeiite basalts to
thick, pilotaxitic flows of amygdaloidal, oxide-rich ferroandesites and andesitic basalts which exhibit steeper REE

72

Figure 1. Schematic Stratigraphic
Section of the LNE showing locations
of geochronologic samples. See text
for details.

�profiles than GPL basalts. U/Pb zircon geochronologic analysis of a thin rhyolite flow
interlayered with the massive andesitic basalts near the base of the ELL returned an age of ca.
1105.4 Ma (Fig. 1).
Bimodal volcanics of the HL sequence above the ELL are typified by feldspar-phyric to
glomeroporphyritic flows of basalt, basaltic andesite, trachyandesite, and rhyolites. Plagioclase
phenocrysts within the mafic and intermediate lithologies are fractured, locally resorbed, contain
inclusions of olivine and clinopyroxene, and have compositions estimated to be more calcic than
the groundmass feldspars. Mafic and intermediate lithologies are locally pillowed, though most
flows do not show evidence of subaqueous eruption. Rhyolites constitute a large volume of the
upper half of the HL sequence. These rhyolites exhibit abundant autobreccia textures, flow
foliation, pumice fragments, and phenocrysts of feldspar and quartz. Microscopically, HL
rhyolites are texturally diverse, containing microlites, perlitic structures, fiamme, and spherules
interpreted to be a product of volatile-rich lavas and pyroclastic flows. U/Pb zircon analyses of
upper HL rhyolites returned ages of ca. 1105.69 Ma and 1106.0 Ma (Fig. 1). Basalt flows
intercalated with the rhyolite units are thick, structured flows with basal breccias, columnar
jointed massive flow centers, and amygdaloidal flow tops.
Subvolcanic, plagioclase ultraphyric diabase dikes and sills of Burnell’s (1976) Brule Lake
Porphyry (BLP) are abundant throughout the HL. The BLP contains 20-70% plagioclase
phenocrysts hosted within a compositionally varied matrix, and although they have not been
dated, a synvolcanic interpretation has been applied to these intrusions based on their local
amygdaloidal nature and textural similarities to the HL.
New ages from rhyolites in the basal portion of the ELL and upper portion of the HL at ca. 1106
Ma suggest these lavas are volcanic expressions of the coeval Early Stage Duluth Complex
Cucumber Lake and Misquah Hills granophyres exposed to the north of the LNE (Vervoort and
others, 2007). The Early Stage granophyres are interpreted to be a product of assimilation of
continental crust (Vervoort and others, 2007). Such a change in magma composition is reflected
in the lithologic and geochemical character of the ELL and HL as compared to the underlying
GPL. The overlap in ages presented here suggests rapid eruption rates at ca. 1106 Ma, which
indicate the entire ELL and HL sequence erupted within ~1 Ma. Phenocryst-rich volcanic and
hypabyssal rocks throughout the HL and BLP may have been derived from anorthositic
cumulates that formed in the roof of a mid-crustal staging chamber during a period of slow rift
spreading, and subsequently remobilized during magma recharge and venting events at 1106 Ma.
References
Burnell, J.R., Jr., 1976, Petrology and structural relations of the Brule Lake intrusions, Cook County,
Minnesota: Minneapolis, University of Minnesota, M.S. thesis, 105 p., 1 pl.
Mattis, A. F., 1972. The Petrology and Sedimentation of the Basal Keweenawan Sandstones of the North
and South Shores of Lake Superior. University of Minnesota – Duluth, M.S. thesis.
Miller, James D., Jr.; Green, J.C.; Severson, M.J.; Chandler, V.W.; Hauck, S.A.; Peterson, D.M.; Wahl,
T.E., 2002. RI-58 Geology and mineral potential of the Duluth Complex and related rocks of
northeastern Minnesota. Minnesota Geological Survey.
Vervoort, J. D., Wirth, K., Kennedy, B., Sandland, T., &amp; Harpp, K. S., 2007. The magmatic evolution of
the Midcontinent rift: New geochronologic and geochemical evidence from felsic magmatism.
Precambrian Research, 157(1-4), 235-268.

73

�Major element geochemistry and first zircon U-Pb age dates of Precambrian basement
rocks in eastern North Dakota
PEREIRA, Cristian1, NESHEIM, Timothy2, VERVOORT, Jeffrey D. 3, and SAINIEIDUKAT, Bernhardt1,4
1
Department of Earth, Environmental and Geospatial Sciences, North Dakota State University,
Fargo, ND 58102, USA
2

North Dakota Geological Survey, 2835 Campus Rd., Grand Forks, ND 58202 USA
School of the Environment: Earth Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164 USA

3

4

Dept of Chemistry and Biochemistry, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102, USA

We are re-examining cores of the 1977 Red River Valley Drilling Project (Moore, 1978).
Other previous work includes study of the paleoweathered horizon on the Precambrian bedrock
(Kelley, 1980), Klasner and King (1986), Sims et al. (1991) and various ILSG abstracts. We
sampled the Precambrian portions of three of these cores (RRVD #5, #8, #11) from eastern
North Dakota, and a core cut by Kennecott Exploration Company in 2010 (10NDV001;
Nesheim, 2013) (Fig. 1; Table 1). Samples were analyzed at Washington State University (WSU)
for U-Pb zircon age dates. Kelley (1980) reported major element analyses and new analyses were
carried out at WSU and North Dakota State University using XRF (Table 2).
Figure 1. Precambrian geology
map of North Dakota after Nesheim
(2012) and Sims et al. (1991), with
location map and core locations
(stars) for this study

Table 1. Summary of samples, lithology, and zircon age dates
Core / depth
Lat / Long
lithology
Zircon age (MSWD)
RRVD 5
46.225514
Fine to medium grained 2715.0 +/- 18.1 Ma (3.4)
379 ft (115.5 m)
-96.932504
quartz monzonite
RRVD 8A
46.897502
Fine to medium grained 2782.7±9.3 Ma (0.72)
600 ft (182.9 m)
-97.370662
chlorite gneiss
RRVD 11
47.614926
Medium grained biotite 2 populations: younger
693 ft (211.2 m)
-97.291738
granitoid
2671±23.2 Ma (3.0)
10NDV001
48.61706
Medium grained
2694.5±13.6 Ma (1.19)
837 ft (255.1 m)
-97.316902
magnetite-rich granitic
gneiss

74

�Table 2. Whole rock major element analyses
wt.%
1
2
3
4
SiO2
74.00 68.91 64.30 65.80
TiO2
0.16
0.18
0.13
0.42
Al2O3
13.7 10.43 17.40 15.20
Fe2O3
1.36
2.04
4.67
FeO
1.65
MnO
0.01
0.31
0.02
0.10
MgO
0.04
0.44
0.71
0.00
CaO
1.49
4.60
0.91
1.65
Na2O
4.60
0.87
8.16
6.00
K2O
4.22
6.82
5.96
5.90
P2O5
0.09
0.03
0.06
0.05
SO3
0.04
LOI
5.44
sum
99.67 99.72 99.68 99.79
1: RRVD 5-383.5''; 2: RRVD 8A-602';
3: RRVD 11-695'; 4: 10NDV001-836'

Figure 2. U-Pb concordia diagrams for zircons from
the Precambrian core samples with weighted mean
207
Pb/206Pb ages. Error ellipses represent 2SE
uncertainties. Open ellipses with thick grey lines
depict outlier U-Pb zircon analyses removed from
final age determinations.

The analyzed rocks contain 64-74 wt.% SiO2, with RRVD 11-695' showing high total alkalis
(Na2O+K2O = 14.12 wt. %). All show Neoarchean zircon ages (2.7 –2.8 Ga) with the granitoids
showing slightly younger ages than the gneisses (Table 1; Fig. 2). Sample RRVD 11-693 appears
to be a 2 component rock with two zircon populations. These chemical results and measured ages
are consistent with those measured in other areas of the Superior Craton (cf. Li et al., 2020).
REFERENCES:
Kelley, L.I., 1980, Kaolinitic weathering zone on Precambrian basement rocks, Red River Valley, eastern
North Dakota and northwestern Minnesota. M.S. Thesis, University of North Dakota. 85 pp.
Klasner, J.S. and E. R. King. 1986a. Precambrian basement geology of North and South Dakota.
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences. 23(8): 1083-1102. https://doi.org/10.1139/e86-109
Li, D., Hollings, P., Chen, H., Sun, X., Tan, C., and Zurevinski, S., 2020, Zircon U–Pb and Lu–Hf
systematics of the major terranes of the Western Superior Craton, Canada: Mantle-crust
interaction and mechanism(s) of craton formation, Gondwana Research, v. 78, p. 261-277.
Moore, W. L., 1978, A preliminary report on the geology of the Red River Valley Drilling Project,
eastern North Dakota and northwestern Minnesota: Bendix Field Engineering Company
Subcontract H77-059-E, 292p. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/6538603 doi:10.2172/6538603
Nesheim, T., 2012, Review of Radiometric Ages from North Dakota’s Precambrian Basement. North
Dakota Geological Survey Geologic Investigations No. 160.
Nesheim, T., 2013, Recent Diamond Exploration in Eastern North Dakota. NDGS GeoNews, p. 5-7.
Sims, P.K., Peterman, Z.E., Hildenbrand, T.G., and Mahan, S., 1991, Precambrian Basement Map of the
Trans-Hudson Orogen and adjacent terranes, northern Great Plains, U.S.A.: USGS Miscellaneous
Investigations Series Map, I-2214.

75

�The geology and ore deposit model of the high-grade Emily Manganese Deposit, Cuyuna
Range, Minnesota: Results from the 2023 drilling program
PETERSON, Dean1, and STEINER, Alex1
1

Big Rock Exploration, 2505 West Superior Street, Duluth, MN 55806.

The Emily deposit is the highest-grade manganese resource in the USA. The deposit is located
along the western margin of the Paleoproterozoic Animikie Basin (Southwick and Morey, 1991)
and is hosted by the Emily Iron Formation, a shallow water Superior type iron formation. Recent
work by Big Rock Exploration on a drilling program for Electric Metals has identified coherent
zones of high-grade mineralization (30 to ≥40 wt.% Mn) over a 1.25-kilometer strike length. An
ore deposit model has been developed that incorporates the deposition of primary thin-bedded
manganese-iron carbonates (Fig. 1) and later conversion into massive manganese oxide through
early folding (Fig. 2) and prolonged periods of weathering, oxidation, and erosion.

Figure 1. Model of the primary depositional setting of the Paleoproterozoic Superior-type iron formations
of the western Animikie basin.

Figure 2. Schematic model for the formation of the Emily District thrust-front folds as related to the
Penokean fold &amp; thrust belt of the Cuyuna North and South iron ranges.

76

�Historic exploration and drilling in the 1940’s and 1950’s by Pickands Mather and US Steel
identified iron and manganese-bearing mineralization within the Emily Iron Formation (Strond,
1959). US Steel developed but did not implement a preliminary mine plan for mining of the
Emily Deposit. Following approximately 50 years of inactivity, Cooperative Mineral Resources
(subsidiary of Crow Wing Power) pursued a pilot mining operation using pressurized water that
ultimately proved unsuccessful. As a follow up investigation into the outcomes of the pilot
mining, a small-scale drill program was completed in 2010-2012. An Emily deposit drilling
program was designed and executed by Big Rock Exploration, LLC, in 2022-2023. A total of 29
drill holes were completed to extend mineralization and refine the previous resource estimates. A
total of 13,107 feet of drilling was completed for this program. Data collected for this project
includes lithological, structural, geotechnical, and geochemical data from drill cores as well as
geophysical data from selected drill holes.
Through interpretation of legacy, recent and new drilling data, Big Rock Exploration has
redefined the stratigraphy of the Emily Iron Formation and developed an ore deposit model for
the high-grade manganese oxides of the Emily deposit (Fig. 3). This ore deposit model and
associated geological model have been used to support an updated and expanded mineral
resource estimate for the Emily Deposit, to be completed by Forte Dynamics.

Figure 3. Integrated stratigraphy, permeability, texture, and Mn-grade diagram for the Emily deposit.

REFERENCES
Southwick, D.L. and Morey, G.B., 1991, Tectonic imbrication and foredeep development in the Penokean
orogen, east-central Minnesota; an interpretation based on regional geophysics and results of test
drilling, U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1904-C, pp. C1–C17.
Strong, R., 1959, Report on Geological Investigation of the Cuyuna District, Minnesota, 1949-1959, US
Steel Internal Report, 318 pages.

77

�Deformation conditions, micromechanics, and fault zone development in mafic protoliths at
the Lac des Iles mine, northwestern Ontario
PETERZON, Jordan1, PHILLIPS, Noah1, HOLLINGS, Pete1, and DJON, Lionnel2
1

Department of Geology, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Road Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1, Canada
Impala Canada, 69 Yonge Street, Suite 700 Toronto, ON M5E 1K3, Canada

2

Faults and their associated damage zones are important geologic structures that serve as
permeable pathways through the upper crust; however, the effect of host lithology on fault core
development and damage zone structure remains poorly constrained. The development of fault
cores and damage zones is typically controlled by the strength and composition of the protolith,
conditions of deformation, and fluid chemistry (Caine et al., 1996). Fault zones are characterized
by a variably developed fault core composed of unconsolidated gouge or silicified breccias,
outward into a highly fractured damage zone and then a relatively unaltered protolith. Trapped
mineralization may be offset or remobilized by later faulting. Faults may act as conduits or
barriers for fluid flow depending on the proportion of fault core to damage zone (i.e., the fault
zone architecture; Caine et al., 1996; Faulkner et al., 2010). Permeability is typically enhanced in
damage zones due to the high density of fractures and is diminished in fault cores due to the
presence of clay-rich fault gouges.
This study examines deformation conditions and fluid-rock interaction of fault zones
within the Lac des Iles Complex. The Lac des Iles Complex is a series of mafic-ultramafic
intrusive bodies occurring within the Marmion terrane of the Superior Province (Figure 1). The
complex has been dated at 2689 ± 1.0 Ma and was emplaced into a ~3.01 to ~2.68 Ga granitegreenstone terrane (Djon et al., 2018). Extensive Ni-Cu-PGE mineralization has been offset by
two late reverse faults in the high-grade zones (&gt;4 g/t Pd) called the Camp Lake fault and the
Offset fault. A depletion in Pd is observed within the damage zone of each fault, approximately
145 – 180 meters from the actual fault. This depletion is likely due to late fluid flow within the
damage zones.
Fault cores in tonalite mainly are composed of breccias with calcite to quartz-rich matrix,
while fault cores in gabbro are composed of chlorite-rich gouges (Figure 2). Fracture densities in
felsic protoliths have a higher fracture density than mafic protoliths suggesting that fluid flow
would be more effective in felsic protoliths which may have contributed to depleted
mineralization. This implies that host rock lithology strongly affects fault zone structure,
including alteration assemblages, fracture densities, and permeabilities. We hypothesize that the
development of a frictionally weak, chlorite-rich fault core impeded the development of a more
fracture-dense damage zone in the gabbros. Electron microprobe analyses on chlorite grains
reveal three generations of chlorite growth have occurred: pre-faulting at ~350°C, syn-faulting at
~150 – 200°C, and post-faulting at ~150°C (Figure 3). Elemental gains and losses from unaltered
protolith to fault core were examined to understand the interactions between alteration and fault
zones. Within fault cores and damage zones, there is an observable gain in Mg and Fe in mafic
protoliths, due to the precipitation of new chlorite within the fault zone. In mafic protoliths,
fluid-rock interactions play an important role in the development of fault core and damage zone
structures.

78

�Figure 2 Variations in drill core with proximity to faulting.

Figure 1 Local geology of the Lac des Iles
Intrusion with faults of study. Modified from
Djon et al., (2018).

Figure 3 Results of chlorite thermometry from electron microprobe
analyses.
References
Caine, J.S., Evans, J.P., and Forster, C. B., 1996. Fault zone architecture and permeability structure.
Geology, 24 (11): 1025-1028.
Djon, M.L., Peck, D.C., Olivo, G.R., Miller, J.D., and Joy, B., 2008. Contrasting Style of Pd-rich
Magmatic Sulfide Mineralization in the Lac des Iles Intrusive Complex, Ontario, Canada.
Economic Geology, 113 (3): 741-767.
Faulkner, D.R., Jackson, C.A.L., Lunn, R.J., Schlische, R.W., Shipton, Z.K., Wibberley, C.A.J., and
Withjack, M.O., 2010. A review of recent developments concerning the structure, and fluid flow
properties of fault zones. Journal of Structural Geology, 32 (11): 1557-1575.

79

�Identification of Fertile Parent Granitoid Units in the Superior Province of Ontario
PETTIGREW, Therese1, CUNDARI, Robert1, PRICE, Rebecca2, and DUGUET, Manuel3
1

Ontario Geological Survey, 435 James St. South, Thunder Bay, ON P7E 6S7
Ontario Geological Survey, 227 Howey St, Red Lake, ON P0V 2M0
3
Ontario Geological Survey, 933 Ramsey Lake Rd, Sudbury, ON P3E 6B5 Canada

aw
n

2

Peraluminous granites are widely distributed throughout the Superior Province of Ontario, most
notably within and adjacent to the metasedimentary rocks of the English River and Quetico
subprovinces from which they were derived by partial melting. There has been a significant
amount of work that proposes a direct genetic relationship between peraluminous, S-type
granitoids (i.e., fertile parent granites) and rare-element pegmatites of the lithium-cesiumtantalum (LCT) group across the world (see for instance Černý, 1989, 1991; Wise, Müller and
Simmons, 2022, and references therein).

W
ith

dr

A fertile granite is the parental granite to rare-element pegmatite intrusions. Many granitic melts
have the capability to generate fertile granite plutons that will, in turn, produce even more
fractionated melts enriched in incompatible elements. In the case of the LCT group pegmatites,
the residual melt may percolate into the surrounding host rock and crystallize rare-element
pegmatites (Breaks, Selway and Tindle, 2003). Identifying fertile parent granites is an important
step in the exploration for rare-element pegmatites as it greatly reduces the search area on a
regional scale (Breaks and Tindle, 1997). A significant amount of work was performed by the
Ontario Geological Survey (OGS) in the late 1990s and early 2000s to improve our
understanding of rare-element pegmatites and their parent granitoid units in the Superior
Province, with a focus on northwestern Ontario (e.g., Breaks, Selway and Tindle, 2003).
In 2022, ten areas of the Superior Province in Ontario were identified for study as part of the
fertile granite project (Figure 1). Locations for sampling were selected to complement the
existing granitoid geochemical databases acquired by the OGS, as well as to provide coverage in
areas previously not investigated for the presence of fertile granitoid rocks and associated LCT
group pegmatites. The 2022 field season was intended as a preliminary investigation of the
selected areas. A total of 100 samples were collected (Figure 1) and analyzed for major, trace
element and rare earth element geochemistry at the Geoscience Laboratories (Sudbury) to
identify potential fertile parent granite bodies. Due to several staffing changes during the spring
and summer of 2023, focus on the project was delayed and did not resume until the winter of
2023-24.
Further work in support of the fertile granite project will include preliminary evaluation of the
geochemical data set generated during the summer of 2022, compilation of geochemical data
from previous studies and planning for additional sampling during the 2024 field season. The
primary deliverable of the project will be an MRD compiling previously released whole-rock
geochemical data related to fertile granites. This compilation will be supplemented with the new
whole-rock geochemical data acquired during this study. Additionally, several articles will be
generated and released during the course of the project in both the Resident Geologist Program
Recommendations for Exploration (released annually in January) and the Report of Activities
(published annually in the spring).

80

�aw
n
dr

W
ith

Figure 1. Locations of fertile granite project target areas (outlined in black) and sample locations (green
dots) collected in 2022. Regional geology from Ontario Geological Survey (2011, see publication for a
detailed geological legend). Subprovince boundaries are based on Stott (2011) and are outlined in blue
(from Cundari, 2022).

References

Breaks, F.W., Selway, J.B. and Tindle, A.G., 2003. Fertile peraluminous granites and related rare-element
mineralization in pegmatites, Superior Province, northwest and northeast Ontario: Operation
Treasure Hunt; Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Report 6099,
179 p.
Breaks, F.W. and Tindle, A.G., 1997. Rare-element exploration potential of the Separation Lake area: An
emerging target for Bikita-type mineralization in the Superior Province of northwest Ontario; in
Summary of Field Work and Other Activities, 1997, Ontario Geological Survey, Miscellaneous
Paper 168, p. 72-88.
Černý, P., 1989. Exploration strategy and methods for pegmatite deposits of tantalum; in Lanthanides,
tantalum and niobium, Springer-Verlag, New York, p. 274-302.
——— 1991. Rare-element granitic pegmatites. Part 1: Anatomy and internal evolution of pegmatite
deposits. Part 2: Regional to global environments and petrogenesis; Geoscience Canada, v.18, p. 4981.
Cundari, R.M., 2022. Identification of Fertile Parent Granitoid Units in the Superior Province of Ontario:
Project Description; in Summary of Field Work and Other Activities, 2022, Ontario Geological
Survey, Open File Report 6390, p. 30-1 to 30-5.
Ontario Geological Survey, 2011. 1:250 000 scale bedrock of Ontario; Ontario Geological Survey,
Miscellaneous Release—Data 126 – Revision 1.
Stott, G.M., 2011. A revised terrane subdivision of the Superior Province in Ontario; Ontario Geological
Survey, Miscellaneous Release—Data 278.
Wise, M.A., Müller, A. and Simmons, W.B., 2022. A proposed new mineralogical classification system
for granitic pegmatites; The Canadian Mineralogist, v.60, p. 229-248.

81

�Lidar Topography: Bright opportunity for Reading Keweenaw Landscapes
ROSE, Bill1 and DeGRAFF, James1
1Geological

and Mining Engineering and Sciences, Michigan Technological University, 1400 Townsend
Drive, Houghton, MI 49931 USA

A GeoAtlas for Keweenaw, Houghton, and Baraga counties will soon be publicly
accessible as an exciting new tool for understanding landscapes through lidar surveys and
convenient geospatial display tools. In this presentation, we discuss hypotheses that emerged
from a “first look” at this remarkable data which reveals greater detail than standard topographic
maps. The purpose of this discussion is to stimulate robust investigation to build new geological
awareness of geomorphology. The work may be a useful element for geoeducation because of the
improved resolution.

82

�Figure 1: Lidar topography may reveal in situ differentiation within thick lavas of the Portage Lake
Volcanics. Here, lidar data from the Keweenaw GeoAtlas is used with field mapping data from Cornwall
(1951) and Longo (1984). These thick lavas reveal cooling of about 1000 years where the interior texture
of the basalt is pegmatoidal, contrasting with ophitic textures near the bottom and top of the flow where
solidification was faster. Arrows show the same crossections on lidar and geologic maps.

Figure 2: Geology at Traverse Island in Keweenaw Bay. Left -aerial image from Google Earth with
offshore tracing of Jacobsville Sandstone strata (yellow) and fractures (red). Onshore features are from
Denning (1949). Right – onshore tracing of sandstone strata from 2-m resolution Lidar data. White
outline is a caprock of “quartzite” with a possible channel form at its western edge.
References
Cornwall, H.R., 1951, Differentiation in Magmas of the Keweenawan Series, J Geol, v. 59, pp. 151-172.
Denning, R.M., 1949, The Petrology of the Jacobsville Sandstone, Lake Superior: Michigan College of
Mining and Technology [MTU], M.S. thesis, 71 p.
Longo, A.A., 1984, A correlation for a middle Keweenawan flood basalt: the Greenstone flow, Isle Royale
and Keweenaw Peninsula, Michigan, M.S. thesis, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI,
198 pp.

83

�Michigan Coastal Path: A Social Commitment to Geoeducation
ROSE, Bill1 and VYE, Erika2
1

Geological and Mining Engineering &amp; Sciences, Michigan Technological University,
1400 Townsend Drive, Houghton, MI 49931 USA
2
Great Lakes Research Center, Michigan Technological University,
1400 Townsend Drive, Houghton, MI 49931 USA

The geology of the Midcontinent Rift is beautifully exposed for researchers, teachers,
students, and geotourists in the Keweenaw Peninsula and Isle Royale
(http://carnegiekeweenaw.org/social-post/keweenaw-shorelines-bill-rose). Michigan holds title to
the surrounding bottomlands of the Great Lakes under the Public Trust Doctrine in addition to a
public trust interest in the shorelands up to the ordinary high water mark (OHWM). Michigan
confronts the challenge of discerning the boundaries between public trust interests and private
property rights at the shore (Norton et al, 2013). In 1968, the Michigan Legislature adopted an
elevation-based approach for discerning the ordinary high water mark (OHWM). In 2005, the
Michigan Supreme Court reaffirmed that Michigan's public trust interest extends up to the
OHWM, but it left unresolved questions of exactly how the two methods of marking ordinary
high water relate to one another, and precisely how far up the shore the state has authority to
regulate private shoreline development extends. (Norton et al, 2011). Here we describe the
definitions of high water lines for geologic discussion. How may both landowner and hiker
amicably agree on the high water mark when we meet along the shore?

Figure 1: Shoreline exposures reveal the rock details clearly - veins of calcite (near the
Copper Harbor Light) and native copper (Washington Island).

84

�Figure 2: Shoreline of Copper Harbor Conglomerate on Manitou Island. The zonation and succession of
shorelines may be seen and used to define the high water mark.
References
Norton, R. K., Meadows, G.A., and Meadows, L.A. (2013). The deceptively complicated “elevation
ordinary high-water mark” and the problem with using it on a Laurentian Great Lakes shore. Journal of
Great Lakes Research, Volume 39, Issue 4, pp 527-535.
Norton, R.K. &amp; Meadows, G.A. (2014). Land and water governance on the shores of the Laurentian
Great Lakes. Water International 39:6, pages 901-920.

85

�Jacobsville Geoheritage is Globally Celebrated and Locally Loved
ROSE, Bill1 and VYE, Erika2
1

Geological and Mining Engineering &amp; Sciences, Michigan Technological University,
1400 Townsend Drive, Houghton, MI 49931 USA
2
Great Lakes Research Center, Michigan Technological University,
1400 Townsend Drive, Houghton, MI 49931 USA

The Jacobsville Sandstone is a well-known red bed sandstone of Neoproterozoic age from
Upper Michigan, USA (Cannon and Nicholson, 2001) and is part of the Keweenaw Supergroup
related to the Midcontinent Rift System. The rift formed ~1100 Ma and is a ~3000 km long
feature in North America, centered on the Lake Superior area. The Jacobsville is the youngest of
the area’s Precambrian rocks and was deposited during the Rigolet Phase of the Grenvillian
Orogeny (1010-980 Ma) (Hodgin et al 2022). Cliff exposures show crossbedding and channels
interpreted as fluvial deposits.
Jacobsville Sandstone was a fashionable building stone in much of Eastern North America.
From 1885 to 1920, it was used in hundreds of prominent buildings including the famous Astoria
Hotel in New York City (Eckert, 2000). It was mined from several quarry sites near Jacobsville,
Michigan. The location is part of a significant geoheritage location where native copper has also
been mined, valued, and utilized for thousands of years. The development of copper mining
drove extensive immigration of Europeans to Upper Michigan. The Jacobsville quarries offered
an alternative to underground employment in the booming mining industry of the Keweenaw.
Since quarrying has ceased, Jacobsville quarries have been overgrown and are often
overlooked. Highlighting the significance of these places and increasing access offers an
opportunity to teach locals and visitors about Earth's history and natural/cultural resources. It
connects people to a significant element of Keweenaw geoheritage often eclipsed by the history
of copper mining. In recent years we have been building awareness of the geohistory and
geoheritage of Jacobsville quarrying. This awareness is building educational outreach focused on
this remarkable rock formation which features in many local towns.
The International Union of Geological Sciences (IUGS) and UNESCO’s International
Geoscience Programme (IGP) have announced that the Jacobsville Sandstone - a rock formation
named for Jacobsville, Michigan - is now one of only 15 Global Heritage Stone Resources
(GHSR) in the world and the first in the United States (Rose et al, 2017). Global Heritage Stone
Resources (GHSR) are scientific designations created and managed by the Heritage Stone
Subcommission – HSS (IUGS/IAEG) to enhance the geological knowledge, use, and
conservation of natural stones of historical importance worldwide.
Highlights of recent Jacobsville geoheritage efforts include boat tours that explore the rock
exposures in spectacular cliff views and Michigan historic signage in Houghton and other towns.
References
WF Cannon and SW Nicholson, 2001, Geologic Map of the Keweenaw and Adjacent Area Michigan:
U.S. Geological Survey Map I-2696, scale = 1:100,000.
WI Rose, EC Vye, CA Stein, DH Malone, JP Craddock and S Stein (2017) Jacobsville Sandstone: A
candidate for nomination for Global Heritage Stone Resource, Michigan, USA. Episodes 40 (3), 213-219

86

�K.B. Eckert, (2000). The Sandstone Architecture of the Lake Superior Region. Wayne State University
Press, Detroit, USA, 344 p.
EB Hodgin, NL Swanson-Hysell, JM DeGraff, ARC Kylander-Clark, MD Schmitz, AC Turner, Y
Zhang, DA Stolper (2022). Final inversion of the Midcontinent Rift during the Rigolet Phase of the
Grenvillian Orogeny. Geology 2022; 50 (5): 547–551

Fig 1: Red Jacket firehouse in Calumet (built in
1898–99) – National Register of Historic Places.
Use through Creative Commons by Andrew Jameson.

Fig 2: One of many cliff exposures of the
Neoproterozoic Jacobsville Sandstone, here
about 1 km N of the town of Jacobsville, 19 km
SE of Houghton, in Michigan’s Keweenaw
Peninsula. Cliff exposures are found in dozens
of locations within Keweenaw Bay. Photo by
Steve Brimm.
Fig 3: Jacobsville Quarry near Portage
Entry, in operation, about 1895 (MTU Neg
03965, Michigan Technological University
Archives and Copper Country Historical
Collections, Houghton, Michigan Michigan
Technological University Archives).

87

�Compiled historical drillhole and geochemical data from the Cuyuna Range, Minnesota,
provides powerful new insights for geological and mineral potential investigations.
SAARI, Stacy1, GORDEE, Sarah1, RIAN, Madison1, and CARTER, Matt1
1

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Lands and Minerals, 1525 Third Ave. East, Hibbing, MN
55746

The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) staff of Lands and Minerals (LAM)
compiled a large tabular dataset of drill hole locations, geological logs, and geochemical data
from the Cuyuna Iron Range of central Minnesota as part of the federally funded Earth Mapping
Resources Initiative (Earth MRI). These data will help to determine where potential resources of
iron and manganese, as well as other critical minerals, may exist in the underlying bedrock.
Iron in the Cuyuna Range was discovered in 1903 by Cuyler Adams and was actively mined until
1984. Prior to the end of WW1, there were 37 active mines on the Cuyuna Range. The lack of
outcrop hindered the geological understanding and definition of the resources, and over 12,000
exploration holes were drilled over this period (Morey et al., 1977). Some of the historical
explorers and mining operators in this area included: Orelands Mining Company, Evergreen
Mining, Pittsburg-Pacific, Pickands-Mather, Oliver Iron Mining (division of US Steel), Inland
Steel, Rogers-Brown Company, and Zontelli Brothers (Sutherland, 2016). Since the end of active
mining in this district, the DNR LAM office in Hibbing has accumulated thousands of mining
and mineral exploration documents from various companies.
Current estimates suggest that the Cuyuna Range is among the top three largest manganese
occurrences in the United States, justifying continued interest in its resource potential (Strong,
1959; Beltrame et al., 1981; Kilgore and Thomas, 1982; Cannon et al., 2017). From the 1940s to
1960s, the US Bureau of Mines (USBM) assembled, coded, and entered location and
geochemical data for about 40% of the 12,833 drill holes available from the USBM Minnesota
Mineral Development Atlas. USBM used criteria such as depth of overburden, past mining
activity, availability of manganese data, and the availability of the sample material to determine
which data to prioritize. All data were entered from public land survey (PLS) sections if there
were fewer than 80 drillholes. For PLS sections exceeding 80 drillholes, then only 5 drillholes
were entered for each quarter-quarter. This compilation resulted in data for 5,045 drillholes
across the entire Cuyuna Range (Morey et al., 1977).
Further, in the early 1990s, the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) created several databases to
compile the assays and geologic logs from the USBMs dataset. Their database contains around
12,000 holes which have limited assay data and generalized geologic logs. Many of these
drillhole sites were also entered in the Minnesota Well Index. As part of the Earth MRI project
the MGS transferred thousands of maps and drill logs to the DNR.
Compiling and managing 10,000s of documents and drill hole locations is a complicated and
enormous undertaking, however, the use of geospatial software (i.e., ArcGIS), artificial
intelligence and machine learning, and MicroMine 3D modelling software has accelerated the
process. Without these technological resources, it would be difficult and time consuming to track

88

�duplication among the various exploration documents as well as the rebranding of drillhole
names by successive explorers. The DNR merged the USBM and MGS databases and used the
MicroMine software to help identify and resolve missing intervals, overlapping intervals,
missing or incorrect azimuth and inclination, drillholes without analytical data, missing total
depth, values beyond the end of the drillhole, and coincident drillhole collars. It would be nearly
impossible to uncover these errors by hand.
DNR staff curated and compiled a collection of US Steel data from the 1950s that was not
included in its entirety in either the MGS or USBM compilations. These and other historic
exploration data added drill logs and assays for hundreds of holes to the DNR’s drillhole
compilation, mainly from the Emily area. Intervals that were assayed from these holes were often
missing geological information, likely because the alteration and mineralization made
interpretation difficult for the earliest explorers. Any missing collar elevations were obtained
from 2012 1-m Lidar, knowing that inaccuracies may exist from previously mined areas or
existing stockpiles post-exploration. DNR staff consolidated lithology types by limiting
modifiers related to alteration or mineralization and extracted all assay data to create a working
3D model of the Emily district. Not only will future users have access to this model, but they will
also be able to easily search by key words, sort based on geochemical results, and view the
geographical location of the data.
The data compilation is the first of a three-phase project which will be followed by ground and
airborne geophysics and later supported by petrographical, lithochemical and geochronological
analyses. Subsequent geologic mapping, mineral potential evaluation, and a geological
interpretation for the rest of the Cuyuna district will complete this project. The project will
culminate in an Earth MRI data release and report in 2026.
REFERENCES:
Beltrame, R.J., Holtzman, R.C., and Wahl, T.E., 1981, Manganese resources of the Cuyuna Range, eastcentral Minnesota: Saint Paul, Minn., Minnesota Geological Survey Report of Investigations 24, 22 p.
Cannon, W.F., Kimball, B.E., and Corathers, L.A., 2017, Manganese, in chap. L of Schulz, K.J.,
DeYoung, J.H., Jr., Seal, R.R., II, and Bradley, D.C., eds., Critical mineral resources of the United
States—Economic and environmental geology and prospects for future supply: USGS Professional
Paper 1802, p. L1–L28.
Jirsa, M. A., Boerboom, T. J., Chandler, V. W., 2012, Geologic Map of Minnesota, Precambrian
Geology, Minnesota Geological Survey Map S-22, 1:500,000.
Kilgore, C.C., and Thomas, P.R., 1982, Manganese availability - Domestic: U.S. Bureau of Mines
Information Circular 8889, 14 p.
Morey, G.B., Broberg, J., Beltrame, R.J., and Holtzman, R.C., 1977, Manganese-Bearing Ores of the
Cuyuna Iron Range, East-Central Minnesota, MGS Report of Investigation for Grant U.S.D.I., Bureau
of Mines G0264002, 185 p.
Strong, R., 1959, Report on Geological Investigation of the Cuyuna District, Minnesota, 1949-1959, U.S.
Steel - Oliver Iron Mining Division, 301 p., 6 plates.
Sutherland, Frederick E., 2016, The Cuyuna Range: Legacy of a 20th Century Industrial Community.
Ph.D. thesis, Michigan Technological University, 271 p.

89

�Understanding the evolution of the upper Midwest Archean gneiss dome corridor
using apatite, titanite, and monazite LA-ICP-MS U-Pb geochronology and
microstructural analyses
SALERNO, Ross1, CANNON, William1, SOUDERS, Amanda2, and THOMPSON, Jay2
1

U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA 20192, 2U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO 80225

The origin of the Archean gneiss dome corridor stretching across Minnesota, Wisconsin,
and northern Michigan is an important question for understanding the Paleoproterozoic tectonic
evolution of the upper Midwest. The formation of these gneiss domes was originally attributed to
orogenic collapse during the Penokean orogeny (1.86-1.83 Ga) (Schneider et al., 2004). More but
more recent work, however, indicates their exhumation may be more closely linked to a suite of
younger structures and metamorphism which are broadly concurrent with the Yavapai event
between 1.78-1.75 Ga (e.g., Tinkham and Marshak, 2004; Schulz and Cannon, 2007). In this
study, we leverage new LA-ICP-MS U-Pb geochronology and microstructural observations
using EBSD (electron backscatter diffraction) to shed light on the timing of metamorphism and
deformation related to the exhumation of these domes to understand the broader tectonic
framework in which they formed.
We investigate a suite of metamorphosed and deformed rocks collected from both inside
and adjacent to these gneiss domes in northern Michigan (Figure 1). We show that these rocks
have metamorphic U-Pb ages ranging from Neoarchean to Mesoproterozoic, reflecting the
prolonged tectonic history of the southern margin of Laurentia (Figure 2). In the Paleoarchean
Watersmeet gneiss, titanite grains have U-Pb intercept ages of 2550±46 (2σ, n=36) Ma,
concurrent with the Sacred Heart orogeny. The U-Pb concordia ages of apatite in the Watersmeet
gneiss at 1869±32 (2σ, n=27) Ma, and monazite U-Pb ages in the Hardwood gneiss at 1826±21
(2σ, n=36) Ma, reflect metamorphism of these rocks during the Penokean orogeny. Several
samples have apatite U-Pb concorida ages that indicate heating continued for tens of millions of
years after the end of the Penokean orogeny at about 1830 Ma: at 1815±32 Ma (2σ, n=17) in the
Republic trough, at 1803±29 Ma (2σ, n=49) in the Hardwood gneiss, and at 1796±29 (2σ,
n=51)Ma in the Michigamme Formation directly adjacent to the Watersmeet dome.
Our dataset documents the influence of post-Penokean orogenic events on the rocks of
the gneiss dome corridor in northern Michigan. In the Neoarchean Carney Lake gneiss,
migmatitic rocks have titanite U-Pb ages of 1752±71 Ma (2σ, n=53), indicating reactivation
during the Yavapai orogeny. In the Solberg schist, in the Felch trough, titanite grains have
recrystallized into aggregates of subgrains, likely formed during deformation. These titanite
grains have U-Pb ages of 1713±32 Ma (2σ, n=82), which we interpret to reflect the timing of
deformation-induced recrystallization. The U-Pb ages of apatite in the Solberg schist are
markedly younger at 1588±28 Ma (2σ, n=46) and align with the timing of the Mazatzal orogeny.
Together, these new U-Pb data add to a growing body of evidence that the present architecture of
the gneiss dome corridor in the upper Midwest is at least in part due to post-Penokean orogenic
events.

90

�Figure 1. Generalized geologic map of the study area (modified from Tinkham and Marshack, 2004)
showing the locations of sample sites with yellow stars. Black dots show the position of towns W:
Watersmeet, R: Republic, H: Hardwood, and M: Marquette.

Figure 2. The LA-ICP-MS U-Pb ages of apatite, titanite, and monazite for the samples in this study. The
vertical bars represent the timing of major orogenic events along the southern margin of the Superior
craton and Laurentia.
References
Schneider. S., Holm. D., O’Boyle. C., Hamilton. M., Jercinovic. M., 2004, Paleoproterozoic development
of a gneiss dome corridor in the southern Lake Superior region, USA: GSA Special Paper 380, 339357.
Schulz. K., Cannon. W., 2007, The Penokean orogeny in the Lake Superior Region: Precambrian
Research, 157, 4-5.
Tinkham. D., Marshak. S., 2004, Precambrian dome and keel structure in the Penokean orogenic belt of
northern Michigan, USA: GSA Special Paper 380, 321-338.

91

�Analysis of deformation-related structures in the Eau Claire Volcanic Complex, Wisconsin
SHAKKED, Daniel, L.1, ROBARGE, Lucas, C.1 and LODGE, Robert W.D. 1
1

Department of Geology and Environmental Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, Eau Claire,
WI 54701, USA

This study is focused on the Penokean-aged (1.8-1.9 Ga) deformation fabrics and
microstructures in the Big Falls region of the Eau Claire Volcanic Complex (ECVC),
Northwestern Wisconsin. Varying intensities of deformation and metamorphism within the
Penokean Orogeny are extensive and well documented, particularly in the External Domain in
the northern parts of the orogen. However, the southernmost regions are more poorly studied
because outcrops are present as rare erosional outliers in river channels. Structural interpretation,
and by association terrane boundaries, have largely been inferred from geophysical data. This
project focused on describing the structural and metamorphic fabric development at two field
areas: one studying the origin of the gneissic banding within the amphibolitic banded gneiss
(Figure 1A), while the other being a study on the genesis of the migmatitic fabrics (Figure 1B).
The goal of this research is to petrographically and geochemically interpret the deformation
mechanisms of the ECVC and improve its tectonic context to the rest of the Penokean orogeny.
There are two main volcanic terranes within the Penokean Orogeny and are sutured
together by the Eau Pleine Shear Zone. The Pembine-Wausau terrane is characterized as a
juvenile arc-system formed through subduction and was accreted onto the southern edge of the
Superior Craton. This was followed by the accretion of the Marshfield Terrane; an Archean
microcontinent overprinted by Paleoproterozoic magmatism. Historical interpretations of the
ECVC suggested these rocks were deposited on the Marshfield Terrane, but recent geochemical
and petrochronological studies show a mantle-derived, oceanic affinity (Lodge et al, 2023;
Weber et al., 2023). Therefore, revisiting and reinterpreting the tectonic context of the ECVC to
the Marshfield Terrane is warranted.
The previous interpretation of the bedrock at Big Falls County Park suggests gneissic
banding was inherited from igneous layering from a layered mafic intrusion (Cummings, 1984).
This study describes field and petrographic observations that indicate intense ductile fabric
development during shearing such as asymmetric inclusions, pressure shadows, and feldspar
grain-boundary migration within the gneiss (Figure 1A, 1C). Comparison of these textures with
other sheared amphibolites and amphibolitic gneisses support the interpretation that banding is,
at least in part, caused by intense shearing (e.g. Bozkurt et al., 1997). Geochemical analysis of
the Big Falls Region shows a hydrated, mantle-derived signature closely related to an E-MORB
oceanic-arc system, indicating that these magmas are not derived from an Archean, continental
fragment (Weber et al. 2023). Structural analysis of these rocks shows extensive fabric shearing
and deformation, supporting the theory that these rocks are structurally emplaced.
Petrographic and outcrop analysis of the tonalite intrusion and “lensoidal amphibolite” in
the Little Falls region indicates the gneissic fabrics and banding are migmatites. Two possible
theories for the genesis of the migmatites are suggested: anataxis of the amphibolite and
granulite facies metamorphism (Ashworth 2011) or melt injection from the tonalite intrusion
during the Penokean deformation. Previous interpretations of the Little Falls region indicated
three episodes of metamorphism (Cummings 1984). Evidence of a weak foliation and
recrystallization in the tonalite intrusion (Figure 1D) containing xenoliths of banded amphibolite
gneiss suggests at least two metamorphic events. However, its relationship to the thermal event
that formed the migmatites is uncertain.

92

�A

B

C

D

Figure 1: A: Outcrop photo of amphibolitic bands and sheared garnet-hornblende porphyroblasts in
banded gneiss, Big Falls County Park, Wisconsin. B: Outcrop photo of migmatite at Little Falls County
Park, Wisconsin. The neosome consists of quartz, plagioclase, and feldspars while the paleosome consists
of hornblende, biotite, and chlorite in the picture. C: Photomicrograph (XPL, 10x) of strained feldspar
crystal with grain boundary migration, and an amphibole band being deflected via shearing above the
feldspar grain. D: Photomicrograph (XPL, 10x) of the tonalite intrusion at Little Falls which contains
quartz, plagioclase, biotite, hornblende, and chlorite.

References
Ashworth, J.R., 2011, Migmatites. New York, NY, Springer, 371 pp.
Bozkurt, E., and Park, R.G., 1997, Microstructures of deformed grains in the augen gneisses of southern
Menderes Massif (western Turkey) and their tectonic significance: Geologische Rundschau:
Zeitschrift für allgemeine Geologie, v. 86, p. 103–119.
Cummings, M.L., 1984, The Eau Claire River complex: A metamorphosed Precambrian mafic intrusion
in western Wisconsin: Geological Society of America bulletin, v. 95, p. 75.
Lodge, R.W.D., Weber, E.M., and Hooper, R.L., 2023, Precambrian Geology of the Eau Claire River
Valley: Re-discovering the Eau Claire Volcanic Complex, in Lodge, R.W.D. ed., Institute on
Lake Superior Geology Proceedings, 69th Annual Meeting, Eau Claire, Wisconsin, Part 2 – Field
Trip Guidebooks, p.47-70.
Schulz, K.J., and Cannon, W.F., 2007, The Penokean orogeny in the Lake Superior region: Precambrian
research, v. 157, p. 4–25.
Weber, E.M., Lodge, R.W.D., and Marsh, J.H., 2023, U/Pb geochronology and zircon petrochronology of
Paleoproterozoic magmas from the Marshfield terrane, Institute on Lake Superior Geology
Proceedings, 69th Annual Meeting, Eau Claire, Wisconsin, Part 1-Program and Abstracts, p. 9798.

93

�Geochemistry and Petrology of the Eagle’s Nest Intrusion, McFaulds Lake Greenstone
Belt, Northern Ontario
SHESHNEV, Vlad1, HOLLINGS, Peter1, PHILLIPS, Noah1, WESTON, Ryan2, DELLER,
Matt2, CAMPBELL, Dana2
1

Department of Geology, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Road, Thunder Bay, ON, P7B 5E1, Canada
Wyloo Metals, 1-1127 Premier Way, Thunder Bay, ON, P7B 0A3, Canada

2

The Eagle’s Nest intrusion hosts economically significant orthomagmatic Ni-Cu-(PGE)
mineralization located in the McFaulds Lake greenstone belt within the northern regions of the
Archean Superior province, approximately 500km northeast of Thunder Bay, Ontario. The
Eagle’s Nest intrusion is part of the 2734 Ma ultramafic-dominated Koper Lake subsuite of the
larger Ring of Fire intrusive suite (Metsaranta et al., 2015; Houlé et al., 2020). The mineralized
ore body of the Eagle’s Nest intrusion is zoned, with massive sulfide mineralization at its
northwestern extent that gradationally becomes semi-massive, net-textured and disseminated to
the southeast (Zucceralli et al., 2022). Mineralization consists of 11.1 million tonnes of proven
and probable mineral reserves containing 1.68% Ni, 0.87% Cu, 0.89g/t Pt, 3.09g/t Pd and 0.18g/t
Au (Burgess et al., 2012). The intrusion was emplaced along a sub-horizontal conduit, forming a
blade-shaped dike (Barnes and Mungall, 2018). Mineralization is consistent with gravitational
sulfide segregation at the basal, northwestern contact of the intrusion. Subsequent deformation
rotated the intrusion into its present day, subvertical orientation, with a width of ~500m,
thickness of ~150m and vertical extent &gt;1600m.
Parental magma composition of the Eagle’s Nest intrusion has been determined on a
number of occasions but with contrasting outcomes. A low MgO komatiitic magma composition
with ~22% MgO and ~12% total FeO was proposed by Mungall et al. (2010). In contrast,
Zuccarelli et al. (2022) reported olivine compositions of Fo82-86 consistent with picritic parental
magmas containing moderate MgO (10-20%) and high total FeO (&gt;12%). The contrasting results
means that parental magma composition of the Eagle’s Nest intrusion needs to be further
constrained. The objectives of this study are to petrographically and geochemically characterize
the (1) unmineralized portions of the Eagle’s Nest intrusion and (2) associated offshoot dikes in
the vicinity, and (3) constrain the parental magma characteristics by using geochemical,
petrographic, mineral chemistry, and radiogenic isotope techniques.
A total of 136 samples were collected for this study. Forty-four samples came from
offshoot dikes consisting of fine- to medium-grained mafic to ultramafic units. Eighty-seven
samples were collected from within the intrusion comprising peridotite (Fig. 1), gabbro, and
chilled margin samples. Lastly, five samples were collected from the host wall-rock of the
intrusion which consists of tonalite. One-hundred and twenty-one samples were analyzed for
major and trace elements using Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectroscopy
(ICP-AES) and Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS), respectively. An
initial batch of 30 thin sections was prepared consisting of 15 offshoot dikes, eight contacts, and
seven peridotite samples. Twenty samples from the intrusion were selected for Sm-Nd isotopes.
To constrain the parental magma composition, three approaches will be considered: (1)
examination of preserved chilled margins along the length of the chonolith, (2) examination of
chilled margins preserved in the magmatic breccia matrix within the stratigraphic hanging-wall

94

�of the intrusion, and (3) mineral chemistry of fresh olivine preserved within the peridotite
horizons of the intrusion. The parental magma composition obtained from these three methods
will be further compared to ensure consistency between the methods. The intrusion’s magmatic
history will be constrained using the obtained Sm-Nd isotope data, which will provide further
insights into the mantle source and contamination history of the melts that formed the Eagle’s
Nest intrusion.

Figure 1. Photomicrograph in crossed-polarized light (XPL) of a peridotite sample containing
serpentinized cumulus olivine and poikilitic orthopyroxene with fresh olivine within the oikocryst.

References
Barnes, S.J. and Mungall, J.E. 2018 Blade-shaped dikes and nickel sulfide deposits: A model for the
emplacement of ore-bearing small intrusions: Economic Geology, v. 113, p. 789 – 798.
Burgess, H., Gowans, R., Jacobs, C., Murahwi, C. and Damjanović, B. 2012. Noront Resources Ltd.—NI
43–101 technical report feasibility study—McFaulds Lake Property, Eagle’s Nest Project, James
Bay Lowlands, Ontario, Canada: Micon International Ltd., 197p.
Houlé, M.G., Lesher, C.M., Metsaranta, R.T., Sappin, A.-A., Carson, H.J.E., Schetselaar, E.M., McNicoll,
V., and Laudadio, A., 2020. Magmatic architecture of the Esker intrusive complex in the Ring of
Fire intrusive suite, McFaulds Lake greenstone belt, Superior Province, Ontario: Implications for
the genesis of Cr and Ni-Cu-(PGE) mineralization in an inflationary dyke-chonolith-sill complex:
Geological Survey of Canada, Open File 8722, p. 141–163.
Metsaranta, R.T., Houlé, M.G., McNicoll, V.J., and Kamo, S.L., 2015. Revised geological framework for
the McFaulds Lake greenstone belt, Ontario: Geological Survey of Canada, Open File 7856, p.
61–73.
Mungall, J.E., Harvey, J.D., Balch, S.J., Azar, B., Atkinson, J., and Hamilton, M.A., 2010, Eagle’s Nest: A
magmatic Ni-sulfide deposit in the James Bay lowlands, Ontario, Canada: Society of Economic
Geologists Special Publication, v. 15, p. 539–557.
Zuccarelli, N., Lesher, C.M., Houlé, M.G., Weston, R. and Barnes, S.J. 2022. The diversity of nettextured sulfides in Magmatic Sulfide Deposits: Insights from the Eagle’s Nest Ni-Cu-(PGE)
Deposit, McFaulds Lake greenstone belt, Superior Province, Canada: Economic Geology, v. 117
(8), p. 1731 – 1759.

95

�New LA-ICP-MS U-Pb geochronology of Archean rocks, central Upper Peninsula,
Michigan, USA: a step toward refining the final assembly of the Superior craton
SOUDERS, A.K.1, CANNON, W.F.2, DRENTH, B.J.1, SALERNO, R.A.2, THOMPSON,
J.M.1, SYLVESTER, P.J.3
1

U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO 80225 USA (asouders@usgs.gov)
U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA 20192 USA
3
Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
2

The central Upper Peninsula, Michigan consists of two contrasting Archean terranes of the
Superior Province: the granite-greenstone terrane of the Wawa-Abitibi Subprovince in the north
(Northern Complex) and the gneisses of the Minnesota River Valley Subprovince (MRVS) in the
south (Southern Complex). The two terranes are separated by the Great Lakes Tectonic Zone
(GLTZ). The suturing of the MRVS to the southern margin of the Superior Province and
development of the GLTZ, long interpreted to have occurred at about 2.69 Ga, has more recently
been suggested to be related to the ca. 2.58 - 2.6 Ga Sacred Heart Orogeny (Schmitz et al. 2018;
Cannon et al. 2024, this volume), a proposal that we are still evaluating. In this study we present
new LA-ICP-MS U-Pb geochronology for Archean crystalline rocks from both the Northern
Complex and Southern Complex, across the GLTZ. This age characterization is essential to
define/refine the regional geochronologic framework of ‘basement’ rocks in the central Upper
Peninsula. This is essential to understand subsequent geologic processes.
Heavy mineral separates were produced using Electro Pulse Dissagregation (EPD) followed by
heavy liquid separation at Zirchron (AZ, USA). Individual zircon grains were hand-picked and
mounted in 25 mm epoxy resin mounts and polished to a 1 µm finish. All samples were imaged
via cathodoluminescence in the Denver Microbeam Lab (USGS) using the JEOL 5800 LV SEM.
LA-ICP-MS analyses were made using a Nu AttoM sector field ICP-MS coupled to a NWR 193
ArF excimer laser system in the Mineral Isotope Laser Laboratory (MILL) at Texas Tech
University. Typical laser ablation conditions during all analytical runs were a fluence of 3 J/cm2,
8 Hz, and 240 laser pulses using a 15 µm laser spot. Data was reduced using Iolite v.4 (Paton et
al. 2011) and final age calculations were made using IsoplotR (Vermeesch, 2018). We are
presently working on zircon LA-MC-ICP-MS Hf isotope analyses to characterize the source
components of Archean crystalline rocks from the Northern Complex and Southern Complex.
Zircon grains from nine rocks in the Southern Complex and six rocks in the Northern Complex
were targeted for LA-ICP-MS U-Pb analysis. Examples of samples analyzed from Southern
Complex granitic gneisses are shown in Figure 1. For all samples, the age spectrum of concordant
grains is complicated with multiple inherited populations within a single sample. This observation
is like that presented by Ayuso et al. (2018) for the ca. 2700 Ma Carney Lake gneiss and ca. 2750
Ma Hardwood gneiss, south of our current study area. Examples of crystalline samples analyzed
from the Northern Complex are shown in Figure 2. A single age population for zircon grains
analyzed with little to no evidence of Early or Middle Archean inheritance is common for Northern
Complex basement samples. These data support the fundamental difference between the primitive
volcanic/plutonic terrane of the Northern Complex and an older Archean continental crustal
component in the Southern Complex.

96

�Figure 1. Examples of a subset of Archean granitic rocks sampled from the Southern Complex, MI

Figure 2. Examples of a subset of Archean granitic rocks sampled from the Northern Complex, MI
References
Ayuso, R.A, Schulz, K.J., Cannon, W.F., Woodruff, L.G., Vazquez, J.A., Foley, N.K., Jackson J. (2018)
New U-Pb Zircon Ages for Rocks from the Granite-Gneiss Terrane in Northern Michigan:
Evidence for Events at ~3750, 2750, and 1850 Ma. ILSG, Proceedings 64th Annual Meeting.
Cannon, W.F., Souders, A.K., Drenth, B.J., Ayuso, R.A. (2024) The Sacred Hearth Orogeny in Michigan:
Latest Archean Granites and the Great Lakes Tectonic Zone. ILSG, Proceedings 70th Annual
Meeting.
Paton, C., Hellstrom, J., Paul, B.,Woodhead, J. and Hergt, J. (2011) Iolite: Freeware for the visualisation
and processing of mass spectrometric data. JAAS. doi:10.1039/c1ja10172b.
Schmitz, M.D., Southwick, D.L., Bickford, M.E., Mueller, P.A., Samson, S.D. (2018) Neoarchean and
Paleoproterozoic events in the Minnesota River Valley subprovince, with implications for southern
Superior craton evolution and correlation. Precambrian Research, v.316, p. 206-226.
Vermeesch, P. (2018) IsoplotR: a free and open toolbox for geochronology. Geoscience Frontiers.
doi: 10.1016/j.gsf.2018.04.001.

97

�Geochemical fingerprints from the late Mesoproterozoic epeiric seaway of the Nonesuch
Formation, Wisconsin and Michigan, USA
STEWART, Esther K.1,2, TAPPA, Michael1, BAUER, Ann1, PRAVE, Anthony3, and
BRENGMAN, Latisha4
1

Department of Geoscience, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey, UW-Madison Division of Extension, Madison,
Wisconsin 53705, USA
3
School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of St. Andrews KY16 9TS, Scotland/UK
4
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Minnesota-Duluth, Duluth, Minnesota
55812, USA
2

The Oronto Group (Copper Harbor Conglomerate, Nonesuch Formation, and Freda
Formation) of the southern Lake Superior Region preserves an exceptional record of late
Mesoproterozoic environments and associated microfossils (e.g., Cumming et al., 2013;
Fedorchuk et al., 2016; Strother and Wellman, 2021). A lacustrine rift basin is often cited as the
most plausible depositional setting for the ca. 1080 Ma Nonesuch Formation because of its
association with alluvial deposits of the underlying Copper Harbor Conglomerate and overlying
Freda Formation and because of its location within interior Laurentia (Elmore et al., 1989;
Slotznick et al., 2023). Our recent sedimentologic and stratigraphic evidence demonstrates
deposition of the lower Oronto Group within a tide- and wave-influenced estuary (Stewart et al.,
2023, see also Hieshima and Pratt, 1991; Jones et al., 2020). New geochemical results from
Nonesuch Formation carbonates (Figure 1), including strontium (Sr), carbon (C), and oxygen (O)
isotope compositions, rare earth element - yttrium (REY) patterns, and trace element ratios
complement and add new dimension to this environmental interpretation.
Strontium isotope compositions refine the Precambrian marine 87Sr/86Sr curve (Chen et
al., 2021), with the Nonesuch recording relatively radiogenic compositions at ca. 1080 Ma
between previously reported values of 0.706600 at ca. 1109 Ma and 0.705965 at ca. 1058 Ma.
Most shale-normalized REY patterns from Nonesuch Formation carbonates are characterized by
positive lanthanum anomalies and elevated yttrium: holmium (Y/Ho) ratios. Many of the same
samples are also enriched in heavy REE, while others record light REE enrichment. These
patterns indicate Nonesuch Formation carbonates precipitated from brackish water, consistent
with REY patterns observed in modern estuaries (Lawrence and Kamber, 2006). One sample has
a flat shale-normalized REY distribution and likely precipitated within part of the estuary
dominated by fluvial input.
The combined geochemical evidence suggests Nonesuch Formation carbonates were
minimally altered by diagenesis, and diagenetic alteration was dependent on sedimentary facies.
While C and O isotopes are uncorrelated, initial Sr isotope compositions correlate positively with
O isotopes, and C isotopes group by sedimentary facies. Minor diagenetic alteration thus resulted
in less radiogenic Sr isotope compositions and did not impact C isotope compositions, which
instead reflect facies-dependent incorporation of remineralized, isotopically light organic carbon
during deposition or early diagenesis. Although ƩREY correlates with initial Sr isotope
composition, there is no covariation between initial Sr isotope composition and lanthanide
anomalies or Y/Ho ratios. This implies that carbonates likely precipitated in shallow pore waters
where ƩREY was modified by contribution from surrounding detrital material, and REY profiles
were determined by original pore water chemistry in connection with the overlying water body.

98

�Figure 1. Example of carbonate sampled for geochemistry from the Nonesuch Formation. (a) core scan
showing fine-grained siliciclastic sediment (dark gray) and carbonate (light cray). Note molar tooth
crack cross-cutting laminae. Core is 1 inch (2.54 cm) wide. (b) photomicrograph showing carbonate spar
(light color) infilling molar tooth crack. Plain polars, scale bar is 1000 µm. Modified from Stewart et al.
(2023).
Chen, X., Zhou, Y., Shields, G.A., 2022. Progress towards an improved Precambrian seawater 87Sr/86Sr
curve. Earth-Science Reviews 224, 103869.
Cumming, V.M., Poulton, S.W., Rooney, A.D., Selby, D., 2013. Anoxia in the terrestrial environment
during the late Mesoproterozoic. Geology 41(5), 583-586.
Elmore, R.D., Milavec, G.J., Imbus, S.W., Engel, M.H., 1989. The Precambrian Nonesuch Formation of
the North American mid-continent rift, sedimentology and organic geochemical aspects of
lacustrine deposition. Precambrian Research 43(3), 191-213.
Fedorchuk, N.D., Dornbos, S.Q., Corsetti, F.A., Isbell, J.L., Petryshyn, V.A., Bowles, J.A., Wilmeth, D.T.,
2016. Early non-marine life: evaluating the biogenicity of Mesoproterozoic fluvial-lacustrine
stromatolites. Precambrian Research 275, 105-118.
Hieshima, G., Pratt, L., 1991. Sulfur/carbon ratios and extractable organic matter of the middle
Proterozoic Nonesuch Formation, North American Midcontinent rift. Precambrian research 54(1),
65-79.
Jones, S., Prave, A., Raub, T., Cloutier, J., Stüeken, E., Rose, C., Linnekogel, S., Nazarov, K., 2020. A
marine origin for the late Mesoproterozoic Copper Harbor and Nonesuch Formations of the
Midcontinent Rift of Laurentia. Precambrian Research 336, 105510.
Slotznick, S.P., Swanson-Hysell, N.L., Zhang, Y., Clayton, K.E., Wellman, C.H., Tosca, N.J., Strother,
P.K., 2024. Reconstructing the paleoenvironment of an oxygenated Mesoproterozoic shoreline
and its record of life. Bulletin 136(3-4), 1628-1650.
Stewart, E.K., Bauer, A.M., Prave, A.R., 2023. End-Mesoproterozoic (ca. 1.08 Ga) epeiric seaway of the
Nonesuch Formation, Wisconsin and Michigan, USA. Geological Society of America Bulletin.
Strother, P.K., Wellman, C.H., 2021. The Nonesuch Formation Lagerstätte: a rare window into freshwater
life one billion years ago. Journal of the Geological Society 178(2).

99

�Characteristics of graphitization across a metamorphic gradient in the Michigamme
Formation of the Marquette Trough and Baraga Basin, MI
STOKES, Rebecca1, CANNON, William1, SALERNO, Ross1
1

U.S. Geological Survey, Geology, Energy and Minerals Science Center, Reston, VA 20192

Graphitization of carbonaceous material (CM) occurs by the progressive aromatization of
carbon, expulsion of heteroatoms, and three-dimensional stacking of graphene layers — a
process that alters the structure, isotopic, and trace element chemistry of the residual CM.
Graphitization is generally considered thermally driven and has been extensively studied in the
context of predictable changes in crystallinity as measured by Raman spectroscopy or X-ray
diffraction, ultimately yielding the development of several graphite geothermometers (Henry et
al., 2019). More broadly, crystalline graphite is an industrial mineral used in lithium-ion batteries
and critical for the energy transition away from fossil fuels. The efficacy of graphite in the anode
of batteries is directly related to its physicochemical properties which are a function of its
geologic origin. The variably metamorphosed and deformed black shales and slates of the
Michigamme Formation provide a natural laboratory to revisit our understanding of the
graphitization process and the associated changes in structure and chemistry of CM in the
context of technological applications.
The Michigamme Formation is a Paleoproterozoic metasedimentary and metavolcanic
sequence that is widespread in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. The lower part of the formation
is finer-grained black shale and siltstone, typically with a prominent slaty cleavage. In the
Marquette Trough and Baraga Basin, the focus areas of our study, this fine-grained sequence has
been mapped and formally designated the Lower Slate Member of the Michigamme Formation.
Highly carbonaceous units are ubiquitous near the middle of this member and vary from ~70
meters on average along the Marquette Trough to 150 meters or more in the Baraga Basin. Along
the Marquette Trough, the outcrop trace of the Lower Slate transects a regional metamorphic
gradient from chlorite to staurolite grade whereas the metamorphic grade in the Baraga Basin is
uniformly low, within the chlorite zone. In the Marquette Trough, the graphitic beds sampled for
this study are along the north limb of this complex syncline, mostly dip steeply southward, and
have a well-developed slaty cleavage that is axial planar to the larger structure of the trough.
Deformational features diminish to the north and the northernmost of our samples, in the Baraga
Basin, are from nearly flat lying beds with no penetrative structural features. An important and
widely accepted distinction of the Michigamme Formation is that the development of the
penetrative regional cleavage predates the final metamorphic event. Thus, graphitization of the
CM occurred under both stressed (tectonic) and static conditions.
A suite of thirteen core samples from the Upper Peninsula Geological Repository and
three outcrop samples, all from carbonaceous sections of the Michigamme Formation, were
selected for detailed evaluation (Figure 1). In all samples, CM occurs as disseminated and
elongated fine-grained (&lt;20 µm) particles that tend to be concentrated in bands parallel to the
metamorphic fabric defined by phyllosilicates and quartz. Analysis of total carbon on
decarbonated samples yielded values ranging from 1 to 24 wt.% C, with an average value of 7

100

�wt.%. Carbon isotopic analysis from decarbonated samples yielded a general trend towards
heavier δ13C values with increasing metamorphic grade, ranging from -32.05‰ (Sample 4) to 21.85‰ (Sample 13). Raman spectroscopic analysis of CM yielded a similar trend with
metamorphic grade across the sample suite. The R2 ratio, which is one parameter used to
evaluate metamorphic grade, decreases from 0.64 in Sample 15 to 0.35 in Sample 8. These R2
values correspond to a temperature range from ~325°C to ~500°C using the empirical
geothermometer from Aoya et al. (2010). Notably, Samples 11 and 13 from the garnet zone are
significant outliers in both the Raman and C isotope datasets. Combining these results with
additional data from scanning electron microscope imaging, X-ray diffraction mineralogical
analysis, and laser ablation ICP-MS analysis of CM concentrates will yield a more detailed look
at the evolution of CM with metamorphism and deformation. These results will help refine our
understanding of the geologic processes that lead to economic graphite deposits and fine-tune
graphite deposit models with an application focus.

Figure 1. Geologic map and metamorphic isograds (red lines) of the field area in the Upper Peninsula
region of Michigan. Map is generalized from Cannon and Ottke (1999). Core samples are noted with
white dots, and blue dots for outcrop samples.
References
Aoya, M., Kouketsu, Y., Endo, S., Shimizu, H., Mizukami, T., Nakamura, D., Wallis, S., 2010. Extending
the applicability of the Raman carbonaceous material geothermometer using data from contact
metamorphic rocks. Journal of Metamorphic Geology, 28: 895–914.
Cannon, W. F., and Ottke, D., 1999. Preliminary digital geologic map of the Penokean (early Proterozoic)
continental margin in northern Michigan and Wisconsin: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File
Report 99-547.
Henry, D. G., Jarvis, I., Gillmore, G., &amp; Stephenson, M. (2019). Raman spectroscopy as a tool to
determine the thermal maturity of organic matter: Application to sedimentary, metamorphic and
structural geology. Earth-Science Reviews, 198: 102936.

101

�Sulfur-isotope ratios in Paleoproterozoic Michigamme Formation at the Lake Superior
Region: Implications on basin evolution and ambient seawater composition in the Greater
Animikie Basin
THAKURTA, Joyashish 1, and HAAG, Beau 2
1

Natural Resources Research Institute, University of Minnesota Duluth, 5013 Miller Trunk Highway,
Hermantown, MN 55811, USA
2
Niblack Project LLC, 136 River Street, Elko, Nevada 89801, USA

A considerable variation in δ34S-ratios of sulfide minerals has been found in a sulfide-mineralrich succession of slate, metasiltstone, and metagreywacke in the Paleoproterozoic Michigamme
Formation located within the Baraga Basin at the eastern edges of the Greater Animikie Basin in
the Lake Superior Region (Ojakangas, Morey, and Southwick, 2001). Sulfide minerals such as
pyrite, chalcopyrite and pyrrhotite display δ34S-values ranging between 2 and 40‰ (V-CDT) and
appear to systematically vary with respect to the stratigraphic intervals (Figure 1). This
variability is gradational and devoid of any anomalous spike. It is predominantly a function of
stratigraphic location and it shows no relationship with the type of sulfide mineral or the textural
mode of occurrence. This observation rejects the possibility that the δ34S values were influenced
by selective infiltration of externally derived sulfur-rich fluids along the stratigraphic layers of
the Michigamme Formation. It also overrules the possibility that the observed δ34S values were
caused by low-grade metamorphism and recrystallization of the sedimentary rocks of the
Michigamme Formation.
The values are consistent with primary δ34S ratios in sulfide minerals which were precipitated
from intergranular fluids within a sequence of clastic sediments in a basin shortly after
deposition. Consequently, the measured δ34S ratios in the stratigraphic horizons represent Sisotopic signatures inherited from the S-reservoir in the ambient basin, as well as changes
introduced by basin-evolution and diagenesis of the siliciclastic sediments in a marine foreland
depositional environment along the eastern portion of the Greater Animikie Basin.
While the observed general trend of gradual increase in δ34S-values in the lower and upper
members of the sequence can be explained by a systematic chronological trend in the global
seawater composition (Paiste et al., 2020), a significant rise and fall in δ34S-values in the Lower
Slate and Upper Greywacke Members can be attributed to a limited-term separation of the
Baraga Basin from an open-ocean circulation to an isolated basin environment in response to
structural adjustments caused by the formation of a fold and thrust belt along the southern shore
line of the foreland basin during the waning stages of the Penokean Orogeny (Schulz and
Cannon, 2007). In this period of isolation, the sulfur-isotope composition was primarily
controlled by intrabasinal bacterial fractionation leading to a significant rise in the δ34S values up
to 40‰ in the observed sediments. Upon subsequent erosional removal of the thrust sequence,
and associated structural readjustments, the connection of the Baraga Basin to an open ocean was
restored and the δ34S-values in the new sedimentary rocks mimic values that are consistent with
deposition in a larger open ocean setting.

102

�Figure 1: Observed variation in δ34S-ratios. Stratigraphy adapted from Rossell and Coombes (2005)

References:
Ojakangas, R.W., Morey, G.B. and Southwick, D.L., 2001. Paleoproterozoic basin
development and sedimentation in the Lake Superior region, North America.
Sedimentary Geology 141-142: 319-341.
Paiste, K., Lepland, A., Zerkle, A.L., Kirsimae, K, Kreitsmann, T, Mand, K., Romashin, A.E.,
Rychanchik, D.V. and Prave, A.R., 2020. Identifying global vs. basinal controls on
Paleoproterozoic organic carbon and sulfur isotope records. Earth-Science Reviews 207:
01320.
Rossell, D. and Coombes, S., 2005. The Geology of the Eagle Nickel-Copper Deposit
Michigan, USA. Report for Kennecott Exploration, dated April 29, 2005, 35 p.
Schulz, K.J. and Cannon, W.F., 2007, The Penokean orogeny in the Lake Superior region:
Precambrian Research, 157: 4-25.

103

�An evaluation of structural and mineralogical controls on gold mineralization on the
GoldRich property in the Abbie Lake area, Wawa, Ontario
THIBODEAU-BELLO, Demily, HILL, Mary Louise, CONLY, Andrew
Department of Geology, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Road, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1
Canada
The GoldRich property in the Abbie Lake area is an active gold prospect in the Michipicoten
greenstone belt, within the Wawa subprovince of the Archean Superior province of the Canadian
shield. The property is located 30 km northeast of Wesdome’s Eagle River mine and 10 km
northeast of Wesdome’s Mishi property in northern Ontario. The Main Shear trench on the
GoldRich property is an area of regional metamorphism dominated by ductile deformation
hosting orogenic gold. The Main Shear trench hosts mylonites of felsic and intermediate
composition with varying strain intensities; all lithologies strike east-west. The mylonite of
intermediate composition is characterized by having en-echelon quartz veins perpendicular to the
foliation. Gold occurrences have been found in zones of high strain, in both felsic and
intermediate mylonite lithologies. This HBSc thesis project relies on detailed trench mapping,
microstructural and petrographic analyses, and geochemical methods to discover how gold is
hosted on this property. Understanding the controls on gold mineralization will guide future
exploration.
Gold mineralization in the Main Shear trench is related to deformation. Based on geochemical
and petrographic analysis there is no correlation observed between alteration mineralogy and
gold mineralization. Microstructural analysis revealed pervasive subgrain-rotation quartz
recrystallization in both mylonitic lithologies indicating that the Main Shear trench has
undergone deformation at the upper greenschist to lower amphibolite facies regional
metamorphic conditions. Gold is associated with deformation, microstructurally related to
recrystallized quartz grain boundaries, boudinaged veins, and shear bands.
Based on these results, it is recommended that further exploration on this property should be
focused on locating zones of similar structure and strain intensity, including areas of boudinage,
regardless of lithology, to continue building the gold prospect.

104

�Petrology and Geochemistry of Felsic Magmatism in the Paleoproterzoic Eau Claire
Volcanic Complex, Northcentral Wisconsin
VICKERS, Lyndsie A. 1, LODGE, Robert W.D.1
1

Department of Geology and Environmental Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, Eau Claire,
WI 54701 USA

The 1.8-1.9 Ga Eau Claire Volcanic Complex (ECVC) (Figure 1) is the type locality for
Penokean-age magmatism formed on an Archean crustal block (~2.6-3.0 Ga) called the
Marshfield Terrane during the Penokean Orogen (Sims et al., 1989; Schulz &amp; Cannon, 2007) and
has influenced historic tectonic models and terrane-boundary maps. The other volcanic terrane
within the Penokean Orogen, the Pembine-Wausau terrane (PWT), is interpreted to have formed
with minimal influence of older crust and hosts about 150 million tonnes of volcanogenic
massive sulfide (VMS) ores. The ‘continental’ setting of the Marshfield Terrane assumes a
different metallogenetic system than the ‘oceanic’ setting of PWT and may be less prospective
for the same VMS mineralization. However, recent U/Pb isotopic and other geochemical data
(Lodge et al., 2023; Weber et al, 2023) indicates parts of the ECVC were mantle-derived and not
contaminated by older Archean crust and challenges this ‘continental’ model.
The ECVC is challenging to study because of a lack of mineral exploration (and drilling)
coupled with rare outcrop exposure due to glacial/fluvial sediment and Paleozoic rock cover.
This project studies remote, inaccessible outcrops along the Eau Claire River to refine the
tectonic model and terrane boundaries of the southern Penokean Orogen. Samples obtained from
mapping were petrographically characterized and analyzed for major and trace element
geochemistry. Thirteen samples were analyzed for major and trace elements via WD-XRF and
compiled with other geochemical datasets from the region. Trace element geochemical data are
used to determine magmatic and tectonic settings of these rocks and improve regional tectonic
models for the ECVC.
Felsic magmatism in the region consists of fine-grained quartz-muscovite schists (Figure
1A) and banded quartzofeldspathic gneisses interpreted to be felsic volcanism and mediumgrained massive granodiorite (Figure 1B). Fine-grained quartz-muscovite schist are characterized
by approximately 5% quartz porphyroclasts that are 1-3mm in size. The matrix is very finegrained quartz, feldspar, and muscovite that can have variable amounts of chlorite. Banded
quartzofeldspathic gneisses have fine grained biotite and amphibole in quartz and feldspar-rich
matrix that may define volcaniclastic textures at the outcrop-scale. Medium-grained, massive
granodiorite is 15% biotite/hornblende and is characterized by weak to minimal foliation. These
granodiorites are interpreted to be intruding felsic volcanic rocks, amphibolites, and
metasedimentary units (Figure 1C). At one outcrop, the contact region is exposed revealing the
formation of a megabreccia matrix, incorporating gneiss fragments that can reach up to 1 meter
in size. These gneissic metasedimentary rocks are fine-grained with alternating bands of light
and dark layers, ranging from straight to intensely folded.
Samples from the ECVC on Zr/Ti vs. Nb/Y classification diagrams reveal a bimodal
magmatic suite which is commonly associated with extensional tectonic settings. Felsic volcanic
and intrusive rocks on Nb vs. Y discrimination plots suggest that felsic magmatism was likely
formed in syn-collisional or volcanic arc settings. Rhyolite fertility discrimination diagrams
(Zr/Y vs. Y) show that both felsic volcanic and intrusive suites from the ECVC are FII-type
rhyolites, typical of upper-crustal melting in rift zones. Therefore, the ECVC region may be
prospective for VMS mineralization and the tectonic setting should be further evaluated.

105

�Figure 1. Bedrock geologic map of the Eau Claire River
region in northcentral Wisconsin showing extent of
Precambrian bedrock. Map from Mudrey &amp; Brown (1982).
(A) Poorly exposed quartz-phyric micaceous schist near Rock
Dam, WI interpreted as a metarhyolite. (B) Weathered surface
of granodiorite intrusion along bank of Eau Claire River, (C)
Contact region between granodiorite and dark gneiss or
metasedimentary rocks.

References
Lodge, RWD, Weber, EM, Hooper, RL (2023), Precambrian Geology of the Eau Claire River Valley:
Re-discovering the Eau Claire Volcanic Complex. in Lodge, RWD (Ed.), Institute on Lake Superior
Geology Proceedings, 69th Annual Meeting, Eau Claire, Wisconsin, Part 2 – Field Trip
Guidebooks. v.69, part 2, p.47-70.
Mudrey, M.G., Jr., Brown, B. A., Greenberg, J. K. "Bedrock Geologic Map of Wisconsin." Wisconsin
Geological and Natural History Survey, 1982.
Schulz, K.J., and Cannon, W.F., 2007, The Penokean orogeny in the Lake Superior region: Precambrian
Research, v. 157, p. 4–25.
Sims, P. K., Van Schmus, W. R., Schulz, K. J., and Peterman, Z. E., 1989, Tectonostratigraphic evolution
of the Early Proterozoic Wisconsin magmatic terranes of the Penokean orogen: Canadian Journal
of Earth Sciences, v. 26, p. 2145-2158.
Weber, EM, Lodge, RWD, Marsh, JH (2023). U/Pb geochronology and zircon petrochronology of
Paleoproterozoic magmas from the Marshfield terrane, Penokean Orogen, Wisconsin. Institute on
Lake Superior Geology Proceedings, 69th Annual Meeting, Eau Claire, Wisconsin, Part 1-Program
and Abstracts, p. 97-98.

106

�The Keweenaw Geoheritage Summer Internship Experience
VYE, Erika1, LIZZADRO-MCPHERSON, Daniel2, and JUIP, James2
1 Great Lakes Research Center, Michigan Technological University, 1400 Townsend Drive, Houghton,
MI, 49931
2 Geospatial Research Facility, Michigan Technological University, 1400 Townsend Drive, Houghton,
MI 49931

Earth science education benefits from holistic interpretation of geologic features, processes, and
landscapes through multiple ways of knowing (Deloria &amp; Wildcat, 2001; Morton &amp; Gawboy,
2003; Ricci &amp; Riggs, 2019; Semken, 2005). Geoheritage is an evolving field that emphasizes the
importance of the varied personal values people have for geologic features and explores the
wide-ranging relationships we have with landscapes; as such it is an excellent place-based
education tool to explore connections to our underpinning geology (Semken et al, 2017; Tormey,
2019). In this project setting, the Keweenaw region of Michigan’s Upper Peninsula on Lake
Superior, we demonstrate a regional, place-based approach to help deepen participant
understanding of the billion-year-old geologic processes at the heart of the Midcontinent Rift
system. These processes created both the Lake Superior basin and the largest known native
copper deposit on Earth in a region further defined as the ancestral and contemporary homelands
and waters of the Keweenaw Bay Indian Community (KBIC) on Lake Superior.
The Keweenaw Geoheritage Summer Internship Experience was created in partnership with the
Keweenaw Bay Indian Community's Natural Resources Department (KBIC NRD) and Tribal
Historic Preservation Office (THPO), and Michigan Tech’s Great Lakes Research Center
(GLRC) and Geospatial Research Facility (GRF). The experience was created to support
intergenerational and multicultural learning about the Keweenaw landscape, its stories, and
geology. Tribal and non-tribal high school student interns, community partners, and knowledge
holders spent time together reading the landscape and sharing reflections on our varied
relationships with land and water.
Week 1 entailed a 5-day field experience visiting valued sites of the Keweenaw Bay Indian
Community that also teach us how geology impacts land, life, and culture in our place asking
“what gifts does geology offer us? what are the relationships with land and water in this place?”.
During the field experience, youth interns collected and documented local knowledge by
engaging in multi-sensory and multimedia documentation strategies to record their experiences
(photos, audio recordings, drawing, 360 virtual reality images, etc.). Sacred Anishinaabe
knowledge was not sought or shared in these experiences.
Data collected during the field experience was then used as the foundation for a 5-day geospatial
workshop following the field experience. The goal of the workshop was for youth interns to
design, create, and publish ARC GIS StoryMaps depicting their personal reflections of the
diverse relationships with local landscape and understanding of its formation. ARC GIS
StoryMaps is a story-authoring, web-based application that enables sharing of maps in the
context of narrative text and other multimedia content. Workshop participants worked with the
data they collected during the field experience in combination with supporting data layers and

107

�maps specifically created for the experience. Interns were mentored by the geospatial research
team who helped students develop digital storytelling skills, inspired brainstorming sessions for
topics to explore in the maps, and facilitated peer-review of StoryMap content prior to
publication. Upon completion, students presented their work at a community open house; all
StoryMaps created have been peer-reviewed by all project partners and are now published.
The StoryMaps reflect a deepened understanding of relationships between geology, mining, and
current environmental justice issues within our community. In the context of the Keweenaw, the
European copper mining boom is most prominently interpreted in our place; students also
reflected on the long history of mining, ways of mining, changing narratives, and missing human
stories seen and experienced when visiting our landscape. Of note, respect, gratitude, and
deepened relationships with land and water featured in all StoryMaps. Students shared
reflections on reciprocity and their responsibility to help steward their place.

Figure 1: Left - students deepen their understanding of mining impacts to Buffalo Reef and our local
communities; Right: students brainstorm story arcs for the foundation of their StoryMap
References
[1] Deloria, V. and Wildcat, D. R. (2001). Power and place: Indian education in America. Fulcrum
Publishing: Golden, Colorado.
[2] Morton, R. and Gawboy, C. (2003). Talking Rocks: Geology and 10,000 Years of Native American
Tradition in the Lake Superior Region. University of Minnesota Press.
[3] Ricci, J. and Riggs, E.M. (2019).
Making a Connection to Field Geoscience for Native American Youth through Culture, Nature and
Community. Journal of Geoscience Education, special theme issues on Diversity in the Geosciences,
DOI:10.1080/10899995.2019.1616273.
[4] Semken, S. (2005). Sense of place and place-based introductory geoscience teaching for American
Indian and Alaska Native undergraduates. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53 (2), 149-157.
[5] Semken, S., Geraghty Ward, E., Moosavi, S. and Chinn, P.W.U (2017). Place-Based Education in
Geoscience: Theory, Research, Practice, and Assessment. Journal of Geoscience Education, 65:4, 542562, DOI: 10.5408/17-276.1.
[6] Tormey, D. (2019). New approaches to communication and education through geoheritage.
International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 7 (4), 192-198, ISSN 2577-4441,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2020.01.001.

108

�R.W. Boyle’s History of Geochemistry and Cosmochemistry
WILSON, Graham C.1, BUTT, Charles R.M.2, GARRETT, Robert G.3 and ROBINSON,
Heather A.4
1

Turnstone Geological Services Limited. P.O. Box 1000, Campbellford, ON K0L 1L0 Canada,
CSIRO Minerals Resources, Kensington, Western Australia;
3
Geological Survey of Canada, 601 Booth Street, Ottawa, ON K1A 0E8 Canada,
4
25 Chester Crescent, Ottawa. ON K2J 2J6 Canada
2

Robert W. Boyle (1920-2003) was a well-respected geochemist with a long career at the
Geological Survey of Canada. He is perhaps best remembered for geological and geochemical
studies of gold, silver and other commodities, and for his association with mining camps, such as
Yellowknife, N.W.T. and Keno Hill, Yukon. Retiring in 1985, Boyle devoted much of his final two
decades to trips to far-flung libraries, gathering information exotic and/or obscure, and penning a
major 3-volume review of the evolution of human knowledge of the nature and use of metals and
other materials, and of diverse fields within geochemistry, cosmochemistry and biogeochemistry.
The result, with copious help in compilation, was almost 2,000 pages of discussion (90% of it
typed, fortunately!), backed by a formidable bibliography of almost 3,000 references. It was
essentially complete at the time of his death, but altogether lacking in illustration. In time, his
G.S.C. colleague Bob Garrett made some editorial notes, and then, in 2011, Charles Butt assessed
the manuscript and made a detailed scientific and editorial review, heavy in marginalia. However,
the work evidently arrived too late for the glory days of Survey and Society printing budgets, and
it sat upon the shelf. In 2015, Ryan Noble, of the Association of Applied Geochemists, broadcast
the existence of the manuscript, which attracted Wilson, who undertook to advance the work of
the earlier editors, with encouragement from Boyle’s daughter, biochemist Heather Robinson.
Volume 1 of the trilogy is set for publication in 2024 (Boyle, 2024). It covers the vast span
of human time from the inception of mining and agriculture to the fall of Rome in the West (476
A.D.), and so ventures onto ground traditionally left to aspects of the Classics, Ancient History
and Archaeology. Despite the western time frame, it is a worldwide review, covering, besides
Europe and the Middle East, India and China and the Americas, every part of the globe where
Boyle found relevant knowledge to impart. The intended volumes 2 and 3 explore, respectively,
history through the critical 19th century, and then the 20th century (and so to the present). Volume
1 traverses the long development of early thought on the nature of matter. In addition to the various,
often conflicting strains of philosophy, there is an equal treatment of the harnessing of materials
(Stone, Bronze and Iron ages), and the early stages of the broad swathe of Earth sciences, mining
and metallurgy. Early practical ideas on “Earth, air, fire and water” are discussed, e.g.,
geochemistry and mineralogy, cosmochemistry (meteorites), and early ideas on the hydrosphere
and atmosphere.
How was the raw manuscript processed? In brief, Wilson: a) ported Boyle’s references into
a database, the easier to split up the long bibliography by chapter, rendering each section and
volume a stand-alone story; b) utilised his MINLIB bibliography to update Boyle’s references,
which for Volume 1 had ended in 1987; c) split up the seminal chapter 3, which provides reviews
for some 29 metals and commodity groups (e.g., Au, Ag, Cu; Fe; Sn, Pb; industrial minerals,
gemstones and organics); d) added a third layer of editing and consistency checks; and e)

109

�ultimately added 132 individual or composite illustrations in 93 numbered figures, including two
original versions of the periodic table. Some of the additions (mostly to post-1987 research) are
inserted in the text, others are collected in endnotes to each section. Some of the additions may be
skating on thin ice (in which case, it is Wilson who falls through), a problem that one suspects
would not have unduly worried the author of the original text.
Boyle himself travelled widely across Canada, and the world. In terms of the Lake Superior
region, Volume 1 has multiple references to the native copper and native silver of the
Mesoproterozoic Midcontinent Rift (Fig. 1; see, e.g., Bornhorst and Barron, 2013; Wilson, 2023).
One of two additional text boxes is devoted to native copper, while the other concerns the wider
literature on the chemical elements, including some of the most accessible, popular titles. An
explicit reference is made to native elements, of which Boyle was fond (e.g., Zn, Pb), including
the obvious starting point of Au, Ag and Cu, and listing some 30 elements (many of them very rare
in their unalloyed forms).

Figure 1. Samples from famous occurrences of native metals in the Lake Superior region. Left: A
spectacular, 4,264-kilogram mass of native copper, the exterior coloured by secondary Cu salts (Calumet,
Keweenaw peninsula, Michigan). Right: native silver revealed in sawn and polished faces of calcite-veined
fractured diabase from the Silver Islet mine in northwestern Ontario, a rich but short-lived venture on the
east side of the Sibley peninsula, east of Thunder Bay, in Lake Superior.

References
Bornhorst, T.J. and Barron, R.J. (2013) Geologic overview of the Keweenaw peninsula, Michigan.
Institute on Lake Superior Geology, v. 59, part 2: 1-42, Houghton, MI.
Boyle, R.W. (2024) A History of Geochemistry and Cosmochemistry. Prehistory to the end of the
Classical Period. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle upon Tyne, England (Wilson, G.C., Butt,
C.R.M., Garrett, R.G. and Robinson, H.A., editors), circa 600pp., in press.
Wilson, W.E. (editor) (2023) Michigan Copper Country II. Mineralogical Record, v. 54 no.1: 196pp.

110

�Cooling of an Archean metamorphic terrane: garnet diffusion study of the Quetico
Subprovince, Canada
XU, Yiruo1 and HOLDER, Robert1
1

Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Michigan, 1100 North University
Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 United States

Archean metamorphic terranes are traditionally suggested to have cooled significantly slower
than their Phanerozoic counterparts. Many have argued that the contrast in metamorphic
timescale reflects changes in Earth’s tectonic regime. However, diffusion chronometry-based
cooling rate data on Precambrian rocks are very limited. We present a case study of metamorphic
timescales on the Neoarchean Quetico metasedimentary belt of the Superior Province, which has
been hypothesized to represent a fore-arc accretionary prism. We combine conventional
thermobarometry and phase-equilibrium modeling to constrain the peak temperature and
pressure and estimate metamorphic cooling rates from major element diffusion in garnet. We
then compare cooling rates across the Quetico Subprovince and with those from Phanerozoic
metamorphic terranes of similar conditions. The results will contribute to the diffusion
chronometry data available on Precambrian orogens for assessing any fundamental change in
global tectonics.

111

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
      <file fileId="12052">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/462b1934e715e86830529c08f5039d63.pdf</src>
        <authentication>d45ee759251a8ad2fecc3255f6c3c6ab</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="85868">
                    <text>70th Annual Meeting
Institute on Lake Superior Geology
Houghton, Michigan

May 15-18, 2024

Proceedings Volume 70
Part 2 - Field Trip Guidebook

�70th Annual Meeting
Institute on Lake Superior Geology
Houghton, Michigan
May 15-18, 2024
Sponsored by:

A. E. Seaman Mineral Museum
Great Lakes Research Center
Department of Geological and Mining Engineering and Sciences
Michigan Technological University

Meeting Co-Chairs
Theodore J. Bornhorst, Erika Vye, Patrice Cobin, and James DeGraff

Proceedings Volume 70
Part 2: Field Trip Guidebook
Compiled by Patrice F. Cobin and Theodore J. Bornhorst

Cover Photo: The only known color photograph of in situ colorless calcite crystals with inclusions of native copper. Vug is about 15 cm across and 30 cm
deep; located at the top of the Knowlton basalt lava flow at the 4th level, 850 ft stope, of the Caledonia Mine, Michigan. Photo taken in 1994 soon after
the vug was blasted open. Native copper in the calcite crystals has not been visibly altered despite being about 1 billion years old.
Photograph by Theodore J. Bornhorst

i

��70th Institute on Lake Superior Geology
Volume 70 consists of:
Part 1: Program and Abstracts
Part 2: Field Trip Guidebook
Trip 1: Mesoproterozoic Midcontinent Rift-filling Strata and Native Copper Deposits of
the Keweenaw Peninsula, Michigan
Trip 2: Mining History and Geology of the Quincy Mine, Keweenaw Peninsula Native
Copper District, Michigan
Trip 3: Geoheritage of Buffalo Reef: Industrial Impact on Land, Culture, and Fish
Sovereignty
Trip 4: Keweenaw Fault System Geometry and Kinematics: Clues to Its Nature and
Origin
Trip 5: Geology and History of a Native Copper Mine: Adventure Mine, Ontonagon
County, Michigan
Trip 6: Southern Complex Granitoids, Gneisses, and Migmatites: New Data,
Discoveries, and Perspectives
Trip 7: Landslides on the Ontonagon River at Military Hill
Reference to material in Part 2 should follow the example below:
Authors, 2024, field trip title, 70th Institute on Lake Superior Geology, Abstracts and Proceedings, v. 70,
Part 2, Field Trip Guidebook, p. xx-xx.
Proceedings Volume 70, Part 1: Program and Abstracts and Part 2: Field Trip Guidebook are published
by the 70th Institute on Lake Superior Geology and distributed by the Institute Secretary:
Peter Hollings
Department of Geology
Lakehead University
Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1
CANADA
peter.hollings@lakeheadu.ca

Some figures in this volume were submitted by authors in color but are printed grayscale to
conserve printing costs. Full color imagery will appear in the digital version of the volume when
it is available on-line at:

http://www.lakesuperiorgeology.org
ISSN 1042-99
ii

��Part 2: Field Trip Guidebook
Table of Contents
Trip 1: Mesoproterozoic Midcontinent Rift-filling Strata and
Native Copper Deposits of the Keweenaw Peninsula, Michigan………………………...1
Trip 2: Mining History and Geology of the Quincy Mine, Keweenaw Peninsula
Native Copper District, Michigan……………………………………………………….55
Trip 3: Geoheritage of Buffalo Reef: Industrial Impact on Land, Culture,
and Fish Sovereignty…………………………………………………………………….79
Trip 4: Keweenaw Fault System Geometry and Kinematics: Clues to Its Nature
and Origin………………………………………………………………………………..97
Trip 5: Geology and History of a Native Copper Mine: Adventure Mine,
Ontonagon County, Michigan.…………………………………………………………137
Trip 6: Southern Complex Granitoids, Gneisses, and Migmatites:
New Data, Discoveries, and Perspectives…………………………………..………….157
Trip 7: Landslides on the Ontonagon River at Military Hill…………………………………..173

iii

��Field Trip 1
Mesoproterozoic Midcontinent Rift-filling Strata and Native
Copper Deposits of the Keweenaw Peninsula, Michigan
Theodore J. Bornhorst
A.E. Seaman Mineral Museum, Michigan Technological University, 1404 E. Sharon Avenue,
Houghton, MI 49931
Introduction
The geology of the far western Upper Peninsula of Michigan consists of three temporally distinct
episodes. During the Mesoproterozoic, about 1.1 Ga, up to 30 km of Keweenaw Supergroup
volcanics and clastic sediments filled an intracratonic rift, the Midcontinent Rift (MCR) (Figures 1
and 2) (Cannon et al., 1989). After about 500 million years of erosion, the MCR rocks were buried
by Phanerozoic sedimentary rocks from about 500 Ma to 175 Ma (Catacosinos et al., 2001). There
are no exposures of rocks in the interval between 175 Ma to about 2.5 Ma (Velbel, 2009).
Pleistocene continental glaciations, beginning about 2 million years ago, removed the
Phanerozoic rocks from the Keweenaw Peninsula leaving only a few Phanerozoic outliers. About
10,000 years ago glaciers retreated from the Lake Superior basin and left behind a variety of
unconsolidated clastic sediments. The geologic evolution of the far western Upper Peninsula is
illustrated in Figure 3.

Figure 1: Generalized geologic map of the Midcontinent Rift showing Grenville tectonic zone with
interpretative cross-section in Figure 2. Modified from Bornhorst and Barron (2013).

1

�Figure 2: Generalized bedrock map showing the exposed rocks of the Midcontinent Rift around Lake
Superior, the native copper occurrences, and the bedrock of the Upper Peninsula of Michigan modified from
Bornhorst and Barron (2013). Interpretative cross section from Cannon et al. (1989).

2

�Figure 3: Cartoon NW to SE cross sections from Minnesota (left) to the Upper Peninsula (right)
illustrating the progressive geologic evolution. Modified from Bornhorst and Lankton (2009).

In the strictest sense, the geographic area of the Keweenaw Peninsula proper extends from L’Anse
northwest to Lake Superior perpendicular to strike of the strata, however, the term Keweenaw
Peninsula has also been applied to the area containing MCR rocks farther to the south from L’Anse
to the White Pine area (Figure 4 and 5). The geologic descriptions in this field trip guide are mostly
restricted to the Keweenaw Peninsula proper. The descriptions provided here were modified from a
combination of Bornhorst and Barron (2011, 2013), Bornhorst and Lankton (2009), Bornhorst and
Rose (1994) and Bornhorst et al. (1983). These sources are mostly used here without specific
citation or quotation.

3

�Figure 4: Bedrock geologic may of the western Upper Peninsula of Michigan showing area of the Keweenaw
Peninsula native copper district (from Bornhorst and Barron, 2013).

Figure 5: Stratigraphic column the Keweenaw Peninsula, Michigan.

4

�Midcontinent Rift Strata
The Keweenaw Peninsula is located on the southern margin of the Lake Superior segment of the
MCR (Figures 1and 2). The rock units that are associated with the MCR have been termed the
Keweenawan Supergroup (Figure 5). These rocks were deposited about 1.1 Ga (Heaman et al.,
2007; Davis and Paces, 1990; Cannon et al., 1989). The MCR beneath Lake Superior is filled with
up to about 30 km of volcanic rocks (Figures 2 and 3) (Hinze et al., 1990; Cannon et al., 1989).
The MCR geology of the Keweenaw Peninsula can be divided into northwest-dipping, rift-filling
volcanic and clastic sedimentary rocks under the central highlands and northwest flank of the
Keweenaw Peninsula (Figure 4) and flat to low-dipping, rift-flanking clastic sedimentary rocks
located on the southeast side. The Keweenaw Fault separates the rift-filling and rift-flanking strata.
The rift-filling strata are subdivided into volcanic-dominated and clastic sedimentary rockdominated lithologies. (Figure 5).
Portage Lake Volcanics
The Portage Lake Volcanics of the Keweenaw Peninsula (Figures 4 and 5) are a 2,500 to 5,200 m
thick formation dominantly composed of subaerial basalt lava flows with less than 1 % by volume
intermediate to felsic volcanic and subvolcanic rocks which are located stratigraphically near the
base of the exposed formation. Interflow reddish-colored conglomerate and sandstone layers are less
than 5 % by volume and are stratigraphically scattered throughout the Portage Lake Volcanics
although greater in abundance towards the top of the formation (Butler and Burbank, 1929; White,
1968). The base of the formation is truncated by the Keweenaw Fault. The lavas flowed from
fissure vents that tended to be located near the axis of the rift zone which produced a layered
succession of flood basalts comparable to the rift zones of East Africa and Iceland (e.g., Nicholson
et al., 1997 and reference therein). Much of the Portage Lake Volcanics erupted over 2 to 3 million
years from 1,096.2+/-1.8 (Copper City flow, Figure 6) to 1,094.0+/-1.5 (Greenstone flow, Figure 6)
(Paces and Miller, 1993; Davis and Paces, 1990).
There are more than 200 individual basaltic lava flows in the exposed Portage Lake Volcanics
which are typically aphyric, Mg-rich, high-Al olivine tholeiites (Paces, 1988). The most abundant
type of basalt flows are olivine tholeiites, followed by primitive olivine tholeiites and quartz
tholeiites. Iron-rich olivine tholeiites are generally lesser in abundance (Table 1). The thicker lava
flows are compositionally stratified due to magmatic differentiation after eruption. Magmatic
differentiation after eruption is especially significant in the Greenstone flow, which is the thickest
individual flow in the formation (Cornwall, 1951a and b; Broderick, 1935; Broderick and Hohl,
1935). The composition of the basalts of the Portage Lake Volcanics is cyclical with minor and
major cycles superimposed on an overall trend. The basalt magmas were derived by partial melting
of sub-continental upper mantle with an overall compositional trend towards younger more
primitive basalt compositions as a result of less crustal contamination (Paces, 1988; Paces and Bell,
1989). The repeated magmatism at the rift axis and progressive crustal thinning provided pathways
for magma with less extended contact with crustal rocks. The youngest rocks of the Portage Lake
Volcanics in the Keweenaw Peninsula have compositions similar to MORB suggesting the MCR
nearly formed an ocean basin. The major geochemical cycles are due to fractional crystallization

5

�and replenishment in large magma chambers near the crust/mantle interface whereas the minor
cycles are due to closed system fractional crystallization in small magma chambers within the crust
(Paces, 1988). The Portage Lake Volcanics were likely derived by partial melting of enriched
plume-related mantle (Nicholson et al., 1997; Nicholson and Shirey, 1990; Paces and Bell, 1989).
All observed basalt lava flows in the Portage Lake Volcanics were erupted subaerially and consist
of a massive (vesicle-free) interior capped by a vesicular and/or brecciated flow top. There is one
thin hyaloclastic unit in the upper part of the formation (Johnson, 1985). Subaerial eruption resulted
in degassing of volatiles, notably SO2 (Cornwall, 1951c). The lava flows range in thickness from 1
to 450 m with most of them between 10 to 20 m thick (Paces, 1988; White, 1960). Most of the lava
flows cannot be traced along strike with confidence although a few such as the Scales Creek,
Kearsarge, and Greenstone flows have well documented lateral continuity (Figure 6). The
Greenstone flow has been correlated down dip across the Lake Superior syncline to Isle Royale
(Longo, 1982; Huber, 1975).
Table 1: Average representative geochemical data for least altered lavas of the Portage Lake Volcanics (from
Paces, 1988). Tholeiites were grouped by Ni content.
Primitive
olivine
tholeiite

Intermediate
olivine
tholeiite

Iron-rich
olivine
and
quartz
tholeiites

Olivine
tholeiite

Olivine
tholeiite

400-300

300250

250200

200-100

100-15

n=5

n=9

n=14

n=8

SiO₂

47.82

47.34

48.03

Al₂O₃

15.89

15.27

FeOt

9.77

MgO

Andesite

Dacite

Rhyolite

n=6

n=1

n=1

n=1

48.55

49.94

56.39

68.44

77.89

15.32

15.12

13.28

13.78

15.17

12.77

11.82

12.32

12.86

14.91

9.87

4.46

1.11

12.44

11.69

9.85

9.06

7.78

5.52

1.14

0.17

CaO

10.58

10.24

10.16

9.65

6.64

5.10

1.40

0.04

Na₂O

2.04

2.10

2.25

2.31

2.91

3.94

4.74

3.67

K₂O

0.19

0.22

0.33

0.42

1.43

2.27

3.86

4.28

TiO₂

0.98

1.13

1.35

1.60

2.34

1.83

0.51

0.08

P₂O₅

0.16

0.19

0.22

0.25

0.36

1.00

0.19

0.01

MnO

0.14

0.16

0.16

0.18

0.24

0.30

0.08

0.01

Ni

326

279

231

172

54

10

7

5

Cu

37

51

73

86

126

5

13

61

Zr

78

85

101

126

212

430

573

145

Ni
(ppm)
Wt.%

PPM

FeOt=total Fe as FeO

6

�The uppermost 5 to 20% of the tops of most individual lava flows are vesicular with between 5 and
50% vesicles (White, 1968). The tops of 21 % of the flows are brecciated with clasts of vesicular
basalt. The vesicles in most lava flows within the Portage Lake Volcanics are largely filled with
secondary minerals, except for the stratigraphically uppermost lava flows; the filled vesicles are
amygdules. Thus, local terminology is to call lava flows with vesicle-only tops, amygdaloids and
those with brecciated tops fragmental amygdaloids.
There are minor amounts of andesite, dacite, and rhyolite lava flows and subvolcanic plutons that
interfinger with and cross-cut the basalts of the Portage Lake Volcanics (Table 1). Most of these
occur in the stratigraphically lowermost portion of the Portage Lake Volcanics. A few dikes of
intermediate composition and a diorite stock at Mt. Bohemia intrude into the exposed Portage Lake
Volcanics. The rhyolitic volcanic setting is analogous to the shield-type central volcanoes of Iceland
(Nicholson, 1991).
Interflow clastic sedimentary rocks layers of the Portage Lake Volcanics are recognized as informal
members since they are important stratigraphic markers in an otherwise monotonous succession of
basalt lava flows. Many of them are given informal names (Figure 6). A few of them can be traced
along strike for large distances, up to 90 km. These interflow sedimentary rock layers consist of redcolored conglomerates with lesser amounts of interbedded sandstone and occasional significant
amounts of siltstone and shale. These informal members range in thickness from a few cm up to
about 40 m (Merk and Jirsa, 1982; White, 1968; Butler and Burbank, 1927). The typical
conglomerate is characterized by sub-rounded to angular pebbles in a sandy matrix. Clast size varies
from granules to boulders and clast lithologies are predominantly felsic, although there is
considerable variation within and between specific beds reflecting diversity in source terrane.
Within the interflow Calumet and Hecla conglomerate, Kalliokoski and Welch (1985) interpreted a
subunit as a caliche soil profile. The interflow clastic sedimentary beds were deposited during
intervals of volcanic quiescence, as terrestrial alluvial fans in an arid to sub-arid climate. Deposition
was on top of the shallow-dipping to flat-lying lava flows by streams flowing from the topographic
high on the margins of the MCR toward the center of the rift basin (now under Lake Superior)
(White, 1968).
Copper Harbor Conglomerate
The Copper Harbor Conglomerate is the oldest formation of rift-filling clastic sedimentary rocks
and conformably overlies and interfingers with the top of the Portage Lake Volcanics (Figures 4 and
5). It consists of red-brown clastic sedimentary rocks with a maximum exposed thickness 2,000 m.
Conglomerates and sandstones are the dominant lithologies in the Copper Harbor Conglomerate.
The formation fines distally and up section, reflecting a waning sediment supply due to progressive
erosion of the source area (Elmore, 1984). The poorly-sorted clasts in the conglomerates range in
size from granules to boulders that are subrounded to rounded and are mostly volcanic in origin and
have a ratio of mafic-to-intermediate + silicic composition of about 2:1 (Daniels, 1982). The
conglomerates include clast-supported and matrix- supported varieties; some of the latter are
diamictites. The conglomerates are interpreted as high-energy channel deposits on coalescing
alluvial fans (Elmore, 1984). The diamictites are debris flow in origin. Sandstone interbeds are more
common in the upper 2/3 of the formation. Sandstones are predominantly red-brown, subangular-to-

7

�angular lithic graywackes with volcanic lithic fragments. The sandstones exhibit current-ripples,
trough-cross beds, current and parting lineations, and reduction spots. Abundant calcite cement in
select conglomerate and coarse sandstone layers was probably deposited as vadose carbonate or
caliche (Kalliokoski, 1986). Thin red-colored siltstone and shale interbeds have desiccation cracks
and are interpreted as periodic drying of the surface. In the Copper Harbor area, there are also
laminated cryptoalgal carbonate beds and ooid lenses. These are laterally-linked contorted layers in
shale-siltstone that are draped over cobbles and are found as poorly developed mats in coarse
sandstone (Elmore, 1983). The laminated carbonate beds are algal stromatolites (genus Colleria).

Figure 6: Generalized stratigraphy of the Portage Lake Volcanics in a strike parallel (longitudinal)
section. Modified from Stoiber and Davidson (1959). Figure 4 shows location of Greenland-Mass
subdistrict (Michigan, Caledonia, Mass, Adventure Mines).

For decades The Copper Harbor Conglomerate CHC and overlying Nonesuch Formation (Figure
5) have been interpreted by many geologists as non-marine. Elmore (1984) interpreted the
environment as a prograding coalescing non-marine alluvial fan complex with proximal-to-distal
braided stream and sheet flood facies on the alluvial fans to distal sand flats and flood plain facies
(Elmore, 1984). However, a number of sedimentological features could be interpreted as either
non-marine or marine and thus, non-marine interpretations often relied on other evidence (Jones
et al., 2020). In the stromatolite interval, Jones et al. (2020) cite bimodal (herring-bone) transport

8

�directions indicated by ripple marks that are mud draped and reactivated as evidence of a shallow
marine environment. Hummocky cross stratification suggests waves on a marine shelf generated
by storms (Jones et al., 2020). Periodic to rhythmic sedimentological features are indicative of
“cyclical periodicity” of tidal deposition on a marine shoreline and are among evidence cited by
Jones et al. (2020). Jones et al. (2020) conclude that the Copper Harbor Conglomerate and
overlying Nonesuch Formation were deposited in a “braided fluvial-evaporitic shoreline-marine
embayment” rather than fluvial-non-marine lacustrine setting. Geochemical evidence provided
by Stüeken et al. (2020) also supports a marine estuary. The climate was probably arid with flashy
seasonal streams. The highlands to the southeast from which the Copper Harbor Conglomerate was
derived are now buried under the Jacobsville Sandstone.
The Copper Harbor Conglomerate in the Keweenaw Peninsula includes a succession of subaerially
deposited lava flows. Lane (1911) used the name, Lake Shore Traps, for this informal member
(Figure 5). This member is well exposed near the tip of the Keweenaw Peninsula where the unit is
composed of 31 lava flows and one interflow conglomerate with a maximum thickness of about 600
m (Paces and Bornhorst, 1985). The composition of the Lake Shore Traps is different than the
underlying Portage Lake Volcanics reflecting the change from active rift-filling magmatism to
passive subsidence with rift-filling clastic sedimentation and little to no magmatism except for the
Lake Shore Traps. These subaerial lava flows range from Fe-rich olivine tholeiitic basalt at the base
to Fe-rich olivine-bearing tholeiitic basaltic andesites and tholeiitic andesites and are likely a shield
volcano. Geochemical data are best explained by a combination of fractional crystallization,
parental magma replenishment, and wall rock assimilation (Paces and Bornhorst, 1985). Davis and
Paces (1990) report a U-Pb age on zircon of 1087.2 +/- 1.6 Ma for the Lake Shore Traps.
Nonesuch Formation
The Nonesuch Formation conformably overlies and locally interfingers with the Copper
Harbor Conglomerate (Figures 4 and 5). It consists of dominantly black-to-gray-to-green to redgray siltstone and shale with a maximum thickness 240 m. Bornhorst and Williams (2013) provide a
stratigraphic column of the entire Nonesuch Formation just south of the Porcupine Mountains State
Park from exploration drilling. Exposures of the Nonesuch Formation in the Keweenaw Peninsula
proper are limited with the best exposure at the Hancock campground and boat launch on M-203
(Stop 14). There are excellent exposures of the Nonesuch Formation along the Big Iron and Presque
Isle rivers in the White Pine area (Woodruff et al., 2013).
In areas with thicker stratigraphic section, siltstone and shale are the dominant lithologies with
lesser very-fine sandstone and minor carbonate laminates. While gray (reduced) color characterizes
most of this formation, the stratigraphic upper beds have more red-brown colors (Bornhorst and
Williams, 2013). Well-laminated to massive black to dark-gray siltstone and shale are the dominant
lithologies near the base of the Nonesuch Formation. The base of the Nonesuch Formation hosted
economic quantities of chalcocite and native copper at the now closed White Pine Mine (Mauk et
al., 1992) and chalcocite at the Copperwood project (Bornhorst and Williams, 2013; Williams and
Bornhorst, 2023). A thin carbonate laminate yielded a Pb-Pb isochron age of 1,081 ± 9 Ma
(Ohr,1993). The environmental setting of the Nonesuch is described above under the Copper
Harbor Conglomerate.

9

�Freda Sandstone
In the Keweenaw Peninsula the Freda Sandstone is the youngest rift-filling clastic sedimentary rock
formations (Figures 4 and 5). The contact between the lower most Freda Sandstone and Nonesuch
Formation is gradational (Bornhorst and Williams, 2013). The exposed thickness is greater than
3,700 m, with the top of the formation submerged beneath Lake Superior. The Freda Sandstone is
generally poorly exposed except along the Lake Superior shoreline. This field guide provides an
optional stop 13 at the McLain State Park where exposures of the Freda are visible during times of
low levels of Lake Superior. Angular and tabular specimens are obtainable at the beach from
outcrops just offshore. The last MCR magmatism was Bear Lake, an intrusive-extrusive dome of
alkaline trachyandesite was emplaced near the middle of the exposed Freda Sandstone (Kulakov et
al., 2018).
Red-brown fine to very-fine sandstone, siltstone, and mudstone are the dominant lithologies in the
Freda Sandstone. Fining-upward sequences occur on the scale of a few meters. The Freda
Sandstone was deposited in an environment characterized by shallow meandering streams (Daniels,
1982). Based on regional correlations the Freda was likely deposited between 1,080 to 1,060 Ma.
Jacobsville Sandstone
The Jacobsville Sandstone was deposited in a rift-flanking basin (Figure 3D) and is outside the
scope of this field guide. Its stratigraphic relationship with other formations is not determined. It
occurs in a contiguous geographic region bound on the northwest side by the Keweenaw Fault and
on the southeast by an unconformable contact with Paleoproterozoic and Archean basement rocks
(Figure 4). The Jacobsville Sandstone is estimated to be more than 2,900 m thick and the top is not
exposed (Kalliokoski, 1982). Red to red-brown sandstone is the dominant lithology with lesser
amounts of red-brown conglomerate, siltstone, and shale. The sandstone varies from subarkose to
quartz sublithic arenite although there are some beds of arkose and quartz arenite (Kalliokoski,
1982). The Jacobsville Sandstone was deposited in an environment characterized by shallow
meandering streams (Kalliokoski, 1988).
Faults, Folds, Fractures
The last episode of the Midcontinent Rift was characterized by post-rift compressional inversion
that facilitated hydrothermal formation of native copper deposits (Woodruff et al., 2020; Bornhorst,
1997). This compression transformed original normal faults into reverse faults, reactivated other
extensional rift-related faults/fractures, and produced new compression-only faults/fractures and
folds. Rather than being an inverted rift-related normal fault, the Keweenaw fault was likely a
detached thrust (DeGraff and Carter, 2023). Cannon et al. (1993) have determined that
compression occurred at about 1,060+/-20 Ma. The probable cause of this event was continental
collision along the Grenville front (Figure 1) beginning as early as 1.08 Ga (Cannon, 1994; Cannon
and Hinze, 1992; Hoffman, 1989). Final inversion of the MCR by compression during Grenville
orogeny occurred between 1,010-980 Ma (Hodgin et al., 2022).

10

�The Mesoproterozoic Midcontinent Rift-filling strata of the Keweenaw Peninsula dip moderately
toward the center of the rift with the angle of dip increasing toward Keweenaw fault where the
stratigraphic base is truncated (Figure 7). The dip of the strata is interpreted as a combination of
syn-depositional downwarpage and structural tilting in response to reverse faulting caused by
regional continental compression (Woodruff et al., 2020; Cannon, 1994).
There are many faults/fractures in the Mesoproterozoic rocks of the Keweenaw Peninsula. Some
of these were exclusively formed during extension of the Midcontinent Rift when grabenbounding normal faulting was prominent along the margin (Figure 3). However, most
faults/fractures were likely either reactivated by or directly produced by the regional
compressional event. The Keweenaw Fault strikes and dips more or less parallel to the bedding
of the truncated Portage Lake Volcanics (Figure 7) and is not necessarily one fault, as it is a zone
with branches up to 0.8 km from the main fault (Butler and Burbank, 1929). It is a detached
thrust fault related to regional compression. Although the Keweenaw Fault would make an ideal
conduit for movement of hydrothermal fluids, there are no native copper deposits along it similar
to other ore-bearing districts where the main faults are not well mineralized. However, the rocks
within and adjacent to the fault are altered by late-stage hydrothermal fluids.

Figure 7: Simplified geologic map showing the location of the major deposits within the Keweenaw
Peninsula native copper district, Michigan. Table 2 provides the names and production for the numbered
deposits. The areas shown on the map are the mined out down-dip portion projected to the surface. All of the
native copper mines are hosted by the Portage Lake Volcanics. Modified from Bornhorst and Barron (2011).

11

�Table 2: Production from 1845 to 1968 of refined copper from native copper deposits (after Weege and
Pollock, 1971).
Million
lbs
Produced
Refined
Copper

Location
Number
see
Figure 7

Calumet &amp; Hecla
Conglomerate

4,229

7

Kearsarge Flow Top

2,263

3

Baltic Flow Top

1,845

12

Pewabic Flow Top

1,077

9

Osceola Flow Top

578

8

Isle Royale Flow Top

341

10

Atlantic Ashbed

143

11

Allouez Conglomerate

73

6

Houghton Conglomerate

38

4

Kingston Conglomerate

20

Greenland-Mass Subdistrict

72

5
See
Figure 3

Other Flow Top and
Conglomerate Deposits

137

Cliff Fissure

38

1

Central Fissure

53

2

Other Fissure Deposits

123

Name of Deposit

District Total

11,030

Several faults occur oblique to the strike of bedding. In the Eagle River area, fault-controlled
native copper veins are common in association with high-angle faults whose displacement is
from 0 to 200 m, (Figure 7; see also Figure 19; Butler and Burbank, 1929). The Allouez Gap
fault (Figure 7) bisects the largest lava flow top hosted native copper deposit in the district (see
Figure 16) and was likely a significant conduit for native copper mineralizing hydrothermal
fluids (Bornhorst, 1997). Correspondence between the thickness of the Kearsarge lava flow and
the Allouez Gap fault suggests this fault was active during deposition of the Portage Lake
Volcanics. It is interpreted as having been reactivated during regional compression.
Faults were the principal pathway for the upward movement and focusing of ore fluids into the
stratabound lava flow tops in the Baltic and Isle Royale deposits as well as those in the
Greenland-Mass subdistrict (Broderick, 1931). Faulting occurred before, during, and after
deposition of native copper and its associated alteration minerals based on fault brecciated and
recemented alteration minerals. There is a close relationship between faulting/fracturing
produced by or reactivated by compression and native copper deposits. The compressional
structures acted as pathways for mineralizing hydrothermal fluids (Bornhorst 1997).

12

�Broad open synclines and anticlines, with wavelengths of around 10 km and various orientations,
are superimposed on the regional dip. Faults with displacement and mineralized tension breaks are
common near the crests of anticlines (Butler and Burbank, 1929). These post-depositional folds are
likely related to the late regional compression (White, 1968).
Keweenaw Peninsula Native Copper District
Active copper mining occurred from 1845 to 1968 in the Keweenaw Peninsula native copper
district. The estimated pre-mining geologic resource for the district is ~20 billion lbs of copper
(Bornhorst and Barron, 2011). Small quantities of native silver are temporally and spatially
associated with the native copper. The major ore producing horizons are located in a 45 km-long
belt in the Keweenaw Peninsula (Figures 4 and 7) and in a subdistrict to the southwest. Native
copper and silver were the only economic metallic minerals and were co-precipitated with a suite of
nonmetallic alteration minerals (Figure 8). Sulfide minerals, such as chalcocite, are uncommon in
native copper deposits and when present only occur in trace amounts. Sulfide minerals occur in latestage veins (Figure 8). Several chalcocite deposits of unknown connection to the native copper
deposits are hosted by the stratigraphically older Portage Lake Volcanics; the largest of these
contains roughly 230 million lbs of copper (Woodruff et al., 2020; Maki and Bornhorst, 1999);
these will not be discussed here.
Native Copper Ore Bodies
Ore bodies in the Keweenaw Peninsula are tabular, stratabound concentrations of native copper
hosted by the Portage Lake Volcanics where there is sufficient original porosity including
brecciated and amygdaloidal flow tops (58.5% of production) and interflow conglomerate beds
(39.5% of production). Secondary porosity occurs along fractures/faults which host veins (about 2%
of production). Since the deposits represent important stratigraphic horizons, the host rocks were
given informal member names (Butler and Burbank, 1929). Several mines with different names
often worked the same deposit/ lithostratigraphic unit. About 85% of the total district production
came from four deposits: Calumet and Hecla Conglomerate, top of the Kearsarge lava flow, top of
the Baltic lava flow, and the top of the Pewabic lava flow (Table 2).
The most common host rocks for native copper deposits are brecciated flow tops (fragmental
amygdaloid) as their original porosity was typically much greater than vesicular (amygdaloidal)
flow tops (White, 1968). The stratabound flow top deposits are “sandwiched” between a footwall
consisting of barren massive basalt of the same flow as the mineralized flow top and hanging wall
interior of the succeeding lava flow. Native copper is often more abundant near the top and bottom
of the brecciated/fragmental amygdaloid interval of the flow top, however, in rich ore shoots, the
entire brecciated/fragmental amygdaloid flow top contains significant amounts of copper. As
brecciated/fragmental amygdaloidal transitions downward into massive basalt, it becomes deficient
in native copper. In some cases, ore shoots are located in tongues of brecciated flow tops within
massive basalt (Weege and Schillinger, 1962). The lateral and vertical distribution of
brecciated/fragmental amygdaloid within the top of a lava flow is irregular and hence, so is the
grade of copper. In general, mined stope heights are from 3 to 5 m. Ore shoots are elongated, but

13

�also occur in a wide variety of shapes, with widths of 30 to 150 m and down dip lengths from 50 m
to 600 m (White, 1968). The strike length for major ore bodies ranges from 1.5 to 11 km with down
dip mineralization extending from 1.5 to 2.6 km on the incline below the surface (Butler and
Burbank, 1929; White, 1968).
Although interflow conglomerate beds make up only a small volume of the Portage Lake Volcanics,
about 40 % of the district production of refined copper were hosted by them. These deposits were
tabular and stratabound, just like the flow top deposits. They are “sandwiched” between a footwall
consisting of the top of the underlying lava flow and hanging wall of barren massive basalt interior
in the overlying lava flow. The porosity of underlying brecciated/fragmental amygdaloid lava flow
top is often greatly decreased by silt and sand filling the primary open space between fragments of
the flow top hence, the originally porous flow top underlying a conglomerate bed acts more like an
aquiclude in the paleohydrologic hydrothermal system. Native copper tends to be concentrated
along specific stratigraphic bands within the conglomerate that are 0.5 to 5 m thick (Weege et al.,
1972).
The Calumet and Hecla Conglomerate was by far the largest single native copper deposit in the
district producing 4.2 billion lbs. as compared to the next largest deposit, the Kearsarge flow top
which produced 2.3 billion lbs. from a fragmental amygdaloid (Figure 7 and Table 2). The Calumet
and Hecla Conglomerate was mined along a strike length of 4.9 km, and down-dip 2.8 km. The
productive area corresponds to a thickening of the conglomerate from less than 1 m up to 6 m
(Butler and Burbank, 1929; Weege et al., 1972). Ore grades decrease with depth where the width of
the conglomerate is greater; essentially the same amount of copper is distributed throughout a
greater volume. (Butler and Burbank, 1929). The highest grades correspond to beds where there is
relatively little fine interstitial material in the clastic sedimentary host rock or where interstitial
spaces are filled with coarse sand or small pebbles (Weege et al., 1972). Thus, localization of native
copper ore is dependent on sedimentary environmental factors.
The first mines in the district were developed on tabular steeply dipping deposits that cross-cut
bedding at high angles. However, overall, the vein deposits are of slight economic importance in the
district. The veins have widths of up to 3 m or more (Butler and Burbank, 1929). Veins are not
single tabular bodies, but rather a series of parallel anastomosing filled open spaces. While
brecciation within vein deposits is common, gouge is not present (Butler and Burbank, 1929). The
lava flow tops and conglomerates adjacent to the vein are mineralized. The distribution of native
copper in veins is more erratic than in either lava flow top or conglomerate deposits. The richest ore
veins tend to be spatially associated with the intersections of the vein and well-oxidized lava flow
tops (Butler and Burbank, 1929). Native copper occurs as both finely disseminated and as masses
weighing many tons. The grade of native copper in the veins has the nugget-effect making
determination of grade difficult. Several small vein deposits are localized just beneath the thickest
basalt flow in the district, the Greenstone flow. For these veins the hydrothermal fluids moved up
along the cross fractures until blocked by the very thick impermeable massive interior of the
Greenstone Flow.
There are veins spatially and genetically associated with the stratabound lava flow top or
conglomerate deposits; these veins occur along faults that intersect major deposits such as the Baltic

14

�and Isle Royale faults (Broderick, 1931). This suggests that ore fluids moved upward along faults
and outward into the permeable flow tops. The intersection of subsidiary faults with locally thick
permeable horizons is a key factor in concentrating ore such as the Kearsage deposit (see Figure
16). White (1968) suggested that for the movement of ore fluids to occur, permeability due to
fracturing was more important than primary permeability. Faults and small fractures cutting massive
interior of lava flows were also likely important for upward transport of ore fluids. Overlapping of
successive lava flows and minor unconformities suggests that simple up-dip movement of ore fluids
was not likely without a network of fractures (Bornhorst, 1997).
Hydrothermal Minerals
The rocks within the Keweenaw Peninsula native copper district were pervasively altered by lowtemperature, low-pressure hydrothermal/burial metamorphic fluids. Alteration was most intensely
associated with the native copper deposits although to some degree secondary hydrothermal
minerals occur in all rocks of the Portage Lake Volcanics. Areas in the Keweenaw Peninsula more
distal to the area of major native copper deposits rocks were less altered at lower temperature. The
intensity and degree of alteration also varies as a function of position within lava flows; the massive
interiors of lava flows are much less altered whereas the lava flow tops are relatively more altered.
Lava flows in close proximity to cross cutting features tend to be more altered. The minerals occur
as amygdule and vein fillings, and as whole rock replacements. Within the Portage Lake Volcanics,
some original igneous minerals are present in the massive interiors of some flows, but secondary
minerals exist in the massive interiors of all flows regardless of their thickness. While the thicker
massive interiors of lava flows contain secondary minerals, their original igneous geochemical
composition is often only slightly or essentially not modified by secondary hydrothermal processes.
There are more than 50 different secondary alteration minerals in the Keweenaw Peninsula; most of
them are related to hydrothermal processes and some are related to supergene processes. Only about
20 alteration minerals are major to less common minerals (Figure 8). Native copper with small
quantities of native silver represents over 99% of the metallic minerals in the mined ore bodies of
the district. Most of the native copper carries a small amount of arsenic in solid solution (typically
less than 0.2 % arsenic of total copper + silver + arsenic; Broderick, 1929). Copper-nickel arsenides
occur in veins that are paragenetically late (Moore, 1971; Stoiber and Davidson, 1959; Butler and
Burbank, 1929).
There is a district wide temporal (paragenetic) and spatial variation in the assemblage of alteration
minerals which was first well described by Butler and Burbank (1929) and later summarized by
White (1968). Recently Bodden et al. (2022) have refined the paragenetic and spatial variation of
the hydrothermal minerals (excluding igneous and supergene related minerals) (Figure 8). The
hydrothermal alteration minerals can be subdivided into main-stage which paragenetically overlap
with the precipitation of native copper (Figure 8). While district-wide there is a well-defined
mineral paragenesis, individual deposits may not exactly follow the district-wide timing of
precipitation (compare Figure 8 to Stop 5). The main-stage is interpreted by Bodden et al. (2022) as
formed during a continuous hydrothermal event.

15

�Figure 8: Paragenesis and relative abundance of secondary hydrothermal alteration minerals in the
Keweenaw Peninsula native copper district. After Bodden et al. (2022).

The late-stage minerals are widespread but volumetrically minor. They commonly occur in small
veins/fractures which cross-cut the main stage minerals or as coatings on main-stage vug filling
minerals. Late-stage alteration minerals are notably more abundant near the Keweenaw fault. The
suite of late-stage minerals are distinguishable by the occurrence of sulfur-bearing minerals, sulfides
and sulfates, and by an assemblage of lower temperature minerals in areas where they overprint an
assemblage of main-stage minerals formed at higher temperatures. The timing of the late-stage
hydrothermal event is uncertain. There could have been no time break or a major time break
between the main-stage and late-stage hydrothermal events. Bodden et al. (2022) suggested that the
main-stage and late-stage hydrothermal events are practically continuous with each other.
Main-stage alteration minerals are spatially zoned perpendicular to stratigraphic strike as
demonstrated for the Calumet area of the district (Figure 9). Epidote and the appearance of quartz
are spatially associated with major native copper deposits (Stoiber and Davidson, 1959). A detailed
study by Stoiber and Davidson (1959) of the Kearsarge deposit shows that native copper is much
more irregularly distributed than secondary mineral zones, but there is a general correlation with the
abundance of native copper associated with the variation of quartz and microcline (Stop 5). The
alteration mineral zones of the Portage Lake Volcanics are similar to the North Shore Volcanic
Group of Minnesota (Schmidt and Robinson, 1997). Bodden et al. (2022) mapped the occurrence of

16

�Figure 9: Distribution of prominent secondary hydrothermal alteration minerals in the Portage Lake
Volcanics in a cross-section in vicinity of Calumet at the center of the major deposits of the Keweenaw
Peninsula native copper district modified from Bornhorst and Rose (1994).

Figure 10: Main-stage hybrid metamorphogenic hydrothermal mineral zones of the Keweenaw
Peninsula (modified from Bodden et al., 2022)

17

�alteration minerals of the Keweenaw Peninsula into those zones used for the North Shore Volcanic
Group (Figure 10; Schmidt and Robinson, 1997). These zones can be equated to the temperatures of
mineral formation (Bodden et al., 2022). The spatial zoning of alteration minerals is consistent with
a thermal high associated with the major native copper deposits (compare Figure 4 and 10). The
mineral zones dip more gently towards Lake Superior than the strata, implying that the strata were
at least somewhat tilted prior to main-stage hydrothermal alteration (Livnat, 1983; Broderick, 1929).
Native copper mineralization is younger than the Copper Harbor Conglomerate, which hosts rare
veins of calcite and native copper (see Stop 7). White (1968) interpreted the age of native copper
mineralization as after the deposition of parts or all of the Freda Sandstone. The Bear Lake igneous
body within the Freda Sandstone is native copper mineralized. Minor amounts of native copper
occur within the lower beds of the Jacobsville Sandstone near Rice Lake (Calumet and Hecla
unpublished drill core log). Based on field relations, hydrothermal alteration is younger than
deposition of rift-filling strata and at least some of the rift-flanking Jacobsville Sandstone. The
absolute age of hydrothermal alteration is between 1060 and 1050 Ma (+/- ~ 20 Ma) (Bornhorst et
al., 1988). This age is consistent with the approximate age of 1060+/-20 Ma for regional continental
compression that caused thrust faulting along the Keweenaw Fault (Cannon et al., 1993). Thus, the
age of main-stage hydrothermal alteration is about 1060 to 1050 Ma contemporaneous with regional
continental compression and some 30 million years after eruption of the Portage Lake Volcanics.
Genesis of the Main-Stage Native Copper Deposits
This section is summarized from Bornhorst and Mathur (2017) and Bodden et al. (2022) and
illustrated in Figure 11.
Native copper occurs throughout the MCR in Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Ontario (Figure 2). It
formed during a regional hydrothermal event from about 1060 to 1050 Ma (Bornhorst et al.,
1988). The regional Cu-bearing hydrothermal fluids are best explained as generated during burial
metamorphism of rift-filling basalts with temperatures reaching a thermal maximum
approximately 30 million years after the end (~1085 Ma) of widespread rift magmatism. The
suite of main-stage hydrothermal minerals precipitated, except native copper, (Figure 7 and 8) is
similar to those found elsewhere rocks have undergone very low to low grade burial
metamorphism at less than about 300OC. The coincidence of regional continental compression
with a burial thermal maximum (Woodruff et al., 1995) provided an integrated paleohydrologic
system through reactivated and new faults and fractures. This allowed the upward movement of
hydrothermal fluids to focus in sites of future copper deposits at the very time of greatest fluid
availability (Bornhorst 1997). During generation of the regional burial metamorphogenic
hydrothermal ore fluids, copper was leached at depth from the rift-filling basalt strata (Bornhorst
and Mathur, 2017, 2018). More than sufficient amount of copper was available to have been leached
from the buried rift-filling basalts.

18

�Figure 11: Cartoon cross sections showing conceptual genetic model of the native copper deposits of the
Keweenaw Peninsula formed at about 1070 to 1040 million years ago. Modified from Bodden et al.
(2022). A. Marine incursions and seawater penetration during deposition of volcanic and sedimentary
rocks in MCR. B. Area prior to burial metamorphism with sulfur depleted evolved seawater providing
salinity for ore-forming fluids. C. Burial metamorphism with generation of burial metamorphic
hydrothermal fluids. Mixing the burial metamorphic fluids with evolved seawater produces copperbearing hybrid metamorphogenic ore-forming hydrothermal fluids. D. Precipitation of main-stage
minerals as a result of mixing of the ore-forming fluids with meteoric water, decreasing temperature, and
water-rock reactions.

19

�The rift-filling volcanic rocks were low in sulfur when they erupted and the little available sulfur
was degassed prior to solidification (Bodden et al., 2022; Bornhorst and Mathur, 2017). These lowsulfur rift-filling volcanic rocks were buried into the source zone where burial metamorphogenic
hydrothermal fluids were generated (Figure 3 and 11C). Since the very low sulfur rift-filling basalts
in the source zone were the same as those in the fluid pathways to the zone of precipitation, the
fluids remained sulfur poor. Since the native copper ore host rocks were again the same rift-filling
very low sulfur volcanic rocks, the burial metamorphogenic hydrothermal fluids remained depleted
in sulfur. The lack of sulfur resulted in the precipitation of native copper rather than copper
sulfides.
While the metamorphogenic hydrothermal fluids lacked sulfur, several studies (Kelly, 2022;
Kelly, 2020; Püschner, 2001; Brown, 2006; Livnat, 1983; Jolly, 1974) have suggested that the
main-stage hydrothermal fluids had at least moderate degree of salinity. The possible sources of
salinity were evaluated by Bornhorst and Mathur (2017), Bornhorst (2021), and Bodden et al.
(2022). Viable sources of salinity for the hydrothermal fluids need to also satisfy the constraint
of very low sulfur. Bornhorst (2021) hypothesized that evolved formation water derived from
sulfur depleted seawater could have been the source of salinity. As seawater penetrates midocean ridge basalts it is heated, reacts with the host basalt, and as a result of precipitation of
minerals it becomes depleted in sulfur. If the sulfur content of the Mesoproterozoic seawater was
low in sulfur, as proposed by Blattlet et al. (2022), then less depletion of sulfur would have been
needed.
During deposition of the youngest Portage Lake Volcanics and overlying Copper Harbor and
Nonesuch formations there were probable incursions of an arm of the sea into the rift for a
significant amount of time. This could have resulted in seawater deeply penetrating into the
underlying rift-filling volcanic rocks (Figure 11A; Bornhorst, 2021). During burial, the riftfilling volcanic and clastic sedimentary rocks and contained seawater was progressively heated
and thereby evolved to be depleted in sulfur (Figure 11B). Continued heating during burial
resulted in burial metamorphic hydrothermal fluids which then thoroughly mixed with the
evolved seawater to form a hybrid metamorphogenic-dominated ore-forming fluid (Figure 11C;
Bodden et al., 2022). These main-stage ore-forming hydrothermal fluids moved upwards from
the source zone through the same very sulfur poor strata as in the source rocks (Figure 11D). As
they moved upwards they cooled, interacted with host rocks, and in the relatively shallow zone
of precipitation they variably mixed with sulfur-poor, low salinity, reduced meteoric water
(Figure 11D; Bodden et. al, 2022). These processes resulted in precipitation of native copper and
main-stage hydrothermal minerals. Higher temperature main-stage mineral assemblages are
spatially associated with the area of native copper deposits where the thermal anomaly was
greatest because of focused hydrothermal fluids (Figure 10). The possible depth of the zone of
precipitation is poorly estimated with a best guess at this time of 10 to 15 km (Kelly et al., 2022;
Kelly, 2020). Within the native copper district, the suite of main-stage minerals, including native
copper, is followed by late-stage minerals precipitated at lower temperatures than the main-stage
hydrothermal fluids coincident with the native copper district.

20

�Late-Stage Hydrothermal Minerals
The suite of late-stage minerals is widespread and similar throughout the Keweenaw Peninsula. The
late-stage suite is readily distinguished in the main area of the native copper district since late-stage
minerals are lower temperature (100 to 150OC) than the main-stage minerals in district itself.
However, outside of the native copper district where main-stage minerals are expected to be formed
at lower temperature, the main-stage and late stage are indistinguishable. Bodden et al. (2022)
suggested that late-stage fluids are a variable mixture of hybrid metamorphogenic hydrothermal
fluids, meteoric water, and shallow seawater, the latter being a source of sulfur in the late-stage
fluids.
Phanerozoic
The Keweenaw Peninsula was subjected to a 500-million-year period of erosion, from about 1
Ga to 0.5 Ga (500 Ma) and multiple kilometers of rock were eroded exposing the native copper
deposits at the surface (Figure 3). Downward percolating groundwaters supergene altered native
copper and produced a suite of including cuprite, tenorite, malachite, and chrysocolla (Bornhorst
and Robinson, 2004). The rocks of the Keweenaw Peninsula were subsequently buried by
Paleozoic sedimentary rocks associated with the Michigan basin beginning about 500 Ma (Figure
3) and ending Precambrian supergene alteration.
Over the past two million years, the Keweenaw Peninsula was subjected to several continental
glacial periods which removed all of the overlying Paleozoic sedimentary rocks with the exception
of Paleozoic outliers slightly south of the Keweenaw Peninsula (Figure 3). The last glacial episode
exposed the native copper deposits at roughly the same erosional level as at 500 Ma or the end of
the Precambrian (Bornhorst and Robinson, 2004). The continental glaciers sculpted the bedrock of
the Keweenaw Peninsula and when the last glacier retreated about 10,000 years ago, it left
behind a variety of unconsolidated glacial-related sediments that included entrained boulders of
native copper. The glaciers carved out the topographic low the Lake Superior basin
corresponding to the less competent clastic sedimentary rocks under the center of the MCR.
After the glaciers retreated, very large volumes of water filled this topographic low and initially
all but the highest land elevations were submerged under a large glacial lake. The glacial lake
levels successively dropped over time to the current level of Lake Superior (Farrand 1960). As
the lake levels receded humans populated the area.

21

�Figure 12: Geologic map of the far western part of the Upper Peninsula of Michigan showing field trip stops.

Objectives of Field Trip
This field trip is designed to provide an overview of the Mesoproterozoic Midcontinent Rift-filling
strata and native copper deposits of the Keweenaw Peninsula (Figure 12). There are four rift-filling
formations: Portage Lake Volcanics, Copper Harbor Conglomerate, Nonesuch Formation, and
Freda Sandstone. The Nonesuch and Freda formations are poorly exposed in the Keweenaw
Peninsula thus, only two optional stops are included in this field guide. The Jacobsville Sandstone is
a rift-flanking formation and is outside the scope of this field trip. The rift-filling strata are overlain
by unconsolidated Pleistocene glacial sediments. There is one glacial related stop.
IMPORTANT NOTE TO ALL READERS:
Many of the field trip stop descriptions and significant parts of the introductory geologic overview have been
previously published especially in other Institute on Lake Superior guidebooks e.g., Bornhorst and Barron
(2013) and the extensive guides by Bornhorst and Rose (1994) and Bornhorst et al. (1883). The stop

descriptions in this field guide, as compared to previously published guides range from exact
wording to significantly modified wording without specific citation. Two of the stops in this field
guide, Stops 2 and 8, were not visited by previous field guides involving Bornhorst. These stop
descriptions are new.

22

�Stop 1: Subaerial basalt lava flow cross-section at South Range Quarry
Latitude: 47.07750N; Longitude: -88.64240W
Directions: Drive west through downtown Houghton on US-41 to south M26. Drive about 4.5 miles
to unmarked road on west side of M-26 just before church on south side of unmarked road. Proceed
on road to tree line. Walk NE uphill to quarry.
THIS STOP IS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY. PLEASE GET PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY.

Volcanic textures and structures typical of moderate-to-thick subaerial lava flows within the Portage
Lake Volcanics are well exposed in this old quarry (Figure 13). As one traverses up the hill to the
quarry along the rubbly path there is a low-profile exposure of a 4 m thick interflow conglomerate
bed which is also exposed laterally along the SE slope face of this knob. The conglomerate layer is
stratigraphically the National Sandstone member and is approximately near the middle of the exposed
Portage Lake Volcanics stratigraphic section (Figure 6). The conglomerate is overlain by an 18 m
thick lava flow (A).

Figure 13: Geologic cross section of the South Range Quarry (modified from White, 1971).

Laterally continuous interflow sedimentary beds provide critical stratigraphic markers within the
Portage Lake Volcanics, an otherwise monotonous volcanic pile with many laterally discontinuous
lava flows. The sedimentary unit exposed below the quarry has been correlated with the National
Sandstone, a marker bed in the Mass-Rockland area (Figure 6). At South Range Quarry, the National
Sandstone is a massively bedded, pebble-cobble framework conglomerate, composed of silicic with
subordinate mafic volcanic clasts that are subangular to subrounded, within a matrix of poorly-sorted
medium-to-coarse sand of similar composition.
The Portage Lake Volcanics basalts in this part of the stratigraphic section are mainly olivine tholeiites
and erupted as subaerial lava sheets. The principal lava flow exposed in the quarry walls illustrates
many of the volcanological features of Portage Lake Volcanics lava flows. The top and bottom of the
South Range Quarry lava flow (B) are exposed. Flow B was deposited directly on top of Flow A and
consists of aphanitic chilled basalt. The base of Flow B occurs where amygdules disappear abruptly
in the top of the underlying flow.

23

�The upper surface of the main flow (B) was brecciated slightly by movement of lava after the
formation of an upper crust. The flow top breccia (locally termed fragmental amygdaloid) is
laterally discontinuous. The fragmental amygdaloid rapidly grades downward to an unbrecciated,
highly amygdaloidal (vesicular) flow top. Note the variation in vesicle size and shape downward in
the flow. There are numerous layers of flattened amygdules (vesicles) in the flow top with their
orientation parallel to the top and bottom of the flow (B). The orientation of these layers may
represent laminar flow planes within the flow top. The section was tilted after emplacement.
Slow cooling of the lava flow caused solidification toward the flow interior at a rate which allowed
development of subophitic to ophitic textures (ophitic texture denoted by large oikocrysts of
clinopyroxene enclosing a felted framework of An-rich plagioclase and intergranular olivine). The
resulting massive, non-vesicular flow interior constitutes about two-thirds of the flow (B). Before
final solidification, small amounts of volatile-rich, differentiated residual liquid were likely injected
into thin discontinuous layers and lenses (tabular openings produced during cooling). Most of these
pegmatoid layers are subparallel to the bottom and top surfaces of the flow.
A typical pegmatoid zone consists of a 5 to 10 cm border zone at the top and bottom which is
composed of a medium-to-coarse grained aggregate of Ab-rich plagioclase, prisms of Fe-rich
clinopyroxene and abundant Fe-Ti oxides, as well as accessory minerals such as apatite and zircon
(Cornwall, 1951c). The cores of the pegmatoid zones are 5 cm to 1.2 m thick consisting of a green
vesicular basaltic rock. Zircons extracted from pegmatoids within thick Portage Lake Volcanics
basalt flows have yielded high-precision U-Pb dates (e.g., Davis and Paces, 1990).
There are thin tabular layers and flattened amygdules (vesicles) in the top of the flow and in the
massive interior of the flow (B) that are composed of a brown and sometimes green fine-grained
material that have been described interpreted by White (1971) as detrital material. Alternatively, this
green-to-red cherty rock, could be simply alteration minerals (quartz, prehnite, epidote, and
pumpellyite) filling fractures and nearly complete pseudomorphic replacement of basalt. Numerous
pegmatoid layers are exposed in the quarry walls, as well as in the glacially-polished surfaces above
and to the north of the quarry.
The effects of regional hydrothermal alteration can be observed within the vesicular flow top and
pegmatoid zones. Vesicles are filled with a variety of secondary minerals including quartz, epidote
(olive green), prehnite (waxy light green), calcite, pumpellyite (pale bluish green), chlorite (dark
green to black) and traces of native copper (pinkish color). Pseudomorphic replacement of basalt by
fine-grained secondary minerals is most intense where permeability was highest. The massive
interior of the flow is only a little visibly altered, however plagioclase is altered to albite and
pyroxene is altered to chlorite. In the vicinity of selected fractures there can be intense epidote or
prehnite alteration. The massive interior was a relatively impermeable horizon in the
paleohydrothermal system. Fracturing during late compression integrated the system and provided
limited pathways for upward movement of ore fluids.

24

�Stop 2: Subaerial basalt lava flow, eastbound US-41 Houghton
Latitude: 47.12144N; Longitude: -88.56474W
Directions: Drive west through downtown Houghton and loop around (Yooper Loop) to head east
for 0.8 miles along US-41 or Montezuma Avenue (one-way two-lane highway). Stay left (north side)
as though going back through downtown and turn into unmarked gravel lot just before large
outcrops on left (north). Use sidewalk to walk to outcrop. BE CAREFUL OF TRAFFIC.
The rock cut at the southeast end of downtown Houghton provides an excellent example of the
characteristics of Portage Lake Volcanics subaerial basalt lava flows (Figure 14). There is a
sidewalk providing access to the Stop 2 south-facing road cut. While there is also a sidewalk on the
other side of the road crossing the road is discouraged. These other outcrops can be accessed by
parking uphill from them on the other side of the road. There are also north-facing exposures of this
same stratigraphic interval on west bound US-41 (Shelden Avenue) east of the Houghton U.S. Post
Office. The exposures at Stop 2 are located stratigraphically above the Scales Creek flow and below
the Kearsarge flow, slightly closer to the Scales Creek flow (Figure 6). The lava flows of the
exposure and vicinity strike approximately N30oE and dip toward the center of the rift (Lake
Superior) at about 55o northwest (White, 1956).

Figure 14: Geologic cross section of road cut eastbound US-41, southeast end of downtown Houghton.

There are parts of two lava flows exposed at Stop 2 (Figure 14). The base of the stratigraphically
lower of these two lava flows (A) is not exposed on the east end of the Stop 2 exposures. It is also
not exposed on the other side of the road. The top of Flow A is well exposed and is overlain by
massive basalt of Flow B. The contact itself is denoted by an abrupt change from underlying highly
altered greenish, slightly brecciated amygdaloidal basalt of Flow A (about 0.5 m thick) that is
overlain by massive dark grey to black basalt of Flow B. This greenish zone of the top of Flow A is
underlain by about 3.5 m of amygdaloidal basalt with slightly fragmental (brecciated) basalt, also
Flow A. The slightly fragmental basalt is gradational downward (east) towards the center of Flow A
where the abundance of amygdules (filled vesicles) is sufficient to call the rock amygdaloidal basalt.
Amygdaloidal basalt lacking fragments is about 4 m thick. There is an arbitrary boundary where the

25

�abundance of amygdules is too low to call the rock amygdaloidal, although it contains some
amygdules. The abundance of amygdules progressively decreases towards the center of Flow A, the
porous and permeable top of Flow A is about 8 m thick. Flow A is greater than 14 m thick as its
base is not exposed.
Notably, flattened amygdules (vesicles) occur along planar layers in the flow A top with their
orientation roughly parallel to the top of the flow. Larger flattened amygdules are about 2 by 2 by 1
cm and between them, appearing to connect larger amygdules, are much smaller amygdules 1 to 2
mm thick. The orientation of these layers may represent laminar flow planes within the flow top.
Layers of flattened amygdules are also numerous at Stop 1.
Flow A is overlain by Flow B and the top of Flow B is not exposed at Stop 2. However, its top is
poorly exposed on the other (south) side of the road. Flow B is about 30 m thick. There is a
pegmatoid layer in the massive basalt interior of Flow B (Figure 14). Flow B is thicker than the
average flow. The pegmatoid is distinguished as notably amygdaloidal. Pegmatoids are discussed
further at Stop 1.
The effects of regional hydrothermal alteration can be observed within the top of Flow A and the
pegmatoid layer in Flow B. The massive basalt interior of Flow A and B are much less altered than
the flow top. However, the primary magmatic plagioclase in the massive basalt has been replaced
by albite and the primary mafic minerals are replaced by chlorite, pumpellyite, and iron oxides. The
intensely altered basalt at the very top of Flow A is largely replaced by hydrothermal alteration
minerals including epidote, prehnite, pumpellyite, quartz, chlorite, calcite, and trace native copper.
Amygdules are frequently filled with colorless to white quartz. a mixture of prehnite pumpellyite
and quartz, a mixture of pumpellyite, a mixture of quartz with lesser calcite, only quartz, and only
pink inclusions of native copper in milky or colorless quartz. There is visible native copper in some
amygdules.
The massive interior of the flow is much less altered than the flow top and represents a relatively
impermeable horizon in the paleohydrothermal system. In contrast, the flow top was a pathway for
movement of hydrothermal fluids.

26

�Stop 3: Overview at Bumbletown Hill
Latitude: 47.290100N; Longitude: -88.417250W
Directions: From Portage Lift Bridge follow US-41 towards Copper Harbor and proceed through
Calumet towards Allouez for about 15.5 miles to Bumbletown Road. Turn left (west) and proceed
one mile up to the top of Bumbletown Hill via Cedar Street. Walk around outside of communication
tower fence to get excellent views as described below.

Figure 15: Geologic sketch map of Bumbletown Hill modified from White (1971).

From the overlook on a clear day, Isle Royale may be seen 80 km to the northwest and the Huron
Mountains may be seen beyond Keweenaw Bay, 60 km to the southeast. From the top of
Bumbletown Hill the land slopes very gradually to the northwest toward Lake Superior. This slope
is similar throughout much of the northwestern side of the Keweenaw Peninsula. The area is
underlain mainly by conglomerates and sandstones of the Copper Harbor Conglomerate dipping at
about 20 to 30 degrees NW. The southeastern flank of the Keweenaw Peninsula has a steeper slope
at the skyline, following approximately the line of the Keweenaw fault. The low-lying plain
between the fault and Keweenaw Bay is underlain by flat-lying Jacobsville Sandstone. Next to the
Keweenaw fault beds of the Jacobsville Sandstone can be steeply dipping.
Looking northeast along the strike of the Portage Lake Volcanics, one can see the cuesta form of the
ridge underlain by the Greenstone flow. At Bumbletown Hill, the Greenstone flow is only 75 m
thick (Figure 15), but the flow thickens abruptly to more than 400 m near this end of the cuesta
ridge. The Greenstone flow dips northward at about 25o toward the center of the Lake Superior. It
can be traced along much of the Keweenaw Peninsula (Figure 6) and has been stratigraphically and

27

�geochemically correlated with a similar unit on Isle Royale, 90 km away, on the opposite side of the
rift. Thus, the areal extent of this great flow exceeds 5,000 km2, and its volume is on the order of
800 to 1,500 km3 (Longo, 1983; White, 1960). The Greenstone Flow is an enormous lava flow. It is
possible that rather than having been a lava flow the Greenstone Flow was a lava lake. Regardless,
the Greenstone Flow perhaps is the greatest single continuous outpouring of lava on Earth.
Very slow solidification of this great mass of magma allowed extensive in-situ magmatic
differentiation (Cornwall (1951a, 1951b). Magmatic differentiation resulted in a massive, ophitic
(lath-shaped plagioclase surrounded by large irregular masses of clinopyroxene) base of the flow; an
overlying zone of intercalated subophitic and pegmatoidal layers; an upper ophitic zone; and a finegrained, vesicular flow top. The lower ophitic zone experienced rates of undercooling low enough
to allow growth of clinopyroxene oikocrysts up to 5 cm in diameter.
The geochemical composition of the Greenstone Flow magma is more evolved than typical olivine
tholeiites; which constitute the greatest volume of the Portage Lake Volcanics. Primitive olivine
tholeiite and quartz tholeiite occur between the Greenstone Flow and the top of the Portage Lake
Volcanics. Generally, magmas of the Portage Lake Volcanics become more primitive and less
crustal contamination with time during the development of the Midcontinent Rift (Paces, 1988). At
Bumbletown Hill, the Greenstone Flow is only 75 m thick and is composed of a thick amygdaloidal
flow top with some exposures of fine-grained columnar basalt.
To the left of the cuesta ridge the rocks consist of the top of the Portage Lake Volcanics and the
bottom of the Copper Harbor Conglomerate. To the right of the ridge, the more distant hills are
formed by lava flows near the base of the Portage Lake Volcanics.
Bumbletown Hill is located on the southwest side of Allouez Gap, a NW- to SE-trending valley (see
Figure 7). The valley follows the Allouez Gap fault, a zone of faults and fractures, along which the
Portage Lake Volcanics and Keweenaw fault, are offset. At this gap, the strike of the Portage Lake
Volcanics swings from about N35oE to N50oE (Figure 7). Almost every permeable horizon near the
Allouez Gap fault contains above average amounts of native copper; nowhere else in the district are
there so many mineralized beds (Figure 7). About 60% of the district production can be linked to
the fault as a primary pathway for ore fluids. The fault bisects the Kearsarge deposit (see Figure 16),
which was the second largest copper producer in the native copper district. There was a readily
visible line of poor rock piles, a little more than 1,500 m southeast of Bumbletown Hill, from the
many mines which were producing native copper from the Kearsarge deposit. Many of these piles
are now gone as they have been crushed for aggregate. The line is still visible in the fall when leaves
are not on the trees. About 1,200 m N65oE of the hilltop, the Houghton conglomerate and the
stratigraphically lower Iroquois flow produced 33 million pounds of copper. East of Bumbletown
Hill but no longer visible is the Kingston Mine, one of the most recent native copper mines to open
and last to close. It was discovered by exploration near the Allouez Gap fault. It only produced 20
million pounds of copper from 1963 to 1968.

28

�Stop 4: Interflow Conglomerate at Bumbletown Hill
Latitude: 47.287136N; Longitude: -88.415365W
Directions: From top of Bumbletown Hill turn around and head downhill 0.5 miles to pull over on
left just before dirt road.
Specimens of Allouez Conglomerate are scattered about the southeast flank of base of Bumbletown
Hill. The remnants of Allouez Conglomerate poor rock piles are private property (Figure 15). Near
this pullover there is the opportunity to collect specimens of the Allouez Conglomerate.
The Allouez Conglomerate is one of a small number of interflow clastic sedimentary horizons
within the Portage Lake Volcanics and is visible on the lower slopes southeast of Bumbletown Hill.
Conglomerate layers within the Portage Lake Volcanics are important stratigraphic marker horizons
(Figure 6). Correlation of basaltic lava flows along strike would be difficult without clastic
sedimentary marker beds deposited during periodic waning of volcanism. The Allouez
Conglomerate can be traced more than 120 km along strike from Mass to Delaware (Figure 6). The
Allouez conglomerate is just below the Greenstone flow. At Bumbletown Hill the Allouez
Conglomerate was mined for native copper (Figure 15) albeit it only yielded about 75 million lbs of
refined copper (Table 2). Elsewhere the Allouez Conglomerate has yielded additional native copper.
The Allouez Conglomerate consists of mostly red-colored conglomerate with lesser amounts of
sandstone and siltstone. The largest clasts at this locality are about 65 cm in diameter and the
median size is about 8 cm. A pebble count of boulders more than 20 cm across by White (1971)
gave the following results: 16% basalt, mostly amygdaloidal; 36% quartz porphyritic rhyolite; 11%,
feldspar porphyritic rhyolite; and 37% felsic granophyre. The Houghton Conglomerate is almost
entirely clasts of quartz porphyry as is the Kingston Conglomerate. There are conglomerates within
the lower Portage Lake Volcanics near the tip of the Keweenaw Peninsula whose clasts are clearly
sourced from an extrusive dome of rhyolite. This could be the explanation for the uniformity of
clasts in the Houghton and Kingston Conglomerates. In contrast, the heterogeneity of the Allouez
Conglomerate clasts suggests a less restricted source area (White, 1971).
Evidence of native copper mineralization can be seen in some rocks of the Allouez Conglomerate at
nearby this stop. Occasionally, one can find a specimen with native copper filling the void space
between clasts and grains. Calcite and chlorite are the dominant pore-filling secondary minerals
visible on this rock pile. Thin black veinlets cutting the Allouez conglomerate consist of calcite with
chalcocite “dust.” Chalcocite is a product of late- stage hydrothermal fluids.
Supergene alteration resulting from the downward percolation of groundwater is not common at
depth in most the native copper deposits. Supergene alteration products are likely common when
native copper ore bodies are at or very near the surface. At this stop, supergene alteration minerals
are common including chrysocolla, malachite, and cuprite. The depth of occurrence is unknown
although given the widespread distribution in rocks of the poor rock piles it seems likely at least
some supergene alteration occurred at depth as documented elsewhere. The occurrence of supergene
alteration minerals at depth in the native copper mines was used by Bornhorst and Robinson (2004)
to hypothesize that at least some supergene alteration was Precambrian in age.

29

�Stop 5: Seneca Mine Rock Pile
Latitude: 47.311915N; Longitude: -88.365818W
Directions: At the intersection of Bumbletown Road and US-41, turn left (northeast). Drive about
2.9 miles almost through Mohawk to 1st Street when you will turn left (northwest). Proceed on 1st
Street/Seneca Location Road 0.3 miles to gated road. Walk to rock piles.
THIS STOP IS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY. PLEASE GET PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY.

The Kearsarge lode was worked by the Seneca Mine, one of multiple mines which produced native
copper from the top of the Kearsarge lava flow over a strike length of more than 12 km and downdip as much as 2,500 m (Figure 16). About 1,026 million kg of refined copper were produced at an
average grade of 1.05% Cu, making the Kearsarge deposit the largest flow top hosted deposit and
the second largest producer in the district behind the Calumet &amp; Hecla Conglomerate mines (Table
2). Production of copper from the Kearsarge lode began in 1887 and stopped in 1967.
The Kearsarge lava flow has been recognized for a distance of about 55 km along strike and dips
between 35 and 40o NW (Figures 6 and 16). It lies directly above the Wolverine Sandstone (Figure
6). The amygdaloidal and/or brecciated top of the Kearsarge flow ranges from near zero up to 10 m
in thickness. The productive top has an average thickness of around 2 m and consists of brecciated
basalt (individual fragments of amygdaloidal basalt are generally less than 15 cm in greatest
dimension). The brecciated basalt grades downward into amygdaloidal basalt with amygdules
concentrated in layers. Further downward, the top grades into a zone of fewer and larger amygdules,
and then into massive basalt in the interior of the flow. Just below the brecciated and/or
amygdaloidal top of the flow, there is distinct plagioclase porphyritic basalt. The abundance and
size of the plagioclase phenocrysts in this zone are variable, but they can make up a large percentage
and phenocrysts are up to 2.5 cm in length. This zone is probably the result in situ floating of
plagioclase during surface crystallization of the flow. The phenocrysts likely formed in a shallow
magma chamber. Specimens with abundant plagioclase phenocrysts are common on this rock pile.
The basalt of the Kearsarge flow is well oxidized. Albitized and pumpellyitized basalt consists of
pseudomorphically replaced plagioclase set in a fine-grained to cryptocrystalline groundmass.
Original igneous minerals were replaced in areas where alteration was intense. Olivine is almost
invariably completely replaced while other igneous minerals are replaced by alteration minerals to
varying degrees.
The amygdule and interfragment spaces are filled with (in order of most to least abundant): calcite,
epidote, K-feldspar, quartz, and lesser amounts of chlorite, prehnite, pumpellyite, laumontite, and
sericite. Native copper is closely associated in time and space with the secondary amygdule
minerals (Stoiber and Davidson, 1959). Paragenetically, chlorite; epidote; microcline; and prehnite
are early-formed minerals, and the latest-formed minerals are quartz; native copper; calcite; and
chlorite (Figure 17). A zonal stratabound arrangement of amygdule minerals in the Kearsarge
deposit is seen in the Ahmeek Shaft No. 3 (Figure 18). The zoning may be explained by deposition
of secondary minerals from a hydrothermal solution moving along a permeable channel. Chlorite
and microcline would have been deposited first, along the outer limits of the solution channel;

30

�followed by quartz and epidote in the center of the channel; and finally, deposition of calcite in the
remaining openings. This is consistent with the paragenetic relationships seen in individual samples
from the rock pile. No strict correlation exists between the stratabound zoning and the grade of
native-copper mineralization (Stoiber and Davidson, 1959). The amygdule minerals and grade of
copper mineralization vary with depth. Within the upper limit of quartz (Figure 16), the quartz
content is typically about 15 % of open space fillings although it is considerably less than 10% at
shallower depths. The lower limit of microcline may also mark the limit of significant copper
mineralization. The amount of native copper present is much more irregular than variation of the
mineral zones.

Figure 16: Thickness of the Kearsarge lava flow showing the productive area to be the thickest in the top
diagram modified from Butler and Burbank (1929). The Kearsarge flow top ore body is bisected by the
Allouez Gap fault. Bottom diagram shows strike parallel down-dip projection to vertical showing
distribution of higher-grade native copper ore and occurrence of important alteration minerals modified
from Stoiber and Davidson (1959). Abundance of quartz in amygdules is greater than 10 % on the downdip side of the line (lower) and K-feldspar is absent on the down-dip side lower line shown. The Kearsarge
flow dips about 35 to 40o NW. Mine names and shaft numbers are noted.

31

�Figure 17: Paragenesis of secondary hydrothermal alteration minerals in the Kearsarge deposit at the
Wolverine No. 2 Mine.

Figure 18: Cross section of the top of the Kearsarge lava flow (amygdaloid) deposit showing the
distribution of secondary hydrothermal amygdule-filling alteration minerals at the Ahmeek Mine, 35th
level, 400 to 500 ft south of the shaft. Modified from Stoiber and Davidson (1959). Data from the back
and walls are projected to a horizontal plane. There is a barren laumontite-quartz-calcite zone not shown
here.

32

�The Allouez Gap Fault bisects the thickest segment of the Kearsarge Flow along its 55 km strike
length (Figure 16). Higher grades and production occur northeast of the fault where fractures with
orientations that parallel the fault are more abundant. Within the Allouez Gap Fault zone, early
epidote and quartz were brecciated and recemented by calcite, quartz, and native copper. After
another episode of brecciation, the fault zone was recemented again with calcite; quartz; and lesser
laumontite (Butler and Burbank, 1929). The latter may be late-stage. Movement along the fault
occurred before, during, and after deposition of native copper. The fault apparently was a conduit
for transport of ore fluids to the permeable flow top. The coincidence of this fault with the relatively
thick flow top resulted in the second largest deposit in the district.
The Seneca Mine is an excellent locality to study the character of a representative basaltic flow top
hosted native copper deposit. Specimens of massive basalt, massive basalt with abundant
plagioclase phenocrysts, and amygdaloidal basalt can be found on this rock pile. Masses of native
copper are readily collectable especially when using a metal detector. Open-space filling minerals
(amydgules and between breccia fragments) that occur in the lode can be found on the rock pile.
Stoiber and Davidson (unpublished data) made a quantitative analysis of open-space filling minerals
for the Seneca Mine rock pile and found open-space filling minerals consisted of: calcite, 57%; red
feldspar 8% (microcline); pink feldspar (adularia) 15%; epidote, 17%; prehnite, trace; pumpellyite,
trace and quartz, trace. Many specimens contain multiple minerals and illustrate paragenetic
relationships.

Stop 6: Eagle River Falls
Latitude: 47°24'44.9N; Longitude: - 88°17'47.3W
Directions: Return to US-41 from Seneca Mine and turn left (northeast) continuing 7.2 miles to
junction of US-41 and M-26. Turn left (north) on M-26 towards Eagle River and proceed 2.3 miles
across bridge and immediately right after the bridge into the parking lot.
The waterfalls of Eagle River are near the contact between the top of the Portage Lake Volcanics
and the base of the Copper Harbor Conglomerate (Figure 5). The contact dips about 30o NNW. The
beds strike roughly parallel to the shoreline of Lake Superior; the orientation of the Keweenaw
Peninsula changes from NE in vicinity of Houghton to ENE at Eagle River to E-W near the tip of
the peninsula. The tholeiitic basalt subaerial lava flows just below the contact are pahoehoe type
with a ropy upper surface. The orientation of the ropes indicates that the flow erupted from a vent to
the north geographically under Lake Superior. That the ropy flow top is preserved suggests that little
erosion occurred between deposition of the last of the lava flows of the Portage Lake Volcanics and
the Copper Harbor Conglomerate. The Copper Harbor Conglomerate consists of red-brown
rhyolite-pebble conglomerate but includes many sandstones and even some shale beds. Under the
bridge, one can get a good view of the lithology of the lower part of the Copper Harbor
Conglomerate. The environmental setting of the Copper Harbor Conglomerate is discussed further
at Stop 8.
This contact marks an abrupt change in the geologic evolution of the Midcontinent rift. Below this
contact the dominant strata is a very thick succession of subaerial basalt lava flows erupted from
fissure vents under Lake Superior that filled the progressively extended and down dropped rift basin

33

�during active Midcontinent rifting. Below this contact the Portage Lake Volcanics consists of more
than 200 individual lava flows with a cumulative exposed thickness of about 5,000 m; the base is
fault truncated (Figure 4 and 5). Abruptly above the contact lava flows are strikingly absent and
clastic sedimentary rocks are the dominant strata deposited in a sagging basin after active extension
ended. The clastic sedimentary strata above this contact consists mostly of conglomerate and
sandstone with a cumulative exposed thickness of more than 5,700 m; the top is not exposed (Figure
4 and 5). While generally absent, a thin package of mafic to intermediate volcanic rocks (Lake
Shore Traps) deposited as a shield volcano interfingers with clastic sedimentary rocks of the Copper
Harbor Conglomerate. The very last magmatic activity in the MCR is the lone Bear Lake alkaline
igneous body near the middle of the clastic sedimentary strata.

Stop 7: Great Sand Bay
Latitude: 47. 446140N; Longitude: -88. 216411W
Directions: Continue driving northeast (right from parking area) on M-26 for 4.5 miles until the
Great Sand Bay paved pullover with overview and beach access.
The Great Sand Bay overlook provides a beautiful view of Lake Superior (Figure 19). Very large
volumes of water filled the Lake Superior basin as a result of melting of the glaciers, turning it
into a glacial lake. The levels of the glacial lakes depended on the position of the ice front,
outlets, and crustal rebound. There are 15 lake stages recognized in the Lake Superior basin
(Farrand 1960). As the lake levels receded to the current level of Lake Superior, more and more
of the Keweenaw Peninsula emerged. At the road level, the sand dunes are remains of the Lake
Nipissing Stage (4,000 to 5,000 years ago) when the lake level was about 9 m (30 feet) higher than
today. After lake stages at about 3,200, 2,000, and 1,000 years ago, the waters receded toward the
present level termed Lake Superior.
The underlying bedrock is the Copper Harbor Conglomerate. In the Keweenaw Peninsula the Lake
Shore Traps are interbedded near the middle of the Copper Harbor Conglomerate (see Stop 9). The
massive interiors of these lava flows are more resistant to erosion than the underlying and
overlying conglomerates and sandstones of the Copper Harbor Conglomerate. As a result,
harbors such as those at Eagle Harbor and Copper Harbor are maintained by lava flows visible at
their mouths. While not visible, lava flows occur at the mouth of Great Sand Bay too.
There are many extensive underwater fissure vein deposits which crosscut the Eagle River shoals
located about 0.5 to 1 km offshore. To date, there have been a total of 36 underwater copper veins
discovered from the eastern tip of Great Sand Bay (visible at this stop) to Eagle River, about 3.2 km
west. Some of these submerged veins likely connect with veins recognized from on land exposures
(Figure 19). The native copper that is naturally on the bottom lands of Lake Superior are grouped as
“lake copper.” The largest lake copper specimen ever recovered underwater was a massive 19-ton
unattached copper slab in July of 2001. It was recovered from one of these vein deposits north of
Jacobs Creek in about 9 m of water. This large underwater native copper vein is on display at the
A.E. Seaman Mineral Museum in the outside copper pavilion.

34

�Many of the submerged veins are often quite rich in native copper and can contain long continuous
stringers protruding up to 1.5 m in height and extending almost 6 meters in length. Most of the veins
are less than 50 cm in width and are primarily composed of quartz or calcite with minor amounts of
laumontite, datolite, prehnite, and traces of silver. Veins will locally contain clay pockets associated
with well-defined copper crystal specimens.
Bornhorst and Barron (2017) provide additional information about the Guiness World record
tabular 19-ton native copper mass.

Figure 19. Geologic and location map of the 19-ton submerged native copper vein recovered
from Great Sand Bay, Keweenaw Peninsula, Michigan (from Bornhorst and Barron, 2017).

35

�Stop 8: Copper Harbor Conglomerate, J. &amp; M. Lizzadro Lakeshore Preserve
By Daniel J. Lizzadro-McPherson
Latitude: 47. 479128N; Longitude: -87.979576W
Directions: Continue east-northeast on M-26 from Great Sand Bay to Eagle Harbor. Continue
on M-26 towards Copper Harbor for 9.2 miles (14.8km) until the sign for the preserve appears
on the lakeward side of the road. Park at the pull-off on the north-side of M-26 for beach access.
PLEASE DO NOT DAMAGE THE OUTCROP. NO HAMMERS ALLOWED. COLLECTION OF
BEACH ROCK ONLY.

Figure 20: Overview of the J. &amp; M. Lizzadro Lakeshore Preserve, which encompasses the entire shoreline
between private properties (shaded, cross-hatched areas) along M26.

The Joseph &amp; Mary Lizzadro Lakeshore Preserve is located near the northern-most point on the
Keweenaw Peninsula and is host to prominent outcrops of Copper Harbor Conglomerate,
colorful cobble-pebble beaches, and iconic views of Lake Superior. This site is notable due to the
diverse facies of CHC, rare occurrences of stromatolites (genus Colleria) and raindrop
impressions found among the wave-washed bedrock exposures. Established as a preserve in
2003 by the Houghton Keweenaw Conservation District and the Keweenaw Land Trust, the
Lizzadro Lakeshore Preserve protects over 640-feet of undeveloped shoreline and several small
islands (Figure 20). The preserve showcases one of only three A-ranked Michigan occurrences of
the globally rare imperilied plant community-type (G2) bedrock beaches. Thanks to a generous
donation by Gina Nicholas, the preserve was named in honor of my grandparents, Joseph &amp;
Mary Lizzadro, with the hope that this significant Geoheritage site remains protected for many
future generations to enjoy.

36

�The bedrock geology of the preserve consists of red-colored clastic sedimentary rocks grouped
under the stratigraphic formation of the Copper Harbor Conglomerate (Figure 5). The Copper
Harbor Conglomerate. ranges from 490 m thick near the Wisconsin border, to about 1,310 m
thick on the Keweenaw Peninsula, reaching a maximum exposed thickness of 2,000 m on the
shores of Isle Royale. Overall, the Copper Harbor Conglomerate is generally a medium reddishbrown colored wedge of fluvial siliciclastic conglomerates and sandstones that rapidly filled-in
the rift basin as volcanism waned and subsequently terminated (Daniels, 1982; Cannon and
Nicholson, 2000; Woodruff et al., 2020). The base of the Copper Harbor Conglomerate. locally
interfingers with the uppermost subaerial basaltic lava flows of the Portage Lake Volcanics
(Figure 5). Near the stratigraphic lower-third of the Copper Harbor Conglomerate there is a
succession of basaltic to intermediate subaerial lava flows, informally named the Lakeshore
Traps (Figure 5). Outcrops of Copper Harbor Conglomerate. exposed along the Lake Superior
shoreline at the Lizzadro Lakeshore Preserve (Figure 21) are stratigraphically above Lakeshore
Traps (Cornwall, 1954).

Figure 11: Overview of geologic features present at the J. &amp; M. Lizzadro Lakeshore Preserve.

37

�Nearby at well-studied Dan’s Point, outcrops of Copper Harbor Conglomerate exhibit lithologic
facies that are characteristic of the upper two-thirds of the formation. The conglomeratic facies
(Figures 21 and 22: Points A, C, and F) are primarily clast-supported and comprised of rounded
to well-rounded poorly sorted clasts, consisting of a 2:1 silicic-to-mafic volcanic rock fragment
ratio with minor pyroclastic, plutonic, and metamorphic rocks (Elmore, 1984). The conglomerate
matrix is comprised of coarse sand-sized subangular grains cemented with carbonate and iron
oxides. The sandstone facies (Figures 21 and 22: Points B and E) are predominantly subangular
to angular, lithic graywackes which exhibit a number of sedimentary structures including:
current-ripples, cross beds, and parting lineations. Many of the coarser sandstones and
conglomerates in the upper section have calcite-rich cement in the matrix, consistent with a
vadose or semiarid, caliche-style environment (Kalliokoski, 1986). Two noteworthy outcrop
features include: 1) a thin continuous zone of laminated cryptoalgal carbonate where laterallylinked stromatolite are draped over cobbles and over contorted sandy siltstone layers (Figures 21
and 22: Point D); and 2) raindrop imprints preserved in fine- to medium-grained sandstone lenses
(Figure 21: Point G). At the time of deposition, the region was nearly equatorial in geographic
position and the climate was likely arid with seasonal rainfall patterns conducive to flashfloods
and the development of vadose carbonate (Elmore and Vander Voo, 1982; Kalliokoski, 1986).
The raindrop imprints in sandstone (Figures 21 and 22: Point G) support this paleoclimate
assumption.
Details surrounding the origin and depositional setting of the Copper Harbor Conglomerate and
overlying Nonesuch Formation (Figure 5) have recently been reevaluated. The long-held
inference of the origin for these two formations has been interpreted as a non-marine, fluvial-tolacustrine couplet (White and Wright, 1960; Elmore, 1983, 1984; Ojakangas et al., 2001). The
Copper Harbor Conglomerate closely resembles modern-day examples of coalescing fluvial and
prograding alluvial fan deposits with varying facies that exhibit proximal-to-distal braided
streams, sheet flooding and sand flat features (Elmore, 1984). Isolated cryptoalgal carbonate and
ooid lenses are interpreted by Elmore (1983) to have formed in shallow, medial fan lakes and
possibly in abandoned or low-water stream channels with limited sediment input (Elmore, 1983).
However, marine sedimentological features often resemble and can be easily mistaken for nonmarine features unless contextualized with additional evidence, such as isotopic geochemistry.
New research presents evidence for a shallow-marine estuarine origin for at least the upper-third
of Copper Harbor Conglomerate and overlying Nonesuch Formation based on new
sedimentological observations (Jones et al., 2023) and geochemical analyses (Stüeken et al.,
2020; Jones et al., 2020). Sedimentological observations include periodic to rhythmic flaserwavy-linsen-pinstripe bedding, superimposed sets of ripple cross-laminations with bimodal
(herring-bone) sediment transport directions, desiccation cracks and hummocky crossstratification (Jones et al., 2023). Periodic to rhythmic textures are indicative of tidal-influenced
marine depositional settings. Geochemical evidence indicates that gypsum evaporite fabrics have
a marine sulfur isotopic composition (Stueken et al., 2020) and that pseudomorphs after gypsum
formed in a saline-to-brackish waterbody (Jones et al., 2020). Both studies conclude that the
upper section of the Copper Harbor Conglomerate and overlying Nonesuch formation were
deposited in a braided fluvial-evaporitic, sabkha-like, tidally-influenced shallow marine
embayment rather than fluvial-lacustrine non-marine depositional setting.

38

�Figure 22: Lithologic column of measured section at the Lizzadro Lakeshore Preserve (data collected by
Lizzadro-McPherson, Bornhorst, and Vye (2023). Bedding about E-W strike and 35 to 40o N dip.

39

�Stop 9: Copper Harbor Conglomerate and interbedded Lakeshore Traps at
Hunter’s Point Park
Latitude: 47.474355N; Longitude: -87.899199W
Directions: Continue driving east on M-26 for 3.7 miles to North Coast Road. Turn left (northwest)
on North Coast Road and proceed 0.3 miles to Harbor Coast Lane. Turn right and drive 0.3 miles
to the parking area for Hunter’s Point Park at end of the road.

Figure 23: Geologic map of the Copper Harbor area taken directly from Cornwall (1955) showing the
location of Hunter’s Point (Stop 9) and Brockway Nose (part of Stop 10). Geology from Cornwall (1954).

Hunter’s Point Park was established in 2005 when funding provided by the Michigan Natural
Resources Trust Fund and many generous private donors (www.hunters-point.org) allowed the
land to be purchased (Figure 23). Prior to becoming an official park the point was a popular
hiking destination for visitors. The landowners subdivided the area for residential housing which
would have restricted public access without its conversion into a park. The origin of the name
Hunter’s Point is uncertain, but it could have been named after A.W. Hunter, an early resident in
the town of Copper Harbor who purchased the point from the U.S. Government.
The Copper Harbor Conglomerate is overall composed of volcanogenic clastic sedimentary
rocks, dominantly conglomerates with lesser sandstone, siltstone, and shale such as observed at
Stop 8. These rocks were deposited in a fining upward prograding alluvial fan complex (Elmore,
1984). Typically conglomerates are composed of clasts with a ratio of mafic-tointermediate+felsic composition of about 2:1 (Daniels, 1982). Towards the tip of the Keweenaw
Peninsula, the Copper Harbor Conglomerate is informally subdivided into an inner (land side)
“member” and an outer (lake side) “member.” Between these two “members” there is a thin

40

�succession of interbedded lava flows collectively known as the Lake Shore Traps (Figure 23).
The Lake Shore Traps consist of Fe-rich olivine tholeiite, basaltic andesite, and andesite lava that
were erupted during a time of waning volcanism within the MCR at 1087.2 +/- 1.6 Ma (Davis and
Paces, 1990). The thickest section of the Lake Shore Traps is about 15 km to the east at the tip of
the peninsula. Volcanologically, the lower lava flows are interpreted as erupted as ponded sheets
while the upper lava flows erupted on a low positive slope such as a shield volcano. The Lake Shore
Traps were subaerially erupted pahoehoe lava flows.
At Hunter’s Point, the top of the andesitic lava flows of Lake Shore Traps are conformably overlain
by conglomerates of the Copper Harbor Conglomerate (Figure 23). The strike of bedding is about
E-W and dip is about 36o to the north (towards the lake). The orientation of the contact is roughly
parallel to the orientation of Hunter’s Point.
From the Hunter’s Point parking lot, follow the walkway to beach towards the west side of the
point. As the walkway ends, you will be on outcrops of lava flows of the Lake Shore Traps.
Walking to the east, the beach gives way to a rocky shoreline. In erosional coves, you can see
contacts between lava flows, represented by vesicular to amygdalodoidal andesitic lava flow top
overlain by massive interior of the overlying lava flow. The massive lava flow interiors within the
Lake Shore Traps often retain relict olivine and interstitial glass due to the overall low degree of
alteration (hydrothermal and weathering). In contrast, in massive lava flow interiors within the
Portage Lake Volcanics the olivine and interstitial glass are completely replaced by Mg-Fe
phyllosilicates and amygdule filling minerals are equivalent to higher degree of metamorphism.
Secondary minerals filling amygdules include agate, chalcedony, quartz, laumontite, analcite,
calcite, and smectite. The Lake Shore Traps are geographically more distal to the thermal high and
increased hydrothermal activity that resulted in the native copper deposits, hence, lower degree and
grade of burial metamorphic/hydrothermal alteration. Highly visible red hematitic bands form
circular patterns within the massive interior; this banding is interpreted to be the result of alteration
related to weathering rather than hydrothermal fluids.
To the west from the walkway, you can see a rocky point extending towards Lake Superior, the
rocks in this point are conglomerates of the Copper Harbor Conglomerate. The sharp contact
between the uppermost lava flow of the Lake Shore Traps and the conglomerates can be viewed on
the eastern edge of this rocky point. The conglomerate above the contact is dominated by rounded
to sub-rounded boulders that are matrix-supported. There are proportionately more basaltic and
andesitic clasts in this conglomerate bed than stratigraphically higher elsewhere along the Lake
Superior shoreline such as at Stop 8 as these clasts are likely derived from erosion of strat equivalent
to the Lake Shore Traps updip towards the highlands of the Keweenaw Peninsula on the edge of the
rift (the updip rocks are now missing having been removed by erosion). The very poor sorting and
fine matrix-supporting the clasts suggest this conglomerate could have been deposited as a debris
flow. Sedimentary debris flows are common in alluvial fan depositional environments. The Copper
Harbor Conglomerate was deposited in an alluvial fan derived from highlands to the southeast in
the vicinity of Keweenaw Bay.

41

�Additional outcrops of the Copper Harbor Conglomerate can be seen on the far western end of the
pebble to cobble beach. These outcrops consist of interbedded conglomerates and sandstone that are
typical of the formation as a whole. These conglomerates are similar to those described at Stop 8.
There are several prominent, white-colored calcite-filled fractures (calcite veins) within these
outcrops. The calcite veins are northerly oriented consistent with the orientation of faults cutting the
Portage Lake Volcanics about 5 km to the south. Calcite veins are a common occurrence in the
Copper Harbor Conglomerate and some of them contain native copper such as those described at
Stop 7, Great Sand Bay.

Stop 10: Overview at Brockway Nose
Latitude: 47.467061N; Longitude: -87.898581W
Directions: Return from Hunter’s Point to M-26. Turn left on M-26 towards Copper Harbor and
drive 0.3 miles (0.5km) to Brockway Mountain Drive. Turn right, uphill, on Brockway and proceed
0.6 miles (1.0km) to Brockway Nose pullover on the left.
Brockway Nose provides an excellent view of Copper Harbor and Lake Fanny Hooe
(Figure 23). Copper Harbor and several other harbors between here and Eagle River have the
Lake Shore Traps at the harbor entrance as the dipping massive interiors of these basaltic to
andesitic lava flows are relatively more resistant to erosion. From Brockway Nose viewpoint, the
town of Copper Harbor is a prominent visible feature. The town of Copper Harbor began as a
boom town in 1843, following the nearby discovery of native copper. Porter's Island, at the
mouth of Copper Harbor on the west side of the harbor's Lake Superior entrance (left) was the
site of the first government land office. Hunter's Point is west of Porter's Island (Figure 23).
On the east side of the mouth of Copper Harbor, the Copper Harbor Lighthouse, built in
1866, is visible. Near the lighthouse on the Lake Superior shoreline is the famous "green rock".
The "green rock" is a vein that was described by Douglass Houghton. The vein contained native
copper and secondary copper alteration minerals. This location and others in the Keweenaw
Peninsula became the foundation of the geological investigations of Douglass Houghton.
Houghton's report to the Michigan legislature that sparked the first major mining rush in North
America to the Keweenaw Peninsula.
Lake Fanny Hooe is located southeast of Copper Harbor. Fort Wilkins is located on the
north shore of Lake Fanny Hooe on the thin strip of land between the lake and harbor. Nearby,
the Estivant Pines is a 0.8 mi2 nature sanctuary established in 1973, containing one the last stands
of virgin white pines in the Midwest and the last stand in the Upper Peninsula. Some of the trees
are up to 600 years old (www.michigannature.org). In 1955, the white pine was designated the
state tree of Michigan.

42

�Stop 11: Overview at Brockway Mountain
Latitude: 47.464260N; Longitude: -87.969506W
Directions: Continue uphill and towards Brockway Mountain for 3.4 miles (5.5km).
The top of Brockway Mountain is accessed by continuing upwards from Brockway Nose.
Brockway Mountain is a conglomerate ridge that reaches an elevation of over 400 m, with
excellent views of the ridge and valley topography of the northern shore of the Keweenaw
Peninsula. At Brockway Mountain, the Lake Superior shoreline is oriented about east-west
From the Brockway Mountain viewpoint there are an excellent 360o views. Underfoot, the
Copper Harbor Conglomerate dips about 20o to the north. Near the base of the ridge on the south
side, opposite Lake Superior, there is an exposure of a single basaltic lava flow erupted as part of
the Lake Shore Traps. With care, at the southwest end of the rock wall, one can view the dipping
conglomerates of the Copper Harbor Conglomerates and see the lava flow near the base of the
ridge.
To the west, the Lake Shore Traps form island chains and a prominent ridge in the vicinity of Agate
Harbor and Esrey Park. The ridges of the Lake Shore Traps and Copper Harbor Conglomerate along
the Keweenaw Peninsula’s north shore are also the site of numerous shipwrecks. Lake Bailey (with
the small island) and Lake Upson occupy a topographically low valley underlain by a finer-grained
clastic horizon (sandstone and siltstone) within the Copper Harbor Conglomerate which was easier
to erode by the glaciers than conglomerates.
Just to the south of Lake Bailey, is the ridge of Mt. Lookout, marking the contact between the basal
conglomerates of the Copper Harbor Conglomerate and the uppermost basalt lava flows of the
Portage Lake Volcanics. This contact was viewed at Stop 6. The inland lake almost directly south, is
Lake Medora, and just before the lake is a prominent ridge which marks the stratigraphic position of
the Greenstone flow as also seen at Stop 3.
In the distance, farther to the south across Lake Medora, is Mount Bohemia, a dioritic stock-sized
intrusion within the lower section of the Portage Lake Volcanics.
To the southwest, a distant ridge is Gratiot Mountain, which is a small shallow rhyolite intrusive body
that cuts the Portage Lake Volcanics.
To the east are the communities of Copper Harbor and Lake Fanny Hooe not easily viewed from
Brockway Mountain (better viewed from Brockway Nose). Just south of Copper Harbor is a golf
course that is part of Brockway Mountain lodge. Brockway Mountain lodge was built during the
Great Depression in the 1930’s by the WPA.
To the north, Lake Superior is the prominent feature. On the skyline roughly 50 miles (80km) away,
is Isle Royale National Park, which can be visible on a clear day. The skyline of Isle Royale is
formed by the Greenstone Flow, as it is on the Peninsula. The beds on Isle Royale dip towards the
Keweenaw Peninsula forming the Lake Superior “syncline.” Viewed from here, the Midcontinent

43

�Rift proper extends from the Keweenaw Fault, near the edge of the rift, just south of Mt. Bohemia to
the Isle Royale Fault, also originally a graben bounding fault on the edge of the rift on the other side
of Lake Superior, just northwest of Isle Royale.
Glacial erosion exposed Keweenawan and pre-Keweenawan relatively hard and competent
bedrock on the edges of the MCR. Dipping well-cemented conglomerates of the Copper Harbor
Formation are exposed at Brockway Mountain and basaltic lava flows of the Portage Lake
Volcanics are exposed when viewing south. Both are relatively resistant to glacial erosion. On
Isle Royale, on the southeast (Keweenaw side) are exposed the same conglomerates of the
Copper Harbor Formation and on the northwest side, there are exposed basaltic lava flows of the
Portage Lake Volcanics. In the center of what is now Lake Superior, much less competent,
nearly flat lying, very fine sandstone and siltstone of the Freda Formation was at the bedrock
surface. The latest glacial advance(s) preferentially eroded out the less competent rocks in the
center of the rift, resulting in present day Lake Superior following the horseshoe shape of the 1.1
billion year old MCR. Very large volumes of water filled the Lake Superior basin as a result of
melting of the glaciers, turning it into a glacial lake. The Duluth Glacial Lake was the largest of
these glacial lakes and only elevations above roughly 400 m (1,300 ft) were emergent such as
here at Brockway Mountain and the visible Mt. Bohemia.

Stop 12: Float Copper at US-41 Calumet
Latitude: 47.241989N; Longitude: -88.448427W
Directions: Follow US-41 from Copper Harbor to Calumet. Across the street from the headquarters
of the Keweenaw National Historical Park. Google Maps shows the float copper as “Float copper
memorial.”

Figure 24: Float copper exhibit along US-41 near headquarters of the Keweenaw National
Historical Park.

44

�A glacially transported native copper mass is on exhibit at this stop (Figure 24). It weighs 4,263
kg (9,392 lbs) and was found about 7 miles SW of Calumet in less than three feet of surficial
sediment/soil. Native copper deposits of the Keweenaw Peninsula were exposed at the bedrock
surface at the time of Pleistocene glaciations. The glacial ice entrained masses laying at the
surface from previous erosion and plucked masses of malleable native copper from the tabular
lodes and veins/fissures. These originally irregular masses were largely cleaned of other minerals
and were smoothed and flattened by abrasion from other rocks carried by the glacial ice. The
native copper masses were "floating" in the glacial ice, hence locally called “float” copper. When
the glaciers retreated about 10,000 years ago, unconsolidated rock debris was left behind by the
melting ice as deposits of gravel, sand, and clay. Masses of native copper were scattered among
the other sediments carried by the glacier. While some of the rocks in the glacial deposits are
from far north of the Keweenaw Peninsula, most of them are recognizable as from local strata
exposed in the Keweenaw Peninsula. Most of the large float copper masses did not move far
from their bedrock source in the Keweenaw Peninsula, but smaller masses have been transported
quite far and have been found southward in Lower Michigan, Indiana, and Illinois (Bornhorst,
2017). The largest known float copper was discovered in the early 2000s and weighed about 35
tons (~70,000 lbs) near the Houghton County airport; it was cut into smaller masses and sold to
be smelted and refined. Most pieces of float copper are small, ranging from a few to 50 cm
across. The world’s largest existing float copper weighs 26.6 tons (53,200 lbs) was discovered on
Quincy Mine claims near Hancock. It is exhibited at a museum in China. The famous Ontonagon
boulder was a 1,700 kg (3,708 lbs) float copper mass much smaller than the float copper on
exhibit at this stop. The Ontonagon boulder was visited by numerous early European explorers.
After Michigan became a territory, Henry Rowe Schoolcraft led an expedition in 1820 with a
special goal of seeing the Ontonagon boulder. In 1831, Douglass Houghton accompanied
Schoolcraft and visited the boulder too. Pieces of native copper were hacked off of the boulder
by Houghton and one of these pieces is part of the University of Michigan mineral collection
held by the A. E. Seaman Mineral Museum under the Michigan Mineral Alliance. The
Ontonagon boulder was removed from the Keweenaw Peninsula to the nation’s capital in 1843
and is now part of the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution’s collection.
Float copper masses were altered by oxygenated groundwater and precipitation since the glaciers
retreated. Many masses likely had smoothed fresh copper surfaces as abrasion in the glacial ice
cleaned off and smoothed the surfaces. The alteration of these surfaces would have occurred in
the last 10,000 years. This supergene alteration produced a surface coating on the native copper
consisting of varying amounts of cuprite (copper oxide; Cu2O), tenorite (copper oxide; CuO),
malachite (hydrated copper carbonate; (Cu2(CO3)(OH)2) and rarely azurite (hydrated copper
carbonate, (Cu3(CO3)2(OH)2) (Figure 24). When small 10s of cm sized masses of float copper are
cut, the typical surface alteration is often less than several mm thick. While native copper is not
stable in contact with water at typical oxidizing surface conditions, the coating of copper oxides,
in particular cuprite, inhibits surface oxidation and thereby protects the native copper from
extensive alteration. An open access article provides more about float copper (Bornhorst, 2017).
The basalt mine rock buildings are part of the Keweenaw National Historical Park. They were
once all part of the Calumet and Hecla Mining Company (Bornhorst and Molloy, 2017). The
Calumet and Hecla Mining Company was incorporated in 1871 as a consolidation of the Calumet

45

�(formed in 1865), Hecla (formed in 1866), Portland, and Scott Mining Companies. The buildings
are built, as are many of the buildings, of local materials, including rock from the Calumet &amp;
Hecla Mining Company mines. The national park was established on October 27, 1992, by U. S.
Congress Public Law 102-543. The enabling legislation ascertained that the Keweenaw was
nationally significant because of its unique geology, the prehistoric use of its copper by Native
Americans, the importance of the region as a past leading copper producer and developer of new
technologies, its long history of corporate paternalism, and because it became home to so many
European ethnic groups that immigrated to the United States. Older mining districts, such as the
Keweenaw Peninsula, typically had only single-industry economies and when the mines shut
down, the communities suffered major contraction. In 1910, nearly 40,000 people resided within
a few miles of this stop whereas now, fewer people live in all of Houghton County.
Behind the float copper stands the statue of Alexander Agassiz. Alexander was the son of famous
Harvard biologist Louis Agassiz. Alexander was the president of the Calumet &amp; Hecla Mining
Company for over 40 years. The statue was moved here from its previous location near Agassiz
Park near downtown Calumet in the 1960s. It now stands in front of the Keweenaw History
Center, the location of the archives of the Keweenaw National Historical Park. This building was
the Calumet &amp; Hecla Library. It is said that at one time this library had more volumes in its
collection than the Michigan State Library. Built in 1898, it served as an employee library and
bathhouse. The baths were in the basement, until a new bathhouse was constructed in 1911
allowing the basement to be remodeled into additional library space.

Stop 13: Freda Sandstone at McLain State Park
Latitude: 47.238371N; Longitude: -88.613116W
Directions: Follow US-41 to M-203 to McLain State Park. There is an entrance fee. From the pay
station turn right towards the campground. Park near the large open area and walk towards the
covered shelter and gazebo. Walk down a sandy slope from the gazebo to the lake shore and look
around for blocks and slabs of red-colored sandstone.
The Freda Sandstone is generally poorly exposed in the Keweenaw Peninsula except for numerous
cliff exposures along the shore of Lake Superior southwest of this stop. At this stop, depending on
the level of Lake Superior, slabs and blocks of Fred Sandstone can be found along the beach. If the
lake level is low enough, then at the shoreline the bedrock of the Freda Sandstone is partially
exposed in shallow water and just off shore. The Freda consists of red-colored fine sandstone and
siltstone. The red is interrupted by whiteish reduced zones and spots. There are occasional outcrops
of Freda Sandstone landward of the Lake Superior shoreline in the area north and south of Portage
Channel which are shown on U.S. Geological Survey geologic quadrangle maps and generally
located along creeks (Cornwall and Wright, 1956). There are good exposures of Freda Sandstone on
the Lake shore between McLain State Park and Porcupine Mountains State Park. The bedding of the
Freda at McLain State Park dips about 5OW as compared to the underlying Nonesuch at Hancock
Campground and boat launch (Stop 14) where it dips 25OW. This shallowing of dip up-section is
typical of the rift-filling strata, and is mostly due to syn-depositional down warping of the rift-filling
strata. The Freda Sandstone is generally fine sandstone which is interpreted to have been deposited
in a shallow fluvial environment.

46

�There are multiple excellent well-described stops in the vicinity of White Pine, Michigan to examine
the Freda Sandstone and these stops are well described by Woodruff et al. (2013).

Stop 14: Nonesuch Formation at Hancock Campground and Boat Launch
Latitude: 47.133755N; Longitude: -88.620581W
Directions: Follow US-41 to M-203 to Hancock Boat Launch and Campground. Drive towards the
boat launch and park. At the shoreline you will find a small outcrop of Nonesuch Formation. Walk
towards the tree area approximately perpendicular to the Portage Canal shore line and boat launch.
About 150 ft from the pavement, you will find the long ago abandoned rock quarry.
The Nonesuch Formation is generally poorly exposed in the Keweenaw Peninsula. At this stop the
Nonesuch Formation crops out around the margin of a historic rock quarry which is northeast of the
Hancock boat launch. Here the Nonesuch Formation is a fine- to-medium grained, gray-to reddish
brown sandstone with subordinate interbedded reddish-brown laminated siltstone and shale. The
attitude of bedding is about N30OE and 25OW (Cornwall and Wright, 1956).
Overall, the Nonesuch Formation consists primarily of siltstone and shale with subordinate amounts
of sandstone. At Hancock campground area the formation is coarser grained since this locality is on
the northern fringe of the depositional basin centered some 60 km southwest of this stop near White
Pine, Michigan. The Nonesuch can be distinguished from the formations below and above by its
generally grayish color. Most Nonesuch is a ripple, laminated siltstone with reddish-gray partings.
Siltstones and sandstones of the Nonesuch are composed of around 30 to 40 % rock fragments and
60 to 70 % mineral grains. The rock fragments are mostly volcanic with a 2:1 ratio of mafic-tosilicic + intermediate composition (Daniels, 1982).
There are multiple excellent well-described stops in the vicinity of White Pine, Michigan to examine
the Nonesuch Formation and these stops are well described by Woodruff et al. (2013).

Acknowledgments
I thank Allan Blaske for his review of this field guide. His comments made this a better guide.

References Cited
Blattler, C.L., Bergmann, K.D., Kah, L.C., Gomez-Perez, I., and Higgins, J.A., 2020 Constraints on
Meso-Neoproterozoic ancient evaporite deposits: Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 532:115951.
Bodden, T.J., Bornhorst, T.J., Bégué, F., and Deering, C., 2022, Sources of hydrothermal fluids inferred
from oxygen and carbon isotope composition of calcite, Keweenaw Peninsula native copper district,
Michigan, USA: Minerals, v. 12, 474.
https://doi.org:10.3390/min12040474

47

�Bornhorst, T.J., 2022, Evolved seawater as the source of salinity for metamorphic-dominated ore-forming
hydrothermal fluids of the Keweenaw Peninsula native copper district, Michigan: 67th Institute on Lake
Superior Geology Proceedings, v. 67, Part 1, Program and Abstracts, p. 5-6.
Bornhorst, T. J., 2017, Float copper, Keweenaw Peninsula, Michigan: A. E. Seaman Mineral Museum,
Web Publication 3, 4p.
Bornhorst, T.J., 1997, Tectonic context of native copper deposits of the North American Midcontinent Rift
system: Geological Society of America Special Paper 312, p. 127-136.
Bornhorst, T. J. and Barron, R. J., 2017, Discovery and geology of the Guinness world record Lake
Copper, Lake Superior, Michigan: A. E. Seaman Mineral Museum, Web Publication 2, 8 p.
Bornhorst, T.J. and Barron, R.J., 2013, Geologic overview of the Keweenaw Peninsula, Michigan: 59th
Institute on Lake Superior Geology Proceedings, Part 2, Field Trip Guidebook, v. 59, p. 1-42.
Bornhorst, T.J., and Barron, R.J., 2011, Copper deposits of the western Upper Peninsula of Michigan:
Geological Society of America Field Guide, v. 24, p. 83-99.
Bornhorst, T. J., and Lankton, L. D., 2009, Copper mining: A billion years of geologic and human history:
in Schaetzl, R., Darden, J., and Brandt, D. (eds.), Michigan Geography and Geology, Pearson
Custom Publishing, New York, p. 69-90.
Bornhorst, T.J. and Mathur, R., 2018, Copper isotope constraints on the Genesis of the Keweenaw
Peninsula Native Copper District, Michigan, USA: Reply. Minerals, v. 8, 508.
https://doi.org:10.3390/min8110508.
Bornhorst, T.J. and Mathur, R., 2017, Copper isotope constraints on the genesis of the Keweenaw
Peninsula native copper district, Michigan USA: Minerals, v. 7, p. 185,
https://doi.org:10.3390/min7100185
Bornhorst, T.J., Paces, J.B., Grant, N.K., Obradovich, J.D., and Huber, N.K., 1988, Age of native copper
mineralization, Keweenaw Peninsula, Michigan: Economic Geology, v. 83, p. 619-625.
Bornhorst, T. J. and Robinson, G.W., 2004, Precambrian aged supergene alteration of native copper
deposits in the Keweenaw Peninsula: Michigan: 50th Institute on Lake Superior Geology
Proceedings, part 1, Program and Abstracts, v. 80, p. 40-41.
Bornhorst, T.J., and Rose, W.I., Jr., 1994, Self-guided geological field trip to the Keweenaw Peninsula,
Michigan: 40th Institute on Lake Superior Geology Proceedings, Part 2, Field Trip Guidebook, v. 40,
185 p.
Bornhorst, T.J., Rose, W.I., Jr., and Paces, J.B., 1983, Field guide to the geology of the Keweenaw
Peninsula, Michigan: 29th Institute on Lake Superior Geology, Part 2, Field Trip Guidebook, v. 29,
116p.
Bornhorst, T.J. and Williams, W.C., 2013, The Mesoproterozoic Copperwood Sedimentary Rock-Hosted
Stratiform Copper Deposit, Upper Peninsula, Michigan. Economic Geology, v 108, p. 1325-1346.

48

�Bornhorst, T.J. and Molloy, L.J, 2017, Geological and historical field trip to the Keweenaw Peninsula, A
tribute to Douglass Houghton, Michigan’s Pioneer Geologist: Michigan Basin Geological Society,
Geological and Historical Excursion, September 10th-12th, 89p.
Broderick, T.M., 1935, Differentiation in lavas of the Michigan Keweenaw: Geological Society of America
Bulletin, v. 46, p. 503-558.
Broderick, T.M., 1931, Fissure vein and lode relations in Michigan copper deposits: Economic Geology,
v. 26, p. 840-856.
Broderick, T.M., and Hohl, C.D., 1935, Differentiation in traps and ore deposition: Economic Geology, v. 64,
p. 342-346.
Brown, A.C., 2006, Genesis of native copper lodes in the Keweenaw Peninsula, Northern Michigan: A
hybrid evolved meteoric and metamorphogenic model: Economic Geology, v. 101, p. 1437–1444.
Butler, B.S., and Burbank, W.S., 1929, The copper deposits of Michigan: U.S. Geological Survey
Professional Paper 144, 238 p.
Cannon, W. F., 1994, Closing of the Midcontinent Rift - A far field effect of Grenvillian contraction:
Geology, v. 22, p. 155-158.
Cannon, W.F., 1992, The Midcontinent Rift in the Lake Superior region with emphasis on its geodynamic
evolution: Tectonophysics, v. 213. p. 41-48.
Cannon, W. F., Green, A. G., Hutchinson, D. R., Lee, M.W., Milkereit, B., Behrendt, J.C., Halls, H.C.,
Green, J.C., Dickas, A.B., Morey, G.B., Sutcliffe, R., and Spencer, C., 1989, The North American
mid-continent rift beneath Lake Superior from Glimpse seismic reflection profiling: Tectonics, v. 8,
p. 305-332.
Cannon, W.F., and Hinze, W.J., 1992, Speculations on the origin of the North American Midcontinent rift:
Tectonophysics, v. 213, p. 49-55.
Cannon, W.F., and Nicholson, S.W., 2000, Geologic Map of the Keweenaw Peninsula and Adjacent Area,
Michigan: U.S. Geological Survey, pamphlet to accompany I-MAP 2696, 7 p., https://doi .org /10
.3133 /i2696.
Cannon, W. F., Peterman, Z.E., and Sims, P.K. 1993, Crustal-scale thrusting and origin of the Montreal
River monocline - A 35-km-thick cross section of the Midcontinent Rift in northern Michigan and
Wisconsin: Tectonics, v. 12, p. 728-744.
Catacossinos, P.A., Harrison, W.B., Reynolds, R.F., Westjohn, D.B., and Wollensak, M.S., 2001,
Stratigraphic lexicon for Michigan: Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Geologic
Survey Division Bulletin 8. 56p.
Cornwall, H.R., 1951a, Differentiation in lavas of the Keweenawan series and the origin of the copper
deposits of Michigan: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 62, p. 159-201.

49

�Cornwall, H.R., 1951b, Differentiation in magmas of the Keweenaw series: Journal of Geology, v. 59, p.
151-172.
Cornwall, H.R., 1951c, Ilmenite, magnetite, hematite, and copper in lavas of the Keweenawan series:
Economic Geology, v. 46, p. 51-67.
Cornwall, H.R., 1954, Bedrock Geology of the Lake Medora Quadrangle Michigan: Geologic Quadrangle
Maps of the United States. United States Geological Survey, Map GQ-52, scale 1:24,000.
Cornwall, H.R. and Wright, J.C., 1956, Geologic map of the Hancock quadrangle, Michigan: U.S.
Geological. Survey Mineral Investigations Field Studies Map MF 46.
Daniels, P. A., 1982, Upper Precambrian sedimentary rocks: Oronto Group: Geological Society of
America Memoir 156, p. 107-134.
Davis, D.W., and Paces, J.B., 1990, Time resolution of geologic events on the Keweenaw Peninsula and
implications for development of the Midcontinent Rift system: Earth and Planetary Science Letters,
v. 97, p. 54-64.
DeGraff, J.M., and Carter, B.T., 2023, Detached structural model of the Keweenaw fault system, Lake
Superior region, North America: Implications for its origin and relationship to the Midcontinent Rift
System: Geological Society of America Bulleting, v. 135, p. 449-466, https://doi.org/10.1130/B36186.1.
Elmore, R.D., 1983, Precambrian non-marine stromatolites in alluvial fan deposits, the Copper Harbor
Conglomerate, upper Michigan: Sedimentology, v. 30, p. 829-842.
Elmore, R.D., 1984, The Copper Harbor Conglomerate: A late Precambrian fining-upward alluvial fan
sequence in northern Michigan: Geological Society of America Bulletin v. 95, p. 610-617.
Elmore, R.D. and Van der Voo, R., 1982. Origin of hematite and its associated remanence in the Copper
Harbor Conglomerate (Keweenawan), Upper Michigan. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid
Earth, 87(B13), pp.10918-10928.
Farrand, W.R., 1960, Former shorelines in western and northern Lake Superior basin: unpublished Ph.D.
dissertation No. 5366, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 226p.
Heaman, L.M., Easton, R.M., Hart, T.M., MacDonald, C.A., Hollings, P., and Smyk, M., 2007, Further
refinement to the timing of Mesoproterozoic magmatism, Lake Nipigon region, Ontario: Canadian
Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 44, p. 1055-1086.
Hinze, W.J., Braile, L.W., and Chandler, V.W., 1990, A geophysical profile of the southern margin of the
Midcontinent rift system in western Lake Superior: Tectonics, v. 9, p. 303-310.
Hodgin, E.B., Swanson-Hysell, N.L., DeGraff, J.M., Kylander-Clark, A.R.C., Schmitz, M.D., Turner, A.C.,
Zhang, Y., and Stolper, 2020, Final inversion of the Midcontinent Rift during the Rigolet phase of the
Grenvillian Orogeny: Geology, v. 50, No. 5, p. 547-551, https://doi.org/10.1130/G49439.1.

50

�Hoffman, P. F., 1989, Precambrian geology and tectonic history of North America: in Bally, A.W., and
Palmer, A.R., eds., The Geology of North America-An overview, Boulder, Colorado, Geol. Soc.
America, The Geology of North America, v. A, p. 447-512.
Huber, N.K., 1975, The geologic story of Isle Royale National Park: U. S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1309,
66p.
Johnson, R.C., 1985, Documentation of a subaqueously emplaced volcanic horizon in the upper Portage
Lake Volcanics, Keweenaw Peninsula, Michigan: 29th Institute on Lake Superior Geology, Part 2,
Part 1 Program and Abstracts, v. 31, p. 38-39.
Jolly, W.T., 1974, Behavior of Cu, Zn, and Ni during prehnite-pumpellyite rank metamorphism of the
Keweenawan basalts, northern Michigan: Economic Geology, v. 69, p. 1118-1125.
Jones, S., Prave, A.R., Raub, T.D., Cloutier, J., Stüeken, E.E., Rose, C.V., Linnekogel, S., and Nazarov,
K., 2020, A marine origin for the late Mesoproterozoic Copper Harbor and Nonesuch Formations of
the Midcontinent Rift of Laurentia: Precambrian Research, v. 336, 105510.
Kalliokoski, J., 1982, Jacobsville Sandstone: Geological Society of America Memoir 156, p. 147-155.
Kalliokoski, J., 1986, Calcium carbonate cement (caliche) in Keweenawan sedimentary rocks (~1.1 Ga),
Upper Peninsula of Michigan: Precambrian Research, v. 32, p. 243-259.
Kalliokoski, J., and Welch, E.J., 1985, Keweenawan-age caliche paleosol in the lower part of the Calumet
and Hecla Conglomerate, Calumet, Michigan: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 96, p. 11881193.
Kelly, D., 2020, Fluid inclusion study of selected calcite associated with native copper, Quincy Mine,
Keweenaw Peninsula, Michigan: Open Access Master's Report, Michigan Technological University,
65p.2020.
Kelly, D., Bornhorst, T.J., and Deering, C., 2022, Fluid inclusions in euhedral calcite crystals from the
Quincy Mine, Keweenaw Peninsula native copper district, Michigan: 68th Institute on Lake Superior
Geology Proceedings, v. 68, Part 1, Program and Abstracts, p. 35-36.
Kulakov, E., Bornhorst, T.J., Deering, C., and Moore, J.B., 2018, The youngest magmatic activity of the
Midcontinent Rift at Bear Lake, Keweenaw Peninsula, Michigan: 64th Institute on Lake Superior
Geology Proceedings, v. 64, Part 1, Program and Abstracts, p. 61-62.
Lane, A.C., 1911, The Keweenawan series of Michigan: Michigan Geological and Biological Survey
Publication 6 (Geology series 4), 297p.
Livnat, A., 1983, Metamorphism and copper mineralization of the Portage Lake Lava Series, northern
Michigan: Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 292p.
Longo, A.A., 1982, A geochemical correlation, with correlative inferences from petrographic and
paleomagnetic data, of the Greenstone flow, Keweenaw Peninsula and Isle Royale, Michigan: 28th
Institute on Lake Superior Geology Proceedings, Part 1, Program and Abstracts, 28, p. 22-23.

51

�Maki, J.C., and Bornhorst, T.J., 1999, The Gratiot chalcocite deposit, Keweenaw Peninsula, Michigan: 44th
Institute on Lake Superior Geology Proceedings, Part 1, Program and Abstracts, v. 44, p. 33-34.
Mauk, J.L., Brown, A.C., Seasor, R.W., and Eldridge, C.S., 1992, Geology and stable isotope and organic
geochemistry of the White Pine sediment-hosted stratiform copper deposit: Society of Economic
Geologists Guidebook Series, v. 13, p. 63-98.
Merk, G.P., and Jirsa, M.A., 1982, Provenance and tectonic significance of the Keweenawan interflow
sedimentary rocks: Geological Society of America Memoir 156, p. 97-105.
Moore, P.B., 1971, Copper-nickel arsenides of the Mohawk No. 2 mine, Mohawk, Keweenaw Co.,
Michigan: American Mineralogist, v. 56, 1319-1331.
Nicholson, S.W., 1991, Geochemistry, petrography, and volcanology of rhyolites of the Portage Lake
Volcanics, Keweenaw Peninsula, Michigan, U. S. Geological Survey Bulletin, 1970B, p. B1-B57.
Nicholson, S.W., and Shirey, S.B., 1990, Evidence for a Precambrian mantle plume: a Sr, Nd, and Pb
isotopic study of the Midcontinent Rift System in the Lake Superior region: Journal of Geophysical
Research, v. 95, p. 10851-10868.
Nicholson, S.W., Shirey, S.B., Schulz, K.J., and Green, J.C., 1997, Rift-wide correlation of 1.1 Ga
Midcontinent rift system basalts: implications for multiple mantle sources during rift development:
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 34, p. 504-520.
Ohr, M., 1993, Geochronology of diagenesis and low-grade metamorphism in pelites: Ph.D. dissertation,
The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.,161 p.
Ojakangas, R.W., Morey, G.B., Green, J.C., 2001. The Mesoproterozoic midcontinent rift system, Lake
Superior region, USA. Sedimentary Geology, v. 141, p. 421–442.
Paces, J.B., 1988, Magmatic processes, evolution and mantle source characteristics contributing to the
petrogenesis of Midcontinent rift basalts: Portage Lake Volcanics, Keweenaw Peninsula, Michigan:
Ph.D. Dissertation, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, 413p.
Paces, J.B., and Bell, K., 1989, Non-depleted sub-continental mantle beneath the Superior Province of the
Canadian Shield: Nd-Sr isotopic and trace element evidence from Midcontinent rift basalts: Geochimica
Cosmochima Acta, v. 53, p. 2023-2035.
Paces, J.B., and Bornhorst, T.J., 1985, Geology and geochemistry of lava flows within the Copper Harbor
Conglomerate, Keweenaw Peninsula, Michigan: 31st Annual Institute on Lake Superior Geology
Proceedings (Kenora, Ontario), p. 71-72.
Paces, J.B., and Miller, J.D., Jr., 1993, Precise U-Pb ages of the Duluth Complex and related mafic
intrusions, northeastern Minnesota: Geochronological insights to physical, petrogenetic,
paleomagmatic, and tectnomagmatic processes associated with the 1.1 Ga Midcontinent Rift system:
Journals of Geophysical Research, v. 98, p. 13,997-14,013.

52

�Püeschner, U.R. Very low-grade metamorphism in the Portage Lake Volcanics on the Keweenaw
Peninsula, Michigan, USA. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland, 2001; pp. 1–
81.
Schmidt, S.T.; and Robinson, D. Metamorphic grade and porosity and permeability controls on mafic
phyllosilicate distributions in a regional zeolite to greenschist facies transition of the North Shore
Volcanic Group, Minnesota. Geological Society of America Bulletin 1997, p. 683-697.
Stoiber, R.E., and Davidson, E.S., 1959, Amygdule mineral zoning in the Portage Lake Lava Series,
Michigan copper district: Economic Geology, v. 54, p. 1250-1277, p. 1444-1460.
Stüeken, E.E., Jones, S., Raub, T.D., Prave, A.R., Rose, C.V., Linnekogel, S., and Cloutier, J., 2020,
Geochemical fingerprints of seawater in the Late Mesoproterozoic Midcontinent Rift, North
America: Life at the marine-land divide: Chemical Geology, v. 553, p. 119812
Velbel, M.A., 2009, The “Lost Interval”: Geology from the Permian to the Pliocene: in Schaetzl, R.,
Darden, J., and Brandt, D. (eds.), Michigan Geography and Geology, Pearson Custom Publishing,
New York, p. 60-68.
Weege, R.J., and Pollack, J.P., 1971, Recent developments in native-copper district of Michigan: Society of
Economic Geologists Field Conference, Michigan Copper District, September 30 - October 2, 1971, p.
18-43.
Weege, R.J., Pollock, J.P., and the Calumet Division Geological Staff, 1972, The geology of two new mines
in the native copper district: Economic Geology, v. 67, p. 622-633.
Weege, R.J., and Schillinger, A.W., 1962, Footwall mineralization in Osceola amygdaloid, Michigan native
copper district: A.I.M.E. Transactions, v. 223, p. 344-350.
White, W.S., 1960, The Keweenawan lavas of Lake Superior, an example of flood basalts: American Journal
of Science, v. 258A, p. 367-374.
White, W.S., 1968, The native-copper deposits of northern Michigan: in Ridge, J.D., ed., Ore Deposits of
the United States, 1933-1967 (the Graton Sales volume), American Institute of Mining,
Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineering, New York, p. 303-325.
White, W.S., 1971, Field Trip A-2 – Houghton to Calumet via South Range quarry and Eagle River: Society
of Economic Geologists, Guidebook for field conference, Michigan copper district, Sept. 30-Oct. 2,
1971, p. 68-75.
White, W.S. and Wright, J.C., 1960. Lithofacies of the Copper Harbor conglomerate, northern Michigan.
U.S. Geological Survey Prof. Paper 400-B, 5-7.
Williams, W.C. and Bornhorst, 2023, Controls on the stratiform copper mineralization in the western
syncline, Upper Peninsula, Michigan: Minerals, v. 13, p. 927-950.
https://doi.org/10.3390/min13070927

53

�Woodruff, L.G., Cannon, W.F., Nicholson, S.W., and Schulz, K.J., 2013, Geology of Keweenawan
Supergroup, Porcupine Mountains, Ontonagon and Gogebic Counties, Michigan: 59th Institute on
Lake Superior Geology Proceedings, v. 59, Part 2, Field Trip Guidebook, p. 69-96.
Woodruff, L.G., Daines, M.J., Cannon, W.F., and Nicholson, S.W., 1995, The thermal history of the
Midcontinent Rift in the Lake Superior region: implications for mineralization and partial melting: in
International Geological Correlation Program, Field Conference and Symposium on the Petrology
and metallogeny of volcanic and intrusive rocks of the Midcontinent rift system, Duluth, Minnesota,
v. 336, p. 213-214.
Woodruff, L.G., Schulz, K.J., Nicholson, S.W., and Dicken, C.L., 2020, Mineral deposits of the
Mesoproterozoic Midcontinent Rift system in the Lake Superior region — A space and time
classification: Ore Geology Reviews, v. 126, p. 1–21,
https://doi.org /10.1016/j.oregeorev .2020 .103716.

54

�Field Trip 2
Mining History and Geology of the Quincy Mine, Keweenaw
Peninsula Native Copper District, Michigan
Theodore J. Bornhorst1, James M. DeGraff2, Tom Wright3, and Katherine Langfield2
1

Department of Geological and Mining Engineering and Sciences and A.E. Seaman Mineral
Museum, Michigan Technological University, 1404 E. Sharon Avenue, Houghton, MI 49931
2
Department of Geological and Mining Engineering and Sciences, Michigan Technological
University, 1404 E. Sharon Avenue, Houghton, MI 49931
3
Quincy Mine Hoist Association, 49750 US-41, Hancock, MI 49930
Objectives of Field Trip
The historic Quincy Mine was the fourth largest copper mine in the Keweenaw Peninsula native
copper district. From 1851 to 1967, mining and processing of native copper ore produced ca. 488
million kilograms of refined copper via several shafts sunk along the top of the Pewabic basaltic
lava flows. The Quincy Mine is interpreted and made accessible to the public by the Quincy
Mine Hoist Association. The field excursion include tours of: the Quincy No. 2 shaft-rockhouse,
the largest steam-driven mine hoist in the world, geology exposed along 675 m of an adit that
intersects the historic Quincy Mine workings at the No. 5 shaft on the 7th level (107 ft below
surface), the Quincy smelter works on the shore of Portage Lake, and two sites on Torch Lake
for extraction of native copper from mined ore. Dress appropriately for the underground portion
of the tour where the temperature averages 7o C (45 o F). Walk-in is on a wet surface and will
access areas not normally visited by the public. Hard hats and lights will be provided.
Brief history of the Quincy Mine
Douglass Houghton's copper report in 1841 sparked the beginning of the first mining rush of
North America to the Keweenaw Peninsula. This human event has its true beginning in the
origin of the rocks and the native copper they host. The human story begins with native people's
exploitation of native copper and their introduction of native copper to European explorers.
Houghton's copper report led to human migration to the Keweenaw Peninsula, the discovery of
the first native copper mine in 1845, the Cliff Mine, and the beginning of modern mining. The
mining district quickly developed into the most significant copper district in the United States
with peak copper production between 1890 and 1915. The district began to decline from 1920 to
the end of mining in 1968 and the decline was accompanied by human exodus; the local
population continues to decline today. The Keweenaw Peninsula exhibits the classic boom and
bust cycle that is often associated with mining. In 1992, a national park was created to preserve
and interpret the rich human and geologic history of the now dormant native copper district.

55

�The Quincy Mining Company was established in 1846 and was termed “Old Reliable” for its
reliable payment of dividends to its shareholders. From 1866 to 1890 the Quincy Mine area
developed into a robust mine. The Quincy Mine was one of the first mines in the Keweenaw
Peninsula to evaluate their operations to maximize efficiency and hence, maximize profits. In
1866 they were the third mine to install a man-engine. They experimented with Burleigh power
drills in 1868, but the large and cumbersome drills proved a failure. They built a rock house
complete with rock crushers in 1873 which eliminated the time and labor involved in the old kiln
houses. In 1879, black powder was replaced by dynamite and most hand drilling was eliminated
when they adopted Rand Company's "Little Giant" power drills. While these innovations were
adapted to increase efficiency, other changes were made to solve problems. The Quincy Mine
could not find enough water in the abandoned shafts for its steam plant near the mine up on the
top of Quincy hill which led to installation of a pumping station to pump water uphill from
Portage Lake. In 1887, they closed their stamp mill on Portage Lake as the tailings they
deposited into the lake began to hinder navigation. Quincy proceeded to build a new mill on
Torch Lake. By building a new mill they were able to adopt steam-powered stamps rather than
the old Cornish drop stamp technology (Lankton and Hyde, 1982). Quincy was able to continue
to adapt because they had sufficient copper ore to mine.
The Quincy Mining Company began to rebuild itself during the boom years for the whole
Keweenaw Peninsula native copper district from 1890 to 1915. It acquired more powerful
engines and hoists and began to raise two skips at a time in balance with each other. In 1891,
they built the photogenic and functional No. 6 combined shaft and rockhouse. The man-engine
reached its maximum depth in 1892 and as a result Quincy began using man-cars to raise and
lower workers using the same hoist they used for ore skips. They built their own smelter on
Portage Lake on the old Pewabic Mill site in 1898. In 1905 they began to replace their 2-cylinder
engines with 4-cylinder engines to get better use of the steam and reduce coal consumption.
Underground mining was changing too. Miners switched from candles to paraffin-based lamps in
1896-97 and to the less-smoky calcium carbide lamps in 1912-14. Miners began using machines
to cut up masses in 1906 rather than drills. Quincy became the first mine in the district to
modernize tramming and hauling when they installed a haulage system with a GE batterystorage locomotive in 1901. Quincy designed and patented their own side-dumping tramcars.
By 1903 Quincy had 15 electric locomotives. They experimented without success with power
shovels underground. In 1905, they reduced the wait time to dump cars underground by digging
500-ton underground storage bins into the hanging wall above the inclined shafts and thereby
were able to hoist 25 % more ore to the surface. In 1910, Quincy operated 160 two-man drills,
each of which weighed 245 pounds. The lighter one-man drills significantly decreased the cost of
mining but this new technology left a miner alone underground which became one issue of the
1913 strike (Lankton, 1991).
The Keweenaw Peninsula native copper mining district never fully recovered after the 1913
strike. The Quincy Mining Company continued to move forward after the strike, and they
installed the world's largest steam hoist. Quincy constructed the No. 2 hoist house in 1918 and
began operating the world’s largest steam hoist in 1920 as the shaft reached an incline depth of
7750 (2360 m) feet. In 1920 Quincy increased efficiency of processing and smelting by adding

56

�Wilfley tables to their stamp mill and adding a casting wheel at the smelter to eliminate hand
pouring of ingots. As the underground workings went deeper, mining became much more
difficult. In 1926, they had to install additional pumps to reduce the time used waiting for
hoisting water-bailing skips rather than rock skips. In 1927, there was a major underground fire
that impacted production. As the mine went deeper, they had to install fans to reduce the
temperature at the bottom where miners still sometimes had to work at temperatures of 98oF
(Lankton and Hyde, 1982).
The Great Depression closed most Keweenaw mines. The Quincy Mine closed in 1930.
The Calumet &amp; Hecla Mining Company closed most of its mines except for a lucky few that
operated on reduced shifts. The Quincy Mining Company reopened the No. 6 and No. 8 shafts
on a limited basis in 1937. It wasn't until World War II and the advent of price controls that a
larger production schedule was resumed. District-wide production resumed on a broader scale
when price controls were lifted on August 31, 1945 and Quincy permanently ended its
underground mining. The reclamation mill continued to operate and make a profit. In 1948, on
its 100th anniversary, Quincy paid a dividend of 25 cents per share due only to the copper
produced by the reclamation from tailings in Torch Lake plant (Lankton and Hyde, 1992). The
Quincy smelter reopened in the mid-1950s after being closed for about 15 years as Quincy could
no longer send reclamation concentrates to the Calumet &amp; Hecla Mining Company smelter. The
Quincy smelter remained open until the reclamation plant closed in 1967. The mines were
allowed to begin flooding in 1970 (Thurner, 1994). The Keweenaw Peninsula native copper
mining district has remained dormant in the 54 years to follow except for several episodes of
exploration. Highland Copper Company, from 2011 to 2015, has been the latest explorer to
attempt to reopen native copper mines in the Keweenaw Peninsula.
The economies of mining districts are typically sustained by one principal industry, mining.
When the mines are profitable and expanding the local communities also do well and when the
mines suffer decline the local communities also suffer decline. This creates the boom to bust
mining cycle. The local population follows this boom-and-bust trend. During the boom of
mining Calumet was a vibrant city and since the mines have closed it has contracted. The last
value obtained from the mining industry is selling the useful equipment to other mines followed
by the dismantling of buildings to sell for scrap. Evidence of mining such as shaft-rockhouses
and industrial buildings disappeared too. The surface rock piles left from mining once dotted the
landscape of the Keweenaw Peninsula, but over time they too are disappearing as they are an
inexpensive source of crushed stone for roads and other purposes. In the late 1980s Calumet
community leaders envisioned that the past might be the key to the future of Calumet and they
sought development of historical tourism. This led to creation of the Keweenaw National
Historical Park in 1992. The park consists of limited park owned lands/structures and multiple
Keweenaw Heritage Sites which are public, private, and non-profit. Together the park and its
cooperative sites preserve and interpret the mining history of the Keweenaw Peninsula and
supports historical tourism.
The brief history of the Quincy Mine was slightly modified from text written by Larry Molloy,
published by Bornhorst and Molloy (2016), and republished by Bornhorst (2022).

57

�Geologic Overview of the Quincy Mine
Readers are referred to Bornhorst (this volume) and Bornhorst and Lankton (2009) for the geologic
setting of the Quincy Mine and its native copper deposits hosted by the Portage Lake Volcanics. This
overview of the geology of the Quincy Mine is from Bornhorst and McDowell (1992), Bornhorst et
al. (1986), and Butler and Burbank (1929).
The Portage Lake Volcanics comprise several hundred subaerial lava flows erupted within the
Midcontinent Rift of North America about 1.1 billion years ago. There are occasional interbedded
sedimentary rock layers dominated by conglomerate (Bornhorst, this volume). The native copper
ores at the Quincy Mine occur in tabular bodies hosted by the originally porous and permeable
tops of subaerial basalt lava flows. Ore-forming hydrothermal fluids precipitated native copper in
the open spaces some 30 million years after the lava flows were erupted.
About 50 lava flows of the Portage Lake Volcanics are exposed along the adit, twelve of them
beneath the interflow sedimentary layer termed the Allouez conglomerate. The Allouez
conglomerate and overlying Greenstone flow can be traced from the Houghton-Hancock area to the
tip of the Keweenaw Peninsula (Bornhorst, this volume). A clay gouge along a bedding plane fault
with undetermined slip occurs at the top of the Allouez conglomerate (Bornhorst and McDowell,
1992). Similar bedding plane faults are common at the tops and bases of conglomerate layers
throughout the district.
Native copper ore at the Quincy Mine is hosted by a group of relatively thin porous tops of lava
flows that are difficult to correlate laterally without mapping the flows in detail (Butler and Burbank,
1929). The productive tops of the lava flows at Quincy, termed the Pewabic amygdaloids, are not
brecciated as is common in the larger flow-top mines in the district. Cavernous zones within the
Pewabic flows began as open spaces and subsequently were filled with hydrothermal minerals
described above. There is much variability within the tabular lode from well to poorly banded and
from high-grade of copper ore to practically barren poor rock (Butler and Burbank, 1929).
Stratigraphically, about 12 lava flows with a cumulative thickness of about 100 m occur between the
Allouez conglomerate and the overlying Pewabic flows which are the host rocks for the native
copper deposits at the Quincy Mine. However, at this location along the adit, the Pewabic flows are
not mineralized as they are on the northwest side of the Hancock fault. There are about 14 additional
lava flows until the Hancock fault is reached. The Hancock fault is marked by a distinctive clay
gouge, almost pure corrensite, and a green corrensite-rich brecciated mineralized zone adjacent to the
gouge (Bornhorst and McDowell, 1992). The Hancock Mine produced native copper from a
mineralized segment of the Hancock fault, suggesting that it may have been a feeder of ore-forming
hydrothermal fluid into void spaces in the tops of the Pewabic flows (Bornhorst and McDowell,
1992).
The amygdaloidal flow tops exposed by the adit are filled with a number of hydrothermal alteration
minerals. Butler and Burbank (1929) describe the main-stage hydrothermal minerals at the Quincy
Mine: quartz and calcite are abundant throughout the lode, commonly as euhedral crystals in open
cavities; pumpellyite is less abundant but is present throughout the lode; epidote is less abundant than

58

�pumpellyite but is a common hydrothermal mineral; chlorite is particularly abundant in amygdules
near the bases of Pewabic lava flows and is locally replaced by quartz and calcite; prehnite is present
but not common; and datolite is present only in upper levels of the mine. The Pewabic lode of the
Quincy Mine is notable for spectacular euhedral calcite with visibly unaltered pink to rose colored
inclusions of native copper, which are highly sought by mineral collectors. Native silver is closely
associated with native copper, although abundance is low. Laumontite is sparse and associated with
small fissures. Thus, it may be a late-stage hydrothermal mineral rather than main-stage (Bornhorst,
this volume). Butler and Burbank described early pumpellyite and epidote followed by quartz,
calcite, and native copper. Bumgarner (1980) described amygdules indicating that prehnite and
chlorite were early hydrothermal minerals followed by quartz, then chlorite, and lastly calcite.
Overview from native copper ore to copper products
At the Quincy Mine and elsewhere in the Keweenaw Peninsula native copper was extracted from
tabular ore bodies by underground mining methods. Quincy Mine yielded about 42,870,000 tons of
ore (1 ton = 2,000 lbs) with recovered refined copper totaling 1,077,000,000 lbs at an average grade
of 1.26 % copper per ton of ore. The amount of silver in the native copper ore can be estimated from
incomplete production statistics in Butler and Burbank (1929) to be roughly 0.2 oz of silver per ton
of ore.
The ore is blasted underground into small enough size to be able to be hoisted to the surface.
Rock lacking sufficient native copper was sent to the poor rock pile or into abandoned
underground mine openings. Prior to being sent to the mineral processing plant to recover native
copper, the broken ore is sized by a slatted grating, “grizzly”. The broken ore passing through the
grating (most of the ore) is sent to the mineral processing plant and those fragments too large are
broken further at the surface near the shaft rock-house with a steam driven hammer. One reason
a fragment could be too large is because it is mostly native copper. Native copper is malleable
and large masses are not readily fragmented by underground blasting. Once most of the rock was
removed from the larger fragments, the copper-dominant fragments were put into barrels (barrel
copper) or, if they were too big, they were put onto a flat rail car and shipped directly to the
smelter instead of to the mineral processing plant.
The ore from the Quincy Mine was processed to separate native copper from the barren host rock
and barren minerals in order to produce a product sufficiently enriched in copper to be smelted.
The ruins of the Quincy processing plant will be visited at Stop 4. The first essential step in
processing was crushing the ore into sand and smaller sized fragments using stamp mills. The
crushing aims to produce fragments which are mostly native copper or mostly rock and thereby
liberates the native copper from the rock.
Because native copper is much denser than the host rock (about 3 times denser than the barren
host rock), fragments of native copper can be separated from the barren host rock using water
and gravity methods such as jigging. Hence, the mineral processing plant usually was
constructed near a body of water. The mineral processing plant produced a “concentrate” which
was composed of sand-sized and finer native copper with some fragments or partial fragments of
barren rock because no separation method is able to completely separate every particle. The ore

59

�mined at Quincy averaged about 25 lbs of copper in a ton of ore. The copper concentrate was
more than 50 % copper, hence most of the sand and smaller size fragments from the crusher
ended up being waste, which still contained some copper. This waste, called tailings, was
transported by water slurry and dumped into lakes, especially Torch Lake.
The amount of native copper in a sand-sized fragment may have been so low that it was correctly
separated into the tailings. In other fragments there was enough copper in them but they were
incorrectly separated into the tailings. For example, the copper could have been finer grain size
than the fragment and it was diluted by barren host rock and minerals. By crushing such
fragments to a finer grain size, more copper could have been liberated from the barren host
material. Quincy Mine kept track of the lost copper as it dumped tailings into Torch Lake. They
later went back and recovered much of the lost copper by reprocessing the tailings using newer
more efficient technology. The mineral processing plant and recovery of lost copper are
discussed at Stop 4.
The copper concentrate from the processing mill was shipped to the Quincy Smelter Works
which is discussed further at Stop 2. The smelting and refining process resulted in solid Quincy
copper ingots of up to 99.8 % pure copper. The copper ingots transported to markets by ships.
The copper mined and processed by Quincy was sufficiently pure to be fabricated into a variety
of usable copper products such as electrical wire.
Copper ore to copper products text from previously published field trip guide by Bornhorst
(2022) with modification.

Field Trip Stops

Figure 1: Map showing approximate stop locations of Field Trip 2 to the Quincy Mine.

60

�Stop 1: Quincy Mine, Keweenaw Heritage Site of the Keweenaw National
Historical Park
Latitude: 47.137137N; Longitude: -88.574875W
Directions: From Michigan Tech drive west on US-41 (left from parking lot by the MUB) and
continue through downtown Houghton across the Portage Lake lift bridge through downtown
Hancock and uphill to the Quincy Mine No. 2 shaft rock-house turning right into the parking lot
just past the shaft rock-house.
The Quincy Mining Company was incorporated in 1846 and operated until 1967. Quincy mined
underground from nine shafts on the Pewabic flow top and there was an industrial complex
associated with mining (Figure 2). Throughout its history, Quincy Mining Company paid
dividends on such a regular basis it was nicknamed "Old Reliable". Quincy Mining Company
produced a total of 1.08 billion pounds of refined copper and approximately 100 million oz of
silver from approximately 43 million tons of ore at an average grade of 25.1 lbs. of copper per
2000 lb. ton of ore (including copper reclaimed from Quincy tailings). The Quincy Mine ranks as
the fourth largest mine in the native copper district. In 1921 the No. 2 shaft was the world's
deepest. The Nordberg steam hoist is the world’s largest.

Figure 2: The Quincy Mining Company complex ca. 1900. The No. 2 shaft-rockhouse is near the
center of the drawing. From Molloy (2011) with permission.

61

�The No. 2 shaft of the Quincy Mine opened in 1858. At the beginning of mining a simple house
was built over the shaft. By 1892, Quincy introduced the concept of hoisting the ore and doing
initial crushing and sorting of the ore in the same building, a shaft-rock house. The current
Quincy No. 2 shaft rock house was built in 1908 (Figure 3). The Quincy No. 2 shaft rock house
is 147 feet (45 m) tall and the angle on the side of the building facing US-41 is at the dip angle of
the native copper deposit. Behind the shaft rock house, there are two of the original eight pulley
stands and stanchions that were used to support a steel cable extending to the No. 2 hoist house
built in 1919. Mining at the No. 2 shaft ended in 1931.

Figure 3: Quincy Mine No. 2 shaft-rockhouse. This drawing is based on Historic American
Engineering Record drawing, MI- 2,19/34, Durward W. Potter, Jr., 1978 and Richard K.
Anderson, Jr., 1979. From Molloy (2007).
By 1917, the No. 2 shaft had reached such great depths that the hoist engine housed in the 1895
hoist house was no longer adequate. The Quincy Mine needed a large and faster hoist to
continue its production. In 1918, the No. 2 hoist house was constructed but World War I delayed

62

�delivery of a new hoist until 1919. The Nordberg hoist began operating in 1920 as the shaft
reached an incline depth of 7750 (2360 m) feet. The Nordberg hoist consists of four
cross-compound steam engines that work as one (Figure 4a and 4b). The new hoist could move
an ore skip carrying 10 tons of rock (13 tons total weight) up at 3200 feet per minute (36 miles
per hour) and was more energy efficient than the hoist it replaced. The Nordberg hoist, the
world's largest, operated 24 hours per day for 11 years until mining ended in 1931; to a depth of
over 9000 feet (2743 m) on the incline (Molloy, 2007).
Stairs - down
Entrance from the
1895 Hoist House

Down
Hoist Rope Slots

DisplaysModel of #6,
Mine Cross
Sections

Up

Overhead Crane
Low Pressure Cylinder

High
Pressure
Receiver

Oil For
Hydraulics
Stored
Under Here

Low Pressure
Receiver

High Pressure
Cylinder

Condenser
Under Here

Oiler's
Gallery
Hoisting Drum 30' Maximum,
16' Minimum
Diameter

D
i
s
p
l
a
y
s

Vacuum
Pump

Low
Pressure
receiver

Miniatures
High Pressure
Cylinder

Displays

High
Pressure
Receiver

Operator's Platform

Overhead Door

Stairs to
Platform

Top Of
Water
Circulating
Pump

Lily
Hoist
Controler
Displays

Oil
Pump
Drive
Low Pressure
Cylinders
Up

Corliss
Steam
Engine

Flywheel
Display Of
Large Tools

Down

Figure 4a: Quincy Mining Company No. 2 shaft Nordberg hoist diagram. This drawing is based
on HAER drawing, MI-2,14/34, Durward W. Potter, Jr., 1978. From Molloy (2007)
A steam engine functions by using alternating intake and exhaust valves to allow steam to enter a
chamber, expand inside of the chamber, and use the force of the expansion to push a piston as the
steam expands. The double-acting pistons used here can be pushed both up and down in the
cylinder by the expanding steam. The entire engine occupies 60 feet by 54 feet of floor space and
is 60 feet tall. It is a cross-compound steam engine, an engine where steam is used twice. This
common technique accounts for the “choo-choo-choo-choo” sound one hears near steam
powered trains.
Today the hoist remains an engineering marvel and is still the world’s largest steam mine hoist.

63

�Miniatures

H ois ting D rum

Operator's Platf orm
Brak e
Main C rank
Oiler's
Gallery

Low
Pres s ure
Throttle

H igh
Pres s ure
Throttle

Steam
Supply
Line

H igh
Pres s ure
Low
Ex haus t to
Pres s ure
Equalizing Line
Pres s ure C ondens er
C y linder
C y linder
H igh Press ure
Low Pres s ure
Steam R ec eiv er
Steam R ec eiv er

Figure 4b: This diagram illustrates the major features of the hoist and traces the flow of steam
through the hoist. It is based on HAER drawing, MI-2,13/34, Jon R. Carter, 1978. From Molloy
(2007).
At the Quincy Mine and elsewhere in the Keweenaw Peninsula native copper was extracted from
tabular ore bodies by underground mining methods. The ore is blasted underground into small
enough size to be able to be hoisted to the surface. Prior to being sent to the mineral processing
plant to recover native copper, the broken ore is sized by a slatted grating, “grizzly.” Those
fragments too large are broken further by steam hammers. The native copper-dominant
fragments were put into barrels (barrel copper) or, if they were too big, they were put onto flat
rail cars. The barrel copper and larger masses were shipped directly to the smelter located
downhill from the shaft rock-house. Next to the Quincy Mine No. 2 shaft rock house is a
specimen of mass copper weighing hundreds of lbs. that would have been shipped directly to the
smelter.
Text from previously published field trip guide by Bornhorst (2022) with limited modification.

64

�Stop 2: Quincy Smelter Works
Latitude: 47.126688N; Longitude: -88.565290W
Directions: From Stop 1 turn left from Quincy Mine returning downhill to Hancock, just before
the Portage Lake lift bridge follow M-26 through underpass and from bridge continue 0.4 miles
(0.65 km) to the Quincy Smelter Works.
The Quincy Smelter was constructed in 1898 and initially consisted of four or five reverberatory
furnaces until switching to two larger furnaces in 1920. The purpose of the smelter was to
produce bars of copper with as few as possible impurities. Copper with low enough impurities
was ready to be made into copper products.
The copper concentrate from the mill, barrel copper, and larger masses are melted, turned from
solid to liquid in a furnace. Smelting is melting at temperatures higher than the melting point. By
being higher than the melting point the liquid metal separates from the liquid silicate rock. Since
the density of metallic copper is much higher than other components in the liquid rock, the liquid
copper sinks to the bottom of the furnace while the other components, molten slag (waste liquid)
float to the top. Men skimmed off the molten slag and it was dumped on a pile where it was left
to cool into glass and minerals. Across from the parking lot opposite the agent’s house/office is a
pile of solidified slag.
The molten copper was tapped from the bottom of the furnace into a refining furnace where it
was rabbled and poled. Rabbling (stirring) agitates the molten copper and allows the introduction
of small amounts of air which oxidizes the impurities (copper has less tendency to oxidize than
impurities). The oxidized impurities are lighter than liquid copper and thus, rise to the surface
and are skimmed off the molten copper. After the impurities are skimmed off of the molten
copper, green sapling poles are inserted into the molten copper (poling). Poling introduces
carbon (wood) which reduces the amount of copper oxides in the molten copper. The refined
copper was ladled and poured into molds and sprayed with water to cool it. The solid copper
shapes were then dumped into a tank of water to complete cooling. Quincy cast copper ingots of
several shapes and sizes (bars, wedges, and cakes). Refined copper from Quincy was up to 99.8
% copper which was sufficient for fabrication of copper products in the early 1900s. Some
copper ingots had to undergo further refining. Today, the copper would undergo electrolytic
refining to make it more than 99.99 % pure copper.
Quincy constructed the smelter to be able to refine and ship its own copper. It also accepted
custom work from neighboring mining operations. While underground mining ended in 1945, the
Quincy smelter remained open until 1971. After closure of the underground mine, Quincy was
actively recovering copper from reprocessing of tailings from Torch Lake. Fortunately, the
smelter site remained intact after closing and is now open for guided tours. In 2014, the
Keweenaw National Historical Park Advisory Commission acquired the smelter from Franklin
Township (Figure 5).
Text from previously published field trip guide by Bornhorst (2022) with limited modification.

65

�Figure 5: The historic Quincy Smelter Works. View July 2022 towards the north from Houghton
waterfront.

Stop 3: Quincy Mine Adit to 7th Level Underground Workings
Latitude: 47.130383°N; Longitude: 88.573824°W
Directions: Turn left onto M-26 heading west and drive 0.5 mi (0.8 km) to its junction with US41 north of the Portage Lake lift bridge. At the stop sign, merge onto US-41 and continue west
for two blocks (~0.1 mi, ~0.15 km) to Dunstan Street on the right before a BP gas station. Turn
right onto Dunstan and drive uphill for three blocks on the right (~0.15 mi, ~0.25 km) to Mason
Avenue. Turn right onto Mason and drive east about 0.2 mi (0.3 km) to near a sharp right-hand
curve. Just before the curve, turn left to enter an unpaved driveway that leads to the adit.
The Quincy adit was first opened in 1892 by the Quincy Mining Company and subsequently
widened in the 1970s by Michigan Tech mining engineering faculty and students for an
underground educational and research facility. The adit enters the south side of Quincy hill at a
point located ~690 m SSE of the iconic Quincy No. 2 shaft house along US-41 at the top of the
hill. From the portal, the adit follows an azimuth of 331° for 675 m, where it intersects the 7th
level workings at the Quincy No. 5 shaft (Bumgarner, 1980). The average strike of PLV layers
here is 213° (right-hand rule), which means that the adit cuts across them in a direction 30°
clockwise from the dip direction. Approximately fifty lava flows and one conglomerate layer,
dipping on average 50° NW, are exposed along the adit (Bumgarner, 1980; Bornhorst et al,
1986). Geologic sites of interest in the adit and side passages are described as sites 3A to 3E in
the following text and shown in Figure 6.
Underground workings of the Quincy Mine were developed along a series of parallel, relatively
thin, lava flow tops, referred to collectively as the Pewabic flow top within the Portage Lake
Volcanics. The mine was developed to a vertical depth of 1897 m (6225 ft) comprising 92 levels.
The ore body decreases in dip from 54o at the surface to 32o at the bottom levels. Pewabic flows
are characterized by large cavernous zones up to 1.5 m thick, interpreted by Butler and Burbank
(1929) as coalescing vesicles and large gas cavities. Alternatively, the large cavities could have

66

�been caves or lava tubes formed by lava drainage beneath a solidified flow surface. Openings
were connected up to 100s m along formation strike and, where especially well developed, they
may host 2 to 10 high-grade copper zones. An interconnected series of such openings would have
provided continuous flow paths for ore-forming hydrothermal solutions. Several prominent and
steeply dipping veins extend throughout the mine. They probably helped to integrate the
hydrothermal system as their mineralogy is similar to that of the hydrothermal mineral
assemblage in the flow tops.

Figure 6: Map of Quincy adit and 7th level mine workings (modified from Bumgarner, 1980). Six
geological sites of interest are labeled 3A through 3F. Numbers 1 – 19 along adit are distances
in hundreds of feet.

67

�Site 3A: Contact between two basaltic lava flows. [~75 m from portal]
The contact between the two lava flows at this site shows many characteristics that are common
in the Portage Lake Volcanics of the Keweenaw Peninsula. Contacts between successive
subaerial lava flows are recognized by textural and color differences between the top of the older
layer and base of the younger one, as well as by the geometry of their boundary. Massive flow
interiors grade into margins with finer grain size and abundant vesicles often arranged in bands
parallel to flow contacts. Flow tops have the highest abundance of vesicles. Upper flow surfaces
were exposed to the atmosphere and escaping gases during and after emplacement, and later to
hydrothermal fluids permeating along flow tops that filled many voids (amygdules) with an
assemblage of minerals (Butler and Burbank, 1929; Stoiber and Davidson, 1959; White, 1968;
Bornhorst, 1997), thus modifying their color as seen here.
Looking at the adit’s northeast wall (right side walking in), the top of the older flow toward the
southeast is highly vesicular and has a lighter greenish tone relative to the younger to the
northwest. In this case, the distinctive lighter tone and greenish tinge of the flow-top rock results
from secondary epidote, pumpellyite, and various copper minerals, which are not present in the
base of the overlying flow. The adit cuts nearly perpendicular across the contact between the
flows, such that their boundary can be traced from one side of the adit across its ceiling to the
other side. This exposure is nearly ideal for measuring strike and dip of the contact because it is
exposed in 3-D over a sufficient distance to allow visual averaging of irregularities that are
typical of flow contacts.

Site 3B: Allouez conglomerate and the Greenstone flow. [~290 m from portal]
The Allouez conglomerate and overlying Greenstone flow are well correlated stratigraphic units
along the strike of the historic copper mining district (Butler and Burbank, 1929; Stoiber and
Davidson, 1959). They can be traced from near the tip of the Keweenaw Peninsula to southwest
of the Quincy Mine, a strike length of 80 kilometers. In the Quincy adit, the Allouez
conglomerate is a 2-m-thick layer and the overlying Greenstone flow is only 10-15 m thick, far
less than its maximum thickness elsewhere. The conglomerate here is typical of most
conglomerates interbedded with mafic lava flows of the Portage Lake Volcanics. It is largely
clast-supported and contains rounded to subrounded cobbles and pebbles of felsic volcanic rocks
and subordinate mafic rocks. At this site, the bedding surface between conglomerate and basalt is
marked by a clay seam, or “fluccan” following Cornish mining terminology (Hubbard, 1898).
Hubbard (1898) systematically documented such clay seams in mines accessible at the time and
he noted that they typically follow contacts between interflow sedimentary layers and lava flows,
but also occur at contacts between flows. The clay seams are commonly associated with polished
surfaces, fault gouge, brecciation and alteration of adjacent units, and secondary mineralization
in fractured zones generally less than a couple of meters thick. As noted by Hubbard (1898),
these phenomena indicate that many layer boundaries in the Portage Lake Volcanics have
slipped during one or more deformation events. Such surfaces are essentially layer-parallel faults
that slipped because of their weaker mechanical strength relative to the layers themselves.

68

�Site 3C: Hancock fault at the adit and in drift to the northeast. [~570 m from portal]
The Hancock fault is a major splay of the Keweenaw fault system that intersects the main
Keweenaw fault about 14.5 km northeast of here and downdip at a depth of around 3 km
(Cannon and Nicholson, 2001; DeGraff and Carter, 2023). Over its 18-km length, the Hancock
fault strikes 234° (right-hand rule) and cuts obliquely across the exposed Portage Lake Volcanics
in a direction that is ~25° clockwise from formation strike and dips northwest at a steeper angle
than layering. It cuts the Pewabic flows of the Quincy and Hancock mines.
The Hancock fault had a strong influence on the distribution of copper in these two mines as
follows:
1. A portion of the fault in the Hancock Mine had copper ore that was exploited;
2. Copper is also abundant along the Hancock fault in the Quincy Mine;
3. Copper mineralization in Pewabic beds of the Quincy Mine is restricted to the hanging wall
northwest of the fault.
The Hancock fault has been proposed as an important pathway for ore-forming fluids to access
porous zones at the Quincy and Hancock Mines (Bornhorst et al., 1986).

Figure 7: Cross-sectional view of the Hancock fault looking northeast at the wall of the adit.
Height of the view is about two meters. The slip surface is marked by a clay seam.

69

�The Hancock fault is best exposed and investigated in the Quincy Mine workings, where it is cut
by the adit and drifts leading northeast and southwest from the adit (Figure 7). At this site, the
Hancock fault is observed crossing the adit and following the northeast drift for about 50 meters,
so that measuring its orientation is easy. At the adit, the fault strikes 239° and dips 54° NW, in
contrast to stratigraphic layering that strikes 213° and dips a bit less than layering. The fault zone
here has a thin (~3 cm) medial clay seam, marking the main slip surface, that is contained within
a breccia envelope of disaggregated fragments. Outside of the breccia envelope, country rock is
highly fractured near the fault but the rock is still intact. As the fault is followed northeastward
along the drifts orientation varies and the thicknesses of its clay seam and surrounding breccia
increase and decrease and are not always symmetrically arranged.

Site 3D: Ropy pahoehoe at the top of a Pewabic flow in the first northeast drift. [~570 m from
portal; ~75 m along drift]
Farther along the same drift at Site 3D is a good exposure of the surface of one of the Pewabic
flows (Figure 8). Like subaerial mafic lava flows elsewhere, the tops of Portage Lake Volcanics
flows show characteristics of two fundamental types – a smooth or ropy geometry (pahoehoe,
locally termed amygdaloid) and a rough blocky geometry (aa, locally termed fragmental
amygdaloid). Most Portage Lake Volcanics lava flows have smooth flow tops and yet ropy
pahoehoe is rarely observed, probably because plan views of flow surfaces are uncommon and
because of degradation of flow surfaces between successive extrusive events. The ropy pahoehoe
observed on the northwest side of the drift is well preserved. The view here is upward at the base
of an overlying flow, and so the pahoehoe feature is really a mold of the upper surface of the
underlying flow top that has been removed along the drift. The curved geometry of pahoehoe
ropes results from local movement of partly solidified lava crust that forms arcuate patterns that
are convex in the local direction of flow (Fink and Fletcher, 1978; Self et al., 1998). The local
flow direction indicated by the convexity of the ropes seen here is updip and toward the
southwest, i.e. from the center towards the edge of the rift.
Most flow-top native copper ore bodies are hosted by brecciated flow tops because their
relatively large volume of open space was well connected and provided relatively easy
movement of ore-forming fluids (Butler and Burbank, 1929; White, 1968; Bornhorst, 1997).
Flows with smooth to ropy pahoehoe tops are usually not favorable because vesicles have limited
volume of not well connected open space which hindered movement of ore-forming fluids.
However, Pewabic flows with pahoehoe tops had economic grades of copper mineralization
because they had large connected openings up to 1.5 m wide and extending up to 100s m along
strike. Butler and Burbank (1929) proposed that the exceptional Pewabic lode was the result of
an extremely gaseous flow that produced a great abundance of vesicles that coalesced to produce
large connected voids. An alternative hypothesis is that the large openings resulted from lava
draining from pools and tubes beneath a solidified flow surface.

70

�Figure 8: Ropy pahoehoe in the hanging wall of the first drift northeast from the adit. View is to the
northwest. The two highlighted patterns indicate flow updip and toward the southwest. Height of
the view is about six meters.

Site 3E: Hancock fault in drift to the southwest. [~675 m from portal; ~55 m along drift]
This site provides another opportunity to examine the Hancock fault where it follows much of
the drift leading southwest from the No. 5 shaft to the No. 7 shaft (Figure 6). From Site 3C at the
adit, the fault angles across the corner of unmined rock between the adit and southwest drift and
is next exposed on the southeast wall of the drift at Site 3E. From here, the fault trace rises up the
southeast wall, gradually angles across the ceiling, and descends the northwest wall where it
enters the drift’s hanging wall before reaching the No. 7 shaft.
Native copper is frequently found in the fault’s hanging wall up to the breccia zone but has not
been found in the footwall. Here, the “medial” clay seam is generally thicker than at Site 3C but
its thickness varies considerably along the fault trace, as does the thickness of the disaggregated
breccia envelope. It is difficult to estimate the thickness of the still-intact zone of fractured rock

71

�that encloses the breccia zone because, as seen at other faults examined in detail (Caine et al.,
1996; Caine and Forster, 1999), its intensity gradually decreases away from the fault to a
background value for the system.
Study of exposures of the Hancock fault and nearby satellite faults in the Quincy Mine is needed
to better understand the slip characteristics and wall-rock modification of the Hancock Fault.
This could also help understand the influence of the Hancock fault on copper mineralization.
Fault slip is being investigated by the measurement and analysis of slip indicators – slickenlines
and steps – on the surfaces of the many small faults associated with the Hancock fault.
Observations of how rocks along the Hancock fault were modified physically and chemically
have been mostly qualitative so far, though with some exceptions (Bornhorst and McDowell,
1992; Langfield et al., 2023).

Site 3F: Hanging wall of Pewabic flow in drift northeast of No. 5 shaft. [~675 m from portal;
~30 m along drift]
Along the drift leading northeast from the No. 5 shaft to the No. 4 shaft (Figure 6), the hanging
wall of the drift and attached stope exhibit slickenlines directed parallel to dip of the lava flows.
One may need to search a little and use oblique lighting to see these fault surface features, which
manifest layer-parallel dip slip on the boundary between two lava flows. Another surface with
similarly oriented slickenlines occurs in a parallel drift a few tens of meters northwest beyond
the hanging wall of this drift. As discussed at Site 3B, Hubbard (1898) documented 12 layer
boundaries with layer-parallel slip, but this surface and the other northwest of here were not
among them. He mentioned polishing and slickensides on such surfaces but did not specify their
orientation. It is likely that such layer-parallel slip is far more common than has been observed
because, like the ropy pahoehoe texture, it can only be observed where an ideal exposure permits
viewing. The documented layer-parallel slip within the PLV section is strong evidence for a
detached style of thrusting, which was used recently to model the cross-sectional geometry of the
Keweenaw and Hancock faults (DeGraff and Carter, 2023).

72

�Stop 4: Quincy Mining Company Processing Plant and Dredge
Latitude: 47.146295N; Longitude: -88.460474W,
Directions: From Quincy Smelter Works turn right (east) and continue 5.7 miles (9.2 km) to
ruins of the Quincy processing plant on left carefully pulling into open lot on west side of ruins.
The Quincy Mine dredge No. 2 is located on the edge of Torch Lake on the other side of the
road.

Figure 9: The Quincy Mining Company mills, 1890-1928. Star shows the location of the Quincy
dredge No. 2. From Molloy (2011) with permission.
The Quincy Mining Company had to move their mill from its Portage Lake site below Quincy
Hill because tailings deposited in the lake were beginning to hinder navigation. Construction
began on the Quincy mill at this site in 1888 (Figure 9). Mill No. 1 began with three rock
crushing stamps and two additional were added in 1892. The building closest to the dredge on
the north side of the road contained the 1890 mill which was modified over time. The square
building adjacent to it was a turbine building that was built in 1921. As production increased,
Stamp Mill No. 2 was built to the north of the No. 1 mill in 1900 and had three stamps.
Underground mining activities at the Quincy Mine focused on mining ore (rock with sufficient
recoverable copper to make a profit). Inevitably the mine also produced waste (uneconomic) rock
along with the ore rock. Some of this waste rock can be seen today throughout the Keweenaw
Peninsula as poor rock piles. Some of the waste rock was used underground as fill for already
mined out stopes. The broken ore from underground blasting that is small enough to pass through
a coarse grating was sent by train to the processing mill.

73

�The purpose of the mill was to remove as much rock as possible from the native copper
producing a product where the percent of contained copper is up to 20 times higher than the
percent of copper in the ore. The copper-rich product is sand to smaller sized fragments of native
copper mixed with similar sized rock and mineral fragments (termed “copper concentrate”). The
inefficiencies in separating native copper from rock and minerals fragment results in some
amount of waste rock and minerals in the copper concentrate. At the end of processing in the
mill, most of the rock and minerals end up as fine sand to sand of waste containing only a small
amount of copper (termed tailings).
The Quincy Mill used several techniques to separate the copper from the rock and minerals. The
essential first step in milling begins with crushing the ore rock to a small enough size to liberate
the unwanted rock and minerals from the native copper. The ore rock and minerals containing
disseminated copper of various sizes was crushed by steam stamps. Much of the rock was
liberated from the native copper by crushing the broken ore fragments derived from mining to
fragments 0.0165 to 0.188 inches in diameter (fine to very fine sand size). Larger masses of
native copper were removed prior to crushing at the mine and sent directly to the smelter. Since
the density of native copper is much higher than the liberated particles of rock and mineral,
gravity and water methods could be used to separate the waste rock and minerals (tailings) from
the copper. Early mines used jigging to concentrate the native copper from the tailings. Jigging
was a well-developed mineral separation technology prior to the first mining of native copper in
the Keweenaw Peninsula beginning in 1845. Jigging is accomplished by placing the sand sized
particles on a screen where pulsating water allows the heavier copper particles to settle while the
lighter particles rise to the top and overflow the screen or are skimmed off the top as waste
tailings. Jigging resulted in a “concentrate” of sand sized native copper particles with some rock
and minerals that were not copper-bearing (tailings), about 50 % copper and the rest waste rock
and mineral. The concentrate was sent to the smelter to be turned into nearly pure copper.
The waste tailings were dumped into nearby Torch Lake. However, using jigging up to 25 % of
the native copper was incorrectly classified as waste (tailings) and dumped the copper was lost as
the tailings were dumped into nearby Torch Lake. Over time new technologies were introduced
into the mills by Quincy to increase efficiency and loose less copper into the tailings. Quincy
used froth flotation in its processing circuit as early as 1920s. Violent agitation of copper and
rock/mineral particles in an oily water along with frothing agents and other chemicals cause
bubbles to rise to the surface with copper particles attached to their surface. The bubbles and
copper particles were captured from the top of the flotation tank while the waster rock/mineral
(tailings) sank to the bottom. and was slurried to Torch Lake. The heavier copper particles were
carried upward by the floatation bubbles rather than sinking due to gravity by jigging. The
mineral processing circuit could begin with jigging and with the tailings after jigging sent to
floatation cells to recover more copper. Later Wilfley tables were added to the mineral
processing circuit to help minimize loss of copper from finer grain sizes. A Wilfley table utilizes
gravity and water to separate denser particles. A shaking ribbed table with a film of water
flowing along the long axis results in the higher density copper particles concentrating in beds
behind the riffles.

74

�The Quincy Mining Company knew that the tailings contained a lot of copper that they were
unable to recover with technology available at that time. The company had considerable
foresight and kept detailed maps each year of the copper content of the tailings that were
deposited into the lake. As technology improved, they were able to reclaim copper from the
tailings at a profit. Quincy built a special reclamation processing mill near here in 1942-43 for
$1.2 million. The main building, 124'x255', had six Harding ball mills to grind the tailings even
finer than the stamp mills in order to release more fine particles of copper from the rock/mineral
and facilitate addition of Wilfley tables and flotation cells to mineral processing circuit.
Across the road is Quincy Mining Company dredge No. 2 on the shore of Torch Lake. Torch
Lake was filled with several 100 millions of tons of tailings since not only did Quincy Mine
operate a mill on its margin so did many other companies, especially Calumet and Hecla Mining
Company. The tailings were sucked up via the dredge and sent to the reclamation mill to recover
more copper from the tailings. The reprocessed tailings were redeposited back into Torch Lake.
This dredge was built in 1913 by Calumet &amp; Hecla Mining Company. In 1951, the Quincy
Mining Company purchased the dredge and it became known as Quincy Dredge No. 2. It could
process over 10,000 tons of tailings per day and it had 141 ft suction pipe that could work 115 ft
below the surface of the lake (Figure 10).
Tailings were conveyed to the mill via a tube held up with pontoons. Quincy recovered 100
million lbs. of copper from tailings in Torch Lake from 1943 until it closed in 1967 or about 10
% of total production. In the 1800s and early 1900s, depositing 100s of millions of tons of
tailings into Torch Lake was acceptable practice and the environmental consequences were not
considered. Today, the environmental impact of tailings must be carefully considered to obtain a
permit, "social license" to operate a mine. The mining companies did not just put tailings into
Torch Lake, they also used it to dispose of other waste such as that from electrical systems and
barrels filled with chemicals. The early processing plants used only water to separate the copper
from the rock. Later floatation cells were used in processing ore from the mine and in processing
reclaimed copper from the tailings. The floatation cells used chemicals in water. These
chemicals along with the tailings were put into Torch Lake. Discovery of fish with tumors in
Torch Lake led to its being designated an U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Superfund site.
Some of these chemicals were biodegradable and are no longer present in the Torch Lake water
but would have been present decades ago, thereby could have readily caused tumors in older fish.
There are far too many tons of tailings in Torch Lake to remove them and thus, the mitigation
strategy is to simply cover them with soil. Fortunately, the copper ores of the Keweenaw
Peninsula lack pyrite that is known under certain environmental settings to produce acid drainage
and in turn can result in significant environmental impact. The lack of acid generating potential
and the otherwise mostly inert minerals in the waste rock has greatly lessened the environmental
impact of the tailings themselves. Today crushed poor rock from the mines is used directly as
aggregate and is also crushed for use as aggregate.
Text from previously published field trip guide by Bornhorst (2022) with limited modification.

75

�Figure 10: Quincy Mining Company dredge No. 2 working on Torch Lake, ca. 1920s. From
Molloy (2011).

Stop 5: Ahmeek Mining Company Stamp Mill
Latitude: 47.168633N; Longitude: -88.435810W
Directions: From Quincy Mill Ruins and Dredge carefully pull out of gravel lot and continue
east on M-26 for 1.9 miles (3 km) to stamp mills of the Ahmeek Mining Company.
This is the only remaining steam-powered stamp in the Keweenaw Peninsula. The Ahmeek
Mining Company had four of these Nordberg compound steam-powered stamps installed in
1910, and four additional stamps were added in 1914. Rail cars brought rock to the mill using the
trestle, located above the trees across the street from the stamp. The compound-expansion nature
of the stamps represented a major improvement in processing of copper ore. The stamp could
strike approximately 104 24-inch blows per minute. The mill could process approximately 7,000
tons of ore in a 24-hour period.
This is not part of the Quincy Mine but we stop here to see a steam-powered stamp used for
crushing the native copper ore.
Text from previously published field trip guide by Bornhorst (2022) with limited modification.

76

�References Cited
Bornhorst, T.J., this volume, 2024, Mesoproterozoic Midcontinent Rift-filling Strata and Native Copper
Deposits of the Keweenaw Peninsula, Michigan Field Trip 1: Institute on Lake Superior Geology,
Field Trip Guidebook, 70th Annual Meeting, Houghton, MI v. 70, part 2, p. this volume.
Bornhorst, T. J., 1997, Tectonic context of native copper deposits of the North American Midcontinent
Rift system: Geological Society of America Special Paper 312, p. 127-136.
Bornhorst, T.J., 2022, Field guide to the geology and native copper mining history of the Keweenaw
Peninsula: Field Trip Guidebook for American Institute of Professional Geologists 2022 National
Conference held in Marquette, Michigan August 6-9, 68p.
Bornhorst, T.J., Kalliokoski, J.O., and Paces, J.B., 1986, The Keweenaw native-copper district: in Brown,
A.C. and Kirkham, R.V. (eds.), Proterozoic Sediment-hosted Stratiform Copper Deposits of Upper
Michigan and Belt Supergroup of Idaho and Montana: Geological Survey of Canada, Contribution
Series 13386, p. 21-36.
Bornhorst, T. J., and Lankton, L. D., 2009, Copper mining: A billion years of geologic and human history:
in Schaetzl, R., Darden, J., and Brandt, D. (eds.), Michigan Geography and Geology, Pearson Custom
Publishing, New York, p. 69-90.
Bornhorst, T.J., and McDowell, S.D., 1992, Michigan Tech Earth Science Laboratory and Experimental
Mine connecting with the Quincy native copper mine, Michigan: Society of Economic Geologists
Field Conference Guidebook Series, v. 13, p. 100-104.
Bornhorst, T.J., and Molloy, L.J., 2016, Geological and Historical Field Trip to the Keweenaw Peninsula:
A Tribute to Douglass Houghton "Michigan's Pioneer Geologist". Michigan Basin Geological
Society, 65 p.
Bornhorst, T. J., and Molloy L.J., 2016, Geological and historical field trip to the Keweenaw Peninsula, A
tribute to Douglass Houghton: “Michigan’s Pioneer Geologist: Michigan Basin Geological Society
Geological and Historical Excursion September 10th-12th, 89 p.
Bumgarner, E.L., 1980, The Geology of the Portage Lake Volcanics in the M.T.U. Mining Laboratory,
Hancock, Michigan: Michigan Technological University, M.S. thesis, 138 p.
Butler, B. S., and Burbank, W. S., 1929, The copper deposits of Michigan: U.S. Geological Survey
Professional Paper 144, 238 p.
Caine, J.S., Evans, J.P., and Forster, C.B., 1996, Fault zone architecture and permeability structure:
Geology, v. 24, no. 11, p. 1025-1028.
Caine, J.S. and Forster, C.B., 1999, Fault zone architecture and fluid flow: Insights from field data and
numerical modeling: in Faults and Subsurface Fluid Flow in the Shallow Crust, American
Geophysical Union, Geophysical Monograph 113, p. 101-128.
Cannon, W.F. and Nicholson, S.W., 2001, Geologic Map of the Keweenaw Peninsula and Adjacent Area,
Michigan: United States Geological Survey, Map I-2696, Scale = 1:100,000.

77

�DeGraff, J.M. and Carter, B.T., 2023, Detached structural model of the Keweenaw fault system, Lake
Superior region, North America: Implications for its origin and relationship to the Midcontinent Rift
System: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 135, no. 1/2, p. 449–466.
https://doi.org/10.1130/B36186.1
Fink, J.H. and Fletcher, R.C., 1978, Ropy pahoehoe: surface folding of a viscous fluid: Journal of
Volcanology and Geothermal Research, v. 4, p. 151–170.
Hubbard, L.L., 1898, Keweenaw Point with particular reference to the felsites and their associated rocks:
Geol. Survey Michigan, v. 6, part 2, 155 p.
Langfield, K.M., DeGraff, J.M., and Gamet, N.G., 2023, Slip kinematics of the Keweenaw and Hancock
faults within the Midcontinent Rift System, Upper Peninsula of Michigan: Institute on Lake Superior
Geology, 69th Annual Meeting, Eau Claire, Wisconsin, Part 1 – Program and Abstracts, v. 69, p. 5051.
Lankton, L.D., 1991, Cradle to Grave: Life, Work, and Death at the Lake Superior Copper Mines, Oxford
University Press, 319 p.
Lankton, L.D. and Hyde, C. K., 1982, Old Reliable: An Illustrated History of the Quincy Mining
Company, Quincy Mine Hoist Association, 159 p.
Molloy, L. J., 2011, A guide to Michigan's historic Keweenaw copper district: published by Great Lakes
Geoscience LLC, 122 p.
Molloy, L. J., 2007, A Visitor's Guide to the Historic Quincy Mine: published by Great Lakes Geoscience
LLC, 61 p.
Self, S., Keszthelyi, L., and Thordarson, T., 1998, The importance of pahoehoe: Annual Review of Earth
and Planetary Sciences, v. 26, p. 81-110.
Stoiber, R.E. and Davidson, E.S., 1959, Amygdule mineral zoning in the Portage Lake Lava Series,
Michigan copper district: Economic Geology, v. 54, p. 1250-1277, p. 1444-1460.
Thurner, A. W., 1994, Strangers and Sojourners: A History of Michigan's Keweenaw Peninsula, Wayne
State University Press, 404 p.
White, W. S., 1968, The native-copper deposits of northern Michigan: in Ridge, J.D., ed., Ore Deposits of
the United States, 1933-1967 (the Graton Sales volume), American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical,
and Petroleum Engineering, New York, p. 303-325.

78

�Field Trip 3
Geoheritage of Buffalo Reef: Industrial Impact on Land, Culture,
and Fish Sovereignty
Erika Vye
Great Lakes Research Center, Michigan Technological University, 1404 E. Sharon Avenue,
Houghton, MI 49931
Charlie Kerfoot
Great Lakes Research Center, Michigan Technological University, 1404 E. Sharon Avenue,
Houghton, MI 49931
Stephanie Swart
Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy, 525 West Allegan Street,
Lansing, MI, 48909
Dione Price
Keweenaw Bay Indian Community, Natural Resources Department, 14359 Pequaming Road,
L’Anse, MI 49946
Evelyn Ravindran
Keweenaw Bay Indian Community, Natural Resources Department, 14359 Pequaming Road,
L’Anse, MI 49946

INTRODUCTION
Buffalo Reef is a geoheritage site with scientific, educational, cultural, and aesthetic value. This
field trip explores the relationship between geology, mining waste, and culture of Buffalo Reef a 2,200-acre natural cobble feature of Lake Superior’s lakebed southeast of the Keweenaw
Peninsula and about 20 miles northeast of Houghton. Finely crushed waste rock - stamp sand from copper ore milling operations at the community of Gay have been moved by currents along
the shoreline of the Keweenaw Peninsula to Big Traverse Bay, thus covering this highly
productive spawning ground for lake trout and whitefish. This has negative implications for
commercial fisheries, local economies, subsistence uses, and the spiritual, physical, and cultural
well-being of tribal nations that identify as fishing people. Further, this has adverse impacts on
tribes’ ability to exercise their treaty rights to fish in this area (Buffalo Reef Task Force, 2024).
Geoheritage is a nascent yet evolving field in the United States that considers the protection,
interpretation, and management of geologic features with significant scientific, educational,
cultural, or aesthetic value (Brocx &amp; Semeniuk, 2007; Geological Society of America, 2017;
National Park Service &amp; American Geosciences Institute, 2015; Reynard &amp; Brilha, 2017). More

79

�distinctively, geoheritage emphasizes the importance of the varied personal values people have
for geologic features and explores the wide-ranging relationships people have with landscape.
The rich geodiversity of the Keweenaw has fostered relationships for millennia and has imbued
our place with significant sites that provide opportunities to broaden both Earth science and
cultural literacy (Rose &amp; Vye with Martin, 2017; Vye, 2016). The rich geosites of the Keweenaw
provide an accessible platform for people to learn about deep time, Earth's dynamic processes,
and importantly, the diverse relationships and reciprocity people have with our geologic
underpinnings.
The Keweenaw is renowned for Earth's largest native copper deposits that became the first great
copper mining district in the United States. From 1845 to 1968, over 11 billion pounds of refined
copper were produced in Keweenaw mines, making it a cornerstone of the American economy in
the 19th and 20th centuries (Bornhorst &amp; Lankton, 2009; Bornhorst &amp; Barron, 2011).
Interpretations and public educational programming depicting the relationship between people
and geology have largely focused on stories and heritage associated with the European diaspora
that fueled the Copper Boom of 1845-1968 and how copper’s prolific use for transatlantic cables,
telegraphs, electricity, and the auto industry ultimately modernized the country (Bornhorst &amp;
Lankton, 2009). Less interpreted, yet central to our history, is how geology has shaped, and
continues to shape, the ancestral, traditional, and contemporary lands, waters, and livelihoods of
the Anishinaabeg- the Three Fires Confederacy of Ojibwe, Odawa, and Potawatomi peoples and
their many more-than-human relatives. As such, this field trip visits three stops (Figure 1) to
explore mining impacts on culture, subsistence uses, and the wellness of all beings.

Figure 1: Map of field trip site locations, courtesy of D.J. Lizzadro-McPherson, MTU

80

�Stop 1 - Mohawk, MI: The trip begins at the poor rock pile where the Mohawk No. 4 mine shaft
once stood - a native copper host rock from which some of the Gay stamp sands were generated.
Stop 2 - Gay, MI: Participants will then travel to the town of Gay to walk the stamp sands and
learn how Tribal, State, Federal, and academic partnerships are collaborating to mitigate
environmental damage and ultimately restore Buffalo Reef to the ecological resource that has
sustained both tribal and non-tribal communities for generations.
Stop 3 - Big Traverse Bay &amp; Buffalo Reef, MI: From Gay, we will travel to Big Traverse Bay to
learn more about why shoreline and habitat restoration efforts are necessary and how
stakeholders and rights holders are working together to address this environmental justice issue
in our community. Participants will benefit from visiting Buffalo Reef aboard Michigan Tech’s
Research Vessel Agassiz. This part of the trip enables participants to compare healthy parts of
the reef with areas that have been inundated with stamp sands.

STOP 1 - MOHAWK, MI
At this site, we will learn more about the source rock for the Gay stamp sands after a brief
overview of the geological history of the Keweenaw region. Participants will have time to
explore the poor rock pile before departing for Gay.
Directions: Leave
downtown Houghton and
head north on U.S. 41
towards Calumet. Stay on
U.S. 41 until you reach
Mohawk; turn right on 6th
street, just past E Phoenix
Street there is a place to
park on the left-hand side
of the road. This space
provides access to the
Mohawk No. 4 poor rock
pile (Figure 2).
Coordinates: 47.301203, 88.363369

Figure 2: Parking location to visit Mohawk No.4

Geological Origin Story
Michigan’s Keweenaw Peninsula has a rich and globally significant geodiversity in tandem with
a fascinating cultural story. This is the site of the largest native copper dominated deposits
known on Earth, the oldest metal workings in the Western Hemisphere, and a recent diaspora of

81

�European cultures that flocked to the region for copper mining in the late 1800s – this has shaped
an entangled mosaic of cultural, mining, and industrial heritage.
Importantly, the Keweenaw Peninsula offers
an important window to Earth’s past,
exposing the heart of the Mesoproterozoic
Mid-Continent Rift. Located on Lake
Superior in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula
(Figure 3); the abundant geodiversity sites
are the result of a flood basalt sequence
comprised of hundreds of voluminous lava
flows, interbedded and covered by a redbed
clastic sedimentary rocks. An upwelling of
heat and magma from a hot spot initiated
great lava flows erupting from the rifting of
supercontinent Rodinia. The rift created a
~3000 km U-shaped feature in the center of
North America that extends from Kansas,
through what is now Lake Superior and
terminated in what is now Michigan
(Cannon, 1994, Cannon and Nicholson,
2001, Stein et al., 2015).

Figure 3: Extent of rifting associated with the
Mid-Continent Rift (K. Schulz, USGS)

Some of the largest lava flows on Earth
erupted and ponded in the Mid-Continent rift over many centuries (Huber, 1983). During quiet
times, red-brown conglomerates and sandstone were deposited between flows in high-energy
alluvial fans (Elmore, 1984). The interbedded lava flows and sedimentary layers were normally
faulted resulting in a syncline feature that extends from Isle Royale to the Keweenaw Peninsula,
now the basin for Lake Superior (Figure 4). Copper was brought to the surface by hydrothermal
systems mineralizing permeable layers such as the amygdaloids of lava flow tops and the cracks
and crevices of conglomerate rocks (Bornhorst &amp; Barron, 2011, Nicholson et al, 1997, Cannon,
1984).

Figure 4: Cartoon depicting interbedded lava flows and minor sedimentary rocks (Huber, 1983.

82

�The Keweenaw is noted for mining nearly 9000 years ago (Martin, 1995, 1999). The valued red
metal has since been traded up and down the Mississippi by the Ojibwa caretakers of this
landscape and used in ceremony today. From 1845 to 1968, ~11 billion pounds of refined copper
were produced from Keweenaw Peninsula mines making it one of the cornerstones of the
American economy and the first great metal mining district in the United States (Bornhorst and
Barron, 2011, Bornhorst and Lankton, 2009). The region has been extensively mapped and
researched since the mid-1800s because of the discovery of copper and the subsequent mining
boom. This field trip explores the impacts related to one of the many mining sites in operation
from the late 1800s to mid-1900s in the Keweenaw region - Mohawk Mine, a native copper host
rock from which some of the Gay stamp sands were derived.
Mohawk No. 4
This field stop explores the site of
the Mohawk mine, specifically the
poor rock pile associated with the
Mohawk No. 4 shaft (Figure 5).
Rock from this site is the main
source for the Gay stamp sands.
Following the discovery of copper
on the property in 1896 by
lumberman Ernest Koch, the
Mohawk Mining Company was
founded. It was incorporated in
1898 and lasted until 1932 (John
Stanton as president, later replaced
by Joseph Gay). In 1923 the
Mohawk Mining Company took
over the neighboring Wolverine
Figure 5: A group of Keweenaw youth explore the poor rock
Copper Mining Company and the
pile at Mohawk No. 4 (photo credit Erika Vye)
Michigan Copper Mining Company.
In 1934 the company was purchased
by the Copper Range Company (Molloy, 2008). The Mohawk Mine had six shafts numbered 1
through 6 running from north to south along what is now US 41. The was a profitable mine
paying out over $15 million in shareholder dividends between 1906 and 1932 (Clark, 1978).
The No. 4 shaft of the Mohawk Mine was constructed at this site in 1901 and stayed open until
the mine closed in 1932 (Figure 6). In the early days of operation, the shaft reached a depth of
501 feet. Technological advances in 1904 led to equipping the No. 1, 2, and 4 shafts with
Nordberg Conical Drum Hoists (Figure 7) enabling depths of up to 6000 feet. With this
technology, the shaft reached a depth of 900 feet by 1906, 1,175 feet by 1908, and by 1922 a
final depth of 2,832 feet. In 1914, the No. 4 shaft was producing between 450 and 500 tons of
ore per day. Mining continued from the No. 4 shaft until 1924, with a brief lull in operations
until it was reopened in 1926, eventually closing in 1932 (Clark, 1978).

83

�Figure 6: No 4 shaft in Mohawk, MI (photo courtesy of the MTU Archives)

Figure 7: Image of Nordberg hoist; the world's largest Nordberg hoist can be visited at the Quincy Mine
in Hancock, MI, pictured here (photo courtesy of the MTU Archives)

84

�Ore Deposit and Significant Minerals
The Kearsarge lode at Mohawk is a native copper-dominated deposit with minor native silver
hosted by basalt lava flows of the Portage Lake Volcanics (about 1.1 billion years old). The
strike of the Kearsarge orebody is N45E, dips at 35W, and is 2.9 meters thick, 1,490 meters
wide, with a total length of 3,250 meters spanning an area of 250 hectares. The productive part of
the fragmental amygdaloidal lode was richer at greater depths than nearer to the surface where
the lode consisted of more massive basalt. The Kearsarge lode was the second largest in the
district and averaged 6 to 13 feet thick (Butler &amp; Burbank, 1929; White et al, 1953; and USGS,
2005).
The fragmental amygdaloid ore of the Mohawk mines is associated with arsenic-rich minerals,
more common than in most of the other Keweenaw deposits. The Mohawk mine is well known
among mineral collectors for its large occurrence of mohawkite - a mixture of algodonite,
domeykite, and copper (Moore, 1971). Mohawkite was first found on the property in 1901, on
the first level north of the No. 1 shaft. In addition to copper, the mine also produced a small
amount of native silver (Figure 8).

Figure 8: Left -Polished mohawkite, a rare mixture of copper and copper arsenides, is named after the
Mohawk-Ahmeek area of the Keweenaw (Photo by Robert M. Lavinsky); Right – native copper in
amygdaloidal basalt.

Geologic features of note include the occurrence of the Mohawkite Fissure that crossed the
Kearsarge lode. From 1900-1901, 105 metric tons of mohawkite ore was produced from the
Mohawk Mine at the No. 1 shaft. From 1902 through 1925 the No. 1 shaft produced about 117,000
metric tons of refined copper. Additional veins were discovered south of the No. 2 shaft in 1901
resulting in 230,000 pounds of mohawkite (Butler and Burbank, 1929).
Mohawkite proved to be challenging in the Keweenaw as smelters were not able to process it on
account of the high arsenic levels and the deadly fumes produced. A unique smelter was built in
Hackensack Meadows, New Jersey for the specific purpose of processing the ore; it became

85

�operational in 1901. The mohawkite ore contained mostly copper and arsenic, it also contained
small amounts of nickel and cobalt, as well as about 20 ounces of silver per ton of ore. (Stevens,
1902)
Copper-bearing rocks were transported 11 miles by rail to the town of Gay for milling near the
mouth of the Tobacco River on Traverse Bay. This is the next stop on the field trip.
STOP 2 – GAY, MI
This part of the field trip begins at the Gay Sands sign just outside of the town of Gay. This stop
is intended to engage participants in a discussion of how the stamp sands were generated and to
learn how Tribal, State, Federal, and academic partnerships are collaborating to mitigate
environmental damage and ultimately restore Buffalo Reef to the ecological resource that has
sustained both tribal and non-tribal communities for generations. Participants will have an
opportunity to walk the stamp sands (accessed just south of the Gay Sands sign): note that at
times large trucks are moving through this area; always exercise caution and stay together.
Directions: From Mohawk, travel to the town of Gay; follow the Mohawk-Gay Road. When you
arrive in Gay, turn right on Main Street, then left on 2nd Street (which becomes the Gay Lac la
Belle Rd), park on the right-hand side of the road beside the smokestack and local signage that
shares information about the Gay stamp sands (Figure 9).
Coordinates: 47.226766, -88.161933

Figure 9: Left - Gay Sands signage; Right – Gay mill smokestack (photo credit Erika Vye)

How were the stamp sands created?
Liberating the copper from the host rock required a large water source - in this instance, Lake
Superior. In 1900, the Wolverine mine and mill opened in Gay. This piqued the interests of New
York financiers of the Central, Atlantic, and Baltic mining companies and shortly thereafter the
Mohawk mines and mills were opened. The two mills were built in Gay by the Mohawk and
Wolverine mining companies enabling the processing of copper ore. A railroad was built to

86

�transport the copper-bearing rocks from Mohawk to Gay; poor rock was left at the mine sites in
Mohawk remaining in piles today. A dock was built nearby to import coal to power operations
and to load copper on ships to transport to other places (Keweenaw County Historical Society).
Note: A QR is included in the resources section of this guide leading to the recently developed
Gay Mills Exhibit created by the Keweenaw County Historical Society.
An unusual landscape &amp; vastly different soundscape
When visiting this site take note of what you hear; try to imagine what the soundscape of this
place might have been like in the early 1900s. At that time, the stamps at both mills were running
constantly. Imagine the ground shaking with over 70 stamps per minute crushing pieces of rock
brought up from underground to free the copper from the matrix. The next step required washing
the material to separate the copper and produce a copper-rich mineral concentrate to then be sent
to the smelter and formed into copper ingots (Lankton, 2005). The material was brought to the
top of the mill with a railway line. To process the copper and create the concentrate, water was
pumped from Lake Superior, and the tailings and waste slurry were dumped back into the lake
with conveyors. The length continued to grow as the tailings built up along the shoreline
(Keweenaw County Historical Society). Figure 10 shows an image of this process on the left,
with what remains of this structure today. Figure 11 illustrates the milling process.

Figure 10: Left - Conveyor sending tailings slurry back to the lake (Photo credit: MTU Archives) during
milling operations in Gay; Right - wood beams left from conveyor structure as sands are continually
swept away by wind and currents over time (Photo by Erika Vye)

What is happening to the sands?
From 1900-1930 the mills flushed over 22.7 million metric tons of tailings to Lake Superior
leaving a large bank of black sand, the consistency of kitty litter, along the shore. This finely
crushed waste rock has moved, and continues to move, along the southeast shoreline of the
Keweenaw Peninsula to Grand Traverse Bay Harbor threatening the nearby Buffalo Reef. Since
the 1930s Lake Superior’s fierce storms and strong currents have eroded the stamp sand bank,
pushing the tailings into the lake and gradually moving them southward along the shoreline to

87

�the Traverse River. These stamp sands contain high amounts of copper and cover 1,426 acres of
shoreline and lakebed. Currently, 30% of the reef has been impacted by stamp sands; modeling
predicts that by 2025 stamp sands will impact 60% of the reef. The next stop focuses on the
importance of understanding the impacts of these predictions and what is happening for
restoration. Before traveling to the last stop we will have lunch at the Gay Park. This site also
hosts the Gay Historic School and Museum open from 1 PM to 4 PM on Wednesday and
Saturday.

88

�Figure 11: This image describes how copper was processed in the mills - first by gravity and large
amounts of water through steam stamps, the rock was funneled into a trommel that sorted and classified
the pieces by size. A jig then separated the copper from the mine rock. Next, a series of vibrating Wilfley
tables separated the tailings from the small-sized copper. This image was recently modified for a
Keweenaw County Historical Society exhibit on the Gay Mills (a link for the exhibit is found in the
Resources section of this guide). Original delineation by the Historic American Engineering Record,
Heritage Conservation &amp; Recreation Service, Eric M. Hansen, 1978. Modification by David A. Vago,
MTU, for the Houghton County Historical Society, 2005; updated 2021.

STOP 3 - BIG TRAVERSE BAY &amp; BUFFALO REEF. MI
At this site, we will explore how the Gay sands are impacting life and culture in the region, learn
about remediation efforts, and how we can share in educating ourselves and others about this
environmental justice issue.
Directions: From the Gay Park by the Historic School and Museum travel left on Lake Street,
then right on 1st Street (becomes the Lake Linden-Gay Rd). Turn left onto Rice Lake Rd, which
becomes the Big Traverse Rd. Turn left on the Traverse River Rd, please drive slowly along this
road as there are families and small children frequently playing here. This takes approximately
15 min from Gay to Big Traverse. Note that the dock is on the other side of the harbor; to get
there simply head back to Big Traverse Rd, then turn left. The dock is about ¼ mile ahead.
Coordinates: Big Traverse Bay 47.189857, -88.236644, Dock to board Agassiz 47.190769, 88.237154
What is Buffalo Reef?
Buffalo Reef is a natural cobble
1
feature in Lake Superior, located
just off the eastern edge of the
Keweenaw Peninsula in the U.P.
of Michigan (Figure 12). The reef
has historically maintained an
invaluable spawning habitat for
fish species such as lake trout and
lake whitefish. Buffalo Reef is
estimated to supply 33% of the
tribal harvest of lake trout and
lake whitefish from Michigan
waters of Lake Superior (i.e.
136,375 pounds of whitefish and
61,830 pounds of lake trout
average annual yield 2001-2016).
Figure 11: Location of Buffalo Reef, also not the locations of
Additionally, if the stamp sands
both Field Trip Stop 2 and 3, marked by stars.
migrate south of Grand Traverse
Harbor, they will threaten the undisturbed native sand that serves as habitat for juvenile whitefish
(Kerfoot et al, 2012 &amp; 2021). Juvenile whitefish produced on Buffalo Reef migrate south of

89

�Grand Traverse Harbor to sandy, shallow-water habitat where they feed before migrating to the
deeper water they inhabit as adults. Without this habitat, whitefish recruitment in the vicinity of
Buffalo Reef would be greatly diminished. Whitefish provide the bulk of the commercial,
cultural, and spiritual value for the tribal communities that use this resource (BRTF, 2024).
How are the stamp sands impacting Buffalo Reef?
Most of the cobbles are glacial rocks,
scattered around the Jacobsville sandstone
bedrock highs of the reef. During spawning,
fish drop eggs into the crevices between
rocks. Cobbles are coated with a natural
organic film, the basis of a food web for
feeding fish. Stamp sands move into the
northern cobble field of Buffalo Reef burying
cobbles and killing living communities on
rocks along the leading edge of the sands.
(Figure 13). These impacts to fish habitat
create a risk for a decline in commercially and
culturally important fish keynote species.
Importantly, a decline in species impacts the
ability to exercise treaty rights. The sands also
have high enough copper concentration (about
two-eighths of a percent) to be toxic to fish
and other organisms that live in Grand
Traverse Bay. There are additional impacts to
human health through fish consumption.
Other concerns include the impacts of the
copper-toxic sands on coastal wetlands medicine chests to the KBIC - as the material
migrates up streams thereby affecting plant
and amphibian habitat (Kerfoot et al, 2012,
2021, in prep).
The sands also impact the aesthetics and sense
of place inspired by the landscape; the aerial
photos in Figure 14 illustrate the movement
of the stamp sands inundating white sand
Figure 12: Healthy reef habitat progressively
beaches along the south shore of the
inundated with stamp sands until covered completely
Keweenaw Peninsula. The stamp sands also
(Photos by Charlie Kerfoot)
create challenges for people coming and
going from the Big Traverse Bay Harbor; the sands have repeatedly blocked the harbor stopping
boat traffic. For example, in 2015, Big Traverse Bay Harbor was dredged removing 4,500 cubic
yards of stamp sand. Dredging happens repeatedly here, without this continued maintenance
there is a great risk of harming the region’s fishing industry. As such, local stakeholders are
working with the Army Corps of Engineers on a long-term solution.

90

�Figure 13

Figure 14: Aerial views of the entry of Traverse River into Lake Superior. The regular movement of
stamp sands over the top of the breakwater requires annual or biennial dredging to keep the small
Traverse River Harbor, home of a commercial fishing fleet, open to entry. Note the black sands on the
left to the north of the channel compared to the white (natural) sands to the right. Left photo credit: Neil
Harri; Right photo credit: Charlie Kerfoot

Impacts on Fish Sovereignty
Buffalo Reef lies within the ceded-territory homelands established by the Treaty of 1842 where
11 Lake Superior Bands of Ojibwa retain rights and responsibilities to harvest fish from the
Michigan waters of Lake Superior. Buffalo Reef has always been considered a culturally
significant harvesting ground for local communities. Fishing is the strand of the cultural core that
ties history to the present day and the future; it is a vital part of the foundation for cultural beliefs
and values, traditional lifeways, and even individual identity (Gagnon, 2018; KBIC, 2017).
The KBIC identify as fishing people and
have always had a strong focus on
cultivating and protecting relationships
within ecosystems that support healthy
food sovereignty initiatives within the
community (Figure 15). The Anishinaabeg
teachings and ways of life emphasize that
landscapes and waters are an intricate
system of diverse relationships, and
interconnected rights and responsibilities
rooted in an acknowledgment and
understanding that humans and nature are
relatives. These sentient elements have
been honored in ceremony since time
immemorial and these important teachings

Figure 14: Fresh catch on Keweenaw Bay

91

�and traditions continue today. These relationships are founded in the long-standing nation-tonation agreements between the Anishinaabe Ojibwa and all orders of creation from rock, water,
fire, and wind; the physical world of sun, stars, moon and earth; plant beings; animal beings; and
human beings - all rooted in the First Treaty with Gichi Manidoo (the Creator), also known as
Sacred Law, Original Instructions, and Natural Law (Johnston, 1976; Keweenaw Bay Indian
Community, 2021). Today, Tribal, State, Federal, and Academic partnerships are combining
efforts to mitigate damages and ultimately restore Buffalo Reef as the ecological resource that
has sustained both tribal and non-tribal communities for generations.
Buffalo Reef Remediation Efforts
This is a complex environmental justice issue requiring local, regional, and state stakeholders
and rights holders to work together on research and restoration efforts for Buffalo Reef. It was
tribal fishermen who first alerted our communities of this issue, underscoring the vital need to
bridge knowledges for a holistic understanding of what is happening within our landscape and to
recognize the gifts that different knowledges share. Research over the past years has included: a)
modeling wave action, currents, and how the sands are migrating across the coastal shelf and
along the shoreline; b) use of LiDAR and sonar assessments to understand the extent of the sands
underneath water; c) submerging remotely operated underwater vehicles to take pictures of the
boulder and cobble fields to assess the quality of the remaining fish habitat; d) researching
environmental impacts on the benthic and fish communities; e) exploring considerations for
building a revetment to hold back stamp sands from further entering the bay; f) conducting
archaeology to understand industrial heritage, mining legacies and Native American uses of the
area prior to colonization; and f) and meeting with community members to understand social and
economic impacts on the communities involved.
After years of observation, scientific study, and dredging at Big Traverse, the EPA funded a
feasibility study for a long-term solution. In 2017 the USEPA endorsed the formation of a
Buffalo Reef Task Force (BRTF) comprised of multiple state, federal, and tribal agencies. In
addition, several academic institutions and private entities have joined the team, recognizing that
this issue is larger than any single entity can accomplish on its own.
The Buffalo Reef Final Alternatives Analysis Report (Report) was recently on public notice from
January 30 to March 1, 2024. This report provides an overview of efforts made by the BRTF “in 2019, the BRTF identified 13 potential alternatives to remediate the stamp sands and restore
the habitat. The alternatives were screened based on constructability, operation and
maintenance requirements, environmental impact, ecological sustainability, initial costs and
legacy costs, regulatory requirements, public input and opinion, time needed for implementation,
impact to local populations, and potential for beneficial use of the stamp sands”.
Three alternatives were selected for further consideration that included the dredging and disposal
of stamp sands in the following locations: 1) White Pine Mine, a closed tailings basin; 2) a
Lakeside Placement site; and 3) an Upland Placement site. In 2022, a public meeting was held to
discuss the one alternative that would be feasible - the removal of the stamp sands to a regulated
and lined landfill to be constructed near Gay. These remediation efforts require land ownership,

92

�both at the shore for a proposed jetty to impede migration of the stamp sands and an upland
placement area to move the mining waste.
The Report indicates that the BRTF’s preferred remedial alternative and “Potential Plan”
identifies the “Upland Placement Alternative” as the BRTF’s preferred remedial alternative
(Figure 16). The study compares three scales of implementation for the Upland Alternative are
compared in the report. “The scale of implementation differs based on the volume of stamp sands
to be dredged and disposed of during the implementation phase. Additionally, the study provides
an assessment of the impact the volume of stamp sands removed during implementation has on
the cost and duration of the operation, maintenance, repair, replacement, and rehabilitation
phase.”

Figure 16: Upland Placement Alternative: Small, Medium, All Dredging Scales represented (Left to
Right). S Shoreline – South Shoreline; M Shoreline – Middle Shoreline; and N Shoreline – North
Shoreline. The Upland Placement footprint required to dispose of the volume of stamp sands removed
during project implementation varies per dredging scale. In the placement site measure, the solid white
line represents the estimated placement site footprint to contain the stamp sands dredged during the
project implementation phase. The dashed white line represents the estimated placement site footprint to
contain stamp sands dredged during the OMRR&amp;R project phase (sourced from page ES-5 of the Buffalo
Reef Final Alternatives Analysis Report).

RETURN TO HOUGHTON
Billion-year-old geologic processes brought copper to the surface where people could find it - a
gift from the deep Earth. Relationships with the red metal have varied over millennia resulting in
different values and actions within our shared lands and waters. Further efforts are required by
all stakeholders and rights holders to communicate and elevate the importance of this
environmental issue with decision-makers, government officials, and environmental advocacy
groups. This field trip is meant to deepen our understanding of these relationships and to reflect
on the following questions:
What are the relationships between people, Earth, and Buffalo Reef? Why does this matter?
How have people impacted Buffalo Reef in the past, and how will they in the future?
What can you do to help with the remediation efforts of this place?

93

�Directions: From Big Traverse Bay Harbor, head north on S Big Traverse Rd and continue
along Rice Lake Rd. Take M-26 S to US-41 S in Houghton.
EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES
Access the following websites and videos by following the QR codes.

Saving Buffalo Reef Website
(DNR)

Saving Buffalo Reef Video
(GLIFWC)

Buffalo Reef Restoration
(Great Lakes Now, Ep. 1006
Segment 3)

Gay Milling at Gay A Lake Superior Story -

REFERENCES CITED
Bornhorst, T. J. and Barron, R. J. (2011). Copper deposits of the western Upper Peninsula of Michigan.
Geologic Society of America, Field Guide, 24, 83-99.
Bornhorst, T. J. and Lankton, T. J. (2009). Copper Mining: A Billion Years of Geologic and Human
History, in Schaetzl, R., Darden, J. and Brandt, D. (eds.) Michigan Geography and Geology. United
States of America: Pearson Custom Publishing, 150-173.
Brocx, M. and Semeniuk, V. (2007). Geoheritage and geoconservation - history, definition, scope and
scale. Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia, 90, 53-87.
Buffalo Reef Task Force (2024). DRAFT Buffalo Reef – Final Alternatives Analysis. Retrieved from:
https://www.michigan.gov/dnr/-/media/Project/Websites/dnr/Documents/Fisheries/BuffaloReef/00DRAFT-Buffalo-Reef-Main-ReportJAN2024.pdf?rev=1ebf68cee9ae428881d8d6991b4d7471&amp;hash=48BD2B6EA77CD5C430FD63757863
2B28

94

�Butler, B.S. &amp; Burbank, W.S. (1929). The Copper Deposits of Michigan. USGS Professional Paper No.
144
Cannon, W. F. (1994). Closing of the Midcontinent Rift: a far-field effect of Grenvillian compression.
Geology 22, pp. 155-158.
Cannon, W. F. and Nicholson, S. W. (2001). Geologic Map of the Keweenaw and Adjacent Area
Michigan 1:100,000. USGS Map I-2696
Clarke, D. (1978). Copper mines of Keweenaw; no. 12: Mohawk Mining Company. ASIN B0066RONSQ.
Elmore, R. D. (1984). The Copper Harbor Conglomerate: A late Precambrian fining-upward alluvial fan
sequence in northern Michigan. Geological Society of America Bulletin 95, pp. 610-617.
Gagnon (2018). A Tribute to Our Fisherman -Minaadowenjigaaziwaat Gidoo giigoonkeninii-minaanik.
Retrieved from: https://nrd.kbicnsn.gov/sites/default/files/A%20Tribute%20to%20our%20Fishermen%20-%20handout.pdf
Geological Society of America (2017). GSA Position Statement: Geoheritage. Retrieved from:
https://www.geosociety.org/documents/gsa/positions/pos20_Geoheritage.pdf.
Huber, N. K. (1983). The geologic story of Isle Royale National Park. United States Geologic Survey
Bulletin (1309), pp. 66.
Johnston, B. (1976). Ojibway Heritage. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.
Kerfoot C., Yousef F., Green A., Regis R., Shuchman R., Brooks N., Sayers M., Sabol B., and Graves M.
(2012). LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) and multispectral studies of disturbed Lake Superior
coastal environments. Limnol. Oceanogr. 57: 749–771. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2012.57.3.0749
Kerfoot C., Hobmeier M., Swain G., Regis R., Raman V., Brooks C., Grimm A., Cook C., Shuchman R.,
and Reif M. (2021). Coastal Remote Sensing: Merging Physical, Chemical, and Biological Data as
Tailings Drift onto Buffalo Reef, Lake Superior. Remote Sensing. 2021, 13 (13), 2434.
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13132434
Kerfoot. C., Swain, G., Regis, R., Raman, V.K., Brooks, C., Cook, C and Reif, M. (in prep). Coastal
Copper Tailings Dispersal: 3D Mapping and Shoreline Impacts, Particle Migration, Leaching, And
Toxicity. Remote Sensing, 2024, 16.
Keweenaw Bay Indian Community (2017). Testimony of Warren C. Swartz Jr. Before the Senate
Committee on Commerce, Science &amp; Transportation. Retrieved from: https://www.michigan.gov/dnr//media/Project/Websites/dnr/Documents/Fisheries/BuffaloReef/TribalTestimonyADA1.pdf?rev=2c9d195
864e44557bc3bc315ed93e4a6
Keweenaw Bay Indian Community (2021). Who We Are. Keweenaw Bay Indian Community Natural
Resources Department. Retrieved from http://nrd.kbic-nsn.gov/about-us.
Keweenaw County Historical Society (2022). Copper Milling at Gay - A Lake Superior Story. Retrieved
from: https://www.keweenawhistory.org/Copper-Milling-At-Gay

95

�Lankton, L. (2005). Keweenaw National Historical Park Historic Resource Study. Prepared for the
National Park Service, United States Department of the Interior. Retrieved from:
http://npshistory.com/publications/kewe/hrs.pdf
Martin, S. R. (1995). Michigan prehistory facts: The state of our knowledge about ancient copper mining
in Michigan. The Michigan Archaeologist, 41(2-3), pp. 119-138.
Martin, S. R. (1999) Wonderful Power: The Story of Ancient Copper Working in the Lake Superior Basin
Wayne State University Press, Detroit, MI, p. 284
Molloy, Lawrence J. (2008). A Guide to Michigan's Historic Keweenaw Copper District: Photographs,
Maps, and Tours of the Keweenaw, Past and Present. Hubbell, Michigan: Great Lakes GeoScience. p. 66.
ISBN 978-0-979-1772-1-7.
Moore, P. (1971). Copper-Nickel Arsenides of the Mohawk No. 2 Mine, Mohawk, Keweenaw Co.,
Michigan. American Mineralogist, Volume 56, pages 1319-1331.
National Park Service and American Geosciences Institute (2015). America’s Geologic Heritage: An
Invitation to Leadership. NPS 999/129325. National Park Service, Denver, Colorado.
Nicholson, S.W., Shirey, S.B., Schulz, K.J., and Green, J.C. (1997). Rift-wide correlation of 1.1 Ga
Midcontinent Rift System basalts; implications for multiple mantle sources during rift development. Can.
J. Earth Sci., v. 34, pp. 504-520.
Reynard, E. and Brilha, J. (2017). Geoheritage: Assessment, protection, and management. Elsevier,
ISBN: 9780128095317.
Rose, W.I. and Vye, E. with Martin, V. (2017). How the Rock Connects Us: A Geoheritage Guide to
Michigan’s Keweenaw Peninsula and Isle Royale. Isle Royale and Keweenaw Parks Association, ISBN
9780935289213.
Stein, C. A., Kley, J., Stein, S., Hindle, D. and Keller, G. R. (2015). North America’s Midcontinent Rift:
When Rift met LIP. Geosphere, 11(5), pp. 1607-1616.
Stevens, Horace J. (1902). The Copper Handbook: A Manual of the Copper Industry of the United States
and Foreign Countries. Vol. II. Houghton, Michigan: Mines Publications.
US Geological Survey (USGS) (2005). Mineral Resources Data System (MRDS).
Vye, E. (2016). Geoheritage of the Keweenaw Peninsula (Doctoral dissertation). Michigan Technological
University.
White, W.S., Cornwall, H.R., &amp; Swanson, R.W. (1953). Bedrock Geology of The Ahmeek Quadrangle.
USGS Map GQ-27, Scale 1:24000

96

�Field Trip 4
Keweenaw Fault System Geometry and Kinematics:
Clues to Its Nature and Origin
James M. DeGraff, Katherine M. Langfield
Department of Geological and Mining Engineering and Sciences
Daniel J. Lizzadro-McPherson
Geospatial Research Facility, Great Lakes Research Center
Michigan Technological University, 1400 Townsend Drive, Houghton, MI 49931
Objectives
This field trip is designed to demonstrate four fundamental attributes of the Keweenaw fault
system along the Keweenaw Peninsula: (1) geometry of the fault network and individual faults;
(2) style of deformation of hanging-wall and footwall strata; (3) zonation of deformed rocks in
fault zones; and (3) kinematic slip indicators on individual faults.
Stops in this guide were chosen and grouped into four areas to illustrate the segmented geometry of the
Keweenaw fault system and to point out fault blocks defined by intersections between faults in three main
directions. Kinematic slip indicators observed at some stops manifest a preponderance of oblique slip with
components of dextral strike slip and northwest-side-up reverse slip. Based on this information and fault
network geometry, the overall nature of the fault system is interpreted to be transpressional and consistent
with forcing by the Grenville orogeny.
Introduction
The Keweenaw fault extends southwest from the tip of the Keweenaw Peninsula in Michigan’s
Upper Peninsula to near Ashland, Wisconsin (Fig. 1), a distance of about 250 kilometers. It is one
of two faults along the south shore of western Lake Superior with reverse movement that
juxtaposes Mesoproterozoic volcanic layers against Meso-Neoproterozoic clastic sedimentary
strata, the other being the Douglas fault in Wisconsin and Minnesota. Irving and Chamberlin
(1885) first established the existence of the Keweenaw fault by combining detailed observations in
outcrops and trenches with astute reasoning to settle a long-running debate about the nature of the
contact between volcanic layers to the northwest and sandstone strata to the southeast. Prior to their
work, Wadsworth (1884) had argued that the sandstone was older and dipped northwest beneath
the volcanic layers based on their similar dip at some locations along their contact. Afterward, this
idea was resurrected intermittently until the mid-1970s, when deep drilling for oil and gas
established the younger age of sandstone in the Keweenaw fault’s footwall once and for all.

97

�Figure 1: Mesoproterozoic Keweenawan Supergroup of the Midcontinent Rift System (inset map
modified from Stein) in the Lake Superior region. For sources of geologic units and faults, see
DeGraff and Carter (2023). KF‒Keweenaw fault; LOF‒Lake Owen fault, DF‒Douglas fault; IRF‒
Isle Royale fault, MIF‒Michipicoten Island fault, TF‒Thiel fault; MF‒Munising fault
(provisionally named). Red “U” on upthrown sides of faults.
Tectonic Evolution
The Keweenaw fault and related major faults along the southern edge of the western Lake Superior
basin cut rocks of the Midcontinent Rift System (Fig. 1) and have slipped several kilometers in a
reverse sense (Cannon and Nicholson, 2000, 2001; DeGraff and Carter, 2023). Ideas to explain the
origin and evolution of the Keweenaw fault differ in relation to the roles of rifting and orogenesis
on fault initiation and movement over time. The Midcontinent Rift System (MRS), formed by
extension of Laurentian crust in Mesoproterozoic time, was accompanied by voluminous mafic
volcanism followed by a period of crustal sag with siliciclastic sediment filling the resulting basin
(Cannon et al., 1989; Cannon, 1992; Hinze et al., 1990; Stein et al., 2015). Woodruff et al. (2020)
defined stages of magmatism and tectonism in MRS evolution as follows: (1) Plateau Stage with
widespread volcanism and distributed minor extension (c.1112 to c.1105 Ma); (2) Rift Stage when
volcanism and extension reached maximum intensity along a central subsiding rift basin (c.1102 to
c.1090 Ma); (3) Late-Rift Stage with declining volcanism transitioning to sedimentary infill of the
rift basin (c.1090 to c.1083 Ma); and (4) Post-Rift Stage with sedimentary infill of a sag basin
(c.1083 to c. 1060 Ma). Prior to recognition of the MRS, the Keweenaw fault was interpreted as a
thrust that formed during an unspecified compressional event following eruption of lava flows and
deposition of siliciclastic strata in the Lake Superior basin (Irving and Chamberlin, 1885; Butler
and Burbank, 1929, White, 1968). After recognition of the rift, a new model for formation and
evolution of the Keweenaw fault and others around the Lake Superior basin proposed that they
formed as normal faults during stages 1 and 2, and then were inverted as reverse faults by post-rift
Grenville compression (Cannon et al., 1989; Hinze et al., 1990; Cannon, 1994), i.e. the fifth

98

�Compressional Stage of Woodruff et al. (2020). A recent model, discussed below in relation to the
inversion model, is that the Keweenaw fault formed by thrusting during post-rift Grenville
compression and did not exist as a normal fault during MRS extension or sag (DeGraff and Carter,
2023). In some ways, the latter model reverts to earlier ideas about the Keweenaw fault.
Ideas about the timing of reverse slip on the Keweenaw fault have evolved from the original ideas
of Irving and Chamberlin (1885), who inferred two episodes of movement – one prior to
deposition of the footwall sandstone and a second afterward. Early thrusting elevated the region
northwest of the fault, creating a highland of mafic volcanic layers that shed debris into the tectonic
basin southeast of the fault. A second episode of thrusting occurred after most of the sandstone
deposition based on deformed footwall strata with steep to overturned attitudes toward the
southeast. Later workers have suggested quasi-continuous fault slip that began before Jacobsville
deposition and continued during most or all of its deposition (Cannon and Nicholson, 2000), and
others have argued for a late reactivation of the fault system during one or more phases of the
Appalachian orogeny (Craddock et al., 1997).
Stratigraphy
Extension during MRS evolution followed by compression during the Grenville Orogeny produced
a broad syncline with strata dipping toward an axis beneath Lake Superior (Fig. 1). The related
rocks in the vicinity of the Keweenaw Peninsula are well described by Cannon and Nicholson
(2000, 2001), whose stratigraphic column and nomenclature are adopted here (Fig. 2). Here, the
main geologic units of the Keweenawan Supergroup are from oldest to youngest: (1) Siemens
Creek Volcanics and Kallander Creek Volcanics (Powder Mill Group) with basaltic to andesitic
lava flows; (2) Portage Lake Volcanics (Bergland Group) mostly composed of basaltic to andesitic
flows with lesser conglomerate and sandstone layers; (3) Oronto Group strata beginning with the
Copper Harbor Conglomerate and locally interbedded basalt-andesite flows, continuing with the
Nonesuch Formation composed of siltstone and shale, and ending with the Freda Sandstone
composed of lithic sandstone and siltstone; and (4) Jacobsville Sandstone mostly composed of
quartzose to subarkosic sandstone and generally correlated with the Bayfield Group in Wisconsin,
USA. Archean granite and gneiss of the Superior craton, with a Paleoproterozoic cover of
graywacke and slate (Michigamme Formation), lie beneath the Keweenawan rocks south of
Keweenaw Bay.
The following descriptions focus on the two geologic units that are juxtaposed along the
Keweenaw fault system, namely the Portage Lake Volcanics in the hanging wall and the younger
Jacobsville Sandstone in the footwall (Fig. 3). Both units are stratified and have compositional and
textural variations between layers that likely influenced their mechanical behavior, which in turn
influenced fault initiation and propagation. A more complete description of other Precambrian
units along the Keweenaw Peninsula is provided elsewhere in this field trip volume (see Field Trip
1 in this volume).

99

�Figure 2: Left. Regional stratigraphy following Cannon and Nicholson (2001). For sources of
radiometric ages in red italics, see DeGraff and Carter (2023). Right. Stratigraphy of the Portage
Lake Volcanics from USGS bedrock geology maps of the Keweenaw Peninsula. Intense green units
are major lava flows: pcc‒Copper City; pgf‒Gratiot; psc‒Scales Creek; pk‒Kearsarge; pg‒
Greenstone. Letter codes on left side are sedimentary layers, except for one: pu‒unnamed
conglomerate (cgl), pbc-pl‒Baltic-Lac La Belle cgl; ps‒St. Louis cgl; pb‒Bohemia cgl; poc‒Old
Colony sandstone; pw‒Wolverine sandstone; pkc‒Kingston cgl; pc‒Calumet and Hecla cgl; ph‒
Houghton cgl; pa‒Allouez cgl; pp‒Pewabic West cgl; paf‒ashbed flow top; phc‒Hancock cgl.
Bold red bars mark units with layer-parallel slip observed in mines and trenches. Letters on right
side indicate where slip occurred (T‒top; B‒bottom; A‒top and bottom).
The Portage Lake Volcanics (PLV) exposed along the Keweenaw Peninsula is truncated on the
southeast by the Keweenaw fault system, leaving an undetermined thickness of PLV in the
footwall beneath Jacobsville Sandstone. The PLV section in the fault’s hanging wall is estimated to
be 3000 to 5000 m thick and to contain about 300 flows (Cannon and Nicholson, 2000). It mostly
consists of subaerial basaltic flows with less abundant andesitic flows, rhyolitic to dacitic extrusive
domes, and associated pyroclastic layers (Butler and Burbank, 1929; White, 1968; Cannon and
Nicholson, 2000, 2001). Six named basalt flows are sufficiently traceable along strike due to their

100

�great thickness and distinctive texture to serve as marker units (Fig. 2). The thickest of these, the
Greenstone flow, in the upper part of the section is traceable for 80 kilometers in outcrop and drill
holes and has a precise radiometric age date of 1091.6 ± 1.3 Ma (Swanson-Hysell et al., 2019; cf.
1094.0 ± 1.5 Ma, Davis and Paces, 1990). The next thickest flow, the Copper City flow, in the
lower part of the section is traceable for 25 kilometers and is precisely dated at 1093.4 ± 1.4 Ma
(Swanson-Hysell et al., 2019; cf. 1096.2 ± 1.8 Ma of Davis and Paces, 1990).
About 3% of the PLV section consists of conglomerate and sandstone deposited between some of
the lava flows (Butler and Burbank, 1929; White, 1952; Merk and Jirsa, 1982). Eleven named
interflow units (Fig. 2) are traceable along strike for considerable distances up to 90 km (Bornhorst
and Barron, 2011), and thus are useful for correlation. Interflow sedimentary layers mostly consist
of clast-supported, pebble-to-cobble conglomerate with a gravelly to sandy matrix, which is well
indurated and tends to form prominent strike ridges. Conglomerate layers are coarsely bedded and
poorly stratified, except where sandy lenses or conglomeratic sandstone occur. Less common are
sandstone and siltstone that may occur as interbeds within a conglomerate layer or locally may
make up an entire interflow layer. Interflow sedimentary layers may be up to 40 m thick and
locally may pinch to near zero thickness (Butler and Burbank, 1929; Merk and Jirsa, 1982; White,
1968). Clasts and matrix grains in the interflow layers were derived from volcanic rocks of the rift basin,
with felsic material generally being far more abundant than expected from the small proportion of felsic
volcanic rocks that make up the PLV section (&lt; 1% according to Nicholson, 1992). These so-called felsic
conglomerates may occur by themselves or in association with mafic conglomerates, in which case the felsic
layer tends to lie atop the mafic layer lying atop the underlying lava flow (Butler and Burbank, 1929).
Stops of this field trip are all within the lower part of the PLV section exposed in the fault’s
hanging wall. For the first half of the trip, the thick Copper City flow is an important stratigraphic
reference that be traced for 25 km along strike. Another important stratigraphic reference with a
greater strike extent is the St. Louis conglomerate (#6 on USGS bedrock geology maps), which lies
at the base of the Copper City flow in many places but elsewhere is separated from it by a thinner
basalt flow. For the second half of the trip, the key stratigraphic reference is the Lac La Belle
conglomerate (#3 on USGS maps), which lies 580 m to 1050 m stratigraphically below the St.
Louis conglomerate. Other lava flows and interflow sedimentary layers in the lower part of the
PLV have not yet been correlated well enough to be useful as regional stratigraphic references. A
few intrusions cut the lowermost PLV layers along the Keweenaw Peninsula, such as the Mt.
Bohemia syenodiorite stock (Cornwall, 1954a) and scattered dikes largely of intermediate
composition (Robertson, 1975).
Jacobsville Sandstone (JS) in the Keweenaw fault’s footwall fills a sub-basin that extends
southeast beneath Keweenaw Bay to an onlap with Paleoproterozoic metasedimentary rocks,
northeast to near Stannard Rock, and southwest to Lake Gogebic (Fig. 1). The unit may reach to 23 kilometers in depth based on gravity modeling and early seismic reflection data (Bacon, 1966; Aho,
1969; Kalliokoski, 1982). An exploratory drill hole (Mayflower #41) through the fault near
Calumet penetrated JS to a total depth of 803 m (White, 1985), and a deeper drill hole 8.6 km
southeast of the fault (Rice Lake #1) reached a total depth in sandstone at 1106 m (Keweenaw
NHP, 2016). Regionally correlated units are not well defined for the unit because of lateral facies
variability and lack of marker beds. However, Hamblin (1958) recognized the following

101

�succession: (1) basal “conglomerate facies” with locally-sourced clasts deposited adjacent to
topographic highs; (2) “lenticular sandstone” facies dominated by planar and trough cross-bedding;
(3) “massive sandstone” facies with laterally persistent layers and occasional planar cross-bedding;
and (4) “red siltstone” facies with thinly bedded, fine-grained, siliciclastic layers and local trough
cross-bedding. Based on this facies succession, Hamblin (1958) interpreted Jacobsville
depositional environments as transitioning from (1) alluvial-fluvial at the base, (2) to dominantly
fluvial in the lower cross-bedded part of the unit, (3) to dominantly lacustrine in the upper massive
part of the unit, and (4) to variably lacustrine and fluvial in the uppermost thinly bedded part of the
unit. He inferred that the general sequence of facies and depositional environments was time
transgressive, representing both a vertical time sequence at any given point as well as a basinward
change of depositional environment at any given time.
The JS section along the Keweenaw Peninsula consists of siliciclastic strata that generally conform
to the facies of Hamblin (1958) but with some variations. Proximal to the fault system, the lower
parts of exposed sections commonly have brownish conglomerate layers consisting of subangular
volcanic clasts chaotically dispersed in a poorly indurated muddy matrix, and interbedded with
soft, fissile, reddish-brown siltstone and shale (Irving and Chamberlin, 1885; Hamblin, 1958;
DeGraff, 1976; Brojanigo, 1984). In such sections with muddy conglomerate and shaly strata,
interbeds of whitish to orangish to pinkish, fine- to medium-grained sandstone occur as isolated
thin beds near the base and become more abundant and thicker upward in the section until muddy
strata are rare. The quartzose to subarkosic sandstones are locally conglomeratic and often crossbedded, which is typical of most JS strata exposed away from the fault system to the southeast.
Sand-prone JS strata also occur near the fault system where the muddy conglomerate and shaly
facies is absent. Brojanigo (1984) interpreted the muddy conglomerate layers as debris flows
derived from an upland of PLV rocks to the northwest, and the more mature sandy strata as fluvial
deposits derived from older quartzo-feldspathic rocks to the south. We interpret this bimodal
alluvial-fluvial assemblage to be basal Jacobsville, whose PLV-derived detritus is evidence of prior
reverse slip on the Keweenaw fault system that elevated the northwest hanging wall and allowed
volcanics there to be weathered, eroded, and transported southeastward into the JS sub-basin.
The time span of JS deposition has been difficult to determine due to a lack of fossils and igneous
rocks interbedded with or crosscutting Jacobsville strata (Kalliokoski, 1982). Deposition probably
did not occur prior to reverse slip on the Keweenaw fault system (KFS) because conglomerate low
in the JS section near the KFS contains PLV detritus sourced from an elevated region to the
northwest (Brojanigo, 1984; Cannon and Nicholson, 2000). The earliest slip on the fault system is
generally taken to be ~1060 Ma based on Rb-Sr ages of gangue minerals in fractures associated
with native copper mineralization of the Keweenaw Peninsula (Bornhorst et al., 1988) and reset
biotite ages in Archean granite gneiss uplifted along related faults west of Lake Gogebic (Cannon
et al., 1993). Later reverse slip on the Keweenaw fault that deformed adjacent Jacobsville strata is
relatively well constrained at 985 ± 30 Ma by a U-Pb date for late-kinematic vein calcite in the
fault zone, in combination with a maximum depositional age of ~993 Ma for deformed strata high
in the Jacobsville section (Hodgin et al., 2022). Most Jacobsville deposition probably occurred in
the period 1060-985 Ma, although somewhat younger layers could have been deposited in the
region (Craddock et al., 2013; Malone et al., 2016).

102

�Keweenaw Fault System – Key Observations and Concepts
The Keweenaw fault has been described as a strike fault because of the general parallelism
between its map trace and PLV layers in its hanging wall (Fig. 3). Butler and Burbank (1929) also
noted a remarkable similarity in dip of hanging-wall layers and the fault, such that PLV layers
change dip along strike by about the same amount and in the same sense as changes in the
underlying fault surface. Where differences in dip exist, the fault cuts 5° to 17° more steeply and
upward across PLV layers in a southeasterly direction, i.e. in the thrusting direction (DeGraff and
Carter, 2023). Related to these surface observations, Hubbard (1898) had systematically
catalogued in mine workings many layer-parallel faults along contacts between volcanic and
interflow sedimentary layers (Fig. 2). These bedding-plane faults are manifested by fault gouge,
polished surfaces, breccia with alteration, and secondary mineralization in fractured zones up to 8
m thick (65% ≤ 1.5 m). Hubbard’s observations indicate that PLV layer boundaries were relatively
weak and became detached during one or more deformation episodes. Furthermore, his
observations along the Keweenaw Peninsula mining district northeast of Portage Lake document
layer-parallel slip throughout the PLV section.
The surface and subsurface evidence of layer-parallel slip within the PLV section is consistent with
knowledge about PLV stratigraphy. The lava flows have variations in texture and mineralogy
across their thickness that likely influence their mechanical properties. Massive holocrystalline
flow interiors grade into margins with finer grain size and abundant vesicles and amygdules, often
arranged in bands parallel to the contacts. Flow tops have the highest abundance of amygdules, are
commonly brecciated, and often have been modified by weathering between eruptions or by
mineralizing fluids that later migrated along these once-permeable zones (Butler and Burbank,
1929; Stoiber and Davidson, 1959; White, 1968; Bornhorst, 1997). Where one flow lies directly
atop another, a significant mechanical contrast exists across their comparatively weak contact.
Contrasts in layer characteristics and properties are even more significant at contacts between
interflow sedimentary layers and lava flows. Altogether, the evidence just summarized implies a
detached style of formation for the Keweenaw fault and related splays (DeGraff and Carter, 2023).
Although the Keweenaw fault has been described as a high-angle reverse fault, its northwesterly
dip at the surface varies from as low as 20° up to 70° (Butler and Burbank, 1929). Cross-section
construction along a transect with abundant constraining data from mining operations and surface
mapping implies that the fault is nearly horizontal northwest of its surface trace at Hungarian Falls
(DeGraff and Carter, 2023, their Fig. 6), one of the stops on this trip (see Stop 2-1, Fig. 8). Several
cross-sections on USGS bedrock geology map sheets from the 1950s show the fault dipping ≤ 25°
or show nearly horizontal PLV layers near surface that imply a similarly-dipping fault below (e.g.,
Laurium, Ahmeek, Mohawk, and Bruneau Creek quadrangles). Thus, the fault and overlying PLV
strata dip between nearly horizontal up to 25° NW at several locations and, there, the hanging-wall
PLV block has overridden footwall JS strata by as much as 2.5 kilometers.
Between 2017 and 2022, three mapping projects funded by the USGS EDMAP program have
refined fault and stratal geometries along the Keweenaw fault, and the results indicate that what
was largely considered to be a single fault is better characterized as a fault system (Tyrrell, 2019;
Mueller, 2021; Lizzadro-McPherson, 2023; Gamet, 2023, Langfield, 2024). The Keweenaw fault

103

�system (KFS), as used here, refers to an ensemble of fault segments whose collective motion has a
significant component of dextral strike slip in addition to the long-recognized component of
reverse slip with northwest side up. The fault system consists of segments that define three main
directional sets: (1) a dominant set that defines the trend of the fault system and locally separates
more steeply dipping PLV layers to the northwest from less steeply dipping PLV layers to the
southeast; (2) splay faults that are angled 15-30° clockwise from set 1; and (3) connector faults
angled 35-75° counterclockwise from set 1 that join footwall splays to the main fault trend (Fig. 3).
The three directional fault sets maintain these angular relationships among each other as the curved
KFS changes direction from a 35° azimuth near Houghton to a 95° azimuth near the tip of the
peninsula. The interconnected nature of the three fault sets defines fault blocks with long
dimensions parallel to the local trend of the KFS.
Fault-slip indicators measured on ~400 fault surfaces show that the collective ratio of reverse slip
to dextral slip on the KFS varies from 1:1 near Houghton to 1:2 or more near the tip of the
peninsula. In other words, strike slip is twice as large as dip slip on the KFS near the tip of the
peninsula where fault azimuth is 60° clockwise from its azimuth near Houghton (Tyrrell, 2019;
Mueller, 2021; Lizzadro-McPherson, 2023; Gamet, 2023; Langfield, 2024). This change in the
ratio of strike slip to dip slip is expected as the fault’s azimuth approaches the estimated 105°
azimuth of maximum compressive stress that is attributed to the Grenville orogeny. The leftstepping arrangement of footwall splay faults and the fault blocks they help to define is consistent
with a transpressional fault system as indicated by the fault-slip data. The relatively short, north- to
northeast-trending, connector faults (set 3) are associated with similar-trending fold axes at
relatively high angles to the estimated maximum compression direction and shortening direction.
The connector faults are inferred to have mostly reverse slip with west side up and to
accommodate northeast to east transport of footwall fault blocks associated with dextral
transpressional slip of the entire KFS.
Why concern ourselves with the geometric details and timing of slip on the KFS? From a science
perspective, the arrangement of fault segments in the system along with fault-slip indicators like
slickenlines provide clues to the mechanics of fault initiation and kinematics of fault slip. Improved
understanding of these aspects of the KFS should apply to similar faults around Lake Superior and
help to understand their causative tectonic events and stress regimes. From a practical perspective,
faulting along the Keweenaw Peninsula and on strike to the southwest provided pathways for
upward migration of mineralizing fluids (Bornhorst, 1997), leading to copper deposits that once
supported a thriving mining industry and are still prospective today. Native copper is commonly
found along major and minor faults in the mining district. The Hancock fault cutting the Quincy
and Hancock mines is an example of a major fault with copper mineralization concentrated in its
hanging wall. Another example is the Allouez Gap fault that bisects the Kearsarge flow-top copper
deposit, the largest of this type in the district (Bornhorst, 1997). Faults likely provided pathways
for upward-moving ore fluids into vesicular flow tops at the Baltic and Isle Royale deposits and
others in the Greenland-Mass subdistrict (Broderick, 1931). The earliest native copper deposits
exploited in the district east of Eagle River were along subvertical fracture zones and minor
transverse faults with displacements less than 200 m (Butler and Burbank, 1929). Therefore, a
better understanding of fault geometry and timing may provide insights about the distribution of
known deposits and about the possible presence of undiscovered deposits.

104

�Figure 3: Geologic map of the Keweenaw Peninsula showing the Keweenaw fault system north of
Portage Lake and field trip stops within the four focus areas. Faults are indicated by curved black
lines.

Field Trip Stops
The field trip stops described below are grouped into four areas to illustrate themes related to fault
system geometry, stratal relationships and deformation, fault blocks, deformation fabric in fault
zones, and slip kinematics. Each area has an introductory overview of the key themes and nature of
the stops, followed by individual stop descriptions.
Reported strike and dip values follow a right-hand-rule convention. The dip value is followed by
letters indicating the cardinal direction of dip, which is redundant but makes for clarity.

About half of the stops in this guide are on public land. Those on private land are specified in the stop
descriptions as requiring permission from the owners to access.

105

�Figure 4: Geologic map of Area 1 with the Keweenaw fault system (KFS) and field trip stops 1-1 to 1-3.
Geologic unit codes: pbc – Baltic conglomerate, ps – St. Louis conglomerate, pb – Bohemia
conglomerate, psc – Scales Creek flow, pk – Kearsarge flow with Wolverine sandstone at its base.
Teeth along reverse faults are on upthrust sides.

106

�Area 1: Hungarian Fault Block ‒ Southwest End
STOPS IN THIS AREA ARE ON PRIVATE LAND AND REQUIRE PERMISSION TO ACCESS.

The three stops in Area 1 are within the vehicle testing grounds of Michigan Tech’s Keweenaw
Research Center (KRC), under lease from the Houghton County Memorial Airport (Fig. 4). From
west to east, the stops are on the main Keweenaw fault zone (1-1), in a basalt quarry within a faultbounded block (1-2), and on a footwall splay fault (1-3) that passes through Hungarian Falls to the
northeast in Area 2. Within the fault-bounded block, an unconformity between the PLV and JS is
interpreted to dip shallowly southwest. These three stops illustrate an en echelon, overlapping, fault
geometry that define a fault block whose long dimension is parallel to the trend of the Keweenaw
fault system (KFS). Recent mapping shows that such fault patterns and fault-bounded blocks are
repeated along the KFS north of Portage Lake (Fig. 3). A similar configuration of faults with the
enclosed block having a west-dipping PLV-JS unconformity occurs in Area 4 (Figs. 3 and 13).

Stop 1-1: Gooseneck Creek fault exposure
Directions: From the Portage Lake lift bridge between Houghton and Hancock, follow US-41 north for
6.7 mi (10.8 km) to Airpark Boulevard on the right. Turn right toward Houghton County Memorial
Airport and drive 0.5 mi (0.8 km) to the Keweenaw Research Center (KRC) on the right. Enter the KRC
parking area and wait in vehicles. We may be escorted by KRC staff for 1.5 mi (2.4 km) to the south edge of their
vehicle testing grounds, where we will park and walk. [Lat: 47° 9.259'N | Lon: 88° 29.895'W]
The fault exposure on Gooseneck Creek is part of the main Keweenaw fault zone that is traced
by means of outcrops, drill holes, and water wells along a line bearing 36° from the Michigan
Tech campus to the intersection of Airport Park and Forsman roads, about one kilometer
southwest of this stop (Fig. 4). Northeast from that intersection, the fault’s map trace curves
eastward so that here it trends 72°, as do the hanging-wall PLV strata. This stop is the most
northeasterly site where this segment of the KFS can be observed because the flat upland to the
northeast, where the airport is located, has little to no bedrock exposure.
Hubbard (1898) seems to be the first geologist to describe this site. While his report puts the
outcrop about 80 m south of its actual location, his geologic description is very similar to what
was observed and measured during the 2021-2022 EdMap project (Langfield, 2024).
“A conglomerate here, underlain by trap, strikes N. 72° E., and dips northerly 44°, the trap
being in contact on the south with the sandstone, which is much broken and disturbed but
appears to dip rather flat to the N. E.” (Hubbard, 1898)
The fault’s main slip surface is not exposed but its position is determined to within a couple of
meters by the proximity of hanging-wall PLV outcrops to footwall JS outcrops. PLV strata in the
hanging wall, striking 252° and dipping 40-44° NW, change stratigraphically upward from
amygdaloidal basalt at the fault at creek level to a felsic pebble conglomerate, and then to a
series of basaltic flows for as far as outcrop exists to the north and northwest. The stratigraphic

107

�position of the conglomerate layer suggests that it is the Baltic (#3) conglomerate shown on the
USGS Hancock and Chassell bedrock geology maps (Cornwall, 1956a; White, 1956). Abundant
fractures within the basalt flows are not obviously systematic, although detailed work might
reveal dominant sets. Jacobsville strata in the footwall commonly appear massive due to being
thickly bedded to locally cross-bedded, which makes their attitude difficult to measure. In
general, JS strata dip gently both toward and away from the fault, suggesting an open anticlinal
structure with an axis that trends approximately east-west (Fig. 4).

Figure 5: Gooseneck Creek cross-section in progress using outcrop and drill hole data (Langfield,
2024). Red lines below topography are New Arcadian drill hole trajectories. Colors and letter
codes of geologic units are explained in Figure 2. KFS-P = Keweenaw fault system - Portage
segment; KFS-H = Keweenaw fault system - Hungarian segment. Dashed orange line above KFSP marks what may be the Baltic (#3) conglomerate.
Diamond drill holes (DDH) of the Calumet and Hecla Consolidated Copper Company provide
data that are critical for the interpretation of this site, situated on a NW-trending line of four New
Arcadian holes drilled in 1911-1912 (Fig. 4). Southeast of here, three drill holes penetrated the
following beneath glacial overburden (hole depth converted to vertical depth): DDH #17 about
140 m SE cut 46 m of JS sandstone followed by 109 m of PLV basalt; DDH #15 about 205 m SE
cut 69 m of JS sandstone and conglomerate followed by 14 m of PLV basalt; DDH #13 about
355 m SE cut 37 m of JS sandstone (Fig 5). Southeast of the fault, therefore, drilling reveals a
veneer of JS strata less than 70 m thick overlying PLV basaltic lava flows. About 135 m
northwest of the fault, DDH #11 inclines 52° toward this site and reaches a total depth of 457 m.
It cuts a single felsic conglomerate layer between depths of 93 m and 109 m (16 m apparent
thickness) that we correlate to the 6-m-thick conglomerate layer seen here in outcrop, which
yields an average stratal dip of 53° NW. Below the conglomerate, DDH #11 penetrated ~2

108

�meters of sludge that we interpret as fault gouge, and then continued through basaltic flows to its
bottom at a vertical depth of 363 m below the DDH #17 surface location to the southeast. The
position of the fault below the conglomerate in DDH #11 and not far below the conglomerate at
the surface indicates that the fault dips nearly parallel to hanging-wall PLV strata. While at the
surface the fault juxtaposes PLV strata against JS strata in the footwall, at depth in DDH #11 the
fault’s hanging wall and footwall both have PLV strata, which is consistent with the thin veneer
of JS strata penetrated by DDH #17 and DDH #15 southeast of here.

Stop 1-2: Basalt quarry of the Keweenaw Research Center
Directions: Return to vehicles and drive north 0.15 mi (0.25 km) to KRC perimeter road. Turn right and
drive southeast for 0.75 mi (1.2 km) to a basalt quarry on the right. Pull off road into a gravel terrace on the
right and park. [Lat: 47° 9.144'N | Lon: 88° 29.023'W]
The KRC basalt quarry was opened in 2018-2019 to provide materials for expansion of their
vehicle testing facilities. The quarry lies between the fault segment just visited at Gooseneck
Creek and a parallel segment to be visited at the next stop (Fig. 4). The quarry exposes portions
of at least two basalt lava flows that dip shallowly southwest. The shallow dip is roughly
manifested by subhorizontal benches of the quarry and can be measured on the first dry bench
west of the quarry pond, where the upper surface of a lava flow has been exposed. Inspection of
the irregular subhorizontal surface reveals isolated patches of sediment whose stratification
yields an average strike of 125° and dip of 19° SW.
The shallow southwesterly dip of PLV strata is important to the understanding of structural
geometry. Early geologists noted that older PLV strata near the Keweenaw fault and its splays
commonly have anomalous orientations relative to younger PLV strata away from the fault zone,
which have a well-defined regional trend (Hubbard, 1898; Butler and Burbank, 1929). In most of
the PLV section, strata generally strike northeast to east and dip 35° – 55° northwest to north. At
this stop and for ~3 kilometers north and northeast, PLV strata dip less than 25° in various
directions, including counter-regional to the southeast. Such anomalies are clues to the structural
configuration of the area along the Keweenaw fault system.
Specific to this stop, the shallow southwesterly dip of PLV stratal is consistent with data from
DDHs #17 and #15, where a thin veneer of JS strata overlies PLV basaltic rocks. The nature of
the PLV-JS contact is not described in the core logs, but the normal stratigraphic sequence
indicates that it is an unconformity. The unconformity dips shallowly southwest to south based
on the two cited DDHs and DDH #20 located ~510 m southwest, which penetrates the
unconformity ~35 m lower relative to a common datum. Projecting the unconformity updip
brings it to the surface southwest of this stop. Therefore, we interpret that basalt at the quarry
roughly correlates with basalt below JS strata in the three DDHs by passing beneath an erosional
wedge of JS strata on a SW-dipping unconformity (Langfield, 2024). This new interpretation
differs from one involving a transverse fault shown on USGS bedrock geology maps for the
Hancock and Laurium quadrangles (Cornwall and Wright, 1956a, 1956b).

109

�Stop 1-3: East branch of Quincy Creek fault exposure
Directions: Return to vehicles and drive east on the perimeter road for 0.25 mi (0.4 km) to an
intersection with a gravel road on the left. Turn left and drive ~0.35 mi (~0.6 km) to a clearing
on the right. Turn into the clearing and park. [Lat: 47° 9.282'N | Lon: 88° 28.548'W]
The east and west branches of Quincy Creek cross a segment of the Keweenaw fault system that
is about 750 meters southeast of the fault segment at Gooseneck Creek and subparallel to it. Both
branches of Quincy Creek constrain the position of the fault to within 8-10 m by the proximity of
hanging-wall PLV outcrops to footwall JS outcrops, but the fault zone itself is not exposed.
Outcrops along the west branch of Quincy Creek are the most southwesterly constraint on the
position of this fault segment because of glacial deposits that cover bedrock southwest of here.
However, we interpret the fault to continue southwesterly to an acute intersection with the fault
segment seen on Gooseneck Creek at a point about halfway to Portage Lake (Fig. 4). Northeast
from this stop, the fault segment is easily traced by means of outcrops and water wells along an
azimuth of 42° for a distance of 3 km to the upper Hungarian Falls in Area 2. We will focus on
the east branch of Quincy Creek because it provides better exposures near the fault.
Again, Hubbard (1898) appears to have been the first geologist to describe outcrops at this site as
well as other outcrops in stream valleys to the northeast that cross the fault line. Although his
report puts the outcrop 150-175 meters north-northeast of its actual location, his geologic
description of part of the outcrop is very similar to what was observed and measured during the
2021-2022 EdMap project (Langfield, 2024).
“In Sec. 22 . . . occur outcrops of sandstone and of a conglomerate with a very sandy matrix. The
pebbles in the conglomerate are subangular and some of them are of quartz porphyry. The dip is
about 50°-54° N. W., strike about N. 45°-50° E.” (Hubbard, 1898)
The outcrop just described begins 60 meters downstream from the gravel access road and
extends another 30 m downstream. The sedimentary layers here are well indurated and well
stratified, having an average strike of 225° and dip of 35° NW. A reddish-brown sublithic
sandstone is the dominant rock type along the semi-continuously exposed section in the creek
bed, with subordinate conglomeratic sandstone and pebble-to-granule conglomerate that ranges
from matrix-supported to clast-supported. Clasts are mostly subrounded to subangular and have a
variety of compositions but are dominantly felsic. Whereas Hubbard (1898) thought that these
were JS strata, we interpret them as PLV strata because of their induration, lithic nature, and
attitude that are similar to other PLV sedimentary units in the area and differ from JS sandstone
strata to be seen downstream.
The south end of the 30-m extent of indurated sandstone and lesser conglomerate coincides with
a sharp deflection in the creek by ~20 meters east before the creek resumes its southerly course at
a sharp right bend. Downstream from this point for ~30 meters, intermittently exposed sandstone
and minor conglomerate differ in many aspects from the sedimentary strata upstream of the
creek’s deflection. The sandstone is lighter toned and locally streaked off-white to beige, is less

110

�indurated and commonly friable, and has a more quartzose composition. The pebble-to-granule
conglomerate layer in the first outcrop downstream from the creek’s deflection has a muddy to
silty matrix, is poorly indurated, and has subrounded to rounded clasts with a variety of
compositions. These characteristics of the sandstone and one conglomerate layer are typical of
Jacobsville strata observed elsewhere in fault juxtaposition with hanging-wall PLV strata.
The sharp deflection in the creek is interpreted, therefore, as marking a fault contact between
PLV sedimentary strata upstream and JS strata downstream. This interpretation is supported by
structural observations. Strata in the first outcrop south of the creek’s deflection strike 220° and
dip 65° NW (overturned), but become less steeply dipping over a short distance as the creek is
followed downstream to the south. These stratal attitudes and their significant change going
downstream from the creek’s deflection contrast with stratal orientation and its consistency over
a similar distance upstream of the deflection. About 15 meters south of the creek’s deflection, a
small fault striking 225° and dipping 80° N cuts thickly bedded JS strata in a larger outcrop
along the west bank of the creek. South of the fault, deformation bands in the sandstone are
expressed as quasi-linear to broadly sinuous ridges on the outcrop surface. Deformation bands
are cataclastic shear zones that develop during compression of partly indurated, porous, clastic
material (Fossen et al., 2007). They are generally more cemented than the host material,
accounting for their raised relief on erosional surfaces, and have not been observed in PLV
sedimentary strata. Farther downstream, JS strata are abundantly displayed for a distance of 1.4
km, nearly down to the derelict Quincy Mining Company stamp mill along state highway M-26.
Over that distance, JS strata generally dip less than 15° NW and display a few broad open folds
with NNE-trending axes.

Area 2: Hungarian Fault Block ‒ Northeast End
The first two stops in Area 2 are on the same fault segment seen at Quincy Creek (2-1) and on its
curved portion (2-2) that connects back to the main Keweenaw fault zone to the north (Fig. 6). A
PLV sedimentary layer, usually conglomerate but locally sandstone, is traceable in the hanging
wall from Quincy Creek through the east branch of Dover Creek near Hungarian Falls, where it
begins a smooth northward curve from 42° to 345° azimuth, a change of over 55°. From this
curved stratal geometry in map view, we infer a single smoothly curved fault along the southeast
and east edges of the Hungarian fault block. The long straight part of the fault is the block’s
southeast edge that parallels the overall KFS, whereas the short curved part is the block’s east edge
and connects the fault segment back to the main Keweenaw fault zone. This geometry and a
northwesterly decrease in stratal dip based on drill hole data define a single scoop-shaped fault
rather than an intersection of two distinct faults. Stop 2-2 illustrates a common dynamic of the KFS
– northeast and east edges of fault-bounded blocks were thrust eastward along west-dipping
reverse faults. The third stop in Area 2 is on the main Keweenaw fault zone (2-3), which aligns
with its counterpart in Area 1 (Fig. 3). The relationship between the main fault zone and the
connector fault may involve the connector fault terminating against a main fault zone that
continues to the southwest (Fig. 6 at “?”). Another option is that the hanging-wall sedimentary
layer is continuous from Stop 2-2 to Stop 2-3 and is draped over a lateral ramp in the KFS that
steps up in stratigraphy to the northeast. The stratigraphic relationships across the Hancock fault
are discussed in the Stop 2-3 description.

111

�Figure 6: Geologic map of Area 2 with the Keweenaw fault system (KFS) and field trip stops 2-1 to2-3.
Geologic unit codes: ps – St. Louis conglomerate, pcc – Copper City flow; pb – Bohemia
conglomerate, psc – Scales Creek flow, poc – Old Colony sandstone; pk – Kearsarge flow with
Wolverine sandstone at its base. Teeth along reverse faults are on upthrust sides. See Figures 4 or
13 for symbology.

112

�Stop 2-1: Dover Creek fault exposure at Upper Hungarian Falls
Directions: Return back to the KRC perimeter road, then turn right and follow it back to the KRC entrance on
Airpark Boulevard. Turn left and drive 0.5 mi (0.8 km) to US-41. Turn right and drive 1.6 mi (2.5 km) to Oneco
Road. Turn right onto Oneco and drive 3.1 mi (5.0 km) to Amygdaloid Street. Turn left and follow Amygdaloid
and Tamarack Hill Road for 0.3 mi (0.5 km) to M-26. Turn left and drive 0.35 mi (0.56 km) to 6th Street in
Hubbell. Turn left and then, after the second house on the left, veer left onto Golf Course Road going uphill.
Drive 0.5 mi (0.8 km) to a rutted gravel road on the left. Depending on conditions, we may turn left and take the
gravel road. Otherwise, park along Golf Course Road and walk to the stop at Upper Hungarian Falls. [Lat:
47° 10.440'N | Lon: 88° 27.086'W]
The fault segment crossed by Dover Creek is near the northeast end of the segment seen at Quincy
Creek, and is where the fault’s surface trace begins to curve northward (Fig. 6). Dover Creek has
three sets of falls that are worthwhile visiting. The two downstream falls have larger drops entirely
over Jacobsville Sandstone. We will visit the upper set of falls at the fault contact between PLV
strata upstream in the hanging wall and JS strata in the footwall. This site has been visited by
geologists since the mid-1800s and is considered a classic exposure of the Keweenaw fault
(original sense). The most insightful description by early geologists is in the work of Irving and
Chamberlin (1885), whose diligent field work, keen observations, and logical reasoning convinced
the geological community of the time that the contact between PLV strata and JS strata was a large
fault. Prior to their work, some geologists argued that JS strata lay stratigraphically below PLV
strata based in part on their similar dip here and at Houghton-Douglass Falls on Hammell Creek
(Stop 2-3). Of historical interest, Roland Duer Irving is this year’s nominee for recognition by the
ILSG as a Pioneer of Lake Superior Geology, and Thomas Chrowder Chamberlin is another wellknown geologist of his time, famous for his classic 1890 work “The method of multiple working
hypotheses” published in Science. Both were contemporaries of John Wesley Powell, a U.S. Army
officer during the American Civil War, famed explorer of the American west, and second director
of the U.S. Geological Survey from 1881–1894.
The faulted relationship between PLV and JS strata at this stop was revealed by excavations
made by a “force of miners” hired to trench across the PLV-JS contact at three locations on the
southwest valley wall (Fig. 7). The trenches exposed a fault zone dipping 30-35° NW along the
contact, which has the following internal zonation from hanging wall to footwall, as summarized
from Irving and Chamberlin (1885) and converted to true thickness.
1. Trap [basalt]: highly fractured but in place. (2.57 m)
2. Trap debris: disintegrated basaltic fragments in a lumpy crudely laminated clay, having a
transitional boundary with zone 1. (0.39 m)
3. Clay: red and “shaly” with light grayish-green spots, some sandy seams, and occasional
lumps of disintegrated trap. (0.13 m)
4. Trap debris: similar to zone 2 but with more clayey material, whose dark color contrasts with
adjacent red clay. (0.13 m)

113

�5. Trap debris mixed with red clay: trap debris is similar to zone 4 but red clay and minor sand
gives zone 5 a reddish tint. (0.17 m)
6. Sandstone: light reddish and quartzose. (0.51 m)
Footwall JS strata near the fault contact dip 10° or less, but at the fault contact they are bent
downward to be nearly parallel with the fault surface. The trench observations indicate that the
fault propagated upward across subhorizontal JS strata and the overriding PLV strata crushed
and abraded the truncated edges of JS strata.

Figure 7: Trenches at upper Hungarian Falls that exposed relationships across the fault, marked
by the red lines (Irving and Chamberlin, 1885).
Downstream from the trenches, JS strata generally dip 10-20° NW toward the fault but exhibit a
few broad open folds similar to what is observed downstream along Quincy Creek. Upstream
from the trenches, PLV strata in the hanging wall begin with a fractured basalt flow at the minor
falls below the main falls, and then progress stratigraphically upward to a felsic cobble-pebble
conglomerate at the main falls, followed by a series of basaltic flows intermittently exposed for
over two kilometers upstream. Stratal dip decreases upstream from 25-30° NW at the main falls
to flat-lying and then to 15° SE to define an open syncline, which is succeeded upstream by an
open anticline before reaching the Hancock fault (Fig. 8). A well-laminated, 1-m-thick sandstone
layer at the base of the 6-m-thick conglomerate layer provides a confident formation strike of
205° and dip of 30° NW, which is essentially parallel to the underlying fault surface. This
geometry indicates that the hanging-wall PLV section at this location became detached along

114

�layering somewhere downdip to the northwest and was thrust southeast and upward to its current
position along a ramp that cuts upward across younger layers.
The fault segment exposed at this stop is penetrated by the vertical Oneco #9 DDH located 1.7
km west-northwest, at a depth of 556 m, which gives an average fault dip over this distance of
19° NW after accounting for topography (Fig. 8; DeGraff and Carter, 2023). Because the fault
dips 30-35° NW at the surface, it must dip less than 19° NW over some portion of its trajectory
between here and the Oneco #9 DDH. That is, its dip must shallow going in a northwesterly
direction similar to the shallowing of PLV stratal dips observed upstream along Dover Creek,
which is characteristic of a detached style of faulting with layer-parallel slip.

Figure 8: Cross-section along Dover Creek based on outcrop and drill hole data (DeGraff and
Carter, 2023). Long bar inclination of L-shaped symbols at land surface shows apparent dip. Thin
black lines below topography are drill hole trajectories. Colors and letter codes of geologic units
are explained in Figure 2. KF‒Keweenaw fault; HF‒Hancock fault; B‒Bacon (1966) seismic
experiment.

Stop 2-2: Beaudoin Creek fault exposure
Directions: Return to Golf Course Road and turn left to go uphill. Drive 0.5 mi (0.8 km) on Golf Course Road
to Beaudoin Creek. We will park along the west shoulder of the road north of the creek culvert. This will require
turning vehicles around at the first driveway north of the creek. [Lat: 47° 10.806'N | Lon: 88° 27.049'W]
THIS STOP IS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY. PERMISSION IS REQUIRED TO OBTAIN ACCESS.

115

�The small creek crossed by Golf Course Road is unofficially called Beaudoin Creek after the
property owner, who also owns the Wood’n Spoon specialty food and gift shop in Mohawk, MI.
We will walk upstream to the west for 300 meters to outcrops first described by Hubbard (1898),
who traced the PLV-JS fault contact throughout this area and noted remarkable changes in its
strike. Between Quincy Creek and the west branch of Dover creek (not visited), the Hungarian
fault segment has an azimuth of 42°, but it begins to curve northward at the east branch of Dover
Creek, where it has an azimuth of 25° (Fig. 6). The gradual change in fault direction continues
from the last stop to this one such that here the fault trace and hanging-wall PLV strata have an
azimuth of 345°, which completes a total change in fault strike of 55-60° along a smooth arc. The
NNW-trending portion of the fault segment extends more than a kilometer north to a point along
another smooth curve of the fault toward the northeast, which re-aligns the fault with the trend of
the Portage fault segment. It is unlikely that the position of the second broad curve in the fault
north of here is a coincidence, and more likely that it manifests in some way a continuation of the
KFS-Portage segment seen at Stop 1-1.
Along Beaudoin creek east of the fault, JS strata are intermittently exposed over a distance of 170
meters and mostly consist of yellowish quartzose sandstone with occasional layers of reddish
siltstone and conglomerate. Over most of this distance, JS strata dip less than 15° W toward the
fault, but within 20 meters of the fault they dip more steeply at 70° E to vertical. The fault contact
between PLV basaltic rock to the west and JS sandstone to the east is located to within a meter by
the exposures, but the fault zone is not well exposed due to the degraded basaltic rock in the
hanging wall. PLV stratigraphy here is very similar to that observed at Hungarian Falls, beginning
with a basaltic lava flow of low relief that extends upstream to a small pond below a 6-m-tall
waterfall. The waterfall is over a NNW-trending ridge of felsic cobble-pebble conglomerate ~10 m
thick that has a meter-thick basal layer of siltstone to fine-grained sandstone, as seen at the
previous stop. West of the conglomerate ridge, a series of basaltic flows crops out along the creek
bed for another 200 meters. A reliable measurement of PLV strata orientation from the basal unit
of the conglomerate layer gives a strike of 170° and dip of 45° W, which probably is also the
attitude of the fault surface by analogy with Hungarian Falls and based on the interpretation of a
detached fault system.
The smooth curve of the fault segment and subparallel PLV strata that are traceable from
southwest of Stop 2-1 to north of Stop 2-2, combined with the decrease in dip of the fault and
PLV strata toward the Oneco #9 DDH, imply a curved fault surface in three dimensions. A
number of geometries involving smaller faults and folds are possible, but the overall geometry
implies a larger scoop-shaped fault surface that plunges between southwest and west. Further
work to integrate surface mapping with subsurface DDH data are needed to fully define the fault
and stratal geometries in this area. For now, we interpret the curved fault segment as part of the
Hungarian segment of the KFS, which defines the long southeast edge and shorter east edge of
the Hungarian fault block (Fig. 6) with relatively shallow dipping PLV strata.

116

�Stop 2-3: Hammell Creek fault exposure at Houghton-Douglass Falls
Directions: Drive southeast on Golf Course Road 1.0 mi (1.6 km) to M-26. Turn left and drive 2.6
mi (4.2 km) to 10th Street in Lake Linden, where M-26 makes a 90° left turn. Turn left and drive 2.0
mi (3.2 km) to a parking area on the right. Turn in and park. [Lat: 47° 12.413'N | Lon: 88°
25.611'W]
Houghton-Douglass Falls (a.k.a. Douglass Houghton Falls) was purchased by the State of
Michigan in 2018 and, as of this writing, is being converted into a day park with walking trails and
signage. The work is not yet complete and access is still somewhat limited but allowed. We will
view the site from overlooks at the top of the steep canyon walls and will not descend to the fault
contact near the base of the falls due to time constraints. The total vertical drop of 34 m (110 feet)
makes Houghton-Douglass Falls the tallest in Michigan.
This stop is another classic exposure of the Keweenaw fault (original sense) that has been
investigated by geologists since the mid-1800s. The trail to the overlook area crosses the Hancock
fault, not yet found in outcrop, and PLV strata in the Keweenaw fault’s hanging wall. The Hancock
fault has been traced 16 km on an azimuth of 55° by means of drill holes from the Hancock and
Quincy mines to an intersection with the Keweenaw fault one kilometer northeast of the falls (Fig.
3). The Hancock fault seems to have had an important role in the occurrence and distribution of
native copper at those two mines (Bornhorst et al., 1986; Field Trip 2 in this volume). Copper
mineralization at the base of Houghton-Douglass Falls next to the Keweenaw fault was
investigated in an adit opened by the Douglass Houghton Mining Company, organized in 1845
(Stephens, 1902), and recently observed in veins (Gamet, 2023).
The geometry of two PLV layers near the intersection of the Hancock and Keweenaw faults is
critical to understanding geologic relationships at Houghton-Douglass Falls (Fig. 6). The Laurium
bedrock geology map shows the St. Louis (#6) conglomerate and overlying Copper City flow in
the hanging walls of the Hancock and Keweenaw faults north and west of their intersection but not
to the southwest in the acute fault wedge containing Houghton-Douglass Falls (Cornwall and
Wright, 1956b). The two units are easily recognized and correlated in drill holes and outcrops from
many kilometers northeast of Calumet-Laurium in a southwesterly direction to the Hancock fault.
The St. Louis conglomerate is a felsic, pebble-cobble, clast-supported conglomerate with locally
significant lithic and conglomeratic sandstone that is associated with rhyolitic rocks along strike
(Hubbard, 1898; White et al., 1953; Nicholson, 1992; Gamet, 2023). The Copper City flow is
recognized for its anomalous thickness of 180 m at a point 7 kilometers to the northeast, coarse
grain size, and pegmatitic segregations that have been precisely dated (Fig. 2). Recent mapping
aided by drill hole data has allowed these two units to be correlated across the Hancock fault into
the acute fault wedge, where they are identified in outcrop at Houghton-Douglass Falls (Fig. 6).
The main drop at Houghton-Douglass Falls is over the Copper City flow, which extends from
upstream of the waterfall down to a ledge ~10 meters above its base. From the north side of the
gorge, a planar fabric with meter-scale spacing over much of the flow thickness dips gently

117

�upstream. Observations at the top of the waterfall suggest that this fabric results from amygdule
layers that dip 20-25° NW. Below the main waterfall on the ledge above the base, a 3-m-thick
sedimentary layer, first noted by Hubbard (1898), consists of a felsic pebble-granule conglomerate
and coarse lithic sandstone whose layering provides a reliable strike of 225° and dip of 20° NW,
i.e. parallel to amygdule layers at the top of the waterfall. This is interpreted to be the St. Louis
(#6) conglomerate below the anomalously thick Copper City flow. Both layers project northeast
along strike to intersect the Hancock fault at a point where their map offsets across the fault match
the offsets of PLV layers previously correlated across the fault (Fig. 6). Below the St. Louis
conglomerate is a basalt lava flow that becomes increasingly fractured at the foot of the falls, at
which point sheared basaltic rock is observed along the south face of the gorge.

Figure 9: Trenches below Houghton-Douglass Falls that exposed relationships across the fault,
marked by the bold red line (Irving and Chamberlin, 1885).
Irving and Chamberlin (1885) focused their investigation of Houghton-Douglass Falls along the
bottom and walls of the gorge below the falls, again combining careful field observations with
trenching across the fault surface. Two trenches running up and down the south valley wall and a
third trench along the fault surface (Fig. 9) revealed similar relationships to those observed in the
trenches at Hungarian Falls but with some important differences. Basaltic rock in the hanging wall
has a clay seam at the fault surface that transitions upward to a clayey breccia and then to fractured
but intact basalt as seen in the Hungarian trenches. However, footwall JS strata here are generally
poorly indurated, red, shaly conglomerate with subordinate whitish quartzose sandstone layers,
which is the opposite relationship of dominant to subordinate lithologies at Hungarian Falls. The
downward flexing of subhorizontal JS strata to dips of 20-30° close to the fault surface is again

118

�observed, but the flexing is spread over a larger horizontal distance than at Hungarian Falls. The
wider zone of flexure here may result from the poor induration and ductility of the red shaly
conglomerate here relative to the moderately indurated sandstone strata at Hungarian Falls.
Irving and Chamberlin (1885) estimated a fault dip of 25-30° NW based on their excavations,
which is similar to their estimate of PLV stratal dip of 25° NW in the hanging wall. Recent field
work yielded a fault dip of 20° NW based on a three-point method using surveyed points across the
gorge and by visually siting upward along the fault surface (Gamet, 2023). This result for fault dip
matches the PLV stratal dip measured on the St. Louis conglomerate and on amygdule layers in the
Copper City flow. While earlier and recent dip values are slightly different, both studies agree that
hanging-wall PLV strata are essentially parallel to the underlying fault surface, which is indicative
of a detached thrust system. A recent cross-section through Houghton-Douglass Falls uses
concepts related to detached thrusting, conservation of volume, and ductile portions of the JS
section to model fault geometry and deformation of strata in the hanging wall and footwall of the
fault system (Fig. 10).

Figure 10: Cross-section along Hammell Creek at Houghton-Douglass Falls based on outcrop
data and drill hole correlations (Gamet, 2023). Geologic unit codes: pcc – Copper City flow; psc –
Scales Creek flow, pk – Kearsarge flow; pg – Greenstone flow. KFS-M = Keweenaw fault system Mayflower segment; HF = Hancock fault.

Area 3: Snake Creek Fault Block – Keweenaw Fault Zone at Lake Gratiot
The three stops in Area 3 (Fig. 11) are on the east boundary fault of the Snake Creek block (3-1),
on the main Keweenaw fault zone north of Lake Gratiot (3-2), and at the intersection of these two
fault trends (3-3). The Keweenaw fault zone roughly parallels the north edge of Lake Gratiot and,
relative to Areas 1 and 2, it trends more easterly with an azimuth of 72° and dips more steeply
northwest. Other fault segments in Area 3 are similarly oriented clockwise relative to their
counterparts in Areas 1 and 2. South of the main Keweenaw fault zone, two fault-bounded blocks
have long dimensions oriented parallel to the KFS (Fig.3). West of Lake Gratiot, the Snake Creek
block is bounded on the southeast by a NE-trending connector fault, along which PLV layers are

119

�thrust southeast over JS strata (Fig. 11). Deformed hanging-wall PLV strata and footwall JS strata
have NE-trending fold axes parallel to their fault contact. Fold axes in the hanging wall plunge 23°
with an azimuth of 44° (Mueller, 2021). The southern boundary fault of the Snake Creek block is
an ESE-trending footwall splay of the main Keweenaw fault zone (Fig. 3) that juxtaposes PLV
strata on the north against JS strata to the south. Similar to the northeast end of the Hungarian
block (Fig. 6), this footwall fault splay appears to curve north and merge seamlessly into the
connector fault along the southeast edge of the Snake Creek block.

Figure 11: Geologic map of Area 3 with the Keweenaw fault system (KFS) and field trip stops 3-1 to 33. Geologic unit codes: pb – Bohemia conglomerate, pgf – Gratiot flow. Teeth along reverse faults
are on upthrust sides. See Figures 4 or 13 for symbology.
The main Keweenaw fault zone in this area is well exposed along several creeks that empty into
Lake Gratiot and, based on outcrop relationships and cross-section models, it consists of two
parallel branches (Fig. 11). The northern branch has a well-developed gouge and breccia zone that
is at least 20 m wide in places and perhaps as much as 45 m wide. This branch juxtaposes PLV
basaltic flows on the north against presumably younger basaltic flows on the south, whereas the
southern branch juxtaposes basaltic flows on its north against JS strata on the south. The double
fault zone north of Lake Gratiot continues in a west-southwest direction past the termination of the

120

�connector fault intersecting from the southwest and forms the northern boundary of the Snake
Creek block. This main fault zone trajectory differs from the 1950s USGS bedrock geology maps
and was first proposed by Cannon and Nicholson (2001) in their map compilation. We have
adjusted the position of their proposed fault based on a combination of outcrop relationships, drill
hole data, and topographic features, and we consider evidence for its existence to be compelling.

Stop 3-1: Unnamed creek fault exposure along Iron Gate Road
Directions: Continue driving north on M-26 for 2.0 mi (3.2 km) to Hecla Street. Turn right and drive
through historic downtown Laurium for four blocks (0.5 mi, 0.8 km) to 1st Street, a.k.a. School Street. Turn
left and drive 0.35 mi (0.56 km) to US-41. Turn right and drive 17.6 mi (28.3 km) past the road to Eagle
Harbor to historic Central Location. Turn right onto Gratiot Lake Road and drive ~4.8 mi (~7.7 km) to
unpaved Iron Gate Road on the right. Turn right and drive 0.5 mi (0.8 km) to an unimproved dirt road on the
right. Turn into the side road and park. [Lat: 47° 21.222'N | Lon: 88° 9.340'W]
This stop will be a quick show-and-tell to explain fault and stratal geometries at the east edge of
the Snake Creek fault block that extends 5 kilometers to the west (Fig. 11). A short walk
northwest along the two-track road leads to a 3-m-tall outcrop of JS in the creek northeast of the
road. This outcrop is much larger than other JS outcrops sometimes exposed for 35 meters
upstream in the creek bed, depending on spring run-off. About 80 meters upstream is the first
PLV basalt outcrop where the creek emerges from the upland to the northwest. The boundary
between the upland with PLV bedrock and the lower flatter area to the southeast with JS bedrock
has a trend of 42° and it extends ~3 kilometers from the southeastern rounded corner of the
Snake Creek fault block to the main Keweenaw fault zone at Nine Thirty Two Creek (Stop 3-3).
Several small creeks flowing southeast from the upland toward Lake Gratiot cross this boundary
and expose bedrock, constraining the position of the geologic contact but not exposing it.
The sandstone strata here strike 36° and dip 63° SE in the inferred direction of stratigraphic up,
indicating that they have been rotated down to the southeast (Lizzadro-McPherson, 2023).
Similar orientations of JS strata are noted at the mouths of other creek valleys where they emerge
from the upland. Scattered JS outcrops to the southeast have nearly flat-lying strata, indicating
that tilting of JS strata is negligible beyond 100 to 150 meters from the PLV-JS contact. In the
upland northwest of the contact, fractured PLV strata with veins of secondary minerals generally
do not present good opportunities to determine strike and dip. Where possible to measure,
consistent northeasterly strikes with dips both to the northwest and southeast define an anticlinesyncline pair with NE-trending fold axes that parallel the PLV-JS contact.
The relationships along the east edge of the Snake Creek block are evidence of a NE-trending
fault along which PLV strata to the northwest were thrust over JS strata to the southeast. Similar
to the curved fault at the northeast end of the Hungarian block, the fault at the east end of the
Snake Creek block also has a curved geometry where it wraps around the block’s southeast
corner and gradually changes direction by 55° to a west-northwesterly trend. Along the fault’s

121

�NE-trending section, its position and nature in the latest map (Fig. 11) do not differ much from
what is shown on the Bruneau Creek bedrock geology map (Wright and Cornwall, 1954).
However, the earlier map labels this fault the “Keweenaw fault,” whereas we interpret it to be
part of a curved splay in the footwall of the main Keweenaw fault that lies to the north, which we
will visit at the next stop.

Stop 3-2: Main Keweenaw fault zone at Eister Creek and Falls
Directions: Return 0.5 mi (0.8 km) on Iron Gate Road back to Gratiot Lake Road. Turn left and
drive 0.2 mi (0.3 km) to East Gratiot Lake Road. Turn right and drive 1.0 mi (1.6 km) to a parking
area along the road. [Lat: 47° 21.975'N | Lon: 88° 7.967'W]
Eister Creek near the falls provides excellent exposures across the northern branch of the main
Keweenaw fault zone where PLV strata in the hanging wall are juxtaposed against presumably
younger PLV strata in the footwall (Figs. 11 and 12). Jacobsville strata that commonly occur in
the footwall of the main fault zone are not present here, though they may constitute bedrock
south of the southern branch of the main fault zone. Elsewhere nearby in the footwall, the JS unit
has thicknesses ranging up to 130 m confirmed in outcrop and greater than 135 m in a water well
northwest of Lake Gratiot. In general, the thickness of the JS unit in this area appears to be much
less than to the southwest near Houghton, where the unit is known to be at least 785 m thick at
the fault system and at least 1,100 m thick away from it to the southeast, but could be 2,000 to
3,000 m thick based on geophysical data.

Figure 12: Cross-section along Fault Creek east of Eister Creek (Lizzadro-McPherson, 2023).
Geologic unit codes: pb – Bohemia conglomerate; pgf – Gratiot flow; psc – Scales Creek flow.
KFS = Keweenaw fault system.
Walking north up Eister Creek from the parking area, scattered outcrops of PLV basaltic lava are
first encountered at the mouth of the incised creek valley. About 80 meters into the narrow gorge

122

�where it becomes deeper, the basaltic rocks become more fractured and are locally sheared,
brecciated, and gougy. Over the next 40-50 m upstream to the base of Eister Falls, fracture
intensity increases and cataclastic shearing becomes more prominent until the rock is essentially
a breccia cut through by shear zones. The area around the base of the falls is at the core of the
main Keweenaw fault zone that is up to 45 meters wide along the creek, depending on how its
northern and southern edges are defined. A rock wall perhaps 4 meters wide that projects from
the eastern wall of the gorge consists of fault breccia and gouge that is better indurated that the
surrounding material, which is also brecciated and gougy. This ridge is inclined steeply
upstream, and is taken to define the orientation of the fault zone as striking 255° and dipping 76°
N. Upstream from the projecting wall of breccia, the long gradual rise of Eister Falls exposes
highly fractured basaltic rocks with some shear zones, but the rock mass is mostly intact and
unlike the completely brecciated fault core. The fault-core relationships seen at Eister Creek are
even better displayed along another creek located ~800 m east-northeast of here at a locality
informally named “Fault creek” (Fig. 12).

Stop 3-3: Nine Thirty Two Creek
Directions: Return 1.0 mi (1.6 km) on East Gratiot Lake Road to Gratiot Lake Road. Turn right and drive 0.4
mi (0.6 km) to a narrow driveway on the right. Either turn into the driveway and park where possible or park
along the right shoulder of the paved road. [Lat: 47° 21.711'N | Lon: 88° 8.730'W]
THIS STOP IS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY. PERMISSION IS REQUIRED TO OBTAIN ACCESS.

A walk of about 300 meters down the overgrown old road to Lake Gratiot leads to a hairpin turn
in Nine Thirty Two Creek that marks the intersection of two fault trends (Fig. 11). The south
branch of the main Keweenaw fault zone generally follows the creek valley upstream from the
hairpin turn toward the west and, in the opposite direction, it follows an ENE-trending path to the
north shore of Lake Gratiot. The thrust that defines the eastern edge of the Snake Creek block
follows the western side of the creek downstream from the hairpin turn and terminates northward
against the main Keweenaw fault zone.
The Keweenaw fault zone upstream of the hairpin turn is manifested by basaltic rocks that are
fractured, brecciated, and altered for a few hundred meters to the west. Its east-northeast path is
marked by a linear depression that connects to the neighboring creek valley where altered basalt
occurs in a cutbank. PLV strata north of the Keweenaw fault zone generally strike east-west and
dip moderately north based on two nearby creek traverses. These hanging-wall strata are
juxtaposed against presumably younger footwall PLV strata west of the creek’s hairpin turn and
against footwall JS strata east of it (Fig. 11). This change in juxtaposition of geologic units along
the Keweenaw fault zone occurs because the thrust fault intersecting it on the footwall side raises
PLV strata on the west over JS strata to the east.
South of the creek’s hairpin turn, JS strata crop out for 235 meters along the creek bed and valley
walls and consist of yellowish to reddish, medium-grained, quartzose sandstone that is poorly

123

�laminated along with subordinate reddish, muddy-to-silty, clast-supported conglomerate that is
poorly indurated. The exposed JS strata are generally subhorizontal but their dip increases to 69°
SE with a strike of 58° within 30 meters of the hairpin turn. The rotation of JS strata downward
to the southeast is consistent with components of reverse slip on the intersecting faults that
contain the sandstone within their obtuse angle (Fig. 11). Above the sandstone outcrops to the
west, the upland caprock is a layer of trachyandesite overlying a basaltic layer, whose contact
dips about 10° NE. This stratal orientation may represent a plunging fold axis that is parallel to
fold axes near the southeast corner of the Snake Creek block.
Some important questions arise from the geometric relationships observed at the intersection of
the two faults. For example, what happens to the main Keweenaw fault zone west and south of
this fault intersection? Wright and Cornwall (1954) show the Keweenaw fault coming from
Eister Creek as bending southwest to follow the PLV-JS fault contact discussed at Stop 3-1.
They also show a splay of the Keweenaw fault continuing along Nine Thirty Two Creek as far as
Gratiot Lake Road. Cannon and Nicholson (2001) continued this splay fault in a broad arc
parallel to regional strike to a reconnection with the Keweenaw fault of Wright and Cornwall
(1954) about 6 kilometers east of Mohawk. Based on new mapping and integration of DDH data,
we have modified the trajectory of the fault extension proposed by Cannon and Nicholson (2001)
and we propose that this is actually the main Keweenaw fault zone. The corollary to this
interpretation is that the thrust fault along the east edge of the Snake Creek block is a footwall
splay of the main fault zone. In other words, we think that the main Keweenaw fault zone is not
always the one that juxtaposes PLV strata in the hanging wall against JS strata in the footwall.

Area 4: Keweenaw Fault Zone with Footwall Splays, Lac La Belle to Bête Grise
The three stops in Area 4 are along part of the KFS that changes direction from a 72° azimuth to
nearly east-west (Fig. 3). The first stop is in the deformed hanging wall of the main Keweenaw
fault zone (4-1) that runs along the northwest edge of Lac La Belle, past the southern base of Mt.
Bohemia, and along most of the paved road to Bête Grise Bay east of here (Fig. 13). In a westerly
direction, the main fault zone forms the northern boundary of the Deer Lake block, whose long
dimension is again parallel to the KFS. The Deer Lake block is limited on the south by a footwall
splay that diverges from the main fault zone north of Lake Gratiot and juxtaposes PLV basaltic
flows on the north against nearly vertical JS strata at the Little Gratiot River (Lizzadro-McPherson,
2023; DeGraff, 1976). Based on diamond drill hole data, the eastern edge of this fault-bounded
block is a connector fault where PLV strata are thrust eastward over JS strata, whereas the block’s
western edge has a thin cover of Jacobsville Sandstone unconformably overlying weathered
basaltic rock. Field relationships and magnetic data suggest that the footwall fault splay curves
north and merges into the connector fault along the east edge of the Deer Lake block.
The other two stops in Area 4 are at historic localities on the shore of Bête Grise Bay that Irving
and Chamberlin (1885) investigated as part of their USGS Bulletin 23 titled “Observations on the
junction between the eastern sandstone and the Keweenaw series on Keweenaw Point, Lake
Superior”. The Bête Grise block is defined by the main Keweenaw fault zone on the north, by a
footwall splay that diverges from it onshore and passes offshore while remaining visible in shallow

124

�Figure 13: Geologic map of Area 4 with the Keweenaw fault system and field trip stops 4-1 to 4-3.
Teeth along reverse faults are on upthrust sides.

125

�water (4-2), and by an inferred thrust along the east edge of the block (4-3). The thrust is inferred
from a NE-trending belt of intense fracturing and veining in altered basaltic rock that follows the
shoreline parallel to the strike of the PLV-JS unconformity exposed to the east along the shore.
Thrusting of hanging-wall PLV strata toward the southeast has tilted footwall PLV strata and JS
strata above the unconformity 50° SE.

Stop 4-1: Haven Falls
Directions: Get back onto Gratiot Lake Road and drive 4.3 mi (6.9 km) back to US-41. Turn right
and drive 5.7 mi (9.2 km) to Lac La Belle Road. Turn right and drive 4.2 mi (6.8 km) to a Yintersection. Veer right and then through the sharp right curve for 0.5 mi (0.8 km) to Haven
Falls Park on the right. Enter the park and park. [Lat: 47° 22.913'N | 88° 1.716'W]
The small but beautiful park at Haven Falls spans a terrace formed by a previous higher stand of
Lake Superior that was about 10 meters above the current lake level. The cliff of felsic
conglomerate over which Haven Creek flows was probably a shoreline cliff at the time of that
higher lake level. This stop is in the proximal hanging wall of the main Keweenaw fault zone (Fig.
13) and its stratigraphy is exposed almost continuously from south of Lac La Belle Road, which is
privately owned, to well upstream of the falls. About 650 meters east of here and south of the main
fault zone, an east-directed thrust fault, cored by the Deer Lake #2 DDH, defines the east edge of
the Deer Lake block (Fig. 13A). Slip on this thrust fault has pushed PLV basaltic lavas on the west
up and over JS strata to the east (Lizzadro-McPherson, 2023) in a manner similar to what occurs at
the east edge of the Snake Creek block. The Haven Falls stop is, therefore, analogous to the Eister
Creek stop except that the fault core here is not as well exposed south of the paved road (cf. Figs.
12 and 14).
The stratigraphic sequence in the hanging wall begins with a highly fractured, veined, and locally
brecciated and sheared lava flow that crops out on both sides of the paved road, but please stay
on the north side to respect the private property on the south side. This strongly deformed lava
flow lies along a topographic step up from the lowland at the lakeshore to the old lake terrace,
and it probably marks the northern edge of the core of the fault zone. Upstream from this first
lava flow, a 12-m-wide belt of conglomerate is followed by a 30-m-wide belt of ophitic basalt
that locally is highly fractured, veined, and sheared. The felsic cobble-pebble conglomerate at the
main falls is largely clast-supported and has a massive appearance. It extends for a horizontal
distance of 16 meters along the creek to well above the top of the falls, where it is brecciated
along a fault zone that cuts slightly up section toward the east. A reliable formation strike of
245° and dip of 65° NW comes from a sandstone layer above the falls near the northern edge of
the second conglomerate layer. The two conglomerate layers here are collectively known as the
Lac La Belle conglomerate (Cornwall, 1954a) and have been tentatively correlated with the
Baltic (#3) conglomerate near Houghton. Although there is considerable uncertainty about this
correlation due to the distance involved, the Lac La Belle conglomerate lies well below the St.
Louis (#6) conglomerate seen at many of the earlier stops of this field trip. This means that the
Keweenaw fault system here cuts the PLV section at a significantly deeper level than near
Calumet, Laurium, and Lake Linden.

126

�The stratigraphic units at the falls have been traced by detailed mapping along strike in both
directions. About 350 meters east-northeast, the two conglomerate layers merge into one layer
where the intervening basalt flow pinches out, but otherwise the layers can be traced
continuously along strike. The only structural complications observed along strike are a few
faults that cut at acute angles upward across layers toward the east and have small reverse
offsets, similar to the fault at the top of Haven Falls. Detailed mapping in 2019-2020 did not find
evidence of four transverse faults shown on the Delaware bedrock geology map as offsetting the
Lac La Belle conglomerate, neither in terms of offsets nor enhanced fracturing (LizzadroMcPherson, 2023). In fact, the kinematics of slip along the main Keweenaw fault zone would
argue for a system of smaller subparallel faults rather than a series of faults normal to the main
fault zone.

Figure 14: Cross-section along Haven Creek at the falls (Lizzadro-McPherson, 2023). Geologic
unit codes: pb – Bohemia conglomerate; psc – Scales Creek flow. KFS = Keweenaw fault
system.
THE NEXT TWO STOPS ARE ALONG APACHE LANE, WHICH IS PRIVATELY OWNED AS ARE ALL
PROPERTIES ALONG IT. PERMISSION IS REQUIRED TO OBTAIN ACCESS.

Stop 4-2: Bête Grise Shoreline, Irving &amp; Chamberlin Historic Site
Directions: Exit Haven Falls Park and drive east back to the stop sign at the Y-intersection. Turn
sharply right onto Bête Grise Road and drive 3.2 mi (5.2 km) to Apache Lane on the left.
[Geology Note: at 1.9 mi / 3.1 km along BG Road, an outcrop to the north is the location of the
dated calcite vein in the fault zone.] Turn left, drive 0.5 mi (0.8 km), and then park along the right
side of the road. [Lat: 47° 23.345'N | Lon: 87° 56.905'W]
We will walk down a moderately steep slope to the shore, where Irving and Chamberlin (1885)
used a “force of miners” to strip the shoreline bare in order to better expose the contact between
PLV layers on the north and JS strata to the south (Figs. 13B and 15). This is probably not a field

127

�practice we could get away with today even if the site was not privately owned. Depending on
the lake level, we may be able to see the contact between highly fractured, veined, and partly
altered basaltic rock at the base of the shoreline scarp and JS strata that strike 105° and dip 55° S.
An aerial image of the shoreline at this stop shows a sharply defined line with an azimuth of
105° that separates uniformly dark-toned PLV basaltic rocks on the lake bottom and along the
shore to the east from variably lighter-toned layers of JS strata to the south and west (Fig. 16).
This is the fault line that may be observed onshore or can be closely constrained by nearby
outcrops. The aerial image shows many small faults as darker lines and narrow zones that cut JS
strata at angles approaching 90° and offset strata by less than a meter or two. Near the fault line,
splay faults break the JS unit into blocks up to 30 meters long parallel to the fault line and 4
meters wide.

Figure 15: Cross-sectional view of a segment of the KFS exposed by excavation along the Bête
Grise Bay shoreline. Fault strike = 100°, dip = 55° S (Irving and Chamberlin, 1885). Circle with
black dot indicates movement toward viewer; circle with cross indicates movement away.
Onshore north of the fault line, PLV strata are highly fractured, veined, and sheared for at least
55 meters along the shoreline to the east, which is about 25 meters perpendicular to the fault.
Basaltic outcrops along Apache Lane and to the north do not exhibit such deformation.
Following the shore to the west and south, JS strata change in terms of both facies and structural
orientation. The basal part of the section consists of reddish, thin-bedded, siltstone and mudstone
with minor fine-grained sandstone (6-7 m true thickness), followed upward by a lighter-toned
package of silty to fine-grained sandstone with minor silty pebble conglomerate that forms a
resistant ridge (~2 m), and then an interval of reddish siltstone and muddy conglomerate (~4 m).

128

�From this point southward and up section, JS strata tend to be sand-prone but alternate between:
(1) pinkish to orange, fine to medium grained, quartzose sandstone; (2) red, thinly bedded,
siltstone to mudstone; and (3) muddy to silty, poorly indurated, conglomerate layers. In
summary, the JS unit tends to clean upward from a silt- and mud-dominated basal section with
conglomeratic units near the fault to a quartzose sand-prone section away from the fault. Along
with these stratigraphic changes, the dip of JS strata decrease from 55° S near the fault to about
20° S at a perpendicular distance of 60 meters from the fault, and presumably becomes
subhorizontal not much further to the south.

Figure 16: Aerial image of Stop 4-2 showing the south boundary fault of the Bête Grise block. The
fault is interpreted to have dominant strike slip. Stratigraphic up in the JS is to the south.
It is clear that movement along the fault has juxtaposed older PLV strata to the north against
younger JS strata to the south and that the north side has a component of upward movement, as
noted elsewhere. However, what is the nature of this fault? The work by Irving and Chamberlin
(1885) and their team exposed a fault surface that dips about 55° S, essentially parallel to
adjacent JS strata (Fig. 15). Based on textbook definitions, this would be a normal fault with
younger JS strata in the hanging wall to the south above older PLV strata in the footwall to the
north. Something about this interpretation seems paradoxical, however, because at previous stops

129

�the main fault zone dipped north or northwest and also because the tectonic setting of the
Keweenaw fault system was compressional.
Part of the paradox results from textbook definitions of reverse and normal faults that are based
on idealized planar fault surfaces that have mostly dip slip. In the case of curved or corrugated
fault surfaces with mostly strike slip, the textbook nomenclature for dip-slip faults may lead to
confusion. Depending on the portion of a corrugated fault surface that is exposed, a mostly
strike-slip fault with a smaller dip-slip component may exhibit an apparent normal or reverse
component of dip-slip even though the actual dip-slip component is the same everywhere along
the fault. The Keweenaw fault system in this area trends nearly east-west and is dominated by
right-lateral strike slip with lesser north-side-up dip slip (2:1 ratio of strike-to-dip slip), and we
infer that motion on this fault is dominantly right-lateral strike slip. The fault forms the southern
edge of a fault-bounded block (Fig. 13B) whose east side will be visited next.

Stop 4-3: Bête Grise Shore, PLV-JS Unconformity and Fault
Directions: Continue driving east on Apache Lane for 0.4 mi (0.6 km) to the end of the road. Park
where space allows. [Lat: 47° 23.437'N | Lon: 87° 56.350'W]
We will walk 100 meters east and 50 meters south to access the shoreline, where geologists
traveling along the coast by boat in the mid-1800s described impressive layers of sandstone on
the rocky bottom of Lake Superior (Figs. 13B and 17). This area was examined later by none
other than Irving and Chamberlin (1885) and then by Cornwall (1954b). The aerial image of the
shoreline and offshore region reveals what the early explorers reported, a set of well-defined
parallel layers that curve sharply from NE-trending layers on the western side to EW-trending
layers along the shore to the east. The shoreline stop is at the western edge of the JS strata where
an unconformity between PLV and JS strata is tilted about 50° SE.
Depending on water level and shoreline erosion, we may be able to see the unconformity
between saprolitized PLV basaltic lava to the northwest and JS strata to the southeast. If the
saprolite is exposed, please do not disturb it by digging, picking at it, or walking on it. The
basaltic protolith has been completely converted to clay minerals and still retains its original
textures, including whitish veins that are approximately normal to the tilted unconformity.
Northwest of the unconformity, i.e. deeper below the paleosurface, PLV basaltic rocks do not
exhibit such alteration. Saprolitic basaltic rock that retains original textures, such as ophitic
texture, has been observed elsewhere in the area where the PLV-JS unconformity is inferred,
such as the east end of the Deer Lake block (Lizzadro-McPherson, 2023; DeGraff, 1976).
East of the unconformity along the shore, a recessive basal part of the JS section consists of
thinly bedded, reddish siltstone and mudstone with minor interbedded fine-grained sandstone.
The recessive strata here strike northeast and dip moderately southeast over a distance of 25
meters to the first small resistant sandstone layer (1-2 m thick). Next in the section is another
recessive interval (6-7 m wide) of reddish siltstone with interbeds of poorly indurated muddy
conglomerate, followed by a larger ridge of resistant sandstone that begins a sequence of

130

�alternating resistant sandstone beds, recessive reddish siltstone, and reddish poorly indurated
conglomerate. Thus, the basal JS section here is very similar to the section at Stop 4-2. The main
difference is in their structural attitude, which differs in strike by 55-60°. At Stop 4-2, the dip
direction of JS strata is 195° and away from the inferred strike-slip fault on the south side of the
Bête Grise block, whereas the dip azimuth of JS strata on the east side of the fault block is 138°
and away from the tilted PLV-JS unconformity (Fig. 13B). We infer that southeast tilting of the
PLV-JS unconformity resulted from southeast thrusting along the east edge of the Bête Grise
fault block, based in part on intense fracturing observed along the shoreline northwest of the
unconformity at stop 4-3.

Figure 17: Aerial image of Stop 4-3 showing the north and east boundary faults of the Bête Grise
block. The east boundary fault is interpreted to have dominant dip slip with west side thrust
eastward, whereas the north boundary fault is interpreted to have dominant strike slip.
Stratigraphic up in the JS is to the southeast and south.
If time permits, we will ascend the shoreline scarp to the flat bench above and walk another 100
meters to reach the eastern edge of JS outcrop along the shore. Here, JS strata strike nearly eastwest and are vertical to slightly overturned to the south, forming narrow ridges and eroded
furrows and clefts due to differential erosion of the resistant and recessive layers (Fig. 17). Near
the eastern edge of JS outcrop, vertical JS strata are flanked on the north by PLV strata that begin

131

�with a felsic conglomerate and continue upslope with PLV basaltic lavas. The contact between
PLV strata on the north and vertical JS strata to the south is a major fault that intersects the
shoreline, where a fault breccia is exposed several meters east of the last onshore JS outcrop.
From this point, the fault turns eastward and runs along the shoreline for 200 meters before
continuing offshore and splitting into two branches.
This is the last stop and we hope that you had a good experience that will help you to
understand other fault systems. Thank you for your participation!
Acknowledgements
We thank the following M.S. graduates and their assistants, whose field mapping was funded by
U.S. Geological Survey EDMAP projects G17AC00115, G19AC00140, and G21AC10681:
Colin Tyrrell (M.S.), Sophie Mueller (M.S.), Nolan Gamet (M.S.), Graham Hubbard, Ian
Gannon, Ginny Hemmila, Gabe Ahrendt, Jack Hawes, Braxton Murphy, Breeanne Heusdens,
and Dillon Breen. We also thank many who have expressed interest in this work and have
provided helpful comments.
References Cited
Aho, G.D., 1969, A Reflection Seismic Investigation of Thickness and Structure of the Jacobsville
Sandstone, Keweenaw Peninsula, Michigan: Michigan Technological University, MS thesis, 104 p.
Bacon, L.O., 1966, Geological structure east and south of the Keweenaw fault on the basis of
geophysical evidence: in Steinhart, J.S. and Smith, T.J. (eds), The Earth Beneath the Continents:
Am. Geophys. Union, Geophysical Monograph 10, p. 42-55.
Bornhorst, T.J., 1997, Tectonic context of native copper deposits of the North American
Midcontinent Rift System: in Ojakangas, R.W., Dickas, A.B., and Green, J.C. (eds.), Middle
Proterozoic to Cambrian Rifting, Central North America: Boulder, CO, GSA Special Paper 312, p.
127-136.
Bornhorst, T.J., and Barron, R.J., 2011, Copper deposits of the western Upper Peninsula of Michigan:
Geological Society of America Field Guide, v. 24, p. 83-99.
Bornhorst, T.J., Paces, J.B., Grant, N.K., Obradovich, J.D., and Huber, N.K., 1988, Age of native
copper mineralization, Keweenaw Peninsula, Michigan: Economic Geology, v. 83, p. 619-625.
Broderick, T.M., 1931, Fissure vein and lode relations in Michigan copper deposits: Econ. Geol., v.
26, p. 840-856. doi:10.2113/gsecongeo.26.8.840
Brojanigo, A., 1984, Keweenaw Fault; Structures and Sedimentology: Houghton, Mich., Michigan
Technological University, unpublished M.S. thesis, 124 p.
Butler, B.S., and Burbank, W.S., 1929, The copper deposits of Michigan: U.S. Geological Survey
Professional Paper 144, 238 p.

132

�Cannon, W.F., 1992, The Midcontinent Rift in the Lake Superior region with emphasis on its
geodynamic evolution: Tectonophysics, v. 213. p. 41-48.
Cannon, W.F., Green, A.G., Hutchinson, D.R., Lee, M., Milkereit, B., Behrendt, J.C., Halls, H.C.,
Green, J.C., Dickas, A.B., Morey, G.B., Sutcliffe, R., and Spencer, C., 1989, The North American
Midcontinent Rift beneath Lake Superior from GLIMPCE seismic reflection profiling: Tectonics,
v. 8, p. 305-332.
Cannon, W.F., Peterman, Z.E., and Sims, P.K. 1993, Crustal scale thrusting and origin of the
Montreal River monocline – a 35-km-thick cross section of the Midcontinent rift in northern
Michigan and Wisconsin: Tectonics, v. 12, p. 728 - 744.
Cannon, W. F., 1994, Closing of the Midcontinent Rift - A far field effect of Grenvillian contraction:
Geology, v. 22, p. 155-158.
Cannon, W.F. and Nicholson, S.W., 2000, Geologic Map of the Keweenaw Peninsula and Adjacent
Area, Michigan to accompany Map I-2696: U.S.G.S Pamphlet, 7 p.
Cannon, W.F. and Nicholson, S.W., 2001, Geologic Map of the Keweenaw Peninsula and Adjacent
Area, Michigan: United States Geological Survey, Map I-2696, Scale = 1:100,000.
Cornwall, H.R., 1954a, Bedrock Geology of the Delaware Quadrangle, Michigan: U.S. Geological
Survey, Washington, D.C., Geologic Quadrangle Map GQ-51, scale 1:24,000.
Cornwall, H.R. and Wright, J.C., 1956a, Geologic Map of the Hancock Quadrangle, Michigan: U.S.
Geological Survey, Washington, D.C., Mineral Investigations Field Studies Map MF-46, scale
1:24,000.
Cornwall, H.R. and Wright, J.C., 1956b, Geologic Map of the Laurium Quadrangle, Michigan: U.S.
Geological Survey, Washington, D.C., Mineral Investigations Field Studies Map MF-47, scale
1:24,000.
Craddock, J.P., Pearson, A., McGovern, M., Kropf, E., Moshoian, A., and Donnelly, K., 1997, Postextension shortening strains preserved in calcites of the Midcontinent Rift: Geological Society of
America, Special Paper 312, p. 115-126. https://doi.org/10.1130/0-8137-2312-4.115
Craddock, J.P., Konstantinou, A., Vervoort, J.D., Wirth, K.R., Davidson, C., Finley-Blasi, L., Juda,
N.A., and Walker, E., 2013, Detrital zircon provenance of the Mesoproterozoic Midcontinent Rift,
Lake Superior region, USA: Journal of Geology, v. 121, no. 1, p. 57-73.
Davis, D.W., and Paces, J.B., 1990, Time resolution of geologic events on the Keweenaw Peninsula
and implications for development of the Midcontinent Rift system: Earth and Planetary Science
Letters, v. 97, p. 54-64.
DeGraff, J.M., 1976, Structural and Age Relationships of Rocks Associated with the Lac La Belle
Magnetic Anomaly, Keweenaw County, Michigan: Michigan Technological University, M.S.
thesis, 130 p.

133

�DeGraff, J.M. and Carter, B.T., 2023, Detached structural model of the Keweenaw fault system,
Lake Superior region, North America: Implications for its origin and relationship to the
Midcontinent Rift System: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 51, no. 1, p. 449–466.
https://doi.org/10.1130/B36186.1
Fossen, H., Schultz, R.A., Shipton, Z.K., and Mair, K., 2007, Deformation bands in sandstone: a
review: Journal of the Geological Society, v. 164, p. 755-769.
Gamet, N.G., 2023, Structural Analysis and Interpretation of Deformation along the Keweenaw Fault
System from Lake Linden to Mohawk, Michigan: Michigan Technological University, M.S. thesis,
122 p.
Hamblin, W.K., 1958, The Cambrian Sandstones of Northern Michigan: Michigan Department of
Conservation, Geological Survey Division, Lansing, MI, Publication 51, 55 p.
Hinze, W.J., Braile, L.W., and Chandler, V.W., 1990, A geophysical profile of the southern margin
of the Midcontinent Rift System in western Lake Superior: Tectonics, v. 9, no. 2, p. 303-310.
Hodgin, E.B., Swanson-Hysell, N.L., DeGraff, J.M., Kylander-Clark, A.R.C., Schmitz, M.D.,
Turner, A.C., Zhang, Y., and Stolper, D.A., 2022, Final inversion of the Midcontinent Rift during
the Rigolet Phase of the Grenvillian orogeny: Geology, v. 50, no. 5, p. 547-551.
Hubbard, L.L., 1898, Keweenaw Point with particular reference to the felsites and their associated
rocks: Geological Survey of Michigan, v. 6, part 2, 155 p.
Irving, R.D. and Chamberlin, T.C., 1885, Observations on the junction between the eastern sandstone
and the Keweenaw series on Keweenaw Point, Lake Superior: U.S. Government Printing Office,
Washington, D.C., U.S. Geological Survey, Bulletin No. 23, 58 p.
Kalliokoski, J., 1982, Jacobsville Sandstone: in Wold, R.J. and Hinze, W.J. (eds.), The Geology and
Tectonics of the Lake Superior Basin, Geological Society of America Memoir, No. 156, p. 147-155.
Keweenaw National Historical Park, 2016, Calumet &amp; Hecla Records – 00019/004.02.01.03-007
Microfiche Drill Core Log Library: Calumet, Michigan, National Park Service, U.S. Department of the
Interior, on microfiche.
Langfield, K.M., 2024, Slip Kinematics and Structural Analysis of the Keweenaw Fault System from Lake
Linden to Hancock, Michigan: Michigan Technological University, M.S. thesis, in preparation.
Lizzadro-McPherson, D.J., 2023, Structural Analysis and Slip Kinematics of the Keweenaw Fault System
between Bête Grise Bay and Gratiot Lake, Keweenaw County, Michigan: Michigan Technological
University, M.S. thesis, 140 p.
Malone, D.H., Stein, C.A., Craddock, J.P., Kley, J., Stein, S., and Malone, J.E., 2016, Maximum
depositional age of the Neoproterozoic Jacobsville Sandstone, Michigan: implications for the
evolution of the Midcontinent Rift: Geosphere, v. 12, no. 4, p. 1271-1282.

134

�Merk, G.P., and Jirsa, M.A., 1982, Provenance and tectonic significance of the Keweenawan interflow
sedimentary rocks: Geological Society of America Memoir 156, p. 97-105.
Mueller, S.A., 2021, Structural Analysis and Interpretation of Deformation Along the Keweenaw
Fault System West of Lake Gratiot, Keweenaw County, Michigan: Michigan Technological
University, M.S. thesis, 69 p.
Nicholson, S.W., 1992, Geochemistry, Petrography, and Volcanology of Rhyolites of the Portage
Lake Volcanics, Keweenaw Peninsula, Michigan: U.S.G.S. Bulletin 1970, Chapter B, p. B1-B57.
Robertson, J. M, 1975, Geology and mineralogy of some copper sulfide deposits near Mount
Bohemia, Keweenaw County, Michigan: Economic Geology 70 (7) 1202-1224.
Stein, C.A., Kley, J., Stein, S., Hindle, D., and Keller, G. R., 2015, North America’s Midcontinent
Rift: When rift met LIP: Geosphere, v. 11, no. 5, p. 1607-1616.
Stoiber, R.E. and Davidson, E.S., 1959, Amygdule mineral zoning in the Portage Lake Lava Series,
Michigan copper district, parts I and II: Economic Geology, v. 54, p. 1250–1277 and 1444-1460.
doi:10.2113/gsecongeo.54.7.1250/
Swanson-Hysell, N.L., Ramezani, J., Fairchild, L.M., and Rose, I.R., 2019, Failed rifting and fast
drifting: Midcontinent Rift development, Laurentia’s rapid motion and the driver of Grenvillian
orogenesis: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 131, nos. 5-6, p. 913-940.
Tyrrell, C.W., 2019, Keweenaw Fault Geometry and Slip Kinematics – Bête Grise Bay, Keweenaw
Peninsula, Michigan: Michigan Technological University, M.S. thesis, 30 p.
Wadsworth, M.E., 1884, On the relation of the Keweenawan series to the eastern sandstone in the
vicinity of Torch Lake, Michigan: Boston Soc. Natural Hist. Proc., v. 23, p. 172-180.
White, W.S., 1952, Imbrication and initial dip in a Keweenawan conglomerate bed, J. Sediment.
Petrol., v. 22, pp. 189-199.
White, W.S., 1956, Geologic Map of the Chassell Quadrangle, Michigan: U.S. Geological Survey,
Washington, D.C., Mineral Investigations Field Studies Map MF-43, scale 1:24,000.
White, W.S., 1968, The native copper deposits of northern Michigan: in Ridge, J.D., ed., Ore
Deposits of the United States, 1933-1967 (Graton-Sales Vol.): New York, Am. Inst. Mining Metall.
Petroleum Engineers, v. 1, p. 301-325.
White, W.S., 1985, “Unpublished diamond drillhole core logs”: U.S. Geological Survey, Field
Records Collection, Boxes 282, 287-290.
Woodruff, L.G., Schulz, K.J., Nicholson, S.W., and Dicken, C.L., 2020, Mineral deposits of the
Mesoproterozoic Midcontinent Rift system in the Lake Superior region – A space and time
classification: Ore Geology Reviews, v. 126, p. 1-21.

135

�136

�Field Trip 5
Geology and History of a Native Copper Mine:
Adventure Mine, Ontonagon County, Michigan
Theodore J. Bornhorst
Department of Geological and Mining Engineering and Sciences and A.E. Seaman Mineral
Museum, Michigan Technological University, 1404 E. Sharon Avenue, Houghton, MI 49931
Matt Portfleet
Department of Geological and Mining Engineering and Sciences, Michigan Technological
University, 1400 Townsend Drive, Houghton, MI 49931
[Latitude: 46.777224; Longitude: -89.081906]
Directions: Leave downtown Houghton and head south on M-26 towards South Range. Stay on
M-26(highway turns into M-38 past the Mass City turnoff). Stay on M-38 towards Ontonagon.
Follow signs to Adventure Mine. The Adventure Mine is privately owned and operated as a
publicly available mine tour
Introduction
The historic Adventure Mine is part of the Greenland-Mass subdistrict of the Keweenaw
Peninsula native copper district of the western Upper Peninsula of Michigan (Figures 1 and 2).
The Adventure Mining Company began mining native copper in 1850. It permanently ceased
mining in 1917 at the time when most small mines of the subdistrict ceased mining operations.
From the 1980s to today, the mining activities at the Adventure Mine have yielded specimens of
massive native copper and copper crystals for purchase by tourists and mineral collectors.
The Adventure Mine is a Keweenaw Heritage Site of the Keweenaw National Historical Park. It
is located in the Greenland-Mass subdistrict about 40 km southwest of the Baltic Mine in
Painesdale, the southernmost major native copper mine in the district (Figure 2). The subdistrict
yielded about 85 million lbs (39 million kg) of refined copper at grades ranging from 0.5 to 1.25
percent (Butler and Burbank, 1929; Weege and Pollock, 1971).
The Adventure Mine was the second largest producer in the subdistrict, yielding about 11 million
lbs. (5 million kg) of refined copper from the tops of five different basaltic lava flows (Butler and
Burbank, 1929).
Despite the relatively low production of copper from the Greenland-Mass subdistrict (~0.8 % of
the total district production of ~ 5 billion kg (11 billion lbs), the geologic characteristics of the
Greenland-Mass subdistrict deposits are typical of the native copper deposits elsewhere in the
Keweenaw Peninsula (e.g., Stoiber and Davidson, 1959; Butler and Burbank, 1929; etc.). Since

137

�mining in the Keweenaw Peninsula native copper district ceased in 1968, underground access to
observe or study the native copper deposits has been limited. Currently there is access to only
two mines in the main area of the district (Quincy and Delaware) and two mines in the
Greenland-Mass subdistrict (Adventure and Caledonia). These mines are operated as
underground experiences for tourists, except for Caledonia.
This field trip guide relies on existing publications by Bornhorst and Whiteman (1995);
Bornhorst et al. (2013); Bornhorst and Barron (2011); and Butler and Burbank (1929). The
overview of the geologic and part of the human history is summarized from Bornhorst and
Lankton (2009), Bornhorst and Mathur (2016), and Bodden et al. (2022). Brandon Erickson
prepared a brief history of the Adventure Mine which is included in this guide.

Figure 1: Simplified bedrock geology of the Mesoproterozoic Midcontinent Rift around Lake Superior.
Modified after Bornhorst et al., 2013)

Overview of Geologic History
The largest known accumulation of native copper in the world is the Keweenaw Peninsula native
copper district (Figure 2). In comparison to other copper mining districts where major copper ore

138

�minerals are sulfides, nearly all of the copper in the district occurs as native copper. About 5
billion kg (11 billion lbs) of refined copper were extracted from about 380 million tons of ore
between 1845 and 1968 via underground mines (Weege and Pollock, 1971). Small quantities of
native silver occur with the native copper. An estimate using incomplete records suggests the
amount of silver was between .05 to .5 oz per ton of ore. Native copper and silver were coprecipitated.
The native copper deposits are hosted by the Mesoproterozoic Midcontinent Rift (MCR) (Figures
1 and 2). More than 25 km of volcanic rocks and 8 km of clastic sedimentary rocks fill the center
of the MCR (Cannon et al., 1989 and 1993). These rift-filling rocks were emplaced between
about 1.15 to ~1 Ga (Cannon et al., 1989; Davis and Paces, 1990; Kulakov et al., 2018; Heaman et
al., 2007).

Figure 2: Simplified geologic map of the Keweenaw Peninsula and vicinity modified from Bornhorst et al.
(2013). At the White Pine mine “Keweenawan” native copper cuts across diagenetic the shale-hosted
chalcocite deposit.

Early eruptions of MCR basaltic lava flows were scattered on a broad land area above a developing
mantle plume. These early eruptions were followed by many eruptions from fissure vents
concentrated in the center part of the MCR (now buried under the center of Lake Superior). These
eruptions were dominated by fissure volcanoes along linear faults. The Portage Lake Volcanics and
Porcupine Volcanics are rift-filling basaltic volcanic rocks erupted about 1.1 billion years ago

139

�during the active rifting of the MCR (Figure 3). The MCR was bounded on the edges by down
dropped normal faults resulting in the MCR being a faulted basin. The basin progressively dropped
down by stretching and by magma erupted at the surface during active rifting.
Eruptions of basalts of the Portage Lake Volcanics were on land surface (subaerial). Subaerially
erupted basalt lava flows have either a vesicular or brecciated and vesicular top (pahoehoe or aa
lava flow). Mineral filled vesicles are termed amygdules and flow tops dominated by vesicles are
termed amygdaloids and those dominated by breccia clasts of amygdaloidal basalt are termed
fragmental amygdaloids. The top of a subaerial lava flow is underlain by a massive (relatively
vesicle-free) basalt. Massive basalt flow interior in thinner flows is fine grained and in thicker
flows it is coarse-grained (ophitic). Thin flows can be vesicular throughout with vesicles more
abundant at the top. The typical flow is 10 to 20 m thick. Eruptions of basaltic lavas were cyclical
and during eruptive hiatuses minor gravel and sand were deposited on top and infiltrated in the tops
of occasional lava flows. These clastic sedimentary layers are overlain by basalt lava flows. A desert
environment 1.1 billion years ago resulted in red coloration of these clastic sedimentary rocks.

Figure 3: Stratigraphic column for the Adventure Mine region with approximate ages.
Active rifting and basaltic volcanic activity ended over a short period of time, but the rift basin
continued to passively sag and was progressively filled with clastic sedimentary rocks from the
Copper Harbor Conglomerate to the Freda Sandstone (Figure 3). In the Adventure Mine region, the

140

�rift-filling volcanic rocks (Porcupine Volcanics and Portage Lake Volcanics, Figure 3) were first
covered by red-colored gravels and sands (Copper Harbor Conglomerate. Overlying the Copper
Harbor Formation are black- to gray-colored muds and silts (Nonesuch Formation). Lastly the rift
was filled with a thick section of red-colored fine sandstones (Freda Sandstone). Today, the rocks of
the Keweenaw Peninsula and Adventure Mine region span the edge of the MCR, and consist of a
thick section of rift-filling subaerial basaltic lava flows overlain by a thick section of rift-filling
clastic sedimentary rocks (Figures 1, 2, and 3).
The last and final phase of the MCR resulted from a regional compressional event due to collision
of continental land mass along the eastern edge of North America at that time (Grenville Orogeny,
Cannon, 1994). Compression resulted in reverse and thrust faults as well as folding and fracturing of
rift-filling volcanic and clastic sedimentary rocks. Native copper and related minerals were
emplaced during this regional compressional event (Bornhorst, 1997). From the beginning of
regional compression at about 1.06 to 1 billion years ago the Jacobsville Sandstone was
deposited in a rift-flanking basin until about 1 billion years ago (Figure 2).
There were no recorded geologic events by rocks of Michigan’s Upper Peninsula from about 1.0
billion years ago to 500 million years ago. Erosion likely exposed the native copper deposits at
the surface and downward percolating oxidizing groundwaters had access to alter the native
copper (Bornhorst and Robinson, 2004). The MCR rocks were buried by Phanerozoic rocks
deposited from 500 to 175 million years ago (Catacosinos and others 2001). The native copper
deposits of the Keweenaw Peninsula were again at the surface after erosion of overlying rocks by
Pleistocene glaciers over the last 2.5 million years.
Native Copper Deposits of the Keweenaw Peninsula
The cumulative pre-mining geologic copper resource of the Keweenaw Peninsula native copper
district totaled about 9 billion kg of copper (20 billion lbs; Bornhorst and Barron, 2011). About
½ of the geologic resource was recovered. Speculative concentrations of copper in rocks are even
greater. These concentrations have not been mined for various reasons such as too low of grade
or too deep below the surface.
Permeable and porous primary geologic settings that have sufficient open spaces that were
sufficiently connected with each other facilitated the movement of ore-forming hot waters
(hydrothermal fluids) from which native copper and other minerals were precipitated.
Compression of the MCR strata integrated the primary permeability and porosity of the
hydrothermal plumbing system with compression generated faults/fractures (Bornhorst, 1997).
The absolute age of the main-stage of hydrothermal activity coincides with the age of the
regional compressional event at about 1.06 to 1.04 billion years ago (Bornhorst et al., 1988).
The permeable and porous tops of amygdaloidals and fragmental amygdaloids hosted ~58.5% of
produced native copper. Horizons of conglomerate and sandstone between lava flows, which are
also permeable and porous, hosted ~39.5% of produced native copper. Native copper ore bodies
are "sandwiched" on the bottom side by the massive basalt interior of the flow whose top hosts
the native copper ore body. On the top side the ore bodies are sandwiched by massive basalt of
the overlying lava flow. The sandwiched ore-bodies are geometrically approximately tabular

141

�(called lode) with a thickness between 3 and 5 m and the same orientation as surrounding host
lava flows. The typical lode extends down-dip 1.5 to 2.6 km and has a lateral extent of 1.5 to 11
km (Butler and Burbank, 1929; White, 1968). Open spaces in amygdaloidal lava flow tops
(vesicles) and sandstones/conglomerates are typically up to a cm across. They are typically filled
dominantly by gangue minerals and lesser native copper. Less frequently the entire open space
was filled with masses of native copper. Open spaces between breccia fragments in the top of a
lava flow (fragmental amygdaloid) or between clasts in conglomerate will tend to have larger
masses of native copper and can weigh up to several lbs, to tens of lbs to hundreds of lbs. and
rarely weighing tons.
A minor amount of the total produced native copper, ~ 2%, was from sub vertical tabular open
spaces (veins when filled with minerals) that follow faults and fissures that perpendicularly cut
across the volcanic-dominated strata. Ore-forming hydrothermal fluids readily moved along
faults and fissures since they have a relatively large amount of interconnected open-space; these
ore-bodies are also tabular lodes. Since the size of open space is large the corresponding size of
masses of native copper can also be large weighing multiple tons with the largest masses being
several hundred tons.
Native copper is closely associated with about 22 common and many more uncommon minerals
(Bodden et al., 2022; Butler and Burbank, 1929; White, 1968). These minerals fill the same open
spaces along with and instead of native copper. The suite of minerals is similar to those found
where rocks have undergone very low to low grade burial metamorphism at less than about &lt;
300OC (Bodden et al., 2022). Thermal modeling suggests that peak burial metamorphic
conditions at depth were between 400 to 500oC (Woodruff, 1995). Burial metamorphic processes
resulted in ore-forming hydrothermal fluids carrying copper leached from the tops of buried riftfilling basalt lava flows. Batches of metamorphogenic-dominated hydrothermal fluid generated
over time were similar to one another.
The rift-filling volcanic rocks were very low in sulfur when they erupted, and the little contained
sulfur degassed into the atmosphere. During subsequent deposition of rift-filling clastic
sedimentary rocks there was an incursion of seawater into the rift for a significant amount of
time. This resulted in seawater deeply penetrating into the underlying rift-filling volcanic rocks
(Figure 4A). During burial, the rift-filling volcanic and clastic sedimentary rocks were
progressively heated and during initial heating the seawater evolved to be depleted in sulfur
similar to expelled modern sea floor hydrothermal fluids (Figure 4B). Continued heating during
burial resulted in burial metamorphic-dominated hydrothermal fluids with copper leached from
the rift-filling volcanic rocks. These fluids were well mixed with the evolved seawater resulting
in hybrid metamorphic-dominated ore-forming fluids (Figure 4C). These main-stage hybrid
metamorphic-dominated ore-forming hydrothermal fluids moved upwards from the source zone
through the same very sulfur poor strata as in the source rocks (Figure 4D). As they moved
upwards they cooled, interacted with host rocks, and in the relatively shallow zone of
precipitation they variably mixed with sulfur-poor reduced meteoric water (Figure 4D; Bodden
et. al, 2022). These processes resulted in precipitation of native copper and main-stage
hydrothermal minerals. Higher temperature main-stage mineral assemblages are spatially
associated with the area of native copper deposits where the thermal anomaly was greatest

142

�because of focused hydrothermal fluids. Within the native copper district, the suite of main-stage
minerals that is associated with native copper and is followed by late-stage minerals precipitated
at lower temperature than the main-stage.

Figure 4: Cartoon cross sections showing conceptual genetic model of the native copper deposits of the
Keweenaw Peninsula formed at about 1060 to 1040 million years ago. Modified from Bodden et al.
(2022). A. Marine incursions and seawater penetration during deposition of volcanic and sedimentary
rocks in MCR. B. Area prior to burial metamorphism with sulfur depleted evolved seawater providing
salinity for ore-forming fluids. C. Burial metamorphic fluids mixing with evolved seawater produce
hybrid ore-forming fluids. D. Precipitation of main-stage minerals, including native copper, as a result of
mixing of ore-forming fluids with meteoric water, decreasing temperature, and water-rock reactions.

143

�Figure 5: Bedrock geologic map and cross sections of the Greenland-Mass subdistrict of the Keweenaw
Peninsula Native Copper District. Modified from Whitlow (1974).

144

�The Evergreen Succession
Butler and Burbank (1929) recognized the Evergreen lava flow and a succeeding number of lava
flows of the Portage Lake Volcanics as having distinctive lithologies and hosting the native
copper deposits in the Greenland-Mass subdistrict (Figure 3 and 5). These are informally termed
the Evergreen Succession (Figure 3). The Evergreen Succession is stratigraphically about 150 m
(500 ft) above the Bohemia (No. 8) conglomerate (Butler and Burbank, 1929).
The Evergreen Succession basaltic lava flows are slightly more intermediate in composition than
other lava flows within the PLV (Butler and Burbank, 1929). They are characterized by
porphyritic or glomerporphyritic texture although thicker flows are ophitic. It is difficult to
correlate individual lava flow with one another except in developed areas for mining of native
copper where individual lava flow can be traced along strike from mine to mine. In the
Greenland-Mass subdistrict most of the native copper was produced from the tops of lava flows
of the Evergreen Succession. Those flow tops hosting native copper are generally fragmental
amygdaloidal lodes with the best areas for native copper being where the flow top is thicker.
Thin amygdaloidal only flow tops or those with areas of massive basalt mixed in the flow top are
typically lower grade. The Evergreen Succession is at a similar stratigraphic position as those
lava flows developed at the Isle Royale Mine to the north of the subdistrict in the Houghton area
of the main district (Butler and Burbank, 1929). The Evergreen flows were also developed for
native copper in the Winona area in the middle between the main district and the subdistrict.
The individual copper-rich lava flows within the Evergreen succession were each informally
named (Figure 3). The Evergreen flow is a 3 to 15 m thick plagioclase porphyritic lava flow. The
Ogima flow is a 30 to 43 m thick slightly plagioclase glomerophyritic basalt lava flow. The
Butler flow is a 15 to 27 m thick plagioclase glomerporphyritic basalt lava flow. The Mass and
Merchant flows are up to about 25 m thick. The South Knowlton flow is up to 15 m and is a
plagioclase glomeroporphyritic basalt. At the top of the Evergreen succession is the Knowlton
flow which is a 9 to 21 m thick plagioclase glomeroporphyritic basalt. Between the Butler and
Knowlton flows there are a number of thin flows of plagioclase glomeroporphryitic basalt with
total thickness of 75 to 90 m thick (Calumet and Hecla, 1958).
The tops of the Evergreen lava flows were productive over a strike length of about 5 km. Native
copper mined from the Evergreen Succession was extracted from many different mines with
some of them connecting with others. The Butler flow top yielded the most copper followed by
the Evergreen and Knowlton flow tops which also yielded significant amounts of copper.
Vesicle- and inter-fragment void-fillings consist of quartz, calcite, K-feldspar, epidote, prehnite,
pumpellyite, and chlorite (Table 1). Less abundant main-stage minerals are native copper, native
silver, and datolite. Laumontite and adularia are common late-stage minerals.

145

�Table 1: Percent amygdule-filling minerals estimated from rock piles adjacent to mines/shafts of the
Greenland-mass subdistrict. Unpublished data by Stoiber and Davidson 1959).
% Amygdule-Filling Mineral
Quartz Calcite
Mine/Shaft
Adventure
#1
Adventure
#2
Adventure
#3
Adventure
#4
National #2
Old Mass
Mass C
Mass 1 &amp;2
Mass B
Mass A
Michigan
Michigan
Flintsteel #1
Flintsteel #2
Butler
Knowlton

Red KFeldspar

Epidote Prehnite Pumpellyite Chlorite

52

5

6

26

2

9

tr

30

20

5

40

0

1

4

11

13

30

37

5

1

3

36
22
17
22
55
19
45
63
21
18
23
20
30

27
17
21
10
23
22
16
27
30
52
45
45
38

0
3
40
45
0
40
trace
trace
35
18
18
20
15

2
5
15
19
22
18
35
5
3
5
5
5
6

24
53
4
0
0
0
trace
5
10
0
0
0
8

10
0
2
3
trace
trace
3
0
0
trace
0
10
0

1
0
1
1
trace
1
1
0
0
7
9
0
8

The Evergreen Succession in the Greenland-Mass subdistrict dips about 45o NW and forms a
local broad open anticline (Fig. 6). The largest mine, the Mass Mine, occurs near the maximum
bend in this anticline. Most faults have displacement of &lt; 1 m while those faults with significant
vertical displacement are uncommon. There are multiple veins in tension fractures in the area of
maximum bend that cut perpendicular across the lava flows (Butler and Burbank, 1929). There
are some veins that are parallel to the strike of the lava flows but dip in the opposite direction. In
the stratigraphically equivalent Isle Royale lode, Broderick (1931) describes similar strike
parallel veins which he interpreted to be feeders of ore-forming fluid into the top of the lava
flow.
The Adventure Mine
The Adventure Mine was very small, producing only about 5 million kg (11 million lbs) of
refined copper, in context of all mines in the district which produced about 5 billion kg (11
billion lbs. Most of the production of native copper from the Adventure Mine came from the top
of the Knowlton basalt lava flow (Knowlton lode; Figure 6 and 7). There was also significant

146

�production from the Butler lode and minor production from the Evergreen, Ogima, and Merchant
lodes (Figure 6 and 7).

Figure 6: Historic 1902 sketch cross section showing the lodes of the Evergreen succession at the
Adventure Mine. Adits perpendicular to strike of the lava flows are shown and drifts parallel to the strike
are indicated by black squares. The field excursion utilizes the adit near the No. 1 shaft.

Figure 7: Longitudinal sections (parallel to strike) of the Evergreen succession native copper lodes
showing underground workings (openings) for the Adventure Mine shafts #1 to #4. Section from Butler
and Burbank (1929).

147

�The Knowlton was the focus of native copper mining at the Adventure Mine. The Knowlton lava
flow top is a fragmental amygdaloid. In the subdistrict, the Knowlton flow top was developed for
about 3000 m along strike and to a maximum depth of about 375 m. At the nearby Mass Mine
(Fig 5), the Bulter lava flow top was the principal focus of native copper mining. It was the
second focus of mining at the Adventure Mine. In the subdistrict the Butler lava flow top was
developed for about 2000 m along strike and to a maximum depth of 300 m down dip. The most
abundant secondary minerals in the Butler are quartz and calcite with slightly lesser amounts of
K-feldspar and epidote (Table 1). Prehnite and pumpellyite are usually much less abundant and
chlorite is present in amounts &lt; 1 %. The Butler contains a high number of veins. Usually, the
veins strike subparallel to the strike of the Butler lava flow top and have dips both similar to the
dip of bedding and at a high angle to bedding (Butler and Burbank, 1929). The average thickness
of the Knowlton lava flow top is about 2.5 m but locally it can thicken to around 6 m (Calumet
and Hecla, 1958). In general, a thicker flow top results in better ore. While most of the ore
occurs in the top of the Knowlton lava flow top, there are pockets of ore that extend into the
underlying Knowlton massive flow interior (footwall) and are closely associated with strikeparallel fractures and veins which were likely feeders of hydrothermal fluids (Bornhorst et al,
2013).
At the Adventure Mine, on average the most abundant main-stage minerals filling amygdules
and spaces between fragments is quartz which is closely followed by epidote and then calcite and
red K-feldspar (Table 1). There are lesser amounts of prehnite, pumpellyite, and chlorite. Native
copper is present in small amounts with average grades of between 0.5 to 1.25 % copper with
native copper associated epidote, quartz, and calcite. Native silver and datolite are present in
much lesser amounts. Least abundant are the late-stage hydrothermal minerals precipitated after
native copper that occur in open space fillings as coatings on earlier formed minerals; late-stage
minerals include calcite, laumontite, and adularia and in cross cutting fractures and veins.
Alteration of hydrothermal mineral is most obvious for native copper. Tenorite and cuprite (Cu
oxide) often but not always occurs as a thin coating on native copper that is found in open space
fillings. The tenorite and cuprite likely formed by downward-percolating groundwater when the
native copper deposits were sufficiently near the surface (supergene alteration) as they are today.
In addition to tenorite and cuprite, there are occasional copper carbonate minerals (such as
malachite), brochantite (hydrated Cu sulfate) and atacamite (hydrated Cu chloride). These are
likely to be supergene in origin. At least one mineral, gerhardtite (hydrated Cu nitrate) is the
result of chemical reactions involving explosives.
At the Adventure Mine a near horizontal cross-cut adit beginning at Shaft No. 2 connects to the
near horizontal Butler drift (Figure 8). To the southeast the Butler drift daylights at the Overview
Entrance/Exit. To the northwest the Butler drift connects with the Shaft No. 1 cross-cut adit and
with the cross-cut adit to the Ogima lode where there is a large, in place mass, of native copper
(Figure 8).
The underground of the Adventure Mine is at a stable temperature of about 6oC and is relatively
dry and regular field shoes are usually sufficient; hard hats and lights are required and provided
by Adventure Mining Company (tour operator). The field trip involves an easy walk

148

�underground to observe the character of native copper mineralization in a horizontal adit that
cross cuts the lava flows and a horizontal drift that parallels the strike of the top of the Butler
lava flow which hosts a tabular native copper ore body (lode) (Figure 8). The character of native
copper mineralization is readily observable in adits, drifts, and stopes (Figure 9).

Figure 8: A. Longitudinal section of the Butler lode at the Adventure mine showing workings/openings
projected to the vertical and locations for the field trip. B. Geologic map of the Adventure Mine showing
workings/openings projected to the horizontal and locations for the field trip. Modified from Butler and
Burbank (1929).

149

�Figure 9: Cross section sketch of the topography at the Adventure Mine showing top of the Butler lava flow
and the Shaft No. 1 crosscut adit.

Overview of the Human History
As the land surface of the Keweenaw Peninsula emerged above the progressively retreating
glacial lake levels by ca. 7,000 years ago native people took an interest in native copper since its
malleability facilitated making tools. At first native peoples likely found boulders of native
copper deposited from the glaciers (locally termed float copper) along with gravels and sands
derived from erosion of local bedrock and bedrock north of Lake Superior in Canada. These
boulders of native copper have a distinctive weathered surface crust of malachite, a green
copper-bearing mineral. The green color would have made the relatively infrequent float copper
boulders stand out among the other brown, gray, red, and white rocks. The float copper would
have also been much heavier than other rocks of the same size. The native people shaped the
native copper into tools and decorations. After they depleted the float copper boulders on the
surface, they needed a new source of native copper to be able to continue making and trading
these items. The native peoples likely found native copper in bedrock because of the green
coloration as compared to black- or red-colored host rocks and then became prehistoric miners.
There are many shallow mine pits throughout the Greenland-Mass subdistrict.
Early European explorers were shown specimens of float copper by native inhabitants which
created interest in the Keweenaw Peninsula. In 1841, Douglass Houghton’s report to the
Michigan legislature (Michigan’s first state geologist) sparked the first major mining rush in
North America. The first significant discovery of native copper was in 1845 at the Cliff Mine
which in 1849 became the first profitable native copper mine in the Keweenaw Peninsula native
copper district. There were only a few profitable native copper mines from 1845 to the early
1860s. The Minesota Mine, in the Greenland-Mass subdistrict (Figure 6) southwest of the
Adventure Mine, became profitable a few years after the Cliff Mine. Many discoveries led to the
opening of many mines in the early 1860s. But by 1880, the fate of most of these mines was the
same as described below. Initial excitement of possible riches from mining copper was promoted
by discoveries of mass copper that implied high grade ore (Figure 10C). Unfortunately, the
existence of masses of copper did not necessarily indicate high grade ore. These masses
represent the sampling problem termed the “nugget effect.” When the deposit formed there was a
clustering of copper in distinct parts of the ore body into a “nugget”. If the mass of copper was
missed during exploration the estimate of the grade of the ore body could be far too low and if a

150

�Figure 10: Historic photos from the Adventure Mine.

mass is found the grade can be far too high. Mining decisions, such as putting in a shaft or
constructing an oversized mill, made from discovery of masses of copper can be costly mistakes
especially when funds are limited. Many of the mining projects were underfunded making it
difficult to succeed and as a result of lack of funds the operations had to frequently close and in
many cases the company merged with another company if they could convince shareholders of
potential to discover a large ore body with high grade. There were also frequent shareholder
assessments. Rather than paying a dividend to each shareholder from excess funds (profits) an

151

�assessment is the opposite and required each shareholder to pay the company a fee for each
share. The fate of the Adventure Mine briefly described below follows this fate and was
permanently closed and abandoned by 1917.
Adventure Mine History
(modified with permission from text provided by Brandon Erickson)

In 1848 the Adventure Mining Company began exploration for native copper in the GreenlandMass subdistrict. Exploration activities were focused on a topographic bluff where several
different lodes were exposed at the surface. By 1850, the Butler lode appeared to have best
potential and the first production of native copper began in 1850. Despite the initial promise the
mine struggled to turn a profit as the Butler lode was very rich in copper in some areas and in
other areas it was barren. By 1855, the Adventure Mining Company itself ceased mining and to
survive in 1855 the company introduced a tributing system. Under tributing, miners would
receive a percentage of copper profits instead of a daily wage. In 1856, during financial troubles,
a water-powered stamp mill was built along nearby Adventure Creek. By the start of the Civil
War in 1861, the richest known ore shoots had been mined out and in 1864 the mine was sold to
new investors.
The new Adventure Copper Company explored the Butler lode on the eastern side of the bluff
but also started an exploration crosscut on the northern slope. The purpose of this adit was to cut
across all the lodes. Today’s mine tours enter the mine using this adit (Figure 8, Shaft No. 1
crosscut.) By 1869, the adit had reached the Butler lode and the miners commenced drifting
along the lode. Several years later this zone proved rich enough to warrant the sinking of a shaft
from the top of the bluff, which is seen on today’s tours as the “skylight stope.” (Figure 8).
Mining was centered around this area until an economic downturn in 1877 forced the mine to cut
costs and once again only support a small handful of tribute miners.
In 1890, the tribute miners uncovered the Knowlton lode, which, unlike the others, cropped out
at the base of the bluff. The deeping of shaft No. 1 started immediately and soon reached
sufficient depth to begin drifting along the Knowlton lode. The Knowlton lode was very rich in
stamp rock (fine sand sized copper disseminated throughout the ore body and lacking the nugget
effect). The high-grade copper ore incentivized the miners to continue sinking the shaft to 200
feet deep. At these depths, work was severely hindered by the lack of more modern equipment,
and without financial backing the Knowlton efforts ceased by 1893.
Adventure Mine was revived again in 1898, as the Adventure Consolidated Mining Company
and listed on the Boston stock exchange. This new company was backed by 2.5 million dollars
perhaps prompted by ”riches” from mass copper (Figure 10C). The new investment at Adventure
Mine was sufficient to build a company town, put in a railroad spur, purchase modern drills,
construct and equip a state-of-the-art stamp mill, and install an electric tram line. The company
first dewatered the No. 1 shaft and started sinking No. 2 shaft. The promising initial results
prompted the company to start a new fully modern third No. 3 shaft (Figure 10A and 10B). This
shaft is near the present-day parking lot. By 1903, the No. 1 shaft production had declined and
was abandoned at a depth of 700 feet. In response, the company started a fourth shaft on the

152

�eastern limit of their lands (Figure 8). This shaft was a failure and was abandoned after a short
time. Shipments of ore from the No. 3 shaft (Figure 10A and 10B) to the stamp mill declined in
tonnage and grade. The mine was forced to use diamond drilling to explore for a new ore shoot.
In 1909, they found a series of promising new lodes, but to reach them a vertical shaft would
need to be sunk. This endeavor around 1910 was Adventure Mines’s “ last hope.” The Adventure
Consolidated Mining Company diverted all resources to sink a shaft to 1,500 feet and explored
several different lodes along the way. Unfortunately, this exploration was a failure as the ore
bodies were not large enough or with high enough grade to make them profitable. The Adventure
Mine was more or less abandoned in 1910 but one last attempt was made in 1916 when copper
prices increased. The No. 3 Shaft (Figure 10A and 10B) was dewatered down to 700 feet and
soon after they were shipping 300 tons of concentrate per day to the smelter. This effort was
short-lived and on October 27, 1917 the company ceased all mining and processing activities.
Keweenaw National Historical Park
The historical significance of the Keweenaw Peninsula native copper district can readily be
deduced from the fact that 80% of the new copper for the entire United States was produced
from the district in 1880. This was the peak of significance of native copper mining in the
district. By 1900, the Keweenaw Peninsula produced only 25 % of the United States new copper.
However, absolute copper production from the district peaked in 1916 at an annual production of
121 million kg (267 million pounds). Mining ended in the Keweenaw Peninsula native copper
district in 1968. The Adventure Mine peaked in production of copper between 1902 and 1907 at
a total of about 3.9 million kg (8.5 million lbs.).
The Keweenaw National Historical Park was created in 1992 to preserve and interpret the
historical importance of native copper mining to the history of the U.S. The national park visitors
center in Calumet provides an excellent overview of the historical significance of the district.
Keweenaw Heritage Sites are affiliated with and support activities of the national park. The A.E.
Seaman Mineral Museum and Quincy Mine are heritage sites and support the activities of the
national park. The Adventure mine is also a Keweenaw Heritage Site and welcomes tourists and
visitors seeking an underground mining experience.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Brandon Erickson for his brief Adventure Mine history summary which we modified
for this field guide. We thank Allan Blaske for his review of this field guide that provided
significant improvements to this guide.
REFERENCES CITED
Bodden, T.J., Bornhorst, T.J., Bégué, F., and Deering, C., 2022, Sources of hydrothermal fluids inferred
from oxygen and carbon isotope composition of calcite, Keweenaw Peninsula native copper district,
Michigan, USA: Minerals, v. 12, 474.
https://doi.org:10.3390/min12040474

153

�Bornhorst, T.J., 1997, Tectonic context of native copper deposits of the North American Midcontinent
Rift System: Geological Society of America Special Paper 312, p. 127-136.
Bornhorst, T.J., and Barron, R.J., 2011, Copper deposits of the western Upper Peninsula of Michigan:
Geological Society of America Field Guide, v. 24, p. 83-99.
Bornhorst, T.J., Barron, R.J., and Whiteman R.C., 2013, Caledonia Mine, Keweenaw Peninsula native
copper district, Ontonagon County, Michigan: 59th Institute on Lake Superior Geology Proceedings, v.
59, part 2, p. 43-57.
Bornhorst, T.J., and Lankton, L.D., 2009, Copper mining: A billion years of geologic and human history:
in Schaetzl, R., Darden, J., and Brandt, D., eds, Michigan Geography and Geology, Pearson Custom
Publishing, New York, p. 150-173.
Bornhorst, T.J. and Mathur, R., 2017, Copper isotope constraints on the genesis of the Keweenaw
Peninsula native copper district, Michigan USA: Minerals, v. 7, 185,
https://doi.org:10.3390/min7100185
Bornhorst, T.J., Paces, J.B., Grant, N.K., Obradovich, J.D., and Huber, N.K. 1988. Age of native copper
mineralization, Keweenaw Peninsula, Michigan: Economic Geology, v. 83, p. 619-625.
Bornhorst, T. J., and Robinson, G.W., 2004, Precambrian aged supergene alteration of native copper
deposits in the Keweenaw Peninsula: Michigan; Institute on Lake Superior Geology Proceedings and
Abstracts, v. 50, part 1, p. 40-41.
Bornhorst, T.J., and Whiteman, R.C., 1995, Native copper and associated minerals in basalts at the Caledonia
Mine, western Upper Michigan: 41st Institute on Lake Superior Geology Proceedings, v. 41, part 1, p. 34.
Bornhorst, T.J., and Whiteman, R.C., 1992, The Caledonia native copper mine, Michigan: Society of
Economic Geologists Guidebook Series, v. 13, p. 139-144.
Butler, B.S., and Burbank, W.S., 1929, The copper deposits of Michigan: U.S. Geological Survey
Professional Paper 144, 238 p.
Calumet and Hecla, 1958, Unpublished report for Defense Minerals Exploration Administration, 29p.
Cannon, W.F., 1994, Closing of the Midcontinent Rift – A far field effect of Grenvillian contraction:
Geology. 22, p. 155-158.
Cannon, W. F., Green, A. G., Hutchinson, D. R., Lee, M.W., Milkereit, B., Behrendt, J.C., Halls, H.C.,
Green, J.C., Dickas, A.B., Morey, G.B., Sutcliffe, R., and Spencer, C., 1989, The North American
mid-continent rift beneath Lake Superior from Glimpse seismic reflection profiling: Tectonics, v. 8,
p. 305-332.
Cannon, W. F., Peterman, Z.E., and Sims, P.K. 1993, Crustal-scale thrusting and origin of the Montreal
River monocline - A 35-km-thick cross section of the Midcontinent Rift in northern Michigan and
Wisconsin: Tectonics, v. 12, p. 728-744.

154

�Catacossinos, P.A., Harrison, W.B., Reynolds, R.F., Westjohn, D.B., and Wollensak, M.S., 2001,
Stratigraphic lexicon for Michigan: Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Geologic
Survey Division Bulletin 8. Lansing, MI.
Davis, D.W., and Paces, J.B., 1990, Time resolution of geologic events on the Keweenaw Peninsula and
implications for development of the Midcontinent Rift system: Earth and Planetary Science Letters,
v. 97, p. 54-64.
Heaman, L.M., Easton, R.M., Hart, T.M., MacDonald, C.A., Hollings, P., and Smyk, M., 2007, Further
refinement to the timing of Mesoproterozoic magmatism, Lake Nipigon region, Ontario: Canadian
Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 44, p. 1055-1086.
Stoiber, R.E., and Davidson, E.S., 1959, Amygdule mineral zoning in the Portage Lake Lava Series, Michigan
copper district: Economic Geology, v. 54, p. 1250-1277, p. 1444-1460.
Weege, R.J., and Pollack, J.P., 1971, Recent developments in native-copper district of Michigan: Society of
Economic Geologists Field Conference, Michigan Copper District, September 30 - October 2, 1971, p.
18-43.
White, W.S. 1968, The native-copper deposits of northern Michigan: in Ridge, J.D., ed., Ore Deposits of
the United States, 1933-1967 (the Graton Sales volume). American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical,
and Petroleum Engineering, New York: p. 303-325.
Whitlow, 1974, Geologic map of the Greenland and Rockland quadrangles, Ontonagon County,
Michigan: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Field Studies Map MF-596.
Woodruff, L.G.; Daines, M.J.; Cannon, W.F.; Nicholson, S.W., 1995, The thermal history of the
Midcontinent Rift in the Lake Superior region: implications for mineralization and partial melting: in
International Geological Correlation Program, Field Conference and Symposium on the Petrology
and metallogeny of volcanic and intrusive rocks of the Midcontinent rift system, Duluth, Minnesota,
v. 336, p. 213-214.

155

�156

�Field Trip 6
Southern Complex Granitoids, Gneisses, and Migmatites: New
Data, Discoveries, and Perspectives
Chad D. Deering
Michigan Technological University, 1400 Townsend Dr., Houghton, MI 49931
Introduction
The Superior Province is part of the Archean Canadian Shield in North America and represents
one of the oldest and most stable cratonic regions on Earth, encompassing parts of Canada and the
United States, including Michigan, Wisconsin, and Minnesota. The Archean craton in Northern
Michigan is divided into a Northern Complex and Southern Complex, which are separated by the
Great Lakes Tectonic Zone (GLTZ) (Morey and Sims, 1976; Sims et al., 1980). The northern
portion of the Southern Complex consists of classic ‘dome-and-keel’ structures characterized by
domes of Archean basement surrounded by keels of Paleoproterozoic Marquette Range
Supergroup lithologies (Annhaeusser et al., 1969). The Archean rocks include a complex
assemblage of granitoids, gneisses, and migmatites intruded by numerous mafic dikes and/or sills.
Our recent research on the area has revealed new aspects of the igneous and metamorphic evolution
that have improved our understanding of the assembly of this large igneous-metamorphic complex
through the Archean-Proterozoic transition, but numerous questions regarding the origin evolution
of these rocks remain unresolved. This field excursion will include the exploration of a number of
different terrains representative of the magmatic, metamorphic, and structural evolution of the
Southern Complex and the overlying metasedimentary rocks; highlighting new discoveries while
at the same time providing an opportunity to investigate still unresolved questions regarding the
geologic evolution of the region.

Figure 1. Regional map outlining the location of the Southern Complex Mineral District near
Marquette, Michigan.

157

�Evolution of the Superior Craton
Mesoarchean
The Mesoarchean evolution of the Superior Craton in North America encompasses a critical period
of crustal evolution between 3.2 to 2.8 billion years ago. During this time, significant tectonic and
magmatic processes shaped the early Earth's crust and laid the foundation for the stable continental
core we recognize today. In the early Mesoarchean, around 3.2 billion years ago, smaller
continental fragments began to accrete and amalgamate due to tectonic processes related to
subduction and associated magmatic activity (Percival et al., 2012; Thurston et al., 2008; Wyman,
2010). These proto-continents served as the building blocks for the Superior Craton (Percival et
al., 2012). Intense magmatic activity occurred, leading to the generation and growth of the
continental crust within the Superior Craton, as magma intruded into and solidified within the
existing crust (King et al., 1998). Greenstone belts, characterized by volcanic and sedimentary
rocks, also began to form during this period. These belts, such as the Abitibi and Wawa greenstone
belts of Canada (Thurston, 2002) and the Ishpeming greenstone belt of the Upper Peninsula,
Michigan, USA (Bornhorst and Johnson, 1993), are important features of the Superior Craton and
provide insights into early Earth processes, including volcanic activity and the nature of oceanic
environments. The rocks of the Superior Craton underwent significant metamorphism and
deformation during the Mesoarchean and high temperatures and pressures caused by tectonic
activity led to the development of foliations and other prominent structural features in the rocks.
Neoarchean
During the Neoarchean Eon, which lasted from approximately 2.8 to 2.5 billion years ago, the
crust of the Superior Craton underwent further significant geological evolution. This involved the
continued accretion of smaller continental blocks and terranes through tectonic processes such as
subduction, collision, and magmatic activity (Mole et al., 2021). In particular, the Minnesotan
orogeny occurred around 2.7 to 2.6 billion years ago. This was a period of intense tectonic activity
characterized by the collision and amalgamation of various smaller continental blocks and island
arcs, leading to the formation of a larger continental mass (Schmitz et al., 2018). The collisional
process resulted in the growth of the Superior Province and the formation of the granite-greenstone
terranes that comprise much of the region. The amalgamation of these crustal fragments
contributed to the expansion and stabilization of the Superior Craton. Neoarchean rocks include
extensive granitic intrusions, which formed through the partial melting of existing crustal rocks or
through the emplacement of mantle-derived magmas (Mole et al., 2021). These granitic intrusions
contributed to the growth of the continental crust and are often associated with mineralization and
hydrothermal activity (Mole et al., 2021). Greenstone belts, characterized by volcanic and
sedimentary rocks, continued to develop during the Neoarchean within the Superior Craton (Polat
et al, 1998; Polat and Kerrich, 2000). These belts represent ancient oceanic crust and island arc
environments, and they are interspersed with granitic intrusions. Metamorphic processes affected
both the greenstone belts and the granitic intrusions within the craton. Hydrothermal activity
continued to play a significant role in the formation of mineral deposits within the Superior Craton
during the Neoarchean. Ore deposits such as gold, iron, and copper formed in association with
granitic intrusions, greenstone belts, and hydrothermal alteration zones, contributing to the
economic significance of the region (Mole et al., 2022).

158

�Southern Complex, Marquette District: Compeau Creek and Bell Creek batholith
The southern complex is located south of the Marquette synclinorium and is dominated by the
Archean Bell Creek batholith, which consists primarily of coarse-grained megacrystic, high-K
igneous rocks with minor amounts of mafic gneiss and metasedimentary rock layers typically
found concordant with the foliation of the gneiss. Bell Creek includes trondhjemite-tonalitegranodiorite (TTG), granites, gneisses, and migmatites. Migmatite comprises only a small portion
of the complex, distributed at irregular intervals throughout the region and is assigned to a unit
referred to as Compeau Creek.
The age and origin of the Southern complex of the Marquette region has been debated for decades.
It was originally thought to be genetically related to similar lithologies found in the nearby
Northern Complex (Cannon and Simmons, 1973; Van Schmus and Woolsey, 1975). However, the
Southern Complex is separated from the Northern complex by the Great Lakes Tectonic Zone
(GLTZ), which is a continental scale suture/fault zone (Morey and Sims, 1976; Sims et al., 1991).
The only age information available before our study of the Bell Creek batholith was obtained by
Tinkham (1997) from a single zircon with a U-Pb age of ~2.61 Ga. This period marks the onset of
the Archean-Proterozoic transition, which is associated with a shift from the production of
dominantly mantle-derived magmas that differentiated to form new continental crust to the early
stages of significant recycling of crustal material (Taylor &amp; McLennan, 1995; Valley, 2005). This
is a crucial period in Earth’s history due to a decrease in global heat flow, and potentially the onset
of ‘modern style’ subduction (Brown et al., 2020) and an increased number of sedimentary
environments (Taylor and McLennan, 1995).
The origin of trondjemite-tonalite-granodiorite (TTG) and high-K granites during the Archean
Eon, including those produced in the Bell Creek batholith, is closely linked to the evolution of
continental crust. Several models have been proposed to explain the formation of TTGs during the
Archean: 1) Partial melting of pre-existing continental crust. During the Archean, the Earth's crust
was thicker and more mafic (rich in magnesium and iron) compared to modern crust (Tang et al.,
2016). As a result, when portions of this crust were subjected to high temperatures and pressures,
particularly in subduction zones or during collisional events, they could undergo partial melting to
produce high potassium granites. 2) Partial melting of the mantle. In this scenario, mantle-derived
melts ascend through the crust, assimilating and interacting with continental crust along the way.
These interactions can lead to the enrichment of potassium and other incompatible elements in the
melts, ultimately resulting in the formation of high potassium granites. 3) Derivation from hybrid
sources. It is also possible that the formation of high potassium granites during the Archean
involved a combination of crustal and mantle processes. This hybrid model suggests that both the
crust and mantle contributed to the source materials for the granites, with melting and mixing
occurring at various depths within the Earth's crust.
New petrogenetic insights on the origin of Bell Creek batholith
Our new bulk-rock major and trace element data and U-Pb zircon dates (including oxygen and LuHf isotopes) provide insight into several aspects of the origin of these rocks. First, extensive U-Pb
zircon dating of Bell Creek and Compeau Creek rocks from several recent Michigan Tech geology
graduate student studies (Table 1; Petryk, 2019 and Barth, 2023) indicates that the bulk of the
magmas were emplaced during a single tectonic event between ~2.4 to 2.6 Ga and is attributed to
the collision of the Paleoarchean Minnesota River Valley Terrane (MRVT). Second, bulk-rock

159

�major and trace element compositions of the Compeau Creek migmatite/gneiss and Bell Creek
granitoids/gneisses are consistent with formation in a continental arc type tectonic environment
(Figure 2).
Table 1. Age summary for Bell Creek granitoids (data from Petryk, 2019)
Bell Creek granitoid
subgroups

Sample

U-Pb crystallization
age (Ga)

Inherited
grains (Ga)

Metamorphic
grains (Ga)

CLG-14B

2.42 ±0.042

2.8-3.6

2.3

CCG-12A
BCG-4A
BCG-1A
BCG-8B
CCG-9D
BCG-7C
CCG-9E

2.43 ±0.160
2.51 ±0.021
2.58 ±0.056
2.54 ±0.040
2.59 ±0.028
2.61 ±0.047
2.56 ±0.038

2.7
2.8-3.9 (4.2)
2.7-2.8
3.1
3.3-3.5
2.7-3.3
2.7-2.8

2.0

2.3, 2.4
2.3, 2.4

Fine-grained

CCG-6A

2.53 ±0.070

-

2.3, 2.4

Clotted

BCG-8A
CCG-1A

2.55 ±0.017
2.55 ±0.033

2.7-2.9
2.7-3.2

2.2, 2.3
1.8, 2.3

Normal'

Foliated

2.3

Figure 2. Left: Tectonic discrimination diagram showing a volcanic arc to syn-collision tectonic
setting for Bell Creek granitoids and gneissic rocks (blue) and two younger alkaline granites
consistent that formed within-plate following the emplacement of the Bell Creek batholith. Right:
Arc rock discrimination diagram showing the high-K nature of most of the Bell Creek and
Compeau Creek rocks. Note that the mafic rocks plotted here represent dikes/sills of varying and
relatively unknown age.

160

�Third, the oxygen isotopic composition of zircon from the granitoids is dominated by mantle-like
values (5.3±0.3) indicating additional of a significant amount of juvenile magma to the crust;
however, the hafnium isotopic compositions of the same zircons are heterogeneous and have
model ages that indicate the involvement of older Mesoarchean crustal lithologies at the source
and during emplacement in the mid- to upper-crust. Our current interpretation is that the granitoids,
gneisses, and migmatites were formed through a hybrid process, initially by partial melting of an
isotopically heterogeneous Mesoarchean lower crust followed by assimilation of mid- to uppercrustal lithologies. Continental arc subduction produces TTGs when high heat flow facilitates
partial melting of lower crust and potentially later as the magma reaches the level of final
emplacement in the mid- to upper-crust. Interestingly, the high oxygen isotopes (δ18O &gt; 6‰) and
εHf isotopes, with a range between -2 and -24, together indicate a potentially greater role for older
Mesoarchean crust in the formation of the Southern Complex magmas than what has been found
in the Canadian portion of the Superior craton. Therefore, it appears as if the evolution of the
southernmost region of the Superior Craton involved a much greater contribution from crustal
lithologies than what has currently been found in the well-studied Canadian segment of the
Superior Craton (Mole et al., 2019).

Figure 3. Hf-O isotopic compositions of zircon from Bell Creek TTGs
Mid- to upper-crustal level mixing and assimilation
The Archean granitoids of the Bell Creek batholith also display field evidence of assimilation and
mafic-felsic magma mixing at the level of emplacement. Small (up to a cm or two) xenoliths that
appear as clots throughout the granitoids in the area consist of biotite, chlorite, garnet and quartz
indicative of assimilation of pelitic crust. However, basement crustal lithologies of this type are
apparently not well exposed. In our investigation we have identified several outcrops that have
quartzite and schist in contact with, or within, gneissic or granitoid host rocks, but the ages have
yet to be determined (in progress). These metasedimentary rocks outcrop within the igneous
intrusions and are considered to be the best possible candidates for remnants of Archean
supracrustal material that was assimilated into the felsic magmas. In addition, our new O and Hf
isotope data from single, inherited zircons indicate incorporation of Mesoarchean age crustal
lithologies (Table 1 and Figure 3). Major and trace element data reveal a slightly peraluminous

161

�character (Figure 4), high-K (Figure 2), and enrichment of incompatible trace elements (Figure 2)
and are best explained as reflecting the assimilation of metasedimentary crustal lithologies.
The mafic intrusions also show evidence of felsic ‘blebs’ and complex interactions with the host
granitoids throughout the region and are interpreted to reflect magma mixing, which would
indicate that at least some of them are sills rather than dikes. However, later generations of mafic
intrusions clearly crosscut the dominant foliation, have sheared boundaries, and/or sharp contacts
with the host rock and represent at least four to five distinct episodes of magmatism related to
younger events unrelated to the granitoids.

Figure 4. Shand's index for peraluminosity of Compeau Creek and Bell Creek granitoid, gneissic
and migmatitic rocks.
Paleoproterozoic
During the Paleoproterozoic Eon (roughly 2.5 to 1.6 billion years ago), the Superior Craton
underwent significant geological evolution, marked by a series of tectonic, magmatic, and
metamorphic events. The early Paleoproterozoic was dominated by the development of rift basins
during the breakup of the Superia supercraton during rifting that began ~2.1 Ga, which separated
the Wyoming Province from the Superior Province (Drenth et al., 2021). These rift basins
accumulated thick sequences of sedimentary rocks, including sandstones, shales, and iron
formations that are today known in the Lake Superior region as the Marquette Range Supergroup
and Huronian Supergroup (Ojakangas et al., 2001). The Penokean Orogeny, which occurred
around 1.85 to 1.75 billion years ago, resulted from the collision of the Superior Craton with other
continental blocks that contributed to the growth of Laurentia, leading to crustal thickening,
mountain-building, and metamorphism (Schulz and Cannon, 2007). Hydrothermal activity during
the Paleoproterozoic played a significant role in the formation of mineral deposits that include
iron-rich sedimentary deposits, such as banded iron formations (BIFs), which were deposited
during this time, along with important mineral deposits such as iron, copper, and gold (DeMatties,
2022). Following the main tectonic events of the Paleoproterozoic, the Superior Craton
experienced episodes of post-orogenic magmatism, marked by the emplacement of large igneous
provinces and granitic intrusions.

162

�Field Trip Objectives
This field trip is designed to provide a geologic overview of the formation of the Neoarchean Bell
Creek batholith including associated metasedimentary rocks and the Paleoproterozoic
metasedimentary rocks that filled the deep basins.

Figure 5. Generalized geologic map of the Southern Complex Mineral District.

163

�Stop 1: Paleoproterozoic Negaunee Iron Formation (FR/Xn) and mafic dike
Directions: Leaving Michigan Technological University drive south along US-41 ~63 miles to the
Michigamme Roadside Park.
N 46° 32’ 20”
W88° 5’ 31”
The outcrop is prominently exposed along the northern side of US-41 across from the Michigamme
Roadside Park, which overlooks Lake Michigamme to the south.
Paleoproterozoic Negaunee Iron Formation that is weakly magnetic containing hematite-goethite
with banded chert as fine laminations. The formation is part of a westward plunging syncline
conformably overlying Siamo Slate or Ajibik quartzite with a gradational contact and lies
unconformably over the Archean basement complex (Gair and Thaden, 1968). This unit includes
sideritic slates, grunerite-magnetite-schists; ferruginous slates, ferruginous cherts and jaspilite
(Van Hise and Bayley, 1895; Cannon and Gair, 1970). Here, the iron formation is dipping ~65° to
the SW and is in sharp contact with the adjacent massive, medium-grained to porphyritic
amphibolite dike. A younger, near vertical dike can be observed on the east side of the outcrop in
sharp contact with the older amphibolite dike/sill.
Stop 2: Paleoproterozoic Ajibik quartzite (Xa)
Directions: Heading east along US-41 ~0.5 miles exposure of Ajibik quartzite outcrops along the
northern edge of the road.
N 46° 32’ 35”
W88° 4’ 16”
The Ajibik consists of basal conglomerates, slates, and graywackes that grade into the overlying
quartzite. At this location, the small exposure of the Ajibik is massive, thick bedded white to buff
orthoquartzite. Some relic cross-bedding may be present, but clear evidence of ripple marks or
other features reflecting the original depositional environment are not present. A mafic dike crosscuts the quartzite roughly NW-SE and is highly sheared along a sharp contact. Bedding is difficult
to identify, but it appears to be dipping ~60° to the SW.
Stop 3: Paleoproterozoic Michigamme formation (Xms)
Directions: Head east on US-41 S toward Orange Rd. 8.4 miles. Turn right onto M-95 S, and drive
~7.3 miles, crossing the Michigamme River basin to destination.
N 46° 24’ 37”
W87° 59’ 45”
This exposure is of the lower slate member, which includes laminated iron-rich rock consisting of
biotite-garnet-cummingtonite-quartz schist with thin beds of quartzite. Minor fold axes are
prominent here as chevron folds plunging to the NW and reflect the regional fold axis orientation.
Boudinage, which form when single, competent layers are stretched into separate pieces through
plastic and/or brittle deformation mechanisms and reflect the presence of minor quartzite layers or
lenses within the schist.

164

�Stop 4: Archean Bell Creek batholith granitoid (Wbcf)
Directions: Head southwest on M-95 N ~0.5 miles to destination.
N 46° 24’ 13”
W87° 59’ 52”
The most common form of Bell Creek batholith is exposed here as a medium to coarse-grained
granitoid that is locally porphyritic with sparse megacrysts of alkali-feldspar (up to several cms).
Minerals include alkali-feldspar, oligoclase, biotite, oxides with apatite and zircon as common
accessory phases. The abundance of mafic xenoliths (clots) (Figure 6) within the granitoids is
correlated with the degree of peraluminosity of the host rock. Some minor pegmatitic veins are
also present. Small mafic injections are in sharp contact with the granitoid indicating emplacement
that post-dates the main magmatic episode. There is some weak alignment of alkali-feldspar
megacrysts that can be best observed on the top of the outcrop.
Kfs
Grt

Iron-Chl

250 μm

Figure 6. Left: Mafic clot containing Fe-chlorite or biotite, K-feldspar, and garnet (almandine).
Garnet-biotite geothermometry yields an equilibration temperature range between 450°C and
550° C. Right: Example of mafic xenoliths clustered within granitoid.

165

�Stop 5: Undivided granitic rocks (Wgu)
Directions: Head south on M-95 toward Co Rd 601 ~4.8 miles to destination. Outcrop is located
just south of the city park along the Michigamme river.
N 46° 20’ 13”
W087° 58’ 22”
A metasedimentary sequence is exposed here, which doesn’t appear on the regional geologic map.
Blonde and gray/black feldspathic quartzite forms alternating beds with gradational contacts
dipping to the north (Figure 7). The blonde quartzite is dominated by quartz, with minor amounts
of feldspar and sparse garnet (1-2mm). The gray/black quartzite has similar proportions of quartz
and feldspar to the blonde quartzite but includes muscovite, biotite and oxides nearing the
abundance of feldspar. Complex interaction with mafic dikes/sills also appear in this outcrop with
minor ptygmatic folding and mafic enclaves throughout. Vertical dike contacts are sharp, whereas
an apparently older generation of mafic intrusions have more complex contact margins with the
host rock. Near vertical mafic dikes on both ends of the outcrop have sharp contacts with the host
rock penetrating locally as splays or fingers.

Figure 7. Metasedimentary sequence dominated by blonde quartzite and a grey to black quartzite.

Lunch Stop: Leif Erickson Roadside Park along the Michigamme River

166

�Stop 6: Archean Bell Creek batholith and Compeau Creek gneiss/migmatite (Wbcf/Wccg)
Directions: Drive north along M-95 towards Welsh’s Rd. ~5.7 miles to destination. Outcrop
exposed prominently on the east and west sides of the road.
N 46° 24’ 54”
W87° 59’ 31”
The contact between Compeau Creek to the south and Bell Creek batholith to the north is clearly
exposed at this outcrop. A zircon U-Pb date of 2426±160 Ma was obtained for the Bell Creek
granitoid at this location. The granitoid is fine- to medium-grained, typically equigranular and has
an apparently gradational contact with the adjacent migmatite/gneiss. Migmatite/gneiss with
ptygmatic folding is best exposed in the outcrop on the west side of the road, but the highly
deformed continuation of this rock type is prominently exposed with mafic intrusions on the east
side of the road.
Stop 7: Archean Bell Creek batholith (Wbcg)
Directions: Drive north along M-95 ~2.1 miles to destination.
N 46° 26’ 16”
W87° 57’ 48”
Exposure of Bell Creek megacrystic granitoid similar to Stop 4. Minerals include alkali-feldspar,
oligoclase, biotite, oxides and apatite with apatite and zircon as common accessory phases. A
strong foliation is not apparent here, but the mafic xenoliths (clots) are well represented as mm- to
cm-sized dark spots typically clustered and randomly oriented. Pegmatitic veins are common and
vary in width up to tens of centimeters.
Stop 8: Archean Migmatite (Wbsc); Compeau Creek?
Directions: Drive north along M-95 ~0.8 miles to destination.
N 46° 26’ 53.7”
W087° 57’ 20.0”
This exposure is likely the Compeau Creek quartofeldspathic migmatite/gneiss dipping to the
south. The highly deformed migmatite/gneiss includes numerous mafic inclusions and enclaves
(Figure 8). However, it is unclear how much of the mafic-felsic segregations are representative of
the initial magma mixing followed by deformation or melanosome-leucosome complementary
rocks derived by melting. Ptygmatic folding is prominently displayed and likely represents felsic
segregations that have buckled during deformation. A zircon U-Pb date of 2525±70 Ma was
obtained for the gneiss, which overlaps in time with the dates obtained for other Bell Creek
granitoids along the M-95 corridor.

167

�Figure 8. Near vertical mafic dike cross-cutting migmatite with chaotic mixture of mafic-felsic
components.
Stop 9: Archean Compeau Creek migmatite/gneiss (Wccg)
Directions: Drive north along M-95 ~1.4 miles to destination.
N46° 27’42”
W87° 56’ 05”
This outcrop is mapped as Compeau Creek migmatite/gneiss that is presumed to be older than the
adjacent Bell Creek granitoid/gneiss. A zircon U-Pb date for the migmatite is slightly older
(2633±46 Ma) than the pink, clotted granite, which has been dated to 2550±33 Ma. Inherited zircon
grains range in age from 2717 to 3200 Ma. The Compeau Creek gneiss/migmatite on the northern
end of this outcrop appears to include a sliver of what might be Archean quartzite (Figure 9); note
that the Paleoproterozoic Goodrich quartzite is mapped directly to the north and would, therefore,
be in direct contact with the migmatite/gneiss. There are numerous mafic dikes/sills that manifest
as either single generation dikes that clearly cross-cut the existing foliation or more complex
dismembered dikes (possibly sills) associated with mixing at the time of felsic magma
emplacement (Figure 10). Inclusions of felsic material (either bulk rock or individual feldspar
crystals) can be found in some of the composite dikes/sills indicative of magma mixing that may
have occurred contemporaneously between the mafic magma and a liquid dominant felsic host
magma. The foliation is steeply south-dipping (~70°).

168

�Figure 9. Band of quartzite concordant with the foliation of gneiss/migmatite fabric.

Relict
feldspar
crystals

~ 4 cm

Figure 10. Mafic intrusion with felsic xenocrysts/xenoliths interpreted to have likely formed
through mixing with the host magma during emplacement. This particular intrusion has a Nd
model age of ~2.57 Ga, which is within error of the age obtained for the Bell Creek gneiss at this
location.

169

�References
Barth, Elana G. Age and chemistry of Bell Creek batholith (MS report), Michigan Technological
University (2023)
Bornhorst, Theodore J., and Rodney C. Johnson. Geology of volcanic rocks in the south half of
the Ishpeming greenstone belt, Michigan. No. 1904. US Government Printing Office, 1993.
Brown, Michael, Tim Johnson, and Nicholas J. Gardiner. "Plate tectonics and the Archean Earth."
Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 48 (2020): 291-320.
Cannon, W. F., and J. E. Gair. "A revision of stratigraphic nomenclature for middle Precambrian
rocks in northern Michigan." Geological Society of America Bulletin 81, no. 9 (1970): 2843-2846.
Cannon, W. F., and George C. Simmons. "Geology of part of the southern complex, Marquette
district, Michigan." J. Res. US Geol. Surv 1 (1973): 165-172.
DeMatties, Theodore A. "Exploration-resource assessment of productive felsic volcanic centers in
the Paleoproterozoic Penokean Volcanic Belt of northern Wisconsin, Michigan and east-central
Minnesota, USA." Ore Geology Reviews 141 (2022): 104489.
Gair, Jacob Eugene, and Robert E. Thaden. Geology of the Marquette and Sands Quadrangles,
Marquette County, Michigan. No. 397. 1968.
King, Elizabeth M., John W. Valley, Don W. Davis, and Garth R. Edwards. "Oxygen isotope ratios
of Archean plutonic zircons from granite–greenstone belts of the Superior Province: indicator of
magmatic source." Precambrian Research 92, no. 4 (1998): 365-387.
Mole, D. R., C. L. Kirkland, M. L. Fiorentini, S. J. Barnes, K. F. Cassidy, C. Isaac, E. A.
Belousova, M. Hartnady, and N. Thebaud. "Time-space evolution of an Archean craton: A Hfisotope window into continent formation." Earth-Science Reviews 196 (2019): 102831.
Mole, D. R., P. C. Thurston, J. H. Marsh, R. A. Stern, J. A. Ayer, L. A. J. Martin, and Y. J. Lu.
"The formation of Neoarchean continental crust in the south-east Superior Craton by two distinct
geodynamic processes." Precambrian Research 356 (2021): 106104.
Mole, D. R., B. M. Frieman, P. C. Thurston, J. H. Marsh, T. R. C. Jørgensen, R. A. Stern, L. A. J.
Martin, Y. J. Lu, and H. L. Gibson. "Crustal architecture of the south-east Superior Craton and
controls on mineral systems." Ore Geology Reviews 148 (2022): 105017.
Morey, G. B., and P. K. Sims. "Boundary between two Precambrian W terranes in Minnesota and
its geologic significance." Geological Society of America Bulletin 87, no. 1 (1976): 141-152.
Ojakangas, R. W., G. B. Morey, and D. L. Southwick. "Paleoproterozoic basin development and
sedimentation in the Lake Superior region, North America." Sedimentary Geology 141 (2001):
319-341.

170

�Percival, John A., Tom Skulski, Mary Sanborn-Barrie, Greg M. Stott, Alain D. Leclair, M. Tim
Corkery, and Michel Boily. "Geology and tectonic evolution of the Superior Province, Canada."
In Tectonic styles in Canada: the LITHOPROBE perspective, vol. 49, pp. 321-378. Saint‐John's,
Newfoundland: Geological Association of Canada, 2012.
Petryk, Brandi. "The origin of an Archean batholith in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula.”. (MS thesis)
Michigan Technological University (2019).
Polat, Ali, and Robert Kerrich. "Archean greenstone belt magmatism and the continental growth–
mantle evolution connection: constraints from Th–U–Nb–LREE systematics of the 2.7 Ga Wawa
subprovince, Superior Province, Canada." Earth and Planetary Science Letters 175, no. 1-2 (2000):
41-54.
Polat, A., R. Kerrich, and D. A. Wyman. "The late Archean Schreiber–Hemlo and White River–
Dayohessarah greenstone belts, Superior Province: collages of oceanic plateaus, oceanic arcs, and
subduction–accretion complexes." Tectonophysics 289, no. 4 (1998): 295-326.
Schmitz, M. D., D. L. Southwick, M. E. Bickford, P. A. Mueller, and Scott Douglas Samson.
"Neoarchean and Paleoproterozoic events in the Minnesota River Valley subprovince, with
implications for southern Superior craton evolution and correlation." Precambrian Research 316
(2018): 206-226.
Sims, Paul Kibler. Great Lakes tectonic zone in Marquette area, Michigan: implications for
Archean tectonics in north-central United States. No. 1904. US Government Printing Office, 1991.
Tinkham, D. K. Tectonic Evolution of the Southern Complex Regiong of the
Penokean Orogenic Belt, Upper Peninsula Michigan: The Formation of Precambrian
Dome-and-Keel Architecture (MS), University of Illinois. (1997).
Tang, Ming, Kang Chen, and Roberta L. Rudnick. "Archean upper crust transition from mafic to
felsic marks the onset of plate tectonics." Science 351, no. 6271 (2016): 372-375.
Taylor, Stuart Ross, and Scott M. McLennan. "The geochemical evolution of the continental
crust." Reviews of geophysics 33, no. 2 (1995): 241-265.
Thurston, P. C. "Autochthonous development of Superior Province greenstone belts?."
Precambrian Research 115, no. 1-4 (2002): 11-36.
Van Hise, Charles Richard, and William Shirley Bayley. Preliminary report on the Marquette ironbearing district of Michigan. US Government Printing Office, 1895.
Valley, J. W., J. S. Lackey, A. J. Cavosie, C. C. Clechenko, M. J. Spicuzza, Miguel Angelo Stipp
Basei, I. N. Bindeman et al. "4.4 billion years of crustal maturation: oxygen isotope ratios of
magmatic zircon." Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 150 (2005): 561-580.

171

�Wyman, Derek, and Robert Kerrich. "Mantle plume–volcanic arc interaction: consequences for
magmatism, metallogeny, and cratonization in the Abitibi and Wawa subprovinces, Canada."
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 47, no. 5 (2010): 565-589.

172

�Field Trip 7
Landslides on the Ontonagon River at Military Hill
Stanley J. Vitton
Civil, Environmental, and Geospatial Engineering, Professor Emeritus,
Geological and Mining Engineering and Sciences, Adjunct Professor Emeritus,
Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931
Mohammad Sadeghi
Civil, Environmental, and Geospatial Engineering, Assistant Professor,
Geological and Mining Engineering and Sciences, Affiliated Assistant Professor
Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931

Figure 1: 2003 landslide east of US-45 on the East Branch of the Ontonagon River.

173

�Introduction
An impressive sight, at least to geologists and engineers, are the landslides along US-45 as it
descends into the Ontonagon River Valley at Military Hill. US-45 follows the trail used by
Indigenous peoples such as the Menominee, Dakota and Anishinaabe (Ojibwe/Chippewa) tribes,
and later fur traders making their way to and from to the mouth of the Ontonagon River at Lake
Superior. In 1844, U.S. Secretary of War William Wilkins, proposed a road between Fort
Howard in Green Bay, WI to Fort Wilkins just north of Copper Harbor, MI to create a supply
route to the Army posts and to improve access to frontier communities such as Copper Harbor
and other neighboring mine sites. Congress, however, did not fund the road. In 1862, with British
troops in nearby Ontario and the prospect of Great Britian entering the war on the side of the
confederacy, the road became a national security issue. According to a Michigan historian, Le
Roy Barnett,
“More than half the copper used in the United States came from mines along
the proposed frontier passage. As a report of the U.S. Senate Committee on
Military Affairs noted, "In case of hostilities with Great Britain, and a descent
upon this important portion of our lake coast, there would be no means of
affording succor without a road [to the region], and these valuable deposits of
copper and other ores might be lost to us. Senator Jacob Howard pressed the
point, explaining that if the Soo Canal were "seized and closed ... there would
be no means of getting into the [Keweenaw] country or out of the country,
either with troops or munitions of war or without them, except by means of
some such road as this." (The Free Library, 2024)
On March 3, 1863, Abraham Lincoln signed an Act of Congress authorizing construction of the
military road. Road construction was started in 1863 but was not completed until 1872.
Following construction, the road was used primarily for timber and other commercial interests
until the railroad network in the western Upper Peninsula became operational a few years later.
Again, according to LeRoy Barnett,
“Despite the years of work put into the route, it never became the avenue of
settlement and commerce its supporters anticipated. As legislators in the early
1860s had feared, railroads--built shortly after the road's completion--soon
siphoned traffic. Furthermore, parts of the road were poorly maintained.
"There was no surfacing on most of the road," wrote Upper Peninsula
author/historian Knox Jamison of a trip in 1915, "and if it had rained recently,
you had better not try it." Getting up and down the Military Hill--a massive
body of slippery, wet clay through which the Ontonagon River had cut a 300foot gorge--took him at least two hours.”
In 1923, the Michigan Highway Department added Military Road into the state’s transportation
network as a section of State Highway M-26 but did not appreciably improve the road, leaving it
with a gravel surface and in general following the route’s topography. In 1957, the Michigan
State Highway Department added this section of M-26 to the federal highway system as US-45.

174

�Becoming a federal highway requires the road to meet both state and federal road design
standards, such as the highway having a maximum grade of less than 8%. This required
significant excavation of the glacial clay slopes and most likely the start of the Military Hill
landslides. Construction was completed in 1959 with a concrete pavement and a grade meeting
state and federal specifications.
While the Military Hill clay soils are known for their difficult road construction issues, the
highway department most likely did not fully appreciate the difficulty with the excavation and
long-term behavior of the slopes. An investigation, either upstream or downstream of the US-45
river crossing, for example, would have shown many old and new landslides not to mention the
red silt laden river itself that never changes throughout the seasons. The landslides are in the
glacial lacustrine and till sediments in the Ontonagon Basin formed during the area’s
deglaciation. One of the more recent landslides near the river crossing, which occurred in 2003,
is shown in Figure 1, is just upstream of US-45 and one of the sites we will visit. Figure 2 shows
the US-45-Ontonagon River crossing and the location of the landslide north of the confluence of
the East and Middle Branches of the Ontonagon River. The steep slopes and the meandering of
the river are evident. Figure 2 also shows the stops that we will be making at Military Hill.
The clays in the Military Hill area were deposited in the final stages of the Late Wisconsin
glacial period, estimated to be at its maximum at about 26,000 BP with deglaciation ending
about 9,500 years BP when the Superior Lobe of the Laurentide Ice Sheet retreated into the
Superior Basin for the last time (Attig et al., 1985). Fortunately, the northern Great Lakes region
is known as the “type area” for the stratigraphic subdivisions of the late-glacial period of North
America so the area has been investigated in some detail (Evenson et al., 1976). The first and the
most detailed investigation of the glacial sediments in the Ontonagon area was conducted
between 1905 and 1919 by Frank Leverett who identified the area’s main glacial features
including Glacial Lake Ontonagon and Duluth (Leverett, 1928). Later, Hatch (1965) investigated
the postglacial drainage evolution and stream geometry in the Ontonagon area while detailed
mapping was conducted by Peterson (1985 and 1986).
The area’s prominent feature is the Copper Range, a topographic ridge formed by the Portage
Lake Volcanics. The Copper Range was influential in the formation of the Ontonagon River
Basin shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4. As shown in these figures, the Ontonagon River System
converges at a gap along the Copper Range. According to Leverett (1928), the Copper Range
formed an ice-margin boundary during the last couple of glacial advances resulting in the
formation of a series of proglacial lakes shown in Figure 5. The proglacial lakes Ontonagon,
Ashland, Brule and Duluth formed along this ice-margin with drainage flowing westward to the
St. Croix River. As isostatic rebound occurred and the Superior Lobe retreated into the Superior
Basin, the drainage merged through a gap in the Copper Range. Leverett notes that it was
probable that Lake Goebic was in a pre-glacial valley that extended northward to Lake Superior
but was prevented from draining into Lake Superior by a moraine that filled the gap. Thus, the
West and South Branch of the Ontonagon River flowed eastward along the Copper Range to
where it drained into the present Ontonagon River.

175

�Another distinct feature of the area is a series of parallel rivers that formed between Copper
Range and Lake Superior as shown in Figure 6 and 7. Hatch (1965) investigated the drainage
system indicating that “it was strongly grooved by glacial flutings parallel to the direction of ice
motion. In places the grooves are buried by lacustrine sediments of glacial Lake Duluth.” It is
possible that the Ontonagon River, as it began flowing through the Copper Range gap at Military
Hill, followed one of the parallel drainages. Due to a greater volume of water, however, it has
significantly cut through the Lake Ontonagon and Duluth sediments as shown in Figure 6.

Figure 2: Military Hill along US-45 showing Field Trip Stops (Google Maps, 2024).

Figure 3: Ontonagon River Basin location (USACE, 2010).

176

�Figure 4: Ontonagon drainage basin showing river recreation, science, and wild designations
(Ontonagon, 2023).

Figure 5: Development of proglacial lakes along the Superior Lob (Farran and Drexler, 1985).

Figure 6: Parallel drainage system on the Ontonagon Plain by glacial grooving (Hatch, 1965).

177

�Figure 7: Aerial photo of the parallel river systems on the Ontonagon till plain.

Figure 8: Bedrock geology of the Military Hill area (Cannon et al., 1995).

178

�Background Information
Bedrock Geology
The landslides at Military Hill are located over the Jacobsville Sandstone, just south of the
Keweenaw Fault, as shown in Figure 8.
Ontonagon River Watershed Overview
The Ontonagon River Watershed, at 1,348 sq. miles, is the second largest watershed entering
Lake Superior behind the St. Louis watershed west of Duluth, MN, at 3,584 sq. miles. What
makes the Ontonagon River watershed distinctive, however, is the large amount of red sediments
that continually flows into Lake Superior. In 1987, the National Geography Magazine, ran an
article on “The Great Lakes Trouble Waters” showing an aerial view of the sediment discharge
from the Ontonagon River into Lake Superior with the caption, “Each year millions of tons of
sediment – like this red clay silt spilling into Lake Superior from Michigan’s Ontonagon River –
enters the lakes from tributary stream. Many contaminated with agricultural chemicals and
industrial wastes (National Geographic, 1987).” The cover and photo of the Ontonagon River
are shown in Figure 9. In the early 2000s, the US Corps of Engineers (USACE, 2010) conducted
a 516e sediment study on the Ontonagon River to determine the source of this large quantity of
sediments to estimate future dredging requirements. After its investigation, the USACE reported:
“The Ontonagon River watershed is primarily undeveloped and consists of forested
land uses with little urbanization or agriculture. Much of the watershed experiences
significant erosion of the incised valley walls due to the highly erodible soils
associated with the lacustrine geology of the lower reaches. Based on the
comparison of historic and present-day river morphology it is concluded that the
valley walls and river banks have been a large contributor of sediment long before
logging or other anthropogenic disturbances were present in the watershed.
Therefore, the primary contributor of sediment yield in the watershed is natural
processes, rather than anthropogenic alterations. Based on this conclusion, a
quantification of geologic time scale sediment yields was conducted.”
The report went on the state:
There is evidence that the deep valleys and steep walls that exist today are due to
natural sediment transport processes and landscape scale geomorphic evolution
that have carved out the valleys and deepened the Ontonagon River and its
tributaries. Frequent examples of mass wasting of the valley walls exist throughout
the downstream reaches of the Ontonagon River and a flat terrace with steep valley
walls adjacent to a meandering channel with a narrow beltwidth are typical in the
lacustrine areas of the watershed…..Moreover, an average sediment yield of 2.4
million tons per year is more than an order of magnitude greater than current
sediment yields of similar watershed sizes in the Great Lakes.”
The USACE report did not investigate which branch of the river produced the greatest amount of

179

�sediments. Based on a study by Weidner et al., (2019), however, it would appear the East and
Middle Branches produce the most sediment based on the frequency of observable landslides.
This would be constitent with Peterson’s 1985 mapping showing that the East and Middle
Branches are mostly located in the Glacial Lake Ontonagon sediments as seen in Figure 10,
which is a portion of Peterson’s glacial geology map. The length of the East and Middle
Branches of the Ontonagon River can also be seen in the soils map from the USDA Natural
Resources Conservation Service landform map shown in Figure 11 where the East and Middle
Branch extend to the southern end of the lake sediments.

Figure 9: July 1987 issue of the National Geographic Magazine (1987).
Review of Landslide Activity on the Ontonagon River
Travelers along US-45 can view a landslide just to the west of the US-45 – Ontonagon River
crossing. A 1,000-foot walk upstream on the East branch of the Ontonagon River will provide
the opportunity to inspect a large-scale landslide that occurred in 2003. If you continue to walk
upstream from the 2003 landslide, about every bend in the river will show landslide activity,
either current or past as shown in Figure 12.
Weidner et al., (2019) studied the landslide activity in the Military Hill area (Figure 13a) for the
development of a landslide susceptibility map based on riverbank erosion-triggering. Additional
landslide studies were conducted by Koons (1965), Dyl (1979), and Smith (2012), all master
theses or reports at Michigan Tech. The Weidner et al., study utilized aerial and satellite imagery
from the United States Geological Survey (USGS) EarthExplorer web tool for the years 1992
through 2016 identifying 21 landslides. The landslide locations in the study area are shown in
Figure 13(a).

180

�Figure 10: A portion of the USGS map of the glacial history of Iron River 1° x 2° Quadrangle (Peterson,
1985).

Figure 11: Landforms map of the study area adapted from Jerome (2006), showing the main soil
regimes.
River hydraulic data were obtained from a USGS gauging station downstream. The USGS
Scoops3D limit-equilibrium analysis software was used to develop a “factor of safety” map of
the study area, which is shown in Figure 13(c). A significant portion of the Ontonagon River
slopes have a factor of safety less than one, which is supported by the observable landslide
activity shown in Figure 13(b) through the lacustrine sediments of Glacial Lake Ontonagon and
Duluth.

181

�Figure 12: Landslide activity upstream of US-45 on the East Branch of the Ontonagon River
(Google Map, 2024).

Figure 13: Weidner et al., Military Hill landslide investigation, (a) study area, (b) observed
landslides between 1992 and 2016, and (c) Scoops3D factor of safety assessment.

182

�Objectives of the field trip:
The objective of the field trip is to investigate landslides in the sediments deposited in the former
Glacial Lakes Ontonagon and Duluth. In general, the sediments consist of lacustrine sediments
deposited in Glacial Lake Ontonagon and later in Lake Duluth which overlay older till deposits.
The first stop, however, will be at Quincy Hill, north of Hancock, MI to observe glacial grooving
and striations in the Portage Lake Volcanics indicating the direction of glacial lobe movement
across the Keweenaw Peninsula. The second and third stops will be in the US-45 Military Hill
area. A summary of the stops are as follows:
•

Stop 1: Top of Quincy Hill, north of Hancock, to view glacial grooving in the Portage Lake
Volcanics indicating the direction of Keweenaw Bay Lobe movement westward into the
Ontonagon Lobe that formed Lake Ontonagon.

•

Stop 2A: The north side of Military Hill to observe the effects of vegetation on limiting
landslide development.

•

Stop 2B: US-45 Military Hills Roadside Park: 2003 Large landslide on the East Branch of
the Ontonagon River

•

Stop 2C: Lower Military Hill Erosion with Slope Movement

•

Stop 2D: Middle Military Hill with Partial Vegetation and Some Slope Movement

•

Stop 2E: Middle Military Hill with More Vegetation and Limited Slope Movement

•

Stop 2F: Middle Military Hill with Some Vegetation and Varved Clay Slope Movement

•

Stop 2G: Upper Military Hill with Active Slope Movement on both Sides of Highway in
non-varved clay

•

Stop 3: Slope movement two miles south of Military Hill, across from Primrose Acres,
where a recently excavated slope on the east side of US-45 has been moving for about eight
years.

Stop 1: Glacial Grooves at the Quincy Hill Historic Park Lookout
Directions: From Michigan Tech drive west through Houghton on US-41 and cross the
Houghton-Hancock Bridge, staying on US-41 going into Hancock. In Hancock, go straight
uphill, passing Hancock’s main street, onto East White Street. East White Street will take you to
US-41 bypassing downtown Hancock. At the US-41 stop, take a right turn, going uphill to the
Quincy Mine Hoist. Directly across from the entrance from the Quincy Mine Hoist take a left
turn onto No. 2 Road. Follow No. 2 Road a short distance until you come to a two-track road on
your left that takes you to the Keweenaw National Historic Park’s “Quincy Mine Dryhouse
Ruins” parking lot. The glacial grooves are a short distance from the parking lot. From
Michigan Tech to the parking lot is 3.6 miles.
Lat: 47.135904°, Lon: -88.577986°

183

�Figure 14: View, looking west, of glacial grooves sculptured into the Portage Lake Volcanics at
the Keweenaw National Historic Park.
Glacial grooving and striations are common along the Keweenaw Peninsula as the glaciers moved over
the Portage Lava Volcanics, which were resistant to glacial erosion. It is generally assumed glaciers came
from northeastern Canada moving south to southwest but are surprised to see grooves heading due west
as shown in Figure 14. The reason for this direction is the movement of the Keweenaw Bay Lobe filled
Keweenaw Bay and then moved west, south, and east as shown in Figure 15. The Keweenaw Bay Lobe
then was stopped by the Ontonagon Lobe and to the west by the Michigamme Lobe to the east.

Figure 15: Location of glacial lobes in the western Lake Superior Basin (from Attig et al., 2013).
Stop 2: Military Hill – Seven Stops – Safety instruction will be provided at the site
Directions: From Michigan Tech drive west through Houghton on US-41 to M-26. At the
Houghton-Hancock Bridge go straight through the intersection to access M-26. Stay on M-26.
Going southwest 37.8 miles to the M-26/M-38 intersection. Take a left turn, staying on M-26
through Mass City, to the M-26/US-45 intersection, 5.5 miles. Take a left turn at the M-26/US-45
intersection headed south 1.8 miles to Stop 2A.
Lat: 46.705726°, Lon: -89.159581°

184

�Stop 2A: North US-45 - Slope with Vegetation and Small Slope Movement
In the Military Hill area, the north side slopes required less excavation than on the south side and
therefore there is less slope movement. In addition, where the slopes were excavated, they tend
to be more vegetated as seen in Figure 16. This is due (possibly) to the north facing slope losing
the spring snow before the south facing slopes and thus having longer growing season.

Figure 16: Stop 1 (a) descending Military Hill going south and (b) vegetated slopes with some
slope movement.
Stop 2B: US-45 Military Hill Roadside Park: 2003 Large landslide on the East Branch of the
Ontonagon River
Directions: From Stop 2A to Stop 2B go 0.4 miles south on US-45 to the Military Hills Roadside
Park parking lot on the east side of US-45. Starting at the rest area facilities (outhouses) on the
northside of the parking lot, walk northeast through the woods to the landslide. There is no path,
but the woods are relatively easy to walk through. The 2003 large scale landslide is
approximately 1,400 ft (411 m) northeast of the parking lot as shown in Figure 17. There is a
smaller landslide north of the path, which has been active for many years, but is difficult to
access. The slope debris, below the landslide, has a thick undergrowth, which is difficult to walk
through.
Military Hills Roadside Park: Lat: 46.699650°, Lon: -89.158627°
Military Hill 2003 Landslide: Lat: 46.703234°, Lon: -89.154132°
In 2003, a large-scale landslide occurred on the East Branch of the Ontonagon River as shown in
Figure 1 and Figure 17. The landslide’s stratigraphy consisted of lacustrine varved clay over a
clean alluvial sand that grades downward into a red silty sand, silt and then clay till as illustrated
in Figure 18 and Figure 19. While the failure mechanism is unknown, it is speculated that the
spring runoff and possibly high-water table caused the alluvial sand to liquefy causing the
massive landslide. As the liquefied sand lost strength, it started to flow outward into the river
channel as shown in Figure 20(b) and (c). During the slope’s collapse, a sliding plane formed in
the varved clay as shown in Figure 20(a) allowing the varved clay to fail over the alluvial sand.
Liquefaction boils are shown in Figure 20(b) and (d).

185

�It will take about 20 minutes to walk to this landslide through the woods from the roadside park.
While there is no path, the woods are fairly open and easy to walk in. However, the landslide
itself is more difficult due to the landslide debris and the vegetation that has developed over the
years. Caution must be observed when walking over this site and it is highly recommended that
the landslide slopes are not accessed.

Figure 17: Stop 2B Military Hills Roadside Park and path to the 2003 landslide.

Figure 18: Assumed stratigraphy of the 2003 landslide (Smith, 2012).

186

�Figure 19: 2003 landslide illustrating the varved clay directly over an alluvial sand.

Figure 20: Landslide illustrating (a) a sliding plane on the varved clay, (b) liquefaction boils in
the varved clay, (c) the flow debris into the river's channel, and (d) a large sand boil.

187

�Stop 2C: Lower Military Hill Erosion with Slope Movement
Directions: From Stop 2B go 0.8 miles south on US-45 across the US-45 bridge to Stop 2C,
which is the start of the lower landslides with significant erosion.
Lat: 46.690087°, Lon: -89.165513°
At the following five stops we will travel up Military Hill’s southside. In general, the soils
traveling up the south side of Military Hill are like the sediments seen at Stop 2B except for the
alluvial sands. The varved clays overlie a sandy brown silt, which have significant erosion
(Figure 21). The base of the varved clay can be seen moving over the sandy silt. As we moved
up US-45 at Stop 2C a short distance, MDOT has been attempting to stabilize a small landslide
just below the base of the varved clay as shown in Figure 22. The clay content appears to be
higher in this area. On the west side of US-45 you can observe the steep US-45 embankment that
descends down to Sandstone Creek, exposing the Jacobsville Sandstone.

Figure 21 Stop 2C showing the contact between the varved clay and a brown/red sandy silt,
which is eroding.

Figure 22 Stop 2C small landslide.

188

�Figure 23 Stop 2C showing the US-45 embankment that descends to Sandstone Creek on the
Jacobsville Sandstone.
Stop 2D: Middle Military Hill with Partial Vegetation and Some Slope Movement
Directions: From Stop 2C go 0.23 miles south on US-45 Stop 2D, which is at the middle
landslides.
Lat: 46.686869°, Lon: -89.164320°
Stop 2D is a short distance up US-45 and is in the same sediments as Stop 2C, which also are
sloping uphill as seen in Figure 24. Movement of the varved clay base can be seen in the upper
portion of Figure 24.

Figure 24 Stop 2D varve clay movement over the lower sandy silt but without the erosion seen at
Stop 2C.

189

�Stop 2E: Middle Military Hill with More Vegetation and Limited Slope Movement
Directions: From Stop 2D go 0.30 miles south on US-45 Stop 2E, an excavated slope that is now
partially vegetated.
Lat: 46.682564°, Lon: -89.164857°
At Stop 2E, the slope has much more vegetation with limited apparent slope movement.

Figure 25 Stop 2E, slope with more vegetation and limited slope movement.

Stop 2F: Middle Military Hill with Some Vegetation and Slope Movement
Directions: From Stop 2E go 0.34 miles south on US-45 Stop 2F, a slope with vegetation that
had was excavated for the construction of US-45.
Lat: 46.677892°, Lon -89.166195°
At Stop 2F, there is again less vegetation but more slope movement Figure 26. The clay soils at
this elevation are not varved.

Figure 26: Stop 2F showing partial vegetation and upper slope movement.

190

�Stop 2G: Upper Military Hill with Active Slope Movement on both Sides of Highway
Directions: From Stop 2F go 0.23 miles south on US-45 Stop 2G, a slope with active slope
movement.
Lat: 46.674640°, Lon -89.167126°
At Stop 2G, landslides occur on both sides of the highway as shown in Figure 27. Figure 27(a)
shows slope movement on the west side of US-45, which has less movement than on the eastside
of US-45 shown in Figure 27 (b), (c) and (d). These landslides have been moving for many years
and appear to be in a non-varved clay. While limited soil investigation has been conducted in
these sediments, it appears that at the higher elevations in the Military Hill area, a non-varved
lacustrine soil overlies the varved clay soils indicating that it possible that this sequence might
indicate when Glacial Lake Duluth and Lake Ontonagon combined. An interesting feature of
Glacial Lake Ontonagon is that it is at a much higher elevation at 1,320 feet than Glacial Lake
Duluth. Isostatic rebound would have had to occur for the lakes to combine.

Figure 27 Stop 2G near the top of Military Hill showing slope movements on both sides of the
highway with (a) west side, (b) top of east side, (c) south section of slope movement on east side,
and (d) north portion of slope movement on the east side.

191

�Stop 3: US-45 Recent Excavation and Resulting Slope Movement
Directions: From Stop 2G go 3.4 miles south on US-45 Stop 3, a slope with active slope
movement.
Lat: 46.627240°, Lon -89.178520°
Stop 3 is at a recent location where MDOT excavated a natural slope to improve drainage along the
eastside of US-45. The natural slope was excavated at a 2H:1V angle, the same slope as the
highway embankment as can be seen in Figure 28. Soon after excavation, however, the slope
started to move and has been moving ever since. Figure 29 was taken one year after the photo in
Figure 26. The US-45 embankment was constructed with the local clay soil but was compacted,
whereas the natural slope was not. The clay soils at this site and at Stop 2G have relatively high
plasticity and are at the interface of the low (CL) and high (CH) plasticity soils defined by the
Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) with moisture contents in the 20 to 25% range. As we
saw at Stop 2F, the lacustrine clay soils are not stable at the angles at which they were excavated,
unless compacted.

Figure 28 Stop 3 showing a recent excavation into the clay soil at a 2(H):1(V) angle.

Figure 29 Stop 3 - excavated slope one year after the photo in Figure 26 was taken.

192

�References Cited
Attig, J.W., Clayton, L., and D.M. Mickelson, 1985. Correlation of late Wisconsin glacial phases in the
western Great Lakes area, Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 96, p. 1585-1593.
Black, R.F., 1969, Valderan glaciation in Western Upper Peninsula, Proc. 12th Conf. Great Lakes Res.,
Internat. Assoc. Great Lakes Res., p. 116-123.
Cannon, W.F, Nicholson, L.G., Woodruff, C.A, Hedgman, C.A. and K.J. Schulz, 1995. Geologic Map of
the Ontonagon and Part of the Wakefield 30’ x 60’ Quadrangle, Michigan, USGS.
Creech, C., Selegean, J., and T. Dahl, 2010. Historic and modern sediment yield from s forested
watershed, 2nd Joint Federal Interagency Conference, Las Vegas, NV, June 27 - July 1.
Dyl, Stanley, 1979. Engineering geologic factors aﬀecting the stability of slopes in the Ontonagon Clay at
the Military Hill Slide, U.S. Highway 45, Ontonagon County, Mi. In: M.S. Thesis. Michigan
Technological University, pp. 92.
Farran, W.R and C.W. Drexler. 1985. Late Wisconsinan and Holocene History of the Lake Superior
basin. In Quaternary Evolution of the Great Lakes, eds. P.F. Karrow and P.E. Calkin, Geological
Association of Canada Special Paper 30:17–32.
Gunderman, B.J. and E. A. Baker, 2008. Ontonagon River Assessment, Michigan DNR, Fisheries
Division, Special Report 46,
Hack, J.T. Postglacial drainage evolution and stream geometry in the Ontonagon area, Michigan. US
Geological Survey, 1965.
Jerome, D.S., 2006. Landforms of the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. 1:750,000. USDA Natural Resources
Conservation Service, pp. 17.
Koons, G.J., 1969. Some geologic and engineering properties of the Pleistocene Ontonagon Clays at
Victoria, Ontonagon County, Mi. In: M.S. Thesis. Michigan Technological University, pp. 110.
Leverett, Frank, 1928, Moraines and shorelines of the Lake Superior region: U.S. G. S. Prof. Paper 154A, p. 1-72.
Ontonagon River. (2023, Nov. 12). In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontonagon_River
Peterson, W. L., 1985, Surficial geologic map of the Iron River 1° x 2° quadrangle, Michigan and
Wisconsin: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Investigations Series Map I-1360-C, scale
1:250,000.
Peterson, W.L., 1986. Late Wisconsinan glacial history of northeastern Wisconsin and western upper
Michigan. USGS Bulletin 1652, p. 1-14.
Smith, J., 2012. Large scale landslide on the Ontonagon River, Michigan. In: M.S. Report. Michigan
Technological University. http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/etdrestricted/146.
The Free Library. S.V. 2024. Through the wilderness, Retrieved Mar 19 2024 from
https://www.thefreelibrary.com/Through+the+wilderness.-a0452051967.
USACE, 2010. Ontonagon River Watershed 516e Sediment Study, USACE Great Lakes Hydraulics and
Hydrology Office, Detroit District, p. 90.

193

�Weidner, L. DePrekel, K., Oommen, T. and Vitton, S., 2019, Investigating large landslides along a river
valley using combined physical, statistical, and hydrologic modeling. Engineering Geology, v. 259,
p. 1-12. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.1051169

194

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="19">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="16970">
                  <text>Institute on Lake Superior Geology</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85869">
                <text>Institute on Lake Superior Geology: Proceedings, 2024</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85870">
                <text>Institute on Lake Superior Geology. Houghton, Michigan. May 15-18, 2024.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85871">
                <text>Institute on Lake Superior Geology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85872">
                <text>2024-05</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85873">
                <text>PDF</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85874">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85875">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="10364" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="12076">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/9e4f1e28865f88aa5567c5ffccfdf06c.jpg</src>
        <authentication>816ea836c5c7a8b2e6847b11745202e3</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="12077">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/d571f4b511d43c8f66923f64afef600f.jpg</src>
        <authentication>8c870cbadb19e215fba98cfb751fce7f</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="1">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="1">
                  <text>Thunder Bay Finnish Canadian Historical Society Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Finnish-Canadians</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="3">
                  <text>Life in Thunder Bay</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4">
                  <text>Photographs collected by the Thunder Bay Finnish Canadian Historical Society from a wide range of collectors, documenting Finnish immigration to and life in Thunder Bay. </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="5">
                  <text>Thunder Bay Finnish Canadian Historical Society</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="6">
                  <text>Lakehead University Library</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85973">
                <text>Play entitled "Bajaderi"</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85974">
                <text>Arts</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="86246">
                <text>Theatre</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85975">
                <text>Play entitled "Bajaderi" performed at Big Finn Hall, 314 Bay Street, Thunder Bay. People in photo: (left to right) Ted Lake, Hulda Makela, Onni Paavi, Mamie Paavi. Donor: Lauri Lahti. 2 copies. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85976">
                <text>Public domain</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85977">
                <text>JPG</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85978">
                <text>Still image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85979">
                <text>MG8_D11Bi11-1&#13;
MG8_D11Bi11-1a&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="38">
            <name>Coverage</name>
            <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85980">
                <text>Canada - Ontario - Thunder Bay</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="85981">
                <text>Canada - Ontario - Port Arthur</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="10366" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="12079">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/77671b7bb528411f5e55f3cf5b30cd3d.jpg</src>
        <authentication>890b17f8f01493f9ca773e7152f65923</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="1">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="1">
                  <text>Thunder Bay Finnish Canadian Historical Society Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Finnish-Canadians</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="3">
                  <text>Life in Thunder Bay</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4">
                  <text>Photographs collected by the Thunder Bay Finnish Canadian Historical Society from a wide range of collectors, documenting Finnish immigration to and life in Thunder Bay. </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="5">
                  <text>Thunder Bay Finnish Canadian Historical Society</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="6">
                  <text>Lakehead University Library</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85991">
                <text>Play entitled "Avioliitto Loma"</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85992">
                <text>Arts</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="86247">
                <text>Theatre</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85993">
                <text>Play entitled "Avioliitto Loma" performed at the Big Finn Hall, 314 Bay Street, Thunder Bay, December 18, 1960. People in photo: (back, left to right) Linda Murto, Mr. Elo, Leo Villa, name  not known, J. Bjorn, Inkeri Kaukovalta (seated left). Donor: Linda Murto. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85994">
                <text>1960-12-18</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85995">
                <text>JPG</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85996">
                <text>Still image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85997">
                <text>MG8_D11Bi12-1</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="38">
            <name>Coverage</name>
            <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="85998">
                <text>Canada - Ontario - Thunder Bay</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="85999">
                <text>Canada - Ontario - Port Arthur</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="10368" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="12082">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/a535a1c0bcaa6ab95272fb2535026773.jpg</src>
        <authentication>7383304937c00603548382d31f24b1b1</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="1">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="1">
                  <text>Thunder Bay Finnish Canadian Historical Society Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Finnish-Canadians</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="3">
                  <text>Life in Thunder Bay</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4">
                  <text>Photographs collected by the Thunder Bay Finnish Canadian Historical Society from a wide range of collectors, documenting Finnish immigration to and life in Thunder Bay. </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="5">
                  <text>Thunder Bay Finnish Canadian Historical Society</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="6">
                  <text>Lakehead University Library</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="86008">
                <text>Play entitled "Onnellinen Sakari"</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="86009">
                <text>Arts</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="86248">
                <text>Theatre</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="86010">
                <text>Play entitled "Onnellinen Sakari" performed at the Big Finn Hall, 314 Bay Street, Thunder Bay. Donor: T. Yrjana.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="86011">
                <text>JPG</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="86012">
                <text>Still image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="86013">
                <text>MG8_D11Bi13-1</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="38">
            <name>Coverage</name>
            <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="86014">
                <text>Canada - Ontario - Thunder Bay</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="86015">
                <text>Canada - Ontario - Port Arthur</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
