<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/items?output=omeka-xml&amp;page=751&amp;sort_field=added" accessDate="2026-07-16T08:00:51+00:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>751</pageNumber>
      <perPage>10</perPage>
      <totalResults>13249</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="8205" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="9044">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/3e37d66ea2ef94f7247b2b9f29a8d1f2.pdf</src>
        <authentication>0f119cb53f0e214bb5fdf701eef07ec8</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="66025">
                    <text>_.,,

-Volume 5 Spring Issue
March 2010

Greetings Everyone,
I am so thrilled that at this coming spring convocation (May 2010) we shall see a record number of
possibly 47 NASL Diploma graduates. Isn't this exciting news! I want to encourage each potential
graduate to complete all assignments by April 1, 2010. Call our office or email Diane or myself if you
need assistance.
The registration forms for all years are coming in quite quickly now, so please send in yours if you
have not. We still want to use paper registration so our office has access to number of students so
we can decide how many classes we are going to schedule. You are able to start registering online
now from home or work, if you required assistance phone me at 807-343-8003 or Diane at 807-3438542.
To check the dates for the summer courses for 2010, see page 4. The N.L.I.P. faculty lecturers are
returning and so are the elders, Ron and Gloria.
If you would like to contribute any information to the next newsletter, email Diane at
dmayee@lakeheadu.ca or call her.
Gidaa miigwechiwendam ekashkitooyan chi anishinaabemoyan
(Be thankful you can speak your Native Language)
Kichi Miigwech,
Charlotte Neckoway
Native Language Instructors' Program
Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Road
Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1

IA Message from tbe Principal
Good Day to all Teachers,
Don't forget to bring your lessons and visual aids that you have already done in your classroom, for
those that are not teaching to begin writing their lesson plans and making visual aids.
July is coming around and before we know it we are all meeting and having to do what we do best;
teaching and speaking our Native languages. Also please don't forget to start asking your students
what are the main slang words/sayings. E.g. cool man, high five and so on. Write them out in your
Native language and we will share them in our classes in July
See you all there in July,
Meegwetch, Florrie

Inside this Issue:
Message from your Coordinator and Principal

1

Upcoming Conferences

2

Recipes

3

2010 Spring and Summer Courses, Language books

4

Native Crafts-Hoop Drums and Arrowhead Necklace

5

Joke Page

6

�I
C

t!
.!C

Antshinnnbomowtn An ond Ortuno
Anlsh1naobo�n Ro?Ourco Oovak&gt;pmont
Amshlnn.nbomowfn Storie� on&lt;I Musk:
AddJo ond Stop Oonce Nl!)hl
Sc.holarthrp Award.sand Bnnquot
OorfUc Storlighl. Puppor En1orto1nor
Anrshloaat&gt;omowfn BlllQO Fun Night

P,ooorv;-iUon l1111L,ttvoG
Ch11drnn's Activttlos
Fonst ond Socml
Cmlt WOfkahops
Country and Wostom MurJc
Youth WorkShops ones Evening Socials
l:cJucnlkm and t loallh Work.a.hops
Roolstor for tho Conforonco .:md hoar Anlshlnnabomowln for 4 doysl

0
(.)

·E-

D)
C

8a.

:,

The web site for the 17th Annual Stabilizing Indigenous Languages Sympo­
sium "Indigenous Languages Across the Generations - "Language and Place"
to be held June 25-27, 2010 at University of Oregon - Eugene, Oregon, USA is
now accessible at http://www.uoregon.edu/~nwili/SILS/SILS.html

The 6th Giving the Gift of Language Symposium and Workshop on Native Lan­
guage Instruction and Acquisition held on April 17-19, 2010, is now accessi­
ble at http://www.nsilc.org/private/GTOL1.htm

Native Language Instructors' Program Newsletter

Page 2

�_...
Cook me up a VeciPe!
........................................................................................•..••••.....................................
...._,,

' Ingredients

Directions

Calabacitas (Skillet Squash}

5 cubed small summer squash
1 diced large onion
2 roasted peeled green pep­
pers
or
1 small can diced green pep­
pers
1 tablespoon shortening or oil
3/4 cup shredded longhorn
cheese

Saute onion in shortening or
oil until soft. Add squash and
stir until
almost tender. Add peppers;
simmer briefly. Sprinkle on
cheese and stir
until melted. From: Dove
Yield: 5 servings 7. Drain
and eat like hamburgers.

Chicken and Ramps with Sweet Potatoes

Ingredients
2 tbsp olive oil
2 tsp chopped fresh sage
2 tbsp Dijon mustard
2 tsp grated lemon rind
2 tsp chili powder
4 boneless, skinless, chicken breasts
salt and freshly ground pepper
2 sweet potatoes cut into I inch cubes
4 ramps or 2 leeks, white and light green
part only, sliced
I cup chicken stock
2 tbsp balsamic vinegar

Directions
Preheat oven to 400F
Combine I tbsp olive oil, sage, mustard,
lemon rind, and chili.
Reserve I tbsp of mixture, and brush the rest
over the chicken breasts. Season with salt
and pepper.
Heat remaining I tbsp oil in a large oven
proof skillet over medium heat. Add chicken
breasts, and cook 2 minutes per side or until
browned.
Remove from skillet and toss in sweet pota­
toes. Saute for I minute, add ramps or leeks
and saute for 2 minutes. Add stock, reserved
mustard mixture and balsamic vinegar and
bring to a boil. Reduce heat, return chicken
breasts to skillet and place over vegetables. Cover skillet. Place in oven and bake for 15 to
20 minutes, or until chicken juices run clear. Slice chicken breasts and serve over
vegetables. Drizzle over the pan liquid .

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Grilled: Lemon, Butter, \Vorcester­
shire Planked Salmon

Ingredients
4 salmon 6-8 oz fillets, about I inch thick,
skin-on
I cedar plank, soaked under water for at
least I hour
Lemon-Pepper dry seasoning
I /3 cup melted butter or margarine
1/3 cup fresh lemon juice
I /3 cup Worcestershire sauce
24 drops Tabasco sauce
Basting Sauce:

Melt butter in a sauce pan on low heat, add
lemon juice1 Worcestershire sauce, and
Tabasco ana heat through.
Seasoning:

Sprinkle fillets on all sides with lemon­
pepper dry seasoning pressing the season-

i�fo the nesh and place in the refrigerator
for 30 minutes.

Directions
Preheat grill to medium low heat, about 350
degrees, place soaked plank on grill rack,
close lid, and heat for 3 minutes.
Using tongs, nip plank and place salmon skin
side down on heated side of plank.
Baste fillets with prepared sauce.
Close lid and grill for 12-15 minutes until done
and salmon is opaque in
the center and nakes easily with a fork. Baste a
few times with basting sauce during cooking.
Remove plank and salmon from the grill and
serve.
Garnish with lemon wedges, and goes well
with sides of broccoli and parsley boiled new
potatoes.

Page 3
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

�Job hunting hmmmmmm? Maybe this can help........
Various teaching positions may be found online. Those who
are looking for positions in language and for those who are
interested in teaching in First Nations may want to check
out the following link. www.jobsineducation.com or

www.educationcanada.com

Fantastic teaching resources incorporating Native language can be found
at these sites:

http://snow.utoronto.ca/index.php?option=com-content&amp;task
=v1ew&amp;id=24&amp;Itemid=33
http://www.native-languages.org/ojibwe_animals.htm
http://www.nativetech.org/games/index.php

Native Language Institute courses offered for summer term 2010

r------------------------------------------------·
Institute courses for 2010
NL 2713 - Algonquian Linguistics
NL 3813 - Special Topics II

Native Language Teacher Certification (NLTC) 2010
July 5-30, 2010

lnstitute/Y ear 4
July 12-30, 2010

Ojibwe
OJI 1013 Pan I July 5-22, 2010
OJI 1015 Part II

July 26 - August 12, 2010

Cree

Language Resources
Intermediate Ojibwe

Advance Ojibwe

Introductory Ojibway (Severn)

ISBN: 88800002873
Publisher: Lu Printer

ISBN: 88800003687
Author: Beardy

ISBN: 88800000826
Author: Beardy, Tom

Price: $69.95

Price: $69.95

Price: $69.95

Cree Legends &amp; Narratives From
West Coat
ISBN: 0887 5 51599
Author: Ellis, C. Douglas

Price: $56.25

Ninootaan I can Hear It
ISBN: 0921064144
Author: O'Meara

Price: $34.95

Please visit the Lakehead Bookstore website for information about the books they have in stock, at http://bookstore.lakeheadu.ca
Page 4

�_..

e
Materials:

Hoop Di-um

•

A round metal cookie tin

•

A can opener

•

Self-sticking shelf paper

•

Scissors, a pencil and ruler

•

A piece of leather large enough to fit over the top of the cookie tin

•

A knife

•

2.5 meters (8 ft.) of leather lace

Directions:

Have an adult remove the bottom of the cookie tin with the can opener.
f
Cut a piece of shelf paper the same circumference and width as the tin. Peel of the backing and stick the paper on the tin.
Trace a circle about 2.5 cm ( I -inch) bigger than the tin. Cut out the circle.
Mark 12 evenly spaced dots around the edge of the rough side of the leather, about 2.5 cm (I -inch) in from the edge. Use the knife to
carefully poke holes in the leather at these dots.
Cut the leather lace into six equal pieces. Soak the laces and the leather circle in warm water for about 15 minutes, until they soften.
Take the laces and leather out of the water and pat them dry. Thread a lace through one of the holes in the leather. Double knot the lace,
leaving a length hanging.
Place the cookie tin on the center of the leather on the rough side. Stretch the lace across the bot1om of the drnm and thread it up through
the hole that is across from where the lace is tied. Pull it tight and double knot it. Thread and tie the next three laces the same way,
pulling the leather tight but being careful not to tear it.
As you pull the last two laces across the bottom of the drum, wrap them around the other laces where they cross in the center. Tie the
laces tightly.
Set the drum in a wann place to dry for a few days. As the leather dries, it will shrink and tighten.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
An-owheac\ Necklace

Use actual stone arrowheads to make a Native American necklace.
You need:

•
•
•

Stone Arrowhead
30" Suede Cord
Pony Beads

Instructions:

Wrap a 30" piece of suede around the arrowhead cross crossing as shown in the photo. Tie in the back. Push both ends of the cord
through a pony bead. You'll need to cut the ends to a point to get them to fit through. Push the bead down to the arrowhead. Slide three
more pony beads on each side. Tie ends together. Trim.

Page 5

�COLD\\ INTER!
The Blackfeet asked their Chief in autumn, if the winter
was going to be cold or not. Not really knowing the an­
swer, the chief replies that the winter was going to be cold
and that the members of the village were to collect wood
to be prepared. Being a good leader, he then went to the
nearest phone booth and called the National Weather
Service and asked, "Is this winter to be cold?" The man
on the phone responded, "This winter was going to be
quite cold indeed." So the Chief went back to speed up
his people to collect even more wood to be prepared. A
week later he called the National Weather Service again,
"Is it going to be a very cold winter?" "Yes," the man re­
plied, "its going to be a very cold winter." So the Chief
goes back to his people and orders them to go and find
every scrap of wood they can find. Two weeks later he
calls the National Weather Service again and asks "Are
you absolutely sure, that the winter is going to be very
cold?" "Absolutely" the man replies, "the Blackfeet are
collecting wood like crazy!"

Dry Bones
STRANGE WHITE I/EN
TN AN./Y CLOTHES
Pl.ANTING CROPS?!

TIE ARST
THAM&lt;SGMNG

"Youj11.�t sl,o,v 11p here i/legt1f�r t111d expect m to tell you 11bo11t com?"

DON BURNSTICK JOKES

YOU MIGHT BE A REDSKIN IF YOU&gt;
you have blankets for curtains ...
your dogs look like their going on a hunger strike...
you have more than 5 cars and only one of them works ... and that's
only in the summer, because in the winter, its too cold for II to start up
you use ketchup and water to fill your bingo dabber...
you use a close hanger for a car antenna...
your cars only alarm is the sound of it opening up a mile away and the
hunger struck dog inside....
you can fit 16 Indians in a ford pickup or a Honda...
you go swimming in your underwear .. .
you go to AA meetings just for coffee...
you hide your money in your sock, don't hide it in your bra, it'll be
found anyway
you go to KFC to celebrate thanksgiving
you use your sons hockey bag for a bingo bag
you bank at the money mart
you ever skinned road kill.... "oh look at that deer...oh.... uh ... we'll
come back when its dark
you ever shot a deer or a moose inside your house "hey .... what is
that... ... honey, bring me my .22!!!"
the most confusing day in your community is fathers day ...
you can properly execute the red river gig with rubber boots on ....
if you carry a five gallon jug and a cut up garden hose in the trunk of
your car...
if you try to make dry meat out of baloney...
if your pocket knife has ever been display as "exhibit A your honor"
you use your probation officer as a reference...
if your screen door has no screen on it...
if people can hear your car long before they can see it...
you been kicked out of several rehab centers for snagging...
you met your current spouse in a AA rehab...
your toolbox consists of duck tape and a butter knife...

Page 6

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="25">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="51851">
                  <text>Anishinaabemowik - Indigenous Languages Program Historical Documents</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="51852">
                  <text>Faculty of Education, Native Language Instructors Program</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="66026">
                <text>Native Language Instructor's Program Newsletter Vol 5 (Spring Issue) March 2010</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="66027">
                <text>Universities</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="66028">
                <text>Native Language Instructor Program</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="66029">
                <text>Faculty of Education</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="66030">
                <text>Lakehead University</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="66031">
                <text>Native Language Instructor Program</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="66032">
                <text>2009-03-01</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="66033">
                <text>Faculty of Education, Lakehead University</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="66034">
                <text>PDF</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="66035">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="66036">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="8206" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="9045">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/e3c61b41a70507fde9996cd617f8254c.pdf</src>
        <authentication>5c6ea3ce1c186fe3f505a7f6cb70f3e2</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="66046">
                    <text>January 2012

Newsletter
Message from the NLIP Coordinator

Bruce K. Beardy

Booshoo, Waachiye, Aniin to all of you. Welcome to the latest issue of the NLIP
newsletter. We are doing our best to offer two issues of the NLIP newsletter
annually that will be submitted to you, NLIP students, electronically. In each
issue, you will find information pertaining to Native Languages and Native
Language Education. Feel free to pass it on to others.
The past 2011 NLIP Summer School was a success and it was great to see many
people achieve their goals.
In the fall of 2011, I have been busy attending conferences and doing some
research for Native Languages Immersion programming. I participated in an
Indigenous Languages Institute symposium entitled "Immersion for all
Environments" in Albuquerque, NM. It was a two day conference discussing the
Native language immersion programs and its successes across Canada and the
United States. A lot of networking resulted from this gathering. I also had an
opportunity to visit an Immersion school in the state of Arizona while I was in the
area. The Tse'hootsooi Dine' Bi'olta' is a Navajo immersion school located in Fort
Defiance, Arizona. I felt very welcomed by the administration and staff of the
school. I observed in classrooms and briefly spoke to teaching staff. It was so
wonderful to see and hear the children speak in their Native language and many
of them wearing their traditional Navajo clothing.
More recently, I visited the Niigaane Ojibwe Immersion School at Leech Lake
Indian Reservation in Minnesota. This visit was to do some research and get an
idea how the immersion school operates and its' function, the role of the
teachers and the community.
I also attended the "Circle of Light - Learning Together for Student Success"
conference in Toronto. This is a First Nation, Metis and Inuit Education
conference put on jointly by Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development and
Ministry of Education. Approximately 1000 participants attended this
conference. While at this conference, the Chair of the Aboriginal Education
Department and I met with Ontario College of Teachers representatives to
discuss some of the issues NLIP students have told us about. It was a very positive
and productive meeting and we hope this will alleviate some obstacles that you
are facing. We will continue to work with OCT and resolve the issues that we
experience.
.....Continues on page 2
'
·

'Ii •

{

A

'IP".

�

_.,1

.........,

�...continued from page 1
Lakehead University, Aboriginal
Education Department also co­
hosted with the Ontario College of
Teachers a "Conversation Circles to
Support the Development of
Additional Qualification Guidelines
for Teaching First Nations
Students". There were
approximately 30 participants of
Ojibwe and Oji-Cree speakers at
this gathering. Out of this
conversations, teaching immersion
Native languages was a big topic.
The Cree speakers held their own
conversations in their territory
with OCT.
We are hoping to offer a course
Teaching Native Language
Immersion to our NLIP students for
2012 summer. This course will fall
under the NLIP Summer Institute
program and is designed for
Native Language teachers who
have completed the NLTC or the
NASL Diploma programs. For more
information, you can call me
directly at 1-807-343-8003 or e­
mail: bbeardy@lakeheadu.ca.
We feel it Is Important to
remind people of the
description of the Native
Language Instructors' Program
(NLIP), Its objectives and other
programs.

1.
2.
3.
4.

5,
6.
7.

8.

Description of
the Program
The Native Language Instructors' Program (NLIP) at Lakehead University is the
only program in Ontario with a mandate from the Ontario College of Teachers
to provide teacher certification in Algonquian languages. Established in 1984,
the purpose of NLIP is to provide persons who are fluent in their native
language with a recognized (in accordance with the Ministry of Education)
means of teaching that language to their respective communities. In other
words, NLIP serves largely as a school that educates students in a relatively
standardized method of instruction, which is applied to traditional languages.
By no means restrictive, NLIP provides a learning environment that respects,
encompasses and promotes traditional teaching practices and beliefs. NLIP
also provides courses to those persons who wish to become fluent in a
particular language.
Students for the Native Language Instructors' program apply from across
Ontario and other regions; once accepted they have an opportunity to earn a
teaching certificate or diploma. The program is offered in the month of July
for three or four summers.
The purpose of the Native Language Instructors' Program is to increase the
number of Native language teachers through summer programs, which will
prepare them to teach Native Languages as described in Ontario Ministry of
Education regulations. The program provides the students the study of the
structure of the Native language, pedagogical principles, methods and
techniques for teaching Native Languages. Course requirements are met
through a combination of courses and student teaching.

the students will have understanding of the underlying structure of their language and will have developed
literacy skills;
the �udents will have a knowledge of methods and techniques for teaching Native As A Second Language;
the students will have an understanding of practical pedagogical principles that will help them work within
the context of the school, with administrators, teachers, students, and the community;
the students will successfully complete a combination of observation and teaching experience;
the students will have gained knowledge of the traditional teachings and values inherent in Native
languages and culture;
to maintain the survival of the Native language and culture;
that the NLIP students have outlined for them the traits, skills and habits of a successful university student;

that the NLIP students be trained in and measured by a single teaching formula and a common lesson
planning and evaluation format;
that NUP provide to its students the means to develop traits, skills and habits of a successful university
!s'tlldent.

Anishinaabemowin Gikino'amaadiiwigamig

�Native Language Teacher's Certification
A three summer program for the month of July; training in teaching Native as a
second language to students whose first language is English.
The Certification Program is designed for individuals who want to teach a Native
Language as a second language in a primary or secondary school. It focuses on
developing skills required for second language teaching. The curriculum is
designed for students who enter the program with an Algonquian Language
background.

Admission to the NLTC Program
Students will be admitted to the program provided that they meet both of the
following:
(a) Native language requirement of the course to which the candidate wishes
to be admitted. i.e. for both NASL/NLTC - fluently speak a native language.
(b)

Lakehead University Admission Requirements. Requirements for
Admission to Undergraduate Degree Programs (See Mature Student and
Extraordinary Admissions in the Lakehead University on-line calendar at
www.lakeheadu.ca).

Components
In order to qualify for the Transitional Certificate of Qualification and
Registration through the Ontario College of Teachers (OCT), a student will be
required to complete successfully each year all four half-courses of the following:
1.

Algonquian Courses: Introduction to literacy in Native Language, Practice
in reading and writing, curriculum materials and understanding of
language structures.

2.

Methodology Courses: Methods of second language teaching, planning,
use of curriculum guidelines, classroom activities, evaluation, and
materials production.

3.

Pedagogy Courses: A survey of teacher ethics, classroom management
skills, record keeping and planning. An examination of characteristics of
children. Identification and solutions to common problems facing Native
language teachers. An examination of bilingual education, strengths,
weaknesses, problems, and opportunities.

4.

Practicum: Students become familiar with Ministry of Education
documents, plan for instruction, classroom observation and on-site
teaching experiences in Native language classes with children aged five to
sixteen. Students participate in workshops and assemblies that provide
activities and resources for the classroom.

Anishinaabemowin Gikino'amaadiiwigamig

�-

---

�--

----�----

Native as a Second Language
for Non-fluent Speakers
NLTC student graduates wishing to enter the fourth
year of the NASL diploma may do so providing that
they complete all the NLIP requirements.
NASL on-campus courses consists of: Algonquian 2233,
Education 1354, and Education 1574.
Education 1599 is a supervised fall and winter
practicum, off-campus, in the fourth year of the Native
Language Instructors' Program and is a required course
to complete six prescribed assignments.
Upon successful completion of the Fourth Year or NASL
Program, student is awarded a Lakehead University
Native as a Second Language Diploma and can attend
the Lakehead University Convocation.

Each summer, two Advanced Native Language and/or
Linguistic courses are offered to students who have
graduated from both NLTC and NASL programs
wishing to extend their knowledge and do research in
the area of their specialty as well as to any person
similarly qualified.
For 2012 NLIP Summer Session these courses are
being offered:
Native language 2711
Introduction to Native American linguistics

A survey of the native languages of North America:
present situation, historical relationships, sound
systems, grammatical structures, geographic and social
variation, writing systems and language maintenance.
The basic principles of descriptive and historical
linguistics will be introduced.
Native language 3811
Special Topic I

A half course on a selected topic. (Possibly an
Immersion course.)

The courses in this series are intended for students who
wish to learn either Ojibwe or Cree, and are not
normally intended for students already fluent in one of
these languages. These Ojibwe and Cree courses are
usually offered through-out the year including spring
and summer and depending on the student
enrollment. Some of these courses are cross listed with
Indigenous Learning.
Ojibwe as a Second Language

Lakehead University offers introductory courses in two
of the main dialect variants found in Ontario. Severn
Ojibwe (sometimes also referred to as 'Oji-Cree,' and as
Anihshininiimowin in the language itself) is the
primary dialect spoken in much of Ontario north of the
Berens River. It is frequently written using the
traditional syllabic writing system; a wide variety of
orthographic traditions, both alphabetic and syllabic,
are used in Ojibwe dialects. Western Ojibwe refers to
the dialects of Ojibwe spoken in communities from
approximately Sault Ste. Marie in the east, along the
north shore of Lake Superior, and through the Lake of
the Woods area.
Severn Ojibwe Courses include:

Introduction to Severn Ojibwe Part I and Part II.
Intermediate Ojibwe
Advanced Ojibwe
Western Ojibwe Courses include:

Introduction to Western Ojibwe Part I and Part II.
Cree as a Second Language

Introduction to Cree Part I and Part II are normally
offered through out the year but is dependent on the
student enrollment.

�The Native Language Minor
Students at Lakehead University may obtain a Minor in
Native Languages by taking an appropriate series of
courses.

NLIP Linguistic Community
Residence

A) The first is intended for fluent speakers of a Native
language (usually Ojibwe or Cree).

With the cooperation of the Lakehead University
Residence and Conference Services, townhouses for NLIP
students are set a side for the month of July each summer.
The residence provides atmosphere conducive to serious
study and encourages the use of the Native language to
the greatest extent. Parents are responsible for children in
the residence community and on campus.

B) The second is intended for individuals who wish to
learn a Native language, or to improve their fluency
in a Native language.

NLIP Residence Coordinator and Assistant are available to
provide services day and evenings including weekends on­
site at the residence.

An overall average of 60% is required in three courses
chosen in consultation with the Coordinator, NLIP
program.

NLIP Elders Program

There are two paths for obtaining the Native Language
Minor.

Program Requirements for Fluent Speakers
The following sequence of courses is recommended for
�tudents who are fluent in Ojibwe or Cree.
1) The equivalent of ONE full first year" ALGO" course.
This requirement may be satisfied by taking ALGO
1212 and ALGO 1232 (Note: these courses are
normally offered during the summer session only).
2)

The equivalent of TWO full courses beyond the first
year level. This may be met by taking a combination
of"ALGO" courses and/or" NALA" courses. In
consultation with the NLIP coordinator, special
combinations of courses may be designed.

Program Requirements for Second Language
Learners and Non-Fluent Speakers
The following sequence of courses is recommended for
students who are learning Ojibwe or Cree.
1) The equivalent of ONE full first year"OJIB" or
"CREE" course. This requirement is satisfied by
taking OJIB 1013 or 1014 and OJIB 1015 or 1016 or
Cree 1010 and Cree 1012. These courses are
regularly offered during the fall and winter
semesters, and may also be offered during the
month of July.
2) The equivalent of TWO full courses beyond the first
year level. This may be met by taking a combination
of"OJIB" or"CREE" courses and/or appropriate
"NALA" courses. In consultation with the NLIP
coordinator, special combinations of courses may be
designed.

Elders provide counselling and general support to
students regarding personal, social, guidance and cultural
needs. On occasion, Elders are invited by the faculty
lecturers and children's programs to share storytelling
sessions and cultural knowledge and experiences to the
classes. They conduct opening and closing prayers at
assemblies and staff meetings, smudges, sweat lodge, and
sunrise ceremonies. They maintain liaison and
communication with the students, children's programs,
faculty and staff.
Elders are available during the day and in the evenings
including weekends for the students.

NLIP Student Support
Workers
The student support workers provide assistance and
support to students in accessing University services:
Aboriginal Services, Library, Learning Assistance Centre,
Health Services, Financial Aid Office, etc. They also
support students regarding personal, social and cultural
needs. Maintain liaison and communication with the
students, children's programs, faculty and staff and work
with NLIP student council regarding goals and activities.
They encourage students to participate in the planning
and organization of activities, maintaining
communication links, scheduling and advertising of
events.
Aboriginal Education Counsellor may be available
on-site, three days per week to provide social,
cultural and academic support to students
during the summer programs.

�Lakehead University
Native Language Teacher's Certification (NLTC)
July 3 - July 27, 2012
Native as a Second Language (NASL) Diploma
July 9 - July 27, 2012
Institute Courses
July 9 - July 27, 2012

Native Language 2 711
Introduction to Native American Linguistics
A survey of the Native languages of North America: present situation,
historical relationships, sound systems, grammatical structures,
geographic and social variation, writing systems and language
maintenance. The basic principles of descriptive and historical linguistics
will be introduced.

Native Language 3811
Special Topic I
A half course on a selected topic. (Possibly an Immersion course.)
Second Language Courses
Ojibwe
July 3 - July 19, 2012
Ojibwe 1013 Part I
Introduction to basic Severn Ojibwe phonetics, grammar and
conversation.
July 23 - August 9, 2012
Ojibwe 1015 Part II
Developmental of conversational skills and practice in writing.
Cree
July 3 - July 19, 2012
Cree 1010 Part I
Introduction to basic Severn Ojibwe phonetics, grammar and
conversation.
July 23 - August 9, 2012
Cree 1012 Part II
Developmental of conversational skills and practice in writing.

�™�

Ani$hinaabemowin-Teg Inc. Presents

0

March 28th to April 1, 2012
l&lt;Gw�dln C�1tno ;md Convctntlon Centre
Saull St•. M,uht, Mich,tffan

R�lttrotlon
f.1,&amp;,,,dOo.odt,,.,•-­
Dotc_, IS 2'0111&lt;: V$Ot
m•oo .a«n

,,oo

1'!000 E-..:�• 0
00 �'l'o./11

This is a Drug and
Alcohol Free Event
Please Koop Conforoncc
Aroa Smoke F roe

$t-nd l'•1mitnt .end ff�••trJtton to

0t•tr-.iN- C tunJ fc:unc:t�
•H.....,, S61, P o
na
1"Ch� 011

POP IC.0

f•• ,�, lf7-64at

morv lnformotlon phNISV vmoll Nortlna Osowomldc ot
mortl1&lt;1omlk@hotm"Gll.com or Jonis Fairbanks ot
foirbonksj hotmoil.com or check out oor wetbsltv www.ateg.&lt;&lt;1
for

...

19th Annual Stablllzlng Indigenous Languages Symposium

Thompson Rivers University, Kamloops, British Columbia, Canada,
May 17-19, 2012
For more information contact Jack Miller at JamiUer@tru.ca
Click here to see Tim on youtube:
Tjm speaks Ojibwe[Tim ojibwemo

http:/Jwww.tr:.u.ca/sils,'1tml

�New Release

Are you returning for NLIP 20 12 Summer
School?
If you were an NLTC (Year 1 , 2 and 3) student last summer, you may proceed to
register on-line for the NLTC summer courses. Year 3 NLTC students who wish to
do an additional year for year 4 or NASL Diploma program may also proceed to
register on-line. Since many of you were able to register your courses on-line
last year, this should be a little bit more easier. If you are unsure which courses
you should register, please refer to your transcripts. The "ALGO" year 1 and 2
courses are a bit tricky as you will need to know which section of the ALGO
course you took last year and must register the same section for second year
students, i.e. for Cree speakers you took ALGO 1 21 2 AC and can register for
ALGO 1 232 AC; for western Oji-Cree speakers; ALGO 1 21 2 AA for 1 232 AA;
eastern Ojibwe speakers AB; and for western speakers AD. For returning first
year NLTC students, ALGO 1 232 AA/AD sections of Western Ojibwe and Western
Oji-Cree may be combined for the 201 2 Summer session as is the first year ALGO
1 21 2 AA/AD sections.
All others, new first year NLTC applicants and Institute Courses applicants MUST
apply through Lakehead ADMISSIONS office. If you require assistance or need
more information, call Diane Maybee or Bruce K. Beardy at 1 -807-343-8542 or
1 -807-343-8003; E-mail: dma bee@lakeheadu.ca or bbeardy@lakeheadu.ca.

Nenapohs Legends

Memoir 2
Margaret Cote
ISBN: 978-0-88977-219-9
Series: University of Regina Publications
25
Year: 2011
Pages: 1 1 2
Binding: Paperback
$19.95

Seven traditional stories of the Saulteaux
trickster. Nenapohs.
In both Standard Roman Orthography
and Syllabics, with English translation
and a glossary of Saulteaux words.
Shop on-line at
WWW.CPRCPRESS.CA

For returning NLTC students, using your Mylnfo (WebAdvisor) go to htt!UL
howtoregister.lakeheadu.ca/ for registration instructions. PLEASE read and
follow the instructions. If you are having a difficult time, call Diane or Bruce at
the NLIP office.

Bring your Lesson Plans
The summer NLIP Practicum Planner is encouraging all returning NLTC students
to bring their Lesson Plans that they used for their classes over the school year.
Please review your lessons carefully and identify what worked best and how
they can be improved. Bring all, if you have available, your worksheets,
exemplars and rubrics that go with the lessons. With this idea, you will have all
your resources to use for your practice teaching next summer. You will be
required to teach a minimum of three practicums during the summer.
For Ontario Ministry of Education Native Languages resources, visit the
website at: hUp://www._edu_.gov.on.caLeng/
For Ontario College of Teachers, visit the website at: b_ttp;//�o_ct.ca/

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="25">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="51851">
                  <text>Anishinaabemowik - Indigenous Languages Program Historical Documents</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="51852">
                  <text>Faculty of Education, Native Language Instructors Program</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="66047">
                <text>Native Language Instructor's Program Newsletter January 2012</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="66048">
                <text>Universities</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="66049">
                <text>Native Language Instructor Program, Faculty of Education, Lakehead University.  This newsletter was sent to students (current and future), and faculty and staff. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="66050">
                <text>Native Language Instructor Program</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="66051">
                <text>Faculty of Education</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="66052">
                <text>Lakehead University</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="66053">
                <text>2012-01-01</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="66054">
                <text>Faculty of Education, Lakehead University</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="66055">
                <text>PDF</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="66056">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="66057">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="8207" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="9046">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/8154f0af057b119dd8208a23f584961e.pdf</src>
        <authentication>f4397eb22cabad582e48970a6ebf2063</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="66280">
                    <text>69th ANNUAL MEETING
Eau Claire, Wisconsin — April 24-25, 2023
INSTITUTE ON LAKE SUPERIOR GEOLOGY
Part 1 — Program and Abstracts

�Thank you to our sponsors!

A SPECIAL THANK YOU TO OUR INDIVIDUAL CONTRIBUTORS:
FREDERICK CAMPBELL, VAL CHANDLER, JIM DEGRAFF, THOMAS
ERICKSON, TOM FITZ, DAVE GOOD, PAULA LEIER-ENGELHARDT,
ALLAN MACTAVISH, BOB MAHIN, GORDON MEDARIS JR., JIM
MILLER, STEVEN PINTA, TOD ROUSH, AND GERRY WHITE

i

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

69th ANNUAL MEETING

INSTITUTE ON LAKE SUPERIOR GEOLOGY

April 24-25th
Eau Claire, Wisconsin
HOSTED BY
Rob Lodge, Esther Stewart, Carsyn Ames Co-Chairs
University of Wisconsin- Eau Claire and Wisconsin Geological
and Natural History Survey
Proceedings - Volume 69
Part 1 – Program and Abstracts
Compiled and edited by Carsyn Ames
Cover Photos. Left— Photograph showing a group of men, women and children traveling through a forest
north of Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin in a horse-drawn carriage, Chippewa Co., 1916. Center— Cross-bedding
in basal Cambrian sandstone Eau Claire Co., 1919. Right — Outcrops of rhyolite schist along the north fork of
the Eau Claire River, Eau Claire Co. 1919.

ii

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

69th INSTITUTE

ON

LAKE SUPERIOR GEOLOGY

VOLUME 69 CONSISTS OF:

PART 1: PROGRAM AND ABSTRACTS
PART 2: FIELD T RIP GUIDEBOOK
Trip 1: PRECAMBRIAN GEOLOGY OF THE CHIPPEWA RIVER VALLEY
Trip 2: WISCONSIN’S PALEOZOIC STRATIGRAPHY AND TOUR OF CRYSTAL
CAVE
Trip 3: PRECAMBRIAN GEOLOGY OF THE EAU CLAIRE RIVER VALLEY
Trip 4: QUATERNARY GEOLOGY AND GEOMORPHOLOGY OF THE EAU
CLAIRE REGION

Reference to material in Part 1 should follow the example below:
Grauch, V.J.S., Heller, Sam J., Stewart, Esther K., and Woodruff, Laurel G. 2023. Exploring the
geology of the Midcontinent Rift under western Lake Superior using a preliminary velocity model
of seismic line GLIMPCE C. in Ames C. (Ed.), Institute on Lake Superior Geology Proceedings,
69th Annual Meeting, Eau Claire, Wisconsin, Part 1 - Abstracts and Proceedings. v.69, part 1, p.3738.
Published by the 69th Institute on Lake Superior Geology and distributed by the ILSG Secretary:
Pete Hollings - ILSG Secretary
Department of Geology
Lakehead University
955 Oliver Road
Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1
Canada
Email: peter.hollings@lakeheadu.ca

ILSG website: www.lakesuperiorgeology.org

iii

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1
ISSN 1042-9964

Part 1: Program and Abstracts
Table of Contents
Institutes on Lake Superior Geology, 1955-2023

v

Sam Goldich and the Goldich Medal

vii

Goldich Medal Guidelines

ix

Goldich Medalists and Goldich Medal Committee

xi

Citation for Goldich Medal Award to Peter Hollings

xii

Honoring the Pioneers of Lake Superior Geology

xii

Nomination for Thomas Benton Brooks, Pioneer of Lake Superior Geology

xv

Memoriams for Stephen Allard, Steven Hauck and Manfred Kehlenbeck

xx

Eisenbrey Student Travel Awards

xxv

Joe Mancuso Student Research Awards

xxvi

Doug Duskin Student Paper Awards and Award Committee

xxvii

Board of Directors and Session Chairs

xxviii

Field Trip Leaders and Guidebook Authors

xxix

Report of the 68th Annual Meeting

xxx

Technical Program

xxxiv

Poster Presentations

xl

Banquet Presentation

xliii

Abstracts

1-99

iv

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Institutes on Lake Superior Geology, 1955-2023

#

Date

Place

Chairs

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

1955
1956
1957
1958
1959
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977

Minneapolis, Minnesota
Houghton, Michigan
East Lansing, Michigan
Duluth, Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Madison, Wisconsin
Port Arthur, Ontario
Houghton, Michigan
Duluth, Minnesota
Ishpeming, Michigan
St. Paul, Minnesota
Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan
East Lansing, Michigan
Superior, Wisconsin
Oshkosh, Wisconsin
Thunder Bay, Ontario
Duluth, Minnesota
Houghton, Michigan
Madison, Wisconsin
Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario
Marquette, Michigan
St. Paul, Minnesota
Thunder Bay, Ontario

C.E. Dutton
A.K. Snelgrove
B.T. Sandefur
R.W. Marsden
G.M. Schwartz &amp; C. Craddock
E.N. Cameron
E.G. Pye
A.K. Snelgrove
H. Lepp
A.T. Broderick
P.K. Sims &amp; R.K. Hogberg
R.W. White
W.J. Hinze
A.B. Dickas
G.L. LaBerge
M.W. Bartley &amp; E. Mercy
D.M. Davidson
J. Kalliokoski
M.E. Ostrom
P.E. Giblin
J.D. Hughes
M. Walton
M.M. Kehlenbeck

v

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

#
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56

Date
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010

Place
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Duluth, Minnesota
Eau Claire, Wisconsin
East Lansing, Michigan
International Falls, Minnesota
Houghton, Michigan
Wausau, Wisconsin
Kenora, Ontario
Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin
Wawa, Ontario
Marquette, Michigan
Duluth, Minnesota
Thunder Bay, Ontario
Eau Claire, Wisconsin
Hurley, Wisconsin
Eveleth, Minnesota
Houghton, Michigan
Marathon, Ontario
Cable, Wisconsin
Sudbury, Ontario
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Marquette, Michigan
Thunder Bay, Ontario
Madison, Wisconsin
Kenora, Ontario
Iron Mountain, Michigan
Duluth, Minnesota
Nipigon, Ontario
Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario
Lutsen, Minnesota
Marquette, Michigan
Ely, Minnesota
International Falls, Minnesota

57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023

Ashland, Wisconsin
Thunder Bay, Ontario
Houghton, Michigan
Hibbing, Minnesota
Dryden, Ontario
Duluth, Minnesota
Wawa, Ontario
Iron Mountain, Michigan
Terrace Bay, Ontario
Meeting cancelled
Virtual meeting
Sudbury, Ontario
Eau Claire, Wisconsin

vi

Chairs
G. Mursky
D.M. Davidson
P.E. Myers
W.C. Cambray
D.L. Southwick
T.J. Bornhorst
G.L. LaBerge
C.E. Blackburn
J.K. Greenberg
E.D. Frey &amp; R.P. Sage
J. S. Klasner
J.C. Green
M.M. Kehlenbeck
P.E. Myers
A.B. Dickas
D.L. Southwick
T.J. Bornhorst
M.C. Smyk
L.G. Woodruff
R.P. Sage &amp; W. Meyer
J.D. Miller &amp; M.A. Jirsa
T.J. Bornhorst &amp; R.S. Regis
S.A. Kissin &amp; P. Fralick
M.G. Mudrey &amp; Jr., B.A. Brown
P. Hinz &amp; R.C. Beard
L. Woodruff &amp; W.F. Cannon
S. Hauck &amp; M. Severson
M. Smyk &amp; P. Hollings
A. Wilson &amp; R. Sage
L. Woodruff &amp; J. Miller
T.J. Bornhorst &amp; J. Klasner
J. Miller, G. Hudak, D. Peterson
M. Jirsa, P. Hollings &amp; T. Boerboom,
P. Hinz &amp; M.Smyk
T. Fitz
P. Hollings
T.J. Bornhorst &amp; A. Blaske
J. Miller &amp; M. Jirsa
R. Cundari &amp; P. Hinz
J. Miller, C. Schardt &amp; D. Peterson
A. Pace, A. Wilson &amp; T.J. Bornhorst
L. Woodruff, W. Cannon &amp; E.K. Stewart
P. Hollings &amp; M.C. Smyk
Cancelled by the COVID-19 pandemic
M. Jirsa, M. Smyk &amp; P. Hollings
R.M. Easton &amp; W. Bleeker
R. Lodge, E.K. Stewart, &amp; C. Ames

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Sam Goldich and the Goldich Medal
Sam Goldich received an A.B. from the University of Minnesota in 1929, a M.A. from Syracuse University
in 1930, and a Ph.D. from the University of Minnesota in 1936. During World War II Sam worked for the
U.S. Geological Survey in mineral exploration. In 1948, Sam returned to the University of Minnesota, and
became Professor and Director of the Rock Analysis Laboratory the following year. He rejoined the U.S.
Geological Survey in 1959 and was appointed as the first Branch Chief of the Branch of Isotope Geology.
Sam returned to academia in 1964 when he went to Pennsylvania State University. He left PSU in 1965
and moved to the State University of New York at Stony Brook, where he stayed for 3 years. Restless yet
again, he moved to Northern Illinois University in 1968 where he was a professor until his retirement in
1977. Sam’s final move was to Denver where he became an emeritus at the Colorado School of Mines.
Sam died in 2000, less than a month before his 92nd birthday.
In the late 1970s, Geological Society of America Special Paper 182, which included seminal
geochronological studies by Sam Goldich and coworkers on the Archean rocks of the Minnesota River
Valley, was nearing completion. At this time various ILSG regulars began discussing the possibility of
recognizing Sam for his pioneering work on the resolution of age relationships and thus the geology of
Precambrian rocks in the Lake Superior region. Three members, R.W. Ojakangas, J.O. Kalliokoski and
G.B. Morey, presented the idea to the ILSG Board of Directors in 1978. The Board approved the creation
of an award, provided funding could be obtained. It was suggested that collecting one or two dollars at
registration for a dedicated account would provide resources for striking the medal. A general request was
made to the ILSG membership for donations and Sam himself offered a challenge grant to match the
contributions. In total $4,000 was collected and thus began the work of creating the Goldich Medal.
The initial Goldich Award was presented to Sam by G.B. Morey in 1979 and consisted of a large paper
proclamation. For the actual medal, G.B. Morey consulted with the foundry on production details, while
Dick Ojakangas and Jorma Kalliokoski worked on the design of the award, suggesting that it be given for
“outstanding contributions to the geology of the Lake Superior region.” Simultaneously, a committee of
J.O. Kalliokosi, W.F. Cannon, M.M Kehlenbeck, G.B. Morey, and G. Mursky developed the Award
Guidelines that were approved by the ILSG Board. By 1981 all the elements of the Goldich Award had
come together, and the second recipient, Carl E. Dutton, Jr., received the Goldich Medal for 50 years of
significant contributions to the understanding of the geology of the Lake Superior region. Since the
beginning, the Awards Committee has consisted of individuals representing industry, government and
academia, with each member of the Committee serving for three years. The medal is now awarded every
year at the annual ILSG meeting.
Reference:
Morey, G.B. and Hanson, G.N. (editors). 1980. Selected studies of Archean gneisses and Lower Proterozoic
rocks, southern Canadian Shield. Geological Society of America, Special Paper 182, 175 p.

Prepared by various Goldich Medal Awardees, 2007

vii

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

INSTITUTE ON LAKE SUPERIOR GEOLOGY GOLDICH MEDAL
viii

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Goldich Medal Guidelines
(Adopted by the Board of Directors, 1981; amended 1999)
Preamble
The Institute on Lake Superior Geology was born in 1955, as documented by the fact that the 27th
annual meeting was held in 1981. The Institute’s continuing objectives are to deal with those
aspects of geology that are related geographically to Lake Superior; to encourage the discussion
of subjects and sponsoring field trips that will bring together geologists from academia,
government surveys, and industry; and to maintain an informal but highly effective mode of
operation.
During the course of its existence, the membership of the Institute (that is, those geologists who
indicate an interest in the objectives of the ILSG by attending) has become aware of the fact that
certain of their colleagues have made particularly noteworthy and meritorious contributions to the
understanding of Lake Superior geology and mineral deposits.
The first award was made by ILSG to Sam Goldich in 1979 for his many contributions to the
geology of the region extending over about 50 years. Subsequent medallists and this year’s
recipient are listed in the table below.
Award Guidelines
1) The medal shall be awarded annually by the ILSG Board of Directors to a geologist whose
name is associated with a substantial interest in, and contribution to, the geology of the Lake
Superior region.
2) The Board of Directors shall appoint the Goldich Medal Committee. The initial appointment
will be of three members, one to serve for three years, one for two years, and one for one year.
The member with the briefest incumbency shall be chair of the Nominating Committee. After
the first year, the Board of Directors shall appoint at each spring meeting one new member
who will serve for three years. In his/her third year this member shall be the chair. The
Committee membership should reflect the main fields of interest and geographic distribution
of ILSG membership. The out-going, senior member of the Board of Directors shall act as
liaison between the Board and the Committee for a period of one year.
3) By the end of November, the Goldich Medal Committee shall make its recommendation to the
Chair of the Board of Directors, who will then inform the Board of the nominee.
4) The Board of Directors normally will accept the nominee of the Committee, inform the
medallist, and have one medal engraved appropriately for presentation at the next meeting of
the Institute.
5) It is recommended that the Institute set aside annually from whatever sources, such funds as
will be required to support the continuing costs of this award.
ix

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Nominating Procedures
1) The deadline for nominations is November 1. Nominations shall be taken at any time by the
Goldich Medal Committee. Committee members may themselves nominate candidates;
however, Board members may not solicit for or support individual nominees.
2) Nominations must be in writing and supported by appropriate documentation such as letters of
recommendation, lists of publications, curriculum vita’s, and evidence of contributions to
Lake Superior geology and to the Institute.
3) Nominations are not restricted to Institute attendees, but are open to anyone who has worked
on and contributed to the understanding of Lake Superior geology.
Selection Guidelines
1) Nominees are to be evaluated on the basis of their contributions to Lake Superior
geology (sensu lato) including:
a) importance of relevant publications;
b) promotion of discovery and utilization of natural resources;
c) contributions to understanding of the natural history and environment of the region;
d) generation of new ideas and concepts; and
e) contributions to the training and education of geoscientists and the public.
2) Nominees are to be evaluated on their contributions to the Institute as demonstrated by
attendance at Institute meetings, presentation of talks and posters, and service on Institute
boards, committees, and field trips.
3) The relative weights given to each of the foregoing criteria must remain flexible and at the
discretion of the Committee members.
4) There are several points to be considered by the Goldich Medal Committee:
a) An attempt should be made to maintain a balance of medal recipients from each of the
three estates—industry, academia, and government.
b) It must be noted that industry geoscientists are at a disadvantage in that much of their
work in not published.
5) Lake Superior has two sides, one the U.S., and the other Canada. This is undoubtedly one of
the Institute’s great strengths and should be nurtured by equitable recognition of excellence in
both countries.

x

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Goldich Medalists
1979 Samuel S. Goldich

1998 Zell Peterman

2016 Mark A. Jirsa

1980 not awarded

1999 Tsu-Ming Han

2017 Philip Fralick

1981 Carl E. Dutton, Jr

2000 John C. Green

1982 Ralph W. Marsden

2001 John S. Klasner

2018 Val W. Chandler
2019 Mark Severson

1983 Burton Boyum

2002 Ernest K. Lehmann

2020 not awarded

1984 Richard W. Ojakangas

2003 Klaus J. Schulz

2021 Alan MacTavish

1985 Paul K. Sims

2004 Paul Weiblen

2022 Terrence J. Boerboom

1986 G.B. Morey

2005 Mark Smyk

2023 Peter Hollings

1987 Henry H. Halls

2006 Michael G. Mudrey

1988 Walter S. White

2007 Joseph Mancuso

1989 Jorma Kalliokoski

2008 Theodore J. Bornhorst

1990 Kenneth C. Card

2009 L. Gordon Medaris, Jr

1991 William Hinze

2010 William D. Addison &amp;

1992 William F. Cannon

Gregory R. Brumpton

1993 Donald W. Davis

2011 Dean M. Rossell

1994 Cedric Iverson

2012 James D. Miller

1995 Gene La Berge

2013 Tom Waggoner

1996 David L. Southwick
1997 Ronald P. Sage

2014 Laurel Woodruff
2015 Rodney J. Ikola

2023 GOLDICH MEDAL RECIPIENT

Peter Hollings
Goldich Medal Committee
Serving through the meeting year shown in parentheses.
Steve Kissin (2018-2023*) Lakehead University (Committee Chair)
Dorothy Campbell (2019-2024*) Ontario Geological Survey
Dean Peterson (2022-2025) Big Rock Exploration
*Terms of the committee members were extended 2 years because of the cancelation of
the 2020 meeting and the logistical difficulties of voting during the 2021 virtual meeting.

xi

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Citation for the Goldich Medal Recipient to
Peter Hollings
ILSG Members, it is our privilege to present the
citation for this year’s recipient of the prestigious
Goldich Medal to Dr. Peter Hollings.
Pete received his Bachelor of Science with Honours in
Geology from the Royal Holloway and Bedford New
College, University of London in 1992. He continued as
a postgraduate research assistant at Royal Holloway and
Bedford New College until 1994 when he enrolled as a
Ph.D. student at the University of Saskatchewan. He
earned his Ph.D. in 1998 and his doctoral dissertation
was titled “Geochemistry of the Uchi subprovince.” He
had a one-year postdoctoral fellowship at
Saskatchewan, followed by a two-year NSERC
postdoctoral fellowship at the University of Tasmania.
Pete joined the faculty at Lakehead University in 2001 as an Assistant Professor and in
2009 was promoted to full Professor, a title he continues to hold. Since 2013 Pete has been
Director of the Centre of Excellence for Sustainable Mining and Exploration (CESME) at
Lakehead University. He has served as Chair of the Department of Geology and as interim
Dean of the Faculty of Science and Environmental Studies at Lakehead.
Pete has been recognized for his research through several awards. In 2004 he and his coauthors were awarded the Julian Boldy Award by the Mineral Deposits Division of the
Geological Association of Canada for an outstanding paper. In 2008 he was awarded the
William Harvey Gross Medal by the Mineral Deposits Division of the Geological
Association of Canada for significant contributions to the field of economic geology by a
geoscientist under the age of 40. He was part of the team recognized by an award in 2012
and in 2014 by AMIRA International. In 2015 he was named the NSERC Distinguished
Researcher for Lakehead University and in 2016 he was named the Lakehead University
Research Chair in the NSERC/CHIR category. He received the Howard Street Robinson
Medal from the Geological Association of Canada in 2017. In 2021, a paper on which he
was co-author was awarded the 2020 Cameron-Hall Copper Medal for the most outstanding
scientific publication in the journal Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis
(GEEA). Pete was awarded the NOHFC Industrial Research Chair in Mineral Exploration
for a term from 2020 to 2025.
Pete has an impressive professional record of publications and presentations. As of 2022,
he has been first author or co-author of 145 refereed journal articles, 13 book chapters, 234
reports, 136 papers in refereed conference proceedings, and 87 abstracts in conference
xii

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

proceedings.
While this is an impressive list of accomplishments, it is Pete’s ongoing contributions to
our understanding of Lake Superior geology and to the Institute on Lake Superior Geology
that make him a worthy recipient of the Goldich Medal.
Pete has extensively conducted research on the geology of the Lake Superior region and the
broader Superior Province. He has focused on both the Midcontinent Rift System (MRS)
and Archean greenstone belts and their mineral resources. More than 30 of his published
papers in refereed journals are on Lake Superior geology as well as about half of both his
30 first-authored conference proceedings and 29 first-authored refereed abstracts. He has
contributed to more than 60 technical reports on Lake Superior geology. Of his 27 invited
presentations, half have dealt with Lake Superior geology.
Pete has a significant number of publications and presentations relevant to the discovery
and utilization of natural resources in the Lake Superior region. Some of his numerous
economic geology publications and presentations on topics outside of the Lake Superior
region are also applicable to our regional geology. An area of emphasis in Peter’s research
is the application of geochemistry and petrology to explore for ore deposits, including NiCu-PGE deposits (e.g., Lac des Iles Mine and the Thunder Bay North igneous complex).
His other areas of interest include igneous geochemistry of the MRS, Archean greenstone
belts and granites, the tectonic setting of komatiites, and Archean gold deposits.
As the Director of CESME, he provides leadership in promoting the discovery of and
environmentally responsible exploration for natural resources. Pete has also made
contributions to understanding of the natural history and environment of the Lake Superior
region as demonstrated by numerous publications focused on the timing and evolution of
local rocks and mineral deposits.
Pete’s research is firmly rooted in field work and uses geochemical and other data to test
existing ideas and concepts and to develop new ones. He has successfully used local and
regional geochemical data to provide evidence and/or implications for broader geological
questions, such as atmospheric oxygen in the Precambrian, continental growth and
lithospheric recycling, the Superior Province cratonic keel, and the earliest phases of
Midcontinent Rift development. In addition to data-driven new ideas and concepts, Pete’s
research efforts have resulted in development of new analytical approaches that can be
applied to the Lake Superior region and beyond.
As a Professor at Lakehead University, Pete is actively involved the education of
geoscientists through classroom teaching and thesis supervision. He is committed to
training and mentoring as evidenced by the large role students play in his research. He has
supervised and co-supervised 37 honours undergraduate research projects and 32 Masters
graduate student theses. Most of this student-focused research has involved Lake Superior
geology. His former students now have senior positions with government and industry, and
some have gone on to complete PhDs. Moreover, he supports and encourages students to
attend and present their research at ILSG.
xiii

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

ILSG plays a significant role in Pete’s professional activities. He has authored/co-authored
(many with his students) 75 ILSG abstracts (nearly 4 per year), six ILSG field trip
guidebooks, and ILSG Special Publication #1, Field trip guidebook for the Slate Islands,
Ontario. At his very first ILSG meeting in 2002, Pete co-authored an abstract and served on
the Student Paper Awards Committee.
Pete has Chaired or Co-Chaired four in-person annual meetings (Nipigon, 2005;
International Falls, 2010; Thunder Bay, 2012; Terrace Bay, 2019) and the virtual meeting
in 2021. He has served as the Secretary of the ILSG from 2003 to the present. As Secretary,
he is responsible for email communications with the members of ILSG. As a member of the
Board, he attends and chairs the annual Board meeting. In ILSG Board meetings he always
considers and defends the best interests of Institute. Pete is the ILSG webmaster and played
a key role in the current design of the ILSG website which he updates and maintains.
Through his efforts, Lakehead University is the digital archive to all of the past ILSG
proceedings and field trip guidebooks and provides open access of this content worldwide.
A testament to the quality and accessibility of these documents was ILSG’s receiving the
2016 Outstanding Geologic Field Trip Guidebook Series Award by the Geoscience
Information Society (GSIS), which Pete accepted on behalf of the Institute. The stature of
ILSG in the regional, national, and international geological communities has been elevated
because of the increased presence of ILSG on the worldwide web, in large part because of
Pete’s efforts.
Over the years, we have all witnessed Pete in action. He is collegial, easy to approach and
gets along well with others, whether they be students, colleagues, or industry geoscientists.
He is both a good listener and a good speaker. And he is open-minded. He has high
personal standards and expects them to be reflected in the work of his students and research
colleagues. Pete is truly enthusiastic about the geology of the Lake Superior region and
about ILSG.
Pete has made and continues to make substantial contributions to the field of geology and
to the Institute on Lake Superior Geology. Pete has more than met the qualifications that
are engraved on the Goldich Medal itself: “For outstanding contributions to the geology of
the Lake Superior region.”
We congratulate the 2023 Goldich Medalist, Peter Hollings.

Citation by:
Theodore J. Bornhorst, Goldich Medalist 2008
Mark C. Smyk, Goldich Medalist 2005

xiv

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Honoring the Pioneers of Lake Superior Geology
(Adopted by the Board of Directors, 2016)
Preamble
At the suggestion of Gene LaBerge, the 2016 executive board agreed to implement a program
to recognize historic pioneers in the understanding of geology in the Lake Superior region.
Beginning with the 2017 annual meeting, nominations will be accepted from the membership
for geologists whose work was conducted primarily before inception of the institute in 1955.
Biographical sketches of those pioneers will be presented at future annual meetings so that all
might appreciate the value of their contributions. Selection of nominees will be decided in part
by the organizing committee of each year's annual meeting, in consultation with the Board, to
ensure equitable geographic representation in the selection process.
Award Guidelines
1) Nominations from the membership will be submitted via the Institute web site and
forwarded to the Chair of the next Annual Meeting. The nominations will be no more than
half a page in length and will summarise the contribution of the nominee.
2) The Organising Committee will select one or two individuals to be highlighted at the next
Annual meeting and submit those names to the Board for approval.
3) The nominator will be requested to prepare a brief presentation to be given during the next
annual meeting with a summary to be included in the Proceedings volume.
4) Unsuccessful nominations will be kept by the Secretary for two years and forwarded to the
next meeting Chair; these nominations may be resubmitted at a later date.
The Board will review this award every five years.

Pioneers of Lake Superior Geology
2017 Douglass Houghton (1809-1845)
2018-20 not presented
2021 Newton Horace Winchell (1839-1914)
2022 Thomas Leslie Tanton (1890-1971)
2023 Thomas Benton Brooks (1836-1900)

xv

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

2023 Nomination for Thomas Benton Brooks
Pioneer of Lake Superior Geology
“During many years Major (T.B.) Brooks was the chief authority in the region on matters
pertaining to geology, the ores and the mines of the iron region of Lake Superior.”1
Shortly after the U.S. Civil War Major Thomas Benton
Brooks moved to the Marquette Iron Range. There over
the course of less than a decade, he became the premier
geologist, prospector, mining and civil engineer, and
mining company executive of the region. During these
formative years of the iron ore industry, when the Lake
Superior region was providing about one-quarter of the
iron ore used in the U.S., he was employed by the Iron
Cliffs Company, the predecessor of the ClevelandCliffs Company, the Michigan and Wisconsin
Geological Surveys, and served as a consultant to iron
ore exploration and mining companies of the region.
His contributions had a significant role in mapping the
Precambrian geology and iron ranges of Michigan and
Wisconsin and a lasting impact on the iron ore industry
of the region. As stated by Prof. C.R. Van Hise,
Brooks’ successor as the premier geologist of the Lake
Superior region2: “Notwithstanding the immense
advantage which it has been to have Brooks’ work as a
foundation, it has taken many years of labor fairly to complete the structural story to which
Brooks contributed important chapters. Only those who have labored in the Lake Superior
region and who understand its peculiar difficulties can give Brooks credit for the remarkable
work he did. His geological work is my ideal of what should be done in a new region of
complex geology.”
Thomas B. Brooks was born on June 15, 1836 in Monroe, NY, near the New Jersey border, and
died nearby on November 22, 1900. In 1852 at the age of 16, he joined a surveying crew of the
Erie Railroad and rapidly advanced from woodsman to instrument man. In 1853 he was
employed with the New York Topographic and Geological Survey and then entered the
Engineering Department of Union College of Schenectady, NY in 1856, graduating in 1858 in
civil engineering. He remained at Union College as an instructor for a year and then took part
in topographical surveys in New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and the U.S. Gulf Coast. In
1

Quoted from an article by Chas. A. Lawton in the Daily Mining Journal, November 29, 1900 entitled The Late Major
Thomas Benton Brooks: Biographical Sketch of a Man Whose Name is Intimately Associated With the Early Development
of Michigan’s Iron Mines. The Mining Journal, the predominant daily newspaper of Marquette, Michigan and the
Northern Peninsula of Michigan, was founded in 1841.
2

As quoted by Bailey Willis of the U.S. Geological Survey in an obituary for Major Brooks in the Proceedings of the
American Association for the Advancement of Science, New Series, Volume 13, No. 325(March 22, 1901), 460-462.

xvi

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

1860 he attended a series of lectures on geology given by Prof. J.P. Lesley former state
geologist of Pennsylvania and Professor of Geology at the University of Pennsylvania. This
was his only formal education in geology. He volunteered for the Union Army in 1861 and
organized an engineering company that had a distinguished record during numerous Civil War
campaigns. He retired from the Union Army in 1864 as a brevet colonel after being wounded
in the battle of Denly’s Bluff, but referred to himself after the war as Major Brooks.
In 1865 after leaving the Union Army he accepted a position with the Geological Survey of
New Jersey where he conducted magnetic surveys with a dip needle to locate iron ores and was
put in charge of mines and furnaces. Shortly thereafter, he was induced to take charge of the
mines of the Iron Cliffs Company in the Marquette Iron Range as vice-president and general
manager. He moved to Negaunee, Michigan, where his practical knowledge of geology and
engineering, leadership skills, originality, keen powers of observation and deduction, and
intense work ethic served him, the company, and the Lake Superior region well. This is where
his extensive geological studies began and where he developed the instruments and
methodology to exploit the iron ores of the Lake Superior region. He brought the dip needle to
the Lake Superior region and was among or possibly was the very first, to use it in iron ore
exploration and geologic mapping in the region. He also pioneered the dial (Sun) compass,
which he modified for geologic use from the surveying solar compass developed by W.A. Burt.
In 1869 he resigned from the Iron Cliffs Company and was given the responsibility of mapping
and reporting on the Marquette Iron Range and was placed in charge of the Economic State
Geological Survey of the district by the Michigan Geological Survey, essentially becoming the
State Geologist of the Northern Peninsula. He received no salary for this position, but he was
allowed to receive private funds from numerous iron ore companies and mines. Unfortunately,
his intense work schedule took a toll on his health that caused him to leave Marquette with his
family in the winter of 1872-73 for London, England and eventually Dresden, Germany, where
he hoped to regain his health, but failed to do so. During this period he prepared reports on his
iron range geologic studies for publication by the Michigan and Wisconsin Geological Surveys
(Brooks, 1873 and 1880), articles on the geology of the region and magnetic surveying
instruments and their use published in various journals including the American Journal of
Science and Arts (Brooks and Pumpelly, 1872; Brooks, 1875), and co-authored the book “Iron
Ores of Missouri and Michigan” (Pumpelly, Brooks, and Schmidt, 1876).
During his years involved with the geology and ores of the Lake Superior region Major Brooks
made numerous advances in the geological knowledge of the region that have served as a
foundation for future studies and developed methods and instruments that proved useful for
exploiting the ores of the region for many years. The following are a list of his major lasting
accomplishments:
•

•

He with the assistance of R. Pumpelly and R.D. Irving developed the dial (Sun) compass for
geologic studies based on the principal of Burt’s surveying solar compass which together with
the dip needle that he brought from the Geological Survey of New Jersey were used in the
Lake Superior region for nearly a century to locate and outline iron-rich rocks and ores. His
publications on these instruments led to their extensive worldwide use.
He established procedures for conducting magnetic surveys for geological purposes in the
Lake Superior region and methods of interpreting the observations of the surveys based on
empirical studies.
xvii

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

•
•

•
•

•

•
•

He was the first to describe the magnetic characteristics of the minerals and rocks of the Lake
Superior region.
He (Brooks, 1872a) recognized that magnetic anomalies observed in the area of non-magnetic
Paleozoic (then Silurian) sedimentary rocks of the eastern part of the Northern Peninsula of
Michigan were likely derived from the basement Precambrian rocks that crop out to the west.
Accordingly, these anomalies could be used to trace the basement rocks and their structure
beneath the sedimentary rocks. Furthermore, he realized that anomaly characteristics could be
used to determine the depth to magnetic sources and thus, the thickness of the sedimentary
rocks. In a similar manner he understood that perhaps the depth of Lake Superior could be
determined from analysis of the lake magnetic anomalies.
He founded the first assay facility for iron ores in the Lake Superior region in the city of
Marquette which facilitated iron ore mining in the region.
He conducted one of the first geological surveys of the Marquette, Menominee, Crystal Falls,
and Gogebic Iron Ranges. He was the first to understand that the Marquette Iron Range occurs
within a 75-km long syncline extending to the west from near Marquette, Michigan (Allen and
Martin, 1922).
He recognized the stratigraphic position of the copper-bearing rocks of the Northern Peninsula
of Michigan and suggested the name Keweenawian (note his spelling) for the age of these
rocks in American Journal of Science and Arts articles of 1872 and 1875. Subsequently, the
term Keweenawan has been used for these rocks.
He had an important role in developing safe, efficient methods of mining iron ores of the Lake
Superior region (Brooks, 1972b).
He was intensely interested in the education of his children and supported the studies of his
son, Alfred Hulse Brooks, a famed geologist of the U.S. Geological Survey, Alaska Branch,
who is honored by naming of the Brooks Range of Alaska after him.
These are all significant contributions that have had a profound role in understanding of the
geology of the Lake Superior region and the exploitation of its ores. They have largely gone
unrecognized for the past century and a half, but they clearly distinguish Major Thomas Benton
Brooks as a Pioneer of Lake Superior geology.
References
Allen, R.C., and Martin, H.M., 1922. A brief history of the Geological and Botanical Survey of
Michigan. Michigan History Magazine, Volume VI, No. 44: 675-750.
Lawton, C.A., 1900. The Late Major Thomas Benton Brooks: Biographical Sketch of a Man Whose
Name is Intimately Associated with the Early Development of Michigan’s Iron Mines. The
Daily Mining Journal, November 29, 1900.
Pumpelly, Raphael, Brooks, T.B., and Schmidt, A., 1876. Iron Ores of Missouri and Michigan. G.P.
Putnam’s Sons, New York: 624.
Willis, B., 1901. Thomas Benton Brooks. Proceedings of the American Association for the
Advancement of Science, Science, New Series, Volume 13, No. 325: 460-462.

William J. Hinze,
Purdue University
xviii

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

APPENDIX: PUBLICATIONS OF T.B. BROOKS
Brooks, T.B., 1872a. On the use of the magnetic needle in mineral explorations on Lake Superior. Van
Nostrand’s Eclectic Engineering Magazine (1869-1879), August 1, 1872; Volume 7, No. 44,
American Periodicals: 161.
Brooks, T.B., 1872b. An analysis of the cost and description of the methods of mining employed in the
Marquette Iron Region, Lake Superior, Michigan. Transactions of the American Society of Civil
Engineers, Volume XXXIV: 18.
Brooks, T.B., and Pumpelly, R., 1872. On the age of the copper-bearing rocks of Lake Superior.
American Journal of Science and Arts, Third Series, Volume III, No. XVIII: 428-432.
Brooks, T.B., 1873. Geology of Marquette Iron Range, Geology of the Menominee Iron Range, and
Geology of the Gogebic and Montreal Iron Ranges. Michigan Geological Survey, Volume 1,
Chapters IV, V, VI, VII, and VIII, Part 1, Iron-Bearing Rocks: 117-243.
Brooks, T.B., 1875. On the youngest Huronian rocks south of Lake Superior and the age of the copperbearing series. American Journal of Science and Arts, Third Series, Volume III, No. XI: 206211.
Brooks, T.B., 1880. Geology of the Menominee Region. In Chamberlin, T.C. (ed.), Geology of
Wisconsin, Volume 3, Part 7, Chapters 1, 2, and 3: 430-552.

xix

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

In Memoriam

Stephen Allard

Stephen Thomas Allard, 59, of Winona, MN, passed away on Friday, September 16, 2022.
He was born May 2, 1963, in Manchester, New Hampshire and graduated from Manchester
Central High School before going on to receive both his bachelor’s and master’s degrees from
the University of New Hampshire, and his doctorate from the University of Wyoming. In
2002, Stephen moved to Winona, MN to begin his career as a professor at Winona State
University. After serving for 19 years as a faculty member in the Department of Geoscience,
Stephen retired from the university in December of 2021. During his tenure at WSU, Stephen
served on several committees and taught 13 different courses drawing on his expertise in hard
rock and structural geology. Stephen was dedicated to teaching and mentoring students
through field-based research, leading courses and field trips throughout the United States,
notably the many summers spent in the Black Hills of South Dakota.
(modified from Hartford Courant newspaper)

xx

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

In Memoriam

Steven A. Hauck
This Fall the Institute on Lake Superior Geology lost a
dedicated geologist and friend, Steve Hauck, who was a
regular attendee of ILSG (since at least 1984) and
worked on countless projects in the Lake Superior
Region while employed at the Natural Resources
Research Institute (NRRI) in Duluth, MN. During that
time, Steve was a mentor to numerous geologists in the
region throughout their early and continuing careers.
Steve Hauck had just recently moved from Duluth to
Euclid, OH where he passed away on October 6, 2022 at
the age of 73.
Steve as born on May 16, 1949, in Rochester, NY,
where he graduated from Gates-Chili High School prior
to attending Albion College where he earned a BS in
geology. He enlisted in the US Army where he was
trained as a Chinese translator and married fellow
Albion student and the love of his life Barbara Horsley
to whom he was married for 50 years. Steve loved to talk about geology on car trips and
impressed his future father-in-law with his knowledge and enthusiasm. Steve later earned a
MS degree in geology from the University of North Carolina before embarking on a geology
career that eventually led him around the globe. He was first employed by Union Carbide in
Grand Junction, CO, where he was responsible for exploration for uranium in the 4-corners
region. While at Union Carbide he was also responsible for developing a world-wide
exploration program in search of IOCG deposits (as they were later called) and visited many
similar deposits including Olympic Dam, Pilot Knob and Pea Ridge in Missouri, and Kiruna
iron deposits in Sweden to name a few. Steve’s first ILSG talk (1984) pertained to the
distinguishing characteristics of these types of deposits and was titled “Comparison of Middle
Proterozoic Iron Oxide Rich Ore Deposits, Mid-Continent, USA, South Australia, Sweden,
and the Peoples Republic of China.”
Steve was then hired as the second employee of the Minerals Division of the NRRI in 1984 as
Research Director and Manager where he worked for over 30 years. He was initially
responsible for building and equipping the division, focusing on economic geology, and
initially hired graduate students from the University of Minnesota Duluth (UMD). During his
tenure at the NRRI, Steve hired well over 30 UMD students (both undergraduate and graduate
students) as well as many geologists in their early career years. Projects that he and his coworkers researched ranged from clay deposits in SW MN, to Cu-Ni and Fe-Ti deposits in the
Duluth Complex, to the Biwabik Iron Formation, to geochemistry on a wide range of rocks
spanning from the Archean to the Cretaceous. He worked closely with fellow geologists at
the Minnesota Geological Survey, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Lands and
Minerals, and the U.S. Geological Survey, and collaborated with many geologists across the
U.S. and overseas in academia and industry.
xxi

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Steve was a Co-chair of the ILSG meeting for its 50th Anniversary in Duluth in 2004 and
served on the Board of Directors for three years. Overall, Steve participated in three ILSG
talks (one as primary author) and ten posters (four as primary author). Steve loved to talk
about rocks and encouraged his co-workers to give talks and poster presentations at many of
the ILSG meetings.
Steve was an avid birder, cultivator of native plants, and shutterbug. He was predeceased by
his youngest son, Davis, and his parents Arthur and Jean (Doron). He is survived by wife
Barbara, son Steven (Danette), sisters Carlin Eagan (Daniel), Sandra Doron, and Mary
McGuire (Mark), and two grandchildren Levi and Abigail.
(modifed from Duluth Tribune newspaper)

xxii

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

In Memoriam

Manfred Kehlenbeck

Manfred was born in Bremen, Germany in 1937 to parents Emma and Theodor. This is where
he spent his childhood, amidst the horrors of World War II, like so many of Europe's children.
At age 14, Manfred immigrated with his parents to the U.S., landing in New York in July of
1952 and settling with relatives in Long Island until they could become established. Here he
completed his high school education, then attended Hofstra University for his undergraduate
degree. It was there that he was introduced to the science of geology, which became his lifelong interest and focus of his future education and career. It was also on Long Island that he
met Elenore, who would eventually become his wife of 53 years.
Manfred went on to Syracuse University in upstate New York to attain his M.Sc. in Geology
and gain field experience in the beautiful Adirondack Mountains. And then, moving even
further north, he attended Queen's University in Kingston, Ontario where he achieved his
Ph.D. Since he has always planned to teach, he then accepted a position at the young
Lakehead University in Thunder Bay, Ontario. Here he soon became fascinated with the
Precambrian geology of the area and greatly enjoyed his teaching duties. He was a born
teacher, winning Teacher of the Year awards both at Lakehead and in the Province.
He served five terms as a Geology Department Chair, guiding the department into its M.Sc.
program. His years at Lakehead were productive and happy ones.
Upon his retirement, Manfred was able to expand on other interests and travel widely. In
addition to trips in Canada, the U.S. and Germany, there were four “special” ones –
professionally to Russia and China, and then the most fascinating ones, to the Arctic and
Antarctic. His other areas of interest and hobbies were in watercolour and pen and ink
drawings of local scenes, especially forests, lakes, rocks, and old buildings of NW Ontario
xxiii

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

and many views of Old Fort William. Many of his works hang in Thunder Bay homes. He
became an avid gardener, curler and opera lover, and spent many hours volunteering for
various causes.
It was a happy and fulfilling retirement for Manfred and Elenore until his last illness and
unexpected passing in the early morning hours of July 7, 2022 when he drew his last breath at
the Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre after emergency surgery. Our thanks to the
I.C.U. staff and especially to Katie and Michaela who were so kind and thoughtful during
those last terrible hours, and to N.P. Crystal Kaukinen for the many years of care she had
provided.
Thanks also to all who have been so kind with phone calls, cards, offers to help, food and
rides. Special thanks to Barb Morriss for always checking in, to Sam and Georgina Spivak for
all the rides, and to Vince and Frieda DeSa who have been here for me everyday with their
help and support – without them, I don't know how I would have survived this devastating
time.
Manfred was a good, kind, generous man, and loving and devoted husband. He is sorely
missed.
Auf Wiedersehen mein lieber Manfred.
Published by The Thunder Bay Chronicle Journal on Aug. 13, 2022.

xxiv

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Eisenbrey Student Travel Awards
The 1986 Board of Directors established the ILSG Student Travel Awards to support student
participation at the annual meeting of the Institute. The name “Eisenbrey” was added to the
award in 1998 to honor Edward H. Eisenbrey (1926-1985) and utilize substantial contributions
made to the 1996 Institute meeting in his name. “Ned” Eisenbrey is credited with discovery of
significant volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits in Wisconsin, but his scope was much
broader—he has been described as having unique talents as an ore finder, geologist, and teacher.
These awards are intended to help defray some of the direct travel costs of attending Institute
meetings, and include a waiver of registration fees, but exclude expenses for meals, lodging,
and field trip registration. The number of awards and value are determined by the annual Chair
in consultation with the Secretary and Treasurer. Recipients will be announced at the annual
banquet.
The following general criteria will be considered by the annual Chair, who is responsible
for the selection:
1) The applicants must have active resident (undergraduate or graduate) student status at the
time of the annual meeting of the Institute, certified by the department head.
2) Students who are the senior author on either an oral or poster paper will be given favored
consideration.
3) It is desirable for two or more students to jointly request travel assistance.
4) In general, priority will be given to those in the Institute region who are farthest away from
the meeting location.
5) Each travel award request shall be made in writing to the annual Chair, and should explain
need, student and author status, and other significant details.
Successful applicants will receive their awards during the meeting.

xxv

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Joe Mancuso Student Research Awards
The 2005 Board of Directors established the ILSG Student Research Fund with $10,000 US from
the Institute’s general fund to encourage student research on the geology of the Lake Superior
region. A minimum of two awards of $500 US each for research expenses (but not travel expenses)
will be made each year. Students are expected to present their research orally or during a poster
session at an ILSG meeting. The award winners will also be automatically eligible for the
Eisenbrey Travel Awards. To allow the fund to grow, the Fund will receive one-half of any
additional proceeds from each annual meeting, after all other commitments and expenses are
covered.
• The ILSG Board of Directors will be responsible for selecting a minimum of two awards
each year. The ILSG Treasurer will issue the awards.
• The ILSG Student Research Fund is available for undergraduate or graduate students
working on geology in the Lake Superior region.
• The applications are due to the ILSG Secretary by August 31st of each year. Awards will
be made by October 1st of each year.
• Names of the award recipients will be announced at the next annual meeting and posted on
the ILSG website.
• Details of the application process can be found on the ILSG web site.
• The proposal will need to be signed by the researcher’s supervisor.
The 2012 Board of Directors approved modification of the fund’s name, adding “Mancuso” to
reflect the many contributions of Joseph Mancuso to the organization and sizeable donations made
in his name. “Doc Joe,” as he was known by his students, taught geology for 36 years at Bowling
Green State University, Ohio. He advised many graduate students in field-oriented research, and
frequently brought them to Institute meetings. Joe was the 2007 Goldich Medalist.
In fall 2022, the ILSG Board of Directors selected two students to be granted research funding of
$1000.00 each from the Joe Mancuso Student Research Fund. The awardees were:
Itai Bojdak-Yates
Lawrence University
Department of Geosciences
TOPIC: Detrital zircon provenance study of
Paleozoic sandstones from Wisconsin

Lillian Glodowski
University of Wisconsin- Eau Claire
TOPIC: Petrogenesis of the Lynne Zn-CuPb Deposit, Oneida Co., Wisconsin

Evan Weber
University of Wisconsin- Eau Claire
TOPIC: U/Pb Geochronology and Zircon
Trace Element Geochemistry of the
Pembine-Wausau Terrane of the
Proterozoic Penokean Orogen, Wisconsin

xxvi

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Doug Duskin Student Paper Awards
Each year, the Institute selects the best of student presentations and honors the presenters with a
monetary award. Funding for the award is generated from registrations of the annual meeting, and
from generous donations to the fund in honor of Doug Duskin—an exploration geologist and longtime friend of the Institute. The 2012 ILSG Board of Directors approved adding Doug’s name to
the award to acknowledge his contributions, and distribute those donations in a manner that would
have pleased him. The Duskin Student Paper Committee is appointed by the Meeting Chair.
Criteria for best student paper—last modified by the Board in 2001—follow:
1) The contribution must be demonstrably the work of the student.
2) The student must present the contribution in-person.
3) The Student Paper Committee shall decide how many awards to grant, and whether
or not to give separate awards for poster vs. oral presentations.
4) In cases of multiple student authors, the award will be made to the senior author, or
the award will be shared equally by all authors of the contribution.
5) The total amount of the awards is left to the discretion of the meeting Chair in
conjunction with the Secretary, but typically is in the amount of about $500 US
(increase approved by Board, 10/01).
6) The Secretary maintains, and will supply to the Committee, a form for the numerical
ranking of presentations. This form was created and modified by Student Paper
Committees over several years in an effort to reduce the difficulties that may arise
from selection by raters of diverse background. The use of the form is not required,
but is left to the discretion of the Committee.
7) The names of award recipients shall be included as part of the annual Chair’s report
that appears in the next volume of the Institute.
Student papers will be noted on the Program.

xxvii

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Board of Directors
Board appointment continues through the close of the meeting year shown in parentheses, or until
a successor is selected.
The terms of Board members were extended 2 years because of cancellation of the 2020 meeting,
and the difficulties of virtual voting by the membership during the 2021 meeting.

Mike Easton, Chair (2022-2025) — Ontario Geological Survey
Mark Smyk (2019-2024*) — Lakehead University
Esther Stewart (2018-2023*) – Wisconsin Geological &amp; Natural History
Survey
Peter Hollings — Secretary (2019-2024*) — Lakehead University
Mark A. Jirsa — Treasurer (2022-2025) — Minnesota Geological Survey

xxviii

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Field Trip Leaders and Guidebook Authors
Field trips have been the mainstay of the ILSG since its inception 69 years ago. We want to
give a special thanks to the field trip leaders and guidebook authors who volunteered their
time and talent in carrying that tradition forward.

1) Precambrian geology of the Chippewa River Valley
Rob Lodge- UW- Eau Claire
Bob Hopper- UW- Eau Claire

2) Wisconsin’s Paleozoic stratigraphy and tour of Crystal Cave
Carsyn Ames- Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey
Esther Stewart- Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey
William Batten- Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey
Eric Stewart- Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey
Ian Orland- Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey

3) Precambrian geology of the Eau Claire River Valley
Rob Lodge- UW- Eau Claire
Evan Weber- UW- Eau Claire (student)

4) Quaternary geology and geomorphology of the Eau Claire Region
Doug Faulkner- UW- Eau Claire
Elmo Rawling- Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey

xxix

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

REPORT OF THE 68th ANNUAL MEETING OF THE
INSTITUTE ON LAKE SUPERIOR GEOLOGY
The Ontario Geological Survey (OGS), with support from the Geological Survey of Canada
(GSC), hosted the 68th Annual Institute on Lake Superior Geology on May 07 – 12, 2023 in the
“Cavern” at Science North in Sudbury, Ontario. The meeting consisted of two days of technical
sessions with pre- and post-technical session field trips.
First, we would like to thank the meeting sponsors for their generous support, either through
direct funding or in-kind support, namely: the Centre for Excellence and Sustainable Mineral
Exploration in Thunder Bay, Gel Exploration Limited, the Northwestern Ontario Prospectors
Association, Vale Canada, and the Ontario Geological Survey. We also thank the Individual
Contributors to the Student Travel Scholarship fund: Mary Kay Arthur, Mike Beauregard, Ben
Berger, Terry Boerboom, Jim DeGraff, Michael and Monica Easton, Dick Heglund, Joanna
Hodge, Bob Mahin, Jim Miller, Dean Peterson, Mark and Laurie Severson, Al MacTavish and
Graham Wilson.
The 2022 meeting was the first in-person meeting held since the 2019 Terrace Bay meeting. An
ILSG meeting questionnaire, which ran from January 20 to February 20, 2022, was key to
shaping the format and venue of the meeting during a period of rapidly changing COVIDrelated regulations, with most responses favouring an in-person meeting. For technical reasons,
a hybrid meeting was not possible.
Total meeting registration was 80, including 12 students. This registration is about 80% of the
attendance of the last two Sudbury area meetings (Sudbury 1997; Sault Ste. Marie 2006), and
was a great turnout given the COVID-related travel restrictions still in place at the time of the
meeting. Attendance from the United States was excellent, with attendance from the Sudbury
area lower than expected, for unknown reasons. Despite the somewhat lower attendance, the
technical program was nevertheless excellent, with a strong focus on Midcontinent Rift geology
and mineralization in the Lake Superior region. In addition, four presentations focused
specifically on Sudbury area geology. There was also time in the schedule for several
impromptu presentations on a variety of topics on Wednesday afternoon prior to the
announcement of the student awards.
Proceedings Volume 68 was published in two parts. Part 1 – Program and Abstracts, compiled
and edited by Michael Easton (OGS), contains 28 published abstracts for 21 oral and 8 poster
presentations (one poster did not have an abstract). Students presented 5 oral and 5 poster
presentations. Part 2 – Field Trip Guidebooks, also was compiled and edited by Michael Easton.
It contains descriptions of three pre-meeting and two post-meeting field trips. Hard copies of the
Abstract Volume and Field Trip Guidebooks for trip participants were printed by Johanne Roux
and Carlo Castrechino (OGS) after it proved impossible to find a commercial printer who could
produce the volumes in time for the meeting. Both volumes are available for download from the
Institute on Lake Superior Geology website. Monica Easton is thanked for assisting in preparing
the digital versions of both volumes.
The 68th ILSG marked only the second time in the Institute’s long history that its annual
meeting was held in Sudbury, the last time being in 1997. Since the discovery of distal ejecta
xxx

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

from the Sudbury impact in the western Lake Superior area in 2005, many members of the
Institute had suggested that the time was right for another Sudbury meeting. The meeting
location enabled organizers to offer five field trips that showcased a variety of Proterozoic rocks
in the Sudbury area itself, as well as along the north shore of Lake Huron. Three field trips
focussed on the geology and mineralization related to the Sudbury Structure, and the organizers
wish to thank the local exploration companies that graciously provided information and access
to their properties. Parts of the other two of the field trips had been offered at previous ILSG
annual meetings (e.g., Sudbury 1997; Sault Ste. Marie 2006), but both greatly benefitted from
the new mapping, research, discoveries and interpretations that had taken place in the
intervening years. COVID-related shortages of rental vehicles and/or drivers led to pre-meeting
trips being held over several days, which unexpectedly, provided more opportunities for
attendees to take in several field trips if they wanted. All the field trips, and the meeting itself,
were blessed with sunny weather and a minimum number of pesky insects. Total field trip
participation was 96 (excluding leaders and volunteer drivers). A list of field trips is provided
below (numbers correspond to trip numbers in the Guidebook volume):
Pre-meeting field trips (and leaders) on Saturday, May 07; Sunday, May 8, and Monday, May
9.
5) A cross-section through the Huronian Supergroup at Elliot Lake, Ontario
(Michael Easton, Ontario Geological Survey) (May 7)
2) Geology of the Grenville Front in the Sudbury area
(Michael Easton, Ontario Geological Survey) (May 8)
1) Traverse across the Sudbury Impact Structure
(Wouter Bleeker, Geological Survey of Canada, and Sandra Kamo, University of Toronto;
Michael Lesher and Henning Seibel, Laurentian University) (Two-day trip, May 8 and May
9)
Post-meeting field trips (and leaders) on Thursday, May12
3) Magmatism and brecciation in the Footwall Rocks of the southwestern Sudbury Structure
(Caroline Gordon, Ontario Geological Survey; Carol-Anne Généreux, Laurentian University
and Terrane Geoscience; and Brad Clarke, SPC Nickel Corporation)
4) An overview of the geology of the Sudbury Structure
(Shirley Péloquin, Ontario Geological Survey)
Many registrants attended the welcoming reception on Monday evening, which included an
IMAX theatre presentation on “Dinosaurs of Antarctica”. Furthermore, the vast majority of
registrants and invited guests attended the annual ILSG banquet on Tuesday night. Although a
Homer Award overview presentation was given, no “recipients” were identified during the 2022
annual meeting, or in the previous 3 years!
As always, a highlight of the post-banquet activities was presentation of the 2022 Goldich
Medal. This year’s very deserving recipient was Terry Boerboom. The Goldich Medal citation
was presented by Mark Jirsa, his colleague for many years. Mark described Terry’s
contributions to the ILSG and to the greater understanding of Minnesota’s geology over several
decades during his time as a student and his 35 years with the Minnesota Geological Survey.
Terry is indeed a worthy recipient of this prestigious award.
The 68th ILSG saw a return to the usual post-banquet guest speaker tradition. Andy Parmenter
xxxi

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

of the Canadian Nuclear Waste Management Organization (NWMO) travelled from Toronto to
give an overview of NWMOs Geoscience site characterization of the Revell batholith in the
Ignace area of northwestern Ontario. His talk provided detailed insights into the 3-D character
of a Neoarchean granodioritic to granitic intrusion, based on detailed mapping and geophysical,
seismic, and geochemical studies, as well as from multiple 1 km-long research cores obtained
from the batholith.
In 2022, the student paper committee had its usual difficult job of selecting the best among five
excellent oral presentations and five poster presentations for the Doug Duskin Student Paper
Awards. The committee awarded four prizes, with the best talk award going to Rebecca Price
for her talk on “Mineralogy and Petrology of the Good Hope Carbonatite Complex, Marathon,
ON” and the best poster award going to Khalid Yahia for his poster on “Geochemical and
isotopic composition of Midcontinent Rift-related intrusions of the Thunder Bay North Igneous
Complex, northwestern Ontario, Canada”. Runner-up prizes went to Audray Hinkenmeyer for
her talk on “Characterizing Late Wisconsinan Rainy Lobe till from the Hudson Bay Lowlands to
SW Minnesota: Insights on provenance and ice sheet behavior during Late Wisconsin
glaciation” and to Katherine Langfield for her poster on “Slip Kinematics of the Hancock Fault
in the Midcontinent Rift System, Keweenaw Peninsula, Michigan”. Eisenbrey Student Travel
Grants were given to three students: Connor Caglitoti (Lakehead University), Katherine
Langfield (Michigan Technical University), and Miles Harbury (University of Wisconsin,
Milwaukee).
The Institute’s Board of Directors met on Tuesday, May 10, 2022, and a brief overview of the
meeting notes is provided below:
1. Accepted report of the Chairs for the 67th ILSG, Virtual Meeting; as published on the ILSG
web site, and minutes of last Board meeting in May 2021.
2. Received, discussed, and accepted 2021-2022 ILSG Financial Summary.
3. Received, discussed, and accepted 2021-2022 report of the Secretary (Hollings).
4. Approved Michael Easton as on-going ILSG Board member
5. Discussed and approved renewal of Mark Jirsa as Institute Treasurer (end of term 2022).
This was later approved by a vote of the membership.
6. Discussed and approved replacing Dan England as the “member from industry” on the
Goldich Committee (end of term 2022) with Dean Peterson.
7. Approved Eau Claire as the site for the 69th annual ILSG meeting. The meeting will be
hosted by Robert Lodge and Esther Stewart.
8. Reviewed and approved the guidelines for the Honouring the Pioneers of Lake Superior
Geology with the charge that the document will be reviewed as needed.
9. Future meeting locations were discussed. Ted Bornhorst offered Houghton in 2024, Peter
Hinz has offered Kenora as a future site and Mark Jirsa is keen to host the Mountain Iron
meeting that was cancelled in 2020 because of the pandemic. In a subsequent discussion,
Bernie Saini-Eidukat expressed a willingness to organize a meeting in St. Cloud.
10. The cost of insurance was discussed and it was agreed that the Board of Directors insurance
and field trip insurance should be maintained for future meetings and that the costs would
be included in the cost of each meeting. The fact that the Institute meets in both the US and
Canada is an added complication.
xxxii

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

11. Jirsa advised the board of the donation of polar bear carvings from Mike Beauregard, and it
was agreed that a silent auction would be held during the meeting with funds going to
support student travel. Dan England later donated two samples with visible gold and,
combined, these items raised $395 for the Eisenbrey fund
12. Bornhorst advised that there are a small number of hard copies missing from the MTU
archives and that he will work to fill these. It was agreed that the ILSG would make a
donation of $1 per member (minimum $100) each year to the library as a “thank you” for
their efforts
13. The 68th ILSG meeting was a great success and we wish to thank all the people who
contributed to that success, including staff of the Ontario Geological Survey who were
pressed into action as editors, field trip leaders and drivers. Patty Cobin and Ted Bornhorst
(A.E. Seaman Mineral Museum, Michigan Technological University) handled the premeeting registration. Ted also supplied the poster boards. Thanks go also to the staff at
Science North who helped the meeting run smoothly as well as Bryston’s on the Park in
Copper Cliff who provided a first-class banquet dinner, as well as lunches and snacks
during the technical sessions.

Michael Easton (OGS) and Wouter Bleeker (GSC)
Co-Chairs, 68th Institute on Lake Superior Geology

xxxiii

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

TECHNICAL PROGRAM

xxxiv

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

TECHNICAL PROGRAM
SUNDAY APRIL 23, 2023
All field trips begin and end at The Lismore Hotel
8:00 am - 5:00 pm PRE-MEETING FIELD TRIPS
1) Precambrian geology of the Chippewa River Valley
Rob Lodge and Bob Hooper – UW- Eau Claire
2) Wisconsin’s Paleozoic stratigraphy and tour of Crystal Cave
Carsyn Ames – Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey
4:00 pm - 10:00 pm Registration (Wilson Hall Lobby)
7:00 pm - 10:00 pm Welcoming Reception (Wilson Hall A/F)

MONDAY APRIL 24, 2023
7:30 am – 11:30 am Registration (Wilson Hall Lobby)
8:00

OPENING REMARKS (Wilson B)
Rob Lodge and Carsyn Ames, Co-Chairs, 2023 ILSG

TECHNICAL SESSION I
Session Chair: James DeGraff- Michigan Technological University
* denotes a student eligible for Best Student Paper Award. To be eligible students must have graduated no more than one
month before the ILSG meeting, be first author, and present the paper at the meeting.
+ denotes author that will present abstract, if different than the first author.

8:10

William J. Hinze, and +William Cannon
2023 Pioneer of Lake Superior Geology: Thomas Benton Brooks

8:30

Erika Vye and William Rose
Geoheritage as an educational tool to explore relationships with land and water in the
Keweenaw

8:50

William Rose
New work developing Keweenaw geoheritage awareness

9:10

Matt Carter and Donald Elsenheimer
Workshop Outcomes and Updates for the Minnesota Department of Natural Resource’s Drill
Core Library

9:30

Dean Peterson
On the Importance of Geologic Maps for Mineral Exploration

9:50
9:50

END OF TECHNICAL SESSION I
COFFEE BREAK
xxxv

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

TECHNICAL SESSION II
Session Chair: Ben Drenth- USGS and Amy Radakovich Block- Minnesota Geological Survey
10:00 Dana Peterson, Paul Bedrosian, and Carol Finn
Subsurface characterization of the Duluth Complex and related intrusions from 3D
modeling of gravity and magnetotelluric data
10:20 Paul Bedrosian, Tien Grauch, Laurel Woodruff, William Cannon, Benjamin Drenth,
Esther Stewart, Dana Peterson, and James Jones
Interpreted geophysical cross-sections through the Lake Superior region: Investigating three
billion years of geologic history in sixteen lines of data
10:40 Tien Grauch, Sam Heller, Esther Stewart, and Laurel Woodruff
Exploring the geology of the Midcontinent Rift under western Lake Superior using a
preliminary velocity model of seismic line GLIMPCE C
11:00 Jennifer Smith, Victoria Tschirhart, Loughlin Tuck, Randy Enkin, and David Roy-Guay
Exploring the application of full tensor magnetic gradiometry to better define conduit type NiCu-PGE targets
11:20 END OF TECHNICAL SESSION II
11:20-1:00 LUNCH BREAK and LSG BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING
- lunches not provided to conference attendees-

11:20-1:00 Student Career Panel- (L.E. Phillips Memorial Public Library- 400 Eau Claire St.
in the Riverview Room (Room 306))

TECHNICAL SESSION III
Session Chair: Marcia Bjørnerud- Lawrence University
1:10

Wouter Bleeker, Jennifer Smith, Michael Hamilton, Sandra Kamo, Pete Hollings,
Michael Easton, and Robert Cundari
The Midcontinent Rift System: Neither triple junction nor failed rift?

1:30

Matthew Brzozowski, +Pete Hollings, Jing-jing Zhu, and Robert Creaser
Contributions of diverse mantle sources during the early stages of Midcontinent Rift formation
— Implications for a passive rifting model

1:50

*Daniel

2:10

*Katherine Langfield,

2:30

END OF TECHNICAL SESSION III

Lizzadro-McPherson, James DeGraff and Ian Gannon
Structural analysis and slip kinematics of the Keweenaw fault system between Bête Grise Bay
and Gratiot Lake, Keweenaw County, Michigan
James DeGraff, and Nolan Gamet
Slip Kinematics of the Keweenaw and Hancock Faults within the Midcontinent Rift System, Upper
Peninsula of Michigan

xxxvi

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

2:30

COFFEE BREAK

TECHNICAL SESSION IV
Session Chair: Pete Hollings- Lakehead University and 2023 Goldich Medalist
2:50

*Tianna

3:10

*Sam Ghantous,

3:30

*Blaize Briggs and Mary Louise Hill
Quetico-Wabigoon Subprovince Boundary in the Superior Province north of Thunder Bay,
Ontario, Canada

3:50

Margaret Upton, Phillip Larson, Allan MacTavish, and Peter Hinz
Summary of the 2022 ILSG Field Trip to Iceland

4:10

END OF TECHNICAL SESSION IV

4:10

POSTER VIEWING - AUTHORS WILL BE PRESENT AT THEIR POSTERS

6:00

RECEPTION AND CASH BAR (Wilson Hall A/F)

7:00

Groeneveld, Peter Hollings, Wyatt Bain, and Lionnel Djon
Petrography, geochemistry, and mineralization of the Archean Titan (Roaring River)
intrusion, Northwestern Ontario
Noah Phillips, Alex Lusk, Julie Newman, and Shaocheng Ji
Are serpentine fault mirrors an indicator of seismic slip? A microstructural analysis

ANNUAL BANQUET AND AWARDS (Wilson Hall A/F)
SPEAKER: Curt Meine- Adjunct Professor at UW- Madison and Senior Fellow with
the Aldo Leopold Foundation and Center for Humans and Nature
IMAGINING “CONSERVATION GEOLOGY”: LESSONS FROM THE DRIFTLESS AREA

TUESDAY APRIL 25, 2023
8:00

INTRODUCTORY REMARKS AND UPDATES (Wilson Hall B)
Rob Lodge and Carsyn Ames, Co-Chairs, 2023 ILSG

TECHNICAL SESSION V
Session Chair: Allan MacTavish- Consulting Geologist and 2021 Goldich Medalist
8:10

*Justin

Jonsson, Pete Hollings, Matthew Brzozowski, Wyatt Bain, and Lionnel Djon
Petrogenesis of the mineralized horizons in the Offset and Creek zones, Lac des Iles Complex,
N. Ontario

8:30

Pete Hollings, Jacob Hanley, Mark Smyk, Larry Heaman, and Brian Cousens
Copper-rich melt inclusions from the St. Ignace Island Complex: Implications for magma
mixing and mineralization
xxxvii

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

8:50

Alex Steiner, Dean Peterson, and Gabriel Sweet
Magma Recharge and the distribution of Copper and Nickel in the Keweenaw Large Igneous
Province

9:10

David Good
Identifying regional exploration domains for Ni-Cu-PGE deposit types in the Midcontinent
Rift

9:30

Julia Steenburg and Anthony Runkel
Record of an Ancient Meteorite Impact Buried Beneath the Twin Cities, MN

9:50 COFFEE BREAK
10:10 Benjamin Drenth, Amy Radakovich Block, George Hudak, Kate Souders, and Stacy
Saari
Geophysical architecture of the Neoarchean Mentor anorthosite intrusive complex,
northwestern Minnesota
10:30 Paul Weiblen
The Use of Electric Pulse Disaggregation Technology to Recover Nickel Metal from Nickel
Sulfide Ore Deposits
10:50 END OF TECHNICAL SESSION V
11:00 ADDITIONAL POSTER VIEWING – AUTHORS ARE ENCOURAGED TO BE AT
THEIR POSTERS (Wilson C &amp; D)
11:30-12:30 LUNCH BREAK
- lunches not provided to conference attendees-

TECHNICAL SESSION VI
Session Chair: Laurel Woodruff- USGS and 2014 Goldich Medalist
12:40 *Margaret Upton, Howard Mooers, and Philip Larson
Alteration Geochemistry Characterization and 3D Modeling of the Back Forty Volcanogenic
Massive Sulfide (VMS) Deposit Stephenson, Upper Peninsula of Michigan, USA
1:00

Robert Lodge
Re-evaluating the tectonics and metallogeny of terranes in the Paleoproterozoic Penokean
Orogen, Wisconsin

1:20

William Cannon and Benjamin Drenth
Eastward transition from banded iron-formation to ferruginous clastic rocks across the
central Upper Peninsula of Michigan

1:40

Jamey Jones, William Cannon, Benjamin Drenth, and Paul O’Sullivan
Provenance patterns and tectonic styles of ca. 2.3–1.8 Ga metasedimentary strata in
northern Michigan based on regional mapping and detrital zircon U-Pb geochronology

xxxviii

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

2:00

*Audray Hinkemeyer, Howard Moores, and Phillip Larson
Determining Provenance of Rainy Lobe Till using Geochemistry and Detrital Zircon
Geochronology.

2:20

COFFEE BREAK

2:40

Gordon Medaris Jr. and Steven Driese
Secular Changes in the Magnitude of Terrestrial Weathering

2:40

END OF TECHNICAL SESSION VI

TECHNICAL SESSION VII
Session Chair: Carsyn Ames- Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey
3:00

Caroline Rose
Tips from a GIS Specialist: Moving maps to GeMS, and a utility for georeferencing
quadrangles

3:20

Matthew Rehwald, Carsyn Ames, Sarah Bremmer, William Fitzpatrick, Eric Stewart,
Bill Batten, and Stephen Mauel
Mobile geologic mapping at the Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey

3:40

Roger Schulz
Outcrop Scale Mapping Utilizing High-Accuracy GNSS with MnDOT’s Virtual Reference
Station (VRS) Network: Minnesota Examples

4:00

Stephen Mauel, Eric Stewart, Matthew Rehwald, Esther Stewart, Carsyn Ames, Sarah
Bremmer, and William Fitzpatrick
3D geologic mapping at the Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey

4:20

END OF TECHNICAL SESSION VII

4:20

BEST STUDENT PAPER AWARDS
STUDENT TRAVEL AWARDS
CLOSING REMARKS

4:40

END OF TECHNICAL SESSIONS

WEDNESDAY APRIL 26, 2023
8:00am – 5:00pm POST-MEETING FIELD TRIPS
Field trips begin and end at The Lismore Hotel
3) Precambrian Geology of the Eau Claire River Valley
Rob Lodge and Evan Weber– UW- Eau Claire
4) Quaternary Geology and Geomorphology of the Eau Claire Region
Doug Faulkner – UW- Eau Claire
J. Elmo Rawling III– Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey
xxxix

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

POSTER PRESENTATIONS
* denotes a student eligible for Best Student Paper Award. To be eligible students must have graduated no more than one
month before the ILSG meeting, be first author, and present the paper at the meeting.

*Zsuzsanna P. Allerton, Anita Hall, Françoise Roger, and Christian Teyssier
Geochronology and Geochemical Analysis of the Giants Range Batholith in Northern
Minnesota
Carsyn Ames
The Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey’s (WGNHS) 2020 and 2021 National
Geological and Geophysical Data Preservation Program (NGGDPP) Projects
*Ryan Barkley, Noah Phillips, and Pete Hollings
The geologic setting, structural controls, and geochemical signature of the Eagle River Au
deposit in Northwestern Ontario
Marcia Bjørnerud, Buchholz, T., Falster, A.U, And Simmons, W.B.
Deformation, metamorphism, fluid flow and pegmatite emplacement history of the post-1630 Ma
Waterloo Quartzite of southern Wisconsin
Amy Radakovich Block, Kate Souders, Benjamin Drenth, George Hudak, Stacy Saari, and
Aaron Hirsch
New geologic mapping in the Superior Province of northwestern Minnesota, USA: Pennington
and Red Lake Counties
*Itai Bojdak-Yates, Marcia Bjørnerud, David Malone, and Esther Stewart
A revised provenance model for the Elk Mound Group in south-central Wisconsin based on
detrital zircon analysis
James DeGraff and William Rose
Digital Image Capture and Database Compilation of Historic Mining Data from the Keweenaw
Copper District, Michigan: A Progress Update
Benjamin Drenth and William Cannon
Geophysical mapping of the Great Lakes Tectonic Zone and surrounding Precambrian geology
in the central Upper Peninsula, Michigan
William Fitzpatrick and Eric Stewart
Multiple overlapping features spatially associated with lead-zinc-copper mineralization in the
Highland quadrangles, southwest Wisconsin, USA
*Lillian Glodowski and Robert Lodge
Characterizing volcanic host stratigraphy and syn-volcanic intrusions at the Lynne Zn-Pb-Cu
deposit, Oneida Co., Wisconsin
xl

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

*Kaine Johnson and Robert Lodge
Hydrothermal Alteration Facies of the Eisenbrey Zn-Cu Deposit, Rusk County, Wisconsin
*Matthew Leahy and Robert Lodge
Petrology and Geochemistry of the Paleoproterozoic Eau Claire Volcanic Complex, Eau
Claire, WI
*Francisca Nuñez-Ferreira, Lucas Zoet, and J. Elmo Rawling III
Morphometry and formation process of eskers developed under the Chippewa Lobe of the
Laurentide Ice Sheet
*Jordan Peterzon, Noah Phillips, Peter Hollings and Lionnel Djon
Fault zone architecture in mafic protoliths at the Lac des Iles mine, northwestern Ontario
Caroline Rose, J. Elmo Rawling III, Eric Carson, John Attig, David Mickelson, William Mode,
Mark Johnson, and Kent Syverson
Quaternary Geology of Wisconsin at a scale of 1:500,000 (in review)
Allison Severson, Eric Nowariak, and Phillip Larson
Geology and geochemistry of the basal North Shore Volcanic Group and Midcontinent Rift
Intrusive Supersuite, Cook County, MN, USA
Eric Stewart, William Fitzpatrick, and Carsyn Ames
Relay zones in weakly folded and faulted Paleozoic strata and their role localizing Mississippi
Valley-type mineralization, southwest Wisconsin, USA
*Madeline Taylor and Marcia Bjørnerud

Deciphering the metamorphic and deformational history of the Hardwood Gneiss, Felch
District, Michigan: Anomalously high-pressure rocks in the heart of the Penokean orogen
*Evan Weber, Robert Lodge, and Jeffrey Marsh

U/Pb geochronology and zircon petrochronology of Paleoproterozoic magmas from the
Marshfield terrane Penokean Orogen, Wisconsin

xli

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

BANQUET PRESENTATION
IMAGINING “CONSERVATION GEOLOGY”: LESSONS
FROM THE DRIFTLESS AREA
Curt Meine
Adjunct Professor at UW- Madison and Senior Fellow with the Aldo
Leopold Foundation and Center for Humans and Nature
The field of conservation biology emerged in the 1980s when scientists became
increasingly alarmed about the loss of biodiversity, and decided that they had a
responsibility to put their science to work to address the issue. This required not
only new interdisciplinary research, but new ways to put knowledge to work in our
human and natural communities. Can we imagine a field of conservation geology
that similarly seeks to integrate geological knowledge with history and culture, and
addresses our concerns for our landscapes and for future generations? The Driftless
Area provides ample examples and opportunities to explore that question.

xlii

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

ABSTRACTS

1

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Geochronology and Geochemical Analysis of the Giants Range Batholith in Northern Minnesota
ALLERTON, Zsuzsanna1, HALL, Anita1, ROGER, Françoise2, and TEYSSIER, Christian1
1

Earth and Environmental Science Department, University of Minnesota, 150 Tate Hall, 116 Church St. SE,
Minneapolis, MN 55455
2
Géosciences Montpellier, Université de Montpellier-Campus Triolet, c.c. 60 Place Eugéne Batallion 34090,
Montpellier, Cedex 05, France

The Giants Range Batholith (GRB) is a ~ 2.7-billion-year-old (2.7 Ga) granitic unit in northern
Minnesota striking SW-NE from east of Ely to Grand Rapids (Figure 1). It is located N-NW of the 1.8
Ga Mesabi Iron Range and the 1.1 Ga Duluth Igneous Complex (DC). During emplacement, the GRB
was situated at the southern edge of the Superior Craton, the Archean core of the North American
Continent. At its eastern end the GRB is in
contact with the Mesoproterozoic DC (1.1
Ga), which is the intrusive segment of the
Mid-continent Rift System, and to the west
the GRB flanks the Lower Member of the
Ely Greenstone Formation. This project has
two main goals: (1) better understanding
the origin of the GRB; and (2) using the
GRB to track the thermal and hydrothermal
history of the rocks from the contact with
the DC outward.
The project included the
compilation of existing data, such as
geochronology and geochemistry, that have
been collected to date on the GRB, based
Figure 1. Simplified geologic map of Minnesota's arrowhead
on Allison (1925), Griffin &amp; Morey (1969), region showing the Giants Range Batholith in blue. Prior
Viswanathan (1971), Boerboom &amp; Zartman studies have been done in the area circled in red. The white
dashed box shows the current and proposed area of this
(1993), Boerboom (1994), and Southwick
project. Modified from Jirsa, M.A., Miller jr., J.D., &amp; Morey,
(1994). The Minnesota Geological Survey
G.B. (2008).
(Jirsa, 2016) acquired U-Pb zircon age
dates on selected samples. Only Boerboom
&amp; Zartman (1993) and Boerboom (1994) have completed trace element analysis. Their eight samples
are from the central section of the GRB (red circle in Figure 1) and were collected along the northern
margin. The samples from the GRB main body have not been analyzed for trace elements, and
geochronological data are scarce.
Our sampling campaign so far has concentrated on the northeastern part of the GRB (white
dashed box in Figure 1) and builds on the work of Boerboom &amp; Zartman (1993) and Boerboom (1994).
Thin sections were cut and used in transmitted-light petrography to determine mineralogical
composition, analyze textures, and identify accessory minerals for radiometric dating.
Radiometric dating involved Laser-Ablation Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass-Spectroscopy
(LA-CPMS) performed at the University of Clermont-Ferrand, France. We obtained zircon and titanite
age dates for samples located within 1000 meters from the DC contact. The zircon grain separates from
one sample produced a concordant age date of ~ 2690 ± 10 Ma. In-situ zircon analysis of another
sample displays some discordia (Pb loss) that may be associated with hydrothermal alteration related to
DC emplacement. The mounted titanite grains and in-situ analysis yielded ages (approx. 2450-2500

2

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Ma) that are consistently younger than zircons from the same samples.
Current and future work include further sample collection in the study area (white dashed box
in Figure 1) to obtain additional U-Pb dates on titanite and zircon to the thermal and hydrothermal
history of GRB at the contact with the DC. The GRB samples also contain abundant apatite grains,
some primary and some recrystallized, that will be dated using the U-Pb method to provide new data
on the thermal and hydrothermal history of the GRB near the DC contact. Additionally, we will pursue
acquiring bulk composition and trace element data in order to better understand the source of magma
and the likely tectonic setting in which the GRB was emplaced.

References
Allison, I.S., 1925. The Giants Range Batholith of Minnesota. The Journal of Geology, 33(5): 488-508.
https://doi.org/10.1086/623215.
Boerboom, T.J. and Zartman. R.E., 1993. Geology, Geochemistry, and Geochronology of the Central Giants
Range Batholith, Northeastern Minnesota. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 30(12): 25102522. https://doi.org/10.1139/e93-217.
Boerboom, T., 1994. Short Contributions to the Geology of Minnesota: Alkalic Plutons of Northeastern
Minnesota; Report of Investigations 43. Minnesota Geological Survey, ISSN 0076-9177.
Frost, B.R. and Frost, C.D., 2008. A geochemical classification for feldspathic igneous rocks. Journal of
Petrology 49.11.
Griffin, W.L. and Morey, G.B., 1969. Geology of the Isaac Lake Quadrangle, St. Louis County, Minnesota.
Published in Cooperation with Minnesota Department of Iron Range Resources and Rehabilitation.
Minnesota Geological Survey 5 P-8 Special Publication Series. University of Minnesota.
Southwick, D.L., 1994. Short Contributions to the Geology of Minnesota: Assorted Geochronologic Studies of
Precambrian Terranes in Minnesota: A Potpourri of Timely Information. Report of Investigations 43.
Minnesota Geological Survey, ISSN 0076-9177.

3

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

The Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey’s (WGNHS)’s 2020 and 2021 National
Geological and Geophysical Data Preservation Program (NGGDPP) Projects
AMES, Carsyn1, GOTTSCHALK, Brad1, ROSE, Caroline1, SIBLEY, Dave1
1

Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey, University of Wisconsin- Madison, 3817 Mineral Point Rd.
Madison, WI 53705

The Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey (WGNHS) received grants from the
United States Geological Survey (USGS)’s National Geologic and Geophysical Data Preservation
Program (NGGDPP) for FY2020 and FY2021. This program promotes the preservation and public
accessibility of geoscience collections and data.
Projects completed during the 2020 grant were 1) to preserve 130 boxes of hand samples, and
2) to convert 10 WGNHS maps to the standard Geologic Map Schema (GeMS) format. The majority of
hand samples for this project came from a donation by Gene LaBerge (UW-Oshkosh) who worked
extensively in and around Marathon County, and whose work resulted in a Marathon County bedrock
map (LaBerge and Myers, 1983) published by WGNHS. The collection includes more than 1500
specimens from 583 separate outcrops. Successfully preserving these samples is of importance as
Marathon Co. continues to urbanize and many of the outcrops these samples represent are being
demolished due to land development. The 10 maps converted to GeMS format during the project
include Pleistocene maps from northwestern Wisconsin and bedrock maps from southern and
northeastern Wisconsin. Converting legacy maps to GeMS format is important because the digital use
of WGNHS maps allows for wider and broader use by both internal and external stakeholders.
Additionally, a survey of WGNHS external partners showed that a majority prefer digital versions of
maps and data.
Projects for the 2021 grant included 1) expanding the WGNHS data viewer’s capacity to deliver
photos of bedrock cores, 2) digitizing borehole data from the Mineral Development Atlas (MDA)- a
joint project between the USGS, United States Bureau of Mines (USBM), and state surveys of
Wisconsin, Iowa, and Illinois- that gathered information related to metallic mineral exploration and
mining in the lead-zinc district, and 3) photograph, log, and permanently archive seven cores from the
Lynne Deposit, a volcangenic massive sulfide deposit in Oneida County. WGNHS’s data viewer,
created in 2018, saw its capacity expanded to include photos of cores in their collection. The 2021
project used almost 300 donated Wisconsin Department of Transportation (WisDOT) cores to test pilot
this new ability and results are available here: https://data.wgnhs.wisc.edu/data-viewer/. An additional
part of this project included the correlation of 3300 scanned logs to the boreholes and updating location
data for logs and cores. The MDA portion of the 2021 project focused efforts on mine workings in
Lafayette Co., WI. Staff at the Survey geolocated more than 17,000 boreholes and corrected polygons
for surface workings such as quarries, prospecting sites, and lead diggings. Lastly, WGNHS
permanently archived seven cores from the Lynne Deposit, Oneida Co., WI in 2021. These cores were
transferred to WGNHS’s samples repository from the University of Wisconsin- Eau Claire where they
had been stored temporarily for student study. The cores (totaling approximately 2500 ft) were then
logged and photographed by UW-Eau Claire students. These photos were also added to the WGNHS
data viewer.
References
LaBerge, G., and Myers, P., 1983. Precambrian Geology of Marathon County, Wisconsin. Wisconsin Geological
and Natural History Survey IC45: 1-88.
https://wgnhs.wisc.edu/catalog/publication/000295/resource/ic45.

4

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

The geologic setting, structural controls, and geochemical signature of the Eagle River Au deposit
in Northwestern Ontario
BARKLEY, Ryan1, PHILLIPS, Noah1, HOLLINGS, Pete1
1

Department of Geology, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Road, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1 Canada

The Eagle River orogenic gold deposit is hosted in the Mishibishu greenstone belt of the
western Superior craton, approximately 50 km west of Wawa, Ontario. The deposit, an active
underground mine, has been in continuous production since 1995 and produced 1.485 (Moz) of Au
through to the end of 2021 (SRK, 2022). The average grade is 9.7 g/pt and Au is primarily hosted in
highly strained, milky white to grey quartz veins that dip to the north and strike east to west. The shear
zones are hosted in an elliptical quartz diorite pluton, extending into iron rich mafic volcanic rocks.
The Mishibishu greenstone belt is dominated by granitic plutons, mafic to felsic volcanics, and lesser
amounts of metasedimentary packages. U-Pb zircon dates in the belt range from 2.6 to 2.8 Ga,
indicating a Neoarchean environment (Keller, 1989). To understand the geological setting, structural
controls, and the geochemical signature of the Eagle River deposit, we completed detailed structural
field mapping, petrography, and whole rock geochemistry analysis of the rocks in and around the
deposit.
A total of 41 whole rock geochemistry samples were collected from the area north of the mine.
Two suites were identified; suite one consists of calc-alkaline basalt, andesite, dacite, rhyolite, diorite,
tonalite and granite. This suite is characterized by enriched La/Smn ratios of 2.06 to 6.83 and negative
Nb anomalies (Nb/Nb* of 0.09 to 0.43), consistent with magmas formed in a supra-subduction
environment. Suite two consists of tholeiitic basalt, andesitic-basalt and gabbro. This suite is
characterized by flatter trace element patterns with La/ Smn ratios of 0.83 to 1.48 and minor Nb
anomalies (Nb/Nb*of 0.40 to 0.85), consistent with primitive arc tholeiites (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. Primitive mantle normalised diagrams for the calc-alkaline (blue) vs tholeiitic (red) rocks of the study
area. Normalising values from Sun and McDonough (1989).

Shear zones for this study appear to be ductile. The white to grey, boudinaged quartz veins are
highly strained and flattened, indicating a ductile environment. Gold accumulates in areas of high
strain. Quartz veins exhibit chessboard extinction patterns and lobate grain boundaries indicating that
the veins have recrystallized through grain boundary migration dynamic recrystallization (Fig. 2; Stipp
et al, 2002). Deformation therefore occurred at high temperatures in a low stress environment.
5

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

0.5 cm
Figure 2. Recrystallization of quartz veins via grain boundary migration.

References
Keller, J., 1989. The evolution of the Mishibishu greenstone belt, near Wawa, Ontario. Electronic Theses and
Dissertations.
Stipp, M., Holger &amp; Heilbronner, R., &amp; Schmid, S., 2002. Dynamic recrystallization of quartz: Correlation
between natural and experimental conditions. Geological Society London Special Publications. 200:
171-190. 10.1144/GSL.SP.2001.200.01.1.
Sun, S.S., and McDonough, W.F., 1989. Chemical and Isotopic Systematics of Oceanic Basalts: Implications for
Mantle Composition and Processes. In: Saunders, A.D., Norry, M.J., Eds., Magmatism in the Ocean
Basins, Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 42: 313-345.
S.R.K Consulting, 2022. 43-101 Eagle River Mine, Ontario, Canada, Wesdome Gold: 262.

6

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Interpreted geophysical cross-sections through the Lake Superior region: Investigating three
billion years of geologic history in sixteen lines of data
BEDROSIAN, Paul A.1, GRAUCH, V.J.S.1, WOODRUFF, Laurel G.2, CANNON, William
F.3, DRENTH, Benjamin J. 1, STEWART, Esther K. 4, PETERSON, Dana E.1 and JONES,
James V.5
1

U.S. Geological Survey, Building 20, MS 964, Denver Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225
U.S. Geological Survey, 2280 Woodale Drive, Mounds View, MN, 55112
3
U.S. Geological Survey, 12201 Sunrise Valley Dr., MS 954, Reston, VA 20192
4
Wisconsin Geological &amp; Natural History Survey, 3817 Mineral Point Road, Madison, WI 53705
5
U.S. Geological Survey, 4210 University Drive, Anchorage, AK 990508
2

The northern midcontinent is a window into an Archean-Proterozoic continent, and the
Mesoproterozoic Midcontinent Rift System (MRS) that nearly tore it apart. This complex tectonic
collage has been largely unmodified during the last billion years yet is poorly exposed except in the
Lake Superior region. The area is rich in mineral resources, including native and sedimentary copper
deposits, iron formations, volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits, and nickel-copper-platinum-group
element sulfide mineralization.
In 2016, 2,710 line-km of airborne electromagnetic (AEM) and magnetic data were collected
along sixteen regional transects spanning parts of three states and more than three billion years of
geologic time (Bedrosian, 2019). The transects range from 100 to 300 km in length and cross parts of
the Wisconsin Magmatic Terrane, the Penokean fold and thrust belt, the MRS, and the Archean
Superior Province (Figure 1). Data modeling was challenging due to poor control on system height and
the prevalence of induced polarization effects (Bedrosian et al., 2018).
The final electrical resistivity models derived from the AEM data have been translated into
interpreted geophysical cross-sections though an iterative, consensus building approach. A team was
assembled with varied expertise in the geology, geophysics, and mineral resources of the MRS,
Penokean, and Archean assemblages within the region. Over a period of two years, a series of
interpretation sessions worked line-by-line through the transects, culminating in a workshop to
synthesize and finalize interpretations. Geologic maps, potential-field data, and drill hole logs were
examined alongside the AEM resistivity models and incorporated into the resulting interpretations.
Constraints from seismic reflection and refraction studies, magnetotelluric models, geochronology, and
detrital zircon studies were also considered where available.
The resulting annotated geophysical cross-sections are a resource to be drawn and built upon
for geologic and tectonic investigations. Some aspects these sections touch upon include:
• Internal structure of the Animikie basin and the basal contact of the Duluth Complex
• Geometry and deformation of MRS-flanking sedimentary basins
• Structure of the MRS Ashland syncline
• Geometry and extent of post-magmatic MRS clastics (Oronto and Bayfield Groups)
• Geometry, internal variability and provenance of the Jacobsville Sandstone
• Geometry and extent of Archean, Penokean, and MRS faults
• Extent and dismemberment of Penokean-deformed metasedimentary units
• Iron formations and Penokean structures along the early Proterozoic gneiss dome corridor
• Patterns of reverse polarity dikes
• Phanerozoic cover and underlying structure (e.g., eastern arm of the MRS)
• Distribution, thickness, and variability in glacial cover

7

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

New insights and refinements are many but include (a) a restricted areal extent for Bayfield Group
clastic rocks, (b) multiple distinct subunits within the Jacobsville sandstone, (c) a close stratigraphic
relation between Penokean iron formations and conductive sulfide-rich metasediments, and (d)
complex deformation and alteration of the main bowl Animikie basin.

Figure 1. Location of AEM and magnetic profiles (magenta). Background geology is from a USGS MRS GIS
compilation from published sources of the region.

References
Bedrosian, P.A., 2018. Geologic mapping and tectonic structure of the U.S. midcontinent via reconnaissance
AEM, 7th Intl. Wksp on Airborne Electromagnetics, Kolding, Denmark: 4.
Bedrosian, P., 2019. Multi-scale AEM and MT mapping of the Precambrian in Upper Michigan, Northern
Wisconsin, and Eastern Minnesota, in Puumala, M., (ed.), Institute on Lake Superior Geology
Proceedings, 51st Annual Meeting, Nipigon, Ontario, Part 1 - Abstracts and Proceedings. v.65, Part 1: 67.

8

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Deformation, metamorphism, fluid flow and pegmatite emplacement history of the post-1630 Ma Waterloo
Quartzite of southern Wisconsin
BJØRNERUD, M.1, BUCHHOLZ, T. 2, FALSTER, A. U.3, and SIMMONS, W. B.3
1

Geosciences Department, Lawrence University, Appleton Wisconsin 54911
1140 12th Street North, Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin 54494
3
Maine Mineral &amp; Gem Museum, PO Box 500, 99 Main Street, Bethel, Maine 04217
2

The Waterloo Quartzite, one of the upper Paleoproterozoic ‘Baraboo Interval’ quartzites of the
southern Great Lakes region (Medaris et al., 2003), experienced a more complex structural history and
higher-grade metamorphism (amphibolite facies) than any of the other quartzite units in this group. It is
also distinctive in being intruded by bodies of granitic pegmatite. Natural outcrops of the Waterloo
quartzite are limited, but a major quarry near the town of Waterloo (43.210 N, 88.450 W) provides
three-dimensional exposures and access to a large volume of fragmented rock. This study is based on
observations and samples taken at the quarry over several years as it was deepened and enlarged by
blasting.
The youngest detrital zircons in the Waterloo Quartzite date to 1634 Ma, younger than the 1710
Ma maximum depositional age of the Baraboo Quartzite, and an indication that sediment transport
directions changed from southward to northward (modern coordinates) between the times of deposition
of the Baraboo and Waterloo units (Schwartz et al., 2018). The protolith of the Waterloo quartzite was
primarily pure quartz sandstone but also included pelites and quartz pebble conglomerates with clasts
of jasper (Stewart, 2021).
The earliest deformational feature in the Waterloo quartzite is a penetrative foliation (S1)
defined by aligned grains of sub-mm muscovite in the pelitic layers; this muscovite has yielded an
40
Ar/39Ar age of 1452 +/- 7 Ma and has been interpreted as evidence of a pervasive fluid flow event that
introduced potassium into the supermature sediments, in which K was originally absent (Medaris et al.,
2003). In the quarry, the S1 foliation is nearly parallel to bedding; both surfaces strike toward the
northeast (045° to 055°) and dip moderately (35°-55°) southeast, suggesting that the rocks lie on the SE
limb of a tight NW-verging anticline. In places, mm- to cm-scale quartz veins with Ti-rich hematite
masses on their margins lie parallel to the foliation and have fibers oriented perpendicular to the
foliation. This points to another episode of fluid infiltration under a stress regime distinct from the one
that formed the foliation. These early quartz veins are commonly folded and/or boudinaged.
The S1 foliation is overprinted by porphyroblasts of andalusite, typically about 0.5 cm in size.
Most of these have been altered to muscovite and/or kaolinite, indicating another episode of fluid
infiltration. The kaolinite occurs mainly on the margins of the andalusite crystals, giving them a zoned
appearance. In many specimens, the retrograded andalusites have a rusty red color that may be related
to the presence of hematite in the kaolinitic rims (Geiger et al., 1982). The next structural feature to
develop in these rocks are kink-like crenulations in pelitic horizons, seen abundantly in blocks in the
quarry waste piles. At two sites where this crenulation cleavage (S2) was observed in place, it strikes N
to NNW and dips steeply east. The geometry of the crenulations is strongly influenced by the presence
of the andalusite porphyroblasts/ pseudomorphs, many of which have small, asymmetric pressure
shadows of quartz and muscovite that seem to be related to the development of the crenulations.
Sometime after the formation of the crenulation cleavage, the quartzite was intruded by Kfeldspar-dominated pegmatite dikes ranging in width from 1 cm to 3 m. Pegmatites have been known
from the NW portion of the Waterloo Quarry for some years and have been discussed by

9

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Buchholz et al. (2016). The pegmatite dikes have sharp boundaries and granitic textures, with Kfeldspar, quartz and muscovite crystals of equal and uniform size. Blasting of a phyllitic horizon in the
NE part of the quarry has recently exposed additional thin (&lt; 5 cm wide) pegmatite dikes, with mmscale chilled margins at contacts with the host rock. Heavy mineral separates from these thin dikes
contain fluorapatite, monazite-(Ce), ilmenite, columbite-(Mn), tantalite-(Mn), evidence of significant
enrichment of Ta/Nb and Mn/Fe.
In addition to the pegmatite dikes, coarse-grained pegmatite-like patches occur in the necks of
boudinaged quartz veins and quartzose layers enclosed by phyllites, primarily in the NE corner of the
quarry. Unlike the clearly igneous dikes, these patches have irregular boundaries with the host rock and
their crystal size is variable. In thin section, K-feldspar and quartz in these patches show a micrographic
texture. Muscovite in pelitic layers surrounding the boudins is coarser than in the rest of the rock, and
rusty andalusite pseudomorphs are smeared and flattened in the vicinity of the boudins, suggesting that
they had already been altered and softened by the time the boudins formed. Although they occur in the
same area of the quarry, the pegmatite-like boudin patches do not seem to be physically connected to
the pegmatite dikes. The patches are presumably older since they formed during the process of
boudinage, while the dikes apparently postdate deformation. The pegmatite-like material in the boudin
necks could either be hydro- thermal or produced by in situ melting related to influx of fluids or
perhaps a local drop in pressure (mean stress) during boudinage.
Examination of heavy mineral separates from the pegmatite-like bodies associated with boudins
revealed fluorapatite and monazite-(Ce). One specimen of the boudin material contains small beryl
crystals in a pocket-like void. This may be similar to beryl occurrences in regionally metamorphosed
rocks in Austria (Franz et al, 1986), believed to have formed between 500- 550⁰C -- slightly higher
than maximum metamorphic temperature estimates of 500⁰C for the Waterloo rocks (Medaris et al.,
2003). Small crystals of greenish to light brown dravitic tourmaline are also present locally; analysis
shows that these are Li-bearing, as are nearby muscovites. Additional mineral phases include
chloritoid, spessartine garnet, fluorapatite, and gahnite, all pointing to the introduction of fluids with a
rich mix of ions.
Although the Waterloo quarry lies only 20 km in the across-strike direction from the south limb
of the Baraboo syncline, it is not easy to correlate either the chronology or the orientations of structures
at Waterloo with those in the more famous Baraboo Quartzite. Our observations from the Waterloo
quarry suggest that the 1470-1450 Ma “Baraboo Orogeny” (Medaris et al., 2021) was a complex, multistage tectonic event whose details have not yet been fully documented.
References
Buchholz, T.W., Falster, A.U. &amp; Simmons, W.B., 2016. Second Foord Pegmatite Symposium: 22-23.
Franz, G., Grundman, G., &amp; Ackermand, D, 1986. Tschermaks Min. Pet. Mitteilungen, 15: 167-192.
Geiger, C., Guidotti, C. &amp; Petro, 1982. Geoscience Wisconsin 6: 21-40.
Medaris, L.G. &amp; others, 2003. Journal of Geology, 111, doi:10.1086/373967
Medaris, L.G. &amp; others, 2021. Geoscience Frontiers, 12, doi: 10.1016/j.gsf.2021.101174
Schwartz, J.J., Stewart, E.K. and Medaris, L.G., Jr., 2018. ILSG Proceedings, 64: 93–94.
Stewart, E.K., 2021. Wisconsin Geological &amp; Natural History Survey Map 508.
Stewart. E.K., Brengman, L. &amp; Stewart, E.D., 2021. Journal of Geology, 129, doi:10.1086/713687.

10

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

The Midcontinent Rift System: Neither triple junction nor failed rift?
BLEEKER, Wouter1, SMITH, Jennifer1, HAMILTON, Michael2, KAMO, Sandra2, HOLLINGS,
Pete3, EASTON, Michael4, and CUNDARI, Robert5
1

Geological Survey of Canada, 601 Booth Street, Ottawa, ON K1A 0E8; wouter.bleeker@canada.ca
Jack Satterly Geochronology Lab., University of Toronto, 22 Ursula Franklin St., Toronto, ON M5S 3B1
3
Department of Geology, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Road, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1
4
Ontario Geological Survey, 933 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, ON P3E 6B5
5
Ontario Geological Survey, 435 James Street South, Thunder Bay, ON P7E 6S7
2

The Midcontinent Rift System has often been described in terms of i) a failed intracontinental rift
system; with ii) a basic ‘triple junction’ architecture, the three arms of the triple junction being
represented by the SW arm of Lake Superior, the SE arm of Lake Superior, and a less developed rift
structure reaching up into the Lake Nipigon area. Here we challenge both views.
Although it is certainly true that on a local scale, i.e. the North American midcontinent, the rift
system failed and inverted, it is likely that on a more global scale the system did not fail but led to
ocean opening at ca. 1103 Ma, i.e. the waning phase of the “Early Magmatic Stage”3 of the
Midcontinent Rift. This led to a global reorganization of plate stresses. The majority of robust
structural indicators suggest that this early stage rifting, initiated at ca. 1110 Ma and waning towards
ca. 1103 Ma, was oriented on an NW-SE axis or trend (present orientation), from Lake Nipigon to the
SE arm of Lake Superior and beyond. The significant gradient in rifting and lithospheric stretching,
from Lake Nipigon (minor rifting followed by sagging) to the SE rift arm (major rifting), requires that
the rotation pole for this early phase of rifting was situated to the northwest, somewhere in northwest
Ontario. At larger distances from this rotation pole, up to 90° of arc away(?), to the southeast (present
orientation), lithospheric spreading may have reached ~1000 km and thus likely led to ocean opening.
This early phase of rifting with its NW-SE axis came to a close with a marked hiatus of ~4-5 Myr (the
“Magmatic Hiatus”), represented in most sections by a distinct unconformity of conglomerates and
more shallow dipping basalt flows on top of older, more steeply dipping basalt flows.
When rifting resumed, after this significant hiatus, it opened up the SW arm of the Midcontinent
Rift organized on a SW-NE trending rift system. This phase was accompanied by the “Main
Magmatic Stage” and was initiated at 1099-1098 Ma, the emplacement age of the Duluth Complex
(e.g., Paces and Miller, 1993). The marked gradient in rifting and lithospheric stretching on this SWNE rift system, with major crustal stretching in the central part of Lake Superior, and less stretching
farther to the southwest, indicates that the rotation pole for this younger phase of rifting was situated
well to the southwest, perhaps in Texas or on the future western margin of Laurentia. This SW-NE rift
system shows marked jogs, and may have stepped over to the south, through the eastern arm of Lake
Superior, and continued to the northeast in the area now obscured by final accretion and collision of the
Grenville orogen at ca. 1 Ga. As for the first phase of rifting, we observe locally (in North America)
only one proximal end (relative to the rotation poles) of the larger rift systems—systems that may well
have been global in scale. Clearly the later SW-NE rift system is distinct from the earlier NW- SE rift
system, with completely different rotation poles, and rift axes that are essentially perpendicular to each
other.
Relevant to the early NW- SE rift phase, the extent of the rifting and the location of its rotation
pole, are occurrences of carbonatite complexes in northwest Ontario, and large diabase sills at the base
3

We use here the magmatic stage terminology of Miller and Nicholson (2013) but with modified age boundaries.

11

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

of the Athabasca Basin (the Moore Lakes sills), the latter with an age exactly equivalent to those of the
Nipigon diabase sills (see Bleeker et al., 2020 and references therein). At a larger scale, there are 1108
Ma magmatic provinces on several other continents (e.g., the Umkondo sills in South Africa; Hanson et
al., 2004). And relevant to the younger SW-NE rift phase is the major diabase sill magmatism of the
SW USA Diabase Province at 1095-1085 Ma (e.g., Bright et al., 2014; Heaman and Grotzinger, 1992).
Clearly, we need to zoom out to develop a broader understanding of the Midcontinent Rift System and
see it in a more global context.
The GSC-funded project to refine our knowledge of this major rift system started with an attempt
to better define the ages (both precision and accuracy) of some of the major events and many of the
mineralized intrusions. We currently have ~30 U-Pb samples in various stages of progress and some
early results were reported in Bleeker et al. (2020) and Smith et al. (2020). Several others will be
discussed as part of this presentation. Our initial focus was to resolve many of the problematic age
‘outliers’, the majority of which were based on extrapolations from sparse and discordant data. Most of
these outliers are now gone. Based on our current data and review of the published literature, major age
divisions may be summarized as follows:
Initiation: ca. 1111-1110 Ma, as best defined by the large Echo Lake subvolcanic layered intrusion (a
robust zircon age, reported in Cannon and Nicholson, 2001).
Early Magmatic Stage: 1110-1103 Ma, with emplacement of regional diabase sill complexes (ca.
1108-1106 Ma) following early rift intrusions and regional plateau basalt building (1110-1107 Ma).
The Tamarack intrusion, still organized on a NNW-SSE dyke-like system, is ca. 1104 Ma.
Hiatus: 1103-1099 Ma, in many places marked by an angular unconformity.
Main Magmatic Stage: 1099-1092 Ma, initiated with emplacement of the Duluth Complex and later
characterized by the very extensive flood basalts of the Portage Lake Volcanic Group.
Late Magmatic Stage: 1092-1084 Ma, waning volcanism and intercalated rift-fill sediments.
Sagging and Rift-Fill Stage: 1084 to ca. 1060 Ma, final rift fill sedimentation, Oronto Group.
References
Bleeker, W. et al., 2020. The Midcontinent Rift and its mineral systems: Overview and temporal constraints of
Ni-Cu-PGE mineralized intrusions. GSC Open File 8722: 7–35. DOI: org/10.4095/326880.
Bright, R.M. et al., 2014. U-Pb geochronology of 1.1 Ga diabase in the southwestern United States: Testing
models for the origin of a post-Grenville large igneous province. Lithosphere, 6:135–156.
Cannon, W.F. and Nicholson, S.W., 2001. Geology map of the Keweenaw Peninsula and adjacent area. U.S.
Geological Survey, Geological Investigations Series, Map I-2696, scale 1:100 000.
Heaman, L.M. and Grotzinger, J.P., 1992. 1.08 Ga diabase sills in the Pahrump Group, California: Implications
for development of the Cordilleran miogeocline. Geology, 20: 637–640.
Miller, J.D. and Nicholson, S.W., 2013. Geology and mineral deposits of the 1.1 Ga Midcontinent Rift in the
Lake Superior region – An overview. Precambrian Research Center Guidebook 13-1:1–50.
Paces, J.B. and Miller, J.D., 1993. Precise U‐Pb ages of Duluth complex and related mafic intrusions,
northeastern Minnesota: Geochronological insights to physical, petrogenetic, paleomagnetic, and
tectonomagmatic processes associated with the 1.1 Ga midcontinent rift system. Journal of Geophysical
Research: Solid Earth, 98: 13 997–14 013.
Smith, J.W. et al., 2020. Timing and controls on Ni-Cu-PGE mineralization within the Crystal Lake Intrusion,
1.1 Ga Midcontinent Rift. GSC Open File 8722: 37–63.

12

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

New geologic mapping in the Superior Province of northwestern Minnesota, USA: Pennington
and Red Lake Counties
BLOCK, Amy Radakovich1, SOUDERS, A. Kate2, DRENTH, Benjamin J.3, HUDAK, George J.4,
SAARI, Stacy M. 5, HIRSCH, Aaron C.1
1

Minnesota Geological Survey, 2609 Territorial Road, St. Paul, MN 55114
U.S. Geological Survey, PO Box 25046, MS 963, Denver Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225
3
U.S. Geological Survey, PO Box 25046, MS 973, Denver Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225
4
Natural Resources Research Institute, 5013 Miller Trunk Highway, Duluth, MN 55811
5
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, 1525 3rd Ave E, Hibbing, MN 55746
2

The Earth Mapping Resources Initiative (Earth MRI) is a partnership between the USGS and
state geological surveys/science agencies that funds data collection and geologic mapping in order to
better characterize areas of potential critical mineral resources. Earth MRI recently funded a highresolution airborne geophysical survey (Allen Langhans and Drenth, 2023; Fig. 1, blue box) and
acquisition of new geochronologic (Souders, A.K., in review), petrologic, and geochemical data in a
part of the Superior Province in northwestern Minnesota that is prospective for numerous criticalmineral-producing systems. Previous geologic mapping of the area (Jirsa et al., 1999; Jirsa et al., 2011)
was limited by an absence of outcrop, limited drill hole data, and only one geochronologic age. Newly
acquired data support ongoing bedrock mapping across a large area (Fig. 1, red box); This map
highlights the geology of Pennington and Red Lake Counties (Fig. 1, orange box). The map area
comprises three conterminous subprovinces of the Archean Superior Province which are situated in
unusually close proximity to one another; in the map area, the Quetico metasedimentary province
pinches to as little as 5 km of thickness in map view where it separates the Wabigoon and Wawa
volcanoplutonic subprovinces on either side.
Ages from a biotite tonalite in the Snake River batholith (ca. 2758 Ma), a diorite in the Grygla
pluton (ca. 2771 Ma), and a biotite-hornblende tonalite in the Red Lake Falls pluton (ca. 2701 Ma)
(Souders, in review) define multiple Neoarchean episodes of intermediate to felsic intrusive activity
within the Wabigoon subprovince. Interpretation of the improved aeromagnetic data suggests a revised,
more southerly position of the Wabigoon-Quetico subprovince boundary, as well as modifications of
numerous other geologic contacts across the map area. Finally, new geochronologic ages confirm an
Archean (ca. 2737 Ma) age for the Mentor Anorthosite Intrusive Complex (MAIC) (Souders, in
review), and new geophysical interpretations reveal that the MAIC is as much as twice as large and
much more structurally complex than previously thought (Drenth et al., this volume). Both findings
regarding the MAIC are consistent with what is known of other Archean anorthosites in the Superior
Province (Sotirou &amp; Polat, 2020; Polat et al., 2018).
Work in the larger Earth MRI mapping area is ongoing. Additional geochronologic data will
shed light on the depositional history and timing of mineralization of volcanic strata in both the Wawa
and Wabigoon subprovinces. Geochemical analyses will supplement petrographic observations and
help refine tectonic provenance of all rock units. A new geologic map of the entire area (Fig. 1, red
box) will be completed, and a comprehensive mineral potential model will better assess the potential
for critical minerals in the area.

13

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Pennington
Red Lake

Figure 1. Generalized subprovince map of the Superior Province in northwest Minnesota, USA, showing the
location of both the recent geophysical survey (blue outline), ongoing new mapping (red outline) for the
EarthMRI project, and the map area for this poster (orange outline).

References
Allen Langhans, A.D., and Drenth, B.J., 2023. Airborne magnetic and radiometric survey, northwestern
Minnesota, 2021: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P97D2JJE.
Drenth, et al., this volume.
Jirsa, M.A., Chandler, V.W., and Runkel, A.C., 1999. M-092 Bedrock geologic map of northwestern Minnesota.
Minnesota Geological Survey. Retrieved from the University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy,
https://hdl.handle.net/11299/973.
Jirsa, M.A., Boerboom, T.J., Chandler, V.W., Mossler, J.H., Runkel, A.C., and Setterholm, D.R., 2011. Geologic
map of Minnesota, bedrock geology: Minnesota Geological Survey State Map S-21, scale 1:500,000.
Polat, A., Longstaffe, F.J., and Frei, R., 2018. An overview of anorthosite-bearing layered intrusions in the
Archaean craton of southern West Greenland and the Superior Province of Canada: implications for
Archaean tectonics and the origin of megacrystic plagioclase: GEODINAMICA ACTA, v. VOL. 30, NO.
1: 84–99, https://doi.org/10.1080/09853111.2018.1427408.
Sotiriou, P., and Polat, A. 2020. Comparisons between Tethyan anorthosite‐bearing ophiolites and Archean
anorthosite‐bearing layered intrusions: implications for Archean geodynamic processes: Tectonics, v. 39,
35.
Souders A.K., in review. U-Pb Geochronology of the Mentor Anorthosite Intrusive Complex (MAIC) and
Regional Plutonic Units. U.S. Geological Survey Data Release. https://doi.org/10.5066/P9WMD477.

14

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

A revised provenance model for the Elk Mound Group in south-central Wisconsin based on
detrital zircon analysis
BOJDAK-YATES, Itai S.1, BJØRNERUD, Marcia1, MALONE, David H.2, and STEWART,
Esther K.3
1

Department of Geosciences, Lawrence University, Appleton, WI, 54911, United States
Department of Geography, Geology, and the Environment, Campus Box 4400, Illinois State University, Normal,
IL, 61790, United States
3
Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey, 3817 Mineral Point Rd, Madison, WI, 53705, United States
2

The Late Cambrian Elk Mound Group consists of three sandstone formations deposited in a
shallow tropical sea: the Mount Simon, Eau Claire, and Wonewoc formations, in ascending order. The
formations underlie much of the upper Midwestern United States in vast, thin sheets, which thicken
toward the Illinois Basin further south. These formations have long fascinated geologists due to their
extraordinary physical and chemical maturity, but they have often eluded explanation thanks to those
same qualities. Recent studies have employed detrital zircon (DZ) U-Pb analysis to constrain the
sources of the sand, and workers have begun to build regional provenance models that describe the
origins of the sand and the routes it took to arrive at its present location.
Our study builds upon these models with new samples from the Mount Simon Sandstone, a
quartz arenite deposited in terrestrial and shoreface environments (Dott et al. 1986). We analyzed
samples from outcrops of nonmarine deposits high on the Wisconsin Arch near Wisconsin Dells, WI,
as well as a drill core taken 26 miles east of the Dells (the Triemstra core, near Belle Fountain, WI).
We place these samples in the context of previous DZ work in this area, especially a study by
Konstantinou et al. (2014). The formations of the Elk Mound Group are poorly defined in central
Wisconsin, and the samples reveal a transition from Mesoproterozoic source provinces towards Late
Archean source provinces as one moves up section and to the west (Figure 1). This transition is
understood to represent a shift from sediments derived from the more local Wolf River Batholith (ca.
1470 Ma) and Penokean orogenies (ca. 1830 Ma) to more distal sediments derived from the Superior
Province (ca. 2650 Ma). However, other sedimentary basins such as the Animikie and Huronian basins
and the Midcontinent Rift may have contributed sediments as well. The physical maturity of the sand
grains supports a recycled origin, as multiple cycles of weathering and erosion would have been
necessary to produce such rounded grains (Dott, 2003).
Sedimentological details of the sandstone reveal additional information about shifts in
provenance. A pair of samples from the Wisconsin Dells area (upper Chapel Gorge and lower Mirror
Lake) show relatively high proportions of Penokean-age sediments. The sedimentology of the outcrops
sampled records a transition from a dune environment to a braided river environment, and these rivers
may have brought sediment from the Penokees. Additionally, the proportional increase in Archean-age
sediments correlates with a rise in sea level as one rises through the Elk Mound Group. This correlation
suggests that local sediment sources were drowned by sea level transgressions, while the distal
Superior Province remained high enough to continue eroding and contribute sediment to a shallow sea
already rich in Archean-age sand. Paleocurrent indicators derived from optical borehole image logs
from wells across central Wisconsin add to the regional provenance picture with evidence of
predominant currents flowing toward the west and southwest, giving some indication of the more
immediate source and final transport of these sediments.

15

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Figure 1. DZ data from six samples gathered in central Wisconsin, organized in ascending order through the
section and from east to west. (The Triemstra sample is the oldest and furthest east; the Wonewoc sample is the
youngest and furthest west.) The Chapel Gorge samples came from the east bank of the Wisconsin River about
1.5 miles north of Wisconsin Dells. The Mirror Lake samples came from the northwest shore of Mirror Lake
about 3.5 miles south of Wisconsin Dells. The Wonewoc sample was collected near Wonewoc, WI, about 21.5
miles west of Wisconsin Dells, and was analyzed by Konstantinou et al. (2014).

References
Dott Jr., R.H., Byers, C.W., Fielder, G.W., Stenzel, S.R., and Winfree, K.E., 1986. Aeolian to marine transition
in Cambro-Ordovician cratonic sheet sandstones of the northern Mississippi Valley, USA.
Sedimentology, 33: 345-367.
Dott Jr., R.H., 2003. The Importance of Eolian Abrasion in Supermature Quartz Sandstones and the Paradox of
Weathering on Vegetation-Free Landscapes. The Journal of Geology, 111(4): 387-405.
Konstantinou, A., Wirth, K.R., Vervoort, J.D., Malone, D.H., Davidson, C., and Craddock, J.P., 2014.
Provenance of Quartz Arenites of the Early Paleozoic Midcontinent Region, USA. The Journal of
Geology, 122: 201-216.
Lovell, T.R., and Bowen, B.B., 2013. Fluctuations in Sedimentary Provenance of the Upper Cambrian Mount
Simon Sandstone, Illinois Basin, United States. The Journal of Geology, 121: 129-154.

16

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Quetico-Wabigoon Subprovince Boundary in the Superior Province north of Thunder Bay,
Ontario, Canada
BRIGGS, Blaize1, and HILL, Mary Louise1
1

Department of Geology, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Road, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1 Canada

The boundary zone between the Quetico and Wabigoon subprovinces is a complex zone of
deformation and metamorphism that historically has been described as a fault, change in
metamorphic grade and/or change in lithology. This boundary zone is exposed along Highway 527
within a roughly 23km stretch of highway. At the south end of this zone the DeCourcey Lake outcrop
is a strongly foliated, mylonitic gneiss containing quartz, feldspar, garnet, sillimanite, muscovite, and
biotite with pegmatites and boudinaged quartz veins that is interpreted to be part of the Quetico
subprovince. The north end of the zone is marked by weakly foliated Max Lake conglomerate that
displays primary sedimentary textures and is interpreted to be part of the Wabigoon subprovince.
Cataclasis was discovered 9.8km north of the DeCourcey Lake outcrop and marks a sharp change
from the high-grade amphibolite to granulite facies Quetico lithologies south of the cataclasite to subgreenschist to greenschist facies Wabigoon lithologies to the north. This cataclasite is characteristic
of brittle deformation and evidence for a fault that has not been reported in previous studies. The fault
is mapped parallel to the foliation of the cataclasite (Fig. 1). This cataclasite is interpreted to be a
boundary fault marking the abrupt transition between the Quetico and Wabigoon subprovinces along
Highway 527.

Figure 1. Map of study area along Highway 527 showing sampled outcrops and new subprovince boundary.

Thirteen outcrops along Highway 527 were mapped and sampled for microstructural analysis.
17

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Thin sections created from these samples were used to identify deformation microstructures in quartz
and feldspar. Feldspar deformation microstructures are particularly useful and can be used as a proxy
for temperature since feldspar needs higher temperatures than quartz to deform internally. Identifying
deformation regimes for feldspar is important as most of the rocks within the study area are dominantly
composed of quartz and feldspar.
Metamorphic Grade
Low

Temperature
400 ℃

Textures/Deformation Structures
-Patchy undulose extinction
- Fracturing and cataclasis
-Angular grains
-Grain size faults with bent cleavage plane/twins

Low-Medium

400-500 ℃

Medium

450-600 ℃

High

600 ℃

-Internal fracturing (minor dislocation glide)
-Bulging recrystallization (BLG)
-Tapered deformation twins
-Bent twins
-Undulose extinction
-Deformation &amp; kink bands
-Core &amp; mantle texture
-Fine grain recrystallization/uniform grain size
-Micro-kinking
-Less abundant deformation twins
-Sub-grain rotation (SGR)
-Bulging recrystallization (BLG)
-Core and mantle texture
-Myrmekite along foliation planes

Table 1. Feldspar deformation structures and corresponding temperatures/metamorphic grade based on
descriptions from Passchier and Trouw (2005).

References
Passchier, C.W. and Trouw, R.A.J., 2005. Microtectonics, Second Edition. Springer. Berlin, New York: 366.

18

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Contributions of diverse mantle sources during the early stages of Midcontinent Rift formation
— Implications for a passive rifting model
BRZOZOWSKI, Matthew1,2, HOLLINGS, Pete1, ZHU, Jing-jing3, CREASER, Robert4
1

Department of Geology, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Road, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1 Canada
British Columbia Geological Survey, 1810 Blanshard Street, Victoria, BC V8T 4J1 Canada
3
State Key Laboratory of Ore Deposit Geochemistry, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences,
99 Lincheng West Road, Guiyang, Guizhou Province 550081, PR China
4
Earth &amp; Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, 116 Street &amp; 85 Avenue, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3,
Canada
2

It is generally accepted that the Midcontinent Rift System (MRS) and associated magmatism
originated as a result of the impingement and melting of the Keweenaw Plume beneath the crust ca. 1.1
Ga (Hutchinson et al. 1990). This interpretation is based largely on Sm–Nd and Re–Os isotope data,
and the need for a heat source to explain the large volumes of magma generated (Cannon 1992;
Nicholson et al. 1997; Shirey 1997). This view has recently been challenged, however, given the long
duration of magmatism associated with the MRS (Hollings and Heggie 2014) and paleomagnetic
evidence that is indicative of rapid plate motion during the formation of the MRS (Swanson-Hysell et
al. 2014). Alongside these ambiguities are uncertainties in the nature of the sources that fed the MRS
with magma (e.g., plume vs. subcontinental lithospheric mantle)? Clarifying these ambiguities has
remained challenging given that many of the earliest magmas in the MRS were variably contaminated
by crustal material (e.g., the Nipigon sills), masking potential contributions from distinct mantle
sources. Development of a robust genetic model for the early history of the MRS and the critical
mineral resources associated with this magmatism requires a firm understanding of these contributions.
To address this, we integrated new Os isotope data of Initiation (&gt;1,109 Ma), Early (1,109–1,104 Ma),
and Hiatus (1,104–1,098 Ma) stage rocks with variations in their bulk-rock trace-element and Nd
isotope geochemistry (Brzozowski et al. 2023).
Early MRS rock suites are characterized by highly variable γOsi values of -10 to 3857, with
Early Stage melts exhibiting the greatest variability (-10 to 3857) and Initiation Stage melts exhibiting
the smallest variability (4 to 50). Given that the γOsi values do not correlate with La/Sm, Gd/Yb, and
MgO, this variability could not be due to variable degrees of partial melting, retention of garnet in the
mantle, or fractional crystallization, respectively. Several of the rock suites of interest exhibit elevated
Th/Nb–Th/La and radiogenic εNdi–Sri values that are indicative of crustal contamination and/or
contributions from a subcontinental lithospheric mantle (SCLM) source. Based on numerical modeling,
the radiogenic εNdi and γOsi values recorded by the mafic–ultramafic intrusions and sills are indicative
of their crystallization from hybrid melts (enriched SCLM-derived melt &gt; plume-derived melt) that
assimilated &lt;10% crustal material during emplacement (Fig. 1). In contrast, the melts that fed the
diabase sills and subaerial lavas likely originated from depleted portions of the Keweenaw Plume based
on their variably negative to positive γOsi values, and were contaminated during emplacement (Fig. 1).
Although contamination can explain the range of εNdi values exhibited by the rock suites, it cannot
independently account for the range of γOsi values because i) this would require unrealistically high
degrees of contamination and ii) not all of the rock suites were contaminated (cf. Wolfcamp Basalt).
Rather, it is likely that fractionation of sulfide liquid and/or Os-bearing platinum-group minerals also
contributed to this variability. Together, these results indicate that i) not all of the rock suites in the
MRS crystallized from plume-derived melts, ii) melt contributions from the SCLM were greatest
during the early stages of rift formation, and iii) the MRS likely initiated passively, with plume
impingement being a coincidence that provided the energy and material necessary for voluminous

19

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

magmatism.

Figure 1. Variation in γOsi and εNdi in hybrid magmas generated by mixing of melts from various mantle
reservoirs. The numbers along the mixing curves are the mixing percents. The numbers in rounded boxes are the
εNdi values of the contaminant.

References
Brzozowski M.J., Hollings P., Zhu J-J., Creaser R.A., 2023. Osmium isotopes record a complex magmatic
history during the early stages of formation of the North American Midcontinent Rift — Implications for
rift initiation. Lithos: 436–437:106966.
Cannon W.F. 1992. The Midcontinent rift in the Lake Superior region with emphasis on its geodynamic
evolution. Tectonophysics 213: 41–48.
Hollings P., Heggie G. 2014. Rethinking the Midcontinent Rift–puncturing the ‘Plume Paradigm’. In: 60th
Institute on Lake Superior Geology. Hibbing, Minnesota, pp 57–58.
Hutchinson D.R., White R.S., Cannon W.F., Schulz K.J., 1990. Keweenaw hot spot: Geophysical evidence for a
1.1 Ga mantle plume beneath the Midcontinent Rift System. J Geophys Res 95: 10869.
Nicholson S.W., Schulz K.J., Shirey S.B., Green J.C., 1997. Rift-wide correlation of 1.1 Ga Midcontinent rift
system basalts: implications for multiple mantle sources during rift development. Can J Earth Sci 34:
504–520.
Shirey S.B. 1997. Re-Os isotopic compositions of Midcontinent rift system picrites: implications for plume –
lithosphere interaction and enriched mantle sources. Can J Earth Sci 34: 489–503.
Swanson-Hysell N.L., Burgess S.D., Maloof A.C., Bowring S.A., 2014. Magmatic activity and plate motion
during the latent stage of Midcontinent Rift development. Geology 42: 475–478.

20

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Eastward transition from banded iron-formation to ferruginous clastic rocks across the central
Upper Peninsula of Michigan
CANNON, W. F.1, DRENTH, Benjamin J.2
1

U.S. Geological Survey, MS 954, Reston, VA 20192; 2U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO 80225

The classic Paleoproterozoic iron-formations of the Lake Superior iron ranges are
predominantly banded cherty chemical sedimentary rocks characterized by centimeter-scale
interbedding of chert and various iron minerals. New observations from legacy iron exploration drill
cores that sampled Precambrian rocks below Paleozoic sediments to the east of the exposed iron ranges
in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan show that highly ferruginous fine-grained clastic sedimentary
rocks are predominant in that area, and that true cherty iron-formation is a subordinate component of
the ferruginous sedimentary section. Most of our information is derived from a collection of cores from
proprietary exploration holes held by Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Company, who has allowed us to examine,
sample, and describe the rock units. Those holes were drilled to test five large-amplitude magnetic
anomalies (Figure 1). Cores from four additional anomalies that are publicly available at the Michigan
Geologic Sample Repository were also studied.

Figure 1. Reduced to pole aeromagnetic anomaly map showing anomalies sourced in sub-Paleozoic
Precambrian basement, names assigned to each magnetic anomaly, and drill holes used in this study. Crosshatched pattern is the area of Paleozoic cover.

The ferruginous clastic rocks examined in this study are generally laminated at centimeter- to
millimeter-scale and range from fine-grained quartzite to siltstone. Most are even-bedded. Laminae
alternate between quartzo-feldspathic and ferruginous; some of the latter are nearly 100% iron
minerals. Average iron mineral content of individual short core segments is as much as 50% by visual
estimates. All are metamorphosed to varying degrees, but unambiguous relict clastic textures are
preserved widely. The combination of textures and mineral content leaves no doubt that these are

21

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

clastic rocks that accumulated very anomalous concentrations of iron.

Figure 2. A. Whole thin section of thinly interlaminated fine sandstone and siltstone from the LaBranch
deposit. Light layers are quartzo-feldspathic fine sandstone. Darkest layers are nearly all magnetite. B. Crossed
polars view of quartz, microcline, biotite, and magnetite in fine sandstone from the Gladstone deposit. C. Same
view as B in reflected light showing numerous magnetite grains. Bright partial rims on some grains are martite.

Figure 3. Schematic section of approximately 100 kilometers showing the transition from Vulcan Ironformation in the west, as exposed on the Menominee Range (Bayley et al., 1966) and Felch Trough (James et al.,
1961), to ferruginous clastic-dominated sedimentary rocks in areas covered by Paleozoic sediments in the east.

We interpret these ferruginous clastic rocks as the lateral equivalent of the Menominee Group,
which includes the major banded iron-formations of the Menominee and other iron-ranges of the
western Upper Peninsula of Michigan. They record a gradation from the purely chemical and clasticstarved true banded iron-formations to the west, to a more shoreward facies where fine clastic
sedimentation predominated and overwhelmed slow precipitation of chert beds. Intermittent periods of
diminished clastic input allowed sporadic deposition of layers of cherty banded iron-formation, some
of which are granular, indicating deposition in shallow water. These relationships show that the lateral
disappearance of true banded iron-formations resulted from suppression of chemical chert precipitation
by the input of fine-grained clastic sediments. However, intense iron deposition persisted into this more
proximal fine-clastic-dominated facies resulting in abundant ferruginous clastic rocks.
References
Bayley, R.W., Dutton, C.E., and Lamey, C.A., 1966. Geology of the Menominee Iron-bearing District,
Dickinson County, Michigan, and Florence and Marinette Counties, Wisconsin: U.S. Geological Survey
Professional Paper 513: 96.
James, H.L., Clark, L.D., Lamey, C.A., and Pettijohn, F.J., 1961. Geology of Central Dickinson County,
Michigan: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 310: 176.

22

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Workshop Outcomes and Updates for the Minnesota Department of Natural Resource’s Drill Core
Library
CARTER, Matt J.1 and ELSENHEIMER, Donald2
1

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, 1525 3rd Ave E, Hibbing, MN 55746
2
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, 500 Lafayette Rd, Saint Paul, MN 55155

The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) provides public access to more than
one million meters of drill core from over 9,000 locations across the state at its Hibbing Drill Core
Library (DCL). This archive opened in 1967 and has been an invaluable resource for bedrock mapping,
mineral exploration, and research, including numerous ILSG presentations.
In November 2022, the DNR convened a workshop to gather stakeholder input on DCL policies and
procedures (Carter et al., 2023). A need to update these policies and procedures was identified by DNR
staff after conducting a 2022 inventory of DCL holdings and determining its current storage capacity,
an assessment of projected core submissions, participation in a National Geological and Geophysical
Data Preservation Program (NGGDPP) data management workshop, and a review of the policies and
procedures of the United States Geological Survey (USGS) and peer repositories. Workshop
participants were affiliated with the mining/mineral exploration industry, government agencies,
academic institutions, and consulting firms.
Feedback was gathered through exercises and participant surveys that focused on the mission of the
DCL, prioritization of storage for various materials, sampling and related policies, and desirable
enhancements to DCL databases. DNR staff used input from the workshop and reviewed the mission
statements from the USGS, the DNR, and peer repositories to create a mission statement for the DCL.
DCL curational decisions on what to add or retain in its collection have not previously been
constrained by storage capacity. Given anticipated core submissions, participants were encouraged to
consider submission and retention priorities, even with a planned addition of a fourth DCL storage
building. It was recommended that prioritization should be given to materials that are costlier to
replace, are more difficult to access (present and future) as well as complete (i.e., non-skeletonized)
diamond drill hole cores that have economic and/or geologic significance. Suggestions were made in
favor of retaining pulp and reject samples derived from bedrock core, while acknowledging the
potential for the materials to degrade over time. It was suggested that unless surficial materials (e.g.,
outcrop, glacial sediments) have historical significance or were from areas with restricted access then
they should be given a low storage priority. Participants encouraged the DNR to consider strategies that
might optimize storage capacity or lower retention costs, such as standardized containers for
unconsolidated materials or off-site storage of lower priority samples within the collection.
Established DCL policies for facility visits, sampling protocols, and derivative thin sections and
dataset submissions are comparable to peer repositories. While reviewing these policies, workshop
participants expressed concerns about missing or oversampled intervals and suggested improving
communication about the allowable sample size based on the proposed analyses. It

23

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

was generally accepted that samples, unused materials, and thin sections should be returned within a
year. Yet, it was recognized that multi-year projects may need accommodations, that regular
communication and updates must be provided by visitors who want to retain materials for over a year,
and that consequences need to be established and enforced for those that do not follow policies. In
general, the DCL could improve the communication of its policies to ensure visitors are better able to
follow them.
Participants also offered ideas on enhancing online access to DCL holdings and associated
datasets. These included improving the accuracy of some drill hole collars as well as the link between
historical and other publicly available data to drill holes. Digital images of cores boxes were also
desirable and the DNR is conducting a pilot program to evaluate digital image collection.
The importance of the DCL and the value it offers to researchers, the local mining and mineral
exploration community, and the citizens of Minnesota was emphasized by workshop participants. DNR
staff are currently using workshop feedback and relevant policies and procedures at peer repositories to
make preliminary curational decisions that support the DCL’s mission on topics such as storage
prioritization, development of operational policies, enhancements to associated databases, and future
decision-making. Discussions and input on preliminary policy ideas at venues such as ILSG will help
craft a published update to DCL policies and procedures.
References
Carter, M.J., Elsenheimer, D. and Arends, H., 2023. Minnesota Minerals Coordinating Committee Drill Core
Library Workshop. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Lands and Minerals Division, OFR
411: 57.

24

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Digital Image Capture and Database Compilation of Historic Mining Data from the Keweenaw
Copper District, Michigan: A Progress Update
DeGRAFF, James1 and ROSE, William1
1

Department of Geological and Mining Engineering and Sciences, Michigan Technological University, 1400
Townsend Drive, Houghton, MI 49931 U.S.A.

The Michigan copper rush starting at Copper Harbor in 1843 (Fig. 1) led to 150 years of mining
that produced ~7.5 x 106 MT of copper (Bornhorst, T.J. and Barron, R.J., 2011), attracted ~100,000
persons from 40 countries, and profoundly influenced understanding of Lake Superior geology,
advances in mining technology, and the region’s pattern of life. Many companies invested significantly
in trenching, coring, and mining operations that generated an enormous body of geologic information.
USGS efforts in the 1940s and 1950s to map bedrock geology and to assess mineral resources have
compiled much of this information as bedrock geology maps with supporting cross sections and
reports. Though available online in various formats, these map products are the tip of an iceberg of
original detailed source data that is not easily accessed. Significant exploratory drilling that postdates
map publication has not been utilized for later geologic investigations because of the same difficulty of
access. Paper records and microfiche that decay with time are stored at various locations, which further
complicates their use. Many groups could benefit from improved access to this vast amount of
information. Therefore, we began a ‘skunk-works’ project to identify and gather information into a
digital image repository, to extract it into tabular databases, and to explore how to make it available to
scientists, industry, land-use planners, and the general public.

Figure 1. Michigan’s copper mining district with generalized bedrock geology. Figure modified from
(Bornhorst, T.J. and Barron, R.J., 2011). Numbered field trip stops generally define the extent of copper mining
and exploration between 1843 and present. Limited mining also occurred on Isle Royale just off the map to the

25

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1
north.

The initial phase of the project was to identify sources, access data, establish procedures, and
demonstrate feasibility. We started with drill holes, trenches, and mine openings posted on USGS
geology maps of the Keweenaw Peninsula. Features were symbolized in Google Earth from
georegistered maps, assigned unique codes, and recorded with their data in tables having a common
layout (Stage 1). Derivative tables contain data unique to a class, such as azimuth and inclination of
drill holes found on core logs (Stage 2). Data captured up to this stage are useful for positioning and
orienting features on maps and in subsurface models. Stage 3 captures geologic data as a function of
location in a feature, e.g., distance along a drill hole. Such information, available from core
descriptions at the Keweenaw National Historical Park (Keweenaw National Historical Park, 2016), the
USGS/Denver Archives (White, W.S., 1985), old reports and plates, often requires careful transcription
to extract it from image records. Other potential sources of such mining data include early reports of
the Michigan Geological Survey, university archives, and private collections. Besides preserving and
making these data available to others in an easy-to-access format, we hope to build subsurface models
that can benefit research, mineral exploration, and land-use planning (Fig. 2).
Figure 2. Possible uses of the database
once it is further developed.

Acknowledgements: We thank Ted
Bornhorst (MTU), Jeremy Mason
(KNHP), Bill Cannon (USGS), and
Jenny Stevens (USGS) for making
us aware of and facilitating access to
the two archives that currently are
being digitally captured and
tabulated. This work is possible
because of the foresight of many late
geologists who gathered and
preserved the original paper records.

References
Bornhorst, T.J. and Barron, R.J., 2011. Copper deposits of the western Upper Peninsula of Michigan, in Miller,
J.D., Hudak, G.J., Wittkop, C., and McLaughlin, P.I., eds., Archean to Anthropocene: Field Guides to
the Geology of the Mid-continent of North America: Geological Society of America Field Guide 24: 83–
99, doi:10.1130/2011.0024(05).
Keweenaw National Historical Park, 2016. Calumet &amp; Hecla Records – 00019/004.02.01.03-007 Microfiche
Drill Core Log Library: Calumet, Michigan, U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, on
microfiche (accessed August 2016).
White, W.S., 1985. “Unpublished diamond drillhole core logs”: U.S. Geological Survey, Field Records
Collection, Boxes 282: 287-290.

26

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Geophysical mapping of the Great Lakes Tectonic Zone and surrounding Precambrian geology
in the central Upper Peninsula, Michigan
DRENTH, Benjamin J.1, CANNON, William F.2
1
2

U.S. Geological Survey, PO Box 25046, MS 973, Denver Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225
U.S. Geological Survey, 12201 Sunrise Valley Dr., MS 954, Reston, VA 20192

The Great Lakes Tectonic Zone (GLTZ) forms the boundary between the Wawa-Abitibi
subprovince (north side) and Minnesota River Valley subprovince (south side) within the Archean
Superior Province. The GLTZ is concealed for all of its 1100 km length, except south of Marquette in
the central Upper Peninsula of Michigan (Sims, 1991; Sims and Day, 1993). Near KI Sawyer, it is
exposed as a NW-striking, 2.3 km wide mylonite zone along a strike length of about 11 km, with a
mylonitic foliation that dips steeply to the SW (Sims, 1993). The location extent of the GLTZ is
unknown to the east where it is concealed beneath Paleozoic sedimentary rocks. We use legacy
aeromagnetic data (Daniels et al., 2009) in combination with modern aeromagnetic data (Drenth and
Brown, 2020) and ground gravity data to geophysically characterize the GLTZ and map its eastward
extent under cover and map additional nearby covered Precambrian tectonic elements.
Discontinuous NW-striking aeromagnetic gradients observed over the mylonite zone are
interpreted to be produced by structurally juxtaposed rocks with varying magnetizations, and such
relations are observed locally in outcrops. Mapping of similar gradients across the region shows that
they are widely distributed, but have highest concentration within 3 km of the center of the GLTZ.
Gravity data show a steep regional gradient along the GLTZ trend, which is likely produced by the
juxtaposition of a dense greenstone belt on the north against lower-density gneisses and granites on the
south. Using the distribution of aeromagnetic gradients, broader aeromagnetic patterns, and the
regional gravity gradient, the GLTZ is interpreted to extend about 55 km under cover to the east, where
it changes to an E-W strike and possibly NE strike (Fig. 1). Interpretations are less detailed and less
certain east of the area covered by high-quality aeromagnetic data.
Interpreted Paleoproterozoic features have similar strike as the GLTZ. This includes an undated
dike swarm and an elongated trough of variably magnetic and dense Paleoproterozoic strata that
extends from the Gwinn district southeast under Paleozoic cover. The trough is truncated on its
southeastern margin by an interpreted extension of the Norway Lake fault.
The GLTZ is terminated on the east by broad aeromagnetic and gravity highs produced by
rocks of the buried eastern arm of the 1.1 Ga Midcontinent Rift. The intersection of the rift and the
GLTZ is the location of a change in the strike of the rift from crudely N-S north of the GLTZ to NW
south of the GLTZ.
References
Daniels, D.L., Kucks, R.P., Hill, P.L., and Snyder, S. L., 2009. Michigan magnetic and gravity maps and data: a
website for the distribution of data: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 411:
http://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/ds411.
Drenth, B.J., and Brown, P.J., 2020. Airborne magnetic survey, Iron Mountain-Chatham region, central Upper
Peninsula, Michigan, 2018: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P91EF3CI.
Sims, P.K., 1991. Great Lakes tectonic zone in Marquette area, Michigan - implications for Archean tectonics in
north-central United States: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1904-E: 17.
Sims, P.K., 1993. Structure map of Archean rocks, Palmer and Sands 7.5-minute quadrangles, Michigan,
showing Great Lakes tectonic zone: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Investigations Map I-2355,
1:24,000 scale.
Sims, P.K., and Day, W.C., 1993. Great Lakes tectonic zone -- revisited: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1904-

27

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1
S, 11 p.

Figure 1. Preliminary interpretations.

28

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Geophysical architecture of the Neoarchean Mentor anorthosite intrusive complex, northwestern
Minnesota
DRENTH, Benjamin J.1, BLOCK, Amy Radakovich2, HUDAK, George J.3, SOUDERS, A. Kate4,
SAARI, Stacy5
1

U.S. Geological Survey, PO Box 25046, MS 973, Denver Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225
Minnesota Geological Survey, 2609 Territorial Road, St. Paul, MN 55114
3
Natural Resources Research Institute, 5013 Miller Trunk Highway, Duluth, MN 55811
4
U.S. Geological Survey, PO Box 25046, MS 963, Denver Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225
5
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, 1525 3rd Ave E, Hibbing, MN 55746
2

The ca. 2737 Ma (Souders, 2023) Mentor anorthosite intrusive complex (MAIC) lies near the
northern margin of the Wawa subprovince of the Archean Superior Province, in an area of
northwestern Minnesota where the Wawa, Quetico, and Wabigoon subprovinces are juxtaposed in
close proximity (Fig. 1). The rocks of interest are entirely concealed by 10s to &gt;100 m of
unconsolidated Quaternary sediments and localized Cretaceous strata and saprolite. The MAIC
comprises a large volume of megacrystic anorthosite, with a lesser volume of oxide-rich gabbros. The
gabbros are known, from a single borehole intersection at ~70 m depth, to be enriched in vanadium
(see http://minarchive.dnr.state.mn.us), and have further potential for chromium and titanium
mineralization. New interpretations are based on data from an Earth Mapping Resources Initiative
(MRI)-sponsored aeromagnetic survey flown in 2021 and pre-existing ground gravity data, constrained
by approximately ten boreholes in the area.
The anorthosite is weakly magnetized and dense, with a mean measured density of 2940 kg/m3,
producing a 10-60 mGal gravity high. Pervasive epidote alteration is a suggested explanation for the
high density of the anorthosite (the density of unaltered anorthite is 2730 kg/m3). The oxide-rich
gabbros are strongly magnetized, producing aeromagnetic anomalies as large as 6000 nT, making them
readily mappable across the complex. New geophysical interpretations (Fig. 1) suggest that the MAIC
is significantly broader in extent than previously interpreted (Jirsa et al., 1999) and can be traced along
strike for approximately double its originally interpreted length. The MAIC covers an area of about 640
km2 along a strike length of about 85 km, and forward modeling suggests a depth extent as great as 7
km. The MAIC is here interpreted to be the largest known anorthosite complex in the Superior
Province, as measured by preserved extent in map view (cf. Sotiriou and Polat, 2020).
The MAIC is observed in drill core to intrude a package of basalt flows at its northwest
boundary and is itself intruded by multiple low-density felsic plutons that produce 10-20 mGal, 4-20
km wide gravity lows. The large felsic pluton along the southeastern margin of the MAIC is dated at
2702 ± 6.5 Ma (Souders, 2023), and is here called the Fertile pluton after the nearby town. This
tectonomagmatic setting is consistent with other anorthosite complexes of the Superior Province, that
commonly intrude packages of mafic volcanic flows and are themselves commonly intruded by felsic
plutons (e.g., Polat et al., 2018). Disrupted trends and patterns of geophysical anomalies indicate that
the MAIC was variably deformed, likely via both faulting and folding, in a complex fashion.

29

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Figure 1. Preliminary geophysical interpretations of geology surrounding of the Mentor anorthosite intrusive
complex and surrounding area. Inset shows location of study area.

References
Jirsa, M. A., Chandler, V. W., and Runkel, A. C., 1999. M-092 Bedrock geologic map of northwestern
Minnesota. Minnesota Geological Survey. Retrieved from the University of Minnesota Digital
Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/973.
Polat, A., Longstaffe, F. J., and Frei, R., 2018. An overview of anorthosite-bearing layered intrusions in the
Archaean craton of southern West Greenland and the Superior Province of Canada: implications for
Archaean tectonics and the origin of megacrystic plagioclase: GEODINAMICA ACTA, v. 30, 1:84–99.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09853111.2018.1427408.
Sotiriou, P., and Polat, A. 2020. Comparisons between Tethyan anorthosite‐bearing ophiolites and Archean
anorthosite‐bearing layered intrusions: implications for Archean geodynamic processes: Tectonics, v. 39:
35. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020TC006096.
Souders A.K., 2023. U-Pb Geochronology of the Mentor Anorthosite Intrusive Complex (MAIC) and Regional
Plutonic Units: U.S. Geological Survey data release. https://doi.org/10.5066/P9WMD477.

30

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Multiple overlapping features spatially associated with lead-zinc-copper mineralization in the
Highland quadrangles, southwest Wisconsin, USA
FITZPATRICK1, William, and STEWART1, Eric
1

Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey, University of Wisconsin-Madison Division of Extension,
3817 Mineral Point Road, Madison, WI, 53705

Several features of the Paleozoic bedrock units of the Upper Mississippi Valley (UMV) leadzinc district have been spatially correlated with sulfide mineralization in the Sinnipee Group including
folds and faults (e.g. Heyl et al., 1959) and paleovalleys in the base St. Peter unconformity surface (e.g.
Mai and Dott, 1985). The significance of these features in creating fluid pathways with sufficient flow
to explain the temperature anomalies associated with ore deposition has been justified by the modeling
of Arnold et al. (1996). New detailed 1:24,000 scale mapping of two quadrangles in the Highland area
created a detailed structural and stratigraphic framework for this area at the northernmost margin of the
UMV district, with the results providing a case study allowing the precise geometry of factors such as
fold zones and paleovalleys relative to lead zinc mineralization to be revealed.
Numerous E-W and N-S trending fold zones with amplitudes of 20-60 ft were identified during
mapping of the Highland quadrangles (Fig. 1). Lead-zinc mineralization as defined by the digitized
mineral development atlas (MDA) mine maps (Pepp et al., 2019) is clustered on the margins of the
synclines, most commonly found on gently sloping ramps below the crest of adjacent structural highs.
The largest deposits in the Highland area are spatially associated with pit zones where the base
Platteville drops for an additional 40-80 ft below the trough of the synclines over restricted elliptical
areas. These pit zones are the site of the steepest folding observed in the mapped area, and may have
been important for compromising the integrity of the overlying Maquoketa formation, providing a fluid
pathway for migrating brines through this regionally important aquitard (Arnold et al., 1996).
Numerous paleovalleys filled with St. Peter formation were identified during mapping (Fig. 2),
with the largest in the southeast and southwest corners of the quadrangles mapped continuing down to
the Jordan formation with the Prairie du Chien group entirely removed. By removing the Prairie du
Chien group, these paleovalleys provide connectivity between the thick, lower Cambrian sandstone
aquifer and the upper St. Peter aquifer, allowing large volumes of migrating brines to migrate upward
in section towards the favorable ore host units in the Sinnipee Group (Arnold et al., 1996). In the
Highland district, the likely flow paths from these paleovalleys to the places where the Maquoketa
aquitard was compromised at the pit zones directly correspond to areas with known lead-zinc
mineralization.
References
Arnold, B.W., Bahr, J.M., and Fantucci, R., 1996. Paleohydrology of the upper Mississippi valley zinc-lead
district: Society of Economic Geologists Special Publication, no. 4: 378-389.
https://doi.org/10.5382/SP.04.28.
Heyl, A.V., Jr., Agnew, A.F., Lyons, E.J., Behre, C.H., Jr., and Flint, A.E., 1959. The geology of the Upper
Mississippi Valley zinc-lead district: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 309: 310 p., 24 pls.,
https://doi.org/10.3133/pp309.
Mai, H., and Dott, R.H., Jr., 1985. A subsurface study of the St. Peter sandstone in southern and eastern
Wisconsin: Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey Information Circular 47: 35 p., 2 pls.,
https://wgnhs.wisc.edu/catalog/publication/000297.
Pepp, K., Siemering, G., and Ventura, S., 2019. Digital atlas of historic mining activity in southwestern
Wisconsin, 40 p., https://learningstore.extension.wisc.edu/products/digital-atlas-of-historic-miningfeatures-and-potential-impacts-in-southwestern-wisconsin.

31

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Figure 1. 10ft structure-contour map for the base of the Platteville formation with interpreted fold axes marked
by red lines with black outlines with arrows denoting synclines and anticlines. Green polygons mark surface
diggings and blue polygons mark underground mine workings from the MDA data digitized by Pepp et al., 2019.

Figure 2. Cross section running E-W through the southern part of the Highland quadrangles. Large black
arrows mark likely flow paths for mineralizing fluids ascending from St. Peter paleovalleys (Oa) to pit
zones which locally breach Maquoketa aquitard.

Are serpentine fault mirrors an indicator of seismic slip? A microstructural analysis

32

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Are serpentine fault mirrors an indicator of seismic slip? A microstructural analysis
GHANTOUS, Sam1, PHILLIPS, Noah 1, LUSK, Alex 2, NEWMAN, Julie 3, &amp; JI, Shaocheng 4
1

Department of Geology, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada
Department of Geology &amp; Geophysics, Texas A&amp;M University, College Station, TX, USA
3
United States Geological Survey, Denver, CO, USA
4
Department of Civil, Geological and Mining Engineering, École Polytechnique, Montréal, QC, Canada
2

Fault mirrors are smooth, sheened surfaces along a fault plane. An array of microstructures may
produce a fault mirror which each have respective formation mechanisms and associated slip velocities.
Fault mirrors in certain compositions may be an indicator of ancient earthquakes with seismic slip
velocities, but not all fault mirrors are associated with seismic slip. We study the microstructures of
two serpentine mirror surfaces, which have not yet been described in the literature, to determine their
formation mechanisms and to assess whether they serve as indicators of paleo-seismic slip. One sample
is a medium green mirror surface from a late normal fault cutting dunites from the Twin Sisters
complex, Washington State, USA. The second mirror surface is pale green and cuts a serpentinite from
the Thetford Mines ophiolite in Quebec, Canada. Both fault mirrors have slickenlines on their surfaces
indicating that they formed during slip. The mirror surface from the Twin Sisters complex consists of a
~2 micron thick, potentially amorphous, low asperity serpentine layer which may have formed during
seismic slip. The mirror surface from the Thetford Mines ophiolite consists of a ~0.5 centimeter-thick
layer which is composed of radiating serpentine microcrystallites which are ~ 1 micrometer in length
and 10’s to 100’s of nanometers in width. These serpentine microcrystallites are interpreted to have
crystallized from a serpentine gel phase during slip. While we hypothesize that these samples are both
indicative of seismic slip, similar structures may form if serpentine gels crystallize during aseismic
creep. Serpentine fault mirrors may represent paleo-seismic slip, but a microstructural examination of
the mirror surface is required to establish a seismic origin.
Figure 1. SEM photomicrographs of radiating serpentine microcrystallites from the Thetford Mines ophiolite
fault mirror.

33

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Characterizing volcanic host stratigraphy and syn-volcanic intrusions at the Lynne Zn-Pb-Cu
deposit, Oneida Co., Wisconsin
GLODOWSKI, Lillian N. 1, LODGE, Robert W.D. 1
1

Department of Geology, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, 101 Roosevelt Avenue, Eau Claire, WI 54701

The Lynne Zn-Pb-Cu deposit in Oneida County, Wisconsin is one of several volcanogenic
massive sulfide (VMS) deposits located within the understudied Paleoproterozoic (1.8-1.9 Ga)
Penokean Volcanic Belt (PVB). The PVB formed as the Marshfield and Pembine-Wausau terranes
collided and accreted onto the Superior Craton during the Penokean orogeny (Schulz and Cannon,
2007). VMS deposition in Wisconsin has been interpreted to be associated with continental back-arc
rifting in a submarine environment. However, little data is available on the deposit-level at Lynne and
other deposits in the PVB to test this model. Volcanic and tectonic variability in VMS forming
environments and the effect of basement inheritance on metallogeny are important for district-scale
exploration. This study constrains the volcanic and tectonic setting at the Lynne deposit via trace
element systematics and aims to improve regional metallogenic models in the PVB.
Historically, the Lynne deposit was subdivided by Adams (1996) based upon their relative
stratigraphic position to the ore horizon into upper and lower “Rhyolite”, “Dacite”, and “Volcaniclastic
(VCS)” with mineralized zones occupying the lower VCS unit (Figure 1A). This study relogged seven
drill holes from the Lynne deposit and sampled for petrographic and geochemical analyses. The new
geochemical data presented in this study reveals there are no petrochemical differences between the
upper and lower host strata (Figure 1B). There were also no petrochemical differences observed
between the volcanic host rocks and the intruding footwall granodiorite. Therefore, the rocks in this
study have been subdivided based simply upon composition and petrography.
The volcanic rocks which host the Lynne deposit are comprised primarily of medium to dark
grey felsic to intermediate lapilli and crystal tuff. The sedimentary rocks at the Lynne deposit are
observed to be very fine-grain, dark grey siltstones with thin parallel laminations and are assumed to be
volcanically derived. The Lynne deposit is intruded by a pluton of medium-grained granodiorite which
disrupts the lower massive sulfide lenses. The granodiorite appears in a variety of colors ranging from
pink and orange to grey and white. Smaller mafic and felsic dikes also crosscut the Lynne deposit. The
mafic dikes are dark grey to green with a fine-grain mafic matrix and feldspar phenocrysts. Felsic dikes
are commonly light to medium grey with a fine-grain felsic matrix.
The geochemical data indicates that VMS deposition at the Lynne deposit occurred in a
bimodal-felsic petrochemical assemblage consistent with a continental setting. The shared FII-type
lithogeochemistry of the felsic volcanic rocks, granodiorite pluton, and felsic dikes suggests these
rocks formed under similar extensional, shallow crustal conditions and originated from the same
magmatic system. Combined with the lack of a metamorphic aureole around the pluton, the intruding
footwall granodiorite is likely the syn-volcanic intrusion which eventually intruded its own volcanic
pile (Galley et al., 2003). Improved geochemical and petrographic data on the Lynne deposit will allow
for more accurate and improved models which can be compared to other deposits throughout the PVB
and around the world.

34

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Figure 1. A) Geologic cross section of the Lynne deposit highlighting host stratigraphy, bore hole traces,
approximate sample locations, and mineralized zones. Modified from Kennedy (1997). B) Rock type
classification diagram of the Lynne. Diagram from Pearce (1996).

References
Adams, G.W., 1996. Geology of the Lynne base-metal deposit, north-central Wisconsin, U.S.A., in LaBerge,
G.L., ed., Volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits of northern Wisconsin: A commemorative volume:
Institute on Lake Superior Geology Proceedings, 42nd Annual Meeting, Cable, WI, v. 42, part 2: 161179.
Galley, A.G., 2003. Composite synvolcanic intrusions associated with Precambrian VMS-related hydrothermal
systems: Mineralium Deposita, v. 38: 443–473.
Kennedy, L.P., 1997. Summary geologic and geotechnical report for the Lynne project Oneida County,
Wisconsin, U.S.A., Unpublished report of Noranda Minerals Wisconsin Corp.: 26.
Pearce, J.A., 1996. A users guide to basalt discrimination diagrams, Trace Element Geochemistry of Volcanic
Rocks: Applications for Massive Sulphide Exploration. Geological Association of Canada, Short Course
Notes 12: 79-133.
Schulz, K.J. and Cannon, W.F., 2007. The Penokean orogeny in the Lake Superior region. Precambrian
Research, 157: 4-25.

35

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Identifying regional exploration domains for Ni-Cu-PGE deposit types in the Midcontinent Rift
GOOD, David1
1

Department of Earth Sciences, Western University, London, ON N6A 5B7 Canada

A new classification strategy for Midcontinent Rift basalts and associated gabbro and
ultramafic rocks is proposed, the main objective being to identify magmatic suites associated with
known Ni-Cu-PGE occurrences and their spatial distribution across the rift. The study is based on the
idea that units with similar incompatible trace element signatures formed under similar conditions in a
similar mantle source region and had been subjected to similar contamination or fractionation
processes. Elements used in this study are REE, Th, Nb, and Zr. The approach taken is to identify point
cloud clusters (magmatic suites) on contoured point density plots for REE represented by ‘lambda’
parameters which emphasize slope and curvature of REE patterns. The resultant groups are checked in
Gd/Yb vs. Th/Nb and Gd/Yb vs. La/Sm diagrams which identify influence by crustal contamination or
clinopyroxene fractionation, respectively. Melts produced in a metasomatised mantle source are a
special case and are distinguished from contaminated melts in a Zr-Th-La diagram.
The data set comprises a total of 1815 samples, 343 of which are basalt, from 70 mafic units.
Data are carefully screened for discrepancies and extreme outliers removed. Results indicate a total of
eight distinct magmatic suites (Groups 1 to 8). The groups are not listed in stratigraphic order because
many units appear simultaneously, and a few are active for long time periods during the MCR event.
Highlights of the study with respect to Ni-Cu-PGE mineralized intrusions include: a) Group 1 includes
the Current, Seagull and Thunder Intrusions and the Lower Suite basalts of the Osler Volcanic Group;
b) Group 2 is the most voluminous and includes the Duluth, Tamarack and Crystal Lake deposits, the
Pigeon, Cloud and Arrow intrusions, and basalts of the Greenstone Flows, Upper Suite at Black Bay
(OVG) and Upper Groups A and B at Mamainse Point; c) The Eagle deposit is intermediate between
Groups 2 and 5 but overlaps the field for all flows in Lower Mamainse Point Group A; d) Group 7
includes the Two Duck Lake (Marathon deposit), Abitibi Dykes and metabasalt unit 3a; e) Group 8
includes the Geordie Lake deposit, Wolfcamp basalt, Copper Island dykes and a few of the Pukaskwa
dyke swarm; and f) Groups 3 and 4 are not, as yet, associated with mineralized intrusions and includes
the Nipigon sills and basalts of the Centre and Upper Suites of OVG. A map of the Midcontinent Rift
showing regional domains for each Group is presented, highlighting the extent of igneous rock
domains for each of the known Ni-Cu-PGE deposit types, and their locations relative to the central axis
of the MCR.

36

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Exploring the geology of the Midcontinent Rift under western Lake Superior using a preliminary
velocity model of seismic line GLIMPCE C
GRAUCH, V.J.S.1, HELLER, Sam J.2, STEWART, Esther K.3, and WOODRUFF, Laurel G.4
1

U.S. Geological Survey, MS 973, Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225
U.S. Geological Survey, MS 939, Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225
3
Wisconsin Geological &amp; Natural History Survey, 3817 Mineral Point Road, Madison, WI 53705
4
U.S. Geological Survey, 2280 Woodale Drive, Mounds View, MN, 55112
2

Seismic-reflection data were collected in the 1980s as part of the Great Lakes International
Multidisciplinary Program on Crustal Evolution (GLIMPCE) to investigate the 1.1 Ga Midcontinent
Rift System (MRS). GLIMPCE Line C crosses western Lake Superior from north to south shores (Fig.
1 inset). Many previous workers have interpreted the MRS in Line C as an asymmetric central graben
filled with 10–20 km of subaerial basalt flows, overlain by 7-10 km of sedimentary section, and
underlain by magmatic underplating. The central graben was interpreted to have formed from
extensional normal faults, later reactivated as high-angle reverse faults. The northern part of Line C
crosses over a prominent gravity low called the Grand Marais Ridge (GMR; Fig. 1 inset), previously
interpreted as an Archean granitic basement high.
Line C interpretations are commonly shown on a section plotted against two-way travel time
along with a crudely estimated depth scale. We are undertaking a more rigorous approach by
developing a detailed velocity model for time to depth conversion. The modeling for Line C is guided
by velocities resulting from a pre-existing seismic refraction study, intervals defined by seismic
horizons, and correlation with velocity models from neighboring seismic-reflection lines. Velocities
are verified using common-reflection point gathers from pre-stack depth migration. Several salient
points about the MRS can be gleaned from the preliminary velocity model alone (Fig. 1). The north
and south sides of the model are dissimilar, reflecting the disparate geology of the north and south
shores. On the south side, we identify an outline reminiscent of a bird (Fig. 1) that helps focus
discussion without implying any geologic significance.
Aided by a land-based seismic line near the southeast end of Line C, we can tentatively identify
the geologic units under the lake within the bird outline (Fig. 1) and interpret a sag basin rather than a
graben. The basin contains inferred Porcupine Mountains Volcanics (PM; 6.1 km/s), Portage Lake
Volcanics (PLV; 5.9 and 6.5 km/s), with older, possibly reversed magnetic polarity, volcanic units at
the base (6.9 km/s). A thick gabbroic sill (6.8 km/s) is inferred within the PLV section. We interpret the
truncated PLV (5.9 km/s) and PM (6.1 km/s) intervals at the bird’s head to represent an eroded cliff
face of the tilted northern limb of the sag basin.
Sheet-like mafic intrusions (7.1 km/s) arise from the lower crust/upper mantle (7.2 km/s) and
diverge upwards, following the geometry of the central sag basin. The interpretation that these 7.1 km/s
units represent discontinuous or only partially evident magmatic feeder zones is based on their high
velocities and sheet-like forms, which in part are constrained by neighboring industry seismic sections.
The sedimentary section above the sag basin includes the Oronto Group (3.4, 4.7, 5.2, and 5.6
km/s) and likely Bayfield Group (3.0 km/s). An angular unconformity between Oronto Group (5.6
km/s) and underlying PM (6.1 km/s) at the bird’s head indicates the north limb of the sag basin was
tilted prior to deposition. In contrast, the units on the south limb appear conformable.
Using aeromagnetic patterns that lead from the north shore into the lake, we tentatively identify
a highly reflective (not shown) 4.7 km/s interval as rhyolites of the upper northeast sequence of the
North Shore Volcanic Group (NSVG). This unit is interpreted to be angularly unconformable with
overlying sedimentary rocks of the same velocity (4.7 km/s). The 5.6 km/s and 6.5 km/s intervals

37

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

beneath the interpreted rhyolites are likely older NSVG volcanic rocks that form a carapace over the
GMR. The 6.1 km/s velocity of the GMR corroborates its interpretation as a granitic basement high.
The model indicates that a 5.6 km/s unit (NSVG?) dives below the bird outline to depths below 15 km.
Whether this unit is connected to deeper parts of the sag basin or separated by faulting is obscured by
the 7.1 km/s sheet-like intrusions.
The sedimentary section on the north side of the model tilts to the south, unconformably
overlies volcanic rocks (4.7 and 5.2 km/s) and is truncated by the overlying 3.0 km/s interval (Bayfield
Group or equivalent). The sedimentary package on the north side collectively has lower velocities and
is thinner than the sedimentary package on the south side. It is unclear if the northern section is
correlative with the Oronto Group or represents less consolidated, younger rocks, possibly eroded from
the NSVG or basalts at the bird’s head.
Identification of velocity intervals and their relations at and under the bird’s head are key to
understanding the tectonomagmatic picture but remain somewhat obscure. Suffice to say for Line C
that magmatism and syn-magmatic subsidence played a greater role in the origins of the MRS than
previously realized. Moreover, unconformable relations within the sedimentary package may be
evidence of multiple post-magmatic tectonic events.

Figure 1. Preliminary velocity model for GLIMPCE Line C showing velocity intervals in km/s. Inset map shows
Line C in relation to the Grand Marais Ridge and neighboring seismic lines in Lake Superior. The white dashed
line outlines a bird-like pattern to guide discussion. Velocities near the bird’s head are interfingered only to
provide a smooth transition for the depth migration; lines are drawn to better represent the form of the depthconverted seismic horizons, which are not shown for simplicity. Vertical exaggeration=2.

38

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Petrography, geochemistry, and mineralization of the Archean Titan (Roaring River) intrusion,
Northwestern Ontario
GROENEVELD, Tianna1, HOLLINGS, Peter1, BAIN, Wyatt1, DJON, Lionnel2
1
2

Department of Geology, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Road Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1 Canada,
Impala Canada, 69 Yonge Street, Suite 700 Toronto, ON M5E 1K3, Canada

The Archean Titan intrusion, formerly known as the Roaring River mafic intrusion, is one of
several mafic-ultramafic complexes in northwestern Ontario that are currently the focus of ongoing
PGE exploration. The Titan intrusion is located ~145 km North of Thunder Bay, Ontario, in the
Winnipeg River terrane of the western Superior Province and is part of the Roaring River Complex
(Figure 1).
The Titan intrusion was identified as an underexplored area during a lake sediment survey in
2000 (Ontario Geological Survey). In the following five-year period, there were several periods of
prospecting and soil surveys carried out in the area as well as one diamond drilling project, which
aimed to determine the extent of the Titan intrusion within the Roaring River Complex and assess the
potential for economic Ni-Cu-PGE mineralization. This early exploration revealed petrologic and
geochemical similarities between the Titan intrusion and the mineralized mafic-ultramafic rocks in the
Lac des Iles (LDI) Complex, which lies ~60 km to the south of the Titan intrusion (Figure 1). The LDI
Complex is the largest of a series of mafic and ultramafic intrusions known as the LDI suite, all within
the Marmion terrane, and hosts the world-class LDI palladium mine. An unpublished U-Pb age for
zircons from the Titan intrusion yielded an age of 2690 ± 3.2 Ma, broadly coeval with the LDI
Complex, dated at 2689 ± 1.0 Ma (Heaman and Easton, 2006).
Outcrop across Titan is sparse, due to the presence of pervasive glacial till and Proterozoic
diabase sills. Samples were collected in the summer of 2021 and analyzed for whole rock and PGE
geochemistry, sulphur and Sm-Nd isotope analysis, and detailed petrographic characterization. The
intrusion consists of a mix of lithologies, ranging from pyroxenites to gabbros to leucogabbros. The
lithologies are distributed throughout the intrusion and suggest a simple magma body, where one pulse
of magma underwent fractional crystallization within a closed system. Sulphide mineralization is
generally confined to pyrite and chalcopyrite, though inclusions of pyrrhotite were observed
occasionally. Sulphide mineralization is typically fine-grained and disseminated, though larger blebs do
occur, usually of either pyrrhotite or chalcopyrite. The pyrite is considered to be a hydrothermal phase,
likely formed from secondary precipitation while the larger blebs of pyrrhotite are considered to be a
primary magmatic phase. The Titan intrusion is characterized by enriched LREE’s and fractionated
HREE’s, with negative Nb, Zr, Hf, and Ti anomalies (Figure 2). Titan samples have a range of
(La/Sm)N from 0.7 to 3.8, a range of (Gd/Yb)N from 2.3 to 7.4, and a range of Nb/Nb* values from
0.02 to 0.47. The geochemistry behavior is consistent with formation in a supra subduction zone
setting, which fits with the regional setting of the Winnipeg River and Marmion terranes during this
time period (~2.74-2.69 Ga). Only small amounts of crustal material appears to have been
incorporated, based on εNd values of 0.70 to 1.82, compared to an estimated depleted mantle at 2.7 Ga
which would have a εNd value of +3. Titan appears to be a simple intrusion when compared to
intrusions of similar size in the LDI suite and many of the similarities between Titan and the LDI suite
appear to occur from regional characteristics of the area in this time period (~2.74-2.69 Ga).

39

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Figure 1. (left) A regional geology map of the
western Superior Province highlighting the
approximate locations of the Titan intrusion,
the Lac des Iles Complex, and the city of
Thunder Bay, modified from Stott et al., 2010.
Figure 2. (below) Primitive mantle
normalized spider plot, showing representative
values for oceanic island basalts (OIB),
continental arc, oceanic arc, and the span of
values for Titan. Concentrations normalized to
primitive mantle from Sun and McDonough
(1989) OIB from Sun and McDonough
(1989), continental and oceanic arcs from
Kelemen et al. (2014).

References
Heaman, L.M. and Easton, R.M., 2006. Preliminary U/Pb geochronology results: Lake Nipigon Geoscience
Initiative. Ontario Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Release-Data 191.
Kelemen, P.B., Hanghøj, K., Greene, A.R., 2014. One View of the Geochemistry of Subduction-Related
Magmatic Arc, with an Emphasis on Primitive Andesite and Lower Crust. Treatise on Geochemistry,
vol. 4: 749-806.
Ontario Geological Survey., 2000. Garden-Obonga Lake Area Lake Sediment Survey: Gold and PGE Data;
Open File Reports 6028: 76.
Stott, G.M., Corkery, M.T., Percival, J.A., Simard, M., Goutier, J., 2010. A Revised Terrane Subdivision of the
Superior Province, in Summary of Field Work and Other Activities, 2010. Ontario Geological Survey,
Open File Report 6260: 20-1 to 20-10.
Sun, S.S., McDonough, W.F., 1989. Chemical and isotopic systematics of oceanic basalts: implications for
mantle composition and processes. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, vol. 42: 313-345.

40

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Determining Provenance of Rainy Lobe Till using Geochemistry and Detrital Zircon
Geochronology.
HINKEMEYER, Audray M.1, MOOERS, Howard D.1, and LARSON, Phillip C.2,
O’SULLIVAN, Paul B.3
1

Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, MN 55812
Vesterheim Geoscience, PLC, Hibbing, MN
3
GeoSep Services, 1521 Pine Cone Road, Moscow, Idaho 83843
2

Till of the Late Wisconsin Rainy lobe (RL), which emanated from the Labradoran sector of the
Laurentide ice sheet, is exposed at the surface from SW Minnesota to the extreme NE part of the State.
The RL advanced to its maximum limit in southwestern Minnesota well prior to the Last Glacial
Maximum (ca. 27-30 ka BP) and retreated into Ontario by 17.9 ka BP. This till exhibits dramatic
spatial and temporal changes in provenance from the Hewitt till of SW Minnesota to the Independence
till in the NE. While texture, fabric, and physical properties are similar, lithologic changes include a
decrease in carbonate and greywacke of the Omarolluk Fm. with an increase in mafic rocks of the
Duluth Complex as the ice retreated. The observed change in lithology reflects changes in the mean
transport length (MTL) of the till. The MTL is the average distance of transport defined by the indicator
lithology abundance. The Hewitt till has a mean transport length of &gt; 1000 km, whereas the Brainerd
and Independence tills have mean transport lengths of approximately 400 and 100 km, respectively
(Berthold, 2015).
Two models have been proposed to explain the lithological differences (particularly carbonate) in
RL tills. Goldstein (1989) postulated that the downglacier increase in carbonate in the Hewitt till was
the result of progressive incorporation, by regelation or deformation, of older underlying till that was
rich in carbonate. However, Goldstein also postulated an accretionary origin for the Wadena drumlins,
which would imply continuous deposition rather than erosion. This subglacial erosional vs.
depositional paradox remains unresolved.
Larson (2008) concluded that the changes in sedimentology and landforms record systematic
changes in provenance related to changing basal boundary conditions in the interior of the LIS. As the
RL advanced early in the last glacial cycle, a continuous till sheet composed of sediment from Hudson
Bay and the Hudson Bay lowlands (HBL) extended to SW MN. As the ice approached its maximum
limit, much of this till sheet was then eroded exposing Canadian Shield bedrock along the central
portion of the flow path (Fig. 1). Early in this phase of glaciation, the sediments reflect long-distance
transport from Hudson Bay, and later phases reflect increased proportions of felsic shield lithologies
and Duluth Complex rocks.
These two models of Rainy lobe till sedimentology are evaluated using mixing models, till matrix
geochemistry, and detrital zircon geochronology. The tills underlying the Hewitt till are typically finer
textured and contain significant concentrations of Cretaceous age carbonates and shales. Therefore, a
multicomponent mixing model is developed to examine sedimentological variability by incorporation
of older, underlying tills (e.g. Goldstein, 1989). To evaluate the model of Larson (2008), which implies
long vs. short transport distances, twenty-eight samples collected along a transect from SW to NE
Minnesota, and six samples collected from the HBL, were processed and sent for geochemical analysis.
Fifteen of these samples were processed and analyses for detrital zircon geochronology using laserablation, ICPMS.

41

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Results of a 48-element analytical suite along with latitude, longitude, and depth were run through
a principal component. The first 3 factors were retained for analysis. Factors 1 and 3 distinguished mafic
vs felsic igneous rock geochemical signatures and carbonate content, respectively. Factor 1, felsic vs.
mafic lithologies, can be used as a proxy for MTL and shows locally vs distally derived lithologies.
Factor 3 distinguishes tills based on carbonate content.
Core SLL (Independence till)
plots positively on factor 1
indicating a short MTL. Core
CSS (Brainerd till) represents an
intermediate MTL, while cores
UMRB and TG (Hewitt till) SW
of the Wadena drumlin field
have the longest MTL. In
addition, the samples with the
longest MTL plot in high
carbonate space, positive on
Factor 3. Detrital zircon age
populations represented on
probability density
plots show that the shortest MTL
Figure 1. Factor 1 (MTL) vs. factor 3 (carbonate content).
samples have the highest
signature of local 1.1 Ga MidContinent Rift zircons. A
Kolmogorov-Smirnoff (K-S) test statistically compares age populations and determines if they are
statistically different. Results from the K-S test reveal that HBL ages are statistically similar to samples
from central Minnesota (core CSS). The mixing model, indicates that the Hewitt till is not a mixture
low-carbonate RL till and older underlying tills. Geochemistry, and detrital zircon analyses support the
model of Larson (2008). Early deposits of the RL in SW Minnesota are geochemically similar to the
high-carbonate HBL samples, indicating a distal provenance. This similarity is also observed in the
detrital zircon results from the K-S test. Subsequently younger deposits lose the HBL signature and
start to incorporate more felsic craton and eventually mafic signatures of the Mid-Continent rift system.
References
Berthold, A.J., 2015. Surface Boulder Concentrations of the Late Wisconsinan Rainy Lobe, Minnesota, USA.
M.S. Thesis, University of Minnesota Duluth: 48.
Goldstein, B.S., 1985. Stratigraphy, sedimentology, and late-Quaternary history of the Wadena drumlin region,
central Minnesota: Minneapolis, University of Minnesota, Ph.D. dissertation: 216.
Larson, P.C., 2008. Quantification of Glacial Sediment Erosion, Entrainment and Transport Processes and Their
Implications for the Dynamic History of the Laurentide Ice Sheet. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of
Minnesota: 76.

42

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Copper-rich melt inclusions from the St. Ignace Island Complex: Implications for magma mixing
and mineralization
HOLLINGS, Pete1, HANLEY, Jacob2, SMYK, Mark1,3, HEAMAN, Larry4, and COUSENS,
Brian5
1

Department of Geology, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Road, Thunder Bay, ON
P7B 5E1 Canada
2
Department of Geology, Saint Mary’s University, 923 Robie Street, Halifax, NS, B3L 2Y5 Canada
3
Ontario Geological Survey, Ministry of Mines, Suite B002, 435 James St. South, Thunder Bay, ON P7E 6S7
Canada
4
Department of Earth &amp; Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, 126 Earth Sciences Building, Edmonton,
AB, T6G 2E3, Canada
5
Ottawa-Carleton Geoscience Centre, Department of Earth Sciences, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By
Drive, Ottawa. Ontario, K1S 5B6, Canada

The St. Ignace Island Complex (SIC) comprises volcanic and intrusive rocks that were
emplaced the upper portions of Midcontinent Rift-related, ca.1008 Ma Osler Group volcanic rocks
(Davis and Sutcliffe 1985; Fig. 1). The St. Ignace Island complex is a ~26 km2 stock with a core of
quartz-feldspar-phyric rhyolites and dacites and an outer ring of anorthosite and gabbro (Sutcliffe and
Smith 1988; Giguere 1975). The petrology
and geochemistry of the SIC has been
described by Smyk et al. (2006) and
Hollings et al. (2023).
The pink to grey, felsic rocks at the
center of the complex are quartz-phyric, with
rare pyroxene and feldspar phenocrysts.
Textures at a variety of scales show evidence
of the mingling and mixing of partially
crystallized mafic and felsic liquids in SIC
rocks.
Mafic and felsic liquids may be
incipiently mixed, resulting in partially
disaggregated mafic enclaves hosted in a
felsic matrix. With progressive mixing, the
felsic volcanic domains in the rock become
darker and phenocrysts of quartz and alkali
feldspar appear embedded in the mafic
Figure 1. (A) Map of upper Great Lakes. (B) Regional
domains. In the most intensely mixed
geology of the St. Ignace Island complex. Age data
samples, small, mafic crystalline clots are
(black stars) from Davis and Sutcliffe (1985) and Davis
dispersed throughout a felsic matrix, and as
and Green (1997). (C) Geological map of St. Ignace
rare mafic enclaves, consisting of only a thin
Island, modified after Giguere (1975).
rind of mafic rock surrounding coarsegrained plagioclase phenocrysts.
Well-preserved silicate melt inclusions (MI), many completely glassy, were observed in quartz,
clinopyroxene and some plagioclase phenocrysts from the felsic and mafic rocks of the SIC,
representing some of the oldest unrecrystallized silicate melt inclusions recognised to date. Melt
inclusions from quartz from the felsic rocks are broadly rhyolitic in composition whereas those from

43

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

plagioclase in the mafic rocks range from basalt to basaltic andesite. The melt compositions are
interpreted to represent the end-member liquids in the system with direct evidence of mixing of the
two. Concentrations of Cu and Ag (in both mafic and felsic MI), and Mo (in felsic MI), are up to an
order of magnitude higher in both the mafic and felsic MI than in continental crust and the host bulk
rock concentrations. We propose that the melt inclusions have preserved pre-eruptive metal tenors that
were subsequently modified by sulfide saturation, degassing, or post-solidus hydrothermal alteration.
The elevated Cu and Ag contents are similar to those noted in arc-related and extremely oxidized early
Midcontinent Rift-related rocks and may account for the world-class volcano-sedimentary-hosted Cu(Ag) deposits within the Rift as well as the presence of small, porphyry-style deposits.
References
Davis, D.W., and Green, J.C., 1997. Geochronology of the North American Midcontinent rift in western Lake
Superior and implications for its geodynamic evolution; Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v.34: 476488.
Davis, D.W., and Sutcliffe, R.H., 1985. U-Pb ages from the Nipigon plate and northern Lake Superior;
Geological Society of America Bulletin, v.96: 1572-1579.
Giguere, J.F., 1975. Geology of St. Ignace Island and adjacent islands, District of Thunder Bay; Ontario
Division of Mines, Geological Report 118: 35.
Hollings, P., Hanley, J., Smyk, M., Heaman, L., and Cousens, B., 2023. The ~1.1 Ga St. Ignace Island complex,
Northern Ontario, Canada: Evidence for magma mixing and crustal melting in the generation of
Midcontinent Rift-related bimodal magmas and implications for regional metallogeny. Journal of
Petrology, in review.
Smyk, M., Hollings, P., and Heaman, L., 2006. Preliminary investigations of the petrology, geochemistry and
geochronology of the St. Ignace complex, Midcontinent Rift, Northern Lake Superior, Ontario. In
Wilson, A.C. (ed.), Proceedings and Abstracts, Institute on Lake Superior Geology 52nd Annual
Meeting, Proceedings Volume 52, Part 1 – Program and Abstracts, 61-62.
Sutcliffe, R.H., and Smith, A.R., 1988. Geology of the St. Ignace Island volcanic-plutonic complex; Summary of
Field Work and Other Activities, Ontario Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Paper 141: 368-371.

44

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Hydrothermal Alteration Facies of the Eisenbrey Zn-Cu Deposit, Rusk County, Wisconsin
JOHNSON, Kaine, P. 1, and LODGE, Robert W.D. 1
1

Department of Geology and Environmental Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, Eau Claire, WI

This study focuses on the hydrothermal alteration zones surrounding the volcanogenic massive
sulfide (VMS) Eisenbrey Zn-Cu deposit in Rusk County, northwestern Wisconsin. The Eisenbrey
deposit is hosted within the Paleoproterozoic Pembine-Wausau terrane and is a part of the Penokean
volcanic belt, along with many other VMS deposits including the Crandon, Lynne, and Flambeau
deposits. The goal of this research is to develop a petrographic and geochemical categorization of
alteration types and complete a geochemical mass balance to produce specific alteration trends. Data
collected on the hydrothermal alteration at the Eisenbrey deposit is being compared with other
Wisconsin VMS deposits to produce a better depositional framework for VMS mineralization.
The Penokean Orogen is the culmination of various accretionary events and volcanism. The
Penokean Orogen began around 1.88 Ga along the southern margin of the Superior Craton. The
collision and subsequent accretion of the Pembine-Wausau terrane resulted in subduction moving to the
south and began back arc basin development. Most VMS deposits within the Penokean volcanic belt
formed within this back arc extensional environment (Shultz and Cannon 2007). Arc magmatism
continued until roughly 1.85 Ga. when an Archean crustal fragment, known as the Marshfield terrane,
accreted to the Pembine-Wausau terrane &amp; Superior Craton.
VMS systems are characterized by volcanic-sedimentary hosted massive sulfide deposits that
form at or near sea floor. Formation is associated with convection of metal rich hydrothermal fluids
rising through the crust and mobilizing elements. These deposits are commonly poly-metallic with
common mineralization of Zn-Cu-Pb-Ag-Au rich sulfides. Hydrothermal alteration in VMS
environments results in mobilization of major elements during modification of primary minerals. The
style of alteration varies based on the volcanic setting and fluid chemistry, but commonly are noted by
gains in MgO, Fe2O3, K2O, and/or SiO2 and losses in Na2O and CaO (Galley et al., 2007).
The Eisenbrey deposit (Figure 1) is relatively poorly understood. Regional metamorphism at
the Eisenbrey deposit is lower amphibolite facies and has completely recrystallized the alteration zone
at the deposit. Eisenbrey deposit is the only known VMS occurrences associated with Algoma-type iron
formation and formed within the “Main Arc Sequence” (DeMatties, 2022). Therefore, improving our
understanding of the Eisenbrey hydrothermal system can aid in identifying new exploration criteria in
non-typical VMS environments for the Penokean Orogen.
Samples of the hydrothermal alteration zone at the Eisenbrey deposit were analyzed across
twelve drill holes from both the structural hanging wall and footwall to the ore horizon. These samples
were initially divided into alteration mineral assemblages based on petrography. Alteration types
include chlorite-cordierite-anthophyllite, quartz-anthophyllite-biotite, quartz-white mica, quartz-biotite.
These alteration types were then characterized using major and trace element geochemistry and mass
balance calculations. The alteration at Eisenbrey has notable gains in Fe2O3 and MnO; with losses in
SiO2, MgO, and Na2O. This contrasts alteration at Flambeau, which has gains in K2O and SiO2 (Lodge
et al., 2022).

45

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Figure 1. Representative cross-section of the Eisenbrey deposit with representative photomicrographs of
common alteration types (right). I. shows Quartz-Anthophyllite alteration (T-22), II. shows Chlorite-Cordierite
alteration (T-40), III. Shows Quartz-White Mica alteration (T-22)

References
DeMatties, T.A., 2022. Exploration-resource assessment of productive felsic volcanic centers in the
paleoproterozoic penokean volcanic belt of northern Wisconsin, Michigan and East-central Minnesota,
USA: Ore Geology Reviews, v. 141: 104489.
Galley, A.G., Hannington, M.D., and Jonasson, I.R., 2007. Volcanogenic massive sulphide deposits, in
Goodfellow, W.D., ed., Mineral Deposits of Canada: A Synthesis of Major Deposit-Types, District
Metallogeny, the Evolution of Geological Provinces, and Exploration Methods: GAC-MAC, Special
Publication No. 5: 141-161.
Lodge, R.W.D., Lemke, T.C., Blotz, K.E., 2022. Using Ore Petrography and Geochemical Mass Balance to
Constrain the Hydrothermal Environment at the Paleoproterozoic Flambeau Cu-Zn-Au Deposit,
Wisconsin, USA. Society of Economic Geology, Society of Economic Geologist Annual Meeting
Proceedings, Denver, CO, paper P2.15.
Schulz, K.J., and Cannon, W.F., 2007. The Penokean orogeny in the Lake Superior region: Precambrian
Research, v. 157: 4–25.

46

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Provenance patterns and tectonic styles of ca. 2.3–1.8 Ga metasedimentary strata in northern
Michigan based on regional mapping and detrital zircon U-Pb geochronology
JONES, Jamey1, CANNON, William F.2, DRENTH, Benjamin J.3, and O’SULLIVAN, Paul4
1

U.S. Geological Survey, Alaska Science Center, Anchorage, AK
U.S. Geological Survey, Geology Energy Minerals Science Center, Reston, VA
3
U.S. Geological Survey, Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center, Denver, CO
4
GeoSep Services LLC, Moscow, ID
2

Detrital zircon U-Pb data from ca. 2.3–1.8 Ga metasedimentary successions in northern
Michigan are used to test regional stratigraphic correlations and yield key insights into provenance and
tectonic styles along the southern Superior craton. Circa 2.3–2.2 Ga Chocolay Group turbiditic strata
and quartzite record initial rifting and basin formation along the southern Superior margin. Unimodal
ca. 2.7–2.6 Ga age populations were derived from abundant Archean batholiths in the surrounding
region. Distinctive ca. 2.3 Ga populations are rare but present in some samples, but the source(s) of
these grains is not well understood. Chocolay Group detrital zircon data are very similar to upper
Huronian Supergroup strata to the east and with other global ca. 2.3–2.2 Ga glaciogenic successions.
The ca. 2.1 Ga Dickinson Group contains bimodal ca. 2.9 and 2.7 Ga age populations in the East
Branch Arkose and Solberg Schist that are distinctive in the region and suggest a mixture of recycled
2.3 Ga Chocolay Group quartzite and more diverse regional Archean basement sources. Minor ca. 2.1
Ga grains indicate derivation from nearby plutonic sources or eroded volcanic equivalents of the same
age, consistent with magmatism, regional uplift, and final rifting of the southern Superior craton ca.
2.1. After a ca. 100 Ma hiatus, the Ajibik and Siamo Formations of the ca. 1.90–1.85 Menominee
Group have unimodal ca. 2.7–2.6 Ga age populations that suggest continued derivation from ca. 2.7–
2.6 Ga batholiths and (or) recycling of older underlying strata. The Goodrich Formation of the basal
Baraga Group (ca. 1.85–1.83 Ga) shows similar patterns. A provenance shift to prominent ca. 1.85 Ga
populations occurs in turbiditic strata of the Michigamme Formation (upper Baraga Group), indicating
arrival of the outboard Wisconsin magmatic terrane to the south. Michigamme strata record basin
evolution between the southern Superior Province and the exotic terrane as it approached and collided
during the ca. 1.87–1.83 Ga Penokean orogeny, but the relative role of Penokean versus younger ca.
1.78–1.76 Ga tectonism in regional folding and metamorphism remains uncertain. Additional mapping
and geochronology focused on Michigamme strata will better constrain regional depositional ages,
facies relationships, and tectono-metamorphic patterns.

47

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Petrogenesis of the mineralized horizons in the Offset and Creek zones, Lac des Iles Complex, N.
Ontario
JONSSON, Justin1, HOLLINGS, Peter1, BRZOZOWSKI, Matthew1, BAIN, Wyatt1, DJON,
Lionnel2
1
2

Department of Geology, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Road Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1 Canada
Impala Canada, 69 Yonge Street, Suite 700 Toronto, ON M5E 1K3 Canada

The Lac des Iles Complex is a Neoarchean (2.69 Ga; D.W. Davis cited in Stone et al., 2003)
polyphase mafic-ultramafic complex located in the Marmion terrane of the Superior Province, 85 km
north of Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada. The intrusive complex can be subdivided into two discrete
subcomplexes: the ultramafic-dominated North Lac des Iles Complex and the mafic-dominated South
Lac des Iles Complex (SLDIC). The SLDIC has been subdivided into four intrusive series, termed the
gabbronorite, breccia, norite, and diorite series (Decharte et al., 2018). To date, economic Pd-rich
mineralization has been discovered in both the breccia and norite series, and occurs proximal to the
contacts between the breccia and gabbronorite series and between the breccia and norite series. The
objectives of this study are to i) evaluate the mechanisms of formation of the mineralized horizons near
the contact between the breccia and norite domains in the Offset and Creek zones of the SLDIC, ii)
evaluate the role that crustal contamination played in this process, and iii) assess the tectonic setting in
which the SLDIC formed.
The breccia and norite series are both composed of varitextured, brecciated, and equigranular
leucocratic-melanocratic norites and gabbronorites, and their altered equivalents. The breccia series
contains a greater proportion of brecciated and varitextured rocks, while the norite series contains a
greater proportion of equigranular rocks. All pre-alteration lithologies are essentially plagioclaseorthopyroxene cumulates with varyingly minor quantities of interstitial clinopyroxene, biotite,
magnetite, chalcopyrite, pentlandite, and pyrrhotite. Variable degrees of hydrothermal alteration are
indicated by the presence of tremolite-actinolite and talc (after pyroxenes), chlorite and sericite (after
plagioclase), and pyrite (after pyrrhotite). Although the breccia and norite series are mineralogically
similar, the breccia series is generally more leucocratic (i.e., higher plagioclase/pyroxene ratio) than the
norite series.
Neodymium isotopic evidence indicates that the Offset and Creek Zone magmas were crustally
contaminated. ɛNd values of 19 analyzed samples range from +0.38 to -3.47 (median = -2.13), which
is consistently more negative than the ɛNd value of +2.24 expected in an uncontaminated mantlederived magma that crystallized at 2.69 Ga. The crustal contaminant that imparted the negative ɛNd
values is unlikely to be the tonalitic gneiss that hosts the SLDIC, as the ɛNd value of one reported
tonalitic gneiss sample is -1.77 (Brugmann et al., 1997). The lack of correlation between ɛNd and
geochemical or spatial variations suggests that variable crustal contamination was not the cause of the
geochemical variability observed within the Offset and Creek Zones. Samples from both the breccia
and norite series have similar trace-element chemistry, including enriched LILE/LREE patterns, flat
HREE patterns, and pronounced negative Nb anomalies. Although these characteristics can be caused
by assimilation of crustal material, it is more likely that they are the result of formation of the parental
magma in a magmatic arc. Evidence for this interpretation includes low Nb/Yb ratios, high Ba/Th
ratios, low Th content, and the lack of correlation between geochemical variability and Nd isotopic
variability.
Evidence from S isotopes of sulfide minerals and whole-rock geochemistry suggests that the
addition of crustal S was not necessary in the formation of the Pd-rich mineralization within the Offset
and Creek zones. δ34S values of 54 crystals from 17 samples range from -0.37‰ to +3.28‰ VCDT
48

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

(median = +1.11‰), with values from 52 of 54 crystals falling in the expected range of mantle-derived
sulfur (0 ± 2‰; Seal, 2006). Based on the association of low Cu/Pd ratios with high Pd values, Offset
and Creek zone ores formed at high R factors, which were likely high enough to cause the PGE
enrichment without incorporation of crustal sulfur. The higher degree of Pd enrichment in the Offset
Zone compared to the Creek Zone was likely due to a greater amount of sulfide liquid in the Offset
Zone that also underwent higher R factors; the distribution of sulfide liquid and magma flow may have
been influenced by primary structural constraints on the geometry of the intrusion. No evidence was
found for significant low-temperature remobilization of chalcophile elements, including the PGEs.
The compositional variability observed within the breccia and norite domains suggests that both
domains formed via multiple pulses of compositionally similar magma. The proximity of
mineralization to the interpreted feeder conduits suggests that the distribution of mineralization is
largely the result of PGMs/Pd-rich pentlandite crystallizing as the magma transitioned from the feeder
structure outwards into the periphery of the intrusive complex. This process may have repeated several
times as successive magma pulses infiltrated the partially crystallized intrusive complex, resulting in
the redistribution of ores in brecciated zones.
References
Brugmann, G.E., Reischmann, T., Naldrett, A.J., and Sutcliffe, S.H., 1997. Roots of an Archean volcanic arc
complex: the Lac des Iles area in Ontario, Canada. Precambrian Research, vol. 81: 223-239.
Decharte, D., Hofton, T., Marrs, G., Olson, S., Peck, D., Perusse, C., Roney, C., Taylor, S., Thibodeau, D., and
Young, B., 2018. Feasibility study for Lac des Iles mine incorporating underground mining of the Roby
Zone. North American Palladium, NI 43-101 Technical Report: 435.
Seal, R.R., 2006. Sulfur isotope geochemistry of sulfide minerals. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry,
vol. 61: 633-677.
Stone, D., Lavigne, M.J., Schnieders, B., Scott, J., and Wagner, D., 2003. Regional geology of the Lac des Iles
area, in Summary of Field Work and Other Activities 2003. Ontario Geological Survey, Open File
Report 6120: 15-1 to 15-25.

49

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Slip Kinematics of the Keweenaw and Hancock Faults within the Midcontinent Rift System,
Upper Peninsula of Michigan
LANGFIELD, Katherine1, DeGRAFF, James1, GAMET, Nolan1
1

Department of Geological and Mining Engineering and Sciences, Michigan Technological University,
Houghton, MI, USA

The Keweenaw fault is a major compressional structure along the center of the Keweenaw
Peninsula and positioned near the southern edge of the Midcontinent Rift System (MRS). The smaller
Hancock fault connects with the hanging wall of the Keweenaw fault and, together, the two faults
define a thrust slice. The MRS formed ~1.1 billion years ago when a major extensional event split a
significant portion of the ancient North American continent across the Upper Midwest. The rifting
produced large volumes of basaltic lava, roughly ending with the Portage Lake Volcanics that have an
exposed thickness of 3-5 km along the Keweenaw Peninsula (1). A common interpretation of the
Keweenaw fault is that it originally formed as a normal fault during MRS extension and then inverted
to become a reverse fault during a post-rift compressional event, most likely the Grenville Orogeny
(2,3). Another interpretation is that the Keweenaw and Hancock faults are parts of a detached fault
system that was initiated during the Grenville Orogeny (4).
Until a few years ago, ideas about these and similar faults in the region considered only dip slip
with an either normal or reverse sense of motion. Recent bedrock mapping and measurements of faultslip lineations, however, have revealed a significant component of right-lateral strike-slip on the
Keweenaw fault system near its northeastern end which is about twice the magnitude of north-side-up
reverse slip (5, 6). To clarify the slip kinematics of this region we utilized bedrock mapping and fault
slip measurements between Hancock and Mohawk, MI to clarify the geometry and slip kinematics of
the NE-trending Keweenaw and Hancock faults and to relate their characteristics here to what is
observed along the more easterly trending portion of the fault system previously studied (Fig. 1).
Rose diagrams of slickenlines rakes found along the Hancock and Keweenaw Faults show
that both faults have roughly equal dip-slip versus strike-slip components (Fig. 2). This bimodal
distribution of rake data differs from previous EDMAP projects, possibly due to the overall curvature
of the Keweenaw Peninsula. The strike-slip to dip-slip component ratio was 2:1 (Mueller, 2021). The
resulting map from this project indicates that the Keweenaw Fault isn’t a single fault trace, but instead
connected fault segments (Fig. 3) The updated map and cross-section from this project proposes a new
model for the Keweenaw Fault system kinematics.
Acknowledgements
This project was funded by the U.S Geological Survey’s EDMAP program under Award No.
G21AC10681. This funding was matched by the Department of Geological and Mining Engineering
and Sciences of Michigan Technological University, as well as sponsorship by the Michigan
Geological Survey. Funding was also provided by the ILSG Student Research Fund for work done in
the Quincy Mine, as well as an award by the Michigan Space Grant Consortium. Thanks goes to Tom
Wright for access to the Quincy Mine. Additionally, we thank Ian Gannon, Breeanne Heusdens, Jack
Hawes, Braxton Murphy, and Dillon Breen for fieldwork assistance.

50

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Figure 1. Map
showing geology of
the Keweenaw
Peninsula. The boxes
show the areas for the
previous and current
EDMAP project.
(Cannon and
Nicholson, 2001).

Figure 2. Rake histograms showing the
distribution of low and high angle rake on the
Keweenaw fault (A) and Hancock fault (B).
Arrows indicate mean rake of each dataset.

Figure 3. Updated bedrock geologic map and legend
of study area.

References
Cannon, W.F., and Nicholson, S.W., 2001. Geologic Map of the Keweenaw Peninsula and Adjacent Area,
Michigan, U.S. Geological Survey, 1:100000 scale.
Cannon, W.F., 1994. Closing of the Midcontinent rift ‒ A far-field effect of Grenvillian compression: Geology,
v. 22: 155-158.
Bornhorst, T.J., 1997. Tectonic context of native copper deposits of the North American Midcontinent Rift
System: in Ojakangas, R.W., Dickas, A.B., and Green, J.C. (eds.), Middle Proterozoic to Cambrian
Rifting, Central North America: Boulder, Co, GSA Special Paper 312: 127-136.
DeGraff, J.M. and Carter, B.T., 2022. Detached structural model of the Keweenaw fault system, Lake Superior
region, North America: Implications for its origin and relationship to the Midcontinent Rift System:
Geological Society of America Bulletin, https://doi.org/10.1130/B36186.1.
Tyrrell, C.W., 2019. Keweenaw Fault Geometry and Slip Kinematics – Bête Grise Bay, Keweenaw Peninsula,
Michigan [M.S. thesis]: Houghton, Michigan, Michigan Technological University: 30.
Mueller, S.A., 2021. Structural Analysis and Interpretation of Deformation Along the Keweenaw Fault System
West of Lake Gratiot, Keweenaw County, Michigan, Open Access Master’s Thesis, Michigan
Technological University

51

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Petrology and Geochemistry of the Paleoproterozoic Eau Claire Volcanic Complex, Eau Claire,
WI
LEAHY, Matthew D.1, LODGE, Robert W.D.1
Department of Geology and Environmental Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, Eau Claire, WI
54701 USA
1

The 1.8 Ga Eau Claire Volcanic Complex (ECVC) is located in the northwestern portion of
Wisconsin primarily exposed in the Eau Claire River valley. The complex is part of the Marshfield
terrane of the Penokean Orogen which developed along the southern margin of the Superior craton
(Schulz &amp; Cannon, 2007). Following the accretion of a juvenile ocean island arc, now known as the
Pembine-Wausau terrane (PWT), with the southern margin of the Superior craton, opposing subduction
zones closed the ocean between the accreted PWT and MT resulting in coeval magmatism on both
terranes prior to collision around 1850 Ma. The origin of the MT is uncertain but is believed to be a
small Archean craton that is either a rifted fragment of the Superior Province (Zi et al., 2021) or
Wyoming Province (Malone et al., 2019). The suture between these terranes is the Eau Pleine Shear
Zone.
Paleoproterozoic subduction-related volcanism began to develop along MT’s northern margin,
resulting in arc volcanism and back-arc spreading with associated calc-alkaline felsic magmas
(DeMatties, 2022). This volcanism continued until the terrane collided with the subduction trench,
resulting in a major compressional event along the Superior craton (Sims et al., 1989; Shultz and
Cannon, 2007). This comprehensive interpretation of the tectonic setting fits well with the eastern
portion of the MT where rocks are more abundantly exposed. However, the lack of outcrop exposure
due to extensive Cambrian sedimentary strata has restricted research and mineral exploration in
western parts of the orogen (DeMatties, 2022). This includes the ECVC, which is based on geophysical
data, and has high potential for supergene-enriched VMS-style mineralization (DeMatties, 2022).
The main objective of this study is to map and sample volcanic, metamorphic, and intrusive
packages of the ECVC exposed along the North Fork of the Eau Claire River (Figure 1A) and
Chippewa River for whole-rock geochemistry and petrographic analysis. Trace element geochemical
data can be used to determine magmatic and tectonic settings of these rocks and improve regional
tectonic models for the ECVC and MT. Twenty-four samples were analyzed for major elements via
XRF and trace elements via ICPMS. Rock classifications were given in the field, reevaluated during
petrographic analysis, and grouped into suites based on geochemistry. The majority of the suites were
separated into four main categories: felsic gneiss (Figure 1B), mafic gneiss (Figure 1C), amphibolite
(Figure 1D), and granitoid (Figure 1E).
Each suite was diagnosed with a tectonic signature using multiple trace element diagrams.
Th/Yb versus Nb/Yb displayed geochemical characteristics of deep crustal recycling for the majority of
the samples, related to the active subduction that occurred during the advancement of the MT. The only
suite that differs from this trend is the amphibolite group, which has a lower Th-Yb-Nb concentration,
insinuating magma-crustal interactions with the protolith basalt. A tectonic classification tertiary
diagram using La-Y-Nb solidified the theory that calc-alkaline arc magmatism dominated the MT
region, while the amphibolite suite trends towards a more tholeiitic arc composition. This interpretation
is backed by a magmatic affinity diagram as well using Th-Yb-Zr-Y percents.

52

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Figure 1. (A) Regional map of the Eau Claire River with the North Fork and relative location in Wisconsin, (B)
Poorly exposed bedrock of a felsic gneiss, (C) Isoclinal folded trondhjemite at Hamilton Falls trending eastwest, (D) Elongated pipe vesicles on an amphibolite outcrop near Knights Pool, (E) Intrusive contact between
pegmatite and amphibolite.

References
DeMatties, T. A. (2022). Exploration-resource assessment of productive felsic volcanic centers in the
Paleoproterozoic penokean volcanic belt of northern Wisconsin, Michigan and East-central
Minnesota, USA. Ore Geology Reviews, 141, 104489.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2021.104489
Malone, S.J., Nicholson, K.N., and Dowling, C.B., 2019, Preliminary geochemistry on the Marshfield
Terrane, west-central Wisconsin: Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, doi:
10.1130/abs/2018am-322316.
Schulz, K.J., and Cannon, W.F., 2007, The Penokean orogeny in the Lake Superior region: Precambrian
Research, v. 157, p. 4–25, doi: 10.1016/j.precamres.2007.02.022.
Sims, P.K., Schmus, W.R., Schulz, K.J., and Peterman, Z.E., 1989, Tectono-stratigraphic evolution of the early
Proterozoic Wisconsin magmatic terranes of the Penokean orogen: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences,
v. 26, p. 2145–2158, doi: 10.1139/e89-180.
Zi, J.-W., and al., et, 2021, Refining the Paleoproterozoic tectonothermal history of the Penokean orogen: New
U-Pb age constraints from the pembine-wausau terrane, Wisconsin, USA: doi:
10.1130/gsab.s.14700069.

53

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Structural analysis and slip kinematics of the Keweenaw fault system between Bête Grise Bay
and Gratiot Lake, Keweenaw County, Michigan
LIZZADRO-McPHERSON, Daniel1, DeGRAFF, James1, and GANNON, Ian2
1
2

Department of Geological and Mining Engineering Sciences, Michigan Technological University, 630
Dow Environmental Sciences, 1400 Townsend Drive, Houghton, MI 49931 USA

The Keweenaw fault is perhaps the most important geologic structure on the Keweenaw Peninsula,
with an estimated 7-11 km (1) of reverse slip juxtaposing Cu-bearing volcanic strata of the ~1.1 Ga
Portage Lake Volcanics above ~1.0 Ga Jacobsville Sandstone. The fault has been interpreted as a riftbounding normal fault later inverted by compressional pulses of the Grenville Orogeny (2) and, more
recently, as part of a detached thrust fault system unrelated to an earlier normal fault (1). The fault is
shown on published maps as a nearly continuous fault trace whose sinuosity implies multiple fault
segments and complex slip dynamics. Recent mapping has revealed that the Keweenaw fault at its most
northeastern exposure on land is better characterized as a network of interconnected, left-stepping fault
segments with easterly strike and exhibiting a 2:1 ratio of dextral strike slip to reverse slip (3).
This project focused on the eastern half of a 2019-2020 EDMAP project (Fig.1) to map the
Keweenaw fault system between Bête Grise Bay and Gratiot Lake. New mapping combined with
structural and fault-slip analyses produced a revised
bedrock geology map (Fig. 2) and a 3D-model (Fig.
3) that better constrain the geometry of the fault
system, revealing folds and fault-bounded blocks in
the main fault’s footwall. Analyses of fault slip data
indicates a strike-to-dip slip ratio of 1.7:1 and a
local shortening direction of 083°-263°. Slip along
faults is a function of their strike relative to the
shortening direction. Eastward transport of faultbounded blocks relative to the distal footwall was
facilitated by mostly strike slip on longer EWtrending faults and reverse slip on shorter NEtrending faults, coupled with layer-parallel
detachments along weak layer boundaries. The fault
network defines a complex multistranded
Figure 1. Bedrock geology of the Keweenaw
transpressional
system with overall dextral strike
Peninsula (4), showing the 2017-2018 (grey box)
slip and north-side-up reverse slip. Footwall folds
and 2019-2020 (green box) EDMAP study areas.
in Jacobsville strata adjacent to mostly strike-slip
faults are considered to be cogenetic drag folds that formed during the Rigolet phase of the Grenville
orogeny. These findings are consistent with recent mapping projects adjacent to the study area and
investigations that relate far-field compressive pulses of the Grenville Orogeny to deformation of
Keweenawan strata.
Acknowledgements
Funding provided by the USGS EDMAP program (Award No. G19AC00140) with a matching
contribution from the Department of Geological and Mining Engineering and Sciences, Michigan
Technological University and additional support from the Keweenaw Community Forest Company.
Sponsored by the Michigan Geological Survey.

54

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Figure 2. Keweenaw fault system between Lac La Belle and Gratiot Lake. Deer Lake fault block is in the
Keweenaw fault’s footwall between the lakes. Cross-sections shown by thin black lines labeled A - F.

Figure 3. Cross-section B-B' showing modeled hanging-wall and footwall structural and stratal relationships
across the Deer Lake fault block.

References
DeGraff, J.M. and Carter, B.T., 2023. Detached structural model of the Keweenaw fault system, Lake Superior
region, North America: Implications for its origin and relationship to the Midcontinent Rift System:
Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 51, no. 1: 449–466.
Cannon, W.F., Green, A.G., Hutchinson, D.R. et al., 1989. The North American Midcontinent Rift beneath Lake
Superior from GLIMPCE seismic reflection profiling. Tectonics, v.8:305-332.
Tyrrell, C.W., 2019. Keweenaw Fault Geometry and Slip Kinematics – Bête Grise Bay, Keweenaw Peninsula,
Michigan: Michigan Technological University, M.S. thesis: 30.
Cannon, W.F. and Nicholson, S.W., 2001. Geologic Map of the Keweenaw Peninsula and Adjacent Area,
Michigan. U.S. Geological Survey, Map I-2696, Scale 1:100,000.

55

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Re-evaluating the tectonics and metallogeny of terranes in the Paleoproterozoic Penokean
Orogen, Wisconsin
LODGE, Robert W.D.1
1

Department of Geology &amp; Environmental Science, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, Eau Claire, WI 54701
USA

The tectonic model for the development of the Penokean orogen was synthesized in a classic
paper by Schutz and Cannon (2007) that compiled decades of mapping, sedimentology, U/Pb
geochronology, and geophysical surveys. The orogen started at ca. 1880 Ma with the accretion of
Pembine-Wausau terrane, an oceanic arc complex, onto the margin of the Superior Province. A
subduction flip after accretion resulted in overprinting continental arc volcanism and rifting (Figure
1A) until the collision a collision of an Archean crustal block, known as the Marshfield terrane, at ca.
1850 Ma. Several undeformed intrusions, interpreted as post-tectonic intrusions, constrain the end of
the Penokean orogen at ca. 1835 Ma (Figure 1B).
Perhaps the most important event during the orogen was the formation of the ~150 million
tonnes of volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS) deposits in the Pembine-Wausau terrane at ca. 1875 Ma
(Sims et al, 1989; Quigley, 2016). This event was widespread across multiple VMS deposits. This
presents a clear episode of submarine rifting and was assigned to a period of continental back-arc
tectonism by Shultz and Cannon (2007). This is supported by the presence of inherited Archean zircons
at the Lynne and Back Forty VMS deposits (Quigley, 2016) indicating the presence of Archean crust
during the formation of Pembine-Wausau magmas. However, new U/Pb data has documented a second
VMS forming event at ca. 1835 Ma at the Back Forty (Quigley, 2016) and Eisenbrey (Weber and
Lodge, 2022) VMS deposits. Recognition of this extensional event has led to an alternate tectonic
model wherein back-arc extension reactivated multiple times during ridge subduction (Zi et al., 2021).
One of the principal issues that needs to be resolved with the classic Penokean tectonic model is
the regional setting of Penokean VMS mineralization. VMS deposits formed in continental settings
have different petrochemical associations than those formed in oceanic settings. New lithogeohemical
data from mafic and felsic rocks at several VMS deposits (Flambeau, Eisenbrey, Lynne, Wolf River)
suggest that most of the deposits hosted in rocks that are consistent with oceanic settings, while some
suggest a continental setting. This suggests that the continental setting for the VMS mineralization does
not apply to all deposits and that the extent of Archean basement needs to be better defined.
Zircon petrochronology provides a mechanism to better resolve the nature of continental
basement and its influence on metallogeny by providing a link between age of magmatism and tectonic
setting and/or crustal inheritance. Once again, some deposits within the Pembine-Wausau terrane
provide evidence for Archean basement, while others do not. However, in the process of discovering
new ages, we also discovered that VMS forming environments continued until ca. 1835 Ma in a
juvenile, oceanic setting. It was also discovered that some of the rocks from the Eau Claire volcanic
complex of the Archean Marshfield terrane were mantle-derived, oceanic magmas that were ~1875 Ma
with no evidence for Archean inheritance and seems eerily similar magmas from the Pembine-Wausau
terrane. While Penokean magmas are known to intrude Archean rocks in the Black River Falls region
of Wisconsin (Weber and Lodge, 2022), they clearly show Archean inheritance. As the hunt for
domestic critical minerals makes its way to Wisconsin, the Penokean terranes and their metallogenic
setting needs to be re-evaluated.

56

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Figure 2. Illustration of tectonic models proposed by Shultz and Cannon (2007) and various new petrochemical
or zircon petrochronology datasets that highlight some inconsistencies in the model.

REFERENCES
Quigley, A., 2016. Setting of the volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits in the Penokean Volcanic belt, Great
Lakes region, USA: Unpublished M.S. thesis, Colorado School of Mines: 95.
Schulz, K.J., and Cannon, W.F., 2007. The Penokean orogeny in the Lake Superior region: Precambrian
Research, v. 157: 4-25.
Sims, P.K., Van Schmus, W.R., Schulz, K.J., and Peterman, Z.E., 1989. Tectonostratigraphic evolution of the
Early Proterozoic Wisconsin magmatic terranes of the Penokean orogen: Canadian Journal of Earth
Sciences, v. 26: 2145-2158.
Weber, E.M., and Lodge, R.W.D., 2022. New U/Pb Geochronology from the Proterozoic Penokean Orogen,
Wisconsin: Implications for VMS Metallogeny. Society of Economic Geology, Society of Economic
Geologist Annual Meeting Proceedings, Denver, CO, paper P5.10.
Zi, J.-W., Sheppard, S., Muhling, J.R., and Rasmussen, B., 2021. Refining the Paleoproterozoic tectonothermal
history of the Penokean Orogen: New U/Pb age constraints from the Pembine-Wausau terrane, Wisconsin,
USA: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 134: 776-790.

57

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

3D geologic mapping at the Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey
MAUEL, Stephen1, STEWART, Eric1, REHWALD, Matthew1, STEWART, Esther K. 1, AMES,
Carsyn1, BREMMER, Sarah1, and FITZPATRICK, William1
1

Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey, University of Wisconsin-Madison Division of Extension,
3817 Mineral Point Road, Madison, WI, 53705

The Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey has constructed a preliminary 14-county
3-D geologic data model across southern Wisconsin. The model was constructed primarily from well
construction reports (WCRs) that have been refined for several WGNHS projects, as well as data from
the Mineral Development Atlas, borehole geophysics, and data from previous mapping performed at
various scales.
Well Construction Reports (WCRs) from digital and analog sources were assembled in a GIS
geodatabase. The land surface elevation for each well was extracted from a DEM, and the elevation
was then used to “hang” each well’s downhole lithology. By displaying and exaggerating the data in
3D, the different lithologies were carefully selected and assigned to geologic formations. Prior to
interpolation, statistical outliers were identified, inspected, and edited when appropriate. The elevation
for each formation contact was used to interpolate a raster. The resultant raster was inspected to
identify obvious outliers, and after the outliers were edited or removed, a “final” raster of each contact
was generated. The formation contact rasters can be intersected with a bedrock elevation raster to
produce a geologic map. New data can be added to the model when available, and a new updated map
can be generated.
The products derived from this type of 3D geologic modelling are useful to the public in many
applications. Harmful minerals or metals dissolved in groundwater are a realistic concern in Wisconsin,
and determining the geologic formation in which a well terminates can help to avoid or resolve water
quality issues. 3D geologic modeling can help to inform decision making about land use and land
practices, land conservation, zoning and planning, identification of natural hazards, and the
construction &amp; engineering of wells, roads, railways, and buildings.

58

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Secular Changes in the Magnitude of Terrestrial Weathering
MEDARIS, L. Gordon Jr.1, and DRIESE, Steven G.2
1
2

Department of Geoscience, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706
Department of Geosciences, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798

In a recent investigation of paleosols in the Lake Superior region, the magnitudes of weathering
in six Proterozoic paleosols were found to be less than those in four Phanerozoic paleosols and four
modern soils (Medaris et al., 2022). However, in view of this relatively small database, the apparent
age distinction in the magnitudes of weathering might be spurious, and thus we have expanded the
database to test the veracity of secular changes in the magnitude of terrestrial weathering. Twenty-one
first-cycle paleosols in igneous and metaigneous rocks with well-characterized and relatively
homogenous protolith compositions were selected for comparison. These paleosols occur world-wide,
vary in age from 100 Ma to 2960 Ma, and have protolith compositions ranging from gabbro to granite.
This expanded database confirms that the magnitude of weathering in Phanerozoic paleosols and
modern soils is greater than that in Precambrian paleosols.
Potassium metasomatism is a common phenomenon in paleosols (Rye and Holland, 1998), and
among the 17 Cambrian and Precambrian paleosols investigated here, 14 experienced potassium
metasomatism, which is recorded by the presence of neoblastic muscovite, illite, or microcline. The
effect of such K-metasomatism is illustrated in a plot of Al2O3-(CaO*+Na2O)-K2O, where
compositional trends for modern soils and unmetasomatized paleosols are oriented subparallel to the AC*N join (Fig. 1A), and those for K-metasomatized paleosols are rotated towards the K apex (Fig. 1B).

(A)

(B)

Figure 1. Protolith compositions and paleosol trends in the system, Al2O3-(CaO*+Na2O)-K2O.
A: Modern soils and paleosols without K-metasomatism; B. Paleosols with K-metasomatism.

In K-metasomatized paleosols, the amount of K2O removed by weathering is unknown, but
may be estimated by comparison to an average for the depth variations of K2O and Na2O in modern
soils, for which:
(% change K2O) / (% change Na2O) = – 1.40z3 + 0.95z2 – 0.31z + 0.75
where z is normalized depth. Following this approach, the removal of K2O is estimated to be 47 ± 4%
for the combined Cambrian and Precambrian paleosols and observed to be 54 ± 21% for the Cretaceous
paleosols and 47 ± 21% for modern soils (Fig. 2A). Interestingly, no correlation exists between the
percentage of K2O removed and age (or protolith composition; not shown). In contrast, the total
59

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

addition of K2O to the weathered profiles, expressed in terms of Depth-Normalized Mass Flux,
progressively increases with decreasing age, i.e. 0.74 ± 0.29 at 2960 Ma, 0.96 ± 0.18 at 2450 Ma, 1.04
± 0.52 at 1600-2200 Ma, and 1.62 ± 0.36 at 500 Ma (Fig. 2B).
(A)

(B)

Figure 2. A: Percentages of K2O removed from soils and paleosols;
B: Total K2O added to paleosols, expressed as Depth-Normalized Mass Flux (DNMF).

The percentage removal by weathering for
the sum of SiO2, CaO, Na2O, and K2O(est or meas)
progressively increases from Archean (17.3±1.5%)
to Proterozoic (21.0±3.7%) to Cambrian
(25.1±3.1%) to Cretaceous (37.1±10.8%) paleosols.
In comparison, the percentage of mass removed
from five modern soils is 36.0±3.7%, which lies
within the values for the Cretaceous paleosols. We
suggest that the greater magnitude of weathering in
Phanerozoic soils compared to Proterozoic ones is
due to higher concentrations of organic acids during
Phanerozoic soil formation, which resulted from the
emergence of sparse cryptophytes in biological soil
crusts in Cambrian time and subsequent greening of
the continents with vascular plants from Devonian
time to the present.

Figure 3. Percentages of the total mass of
SiO2, CaO, Na2O, and K2O removed from
modern soils and paleosols.

References
Medaris et al., 2022. Journal of Geology, v. 130, in press.
Rye &amp; Holland, 1998. American Journal of Science, v. 298: 621-672.

60

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Morphometry and formation process of eskers developed under the Chippewa Lobe of the
Laurentide Ice Sheet
NUÑEZ-FERREIRA, Francisca1, ZOET, Lucas1, and RAWLING III, J Elmo 2
1
2

Department of Geoscience, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53705
Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey, University of Wisconsin‐Madison, Madison, WI, 53705

Eskers are an important indicator of paleo subglacial hydrologic conditions and a good
alternative to direct glaciological observations because they are one of the few landforms that record
those processes. Esker morphology and sedimentology is useful to gain insight into how sediment
transport relates to subglacial hydrology along channels, which in consequence provides understanding
on ice dynamics. However, large discrepancies in the formation mechanisms of eskers still exist and
there are even fewer attempts to investigate the influence of soft bed conditions on this process. To
address this, we analyzed the morphometry and distribution of eskers formed under the Chippewa Lobe
of the Laurentide Ice Sheet (Figure 1). This includes mapping the sinuosity and spatial distribution with
2m resolution LiDAR, comparing these to sediment thickness derived from a water well data base, and
examining the sediment sequence of one large esker exposed to sand and gravel extraction (~20 m tall)
(Figure 2).
The LiDAR analysis revealed a direct relation between sinuosity and length of eskers formed in
soft bed conditions, with a mean of 1.07 that is very similar to eskers formed under hard bed
conditions. Eskers spacing over the soft bed of the Chippewa Lobe appear closer than over hard beds in
Canada (e.g Storrar et al, 2014). The spacing of eskers decrease when the ice margin retreats, meaning
that melt rates increase (Boulton et al, 2009; Hewitt, 2011). Moreover, the relation between the
distribution of eskers and till thickness indicates that eskers formed preferentially over thin layers of
sediment, specifically near 18 meters for the Chippewa Lobe. The results from the grain size
distribution of the large esker showed that the critical shear stress changed nonmonotonically
throughout the formation of the esker. As such, we can assume that the water velocity or depth of the
channel likely changed sporadically with time while the esker formed.

Figure 1. Distribution of eskers formed under the Chippewa Lobe during the Last Ice Age.

61

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Figure 2. Location of the selected esker for sediment analysis. The yellow start shows the location of a pit where
the samples were extracted for the analysis.

References
Boulton, G.S., Hagdorn, M., Maillot, P.B., &amp; Zatsepin, S., 2009. Drainage beneath ice sheets:
groundwater–channel coupling, and the origin of esker systems from former ice
sheets. Quaternary Science Reviews, 28(7-8): 621-638.
Hewitt, I.J., 2011. Modelling distributed and channelized subglacial drainage: the spacing of
channels. Journal of Glaciology, 57(202): 302-314.
Storrar, R.D., Stokes, C.R., &amp; Evans, D.J., 2014. Morphometry and pattern of a large sample
(&gt; 20,000) of Canadian eskers and implications for subglacial drainage beneath ice sheets. Quaternary
Science Reviews, 105: 1-25.

62

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Subsurface characterization of the Duluth Complex and related intrusions from 3D modeling of
gravity and magnetotelluric data
PETERSON, Dana E. 1, BEDROSIAN, Paul A. 1 and FINN, Carol A. 1
1

U.S. Geological Survey, MS 973, Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225

The Mesoproterozoic Duluth Complex and related intrusions in northeastern Minnesota make
up the second largest exposed mafic intrusive complex in the world, second only to the Bushveld
Complex in Africa. It is one of the major plutonic components of the Midcontinent Rift System and
hosts a variety of copper-nickel sulfide and platinum-group-element deposits. Given the complex
geology of the area, 3D modeling is necessary to provide a complete picture of the variable densities
and geometries of intrusive suites throughout the Duluth Complex as well as their extent at depth.
In this study, we use Bouguer gravity data collected over the past ~60 years and magnetotelluric
data collected in 2019 to create new 3D models of density, resistivity, and subsurface structure of the
region constrained by geologic data. We use the results of these models to calculate the total volume of
the Beaver Bay Complex, Duluth Complex, and onshore North Shore Volcanic Group, and estimate
preliminary intrusion and emplacement rates using age estimates from Swanson-Hysell et al. (2021).
We model both thickness and density of intrusive and volcanic rocks in the region using Oasis
GMSYS-3D. The igneous layer in our starting model is 11 km thick with a constant density of 2,941
kg/m3. Other surfaces in the model include topography, near surface glacial deposits, a high-density
lower crustal layer, and the base of the crust. We start our inversion by allowing the basal surface of the
igneous units to vary and then invert for density within the igneous layer, within a range of 2,630-3,180
kg/m3. Our gravity modeling indicates that intrusive and volcanic rocks reach a maximum thickness
~23 km, or half the crustal column, with densities ranging from ~2,730-3,030 kg/m3 and a mean
density of 2,940 kg/m3. The thickest, highest density areas of the model are beneath the Beaver Bay
Complex and other mapped diabase intrusions. We interpret the two thickest areas in our gravity model
as feeder zones for the Beaver Bay intrusive complex and possibly also for the Duluth Complex, in-line
with interpretations arising from previous gravity studies in the area (Allen, 1994; Miller et al., 2002).
Preliminary volume estimates from 3D gravity modeling indicate the present-day Duluth
Complex, Beaver Bay Complex, and onshore volcanic rocks constitute ~92,100 km3 of igneous
material. We calculate the volume of separate mapped units by extending the mapped geologic
boundaries at the surface to depth within our 3D model. Three major geologic groups each comprise
~30% of this total volume: 1) the North Shore Volcanic Group, 2) diabase units of the Beaver Bay
Complex and intrusions to the northeast and southwest of it, and 3) the Duluth Complex Layered and
Anorthositic series. The older Early gabbro series and Felsic series of the Duluth Complex make up the
remaining ~10% volume. 206Pb/238U zircon ages for the Anorthositic and Layered series from
Swanson-Hysell et al. (2021) indicate that rocks of these units were emplaced contemporaneously over
a period of 500,000 ± 260,000 years, suggesting an emplacement rate of ~0.06 km3/year, assuming a
constant rate on magma input.
Using recently acquired magnetotelluric data, we invert for resistivity in the study area using
ModEM (Kelbert et al., 2014). Our magnetotelluric model highlights an arcuate low resistivity
anomaly at depths of ~9-20 km, westwardly adjacent to the high-density and high resistivity feeder
zones (Figure 1). This anomaly may represent a plane of weakness along which magma intruded to
form the Beaver Bay Complex and the Duluth Complex. Low resistivities in this case would be
attributed to sulfide or graphitic mineralization that developed along the contact between intruding
magma and country rock. These resistivities are also similar to values observed in the Paleoproterozoic
metasedimentary rocks of the Animikie Basin, located to the southwest of the Duluth Complex. The
63

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

spatial and temporal relationship between the Animikie Basin and Duluth Complex raises a tantalizing
hypothesis that the basin structure may have preferentially localized magma intrusion. If this was the
case, entrainment of conductive metasedimentary rocks of the Animikie Group along a pre-existing
fault could also explain the arcuate low resistivity anomaly observed adjacent to the highly resistive
feeder zones.

Figure 1. Depth slice through the 3D magnetotelluric resistivity model at ~14 km depth. Black dashed line is the
surface extent of the Duluth Complex and related intrusive and volcanic rocks. White lines are 5 km contours of
Duluth Complex thickness extracted from our gravity model, starting from 10 km. Cyan line is the outline of
Lake Superior.

Acknowledgements
Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply
endorsement by the U.S. government.
References
Allen, D.J., 1994. An integrated geophysical investigation of the midcontinent rift system: Western Lake
Superior, Minnesota, and Wisconsin. PhD thesis: Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana: 267.
Kelbert, A., Meqbel, N., Egbert, G.D. and Tandon, K., 2014. ModEM: A modular system for inversion of
electromagnetic geophysical data. Computers &amp; Geosciences, 66:40-53.
Miller, J.D., Jr., Green, J.C., Severson, M.J., Chandler, V.W., Hauck, S.A., Peterson, D.M., Wahl, T.E., 2002.
RI-58 Geology and mineral potential of the Duluth Complex and related rocks of northeastern
Minnesota. Minnesota Geological Survey. Retrieved from the University of Minnesota Digital
Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/58804.
Swanson-Hysell, N.L., Hoaglund, S.A., Crowley, J.L., Schmitz, M.D., Zhang, Y., &amp; Miller Jr, J.D., 2021. Rapid
emplacement of massive Duluth Complex intrusions within the North American Midcontinent rift.
Geology, 49(2): 185-189. https://doi.org/1.1130/G47873.1.

64

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

On the Importance of Geologic Maps for Mineral Exploration
PETERSON, Dean1
1

Big Rock Exploration, 2505 West Superior Street, Duluth, MN 55806

The basis for most types of geologic investigations is fundamentally rooted in geologists’
observations and interpretations made of landscapes, exposed rocks, and surficial materials in their
natural habitat: “in the field”. Coherent geologic maps, which may take many years to create, represent
assembled collections of observations in context of space and geologic time, requiring teams of
geologists who are usually employed by federal or state/province geological surveys. The outcomes of
these concerted efforts in the field are published geologic maps at various scales. It is these works of
publicly funded geologic mapping that form the foundation upon which mineral exploration programs
and mineral resource developments are built (Figure 1). These early endeavors are key components in
national goals to define domestic resources of critical minerals.
In decades past, many university geology students in the USA (including the author) were
employed as summer interns assisting geological survey geologists in the bedrock geologic mapping of
1:24,000 scale quadrangles. This type of early professional experience can have profound implications
for the careers of these students. Student knowledge gained includes the understanding of what it takes
to systematically map bedrock exposures and structural zones, categorize the various rock types into
lithologic map units, write out detailed descriptions of these map units, generate geologic cross sections
and correlation diagrams, and putting all of these components together into a map that the geologic
survey will subsequently publish.
In today’s mineral industry, geologic maps are largely digital compilations of publicly available
regional/district scale GIS data (downloaded and/or digitized from geological survey websites)
merged/overlain with detailed industry geologic mapping of prospects and/or project areas. For the
most part, the mineral industry quickly compiles digital data into geologic databases and is seemingly
always searching for new ways to quickly capture data in the field digitally. The ease with which the
mineral industry can generate digital geologic map products today can be good, bad, or ugly. The state
of such geologic map outcomes by industry entities rests largely on the knowledge and experience of
the company geologists.
The US Geological Survey’s (USGS) Earth Mapping Resources Initiative (Earth MRI) program
is a partnership of the USGS, the Association of American State Geologists (AASG) and other
governmental, Tribal, and private-sector entities to update the nation’s surface and subsurface mapping
to improve our knowledge of the geologic framework in the United States and to identify areas that
may have the potential to contain undiscovered critical mineral resources. In November 2021, the US
government passed the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, one outcome of which is an investment
of $320 million into Earth MRI to develop a better understanding of sustainable mineral production
and mine waste options. An industry appeal to Earth MRI programs is to reinvigorate the education of
future professional geologists by employing hundreds of geology student interns in upcoming geologic
mapping projects.

65

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Figure 1. The mineral development trapezoid.

66

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Fault zone architecture in mafic protoliths at the Lac des Iles mine, northwestern Ontario
PETERZON, Jordan1, PHILLIPS, Noah1, HOLLINGS, Peter1, DJON, Lionnel2
1
2

Department of Geology, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Road Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1, Canada
Impala Canada, 69 Yonge Street, Suite 700 Toronto, ON M5E 1K3, Canada

Faults are important geologic structures that host earthquakes and serve as permeable pathways
through the upper crust. From an economic perspective, faults may transport and trap mineralized
fluids. In turn, trapped mineralization may be offset or remobilized by later faulting. Fault zones are
complex structures that produce an array of fault rock fabrics and architectures. Fault zone architecture
typically consists of three components: 1) a fault core where most of the slip has been accommodated,
2) a damage zone bounding the fault core where fracture density increases with proximity to the fault
core, and 3) an undeformed and less altered protolith. (Faulkner et al., 2010). Permeability is
significantly enhanced in damage zones due to the high density of fractures and is diminished in fault
cores due to the presence of clay-rich fault gouges. Faults may therefore act as conduits or barriers for
fluid flow depending on the proportion of fault core to damage zone (i.e., the fault zone architecture;
Caine et al., 1996). Fault zone architecture has been well studied in felsic to intermediate protoliths but
studies on mafic protoliths are lacking. Here, we examine late faults within the mafic Lac des Iles
complex to characterize fault zone architecture in mafic protoliths.
The Lac des Iles complex is a series of mafic-ultramafic intrusive bodies occurring within the
Marmion terrane of the Superior Province. The complex has been dated at 2689 ± 1.0 Ma and was
emplaced into a ~3.01 – ~2.68 Ga granite-greenstone terrane (Djon et al., 2018). The Lac des Iles mine,
owned and operated by Impala Canada, is a working Pt-Pd mine which is classified as a structurally
controlled magmatic sulfide deposit. Extensive Ni-Cu-PGE mineralization has been offset by two late
reverse faults in the high-grade zones (&gt;4 g/t Pd): the Camp Lake fault and the Offset fault. A depletion
in Pt-Pd mineralization is observed surrounding the late Camp Lake fault which extends ~180m into
the hanging wall and ~145m into the footwall.
Five drill holes that cross the late faults were logged and sampled in detail, with a fracture
density counting program conducted systematically in the hanging wall and footwall. Fracture density
increases as a power law function with proximity to the fault core and correlates with alteration.
Tonalite has a higher fracture density and fracture density decay rate than gabbronorites near the fault.
Fracture density and hematite/epidote alteration are more intense in the damage zone when faults cut
through tonalite than when faults cut through gabbro. Fault cores in tonalite display a range of textures,
from chlorite-rich gouges to fault breccias with calcitic matrix, while fault cores in gabbro only display
chlorite-rich gouges. In this study, felsic protoliths have a higher fracture density than mafic protoliths
indicating that fluid flow was more effective in felsic protoliths which may have contributed to depleted
mineralization. This implies that host rock lithology strongly affects fault zone structure, including
alteration assemblages, fracture densities, and permeabilities.

67

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1
Figure 1. Simplified regional map of the Lac
des Iles intrusive complex (Djon et al., 2018).

Figure 2. (A): Fracture density data from a single drill hole displaying an increase in fractures with
proximity to faulting. (B): Underground exposure of the Camp Lake Fault at Lac des Iles. (C):
Schematic of a typical fault zone architecture with corresponding cartoons of typical fracture density
and permeability across the fault (Faulkner et al., 2010).
References
Caine, J.S., Evans, J.P., and Forster, C.B., 1996. Fault zone architecture and permeability structure. Geology, 24
(11): 1025-1028.
Djon, M.L., Peck, D.C., Olivo, G.R., Miller, J.D., and Joy, B., 2008. Contrasting Style of Pd-rich Magmatic
Sulfide Mineralization in the Lac des Iles Intrusive Complex, Ontario, Canada. Economic Geology, 113
(3): 741-767.
Faulkner, D.R., Jackson, C.A.L., Lunn, R.J., Schlische, R.W., Shipton, Z.K., Wibberley, C.A.J., and Withjack,
M.O., 2010. A review of recent developments concerning the structure, mechanics and fluid flow
properties of fault zones. Journal of Structural Geology, 32 (11): 1557-1575.

68

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Mobile geologic mapping at the Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey
REHWALD, Matthew1, AMES, Carsyn1, BREMMER, Sarah1, FITZPATRICK, William1,
STEWART, Eric1, BATTEN, William1 and MAUEL, Stephen1
1

Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey, University of Wisconsin-Madison Division of Extension,
3817 Mineral Point Road, Madison, WI, 53705

The Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey (WGNHS) currently collects and
analyzes data using a number of mobile applications for different purposes. Field data collection has
become a tool for collection of new data and the verification of existing data. It has allowed the survey
to create an automated pipeline to capture photos, notes, as well as record location information into one
central location for a respective project. We had 4 objectives to implement while incorporating mobile
applications. The application had to be 1) easy to use, 2) efficient, 3) easy to update, and 4) capable of
displaying many datasets in the field.
At the WGNHS we utilize mobile field applications for the collection of new data and the
verification of existing map data. A mobile field application has the advantage of making many
different data sets available to the user in the field within the flexible scale of a mobile GIS application.
The incorporation of other mobile applications (FieldMove Clino) for data collection can increase
efficiencies and are a vital to aid interpretations. Mobile field applications allow for field
reconnaissance from almost anywhere.
When considering a large project with a lot of data, increasing efficiency in field mapping
techniques without compromising quality is important. Automating much of the data collection and
data transfer eliminates the need for individuals to spend time cataloging digital pictures, copying field
notes, and uploading field data. It’s a great advantage to be able to easily update or add additional map
layers and data, and to see the data already collected. A visual display of data collection progress is
useful in time management and project planning. The ease of which an application can be updated
consumes time and affects project budget. Ease of use is also important, Accessibility and technical
expertise should not be barriers to data collection. The ease of use of a mapping application has
positive impacts the project participants, the project budget, and the project output.

69

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Figure 1. Diagram of the flow of geologic data from the source to and from the mobile application. Managing
the data allows for customization of the functionality and the display of the data.

70

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Quaternary Geology of Wisconsin at a scale of 1:500,000 (in review)
ROSE, Caroline1, RAWLING III, J. Elmo1, CARSON, Eric C.1, ATTIG, John W.1,
MICKELSON, David M.1, MODE, William N.2, JOHNSON, Mark D.3, and SYVERSON, Kent
M.4
1

Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey, 3817 Mineral Point Road, Madison, WI 53705
University of Wisconsin–Oshkosh Department of Geology, 645 Dempsey Trail, University of Wisconsin–
Oshkosh, Oshkosh, WI 54901
3
Department of Earth Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
4
University of Wisconsin–Eau Claire Dept. of Geology, 145 Phillips Hall, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire,
Eau Claire, WI 54702
2

In 2023 the Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey staff expect to publish a new
statewide compilation map of Quaternary geology at a scale of 1:500,000. A preliminary version is
presented here by the principal cartographer. Pre-existing statewide coverages of the surficial geology
are limited to Chamberlin’s 1881 map of Quaternary formations and Hadley and Pelham’s 1976 map of
glacial deposits at 1:500,000, which differentiates only six map units. No modern compilation of the
surficial geology of the state at a scale of 1:500,000 or larger has been completed before.

Figure 1. Statewide Quaternary geologic mapping in Wisconsin: Left: Chamberlin’s 1881 “Quaternary
Formations of Wisconsin”. Center: Hadley and Pelham’s 1976 “Glacial Deposits of Wisconsin”. Right:
Draft polygons of 1:500,000 scale surficial geologic map being compiled by WGNHS geologists.

This effort began in 2019 due to a one-time funding opportunity from the US Geological
Survey’s National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program. Authors compiled previous mapping at
1:100,000 scale for 44 of Wisconsin’s 72 counties, along with partial mapping at the 1:100,000 scale
and/or mapping at the 1:250,000 scale for 13 additional counties. Some areas had no prior mapping
available at detailed scales. New map units have been developed for the 1:500,000 scale and are
divided into glacial and nonglacial sediment that is characterized by lithology and subdivided by
geomorphology. Glacial deposits are mapped at the formation level following the WGNHS Lexicon of
Pleistocene Stratigraphic Units. We use color hue to differentiate among the various glacial formations
by source areas with green groupings derived from the Superior basin, blue groupings from the

71

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Michigan basin. We assign the darkest colors to the strings of moraines and hummocky till marking the
extent of glacial lobes of the most recent Wisconsin Glaciation.
Nonglacial Quaternary units are generally shown in warm colors, including modern alluvium,
colluvium, lake deposits, and meltwater stream deposits, with small pockets of terraces which are
highlighted along major river valleys. The Driftless Area in southwestern Wisconsin shows the
dendritic patterns of eroding colluvium along branching alluvial tributaries with windblown silt on the
uplands. Some large deposits of organic sediment and areas of exposed or thinly covered bedrock are
included at this scale.
This map layout is being produced entirely in ArcGIS Pro, which is a relatively new layout
process for our office. We are organizing the GIS data according to the USGS standard Geologic Map
Schema (“GeMS”), and we make use of this data structure to draw the unit description text in the
Explanation of Map Units (legend) directly from a table in the geodatabase using a dynamic text
element. This saves us from the extra work of synchronizing the layout text with the database text.
Although ArcGIS Pro does not natively offer an easy solution for geologic map legends, we have been
able to find a series of work-arounds to achieve the desired legend layout.
References
Chamberlin, T.C., 1881. General map of the Quaternary formations of Wisconsin, plate 2 of Atlas of the
Geological Survey of Wisconsin: [Madison, Wisc.], Wisconsin Geological Survey, scale approximately
1:960,000.
Hadley, D.W., and Pelham, J.H., 1976. Glacial deposits of Wisconsin—Sand and gravel resource potential:
Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey Map M061: 19 p., 1 pl., scale 1:500,000,
https://wgnhs.wisc.edu/catalog/publication/000385 [Previously Map 10.].
Acomb, L., Attig, J.W., Baker, R.W., Brownell, J., Clayton, Lee, Fricke, C., Frolking, T.A., Frye, J.C., Hemstad,
C., Jacobs, P.M., Johnson, M.D., Knox, J.C., Leigh, D.S., Mason, J.A., McCartney, M.C., Mickelson,
D.M., Mode, W.N., Muldoon, M.A., Need, E.A., Schneider, A.F., Simpkins, W.W., Socha, B.J., Syverson,
K.M., Willman, H.B., 2011. Lexicon of Pleistocene Stratigraphic Units of Wisconsin: Wisconsin
Geological and Natural History Survey Technical Report 001: 180.

72

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Tips from a GIS Specialist: Moving maps to GeMS, and a utility for georeferencing quadrangles
ROSE, Caroline1
1

Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey, 3817 Mineral Point Road, Madison, WI 53705 USA

The USGS has recently been requiring that geologic mapping deliverables use their new
standard database format, called the Geologic Map Schema, or “GeMS.” The Wisconsin Geological
and Natural History Survey (WGNHS) began converting geologic maps into the GeMS format four
years ago. I will offer a brief overview of GeMS and will use the GIS data for the Geology of LaCrosse
County map (available for download on our website) to demonstrate how GeMS captures the
components of a geologic map in geodatabase format. We have created several documents to facilitate
the process of migrating maps into GeMS, and we have made them available in this Github repository:
https://github.com/wgnhs/gems.
My advice to anyone beginning this process is to first consult our “Workflow Overview”
document for a high-level summary of the steps. When completing the GeMS-specified attributes, the
“Quick-Reference Sheets” are a convenient arrangement of the GeMS documentation, with each layer
or table printed on a separate reference sheet, to put focus on one layer or table at a time. To help verify
that a GeMS database is complete, the “GeMS Fields Checklist” is designed to help in confirming
completion of GeMS attributes.
Two of our documents address the process of authoring metadata for a GeMS geodatabase. The
document titled “Metadata For GeMS Maps - Step by Step in ArcCatalog” is a guide to starting FGDC
metadata in ArcCatalog before using the USGS-provided metadata script. The “Metadata Summary for
GeMS Fields” is a reference to show where GeMS attributes appear in the FGDC metadata, as
produced by the metadata script.
All of these documents are housed on our github page, along with other resources such as python
scripts and slides from various presentations. We are making it a priority to share these with other
GeMS users; we hope these resources are useful to other organizations working through the process of
converting maps into GeMS.
I will also briefly summarize how we have involved the GeMS format in our map layouts in
ArcGIS Pro by drawing from the Description of Map Units table to automatically lay out the legend
using Dynamic Text elements.
In the second half of this talk, I will give an overview of a semi-automated utility for
georeferencing maps, especially USGS quadrangles. The software is called QuadG+ and was
developed by USGS and University of Wisconsin collaborators to build the Historical Topographic
Map Collection. It is available for free download at https://geography.wisc.edu/quad-g/ and has proven
useful to Wisconsin survey staff for georeferencing maps with field notes.

73

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Figure 1. The free software QuadG+ automatically detects the
corners and other control marks in a scan of a USGS quadrangle

References
Burt, James E., Jeremy White, Gregory Allord, Kenneth Then, A-Xing Zhu, 2022. Quad-G+: Automated
Georeferencing of Scanned Map Images User Manual Version 2.13 December 2022. University of
Wisconsin – Madison. Accessed March 27, 2023.
https://uwmadison.app.box.com/s/tkccw1j5u3ensn2e10hrl1eiek78z9r6/file/1125666147300.

74

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

New work developing Keweenaw geoheritage awareness
ROSE, William1
1

Department of Geological and Mining Engineering and Sciences, Michigan Technological University, 1400
Townsend Drive, Houghton, MI 49931 U.S.A.

Telling Keweenaw Geostories in ~ten minutes. Old stories of Keweenaw geohistory have been made
into web-based illustrated summaries meant to fill awareness of geoheritage from literature sources.
About 8-15 minutes long with ~20 illustrations, these stories tell about the Ontonagon Boulder,
Douglass Houghton, Louis Agassiz, Jane Schoolcraft and Hiawatha, Pasties and Keweenaw Miners,
Big Annie and the 1913 Strike, Discovery of the Keweenaw Fault, the Green Rock at Copper Harbor,
Ben Franklin and Lake Superior, and the Discovery of the C&amp;H Conglomerate. The stories may be
viewed online (https:// vimeo.com/showcase/9801619). They show how local history is guided by
geology. They are intended to supplement local and statewide awareness and pride.
Bringing the Boulder Home to the UP. The Ontonagon Boulder was a legendary float of native copper

75

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

which was on the west branch of the Ontonagon River until 1847
(https://vimeo.com/showcase/9801619/ video/785968264). The word of mouth of this unusual precious
rock led to widespread interest, but it was difficult to move. Dispute over the ownership of the Boulder
was spirited, and eventually it ended up in Washington DC at the Smithsonian Mineral Science
Museum. The Boulder is considered a sacred object by Ojibway (Erik Redix, 2017, American Indian
Quarterly, 41 (3)). Repatriation of the boulder to the UP was applied for, but rejected by the
Smithsonian in 2000. UP residents and tourists have no access to this iconic legend. Currently (for
decades) the boulder resides out of public view. We propose a loan of the boulder to allow it to visit
museums such as Cranbrook, Univ of Michigan and the AE Seaman Mineralogical Museum, partner of
the Keweenaw National Historic Park

Building a Statue of a feminist labor leader. Anna Klobuchar Clemenc was a feminist labor leader in
Calumet during the miners’ strike of 1913 (https://vimeo.com/showcase/9801619/video/748833299).
She had fame for her leadership of labor parades when she wrapped herself in the American Flag to
inhibit the violent confrontations. Tall and homely, “Big Annie” used her personnage advantageously
and allied with the Western Federation of Miners. She worked with Mother Jones and with the
women’s vote efforts in Washington. She was the first member of the Michigan Women's Hall of
Fame.
The Michigan legislature has officially named June 17 as “Big Annie Day”. A bronze life-sized
statue of her is planned for permanent display in Red Jacket, outside of the Calumet Opera House and
one block away from the Italian Hall. For more info:
https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100090193837168

76

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Outcrop Scale Mapping Utilizing High-Accuracy GNSS with MnDOT’s Virtual Reference
Station (VRS) Network: Minnesota Examples
SCHULZ, Roger1
1

Big Rock Exploration

Geologic mapping has long been utilized to visualize the underlying geology of a region. An
important tool used in geologic mapping are those that resolve the mapper’s locations at a given time.
The tools used to locate a mapper have advanced greatly since the time of pace and compass, chains,
and grids. With that advancement comes ever more accurate location data. One of the most common
modern mapping tools utilizes satellite networks to send a signal from which location data is calculated
on a consumer grade handheld GPS unit. While handheld GPS’s are useful in mapping moderate to
small scale (e.g., 1:5000 or 1:24,000), the accuracy limitations of these units are not capable of
resolving outcrop-size maps (e.g., &lt;1:250 scale). Given the limited outcrop in places like the Lake
Superior region, it is necessary to extract all possible data from a given outcrop, lending greater
importance to small-scale maps. Attaining a level of location accuracy needed for such outcrop scale
mapping requires additional real-time corrections of satellite data.
The Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) encompasses three major satellite networks
operated by the USA (GPS), Russia (GLONASS), and the EU (Galileo). When utilized within the
GNSS framework, it is possible to have reliable satellite coverage anywhere in the world, a
requirement for accurate location data. GNSS functions via one-way communication of radio waves
from the satellites to a receiver that calculates distance from the satellite to the receiver. Distance
calculations based on the speed of the signal (c) and the time differential (Δt) between the signal being
sent then picked up by the receiver (D = c • Δt). To triangulate the position of the observer, this
calculation must be solved by multiple satellites. This results in positional data that is generally
accurate to 10m in the horizontal, at best. The reason for the inaccuracy is that the atmosphere
interferes with the speed of the signal resulting in a delay. It is possible to achieve more accurate data
by correcting for this differential delay using established ground-based networks.
Differential correction using Virtual Reference Station (VRS) utilizes base stations at control
monuments that continually collect positional data generating an average position that can be used to
determine the degree of atmospheric delay. When used in a network of base stations, the average
atmospheric delay for an area can be determined. The regional delay, or differential, can be
communicated to a handheld unit over an internet connection, thereby eliminating the effect of
atmospheric delay. Positions can then be determined to centimeter-scale accuracy, a requirement of
mapping outcrop scale features. MNDOT has implemented a statewide Virtual Reference Station
(VRS) network with over 140 base stations over control monuments whose purpose is to correct for the
atmospheric delay and generate high-accuracy GNSS datasets.2 This network is free to use for anyone.
Figure 1 below is a case study from South Pass, Wyoming where a trench was mapped at 1:250
using a Trimble Geo 7x. The trench this study area contained auriferous quartz veins and barren quartz
veins anastomose along a pair of sheared faults separated by several meters and are connected ladder
veinlets. Without the decimeter-scale accuracy of the corrected positional data, it would not have been
possible to accurately locate the geology, geochemical samples, or structural data within the trench and
the adjacent outcrops. Such an approach could be extremely useful in visualizing complex intrusive
outcrops in the Duluth Complex, tracing of the contacts of lava flows and interflow sediments along
the shore of Lake Superior, and veins and stockworks within Archean rocks.

77

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1
Figure 1. Trench Mapping and Sampling for Relevant Gold Corp at the Golden Buffalo Project - South Pass,
Wyoming. by Big Rock Exploration LLC

References
GNSS Timing and Atmospheric Interferences: How GNSS Is Solving These Problems. Global GPS Systems, 24
Jan. 2023, https://globalgpssystems.com/gnss/gnss-timing-and-atmospheric-interferences-how-gnss-issolving-these-problems/.
Land Management. MnCORS Network - Land Management - MnDOT,
https://www.dot.state.mn.us/surveying/cors/index.html.
Understanding RTK VRS Networks. Global GPS Systems, 24 Jan. 2023,
https://globalgpssystems.com/gnss/understanding-rtk-vrs-networks/.

78

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Geology and geochemistry of the basal North Shore Volcanic Group and Midcontinent Rift
Intrusive Supersuite, Cook County, MN, USA
SEVERSON, Allison R.1, NOWARIAK, Eric S.1, LARSON, Phillip C.2
1

Minnesota Geological Survey, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Minnesota-Twin
Cities, MN, USA
2
Vesterheim Geoscience PLC, Duluth, MN, USA

Northeastern Minnesota preserves complex relationships between Mesoproterozoic volcanic
flows and comagmatic gabbroic to granophyric intrusive rocks associated with the ca. 1.1 Ga
Midcontinent Rift System (MRS), as well as Paleoproterozoic metasedimentary rocks. Over the last
two years, bedrock mapping of nine 1:24K quadrangles in northeastern-most Minnesota (Fig. 1) has
elucidated some of these relationships between the Rove Formation, Logan sills, Puckwunge
sandstone, reversely polarized North Shore Volcanic Group (NSVG), and gabbroic and granophyric
rocks of the Midcontinent Rift Intrusive Supersuite. Results described herein are based on field and
thin section observations, and associated geochemistry, which will be compiled and published as part
of the Minnesota Geological Survey’s County Geologic Atlas Series.
Volcanic rocks lie conformably on top of the Puckwunge sandstone in the eastern map area
(Fig. 1). In the western part of the map area, the Crocodile Lake Gabbro (CLG) is in contact with the
Paleoproterozoic Rove Formation to the north, with the Rove being highly deformed, metamorphosed,
and partially melted proximal to the contact. South of the CLG, is the coeval Cucumber Lake
Granophyre (CLGp), which is in contact with the Grand Portage Lavas (GPL), Esther Lake Lavas
(EL), and Hovland Lavas (HL) of the NSVG to the south.
The NSVG youngs from north to south, and transitions from mafic to more felsic from north to
south which is most evident in the transition from the GPL to the overlying EL (Fig. 1).
Geochemically, this sequence evolves along a strong tholeiitic trend (Fig. 2). Lithologic and
geochemical patterns suggest the &gt;1108 Ma GPL, EL, and HL were likely sourced from a long-lived,
evolving magma. The basal GPL amygdaloidal basalt preserves 5 - 75 cm long pillows with somewhat
enigmatic siliceous, carbonate, and glassy selvages that also preserve hyaloclastic and perlitic textures.
These flows are geochemically primitive and contain abundant altered olivine, pyroxene, and oxide
phenocrysts. The pillowed basal unit grades into thick, massive to ophitic basaltic and basaltic andesite
flows of the EL. The transition from the GPL is also marked by a change in trace element geochemistry
from an enriched mantle to a more depleted mantle signature. The base of the HL consists of a package
of strongly glomeroporphyritic, amygdaloidal andesites and basaltic andesites transitioning to
porphyritic rhyolite and icelandite. Porphyritic basaltic to andesitic lavas in the westernmost map area
also preserve pillow structures, but these flows vary in thickness and extent, suggesting aqueous subbasins within the HL volcanic basin. Intercalated throughout the HL are abundant dikes and sills of
ultraphyric diabase containing 15-60% of &gt;5 mm plagioclase phenocrysts within a basaltic, locally
ophitic very fine-grained groundmass. These intrusives are interpreted to be hypabyssal and locally cut
across volcanic stratigraphy. Though these dikes and sills are endemic to the area, temporal
relationships between these intrusives, the surrounding volcanics, and the Brule-Hovland Gabbro are
unknown.
The ca. 1107 Ma CLG and the CLGp comprise some of the earliest known rocks within the
intrusive Duluth Complex. Basal gabbroic cumulates of the CLG grade into dioritic-monzonitic rocks
of the Crocodile Lake “Mixed Zone”, below the contact with the overlying CLGp. This Mixed Zone is
typified by complex dikes and plagioclase cumulate rocks, rich in micrographic interstitial felsic
mesostasis. Abundant quench textures and pegmatitic zones, as well as distinct geochemical patterns

79

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

suggest the Mixed Zone is a “cap” to the CLG rather than a gradual transition to the CLGp. REE
patterns and Eu anomalies within these coeval intrusives suggest liquid immiscibility between mafic
and felsic components of the source magma may have played a significant role in their genesis (Fig 3.).
Other intrusive gabbroic rocks include the texturally varied Brule-Hovland Gabbro, which cross-cuts
the HL.
Figure 1. Regional
geologic map of
northeastern Cook
County, MN. Ongoing
partially USGS-funded
STATEMAP projects
outlined with bold
lines. Generalized
geology is from MGS
miscellaneous map
series M-119.

Figure 2. AFM diagram of volcanic rocks.

Figure 3. Chondrite-normalized REE diagram
of Crocodile Lake and Cucumber Lake
intrusives, based on Sun and McDonough, 1989.

80

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Exploring the application of full tensor magnetic gradiometry to better define conduit type NiCu-PGE targets
SMITH, Jennifer1, TSCHIRHART, Victoria1, TUCK, Loughlin2, ENKIN, Randy1, and ROYGUAY, David3
1

Geological Survey of Canada, 601 Booth Street, Ottawa, ON K1A 0E8
Defence Research and Development Canada, Ottawa
3
SBQuantum,Sherbrooke, QC, J1H 1Z1
2

Magmatic Ni-Cu-PGE sulfide deposits are often associated with small conduit- or chonolithtype intrusions. These deposit types are notoriously challenging exploration targets owing to: 1) their
small size, 2) lack of alteration halo or distal footprint, 3) complex and variable morphology, and 4)
unpredictable depositional sites of sulfides (Barnes 2023). Furthermore, mafic rocks commonly retain
significant remanent magnetization which, if not detected, can result in inaccurate modelling and
targeting of these deposits. With a significant increase in the global production of Ni forecasted for the
transition to a low-CO2 future, these deposit types will likely become an increasingly important source
of Ni, both in Canada and globally. With fewer new discoveries being made, despite increased
exploration expenditure, new methods and knowledge are needed to facilitate successful exploration at
the regional and deposit scales and to ultimately secure a stable Ni supply.
Historically, exploration has traditionally relied on geophysics (gravity, magnetics,
electromagnetics), to identify potential mafic and/or ultramafic host intrusions, with airborne magnetic
surveying dominating due to its low cost, and ability to survey vast areas rapidly and
systemically. Although there is incredible value in Total Magnetic Intensity (TMI) data there are
numerous limitations to this approach (e.g. non-uniqueness, scalar measurements, can’t distinguish
remanence from induced field). The full tensor magnetic gradiometry (FTMG) technique, which
measures the full magnetic gradient tensor at each measurement point, overcomes many of the
limitations of TMI data. Advantages of FTMG include: (a) superior resolution of near-field sources, (b)
enhanced detectability at low-magnetic latitudes, (c) automatic removal of the regional field and
diurnal variations, and (d) additional target information from a single flight line. FTMG can provide a
more complete picture of the subsurface magnetic properties and improved discrimination between
magnetic sources. This leads to improved imaging of complex structures, more accurate models of the
subsurface, and improved understanding of geological processes.
While quantum FTMG is in use by industry, practicalities relating to the system hamper its
widespread deployment. Currently, existing quantum FTMG relies on SQUID technology for large
scale airborne surveying. The application of SQUID technology has shown great benefits due to the
enhanced sensitivity and fidelity of the system. However, these systems typically weigh ~270 kg and
require extremely low sensor temperatures, making them impractical for ground and uncrewed aerial
vehicle (UAV) surveying. These limitations have warranted the development of a complimentary
ground and UAV quantum FTMG system such as the diamond-based quantum magnetometer in
development by SBQuantum. This rugged and compact system leverages quantum properties of
nitrogen vacancy (NV) centres in a diamond to provide highly accurate, quantum-based FTMG
measurements.
The Geological Survey of Canada (GSC) is in the early stages of establishing a new
collaborative partnership with Defence Research and Development Canada (DRDC), SBQuantum, and
numerous other industry and academic partners. The aim of this partnership and wider project is to derisk quantum magnetic gradiometer use across Canada with the purpose of facilitating widespread
adoption by the Canadian exploration industry, academia and the military. This will be achieved

81

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

through the field testing and validation of the ruggedized quantum FTMG system developed by
SBQuantum. As part of this project, SBQ’s quantum magnetic gradiometer will be deployed on several
Canadian critical mineral systems, allowing comparison with traditional airborne and/or ground total
magnetic field systems and non-quantum FTMG systems. As part of this, a detailed study will be
undertaken on the Ni-Cu-PGE bearing Escape Lake intrusion in northern Ontario, which presents as a
complicated magnetic signal that is strongly affected by remanent magnetization and associated with
the 1.1. Ga Midcontinent Rift. With conventional total field geophysical methods unable to address the
challenging features which are often characteristic of small, conduit-type magmatic sulfide deposits,
this case study will explore the use and application of quantum FTMG in the context of improving
targeting of conduit type Ni-Cu-PGE deposits.
This study will be the first to generate publicly accessible quantum FTMG data over critical
mineral deposits in Canada and will act to improve exploration capacity by validating tools useful for
critical metal deposits whose complex geophysical expressions are not easily resolved by traditional
geophysical techniques. The increased accuracy of these quantum technologies, which map the
magnetic field at an enhanced scale, provide the ability to resolve the complexity of these deposits.
Providing enhanced tools to facilitate exploration and delineate deposits better will aid with the
identification of new Canadian deposits of critical metals needed for the lower carbon and digitized
economy supply chain. This will aid Canada’s Critical Minerals Strategy set forth in the 2022 Federal
Budget.
References
Barnes, S.J., 2023. Lithogeochemistry in exploration for intrusion-hosted magmatic Ni–Cu–Co
deposits. Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis, 23(1): geochem2022-025.

82

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Record of an Ancient Meteorite Impact Buried Beneath the Twin Cities, MN
STEENBERG, Julia R. 1, and RUNKEL, Anthony C. 1
1

Minnesota Geological Survey, 2606 W. Territorial Rd., St. Paul, MN 55114 USA

An impact crater is proposed in the southeast part of the Twin Cities metropolitan area, 11
miles (18 km) south of St. Paul within an area with significant residential and industrial development.
The crater lies within a predictable package of Paleozoic sedimentary rocks in the Twin Cities
structural basin where near its center includes 14 formations with a total thickness of about 1,200 feet
(365 meters) (Mossler, 2008; Mossler, 2013). Paleozoic formations are characterized by widespread
layers of sandstone, shale, and carbonate deposited in shallow seas during the Cambrian and
Ordovician Periods (500 to 450 Ma). They are underlain by Mesoproterozoic (1,100 Ma) sedimentary
and volcanic rocks of the Keweenawan Supergroup associated with the Midcontinent Rift.
Paleozoic rocks in this area have limited exposure along the Mississippi and Minnesota River
bluffs, roadcuts, and rock quarries, but elsewhere are buried beneath a variable thickness of Quaternary
glacial sediments. Without extensive exposures, a variety of subsurface datasets are used for bedrock
mapping including core, drill cuttings, geophysical logs, passive seismic stations, and driller’s
descriptions from water well records. While mapping the bedrock geology of Dakota County, an area
of discordance with the surrounding Paleozoic stratigraphy was observed in geologic cuttings samples,
and corroborated with additional cuttings, geophysical logs and water wells driller’s records. Drill
samples reveal as much as 575 ft (175 m) of anomalous sandstone, siltstone and shale with some
intervals containing abundant cloudy and fractured quartz sand grains. The samples are from an area
entirely buried by several hundred feet of glacial deposits within a deep buried channel carved into the
surrounding bedrock layers adjacent to the Mississippi River near the city of Inver Grove Heights.
Beneath the anomalous sequence of strata and in additional samples near the site, local Cambrian and
Mesoproterozoic stratigraphic layers are recognized but are out of the usual stratigraphic order and in
places entirely overturned.
Microscopic investigation has resulted in the detection of shocked metamorphic features
including planar deformation features (PDFs) in the fractured quartz grains, confirming the impact
origin of this structure (Fig. 1). As such, this area is referred to as the Pine Bend Impact Structure
(PBIS) (Steenberg, in prep). Based on the available geologic data near the site and current models of
crater formation from similarly sized structures in layered sedimentary target rocks we interpret this
feature to be a complex crater, approximately 4 km wide with an apparent central uplift and possible
terraced rims (Grieve, 1991). The total disturbed area may be as large as 9 square miles (23 square
kilometers). Based on published crater- to- meteor size ratios, the size of the meteor is estimated to be
several hundred meters in diameter (Grieve and Pilkington, 1996). Due to its location, within a buried
bedrock valley, the upper sequence of this structure has been removed by erosion, making it difficult to
precisely date the impact. It may be as old as Late Cambrian (~490 Ma), having occurred during or
after deposition of the Jordan Sandstone based on the age of the overturned strata and the apparent lack
of carbonate from the overlying Prairie du Chien Group in the samples. We have also collected a
pebble with PDFs from strata approximating the Jordan-Prairie du Chien contact in an outcrop about
10 kilometers from the crater. If this pebble is ejecta from the PBIS, it also supports a latest Cambrian
or very Early Ordovician age of impact. This would make the PBIS older than known craters in
surrounding states which are Ordovician and younger (French et al., 2004; French et al., 2018).
The dynamic nature of our planet has left us with a small sample size of terrestrial impact
structures, nearly 200 confirmed impact structures are currently recognized on Earth (Gottwald et al.,
2020). Although Minnesota has known impact debris from the Sudbury Impact Structure, this would
83

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

be Minnesota’s first documented crater, giving us a rare opportunity to better understand the important
geological and biological effects of meteorite impact events on Earth.

Figure 1. Photomicrographs of mounted quartz sandstone rock chips from a cuttings sample, sample depth is
525 feet. A- Two sets of planar features and feather features. B- One set of decorated planar deformation
features. Photos by L. Ferriere, Natural History Museum, Vienna, Austria.

References
French, B.M., Cordua, W., and Plescia, J.B., 2004. The Rock Elm meteorite impact structure, Wisconsin:
Geology and shock-metamorphic effects in quartz. GSA Bulletin, 116: 200–218.
French, B.M., McKay, R.M., Liu, H.P., Briggs, D.E.G., and Witzke, B.J., 2018. The Decorah structure,
northeastern Iowa: Geology and evidence for formation by meteorite impact. GSA Bulletin, 130: 2062–
2086.
Gottwald, M., Kenkmann, T., and Reimold, W.U., 2020. Terrestrial impact structure. In: TheTan-DEM-X
Atlas, Part 1 and 2, Friedrich Pfeil, Munich, Germany. Verlag Dr.
Grieve, R.A.F., 1991. Terrestrial impact: the record in the rocks. Meteoritics, 26: 175–194.
Grieve, R.A.F., and Pilkington, M., 1996. The signature of terrestrial impacts. AGSO Journal of
Australian Geology and Geophysics, 16: 399-420.
Mossler, J.H., 2008. Paleozoic stratigraphic nomenclature for Minnesota. Minnesota Geological Survey
Report of Investigations RI-65: 76, 1 pl.
Mossler, J.H., 2013. Bedrock geology of the Twin Cities ten-county metropolitan area, Minnesota.
Minnesota Geological Survey Miscellaneous Map M-194: scale 1:125,000.
Steenberg, J.R., in prep. Bedrock geology, pl. 2 of Steenberg, J.R., project manager, Geologic atlas of
Dakota County, Minnesota. Minnesota Geological Survey County Atlas C-57: 6 pls., scale 1:100,000.

84

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Magma Recharge and the distribution of Copper and Nickel in the Keweenaw Large Igneous
Province
STEINER, Alex1, PETERSON, Dean1, SWEET, Gabriel1
1

Big Rock Exploration, 2505 W. Superior Street, Duluth, MN 55806.

The Keweenaw large igneous province (LIP) was formed over a protracted period of
magmatism that emplaced Cu-Ni-PGE bearing mafic to ultramafic intrusions along the arcuate MidContinent Rift system, thus creating one of the largest critical mineral resources in North America. The
magmatic activity associated with the Keweenaw LIP has been divided into a series of
tectonomagmatic stages extending from at least 1115 Ma to 1080 Ma. Of the six stages of formation,
significant orthomagmatic sulfide deposits were formed during Stage 1 (plume impact stage; 11151110 Ma), Stage 2 (early stage; 1110-1105 Ma), and the Stage 4 (the main stage; 1101-1094 Ma).
Stage 1 and 2 intrusions in the Minnesota and Michigan are Ni-rich while those of stage 4 in the Duluth
Complex are considerably more copper-rich. Here we discuss a potential mechanism of copper
enrichment via magma recharge-evacuation-fractional crystallization (REAFC) where the parameters
of differentiation are based upon a conceptual model for the formation of continental LIPs.
It has been recognized that continental LIPs form in a series of phases that reflect the conditions
of magma generation and differentiation prior to the eruption and eventual formation of continental
flood basalts (Jerram and Widdowson, 2005). Early phases of LIP formation are dominated by more
primitive lavas, that pass through a magma plumbing system that is immature and inefficient at
differentiating magmas (Steiner et al., 2021). However, the magmatic plumbing system of the most
voluminous eruptive phase is mature and capable of differentiating magmas to a considerable degree.
The key difference between these two periods is the amount of magma recharge, which has a profound
impact on the geochemical composition of the resultant magmas where compatible elements become
buffered and incompatible elements become enriched (Lee, Lee and Wu, 2014).
The relative Cu-enrichment of mineralized Stage 4 intrusions compared to earlier Ni-rich Stage
1 and 2 intrusions may be explained by several mechanisms. Mechanisms such as sulfide upgrading
and high-R factors have been recognized as important contributors to Cu-rich mineralization (Peterson
and Boerst, 2013). However, recent chemo-stratigraphic examinations of Keweenaw LIP lavas from
the Keweenaw Peninsula have demonstrated that REAFC processes are controlling erupted lava
compositions during the eruption of Stage 4 lavas (Davis et al., 2021). To test the effect of REAFC on
the proportions of Ni and Cu that may be available to form an orthomagmatic sulfide deposit, REAFC
geochemical modelling utilizing the equations of Lee et al. (2014) were performed on a generalized
basaltic composition (MgO = 10%, Ni = 250 ppm, Cu = 116 ppm (Prinz, 1967)). Figure 1 demonstrates
the liquid line of descent for Cu, Ni, and MgO during REAFC differentiation and pure fractional
crystallization. During pure fractional crystallization, MgO and Ni behave compatibly, gradually
decreasing in concentration with continued differentiation while Cu gradually increases. However,
during REAFC differentiation, both Ni and MgO become buffered while Cu becomes decoupled,
increasing in concentration while Ni and MgO remain the constant. The consequence of this
decoupling is that Cu can become considerably enriched relative to Ni, thereby producing a magma
that contains greater than anticipated Cu concentrations compared to pure fractional crystallization.
When this Cu-enriched magma reaches sulfur saturation, the subsequent sulfide magma would have a
greater abundance of Cu to scavenge, resulting in the Cu-rich sulfide deposits observed in in the Duluth
Complex.

85

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Figure 1. REAFC calculations (Lee, Lee and Wu, 2014) for a generic basalt. Model parameters are
recharge/evacuation = 0.43, assimilation = 0.07, fractional crystallization = 0.5. Crystallizing phases were
olivine (25%), plagioclase (65%), and clinopyroxene (15%).

References
Davis, W.R. et al., 2021. Geochemical, petrographic, and stratigraphic analyses of the Portage Lake Volcanics of
the Keweenawan CFBP: implications for the evolution of main stage volcanism in continental flood
basalt provinces, Geological Society, London, Special Publications: SP518-2020–221.
doi:10.1144/SP518-2020-221.
Jerram, D.A. and Widdowson, M., 2005. The anatomy of Continental Flood Basalt Provinces: geological
constraints on the processes and products of flood volcanism, Lithos, 79(3): 385–405.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2004.09.009.
Lee, C.-T.A., Lee, T.C. and Wu, C.-T., 2014. Modeling the compositional evolution of recharging, evacuating,
and fractionating (REFC) magma chambers: Implications for differentiation of arc magmas, Geochimica
et Cosmochimica Acta, 143: 8–22. doi:10.1016/j.gca.2013.08.009.
Peterson, D. and Boerst, K., 2013. Twin Metals Minnesota’s Maturi Deposit, in Cu-Ni-PGE Deposits of the
Duluth Complex, Geology and Development: Precambrian Research Center, Workshop on the Copper,
Nickel, Platinum Group Element Deposits of the Lake Superior RegionOctober 6-13, 2013, Field Trip
Guidebook: 45–57.
Prinz, M., 1967. Geochemistry of basaltic rocks: trace elements. In’, Basalts, 1: 271–333.
Steiner, R.A. et al., 2021. Initial Cenozoic Magmatic Activity in East Africa: New Geochemical Constraints on
Magma Distribution within the Eocene Continental Flood Basalt Province, Geological Society, London,
Special Publications: SP518-2020–262. doi:10.1144/SP518-2020-262.

86

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Relay zones in weakly folded and faulted Paleozoic strata and their role localizing Mississippi
Valley-type mineralization, southwest Wisconsin, USA
STEWART, Eric1, FITZPATRICK, William1, and AMES, Carsyn1
1

Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey, 3817 Mineral Point Road, Madison, WI, 53705

Folds and faults have long been known to play a role in localizing Mississippi Valley-type zinclead mineralization in the historic Upper Mississippi Valley base metal district (UMVD) of
southwestern Wisconsin. However, a simple correlation between mineralization and map-scale
structures is overly simplistic since it does not explain why mineralization often occurs only along
isolated portions of folds and faults. New 1:24,000 scale geologic mapping as part of the United States
Geological Survey Earth Mapping Resources Initiative (EarthMRI) in the Stitzer region of the northern
UMVD was initiated to improve understanding of the relationship between folds, faults, and
mineralization.
The Mineral Point anticline is the dominant structure in the Stitzer area (Figure 1). It is an
asymmetric, northwest-trending gentle fold with a maximum amplitude of around 180 feet. The fold
deforms platform Cambrian and Ordovician siliciclastic and carbonate strata, and contains several
doubly plunging segments. Structural highs along the fold (Figure 1) correspond to aeromagnetic
anomalies (Daniels and Snyder, 2002). Deformation bands in sandstone are common along the more
steeply dipping northeast limb of the fold.
The asymmetry of the fold and the correspondence of structural highs to aeromagnetic
anomalies suggest the Mineral Point anticline is a forced fold, forming from thrust reactivation of a
buried Precambrian fault. At depth near the Precambrian basement, the segments of the Mineral Point
anticline probably transition into fault segments. Simple 2D kinematic modeling suggests contraction is
highest near the base of the overlying folded section. If deformation bands accommodate some of the
contraction in the basal siliciclastic sequence, then significant numbers of deformation bands are
probably present low in the Paleozoic section.
Mineralization and historic mining are heavily concentrated where two segments of the Mineral
Point anticline overlap, and a third smaller anticline terminates (Figure 1). The area between the
overlapping segments of the Mineral Point anticline is interpreted to represent the area above a relay
zone between thrust segments. As mineralizing brines approached the Mineral Point anticline from the
south, flow was probably altered due to the abundance of impermeable deformation bands. Flow
conduits developed in the relay zone between fault-fold segments, focusing the brines upward and
concentrating mineralization.
References
Carlson, J., 1961. Geology of the Montfort and Linden Quadrangles, Wisconsin, in Geology of parts of
the Upper Mississippi Valley zinc-lead district. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1123–B: 95–
138, 2 pls.
Daniels, D. and Snyder, S., 2002. Wisconsin aeromagnetic and gravity maps and data; a web site for
distribution of data. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2002-493.
Taylor, A., 1964. Geology of the Rewey and Mifflin quadrangles, Wisconsin, in Geology of parts of the
Upper Mississippi Valley zinc-lead district. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1123–F: 279–360, 2
pls.
West, W., 1971. Geologic map of the Ellenboro quadrangle, Grant County, Wisconsin. U.S. Geological
Survey Geologic Quadrangle Series 959: 1 pl.

87

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Figure 1. Simplified structure contour map of the base of the Ordovician Platteville Formation. Mines are
concentrated in the SE portion of the map near the junction of three anticline-syncline pairs. Additional data
sources include the Mineral Development Atlas, Carlson (1961), West (1971), and Taylor (1964).

88

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 1

Deciphering the metamorphic and deformational history of the Hardwood Gneiss, Felch District,
Michigan: Anomalously high-pressure rocks in the heart of the Penokean orogen
TAYLOR, Madeline1 and BJØRNERUD, Marcia1
1

Geosciences Department, Lawrence University, Appleton Wisconsin 54911

The Neoarchean Hardwood Gneiss is a mafic granulite with minor metapelites, exposed over an
area of about 6 km2 between the towns of Foster City and Hardwood, MI, 8 km southeast of the eastern
end of the Paleoproterozoic “Felch Trough” (James, 1961). The area lies at the heart of the ca. 1.85 Ga
Penokean orogen and within the superimposed Yavapai-age (1.75 Ga) ‘gneiss dome corridor’ (Drenth et
al., 2021). In contrast to the primarily felsic gneisses of the region, which contain inherited zircons with
ages of 3.8-3.5 Ga, the Hardwood Gneiss is mostly mafic and yields no zircons older than 2.7 Ga (Ayuso
et al., 2018). Zircons from the Hardwood also record a period of growth between 2.2 and 1.9 Ga, which
does not correspond to any known thermal events in the region (Cannon et al., 2018). Most notably, the
Hardwood experienced much higher-pressure metamorphism than any other rocks in the region. Using a
variety of geo- thermometers and -barometers, Peterson &amp; Geiger (1990) concluded that the mafic rocks
underwent two distinct metamorphic events, the first, ‘M1’, at 8.2-11.6 kbar and ca. 770°C, and a
another, ‘M2’, at 6-10 kbar and 610-740°C, while the pelites experienced only the second.
Maximum pressure estimates for the nearby Peavy metamorphic node, in contrast, are &lt; 5 kbar
(Attoh and Klasner, 1989). It is difficult to explain how the Hardwood complex, with its distinctive
geochronologic and metamorphic signatures, came to be incorporated into the Penokean orogen. This
study presents detailed field, petrographic and microstructural observations that may help constrain the
origin and history of the Hardwood Gneiss.
Peterson &amp; Geiger (1990) identified three compositional units in the Hardwood: metabasite,
amphibolite, and metapelite. The metapelite, a garnet-biotite schist, is clearly a distinct unit, exposed in
the western end of the outcrop area, but our work suggests that the amphibolite and metabasite are both
part of a heterogeneous igneous complex that included anorthositic, gabbroic and noritic horizons –
perhaps a Neoarchean layered mafic intrusion. If this complex was of mantle origin, it could explain the
absence of older Archean zircons.
In addition to their compositional variety, the metamafic rocks display a wide range of
metamorphic and deformational textures. In outcrop, they have a strong, apparently mylonitic, foliation
that dips mainly NE but is somewhat variable in orientation and may be folded. In thin section,
microstructures show that a combination of brittle and plastic deformation mechanisms contributed to
the intense fabric. In plagioclase-rich horizons, the feldspars tend to be the largest crystals, apparently
surviving as porphyroclasts. These show both cataclastic fracturing and highly distorted twins, a
combination usually interpreted to indicate that deformation took place at mid-crustal depths and
temperatures of ca. 500°, the brittle-plastic transition for feldspars.
These intensely deformed rocks show evidence of only limited, and heterogeneous, recrystallization, either dynamic or static. This suggests that deformation was brief and that the rocks cooled
quickly after deformation ceased.
Garnet-bearing horizons within the mafic complex display especially remarkable textures.
Clusters and trains of garnets, apparently broken -- and in some cases, shattered – are engulfed in a very
fine-grained (&lt;0.01mm) feldspathic matrix. The unusual shapes of some of the garnet fragments –
including crescents and splinters – may indicate seismic fragmentation (Hawemann et al., 2019). The
largest garnet fragments tend to have inclusion-free cores and ‘spongy’ poikilitic rims, while smaller
fragments are commonly poikilitic throughout, with a notable

89

�concentration of opaque inclusions. In some cases, the edges of the small garnet fragments are so diffuse
that they cannot be seen in plane light. Peterson &amp; Geiger (1990) interpreted the poikilitic rims and small
inclusion-rich garnets as records of a second metamorphic event, but we speculate that these are
resorption features rather than overgrowths. ‘Spongy’ or ‘amoeboid’ poikilitic rims are known to form
around granulite-facies garnets during the introduction of external fluids (Baxter et al., 2017), or when
garnets are engulfed in pseudotachylyte melts (Austrheim et al., 1996). Because they form under
disequilibrium conditions, such resorption rims are unlikely to yield reliable P-T results, and this could
account for the large range of P-T conditions Peterson &amp; Geiger (1990) suggested for their ‘M2’
metamorphic event. Given the shattered nature of the Hardwood garnets, we tentatively speculate that
the very fine-grained material in which they occur could represent coseismic fault rock – either
(devitrified) pseudotachylyte or/and ultracataclasite flushed with seismically-pumped fluids.
In this interpretation, the Hardwood complex would have experienced only one high-P/T
metamorphic event, followed by mylonitization, cataclasis and seismic faulting. If the quasi- brittle
deformation of the feldspars – which seems to be part of the same event that shattered the garnets -- can
be interpreted as occurring at ca. 500°, the deformation would have had to happen well after the
granulite-facies event. However, feldspar plasticity can be suppressed in very dry rocks (e.g. Bjørnerud
&amp; Austrheim, 2004), so it is also possible that the seismic event(s) occurred under high-temperature
conditions and possibly soon after the granulite facies metamorphism that formed the inclusion-free
garnets. Whether any of these events occurred during the Penokean orogeny remains unclear. One
possible constraint on the timing of the main foliation-forming event comes from the occurrence of an
unfoliated mafic within a feldspathic layer in the Hardwood Gneiss on the south bank of the East Branch
of the Sturgeon River. If this sill could be dated or linked geochemically with known mafic magmatic
units in the region, this would establish the youngest possible deformation age for the Hardwood Gneiss.
The Hardwood pelites are classic garnet-biotite schists, with asymmetric quartz-vein boudins and
garnet ‘tails’ that suggest normal-sense shear along the NE-dipping foliation. Low- angle normal
faulting would be the most efficient way to juxtapose deep crustal rocks like the Hardwood Gneiss
against the shallower units that surround it. But the pelites, which represent supracrustal material and
record amphibolite rather granulite-facies conditions, lie on the western edge of the Hardwood outcrop
area, so top-to-the-east normal slip does not help explain how the high-pressure mafic units were brought
up from depth. The area between the Felch Trough and the Niagara Fault is among the most structurally
complex of parts of the Penokean/Yavapai orogen, with many anastomosing faults of different
generations (Drenth et al., 2021). The orientations of structures within the Hardwood complex have
almost certainly been altered since their formation by later faulting and tilting. For now, the Hardwood
Gneiss remains a micro- terrane of unknown provenance within the Penokean orogen.
References
Attoh, K. &amp; Klasner, J., 1989. Tectonics 8: 911-933.
Austrheim, H., Erambert, M., &amp; Boundy, T., 1996. Earth &amp; Planetary Science Letters 139: 223-238.
Ayuso, R., et al., 2018. Institute on Lake Superior Geology Proceedings 64: 7-8.
Baxter, E., Caddick, M., &amp; Dragovic, B., 2017. Rev. Min. &amp; Geochem. 83, 469–533. doi:
10.2138/rmg.2017.83.15
Bjørnerud, M. &amp; Austrheim, H., 2004. Geology 32: 765-768.
Cannon, W.F., Schulz, K., Ayuso, R. &amp; Mroz, T., 2018. ILSG Field Trip Guidebook 64: 1-38.
Drenth, B., Cannon, W.F., Schulz, K., &amp; Ayuso, R., 2021. Precam. Res. 369. doi:
10.1016/j.precamres.2021.106205
Hawemann, F., et al., 2019. Solid Earth 10: 1635-1649. doi: 10.5194/se-10-1635-2019
James, H., Clark, L., Lamey, C., &amp; Pettijohn, F., 1961. USGS Professional Paper 310.
Peterson, J. &amp; Geiger, C., 1990. Journal of Geology 98: 273-281.
90

�Alteration Geochemistry Characterization and 3D Modeling of the Back Forty Volcanogenic
Massive Sulfide (VMS) Deposit Stephenson, Upper Peninsula of Michigan, USA
UPTON, Margaret1, MOOERS, Howard1, LARSON, Phillip2
1

Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Minnesota - Duluth, 1114 Kirby Drive, 102
Heller Hall, Duluth, MN 55812
2
Cleveland-Cliffs Hibbing Taconite Company. Hibbing, MN 55746

The Gold Resources Back Forty zinc-and-gold-rich polymetallic volcanogenic massive sulfide
(VMS) deposit is located near Stephenson in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. In general, VMS
deposits are created in submarine environments when heated seawater circulates through oceanic crust
and precipitates base and precious metals at or near the seafloor due to both cooling and neutralization
of the ore fluid. In the process, host rock mineralogy and geochemistry are modified by both
downwelling and upwelling hydrothermal fluids, which produces distinct alteration mineral
assemblages and metasomatic changes within the host rock (Shanks and Thurston, 2012; Galley et al.,
2007). Alteration mineral assemblages and their spatial distribution can be used to unravel the
geochemical evolution of the system and help locate mineralization. The relationship between host
rock and alteration mineralogy is not well understood or documented at the Back Forty Deposit but
essential for understanding its genesis.
This study 1) identifies the alteration mineral assemblage present at the Back Forty Deposit
using lithogeochemistry results; 2) calculates the elemental gains and losses associated with
hydrothermal alteration; 3) develops a working method for immediate qualitative alteration values from
core logging; and 4) creates a model of the alteration zonation in coordination with the existing
stratigraphy and mineralization.
Core from nine drill holes (~ 2,950 meters), were logged to observationally identify alteration
mineral assemblages, intensity, and their textural characteristics. The deposit, hosted in felsic
pyroclastic rocks, shows mostly sericite alteration, which was used to establish an alteration intensity
scale of 1-4 (1: weak, 5: intense). Major alteration mineral assemblages observed were sericite ± silica
± chlorite. Sericite alteration is pervasive throughout the deposit (2.5-3.5) with silica alteration
intensity ranging from 1-2 and a few areas of silica flooding (3.5-4.5). Weak to moderate (1.5-2.5)
chlorite alteration occurred throughout the deposit within the host rhyolite crystal tuff units as spotty
chlorite coarse-grained agglomerations.
Lithogeochemistry (1,300 count) was evaluated using the alteration box plot (Large et al., 2001)
and the isocon mass balance method (Grant, 1986) (fig. 1), which are essential in quantitative
assessment of chemical changes associated with alteration mineral assemblages and their spatial
distribution, and the identification of hydrothermal fluid pathways and mineralization vectors within
the deposit. In addition to using isocon results, alteration box plot results were modeled based on
sericite, chlorite, and total alteration. The production of cross sections based upon this numerical
modeling identify the alteration mineral zonation and its relative extent; this model is evaluated to
determine the relationship between massive sulfide mineralization and alteration intensity.
From these results, downhole core logging of alteration assigned numeric values (“quick log”)
is evaluated as a method to make fast-paced exploration decisions while awaiting longer lead-time
lithogeochemical results. By leveraging the process and combination of core logging for alteration
mineralogy and intensity paired with geochemical analysis, it may be possible to determine the origin
direction of hydrothermal fluid flow associated with mineral deposition and aid in future exploration
efforts to locate additional mineralization on the Back Forty Deposit property.
91

�Results from this study show the sericite alteration is most significantly related to Zn and Cu
mineralization, whereas the chlorite alteration is most associated with Ag, Au, and Pb. Distinctly
depleted species associated with sericite alteration include Ba, Sr, Na2O, Rb; with chlorite commonly
depleted in Br, Ba, Sr, Na2O.

Least v. Intense Sericite Alteration

50
45

45

Be

Au
Ge

Zn

Ga
U

Cu

40
35

More Altered

Cs

Dy

Ce
La

Ag
Ni

Cr

20
Tl

Hf

Sn
Sc
TiO2

10

MgO

As

Yb

Tl

Mo
Zr

Pr

Pr

Hg
Cd

U

Ir

15

Lu

Sc

10

Hf

V TiO2

Te

Ba

Tb

MnO

Br

Eu

Ga

Cs

Co

Nd

K2O

Be

In

20

Er
Ho
Y Cr2O3

Nb

Ge

y = 0.996x
R² = 0.996

Na2O

CaO

10

15

20

25

30

5

NdYb

Sm

Br
Rb

Gd
Dy Tm
Eu

Bi

Ba

AL2O3

K2O

35

40

45

50

Cr
Ta

Sr

y = 1.067x
R² = 0.999

Na2O

CaO
BaO

Re

0

Least Altered

Th

MgO

P2O5

0

Lu
SiO2

La Ce

Ir
Ho
Sr

5

Ni

Pb

In
Cd

0

25

BaO

Tb
V

Co

Bi

Gd
Er

Hg

Fe2O3

5

Rb

Pb

Y
MnO

Sb

Cu
Fe2O3

Sm

P2O5

15

Tm

Cr2O3 Ta

Se

W

30

W
Zr

25

Zn

35

SiO2
Nb

0

40

Th

30

Least v. Intense Chlorite Altered

50

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Least Altered

Figure 1. ISOCON plot of selected elements used to compare elemental gains and losses between least and most
altered samples. Isocon line of best fit is defined by relative immobile. Species above the isocon line are
enriched; below are depleted (Grant, 1986).

References
Aquila Resources (now Gold Resources), data current as of April 2021.
Galley, A., Hannington, M., Jonasson, I., 2007. Volcanogenic Massive Sulphide Deposits. Geological Survey of
Canada, Special Publication 5: 141-161.
Grant, J. A., 1986. The Isocon Diagram: A Simple Solution to Gresens' Equation for Metasomatic Alteration.
Economic Geology, v. 81: 1976-1982.
Large, R. R., Gemmell, B.J., Paulick, H., 2001. The Alteration Box Plot: A Simple Approach to Understanding
the Relationship between Alteration Mineralogy &amp; Lithogeochemistry Associated with Volcanic-Hosted
Massive Sulfide Deposits. Economic Geology, v. 96: 957-971.
Shanks, W.C.P., Thurston, R., 2012. Volcanogenic Massive Sulfide Occurrence Models. USGS Scientific
Investigations Report 2010–5070–C: 363.

92

�Summary of the 2022 ILSG Field Trip to Iceland
UPTON, Margaret1, LARSON, Phillip2, MACTAVISH, Allan3, HINZ, Peter4
1

Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Minnesota - Duluth, 1114 Kirby Drive, 102
Heller Hall, Duluth, MN 55812
2
Cleveland-Cliffs Hibbing Taconite Company. Hibbing, MN 55746
3
AGC GeoConsulting, 777 Red River Road, Thunder Bay, ON P7B IJ9
4
Retired, Ontario Ministry of Energy, Northern Development and Mines, Thunder Bay, ON

During Summer of 2022 (July 26-August 9), a group of 16 people set out to tour the diverse and
awe-inspiring geology of Iceland, led by ILSG representative geologists Phil Larson, Peter Hinz, and
Allan MacTavish. The 15 day trip held many surprises for all involved, including the worst stretch of
weather Phil has experienced in Iceland (of 11 visits!) as well as a once-in-a-lifetime experience to see
a volcanic eruption.
In addition to the trip leaders, the group of 16
people included 3.5 professional geologists, 1.5
graduate students, one retiree, one Goldich Medal
laureate, and 9 members of the Minnesota
Geological Society. Stops throughout the trip
focused on a wide range of topics:
• Volcanism, both historical and the 2021
Geldingadalir eruption;
Figure 1. Photo credit: Tom Hart
• Icelandic cuisine, lore, and the historical and
cultural evolution of the nation;
• Environmental geochemistry of subsurface and near-surface processes;
• Volcanic flows, igneous petrology for mineralogy and volcanic textures;
• Geothermal energy and its uses;
• Hydrology and hydrologic events related to glaciers and volcanics;
• Geomorphology as it relates to ecology, volcanics, and glaciers
• Wind, water, and glacial erosional features; glacial nomenclature
By special arrangement, the trip was scheduled to overlap with the onset of the 2022 Meradalir
eruption (fig.1). An advance party made a midnight scouting foray to the vent site before a Force 13
gale descended on the island.

93

�This presentation summarizes the highlights
from the trip (fig.2). Featured locations include
the Fagradalsfjall eruptions on the Reykjanes
Peninsula, the Vestmannaeyjar Islands, climbing
atop and viewing the Laki fissure from above,
trekking to the highlands to view Askja and its
pumice fields, the Jökulsárgljúfur canyon and
scablands, free roadside hákarl stands, being
lowered into a dormant magma chamber, a
sampling of geothermal pools, plus the many
epic waterfalls along the way!

Figure 2. Generalized map of the trip route.

94

�GEOHERITAGE AS AN EDUCATIONAL TOOL TO EXPLORE RELATIONSHIPS WITH
LAND AND WATER IN THE KEWEENAW
VYE, Erika1 and ROSE, William2
1

Great Lakes Research Center, Michigan Technological University, 1400 Townsend Drive, Houghton, MI 49931
Department of Geological and Mining Engineering and Sciences, Michigan Technological University, 1400
Townsend Drive, Houghton, MI 49931
2

Geoheritage is an evolving field in the United States that considers the protection, interpretation,
and management of geologic features with significant scientific, educational, cultural, or aesthetic
value (Brocx &amp; Semeniuk, 2007; Geological Society of America, 2017; National Park Service &amp;
American Geosciences Institute, 2015; Reynard &amp; Brilha, 2017). Geoheritage strongly emphasizes the
importance of the varied personal values people have for geologic features and the wide-ranging
relationships we have with landscapes. As such, geoheritage is an effective geoscience communication
tool affording place-based learning experiences that nurture our sense of place, deepen our Earth
science literacy, and inspire stewardship and protection of our place. This presentation explores
geoheritage education and outreach initiatives in Michigan’s Keweenaw Peninsula for both formal and
informal learning communities.
The Keweenaw Peninsula sits at the heart of the Midcontinent Rift and is renowned for the world’s
largest accessible native copper deposit and Lake Superior, the largest freshwater lake on Earth. These
geologic processes and features have fostered varied human relationships with the landscape, including
the oldest metal workings in the Western Hemisphere and the European immigration wave of 18401910 triggered by the Copper Boom. This intersection of deep time, industrial, and cultural heritage has
been the focus of teacher professional learning institutes and student internship experiences that
explore the compelling geoheritage of our place. These programs: a) focus on complex environmental
issues rooted in Earth systems processes of importance within the community, b) emphasize strong
community partnerships that bring together varied values and perspectives of our place; c) explore
other ways of knowing about the dynamic and interconnected geologic and human stories that serve as
the foundation of the landscape’s past, present, and future through equitable knowledge exchange, and
d) elevate Earth science literacy for educators and students by connecting the underpinning geology to
current environmental issues with wide-ranging impacts in our communities today such as cultural
identity, subsistence uses, recreation, and sense of place.
The geologic formations of the Midcontinent Rift are beautifully exposed in the Keweenaw for
researchers, teachers, students, and geotourists. As the Keweenaw shifts from an extractive industrial
economic past, geoheritage initiatives support a future based on education, conservation, and
sustainable tourism. Current initiatives in our community include a) the development of geotourism
opportunities - Keweenaw Geotours, b) strong partnerships with local conservation groups to maintain
access to world-class geosites that provide outstanding Earth science learning opportunities, and c)
exploration of recreational opportunities including the concept of a shoreline hiking trail following the
high water mark of Lake Superior. Geoheritage education and outreach opportunities help foster a
culture of stewardship, increase Earth science literacy, and provide opportunities to share our varied
relationships with land and water.

95

�Figure 1. Teachers and students explore the geoheritage of the Keweenaw by land and water.

References
Brocx, M. and Semeniuk, V., 2007. Geoheritage and geoconservation - history, definition, scope and scale.
Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia, 90: 53-87.
Geological Society of America 2017. GSA Position Statement: Geoheritage. Retrieved from:
https://www.geosociety.org/documents/gsa/positions/pos20_Geoheritage.pdf.
National Park Service and American Geosciences Institute 2015. America’s Geologic Heritage: An Invitation to
Leadership. NPS 999/129325. National Park Service, Denver, Colorado.
Reynard, E. and Brilha, J., 2017. Geoheritage: Assessment, protection, and management. Elsevier, ISBN:
9780128095317.

96

�U/Pb geochronology and zircon petrochronology of Paleoproterozoic magmas from the
Marshfield terrane Penokean Orogen, Wisconsin
WEBER, Evan1, LODGE, Robert W.D.1, MARSH, Jeffrey2
1

Department of Geology and Environmental Science, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, Phillips Hall Eau
Claire, WI 54701
2
Department of Earth Sciences, Laurentian University, 933 Ramsey Lake Rd, Sudbury, ON P3E 6H5, Canada

This study presents U-Pb, Hf-Lu, and trace isotopic element data from zircons obtained from
volcanic and intrusive rocks from the Paleproterozoic Penokean magmas within the Marshfield terrane
in northern Wisconsin. The Penokean Orogen hosts both the Proterozoic Pembine-Wausau and the
Archean Marshfield terranes. The Eau Pleine Shear Zone is interpreted as the paleosuture zone between
these two terranes (Sims et al., 1989). Both terranes host volcanic and intrusive rocks that were formed
during the Penokean orogen. The Pembine-Wausau terrane is a juvenile arc system that was developed
through subduction during the Penokean orogen that accreted against the Superior craton. The volcanic
rocks in this terrane are tholeiitic and calcalkaline in nature (Schulz and Cannon, 2007). The
Marshfield terrane is thought to be an accreted fragment of an Archean craton that collided with the
Pembine-Wausau terrane and the Superior craton (Klier, 2019). The Marshfield terrane is mainly
comprised of gneisses that underlie Early Proterozoic volcanic rocks (Sims et al., 1989), but due to
poor exposure of these rocks this terrane is poorly understood. This study aims to provide a better
understanding of the volcanic terranes in the region to improve regional models of the southern portion
of the Penokean orogen.
Samples were collected from Big Falls and other locations within the Eau Claire volcanic
complex, as well as from granites and gneisses exposed in Black River Falls. Zircons from these
samples were then analyzed at Laurentian University (Sudbury, Ontario, Canada) via Split-Stream
Laser Ablation Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometer (LASS-ICP-MS) to obtain U-Pb, HfLu, and trace isotopic element data. Results reveal complex age relationships and basement
architectures. The Big Falls gneiss, part of the Eau Claire volcanic complex lying south of the Eau
Pleine Shear Zone (Fig. 1), resulted in an interpreted U-Pb age of 1874.7±2.1 Ma (Fig. 1) which is
consistent with VMS-forming events in the Pembine-Wausau terrane. Zircon trace element
geochemistry from the Eau Claire volcanic complex indicate rocks formed from a hydrated but reduced
melt. This melt may have occurred in a back-arc setting where decompression occurred in a
metasomatized mantle, which is characteristic of back-arc signatures. Hf-Lu isotopic data from the Eau
Claire volcanic complex show the rocks here lack an Archean inheritance.
The data from the Eau Claire volcanic complex was compared to a granite intrusion in Black
River falls and both the Eisenbrey and Lynne VMS deposits in the Pembine-Wausau terrane. Based on
Hf-Lu data, the Black River Falls granite showed inheritance of basement, which is expected based on
field relationships with Archean rocks from the Marshfield terrane. The Eisenbrey and Lynne deposit
have juvenile signatures which is characteristic of an oceanic arc system. According to trace isotopic
element data, the VMS deposits also formed from a more oxidized and hydrated melt which is a similar
geodynamic setting seen in the Eau Claire volcanic complex. Since we would expect basement
inheritance in the Eau Claire volcanic complex, these results question what is known about the
Marshfield terrane and its relationship to the Penokean.

97

�Figure 1. Geologic map of Eau Claire and Chippewa Falls area highlighting the
location of Big Falls alongside a concordia diagram plotting the age of Big Falls
at 1874.7±2.1 Ma. Cathodoluminescence imaging of individual zircons are also
shown with their corresponding ages.

References
Brown, B.A., 1988. Bedrock Geology Map of Wisconsin (Regional Map Series: West-Central Sheet), University
of Wisconsin-Extension Geological and Natural History Survey, Scale: 1:250,000.
Klier, J.J., 2019. The Marshfield Terrane: Redefinition of Origin Through Zircon Geochronology and
Geochemistry [MSc thesis]: Ball State University: 115.
Schulz, K.J. and Cannon, W.F., 2007. The Penokean orogeny in the Lake Superior region. Precambrian
Research 157: 4-25.
Sims, P.K., Van Schmus, W.R., Schulz, K.J., and Peterman, Z.E., 1989. Tectonostratigraphic evolution of the
Early Proterozoic Wisconsin magmatic terranes of the Penokean orogen: Canadian Journal of Earth
Science, v. 26: 2145-2158.
Zi, J.-W., Sheppard, S., Muhling, J.R., and Rasmussen, B., 2021. Refining the Paleoproterozoic Tectonothermal
History of the Penokean Orogen: New U-Pb Age Constraints from the Pembine-Wausau terrane,
Wisconsin, USA: GSA Bulletin, v. 134: 776–790.

98

�The Use of Electric Pulse Disaggregation Technology to Recover Nickel Metal from Nickel
Sulfide Ore Deposits
WEIBLEN, Paul1
1

Minnesota Geological Survey (Retired), 2609 West Territorial Road, St. Paul, MN 55114

All metals, except for the noble metals like gold, occur in nature as metal sulfides. The
chemical process “Plat Sol”1 can be used to recover nickel metal from nickel sulfide ores. The demand
for nickel metal has increased dramatically due to the need for nickel metal for electric vehicle
batteries. Elon Musk, always ahead of the curve, has signed an agreement with Talon Metals to be the
sole recipient of any nickel metal they produce. Similarly, the Biden Administration is encouraging a
transition from fossil Fuel vehicles to electric vehicles.2
However, a particle size of less than a millimeter is required for the feed to the Plat Sol process.
Electric Pulse Disaggregation Technology3 provides much more efficient and less expensive method
than conventional crushing and grinding for reducing the particle size of ore samples. Figure 1 provides
details on the disaggregater. Inside the 3D printed gray cap on the left below is a stainless steel
hemisphere with a pointed electrode projecting upward. On the right, is a black 3D printed cap with an
electrode like the one above. When the two caps are screwed together, a sphere is formed. The
electrodes are separated ~ 5 mm forming a spark gap. The two hemispheres are filled with water and
inch-sized sample fragments. When the 50KV power supply is turned on the discharge across the spark
gap vaporizes the water, which in turn separates different minerals along their grain boundaries.
Examples of “zapped” Talon Metals nickel sulfide ore will be shown.

Figure 1. Image of the disaggregator set up.

References
Google “Plat Sol”
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/08/05/fact-sheet-president-bidenannounces-steps-to-drive-american-leadership-forward-on-clean-cars-and-trucks/
https://www.researchgate.net/project/Electric-pulse-disaggregation-and-hydroseparation-for-mineral-processing

*** Abstract Withdrawn***

99

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
      <file fileId="9047">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/0b0e110830002a4043b2d65b71c5ca51.pdf</src>
        <authentication>2cbbb59065186547c55e7817dcd81e3e</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="66281">
                    <text>69th ANNUAL MEETING
Eau Claire, Wisconsin — April 24-25, 2023
INSTITUTE ON LAKE SUPERIOR GEOLOGY
Part 2 — Field Trip Guidebooks

�Thank you to our sponsors!

A
SPECIAL THANK YOU TO OUR INDIVIDUAL CONTRIBUTORS:

FREDERICK CAMPBELL, VAL CHANDLER, JIM DEGRAFF, THOMAS
ERICKSON, TOM FITZ, DAVE GOOD, PAULA LEIER-ENGELHARDT,
ALLAN MACTAVISH, BOB MAHIN, GORDON MEDARIS JR., JIM
MILLER, STEVEN PINTA, TOD ROUSH, AND GERRY WHITE

i

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 2

69th ANNUAL MEETING

INSTITUTE ON LAKE SUPERIOR GEOLOGY

April 24-25th
Eau Claire, Wisconsin
HOSTED BY
Rob Lodge, Esther Stewart, Carsyn Ames Co-Chairs
University of Wisconsin- Eau Claire and Wisconsin Geological
and Natural History Survey
Proceedings - Volume 69
Part 2 – Field Trip Guidebooks
Compiled and edited by Rob Lodge
Cover Photos. Upper — Photograph of E.O. Ulrich taking notes in the field describing the Cambrian Mount
Simon Formation in the Chippewa Falls region in 1913. Lower — Photograph of geologists E.F. Bean and
E.C. Edwards fording the Eau Claire River at Morrison’s Ford in 1919.

iii

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 2

69th INSTITUTE

ON

LAKE SUPERIOR GEOLOGY

VOLUME 69 CONSISTS OF:

PART 1: PROGRAM AND ABSTRACTS
PART 2: FIELD T RIP GUIDEBOOK
Trip 1: PRECAMBRIAN GEOLOGY OF THE CHIPPEWA RIVER VALLEY
Trip 2: WISCONSIN’S PALEOZOIC STRATIGRAPHY AND TOUR OF CRYSTAL
CAVE
Trip 3: PRECAMBRIAN GEOLOGY OF THE EAU CLAIRE RIVER VALLEY
Trip 4: QUATERNARY GEOLOGY AND GEOMORPHOLOGY OF THE EAU
CLAIRE REGION

Reference to material in Part 2 should follow the example below:
Lodge and Hooper, 2023. Precambrian geology of the Chippewa River Valley: A transect through
the western Marshfield Terrane. in Lodge, R.W.D. (Ed.), Institute on Lake Superior Geology
Proceedings, 69th Annual Meeting, Eau Claire, Wisconsin, Part 2 – Field Trip Guidebooks. v.69,
part 2, p.1-26.
Published by the 69th Institute on Lake Superior Geology and distributed by the ILSG Secretary:
Pete Hollings - ILSG Secretary
Department of Geology
Lakehead University
955 Oliver Road
Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1
Canada
Email: peter.hollings@lakeheadu.ca

ILSG website: www.lakesuperiorgeology.org
ISSN 1042-9964

iv

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting – Part 2

Part 2: Field Trip Guidebooks
Table of Contents

Page
Field Trip 1:
Precambrian geology of the Chippewa River valley: A transect through the
western Marshfield Terrane

Field Trip 2:
Wisconsin’s Paleozoic stratigraphy and tour of Crystal Cave

Field Trip 3:
Precambrian Geology of the Eau Claire River Valley: Re-discovering the
Eau Claire Volcanic Complex

Field Trip 4:
Quaternary Geology and Geomorphology of the Eau Claire Region

v

1

27

48

71

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Field Trip 1 – Precambrian geology of the Chippewa River Valley:
A transect through the western Marshfield Terrane
Robert W.D. Lodge and Robert L. Hooper
Department of Geology &amp; Environmental Science, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire,
Eau Claire, Wisconsin 54701

of the 18.2 Mt Back Forty VMS deposit in
Michigan, easing of the Wisconsin sulfide mining
moratorium in 2017, and a recent national push
for securing critical mineral resources. However,
this has also highlighted the lack of modern
datasets, notably lithogeochemistry, on these
deposits that could be used to further our
knowledge of the mineral-forming systems in the
VMS belt. The Pembine-Wausau terrane has
received most of the historic and recent attention
since it hosts approximately 150 million tonnes of
known VMS mineralization. However, little
attention has been given to the Penokean volcanic
deposits that overprinted the Marshfield Terrane
that are presented in this guidebook. DeMatties
(2022) recognized the gap in knowledge for these
Penokean volcanic deposits within the Marshfield
Terrane, also called the Eau Claire Volcanic
Complex, and highlighted their exploration
potential.

Introduction
The erosional outliers of Precambrian bedrock
in the Chippewa River Valley represent the
southernmost extent of the Canadian Shield
before it is completely covered by Paleozoic
sedimentary strata. The rocks exposed here are
part of the Paleoproterozoic Penokean Orogeny,
a collisional orogen that resulted from the
accretion of the Pembine-Wausau and Marshfield
terranes onto the (present-day) southern margin
of the Superior Province. This region was last
visited by members of the Institute of Lake
Superior Geology in 1980 when a field trip
through the region was conducted by Paul Myers
(Myers et al., 1980). Since this time, there has
been ‘new’ U/Pb data collected by the USGS
(Sims et al. 1989) and others (Van Wyke et al,
1997; Klier, 2019), regional syntheses of the
Penokean volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS)
mineralization (DeMatties 1989; 1994; 2018;
2022), maps published by government surveys
(Mudrey et al, 1987; Brown 1988), and orogenwide tectonic model (Shultz and Cannon, 2007)
that is being revisited based on new U/Pb data (Zi
et al., 2021). After forty years of advancing our
knowledge of the Penokean Orogen, it is worth
touring again.

The portion of the Marshfield terrane that is
visited in this guidebook is well known, but
grossly understudied and much of its regional
context is unknown. Students from the University
of Wisconsin-Eau Claire have been visiting many
of the locations in this guidebook for decades to
learn how to map and describe rocks in the field,
measure structures and interpret geologic
histories, and learn the basic mechanics of field
work. Faculty, students, and alumni from Eau
Claire consider these outcrops classic. This
guidebook will (re-)introduce these rocks and
provide an updated view on their context to the
Marshfield terrane and Penokean Orogen.
Ongoing research in this region hopes to expand
the
lithogeochemistry
and
zircon
petrochronology database to better delineate the

The Penokean Orogen is perhaps best known
for hosting numerous VMS deposits. The passing
of the “Prove-it-first” law, or sulfide mining
moratorium, in 1997 effectively shut down
mineral exploration and mining in Wisconsin.
One of the most complete descriptions of several
deposits was published by the Institute of Lake
Superior Geology (LeBarge, 1996). More
recently, the mineral exploration industry has
been reinvigorated because of the 2002 discovery

1

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

geodynamic evolution and crustal architecture of
this region. Determining the presence or absence
of Archean basement throughout the Marshfield
terrane will help refine terrane boundaries and
improve our understanding of the metallogeny of
the region to assist in future mineral exploration
efforts.

in a suprasubduction zone setting and are now
structurally juxtaposed along the southern edge of
the Archean Superior Province during the earliest
phases of forming the Columbia, or Nuna,
supercontinent (LaBerge and Myers, 1984; Sims
et al., 1989; Schulz and Cannon, 2007). The
orogen is host to at least 150 million metric
tonnes (Mt) of VMS and associated
mineralization (DeMatties, 1994, 2018) but
remains one of the more poorly understood and
underexplored mineral districts in North
America.

Regional Geology
The Paleoproterozoic Penokean Orogen (ca.
1.8 Ga) in the Lake Superior region (Figure 1) is
a classic Precambrian orogenic belt comprised of
dominantly sub-marine volcanic rocks and
associated plutons. The Penokean rocks formed

The Penokean Orogen has been divided into
the Interior and Exterior domains. The Exterior

Figure 1 – Geologic map of the major tectonic assemblages and major structures of the Penokean Orogen. Notable
and important abbreviations that are important for this guidebook are EPSZ, Eau Pleine shear zone; NFZ, Niagara
fault zone. Figure from Shultz &amp; Cannon (2007).

2

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

domains are sutured to the Superior Craton by the
Niagara fault zone (Figure 1). The Exterior
domain consists of passive margin, rift, and
forearc basin sediments and Archean crustal
blocks from the Superior Province that were
folded and faulted in the foreland part of the
orogen. The Interior Domain consists of two
accreted terranes, the Pembine-Wausau and
Marshfield terranes, that are sutured by the Eau
Pleine Shear zone (Figure 1). The PembineWausau terrane is a composite accreted oceanic
arc
overprinted
by
continental-margin
magmatism and hosts numerous VMS deposits
and occurrences (DeMatties, 1994; Shultz &amp;
Cannon, 2007) (Figure 2). The Marshfield
terrane is composed of Archean crustal fragments
of unknown origin that were overprinted by
Penokean magmas during the orogen (Figure 2)
and is described in more detail in the section to
follow.
Shultz and Cannon (2007) synthesized tectonic
events during the Penokean Orogeny based on a
detailed compilation of lithologic, structural,
sedimentological, isotopic, and geochronological
datasets. This classic model proposed that an
oceanic arc, now referred to as the PembineWausau terrane, collided with the southern
Superior Province around 1880 Ma. Following a
subduction flip from south-directed to northdirected subduction, continental arc magmatism
and back arc extension followed until about 1850
Ma when convergence with an Archean crustal
block, known as the Marshfield Terrane accreted
to the southern edge of the Wausau- Pembine
Terrane along the Eau Pleine Shear Zone (ESPZ).
Sedimentation related to this convergence in a
foreland basin setting continued until about 1835
Ma. The end of the Penokean orogen was
constrained by a series of undeformed posttectonic plutons dated at 1830 Ma which stitched
the terranes.

Figure 2 – Schematic tectonic evolution of the
Penokean Orogen provided by Shultz and Cannon
(2007) based on geophysical, sedimentological, and
geochronological complications.

contradictory data came when Quigley (2016)
obtained a high-precision U/Pb zircon age of
1832.98 ± 0.52 Ma from a rhyolite at the Back
Forty deposit via CA-ID-TIMS. The other
analyzed VMS deposits across the PembineWausau terrane by Quigley (2016) provided
consistent U/Pb zircon ages ca. 1875 Ma and
supported the Shultz and Cannon (2007) tectonic
model. Additional U/Pb zircon ages from
volcanic units (Beecher Formation) and plutonic
rocks (Dunbar Gneiss, Newingham Tonalite) in
the eastern part of the orogen by Zi et al. (2021)

However, this classic tectonic model for the
evolution of the Penokean orogen has recently
been re-evaluated in light of new U/Pb data
obtained throughout the orogen. The first

3

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

supported the younger extensional tectonic event
proposed by Quigley (2016). These new ages
resulted in a revised Penokean tectonic model
where long-lived northward subduction along a
continental margin with repeated extensional and
contractional regimes in response to retreat and
advance of the subducting oceanic plate (Figure
3). Weber and Lodge (2022) obtained a U/Pb age
of 1831.4 ± 2.0 Ma on the dacite unit hosting the
Eisenbrey deposit in the western part of the
orogen, suggesting that this second VMS forming
event was widespread. A summary of the
geochronology is presented in Figure 4.

part of the Marshfield terrane and lie immediately
south of the Eau Pleine Shear Zone. Current
tectonic models suggest that the Marshfield
Terrane represents an Archean microcontinent of
uncertain origins (Sims et al., 1989; Schulz and
Cannon, 2007; Zi et al., 2021). Some of the
earliest work on the terrane by Sims et al. (1989)
noted only eight Archean U/Pb ages from isolated
outcrops along the Wisconsin, Black, and
Chippewa Rivers, many of which were compiled
from unpublished sources. One of those was the
gneiss exposed at Jim Falls (Stop 3 in this
guidebook) which was dated at 2522 ± 22 Ma.
Current tectonic reconstructions usually have
Paleoproterozoic volcanic rocks in the Marshfield
terrane being deposited on Archean basement at
about 1870–1860 Ma. The Paleoproterozoic
volcanic sequence is referred to as the Eau Claire
Volcanic Complex by DeMatties (2018; 2022)
and are preserved only as erosional remnants. The
Eau Claire Volcanic Complex consists
principally of an interlayered sequence of felsic
to mafic volcanic rocks, dacite porphyry, and a
variety of clastic and chemical sedimentary rocks
(Sims et al., 1989). Some conglomerates contain
granitic gneissic clasts that were interpreted to be
Archean (Myers et al. 1980), but no definitive
ages were determined on the clasts. Throughout
the Marshfield terrane there are various
Paleoproterozoic intrusions of gabbro, diorite,
and tonalite. These have U/Pb ages of 1835-1865
Ma (Sims et al., 1989; Van Wyck and Johnson,
1997; Weber and Lodge, 2022). Otherwise, our
knowledge of the Archean basement of the
Marshfield
terrane
and
associated
Paleoproterozoic volcanic rocks remains as
sparse as the outcrop exposures.

Figure 3 - Schematic illustration of the revised
tectonic model of the Penokean Orogen. Figure is
from Zi et al. (2021). Abbreviations: NF—Niagara
fault zone; EPSZ—Eau Pleine shear zone.Marshfield
Terrane

The study of the Marshfield terrane remained
stagnant until new U/Pb and Lu-Hf isotopic data
from zircons was published as a masters thesis
(Kleir, 2019). The new isotopic data in the
Marshfield Terrane collected from the Chippewa
and Yellow River valleys will be presented at
various stops on this field trip. In our opinion, one
of the most significant results was that the
“Archean” rocks from the Jim Falls region of

Marshfield Terrane
This guidebook visits field sites from the
northwestern exposures of rocks interpreted to be

4

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Figure 4 - Time-space plot for the tectonic components of the Penokean Orogen. Plot is from Zi et al. (2021). See
citation for references on data sources.

Sims et al. (1989) is a metasedimentary rock that
has a significant proportion of Paleoproterozoic
zircons (Kleir, 2019). While the data clearly
indicates the presence of Archean rocks in the
sedimentary source region, the sedimentary
provenance does not require that Archean rocks
represent the basement architecture in the
northern part of the Marshfield Terrane. U/Pb

ages from the northern part of the Marshfield
Terrane collected in the Chippewa and Yellow
River areas are interpreted as Paleoproterozoic in
age (~1.83-1.88 Ga) and Hf isotopies indicate a
juvenile source (without Archean contributions).
This finding raises questions about the extent of
the Archean basement in the Marshfield Terrane
and consequently, the basement architecture in

5

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

the region. Preliminary geochemistry from Klier
(2019) and our ongoing studies in the region
show interesting trends that will help distinguish
petrogenetic processes. Figure 5 highlights the
REE trace element characteristics of these
deposits and their application to each stop in
subsequent sections below.

thermometry determined temperatures between
719-769°C (Hannack and Radwany, 2018). A
rutile U/Pb age of 1835 Ma from Sims et al.
(1989) in the Eau Claire Volcanic Complex (Big
Falls – Fieldtrip 3 in this volume) may indicate
the timing of metamorphism since new zircon
U/Pb age from the same region provided a
crystallization age of ~ 1875 Ma (Weber and
Lodge, 2022).

Regional metamorphism in this region is at
lower to upper amphibolite facies. Hornblendeplagioclase thermo-barometry from gneisses in
the
Chippewa
River
valley
indicate
metamorphism occurred at temperatures between
606-646°C and pressures between 5.74-6.64
Kbar (Hafften and Radwany, 2018). A sample of
amphibolitic gneiss from the Eau Claire Volcanic
Complex
using
the
edenite-richterite

Field Trip Stops
The overall objective to this guidebook is to
tour the Precambrian exposures of the Marshfield
terrane along a southwest-northeast transect as
exposed in the Chippewa River Valley. Starting
within the city of Chippewa Falls, the trip will
work its way to the northwest along the river and
presumably get closer to the terrane boundary at
the Eau Pleine Shear Zone. Stops 1-4 and 6 are all
within the Marshfield Terrane, whereas Stop 5 is
considered the southernmost exposure of the
Pembine-Wausau Terrane. Fieldtrip stops are
summarized in Figure 6. New data have us
questioning what we know about the Marshfield
Terrane. For example: Where exactly is the
northern boundary of the Marshfield terrane in
the Eau Claire region, and how much of the
Marshfield Terrane, as currently defined, has an
Archean basement architecture?
Most of the locations in this guidebook are at
the downstream side of hydro-electric dams.
These areas are prone to sudden flooding and the
upmost caution and careful planning should be
used prior to visiting these locations. In addition,
rocks here are uneven and slippery especially
when wet. To access larger sections of outcrops,
low water conditions or ladders (temporary
bridges) may be required. In addition, all
locations in this region may contain poisonous
plants (e.g. nettle, poison ivy) and black-legged
ticks that can transmit diseases. While this is
unlikely to be a concern in early spring during the
2023 ILSG conference, future users of this
manual should plan appropriately.

Figure 5 - Trace element diagrams from the rocks in
the Chippewa River valley region. Data from Cornell
is preliminary data from ongoing projects whereas
the remainder is from Klier (2019). (A) Classification
diagram from Pearce (1996) showing protolith
compositions. (B) Primitive mantle-normalized rare
earth element diagram using normalizing values from
Sun and McDonough (1989).

6

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Figure 6 - Regional geology of the Chippewa Falls and Eau Claire region showing fieldtrip stops and approximate
location of the Eau Pleine Shear zone. Rocks to the south of the Shear Zone are interpreted to be part of the
Marshfield Terrane, whereas rocks to the north are part of the Pembine-Wausau terrane. Figure compiled from
Mudrey et al. (1987) and Brown (1988).

7

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Stop #1 – Nonconformity at Irvine Park

Claire and Chippewa Falls region are some of the
southernmost exposures of the crystalline
basement in the Lake Superior region before it
disappears beneath the undeformed Paleozoic
sedimentary strata. This is one of the many
exposures of the “Great Unconformity” that is
present throughout this region. Details of this
unconformity in this region is described in detail
in the most recent ILSG guidebook presented in
Eau Claire (Chan et al. 1991) and is summarized
below.

Lat: 44.9542° Long: -91.3972°

Precambrian Unconformity
The Precambrian- Cambrian boundary is
represented by a highly variable surface in the
mid-continent area. In west-central Wisconsin,
the Precambrian surface forms an extensive
planation surface with a regional SW dip of less
than 1 degree. Archean iron formations in the
Black River Falls region and Proterozoic
quartzites throughout the state, most famously the
Baraboo Syncline, form isolated monadnocks on
the peneplain. The peneplain was mantled by a
layer of paleosols as much as several hundred feet
thick. In some areas, Cambrian rocks directly rest
upon barren, moderately weathered Precambrian
rocks. Considering the low paleolatitude of the
continent during the Cambrian, deep weathering
of the Precambrian surface must have occurred
before the Upper Cambrian deposition. The
Precambrian basement, however, shows variable
degrees of weathering and the weathering is
complicated by potassium metasomatism
overprinting associated with Silurian and
Devonian K-rich basinal brines (Lui, 1997; Lui et
al., 2003). Potassium metasomatism along the
unconformity is responsible for the development
of illite, interlayered I/S and authigenic Kfeldspar in both saprolites and in the Cambrian
rocks in the Chippewa River Valley. Where the
Precambrian is mafic (gabbros, amphibolites and
gneisses)
the
potassium
metasomatism
commonly produces a distinctive bright bluegreen clay (celadonite) seen at Stop 2 on this field
trip and at Big Falls (Fieldtrip 3 in this
guidebook). These potassic brines have been

The outcrop described at this stop is located
along the east bank of Duncan Creek within
Irvine Park in Chippewa Falls. Upon entering the
park, drive north on Irvine Park Drive past the zoo
and bison enclosure until the inter-section with
Bear Den Road. There is ample parking in this
area near the intersection that crosses Duncan
Creek to the east and find the small foot trail that
leads northward to the outcrop. Potential hazards
include poisonous plants and ticks, but they are
unlikely to be a problem in early spring. There is
also uneven and potentially wet ground. The
purpose of this location is to highlight the
conditions that are impeding the study of the
Precambrian bedrock in the region. The Eau

8

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

implicated in the formation of MVT deposits in
the Tri-state region (Aleinkoff et al., 1993). At
this location (and numerous others) where the
Cambrian formations are in contact with
Precambrian plutonic rocks, the basement is
heavily spheroidal weathered (Photo 1, Figure 7)
and is generally deeply altered to kaolinite
saprolite and then metasomatically altered to illite
I/S and authigenic Kspar. Mt. Simon Formation
sandstone and conglomerate fill the wedges
among the spheroids. In some areas such as Little
Falls and Big Falls in Eau Claire County
(Fieldtrip 3, this volume) or Rock Dam in Jackson
County, Cambrian sandstones rest upon
Proterozoic amphibolite and meta-rhyolites that
are only partially altered.

Mount Simon Formation is a coarse-grained,
medium to thick-bedded quartz pebble
conglomerate. The topographic relief on the
Precambrian surface was probably only a few
meters as sedimentary channels are typically less
than 1 meter deep. The presence of trace fossils
(rusophycus and Climactichnites, or trilobite
burrows/tracks; Photo 2) and planar and bipolar
cross-bedding (Photo 3) suggest a littoral or
shallow marine tidal flat environment of
deposition for the lower part of the formation.
The upper part of the Mt. Simon Formation
contains feldspathic quartz arenite with smallscale ripple bedding, brachiopod fragments
(lingula sp.), and worm trails (planolites) The

Photo 2 - Climactichnites fossil from the lower Mt.
Simon Formation collected along the Chippewa River
near downtown Eau Claire. Climachtinites trace
fossils are typical of tidal flats in the Cambrian. Field
of view is ~1m across.
Photo 1 – Irvine Park outcrop photograph showing
nonconformity between Cambrian Mt. Simon
Formation (above) and Paleoproterozoic trondhjemite
(below). Photo courtesy of Scott Clark (UW-Eau
Claire

Cambrian Mount Simon Formation
The sediment above the unconformity consists
largely of Upper Cambrian Mt. Simon Formation
deposited on the mid-continent region of North
America during the Dreisbachian transgression.
The Mount Simon Formation is a fine to coarsegrained, moderately to well sorted, quartz arenite
with a local basal conglomerate. The Mount
Simon Formation varies in thickness 40 to 180
meters in the Upper Mississippi Valley. Locally,
in the Chippewa Valley area, the lower part of the

Photo 3 - Cross-bedded conglomerate and sandstone
of the Cambrian Mount Simon Formation in the
Irvine Park area, Chippewa Falls. Photo courtesy of
Scott Clark (UW-Eau Claire).

9

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Figure 7 – Conceptual field sketch of the unconformity at Irvine Park. Figure from Chan et al. (1991).

Stop 2 – Penokean and Mid-Continent Rift
Intrusions at Lake Wissota Dam

grain size distribution shows a generally fining
upward sequence.
Precambrian Intrusion

Lat: 44.9429° Long: -91.3425°

The
Paleoproterozoic
biotite
tonalite
(trondhjemite) showing spheroidal and saprolitic
weathering at this location is interpreted to be
similar to the larger trondhjemite intrusion that
underlies much of the Chippewa River valley.
The trondhjemite can be more easily observed
below the Chippewa Falls hydroelectric dam in
downtown Chippewa Falls and below the
Wissota hydroelectric dam (Stop 2 in this
guidebook). The biotite trondhjemite at
Chippewa Falls Hydro was dated by Van Schmus
(1980) at 1,840 ± 15 Ma. Saprolites like the one
exposed here are characteristic of areas of
prolonged tropical to subtropical weathering on a
granitoid bedrock surface of low relief. The
saprolite at this outcrop contains high clay
content and angular quartz and feldspar. The
alteration intensity increases approaching the
Cambrian Mt Simon Formation.

This outcrop is located on the downstream side
the dam on Lake Wissota. Drive to the end of 74th
Avenue in Chippewa Falls and park in the
Chippewa Rod and Gun Club &amp; Marina. From
here, you can walk southward along the access
road to the dam (about 1 km). There are several
places to cross the small steam to access the
largest part of the outcrop. The largest potential
hazard at this location is the stream crossing and
uneven, wet walking area. A ladder or other
temporary structure might be required to assist in
crossing the stream if water levels are high.
This outcrop highlights some of the magmatic
history in this region. The majority of the
exposure here is a Paleoproterozoic biotite
tonalite (trondhjemite) that has local pods and
dikes or medium gray biotite tonalite and alkali
feldspar granite pegmatite. The outcrop is
intruded by at least three gabbroic dykes
associated with the mid-continent rift. The largest

10

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

of which is clearly visible in arial view (Figure
8). The entire area is covered by thin outwash
gravels and silts that varies with seasonal
flooding events. Some of the tonalite near the
Chippewa River displays the same spheroidal
weathering seen at Irvine Park so this location is
just below the Great Unconformity and displays
some of the same associated potassic alteration
along faults and joints seen in Irvine Park (Stop
1). The potassic alteration is responsible for most
of the pink color seen in outcrop.

Figure 8 - (top) Generalized geology of the Wissota
Dam region. Figure modified from Myers et al.
(1980). (bottom) Aerial view of the outcrops with the
mid-continent rift highlighted. Image obtained from
Google Earth.

tonalite for rocks with higher mafic
concentrations. The oldest, abundant rock at
Wissota Dam is a weakly foliated hornblende,
biotite trondhjemite composed of oligoclase
(50%), quartz (30%), microcline (5%), biotite
(10%), and 5% hornblende with common
accessory euhedral to subhedral titanite (Photo
4). Weak foliation strikes Nl5°W and dips steeply
east. This is intruded by small dykes and masses
of medium-grained, medium-grey hornblendebiotite tonalite (± epidote) that locally contains

Granitoid Intrusive Suite
Most of the Paleoproterozoic intrusive igneous
rocks at Wissota are quartz diorites or tonalites
with various proportions of hornblende and
biotite. For clarity, and to be consistent with the
terminology used by previous geologists working
in the Chippewa River Valley, on this field trip
we refer to the lightest colored tonalites (color
index 15 or less) as trondhjemite and reserve

11

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

trondhjemite is an FI-type felsic rock with
strongly depleted HREE (Figure 5) representing
deep crustal melting (Hart et al. 2004). The
trondhjemite is cut by east-northeast-trending
pegmatite veins and pods and quartz ± pyrite) and
epidote veinlets.
Potassic alteration especially along any
fractured surfaces the trondhjemites produces a
pink color in outcrop (Photo 5). Minor cataclastic
fault zones cut the granitoid intrusions with leftlateral displacement. A thin, branching discordant
sheet
of
foliated
biotite
trondhjemite
approximately 1-3 meters wide and trends
N55°W. Drag folded foliation in the enclosing
rocks indicates left-lateral displacement.

Photo 4 – Photographs of main lighter colored
tonalite phase at Wissota Dam. (A)
Photomicrographs in plane-polarized light showing
feldspar grains are lightly weathered with opaque
rims around titanite. In cross-polarized light, quartz
grains show moderate undulatory extinction. Photo
from Klier (2019). B) Field photograph of biotite
tonalite (trondhjemite) showing medium-grained,
equigranular texture. Feldspars weather pink in color
and mafic phases tend to be recessively weathered.

lenticular xenoliths of banded amphibolite. The
tonalite pods show no grain size diminution and
sometimes have irregular shapes suggesting that
some tonalites may be enclaves of earlier phases
of the trondhjemite. In other cases, the tonalites
are clearly dykes crosscutting the trondhjemite.
The tonalite dikes tend to be unaltered with
vitreous dark-brown biotite (~25%) and lack
foliation. All minerals in the foliated tronhjemite
show internal fracturing and dislocation, and
contain quartz grains with undulatory extinction,
display grain boundary migration and dynamic
quartz recrystallization (Klier, 2019). The

Photo 5 – Photographs of pegmatite and associated
alteration at Wissota Dam. (A) Thin quartz-epidote
veining and potassic alteration surrounding conjugate
fracture sets adjacent to pegmatite. (B) Coarse
grained texture of the pegmatite. Feldspar crystals
can be as large as 5-7 cm in size.

12

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Slickenside fault surfaces elsewhere in this
outcrop have similar strike and dip with the
slickensides plunging 5°NW.

of the largest dyke and the mineral chemistry was
examined using SEM-EDS and optical
petrography. The main dyke has an aphanitic
chilled margin a few cm wide along both the
north and south sides and the grain size
consistently coarsens toward the middle of the
dike into a medium grained olivine gabbro
(Photo 7A). A prominent set of joints
perpendicular to the cooling surface along the
dike walls are interpreted as columnar joints and
these are especially prominent on the south side
below the power lines. More pronounced
columnar joints are also seen in one of the smaller
(2m wide) dikes along the northwest side of the
area next to the Chippewa River. No internal
contacts are apparent at the outcrop scale
suggesting that this large dike represents a single
cooling unit of magma intruded into the upper
crust. West of the power lines the dike is cut by
two faults, one left lateral strike slip fault with a
few meters of displacement and a low angle
reverse fault with well-developed chlorite
slickensides and extensive alteration including
chlorite and hematite, and calcite filled tension
fractures.

Mid-Continent Rift Dykes
Three diabase dykes related to mid-continent
rift extension intrude the granitoids (Photo 6)
exposed below the Wissota Dam spillway and the
largest dike is an ENE trending (~N65E) olivine
tholeiite that averages 47m in width. The large
dyke has a notable sharp and chilled margin.
Unpublished data from the dyke at this location
and others along the Chippewa River indicate a
tholeiitic composition that shows slightly more
Mg-enrichment trends on AFM diagrams in
comparison to other parts of the dyke swarm in
the region.
Ongoing student-faculty research at the
University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire is examining
the composition of the large dyke at Wissota
Dam. Samples were collected as a cross section

The chilled margins consist of very finegrained plagioclase with variable compositions
ranging from An35 to An63, in a devitrified-glass
matrix crowded with submicron Fe-Ti oxides and
sparse sub-calcic augite (Average cpx =
[Mg.68Fe.60Ca.55Al.09Ti.02Mn.01] [Si1.91Al.09O6]).
Within two meters of the north side of the diabase
the dike contains single crystals of labradorite up
to 10 cm across apparently sourced from a deeper
magma chamber and transported (floated?)
upwards during intrusion of the dike. Locally the
chilled margin is altered to chlorite and very fine
grained bright blue-green celadonite (Photo 7D),
alkali-feldspar and dark red biotite.
Five samples collected from the central 35 m
of the dike all consists of an olivine gabbro with
a well-developed ophitic texture (Photo 7B). The
mineralogy from the center includes both
titaniferous augite (1-2wt% TiO2) and titanaugite
(&gt;2wt% TiO2) oikocrysts with pink and lavender

Photo 6 – Photographs showing sharp, chilled margin
of mid-continent rift gabbro with Paleoproterozoic
trondhjemite intrusion.

13

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Photo 7 – Photographs of mid-continent rift gabbroic dyke at Wissota Dam. (A) Outcrop photo showing fractured
and weathered surface of dyke. Weathered surface shows medium-grained texture. (B) photomicrograph in crosspolarized light (40x) showing ophitic texture. (C) Photomicrograph in plane-polarized light (40x) showing aggregate
of euhedral to subhedral olivine (ol) crystals (Fo 40-45) in plagioclase and cpx matrix where cpx as pinkish purple
pleochroism typical of the titanaugite composition. (D) Photomicrograph in plane-polarized light (100x) showing
greenish blue celadonite (cel) replacing biotite (bt) in the transitition zone between the chilled margin and dikes
central olivine gabbro.

pleochroism, laths of normally zoned plagioclase
with labradorite cores (An55-65) and thin rims of
andesine (An30-35) and unusually large aggregates
of euhedral to subhedral olivine containing over
50 individual olivine crystals (Photo 7C). The
augite and biotite show little variation across the
dyke but the olivine becomes progressively more
Fe-rich towards the south with an average of Fo43
in the north to Fo35 near the southern contact. The
opaque minerals are primarily ilmenite with
titaniferous magnetite lamellae often rimmed
with a highly titaniferous reddish orange biotite.
In the transition zone between the chilled margin
and the center 30 m of the dyke much of the

biotite is replaced (altered) with celadonite
K(Mg,Fe2+)(Al,Fe3+)[Si4O10](OH)2
with
a
brilliant blue-green color in plane polarized light
(Photo 7D). Unusual olivine aggregates
(glomerocrysts?) occur throughout the central
35m of the dyke and often consist of more than
50 crystals (Photo 8). In some of the olivine
aggregates the minerals show at least some
crystallographic alignment. Olivine within
individual aggregates have a very narrow range
of chemistry. In one aggregate 16 grains were
analyzed and the average composition was
Fo47.5±0.2(2σ); this standard deviation is about the

14

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

magma with limited chemical variation and could
be produced by turbulent flow (synneusis)
agglomeration or by a high degree of
undercooling and ripening of dendritic olivine. It
seems very likely that this dike was an active
conduit for magmas reaching the surface to
produce MCR lava flows even though Chippewa
Falls is almost 200 km south of the main MCR
rift axis. Geochemical results which are pending
should help further constrain the system.
Stop 3 – Gneisses and Pegmatites at Jim Falls

Photo 8 – Photomicrograph in cross-polarized light of
olivine aggregate (glomerocrysts) showing consistent
orientation of olivine crystals in the cluster. Gray
crystals all have an optic axis almost perpendicular to
the section. Magnification 100X.

Lat: 45.0549° Long: -91.2734°

same size as the analytical error for EDS analysis
on olivine.
Olivine aggregates have been described from
several basaltic conduits where they have been
attributed to differential crystal movement during
turbulent flow in an active conduit such as at
Kilauea (Helz, 1987) or as xenocrysts extracted
from a deforming cumulate. However, there is no
reference to aggregates with such a large number
of crystals. The texture and chemistry of the
aggregates at Wissota come closest to matching
olivine aggregates collected from lava flows at La
Reunion (Welsch et al., 2013) which they ascribe
to rapid dendritic crystal growth and ripening
under a high degree of undercooling (-ΔT &gt; 60°C)
from low viscosity basalts.
Petrographic Interpretation: The dyke is
sourced from a lower-level fractionated magma
chamber of enriched basalt (E-MORB or alkali
olivine parent) as evidenced by the olivine
composition (~Fo40), plagioclase (An60) and
titanaugite/ilmentite
modal
mineralogy.
Plagioclase zoning from An60 cores to An30 rims
suggests at least limited reaction with wall rocks.
As a fractionated magma it seems likely that the
ascending magma contained phenocrysts of both
olivine and plagioclase that were kinetically
fractionated by turbulent flow resulting in a
chilled margin largely devoid of phenocrysts. The
olivine aggregates form in equilibrium with

This outcrop is located within the spillway of
the hydroelectric dam near the community of Jim
Falls. About 500 m north from the intersection of

15

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Highway 178 and County Highway Y (the main
road into the community of Jim Falls), there will
be an old, abandoned bridge that that used to be
the access bridge to the community. There is
ample parking in front of this bridge. On the south
side of the old bridge is a small foot path that
leads down to the outcrops along the river. These
outcrops are smoothly polished from the flooding
at the dam. They are uneven and quite slippery
when wet. If water levels are high, there are also
outcrops immediately downstream of the
spillway to the north.
This location has intensely folded amphibolite
and biotite quartzofeldspathic gneiss that is
intruded by granitoid intrusions and associated
pegmatites (Figure 9). Intense shearing and
metamorphism results in little preserved primary
texture within the gneisses and amphibolites. On
the east bank of the river is a gabbroic dyke
associated with the mid-continent rift.

Figure 10 - Tera-Wasserburg concordia diagram of
biotite quartzofeldspathic gneiss from Jim Falls. A
wide spread of ages is suggestive of a detrital origin.
Figure from Klier (2019).

sedimentary rocks. Trace element geochemistry
from Klier (2019) was inconclusive in
determining volcanic protolith because of low Ti
abundance. Preliminary petrography from student
projects at the University of Wisconsin-Eau
Claire and Kleir (2019) seem to suggest that
amphibolites are rather rare. Other geochemical
results from ongoing research at the University of
Wisconsin-Eau Claire are pending.

The outcrops at this stop are one of the original
“Archean” exposures of the Marshfield terrane
that was described in in Sims et al. (1989), but
new data in the region casts doubt on that original
interpretation. The gneisses at this location were
assigned a U/Pb age of 2522 ± 22 by Sims et al.
(1989). Little description of the data was
provided in that original reference and the date
itself was referenced as unpublished data from
personal communication. Klier (2019) resampled
the gneiss from the region and analyzed zircons
using LA-ICPMS. The resulting data clearly
shows a large spread of ages and a significant
portion of those are Paleoproterozic in age. There
are clearly older sources of detritus for these
meta-sedimentary rocks, some as old as 2841 Ma.
However, the dominant source of detritus was
Paleoproterozoic (Figure 10). Based on this new
data, the Jim Falls region is not obviously an
Archean crustal fragment.

A biotite quartzofeldspathic gneiss was
sampled by Klier (2019) for U/Pb geochronology.
Based on recent field work, this rock appears to
be the dominate lithology that exists in the
immediate region around and under the bridge.
Kleir (2019) describes the rock containing classic
mylonitic textures and is comprised of quartz
(60%), alkali feldspar (25%), biotite (15%), and
trace zircon (Photo 9A). There are prominent
bands
of
porphryoblastic
quartz
and
cryptocrystalline biotite. Biotite is also present
rarely as larger “destroyed” grains. Quartz has
undulatory extinction and has undergone grain
boundary migration recrystallization. Some
feldspar grains display domino-type fragmented
porphyroclastic textures. Portions of feldspar
grains have diminished to sericite. Weakly

Amphibolites and Gneisses
Myers et al. (1980) interpreted the
amphibolites and gneisses in this region to be
derived from mafic volcanic rocks and associated

16

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Figure 9 – Precambrian geologic map of Chippewa River near Jim Falls. Figure digitized from Myers et al.
(1980).

17

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

isoclinally folded amphibolite occur in the
granitic rocks.
Granitoids and Pegmatites
Granitic rocks range in composition from
trondhjemite to alkali feldspar granite. Pegmatite
dike intrusion occurred at several stages of
"granite" intrusion. Mineralogy includes alkali
feldspar (65%) quartz (32%), plagioclase (3%),
and trace zircon.. The grains are subhedral to
anhedral with intergrowths and granophyric
textures occasionally present. Quartz grains
appear stretched and strained and have undergone
either subgrain rotation recrystallization or grain
boundary migration recrystallization (Klier,
2019).
The older granitic rocks are foliated and locally
mylonitized. Shearing and boudinage of
pegmatite stringers transposed them into oblique
concordance with lamination in the enclosing
rocks. A rough correlation can be made between
relative age and concordance of veinlets. thinly
laminated amphibolite was intruded by granite so
that lenticular slices of the amphibolite were
dragged en echelon away from the wall (Photo
10). The coarse granite pegmatite intruded under
stress contains en echelon fractures filled with
very coarse quartz.

Photo 9 – (A) Photomicrograph in plane-polarized
light of biotite quartzofeldspathic gneiss showing
sericite-altered feldspar crystals and pronounced
dynamic recrystallization of matrix. Foliation defined
by elongation of grains and alignment of biotoite.
Photo from Klier (2019). (B) Outcrop photo showing
gneiss intruded by boudinaged granitic dykes.
Gneissic layering is very fine and difficult to see in
this photo.

chlortizied biotite bands define foliation (Photo
9A).
Garnetiferous hornblende gneiss and schist are
folded with high-amplitude isoclinal folds with a
persistent ENE strike. Small (F2) folds plunge
gently east-northeast. These are folded F1
isoclinal folds, and a few hinges can be found in
the outcrop. Some of the granitic pegmatites
appear to be folded as well or are slightly
boudinaged (Photo 9B), suggesting that
pegmatites intruded prior to F2 or where
exploiting layering within the folded gneisses and
amphibolites during emplacement. Xenoliths of

Photo 10 – Typical intrusive relationship between
pegmatite surrounding amphibolites and gneisses.
Small pegmatite veinlets and en echelon fracturing
along margins is common resulting in lens-shaped
gneissic fragments.

18

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Stop #4 – Amphibolites and Gneisses at
Cornell Dam

outcrops almost continuously for 4 km down the
river. The amphibolite could also be classed as a
gneissic, mafic hornblende tonalite or hornblende
gneiss. This is also one of the few areas that this
trip visits that you can potentially see primary
depositional features! Immediately below the
dam, the rock is a fine-grained amphibolite with
elongate bulbous inclusions that appear to
stretched pillows (Photo 11A) that contain local
irregular to lens-shaped quartz-epidote nodules
(Photo 11B).

Lat: 45.1625° Long: -91.1596°

The amphibolite is composed of subhedral to
anhedral, lensoidal hornblende clusters (54%)
with coarse, lensoidal porphyroclasts of twinned
plagioclase (28%) and fine-grained quartz.
Banding in the amphibolite Is cut by lenticular
segments of granite and quartz veinlets. Garnets

This outcrop is located within the spillway of
the hydroelectric dam near the community of
Cornell. About 500 m southwest from the bridge
into Cornell on Highway 178 is the Wisconsin
Department of Natural Resources Ranger Station
where there is ample parking. Just south of the
Ranger Station is a small road (called Pine Point
Road) that leads toward the water. There are foot
trails and gated roads (accessible by foot) that
lead toward the outcrops at the dam and by the
river. These outcrops are uneven but are generally
dry and easily traversed under normal river
conditions. If water levels are high, outcrops can
also be visited on the shoreline above the dam
near the Municipal Works buildings in Cornell.

Photo 11 – Flow-like features in the amphibolites at
Cornell Dam. (A). Streched pillow-like structures
with cm-scale darkened pillow margins. (B) Irregular
quartz-epidote nodules that are common in submarine
or hydrothermally-altered submarine flows.

Myers et al (1980) described this location as a
laminated (foliated) garnet amphibolite that

19

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

in the amphibolite tend to be moderately
poikioblastic with minor rotational features. The
distribution of garnet clusters shows little relation
to banding. Trace element chemistry of these
rocks show clear tholeiitic trends and flat REE
patterns on normalized diagrams (Figure 5).
Further downstream from the dam, the rock
becomes notably lighter in color and there
appears to be a lower percentage of amphiboles.
These rocks share similar trace element patterns
(Figure 5) and are interpreted to be genetically
related. The reason for the change in texture may
be due to increase structural modification and
gneissic banding development.
The outcrops are also intruded by mafic dykes
that clearly cross-cut the dominant foliation
(Photo 12). These dykes trend N40°W and are
approximately 30-50 cm in apparent thickness
with no obvious chill margin. Since these dykes
cross-cut the structural fabric, they are assumed
to be related to the mid-continent rift. However,
no petrography or chemistry has been done to
confirm this hypothesis.

of the river, there is a small vehicle parking area
and footpath that leads to the dam on 260th
Avenue about 100 m west of the intersection with
County Highway M. This trail will take you to the
dam and carefully navigate to the north bank of
the river downstream of the dam. To access the
south bank of the river, drive to the end of Irvine
Avenue before it turns into a private driveway.
There are numerous small foot paths that will lead
to the south bank of the river.

Photo 12 – Gabbroic dyke intruding through
amphibolites at Cornell Dam.

Stop 5 – Amphibolites and Deformed Diorite
at Holcombe Dam

The outcrops at this location are considered
part of the Pembine-Wausau terrane, or is it?
While the location of the Eau Pleine Shear Zone
becomes problematic in this region, Sims et al.
(1989) consider the Jump River Shear Zone the
northern boundary of the Marshfield Terrane.
Magnetic lineaments mark this shear zone and
extend it close to these outcrops. Depending on

Lat: 45.2251° Long: -91.1289°
As time permits, each side of the river at
Holcombe Dam has different rock types to
examine, but are vastly different approaches to
see them. To visit the outcrops on the north bank

20

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

the map, the shear zone lies just north or just
south of the outcrops at this location (e.g. Mudrey
et al., 1987). The rocks at this stop are a gneissic
quartz diorite intrusion and an amphibolite schist
(Figure 11). So, Marshfield or Pembine-Wausau
terrane? The newest geochronology from the
region is inconclusive.
The rock exposed on the southern bank of the
river below the dam is a foliated amphibolebiotite schist (Photo 13). Klier (2019) describes
this rock as banded at the microscopic scale.
Quartz grains are well banded, fairly subhedral to
anhedral and feature undulatory extinction. Their
boundaries are somewhat irregular and indicative
of bulging recrystallization. Amphibole grains
are hornblende to tremolite. Biotite appears as
brown to light green grains and typically feature

Photo 13 – Photomicrograph in plane-polarized light
of amphibole-biotite schist with trace amounts of
epidote in a quartzofeldspathic matrix. Figure from
Klier (2019).

Figure 11 – Precambrian geologic map of the Holcombe Dam region. Unit Abbreviations: qd: quartz-diorite, bgn:
banded gneiss, ams: amphibolite schist. Figure from Myers et al. (1980).

21

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

shear bands with cryptocrystalline biotite crosscutting crystals. Klier (2019) obtained a U/Pb
zircon age via LA-ICPMS of 1858 ± 1.0 Ma
(Figure 12). This age does not definitively put the
rocks in this region in Marshfield or PembineWausau terrane. There does not appear to be any
Archean inherited zircons, as one might expect if
Penokean magmas were overprinting an Archean
crustal block.

Photo 14 – Outcrop of quartz diorite on north bank of
Chippewa River at Holcombe Dam.

quartz, with minor amounts of biotite, muscovite
and epidote.
The quartz diorite contains two types of
inclusions: hornblende rich ultramafic inclusions
and spotted mafic inclusions. Ultramafic
inclusions occur along the northwest portion of
the exposed quartz diorite, generally less than 0.5
meters in length, although one is at least 2 meters
long. Ultramafic inclusions are composed of 7585% hornblende and 11—13% biotite with a
small amount of plagioclase (meta pyroxenites?).
Chlorite occurs as an alteration product of biotite
and less commonly of hornblende and can
compose more than 20% of the rock.

Figure 12 – Tera-Wasserburg concordia diagram of
amphibolitic schist on the south bank of the
Chippewa River near Holcombe dam. Figure from
Klier (2019).

Stop 6 – Tonalites and quartz diorites at
Cadott Bridge

On the north bank of the river, the outcrop is
predominately a synkinematic quartz diorite
(Photo 14; Figure 13). The quartz diorite is a
medium-grained, dark to medium grey rock with
rusty weathering surfaces. It is faintly foliated
and has white discontinuous bands and lenticles
which are more quartz rich than the rest of the
rock. Quartz diorite is composed of plagioclase
(32-51%), quartz (11-31%) and mafic minerals
(12-33%). Mafic minerals range from entirely
hornblende to entirely biotite. The quartz diorite
is cut by medium-grained granite pods with
migmatitic contacts and by finer-grained dykes
with sharp contacts. The granite is a pink, faintly
foliated rock which locally contains porphyritic
microcline grains reaching 1 cm in size. Granitic
rocks consist of plagioclase, microcline and

Lat: 45.9535° Long: -91.1508°
This outcrop shows is easily accessible under
the Main Street bridge in Cadott. Just north of the
bridge near the Main Street-Yellow Street
intersection there is a parking area on the north
bank of the river. From this parking area, there are
footpaths that lead to the waters edge.
The predominant rock type here is foliated
biotite quartz diorite to biotite tonalite (Figure
14) composed of plagioclase (An25-35, 30-55%),
quartz (10-40%), hornblende (0-25%) and biotite
(0-15%) (Myers et al. 1980). Mafic minerals are
partly replaced by chlorite (of several varieties),
epidote, and sericite. Magnetite (1-5%) is a by-

22

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Figure 13 – Detailed outcrop map of the quartz diorite gneiss on the north bank of the Chippewa River at Holcombe
Dam. Figure from Myers et al. (1980).

Figure 14 – Precambrian geologic map of the region downstream of Cornell Dam. Figure modified from Myers et
al. (1980).

23

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Photo 15 – Mylonitized biotite tonalite at the Cadott
Bridge on the Yellow River.

Photo 16 – Photograph of elongated xenoliths (?) of
chlorite-rich metavolcanic rocks in biotite tonalite at
Cadott Bridge on the Yellow River.

product in the chloritization of hornblende. The
tonalites have been mylonitized (Photo 15) and
locally recrystallized and contain lenticular
xenoliths of chlorite and epidote-rich
metavolcanic(?) rock (Photo 16). The older
cataclastic foliation is axial-planar to isoclinally
folded pegmatite, aplite, and quartz layers. These
rocks are cut by a pervasive N65-75°W trending
foliation and mylonitic shear zones.

Acknowledgements
Despite decades of regular visits from groups
from the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, the
most extensive detailed maps and rock
descriptions were provided by Paul Myers and
collaborators in the 1980 ILSG guidebook
(Myers et al, 1980). There is some recent research
activity in the region, but between new but
pending analyses and future ambitions, the
descriptions and maps provided in that ILSG
guidebook are the most detailed and accurate for
the region. A lot of the geologic descriptions have
been updated and figures have been digitized
while adding new data and insights where
available.

West of the Yellow River bridge, foliated
biotite tonalite encloses angular xenoliths of
hornblende tonalite or amphibolite containing
strongly deformed aplite and pegmatite stringers.
Isoclinally folded quartz, aplite, and pegmatite
veinlets exist as angular xenoliths in a lighter
biotite tonalite.

24

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Hafften,
D.,
and
Radwany,
M.,
2018,
Geothermobarometry
of
a
Precambrian
amphibolite from Cornell WI: Proceedings of the
Institute on Lake Superior Geology 64th Annual
Meeting, Iron Moutain, Michigan, p. 45-46.

In addition, the authors of this guidebook
would like to thank the countless undergraduate
and graduate students that have worked on these
outcrops and have continued to inspire new work
in the region. Specific acknowledgement is
deserving to Matt Leahy and his efforts in
digitizing figures and compiling geochemistry for
the guidebook.

Hannack, G., and Radwany, M., 2018, HornblendePlagioclase thermometry of the Eau Claire River
Complex, western Wisconsin: Proceedings of the
Institute on Lake Superior Geology 64th Annual
Meeting, Iron Mountain, Michigan, p. 47-48.

References
Aleinikoff, J.N., Walter, M., Kunk, M.J., and Hearn,
P.P., Jr., 1993, Do ages of authigenic K-feldspar
date the formation of Mississippi Valley–type PbZn deposits, central and southeastern United
States? Pb isotope evidence: Geology, v. 21, p. 73–
76.

Hart, T. R., Gibson, H. L., and Lesher, C. M., 2004,
Trace element geochemistry and petrogenesis of
felsic volcanic rocks associated with volcanogenic
massive Cu-Zn-Pb sulfide deposits: Economic
Geology, v. 99, p. 1003-1013.
Helz, R. T. 1987, Diverse olivine types in the lava of
the 1959 eruption of Kilauea Volcano and their
bearing on eruption dynamics. USGS Professional
Paper 1350, p. 691-722.

Brown, B. A., 1988, Bedrock geology of Wisconsin,
west-central sheet, Wisconsin Geological and
Natural History Survey Map 87–11b.
Chan, L. S., Myers, P. E., and Hay, R. L., 1991,
Features and significance of the PrecambrianCambrian contact in western Wisconsin. Institute
of Lake Superior Geology 37th Annual Meeting,
Eau Claire, Wisconsin, Field Trip Guidebook 2, 17
p.

Klier, J. J., 2019, The Marshfield Terrane:
Redefinition
of
origin
through
zircon
geochronology and geochemistry: Unpub. M.S.
thesis, Ball State University, 115 p.
LaBerge, G. L., 1996, Volcanogenic massive sulfide
deposits of northern Wisconsin: A commemorative
volume, Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting
of the Institute on Lake Superior Geology, Cable,
Wisconsin.

DeMatties, T. A., 1989, A proposed geologic
framework for massive sulfide deposits in the
Wisconsin Penokean volcanic belt: Economic
Geology, v. 84, p. 946-952.

LaBerge, G. L., and Myers, P. E., 1984, Two early
Proterozoic successions in central Wisconsin and
their tectonic significance: Geological Society of
America Bulletin, v. 95, p. 246-253.

DeMatties, T. A., 1994, Early Proterozoic
volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits in
Wisconsin: An overview: Economic Geology, v.
89, p. 1122-1151.

Lui, J., 1997, K-Metasomatism in Uppermost
Precambrian Rocks in West-Central, Wisconsin
and Southeastern, Missouri. Unpub. PhD thesis,
University of Illinois. 227p.

DeMatties, T. A., 2018, Effects of paleoweathering
and supergene activity on volcanogenic massive
sulfide (VMS) mineralization in the Penokean
Volcanic Belt, northern Wisconsin, Michigan and
east-central Minnesota, USA: Implications for
future exploration: Ore Geology Reviews, v. 95, p.
216-237.

Lui, J. Hay, R. L., Deino, A. and Kyser, T. K., 2003,
Age and origin of authigenic K-feldspar in
uppermost Precambrian rocks in the North
American Midcontinent. Geological Society of
America Bulletin, v. 115, p. 422-433.

DeMatties, T. A., 2022, Exploration-resource
assessment of productive felsic volcanic centers in
the Paleoproterozoic Penokean Volcanic Belt of
northern Wisconsin, Michigan and east-central
Minnesota, USA: Ore Geology Reviews, v. 141,
article 104489.

Myers, P. E., Cummings, M. L., and Wurdinger, S. R.,
1980, Precambrian geology of the Chippewa
Valley, Wisconsin, Institute of Lake Superior
Geology 26th Annual Meeting, Eau Claire,
Wisconsin, Field Trip Guidebook 1, 123 p.

25

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Mudrey, M. G., LaBerge, G. L., Myers, P. E., and
Cordua, W. S., 1987, Bedrock geology of
Wisconsin, northwest sheet, Wisconsin Geological
and Natural History Survey Map 88-7.
Quigley, A., 2016, Setting of the volcanogenic
massive sulfide deposits in the Penokean Volcanic
belt, Great Lakes region, USA: Unpub. M.S. thesis,
Colorado School of Mines, 95 p.
Schulz, K. J., and Cannon, W. F., 2007, The Penokean
orogeny in the Lake Superior region: Precambrian
Research, v. 157, p. 4-25.
Sims, P. K., Van Schmus, W. R., Schulz, K. J., and
Peterman, Z. E., 1989, Tectonostratigraphic
evolution of the Early Proterozoic Wisconsin
magmatic terranes of the Penokean orogen:
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 26, p. 21452158.
Van Schmus, W. R., 1980, Chronology of igneous
rocks associated with the Penokean orogeny in
Wisconsin: Geological Society of America Special
Paper, v. 182, p. 159-168.
Van Wyck, N., and Johnson, C. M., 1997, Common
Lead, Sm-Nd, and U-Pb constraints on
petrogenesis, crustal architecture, and tectonic
setting
of
the
Penokean
orogeny
(Paleoproterozoic) in Wisconsin: Geological
Society of America Bulletin, v. 109, p. 799-808.
Weber, E. M., and Lodge, R. W. D., 2022, New U/Pb
Geochronology from the Proterozoic Penokean
Orogen, Wisconsin: Implications for VMS
Metallogeny: Society of Economic Geologists
Annual Meeting, Denver, CO, paper P5.10.
Welsch, B., Faure, F., Famin, V., Barronet, A.,
Bachelery, P., 2013, Dendritic Crystallization: A
Single Process for all of the Textures of Olivine in
Basalts?, Journal of Petrology, v.543, p. 539-574.
Zi, J-W., Sheppard, S., Muhling, J. R., and Rasmussen,
B., 2021, Refining the Paleoproterozoic
tectonothermal history of the Penokean Orogen:
New U/Pb age constraints from the PembineWausau terrane, Wisconsin, USA: Geological
Society of America Bulletin, v. 134, p. 776-790.

26

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Field Trip 2 – Wisconsin’s Paleozoic stratigraphy and tour of Crystal Cave
Carsyn Ames, Esther Stewart, William “Bill” Batten, Eric Stewart, Ian Orland
Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey, University of Wisconsin- Madison,
3817 Mineral Point Rd. Madison, WI 53705

Introduction
The Cambrian-Ordovician strata exposed in
western Wisconsin were deposited during the
major
Sauk
and
Tippecanoe
marine
transgressions onto the interior of the Laurentian
continent (Sloss, 1963). These rocks compose the
regional aquifer system, host disseminated
sulfide mineralization that contribute to
groundwater contamination, and are locally
mined as proppant for fracking in the oil and gas
industry. Additionally, variable hardness of these
units in part controls the formation of ledges and
hillslopes in the fluvially-dissected Driftless Area
of southwestern Wisconsin. During this field trip,
we will focus on Cambrian and lower Ordovician
strata of the Sauk sequence (Figures 1 and 2).
We start our day touring Crystal Cave, a cave
system developed along joints within the
Ordovician Prairie du Chien Group dolostone.
For the rest of the day, we will visit outcrop
exposures of the Cambrian Jordan Formation,
Tunnel City Group, and Wonewoc Formation
sandstones, and if time permits- the Eau Claire
and Mount Simon Formations. We hope this field
trip will provide an opportunity to discuss
similarities and differences between units
deposited on the western side of the Wisconsin
Arch and those deposited on the eastern side,
where field trip authors have focused much of
their work. Additionally, we welcome and
encourage discussion between participants that
have knowledge of or experience working with
these stratigraphic units.

Figure 1. Correlation of map units showing relative
ages of Cambrian-Ordovician units. COpg: Parfreys
Glen Formation, Ce: Elk Mound Group, Ctl: Lone
Rock Formation of the Tunnel City Group, Ctm:
Mazomanie Formation of the Tunnel City Group,
Ctc: Tunnel City Group, Ct: Trempealeau Group,
Opc: Prairie du Chien Group including the Oneota
and Shakopee Formations, Oa: Ancell Group,
including the St. Peter and Glenwood Formations,
Osp: Sinnipee Group, including the Platteville,
Decorah, and Galena Formations. From Stewart (in
revision). Ages from Gradstein et al. (2020).

Cambrian-Ordovician strata in the southern
Lake Superior Region were deposited on an
essentially flat continental shelf in a shallow
epeiric sea well within the Laurentian continent
(Figure 3, Runkel et al., 2012, 2020). These strata
overlie Precambrian bedrock of variable ages
across the Great Unconformity, a surface
characterized by locally significant topographic
relief and weathering and exposed in outcrops
around the Eau Claire area. The regional
paleogeography that controlled sediment source
to sink was defined by several structural highs,
including the Transcontinental Arch, Wisconsin
Dome, and Wisconsin Arch, and several basins,
including the Hollandale Embayment, Illinois
Basin, and Michigan Basin (Figures 3 and 4,

A very brief geologic history of the
Cambrian-Ordovician strata in Western
Wisconsin
Regional depositional model and setting

27

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Figure 2. Generalized stratigraphic column of Wisconsin. From: Bedrock Stratigraphic Units in Wisconsin Bedrock Stratigraphic Units in Wisconsin [small] - WGNHS.

28

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Figure 3. From Runkel 2020, Figure 4. This figure illustrates a depositional model developed for southeastern
Minnesota. The Cambrian- Ordovician strata in Wisconsin are thought to have been deposited in a similar
fashion.

Runkel et al., 1998). The field stops we will visit
in western Wisconsin lie west of the Wisconsin
Arch and straddle the eastern edge of the
Transcontinental Arch and the southwest flank of
the Wisconsin Dome. These structural highs were
periodically subaerially exposed and eroded
during deposition of Paleozoic units.

dominated Great American Carbonate Bank
(Figures 3 and 5; Runkel et al., 2012). Sandy
Cambrian sediments of the Mt. Simon,
Wonewoc, and Jordan Formations were
deposited in shoreface, aeolian, wave-, and tideinfluenced settings within the inner detrital belt.
Mixed, fine-grained sandstone, siltstone, shale,
and carbonate of the Eau Claire Formation,
Trempealeau and Tunnel City Groups were
winnowed and trapped within a transitional,
relatively deeper water moat that separated the
inner detrital belt from the Great American
Carbonate Bank (Runkel et al., 2012). Dolomite
of the Prairie du Chien Group was deposited in
relatively shallow water, subtidal to peritidal
settings on this carbonate bank. Interfingering
sandstone, shale, and carbonate record marine
transgressions and regressions that caused
reciprocal expansion and contraction of the facies
belts. During sea level rise, the carbonate bank
advanced landward as siliciclastic-dominated
nearshore
environments
were
drowned.

Cambrian-Ordovician
siliciclastic
and
carbonate units were deposited in a nearshore,
sandstone-dominated inner detrital belt that
passed offshore into a relatively deeper water
moat, which in turn transitioned into a carbonate-

Figure 4. from Runkel and others 1998, regional map
showing locations of the Wisconsin Dome, Wisconsin
Arch, Transcontinental Arch and Hollandale
Embayment. Other depositional basins are shown on
map (Michigan and Illinois Basins), as well as regional
extent of Paleozoic units.

29

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Figure 5. from Runkel et. al., 2012 showing the depositional environments that produce interfingering of different
Cambrian-Ordovician siliciclastic and carbonate units across the Midwest.

Conversely, during sea level fall, sandy nearshore
facies of the inner detrital belt expanded seaward,
limiting carbonate deposition.

Paleozoic sedimentary rocks were gently
folded and faulted in the Paleozoic, probably
related to far-field effects of continental margin
orogenic events. Structures in Wisconsin rarely
exceed 200 feet in structural relief. Recent
mapping in Wisconsin and Minnesota suggests
folds and faults are probably related to
reactivation of much older Precambrian
structures (Figure 8). Deformation probably
occurred in at least two pulses: once during the
Ordovician (Mossler, 2006; Steenberg and
Retzler, 2016; Stewart E.K., 2021) and at least
once later in the Paleozoic (Heyl and others,
1959; Carlson, 1961). The importance of these
folds and faults for groundwater studies is a topic
of active interest. In northern Illinois, sandstones
in the core of the Sandwich Fault zone have an
order of magnitude reduction in horizontal
hydraulic conductivity compared to the
surrounding rocks (Hadley and others, 2020). In
eastern Wisconsin, the Beaver Dam anticline is
associated with a statistically significant increase
in detection of dissolved arsenic in groundwater
wells (Stewart E.D. and others, 2021).

The Wisconsin Arch and its influence on
Cambrian-Ordovician strata
Strata deposited in areas east (for example,
Dodge, Fond du Lac, and Jefferson Counties,
Wisconsin) and west (for example, the outcrops
we will visit today) of the Wisconsin Arch
(Figure 4) were deposited in different sub-basins
and tapped different local sediment source areas.
In addition, the Dodge, Fond du Lac, and
Jefferson County map areas were situated in more
proximal locations on the Wisconsin Arch
relative to today’s field stop locations. Therefore,
the eastern sections include more pronounced
exposure surfaces, condensed, or eroded sections,
and typically include thinner and less abundant
fine-grained intervals. Figure 6 shows a
generalized stratigraphic column for Jefferson
County (east of Wisconsin Arch), with
accompanying pXRF elemental data. Figure 7
shows a stratigraphic column from Trempealeau
County in western Wisconsin, south of this trip’s
field stops, and west of the Wisconsin Arch.

Regional and county scale mapping
The most recent regional map for West-Central
Wisconsin was published in 1988 by Bruce

Structural observations on the CambrianOrdovician strata in Wisconsin

30

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Figure 6. From Stewart (in revision), Bedrock geology of Jefferson County. Jefferson County is east of the Wisconsin
Arch.

31

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Figure 7. Core log, Gamma Ray log, and pXRF logs from the Arcadia core, Trempealeau County. Modified
slightly from Zambito et al. (2018). Trempealeau County is west of the Wisconsin Arch.

Brown (WGNHS). This map (Figure 9) includes
all of the Paleozoic units we will see today, as
well as the older Proterozoic and Archean rocks
that make up the bedrock to the east of Eau Claire.
Many of the stops for this field trip were found
using the Cambrian contacts from this map.

Field Trip Stops
Stop 1: Crystal Cave, Spring Valley, WI
(Contributed by Ian Orland, WGNHS)
UTM location
4964692.71N)

for

stop

(559180.94E,
and includes walking, ducking, and climbing 7
stories. Please exercise caution while inside the
cave as surfaces may be uneven. Below is a brief

We will be touring the cave with staff from
Crystal Cave. The tour is moderately strenuous

32

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

synopsis of a recent collaboration between
WGNHS and UW-Madison’s Geoscience
Department on speleothems from southern
Wisconsin:
Caves are fascinating natural features, and can
preserve geologic records of past environments.
Relatively recent advances in the methods and
precision of geochemical analyses have
established cave formations (speleothems) as
important scientific tools for understanding
climate changes of the last 500,000 years.
A number of groups have studied the
geochemistry of speleothems in the Lake
Superior region. In Wisconsin, much of this work
has happened at Cave of the Mounds in Blue
Mounds, WI, just outside of the terminal moraine
of the Laurentide Ice Sheet and some 20 miles
southwest of Madison. While that cave is not the
destination for this field trip, this section is
intended to highlight the types of information we
can learn from caves like Crystal Cave. Both
caves are privately-owned show caves that were
opened for tours in the late 1930s/early 1940s.
Crystal Cave is situated in Prairie du Chien
Group dolomites of the Early Ordovician (~475
Ma), while Cave of the Mounds is in Sinnipee
Group dolomites of the Middle Ordovician (~465
Ma). The formation ages of passages in each cave
are poorly constrained. Stalagmites and
stalactites from Cave of the Mounds, however,
have recorded environmental signals for
&gt;250,000 years.
Cave of the Mounds: permafrost record
Researchers from UW-Madison collected the
first seven stalagmite samples in 2015 for modern
U-Th geochronological analysis at UM-Twin
Cities. Initial results prompted further sampling
and analyses; Batchelor et al. (2019) reports 141
U-Th dates from 19 cave carbonate (speleothem)
samples ranging from 250–2 ka. The temporal
distribution of these ages revealed hiatuses of
stalagmite growth in the cave during both of the
last glacial maxima, demonstrating the presence
and duration of permafrost (Figure 10). Notably,

Figure 8. Cross-section from Dodge County, eastern
flank of the Wisconsin Arch, south-central
Wisconsin. Note offset of Precambrian basement and
Cambrian Elk Mound Group (Ce) through
Ordovician Prairie du Chien Group (Opc) and subtle
folding of younger units. From Stewart E.K. (2021).

33

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Figure 9. Bedrock geologic of west-central Wisconsin from Brown, 1988.

34

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Figure 10 (*from Batchelor et al., 2019). Speleothem U‐Th ages at Cave of the Mounds (COM) in context with
regional and global paleoclimate records. (a) MIS boundaries (odd numbers=interglacial periods, even
numbers=glacial periods). (b) Stacked records of δ18O (‰) from benthic marine foraminifera annotated with MIS
substage names (Lisiecki &amp; Raymo, 2005). (c) Summer insolation (21 June at 43°N). (d) Atmospheric CO2 (ppm)
and (e) CH4 (ppb) concentrations. (f) U‐Th ages from COM speleothems with associated 2σ uncertainties (this
study) and statistically significant growth hiatuses (gray and red vertical bars). (g) Paleo‐permafrost reconstructions
based on geomorphic features in Wisconsin, including ice wedge casts and polygons (Clayton et al., 2001). (h) U‐Th
dates of speleothems from caves in the Midwestern United States in order of decreasing latitude. References
provided in the main text. MIS = Marine Isotope Stage

changes in the δ18O signal during a time period
when warm periods are recorded in polar ice
cores and stronger monsoons are recorded in
tropical stalagmites (Figure 11).

the 18 ky duration of the growth hiatus at MIS 2
was much longer than the hiatus that overlaps
MIS 6 (5 ky), consistent with more extensive
continuous permafrost in the region during the
last glacial period.

A combination of microscopic imaging and
analysis showed that the δ18O changes each
happened in ~10 years, and comparison to a
climate model demonstrated that the δ18O
changes likely happened as a result of &gt;10°C
warming above the cave. These results speak to
how quickly and dramatically those polar

Cave of the Mounds: Decadal warming events
during the last glacial period
Earlier this year, Batchelor et al. (2023)
published a record of the oxygen isotope ratios
(δ18O) of calcite from a Cave of the Mounds
stalagmite that grew during the last glacial period.
Their interpretation focused on a number of rapid

35

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

warming events were propagated across the
Laurentide Ice Sheet, which is important for
better understanding the dynamics of rapid
climate change.

As you enjoy the tour of Crystal Cave, consider
what geologic stories might be captured in its

Figure 11 (*from Batchelor et al., 2023). Stalagmite CM-5 δ18O record in comparison to other regional δ18O
records of the last-glacial period. a, Cave of the Mounds (COM; this study) δ 18O record (black line), with associated
U-Th ages (black dots/2SD error). Note the error of our age model ranged from 520 to 2800 years and was on
average 730 years. b, A stalagmite δ18O record from Buckeye Creek Cave, WV (red line) showing relatively lowmagnitude δ18O changes during the last glacial period. c, A compilation of Chinese speleothem δ 18O records (orange
line), showing high-magnitude δ18O changes, which reflects the sensitivity of the East Asian monsoon system to
high-latitude warmings (DO events) during the last glacial period. *Note the scale of the y-axis in panels A-C are
the same to allow for one-to-one comparison. d, The North Greenland Ice Sheet Project (NGRIP) δ18O record (blue
line), showing the timing of abrupt warming DO Events (labeled #s).

36

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

speleothems. If you have ideas or questions, feel
free
to reach out to Ian
Orland
(orland@wisc.edu)!
Stop 2: Prairie Du Chien Group- Kraemer
Quarry Entrance Outcrop- 850th Ave
between Lincoln Rd and 870th Ave
intersections.
UTM location
4966004.74N)

for

stop

(564719.58E,

We do not have permission to enter the quarryDo not enter the quarry. There is an outcrop of the
Prairie Du Chien Group just outside of the quarry
gate that continues down the hill from the quarry
entrance. This outcrop appears to be a very sandy
portion of the Prairie Du Chien Group, possibly
representing the lower most Stockton Hill
Member of the Oneota Formation, or an
interfingering of the Jordan Sandstone within the
basal Prairie Du Chien Group.

Figure 12. Massive beds, of sandy, carbonate
cemented Prairie Du Chien Group.

Just to the right of the quarry entrance are
massive, 1-2m thick beds (Figure 12). To the left,
and down the hill, the massive beds continue and
just below them thinly bedded, lighter color units
begin to appear (Figure 13). The portion of the
outcrop that continues down the hill also contains
what may be the Prairie Du Chien Gp./Jordan Fm.
contact in the ditch just below the road grade
between the outcrop and the road (Figure 14).
While not recognized in the formal bedrock
stratigraphic column for Wisconsin, the thinly
bedded, lighter color units may also represent the
Coon Valley Member of the Oneota Formation,
often recognized and mapped in Minnesota
(Steenberg, J.R., and Retzler, A.J., 2016). We
will depart on 850th Ave. by continuing down the
slope. To the left near the toe of the slope, there
is a valley floor with a barn and small pasture.

Figure 13. Massive beds of Prairie Du Chien GroupStockton Hill Member? Possibly atop thinly bedded
interfingerings of Jordan sandstone.

Looking across the valley floor, there is an
outcrop of Jordan sandstone just across the creek
(Figure 15).

37

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Figure 15. View of valley floor, at toe of slope
driving down 850th Ave., looking across pasture
towards Jordan outcrop just across creek.

18). This outcrop (Figure 17) is likely close to the
base of the
Figure 14. Arrow pointing to possible Prairie Du
Chien Gp/Jordan Fm. contact in ditch just below road
grade.

Jordan/St. Lawrence contact (labeled in Figure
16), and the floodplain that the Eau Galle River
runs through most likely represents the top of the
St. Lawrence Formation.

Stop 3: Jordan Formation- Cth B and
770th (Spring Lake, Wisconsin)
UTM location
4962594.39N)

for

stop

The Jordan Formation of the Trempealeau
Group has been highly studied in both Wisconsin
and Minnesota (Mudrey, M.G. Jr. ed, 1997 and
references therein). The distinction between and
regional application of the quartzose and
feldspathic sandstones in this formation have also
been debated (Runkel 1994 and Byers and Dott,
1995). Overall, the Jordan Formation represents a
coarsening upward sequence that is conformable

(562605.40E,

Lithofacies of the Jordan Formation are
described in Runkel, 1994 and are as follows: 1)
very fine-grained hummocky cross-stratified and
burrowed sandstone, 2) fine-grained, trough
cross-stratified and burrowed sandstone, 3)
medium- to coarse-grained, large-scale crossstratified sandstone and 4) thinly interbedded
sandstone, mudstone and shale. They note that
lithofacies 4 may only be relevant to certain areas
in Minnesota (Figure 18). Authors are open to
discussion as to where this particular outcrop falls
in Runkel’s 1994 classification schema (Figure

Figure 16. View of the outcrop across Cth B with
approximate contacts labeled.

38

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Iron
staining
Figure 17. A. View of outcrop. Note the cross
bedding and iron staining above hammer. B. Possible
iron concretions?

PDC
Jordan

Silcrete

at its basal contact with the St. Lawrence, and
unconformable with the Prairie Du Chien Group
contact at its top. The Coon Valley member of the
Jordan is not formally recognized in the
stratigraphic column of Wisconsin (WGNHS

Figure 19. Photo of core from Jefferson County,
Wisconsin (east of Wisconsin Arch) modified from
Kusick, 2022 M.S. Thesis. This interval of core
shows the contact between the Jordan Formation and
the Prairie Du Chien Group.

2011), though it has been noted above the Jordan
Fm. in southern parts of the state.
A recent M.S. dissertation (Kusick, 2022)
discussed, in detail, both the stratigraphy and
depositional environments of the CambrianOrdovician units east of the Wisconsin Arch.
Kusick (2022) describes the Jordan sandstone as
being comprised of only 2 facies of cross
stratified sandstone and shaly sandstone, and as
being deposited in an upper to lower shoreface
environment. These authors would also like to
note that locally, the Jordan Formation east of the
Wisconsin Arch includes silcrete and clay, and
hosts disseminated sulfides (Figure 19).
Stop 3a: Rock Elm Impact Structure- Rock
Elm, WI- lunch at Nugget Lake County Park
UTM location
4948450.76N)

Figure 18. Figure 2 from Runkel, 1994 illustrating
the different lithofacies of the Jordan Sandstone in
Minnesota.

39

for

stop

(561573.58E,

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Figure 20. Core photos showing jumbled and deformed Cambrian strata from the southern edge of
the Rock Elm central uplift - from WGNHS archives.

No set stop, informational only as we’ll be
eating lunch at a park within the crater.

detected in detrital zircon grains and is interpreted
to be caused by the impact (Cavosie et al., 2015).

The field trip will go through the Rock Elm
impact structure (Figure 20), located in Pierce
County around 35 miles WSW of Eau Claire
(Figure 21). The Rock Elm impact structure is
the largest deformation event recorded in the
Paleozoic section of western Wisconsin. The
structure contains a 6.5 km diameter ring
boundary fault and a central uplift 1 km across
(Cordua, 1985). Where control exists, the ring
boundary fault is thought to have accommodated
45 meters of down-in-the-center displacement
(French and others, 2004). Much of the interior of
the ring boundary fault is filled with the relatively
flat-lying Rock Elm shale and the overlying
Washington Road sandstone, which have a
combined thickness of approximately 48 meters.
These units are unique to the area, and do not
exist outside of the ring fault. These units are
described based on numerous outcrops, many
given in Cordua (1987) and Cunningham and
others (2011). The central uplift contains
outcrops of tilted Mt. Simon Formation (Figure
20), which suggests 250 to 300 meters of uplift
within the core zone relative to rocks outside the
impact structure (French et al., 2004). Reidite, a
high pressure polymorph of zircon, has been

Stop 4: Skolithos burrows in Tunnel City
Group-330th Ave. between HWY 25 and Cth Y
(Private Property!!!)
UTM location
4961335.76N)

for

stop

(586184.90E,

We will park on a private drive and walk east
along the road to this outcrop.
This stop in the Tunnel City Group is an
excellent example of Skolithos burrows (Figure
22) which are common in the Tunnel City Group.
This outcrop is likely the Tomah Member of the
Lone Rock Formation. Excellent examples of
cross-stratification can be seen at this outcrop as
well.

40

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Figure 21. Map plate from the 2007 Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey Open File
Report on the Rock Elm impact structure (Cordua and Evans, 2007).

41

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Figure 22. Tunnel City Group outcrop with excellent examples of Skolithos burrows
and possibly multiple types of cross-stratification.

“Tunnel City Group (Cambrian)
The Tunnel City Group is comprised of the
Lone Rock and Mazomanie Formations. Similar
to neighboring La Crosse County (Evans, 2003),
the Mazomanie Formation was not recognized in
Trempealeau County.

Stop 5: St. Lawrence Formation/Tunnel City
Group road cut- Cth C and Cth Y
UTM location
4958918.89N)

for

stop

(587368.83E,

Lone Rock Formation. The Lone Rock
Formation (Figure 23) and its members are
identifiable in the map area. The members, from
oldest to youngest, are Birkmose, Tomah, and
Reno; these are not differentiated at the map
scale. The Birkmose Member is a dolomitecemented, coarse-grained, glauconitic sandstone
to
sandy
dolostone
with
flat-pebble
conglomerates; the Tomah Member is a tan to
white-colored, medium-grained, glauconitic
quartz sandstone; and the Reno Member is a
glauconitic medium- to coarse-grained quartz
sandstone with flat-pebble conglomerates.
Palaeophycus and Skolithos are common, as is
hummocky cross-stratification and crossstratification bounded by horizontal bedding
surfaces. The contact with the overlying St.
Lawrence
Formation
is
sharp
and
unconformable.

The road cut is just west of the intersection of
Cth C and Cth Y. We will park and walk to this
outcrop. Cth C is a fairly busy road, please
exercise caution when you decide to cross.
Recent mapping in Trempealeau County,
southeast of stops 5 and 6, has produced
interesting work on both the geological
relationships of the Cambrian- Ordovician rocks,
and the quality of groundwater in the west-central
part of the state. Zambito and others, 2018
published the following unit description for the
Tunnel City Group:

42

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

phyllosilicate mineral. Another interesting part of
this road cut is the bench approximately 35ft up.
This bench feature likely represents the
unconformable contact Zambito and others, 2018
alluded to with the overlying St. Lawrence
Formation. The Mazomanie Formation is
generally not observed in this part of the state and
is more prevalent in the southern parts of the state
where it interfingers the Lone Rock Formation
(Mudrey, M.G. Jr. ed, 1997 and references
therein).

St. Lawrence Fm.
above bench

Reno
Member
Tomah Member

A 2019 study by Zambito and others
investigated
the
relationship
between
groundwater quality and the geochemistry of the
Tunnel City-Wonewoc units in western
Wisconsin. This study notes that sulfide bearing
minerals are disseminated between the two units
in west-central Wisconsin, and they call for more
work to better understand the geochemical effects
of oxidation of sulfide minerals during
groundwater pumping in this part of the state. Our
next stop will be at an outcrop of Wonewoc
sandstone, and we will pass other outcrops of this
unit on our drive.

Figure 23. Road cut showing contacts between the St.
Lawrence Fm., and Reno and Tomah Mbrs. of the Lone
Rock Fm. This is the view from the north side of Cth C.

The Lone Rock Formation is commonly
exposed in shale pits, along roads leading to
ridgetops, and at the top of sand mine high walls
where the Wonewoc Formation is extracted and
the Birkmose Member forms the caprock. The
formation is approximately 150 feet thick in the
map area. Elemental data for part of the Lone
Rock Formation is shown in plate 2 [figure 7].
These data show the formation’s lithologic
variability, in particular the distinct upper
carbonate-cemented and lower sandstone
dominated intervals in the Birkmose; the lower
interval consists of reworked quartz grains from
the underlying Wonewoc with interspersed, rare
glauconite grains and phosphatic brachiopods.”
These authors find this to be an excellent, and
representative description of the unit for the westcentral region. – Zambito and others (2018)

Overall, the Tunnel City Group both east and
west of the Wisconsin Arch are quite similar. As
examined at this stop, west of the Arch, the
Tunnel City Gp. East of the Arch is also a quartz
sandstone with glauconite and trace amounts of
shale.
Stop 6: Wonewoc road cut- Cth Y
UTM location
4959793.83N)

Figure 24 shows a small part of the
westernmost portion of the outcrop. The very
dark, greenish-black bed just below the more
resistant dolomitic bed is rich in the mineral
glauconite, which is an iron potassium

for

stop

(593272.27E,

The Wonewoc Formation is a fine to coarse
sandstone unit with medium to thick beds, highangle trough cross-stratification and some

43

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Figure 24. A. View of westernmost point of the outcrop. B. close up of the phosphatic rich, friable sandstone of
the Tomah Member.

orange, iron rich bed on the south side of Cth Y
that doesn’t seem to appear in the north face of
the outcrop.

feldspar (Mudrey, M.G. Jr. ed, 1997). Brachiopod
fragments, Skolithos burrows (which we
observed at stop 4), and Climactichnites are
somewhat common in the fossiliferous Ironton
Member of this formation. The upward contact
(Figure 25) with the Tunnel City Group is
gradational and fines upward; the basal contact
with the Eau Claire Formation has been debated
as to whether it is gradational or not (Mudrey,
M.G. Jr. ed, 1997 and Ostrom 1978). Note the

In the 1990s, to better characterize aquifer and
confining units, the Minnesota Geological Survey
began focusing on the hydrostratigraphic
characteristics of geologic units (1998 ILSG field
guide). Hydrostratigraphic subdivisions include:
1) fine clastic; 2) coarse clastic; 3) carbonate; 4)
clastic/carbonate mix. While this approach has
not been implemented as part of bedrock mapping
in Wisconsin, its importance has been recognized
by Wisconsin hydrogeologists in lithologically
complex units such as the Eau Claire Formation
(Bradbury and Runkel, 2011). The authors are
open to questions, and discussion of this method
as it may pertain to future groundwater study
needs across the Midwest.

Additional stops if time permits:
Devil’s Punchbowl – Eau Claire Formation:
UTM location
4966909.29E)

Figure 25. View of the Wonewoc outcrop on Cth Y.

44

for

stop

(582783.00N,

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Park in the parking lot, walk east towards the
stairs, and take them down the trail into the
Punchbowl.

Acknowledgements
A special thanks to Eric Stewart and Ian Orland
for contributing content to this guide. A very
special thanks to Bill Batten for helping scout
field locations and always knowing where to find
the best contacts. Additionally, this guide would
not have been possible with consulting Dave
LePain’s mapping notes and field guides from
Pierce and St. Croix counties and the work of
others who have previously published work on
these Paleozoic units.

This is a classic stop for field trips in this part
of the state. Devil’s Punchbowl is managed by the
Landmark Conservancy- please do not use rock
hammers on the outcrops and be good
stewards of the landscape. This outcrop shows
the relationship between the Eau Claire
Formation and the Wonewoc Formation. Expect
to see a fine-grained sandstone with swaley cross
beds in the Eau Claire Formation, and mediumto coarse-grained, cross-stratified sandstone in
the Wonewoc Formation at this location
(Mudrey, M.G. Jr. ed, 1997).

References
Batchelor, C. J., Marcott, S. A., Orland, I. J., He, F.,
and Edwards, R. L., 2023. Decadal warming events
extended into central North America during the last
glacial period. Nature Geoscience 16: pages 257261,

Hwy 37/Hendricks Ave and Silver Springs
Dr.- Mt. Simon Formation:
UTM location
4958712.01E)

for

stop

(615774.61N,

Batchelor C. J., Orland I. J., Marcott S. A., Slaughter
R., Edwards R. L., Zhang P., and Li X., 2019.
Distinct permafrost conditions across the last two
glacial periods in mid-latitude North America.
Geophysical Research Letters 46: pages 1331813326,

This is a typical Mt. Simon Formation
exposure (Figure 26), coarse- to mediumgrained, cross-bedded, iron stained, sandstone,
interbedded with shale and fine grained sandstone
(Mudrey, M.G. Jr. ed, 1997).

Bradbury, K. R., &amp; Runkel, A. C., 2011. Recent
advances in the hydrostratigraphy of Paleozoic
bedrock in the Midwestern United States. GSA
Today, v. 21, pages 10-12.
Byers C.W. and Dott R.H. Jr., 1995 Sedimentology
and depositional sequences of the Jordan
Formation
(Upper
Cambrian),
Northern
Mississippi Valley, Journal of Sedimentology, v.
B65, no.3, pages 289-305.
Cavosie, A. J., Erickson, T. M., &amp; Timms, N. E., 2015.
Nanoscale records of ancient shock deformation:
Reidite (ZrSiO4) in sandstone at the Ordovician
Rock Elm impact crater. Geology, 43(4), pages
315-318.
Cordua, W. S. 1985. Rock Elm structure, Pierce
county, Wisconsin: a possible cryptoexplosion
structure. Geology, 13(5), pages 372-374.

Figure 26. View of the Mt. Simon Formation
outcrop. This location is heavily iron stained and
exhibits excellent examples of sedimentary structures
like trough cross stratification and channel forms.

Cordua, W. S., 1987. The Rock Elm Disturbance,
Pierce County Wisconsin, in Balaban, N. (ed.),
Field trip guidebook for the Upper Mississippi

45

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Valley, Minnesota, Iowa and Wisconsin, prepared
for the 21st annual meeting of the Geological
Society of America North-central section,
Minnesota Geological Survey Guidebook Series
#15, pages 123-152.

Central Section, Geological Society of America,
May1-2, 114 pages.
Ostrom, M.E.,1978. Stratigraphic relations of Lower
Paleozoic rocks of Wisconsin, Wisconsin
Geological and Natural History Survey Field Trip
Guidebook 3, pages 3-22

Cordua W.S. and Evans T.J., 2007. Geology of the
Rock Elm Complex, Pierce County, Wisconsin,
Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey
Open File Report WOFR2007-02, Map, 1 plate.

Runkel A.C., 1994. Deposition of the uppermost
Cambrian (Croixian) Jordan Sandstone, and the
nature of the Cambriand-Ordovician boundary in
the Upper Mississippi Valley, Geological Society
of America Bulletin, vol. 43: pages 60-71

Cunningham, J., Dolliver, H., and Cordua, W., 2011.
Flaming meteors, dark caves and raging water:
geological curiosities of western Wisconsin, in
Miller, J.D, Hudack, G., Wittkop, C., and
McLaughlin, P.I. (eds.), Archean to Anthropocene:
Field Guides to the Geology of the Mid-continent
of North America, Geological Society of America
Guidebook Field guide 24, pages 411-424.

Runkel A.C. McKay, R.M., and Palmer, A.R., 1998.
High-resolution sequence stratigraphy of lower
Paleozoic sheet sandstones in central North
America: The role of special conditions of cratonic
interiors in development of stratal architecture.
GSA Bulletin, v.110 no.2., pages 188-210.
doi:10.1130/B26117.1

French, B. M., Cordua, W. S., &amp; Plescia, J. B., 2004.
The Rock Elm meteorite impact structure,
Wisconsin: Geology and shock-metamorphic
effects in quartz. Geological Society of America
Bulletin, 116(1-2), 200-218.

Runkel, Anthony C., Robert M. McKay, Clinton A.
Cowan, James F. Miller, and John F. Taylor, 2012,
The Sauk megasequence in the cratonic interior of
North America: Interplay between a fully
developed inner detrital belt and the central great
American carbonate bank, in J. R. Derby, R. D.
Fritz, S. A. Longacre, W. A. Morgan, and C. A.
Sternbach, eds., The great American carbonate
bank: The geology and economic resources of the
Cambrian – Ordovician Sauk megasequence of
Laurentia: AAPG Memoir 98, p. 1001 – 1011.

Carlson, J.E., 1961. Geology of the Montfort and
Linden Quadrangles, Wisconsin, in Geology of
parts of the Upper Mississippi Valley zinc-lead
district: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1123– B,
pages 95–138, 2 pls., scale 1:24,000,
Gradstein, F.M., Ogg, J.G., Schmitz, M.D. and Ogg,
G.M. eds., 2020. Geologic time scale 2020.
Elsevier.

Runkel, A.C., 2020. Minnesota at a Glance Paleozoic
History of Southeastern Minnesota-Ancient
Tropical Seas. Minnesota Geological Survey.
Retrieved from the University of Minnesota
Digital Conservancy,

Heyl, A.V., Jr., Agnew, A.F., Lyons, E.J., Behre, C.H.,
Jr., and Flint, A.E., 1959, The geology of the Upper
Mississippi Valley zinc-lead district: U.S.
Geological Survey Professional Paper 309, 310
pages., 24 pls.

Sloss, L.L., 1963. Sequences in the cratonic interior of
North America. Geological Society of America
Bulletin, 74(2), pages 93-114.

Kusick, A. R., 2022. Stratigraphy, Sedimentology, and
Deformational Significance of Cambrian and Early
Ordovician Strata Along the Southeast Wisconsin
Arch (M.S. dissertation, The University of
Wisconsin-Milwaukee).

Steenberg, J.R., and Retzler, A.J., 2016. Bedrock
geology, plate 2 of Geologic atlas of Washington
County: Minnesota Geological Survey County
Atlas Series C–39, Part A, scale 1:100,000,

Mossler, J.H., 2006, Bedrock Geology of the Prescott
quadrangle, Washington and Dakota counties,
Minnesota: Minnesota Geological Survey
Miscellaneous Map Series M–167, scale 1:24,000,

Stewart E.D., Stewart E.K., Bradbury, K.R.,
Fitzpatrick, W.A., 2021. Correlating Bedrock
Folds to Higher Rates of Arsenic Detection in
Groundwater, Southeast Wisconsin, USA,
Groundwater, v59, no.6, pages 829-838.

Mudrey, M.G. Jr. ed, 1997. Guide to field trips in
Wisconsin and Adjacent areas of Minnesota.
Prepared for the 31st Annual meeting of the North-

46

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Stewart, E.K., 2021. Bedrock geology of Dodge
County, Wisconsin: Wisconsin Geological and
Natural History Survey Map Series M–508, scale
1:100,000,
Stewart (in revision). Bedrock Geologic map of
Jefferson County, Wisconsin: WGNHS Map
Series, 1 plate, 1:100,000-scale.
Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey
[WGNHS], 2011, Bedrock stratigraphic units in
Wisconsin: Wisconsin Geological and Natural
History Survey Educational Series 51, 2 p.
Zambito J.J IV, Mauel, S. W., Haas, L.D., Batten,
W.G., Chase, Streiff, C.M., P.M., Niemisto, E.M.,
Heyrman, E.J., 2018. Preliminary Bedrock
Geology of Southern Trempealeau County,
Wisconsin, Wisconsin Geological and Natural
History Survey Open File Report WOFR2018-01,
2 plates scale 1:100,000, 27 pages
Zambito J.J IV, Haas, L.D., Parsen, M.J., McLaughlin,
P.I., 2019. Geochemistry and mineralogy of the
Wonewoc-Tunnel City contact interval strata in
western Wisconsin, Wisconsin Geological and
Natural History Survey Open File Report
WOFR2019-01: 28.

47

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Field Trip 3 – Precambrian Geology of the Eau Claire River Valley:
Re-discovering the Eau Claire Volcanic Complex
Robert W.D. Lodge, Evan M. Weber, Robert L. Hooper
Department of Geology &amp; Environmental Science, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire,
Eau Claire, Wisconsin 54701

of the “prove-it-first” law, or sulfide mining
moratorium, in 1997 effectively shut down
mineral exploration and mining activities in the
region. More recently, the mineral exploration
industry has been reinvigorated because of the
2002 discovery of the 18.2 Mt Back Forty deposit
in Michigan, easing of the sulfide mining
moratorium in 2017, and a recent national push
for securing domestic critical mineral resources.
However, this has also highlighted the lack of
modern datasets on Wisconsin’s mineral deposits
that could be used to further our knowledge of the
mineral-forming systems in the belt. The
Pembine-Wausau Terrane has received most of
the historic and recent attention since it hosts
approximately 150 million tonnes of known VMS
mineralization. However, little attention has been
given to the Penokean volcanic deposits that
overprinted the Marshfield Terrane that are
presented in this guidebook. These volcanic
deposits host a VMS prospect (Butler Prospect)
and therefore the geodynamic setting of these
volcanic rocks clearly are favorable for
submarine hydrothermal activity. DeMatties
(2022) recognized the gap in knowledge for these
Penokean volcanic deposits, known as the Eau
Claire Volcanic Complex, within the Marshfield
Terrane and their exploration potential. It is a
little embarrassing how little we know about the
Eau Claire region considering the mineral wealth
of the rest of the orogen. Current research at the
University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire is aimed at
the addressing this issue.

Introduction
The erosional outliers of Precambrian bedrock
in the Eau Claire River valley represent the
southernmost extent of the Canadian Shield
before it is completely covered by Paleozoic
sedimentary strata. The rocks exposed here are
part of the Paleoproterozoic Penokean Orogeny,
a collisional orogen that resulted from the
accretion of the Pembine-Wausau and Marshfield
terranes onto the southern margin of the Superior
Province. This region was last visited by
members of the Institute of Lake Superior
Geology in 1980 when a field trip through the
region was conducted by Paul Myers and
colleagues (Myers et al., 1980) when it was called
the “Chippewa Amphibolite Complex”. Since
then, the “Eau Claire River Complex” was
defined and described in detail by Cummings
(1984). There has been ‘new’ U/Pb data collected
by the USGS (Sims et al. 1989) and others (Van
Wyck et al, 1997; Klier, 2019; Weber and Lodge,
2022), regional syntheses of the Penokean
volcanogenic
massive
sulfide
(VMS)
mineralization (DeMatties 1989; 1994; 2018;
2022), maps published by government surveys
(Brown, 1988), and orogen-wide tectonic model
(Shultz and Cannon, 2007) that is being revisited
based on new U/Pb data (Zi et al., 2021). The
rocks that will be visited on this trip are a critical
part of evaluating the tectonic models for the
Penokean Orogen and have not been examined
using modern analytical techniques.
The Penokean Orogen is perhaps best known
for hosting numerous VMS deposits. In fact, one
of the most complete descriptions of several
deposits was published by the Institute of Lake
Superior Geology (LeBarge, 1996). The passing

The portion of the Eau Claire Volcanic
Complex that is visited in this guidebook is not
well exposed and its regional context is poorly
constrained. Students from the University of

48

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Wisconsin-Eau Claire have been visiting Big
Falls and Little Falls locations in this guidebook
for decades to learn how to map and describe
rocks in the field, measure structures and interpret
geologic histories, and learn the basic mechanics
of field work. Faculty, students, and alumni from
Eau Claire consider these outcrops classic. This
guidebook will (re-)introduce these rocks and
present some of the ongoing research with the
Eau Claire Volcanic Complex. The outcrops
visited in this guidebook are accessible by foot,
but many others were accessed by kayaking in the
Eau Claire River. Ongoing research in this region
hopes to expand the lithogeochemistry and zircon

petrochronology database to better delineate the
geodynamic evolution and crustal architecture of
this region. Determining the presence or absence
of Archean basement throughout the Marshfield
terrane will help refine terrane boundaries and
improve our understanding of the metallogeny of
the region to assist in future mineral exploration
efforts.

Regional Geology
The Paleoproterozoic Penokean Orogen (ca.
1.8 Ga) in the Lake Superior region (Figure 1) is
a classic Precambrian orogenic belt comprised of

Figure 1: Geologic map of the major tectonic assemblages and major structures of the Penokean Orogen. Notable
abbreviations that are important for this guidebook are EPSZ, Eau Pleine shear zone; NFZ, Niagara fault zone.
Figure from Shultz &amp; Cannon (2007).

49

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

dominantly submarine volcanic rocks formed in a
suprasubduction zone setting that are now
structurally juxtaposed along the southern edge of
the Archean Superior Province during the earliest
phases of forming the Columbia, or Nuna,
supercontinent (LaBerge and Myers, 1984; Sims
et al., 1989; Schulz and Cannon, 2007). The
orogen is host to at least 150 million metric
tonnes (Mt) of VMS and associated
mineralization (DeMatties, 1994, 2018) but
remains one of the more poorly understood and
underexplored mineral districts in North
America.
The Penokean Orogen has been divided into
the Interior and Exterior domains. These domains
are sutured by the Niagara Fault Zone (Figure 1).
The Exterior domain consists of passive margin,
rift, and forearc basin sediments and Archean
crustal blocks from the Superior Province that
were deformed in the folded and faulted foreland
part of the orogen.
The Interior Domain consists of two accreted
terranes, the Pembine-Wausau and Marshfield
terranes. These terranes are sutured by the Eau
Pleine Shear Zone (Figure 1). The PembineWausau Terrane is a composite accreted oceanic
arc
overprinted
by
continental-margin
magmatism and hosts numerous VMS deposits
and occurrences (DeMatties, 1994; Shultz &amp;
Cannon, 2007) (Figure 2). The Marshfield
Terrane is composed of Archean crustal
fragments of unknown origin that was
overprinted by Penokean-aged magmas during
the Penokean orogen (Figure 2) and is described
in more detail in the sections to follow.

Figure 2 - Schematic tectonic evolution of the
Penokean Orogen provided by Shultz and Cannon
(2007) based on geophysical, sedimentological, and
geochronological compilations.

continental arc volcanism and back arc extension
developed until about 1850 Ma until the collision
with the Marshfield terrane began. During this
ocean closure, a double subduction zone with
concurrent northward and southward subduction
resulted in arc magmatism on both the PembineWausau and Marshfield terranes. Sedimentation
related to this convergence in a foreland basin
setting continued until about 1835 Ma. The end
of the orogen was constrained by undeformed
post-tectonic plutons dated at 1830 Ma that stich
shear zones.

Shultz and Cannon (2007) synthesized the
tectonic events that formed the Penokean Orogen
(summarized in Figure 2) based on a detailed
compilation of lithologic, structural, sedimentological, and geochronological datasets. This
classic model proposed that an oceanic arc, now
the Pembine-Wausau Terrane, collided with the
southern margin of the Superior Province around
1880 Ma. Following a subduction flip from
south-directed to north-directed subduction,

50

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

However, this classic tectonic model for the
evolution of the Penokean Orogen has recently
been re-evaluated considering new U/Pb data.
The first contradictory data came when Quigley
(2016) obtained a high-precision U/Pb zircon age
of 1832.98 ± 0.52 Ma from a rhyolite at the Back
Forty deposit via CA-ID-TIMS. This younger age
was in stark contrast to the other VMS deposits
that yielded U/Pb zircon ages of ca. 1875 Ma.
Additional U/Pb zircon ages reported by Zi et al.
(2021) from volcanic units (Beecher Formation)
and plutonic rocks (Dunbar Gneiss, Newingham
Tonalite) in the eastern part of the orogen
supported the younger extensional tectonic event
proposed by Quigley (2016). These new ages
resulted in a revised Penokean tectonic model
where long-lived northward subduction along a
continental margin with repeated extensional and
contractional regimes in response to retreat and
advance of the subducting oceanic plate (Figure
3). Weber and Lodge (2022) obtained a U/Pb age
of 1831.4 ± 2.0 Ma on the dacite unit hosting the
Eisenbrey deposit in the western part of the
orogen, suggesting that this second VMS forming
event was widespread. A summary of the geochronology is presented in Figure 4.

Figure 3 - Schematic illustration of the revised
tectonic model of the Penokean Orogen. Figure is
from Zi et al. (2021). Abbreviations: NF—Niagara
fault zone; EPSZ—Eau Pleine shear zone.

Marshfield Terrane
This guidebook visits the only Penokean
volcanic complex south of the Eau Pleine Shear
Zone and is interpreted to part of the Marshfield
Terrane. The Marshfield Terrane represents an
Archean microcontinent of uncertain origins
(Sims et al., 1989; Schulz and Cannon, 2007; Zi
et al., 2021). Some of the earliest works on the
terrane by Sims et al. (1989) noted eight Archean
U/Pb ages from isolated outcrops along the
Wisconsin, Black, and Chippewa Rivers; many of
which were compiled from unpublished sources.
Paleoproterozoic volcanic rocks in the Marshfield
terrane were deposited about 1835-1865 Ma
(Sims et al., 1989; Van Wyck, 1995; Klier, 2019;
Weber and Lodge, 2022). These supracrustal
rocks were referred to as the Eau Claire River
Complex by Cummings (1984) or the Eau Claire
Volcanic Complex by DeMatties (2018; 2022).

They consist of an interlayered sequence of felsic
to mafic volcanic rocks, dacite porphyry, and a
variety of clastic and chemical sedimentary rocks
(Sims et al., 1989). Some conglomerates contain
granitic gneissic clasts that were interpreted to be
Archean (Myers et al. 1980), but no definitive
ages were determined on the clasts. Otherwise,
our knowledge of the Archean Marshfield terrane
and associated Paleoproterozoic volcanic rocks
remains as sparse as the outcrop exposures.
Eau Claire Volcanic Complex
The Eau Claire Volcanic Complex is poorly
documented and understudied mainly due to its
inaccessible outcrops in remote parts of the Eau
Claire River valley. Myers et al. (1980) described

51

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Figure 4 - Time-space plot for the tectonic components of the Penokean Orogen. Plot is from Zi et al. (2021). See
citation for references on data sources.

supracrustal amphibolites, metarhyolites and
metasediments in the Eau Claire River valley and
classified them as part of the Chippewa
Amphibolite
Complex.
This
informal
classification of the high metamorphic grade
rocks in the Eau Claire-Chippewa River area was
eventually grouped with the Marshfield Terrane
by Sims et al. (1989) and Shultz and Cannon
(2007). The first time that that the Eau Claire
“Complex” was officially referred to was by
Cummings (1984) when discussing the petrology

and geochemistry of the gneisses in the Big FallsLittle Falls area (Stops 1 and 2 in this guidebook).
After that, research in the Eau Claire Volcanic
Complex essentially ceased. Sims et al. (1989)
reported a U/Pb rutile age from Big Falls of ca.
1835 Ma. In fact, the words “Eau Claire” are not
used in the Shultz and Cannon (2007) regional
synthesis. DeMatties (2018; 2022) refers to the
Eau Claire Complex when discussing the
volcanic complexes in the Penokean, but largely
cites the work of Myers et al. (1980).

52

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Preliminary Hf-isotope data and zircon trace
elements reveal that the rocks analyzed in the Eau
Claire Volcanic Complex are juvenile, mantlederived melts with no inheritance from older
sources (See Weber et al. 2023, Part 1 of this
volume). This suggests that these volcanic rocks
are not forming on Archean basement, as one
would expect if the Eau Claire Volcanic Complex
was emplaced onto the Marshfield Terrane.
Additionally,
magnetic
lineaments
on
aeromagnetic maps for the region appear to
crosscut the interpreted position of the Eau Pleine
Shear Zone and the overall fabric as outlined by
magnetics appears constant (Figure 5). Ongoing
research in the region seeks to better define the
relationship of the Eau Claire Volcanic Complex
to the Marshfield Terrane and the architecture of
the basement in this area.

Field Trip Stops
The overall objective of this guidebook is to
tour the accessible parts of the Eau Claire
Volcanic Complex as exposed in the Eau Claire
River valley and surrounding tributaries. The
guidebook can be divided into two main regions:
The Big Falls-Little Falls and North Fork regions.
The Big Falls-Little Falls region represents the
classic “Eau Claire Complex” originally
described by Cummings (1984). The North Fork
region is much more remote and rarely visited by
geologists. In fact, it is not obvious that anyone
has studied these rocks since they were first
reported by Myers et al. (1980). These more
remote parts of the complex are currently being
studied (see Leahy and Lodge, Part 1 of this
volume) to determine their regional context.
Some of that data will be presented herein. The
goal of this work is to determine if the Eau Claire
Volcanic Complex is a volcanic center built upon
Archean crust (continental arc) or is juvenile

Figure 5 - Total field aeromagnetic map of the Eau Claire River region showing the location of Eau Pleine Shear
Zone and field trip regions (Big Falls, North Fork). White dashed lines highlight a couple of magnetic lineaments
that extend through the suturing shear zone. Magnetic maps from Daniels and Snyder (2002).

53

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

(oceanic arc) as this is important implications for
the regional metallogeny and mineral systems.
Most of the locations in this guidebook are on
riverside outcrops. These areas are prone to
sudden flooding and the upmost caution and
careful planning should be used prior to visiting
these locations. In addition, rocks here are uneven
and potentially slippery. To access larger sections
of outcrops, low water conditions may be
required. In addition, all locations in this region
may contain poisonous plants (e.g. nettle, poison
ivy) and black-legged ticks that can transmit
diseases. While this is unlikely to be a concern in
early spring during the 2023 ILSG conference,
future users of this manual should plan
appropriately.

Figure 6 - Generalized Precambrian geologic map of
the Big Falls-Little Falls area of the Eau Claire River.
Figure modified from Cummings (1984).

Big Falls Region
The banded amphibolite, gneisses, and
intrusions in the Big Falls region of the Eau Claire
River are some of most studied Precambrian
exposures in this region and are visited multiple
times a year by introductory and upper division
geology classes at the University of WisconsinEau Claire. It is in this region that the term “Eau
Claire River Complex” was first introduced by
Cummings (1984) and this terminology has since
been adopted by others (e.g. DeMatties, 2018) to
describe the volcanic rocks present in the
Marshfield Terrane.

Figure 7 - Metamorphic conditions from
geothermobarometic studies at Big Falls indicated by
the yellow star. Data is from unpublished student
project at the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire.

The region consists of mostly amphibolitic and
felspathic gneisses that are intruded and
brecciated by tonalite (Figure 6). Regional
metamorphism in this region is at lower to upper
amphibolite facies. A sample of amphibolitic
gneiss from the Eau Claire Volcanic Complex
using the edenite-richterite thermometry
determined temperatures between 719-769 °C
(Hannack and Radwany, 2018). Unpublished data
from University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire class
projects using garnet-biotite thermobarometry
estimate peak metamorphic conditions at 765 °C
and 11.5 kbars (Figure 7). A rutile U/Pb age of
1835 Ma from Sims et al. (1989) in the Eau Claire

Volcanic Complex may indicate the timing of
metamorphism.
New research in this region provides our first
glimpse into the trace element characteristics of
these rocks (Figure 8). Rocks from both Big Falls
and Little Falls have mafic protoliths with EMORB to oceanic arc like abundances of Th, Nb,
and Yb (Pearce, 2008). On normalized trace
element diagrams, samples have elevated LREE,
low Th/La ratios, negative Nb and Ti anomalies.
These trace element characteristics features are
common in back-arc environments. Additionally,
feldspathic units sampled have extremely

54

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

depleted trace element signatures and positive Eu
anomalies, suggesting that they may be
fractionated crystal cumulates. This broadly
supports the interpretation of Cummings (1984)
that the protolith of the Big Falls gneisses are a
layered mafic intrusion.
Stop 1: Amphibolite Gneisses and the “Great
Unconformity” at Big Falls County Park
Lat: 44.8215° Long: -91.2953°

Figure 8 – Preliminary trace element geochemistry
from the Big Falls-Little Falls area of the Eau Claire
Volcanic Complex. Top: Trace element classification
diagram from Pearce (1996) modified from
Winchester and Floyd (1977). Middle: Mantle source
discrimination diagram from Pearce (2008). Bottom:
Primitive mantle-normalized trace element diagram
using values from Sun and McDonough (1989).

This location is accessible from the north
entrance to Big Falls County Park off Eau Claire
County Highway Q. There is a parking lot at this
entrance with plenty of parking for park visitors.
Follow the paved foot path eastward toward the
river. Once on the riverbank, walk northward for

55

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

about 50 m to reach the outcrops at the falls. Note
that outcrops on the south bank of the falls will
have to be accessed via the south entrance to the
park on County Highway K. During very low
water conditions, it is possible to hop across the
outcrops to access the south bank. This region has
some steep-edged rock cliffs adjacent to the river
and there are springs that keep some areas wet
and slippery. Please watch your step.
This stop highlights the geology along the
north side of Big Falls County Park where the
rocks are exposed along the Eau Claire River. In
addition to the Precambrian rocks, this location
also has a great exposure of the “Great
Unconformity” with overlying Cambrian Mount
Simon Formation. The Eau Claire River flows
along the nonconformity between the Cambrian
and Precambrian rocks, where the river has
eroded the overlying Cambrian units away
exposing the Precambrian basement rocks. At this
stop, we highlight four locations that highlight
different units seen here at Big Falls County Park
(Figure 9).

Photo 1: Photographs of the banded amphibolitic
gneiss at Big Falls County Park. (A) Banded
amphibole gneiss at Big Falls. B: Photomicrograph in
plane-polarized light (25x) of large garnet
porphyroblasts in quartzofeldspathic and hornblende
matrix.

Location 1: The Banded Amphibole Gneiss
The banded amphibole gneiss (Photo 1A) is
best described as a fine-grained banded gneiss
with alternating hornblende-rich and plagioclaserich layers. The hornblende-rich layers range
anywhere from less than 1 cm to ~15 cm and
contain about 85% hornblende and 15%
granulated plagioclase with sparse idioblastic
garnet. The plagioclase-rich layers are
consistently thicker and contain approximately
15% hornblende. The garnets though scarce occur
as coarse grained porphyroblasts in both layers
(Photo 1B) although these garnets often show
retrograde alteration back to hornblende. The
garnets are typically poikioblastic (Photo 2) with
quartz, plagioclase and occasionally biotite
inclusions. The hornblende occurs as euhedral to
subhedral grains and the plagioclase as very-fine
grained, dynamically recrystallized, matrix. The
granulated plagioclase is typically labradorite to
bytownite but anorthite (An92) occurs as cores in
some of the idioblastic hornblende to create an

Photo 2: Photomicrograph in plane polarized light of
poikioblastic garnet in a hornblende and granulated
plagioclase matrix (50X magnification).

unusual bi-modal plagioclase population (Photo
3).
Multiple shear zones and isoclinal folds are
present throughout the outcrop, providing
evidence for multiple deformation periods.
Partially annealed shear zones can be traced
across almost the entire unit that truncate and
offset banding. There are also asymmetric

56

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

amphibole schist is enriched in MgO and FeO and
depleted in CaO and Al2O3 in comparison to the
banded amphibole gneiss (Table 1). Both major
element (Table 1) and trace elements (Figure 8)
characterize this as a MORB-like composition.
Isoclinal folds of the foliation and the presence of
ductile shear zones indicate deformation
throughout this unit. The contact between the
banded amphibole gneiss and the amphibole
schist is buried by slumping blocks of the
Cambrian Mount Simon Formation and
vegetation.

Photo 3: Photomicrograph in partially crossed polars
of idioblastic hornblende with anorthite cores (An 92)
in a matrix of granulated plagioclase (An72) in the
banded amphibole gneiss at Big Falls (Magnification
is 50x).

amphibolite inclusions
kinematics.

that show variable

This unit was sampled for a recent zircon
petrochronology study and produced significant
results that question what is currently understood
about the southern portion of the Penokean
Orogen. This unit yields a U/Pb age of 1874.7 ±
2.1 Ma which temporally correlates with other
VMS-forming events across the PembineWausau terrane. Zircon trace element
geochemistry of the sample indicate the sample
formed in a hydrated but reduced melt in a backarc setting where decompression was occurring in
a metasomatized mantle (Weber and Lodge,
2022). Hf-Lu data from the banded amphibolite
gneiss indicates a lack of older basement
inheritance. The zircon petrochronology from
these rocks contradicts the interpretation that Eau
Claire Volcanic Complex was emplaced into the
Archean Marshfield Terrane. These results have
motivated additional research in the Eau Claire
Volcanic Complex.

Photo 4: Outcrop photo of the feldspathic gneiss at
Big Falls.

Location 3: Transition Gneiss and Feldspathic
Gneiss
The amphibole schist gradually grades into the
transition gneiss for a few meters as the unit
contains fewer amphibole-rich layers and the
plagioclase rich layers become more prominent
(Photo 4). The feldspathic gneiss is primarily
made of plagioclase, with 10-20% hornblende
and lesser amounts of chlorite, epidote, and
localized sulfidation with some pyrite
mineralization.

Location 2 Amphibole Schist

Despite strong metamorphic recrystallization
and structural fabric overprinting, there are some
primary igneous textures that are preserved
(Cummings, 1984). The compositional banding
and layering throughout all units appear to be

The further west along the Eau Claire River,
the amphibole schist is exposed. This unit is best
described as a dark green to black, fine grained
thinly banded amphibole schist. Hornblende is
the primary amphibole with lesser amounts of
plagioclase. Based on whole rock XRF data, the

57

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Figure 9: Geologic map showing outcrop locations at the Big Falls stop. Modified from Cummings (1984).
Table 1. Whole rock major element geochemistry (via XRF) from Big Falls for banded amphibole gneiss (location
1), amphibolite (location 2), and altered rocks at the Precambrian-Cambrian contact (location 3). Average MORB
composition (Winters, 2010) is included for comparison.
Unit
Unaltered
Banded Gneiss 1
Banded Gneiss 2
Banded Gneiss 3
Altered (Depth)
surface
.5m
1.0m
1.5m
Unaltered
Amphibolite 1
Amphibolite 2
Average MORB (Winter 2010)
Altered (Depth)
surface
.25m
.5m
.65m
.75m
1.0m

SiO2

TiO2

Al2O3

Fe2O3T

CaO

MgO

MnO

Na2O

K2O

P2O5

Totals

47.10
48.43
46.63

0.17
0.21
0.23

30.43
30.56
30.24

2.14
3.35
2.47

15.18
14.65
14.51

0.72
1.38
0.88

0.03
0.04
0.03

2.21
2.97
2.85

0.20
0.25
0.18

0.05
0.04
0.03

98.23
101.88
98.05

52.06
50.26
52.55
52.92

0.44
0.74
0.34
0.32

16.66
15.28
17.36
18.23

6.72
11.56
7.28
5.79

0.88
0.63
1.06
0.80

5.21
6.18
5.17
4.91

0.04
0.05
0.03
0.02

0.11
0.05
0.05
0.09

9.28
9.14
9.04
9.37

0.03
0.28
0.03
0.03

91.43
94.17
92.91
92.48

51.10
52.66
50.50

1.34
1.71
1.56

15.50
13.25
15.30

13.73
12.12
11.50

9.07
8.05
11.50

5.79
6.57
7.47

0.19
0.20
n/a

3.11
3.56
2.62

0.29
1.46
0.16

0.23
0.17
0.13

100.35
99.75
100.74

61.93
62.79
61.48
62.62
60.07
58.69

0.94
0.99
0.84
0.88
0.95
0.87

17.36
17.18
17.04
16.26
16.84
16.31

4.98
6.10
5.04
5.42
5.60
7.30

0.63
0.65
0.64
0.64
0.64
0.66

2.70
3.05
3.02
2.68
2.89
3.24

0.02
0.04
0.02
0.04
0.04
0.07

0.32
0.20
0.21
0.23
0.07
0.08

7.10
7.22
6.97
7.15
7.45
7.18

0.19
0.19
0.18
0.18
0.21
0.19

96.17
98.41
95.44
96.10
94.76
94.59

58

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

primary. Anorthositic autoliths are incorporated
in a fine-banded, more mafic matrix near the
transitional gneiss. The banding in the autolith is
discordant to banding in the matrix and appear to
be concentrated in bands but are not associated
with boudinage fabrics. These observations were
critical in interpreting the protolith of this region.
Location 4: The Great Unconformity and the
basal portion of the Mt. Simon Formation
The large hillside on the north bank of the river
and above the Precambrian outcrops is the
Cambrian Mount Simon Formation. The base of
the Mt. Simon Formation is a mix of coarsegrained quartz arenites and quartz pebble
conglomerates.

Photo 5: Nonconformity between the Cambrian
Mount Simon Formation and the amphibolites at Big
Falls County Park.

The Great Unconformity creates a nonconformable contact between the Precambrian
units at the previous three locations and the base
of the Mt. Simon Formation. At Big Falls, a thin
blue-green celadonite clay layer (Figure 10) has
formed along the nonconformity as a result of Kmetasomatism from basinal brines. The Kmetasomatism at the unconformity is recognized
throughout the midcontinent region and is related
to MVT lead zinc deposits in the Tri-state region
(See field trip 1 in this volume). Locally the
celadonite acts as a fluid barrier for springs that
flow along the unconformity. In other places, the
contact appears to be relatively sharp with little
alteration (Photo 5).

Figure 10: A-CN-K diagram showing chemical change
due to weathering and the alternative path of Kmetasomatism. The celadonite at Big Falls is not a
weathering profile and requires adding substantial
potassium and to produce the celadonite and authigenic
K-spar seen along the unconformity (see Table 1 for
chemistry).

Stop 2 –Tonalite Breccia and Gneisses at
Little Falls.
Lat: 44.8103° Long: -91.2825°

bridge at this location for the Eau Claire River
flood stage measurement. Just north of the bridge
there is a small parking area on the west side of
the road. There are several small foot paths that
lead down to the river’s edge. The outcrops are
mostly exposed immediately around and under
the bridge. The quality of exposure here changes
all the time as flooding conditions sometimes

This location is just on the north side of the
County Highway K bridge that crosses the Eau
Claire River and is 300 m north of the exit to the
south entrance of Big Falls County Park. Google
Maps calls this place the East Eau Claire Canoe
Landing, but the USGS refers to this location as
Little Falls (so does the faculty and students at the
University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire) and uses the

59

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

buries parts of the outcrop with sand and downed
vegetation. To access the south bank of the river,
a short bush traverse (100-300 m) will be required
from the southside of the bridge along the
riverbank.
If water level and time permit, this stop has
four locations of interest that highlight the
intrusive history in the region. The outcrops in
this area expose an inclusion-rich intrusive
contact between a foliated tonalite and lensoidal
amphibolite and are cut by younger pegmatitic
and mid-continent rift diabase dykes (Figure 11).
This location is used to teach students at the
University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire about
interpreting relative geologic time and observing
contact relationships. The absolute ages of these
rocks are unknown as recent attempts to isolate
zircons from the tonalite were unsuccessful.

Photo 6: Gneissic tonalite breccia highlighting some
of the banded gneiss xenoliths. Some of the smaller
xenoliths here are elongated.

significant assimilation of amphibolite. Biotite
commonly produces a crude foliation that may
have formed from hornblende during a later
deformation.

Location 1: Gneissic Tonalite Breccia

It is clear the tonalite is metamorphosed and is
an important part of determining the nature of the
Eau Claire Volcanic Complex. However, efforts
to constrain the timing of this intrusive event have
yielded conflicting results. Van Schmus (1980)
yielded a U/Pb age of 1842 ± 10 Ma utilizing
zircon fractions (i.e. not modern single crystal
methods). Sims et al. (1989) reported a U/Pb age
of 1856 ± 5 Ma from a xenolith at Little Falls.
Assuming that the amphibolite xenoliths at Little
Falls are from the same amphibolite unit at Big
Falls that was dated at 1875 Ma, then there is a
clear conflict. The tonalite was sampled for that
recent petrochronologic study (Weber and Lodge,
2022) but yielded very few zircons. Resolving the
timing of emplacement and tectonic setting of this
intrusion will help better understand the
geodynamic setting of the Eau Claire Volcanic
Complex.

The gneissic tonalite breccia is the most
prominent unit at Little Falls (Photo 6). Roughly
90% of xenoliths in the breccia are characterized
as banded gneiss to banded amphibolite
containing 50-80% hornblende and 20-40%
plagioclase with lesser amounts of biotite. These
xenoliths range in size anywhere from less than
1cm to greater than 20 cm, and they are hosted in
a biotite tonalite intrusion which destroys the
older banded gneiss. The banded gneiss xenoliths
are also elongated and contain folds. Ultramafic
xenoliths are scarce but also present. These
xenoliths contain over 90% hornblende with
lesser amounts of epidote-clinozoisite and
plagioclase. Occurring in localized clusters, the
fragmented ultramafic xenoliths indicate these
were most likely part of a larger block but
separated during the tonalite intrusion event
(Myers et al., 1980). The tonalite is composed of
35-40% plagioclase (An50-55), about 30%
hornblende, 25-30% quartz, 5-10% biotite, and
accessory epidote. Myers et al. (1980) interpreted
the fabric in the rock as flow-lamination, however
it is parallel to regional magnetic lineaments
suggesting it may be a structural fabric. Large
variation in mafic mineral abundance indicates

Location 2: Diabase
Along the north side of the river and east of the
bridge, lies one of many mid-Proterozoic diabase
dykes associated with the mid-continent rift in the

60

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Figure 11: Geologic map of the Little Falls area showing the locations of interest at this stop. Figure modified from
Myers et al (1980).

Eau Claire region. Like many other diabase dike
outcrops in the area, this diabase exhibits both
clean columnar jointing and well-defined chilled
margins. This diabase is only a few meters in size
and disappears beneath the surrounding
overburden (Figure 11). The diabase has a
medium-grained, equigranular texture and does
not have any foliation or recrystallization textures
and is clearly post-metamorphism.

throughout the Eau Claire volcanic complex
along the Eau Claire River where the
Precambrian rocks are exposed. Their macro- and
microscopic characteristics indicate they are

Location 3: Pegmatite Dike
On the west bank of the river lies a 2 m wide
pegmatite dyke (Photo 7). Outlier boulders of
this pegmatite can be found on the eastern bank
of the river. The alkali-feldspar crystals in this
outcrop reach sizes greater than 30 cm. Various
sizes of quartz veins also crosscut this unit. This
granite pegmatite dike is one of a handful seen

Photo 7: 18m-wide pegmatite in the Eau Claire River
downstream from Little Falls.

61

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

clearly younger than the Penokean deformation
and metamorphism and could be related to
Mazatzal or Yavapai orogenic events to the south
like the Wolf River Batholith in northcentral
Wisconsin.

The mineralogy of the pegmatites is very
complicated with many accessory carbonate,
phosphate and oxide phases enriched in Nb, Y, F
U, Th and REE. Zircon in the pegmatites indicate
extreme fractionation (Figure 12). The zircons
also show considerable xenotime (Y,P)
substitution and considerable solid solutions with
both coffinite (USiO4) and thorite (ThSiO4).

The pegmatites, despite their pink color, are
primarily composed of plagioclase with an
overprint of potassic alteration. Most of the
alkali-feldspar occurs along cleavages, crystal
boundaries and fractures indicating it is a late
phase in pegmatite formation. The plagioclase in
the pegmatites is primarily albite but ranges from
An0 to An30. The euhedral and inclusion free
garnets (Photo 8) have a limited range of
chemistry close to 50% almandine and 50%
spessartine which is similar to magmatic garnet
compositions in other garnet-quartz-albite
pegmatites (Muller et al., 2018).

Figure 12. Zr/Hf in pegmatites from the Eau Claire
River Complex.

The Eau Claire River pegmatites have many
characteristics of pegmatites in the Nb/Y/F
(NYF) family of rare element pegmatites and
NYF pegmatites are always associated with
metaluminous to alkaline (or peralkaline) granites
(Cerny and Ercit, 2005)

Location 4: Amphibolitic Gneiss
The xenoliths within the tonalite are assumed
to be derived from the nearby outcrops of the
amphibolitic gneisses. Unlike the planar banding
at Big Falls, the amphibolitic gneisses here is
more lensoidal with cm- to dm-scale lens-shaped,
hornblende-rich pods surrounded by more
plagioclase-rich “matrix” and quartz-veining.

Photo 8. Top: Photomicrograph (25X in plane
polarized light) of garnet cluster in quartz and albite
from Little Falls pegmatite dike on the west side of the
river. Bottom: Almandine/spessartine garnet clusters
at the same location at Little Falls are magmatic in
origin.

62

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Detailed work has not been completed on these
outcrops but are assumed to be petrogenetically
related to the amphibolites at Big Falls. Future
research will examine these exposures more
closely.

the trace element geochemistry and zircon
petrochronology of the rocks in this region to
make better links with the rest of the Eau Claire
Volcanic Complex. Much of that data is still
pending or preliminary, so results will be
forthcoming soon. The goal for the field trip in
this region is to show as many of the rocks as
possible, regardless of how much we know about
them.

North and South Fork Region
This is the part of the trip where information on
these rocks is sparse and new data is only just
becoming available. To our knowledge, the rocks
in the North and South Fork areas of the Eau
Claire River have not been studied in any detail
since Myers et al. (1980). Much of the area is
remote and sparsely developed and very few
outcrops are easily accessible. Field work in the
2022 summer relied on one-way, day-long kayak
trips along different segments of the North Fork.
Aside from the occasional powerline, field work
on these stretches of the Eau Claire River felt wild
and remote. This field work aimed to characterize

The region consists of amphibolites,
feldspathic gneisses, and foliated granitoids and
are cross-cut by younger, undeformed granitic
pegmatites (Figure 13). A metarhyolite from this
region yielded an age of 1858 ± 5 Ma (Sims et al,
1989) and was one of the key samples that linked
Penokean volcanic processes to the Marshfield
terrane. Myers et al. (1980) interpreted mappable
contacts between intrusions and foliated

Figure 13: Geologic map of the North and South Fork of the Eau Claire River in eastern Eau Claire County and
western Clark County. Figure modified from Myers et al. (1980).

63

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

supracrustal rocks in this area to be sheared and
nearly vertical and that they enclose lensoidal
fault slices which have been juxtaposed mainly
by strike-slip displacement. Outcrops of
amphibolite in the southern part of the map
(Figure 13) near the confluence of the North and
South Forks of the Eau Claire River were
interpreted to be part of the “Chippewa
Amphibolite Complex” (Myers et al., 1980)
which is broadly supported by regional
aeromagnetic maps (Figure 5). Myers et al.
(1980) interprets the volcanic rocks in this region
to unconformably on amphibolites, but
geochronologic data is lacking to make any
absolute local or regional correlations. Regional
metamorphic grade is estimated to be upper
greenschist to lower amphibolite based on the
presence of garnet, epidote, muscovite, and
hornblende.
Preliminary geochemical results from the
North Fork region begin to reveal the setting of
these volcanic and intrusive rocks. Volcanic
protoliths are bimodal (Figure 14) with tholeiitic
mafic rocks with oceanic affinities (Figure 15)
and FI- to FII-type felsic rocks arc-like affinities
(Figure 16). More work needs to be done before
we can concretely interpret the setting of this
region of the Eau Claire Volcanic Complex.

Figure 15: Trace element geochemical characteristics
of the mafic rocks from the North Fork region of the
Eau Claire River. Top: Magmatic affinity diagram for
sub-alkaline basalts from Ross &amp; Bedard (2009).
Middle: Mantle source discrimination diagram from
Pearce (2008). Bottom, Primitive mantle-normalized
trace element diagram using values from Sun and
McDonough (1989).

Figure 14: Trace element classification diagram from
Pearce (1996), modified from Winchester &amp; Floyd
(1977).

64

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

These settings are not typical of continental
settings, which continues to question the
relationship between the Eau Claire Volcanic
Complex and Marshfield Terrane.

Stop 3 – Amphibolite and Intrusions at
Knights Pool
Lat: 44.7482° Long: -90.9669°

Figure 16 – Trace element geochemical
characteristics of felsic rocks from the North Fork
region of the Eau Claire River. Top: Nb/Y
discrimination diagram for granites from Pearce
(1984). Middle: F-type felsic discrimination
diagram from Hart et al. (2004). Bottom: Primitive
mantle-normalized diagram using values from Sun
&amp; McDonough (1989).

The directions to get to this stop are a little
more elaborate since it is in a more remote
location. From the community of Augusta, take
State Highway 27 north for 4.4 miles to County
Road GG. Turn east on to County Road GG and
drive 4.7 miles to the intersection of Channey

65

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Road just after the bridge over the Eau Claire
River. Turn east on Channey Road (note that this
is an unpaved road) and drive for 4.6 miles until
the road crosses the North Fork of the Eau Claire
River. This location is called Knights Pool and is
labelled by signage. The accessible outcrops in
this region are immediately beneath the bridge
and are accessible by foot trails. There are larger
outcrops north of the bridge that are accessible by
a small, 150 m bush traverse along a sparsely used
trail. At both locations, rocks are immediately
adjacent to a shallow but fast-moving river and
caution should be used.

Complex exposed in this section of the river upand downstream of this location. However, this is
the only easily accessible section by foot. At
Knights Pool, there are mostly strongly foliated
and deformed amphibolites that are intruded by a
biotite granodiorite (Figure 17).
Amphibolite: The amphibolite at Knights Pool
is characterized by a fine to very fine grained
mafic lineated amphibolite with stretched quartzfilled amygdules, relict pillow structures, and
wispy textures suggesting a mafic flow (Photo 9).
Thin sections of the amphibolite clearly show the
lineations present in the amphibolite here (Photo
10). Several stages of deformation occurred
starting with the amphibolite being isoclinally
folded, then intruded by aplite veins, and intruded
by large granodiorite body (Myers et al., 1980).
The shearing in of the granodiorite body created
a mylonite gneiss along the contact with the
amphibolite.

Knights Pool is located at the bridge on
Channey Road as it crosses the North Fork of the
Eau Claire River along the southern edge of the
North Fork Eau Claire River State Natural Area.
There is more of the Eau Claire Volcanic

Photo 9: Outcrop of the amphibolite showing both the
isoclinal folds and strained amygdules present in the
unit.

Trace element geochemistry of the
amphibolites at Knights Pool are notably LREEdepleted with strong negative Nb anomalies
(Figure 15). This suggests it was derived from
strongly depleted but metasomatized mantle. This
type of environment, presumably a mature backarc, rarely exists in a continental setting. The
granitoids in the map area have classic enriched
LREE and Th with depleted Nb and HREE
signatures suggesting they are related to a

Figure 17: Geologic map of the Knights Pool area.
Map is modified from Myers et al. (1980).

66

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Photo 10: Photomicrographs in plane-polarized light
of the amphibolite at Knights Pool amphibolite under
thin section at 25x magnification (A) and 100x
magnification (B). Hornblende forms a clear
lineation.

Photo 11: Photomicrographs of the biotite
granodiorite at Knights Pool in (A) plane-polarized
light, and (B) cross-polarized light. Both images are
25x magnification.

the village of Rock Dam. Turn northward on
Butler Road and use the parking lot on Hay Creek
Lake just south of the bridge over Hay Creek. The
outcrop of phyllite are under the bridge and near
the Rock Dam spillway. The nonconformity and
metarhyolite can be better accessed from within
the Rock Dam Campground near campsite 90.

different tectonic event when the crust was
thicker, and garnet was stable to deplete HREE.
Granodiorite Intrusion: The medium to coarse
grained biotite granodiorite intruded the
amphibolite creating a mylonitic fabric along the
contact. The intrusion, shearing along the contact,
caused the folding of the aplite veins seen in the
amphibolite. Quartz is strongly recrystallized and
biotite concentrations define a weak foliation.
Thin section photos highlight how the quartz is
being recrystallized, as well as show the
alignment of biotite aggregates (Photo 11).

This location reveals another nonconformity
between the Precambrian and Cambrian Mount
Simon Formation. The metarhyolites and
phyllites in this area are strongly mylonitized and
primary structures are difficult to interpret. The
metarhyolite at this location described by Myers
et al. (1980) is the only reference to a rhyolitic
unit in the Eau Claire Volcanic Complex. Since
Sims et al. (1989) dated a metarhyolite at 1858 ±
5 Ma in the Eau Claire River and cited Myers et
al. (1980), it presumably came from this location.
If that is the case, then the rocks at Rock Dam are
of regional significance because it is one of

Stop 4 – Metarhyolite and Phyllite at Rock
Dam
Lat: 44.7338° Long: -90.8469°
From the previous stop, continue eastward on
Channey Road until it ends at County Highway
H. Turn southward and drive 1.5 miles to Rock
Dam Road. Turn eastward and take this road into

67

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

estimated mineral percentages and matrix of this
rock is composed of a very fine-grained alkalifeldspar (57%), quartz (35%), muscovite (3%),
magnetite (2%), and biotite (1%). The quartz eyes
along with the absence of feldspar porphyroclasts
suggests that the quartz either originated as
phenocrysts or clasts in a tuff (Myers et al.
(1980). Foliation trends east-west and is near
vertical.
Phyllite: Closer to the base of Rock Dam lies a
muscovite-rich phyllite composed of alkalifeldspar, quartz, and muscovite (Photo 12). This
outcrop lacks both the quartz eyes and biotite
possibly indicating a separate protolith than the
metarhyolite (Myers et al. 1980).

Photo 12: Outcrop photo of strongly foliated phyllite
at Rock Dam near spillway. Cambrian strata can be
seen in background on opposite bank of river.

Mt. Simon Formation: The basal part of the Mt.
Simon Formation, a conglomerate layer
containing pebbles of vein quartz and rhyolite, is
exposed at this location (Photo 13). The contact
between the Mt. Simon and the Precambrian
metarhyolite shows about 5 m of relief. Many of
the locations exposing the Great Unconformity in
the Eau Claire region show deep weathering of
the underlying Precambrian rocks, however there
is not much weathering of the Precambrian
metarhyolite here.

the very few dated Penokean supracrustal rocks
within the Marshfield terrane.
Mylonitized Metarhyolite: Myers et al. (1980)
admittingly conceded that determining the
protolith of this outcrop can be challenging
considering the similarities between sheared
porphyritic rhyolites and leucogranites. The
mylonite here is pale pink metamorphosed
porphyritic rhyolite containing quartz eyes that
can be described as phenocrysts or clasts. These
quartz eyes are roughly 1-2.5 mm in size and
under thin section show a subrectangular to
lenticular shape (Myers et al. (1980). The

68

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Photo 13: Basal pebble conglomerate in Cambrian
strata overlying metarhyolite at Rock Dam.

Stop 5 – Metavolcanic Rocks at Mead Lake
Lat: 44.7885° Long: -90.7742°
From the previous stop, continue northward on
Butler Road for 0.8 miles to the intersection with
Willard Road. Drive eastward on Willard Road
for 2.0 miles and turn north onto County Road M.
Drive northward on County Road M for 1.6 miles
and turn eastward onto Rocky Run Road. Drive
1.2 miles on Rocky Run Road and turn northward
on Bruce Mountain Road that will turn into South
Lake Road. South Mead Lake Park will be 1.4
miles down this road. Park there, and the outcrops
are on the riverbank west of the Mead Lake Dam
spillway.
The bedrock exposed at this location is
primarily a foliated, fine-grained chloritic
metavolcanic rock (Photo 14). There has been no
known study of this rock, and our data is still
pending. Nonetheless, it is apparent that the
metamorphic grade seems to be decreasing in this
part of the Eau Claire Volcanic Complex. This is
in stark contrast to the rocks in the Chippewa
River valley (Fieldtrip 1, this volume) and Big
Falls region (Stops 1-2). Future work in the
region will utilize every outcrop, even small ones
like this location, to better describe and define the
tectonics and metallogeny of the Eau Claire
Volcanic Complex.
Photo 14: Outcrop photo of metavolcanic rocks at
Mead Lake Dam.

69

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Wisconsin: An overview: Economic Geology, v.
89, p. 1122-1151.

Acknowledgements
Despite decades of regular visits from groups
from the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, the
most extensive detailed maps and rock
descriptions were provided by Paul Myers and
collaborators in the 1980 ILSG guidebook.
Outside of Big Falls County Park, many of those
locations have not been visited since then. A lot
of the geologic descriptions from those lesserknown areas have been updated from Myers et al.
(1980) and figures have been digitized while
adding new data and insights where available.

DeMatties, T. A., 2018, Effects of paleoweathering
and supergene activity on volcanogenic massive
sulfide (VMS) mineralization in the Penokean
Volcanic Belt, northern Wisconsin, Michigan and
east-central Minnesota, USA: Implications for
future exploration: Ore Geology Reviews, v. 95, p.
216-237.
DeMatties, T. A., 2022, Exploration-resource
assessment of productive felsic volcanic centers in
the Paleoproterozoic Penokean Volcanic Belt of
northern Wisconsin, Michigan and east-central
Minnesota, USA: Ore Geology Reviews, v. 141,
article 104489.

In addition, the authors of this guidebook
would like to thank the countless undergraduate
and graduate students that have worked on these
outcrops and have continued to inspire new work
in the region. Specific acknowledgement is
deserving to Matt Leahy and his undergraduate
research project in the North Fork region in
providing some insight into that part of the
complex.

Hannack, G., and Radwany, M., 2018, HornblendePlagioclase thermometry of the Eau Claire River
Complex, western Wisconsin: Proceedings of the
Institute on Lake Superior Geology 64th Annual
Meeting, Iron Mountain, Michigan, p. 47-48.
Hart, T. R., Gibson, H. L., and Lesher, C. M., 2004,
Trace element geochemistry and petrogenesis of
felsic volcanic rocks associated with volcanogenic
massive Cu-Zn-Pb sulfide deposits: Economic
Geology, v. 99, p. 1003-1013.

References

Klier, J. J., 2019, The Marshfield Terrane:
Refedinition
of
origin
through
zircon
geochronology and geochemistry: Unpub. M.S.
thesis, Ball State University, 115 p.

Brown, B. A., 1988, Bedrock geology of Wisconsin,
west-central sheet, Wisconsin Geological and
Natural History Survey Map 87–11b.
Cummings, M. L., 1984, The Eau Claire River
complex: A metamorphosed Precambrian mafic
intrusion in western Wisconsin: Geological
Society of America Bulletin, v. 95, p. 75-86.

LaBerge, G. L., 1996, Volcanogenic massive sulfide
deposits of northern Wisconsin: A commemorative
volume, Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting
of the Institute on Lake Superior Geology, Cable,
Wisconsin.

Cerny, P. and Ercit, T. S., 2005, The classification of
granitic
pegmatites
revisited.
Canadian
Mineralogist, v.43, p. 2005-2026.

LaBerge, G. L., and Myers, P. E., 1984, Two early
Proterozoic successions in central Wisconsin and
their tectonic significance: Geological Society of
America Bulletin, v. 95, p. 246-253.

Daniels, D. L., and Snyder, S. L., 2002, Wisconsin
aeromagnetic and gravity maps and data, U.S.
Geological Survey Open-File Report 02-493.

Myers, P. E., Cummings, M. L., and Wurdinger, S. R.,
1980, Precambrian geology of the Chippewa
Valley, Wisconsin, Institute of Lake Superior
Geology 26th Annual Meeting, Eau Claire,
Wisconsin, Field Trip Guidebook 1, 123 p.

DeMatties, T. A., 1989, A proposed geologic
framework for massive sulfide deposits in the
Wisconsin Penokean volcanic belt: Economic
Geology, v. 84, p. 946-952.

Muller, A., Spratt, J., Thomas, R., Williamson, B.J.,
and Seltmann, R., 2018, Canadian Mineralogist, v.
56, p. 657-687.

DeMatties, T. A., 1994, Early Proterozoic
volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits in

70

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Pearce, J. A., 1996, A users guide to basalt
discrimination
diagrams:
Trace
Element
Geochemistry of Volcanic Rocks: Applications for
Massive Sulphide Exploration. Geological
Association of Canada, Short Course Notes, v. 12,
p. 79-133.

pre- and early Proterozoic rocks in Wisconsin:
Unpub. Ph.D. thesis, University of Wisconsin Madison, 295 p.
Van Wyck, N., and Johnson, C. M., 1997, Common
Lead, Sm-Nd, and U-Pb constraints on
petrogenesis, crustal architecture, and tectonic
setting
of
the
Penokean
orogeny
(Paleoproterozoic) in Wisconsin: Geological
Society of America Bulletin, v. 109, p. 799-808.

Pearce, J. A., 2008, Geochemical fingerprinting of
oceanic basalts with applications to ophiolite
classification and the search for Archean oceanic
crust: Lithos, v. 100, p. 1-4.

Weber, E. M., and Lodge, R. W. D., 2022, New U/Pb
Geochronology from the Proterozoic Penokean
Orogen, Wisconsin: Implications for VMS
Metallogeny: Society of Economic Geologists
Annual Meeting, Denver, CO, paper P5.10.

Pearce, J. A., Harris, N. B. W., and Tindle, A. G.,
1984, Trace element discrimination diagrams for
the tectonic interpretation of granitic rocks: Journal
of Petrology, v. 25, p. 956-983.
Quigley, A., 2016, Setting of the volcanogenic
massive sulfide deposits in the Penokean Volcanic
belt, Great Lakes region, USA: Unpub. M.S. thesis,
Colorado School of Mines, 95 p.

Winchester, J. A., and Floyd, P. A., 1977,
Geochemical discrimination of different magma
series and their differentiation products using
immobile elements: Chemical Geology, v. 20, p.
325-343.

Ross, P.-S., and Bédard, J. H., 2009, Magmatic affinity
of modern and ancient subalkaline volcanic rocks
determined from trace-element discriminant
diagrams.: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v.
46, p. 823-839.

Winter, J. D., 2010, An Introduction to Igneous and
Metamorphic Petrology, Prentice Hall, 697p.
Zi, J-W., Sheppard, S., Muhling, J. R., and Rasmussen,
B., 2021, Refining the Paleoproterozoic
tectonothermal history of the Penokean Orogen:
New U/Pb age constraints from the PembineWausau terrane, Wisconsin, USA: Geological
Society of America Bulletin, v. 134, p. 776-790.

Schulz, K. J., and Cannon, W. F., 2007, The Penokean
orogeny in the Lake Superior region: Precambrian
Research, v. 157, p. 4-25.
Sims, P. K., Van Schmus, W. R., Schulz, K. J., and
Peterman, Z. E., 1989, Tectonostratigraphic
evolution of the Early Proterozoic Wisconsin
magmatic terranes of the Penokean orogen:
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 26, p. 21452158.
Sun, S., and McDonough, W. F., 1989, Chemical and
isotopic systematics of oceanic basalts:
implications for mantle composition and
processes, in Saunders, A. D., and Norry, M. J.,
eds., Magmatism in the Ocean Basins, Geological
Society Special Publication, v. 42, p. 313-345.
Van Schmus, W. R., 1980, Chronology of igneous
rocks associated with the Penokean orogeny in
Wisconsin: Geological Society of America Special
Paper, v. 182, p. 159-168.
Van Wyck, N., 1995, Oxygen and carbon isotopic
constraints on the development of eclogites,
Holsnpy, Norway, and, Major and trace element,
common Pb, Sm-Nd, and zircon geochronology
constraints on petrogenesis and tectonic setting of

71

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Field Trip 4 – Quaternary Geology and Geomorphology of the Eau Claire
Region
Douglas J. Faulkner
Department of Geography and Anthropology, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, Eau Claire, WI 54701
J. Elmo Rawling, III
Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey, Madison, WI 53705
Phillip H. Larson
Earth Science Programs, EARTH Systems Laboratory, Minnesota State University Mankato, Mankato,
MN 56001

72

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Introduction
Eau Claire lies close to the outermost edge of
the former Chippewa Lobe of the Laurentide Ice
Sheet as it existed during late Wisconsinan time
(MIS-2) (Fig. 1). To the south are older glacial
deposits and then the Driftless Area, which
apparently was never glaciated. This all-day field
trip will concentrate on three aspects of the
region’s landscape development from the late
Wisconsinan to the late Holocene: glacial, fluvial
and aeolian.
Glacial Landscapes
Northern Wisconsin was glaciated multiple
times in the Quaternary. The oldest glacial
deposits were derived from the northwest and
were likely deposited prior to 780,000 ka. These
include the Pierce and Marathon Formations
(Rawling et al., in review; Syverson et al., 2011).
These deposits are poorly preserved where they
occur at the surface (Rawling et al., in review)
and although their occurrence is documented in
the subsurface (Attig 1985 and 1993; Woodruff
et al., 2004), their regional distribution is poorly
documented. During the most recent glaciations,
ice flowed from the northeast through the
Superior Basin until it was thick enough to spill
over the regional bedrock divide (Attig and
Rawling, 2018). Ice formed during an earlier
glaciation deposited glacial and meltwater
sediment of the River Falls Formation (Syverson,
2007). River Falls tills and outwash are preserved
on uplands in the Eau Claire area, and landforms
associated with this advance have been eroded
and are not preserved. The best preservation of
landforms is associated with the late Wisconsinan
ice (ca. 25–11.5 yr B.P.), which formed the
Chippewa Lobe that reached its maximum extent
at the Chippewa Moraine. This ice was subject to
stagnation whenever the ice profile in the
Superior Basin lowered, resulting in an ice
margin landscape consisting of broad (10s of
kilometers) zones of stagnant ice features such as
disintegration ridges, ice-walled lakes, and
kettles.

Figure 1. Top: Map of Wisconsin showing areas
covered by lobes of the southern Laurentide Ice Sheet
during the late Wisconsinan (MIS-2) Glaciation; inset
map shows distribution of ice in the Great Lakes
region. The red circle shows the location of Eau
Claire near the southern edge of Chippewa Lobe.
Bottom: Schematic illustration showing how
moraines form over time. Supraglacial sediment
accumulates at a stable ice margin (time one). As
glacier retreats, buried ice is preserved under
supraglacial sediment and minor moraines form if
margin temporarily stabilizes (time two). The
distribution of moraines after ice has melted (time
three; modified from Attig and Rawling, 2018).

73

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Fluvial Landscapes

The process of knickzone migration and incision
up the LCR was episodic and unexpectedly
prolonged. The episodic history of knickzone
migration and incision is clearly indicated by the
number and spatial distribution of terraces found
in the LCR valley below the Wissota. Instead of
two terrace levels resulting from the two episodes
of abrupt base-level fall, there are as many as
seven (Fig. 2). Each of these levels represents a
period when the river was migrating laterally and
forming a floodplain, followed by an episode of
renewed incision that left the floodplain as a
terrace. The prolonged history of knickzone
migration and incision along the LCR is revealed
by the optically stimulated luminescence (OSL)
ages of terrace alluvium from several sites in the
LCR valley (Fig. 3). These OSL ages indicate that
knickzone migration took thousands of years
longer than studies of modern alluvial streams
affected by minor base-level falls suggest it
should’ve taken (Begin 1986, 1988; Begin et al.,
1981)

The Chippewa River is the second largest
stream in Wisconsin, draining a watershed of
approximately 25,000 km2 to the upper
Mississippi River (UMR). During the Late
Wisconsinan, it was the primary stream draining
meltwater from the Chippewa Lobe. Overloaded
with glacigenic sediment, the lower Chippewa
River (or LCR, which refers to the river beyond
the Chippewa Moraine) filled its bedrock valley
with sandy outwash to depths exceeding 50
meters. Then, sometime between 18-16 ka, the
UMR incised 15 m, and at ~13.4 ka, it incised an
additional 40 m (Knox 2007; Loope 2012; Gran
et al. 2013). Each of these incision episodes
abruptly lowered the base level of the LCR,
creating knickzones that migrated up the LCR
and its tributaries. The incision resulting from
knickzone migration created the Wissota terrace,
a prominent landform in the LCR valley that
marks the maximum height of LCR aggradation
during the Late Wisconsinan (Andrews 1965).

Figure 2. Terraces of the LCR
valley. The names of terraces
below the Wissota terrace are based
on their height above the modern
floodplain and distance below the
Wissota. From lowest to highest
these are T-1, T-2, T-3, T-4, T-5,
and T-6. One terrace that does not
fit into the T1-T6 schema is found
in the relatively narrow bedrock
valley downstream from the Eau
Galle-Chippewa River confluence.
Named the Maxville Terrace, this
terrace slopes from the level of the
Wissota at its upvalley end to a
level equivalent to T-4 in the UMR
valley. (Figure from Faulkner et al.
(2016).)

74

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Figure 3. A proposed model of
the evolution of the longitudinal
profile of the LCR in response
to UMR incision labeled with
OSL ages of terrace alluvium.
The profiles were constructed
by connecting scattered terrace
remnants, except for the
Wissota and Maxville terraces,
which are relatively continuous
features. (Modified from
Faulkner et al. (2016).)

Autogenic variations in the amount of
sediment supplied to the river likely explain why
the migration of knickzones and incision up the
LCR was episodic and prolonged. Incision
resulting from knickzone migration would’ve
created a relatively deep narrow channel with
steep, unstable banks. Bank collapse, promoted
by lateral stream erosion, would have greatly
increased the supply of sediment to the stream.
With more sediment to transport, the stream
would no longer have had excess power, causing
knickpoint migration and incision to slow or
cease altogether. This, in turn, would’ve allowed
lateral stream migration and floodplain formation
to occur. Over time, lateral erosion and bank
failure would’ve caused the banks to move away
from the stream and become less steep, leading to
a reduction in the amount of sediment supplied
from them to the LCR. With a declining sediment
supply, the stream would’ve once again had
excess power, resulting in renewed knickzone
migration and incision, at least until the process
repeated itself farther upstream.
The supply of sediment to the LCR from its
tributaries was also subject to autogenic
variations. LCR incision resulting would have
lowered base level for its tributary streams,
creating knickzones that then migrated up them.

The subsequent tributary incision would have
caused a dramatic increase in the supply of
sediment to the LCR. Sediment supplied from
tributaries would have remained high until their
incised channel banks began to stabilize. But until
that happened, high amounts of tributary
sediment would have affected knickpoint
migration and incision on the LCR, slowing it
down and possibly causing it to stop. It is likely
that autogenic variations in sediment from the
largest tributaries, the Red Cedar River and the
Eau Claire River, had the biggest impact on the
LCR.
Aeolian Landscapes
There is abundant evidence throughout the Eau
Claire region that wind has been a significant
geomorphic agent during the late Quaternary. The
most widespread evidence of aeolian activity is
provided by deposits of loess, which were mainly
sourced from the outwash plains of meltwater
streams, including that of the Chippewa River
(Schaetzl et al., 2014; Schaetzl et al., 2018; Fig.
4). Loess deposition during the Late Wisconsinan
in the Eau Claire region began no later than 24 ka
and continued until as recently as 10 ka (Schaetzl
et al., 2014). Over this interval, the dominant
processes of loess transport and deposition

75

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

2014). Later, strong northwest winds entrained
sands from outwash and weathered sandstone. As
they traveled over existing loess, saltating sands
remobilized it and kept it in suspension until
topographic barriers blocked further sand
movement, which allowed loess to accumulate in
their lee. Today, large swaths of the region are
loess-free, with the thickest loess found on the
southeast sides of prominent sandstone inselbergs
and ridges (Schaetzl et al., 2018).
A variety of sandy aeolian landforms, such as
parabolic dunes, sand sheets, sand ramps, and
sand stringers, also attest to the geomorphic
significance of wind in the Eau Claire region.
While these landforms are generally subtle and
apparent only on LiDAR-derived DEMs, they are
widespread (Fig. 5). They also have a generally
consistent orientation, which indicates that they
were primarily formed by west-northwesterly
winds. In addition, a dozen OSL ages from
different landforms reveal that sandy aeolian
landforms in the region were being deposited
between 13 and 9 ka (Schaetzl et al., 2018;
Millett, 2019; Mataitis, 2020; Shandonay et al.,
2022).

Figure 4: Extent and thickness of loess within in
western Wisconsin, as derived from Natural Resources
Conservation Service county soil surveys (from
Schaetzl et al., 2018.)

apparently changed (Schaetzl et al., 2018).
Existing evidence indicates that, early on, loess
was primarily deflated from the outwash plains of
the Chippewa River and its meltwater tributaries
and deposited downwind of them (Schaetzl et al.,

Figure 5. Parabolic dunes
(Millett, 2019) and sand
stringers (Schaetzl et al.,
2018; Mataitis, 2020)
identified from lidar-derived
DEMs, aerial photographs,
and soil survey data in and
near the LCR valley.

76

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

buried and melted. The dominant landforms in
the area are ice-walled lake plains (Figs. 6 and 7;
Clayton et al., 2001), such as the one the Obey
Center is built upon. These form when lakes
develop in the stagnant ice landscape preserved in
permafrost conditions. It is likely that permafrost
conditions were in northern Wisconsin until
~13.5 ka (Attig and Rawling, 2018; Batchelor,
2019). They are composed of laminated finegrained sediment that is typically fine sand and
silt. These landscapes contain organic material
further south that have aided in interpreting the
timing of the Lake Michigan Lobe (Curry et al.,
2018); however, organic material is typically not
preserved in northern Wisconsin.

Field Trip Stops
UTM coordinates are in zone 15, WGS84 datum
Stop 1: Copper Falls Glacial Deposits
UTM coordinates 623464E, 5008658N
Till of the Copper Falls Formation is reddish
brown, sandy (~30 – 80% sand; Syverson, 2007;
Syverson et al, 2011), and sourced from the
northeast. Copper Falls till is distinguished from
older River Falls till primarily by the landscape
they underlie. Copper Falls sediment is found in
relatively unmodified landscapes formed during
the late Wisconsinan. Glacial landforms
(moraines, eskers, drumlins, ice-walled lake
plains…) are well persevered. River Falls
sediment is associated with a highly eroded
landscapes and likely formed before the late
Wisconsinan Glaciation. This roadcut exposes
typical unsorted glacial deposits of the Copper
Falls Formation deposited as stagnant ice melted.
Stop 2. David R. Obey Ice Age Interpretive
Center
UTM coordinates 624514E, 5009009N
The interpretive center is located in the
Chippewa Moraine State Recreation Area and
within the Chippewa Moraine. The moraine
formed when late Wisconsin ice was at its
maximum position (Syverson, 2007). The
landscape here is generally described as
hummocky, and formed as stagnant ice was

Figure 6. Schematic illustration showing the
formation of ice walled lake plains (from Clayton et
al., 2001). (A) Supraglacial sediment forms at the
surface of stagnant ice and lakes occupies low areas
where sorted sediment accumulates. (B) Hummocky
topography with ice-walled lake plains remain after
the ice has melted.

Figure 7. Lidar-derived
DEM showing the
hummocky topography of
the Chippewa Moraine near
Stops 1 and 2. Ice walled
lake plains are abundant
within the moraine, which
contrasts with the flat
landscape formed by
meltwater streams
(outwash).

77

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

suggest that it happened during the late Holocene
(Fig. 3).

Stop 3. Colluvium Exposure
UTM coordinates 625123E, 5001761 N

The falls consist of a series of small
knickpoints formed in early Proterozoic bedrock
consisting of banded amphibolites with granitic
intrusions (Myers and Maercklein, 1978). The
angular form of the knickpoints, along with
angular boulders of the same lithology scattered
along the channel bed, suggest that the river is
incising here primarily by mean of hydraulic
plucking. Hydraulic plucking occurs when flows
are deep and fast, leading to a zone of flow
separation and low pressure on the downstream
face of knickpoints. If the bedrock of a knickpoint
is sufficiently jointed and weathered, the resulting
drag force will pull blocks away from the
knickpoint face. Polished rock surfaces with rare
grooves and potholes indicate that abrasion by
bedload sediment is also playing a role here in
channel incision, although its effects appear
secondary to that of plucking.

The landscape beyond the LIS margin was
greatly affected by periglacial processes. One of
the most profound effects was the stripping of
hillslopes by the mass-wasting process of
solifluction (Clayton et al., 2001). Evidence of
solifluction is provided by relict deposits of
colluvium (colluvial aprons) that mantle bedrock
slopes in areas of former permafrost. Here we see
a prime example of such a colluvial deposit,
which consists of an unsorted mixture of
sandstone clasts (pebble to boulder in size)
supported in a matrix of silty sand. The sand and
the sandstone clasts were likely derived from the
underlying bedrock (sandstone of the Cambrian
Eau Claire Formation) by intense freeze-thaw
weathering during the Late Wisconsinan. The
silty material probably is loess that winds deflated
and transported to the sight from nearby outwash
plains.

While the Chippewa has clearly incised into
the Jim Falls bedrock, incision overall has been
minimal. The lack of incision is likely due, in
part, to the weathering and erosion-resistant
nature of the bedrock. An additional factor is the
relatively short amount of time that the river has
been incising at this location. Given the model of
long-profile evolution in Figure 3, incision didn’t
start here until sometime after 4.7 ka.

Stop 4. Jim Falls
UTM coordinates 635875E, 4990538 N)
The Chippewa at Jim Falls is an example of a
superimposed river (Fig. 8). Here, the Chippewa
River incised through a cover of outwash and till
and encountered a topographic high in the buried
a bedrock landscape. It did not, however, incise
to its present level in one episode of downcutting,
as evidenced by two terraces that are apparent at
and near this site. The highest terrace grades to
the Wissota terrace, the maximum level of
aggradation of the lower Chippewa River. This
indicates that the river continued to flow at this
level after the glacial margin had retreated to the
north of this site. Remnants of a terrace
approximately 3 meters below the Wissota (best
seen downstream from the east end of the
pedestrian bridge), which is cut into till, indicate
a period of channel stability before the river
incised further to the buried bedrock. When
deeper incision occurred is unknown, although
OSL ages of terrace alluvium farther down valley

The site today clearly is highly modified by a
dam, appropriately named the Jim Falls Dam. The
original Jim Falls Dam was built in 1923 to utilize
the hydraulic head provided by the falls to
generate electricity. It was designed so that the
falls were bypassed and left dry except during
high flows, when excess water was released
through a spillway that was located at the falls
upstream end. The dam was redeveloped in 1988
and now has the highest generation capacity of
any hydropower dam in Wisconsin (~60 MW).
This redevelopment included moving the main
spillway from the head of the falls to a location
adjacent to a new main powerhouse. It also
included constructing a smaller spillway and

78

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

auxiliary powerhouse where the main spillway
had been. This was done so that a minimum flow
of 240 cfs could be released down the bypassed
reach year-round, except for the period April 1-

May 31, when flow through the reach is increased
to 850 cfs to enhance fish spawning habitat.

Figure 8. Lidar-derived DEM of Jim Falls and surrounding area.

Stop 5. Wildenberg Quarry

Evidence for permafrost during the Late
Wisconsinan is widespread in Wisconsin, with a
hypothesized permafrost interval in central
Wisconsin from ca. 33 to 15 ka (Batchelor et al.,
2019) and as late as 13.5 ka in northern Wisconsin
(Attig and Rawling, 2018). This interval is,
however, poorly constrained in the Eau Claire
region due to a lack of 14C datable materials in
features diagnostic of permafrost. OSL dating
now makes it possible to date proxy geomorphic
features, like ice-wedge pseudomorphs, to help
constrain this (Schaetzl et al., 2021).

UTM coordinates 616648 E, 4970372 N
Note: This is private property. No access is
allowed without owner’s permission.
Glacial sediment of the River Falls Formation
includes till that is lithologically like the Copper
Falls Formation and melt-water stream sediment
(Syverson, 2007; Severson et al., 2011). These
can be distinguished from the Copper Falls
formation because they occur at the top of highly
eroded landscapes and the soils in them are more
developed. There are no primary glacial
landforms associated with the River Falls
Formation, likely due to intense modification by
periglacial processes in permafrost conditions
during the late Wisconsinan.

The ice-wedge pseudomorphs in this quarry
are sand wedges (Fig. 9). Sand wedges such as
these form in periglacial settings when thermal
contraction of frozen ground in winter forms

79

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Figure 9. Sand wedges exposed in the headwall of the Wildenberg quarry in July 2018. (Photograph by Randy
Schaetzl.)

cracks in the soil. If this happens in a cold, dry,
wind-swept environment with sand available for
transport, sand will blow into and fill the cracks.
Over time, repeated cracking and filling will form
vertical structures that generally taper with depth.
OSL dating of sand wedges in this quarry and in
another quarry located 60 km to the south indicate
that thermal contraction cracks existed and were
filling with sand from no later than 19.3 ka until
14.7 ka. Schaetzl et al. (2021) interpret these ages
as documenting when permafrost in the region
most likely ended. Interestingly, the OSL ages
from this quarry (15.1 and 14.7 ka) are younger
than those from the quarry 60 km to the south
(19.3, 19.1, and 18.3 ka). These may represent a
time-transgressive spatial relationship in that
permafrost possibly degraded earlier at the more
southerly location and remained longer at the
more northerly one, although this is purely
speculative given the large errors on the OSL ages
(1.4 to 2.2 ka at 1). That said, the larger and
more complex morphologies of the sand-wedges
found at this quarry do suggest the possibility of
more intense sand-wedge development due to
more prolonged permafrost conditions.

City incorporated it into its bicycle-pedestrian
trail system.
In addition to being historically significant, the
High Bridge (Fig. 10) affords an excellent view
of many of the terrace levels found in the LCR
valley. The High Bridge itself is at the level of T6. To the east, trees and houses can be seen at the
top of the Wissota terrace scarp, which is 6-7
meters above T-6. The Wissota can also be seen
to the west where the pedestrian-bicycle trail cuts
into its scarp. Looking downstream, lower
terraces are difficult to discern from this vantage
point, although the residential and business
districts located near the river provide clues.
These built-up areas are all above the 100-year
flood level. That is, they all are on terraces. In Eau
Claire, there is little active floodplain. This
suggests that incision below the lowest terrace
level occurred here recently (within the last 2.3 ka
according to the model of long-profile evolution
in Fig. 3).
Upstream from the High Bridge is the Dells
Dam. This dam, which was built in 1924 for the
purpose of generating electricity, is situated at an
unusually good site for a dam on the LCR – a
bedrock gorge. This gorge was formed when the
river incised into a cover of glacial outwash that
buried a low ridge of Cambrian sandstone (Mt.
Simon Formation) connecting Mt. Simon (the
conical bedrock hill located approximately 500 m
northeast of the dam) to the bedrock uplands
located west-northwest of it. In other words, the
river here did not incise into its pre-glacial
bedrock valley, which is located east of Mt.

Stop 6. High Bridge
UTM coordinates 617832E, 4964561N
This stop is on the so-called High Bridge in the
city of Eau Claire. Standing 26 m above the
Chippewa River, the High Bridge was built in
1880 as a railroad bridge and was an innovative
bridge for its time. It was abandoned in 1992, and
the City acquired ownership in 2007. In 2015, the

80

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Simon and the High Bridge. This is an example
of an epigenetic gorge (Ouimet et al., 2008), and
the river likely carved it sometime after 7.4 ka

(see Fig. 3). Incision is actually still occurring
here, as evidenced by a 1.5-m bedrock knickpoint
located 180 m downstream of the bridge.
Figure 10. Lidar-derived
DEM
showing
the
stream terraces found in
Eau Claire in the vicinity
of the High Bridge.

upvalley and on the valley’s other side. The last
episode of incision, below T-1, occurred within
the last 2.3 ka based on an OSL date of T-1 fill
from a site also located 6.5 km upvalley (Fig. 3).
In the downstream direction, the valley below the
Wissota is predominantly floodplain with only
rare lower terrace remnants. In addition, the
river’s planform switches from a single-thread
meandering shape to a multi-thread anabranching
one that extends downvalley for a distance of 8.5
km. At that point, it returns to a single-channel
meandering form. It is uncertain why this
anabranching reach exists, although its similarity
to the sedimentation zones of wandering gravel
bed streams in British Columbia described by
Desloges and Church (1987) suggests a cause.
Given its location immediately downstream of

Stop 7. Sand Hill Cemetery
UTM coordinates 599549E, 4958254N
This stop is at the edge of the Wissota terrace
tread and top of the Wissota terrace scarp. To the
north, a braided channel is apparent in the subtle
rolling topography of the Wissota tread,
providing evidence of the Chippewa’s glacial
past (Fig. 11). To the south, the Wissota scarp
descends nearly 30 m to the lowest terrace in the
valley (T-1). Looking upvalley, this terrace can
be identified by the farmland situated on it. Lowlying land that is wooded is either floodplain or
paleochannels cutting across the T-1 surface.
Incision here below the Wissota level occurred
between 10 and 9 ka, based on four OSL dates of
Wissota fill obtained from sites located 6.5 km

81

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

the reach that was recently incised below T-1, it
could be the result of sedimentation resulting
from that incision event (Fig. 12). A pronounced

convexity in the long profile of the modern river
along the anabranching reach supports this
hypothesis (Faulkner et al., 2016).
Figure 11. Lidar-derived
DEM showing the fluvial
and aeolian landforms in
the vicinity of the Sand
Hill Cemetery (Stop 7),
which are discussed in
the text.

Figure 12. Cartoon showing
the
setting
of
the
anabranching reach (and
hypothesized sedimentation
zone) downstream of the
reach that is incised below
the T-1 terrace (adapted
from Adams et al., 2016).

82

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

A short distance (~200 m) west of the Sand Hill
Cemetery, an elongate wooded hill—informally
named the Steffes-Zanoni site—can be seen
rising above the low-relief landscape of the
Wissota terrace. (This hill can also be seen in Fig.
11.) Its summit is approximately 8 m higher than
the surrounding Wissota terrace surface, and its
elongate form runs parallels to the Wissota
terrace scarp. The landform is composed of sand
that is mineralogically indistinguishable from the
terrace sediments beneath it, although it is
relatively finer-grained and more well-sorted,
indicating that it is aeolian sand (Millett, 2019). It
is also morphologically complex, consisting of
multiple parabolic forms coalesced together with
smaller parabolic forms on top of them. These
forms--smaller parabolic dunes superimposed on
larger older ones—indicate repeated aeolian
activity at this site. The OSL ages of samples
obtained from depths of 1.7 m and 2.5 m near the
hill’s northwest end suggest a depositional age of
the landform’s upper part to be ~0.5 ka. Larson et
al. (2008) identified a dune similar to this one in
the city of Eau Claire and called it a cliff-top
parabolic dune (because of its form and its
proximal relationship to the Wissota terrace
scarp). Since then, many cliff-top parabolic dunes
have been noted in the Eau Claire region (note the
large number of parabolic dunes situated along
the Wissota scarp in Fig. 5). Why these dunes
exist will be discussed at our final stop.

with parabolic forms oriented perpendicular to
them—are hypothesized to have had a similar
genetic origin (Larson et al., 2008; Millett, 2019).
In their proposed model, a river cuts into the base
of a high fill-terrace scarp. This creates an
unstable cutbank and promotes mass wasting that
removes vegetation from the scarp face. Wind
that then blows against such a scarp gets
compressed, which causes its velocity to go up.
The increase in velocity enhances the wind’s
ability to entrain exposed sandy sediment and
transport it up the scarp face. When this happens,
the sandy sediment ultimately settles out at the
top of the scarp as wind velocity is reduced there.
This leaves behind “cliff-top dunes.” (Fig. 14).
Given this model of dune genesis, one should
expect cliff-top dunes to have different
orientations and depositional ages compared to
other parabolic dunes not in cliff-top positions.
This is indeed the case. Non-cliff-top dunes
generally have a northwest-southeast orientation
and depositional ages older than 10 ka. Cliff-top
dunes display a variety of orientations
(perpendicular to their scarps) and are generally
much younger. OSL ages from a cliff-top dune in
the city of Eau Claire indicate a period of aeolian
deposition at ca. 6.0 ka, while two from the
Steffes-Zanoni site (Stop 7) indicate that
deposition in the uppermost dune sediments
occurred at ca. 0.5 ka. At the Kiwanis site, eight
OSL ages point to two depositional episodes: at
ca. 0.9 ka and 0.5 ka.

Stop 8. Town of Union Conservancy

The model of Larson et al. (2008) of cliff-top
dune genesis suggests that these should be
forming wherever the Chippewa River is eroding
laterally into Wissota terrace fill. This, however,
is not the case; today, all cliff-top dunes in the
LCR valley are stabilized by vegetation and no
longer moving. Thus, the genesis of these
landforms is doubtless more complex than the
model of Larson et al. (2008) suggests, with
climatic variability likely playing a key role in the
process of aeolian sedimentation and dune
formation at cliff-top locations (Millett, 2019).
For example, during humid climate intervals

UTM coordinates 607504E, 4959523N
Note: This site involves walking on unpaved
trails for an approximate distance of one mile.
There are some short sections of the trail that
are moderately steep.
Parabolic dunes in cliff-top positions are
especially prominent at this location, which is
informally called the Kiwanis Site (Fig. 13). Like
those seen at the previous stop, these dunes are
situated atop the Wissota terrace scarp. These
dunes and others that are similarly situated in the
LCR valley—above high Wissota terrace scarps

83

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

(such as at the present), high cutbanks carved by
the river into Wissota fill are colonized readily by
vegetation, which inhibits the entrainment and
transport of sand up terrace scarps. In contrast,
during arid intervals, vegetation cover is greatly
reduced, especially on steep well-drained terrace
scarps, allowing wind to entrain and transport
sand up them. OSL ages from the Kiwanis Site
and the Steffes-Zanoni Site support the
significance of climate variability in the
formation of cliff-top dune. At Kiwanis, these
ages indicate two pulses of aeolian deposition –
the first at ca. 0.9 ka and a second at ca. 0.5 ka,
with the latter coinciding with ages from the
Steffes-Zanoni Site. If correct, these pulses
happened during the Medieval Climatic Anomaly
when well documented dry periods affected the
mid-continent of North America (reviewed in
Millett, 2019).

forms enclosed by a subtle linear ridge appear to
be anthropogenic features. It is likely, based
onthe morphology and distribution of these
features, that their creation was tied to the genesis
of the prominent aeolian dunes found nearby and,
potentially, culturally linked to
a wellestablished late Woodland period of mound
building in the upper Mississippi River valley – a
period which would have coincided with the
formation of the Kiwanis and Steffes-Zanoni
dunes. Based on the configuration of these
features, it is hypothesized that this site represents
the “Thunderer,” an effigy of a bird-like deity, or
sky being. The spotted Thunderer, with “spots”
represented by the location of the mounds within
the linear structure, is associated with the West
and the bringer of storms. If true, Native peoples
may have watched the dunes form during a period
of more aridity during episodes of higher
winds/storms, resulting in this site being
spiritually significant at that time and now an
important site of cultural heritage (R. Schirmer,
personal communication).

Lastly, closer examination of the Kiwanis Site
(Fig. 13) reveals landforms in close proximity to
the dunes that do not look to be of natural origin.
Several hemispherical (or conical) mound-like

Figure 13. The Kiwanis Site. Cliff-top parabolic dunes are situated directly above the Chippewa River on top of the
Wissota terrace scarp. Also note the hemispherical mounds and linear ridge of hypothesized anthropogenic origin.

84

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Figure 14. Model of cliff-top dune genesis induced by lateral river erosion (adapted from Larson et al., 2008).

Begin, Z.B. 1986. Determination of “diffusion”
erosion coefficients for some tributaries of
Oaklimiter Creek, North-Central Mississippi, in
Hadley, R.F., ed., Drainage Basin Sediment
Delivery. IAHS Publication, p. 447–462.

References
Adams, H.R., Vincent, A.M., and Faulkner, D.J. 2016.
Patterns of downstream fining on the lower
Chippewa River, Wisconsin: Abstracts, Annual
Meeting - American Association of Geographers,
San Francisco, CA

Begin, Z.B. 1988. Application of a diffusion-erosion
model to alluvial channels which degrade due to
base-level lowering: Earth Surface Processes and
Landforms, v. 13, p. 487–500.

Andrews, G.W. 1965. Late Quaternary geologic
history of the Lower Chippewa Valley, Wisconsin.
Geological Society of America Bulletin: v. 76, p.
113–124.

Begin, Z.B., Meyer, D.F., and Schumm, S.A. 1981.
Development of longitudinal profiles of alluvial
channels in response to base-level lowering: Earth
Surface Processes and Landforms, v. 6, p. 49–68.

Attig, J.W. 1985. Pleistocene Geology of Vilas
County, Wisconsin: Wisconsin Geological and
Natural History Survey, Information Circular 51,
32 p.

Clayton, L., Attig, J.W., and Mickelson, D.M. 2001.
Effects of late Pleistocene permafrost on the
landscape of Wisconsin: Boreas, v. 30, p. 173–188.

Attig, J.W. 1993. Pleistocene Geology of Taylor
County, Wisconsin: Wisconsin Geological and
natural History Survey, Bulletin 90, 25 p.

Curry, B.B., Lowell, T.V., Wang, H., and Anderson,
A.C. 2018. Revised time-distance diagram for the
Lake Michigan Lobe, Michigan Subepisode,
Wisconsin Episode, Illinois, USA, in Kehew, A.,
and Curry, B.B., eds., Quaternary Glaciation of the
Great Lakes Region: Process, Landforms,
Sediments, and Chronology: Geological Society of
America Special Paper 530, p. 1–12.

Attig, J.W., and Rawling, J.E., III. 2018. Influence of
persistent buried ice on late glacial landscape
development in part of Wisconsin’s Northern
Highlands, in Kehew, A., and Curry, B.B., eds.,
Quaternary Glaciation of the Great Lakes Region:
Process, Landforms, Sediments, and Chronology:
Geological Society of America Special Paper 530,
p. 1–12.

Desloges, J.R., and Church, M. 1987. Channel and
floodplain facies in a wandering gravel-bed river,
in Ethridge, F.G., Flores, R.M., Harvey, M.D.,
Weaver, J.N., eds., Recent Developments in
Fluvial Sedimentology: Special Publication.
Society of Economic Paleontologists and
Mineralogists, p. 99–109.

Batchelor, C.J., Orland, I.J., Marcott, S.A., Slaughter,
R., Edwards, R.L., Zhang, P., Li, X., and Cheng,
H. 2019. Distinct permafrost conditions across the
last two glacial periods in midlatitude North
America: Geophysical Research Letters, v. 46, no.
22, p. 13318-13326.

85

�Proceedings of the 69th ILSG Annual Meeting - Part 2

Faulkner, D.J., Larson, P.H., Jol, H.M., Running, G.L.,
Loope, H.M., and Goble, R.J. 2016. Autogenic
incision and terrace formation resulting from
abrupt late-glacial base-level fall, lower Chippewa
River, Wisconsin, USA: Geomorphology, v. 266,
p. 75–95.

Schaetzl, R.J., Forman, S.L., and Attig, J.W. 2014.
Optical ages on loess derived from outwash
surfaces constrain the advance of the Laurentide
Ice Sheet out of the Lake Superior Basin, USA:
Quaternary Research, v. 81, p. 318–329.
Schaetzl, R.J., Larson, P.H., Faulkner, D.J., Running,
G.L., Jol, H.M., and Rittenour, T.M. 2018. Eolian
sand and loess deposits indicate west-northwest
paleowinds during the Late Pleistocene in western
Wisconsin, USA: Quaternary Research, v. 89, p.
769–785.

Gran, K.B., Finnegan, N., Johnson, A.L., Belmont, P.,
Wittkop, C., and Rittenour, T. 2013. Landscape
evolution, valley excavation, and terrace
development following abrupt postglacial baselevel fall: Geological Society of America Bulletin,
v. 125, p. 1851–1864.

Schaetzl, R.J., Running, G.L., Larson, P., Rittenour,
T., Yansa, C., and Faulkner, D. 2022.
Luminescence dating of sand wedges constrains
the Late Wisconsin (MIS 2) permafrost interval in
the upper Midwest, USA: Boreas, v. 51, p. 385–
401.

Knox, J.C., 2007. The Mississippi River System, in
Gupta, A., ed., Large Rivers: Geomorphology and
Management. John Wiley &amp; Sons, Chichester,
England ; Hoboken, NJ, p. 145–182.
Larson, P.H. McDonald, J., Baker, A., Dryer, W.P.,
Running, G.L., Faulkner, D.J. and Jol, H.M. 2008.
Geomorphology of cliff-top parabolic dunes
within the lower Chippewa River valley, upper
Putnam Park, Eau Claire, Wisconsin: Abstracts,
Annual Meeting - Association of American
Geographers, Boston, MA.

Schirmer, R. 2023. Personal communication regarding
archeology in the upper Mississippi valley and the
Kiwanis Site. 3/8/2023.
Shandonay, K.L., Bowen, M.W., Larson, P.H.,
Running, G.L., Rittenour, T., and Mataitis, R.
2022. Morphology and stratigraphy of aeolian sand
stringers in southeast Minnesota and western
Wisconsin, USA: Earth Surface Processes and
Landforms, v. 47, p. 2863–2876.

Loope, H.M., Mason, J.A., Knox, J.C., Goble, R.J.,
Hanson, P.R., Young, A.R., and Curry, B.B. 2012.
Late Wisconsinan aggradation and incision history
of the upper Mississippi River, USA: Abstracts
with Programs - Geological Society of America, v.
44, p. 455.

Syverson, K.M. 2007. Pleistocene Geology of
Chippewa County, Wisconsin: Wisconsin
Geological and natural History Survey, Bulletin
103, 53 p.

Mataitis, R. 2020. “Geomorphology and chronology
of sand stringer deposition beyond the ice margin:
Southeastern Minnesota and western Wisconsin,
USA.” M.S. Thesis. Minnesota State University,
Mankato.

Syverson, K.M., Clayton, L., Attig, J.W., and
Mickelson, D.M. 2011. Lexicon of Pleistocene
Stratigraphic Units of Wisconsin: Wisconsin
Geological and Natural History Survey Technical
Report 1, 180 p.

Millett, J. 2019. “Cliff-top dunes in the lower
Chippewa River valley of west-central
Wisconsin.” M.S. Thesis. Minnesota State
University, Mankato.

Woodruff, L.G., Attig, J.W., and Cannon, W.F. 2004.
Geochemistry of glacial sediments in the area of
the Bend massive sulfide deposit, north-central
Wisconsin: Journal of Geochemical Exploration, v.
82, p. 97–109.

Myers, P.E., and Maercklein, D.A. 1978.
Amphibolites and Granites at Jim Falls: Wisconsin
Geology of Wisconsin – Outcrop Descriptions,
Geological and Natural History Survey, 7 p.
Rawling III, J.E., Carson, E.C., Attig, J.W.,
Mickelson, D.M., Mode, W.N., Johnson, M.D.,
Syverson, KM. (in preparation). The Quaternary
Geology of Wisconsin. Wisconsin Geological and
Natural History Survey. Map Sale 1:500,000.

86

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="19">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="16970">
                  <text>Institute on Lake Superior Geology</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="66273">
                <text>Institute on Lake Superior Geology: Proceedings, 2023</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="66274">
                <text>Institute on Lake Superior Geology. Eau Claire, Wisconsin. April 24-25, 2023.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="66275">
                <text>Institute on Lake Superior Geology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="66276">
                <text>2023-04-24</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="66277">
                <text>PDF</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="66278">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="66279">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="8208" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="9049">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/0b24745b5f54dab200df24eadc001ccf.pdf</src>
        <authentication>b70185d5c567dae0da9dc29359c01222</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="67039">
                    <text>����������������������������������������������������������������������</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="8">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="5777">
                  <text>Lakehead University Alumni Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="5778">
                  <text>Material kept by the Lakehead University Alumni Association, or donated by Alumni to the Association. </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67040">
                <text>Intramural and Varsity Athletic Banquet, 1979-1980</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67041">
                <text>Universities</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67042">
                <text>The book contains sports award recipients, team rosters, and team standings and statistics, records and highlights from the 1979-1980 intramural and varsity sports season. The banquet was held at the DaVinci Centre on April 3rd, 1980.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67043">
                <text>Lakehead University </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67044">
                <text>1980-04-03</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67045">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1780">
        <name>1980</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="3723">
        <name>1980s</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="1813">
        <name>intramural sports</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="1797">
        <name>Lakehead athletics</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="1053">
        <name>Nor'Wester</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="1816">
        <name>student committee on athletics</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="1796">
        <name>varsity athletics</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="8209" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="9050">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/63f433e29dc33d217f1c22a1efcdf2d1.pdf</src>
        <authentication>8df9d5ae3162df515453ed084cbdf99c</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="67046">
                    <text>��������</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="8">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="5777">
                  <text>Lakehead University Alumni Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="5778">
                  <text>Material kept by the Lakehead University Alumni Association, or donated by Alumni to the Association. </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67047">
                <text>Lakehead University Nor'Westers Basketball Program for Women's and Men's games on Jan 5/6, 1990</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67048">
                <text>Universities</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67049">
                <text>Booklet contains January 1990 varsity basketball home schedule and Lakehead women's and men's basketball team rosters. It also contains the team rosters of the opponents teams. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67050">
                <text>Lakehead University</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67051">
                <text>1990-01</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67052">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1112">
        <name>1990</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="577">
        <name>Baseball</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="1947">
        <name>Basketball team</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="397">
        <name>Men's Basketball</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="1820">
        <name>roster</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="4875">
        <name>varsity</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="1796">
        <name>varsity athletics</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="408">
        <name>Women's Basketball</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="8210" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="9051">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/987933bdc82efa1b8d0adc46782be62a.pdf</src>
        <authentication>32ef89cf6b2030a66c0ea44d210a567d</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="67053">
                    <text>������������������������������������������������������������������������</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="8">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="5777">
                  <text>Lakehead University Alumni Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="5778">
                  <text>Material kept by the Lakehead University Alumni Association, or donated by Alumni to the Association. </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67054">
                <text>Nor'Westers P.E. Yearbook 1990-1991</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67055">
                <text>Universities</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67056">
                <text>Physical Education yearbook for the year 1990-1991. Contains class photos and names by year, photos and memories from the school year and professor information. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67057">
                <text>Lakehead University </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67058">
                <text>1991</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67059">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1112">
        <name>1990</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="1118">
        <name>1991</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="915">
        <name>Alumni</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="122">
        <name>Lakehead</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="1568">
        <name>Lakehead Alumni</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="1797">
        <name>Lakehead athletics</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="1053">
        <name>Nor'Wester</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="1578">
        <name>Physical Education</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="998">
        <name>Yearbook</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="8211" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="9052">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/d7ad9738f90c0ed88a4faa04e0df1aa0.pdf</src>
        <authentication>705d1d089bee8a6a7115b7702e9b8fb5</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="67060">
                    <text>��������������������������������������������������������������</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="8">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="5777">
                  <text>Lakehead University Alumni Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="5778">
                  <text>Material kept by the Lakehead University Alumni Association, or donated by Alumni to the Association. </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67061">
                <text>Nor'Westers P.E. Yearbook 1989-1990</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67062">
                <text>Universities</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67063">
                <text>Physical Education yearbook for the year 1989-1990. Contains class photos and names by year, photos and memories from the school year and professor information.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67064">
                <text>Lakehead Univeristy</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67065">
                <text>1990</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67066">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67191">
                <text>PDF</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67192">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1109">
        <name>1989</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="1112">
        <name>1990</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="915">
        <name>Alumni</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="1568">
        <name>Lakehead Alumni</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="1797">
        <name>Lakehead athletics</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="1053">
        <name>Nor'Wester</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="1578">
        <name>Physical Education</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="998">
        <name>Yearbook</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="8212" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="9053">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/ef32259eaf2189a69443b03071bd82f0.pdf</src>
        <authentication>1ae3c8c2761627421a10e96dd8eb4460</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="67067">
                    <text>��������������������������������������������������������������������������</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="8">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="5777">
                  <text>Lakehead University Alumni Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="5778">
                  <text>Material kept by the Lakehead University Alumni Association, or donated by Alumni to the Association. </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67068">
                <text>Lakehead University P.E. Yearbook, 1992</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67069">
                <text>Universities</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67070">
                <text>Physical Education yearbook for the year 1991-1992. Contains class photos and names by year, photos and memories from the school year and professor information.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67071">
                <text>Lakehead University</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67072">
                <text>1992</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67073">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67202">
                <text>PDF</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67203">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1118">
        <name>1991</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="1123">
        <name>1992</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="915">
        <name>Alumni</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="1568">
        <name>Lakehead Alumni</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="1797">
        <name>Lakehead athletics</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="1578">
        <name>Physical Education</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="998">
        <name>Yearbook</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="8213" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="13357">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/9a5668dcfc36bc3b5a8ac42d479c940b.jpg</src>
        <authentication>45a8ad5aad013be5bc55ecdda515d3c3</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="1">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="1">
                  <text>Thunder Bay Finnish Canadian Historical Society Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Finnish-Canadians</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="3">
                  <text>Life in Thunder Bay</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4">
                  <text>Photographs collected by the Thunder Bay Finnish Canadian Historical Society from a wide range of collectors, documenting Finnish immigration to and life in Thunder Bay. </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="5">
                  <text>Thunder Bay Finnish Canadian Historical Society</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="6">
                  <text>Lakehead University Library</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67609">
                <text>Trappers with dog team</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67610">
                <text>Communities in Northwestern Ontario</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="67611">
                <text>People</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67612">
                <text>Trappers with dog team, Nipigon, Ontario. People in photo: Joe Sault.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67613">
                <text>JPG</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67614">
                <text>Still image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67615">
                <text>MG8_D13Ei74</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="38">
            <name>Coverage</name>
            <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67616">
                <text>Canada - Ontario - Nipigon</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="8214" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="13430">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/c3fe0a1e52a261700eb333fd639b6b4a.jpg</src>
        <authentication>8ad9f6e0c9fb2b930c52cae7d0d619cd</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="1">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="1">
                  <text>Thunder Bay Finnish Canadian Historical Society Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="2">
                  <text>Finnish-Canadians</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="3">
                  <text>Life in Thunder Bay</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="4">
                  <text>Photographs collected by the Thunder Bay Finnish Canadian Historical Society from a wide range of collectors, documenting Finnish immigration to and life in Thunder Bay. </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="5">
                  <text>Thunder Bay Finnish Canadian Historical Society</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="6">
                  <text>Lakehead University Library</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67617">
                <text>Beginnings of the "Boom"</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67618">
                <text>Beginnings of the "Boom" in Beardmore, Ontario, September, 1933. Home of Mr. &amp; Mrs. Perala (left), construction of hotel, log structure (right).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67619">
                <text>1933-09</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67620">
                <text>JPG</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67621">
                <text>Still image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67622">
                <text>MG8_D13Ei75</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="38">
            <name>Coverage</name>
            <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="67623">
                <text>Canada - Ontario - Beardmore</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="92396">
                <text>Business and Industry</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="92397">
                <text>Communities in Northwestern Ontario</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="92398">
                <text>Public domain</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
