<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/items?output=omeka-xml&amp;page=254&amp;sort_field=added" accessDate="2026-06-26T09:58:05+00:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>254</pageNumber>
      <perPage>10</perPage>
      <totalResults>13233</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="3057" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="3387">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/80b58efd03b4e1a9f95723f214ecb4a2.jpg</src>
        <authentication>98f15824d6e8dd818fb61e4b02bffbf7</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="18">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="16969">
                  <text>Cairine Budner fonds</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18683">
                <text>Newspaper clipping</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18684">
                <text>Sports</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18685">
                <text>Black and white photograph of a newspaper clipping on the West End Bearcat Hockey Club winning the second running of the Finnish Athletic Club Nahjus' annual 10-mile relay road race. Club members are standing and sitting holding their trophies</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18686">
                <text>Public domain</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18687">
                <text>Photograph</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18688">
                <text>Still image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18689">
                <text>PHIII-0011a (xi) scan# BUD-0147</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="2591">
        <name>10 mile Relay Road Race</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="2297">
        <name>Nahjus Athletic Club</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="336">
        <name>Newspaper Article</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="2357">
        <name>trophies</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="2590">
        <name>West End Bearcat Hockey Club</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="3058" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="3388">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/79f33bd034590d1312c5c32d838ad072.jpg</src>
        <authentication>e2d7d0daebba249636e56c6c6789a490</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="18">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="16969">
                  <text>Cairine Budner fonds</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18690">
                <text>Award trophies won by Arne Rita </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18691">
                <text>Sports</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18692">
                <text>Black and white photographs of some of the many award trophies won by Arne Rita in running race events. Trophies are lined up on a table</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18693">
                <text>Donor A. Rita</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18694">
                <text>Public domain</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18695">
                <text>Photograph</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18696">
                <text>Still image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18697">
                <text>PHIII-0011b (xiv) scan# BUD-0148</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="2573">
        <name>Arne Rita</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="2334">
        <name>athlete</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="1508">
        <name>Awards</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="2333">
        <name>race</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="2355">
        <name>runner</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="4620">
        <name>Sports (Individuals)</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="2357">
        <name>trophies</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="3059" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="3389">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/00cedf984e1b0bb0b4d6db6537938f53.jpg</src>
        <authentication>9d702d8b9659cf5c897a70597771cced</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="18">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="16969">
                  <text>Cairine Budner fonds</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18698">
                <text>Runners at Isku Park</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18699">
                <text>Sports</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18700">
                <text>Black and white photograph of runners jumping hurdles at Isku Park</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18701">
                <text>Donor A. Widgren</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18702">
                <text>Public domain&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18703">
                <text>Photograph</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18704">
                <text>Still image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18705">
                <text>PHIII-0011c (ii) scan# BUD-0149</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="2546">
        <name>A. Widgren</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="2326">
        <name>athletes</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="2542">
        <name>Isku Park</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="2332">
        <name>runners</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="3060" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="3390">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/437753a84ad9094889142cf5dd898a27.jpg</src>
        <authentication>b0db3ac72c42122bcefa69a7e729df30</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="18">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="16969">
                  <text>Cairine Budner fonds</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18706">
                <text>Finals in 300 Metre Race at Isku Park 1932</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18707">
                <text>Sports</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18708">
                <text>Black and white photograph of the finals in 300 metre race at Isku Park. Spectators are lined along the route. Sam Pukkala is in 3rd position</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18709">
                <text>1932</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18710">
                <text>Donor S. Pukkala</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18711">
                <text>Public domain</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18712">
                <text>Photograph</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18713">
                <text>Still image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18714">
                <text>PHIII-0011c (iii) scan# BUD-0150</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="2544">
        <name>1932</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="2592">
        <name>300 metre race</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="2326">
        <name>athletes</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="2542">
        <name>Isku Park</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="2332">
        <name>runners</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="2336">
        <name>spectators</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="3061" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="3391">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/a9cc14fa1ae4782c577ef54d21d6a046.jpg</src>
        <authentication>78b780a1762766bad5a9e6d0b9ddad42</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="18">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="16969">
                  <text>Cairine Budner fonds</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18715">
                <text>Leo Wyrynen distance runner 1953</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18716">
                <text>Sports</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18717">
                <text>Black and white photograph of Leo Wyrynen distance runner for Hillcrest High School and Isku Club Port Arthur. He won track &amp; field awards. Leo is running in the centre track. Spectators are behind the fence watching the race</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18718">
                <text>1953</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18719">
                <text>Donor W. Wyrynen</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18720">
                <text>Public domain</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18721">
                <text>Photograph</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18722">
                <text>Still image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18723">
                <text>PHIII-0011c (v) scan# BUD-0151</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="1771">
        <name>1953</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="2594">
        <name>Hillcrest High School</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="2542">
        <name>Isku Park</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="2593">
        <name>Leo Wyrynen</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="2333">
        <name>race</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="2332">
        <name>runners</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="1806">
        <name>track &amp; field</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="3062" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="3392">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/2f0c0072368cd8f2083ec96efc90e235.jpg</src>
        <authentication>25da6bc72953a164563280279c61500b</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="18">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="16969">
                  <text>Cairine Budner fonds</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18724">
                <text>Summer competition near Rockwood area 1917</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18725">
                <text>Sports</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18726">
                <text>Black and white photograph of shot put event near Rockwood area. Spectators are lined up close by the shot putter watching the event</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18727">
                <text>1917</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18728">
                <text>Donor E. Takala</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18729">
                <text>Public domain</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18730">
                <text>Photograph</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18731">
                <text>Still image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18732">
                <text>PHIII-0011c (vii) scan# BUD-0152</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="2596">
        <name>1917</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="2326">
        <name>athletes</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="2319">
        <name>competition</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="2595">
        <name>Rockwood</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="2346">
        <name>shot put</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="2336">
        <name>spectators</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="3063" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="3393">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/795d9a865d55c3086bcda137ccad1c7f.pdf</src>
        <authentication>59d34dc03c74139c37d2d5698efda839</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="18733">
                    <text>Volume 67, Part 1*

67th ANNUAL MEETING

VIRTUAL EVENTS
May 11, 14, 18, 21, 2021
Hosted by:
Peter Hollings, Mark Smyk, and Mark Jirsa
Co-chairs
Lakehead University and
Minnesota Geological Survey

The Sleeping Giant

66th

*The
Annual meeting originally planned for 2020 in Mountain Iron, Minnesota, was
cancelled due to the Covid-19 pandemic, and thus, no Proceedings Volume 66 was produced.
To mitigate potential impact from the ongoing pandemic, the 67th Annual meeting was held in
a virtual format. As a result, there were no fieldtrips, and only this Part 1 of Proceedings
Volume 67 was produced.
We would like to thank the Lakehead University Technology Services Centre, particularly Blain
Boyd, Shawn Hartviksen and John Bonofiglio, for providing the Zoom account and technical
support for this virtual meeting.

i

�Proceedings Volume 67,
Part 1: Program and Abstracts
Table of Contents
Institutes on Lake Superior Geology, 1955-2019

iii

Sam Goldich and the Goldich Medal
Goldich Medal Guidelines
Goldich Medalists and Goldich Medal Committee
Citation for Goldich Medal Award to Allan MacTavish

v
vii
ix
x

Honoring the Pioneers of Lake Superior Geology-Newton Horace Winchell
xii
Memoriams for John Klasner, Thomas Waggoner, Ronald Seavoy, and John Heine
xvi
Eisenbrey Student Travel Awards
xvii
Joe Mancuso Student Research Awards
xviii
Doug Duskin Student Paper Awards and Award Committee
Institute Board of Directors
Report of the 65th Annual Meeting (2019)
TECHNICAL PROGRAM
ABSTRACTS

xix
xx
xxi
xxv
1-72

Reference to material in Part 1 should follow the example below:
Authors(s), 2021, abstract title. 67th Institute on Lake Superior Geology Proceedings v. 67, Part 1Program and Abstracts, p. XX
Published by the 67th Institute on Lake Superior Geology
and distributed by the ILSG Secretary:
Peter Hollings
Department of Geology
Lakehead University
Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1
CANADA
peter.hollings@lakeheadu.ca
Digital version of the volumes are available on-line at
http://www.lakesuperiorgeology.org.
lSSN 1042-99

ii

�Institutes on Lake Superior Geology, 1955-2019

#

Year

Meeting Location

Chairs

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

1955
1956
1957
1958
1959
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977

Minneapolis, Minnesota
Houghton, Michigan
East Lansing, Michigan
Duluth, Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Madison, Wisconsin
Port Arthur, Ontario
Houghton, Michigan
Duluth, Minnesota
Ishpeming, Michigan
St. Paul, Minnesota
Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan
East Lansing, Michigan
Superior, Wisconsin
Oshkosh, Wisconsin
Thunder Bay, Ontario
Duluth, Minnesota
Houghton, Michigan
Madison, Wisconsin
Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario
Marquette, Michigan
St. Paul, Minnesota
Thunder Bay, Ontario

C.E. Dutton
A.K. Snelgrove
B.T. Sandefur
R.W. Marsden
G.M. Schwartz &amp; C. Craddock
E.N. Cameron
E.G. Pye
A.K. Snelgrove
H. Lepp
A.T. Broderick
P.K. Sims &amp; R.K. Hogberg
R.W. White
W.J. Hinze
A.B. Dickas
G.L. LaBerge
M.W. Bartley &amp; E. Mercy
D.M. Davidson
J. Kalliokoski
M.E. Ostrom
P.E. Giblin
J.D. Hughes
M. Walton
M.M. Kehlenbeck

iii

�#
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55

Year
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009

56

2010

57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018

65
66
67

2019
2020
2021

Meeting Location
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Duluth, Minnesota
Eau Claire, Wisconsin
East Lansing, Michigan
International Falls, Minnesota
Houghton, Michigan
Wausau, Wisconsin
Kenora, Ontario
Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin
Wawa, Ontario
Marquette, Michigan
Duluth, Minnesota
Thunder Bay, Ontario
Eau Claire, Wisconsin
Hurley, Wisconsin
Eveleth, Minnesota
Houghton, Michigan
Marathon, Ontario
Cable, Wisconsin
Sudbury, Ontario
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Marquette, Michigan
Thunder Bay, Ontario
Madison, Wisconsin
Kenora, Ontario
Iron Mountain, Michigan
Duluth, Minnesota
Nipigon, Ontario
Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario
Lutsen, Minnesota
Marquette, Michigan
Ely, Minnesota

Chairs
G. Mursky
D.M. Davidson
P.E. Myers
W.C. Cambray
D.L. Southwick
T.J. Bornhorst
G.L. LaBerge
C.E. Blackburn
J.K. Greenberg
E.D. Frey &amp; R.P. Sage
J. S. Klasner
J.C. Green
M.M. Kehlenbeck
P.E. Myers
A.B. Dickas
D.L. Southwick
T.J. Bornhorst
M.C. Smyk
L.G. Woodruff
R.P. Sage &amp; W. Meyer
J.D. Miller &amp; M.A. Jirsa
T.J. Bornhorst &amp; R.S. Regis
S.A. Kissin &amp; P. Fralick
M.G. Mudrey &amp; Jr., B.A. Brown
P. Hinz &amp; R.C. Beard
L. Woodruff &amp; W.F. Cannon
S. Hauck &amp; M. Severson
M. Smyk &amp; P. Hollings
A. Wilson &amp; R. Sage
L. Woodruff &amp; J. Miller
T.J. Bornhorst &amp; J. Klasner
J. Miller, G. Hudak, &amp;
D. Peterson
International Falls, Minnesota
M. Jirsa, P. Hollings, T.
Boerboom, P. Hinz &amp; M.Smyk
Ashland, Wisconsin
T. Fitz
Thunder Bay, Ontario
P. Hollings
Houghton, Michigan
T.J. Bornhorst &amp; A. Blaske
Hibbing, Minnesota
J. Miller &amp; M. Jirsa
Dryden, Ontario
R. Cundari &amp; P. Hinz
Duluth, Minnesota
J. Miller, C. Schardt, &amp; D. Peterson
Wawa, Ontario
A. Pace, A. Wilson, &amp; T.J. Bornhorst
Iron Mountain, Michigan
L. Woodruff, W. Cannon, &amp;
E.K. Stewart
Terrace Bay, Ontario
P. Hollings &amp; M.C. Smyk
Meeting cancelled due to Covid-19 pandemic
Virtual meeting
P. Hollings, M. Smyk, M. Jirsa

iv

�Sam Goldich and the Goldich Medal
Sam Goldich received an A.B. from the University of Minnesota in 1929, a M.A. from Syracuse
University in 1930, and a Ph.D. from the University of Minnesota in 1936. During World War II Sam
worked for the U.S. Geological Survey in mineral exploration. In 1948, Sam returned to the University of
Minnesota, and became Professor and Director of the Rock Analysis Laboratory the following year. He
rejoined the U.S. Geological Survey in 1959 and was appointed as the first Branch Chief of the Branch of
Isotope Geology. Sam returned to academia in 1964 when he went to Pennsylvania State University. He
left PSU in 1965 and moved to the State University of New York at Stony Brook, where he stayed for 3
years. Restless yet again, he moved to Northern Illinois University in 1968 where he was a professor until
his retirement in 1977. Sam’s final move was to Denver where he became an emeritus at the Colorado
School of Mines. Sam died in 2000, less than a month before his 92nd birthday.
In the late 1970’s, Geological Society of America Special Paper 182, which included seminal
geochronological studies by Sam Goldich and coworkers on the Archean rocks of the Minnesota River
Valley, was nearing completion. At this time various ILSG regulars began discussing the possibility of
recognizing Sam for his pioneering work on the resolution of age relationships and thus the geology of
Precambrian rocks in the Lake Superior region. Three members, R.W. Ojakangas, J.O. Kalliokoski and
G.B. Morey, presented the idea to the ILSG Board of Directors in 1978. The Board approved the creation
of an award, provided funding could be obtained. It was suggested that collecting one or two dollars at
registration for a dedicated account would provide resources for striking the medal. A general request was
made to the ILSG membership for donations and Sam himself offered a challenge grant to match the
contributions. In total $4,000 was collected and thus began the work of creating the Goldich Medal.
The initial Goldich Award was presented to Sam by G.B. Morey in 1979 and consisted of a large
paper proclamation. For the actual medal, G.B. Morey consulted with the foundry on production details,
while Dick Ojakangas and Jorma Kalliokoski worked on the design of the award, suggesting that it be given
for “outstanding contributions to the geology of the Lake Superior region.” Simultaneously, a committee
of J.O. Kalliokosi, W.F. Cannon, M.M Kehlenbeck, G.B. Morey, and G. Mursky developed the Award
Guidelines that were approved by the ILSG Board. By 1981 all the elements of the Goldich Award had
come together, and the second recipient, Carl E. Dutton, Jr., received the Goldich Medal for 50 years of
significant contributions to the understanding of the geology of the Lake Superior region. Since the
beginning, the Awards Committee has consisted of individuals representing industry, government and
academia, with each member of the Committee serving for three years. The medal is now awarded every
year at the annual ILSG meeting.
Reference:
Morey, G.B. and Hanson, G.N. (editors). 1980. Selected studies of Archean gneisses and Lower Proterozoic
rocks, southern Canadian Shield. Geological Society of America, Special Paper 182, 175 p.

Prepared by various Goldich Medal Awardees, 2007

v

�INSTITUTE ON LAKE SUPERIOR GEOLOGY GOLDICH MEDALLION

�Goldich Medal Guidelines
(Adopted by the Board of Directors, 1981; amended 1999)
Preamble
The Institute on Lake Superior Geology was born in 1955, as documented by the fact that the 27th
annual meeting was held in 1981. The Institute’s continuing objectives are to deal with those
aspects of geology that are related geographically to Lake Superior; to encourage the discussion
of subjects and sponsoring field trips that will bring together geologists from academia,
government surveys, and industry; and to maintain an informal but highly effective mode of
operation.
During the course of its existence, the membership of the Institute (that is, those geologists who
indicate an interest in the objectives of the ILSG by attending) has become aware of the fact that
certain of their colleagues have made particularly noteworthy and meritorious contributions to the
understanding of Lake Superior geology and mineral deposits.
The first award was made by ILSG to Sam Goldich in 1979 for his many contributions to the
geology of the region extending over about 50 years. Subsequent medallists and this year’s
recipient are listed in the table below.
Award Guidelines
1) The medal shall be awarded annually by the ILSG Board of Directors to a geologist whose
name is associated with a substantial interest in, and contribution to, the geology of the Lake
Superior region.
2) The Board of Directors shall appoint the Goldich Medal Committee. The initial appointment
will be of three members, one to serve for three years, one for two years, and one for one year.
The member with the briefest incumbency shall be chair of the Nominating Committee. After the
first year, the Board of Directors shall appoint at each spring meeting one new member who will
serve for three years. In his/her third year this member shall be the chair. The Committee
membership should reflect the main fields of interest and geographic distribution of ILSG
membership. The out-going, senior member of the Board of Directors shall act as liaison between
the Board and the Committee for a period of one year.
3) By the end of November, the Goldich Medal Committee shall make its recommendation to the
Chair of the Board of Directors, who will then inform the Board of the nominee.
4) The Board of Directors normally will accept the nominee of the Committee, inform the
medallist, and have one medal engraved appropriately for presentation at the next meeting of the
Institute.
5) It is recommended that the Institute set aside annually from whatever sources, such funds as
will be required to support the continuing costs of this award.
Nominating Procedures
1) The deadline for nominations is November 1. Nominations shall be taken at any time by the
Goldich Medal Committee. Committee members may themselves nominate candidates; however,
Board members may not solicit for or support individual nominees.
vii

�2) Nominations must be in writing and supported by appropriate documentation such as letters of
recommendation, lists of publications, curriculum vita’s, and evidence of contributions to Lake
Superior geology and to the Institute.
3) Nominations are not restricted to Institute attendees, but are open to anyone who has worked
on and contributed to the understanding of Lake Superior geology.
Selection Guidelines
1) Nominees are to be evaluated on the basis of their contributions to Lake Superior geology
(sensu lato) including:
a) importance of relevant publications;
b) promotion of discovery and utilization of natural resources;
c) contributions to understanding of the natural history and environment of the region;
d) generation of new ideas and concepts; and
e) contributions to the training and education of geoscientists and the public.
2) Nominees are to be evaluated on their contributions to the Institute as demonstrated by
attendance at Institute meetings, presentation of talks and posters, and service on Institute boards,
committees, and field trips.
3) The relative weights given to each of the foregoing criteria must remain flexible and at the
discretion of the Committee members.
4) There are several points to be considered by the Goldich Medal Committee:
a) An attempt should be made to maintain a balance of medal recipients from each of the
three estates—industry, academia, and government.
b) It must be noted that industry geoscientists are at a disadvantage in that much of their
work in not published.
5) Lake Superior has two sides, one the U.S., and the other Canada. This is undoubtedly one of
the Institute’s great strengths and should be nurtured by equitable recognition of excellence in both
countries.

viii

�Goldich Medalists
1979 Samuel S. Goldich

1998 Zell Peterman

2016 Mark A. Jirsa

1980 not awarded

1999 Tsu-Ming Han

2017 Philip Fralick

1981 Carl E. Dutton, Jr

2000 John C. Green

2018 Val W. Chandler

1982 Ralph W. Marsden

2001 John S. Klasner

2019 Mark Severson

1983 Burton Boyum

2002 Ernest K. Lehmann

2021 Allan MacTavish

1984 Richard W. Ojakangas

2003 Klaus J. Schulz

1985 Paul K. Sims

2004 Paul Weiblen

1986 G.B. Morey

2005 Mark Smyk

1987 Henry H. Halls

2006 Michael G. Mudrey

1988 Walter S. White

2007 Joseph Mancuso

1989 Jorma Kalliokoski

2008 Theodore J. Bornhorst

1990 Kenneth C. Card

2009 L. Gordon Medaris, Jr

1991 William Hinze

2010 William D. Addison &amp;

1992 William F. Cannon

(Not awarded 2020)

Gregory R. Brumpton

1993 Donald W. Davis

2011 Dean M. Rossell

1994 Cedric Iverson

2012 James D. Miller

1995 Gene La Berge

2013 Tom Waggoner

1996 David L. Southwick

2014 Laurel Woodruff

1997 Ronald P. Sage

2015 Rodney J. Ikola

Goldich Medal Committee
Serving through the meeting year shown in parentheses.
Dan England (2017-2022) Eveleth Fee Office (Committee Chair)
Steve Kissin (2018-2023) Lakehead University
Dorothy Campbell (2020-2024) Ontario Geological Survey
Terms of the committee members have been extended 2 years due to cancelation of the 2020
meeting and the logistical difficulties of voting during the 2021 virtual meeting. Presentation of
the award to Allan MacTavish was to have occurred at the 2020 meeting, but was delayed one
year.

2021 GOLDICH MEDAL RECIPIENT

ALLAN MACTAVISH
ix

�Citation for
Allan MacTavish
ILSG members, Goldich Medal recipients and
guests, it is my privilege to present the citation for
this year’s recipient of the Goldich Medal, Allan
MacTavish.
Allan received his Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.)
degree in geology from Laurentian University in
1977. Over the past 44 years, he has spent much of
his career working as an economic geologist in the
Lake Superior region, both in the mineral
exploration industry and with the Ontario
government. Early on, Allan also somehow found
the time to be a part-time graduate student at
Lakehead University, where he completed a Master
of Science (M.Sc.) thesis entitled “The Geology,
Petrology, Sulphide and Platinum-Group Element
Mineralization of the Quetico Intrusions,
Northwestern Ontario” in 1992. Since completing
this project, much of Allan’s work has been focussed on the evaluation of copper-nickel-platinum
group element (Cu-Ni-PGE) deposits.
While working in the private sector, Allan has led numerous field exploration programs in the
Lake Superior region that have targeted Cu-Ni-PGE, volcanogenic massive sulphide and gold
deposits. Most notably, he has served since 2007 as Exploration Manager for Magma Metals
(Canada) Ltd./Panoramic PGMs (Canada) Ltd. and most recently as Vice President Project
Manager with Clean Air Metals Inc., with a primary focus on the Thunder Bay North Cu-Ni-PGE
project. At Thunder Bay North, Allan has led teams of geoscientists from the grassroots
exploration phase, through to mineral resource delineation. The initial exploration success at
Thunder Bay North, largely attributed to Allan’s leadership, sparked a staking rush in the Nipigon
Embayment and consequently, a flurry of exploration activity and investment in the region.
Although exploration activity in the project area has waxed and waned over the past 14 years,
Allan’s persistence is now paying off, with Clean Air Metals having reported a significant mineral
resource expansion during the winter of 2021, along with an exciting new intersection of highgrade massive sulphides. Furthermore, his work on the Thunder Bay North project, and his support
of academic research work into the Current Lake intrusive complex, has made significant
contributions to our understanding of chonolith-hosted magmatic sulphide deposits and the greater
Midcontinent Rift system.
One of Allan’s most notable skills is his competence as a field mapping geologist, an aspect of
geology that has largely become a lost art. This skill was developed through his long list of
positions, including a stint as a Field Geoscientist with the Ontario Geological Survey, during
which he mapped the Montcalm greenstone belt. Even in the private sector, any project under
Allan’s watch can be counted on to include solid geological mapping. This steadfast belief in the
core fundamentals of geology has led to a significant advancement in our understanding of many
geological districts in the Lake Superior region, including the Hemlo gold camp, the Coldwell
x

�complex, the Nipigon Embayment, the Atikokan-Quetico district and the Abitibi greenstone belt.
Understanding the importance of a solid foundation in geological mapping as part of the training
for future geoscientists, Allan has also been a long-time supporter of the Precambrian Research
Centre (PRC), focussing his contributions toward the PRCs mapping school and the students
therein.
It was during Allan’s time working on his M.Sc. project, when I was a fellow graduate student,
that I first got to know him. I quickly gained an appreciation for his knowledge and enthusiasm for
the science of geology. I consider myself fortunate that, shortly after graduation, I became one of
the many aspiring geoscientists who have benefitted from Allan’s mentorship when he hired me
as a field assistant for a short-term project. More recently, the Lakehead University Student
Chapter of the Society of Economic Geologists (SEG) has also been privy to Allan’s wisdom and
knowledge. Since its inception in 2014, he has served as the Industry Representative for the SEG
student chapter, assisting the group with fundraising and field trip endeavours, most notably trips
to Arizona and Ireland. The Geology Department at Lakehead University has long known the
benefit of having Allan as an associate, whether as a voice for industry to help direct departmental
decisions, or as an employer hiring a geology student during or immediately following their
studies.
Allan’s contributions to the Institute on Lake Superior geology are many. He has tirelessly
supported the ILSG by serving as a Board member, Goldich Award Committee member, Annual
Conference planning committee member, and as an individual contributor to the ILSG Student
Travel Scholarship. Dating back to 1985, Allan is credited as an author for 7 abstracts and 4 field
trip guides, plus as an editor for 3 field trip guidebooks. Allan has led field trips for ILSG annual
meetings, most recently the Coldwell Complex trip at the 2019 Terrace Bay meeting. He was also
the co-organizer and field trip leader for the 2017 ILSG Iceland Geological Field Trip, and
organized and led the 2020 Hawaii Geological Field Trip, which also happened to be the last ILSG
in-person event to occur prior to the onset of the global Covid-19 pandemic (let’s all hope that we
can once again get together for ILSG field trips in 2022).
Anyone who has had the pleasure of knowing Allan over the years immediately becomes aware
of his enthusiasm for geoscience and his deep knowledge of the rocks of the Lake Superior region.
Allan’s contributions to the understanding of the geology of the Lake Superior region, as well as
his unwavering support of the Institute on Lake Superior Geology, make him a worthy recipient
of the 2021 Goldich Medal.
Submitted by Mark Puumala, M.Sc., P.Geo.
Senior Manager, Resident Geologist Program
Ontario Geological Survey

xi

�Honoring the Pioneers of Lake Superior Geology
(Adopted by the Board of Directors, 2016)
Preamble
At the suggestion of Gene LaBerge, the 2016 executive board agreed to implement a program to
recognize historic pioneers in the understanding of geology in the Lake Superior region. Beginning
with the 2017 annual meeting, nominations will be accepted from the membership for geologists
whose work was conducted primarily before inception of the institute in 1955. Biographical
sketches of those pioneers will be presented at future annual meetings so that all might appreciate
the value of their contributions. Selection of nominees will be decided in part by the organizing
committee of each year's annual meeting, in consultation with the Board, to ensure equitable
geographic representation in the selection process.
Award Guidelines
1) Nominations from the membership will be submitted via the Institute web site and forwarded
to the Chair of the next Annual Meeting. The nominations will be no more than half a page in
length and will summarise the contribution of the nominee.
2) The Organising Committee will select one or two individuals to be highlighted at the next
Annual meeting and submit those names to the Board for approval.
3) The nominator will be requested to prepare a brief presentation to be given during the next
annual meeting with a summary to be included in the Proceedings volume.
4) Unsuccessful nominations will be kept by the Secretary for two years and forwarded to the next
meeting Chair; these nominations may be resubmitted at a later date.
The Board will review this award every five years.

Pioneers of Lake Superior Geology
2017 Douglass Houghton (1809-1845)
2018-2020 not presented
2021 Newton Horace Winchell (1839-1914)

xii

�2021 Pioneer of Lake Superior Geology

Newton Horace Winchell (1839-1914)
“Minnesota’s Geologist”
Citation by Jim Miller, Former Associate Professor, University of
Minnesota Duluth and Senior Geologist, Minnesota Geological Survey,
with insights from author Sue Leaf.
Newton Horace Winchell was first director of the Minnesota
Geological and Natural History Survey at the University of Minnesota
from 1872 to 1898. During his 26 year tenure, Winchell and his staff
visited every corner of the state to document its bedrock geology,
mineral deposits, quarry stone resources, glacial deposits and landforms,
paleontological record, modern flora and fauna, and hydrologic
framework. The survey’s findings were recorded in 24 Annual Reports, which summarized each
year’s accomplishments and commonly totaled hundreds of pages, and in a six-volume final report.
Pdfs of these reports are all available from the University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy
(https://conservancy.umn.edu/handle/11299/708).
As skillfully told in Sue Leaf’s (2020) engaging and intimate biography of Winchell’s private
and professional life, Newton Horace Winchell (NHW) was born and raised as the middle child in
a large family near the New York-Massachusetts-Connecticut borders. At the age of 15 after 8th
grade, he began teaching in small schools in the area. In 1857, he moved to Ann Arbor, Michigan
to live with his older (by 15 years) brother Alexander, who was a professor of natural history at
the University of Michigan and director of the Michigan Geological Survey. Over the next 12
years, NHW worked as an elementary school teacher/principal in various southern Michigan
towns, got married, had two children, and also intermittently took classes at the U of Michigan. In
the summer of 1860, he was hired by the Michigan Geological Survey as a botanist and explored
the coastlines of Lakes Huron and Michigan. NHW completed his BA degree in 1866, committed
to geology as a profession, and began to work more regularly for the Michigan Survey. In 1869,
he completed his MS degree at U of Michigan and became Assistant State Geologist under his
brother. In 1870, the Michigan legislature defunded the geological survey, which prompted NHW
to work the summers of 1871 and 1872 for the Ohio Geological Survey. In July 1872, University
of Minnesota president, William Folwell, offered NHW the position of director of the newly
created Minnesota Geological and Natural History Survey. With an initial legislative appropriation
of $1000 per year, Folwell estimated that the survey would need 20 years to accomplish its task of
conducting “a thorough geological and natural history survey of the State". In addition, he would
be responsible for teaching two geology courses each year and organizing a natural history
museum. NWH accepted the offer, and began field work that fall.
The first six field seasons of the Survey (1872-1877), NWH and his small staff focused their
attention on the geology, geomorphology, paleontology, and economic geology of southern
Minnesota counties. In 1876, Winchell’s responsibility for the University museum was relieved
by the hiring of zoologist, Clarence Herrick, as museum director. HNW’s other non-survey
obligation of teaching college classes was removed just before the 1879 field season by the hiring
of another zoologist, Christopher Hall, who was also appointed assistant director of the survey.
Additionally significant hires in 1879 were those of glacial geologist Warren Upham and
paleontologist Edward Urlich. Although NHW was well versed in both these disciplines, their
contributions and other staff hires in the 1880’s, freed Winchell to devote many months of field
xiii

�work per year over the next decade and to accomplish his most challenging task –deciphering the
Precambrian geology of northeastern Minnesota.
The Paleozoic, Cretaceous and Quaternary geology of southern and western Minnesota was
summarized in Volumes 1 (1884; 673 p.) and 2 (1888; 671 p.) of the final report written by NHW
and Upham. The paleontology of Ordovician and Cambrian rocks (at the time interpreted to be
Upper and Lower Silurian) and of Cretaceous rocks was summarized in the 1200+ page Volume
3 that was published in two parts (pt. 1 – 1895; Pt. 2 - 1897).
The task of mapping and deciphering the Precambrian geology of northeastern Minnesota
started in the summer of 1878 when NWH and three others paddled along the Lake Superior
shoreline from Duluth to the Canadian border. In all, they collected over 300 samples. Then, from
September to November of that same year, NHW and two Ojibwe guides paddled and portaged
from Grand Portage, to Lake Vermilion, down the Embarrass, St. Louis and ultimately the
Mississippi rivers to Minneapolis – a 500+ mile trek! Winchell devoted most of his remaining
field seasons to northern Minnesota geology with the able assistance of his son (Horace), his sonin-law (Uly), and his brother (Alexander). With iron mining taking off on the Vermilion Range
(1st ore shipped -1884), and then the Mesabi Range (1st ore shipped - 1892), much of NHW’s
attention was focused on that geology. Also, beginning the mid-1880’s, Winchell regularly
employed petrography to better understand the granite, gabbro, greenstone, and basalt that he
encountered. In fact, in 1895, he took a year-long “sabbatical” to Paris to learn petrographic
methods from the French petrographers Fonque and Michel-Levy. Still, as I highlighted in an ILSG
talk in 2004, Winchell struggled mightily to understand the genesis of Precambrian crystalline
rocks. In the introduction of Volume 4 of the Final Report (1899), wherein he summarizes his
studies of northern Minnesota geology, NWH comments: "Here [among the crystalline rocks] the
geologist is deprived of his usual guides and guys, and finds himself floundering in a muddy sea
of innumerable conflicting currents".
Some other notable aspects of Winchell’s remarkable career include his role in the
development of the first scientific journal exclusively devoted to geology – The American
Geologist. He served as its managing editor and publisher from its inception in 1888 to its merger
with Economic Geology in 1905. Part of his motivation for creating this journal was to give a
voice to state survey geologists which had the potential of being dismissed by academics and
experienced overreach by the USGS. Also, as a founding fellow, NHW was instrumental in the
creation of the Geological Society of America, also starting in 1888. After the Minnesota survey
ended in 1899 and he got closure on Volumes 5 (1900, Uly Grant’s PhD thesis) and 6 (1901, atlas
of county geologic maps), NHW focused the final decade of his life on archeological studies with
the Minnesota Historical Society, particularly as they applied to native peoples who lived in the
midcontinent before, during and after the last glacial episode. He published Aborigines of
Minnesota in 1911 (743 p. 642 figures, 32 plates). As Sue Leaf points out, this well received book
was “comprehensive in scope, methodical in approach, and meticulous in detail; a worthy
companion to the voluminous Geology of Minnesota.” Winchell died on May 2, 1914 due to
surgical complications at the age of 74.
Newton Horace Winchell’s geological survey took the blank canvas of Minnesota’s landscape
(Fig. 1) and began the process of revealing the rich diverse geology that we now recognize (Fig.
2) and continue to embellish and improve upon. As Sue Leaf’s book proclaims in its title, Newton
Horace Winchell indeed deserves the designation as “Minnesota’s Geologist,” and as one of the
great pioneers of Lake Superior geology.

xiv

�Figure 1 – Geological map of Minnesota in
1872 at the beginning of the Minnesota
Geological and Natural History Survey
References
(Annual Report #1).

Figure 2 – Geological map of Minnesota in
1900 at the end of the Minnesota Geological
and Natural History Survey (Final Report,
V. 6).

References
Leaf, Sue, 2020, Minnesota’s Geologist - The Life of Newton Horace Winchell. University of
Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN, 261p.
Miller, James D., 2004, N.H. Winchell's study of the Keweenawan Supergroup rocks of northeastern
Minnesota, 1872-1900. Proceedings and Abstracts, 50th Institute of Lake Superior Geology,
Duluth, MN, p. 117-118.

xv

�In Memoriams
The ILSG lost four of its’ long-time members since our last in-person meeting in 2019. Brief
descriptions of their professional lives follow, excerpted from online obituaries and tributes. They
were active members throughout their professional careers and beyond. They all made significant
contributions to the science and to the Institute. They will be missed.
Ronald Seavoy passed away on March 25, 2020. He was born July 6, 1931 in New York City and was
raised in Chicago. He received his Bachelor of Science degree in Geology in 1953 from the University of
Michigan, and his Master of Arts (1963) and PhD (1969) in History from Michigan. He served in the U.S.
Army from 1953-1955. He was hired by the Department of History at Bowling Green State University in
1965 where he taught U.S. Constitutional History, U.S. Business History, as well as numerous survey
courses until his retirement in 1991 as Professor Emeritus. Ron is the author of ten books and nineteen
articles on the subjects of American business history, famine in developing countries, political economy,
and mining exploration. Before and while employed as a historian, Ron worked as an exploration geologist
for Canadian Johns Manville, International Nickel Company, Alcoa, Burwest, Western Nuclear, and
Cleveland Cliffs Mining. He was a member of the Organization of American Historians, the Society of
Economic Geologists, and the Institute of Lake Superior Geology. Over the many years of Ron’s
involvement with ILSG, he donated thousands of dollars to the Mancuso Student Research Award, which
was named for Ron’s good friend and colleague.
John Klasner passed away on July 15, 2020. John was born June 22, 1935 in Flint, Michigan. He attended
Michigan State University and Michigan Technological University where he graduated with degrees in
geology and geophysics. He worked in mineral and oil exploration in the US, Canada, Africa, and the
Middle East. John then became a geology professor and directed the honors program at Western Illinois
University. He also was employed by the USGS for mapping in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan and
Northern Wisconsin. John was a member of several professional organizations, including the Institute on
Lake Superior Geology.
John Heine passed away August 17, 2020 in Duluth. He was born in Minneapolis and graduated from
University of St. Thomas in St. Paul. John moved to Duluth and pursued graduate studies in the Geology
Department at the University of Minnesota Duluth. During his 30+ year career with the Natural Resources
Research Institute (NRRI), Minerals &amp; Metallurgy Strategic Research Initiative, he worked on a wide
variety of field- and laboratory-based geological studies to better understand the mineral characteristics and
mineral potential of the state. He retired from the NRRI in 2020 after an accomplished career. John loved
field work, and he never stopped learning and teaching.
Thomas Waggoner of Negaunee, Michigan, died December 7, 2020. Tom acquired an MSc in geology
at Michigan State University, and worked for Cleveland Cliffs Mining. He helped Cliffs make the transition
from underground mining of direct shipping ore to surface mining and production of taconite pellets, which
are now the life blood of iron mining in the Lake Superior region. The success of his contributions is best
measured by 40 years of continual production of pellets from the Empire and Tilden mines. During his
long career with Cliffs (1965-1997), Tom actively participated in the teaching function of the Institute on
Lake Superior Geology. He led 45 field trips for various organizations, and made numerous poster and oral
presentations at annual meetings of the Institute. After his retirement in 1997, he continued to serve the
mining industry. Tom remained active in ILSG, leading a field trip during the Iron Mountain meeting in
2018 and attending the Terrace Bay meeting in 2019. We all benefited from his knowledge, enthusiasm,
and support. He will be sorely missed by all who knew him.
(excerpted from a tribute by Alan Strandlie, December 10, 2020)

xvi

�Eisenbrey Student Travel Awards
Because the 2020 meeting was canceled, and the 2021 meeting is virtual, no awards are granted.
The program will continue when it’s safe to travel and meet in-person.
The 1986 Board of Directors established the ILSG Student Travel Awards to support student
participation at the annual meeting of the Institute. The name “Eisenbrey” was added to the award
in 1998 to honor Edward H. Eisenbrey (1926-1985) and utilize substantial contributions made to
the 1996 Institute meeting in his name. “Ned” Eisenbrey is credited with discovery of significant
volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits in Wisconsin, but his scope was much broader—he has
been described as having unique talents as an ore finder, geologist, and teacher. These awards are
intended to help defray some of the direct travel costs of attending Institute meetings, and include
a waiver of registration fees, but exclude expenses for meals, lodging, and field trip registration.
The number of awards and value are determined by the annual Chair in consultation with the
Secretary and Treasurer. Recipients will be announced at the annual banquet.
The following general criteria will be considered by the annual Chair, who is responsible for
the selection:
1) The applicants must have active resident (undergraduate or graduate) student status at the
time of the annual meeting of the Institute, certified by the department head.
2) Students who are the senior author on either an oral or poster paper will be given favored
consideration.
3) It is desirable for two or more students to jointly request travel assistance.
4) In general, priority will be given to those in the Institute region who are farthest away from
the meeting location.
5) Each travel award request shall be made in writing to the annual Chair, and should explain
need, student and author status, and other significant details.
Successful applicants will receive their awards during the meeting.

xvii

�Joe Mancuso Student Research Awards
The 2005 Board of Directors established the ILSG Student Research Fund with $10,000 US from
the Institute’s general fund to encourage student research on the geology of the Lake Superior
region. A minimum of two awards of $500 US each for research expenses (but not travel expenses)
will be made each year. Students are expected to present their research orally or during a poster
session at an ILSG meeting. The award winners will also be automatically eligible for the
Eisenbrey Travel Awards. To allow the fund to grow, the Fund will receive one-half of any
additional proceeds from each annual meeting, after all other commitments and expenses are
covered.
• The ILSG Board of Directors will be responsible for selecting a minimum of two awards
each year. The ILSG Treasurer will issue the awards.
• The ILSG Student Research Fund is available for undergraduate or graduate students
working on geology in the Lake Superior region.
• The applications are due to the ILSG Secretary by August 31st of each year. Awards will
be made by October 1st of each year.
• Names of the award recipients will be announced at the next annual meeting and posted on
the ILSG website.
• Details of the application process can be found on the ILSG web site.
• The proposal will need to be signed by the researcher’s supervisor.
The 2012 Board of Directors approved modification of the fund’s name, adding “Mancuso” to
reflect the many contributions of Joseph Mancuso to the organization and sizeable donations made
in his name by Ronald Seavoy, Joe’s colleague and friend. “Doc Joe,” as he was known by his
students, taught geology for 36 years at Bowling Green State University, Ohio. He advised many
graduate students in field-oriented research, and frequently brought them to Institute meetings.
Joe was the 2007 Goldich Medalist.
In fall 2020, the ILSG Board of Directors selected one student to be granted research funding of
$1000.00 from the Joe Mancuso Student Research Fund. The awardee was:
Ann Marie Prue
University of Minnesota-Duluth, MSc, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences,
TOPIC: Multi-method Geochemical Investigation of the Neoarchean Soudan Iron Formation, NE,
Minnesota.
[editor’s note: She is presenting her research at this meeting]

xviii

�Doug Duskin Student Paper Awards
Because the virtual format of this meeting would likely complicate the process of judging student
presentations, no awards are granted. The awards program will continue when it’s safe to travel
and meet in-person.
Each year, the Institute selects the best of student presentations and honors the presenters with a
monetary award. Funding for the award is generated from registrations of the annual meeting, and
from generous donations to the fund in honor of Doug Duskin—an exploration geologist and longtime friend of the Institute. The 2012 ILSG Board of Directors approved adding Doug’s name to
the award to acknowledge his contributions, and distribute those donations in a manner that would
have pleased him. The Duskin Student Paper Committee is appointed by the Meeting Chair.
Criteria for best student paper—last modified by the Board in 2001—follow:
1) The contribution must be demonstrably the work of the student.
2) The student must present the contribution in-person.
3) The Student Paper Committee shall decide how many awards to grant, and whether or not
to give separate awards for poster vs. oral presentations.
4) In cases of multiple student authors, the award will be made to the senior author, or the
award will be shared equally by all authors of the contribution.
5) The total amount of the awards is left to the discretion of the meeting Chair in conjunction
with the Secretary, but typically is in the amount of about $500 US (increase approved by
Board, 10/01).
6) The Secretary maintains, and will supply to the Committee, a form for the numerical
ranking of presentations. This form was created and modified by Student Paper
Committees over several years in an effort to reduce the difficulties that may arise from
selection by raters of diverse background. The use of the form is not required, but is left
to the discretion of the Committee.
7) The names of award recipients shall be included as part of the annual Chair’s report that
appears in the next volume of the Institute.
Student papers will be noted on the Program.

xix

�Board of Directors
Board appointment continues through the close of the meeting year shown in parentheses, or until
a successor is selected.
The terms of Board members have been extended 2 years due to cancellation of the 2020 meeting,
and the difficulties of virtual voting by the membership during the 2021 meeting.
Mark Smyk (2019-2024) – Lakehead University
Esther Stewart (2018-2023) – Wisconsin Geological &amp; Natural History Survey
Anthony Pace (2017-2022) – Ontario Ministry of Energy, Northern Development and Mines
Pete Hollings - Secretary (2016-2024) – Lakehead University
Mark Jirsa – Treasurer (2017-2022) – Minnesota Geological Survey (retired)

xx

�REPORT OF THE 65th ANNUAL MEETING OF THE
INSTITUTE ON LAKE SUPERIOR GEOLOGY
Terrace Bay, Ontario
Lakehead University and the Ontario Geological Survey (OGS), hosted the 65th Annual
Institute on Lake Superior Geology on May 07 – 10, 2019 at the Terrace Bay Cultural Centre,
Terrace Bay, Ontario. The meeting consisted of two days of technical sessions with pre- and posttechnical session field trips. Mark Smyk (OGS) and Pete Hollings (Lakehead University) were cochairs for the 2019 meeting. Invaluable advice and logistical support was provided by Dean Main
and Michelle Malashewski of the Township of Terrace Bay’s Community Development
department. Access to the Terrace Bay Public Library was graciously provided by Mary
Deschatelets, Library CEO. Patty Cobin and Ted Bornhorst (A.E. Seaman Mineral Museum,
Michigan Technological University) handled pre-meeting registration. Ted also supplied the
poster boards.
Generous contributions to the ILSG general fund and in support of 2019 student travel
scholarships came from: Abitibi Geophysics, Barrick Gold Corporation, Benton Resources Corp.,
Geological Society of Minnesota, Greenstone Gold Mines, Landore Resources Canada Inc.,
Noront Resources Ltd., North American Palladium Ltd., Northwestern Ontario Prospectors
Association, Panoramic PGMs (Canada) Limited, Premier Gold Mines Limited, Stillwater Canada
Inc., Superior Lake Resources Limited, Thunder Bay Community Economic Development
Commission, Wesdome Gold Mines Ltd., and Wolfden Resources Corporation. Individual
Contributors to Student Travel Scholarship were: Al MacTavish, Mary Kay Arthur, L. Gordon
Medaris, Jr. and Nick Swanson-Hysell. Total meeting registration was 114, which included 15
students. Welcoming remarks were provided by Terrace Bay Mayor Jody Davis. Elder Raymond
Goodchild of Pays Plat First Nation provided traditional blessings for the meeting.
Proceedings Volume 65 was published in two parts. Part 1 – Program and Abstracts, compiled
and edited by Mark Puumala (OGS), contains 51 published abstracts for 32 oral and 19 poster
presentations. Students presented 6 oral and 3 poster presentations. Part 2 – Field Trip Guidebooks,
was compiled and edited by Al MacTavish and Pete Hollings. It contains descriptions of four premeeting and four post-meeting field trips.
The 65th ILSG marked the first time in the Institute’s long history that its annual meeting was
held in Terrace Bay. The meeting location enabled organizers to offer trips that showcased a
variety of Archean and Proterozoic rocks along the north shore of Lake Superior. Although the
majority of the field trips had been offered at previous ILSG annual meetings (e.g. Marathon 1995;
Nipigon 2005), they greatly benefitted from the new mapping, research, discoveries and
interpretations that had taken place in the intervening years. Local exploration companies
graciously provided information and access to their properties. Unfortunately, a late spring
precluded visiting the Slate Islands (lake ice) and the Midcontinent Rift-related carbonatites and
diatremes in the Dead Horse Road area (snow). Slate Islands trip delegates were provided with an
impromptu, “eclectic” field trip along Highway 17 between Schreiber and Marathon by Mark
Smyk. Those who planned to see the MCR carbonatites and diatremes switched to other available
trips.

xxi

�A list of field trips is provided below:
Pre-meeting field trips (and leaders) on Tuesday, May 07:
1) Slate Islands (Pete Hollings, Lakehead University)*
2) Midcontinent Rift-related carbonatites and diatremes (Shannon Zurevinski, Lakehead
University)*
3) Geology of the western Schreiber-Hemlo greenstone belt (Seamus Magnus, Ontario
Geological Survey)
4) Geology of the Nipigon area (Philip Fralick, Lakehead University and Rob Cundari, Ontario
Geological Survey)
(*denotes cancelled due to snow/ice conditions)
Post-meeting field trips on Friday, May10:
5) A stratigraphic transect across the northern flank of the Midcontinent Rift near Rossport
(Pete Hollings, Lakehead University)
6) Geology of the Coldwell alkaline complex (Allan MacTavish, Panoramic PGMs (Canada)
Limited and David Good, Western University)
7) Building and ornamental stone sites of the Marathon area (Peter Hinz, Ministry of Energy,
Northern Development and Mines)
8) Geology of the past-producing Winston Lake Cu-Zn Mine (Mark Puumala and Mark Smyk,
Ontario Geological Survey).
Pre- and post-meeting field trips attracted 172 registrants, once again reaffirming their integral
role in the allure and success of ILSG annual meetings.
The vast majority of registrants and invited guests attended the annual ILSG banquet on
Wednesday night. Although a Homer Award overview presentation was given, no “recipients”
were identified during the 2019 annual meeting!
As always, a highlight of the post-banquet activities was presentation of the 2019 Goldich
Medal. This year’s very deserving recipient was Mark Severson. Mark’s wife, Laurie, and
daughter, Allison, attended the banquet and award ceremony. The Goldich Medal citation was
presented by George Hudak, his colleague for many years. George described Mark’s contributions
to ILSG and to the greater understanding of Minnesota’s geology over several decades during his
time as a student, in his role at the Natural Resources Research Institute-University of Minnesota
Duluth, in his collaborations with the Minnesota Geological Survey and later in the mining and
exploration industry. Mark is indeed a worthy recipient of this prestigious award.
The 65th ILSG included a radical departure from the usual post-banquet guest speaker
tradition. In lieu of a guest speaker, Master of Ceremonies, Mark Smyk, moderated a trivia contest
entitled “ILSG Geo-Pardy.” It tested our delegates’ knowledge of ILSG history (e.g. past host
cities, Goldich Medalists), geology in pop culture and “fun facts” about Lake Superior
geology. Scores were tabulated and winners were announced the following day. Donated prizes
and bragging rights attended the “awards ceremony.”
In 2019, the student paper committee had its usual difficult job of selecting the best among six
excellent oral presentations and three poster presentations for the Doug Duskin Student Paper
Awards. The 2019 committee comprised Katarina Bjorkman (Bjorkman Prospecting), George
Hudak (Natural Resources Research Institute–UMD) and David Good (Western University). The
committee awarded three prizes with best talk going to Sophie Kurucz for her talk on
“Paleoproterozoic snowball earth? Sedimentology and geochemistry of a Huronian glacial cycle”
xxii

�and runner up prizes going to Kira Arnold (Geology and geochemistry of the Terrace Bay
Batholith, N. Ontario) and Munira Afroz (Sulfur, Carbon, and Oxygen Isotope Geochemistry of
~2.93 Ga Mesoarchean Chemical Sedimentary rocks in the Red Lake Area, Ontario)
Eisenbrey Student Travel Grants were given to nine students: Paul Bielski (Lakehead) $200, Kira
Arnold (Lakehead) $200, Jaqueline Drazan (UMD) $400, Jackie Wrage (University of Michigan)
$600, Brittany Ramsay (Lakehead) $200, Munira Afroz (Lakehead) $200, Thomas Bodden (MTU)
$500, Sophie Kurucz (Lakehead) $200 and Chanelle Boucher (Lakehead) $200.
The Institute’s Board of Directors met on Wednesday, May 8, 2019 and a brief overview of the
meeting is provided below:
1. Accepted report of the Chairs for the 64th ILSG, Iron Mountain, Michigan; as
printed in the 2019 Proceedings Volume, and minutes of last Board meeting, May 16, 2018
(Hollings)
2. Received, discussed, and accepted 2018-2019 ILSG Financial Summary (Jirsa).
3. Received, discussed, and accepted 2018-2019 Report of the Secretary (Hollings).
4. Approved Mark Smyk as on-going ILSG Board member
5. Approved Mountain Iron, Minnesota as the site for the 66th annual ILSG meeting,
hosted by Mark Jirsa, with help from Amy Radakovich and Terry Boerboom, all of the
Minnesota Geological Survey. The dates of the meeting were set for May 12-15, 2020.
6. There was discussion as to future meeting locations, with Sudbury being suggested
as a possibility. In addition, Esther Stewart has been in discussion with Rob Lodge and
Dyanna Czeck about hosting a meeting in Wisconsin.
7. Discussed and approved replacing Klaus Schultz as the “member from
government” on Goldich Committee (end of term 2019) with Dorothy Campbell (OGS).
8. Liability Insurance for the Institute was discussed and approved by the Board as an
ongoing, annual expense. The Treasurer will investigate further to ensure that insurance is
in place for the 2020 meeting.
9. It was approved that the Treasurer should purchase 10 Goldich medals, as only one
remains.
10. Discussed and approved renewal of Pete Hollings as Institute Secretary (end of term
2022). This was later approved by a vote of the membership.
The 65th ILSG meeting was a great success and we wish to thank all the people who
contributed to that success, including staff of the Ontario Geological Survey and Lakehead
University who were pressed into action as editors, field trip leaders and drivers. The Township of
Terrace Bay was extremely hospitable in providing facilities (including the Cultural Centre,
Library and Bowling Alley), suggestions and liaison services. We enlisted five different businesses
to admirably handle our many catering needs in trying to “spread business around” in both Terrace
Bay and neighbouring Schreiber. We heard many favourable comments from local people and
businesses, not only about our patronage, but also about their interactions with ILSG delegates.
They were thrilled to have us. We even received coverage in the local newspaper, provided by a
reporter who tagged along on a field trip and popped by the Technical Sessions. We were happy
that we were finally able to host the annual meeting in Terrace Bay. It was well worth the wait!
Like most ILSG annual meetings hosted in smaller communities in Ontario, attendance was
lower in 2019. However, those who did attend thoroughly enjoyed the meeting, facilities and field
trips. Always flexible and understanding, our delegates took any changes in programming in stride.
xxiii

�We continue to encourage student attendance and new delegates in ensuring a healthy future for
the Institute. We appreciate the support of our respective organizations, the Ontario Geological
Survey and Lakehead University, and recognize the efforts that everyone made in travelling,
attending, presenting and participating in activities that made the a 65th Annual Meeting what we
feel was a great success. We encourage others to consider hosting and contributing to future
meetings. It is truly a rewarding experience.
Mark Smyk and Pete Hollings
Co-Chairs, 65th Institute on Lake Superior Geology

xxiv

�TECHNICAL PROGRAM
(Times are EDT)

TUESDAY, MAY 11, 2021
SESSION 1
9:45-10:00

Welcome, introduction, and instructions (meeting chairs)

10:00-10:20 Paul Bielski and Philip Fralick
Comparisons of Archean Iron Formations deposited at Shallow vs
Deeper Depths
10:20-10:40 Bailey Drover, Mary Louise Hill, and Shannon Zurevinski
The deformation and alteration of granitoid plutons
in the Wabigoon subprovince
10:40-11:00 Manuel Duguet
Geochemistry and Age of Archean Volcaniclastic and Mafic Intrusive Rocks,
Georgia Lake Area, Quetico Subprovince, Northwestern Ontario
11:00-11:20 Seamus Magnus
Chemostratigraphy of the western Schreiber-Hemlo Greenstone Belt—Results
and Regional Implications
11:20-11:40 Brittany Ramsay, Philip Fralick, Stefan Lalonde, Paul Bielski,
and Laureline Patry
Environmental Control of Seawater Geochemistry in a Mesoarchean Peritidal
System, Woman Lake, Superior Province
11:40-12:00 Michael Tamosauskas, Robert Lodge, M.A. Chong, Rasmus Haugaard,
and Ross Sherlock
The provenance, depositional environment and metallogenic implications of the
Ament Bay Metasedimentary Assemblage, Sturgeon Lake Greenstone Belt,
Northwest Ontario
12:00-12:20 Val W. Chandler V. W and Mark Jirsa
Three-dimensional geologic mapping of Precambrian rocks in Minnesota: The
creation of “removeable” geologic layers using gravity and magnetic data
interpretation
12:20-12:40 Planavsky, Noah
Negative Carbon Dioxide Emissions through Enhanced Silicate Weathering
and the Lake Superior Region

xxv

�FRIDAY, MAY 14, 2021
SESSION 2
9:45-10:00 Introduction and instructions
10:00-10:20 Benjamin Drenth, Bill Cannon, Klaus Schulz, and Robert Ayuso
Geophysical insights into Paleoproterozoic tectonics along the southern margin
of the Superior Province, central Upper Peninsula, Michigan
10:20-10:40 Megan Landman and Mary Louise Hill
Archean Orogenesis to Proterozoic Rifting: A structural history of Pass Lake,
Thunder Bay, Ontario
10:40-11:00 Seamus Magnus
Proterozoic Geology of the Schreiber–Terrace Bay Area
11:00-11:20 Ann Marie Prue and Latisha Brengman
Preliminary pXRF results from Precambrian rocks of northern Minnesota
11:20-11:40 Nicholas Swanson-Hysell, Margaret Avery, Yiming Zhang, Eben Hodgin, and
Terry Boerboom
The paleogeography of Laurentia in its early years: new constraints from the
Paleoproterozoic East-Central Minnesota batholith
11:40-12:00 Michael Easton
The Critical Mineral potential of carbonatite and alkalic complexes in Ontario
12:00-12:20 Mark Puumala and Robert Cundari
Critical Minerals Exploration and Development Potential in Ontario
12:20-12:40 Robert Cundari, Mark Puumala, Riku Metsaranta, and Dorothy Campbell
Critical Mineral Potential on the North Shore of Lake Superior; Elements to
‘Structure’ our future

POSTER SESSION
14:00-14:05 Introduction to 5-minute author summaries
14:05-14:10 Benjamin Gallagher and Marcia Bjornerud
Reconstructing the hydration and carbonation history of the Presque Isle
peridotite, Marquette Michigan: Insights into mechanisms of carbon
sequestration in ultramafic rocks
14:10-14:15 Tara Lemke, Evan Weber, and Robert Lodge
Characterization of Hydrothermal Alteration and Sulfide Ores at the Lynne ZnCu-Pb Deposit, Oneida Co. WI.
xxvi

�14:15-14:20 Trevor Nelson, Rory Johnson, Robert Lodge, Chong MA, Jeffery Marsh
U-Pb geochronology and zircon trace-element geochemistry from granitoid
plutons in the Neoarchean Sturgeon Lake greenstone belt, Ontario, Canada
14:20-14:25 Dana Peterson, P. Bedrosian and C. Finn
3-D Modeling of the Duluth Complex from geophysical data
14:25-14:30 Rebecca Price, Shannon Zurevinski, and Roger Mitchell
A newly discovered orbicular occurrence within the Good Hope carbonatite,
north of Marathon, Ontario
14:30-14:35 Shelby Short, Lillian Glodowski, and Robert Lodge
Geochemistry and Petrography of Volcanic and Intrusive Rocks Hosting the
Lynne Cu-Zn-Pb Deposit, Oneida County, WI
14:35-14:40 Esther Stewart, Billy Fitzpatrick, and Eric Stewart
Geologic mapping identifies bedrock folds that may be significant for increased
probability of arsenic detection in water wells
14:40-15:30 Breakout room discussions with Poster Presenters

TUESDAY, MAY 18, 2021
SESSION 3
9:45-10:00

Introduction and instructions

10:00-10:20 Paul Bedrosian, Max Pace, and Katerina Zamudio
Geophysical mapping of the eastern arm of the Midcontinent Rift in Upper
Michigan
10:20-10:40 Sophie Mueller, J. Degraff, and D. Lizzadro-Mcpherson
Structural Analysis and Interpretation of Deformation along the Keweenaw Fault
System West of Lake Gratiot, Keweenaw County, Michigan
10:40-11:00 Nicholas Craik and Phil Fralick [presentation cancelled]
Tracing redox pathways of the Mesoproterozoic Copper Harbour Conglomerate,
Michigan
11:00-11:20 Ted Bornhorst
Evolved seawater as the source of salinity for metamorphic-dominated oreforming hydrothermal fluids of the Keweenaw Peninsula native copper district,
Michigan

xxvii

�11:20-11:40 Tien Grauch and S.J. Heller
Integration of geophysical evidence indicates that anorthosite composes a
significant portion of Grand Marais ridge, an inferred basement high in western
Lake Superior
11:40-12:00 Laurel Woodruff and Tien Grauch
Possible implications of a non-Archean Grand Marais Ridge, western Lake
Superior
12:00-12:20 Eben (Blake) Hodgin, Nicholas Swanson-Hysell, Daniel Stolper, Andrew
Turner, James DeGraff, Andrew Kylander-Clark, and Mark Schmitz
Final inversion of the Midcontinent Rift during the Rigolet Phase of the
Grenvillian orogeny

FRIDAY, MAY 21 2021
SESSION 4
9:45-10:00

Introduction and instructions

10:00-10:20 Matthew Brzozowski, Peter Hollings, Allan MacTavish, Dawn EvansLamswood, Abraham Drost, and Derek Wilton
Mineralizing processes in the Current Lake and Escape Lake conduit-type PGE–
Cu–Ni deposits of the Thunder Bay North igneous complex, northwestern
Ontario, Canada
10:20-10:40 David Good
A Practical Approach to Using Incompatible Elements to Define Geochemical
Correlation and a Common Mantle Source: Example Crystal Lake Gabbro and
the Duluth Complex
10:40-11:00 Kyle Lachance, Jackie Kleinsasser, Adam Simon, Dean Peterson,
and George Hudak
Identifying the genesis of Fe-Ti oxide- and sulfide-bearing ultramafic intrusions
in the Duluth Complex through sulfide geochemical analysis
11:00-11:20 Jackie Kleinsasser, Adam Simon, Dean Peterson, and George Hudak
Textures and geochemistry of ilmenite and titanomagnetite in Fe-Ti oxide-bearing
ultramafic intrusions of the Western Margin of the Duluth Complex, Minnesota
11:20-11:40 Amartya Kattemalavadi, Jackie Kleinsasser, Adam Simon, Dean Peterson,
and George Hudak
Olivine Geochemistry from Fe-Ti Oxide-Bearing Ultramafic Intrusions in the
Duluth Complex, MN

xxviii

�11:40-12:00 Dave Dahl, Stacy Saari, and Thomas Lee
Availability of Historical Airborne Geophysical Survey Data at Minnesota DNR
12:00-12:20 Allan MacTavish, Peter Hinz, Mary Kay Arthur, Robert Chataway, Jim
Edberg, Tom Erickson, Steve Fox, Joan Furlong, Jim Gerlich, Lindsay Smith,
and David Wilhelm
Island of Hawaii Field Trip, February 11-21, 2020
12:20-12:30 Closing remarks

MAY 21-AWARDS EVENING
19:00-20:30
•
•
•
•
•
•

Words of welcome (chairs)
ILSG updates
Goldich Medal presentation to Allan MacTavish
2022 ILSG meeting plans—Sudbury Ontario
Honoring the Pioneers of Lake Superior Geology—Newton Horace Winchell (by Jim
Miller and Sue Leaf)
Closing remarks

xxix

�ABSTRACTS

xxx

�Geophysical mapping of the eastern arm of the Midcontinent Rift in Upper Michigan
BEDROSIAN, Paul A, PACE, Max, and ZAMUDIO, Katrina D.
Geology, Geophysics and Geochemistry Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO
The western arm of the Midcontinent Rift system (MRS), extending from western Lake Superior
into Kansas, is somewhat understood due to exposures of MRS igneous and sedimentary rocks,
scattered drillholes, and seismic imaging. By comparison, the eastern rift arm (ERA), extending
from eastern Lake Superior through lower Michigan is poorly understood, with almost no
outcropping volcanic rocks south of Michipicoten and Caribou Islands in Lake Superior, few
boreholes that intercept MRS rocks, and the majority of the rift concealed beneath the Michigan
basin. Seismic reflection sections in the eastern Lake Superior basin (Behrendt et al., 1990;
Mariano and Hinze, 1994) and in Lake Michigan (Cannon et al., 1991) provide the primary
constraints on the gross structure of the ERA. Unlike the western rift arm, which has undergone
considerable post-rift shortening (Cannon et al., 1993), the ERA appears less deformed, with
perhaps as much as 30 km of rift clastic and volcanic rocks preserved within a broadly symmetric
basin (Behrendt et al., 1988) and about 5 km of anticlinal relief on the top of the volcanics (Mariano
and Hinze, 1994). Under Paleozoic cover in the eastern part of Michigan’s Upper Peninsula, the
ERA western margin is inferred from linear northwest-trending potential-field anomalies (Fig. 1a,
b) and the occurrence of MRS basalt and rhyolite beneath ~2 km of Paleozoic and MRS clastic
rocks in the St. Amour drillhole (Ojakangas and Dickas, 2002).
In this examination of the ERA, we present results of a recent magnetotelluric survey over the
ERA and a 3D electrical resistivity model derived from these data. The ERA is clearly imaged as
a 150-km wide conductive rift basin with a sharp western margin and an irregular eastern margin
that traces the distribution of mapped MRS clastics in Ontario (Fig. 1c). The lowest resistivities
(10 Ω·m) correspond to the Jacobsville Ss, imaged as an east-dipping horizon extending to 2-3 km
depth beneath the edge of the Michigan basin. Underlying the Jacobsville are moderately
conductive rocks (100-500 Ω·m) that thicken basinward to 8-10 km depth with a nested inner basin
that may be 20 km or more deep. The rift-fill rocks are attributed to a combination of Oronto Grp.
clastics and MRS basalts, which cannot be separately distinguished within the resistivity model.
In map view, the resistivity model at 10 km depth (Fig. 1d) shows along-rift changes in
resistivity with a wavelength of ~50 km. Though data coverage is limited, both magnetic and
gravity data (extending north into Lake Superior) show a similar pattern of highs and lows. A
seismic reflection profile parallel to the rift axis (LS-15; Mariano and Hinze, 1994, their Fig. 7)
interprets folding of the rift sedimentary and volcanic section and infers several kilometers of relief
along strike.
The linearity of the western rift margin suggests that both the thickest sections of rift basalt
and Jacobsville are fault bounded. Together with the evidence for along-strike folding and faulting,
we suggest the current structure of the ERA reflects post-rift NW-SE compression oriented along
the rift axis, with the western margin marked by a transform fault (likely a reactivated normal fault
of MRS age). Extrapolating farther north, we speculate that left-lateral offsets within the broad
magnetic high that follows the western side of the ERA reflect a series of en echelon faults that
together conspired to shorten the ERA by several tens of kilometers or more.

�Figure 1. (a) magnetics, (b) gravity, (c) resistivity at 1 km depth and (d) resistivity at 10 km depth. Shaded
regions show mapped or inferred MRS clastic rocks. White circles, stars, and lines indicate magnetotelluric
stations, deep drillholes, and seismic reflection lines, respectively. Faults are shown in black. White dashed
lines show interpreted structures. Potential field data are from Anderson and Grauch (2018).
Anderson, E.D., and Grauch, V.J.S., 2018, Updated gravity stations and anomaly compilation over Lake Superior:
U.S. Geological Survey data release, doi:10.5066/F7F18X8S.
Behrendt, J.C., Green, A.G., Cannon, W.F., Hutchinson, D.R., Lee, M.W., Milkereit, B., Agena, W.F., and Spencer,
C., 1988, Crustal structure of the Midcontinent Rift system: Results from GLIMPCE deep seismic reflection
profiles: Geology, v. 16, p. 81, doi:10.1130/0091-7613(1988)016&lt;0081:CSOTMR&gt;2.3.CO;2.
Behrendt, J., Hutchinson, D., Lee, M., Thornber, C., Trehu, A., Cannon, W., and Green, A., 1990, GLIMPCE
seismic reflection evidence of deep—Crustal and upper-mantle intrusions and magmatic underplating:
Tectonophysics, v. 173, p. 595–615.
Cannon, W.F., Lee, M.W., Hinze, W.J., Schulz, K.J., and Green, A.G., 1991, Deep crustal structure of the
Precambrian basement beneath northern Lake Michigan, midcontinent North America: Geology, v. 19, p. 207–210.
Cannon, W.F., Peterman, Z.E., and Sims, P.K., 1993, Crustal-scale thrusting and origin of the Montreal River
monocline-A 35-km-thick cross section of the midcontinent rift in northern Michigan and Wisconsin: Tectonics, v.
12, p. 728–744, doi:10.1029/93TC00204.
Mariano, J., and Hinze, W.J., 1994, Structural interpretation of the Midcontinent Rift in eastern Lake Superior from
seismic reflection and potential-field studies: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 31, p. 619–628.
Ojakangas, R.W., and Dickas, A.B., 2002, The 1.1-Ga Midcontinent Rift System, central North America:
sedimentology of two deep boreholes, Lake Superior region: Sedimentary Geol., v. 147, p. 13–36.

2

�Comparisons of Archean Iron Formations deposited at Shallow vs Deeper Depths
BIELSKI, Paul and FRALICK, Philip
Department of Geology, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada

The occurrence of iron formation (IF) during the Archean is well documented, however
the mechanisms of their genesis are poorly understood within shallow waters and even more so
within the deep-ocean. At the same time our understanding of Archean deep-ocean chemistry is
also limited and poorly constrained. To address these issues, multiple shallow and deeper water
iron formations were analysed by coarse and fine-scale geochemical analysis. The fine-scale
method entailed using Laser Ablation Inductively Coupled Mass Spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS)
alongside Scanning X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF), while the coarse-scale analysis is done with bulk
rock geochemistry.
The IFs used in this study were all deposited at approximately 2.7 Ga in different
depositional settings. The shallow water IF is from Beardmore and Lake St. Joseph, which are
both instances of deltaic sediments intermingled with sections of cherty-IF, and magnetite layers
directly within deltaic distributary mouth bars. The deeper water IFs are from Temagami and
Timmins in Ontario and Soudan, Minnesota. These IFs contain no discrete siliciclastic strata within
the main body of IF, where chert and iron oxides are the dominant lithology. While the true depths
of these deeper water formations are unknown, the lack of non-chemical sedimentary rock,
excluding thin slate strata, and no storm-related sedimentary structures within layering suggests
some distance from landmasses and depths from below storm wave base to abyssal. Siliciclastic
turbidites from Beardmore have been included in this study to assist in identifying trends related
to detrital contamination.
Rare earth element (REE) concentrations, normalized with post-Archean Australian shale
(PAAS), and analysed by bulk rock geochemistry, show similarities between deeper and shallow
water deposits. The deeper water IFs contain pronounced HREE enrichment with prominent Eu
and Y anomalies while shallow water IF do not show consistent Y anomalies but do contain
relatively smaller Eu anomalies (Figure 1) despite siliciclastic contamination. Y/Ho is largest
within the deep water IF with mainly supercondritic ratios from 28 to 55. Shallow water IF contains
near chondritic (~28) ratios. The smaller Eu and Y anomalies are interpreted to be a combination
of weaker Eu anomalies present in shallower water (cf. Planavsky et al., 2010) and contamination
by siliciclastics, which have non-anomalous values. The lack of superchondritic Y/Ho in the
shallow water IF samples is odd as Y anomalies are thought to be largest in shallow water during
the Archean (cf. Planavasky et al., 2010) which may relate to a scavenging disequilibrium with the
surrounding seawater as deeper water IF contain a consistent Y anomaly (Figure 1).
Trace element analysis of redox sensitive elements U, V, and Cr have a strong relationship
with Al2O3, indicating significant contributions of these elements from detrital material, especially
within shallow water IF. However, V/Fe and Cr/Fe ratios in deeper water IF are comparable to
shallow water ratios while having much lower levels of detrital contamination (i.e., Al2O3) (Figure
2). This indicates Cr and V were enriched in the precipitated phase, adding extra Cr and V to the
sediment. These elements are more soluble in oxidizing fluids, but their solubility greatly decreases
in reducing environments, e.g. the Archean deeper ocean. Thus, they required the presence of some
oxygen in the weathering environment, but were reduced and precipitated in the Archean deeper
ocean. Th/U ratios of IF samples may be used to identify enrichments of U, or depletions of Th,
3

�relative to the ratio found within igneous rock at a given time. At 2.7 Ga, the Th/U ratio within
crustal rock was approximately 3.9, which is imprinted into the seawater ratio from the weathering
and breakdown of minerals containing this ratio. Deep water IF contains low Th/U ratios in bulk
rock geochemistry (Figure 2) and has even lower ratios (&lt;1) in laser ablation data, which is less
affected by detrital contamination. Shallow water IF bulk geochemistry shows values near that of
average crustal rock, with variance around this value (~3.9).
A more detailed understanding of differences between shallow and deeper water IF is
obscured by the inevitable presence of detrital contamination. However, it is evident that Eu
anomalies are larger and redox elements are enriched in deeper water IF. Shallow water IF may be
more susceptible to changes in water chemistry within the deltaic depositional environment
causing anomalous and/or variable REE and trace element geochemistry compared to the similar
geochemistry between different deeper water IFs.
Taylor-McLennan 1985-REEs
80
70
60

1

50
Y/Ho

Rock/Post-Arch. Aust. Shale-PAAS

10

40
30

.1
20
10

.01

Ce
La

Nd
Pr

Eu
Sm

Tb
Gd

Y
Dy

Er
Ho

0
.01

Yb
Tm

.1

1
Al 2 O 3

Lu

10

100

Figure 1. REE analysis. Note that the flatter pattern of the shallow IF is due to contamination.
5

100

4
10

3
Th/U

Al 2 O 3

1

2
.1

1

0
.01

.1

1

10

.01
.01

.1

Th

1
V/Fe 2 O 3

10

100

Figure 2. Redox element analysis. Shallow water IF and turbidites correlate while deep water IF
contains similar V/Fe2O3 ratios despite much lower amounts of Al2O3 (detritus).
References
Planavsky, N., Bekker, A., Rouxel, O. J., Kamber, B., Hofmann, A., Knudsen, A., &amp; Lyons, T.
W. (2010). Rare earth element and yttrium compositions of Archean and
Paleoproterozoic Fe formations revisited: new perspectives on their significance and
mechanisms of deposition. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 74(22), 6387-6405.

4

�Evolved seawater as the source of salinity for metamorphic-dominated ore-forming
hydrothermal fluids of the Keweenaw Peninsula native copper district, Michigan
BORNHORST, Theodore J.
Department of Geological and Mining Engineering and Sciences, Michigan Technological University,
Houghton, Michigan 49931

The Mesoproterozoic Midcontinent rift of Michigan’s Keweenaw Peninsula hosts the
world’s largest accumulation of native copper. For more than 60 years, it has been generally
accepted that burial metamorphic processes generated ore-forming hydrothermal fluids. However,
Brown (2006) reasoned that metamorphic processes could not generate high enough salinity. This
constraint requires an outside source of salinity. He proposed a hybrid hydrodynamic evolved
meteoric water and metamorphic ore-forming fluid at depth and down-dip below the native copper
deposits in the fluid source zone. Brown’s envisioned meteoric waters evolved during descent
through the Oronto Group clastic sedimentary rocks and the salinity was dissolved from postulated
evaporite horizons and/or scattered cement. An additional genetic constraint is that the ore-forming
fluids were abnormally low in sulfur leading to the precipitation of native copper rather than copper
sulfides (White, 1967). Because of very low sulfur magmas and degassing of sulfur upon eruption,
the rift-filling Portage Lake Volcanics (PLV), host rocks of the native-copper deposits, and
stratigraphically equivalent rocks of the source zone are sulfur-poor. Metamorphism of the source
zone rocks resulted in sulfur-poor metamorphic ore-forming fluids. Brown’s hydrodynamic
evolved meteoric water model lacks a mechanism to satisfy the constraint of very low sulfur fluids.
Further, the reasoning presented by Bornhorst and Mathur (2017 and 2018) suggests that
hydrodynamic evolved meteoric water had limited to no significant role in the ore-forming fluids.
A role for seawater in generation of the native copper ore-forming fluids was proposed by
Livnat (1983). However, seawater has not been widely accepted since the PLV were subaerially
deposited and until recently there was only the debatable possibility of an incursion of seawater
into the rift during deposition of the Nonesuch Formation. Recent evidence (Jones et al., 2019)
suggests that the Nonesuch and underlying Copper Harbor Formations were deposited in a
“braided fluvial-evaporitic shoreline-marine embayment triplet.” Johnson (1985) documented an
extensive subaqueous emplaced volcanic layer in the Keweenaw Peninsula and Isle Royale in the
upper part of the PLV basalts which are otherwise subaerially deposited. This layer may have been
deposited during an incursion of seawater into the rift. Incursions of seawater are also possible
during times of PLV interbedded minor clastic sediments when volcanism waned. Thus, there is
likely a long history of seawater incursion into the Midcontinent rift and a significant volume of
seawater could have penetrated deeply into the PLV. As the PLV was buried into the fluid source
zone, the contained seawater (formation water) evolved. A plausible mechanism is needed to
satisfy the constraint of very low sulfur fluids.
Blättler et al. (2020) have shown that low sulfate levels in seawater occurred during the
late-Mesoproterozoic which would have required less depletion of sulfur. When seawater
penetrates mid-ocean basalts in vicinity of hydrothermal vents it becomes heated and evolves as it
reacts with and alters the host basalt. At 130-150oC anhydrite begins to precipitate; the solubility
of anhydrite is retrograde (Antonelli et al., 2017). The precipitation of anhydrite (CaSO4) depletes
sulfate from seawater and if there is sufficient Ca, precipitation of anhydrite removes most of the
sulfate. As the partially evolved seawater and its host basalts continue to be heated, albitization of
basalt releases Ca into the seawater which results in complete removal of any remaining sulfate.
Breakdown of olivine and pyroxene releases Mg into the fluid but it is bound up in secondary Mg
minerals, such as chlorite, leaving the fluid both sulfur- and Mg-poor. At yet higher temperatures
5

�(&gt; 250oC) the water-rock reactions continue to release Ca to the fluid, which accumulates,
producing a Ca-rich brine (Antonelli et al., 2017; Tivey, 2007). Oceanic and continental rifts
undergoing greenschist to amphibolite facies metamorphism are known for CaCl2-rich, Mg-poor
brines, also enriched in leached Na, K, and Cu among other elements (Tivey, 2007; Hardie, 1983).
This model for modern mid-ocean basalts is applicable to the generation of native copper
ore-forming fluids. The PLV basalts are tholeiitic, similar to mid-ocean ridge basalts, and have
undergone extensive albitization. The rocks in the source zone have been subjected to temperatures
exceeding the temperature of precipitation of anhydrite, hence the seawater could have become
depleted in sulfur and enriched in Ca before undergoing burial metamorphism. Kelly (2020)
demonstrated that probable primary fluid inclusions formed during precipitation of native copper
are filled by Ca-rich fluids with up to 30 equivalent weight percent CaCl2. Published light stable
isotope data are permissive of a hybrid evolved seawater and metamorphic-dominated ore-forming
fluid originating from the source zone. Such a hybrid cannot be isotopically distinguished from
metamorphic-only fluid. The combination of low sulfate seawater and anhydrite precipitation
provides a viable mechanism to generate evolved seawater that provides an outside source of
salinity for the ore-forming fluids without sulfur. Lengthy incursions of seawater into the
Midcontinent rift supports the hypothesis that evolved seawater may have played an important role
in the generation of burial metamorphic-dominated native copper ore-forming fluids.
References:
Antonelli, M.A., Pester, N.J. Brown, S.T, DePaolo, D.J., 2017, Effect of paleoseawater composition on
hydrothermal exchange in midocean ridges, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,114:
12413-12418.
Blättler, C.L., Bergmann, K.D., Kah, L.C., Gómez-Pérez, I., Higgins, J.A., 2020, Constraints on MesoNeoproterozoic seawater from ancient evaporite deposits, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 532:
115951.
Bornhorst, T.J, Mathur, R., 2017 and 2018, Copper isotope constraints on the genesis of the Keweenaw
Peninsula native copper district, Michigan, USA, Minerals: 7, 185 and 8, 508
Brown, A.C., 2006, Genesis of native copper lodes in the Keweenaw Peninsula, northern Michigan: A
hybrid evolved meteoric and metamorphogenic model, Economic Geology, 101: 1437–1444.
Hardie, L. A., 1983, Origin of CaCl2 brines by basalt-seawater interaction; insights provided by some
simple mass balance calculations, Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology: 82, 205-213.
Johnson, R.C., 1985, Documentation of a subaqueously emplaced volcanic horizon in the upper Portage
Lake Volcanics, Keweenaw Peninsula, Michigan, ILSG Proceedings, 31, part 1: 38-39.
Kelly, David., 2020, Fluid inclusion study of selected calcite associated with native copper, Quincy mine,
Keweenaw Peninsula, Michigan, Open Access M.S. Report, Michigan Technological University, 165.
Livnat, A., 1983, Metamorphism and Copper Mineralization of the Portage Lake Lava Series, Northern
Michigan. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; 1–292.
Tivey, M.K., 2007, Generation of seafloor hydrothermal vent fluids and associated mineral deposits,
Oceanography, 20: 50-65.
White, W.S., 1968, The native-copper deposits of northern Michigan, In Ore Deposits of the United
States, 1933–1967 (Graton Sales Volume), Ridge, J.D., Ed.; American Institute of Mining,
Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers: New York, NY, USA, 303–325.

6

�Mineralizing processes in the Current Lake and Escape Lake conduit-type PGE–Cu–Ni
deposits of the Thunder Bay North igneous complex, northwestern Ontario, Canada
BRZOZOWSKI, Matthew1, HOLLINGS, Peter1, MACTAVISH, Allan2, EVANS–
LAMSWOOD, Dawn2, DROST, Abraham2, WILTON, Derek3.
1

Department of Geology, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Road, Thunder Bay, ON, P7B 5E1, Canada
Clean Air Metals, 1004 Alloy Drive, Thunder Bay, ON, P7B 6A5, Canada
3
Earth Sciences, Memorial University, 230 Elizabeth Avenue, St. John’s, NL, A1C 5S7, Canada
2

The Thunder Bay North igneous complex (TBNIC), located approximately 50 km northeast of
Thunder Bay, comprises a series of small mafic–ultramafic intrusions that occur in the vicinity of
several other similar intrusions, including the Sunday Lake, Saturday Night, and Thunder
intrusions to the southwest, and the Seagull, Disraeli, and Hele intrusions to the northeast. The
intrusions of the TBNIC comprise the 1106.6 ± 1.6 Ma Current Lake (Bleeker et al., 2020), Escape
Lake, Lone Island Lake, and 025 intrusions, all of which were emplaced proximal to the east–west
trending Quetico Fault System. Of these intrusions, the Current Lake (CL) and Escape Lake (EL)
chonoliths host significant orthomagmatic Ni, Cu, and platinum-group element (PGE)
mineralization, and have been in active exploration since 2005. Although few theses have been
completed on the Current Lake (Chaffee, 2015) and Escape Lake (D’Angelo, 2013) chonoliths,
the mechanisms that generated the variable styles of PGE–Cu–Ni mineralization in these spatially
associated chonoliths, and their genetic relationships have never been formally characterized. This
presentation highlights some of the preliminary results from a three-year collaborative effort
between Clean Air Metals, Lakehead University, and Memorial University, with the ultimate goals
of developing robust mineralization models for and characterizing the genetic relationships
between the CL and EL intrusions.
Although both the CL and EL chonoliths have been actively explored, the most extensive work
has been conducted on the CL chonolith, resulting in an indicated resource of 12 Mt at 1.48 g/t Pt,
1.4 g/t Pd, 0.28% Cu, and 0.17% Ni for CL, and 4.3 Mt at 0.92 g/t Pt, 1.18 g/t Pd, 0.52% Cu, and
0.28% Ni for EL (Kuntz and Jones, 2021). The CL chonolith contains five variably mineralized
zones (from north to south) — the Current Lake, Bridge, Beaver Lake, Cloud, and 437 zones. The
southernmost portion of the conduit is represented by the unmineralized Southeast Anomaly. The
EL chonolith has been divided into two sections (from north to south) — the Escape and
Steepledge Lake sections. Both conduits dip gently to the south, with their lowest points being
adjacent to the E–W trending Escape Lake Fault. Primary base-metal sulfides (BMS) in both
systems largely comprise pyrrhotite, pentlandite, and chalcopyrite; BMS occur in the CL system
occur throughout the chonolith in the Current Lake and Bridge zones, and at the base and top of
the chonolith in the Beaver Lake and Cloud zones, respectively.
Metal tenors in the CL and EL systems are similar, being enriched in Cu and the Pt-group PGEs
relative to Ni and the Ir-group PGEs, and exhibiting a distinct negative Ru anomaly, a feature not
commonly observed in other Ni–Cu–PGE systems globally (e.g., Eagle and Jinchuan). The
anomalously low Ru concentrations are likely the result of clinopyroxene fractionation at depth.
Copper/Pd ratios in the Current Lake and Beaver Lake zones of the CL chonolith, and Escape Lake
and Steepledge Lake sections of the EL chonolith, are indistinguishable and largely within the
range of mantle values, suggesting that significant amounts of sulfide were not removed at depth.
Although most of the samples from both systems have mantle-like Cu/Pd and Pd/Pt ratios, data
7

�from the Southeast Anomaly, Escape Lake, and Steepledge Lake zones trend towards high Cu/Pd
and low Pd/Pt ratios, suggesting that some Pd may have been removed by segregation of limited
sulfide liquid at depth. If the Southeast Anomaly is considered the feeder to the CL system, then
this may suggest that sulfides are located deeper in the feeder system. Numerical modeling
suggests that, although the CL system is characterized by slightly higher R factors than the EL
system (~12,000 vs. ~7,000), there was not a significant variation in R factor along the length of
the conduits, with variations in bulk-rock metal concentrations largely representing variable
accumulations of sulfide. In both systems, the Pt-group and Ir-group PGEs, and Au correlate with
Pd, suggesting that the physical separation of residual Cu-rich liquid from monosulfide solid
solution did not play a role in generating the mineralization. Variations in Ni/Cu–Mg and Pd/Pt–
Pd/Ir ratios suggest that the concentrations of Ni and Ir in the CL system appear to be controlled,
in part, by the accumulation of olivine towards the Southeast Anomaly. The fact that rocks in this
zone are olivine-poor suggests that olivine may be located at depth in the feeder system. Systematic
inverse correlations between Fe–S–Cu–Ni–Pd–Pt (+ spikes) and Mg–Ca–Cr–Ti (– spikes)
throughout the thickness of the Current Lake Zone suggest multiple influxes of metal-rich magma
into the system. The abundance of these inverse correlations at the base and top of the Beaver
Lake–Cloud zones suggest that the dynamics of magma flow varied along the length of the conduit,
likely as a result of the variable conduit morphology. Bulk assimilation of the granitic and
sedimentary country rocks is unlikely to have played a role in sulfide saturation as there are no
systematic mixing trends in La/Zr–Th/Nb between the host and country rocks. Although it is
possible that the large variation in S/Se values could be the result of contamination by BMS from
the granitic and sedimentary country rocks, it is also possible that the variation resulted from S
loss and very low R factors (&lt; ~1,000). The importance of local S addition for, and the timing of,
sulfide liquation remains unclear, but is one of the critical questions that will be assessed in the
Clean Air Metals–Lakehead University–Memorial University partnership.
References
Bleeker, W., Smith, J., Hamilton, M., Kamo, S., Liikane, M., Hollings, P., Cundari, R., Easton, M., Davis,
D., 2020. The Midcontinent Rift and its mineral systems: Overview and temporal constraints of Ni-CuPGE mineralized intrusions (No. 8722), Targeted Geoscience Initiative 5: Advances in the understanding
of Canadian Ni-Cu-PGE and Cr ore systems - Examples from the Midcontinent Rift, the Circum-Superior
Belt, the Archean Superior Province, and Cordilleran Alaskan-type intrusions.
Chaffee, M.R., 2015. Petrographic and Geochemical Study of the Hybrid Rock Unit Associated with the
Current Lake Intrusive Complex (MSc). University of Minnesota.
D’Angelo, M., 2013. Igneous textures and mineralogy of the Steepledge Intrusion, Northern Ontario
(BSc). Lakehead University.
Kuntz, G., Jones, L., 2021. NI 43-101 Technical report and mineral resource estimate for the Thunder
Bay North project, Thunder Bay, Ontario (NI 43-101).

8

�Three-dimensional geologic mapping of Precambrian rocks in Minnesota: The creation of
“removeable” geologic layers using gravity and magnetic data interpretation
CHANDLER V. W. (chand004@umn.edu) and JIRSA M.A.(jirsa001@umn.edu)
Minnesota Geological Survey (retired), 2609 Territorial Road, St, Paul, MN 55114 -1009
As part of the National Geological and Geophysical Data Preservation Program (NGGDP) of the
U. S. Geological Survey, the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) compiled geophysical models
from past and on-going investigations to create three-dimensional representations of several
Proterozoic basins, consisting of elevation contours and inferred bedrock geology of the
underlying basement surfaces. Thus defined, the Proterozoic basins are represented as removeable,
three-dimensional layers in the Precambrian bedrock map of the state. The NGGDP-MGS work
focused on several basins including those associated with the Sioux Quartzite, the Animikie Group,
the sedimentary rocks of the Midcontinent rift system, and the somewhat more complicated basin
enclosing the North Shore Volcanic Group and the Duluth Complex (NSVG-DC). In this
presentation we will focus on the results from the main bowl of the Animikie basin and the
adjoining NSVG-DC basin. Figure 1 presents the elevations estimated for the basement of these
two basins.
The basement elevations estimated for the main bowl of the Animikie basin are primarily based
on Euler analysis, a semi-automated depth interpretation scheme, in which a non-magnetic basin
sequence is assumed to overlie an assortment of anomaly sources that suitably approximates a
basin floor. Correspondingly much of the Animike sequence consists of non-magnetic slates and
grauwackes, with anomaly sources restricted to iron-formation near the base of the sequence, or
to sources within the underlying Archean basement. The Euler results were cross-checked in a
few areas by conventional, two-dimensional modeling, and the geology of the inferred basin floor
is based on extrapolating the bedrock geology of adjacent areas, as guided by gravity and magnetic
anomaly signatures. The results (Figure 1) indicate that northern and western margins of the
Animike basin are rimmed by a shallow (0-1.5 km elevation) shelf. The northern part of the shelf
has been previously inferred from earlier investigations, but the western shelf is somewhat novel,
and it appears to be significantly controlled by NW-striking structures. Several prominent sources
underlying the Animikie sequence are interpreted to be strongly magnetic, consistent with ironformation-bearing horizons, and the steep northward dips interpreted for some of these sources are
most consistent with Archean rocks in the region. The deeper parts of the basin are locally below
-4 km elevation, including the area along the basal contact of the NSVG-DC basin. This ~5 km.thick Animikie sequence could presumably continue to the east in some fashion beneath the
NSVG-DC sequence. Such a scenario has implications for the metallogenesis and upper crustal
geology of the region.
Euler analysis cannot resolve the base of a magnetic sequence, so the base of the NSVG-DC
basin is estimated along twenty two-dimensional gravity and magnetic models that transect the
complex in strategic areas. Of these, ten models have been recovered and revised from earlier
investigations and ten models have been created specifically for this study. Wherever possible,
modeling has been constrained by geology mapped at the bedrock surface (Jirsa and others, 2012)
and by rock-property data (Chandler and Lively, 2011). The modeling results were used to compile
basement elevation contours beneath the land surface, and these contours were smoothed and
merged with elevation contours beneath Lake Superior, which were compiled from 3-d gravity
modeling and seismic reflection interpretations (Allen and others, 1997). The two lowest parts of
the NSVG-DC sequence are interpreted lie ~-15 km. below MSL, and are plausible candidates for
major feeder zones. A prominent basement high separates these two lows, and it appears to
9

�ultimately connect with major basement ridges beneath Lake Superior, including Walter White
ridge to the south, and with the Grand Marais ridge to the east. Estimated dips along the base of
the NSVG-DC basin generally range from 25 to 60 degrees, with the steepest dips inferred along
the northern and western basal contacts. A shelf-like structure inferred beneath the northwestern
margin of the NSVG-DC basin lies roughly along-strike with the shelf inferred beneath the
northern margin of the Animikie basin.
The interpretations presented here represent our current “best guess” of subsurface structure,
based on available data, and many improvements should be possible in the future. As such, the
interpretations presented here should serve as a helpful starting point for future three-dimension
investigations, including the gravity, magnetic, and electromagnetic studies that has been recently
initiated by the U. S. Geological Survey in the region.
References cited:
Allen, D. J., Hinze, W. J., Dickas, A. B., Mudrey Jr., M. G., 1997, Integrated geophysical modeling of the North
American Midcontinent Rift System: new interpretations for western Lake Superior, northwestern Wisconsin, and
eastern Minnesota, in, Ojakangas, R. W., Dickas, A. B., and Green, J.C., eds., Middle Proterozoic to Cambrian Rifting,
Central North America: Geological Society of America Special Paper 312, p 47-72.
Chandler, V.W.; Lively, R.S.. (2011). Density, Magnetic Susceptibility, and Natural Remanent Magnetization of
Rocks in Minnesota: An MGS Rock Properties Database. Minnesota Geological Survey. Retrieved from the
University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy, http://hdl.handle.net/11299/175580.
Jirsa, M.A.; Boerboom, T.J.; Chandler, V.W.. (2012). S-22, Geologic Map of Minnesota, Precambrian Bedrock
Geology. Retrieved from the University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy, http://hdl.handle.net/11299/154540.

Figure 1. Estimated elevation of the basement surface below the main bowl of Animikie basin and the combined
igneous sequences of the North Shore volcanic Group and the Duluth Complex. Elevations are relative to mean sea
level, and range from 0 to 2,000 m. (yellow), -2,000 to -5,000 m. (light green), -5,000 to -15,000 m. (green), and &lt;15,000 m. (blue). Elevations beneath the North Shore Volcanic Group- Duluth Complex basin are highlighted with
1000 m. contours.

10

�Tracing redox pathways of the Mesoproterozoic Copper Harbour Conglomerate, Michigan
CRAIK, Nicholas1 and FRALICK, Philip1
1

Department of Geology, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Road, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1 Canada

The history of Earth’s oxygenation is key to understanding the evolution of life, the emplacement
of important mineral deposits, and the cycling of oxidative weathering products through time.
Many studies have been particularly focused on atmospheric and oceanic oxygenation during the
Archean to Paleoproterozoic – denoting the Mesoproterozoic as part of the ‘Boring Billion’, a time
of general stability or stagnation of many Earth processes. During the ‘Boring Billion’ oxygen was
thought to have been stalled at low concentrations relative to today. This idea has largely been put
forth by researchers utilizing deep sea black shales as a proxy for continental weathering patterns
Many studies of atmospheric oxygen within the Mesoproterozoic are contradictory to one another,
likely due to sampling of deep ocean settings where oxygen cannot penetrate, and lack of abundant
studies on terrestrial sediment. To reach results more representative of the ancient atmosphere,
choosing a depositional setting that has been well documented as subaerial, and/or being able to
constrain the weathering history of the system is imperative. In this work sedimentological and
geochemical evidence from the subaerial red-bed deposits and carbonates of the unmetamorphosed
Copper Harbour Conglomerate were collected with the aim of better understanding and
constraining the spatial and temporal fluctuations of atmospheric oxygen levels during the
Mesoproterozoic.
The Copper Harbour Conglomerate of the Keweenaw Peninsula, Michigan is a progradational
alluvial to lacustrine sedimentary sequence representing the first continuous infilling of the
Midcontinent Rift basin after the cessation of associated volcanic activity at ~1.1 Ga. Within the
formation are pervasive carbonate cement (calcrete) lenses as well as a stromatolitic horizon
located in its uppermost portion. The purpose of this study was to examine the oxidative
weathering products (siliciclastics), groundwater-precipitated carbonates (calcrete), and
pond/lacustrine-precipitated carbonates (non-biogenic precipitates and stromatolites) found within
the Copper Harbour Conglomerate to determine the relative oxygenation of the atmosphere at the
time of deposition (~1085 Ma).
ICP-MS and ICP-AES methods, both whole rock and preferential carbonate extraction, were
utilized to determine the whole rock and carbonate geochemistry of the rock types within the upper
Copper Harbour Conglomerate. By analyzing the redox sensitive metals (e.g., Fe, Mn, V, and U)
and rare earth elements (e.g., Ce anomaly), theoretical constructions of the hydrological pathways
of these elements can be developed. This allows understanding of the redox environment during
early diagenesis.

11

�Figure 1 shows the Ce and La
anomalies of the samples taken in
the study area.
The calcrete
samples have the strongest
negative Ce anomalies, indicating
they have the least abundance of Ce
and therefore have previously had
the greatest interaction with
oxygen, either due to abundance of
oxygen or elapsed reaction time.
This makes sense because calcrete
is formed by the evaporation of
groundwater near surface (i.e.,
subaerial) and takes thousands of
years to form. The stromatolite
Figure 1: La and Ce anomalies (PAAS normalized) of
samples show a slight negative Ce
calcrete, stromatolite, and siliciclastic samples in the
anomaly which indicates the fluids
study area.
they formed from had previously
interacted with oxygen. The anomaly for the stromatolites is less than that of the calcrete which
can be attributed to the lower residency time of surface water (in which the stromatolites form)
compared to groundwater. The siliciclastic samples do not show a positive or negative Ce anomaly.
This is likely due to abundance of primary, unweathered material contained within the samples
themselves.
Similar results were obtained from the redox sensitive elements Fe, Mn, V, and U. Surficial
weathering of the basaltic sediment induced by significant atmospheric oxygen levels resulted in
the development of Fe hydroxides and oxyhydroxides pervasive throughout the sediment of the
Copper Harbour Conglomerate. In this system Mn was staying in solution for a longer time, on
average, than Fe and became concentrated within the groundwater and precipitated out with the
calcrete. The oxidized forms of V and U were readily weathered from the basalt and held in
solution until encountering the reducing biochemical reactions of the decaying bacterial
component of the stromatolites or becoming oversaturated within the groundwater and
precipitating out with the calcrete.
By breaking down the sub-environments of the three sample types in this study, a clear progression
and hydrologic geochemical evolution of the broader depositional environment could be traced
out. There was enough oxygen in the atmosphere for pervasive oxidative weathering at surface
and for the studied redox sensitive elements to maintain their oxidized state through surface and
groundwater transportation – only being removed through oversaturation or local reduction via
organic decomposition. These results indicate that atmospheric oxygen was present in greater
concentrations ~1085 Ga than previously thought. This also leads into the idea that Earth’s
oxygenation may have been variable in relatively short time spans.

12

�Critical Mineral Potential on the North Shore of Lake Superior; Elements to ‘Structure’
our future
CUNDARI, Robert1, PUUMALA, Mark1, METSARANTA, Riku2 and CAMPBELL,
Dorothy1
1
Resident Geologist Program, Ontario Geological Survey, Thunder Bay, ON, P7E 6S7
2
Earth Resources and Geoscience Mapping Section, Ontario Geological Survey, Sudbury, ON
P3E 6B5
In March 2021, the Ontario Government released a Critical Minerals Framework Discussion Paper which
outlines Ontario’s proposal for developing a critical minerals strategy as well as a draft critical mineral list.
Critical minerals are defined as “….raw materials needed to produce many products and specialized
technologies. The minerals that a jurisdiction deems “critical” depends on its geology, as well as its own
domestic and economic priorities.” (https://www.ontario.ca/page/critical-minerals). This abstract and
associated presentation provides a general synopsis of the geology and existing models for several critical
mineral enriched mineralization styles (“deposits” sensu lato) related to the Proterozoic Midcontinent Rift
(MCR) along the northwestern shore of Lake Superior. The specific deposit types highlighted are:
orthomagmatic platinum group elements deposits in MCR-related intrusions (PGE-Ni-Cu-Cr-Co) ,
polymetallic hydrothermal vein deposits (Ag-rich, Pb-Zn-Cu-rich U-rich types; U-Ni-Zn-Cu-Co-Sb-Bibarite-fluorite) and hydrothermal polymetallic breccia complex related deposits (Deadhorse Creek diatreme
type; U-Be-Zr-Hf-Y-Ce-Nb-Ti-V-Cr-REE).
Platinum Group Elements (PGE) have long been a subject of exploration interest north of Lake
Superior. Since the discovery of PGE mineralization at the Thunder Bay North (TBN) project, the region
has seen relatively steady exploration efforts targeting similar chonolith-hosted magmatic sulphide
deposits. Larger MCR-related mafic-ultramafic intrusions, including Sunday Lake and Seagull, have also
been explored for magmatic sulphides. These PGE prospective intrusions are interpreted to have been
emplaced early in MCR history through crustal-scale structures (Bleeker et al., 2020). Hart and MacDonald
(2007) stated the importance of deep-seated structures, specifically the Black Sturgeon fault, as conduits
for early, primitive melts and subsequent emplacement of the early mafic-ultramafic units (e.g. Hele,
Seagull, Kitto, Disraeli). Furthermore, Heggie (2012) recognized that the emplacement of the TBN complex
was primarily controlled by a macro-structure (i.e. Archean Quetico fault) during MCR magmatism which
provided a zone of weakness for the intrusive complex to develop. Many of these mineralized intrusions
are relatively removed spatially from the historically mapped extent of rocks related to the MCR
highlighting the larger structural footprint of the rift and its related fault systems.
The silver-bearing veins in the Thunder Bay area have been subject to considerable historical mining
and more recently, renewed exploration interest. The critical mineral potential of these vein systems is not
well established, although examples of similar vein systems (e.g. deposits at Cobalt) were a source of
critical minerals (e.g. Kissin, 1992). The vein systems are organized in 2 groups known as the Mainland
and Island belts (cf. Franklin et al., 1986). The Mainland Belt deposits (e.g., Beaver, Badger, Silver
Mountain) occur in Rove Formation sedimentary rocks immediately below the contact with Logan diabase
sills. The veins locally extend upwards into the sills, with silver-rich portions of the systems bound by
locally silicified shale. The Island Group deposits (e.g. Silver Islet Mine) are characterized by fracturefilled vein systems oriented perpendicular to a northeast-trending swarm of gabbroic (Pigeon River) dykes.
The Mainland and Island group veins contain similar mineral assemblages of acanthite and native silver
associated with base-metal sulphides, fluorite, barite, quartz, and calcite. The Island group differs from the
Mainland group in that they locally contain a nickel-cobalt sulpharsenide suite of minerals often termed 5elements veins (Ag-Bi-Co-Ni-As). The Island and Mainland group are present in or near crustal-scale,
extensional listric faults that formed throughout the main episode of MCR extension which then became
reverse faults at the termination of that event (Smyk and Franklin, 2006). Similar to the mafic-ultramafic

13

�intrusions hosting PGE mineralization, polymetallic vein systems have a wider spatial distribution than the
mapped extent of MCR related rocks and thus may serve as a tool for mapping rift related structures and
hydrothermal systems.
Uraninite (pitchblende) was documented by Franklin (1978) and occurs in quartz veins and vein
breccias in association with hematite, magnetite and/or pyrite within the Archean basement rocks of the
Sibley basin (Sutcliffe, 1991). Uranium mineralization is associated with fracture zones related to north- to
northwest-striking regional structures such as the Black Sturgeon fault, and has been dated at 1094 Ma
(Ruzicka and LeCheminant, 1984), supporting a model similar to the genesis of lead-zinc veins in the
Dorion area (Franklin and Mitchell, 1977; Smyk and Franklin 2007). The model invokes mineralizing
hydrothermal fluids generated by MCR-heating inducing leaching of uranium and other metals from
uraniferous basement pegmatites or basal sedimentary strata in the Sibley Group (ibid). The fluids which
migrated through permeable Pass Lake formation sandstone precipitated metals in stratigraphic traps at or
near the Archean unconformity (ibid). Although the timing of these veins is considered broadly coeval with
the Ag-rich veins of the Mainland and Island silver-belts, the variable metal signatures of different vein
systems (Ag-rich vs U-rich vs Pb-Zn-Cu-rich) remains relatively poorly understood. In addition, their trace
critical mineral contents have not been investigated extensively.
The Dead Horse Creek volcaniclastic breccia complex is host to a diverse group of highly altered
heterolithic breccias and mafic to intermediate dikes that have been explored for rare earth elements,
uranium, yttrium, cerium, zirconium and hafnium (Zurevinski et al., 2019). The Dead Horse Creek
Complex has been divided into 5 subcomplexes, referred to as North, South, East, West and Central and
described as altered heterolithic breccias that have undergone varying degrees of alteration and are variably
radioactive (Sage 1982; Smyk et al., 1993). Exploration has mainly been focused on the mineralized zones
at the West Dead Horse and the North Dead Horse subcomplexes. The West Dead Horse subcomplex has
been described as “diverse, exotic, hydrothermally altered and rare metal mineralized” (ibid). The main
mineralized zone at the West Dead Horse Subcomplex is small; however, the grade and style of
mineralization highlights the importance of following up on larger, underexplored structures elsewhere in
the Dead Horse Complex. Uranium-beryllium-zirconium mineralization was introduced via A-type granitic
fluids along fault structures that crosscut the genetically unrelated breccias. Subsequently, niobiumtitanium-vanadium-chromium-bearing alkaline fluids were introduced into the same fault system. These
reacted with the pre-existing mineral assemblage and created the observed exotic mineralogy (Potter and
Mitchell 2005).
The recognition of structures that were formed or re-activated during the Midcontinent Rift event is
integral to understanding the location and timing of all the deposit types noted above. Bleeker et al, (2020)
have made significant advances in the understanding of the timing of intrusions and subsequently the overall
geodynamic evolution of the MCR. It has been noted that younger and more voluminous magmatism was
focussed into the central rift as the lithosphere thinned and rifted apart, whereas the older intrusions (e.g.
Thunder Bay North, Tamarack and others) were emplaced farther afield. This lithospheric thinning may
have been an important factor in the location of structurally controlled hydrothermal deposits surrounding
the Lake Superior basin as the majority of the vein systems are hosted in faults parallel to the rift axis,
proximal to the rift margin. Distance from rift axis may have also had a bearing on the type of mineralization
present in the vein systems as specific arrays of deposits appear to have differing metal signatures. The
structural controls on the deposits, whether deposit controlling faults are primary MCR-related or
reactivated Archean structures, remain important to understanding the structural evolution of the MCR and
may help to further elucidate the nature of metallogeny in the region. Apart from the intrusion-hosted PGE
deposits, the polymetallic vein deposits outlined here (Ag-rich, U-rich, Pb-Zn rich, Deadhorse Creek-type)
are all generated by fluids derived from heat related to the MCR (Smyk and Franklin, 2007). The
composition of the polymetallic veins is a product of the nature of the diverse ore-related fluids, and the
geochemistry of the host rocks and their relative interactions and contributions of metals. Understanding

14

�the structures which host all the deposit types outlined here and their relative timing, along with refining
tectonic/structural evolution of the MCR, will be integral to furthering our understanding on the controls
on these critical deposit types.
References
Bleeker, W., Smith, J., Hamilton, M., Kamo, S., Liikane, D., Hollings, P., Cundari, R., Easton, M., and Davis, D.,
2020. The Midcontinent Rift and its mineral systems: Overview and temporal constraints of Ni-Cu-PGE
mineralized intrusions; in Targeted Geoscience Initiative 5: Advances in the understanding of Canadian Ni-CuPGE and Cr ore systems – Examples from the Midcontinent Rift, the Circum-Superior Belt, the Archean Superior
Province, and Cordilleran Alaskan-type intrusions, (ed.) W. Bleeker and M.G. Houle; Geological Survey of
Canada, Open File 8722, p. 7–35. https://doi.org/10.4095/326880.
Franklin, J.M., Kissing, S.A., Smyk, C. and Scottt, S.D. 1986. Silver deposits associated with the Proterozoic rocks
of the Thunder Bay district, Ontario. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 23, p. 1576- 1591.
Franklin, J.M. and Mitchell, R.H. 1977. Lead-zinc-barite veins of the Dorion area, Thunder Bay District, Ontario.
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 14: 1963-1979.
Franklin, J.M. 1978. Uranium mineralization in the Nipigon area, Thunder Bay District, Ontario; in Current Research,
Part A, Geological Survey of Canada, Paper 78-1 A, p.275-282.
Heggie, G., MacTavish, A., Johnson, J., Weston, R., and Ma, L., 2012. Structural control on the emplacement of the
TBN-Igneous Complex in Institute on Lake Superior Geology Proceedings, 58th Annual Meeting, Thunder Bay,
Ontario, Part 1 – Proceedings and Abstracts, v.65, p.37-38.
Hart, T.R. and MacDonald, C.A., 2007. Proterozoic and Archean Geology of the Nipigon Embayment: implications
for emplacement of the Mesoproterozoic Nipigon diabase sills and mafic to ultramafic intrusions. Canadian
Journal of Earth Sciences 44: 1021-1040.
Kissin, S.A., 1992. Five-element (Ni-Co-As-Ag-Bi) veins. Geosci. Can. 19, 113–124.
Potter, E.G. and Mitchell, R.H. 2005. Mineralogy of the Dead Horse creek volcaniclastic breccia complex,
Northwestern Ontario, Canada; Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, v.150, p.212-229.
Ruzinka, V. and LeCheminant, G.M. 1984. Uranium deposit research, 1983, in Current research, part A. Geological
Survey of Canada, Paper 84-1A, p39-51.
Sage, R.P. 1982. Mineralization in diatreme structures north of Lake Superior, Ontario Geological Survey, Study 27,
Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Toronto, 79p.
Smyk, M.C. and Franklin, J.M. 2007. A synopsis of mineral deposits in the Archean and Proterozoic rocks of the Lake
Nipigon Region, Thunder Bay District, Ontario. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 44, p. 1041-1053.
Smyk, M.C., Taylor, R.P., Jones, P.C. and Kingston, D.M. 1993. Geology and geochemistry of the West Deaf Horse
Creek rare metal occurrence, northwestern Ontario; Exploration and Mining Geology, v.2, p.245- 251.
Sutcliffe, R.H. 1991. Proterozoic Geology of the Lake Superior Area in Geology of Ontario. Edited by P.C. Thurston,
H.R. Williams, R.H. Sutcliffe and G.M. Stott. Ontario Geological Survey, Special Volume 4 Part 1. P. 627-672.
Zurevinski, S., Campbell, D. and Puumala, M. 2019. Midcontinent Rift-related carbonatites and diatremes; in Institute
on Lake Superior Geology Proceedings, 65th Annual Meeting, Terrace Bay, Ontario, Part 2 - Field Trip
Guidebook, v.65, part 2, p.2-10.

15

�Availability of Historical Airborne Geophysical Survey Data at Minnesota DNR
DAHL, David1, SAARI, Stacy1, and LEE, Thomas1
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources – Lands and Minerals Division, 1525 3rd Ave. East,
Hibbing, MN 55746 USA dave.dahl@state.mn.us stacy.saari@state.mn.us thomas.lee@state.mn.us
1

The collections of exploration and scientific research data housed at the Minnesota Department of
Natural Resources include a large volume of unpublished airborne geophysical survey
deliverables, including maps, flight line profiles, flight records, interpretation reports, and other
materials. An effort to discover, organize and make accessible these materials has uncovered 131
non-government pre-GPS mineral exploration airborne geophysical surveys representing 156,192
line kilometers of acquired data. The effort has accomplished several goals:
• From a collections perspective, segregation of these airborne survey deliverables from other
exploration project records has succeeded in greatly reducing the physical volume of mineral
exploration materials remaining to be handled in other curation and cataloging activities.
Large maps, typically on Mylar, have been indexed and collected into vertical map cabinets.
Folders of flight line profiles have been indexed at the survey level and stored in archival
quality office boxes on a space efficient mobile shelving system. Contractor technical reports
and irregular documents such as 35mm strip films and nine-track magnetic tapes have also
been indexed, boxed and stored in the mobile shelving system. This single episode of curation
activity has addressed some 30% of the volume in the collections.
• The effort has introduced the geography of mineral exploration data collections to newer
mineral potential geoscientists in the Division, and provided big-picture orientation to
historical exploration program data that is often reused in support of geologic survey mapping,
university research, and natural resource land management activities.
• Scanned products of the organizing effort include 1) PDF/A archive format files of all maps,
reports and similar documents, 2) color-indexed TIFF image files of all inventoried airborne
geophysical survey map sets, and 3) georeferencing links files for all inventoried map images
(georeferenced to UTM zone 15, NAD83). These files provide a critical backup to otherwise
irreplaceable hard copy. An effort to make these and other collections products more easily
accessed, viewed, searched and downloaded is currently in development.
• Four index files have been developed: 1) a surveys index based on flight line extents contains
acquisition footprints (multi-part polygons) and survey attributes for the 131 surveys, 2) a maps
index based on the 860 maps contains map tile footprints and map tile attributes (some survey
map sets have up to 18 tiles, with up to 4 map sheets per tile), 3) a flight lines index contains
line traces and line attributes for the 8,778 flight lines represented on the 129 map sets, and 4)
a documents index spreadsheet based on inventory of the document collection contains
metadata for each of the 1,089 documents curated during the effort. Availability of these
indexes serves dual purpose, first as a finding aid, and secondly as an orientation and quality
control aid for the curation of much of the follow up geologic, ground geophysical, and
geochemical mineral exploration data sets archived at Minnesota DNR.
Mineral exploration magnetic-EM survey data comprise 89% of flight line content (138,786 line
km). Magnetics-only surveys represent 10% of the data, and 1% is from a regional AFMAG
(passive EM) reconnaissance survey over the Duluth Complex. Locations in Minnesota targeted
by these surveys include the Archean Wawa and Wabigoon Subprovinces, Proterozoic bedrock on
16

�the Mesabi and Cuyuna iron ranges and in areas of west-central, east-central, and southwestern
Minnesota. Most of the surveys are based on ¼ mile flight line spacing.
For geologic mappers these surveys provide context for site surveys and drill core locations, and
additional information about Minnesota’s concealed bedrock terranes. For instance, many of the
surveys have flight orientations different than government sponsored magnetic surveys; and
formational EM conductors mapped in areas such as the southern part of the Animikie basin may
enhance geologic interpretation in areas mostly devoid of magnetic anomaly detail. EM data may
also provide information on surficial material features such as gravels or conductive clays.
Obviously, more work can be done to round out the inventory of non-government airborne
geophysical surveys in Minnesota. GPS-based airborne survey data sets, which are digital and less
susceptible to physical loss, are yet to be indexed, and indexing staff are aware of about 20
additional historical non-government airborne surveys in Minnesota that might potentially be
targets for future donation (if they still exist). These additional historical airborne surveys are
partially evidenced, either through coarse index maps, or clusters of named ground target sites, or
staff knowledge of survey area vicinities for which no footprints are found in the collections.
The flight line profiles, which hold the actual magnetic, EM, and occasional radiometric survey
data are now curated at the survey level and indexed at the flight line level. But they are still
without backup and vulnerable to physical loss. These flight line profiles are an obvious target for
a future National Geological and Geophysical Data Preservation Program (NGGDPP) proposal to
scan and convert the hard copy records to PDF/A format, for preservation and access.

Figure 1: Acquisition footprints for the non-government pre-GPS airborne geophysical surveys
inventoried during current effort. Bedrock geology - Minnesota Geological Survey map S-22.

17

�Geophysical insights into Paleoproterozoic tectonics along the southern margin of the
Superior Province, central Upper Peninsula, Michigan
DRENTH, Benjamin J.1, CANNON, William F.2, SCHULZ, Klaus J.2, and AYUSO, Robert
A.2
1

U.S. Geological Survey, PO Box 25046, MS 964, Denver Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225
U.S. Geological Survey, 12201 Sunrise Valley Dr., MS 954, Reston, VA 20192

2

The southern margin of the Archean Superior Province in the central Upper Peninsula of Michigan
was a nexus for key Paleoproterozoic tectonic events involved in the ~2.1 Ga rifting of proposed Archean
supercraton Superia and subsequent assembly of Laurentia. Interpretations of the region’s tectonic history
have historically been hampered by extensive Pleistocene glacial and Paleozoic sedimentary cover and a
lack of appropriate geophysical data. These rifting and orogenic events formed geologic effects that are
readily mappable with modern geophysical methods. New aeromagnetic and gravity data provide a critical
means of mapping and interpreting the complex geological framework through cover, allowing
development of significantly richer geographical and process-based perspectives on all these tectonic events
(Drenth et al., in press). Existing interpretations of Archean and Paleoproterozoic contacts and structure
(e.g., James et al., 1961; Bayley et al., 1966) are carried &gt;30 km eastward under Paleozoic cover (Fig. 1).
The progression of ~2.1 Ga rift-related sedimentation and magmatism recorded in rocks of the Dickinson
Group are clearly expressed as a geographically extensive and largely concealed tectonic feature of the
southern Superior Province. Geophysical interpretations provide evidence for plausible ~2.1 Ga intrusive
magmatism, such as a previously unrecognized swarm of mafic northeast-striking dikes cutting Archean
rocks and multiple granitic bodies. Effects of the ~1.87-1.83 Ga Penokean orogeny include the clearly
imaged Niagara fault zone suture, abundant evidence for thin-skinned thrusting and folding in the
Menominee iron district, and speculative emplacement of an allochthonous sedimentary sequence in the
Calumet trough. Numerous east-west trending structures likely originated, or were significantly reactivated,
by post-Penokean deformation. Metamorphic events at ~1.76 Ga and ~1.65 Ga may correspond to orogenies
involving younger, outboard Paleoproterozoic crustal provinces recognized in southern Laurentia. For
example, the previously unrecognized West Branch fault, separating the Dickinson Group from Archean
rocks, is shown to be a major structure in the region and is a proposed expression of ~1.76 Ga thick-skinned
deformation documented elsewhere in the region. Oblique disruptions of crudely east-west striking
structures have robust geophysical expressions and are speculatively connected to transpressive
deformation at ~1.65 Ga.
References
Bayley, R. W., Dutton, C. E., Lamey, C. A., and Treves, S. B., 1966, Geology of the Menominee ironbearing district Dickinson County, Michigan and Florence and Marinette Counties, Wisconsin: U.S.
Geological Survey Professional Paper 513, 96 p.
Drenth, B. J., Cannon, W. F., Schulz, K. J., and Ayuso, R. A., in press, Geophysical insights into
Paleoproterozoic tectonics along the southern margin of the Superior Province, central Upper
Peninsula, Michigan, USA: Precambrian Research.
James, H. L., Clark, L. D., Lamey, C. A., and Pettijohn, F. J., 1961, Geology of central Dickinson County,
Michigan: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 310, 176 p.

18

�Figure 1: Plan view of interpretations (Drenth et al., in press). All units Paleoproterozoic unless otherwise
noted.

19

�The deformation and alteration of granitoid plutons in the Wabigoon subprovince
DROVER, Bailey, HILL, Mary Louise, ZUREVINSKI, Shannon
Department of Geology, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Road, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1

Ongoing research suggests that the brittle deformation, ductile deformation and associated
metasomatism/hydrothermal alteration studied in 12 granitoid plutons across the Wabigoon
subprovince provide evidence for coeval brittle-ductile deformation at the amphibolite facies of
metamorphism consistant with Archean-aged oblique convergence (transpression). Approximate
outcrop locations where the brittle and/or ductile deformation were studied are shown in figure 1.
Four hundred and two structural measurements of fractures and faults along with approximately
95 thin sections were used to assess the degree of deformation /metamorphism and the
metasomatism of various granitoid plutons across the subprovince.

Figure 1. Modified map from Blackburn et al. (1991) showing the approximate outcrop
locations where the brittle and/or ductile deformation of the granitoid plutons were studied.
Brittle deformation features common to all plutons include chlorite ± epidote shear veins
and unfilled fractures. Shear veins show a conjugate strike-slip relationship in the field and are
seen with dips ranging from 15° to 90°. Average and median dips of the shear veins is roughly 70°
± 10° for each pluton studied. These shear veins are seen with sub-horizontal slickenlines that have
pitches ranging from 00° to 33°. Although conjugate relationships are noted in the field, the
orientation of the shear veins are quite variable across outcrops of individual plutons and the
subprovince. These shear veins are also commonly seen defining the fabric in narrow shear zones
present in the plutons across the Wabigoon subprovince. Many of the plutons also have quartz
veins that have been subsequently ductiley deformed. These ductiley deformed quartz veins are
commonly associated with narrow shear zones and are typically boudinaged with strong undulose
extinction, subgrains and serrated grain boundaries. The ductile overprint of the quartz veins
demonstrates coeval brittle-ductile deformation and is seen in the Sabaskong batholith, the
Dryberry batholith, the Ottertail pluton, the Atikwa batholith and the Revell batholith.
Although the plutons studied appear to lack a notable macroscopic deformation fabric, thin
section analysis shows that dislocation creep mechanisms were active in both quartz and feldspar
mineral phases during peak metamorphic conditions. Deformation microstructures commonly seen
20

�in quartz across all plutons studied include undulose extinction, serrated grain boundaries and
subgrains. Feldspars have undulose extinction, subgrains, serrated grain boundaries, intragranular
microfractures and deformation twins. Evidence for dislocation creep in feldspars indicates that
the metamorphic grade of the plutons is consistent with the amphibolite facies of metamorphism.
Alteration of the plutons is directly related to brittle fracturing. Alteration minerals
commonly seen adjacent to brittle fractures include chlorite, epidote group minerals, biotite,
sphene, calcite, sericite, and muscovite with lesser amounts of hematite. The degree of alteration
is most notable near the margins of the plutons where strain is concentrated.
REFERENCES
Blackburn, C.E., John, G.W., Ayer, J., Davis, D.W., 1991, Wabigoon Subprovince. Ontario
Geological Survey Special Volume 4, Pt. 1, pp. 303-383.

21

�Geochemistry and Age of Archean Volcaniclastic and Mafic Intrusive Rocks, Georgia Lake
Area, Quetico Subprovince, Northwestern Ontario
DUGUET, Manuel
Earth Resources and Geoscience Mapping Section, Ontario Geological Survey, Sudbury, Ontario
manuel.duuet@ontario.ca

The metaturbidites of the Georgia Lake area in the Quetico Subprovince host 2 peculiar
types of rock: volcaniclastic rocks that are mafic to intermediate in composition and mafic
intrusive rocks that likely were emplaced when the turbidites were unconsolidated. The
volcaniclastic rocks were described first on the shoreline of Lake Jean by Williams (1988), who
interpreted them as sedimentary rocks derived from the erosion of nearby ultramafic bodies. A
similar interpretation was given by Valli, Guillot and Hattori (2004), but they suggested a
komatiite basalt as the source. Field work conducted during the summer 2019 showed that these
rocks are very likely the result of deposition and local reworking of either ash from a volcanic
plume or a distal part of a pyroclastic flow. Analyses of newly acquired and historical geochemical
data were performed to, first, assess the level of contamination of these volcaniclastic rocks by the
surrounding turbidites and, second, to compare it with possible source in the area such as the
numerous Archean mafic sills and veins that intruded the turbidites. The least contaminated
members of the volcaniclastic rocks fall in the fields of boninites and siliceous high-magnesium
basalts in various discriminant diagrams such as SiO2 versus MgO, TiO2 versus MgO, SiO2 versus
Cr and TiO2 versus Cr (Pearce and Reagan 2019). TiO2 content of the mafic intrusive rocks
compared to that of the volcaniclastic rocks (respectively &gt;1 wt.% and less than 0.6 wt. %) show
that the former are unlikely to be the source of the volcaniclastic rocks. On primitive mantle–
normalized incompatible element diagram, volcaniclastic rock compositions show moderate to
strong enrichment in light rare earth elements (LREE) and depletion in heavy rare earth elements
(HREE), with negative anomalies in niobium, tantalum and titanium and positive anomalies in
zirconium and hafnium, as summarized in Duguet (2020). Although being more enriched in REE,
the mafic intrusive rocks display similar fractionation pattern than those of the volcaniclastic rocks
but with negative anomalies in zirconium and hafnium. LA-ICP-MS U-Pb dating on zircon of a
volcaniclastic rock yielded a mean age of 2702 ± 3 Ma that is interpreted as its depositional age
(Figure 1). These volcaniclastic rocks came either from the Wabigoon Subprovince to the north or
the Wawa Subprovince to the south. Such rocks remain to be identified in these areas and the
closest candidates may be the andesitic volcanic rocks of the Shebandowan greenstone belt to the
south. Different process can generate boninitic magmas, but based on the geological setting and
previous studies, an arc/fore-arc environment is favoured. The mafic intrusive rocks are also very
interesting because they were intruded at the time when the sediments were deposited. This would
rule out an accretionary prism environment for the Quetico Subprovince because active volcanism
coeval with turbidite sedimentation is more common in back-arc and/or rifted arc settings.
However, the calc-alkaline chemistry, which also display similarities with sanukitoid plutons in
the area, contradicts this interpretation. The geodynamical implications of this remain to be
investigated and a more complex scenario involving either rifted fore-arc/arc or subduction
polarity flips should be investigated.

22

�Figure 1. Concordia plot for a volcaniclastic rock from the Georgia Lake area showing the main zircon
population at 2702±3 Ma (n=28) reflecting the age of deposition. Geon 28, 29 and 30 grains are also present.
Data from Sutcliffe (2020).
Duguet, M. 2020. Geochemistry of Archean volcaniclastic and mafic intrusive rocks, Georgia Lake area,
Quetico subprovince, northwestern Ontario; in Summary of Field Work and Other Activities, 2020;
Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Report 6370: 8-1 to 8-10.
Pearce, J.A. and Reagan, M.K. 2019. Identification, classification, and interpretation of boninites from
Anthropocene to Eoarchean using Si-Mg-Ti systematics; Geosphere, 15: 1008-1037.
doi.org/10.1130/GES01661.1
Sutcliffe, C.N. 2020. U-Pb geochronology by LA-ICP-MS in samples from northern Ontario; internal report
prepared for the Ontario Geological Survey, Jack Satterly Geochronology Laboratory, Ontario, 128p.
Valli, F., Guillot, S. and Hattori, K.H. 2004. Source and tectono-metamorphic evolution of mafic and pelitic
metasedimentary rocks from the central Quetico metasedimentary belt, Archean Superior Province
of Canada. Precambrian Research, 132: 155-177.
Williams, H.R. 1988. Geological studies in the Wawa, Quetico, and Wabigoon subprovinces, with emphasis
on structure and tectonic development; in Summary of Field Work and Other Activities, 1988,
Ontario Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Paper, 141: 169-172.

23

�The Critical Mineral potential of carbonatite and alkalic complexes in Ontario
EASTON, Robert Michael
Earth Resources and Geoscience Mapping Section, Ontario Geological
Ontario P3E 6B5 mike.easton@ontario.ca

Survey, Sudbury,

There are more than 50 carbonatite and/or alkalic complexes in Ontario ranging in age from
Neoarchean to Jurassic (Figure 1). Although there are numerous reports and compendia on them
(Sage 1991; Woolley and Kjarsgaard 2008), from a mineral exploration standpoint, there is little
guidance available with respect to determining which complexes might have higher mineral
potential than the others, especially for niobium and the rare earth elements (REE). Recent
academic studies on alkaline and carbonatitic magmas by Nabyl et al. (2020) and Ballouard et al.
(2020) indicate that calcio-carbonatites associated with coeval feldspathoidal-dominated silicate
rocks (e.g., ijolite, nepheline syenite) are more likely to host niobium and/or REE mineralization
than are calcio-carbonatites found with other igneous rock associations. This presentation
examines this suggestion with respect to carbonatite and alkalic complexes in Ontario; more details
are found in (Easton 2020). It should be noted that many of the complexes in Ontario, especially
the carbonatite complexes, are typically poorly exposed, known only through limited diamonddrill hole data, and only major element geochemical data are available for most.
Neoarchean alkaline intrusions in Ontario do not have phonolite to phono-trachyitic rock
compositions and thus are not considered as having high REE potential. This also applies to the
circa 1090-1065 Ma Kensington-Skootamatta intrusive suite in the Grenville Province. In contrast,
mafic end-members of the Frontenac intrusive suite (circa 1180-1155 Ma) in the Grenville
Province are characterized by high TiO2, P2O5 and alkali (Ba, K, Rb, Sr) contents, have bulk rock
compositions of basaltic trachyandesite to trachyandesite, and have the potential to host iron-oxide
(P-rich) mineralization (Easton 2019).
Using the suggestion that phonolite to phono-trachyitic rock compositions may be a predictor
or favourable rare element mineralization in carbonatite and alkalic complexes reduces the number
of potential targets from more than 40 to ~10. The more favourable complexes are associated with
feldspathoidal-bearing intrusive rocks and known pyrochlore and/or significant apatite
occurrences. Most occur in 3 main areas of the province associated with areas of crustal extension
and/or mantle upwelling. Specifically, 1) the Paleoproterozoic Argor Complex is proximal to the
Circum-Superior Orogen; 2) the Manitou Island, Iron Island and Burritt Island complexes, and the
Lavergne fenite, are all associated with the Ottawa–Bonnechere graben where it impinges on the
former trace of the Sudbury dike swarm mantle plume at circa 1238 Ma; and, 3) Although
proximal to the Midcontinent Rift (MCR), the Firesand River, Good Hope and Prairie Lake
complexes were emplaced between 1163 and 1143 Ma, suggesting that they may be a far-field
effect of the Grenville Orogen rather than the MCR. The Mesoproterozoic Lackner, Nemegosenda
and Seabrook complexes along the Kapuskasing Structural Zone also have exploration potential.
Acquisition of modern trace element geochemistry from these 10 complexes may help to further
refine their potential to host rare element mineralization.
Ballouard et al. 2020; Earth Science Reviews, v.203, article 103115, 31p.
Easton, R.M. 2019. in Ontario Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Release—Data 351
Easton, R.M. 2020. in Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Report 6370, p.9-1 to 9-10.
Nabyl, Z. et al. 2020. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, v.282, p.297-323.
Sage, R.P. 1991. Chapter 18, in Ontario Geological Survey, Special Volume 4, Part 1, p.682-709.
Woolley, A.R. and Kjarsgaard, B.A. 2008. Geological Survey of Canada, Open File 5796.

24

�Figure 1. Locations of carbonatite complexes, alkalic complexes, aeromagnetically inferred alkalic and/or
carbonatite complexes and areas of fenite and carbonatite dikes in Ontario. Also indicated are the traces of
the southern limit of the Circum-Superior Orogen, the Kapuskasing Structural Zone, the Midcontinent Rift,
and the Ottawa–Bonnechere graben. Complexes with higher estimated exploration potential are indicated
in red. Figure modified from Sage (1991).

25

�Reconstructing the hydration and carbonation history of the Presque Isle peridotite,
Marquette Michigan: Insights into mechanisms of carbon sequestration in ultramafic rocks
GALLAGHER, Benjamin and BJORNERUD, Marcia
Geosciences Department, Lawrence University, 711 East Boldt Way, Appleton WI 54911 USA
The Presque Isle peridotite is a serpentinized lherzolite that occupies about 500,000 m2 on the northern
outskirts of Marquette, Michigan. The age of the Presque Isle peridotite is not known, although it and a
similar body, the Deer Lake Peridotite, exposed about 25 km to the WSW, have been assumed to be
Neoarchean (Sims, 1991; Sasso, 2016). Both ultramafic masses lie within an area of Neoarchean (2.7 Ga)
rocks -- the tonalitic to granodioritic Compeau Creek Gneiss -- near the southern edge of the Superior
Craton, about 10 km north of the Great Lakes Tectonic Zone. If the peridotites are Neoarchean, they may
represent cumulate bodies related to metabasalt/ greenstone units mapped as the Mona and Kitchi Schists
in the Marquette region. However, there is another ultramafic body in the area, the mineralized Yellow
Dog peridotite found 40 km northwest of Marquette, that is related to the ca. 1.0 Ga Midcontinent Rift –
part of a dike swarm emplaced into Paleoproterozoic metasedimentary rocks of the Baraga Group. In the
absence of direct geochronologic constraints, a Mesoproterozoic age for the Presque Isle and Deer Lake
peridotites cannot be ruled out, although their irregular, non-tabular shapes are quite different from the
fracture-controlled form of the Yellow Dog intrusions.
The Presque Isle peridotite is overlain nonconformably by a unit that has been mapped as the ca. 1.0 Ga
Jacobsville Sandstone (a late rift-filling unit). However, the sedimentary material just above the
unconformity is a rubbly conglomerate about 2 m thick with a greenish matrix and irregularly shaped redorange clasts of chalcedony -- very different in character from the typically well sorted, quartzose
Jacobsville Fm. In places along the contact, it is in fact difficult to distinguish the highly altered peridotite
from the overlying sedimentary rocks.
Despite the uncertainties about the igneous age and origin of the Presque Isle peridotite and the time at
which it was exposed to weathering in the geologic past, extensive unvegetated exposures of the peridotite
at the northern tip of Presque Isle Park make it possible to reconstruct a detailed relative chronology of fluid
flow, deformation and weathering processes that altered the rock over time. Based on field, thin section,
XRD and stable isotope analyses, we infer the following sequence of events, recording progressive cooling
and exhumation of the peridotite from depth.
1) Percolative infiltration by water-rich fluids
The least altered parts of the Presque Isle peridotite still have recognizable igneous textures and record an
early period of pervasive, percolative flow by aqueous fluids that altered the original olivine crystals to
lizardite along grain boundaries and transgranular cracks. Phase relations for ultramafic rocks (Philpotts
and Ague, 2009) suggest this happened at temperatures below 500-600°C, depending on depth. XRD
analysis also indicates the presence of minor talc in these rocks, which could indicate metamorphism at
slightly higher temperatures (up to ca. 650°).
Serpentine also occurs in centimeter-scale curviplanar seams within the Presque Isle peridotite. These
seams are typically meters apart but variably oriented and intersecting, and thus do not appear to have been
influenced by a consistent external stress regime. Although the seams represent a morphologically distinct
style of serpentinization, they may be temporally linked with the grain-scale alteration of the rocks. The
serpentine seams exhibit small-scale transverse fractures whose spacing is comparable to their width; such
features have been interpreted in other peridotites to reflect the significant volume increase (close to 40%;

26

�Klein and Le Roux, 2020) that occurs with serpentinization. This early serpentinization event does not seem
to have been associated with significant deformation.
2) Tectonically-influenced hydrofracturing and reaction-induced fracturing by CO2-rich fluids
Carbonate material in different forms cuts across serpentinized areas of the peridotite. The simplest
carbonate occurrences are NW-striking, vertical dolomite-serpentine veins with fibrous crack-seal textures
indicating incremental, dilational opening. These are spatially associated with vertical WNW-trending
dextral faults with dolomite slickenfibers. The orientation of the veins relative to the faults is consistent
with their formation as tensile fractures in a dextral shear zone. The crack-seal texture of the vein fillings
suggests repeated, perhaps seismically induced, fluid flow and hydrofracturing events at depths shallow
enough that the rocks deformed brittlely. In a few samples, carbonate crystals have terminated faces,
suggesting they grew into open space or a dense vapor phase; this too implies shallow depths of formation.
More geometrically complex carbonate masses are 5-10 cm thick ‘rinds’ around pods of less altered
peridotite. These have crude ‘onion-skin’ layers and transverse veins that create a mesh-like appearance,
and are similar to features attributed to reaction-induced fracturing by Jamtveit et al (2008). Like the crackseal veins, the carbonate meshes consist mainly of dolomite. Oxygen isotope values for both the vein and
mesh carbonates are consistently negative (18O VPDB between -6.57 and -11.89) and suggest that the
mineralizing fluids came from meteoric water. These fluids must have carried enough dissolved CO2 to
cause reactions such as:
Mg2SiO4 (ol) + CaMgSi2O6 (cpx) + CO2 + H2O → Mg3Si2O5(OH)4 (serp) + 2CaMgCO3
3) Deep near-surface weathering under high CO2 conditions
Beginning about 5 m below the unconformity, the peridotite has a strikingly different color and
composition. The rock mass consists of at least 30% carbonate (dolomite, magnesite, rhodochrosite), some
of it massive, with intervening areas of reddish material that represents extremely altered olivine and
serpentine. As one approaches the unconformity, even the serpentine has been altered to a residuum of
fine-grained quartz or chalcedony and opaque minerals, likely Fe and Mg oxides. This deep weathering
may reflect long-term leaching by surface fluids in late Proterozoic time under higher atmospheric CO2
levels than at present. The large amount of carbonate near the unconformity indicates that the rock
continued to be reactive even after the original olivine had already been altered to serpentine.
The complex hydration and carbonation history of the Presque Isle peridotite provides a natural analog for
physical and chemical processes that might be emulated for carbon sequestration in ultramafic rocks if
carbon capture becomes technologically and economically feasible.
References cited
Jamtveit, B., Putnis, C., and Malthe-Sorenson, A., 2008. Reaction induced fracturing during replacement
process. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 157: 127-133.
Klein F. and Le Roux, V., 2020. Quantifying the volume increase and chemical exchange during
serpentinization. Geology, 48: 552-556.
Philpotts, A. and Ague, J., 2009. Principles of Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology. Cambridge Univ Press.
Sasso, A., 2016. Geochemical and Petrological Characterizations of Peridotite and Related Rocks in
Marquette County, Michigan. Master’s Thesis, Western Michigan University. 100 pp.
Sims, P.K., 1991, Great Lakes Tectonic Zone in Marquette Area, Michigan Implications for Archean
Tectonics in the North-Central United States. US Geological Survey Rep. 1904-E.

27

�A Practical Approach to Using Incompatible Elements to Define Geochemical Correlation
and a Common Mantle Source: Example Crystal Lake Gabbro and the Duluth Complex
GOOD, David
Department of Earth Sciences, Western University, London, ON N6A 5B7 Canada

This presentation focuses on fundamental principles of igneous geochemistry to provide a
practical approach for identifying geochemical correlations between mafic rock units in the MCR.
A common approach will aid in development of a rift-wide classification strategy and knowledge
of the geographic extent of defined mafic rock series. This level of information is key to
understanding the nature of mantle sources across the rift. The ultimate goal is to provide useful
criteria to guide ongoing exploration for Cu-Ni-PGE deposits in the MCR.
There is a seemingly infinite array of methods to combine geochemical criteria and trace
element data to derive useful petrogenetic models to explain mafic rocks, but most are not
necessary for a regional scale study such as this. By defining a clear hypothesis, it is possible to
simplify the number of elements used to a manageable and reliable few. In this case, a widely
known concept that igneous rock sequences which have not been contaminated by crustal material,
and that have similar incompatible trace element patterns were derived from a similar mantle
source. With this objective in mind, it is not necessary to consider elements that are susceptible to
hydrothermal alteration or are associated with plagioclase. Thus, U, Th, Ta, Nb, Zr and the REE
provide a definitive range of elements for making comparisons and drawing conclusions regarding
correlation (but do not necessarily show rocks are co-genetic). In those rare instances where there
is evidence for mantle metasomatism, K, Ba and Sr abundances should be considered.
A practical approach applies 4 steps: 1) elimination of samples considered to have
undergone crustal contamination by evaluation Th/Nb (&gt;0.2), 2) cleaning the data set of unrelated
or outlier samples using REE patterns or the λ1 vs λ2 plot, 3) testing for evidence of clinopyroxene
fractionation (La vs. Sm), and 4) inspection and comparison of twice normalized (primitive mantle
and Lu) extended trace element diagrams. Two examples are presented: 1) the Babbitt intrusion of
the Duluth Complex is compared to the Crystal Lake gabbro, and 2) the Current Lake intrusion is
compared to the Lower Suite (Simpson Island traverse) of the Osler Volcanic Group.

Sources:
Current Lake: Cundari, R.M., Puumala, M.A.,
Smyk, M.C. and Hollings, P.N. 2021. OGS MR
Data 308
Osler Volcanic Group: Barnes et al., 2021,
Magmas Through Time, J. Petrology, in press.
Crystal Lake Gabbro: O’Brien, S. 2018, MSc
Thesis, Lakehead University.
Duluth Complex: Ripley et al., 1998, Geochimica et
Cosmochimica Acta 62, 3349-3365.
λ-λ plot: O’Neill, H. 2016, J. Pet. 57, 1463-1508

28

�Integration of geophysical evidence indicates that anorthosite composes a significant portion
of Grand Marais ridge, an inferred basement high in western Lake Superior
GRAUCH, V.J.S. 1 and HELLER, S.J. 2
1

U.S. Geological Survey, MS 973, Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225
U.S. Geological Survey, MS 939, Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225

2

The Midcontinent Rift System (MRS) is expressed geophysically by a semi-linear, regional gravity
high that trends across the Midcontinent and Great Lakes region of North America. The gravity
high is interrupted by two prominent, semicircular gravity lows, which have been interpreted from
modeling and seismic-reflection sections as basement highs of Archean granite (Allen et al., 1997).
One is centered southwest of Isle Royale in western Lake Superior (Grand Marais ridge) and the
other over Bayfield Peninsula (White’s Ridge). Allen et al. (1997) suggest that the Archean granite
highs were pre-rift features that remained high while lava basins of the MRS subsided adjacent to
them. Hart et al. (1994) questioned the presence of granitic rocks underlying Grand Marais ridge
(GMR) because heat flow measurements there are much lower than is typical for Archean granitic
upper crust. They argued that the region must instead be underlain by rocks of low radiogenic heat
production, such as gabbro, extending to at least 15 km depth. However, gabbro has high densities
and would not produce the observed gravity low. Thus, the geophysical observations appear
contradictory.

Figure 1. Physical properties of rock types compared to the ones inferred for Grand Marais ridge. (A) All velocitydensity point data are from Christensen and Mooney (1995), representing means at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 km depths, except
for two additional sites for anorthosite (orange), which are from Birch (1961), measured at 2 kbars. The regression
line representing Keweenawan basalt and diabase is from Halls (1969). Typical radiogenic heat production by rock
type (in brackets) in µW/m3 are from Hasterok et al. (2018) except for anorthosite, which is from Roy et al. (2021).
(B) Statistics for Duluth Complex and Animikie Basin densities were analyzed from the database of Chandler and
Lively (2011). Representative densities for the NE Grenville and Egersund massifs are from Keary and Thomas
(1979) and Smithson and Ramberg (1979), respectively. N is the number of samples measured.

Bouguer gravity, seismic-reflection, seismic-refraction, and heat-flow data suggest that the rock
types composing GMR to a depth of about 15 km have densities of 2,650-2,720 kg/m3 (Hutchinson
et al., 1990; Allen et al., 1997), compressional-wave velocities of about 6.5 km/s (Luetgert and
Meyer, 1982; Hutchinson et al., 1990; our own velocity analyses), and radiogenic heat production
29

�values of no more than 0.7 µW/m3 (Hart et al., 1994). These inferred GMR physical properties
are compared to the same properties compiled globally and measured locally for rock types likely
to occupy the subsurface of western Lake Superior (Fig. 1). As already noted, the granitic rocks
have densities and velocities closest to the GMR suite of properties, but the heat production is too
high. The mafic and intermediate rocks (Fig. 1A) and metasedimentary rocks of the Animikie
Basin (Fig. 1B) are too dense. The latter also are likely to have heat production that is too high
(noted next to MGW on Fig. 1A).
If the values compiled for anorthosite (Fig. 1A) are representative for the MRS, the low heat
production fits but velocities are too high for anorthosite to be the sole rock type underlying GMR.
However, if added in significant volume to felsic rock types, for example, the velocity and the heat
generation could be combined to result in the desired physical properties for the whole rock
column. Alternatively, the lower densities for anorthosite xenoliths and massifs elsewhere (Fig.
1B) hint that the compiled values are not representative; the xenolith source may have velocities
that match those of GMR. In any case, anorthosite likely constitutes a significant volume of GMR.
References
Allen, D.J., Hinze, W. J., Dickas, A. B., and Mudrey, M. G., Jr., 1997, Integrated geophysical modeling of the North
American Midcontinent Rift System: New interpretations for western Lake Superior, northwestern Wisconsin,
and eastern Minnesota: Geological Society of America Special Paper 312, p. 47-72. doi: 10.1130/0-8137-23124.47
Birch, F., 1961, The velocity of compressional waves in rocks to 10 kilobars, Part 2: Journal of Geophysical Research,
v. 66, no. 7, p. 2199-2224.
Chandler, V. W., R. S. and Lively, 2011, Density, magnetic susceptibility, and natural remanent magnetization of
rocks in Minnesota: Minnesota Geological Survey online services, http://dx.doi.org/10.13020/D63S3D, accessed
22 January 2018.
Christensen, N.I., and Mooney, W.D., 1995, Seismic velocity structure and composition of the continental crust: A
global view: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 100, no. B6, p. 9761-9788. doi:10.1029/95JB00259.
Halls, H.C., 1969, Compressional wave velocities of Keweenawan rock specimens from the Lake Superior region:
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 6, p. 555-568.
Hart, S.R., Steinhart, J.S., and Smith, T.J., 1994, Terrestrial heat flow in Lake Superior: Canadian Journal of Earth
Sciences, v. 31, p. 698-708.
Hasterok, D., Gard, M., and Webb, J., 2018, On the radiogenic heat production of metamorphic, igneous, and
sedimentary rocks: Geoscience Frontiers, v. 9, p. 1777-1794.
Hutchinson, D.R., White, R.S., Cannon, W.R., and Schulz, K.J., 1990, Keweenaw hot spot: Geophysical evidence
for a 1.1 Ga mantle plume beneath the Midcontinent Rift system: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 95, no.
B7, p. 10,869-10,884.
Keary, P., and Thomas, M.D., 1979, Interpretation of the gravity field of the Lac Fournier and Romaine River
anorthosite massifs, eastern Grenville Province: Significance to the origin of anorthosite: Journal of the
Geological Society of London, v. 136, p. 725-736.
Luetgert, J. H., and Meyer, R. P., 1982, Structure of the western basin of Lake Superior from cross structure refraction
profiles, in Wold, R. J., and Hinze, W. J., eds., Geology and Tectonics of the Lake Superior Basin, Geological
Society of America Memoir 156, p. 245-255.
Roy, D.J., Merriman, J.D., Whittington, A.G., Hofmeister, A.M., 2021, Thermal properties of carbonatite and
anorthosite from the Superior Province, Ontario, and implications for non-magmatic local thermal effects of these
intrusions: International Journal of Earth Sciences, published online 29 March 2021, doi: 10.1007/s00531-02102032-w.
Smithson, S.B. and Ramberg, I.B., 1979, Gravity interpretation of the Egersund anorthosite complex, Norway: Its
petrological and geothermal significance: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 90, p. 199-204.

30

�Final inversion of the Midcontinent Rift during the Rigolet Phase of the Grenvillian orogeny
HODGIN, Eben B., SWANSON-HYSELL, Nicholas L., STOLPER, Daniel A., TURNER,
Andrew C.
Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
DeGRAFF, James M.,
Department of Geological and Mining Engineering and Sciences, Michigan Technical University,
Houghton, MI, USA
KYLANDER-CLARK, Andrew
Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
SCHMITZ, Mark D.
Department of Geosciences, Boise State University, Boise, ID, USA
The Keweenaw Fault is a major structure associated with inversion of the Midcontinent Rift; it
thrusts ca. 1093 to &lt;1086 Ma rift volcanic and sedimentary rocks atop the post-rift Jacobsville
Sandstone in northern Michigan. Given the position of folded Jacobsville Sandstone in the footwall
of the fault, its depositional age provides a maximum age constraint on faulting. Previous detrital
zircon U-Pb geochronology used laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry
(LA-ICPMS) that led to an interpretation of a ~950 Ma maximum depositional age for the
Jacobsville Sandstone and to argue that motion on the Keweenaw Fault must postdate the ca. 1080
to 980 Grenvillian orogeny (Craddock et al., 2013; Malone et al., 2016). In this study, we
reproduced similar low-precision maximum age constraints on detrital zircons using LA-ICPMS,
then we dated the youngest detrital grains at high-precision by chemical abrasion-isotope dilutionthermal ionization mass spectrometry (CA-ID-TIMS). Our revised maximum depositional age is
based on the youngest detrital zircon dated by CA-ID-TIMS and contemporaneous with the 1000–
980 Ma Rigolet Phase of the Grenvillian orogeny. This revised maximum age constraint overlaps
with U-Pb LA-ICPMS dates on syn- to post-kinematic calcite veins within the brecciated fault
zone of the Keweenaw Fault that yield lower intercept dates that are also contemporaneous with
the Rigolet Phase of the Grenvillian orogeny. From these age constraints, we infer that the
Jacobsville Sandstone was deposited during the final inversion of the Midcontinent Rift during the
Rigolet Phase of the Grenvillian orogeny, just before reverse motion on the Keweenaw Fault. This
deposition and subsequent reverse faulting is contemporaneous with development of the Grenville
Front during the Rigolet phase of the Grenvillian orogeny. These data demonstrate the propagation
of Rigolet-aged orogenesis into the continental interior ca. 580 km from the Grenville Front.
Craddock, J.P., Konstantinou, A., Vervoort, J.D., Wirth, K.R., Davidson, C., Finley-Blasi, L.,
Juda, N.A., &amp; Walker, E. (2013). Detrital zircon provenance of the Mesoproterozoic
Midcontinent Rift, Lake Superior region, USA. The Journal of Geology, 121(1), 57–73.
doi:10.1086/668635
Malone, D.H., Stein, C.A., Craddock, J.P., Kley, J., Stein, S., &amp; Malone, J.E. (2016). Maximum
depositional age of the Neoproterozoic Jacobsville Sandstone, Michigan: Implications for
the evolution of the Midcontinent Rift. Geosphere, 12(4), 1271–1282.

31

�Olivine Geochemistry from Fe-Ti Oxide-Bearing Ultramafic Intrusions in the Duluth
Complex, MN
KATTEMALAVADI, Amartya , KLEINSASSER, Jackie , SIMON, Adam , PETERSON,
Dean , and HUDAK, George
1

2

1
2

1

1

2

Department of Earth &amp; Environmental Sciences, University of Michigan
Natural Resources Research Institute, University of Minnesota–Duluth

The Duluth Complex is a series of mafic intrusions in northeastern Minnesota which
formed 1.1 billion years ago as part of the Midcontinent Rift System. On the southern side of the
Complex, specifically on the western margin, it hosts 14 different ultramafic intrusions which bear
Fe-Ti oxides, known
as oxide bearing
ultramafic
intrusions, or OUIs.
There are currently
three
competing
hypotheses
about
how these OUIs
formed, but none of
them have been
rigorously
tested.
However, there are
many
minerals
present in these
OUIs which can be
used as proxies to
Figure 1: Depth vs Forsterite content in Titac and Longnose. Both
discover more about their the surrounding host troctolites and the OUI rocks themselves were
genesis, such as olivine. analyzed, and results can be seen here.
Since olivine is a solid
solution mineral and is typically one of the first minerals to crystalize from a melt phase, we can
gain a lot of information about the way the magma formed from its composition alone. Two OUIs
in particular, Titac and Longnose, were studied in thin section using a variety of tools, including a
petrographic microscope, a scanning electron microscope (SEM), and an electron probe
microanalyzer (EPMA). The petrographic microscope and SEM showed the different textures in
which olivine formed. In Titac, olivine appears to be tubular in shape and fractured. In Longnose,
olivine appears to form in a ropy shape, and is heavily striated. There is evidence of fracturing, but
not as much as in Titac. In addition, there is evidence of deformation, shown by grain boundary
bulging of Fe-Ti oxides and plagioclase present. In both intrusions, the olivine is heavily
serpentinized. Under the EPMA, compositions of olivine were measured, of olivine in OUIs as
well as olivine in surrounding host rocks (troctolites). The results of this analysis can be seen in
Figure 1. In the OUI rocks, it was found that forsterite content was overall higher than the host
rock in both intrusions (~Fo60 to ~Fo70), with Longnose having a higher content than Titac. It also
appears to be very consistent throughout the drill core for both. In addition, the host rocks have
much lower amounts of forsterite (~Fo60 to ~Fo35), with the Longnose (both OUI rock and host
rock) having a higher forsterite content overall. The higher forsterite content in the OUI rocks can
likely be attributed to the abundance of Fe-Ti oxide minerals, which leach out iron from the area,
leaving the olivine with a higher forsterite content. The higher forsterite content in Longnose
32

�indicates that the magma which formed it is relatively more primitive than the magma which
formed Titac. The forsterite content is consistent with the findings of Miner (1995) in her thesis
about the Longnose body1. We also compare the forsterite content to the content of nickel in the
olivine (trace). We can see that there is overall more nickel in the Longnose OUI, and this is most
likely due to the lower modal abundance of sulfide minerals compared to Titac.
1

Miner, G. C., 1995. Aspects of the Petrogenesis of the Longnose Fe-Ti-Oxide-Rich Ultramafic Body,
Duluth Complex, MN. Washington University Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences.

33

�Textures and geochemistry of ilmenite and titanomagnetite in Fe-Ti oxide-bearing
ultramafic intrusions of the Western Margin of the Duluth Complex, Minnesota
KLEINSASSER, Jackie1, SIMON, Adam1, PETERSON, Dean2, and HUDAK, George2
1

Department of Earth &amp; Environmental Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Natural Resources Research Institute, University of Minnesota–Duluth, Duluth, MN, USA

2

The Duluth Complex hosts numerous undeveloped mineral deposit types, including CuNi, PGE, Mn, Fe-Ti±V, and others. Significant Fe-Ti±V mineralization has remained particularly
unstudied over the past 20 years and represents one of the United States’ most promising domestic
resources of these energy- and infrastructure-critical metals. Fe-Ti±V mineralization is hosted in
~14 Fe-Ti oxide-bearing ultramafic intrusions (known in the literature as OUIs) along the Western
Margin. Although most are broadly similar in mineralogy, three contrasting genetic models have
been proposed to explain the source of Fe and how the deposits formed. Because there exists
incredibly scarce geochemical evidence to
(a)
support or refute any of the three models,
ilm
and the main objective of this project is to
unravel the genesis of Fe-Ti±V oxidebearing ultramafic intrusions.
pln
ilm

Focusing on the Longnose and
Titac (Section 34) OUIs, two well-drilled
intrusions ~40 km apart hosted in the
ttm
Partridge River and Western Margin
intrusions, respectively, we used detailed
optical and microbeam methods to
compare the textures and compositions of
100µm
Fe-Ti oxides (ilmenite, titanomagnetite,
and magnetite) to gain insight into their
(b)
origin and cooling history. Both intrusions
show similar complex textures despite
ttm
differing proportions of ilmenite and
titanomagnetite, with Longnose typically
having higher amounts of ilmenite.
‘dog tooth’
Titanomagnetite
contains
extensive
pln
ilmenite and pleonaste ((Fe,Mg)Al2O4).
ilm
Ilmenite is present as primary grains and as
‘oxy-exsolution’
lamellae
in
titanomagnetite (e.g., Buddington and
Lindsley, 1964) as thin trellis-type
100µm
lamellae, thicker bands of sandwich-type
lamellae, and titanomagnetite-hosted
Figure 1 – BSE images of Fe-Ti oxides from Longnose (a) and
granular exsolutions (Fig. 1). Pleonaste is Titac (b). Multiple types of exsolution and oxy-exsolution are
present in ilmenite at or near the contacts present. Ilmenite – ilm; titanomagnetite – ttm; pleonaste –
between titanomagnetite and ilmenite as pln.
large, granular blebs and as ‘dog tooth’
symplectites that are triangular intergrowths with ilmenite (Fig. 1b). In titanomagnetite, pleonaste
exsolution is present as lamellae and cubic granules and within and around ilmenite sandwich-type
34

�lamellae as both vermicular symplectites (Fig. 2a) and blebs. Hematite lamellae are present in
ilmenite from both OUIs, which indicates the original ilmenite-hematitess decomposed during
cooling below 750–675℃ to form the hematite exsolution rods (Lindsley 1991). These textures
indicate that both magnetite-ulvöspinelss and ilmenite-hematitess were present and that cooling and
oxidation-reduction reactions induced the various exsolution textures observed, starting at &gt;900℃
(Turnock and Eugster 1962).
(a)

(b)

ilm
pln
hem
pln
ttm

ilm

10µ
m

30µ
m

Figure 2 – BSE images of finer exsolution textures from Titac. In (a), ilmenite oxyexsolution bands contain
vermicular pleonaste symplectites while titanomagnetite contains pleonaste exsolution lamellae. In (b),
the presence of hematite lamellae that exsolved during cooling through decomposition of an original
ilmenite-hematitess below 750–675℃. Ilmenite – ilm; titanomagnetite – ttm; pleonaste – pln, hematite
– hem.

Major and minor element compositions of titanomagnetite and ilmenite are broadly similar
between Longnose and Titac, with the possibility of remobilization and distribution of V and Co
during alteration in Titac. The initial results of this study point towards a similar complex cooling
history for Fe-Ti oxide liquids in both the Longnose and Titac OUIs, despite being emplaced in
different rock types and hosted in different intrusions. Future work will involve measuring stable
Fe and Ti isotopes of the ilmenite and titanomagnetite to fingerprint the metal sources and directly
assess whether assimilation of the Biwabik Iron Formation is necessary to form the OUIs. Another
avenue for future work involves using stable O isotopes to test whether volatiles released during
the assimilation of Virginia Formation footwall were responsible for transporting metals and the
serpentinization of olivine.
Buddington, A., and Lindsley, D., 1964. Iron-Titanium oxide minerals and synthetic equivalents. Journal
of Petrology, 5: 698–719.
Lindsley, D., 1963. Equilibrium relations of coexisting pairs of Fe-Ti oxides. Carnegie Institution of
Washington Year Book, 62: 60–66.
Turnock, A. and Eugster, H., 1962. Fe-Al oxides: Phase relationships below 1000. Journal of Petrology, 3:
533–565.

35

�Identifying the genesis of Fe-Ti oxide- and sulfide-bearing ultramafic intrusions in the
Duluth Complex through sulfide geochemical analysis
LACHANCE, Kyle1, KLEINSASSER, Jackie1, SIMON, Adam1, PETERSON, Dean2, and
HUDAK, George2
1

Department of Earth &amp; Environmental Sciences, University of Michigan
Natural Resources Research Institute, University of Minnesota–Duluth

2

During the formation of the 1.1 Ga Midcontinent
Rift System, a series of massive mafic intrusions
were emplaced in northeast Minnesota and are
referred to as the Duluth Complex. Rock types
include a series of gabbroic, troctolitic and
anorthositic intrusions that protruded into the
Archean and Paleoproterozoic footwall, which
comprises banded iron formation and other
metasedimentary rocks. The western margin of
the complex is home to 14 different Fe-Ti oxidebearing bodies containing ilmenite, magnetite
and titanomagnetite. While these oxide-bearing
ultramafic intrusions (OUIs) have been identified Figure 1: (Femol+ Nimol)/Smol vs. Smol ratio plot
demonstrating the distribution of electron probe
in field studies, their exact genesis is unknown. microanalysis data for both deposits
Three hypotheses have emerged that attempt to
explain the origin of the OUIs, none of which has
been rigorously tested. To investigate the origin of the OUIs, we studied the sulfide geochemistry
of two spatially distant OUIs: Longnose, which is located in the Partridge River Intrusion, and
Titac (sec. 34), which is located in the Western Margin Intrusion. Published compositional data
for sulfides from these OUIs is sparse, with most studies reporting a very brief overview of the
sulfide abundances, mineralogies and stable sulfur isotopes. One study, for instance, reports modal
abundances of sulfides within Longnose ranging from 0.2-5%, 99% of which being chalcopyrite
(Linscheid 1991). Our petrographic study of samples from Titac and Longnose revealed a greater
abundance and variety of sulfides in samples from both deposits. As the first systematic
geochemical comparison of sulfides between OUIs, our research began with scanning electron
microscopy (SEM) to image the sulfide grains, followed by energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS)
to identify a range of different sulfides present within the OUI, and finally electron probe
microanalysis (EPMA) to quantitatively determine the elemental makeup of the sulfides.
Initial analysis of these data demonstrates that chalcopyrite is the modally dominant sulfide in
both Titac and Longnose, with trace bornite, sphalerite and millerite found in both deposits as well.
Pyrite was found only in the Titac samples, whereas chalcocite was found only at Longnose. Using
the electron probe data, metal/sulfur ratio plots can be produced, such as in figure 1, to visualize
the full spectrum of data including non-stoichiometric points that do not distribute into the
expected mineral phases. As seen in this figure, which takes the ratio of moles of Fe and Ni to
moles of S, the data indicates areas of points consistent with the Fe+Ni values for sulfides of
interest, such as chalcopyrite around the value of 0.5 and bornite around 0.25. Many points were
present that did not match any known mineral elemental compositions, suggesting points of
exsolution, mixing or inclusions. Some Co-rich data points were also present that we were unable
to characterize, so further analysis will be required to identify, if any, Co-sulfides within the
deposits.
36

�With similar bulk sulfide content across the two deposits, these initial results suggest a
consequently similar genesis across both of the OUIs. Future work regarding the stable sulfur
isotopes will be necessary to identify the origin of the sulfur content to determine whether it is
magmatic or through assimilation from the nearby Virginia Formation. Due to the heavier footprint
of the Virginia Formation sulfur, an increase in the sulfur isotope ratio in the deposits would
indicate some form of assimilation rather than solely a magmatic origin. Furthermore, a complete
study on trace elements, such as the Pt group elements, will be necessary to further this project.
Reference
Linscheid, E., 1991. The Petrography of the Longnose Peridotite and Its Relationship to the Duluth
Complex: MSc thesis, University of Minnesota Duluth, 121p.

37

�Archean Orogenesis to Proterozoic Rifting: A structural history of Pass Lake, Thunder
Bay, Ontario
LANDMAN, Megan and HILL, Mary Louise
Department of Geology, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Road, Thunder Bay, ON, P7B 5E1 Canada

New roadside outcrops along the Trans-Canada Highway 11/17 near Pass Lake, ON,
expose the basal unconformity between Archean basement rock and the Proterozoic Gunflint
Formation. Shear fractures, joints, and the Blende Lake Fault damage zone seen in these two
outcrops record the brittle deformation history of the area before and after the Gunflint Formation
was deposited. The unconformity represents a temporal gap in the stratigraphic sequence of at least
800 million years. The Archean rock belongs to the Wawa subprovince of the Superior province,
in close proximity to the Wawa-Quetico subprovince boundary. Structural measurements,
stereographic projections, and qualitative observations have allowed deeper insight and analysis
of how structural controls have changed over an approximately 2.7 billion year-old geological
history. The Archean basement unit underneath the unconformity is a coarse-grained amphibolite
that contains accessory epidote and biotite, and is homogeneous throughout the length of both
high-standing outcrops. This is interpreted to be a mafic pluton that has undergone amphibolitefacies metamorphism. The amphibolite records a scatter in orientation of joints and shear fractures,
but some trends align well with data from Mackenzie River granite plutons, including an overall
east-northeast and west-southwest strike. Later post-Proterozoic features, including the Blende
Lake fault, have a common strike of east-northeast, which closely align with the orientation of the
1.1 Ga Mid-Continent Rift in Thunder Bay. This similarity is further reflected by the Blende Lake
fault being oriented subparallel to the Mid-Continent Rift related silver veins. Similarities between
trends in the amphibolite and Gunflint Formation suggest that the Mid-Continent Rift in Thunder
Bay may have reactivated some Archean-aged orogenic-related faults and shear fractures. Minor
folding in the Gunflint Formation directly adjacent to the Blende Lake Fault may be evidence of
compression during the later stage of the Mid-Continent Rift.

38

�Characterization of Hydrothermal Alteration and Sulfide Ores at the Lynne Zn-Cu-Pb
Deposit, Oneida Co. WI.
LEMKE, Tara C., WEBER, Evan M., and LODGE, Robert W.D.
Department of Geology, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, Eau Claire, WI

The volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS) Lynne Zn-Cu-Pb deposit was discovered by Noranda
Exploration in 1990 within Oneida County, WI (Dematties, 1994; Adams, 1996). The Lynne
deposit is one of many of VMS deposits across northern Wisconsin found in the Pembine-Wausau
terrane. The Pembine-Wausau terrane is an accreted volcanic arc that formed during the
Paleoproterozoic Penokean Orogeny. VMS deposits form from metallic-rich fluid exhaling on or
near the ocean floor during extensional submarine volcanism (Galley et al., 2007). Interestingly,
the hydrothermal alteration at the Lynne deposit contains talc-carbonate and calc-silicate mineral
assemblages (Adams, 1996) and is unique compared to other deposits in Wisconsin (DeMatties,
1994). In addition, the sulfide ores contain more Pb than other deposits (DeMatties, 1994). The
purpose of this study is to better characterize these unique hydrothermal rocks to improve our
knowledge of the ore-forming environment at the Lynne deposit.
The drill core from the Lynne deposit was obtained from the Natural Resources Research
Institute in Duluth, Minnesota, and brought to Eau Claire where it was re-logged and sampled.
Samples taken from the hydrothermal alteration and mineralized zones were cut into thin sections
for petrographic analyses using transmitted- and reflected-light microscopes and scanning electron
microscope (SEM) to determine the paragenetic sequence of ore minerals. Major and trace element
geochemistry of altered rocks were determined using X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) at UW-Eau
Claire to characterize the element mobility during alteration and to determine the nature of the
protoliths.
The main sulfide mineralization within the Lynne deposit with abundance in decreasing
order includes sphalerite, pyrrhotite, pyrite, galena, and chalcopyrite. Gold, silver, and copper are
also found but in more localized sections within the Lynne deposit (Adams, 1996). The
mineralization can be further divided into units A, B, and C, based on their stratigraphic position
and compositional differences (Adams, 1996). Sphalerite is formed early on and is replaced by
other minerals over time. In the deeper ore zones, pyrite tends to form relatively early and is
replaced over time but in the ore zones closer to the surface, pyrite forms later. Chalcopyrite forms
later in the ore zones replacing other minerals as it grows. Galena, pyrrhotite, and magnetite form
in the middle replacing some minerals such as sphalerite and getting replaced by others such as
pyrrhotite over time.
The main alteration types found within the Lynne contain are carbonate and talc alteration.
The unusually high amounts of carbonate material - unique to VMS deposits - found within the
alteration zones are credited to CO2-rich hydrothermal vent fluid (Adams, 1996). The talc
alteration is highly variable throughout the deposit but is largely found within two major zones.
There is also unique skarn-type alteration is noted by chloritized diopside and garnet. A brecciated
alteration texture is also notable as it shows progressive replacement of volcanic rocks with
alteration minerals. Major chemistry indicates Mg-metasomatism with MgO values up to 30 wt%
and five times that of the hosting volcanic rocks. Trace element chemistry reveals that these unique
alteration assemblages had felsic protoliths with similar trace element abundances as the host
rhyolites.
39

�Figure 1: A cross section of the Lynne deposit shows the distinct sulfide units. A) massive sphalerite and pyrite, B)
disseminated sphalerite in carbonate host rock, C) massive sphalerite with semi-massive pyrite and disseminated
galena, D) talc alteration, E) carbonate alteration, and F) skarn alteration (Adams, 1996).

References:
Adams, G.W., 1996, Geology of the Lynne base-metal deposit, north-central Wisconsin, U.S.A., in
LaBerge, G.L., ed., Volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits of northern Wisconsin: A
commemorative volume: Institute on Lake Superior Geology Proceedings, 42nd Annual Meeting,
Cable, WI, v. 42, part 2, p. 161-179.
DeMatties, T.A., 1994, Early Proterozoic volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits in Wisconsin: An
overview. Economic Geology, 89: 1122-1151.
Galley, A., et al., 2007, Volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits in Goodfellow W.D., ed., Mineral
Deposits of Canada, Special Publication 5, p. 141-161.

40

�Island of Hawaii Field Trip, February 11-21, 2020
MACTAVISH(1), Allan, HINZ(2), Peter, ARTHUR(3), Mary Kay, CHATAWAY(4), Robert,
EDBERG(3), Jim, ERICKSON(3), Tom, FOX(3), Steve, FURLONG(3), Joan, GERLICH(3),
Jim, SMITH(5), Lindsay, WILHELM(3), David
1

Clean Air Metals Inc., Thunder Bay, ON; 2Ontario Ministry of Energy, Northern Development and Mines,
Thunder Bay, ON; 3Minnesota Geological Society, Minneapolis, MN; 4Consulting Geologist, Thunder Bay,
ON; 5Big Rock Exploration, Vancouver, BC

Between February 11 and 21, 2020 the Institute on Lake Superior Geology facilitated a field trip
to the Island of Hawaiʻi. This 10-day trip was led by Allan MacTavish and Peter Hinz, and
consisted of 11 participants that included 4 professional geologists and 7 members of the
Minnesota Geological Society. The trip circumnavigated the entirety of the Big Island of Hawaiʻi
(Figures 1 and 2) and visited all 5 exposed volcanoes on the island. The aims of the field trip were
to observe the characteristics of modern volcanoes in an intra-plate, non-rift environment (see) and
to provide contrast and comparison to modern and ancient rift environments (i.e. the MCR and
Iceland; Figure 3). The Big Island is made up of five distinct volcanoes: Kohala, Hualālai, Mauna
Kea, Mauna Loa and Kīlauea. A sixth volcano associated with the Big Island, Loʻihi, is an active
undersea volcano located approximately 20 km (12mi) south of Kīlauea. Stops were made at all
five (5) extinct, dormant, or active volcanoes with the intent to focus on volcanology, igneous
petrology, and geomorphology as well as a few stops at Hawaiʻian cultural and historical locations
The 9 main islands comprising the Hawaiʻian islands are part of a chain of over 100
individual volcanoes in various states or formation and erosion (Lockwood and Hazlett, 2010).
The Hawaiʻian-Emperor Chain is composed of eighteen islands, atolls, and seamounts stretching
for greater than 6000km from the Island of Hawaiʻi and Loihi Seamount, in the east,
northwestward and then north-northwestward across the Pacific Ocean to the Aleutian Trench
(Lockwood and Hazlett, 2010; Best, 2003). It is postulated that this chain of islands was formed
over a greater than 65 million year period as the Pacific Ocean plate migrated over a mantle
“hotspot” initially in a north-northwest direction (Emperor Chain) and later in a northwesterly
direction (Hawaiʻian Chain) (Barker, 1983). The volcanism creating the islands was, and is,
primarily basaltic in chemistry with the occurrence of both effusive (dominant) and explosive
eruptions (Lockwood and Hazlett, 2010). Explosive activity is primarily due to the interaction
between basaltic magma and ground or sea water.
This presentation will summarize the highlights of our trip and provide comparisons of
Hawaiʻian geology, the Midcontinent rift, and Iceland (?). Featured highlights will include
historical eruptive features from the eruptions of Kohala (100,000BP). Hualālai (1801 To 1802),
Mauna Kea, and the 2018 Kīlauea Lower East Rift Zone eruption (Fissures 8 and 9). The
presentation will also display local features such as the Koaʻe fault zone, Hōlei Pali (cliff), Mauna
Ulu, the Pu‘u ‘Ō‘ō eruption lava field, Kīlauea Iki, fossil footprints in 18th century Kīlauea ash,
the 2018 Kīlauea caldera collapse (Halemaʻumaʻu), and the Papakōlea Green Sand Beach.

41

�Kaua‘i
Ni‘ihau
Oahu
Ka‘ula

Molokaʻ
i
Maui
Lanaʻi
Kahoʻolaw
e

Hawai‘i

Figure 1: Topographic relief and bathymetric map of the nine Hawai‘ian Islands. Modified from Eakins et al.,
2003.

Figure 2: Daily ILSG 2020 Field Trip routes, Island of Hawai‘i. Modified from Hazlett and Hyndman, 1996.

42

�Iceland

MCR

Figure 3: Location of the Hawai‘ian Islands with respect to world tectonic plates, the MCR, and Iceland. Modified
after Tilling et al., 2010.

REFERENCES
Barker, D.S. 1983. Igneous Rocks; Prentis-Hall Inc., 417p.
Best, Myron, G. 2003. Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology; Blackwell Science Ltd., 729p.
Eakins, Barry W.; Robinson, Joel E.; Kanamatsu, Toshiya; Naka, Jiro; Smith, John R.; Takahashi, Eiichi;
Clague, David A. 2003. Hawaii's volcanoes revealed: U.S. Geological Survey Geologic Investigations
Series Map I-2809, 1 plate, https://pubs.usgs.gov/imap/2809/.
Hazlett, R.W. and Hyndman, D.W. 1996. Roadside Geology of Hawaiʻi; Mountain Press Publishing
Company, MT, 308p.
Lockwood, Jock P. and Hazlett, Richard W. 2010. Volcanoes: Global Perspectives; Wiley-Blackwell,
536p.
Tilling, R.I., Heliker, C., and Swanson, D.A. 2010. Eruptions of Hawaiian Volcanoes – Past, Present, and
Future: U.SW. Geological Survey General Information Product 117, 63p.

43

�Chemostratigraphy of the western Schreiber-Hemlo Greenstone Belt, Results and Regional
Implications
MAGNUS, Seamus
Ontario Geological Survey, Ministry of Energy, Northern Development and Mines, 933 Ramsey Lake Road,
Sudbury, ON P3E 6B5 Canada seamus.magnus@ontario.ca

The Neoarchean Schreiber–Hemlo greenstone belt is located within the Wawa–Abitibi
terrane of the Superior Province. The western (Schreiber) and eastern (Hemlo) parts of the belt are
separated by the cross-cutting Mesoproterozoic Coldwell Alkalic Complex. Recent mapping by
the Ontario Geological Survey in the western part of the belt was conducted to produce an updated
genetic model for the western part of the greenstone belt and to better understand its relationship
with the rocks in the Hemlo area and surrounding greenstone belts (Hastie and Magnus, 2021a;
Magnus 2021a, 2019a, 2017). New geochemical and geochronological data (Hastie and Magnus,
2021b; Magnus 2021b, 2019b, 2018) have changed the model presented by the author in a field
trip guide for the 2019 ILSG conference (Magnus, 2019c).
The supracrustal rocks in the western Schreiber–Hemlo greenstone belt are arranged in 4
depositional packages composed of metavolcanic and metasedimentary rocks with distinct
petrographic and geochemical characteristics. Chemical and clastic metasedimentary rocks mark
major disconformities between the depositional packages. For the sake of brevity, the clastic and
chemical metasedimentary rocks of the greenstone belt will not be discussed in this presentation.
The oldest recognized supracrustal rocks are exposed south of the Town of Schreiber, west
of the Terrace Bay Pluton. In this package, predominantly tholeiitic mafic flows are interbedded
with plagioclase porphyritic felsic flows and volcaniclastic breccias, wackes and mudstones. One
mafic flow has major and trace element concentrations that are transitional between tholeiitic and
calc-alkalic mafic volcanic rocks. Felsic volcaniclastic rocks near the top of this package are crosscut by a quartz porphyritic felsic intrusive rock west of Worthington Bay, dated at 2722.6 ±1.1 Ma
by zircon (Kamo, 2019), which constrains this depositional package to &gt;2720 Ma.
Quartz porphyritic felsic volcanic and volcaniclastic rocks with U-Pb zircon ages of circa
2720 Ma occur along the entire length of the greenstone belt and along the shores of Lake Superior
in Tuuri and Walsh townships (Hastie and Magnus, 2021; Magnus, 2021a, 2019a, 2017). These
felsic rocks are closely associated with mafic flows that commonly contain an abundance of both
equant plagioclase phenocrysts and coarse amygdules. These flows contain major and trace
element concentrations that are transitional between tholeiitic and calc-alkalic volcanic rocks.
Unlike the single flow of “transitional” mafic rock in the older package, the transitional mafic
rocks in this package are the overwhelming majority.
No contacts between the &gt;2720 Ma and the circa 2720 Ma depositional packages have been
observed. Both packages are disconformably overlain by an extensive package of tholeiitic mafic
flows with distinct variolitic textures and trace element geochemistry consistent with a back-arcbasin volcanic environment. These rocks are cross-cut by quartz and feldspar porphyritic felsic
dikes dated 2698.1±4.5 Ma (Sutcliffe and Davis, 2019), constraining their deposition to between
circa 2720 Ma and circa 2700 Ma.
The disconformity between the younger tholeiitic rocks and the older transitional mafic rocks
is not easily distinguishable by geophysics or by field observations, especially where the rocks are
deformed. The distribution of geochemical samples in this study area has helped trace this
disconformity and locate cryptic folds along that contact that otherwise would not have been
identified. This geochemical mapping technique may be helpful for delineating the stratigraphy in
the nearby greenstone belts, it could be critical for reconciling the stratigraphy between the east
44

�and west parts of the Schreiber–Hemlo greenstone belt, and it may be applicable to other nearby
greenstone belts in the western Wawa–Abitibi Terrane.
In addition to the major and trace element geochemical analyses, 27 samples of mafic,
intermediate and felsic metavolcanic rocks from the previously described packages and 12 samples
of the varied granitoid plutons that cross-cut and surround the greenstone belt were submitted for
Sm-Nd isotope analysis (Magnus, 2021b). εNd values for all of the volcanic and intrusive rocks
cluster around the value of the depleted mantle at circa 2700 Ma, which supports the model that
the volcanic rocks of the Wawa-Abitibi Terrane were generated in a juvenile arc magmatic system.

Figure 1. Simplified geological map of the western Schreiber–Hemlo greenstone belt, highlighting the
three metavolcanic packages described in this abstract

References
Hastie, E.C.G. and Magnus, S.J. 2021. Ontario Geological Survey, Preliminary Map P.3846, scale
1:20 000.
Hastie, E.C.G. and Magnus, S.J. 2021b. Ontario Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Release—Data 382.
Kamo, S.L. 2019. Internal report for the Ontario Geological Survey; Jack Satterly Geochronology
Laboratory, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, 4p.
Magnus, S.J. 2017. Ontario Geological Survey, Preliminary Map P.3812, scale 1:20 000.
Magnus, S.J. 2018. Ontario Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Release—Data 361.
Magnus, S.J. 2019a. Ontario Geological Survey, Preliminary Map P.3826, scale 1:20 000.
Magnus, S.J. 2019b. Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Report 6357, 41p.
Magnus, S.J. 2019c. Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Report 6357, 41p.
Magnus, S.J. 2021a. Ontario Geological Survey, Preliminary Map P.3845, scale 1:20 000.
Magnus, S.J. 2021b. Ontario Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Release—Data 381.
Sutcliffe, C.N. and Davis, D.W. 2019. Internal report for the Ontario Geological Survey; Jack Satterly
Geochronology Laboratory, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, 146p.

45

�Proterozoic Geology of the Schreiber–Terrace Bay Area
MAGNUS, Seamus
Ontario Geological Survey, Ministry of Energy, Northern Development and Mines, 933 Ramsey Lake Road,
Sudbury, ON P3E 6B5 Canada seamus.magnus@ontario.ca

The Mesoproterozoic Keweenawan Midcontinent Rift event emplaced a multitude of
intrusive and volcanic igneous rocks around present-day Lake Superior. Previous work on these
rocks along the north shore of Lake Superior has mainly focused on the Thunder Bay, Lake
Nipigon and Marathon areas. Recent mapping by the Ontario Geological Survey along the north
shore in the Schreiber–Terrace Bay area was conducted, in part, to bridge this gap (Hastie and
Magnus, 2021a; Magnus, 2017, 2019a, 2021a).
Dikes with orientations and geochemical and geophysical signatures consistent with known
Paleoproterozoic dike swarms, including the Matachewan, Biscotasing and Marathon dike
swarms, have been identified in the Schreiber–Terrace Bay area. Similarly, dikes with other
orientations and geochemical and geophysical signatures, assumed to be Mesoproterozoic and
belong to the Midcontinent Rift event. A total of 156 samples of Mesoproterozoic diabase and
lamprophyre dikes were submitted for whole rock geochemical analysis throughout this project
(Hastie and Magnus, 2021b; Magnus, 2018, 2021b).
The results of mapping and geochemical analysis suggest potential correlation between
several smaller populations of dikes and known Keweenawan units. East-northeast trending dikes
in the study area are parallel to, along strike with (separated by 200 km), and share similar wholerock geochemistry with the Pigeon River dikes of the Thunder Bay area (Cundari et al. 2021).
Dikes of varied orientation share similar whole-rock geochemistry with Osler Group I and Group
II volcanic rocks (Hollings et al., 2007). A newly recognized, circular intrusion north of the town
of Terrace Bay, dated 1107.9±1.4 Ma by baddeleyite (Kamo, 2019), also shares similar
geochemistry with Osler Group II volcanic rocks.
The results of mapping and geochemical analysis have revealed one new and significant
population of diabase dikes. These west-northwest trending dikes with reversely polarized
aeromagnetic signature cross-cut the entire study area. In the east, they were observed crosscutting, and being cross-cut by, syenite at the western edge of the circa 1108 Ma Coldwell Alkalic
Complex, which constrains them to emplacement at around the same time. The dikes consist of an
ophitic to sub-ophitic textured olivine gabbro composed of augite, plagioclase and generally
fayalitic olivine (average composition Fo30, as low as Fo10, up to Fo70), which is an expected
composition of olivine for an alkalic rock. The dikes have alkalic major element concentrations
and enriched, “ocean island basalt”-like trace element concentrations and chondritic to slightly
depleted Sm-Nd and Sr-Rb isotopic values. There are two small subsets of these dikes – one that
is plagioclase megacrystic and is geochemically indistinguishable from the main population; and
one that is heavily depleted in calcium, strontium, barium and phosphorous, consistent with apatite
fractionation, and which displays a “trachytic” texture with abundant plagioclase laths.
South of the town of Schreiber a parallel set of alkalic dikes with normally-polarized
aeromagnetic signature cross-cut the peninsula between the Schreiber Channel and Worthington
Bay. Geophysical data, air photos and previous maps indicate that these dikes continue along strike
westward, cross-cutting the islands in Schreiber Channel and south of Nipigon Bay. A targeted
46

�sampling program in these islands would be helpful to study the extent of these normally-polarized
alkalic dikes.
The petrographic and geochemical characteristics of the alkalic diabase are similar to the
Wolfcamp Lake alkalic basalts that overlie the Coldwell Alkalic Complex (Davis et al., 2017), the
Geordie Lake gabbro, which cross-cuts the complex (Meghji, 2016), and a subset of dikes that
crop out south of the complex in Pukaswka National Park (Cundari et al., 2021). Altogether, the
mafic alkalic magmatism in the northeast part of Lake Superior represents an emergent and
potentially important part of the Keweenawan geological history (Good et al., in review).
References
Cundari, R.M., Puumala, M.A., Smyk, M.C. and Hollings, P. 2021. New and compiled whole-rock
geochemical and isotope data of Midcontinent Rift–related rocks, Thunder Bay area; Ontario
Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Release—Data 308 – Revised.
Davis, S., Hollings, P. and Cundari, R.M. 2017. Geochemistry of the Mesoproterozoic Wolfcamp Lake
basalts, northwestern Ontario; Ontario Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Release—Data 345.
Hastie, E.C.G. and Magnus, S.J. 2021a. Precambrian geology of Strey Township, northwestern Ontario;
Ontario Geological Survey, Preliminary Map P.3846, scale 1:20 000.
Hastie, E.C.G. and Magnus, S.J. 2021b. Geological, geochemical and petrographic data from Strey
Township, western Schreiber–Hemlo greenstone belt, Wawa–Abitibi terrane, Superior Province,
northwestern Ontario; Ontario Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Release—Data 382.
Hollings, P., Fralick, P and Cousens, B. 2007. Early history of the Midcontinent Rift inferred from
geochemistry and sedimentology of the Mesoproterozoic Osler Group, northwestern Ontario;
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v.44, p.389-412.
Good, D., Hollings, P., Dunning, G., Epstein, R., McBride, J., Jedemann, A., Magnus, S., Bohay, T. and
Shore, G. in review. A new model for the Coldwell Complex and associated dykes in the Midcontinent
Rift, Canada; Journal of Petrology, 43p.
Kamo, S.L. 2019. Part A: Report on U-Pb ID-TIMS geochronology for the Ontario Geological Survey:
Bedrock Mapping Projects, Ontario, Year 4: 2018-2019, internal report for the Ontario Geological
Survey, Jack Satterly Geochronology Laboratory, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, 26p.
Magnus, S.J. 2017. Precambrian geology of Tuuri and Walsh townships, northwestern Ontario; Ontario
Geological Survey, Preliminary Map P.3812, scale 1:20 000.
Magnus, S.J. 2018. Geological, geochemical, geophysical and petrographic data from Tuuri and Walsh
townships, Schreiber–Hemlo greenstone belt, Wawa–Abitibi terrane, Superior Province; Ontario
Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Release—Data 361.
Magnus, S.J. 2019a. Precambrian geology, Syine Township; Ontario Geological Survey, Preliminary Map
P.3826, scale 1:20 000.
Magnus, S.J. 2019b. Geological, geochemical and petrographic data from Syine township, Western
Schreiber–Hemlo greenstone belt, Wawa–Abitibi terrane, Superior Province, Northwestern Ontario;
Ontario Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Release—Data 375.
Magnus, S.J. 2021a. Precambrian geology of Priske township; Ontario Geological Survey, Preliminary Map
P.3845, scale 1:20 000.
Magnus, S.J. 2021b. Geological, geochemical and petrographic data from Priske Township and Nd, Sm
and Sr isotopic data from Priske, Strey, Syine, Tuuri and Walsh townships, Western Schreiber–Hemlo
Greenstone Belt, Wawa–Abitibi Terrane, Superior Province, Northwestern Ontario; Ontario
Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Release—Data 381.
Meghji, I. 2016. The character and distribution of Cu-PGE mineralization at the Geordie Lake Deposit
within the Coldwell Complex, Ontario. Unpublished M.Sc. thesis, University of Western, Ontario,
London, Canada, 336 p.

47

�Structural Analysis and Interpretation of Deformation along the Keweenaw Fault System
West of Lake Gratiot, Keweenaw County, Michigan
MUELLER, S.A., DEGRAFF, J.M., and LIZZADRO-MCPHERSON D.J.
Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931
The Keweenaw fault extends along the southern margin of the Midcontinent Rift System from northwest
Wisconsin to near Keweenaw Point in Michigan, making it longest known fault associated with the rift.
Reverse movement on the NW-dipping fault has thrust Portage Lake Volcanics (PLV, 1.1 Ga) over
younger, mostly flat-lying Jacobsville Sandstone (JS) (Fig. 1), regionally tilting PLV strata northwestward
on the southeast limb of the Lake Superior syncline (1). Published geologic maps from the 1950s (2-4)
depict the fault as a single sinuous trace parallel to strike of hanging-wall PLV strata that are juxtaposed
against JS nearly everywhere. Published cross-sections generally show hanging-wall strata facing northwest
with a simple listric geometry and footwall strata tilted steeply southeast near the fault. The maps and crosssections show a few complications along the fault trace (anomalous sinuosity) and in its hanging-wall
(lesser faults, folds), hints of deformation complexity that may reveal the nature and cause of faulting.
Midway along the Keweenaw Peninsula, published maps show a prominent reentrant of JS into PLV along
the fault and hint at a major splay in the Keweenaw fault’s hanging wall (3-4).
New mapping near Lake Gratiot and Lac La Belle, combined with drill core logs, suggests that the
postulated splay in the Keweenaw fault’s hanging wall is instead the main fault of an orderly fault system
(Fig. 2). The Keweenaw fault system here consists of: 1) segments striking east-northeast with steep
northerly dip (main trend), 2) segments striking east-southeast also dipping steeply north, and 3) segments
striking north-northeast with moderate-to-shallow westerly dip. Members of these fault sets define a
multistranded fault system and several, large, PLV blocks southeast of the main fault. Set 2 faults have a
left-stepping arrangement similar to analogous faults mapped in a previous project to the east along Bête
Grise Bay (5). Mapping also has revealed folding in hanging-wall Portage Lake Volcanics and has resolved
fold geometry in footwall Jacobsville Sandstone. Fold axes are generally subparallel to adjacent faults and
therefore are probably related to fault movement. A Set 3 fault crossing Bruneau Creek is associated with
a faulted anticline in hanging-wall PLV and multiple anticlines and synclines in the footwall JS, indicating
significant shortening across a west-dipping thrust fault. A Set 2 fault crossing a Snake Creek tributary has
an anticline-syncline pair in hanging-wall PLV and a single asymmetric syncline in footwall JS, resulting
from mostly right-lateral strike slip and lesser north-side-up reverse slip on a steeply dipping fault.
Shortening across this ESE-trending fault is relatively minor because of its inferred steep dip and dominant
strike slip motion.
The pattern and relationships of faults and folds suggest a fault system dominated by dextral shear
rather than by reverse movement as in the conventional model. Indicators of slip direction and sense
measured on 55 small faults demonstrate that the fault system here is in fact dominated by strike slip, with
a 2.5:1 ratio of strike-to-dip slip. Inversion of fault-slip data yields a maximum shortening direction of 285°105° during faulting, which implies overall dextral shear on the fault system and differences in slip
kinematics between fault sets. Set 1 faults defining the overall trend of the Keweenaw fault system in this
area have strike slip &gt; dip slip; Set 2 faults with ESE-trend have strike slip &gt;&gt; dip slip; Set 3 faults with N
to NE trends have dip slip &gt;&gt; strike slip.
New mapping and structural analyses in this area have revealed a multistranded Keweenaw fault system
that is transpressional in nature, dominated by dextral strike slip, and has lesser reverse slip with north side
up. Fault-bounded blocks with ENE-oriented long dimensions generally moved eastward along set 1 and 2
faults, as thrusting of Portage Lake Volcanics over Jacobsville Sandstone occurred on set 3 faults. The
estimated WNW-ESE maximum shortening direction associated with fault movement strongly suggests
that the Grenville Orogeny was primarily responsible for movement of the Keweenaw fault system, with
possible reactivation occurring during the Appalachian Orogeny.

48

�Acknowledgements: We appreciate primary funding by the USGS EDMAP program, sponsorship by the
Michigan Geological Survey, a Michigan Space Grant Consortium award to the lead author, and a generous
donation by the Keweenaw Community Forest Company.

Figure 1 (left): Keweenaw Peninsula where Portage Lake
Volcanics are thrust over Jacobsville Sandstone. Green
rectangle near middle of peninsula marks area of Figure 2.
(adapted from 1).

Figure 2 (below): Study area along Keweenaw fault between Mohawk and Bête Grise Bay. Main units:
PLV mafic = greens; PLV felsic = reds; JS = yellow. Red line marks newly interpreted main trace of the
Keweenaw fault system. Other major faults as black solid and dashed lines.

References
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

Cannon, W.F. and Nicholson, S.W., 2001, Geologic Map of the Keweenaw Peninsula and Adjacent Area,
Michigan: United States Geological Survey, Map I-2696, Scale = 1:100,000.
Cornwall, H.R., 1954, Bedrock Geology of the Delaware Quadrangle, Michigan: U.S. Geological Survey,
Washington, D.C., Geologic Quadrangle Map GQ-51, scale 1:24,000.
Davidson, E.S., Espenshade, G.H., White, W.S. and Wright, J.C., 1955, Bedrock Geology of the Mohawk
Quadrangle, Michigan: U.S. Geol. Survey, Washington, D.C., Geologic Quadrangle Map GQ-54, scale 1:24,000.
Wright, J.C. and Cornwall, H.R., 1954, Bedrock Geology of the Bruneau Creek Quadrangle, Michigan: U.S.
Geological Survey, Washington, D.C., Geologic Quadrangle Map GQ-35, scale 1:24,000.
DeGraff, J.M., Tyrrell, C.W., and Hubbell, G.E., 2018, Keweenaw Fault Geometry, Secondary Structures, and
Slip Kinematics along the Bête Grise Bay Shoreline: U.S. Geological Survey, Final Technical Report, 21 p.

49

�U-Pb geochronology and zircon trace-element geochemistry from granitoid plutons in the
Neoarchean Sturgeon Lake greenstone belt, Ontario, Canada
NELSON, Trevor J.1, JOHNSON, Rory M.1, LODGE, Robert W.D.1, MA, Chong2, MARSH,
Jeffery H.2
1

Department of Geology, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, Eau Claire, WI 54701 USA
Metal Earth, Mineral Exploration Research Centre, Harquail School of Earth Sciences, Laurentian
University, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada P3E 2C6
2

The Sturgeon Lake granite-greenstone belt is in the eastern portion of the Western
Wabigoon subprovince of the Superior province and is bordered to the north, east, and south by
the Winnipeg River terrane. The belt is comprised of felsic to mafic volcanic successions, synorogenic sedimentary assemblages, and calc-alkaline to alkalic plutons (Sanborn-Barrie and
Skulski, 2005; Lodge et al., 2019). The emplacement of granitoid plutons in the Sturgeon
greenstone belt can provide a more complete magmatic and deformational history than volcanic
assemblages and sedimentary rocks. The origin and timing of their melts, mantle-crust interaction,
and subsequent magmatic-hydrothermal activity record important tectonic events throughout the
petrogenetic history of Sturgeon Lake greenstone belt and the western Superior Province. The
primary objective of this project is to better constrain the magmatic and tectonic history of the
Sturgeon Lake greenstone belt through U-Pb geochronology and trace element geochemistry of
zircons from the granitoid plutons.
Previous mapping in the Sturgeon Lake greenstone belt (Sanborn-Barrie and Skulski,
2005) constrained spatial and temporal relationships between plutonic rock and supracrustal
assemblages largely by describing the geometry of plutons through aeromagnetic surveys and their
relationship with regional foliations in the surrounding rocks. However, geochronologic data was
largely constrained to the volcanic and sedimentary assemblages and the timing of plutonic events
were mostly estimated. Plutons were broadly characterized into three categories based on these
relationships: synvolcanic, early- to syntectonic, and late- to post-tectonic (Sanborn-Barrie and
Skulski, 2005).
This study obtained representative samples from the different plutons along the Metal Earth
Sturgeon transect. After petrographic and whole-rock geochemical characterization (Nelson et al.,
2020), zircons were separated for further analyses. Zircon grains were analyzed using Laser
Ablation Split Stream Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (LASS-ICP-MS) at
Laurentian University for simultaneous collection of U-Pb isotopic abundances and trace-element
geochemistry.
The interpreted U-Pb ages of the sampled plutons allowed for refinement of the prior
tectonic classifications. Some plutons were re-assigned to refined classifications based on the
interpreted age: those that formed at the same time as the greenstone belt volcanic assemblages
(syn-volcanic), those that formed during major deformation events (syn-tectonic), and those that
post-date most deformation events (post-tectonic) (Figure 1). Trace-element geochemistry of the
zircons not only supports the updated plutonic classifications, but also reveals a temporal evolution
in the petrogenesis of granitoid plutons from anhydrous melting of mantle-derived sources to
hydrous, oxidized melts that have significant interaction with the evolved crust. (Figure 1, inset).

50

�Figure 1: Regional geology of Sturgeon Lake granite-greenstone belt modified from Sanborn-Barrie and
Skulski (2005) with new U-Pb ages of granitoid plutons and their timing relative to major tectonic events.
Inset diagram displays U/Yb versus 207Pb/206Pb age displaying increasing role of evolved crust in the genesis
of felsic melts over time.
REFERENCES
Lodge, RWD., Ma, C, Etienne, M, Nelson, TJ, Chandler, MD, Brock, NM (2019). Geologic Overview and
petrogenetic history of the Sturgeon Lake Transect, Western Wabigoon. Summary of Field Work
and Other Activities, Ontario Geological Survey Open File Report 6260.
Nelson, TJ, Lodge, RWD, Ma, C (2020). Geologic overview of Sturgeon Lake greenstone belt granitoid
plutons, Western Wabigoon Subprovince. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs,
52(6), paper 97-7.
Sanborn-Barrie, M, and Skulski, T (2005) Geology, Sturgeon Lake greenstone belt, western Superior
Province, Ontario; Geological Survey of Canada, Open File 1763, scale 1:100 000.

51

�3-D Modeling of the Duluth Complex from geophysical data
PETERSON, D.E., BEDROSIAN, P.A. and FINN, C.A.
U.S. Geological Survey, MS 973, Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225

The Mesoproterozoic Duluth Complex in northeastern Minnesota is one of the major
plutonic components of the Midcontinent Rift System and hosts a variety of copper-nickel sulfide
and platinum-group element deposits. The Duluth Complex is composed of a series of individual
mafic and felsic intrusions emplaced 1110-1098 Ma within Paleoproterozoic sedimentary rocks of
the Animikie basin and volcanic flows of the Midcontinent Rift. Prior work has included 2-D
modeling and qualitative geologic interpretations of gravity and magnetic data (e.g., Chandler,
1990; Chandler and Ferderer, 1989), much of which is still preliminary (V. Chandler, written
commun., 2020). Three-dimensional modeling has been limited, with only one 3-D model created
using Bouguer gravity data constrained by seismic-reflection interpretations as part of a PhD thesis
(Allen, 1994). Given the complex geology of the area, 3-D modeling is useful for providing a
complete picture of the variable densities, susceptibilities, and electrical resistivities throughout
the Duluth Complex and associated volcanic rocks as well as their depth extent beneath
sedimentary cover. Models of these geophysical properties at depth enable more accurate geologic
mapping in the subsurface which can lead to an improved understanding of the formation history
of the Duluth Complex.
In this study, we use aeromagnetic data acquired between 1979-1991 (Chandler, 2007),
Bouguer gravity data collected since 1950 (Chandler and Lively, 2019), and magnetotelluric data
collected in 2019 to create new 2-D and 3-D geophysical models of the Duluth Complex
constrained by seismic reflection, geologic, and rock property data. An inversion of the Bouguer
gravity data for thickness of the Duluth Complex using constant densities of 3110 kg/m3 and 2670
kg/m3 for the Duluth Complex and surrounding crustal rocks, respectively, results in thicknesses
ranging from ~3-28 km for the Duluth Complex and related intrusions and volcanic rocks (Figure
1A). A 3-D model of the magnetotelluric data reveals low resistivity anomalies at ~5-10 km depth
below the northern margin of the Duluth Complex and below the Greenwood Lake intrusion
(Figure 1B). We expect to encounter low resistivities at depth associated with the Paleoproterozoic
Animikie basin, which makes up the floor of the Duluth Complex, and therefore interpret these
anomalies as either the base of the complex or as fragments of Animikie sediments interfingered
with igneous intrusive rocks. Finally, 3-D voxel models of density and susceptibility illuminate
the subsurface distribution of rock properties below the Duluth Complex which, in combination
with resistivity and thickness models, can be used to create a 3-D geologic map of this area.

52

�Figure 1. Geophysical models of the Duluth Complex. A) Modeled thickness of the Duluth Complex and
associated igneous rocks (dashed black outline in A and B) resulting from constant density inversion of
Bouguer gravity data. B) Depth slice through 3-D resistivity model at 5 km below the surface.
GL=Greenwood Lake intrusion.
References
Allen, D. J., 1994, An integrated geophysical investigation of the midcontinent rift system: Western Lake
Superior, Minnesota, and Wisconsin, [PhD thesis]: Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, 267
pp.
Chandler, V. W., 1990, Geologic interpretation of gravity and magnetic data over the central part of the
Duluth Complex, northeastern Minnesota: Economic Geology, v. 85, p. 816-829.
Chandler, V. W., 2007, Upgrade of aeromagnetic databases and processing: Minnesota Geological Survey
Open File Report OFR07_06.
Chandler, V. W., and Ferderer, R. J., 1989, Copper-nickel mineralization of the Duluth Complex,
Minnesota; a gravity and magnetic perspective: Economic Geology, v. 84, p. 1690-1696.
Chandler, V. W., and Lively, R. S., 2019, Upgrade of the gravity database at the Minnesota Geological
Survey: Retrieved from the University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy, 28 August 2020.

53

�Negative Carbon Dioxide Emissions through Enhanced Silicate Weathering and the Lake
Superior Region
PLANAVSKY, Noah Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Yale University, 210 Whitney
Avenue, New Haven, CT, USA

Carbon capture is now widely recognized as necessary to stabilize atmospheric carbon dioxide to
keep global warming below 1.5˚C, a temperature threshold mandated by the 2015 Paris
Agreement. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) projects significant
degradation of livelihoods, food security, and water supply, if this threshold is exceeded. There
are multiple proposed mitigation approaches that could curb climate catastrophe. Although no one
carbon capture approach is perfect, all are on the table by necessity. Each has specific capture
potential in terms of uptake rate, storage capacity, and storage longevity. I will give an overview
of work determining whether adding basalt to agricultural lands is an effective, low-risk carbon
capture strategy—and make a case that Lake Superior region is great place to implement this
means of climate change mitigation.
The idea behind this carbon dioxide removal (CDR) strategy is simple. Carbon dioxide in the
atmosphere chemically reacts with silicates minerals—and reacts especially rapidly with mafic
minerals. The byproducts of this reaction lead to marine carbonate precipitation, which transfers
carbon from the atmosphere into the rock record. This is, on geologic timescales, how Earth has
sequestered almost all the carbon continuously sourced to the atmosphere from Earth’s interior
(e.g., volcanic carbon dioxide outgassing). In principle, carbon capture through mineral weathering
involves enhancing the rate of a process that the Earth does naturally. In practice, the overriding
controls on this process are complex. Carbon capture rates are highly variable and dependent on
local conditions and implementation strategy. Nonetheless it is clear that capture through
weathering can be greatly accelerated by milling of mafic minerals to increase its surface exposure.
This approach holds great potential and is certain to be carbon negative.
IPCC estimates are that the agricultural sector contributes about 25 percent of total greenhouse gas
emissions worldwide. I will present modeling work and empirical studies that suggests addition of
mafic rocks to agricultural lands has the potential to simultaneously offset a significant component
of this anthropogenic greenhouse gas source and increase agricultural yields and pest resistance.
If subsidized, this process could provide a stable source of income for farmers increasingly
vulnerable to climate extremes and promote regional economic growth. The Lake Superior region
is the ideal area to carry out this carbon capture process and widespread implementation could
revitalize the economy of Lake Superior region towns that are (or were formerly) heavily
dependent on mining. Compilations of the extensive knowledge of Lake Superior Region geology
are essential to support that enhanced silicate weathering is a viable means climate change
mitigation, sway policy makers, and foster investment in case studies of this process.

54

�A newly discovered orbicular occurrence within the Good Hope carbonatite, north of
Marathon, Ontario
PRICE, Rebecca, ZUREVINSKI, Shannon, and MITCHELL, Roger H.
Department of Geology, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Road, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1 Canada

The Good Hope carbonatite is emplaced within Archean gneisses of the Wawa Subprovince. This
occurrence is located along the northwest margin of the Prairie Lake carbonatite complex (1160
Ma, Wu et al. 2017), although their genetic relationship remains speculative (Mitchell et al. 2020).
The Good Hope carbonatite is a niobium occurrence with the niobium primarily occurring within
pyrochlore-group minerals, minor niobium in ferrocolumbite, and consists of multiple generations
of carbonatite that include calcite-, dolomite-, ferrodolomite-, and quartz fluorite-carbonatite
(Mitchell et al. 2020). The purpose of this study is to characterize the orbicular occurrence and
suggest a possible petrogenesis for this rare textural occurrence.
The orbicular occurrence was first identified from the drill core, where it occurs as narrow
bands or possible clasts within the carbonatite groundmass. These orbicules are mm-scale, oblate
to spherical in shape with variable degrees of monomineralic shell development ranging from welldeveloped shells to spherical aggregates of the minerals which define the orbs (Figure 1). The
orbicules consist of biotite, Ti-bearing aegerine, and magnetite with ilmenite lamellae within an
allotriomorphic calcite carbonatite groundmass that contains some Fe-dolomite. The orbicules
commonly consist of a ‘core’ of magnetite + biotite followed by a shell of aegirine and one or
more outer shells of monomineralic biotite and/or magnetite. Within these orbicules there are
variable amounts of calcite and Fe-dolomite, which can occur both as monomineralic shells,
commonly associated with the outer shells, as well as entrained within the ‘core’ of the orbicules.
This type of texture has been observed within other carbonatites (eg. Haggerty and Fung,
2006), but is more commonly observed within granitic and dioritic compositions (eg. Smillie and
Turnbull, 2013). It is largely accepted that the orbicular textures are of magmatic origin, however
a variety of genetic models exist, due to the unique nature of each occurrence. In general, these
models broadly fit into three groups with orbicular formation controlled by (1) liquid immiscibility
(eg. Ai et al. 2020) (2) superheating of the magma that lowers the nucleation rate and increases the
growth rate (eg. Lindh and Näsström, 2006) or (3) quenched recrystallization following the
injection of magma (eg. Zurevinski and Mitchell, 2015). Orbicular textures within carbonatites are
commonly modelled by liquid immiscibility, given this model lends itself to the orbicules having
a different composition than the groundmass. The second group has variations in the compositions
of the shells and groundmass that lead to variability between the models in the source of the
‘orbicular magma’, the cause of the increased temperature within the magma, and the process of
crystallization of the orbicule shells. The third group also has variability, with the orbicule and
groundmass being either the same composition (Zurevinski and Mitchell, 2015) or different
compositions (Zhang and Lee, 2020) due to the composition of the initial magma and the latter
injected magma. The Prairie Lake orbicular occurrence mimics ‘contact metamorphism-type’
recrystallization of the orbicules within a compositionally identical groundmass (Zurevinski and
Mitchell, 2015). The Good Hope occurrence differs significantly from the Prairie Lake occurrence;
the composition of the orbicules and the groundmass are distinctly different, the orbicules are
variably oblate indicating soft-shell deformation, and they do not exhibit quenched or
recrystallization textures.
55

�Figure 1: Scan of the standard polished petrographic thin section of the orbicular occurrence of the Good
Hope carbonatite, highlighting the predominantly oblate, mm-sized orbicules.
References
Ai, J., Lu, X., Li, Z., and Wu, Y. 2020. Genesis of the graphite orbicules in the Huangyangshan graphite
deposit, Xinjiang, China: Evidence from geochemical, isotopic and fluid inclusion data; in Ore
Geology Reviews, 122: 103505
Haggerty, S. E., and Fung, A. 2006. Orbicular oxides in carbonatitic kimberlites; in American Mineralogist,
91: 1461-1472
Lindh, A., and Näsström, H. 2006. Crystallization of orbicular rocks exemplified by the Slättemossa
occurrence, southeastern Sweden; in Geological Magazine, 143: 713-722
Mitchell, R.H., Wahl, R., and Cohen, A. 2020. Mineralogy and genesis of pyrochlore apatitite from the
Good Hope Carbonatite, Ontario: A potential niobium deposit; in Mineralogical magazine, 84: 8191
Smillie, R. W., and Turnbull, R. E. 2013. Field and petrographical insight into the formation of orbicular
granitoids from the Bonney Pluton, southern Victoria Land, Antarctica; in Geological Magazine,
151 (3): 534-549
Wu, F., Mitchell, R.H., Li, Q., Zhang, C., and Yang, Y. 2017. Emplacement age and isotopic composition
of the Prairie Lake carbonatite complex, Northwestern Ontario, Canada; in Geological Magazine,
154: 217-236
Zhang, J., and Lee, C. A. 2020. Disequilibrium crystallization and rapid crystal growth: acase study of
orbicular granitoids of magmatic origin; in International Geology Review
Zurevinski, S. E., and Mitchell, R. H. 2015. Petrogenesis of orbicular ijolites from the Prairie Lake complex,
Marathon, Ontario: Textural evidence from rare processes of carbonatitic magmatism; in Lithos,
239: 234-244

56

�Preliminary pXRF results from Precambrian rocks of northern Minnesota
PRUE, Ann Marie1 and BRENGMAN, Latisha1
1

Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Minnesota-Duluth, 229 Heller Hall, 1114
Kirby Drive, Duluth, MN 55812
Precambrian iron-rich chemical sedimentary rocks are an important archive of early seawater chemistry
(Konhauser et al., 2017). Interpreting the origin of these iron-rich rocks is complicated because they can
form at the intersection of sedimentary and hydrothermal activity. One tool that can be used to identify
signatures of past seawater and hydrothermal fluids are major-, trace-, and rare-earth-elements. Drawbacks
to laboratory-based geochemical approaches include extensive sample preparation and destruction of the
material. Advances in XRF technology have led to the development of portable x-ray fluorescence (pXRF)
instruments capable of producing laboratory-quality element analyses in the field when used with a custombuilt, rock-type-specific calibration (Steiner et al., 2017; Al-Musawi and Kaczmarek, 2020). With the
ability to create a custom calibration, it is possible to measure major- and trace- elements in the field or in
drill core. One goal of this project is to create a customized, rock-type specific calibration for the Bruker
5g Tracer pXRF instrument to analyze iron-rich rocks that outcrop near Soudan, MN. Field and drill-core
geochemical analysis can help identify units of unknown origin, while aiding in the identification of key
samples for additional destructive analyses.
To create the custom iron formation calibration for the pXRF instrument, we first need an internal reference
material. We analyzed select iron formation samples from the Soudan iron formation for a suite of 46 major, trace-, and rare-earth-elements using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICPOES) and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) methods following the procedures
outlined in Brengman et al. (2020). We can directly compare elements analyzed using ICP-OES and ICPMS to the pXRF data (Figure 1A). The pXRF instrument was set up in tabletop working mode, and
powdered samples were analyzed in standard XRF mount cups. To test the effect of pressing the sample
into the mount cup, we performed a comparison test on one sample (PL-19-3c; Figure 1B) using the internal
mudrock calibration. First, the un-pressed powder was run, then the pressed powder was run 1.5 hr. later,
with five minutes between each analysis to allow for cooling. Measurements for the element silicon (Si) in
the three un-pressed powers ranged from 23.075 wt. % (±0.083) to 23.197 (±0.083) wt. % (Figure 1B). The
same three powders were pressed, and measurements were repeated using the same analytical setup.
Measurements for the element silicon (Si) in the three samples (now pressed powders) ranged from 23.733
(± 0.084) to 23.891 (±0.0847) wt. %. We observe a difference of ~0.7 wt. % between Si measured in the
un-pressed and pressed powders and recommend pressing powders to ensure uniform measurements.
Previous studies identified a “warm-up” period in which the pXRF instrument took roughly 1 hour to
stabilize. To test whether the Bruker Tracer 5g instrument also required this “warm-up” period, we
conducted continuous acquisition of one sample (V-19-05A) for 21 consecutive runs, with 5 minute-spacing
between analyses. At this point, a second “split” of the same initial powder (V-19-05B) was analyzed in
the same way to determine if there was a measurable difference between the two splits of the same sample
(V-19-05A and V-19-05B). Data for Si (wt. %) and Ca (wt. %) from sample V-19-05A and B are reported
in Figure 1C, and D. We identified a steady increase (Figure 1C, D) until the instrument stabilized (run
#110 for Si and #102 for Ca). We determined the instrument requires a significant “warm-up” period to
ensure consistency between analytical runs. Future work will focus on comparison of ICP-OES and ICPMS data to pXRF data to build the custom-calibration for powdered, and non-powdered sample materials.

57

�Figure 1: Preliminary geochemical data from iron-rich rocks near Soudan, MN. (A) Rare-earth-element
data for iron formation (V-19-05) and regional greywacke (PL-19-3c). (B) Initial test run of pressed versus
un-pressed powders using the pXRF instrument. (C, D) Consecutive pXRF analyses of iron formation
sample V-19-05 to determine the duration of the “warm-up” period for the instrument.
REFERENCES
Al-Musawi, M., Kaczmarek, S., 2020. A new carbonate-specific quantification procedure for determining
elemental concentrations from portable energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence (PXRF) data. Applied
Geochemistry 113.
Brengman, L.A., Fedo, C.M., Whitehouse, M.J., Jabeen, I., Banerjee, N.R. 2020. Textural, geochemical,
and isotopic data from silicified rocks and associated chemical sedimentary rocks in the ~ 2.7 Ga
Abitibi greenstone belt, Canada: Insight into the role of silicification, Precambrian Research, 351.
Konhauser, K.O., Planavsky, N.J., Hardisty, D.S., Robbins, L.J., Warchola, T.J., Haugaard, R., Lalonde, S.
V., Partin, C.A., Oonk, P.B.H., Tsikos, H., Lyons, T.W., Bekker, A., Johnson, C.M., 2017. Iron
formations: A global record of Neoarchaean to Palaeoproterozoic environmental history. Earth-Science
Reviews 172, 140–177.
Steiner, A. E., Conrey, R. M., Wolff, J. A. 2017. PXRF calibrations for volcanic rocks and the application
of in-field analysis to the geosciences. Chemical Geology, 453: 35-54.

58

�Critical Minerals Exploration and Development Potential in Ontario
PUUMALA, Mark and CUNDARI, Robert
Ontario Geological Survey, Ministry of Energy, Northern Development and Mines, Resident Geologist
Program, Suite B002, 435 James Street South, Thunder Bay, Ontario, P7E 6S7

On March 10, 2021, Ontario released a discussion paper that outlines the province’s
proposal to develop a critical minerals strategy (Ministry of Energy, Northern Development and
Mines 2021). The discussion paper is focused on:
1. Supporting partnership opportunities with Indigenous peoples;
2. Finalizing an Ontario critical minerals list;
3. Enhancing investment in mineral exploration and development;
4. Regulatory and policy reform; and,
5. Supply chain and manufacturing opportunities.
Public consultation is underway, with the strategy scheduled for release by the end of 2021.
While there is no universal definition of critical minerals and various jurisdictions define
them differently, the term generally applies to minerals that have specific industrial, technological
and strategic applications for which there are few viable substitutions. These minerals are also at
higher supply risk due to geopolitical considerations and market demand. Ontario is uniquely
positioned to meet rising global demand for critical minerals and can attract potential investment
opportunities by creating a provincial critical minerals list to guide mineral exploration and
development. An Ontario critical minerals list will be of interest to jurisdictions that are seeking
to secure a reliable supply of raw materials for their own domestic markets, such as the United
States, the European Union, Japan and South Korea.
Ontario has created a draft list of critical minerals that includes commodities that are
currently being produced commercially at existing mines, commodities that have a reasonable
prospect of being developed in the near term (i.e., advanced projects that could produce within 5
years), commodities that have demonstrated exploration potential, and commodities that were not
originally mined in Ontario, but are being smelted or refined here. The entire list is provided in
Table 1, with the critical minerals that are in common with the United States draft list (Fortier et
al. 2018) indicated in bold type.
Ontario’s current critical mineral production is derived from magmatic copper-nickelcobalt-platinum group element (Cu-Ni-Co-PGE) deposits (8 Sudbury mines and Lac des Iles) and
volcanogenic massive sulphide zinc-copper (Kidd Creek) deposits. The Sudbury mines also
produce selenium and tellurium as by-products, while indium is a by-product at Kidd Creek. Due
to current high prices for platinum group elements (most notably palladium) and battery metals
(which include nickel and cobalt), current exploration interest in magmatic Cu-Ni-Co-PGE
deposits is strong in Ontario, with numerous active projects. These include several in the
Midcontinent Rift area that are primarily targeting PGEs, including the Clean Air Metals Inc.
Thunder Bay North project, where the Escape Lake deposit is currently being delineated, and
Generation Mining Limited’s Marathon project, which is undergoing an Environmental
Assessment to support future mine development. Another notable advanced-stage magmatic
sulphide project is Canada Nickel Company’s Crawford Nickel-Cobalt project near Timmins,
where a high-tonnage low-grade resource has been defined in an Archean ultramafic intrusion.
Strong interest in battery metals has also fuelled significant exploration interest in lithium
and cobalt in recent years. Numerous areas in the Superior Province of northwestern Ontario are
known to host lithium-bearing rare element pegmatites. These deposits are associated with fertile
peraluminous granites (Breaks et al. 2003), with notable examples currently moving toward
59

�development in the Pakeagama Lake (Frontier Lithium Inc.), Separation Rapids (Avalon
Advanced Materials Inc.) and Georgia Lake (Rock Tech Lithium Inc.) areas. Recent cobalt
exploration has largely been focussed on the Proterozoic 5-element vein systems of the Cobalt
Embayment, where First Cobalt Corp. is developing a refinery to produce battery-grade cobalt
sulphate.
Some cobalt exploration has also occurred in the Thunder Bay area, where Honey Badger
Exploration Inc. recently discovered a new style of disseminated cobalt mineralization in close
proximity to silver-bearing veins at the Beaver Mine, near the contact between the Rove Formation
and a diabase sill (Puumala et al. 2019). Another previously unrecognized style of cobalt-coppernickel mineralization that has been described as a possible skarn or IOCG occurrence is hosted in
altered calcareous sedimentary rocks of the Rossport Formation north of Thunder Bay, near
Disraeli Lake (Ontario Geological Survey 2019). Both deposit types present new critical mineral
research and exploration opportunities in Ontario.
Table 1. Ontario’s draft list of critical minerals. Asterisk indicates commodity also processed in Ontario.
Critical minerals listed in bold type are also found on the United States draft list (Fortier et al. 2018).
Producing
Cobalt *
Copper *
Indium
Nickel *
Platinum Group Elements *
Selenium *
Tellurium *
Zinc

Advanced
Projects
Barite
Chromite
Graphite
Lithium
Magnesium
Niobium

Exploration Potential
Antimony
Beryllium
Bismuth
Cesium
Fluorspar
Manganese
Molybdenum
Phosphate

Rare Earth Elements
Tantalum
Tin
Titanium
Tungsten
Vanadium
Zirconium

Processing
Only
Uranium

References
Breaks, F.W., Selway, J.B. and Tindle, A.G. 2003. Fertile peraluminous granites and related rare-element
mineralization in pegmatites, Superior Province, northwest and northeast Ontario: Operation
Treasure Hunt; Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Report 6099, 179p.
Fortier, S.M, Nasser, N.T., Lederer, G.W., Brainard, J., Gambogi, J. and McCullough, E.A. 2018. Draft
critical mineral list – summary of methodology and background information; United States
Geological Survey, Open File Report 2018-1021, 15p.
Ministry of Energy, Northern Development and Mines 2021. Critical minerals framework discussion paper;
Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 32p.
Ontario Geological Survey 2019. Caro Lake; Mineral Deposit Inventory Record No. MDI000000002293.
Puumala, M.A., Campbell, D.A., Tuomi, R.D., Fudge, S.P., Pettigrew, T.K. and Hinz, S.L.K. 2019. Report
of Activities 2018, Resident Geologist Program, Thunder Bay South Regional Resident Geologist
Report: Thunder Bay South District; Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Report 6353, 109p.

60

�Environmental Control of Seawater Geochemistry in a Mesoarchean Peritidal System,
Woman Lake, Superior Province
1

RAMSAY, Brittany, 1FRALICK, Philip, 2LALONDE, Stefan, 1BIELSKI, Paul, and 2PATRY,
Laureline
1Department of Geology, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Road Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1 Canada
2Ocean Geosciences Laboratory, European Institute for Marine Studies, Technopôle Brest, Place
Nicolas Copernic, 29280 Plouzané, France

The 2.857±5 Ga (this study) carbonate platform at Woman Lake, Ontario, Canada, presents
a unique opportunity to fill a 130 million year knowledge gap on early carbonate sedimentology
and ocean chemistry between similar platform occurrences at Steep Rock Lake (2.80Ga)(Fralick
&amp; Riding, 2015) and Red Lake (2.93Ga)(MacIntyre &amp; Fralick (2017). Woman Lake carbonates
are among the few very early and thick carbonate platforms to develop in the Mesoarchean. Field,
petrographic, and geochemical investigations were performed on the limestone sequence to better
understand the paleoenvironmental context of this understudied, 90-meter-thick succession.
At the base of the carbonate platform, lying atop felsic subaerial Archean tuff, are
stratiform stromatolites interbedded with thin beds of massive carbonate grainstone, followed by
laterally linked low domal stromatolites, which gradually become larger domes, then bioherms
with walled pseudocolumnar stromatolites. They are overlain by cross-stratified and parallel
laminated carbonate grainstones and more pseudocolumnar stromatolites. A variety of fenestral
microbialites overly this unit, including thrombolites, stromatactis-bearing low domal
stromatolites, and narrow isolated columnar stromatolites. This is followed by a cyclic succession
of low domal stromatolites alternating with microbial carbonate and carbonate grainstone. Three
main stromatolitic morphologies exist and represent a range of low to moderate current energies
from upper intertidal to subtidal environments. They are: 1) low relief stratiform to undulating
stromatolites 2) laterally linked low domal and pseudocolumnar stromatolites, and 3) isolated to
locally isolated domes and narrow columnar stromatolites. Evidence here supports mainly peritidal
environments on a carbonate platform with fluctuating sea-level and water energies in an overall
deepening succession.
The diverse carbonate facies are comprised of geochemical features reminiscent of both
Archean and modern signatures in shale normalized REE patterns. Trace elements indicate that
the carbonates precipitated from a mixture of two different fluids: anoxic seawater that carried a
positive Eu anomaly, and oxygenated waters that imparted significant negative Ce anomalies. On
a microscopic scale, using LA-ICP-MS, there is less compositional contrast between carbonate
phases, which indicates that dissolution and precipitation on a small spatial scale homogenized
localized areas, but did not affect changes on a metric scale. Geochemical trends paired with
stratigraphic depth show decameter cycles of gradual declines in Mg, Fe, Mn, Ba and Sr
substitution into the calcite lattice followed by sharp increases throughout the platform’s
deposition, possibly reflecting changing accommodation space effecting precipitation rate (Fig. 1).
Typical Archean values for δ13C ranging from -3.83‰ to 1.30‰, with an average of 0.53‰
(±0.59, n=31) occur with Y/Ho ratios ranging from 27 to 117 and 87Sr/86Sr isotopic values from
0.700346 to 0.711313 (±0.00098 (1σ)). The observed trends suggest that the precipitating
carbonates were able to record and retain the effects of an evolving water column had in the local
environment. Importantly, the Woman Lake carbonate platform provides context for, and evidence
of, free oxygen approximately 500 million years before the Great Oxygenation Event, during a
relatively undocumented period in time.
61

�Fig. 1. Five meter moving averages of molar weight ratios normalized to Ca are plotted against
stratigraphic depth. Ratios are of common carbonate group elements that substitute into various
carbonate minerals. Three cycles of increasing and decreasing concentrations are evident. Decreasing
trends represent times of higher substitution rates and an increase represents lower substitution rates
relative to Ca (numerator).
Fralick, P., &amp; Riding, R. (2015). Steep Rock Lake: Sedimentology and geochemistry of an Archean
carbonate platform. Earth-Science Reviews, 151, 132–175.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.10.006
MacIntyre, T., &amp; Fralick, P. (2017). Sedimentology and Geochemistry of the 2930 Ma Red LakeWallace Lake Carbonate Platform, Western Superior Province, Canada. The Depositional
Record, 3(2), 258–287. https://doi.org/10.1002/dep2.36

62

�Geochemistry and Petrography of Volcanic and Intrusive Rocks Hosting the Lynne Cu-ZnPb Deposit, Oneida County, WI
SHORT, Shelby R., GLODOWSKI, Lillian N., and LODGE, Robert W.D.
Department of Geology, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, Eau Claire, WI

The Lynne Zn-Cu-Pb deposit was first discovered in 1990 by Noranda Exploration in
Oneida County, WI and is one many volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS) deposits in northern
Wisconsin (DeMatties, 1994). These deposits formed 1.8 to 1.9 Ga when the Pembine-Wausau
Terrane collided and accreted onto the Superior Craton during the Paleoproterozoic Penokean
Orogeny. VMS deposits are created in extensional submarine environments that are preserved in
the rock record in a variety of tectonic settings. The VMS-forming environment in Wisconsin has
previously been interpreted to be back-arc rifting in a continental setting during the collision of
the Archean Marshfield Terrane onto the Pembine-Wausau Terrane and the rest of the Superior
Craton (Schulz and Cannon, 2007). However, studies at other deposits throughout Wisconsin have
highlighted variable volcanic and tectonic settings (e.g. Jackson et al, 2016; Jacobson and Lodge,
2018). The purpose of this study is to better constrain the volcanic and tectonic setting at the Lynne
deposit and improve tectonic and metallogenic models across the Penokean Orogen.
Research on Penokean VMS systems depends on drill core as outcrop exposure in the
region is limited due to a thick cover of glacial deposits and Paleozoic Sedimentary strata
(Dematties, 1994; Adams, 1996). The Noranda drill cores from the Lynne deposit were obtained
from the archives at the Natural Resources Research Institute of Duluth, Minnesota and re-logged
and sampled at an off-campus lab associated with UW-Eau Claire. Core samples from the leastaltered felsic host rocks and various intrusive rocks were then processed for petrographic and
geochemical analyses. Major and trace elements were analyzed using X-ray Fluorescence at the
Materials Science Center at UW-Eau Claire. Interpretations from this new geochemical data
yielded an improved volcanic stratigraphy and tectonic model that describes the volcanic system
forming the Lynne VMS deposit.
The stratigraphy of the Lynne deposit was described by Adams (1996) based on drilling
during the exploration program. The stratigraphy consists of the Upper Rhyolite, Upper Dacite,
Upper Volcaniclastic (VCS), Lower Rhyolite, Lower Dacite, and Lower Volcaniclastic based on
their relative position to the ore horizon (Adams, 1996). After a geochemical analysis of the felsic
volcanic units was conducted, it revealed that there are no chemical distinction between the upper
and lower horizons. Therefore, unit descriptions are constrained by composition and not
stratigraphy. Rhyolites are crystal rich lapilli tuff to ash with plagioclase being the most abundant
crystal. The VCS unit is greywackes and siltstones with some bedding and localized alteration.
The Dacite unit is a crystal to crystal-lithic lapilli tuff with plagioclase crystals.
The Lynne drill core also intersects felsic and mafic dykes, along with a large
granophyre/granodiorite pluton at the bottom of the deposit which is geochemically
indistinguishable from intersecting felsic dykes. The felsic dykes are fine grained and light to
medium grey in color and contain plagioclase and quartz veins. The mafic dykes appear fine
grained, dark grey in color, and contain plagioclase phenocrysts. The granodiorite/granophyre
contains medium- to coarse-grained quartz and feldspars which vary between the phenocrystic
granophyre near the contact to equigranular away from the contact region. The geochemical
signature of the intrusive units of the Lynne deposit indicate that they are derived from two distinct
63

�sources that formed in a volcanic arc setting much like the extrusive volcanic stratigraphy.
Therefore, it is likely that they are genetically related.
REFERENCES
Figure 1: Generalized stratigraphic
column of the Lynne Deposit (from
Quigley, 2016) with core pictures from
representative volcanic and intrusive
units. A. Upper Dacite B. Upper Rhyolite
C. Upper VCS D. Felsic Dyke E. Lower
VCS F. Lower Rhyolite

Adams, G.W., 1996, Geology of the Lynne base-metal deposit, north-central Wisconsin, U.S.A., in LaBerge, G.L.,
ed., Volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits of northern Wisconsin: A commemorative volume: Institute on
Lake Superior Geology Proceedings, 42nd Annual Meeting, Cable, WI, v. 42, part 2, p. 161-179.
DeMatties, T.A., 1994, Early Proterozoic volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits in Wisconsin: An overview.
Economic Geology, 89: 1122-1151.
Jackson, N.R., Moura Merss, B.H., and Lodge, R.W.D., 2016, Lithostratigraphy and Ore Petrology of the Eisenbrey
Zn-Cu-Pb Deposit, Rusk County, Wisconsin: Institute on Lake Superior Geology Proceedings, 62 nd Annual
Meeting, Duluth, MN.
Jacobson, R.E. and Lodge, R.W.D., 2018, Reconstructing Paleoproterozoic volcanism in northwestern Wisconsin:
Geochemistry of the Flambeau Cu-Zn-Au Mine: Institute on Lake Superior Geology Proceedings, 64 th Annual
Meeting, Iron Mountain, MI.
Schulz, K.J. and Cannon, W.F., 2007, The Penokean orogeny in the Lake Superior region. Precambrian Research 157:
4-25.
Quigley, P.O., 2016, The Spectrum of Ore Deposit Types, their Alteration and Volcanic Setting in the Penokean
Volcanic Belt, Great Lakes Region, USA, Colorado School of Mines, Master’s Thesis, 2016

64

�Geologic mapping identifies bedrock folds that may be significant for increased probability
of arsenic detection in water wells
STEWART, Esther K.1, FITZPATRICK, Billy1, and STEWART, Eric D.1
1
Wisconsin Geological &amp; Natural History Survey, 3817 Mineral Point Road, Madison, WI 53705
Recently completed bedrock mapping of Dodge County, southeast Wisconsin, provides an
improved geologic framework that informs the region’s geologic history and adds to our
understanding of groundwater resources (Stewart, E.D. et al., 2021; Stewart, E.K. 2021). Dodge
County is underlain by glacial sediments, Precambrian Quartzite, and Cambrian through Silurian
siliciclastics and carbonates and is situated proximal to the WI Arch, a basement high that
influenced Paleozoic basin development. We identify bedrock folds that likely increase the
probability of arsenic (As) detection in groundwater wells. New petrographic observations
constrain the As host and suggest processes that resulted in As mineralization.
Mapping indicates episodic movement along the WI Arch influenced deposition of Paleozoic
strata. Most significant deformation during early Ordovician time resulted in localized uplift and
erosion of the dolomitic Prairie du Chien Group prior to deposition of the overlying siliciclastic
Ancell Group. Continued deformation is associated with folding of the overlying Sinnipee Group,
fracture development, and mineralization. Marcasite and carbonate-filled fractures in one locality
along an anticlinal axis show well developed cataclasis evidencing deformation during and after
formation of trace MVT occurrences. Most elevated hydraulic conductivity (K) estimates from the
Ancell Group are within 2 km of mapped folds, indicating fractures associated with folds locally
increases groundwater flow (Stewart, E.D. et al., 2021).
Water wells completed in the Ancell Group in Dodge County have increased likelihood of
detecting As close to folds, suggesting fold induced fractures promoted a focus or change in As
host minerals that increased the probability of arsenic release. No As was detected in SEM-EDS
analysis of oxide phases, while two sulfide As hosts were identified in mineralized core samples:
(1) Small (10-20 µm), cubic, Ni-Co-Fe sulfides with up to 3 wt.% As are scattered within marcasite
that infills localized fractures and sulfide cement in Cambrian Elk Mound Group sandstone . These
crystals are similar in morphology, size, and chemistry to Ni-Co-Fe sulfides identified as VaesiteBravoite from trace MVT-mineralized samples in Brown and Oconto Counties reported by Luczaj
et al., 2016. (2) Tiny (3-5 µm), circular, rimmed Fe-sulfides with 1.4-2.2 wt.% As are only present
within thin clay rims on quartz grains in the Ancell Group sandstone , in contrast to all other
sulfides observed from the same sample, which lack detectable As. Rimmed grains may be the
mineralized remains of specialized microbacterial colonies that metabolically reduced dissolved
aresenate and sulfate to produce As-bearing Fe-sulfide (e.g. Stolz et al., 2006). Observation of Fesulfide frambroids supports a biologic control on sulfide mineralization. High-resolution SEMBSE imaging reveals common As-poor, Fe-sulfides present as hexagonal, small to large, euhedral
marcasite plates and subordinate framboidal clusters of tiny Fe-sulfide crystals . Framboids are
common as isolated clusters encased within larger euhedral sulfide or as nucleation points for
single grains of euhedral sulfide. Framboidal sulfide clusters are commonly interpreted as
mineralized remains of sulfate-reducing microbacterial colonies (e.g. Folk, 2005), and sulfatereducing bacterial colonies are known to seed adjacent areas with reduced sulfur allowing for
inorganic precipitation of larger volumes of sulfide cement (Schieber, 2002). Bacterial reduction
65

�of sulfate sourced from regionally migrating hydrothermal brines coming out of the Michigan
Basin is proposed as a broader mechanism that drove precipitation of Fe-sulfides forming the bulk
of mineralization within the trace MVT occurrences of Dodge County.
References:
Folk, R.L., 2005, Nanobacteria and the formation of framboidal pyrite: Textual evidence: Earth System
Science, v. 114, no. 3, p. 369-374.
Luczaj, J.A., McIntire, M.J., and Olson-Hunt, M.J., 2016, Geochemical characterization of trace MVT
mineralization in Paleozoic sedimentary rocks of northeastern Wisconsin, USA: Geosciences, v. 6,
no. 29.
Schieber, J., 2002, The role of an organic slime matrix in the formation of pyritized burrow trails and pyrite
concretions: PALAIOS, v. 17, p. 104-109.
Stewart, E.D., Stewart, E.K., Bradbury, K.R., and Fitzpatrick, W., 2021, Correlating bedrock folds to higher
rates of arsenic detection in groundwater, SE Wisconsin, USA, Groundwater.
Stewart, E.K., 2021, Bedrock geology of Dodge County, 1:100,000-scale. Wisconsin Geological and
Natural History Survey map series, plate 1.
Stolz, J.F., Basu, P., Santini, J.M., and Oreland, R.S., 2006, Aresenic and selenium in microbial metabolism:
Annual Reviews in Microbiology, v. 60, p.107-130.

Figure 1: (A) Electron backscatter
image of marcasite-cemented
vertical zone within Elk Mound
group. Frame is centered on an
unusual cubic Fe-Ni-Co-As sulfide
grain. (B) Electron backscatter
image of unusual rimmed, circular
As-bearing Fe-sulfides from Tonti
Member of the St. Peter Formation,
Ancell Group. Smaller, unrimmed
grains outboard of main rimmed
sulfides contain detectable As but at
reduced concentration relative to
main rimmed grain (&lt;.5 wt%).
Platy medium gray matrix
enclosing sulfides is a thin rim of
kaolinitic clays. Light gray at
bottom right of image is edge of detrital quartz grain. (C) Electron backscatter image of single framboidal
cluster at high magnification illustrating tiny individual grains making up structure. (D) Electron
backscatter image of cluster of sulfide grains within Tonti Member of St. Peter. Note how framboidal
clusters appear to be serving as nucleation points for larger, euhedral hexagonal sulfide grains.

66

�The paleogeography of Laurentia in its early years: new constraints from the
Paleoproterozoic East-Central Minnesota batholith
SWANSON-HYSELL, Nicholas L., AVERY, Margaret S., ZHANG, Yiming, HODGIN,
Eben B.
Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley

BOERBOOM, Terrence, J.
Minnesota Geological Survey, St. Paul, MN, USA
The ca. 1.83 Ga Trans-Hudson orogeny resulted from collision of an upper plate consisting of the Hearne,
Rae, and Slave provinces with a lower plate consisting of the Superior province. While the geologic record
of ca. 1.83 Ga peak metamorphism within the orogen suggests that these provinces were a single
amalgamated craton from this time onward, a lack of paleomagnetic poles from the Superior province
following Trans-Hudson orogenesis has made this coherency difficult to test.
Figure 2: Map of Laurentia showing
the location of Archean provinces
and younger Proterozoic crust
(simplified from Whitmeyer and
Karlstrom 2007)). The localities of
paleomagnetic poles that constrain
Laurentia’s position just after its
amalgamation are shown with stars
including the new pole from this
study developed from the EastCentral
Minnesota
Batholith
(ECMB). This right map shows
interpreted Precambrian geology for
the state of Minnesota (simplified
from Jirsa et al., 2012)) including in
regions covered by Phanerozoic
sedimentary rocks where the
bedrock is inferred from geophysical
data and drill cores.

We develop a high-quality paleomagnetic pole for northeast-trending diabase dikes of the post-Penokean
orogen East-Central Minnesota Batholith (Holm et al., whose age we constrain to be 1779.1 ± 2.3 Ma (95%
CI) with new U-Pb dates. Demagnetization and low-temperature magnetometry experiments establish dike
remanence be held by low-Ti titanomagnetite. Thermochronology data constrain the intrusions to have
cooled below magnetite blocking temperatures upon initial emplacement with a mild subsequent thermal
history within the stable craton. The similarity of this new Superior province pole with poles from the Slave
and Rae provinces establishes the coherency of Laurentia following Trans-Hudson orogenesis. This
consistency supports interpretations that older discrepant 2.22 to 1.87 Ga pole positions between the
provinces are the result of differential motion through mobile-lid plate tectonics. The new pole supports the
NENA connection between the Laurentia and Fennoscandia cratons. The pole can be used to jointly
reconstruct these cratons ca. 1780 Ma thereby strengthening the paleogeographic position of these major
constituents of the hypothesized late Paleoproterozoic supercontinent Nuna.

67

�Figure 2: Paleogeographic
reconstructions
at
five
different
times
in
the
Paleoproterozoic and the
position of the provinces at
present. Paleomagnetic poles
within 20 Myr of the given
time (10 Myr for 1888 and
1868 Ma) are shown from the
compilation of Evans et al.
(2021) as well as the new
ECMB pole. These data
illustrate differential plate
motion between the Superior
and Slave Provinces that is
required by the data leading
up to the closure of the
Manikewan Ocean and the
assembly of Laurentia during
the Trans-Hudson orogeny.
The ECMB pole is consistent
with an assembled Laurentia
following the Trans-Hudson
orogeny which contrasts with
the disparate orientations and
paleolatitudes
between
Laurentia’s
constituent
provinces prior to the
orogeny.

Evans, D. A. D., Pesonen, L. J., Eglington, B. M., Elming, S.-Å., Gong, Z., Li, Z.-X., … Zhang, S. (2021). An expanding list of
reliable paleomagnetic poles for Precambrian tectonic reconstructions. In Ancient supercontinents and the paleogeography of
the Earth.
Holm, D. K., Van Schmus, W. R., MacNeill, L. C., Boerboom, T. J., Schweitzer, D., &amp; Schneider, D. (2005). U-Pb zircon
geochronology of Paleoproterozoic plutons from the northern midcontinent, USA: Evidence for subduction flip and continued
convergence after geon 18 Penokean orogenesis. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 117(3), 259–275. doi:
10.1130/b25395.1
Jirsa, M., Boerboom, T., &amp; Chandler, V. (2012). S-22, Geologic Map of Minnesota, Precambrian Bedrock Geology (Tech. Rep.).
Minnesota Geological Survey.
Whitmeyer, S., &amp; Karlstrom, K. (2007). Tectonic model for the Proterozoic growth of North America. Geosphere, 3(4), 220–259.
doi: 10.1130/GES00055.1

68

�The provenance, depositional environment and metallogenic implications of the Ament Bay
Metasedimentary Assemblage, Sturgeon Lake Greenstone Belt, Northwest Ontario
TAMOSAUSKAS, Michael1, LODGE, Robert2, MA, Chong1, HAUGAARD, Rasmus, SHERLOCK,
Ross1
1

Mineral Exploration Research Centre (MERC), Harquail School of Earth Sciences, Goodman School of
Mines, Laurentian University, 935 Ramsey Lake Rd., Sudbury, ON, P3E 2C6, Canada
2
Department of Geology, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, 105 Garfield Ave, Eau Claire, WI 54701,
United States

The Ament Bay Metasedimentary
Assemblage (ABMA) is the youngest
supracrustal assemblage in the Savant
Lake-Sturgeon Lake greenstone belt
(SSGB), and has previously been
interpreted to have alluvial-fluvial
origin (Sanborn-Barrie and Skulski,
2005). However, its timing, tectonic
setting, and metallogenic significance is
unclear. The SSGB makes up the
easternmost part of the Western
Wabigoon terrane of the Superior
Province. The supracrustal assemblages
in this belt form a regional-scale
syncline, with the ABMA exposed
along the hinge, and is intersected by
the Sturgeon Lake fault zone (fig. 1).
The ABMA is surrounded by felsic and
mafic volcanic rocks that compose the
Central
and
South
Sturgeon
Assemblages, however its contact
relationships are poorly understood
(Sanborn-Barrie and Skulski, 2005).

Figure 1. Regional geology of the Sturgeon Lake greenstone belt.
Modified after Sanborn-Barrie and Skulski (2005). Inset map showing
close-up view of central portion of ABMA (outlined).

69

The goal of this study is to
determine if the ABMA represents a
Timiskaming-type basin. Timiskamingtype basins are found in various
Neoarchean
greenstone
belts
throughout the Superior. These are
synorogenic basins which consist of
clastic rocks with fluvial and marine

�origins
representing
molasse
basin-fill
successions (Hyde, 1980; Thurston and Chivers,
1990; Mueller and Corcoran, 1998). These
basins are commonly coeval with alkalic
magmatism, as alkalic rocks can be both
interbedded and intruded into the sediments,
however they are also incorporated as clasts.
Timiskaming-type basins are of interest because
of their association with gold mineralization, as
numerous prolific gold occurrences in the
Abitibi greenstone belt are hosted within
Timiskaming Group sediments (Bleeker, 2012).
The ABMA consists of many features consistent
with Timiskaming-type basins, as it is
interpreted as a molasse basin-fill succession and
Figure 2. Close-up view of central portion of the ABMA
and its interpreted lithofaices.
is spatially associated with alkalic magmatism.
The ABMA consists of mostly weakly foliated, massive- to- planar bedded polymictic
conglomerates and arkosic- to- lithic-rich arenites and greywackes. Based on petrographic analysis
and lithology distribution, three lithofacies have been attributed to the ABMA: (i) arkosic
greywacke lithofacies; (ii) polymictic conglomerate-sandstone lithofacies; (iii) lithic greywackemafic-rich conglomerate lithofacies (fig. 2). These are comparable to some lithofacies which make
up other molasse basin-fill successions, some of which are Timiskaming-type (Corcoran and
Mueller, 2007).
Despite having similar characteristics with Timiskaming-type basins, the ABMA is poorly
endowed relative to some of the gold-rich Timiskaming Group sediments in the Abitibi greenstone
belt. This study explores possible factors which hindered gold mineralization in the Sturgeon Lake
greenstone belt.
References
Bleeker, W., 2012. Lode gold deposits in Deformed and metamorphosed terranes: The role of
Extension in the Formation of Timiskaming Basins and Large Gold Deposits, Abitibi Greenstone
Belt–A Discussion, in Parker, J., ed., Summary of Field Work and Other Activities 2012:
Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Report 6280, p. 47-41 to 47-12
Corcoran, P., &amp; and Mueller, W., 2007. Time-Transgressive Archean Unconformities Underlying
Molasse Basin-Fill Successions of Dissected Oceanic Arcs, Superior Province, Canada. Journal of
Geology, volume 115, p. 655–674.
Hyde, R.S., 1980. Sedimentary facies in the Archean Timiskaming Group and their tectonic
implications, Abitibi greenstone belt, northeastern Ontario, Canada; Precambrian Research, v.12,
p.161-195.
Mueller, W.U. and Corcoran, P.L., 1998. Late-orogenic basins in the Archean Superior Province,
Canada: Characteristics and inferences; Sedimentary Geology, v.120, p.177-203.
Sanborn-Barrie, M. and Skulski, T. 2005. Geology, Sturgeon Lake greenstone belt, western
Superior Province, Ontario; Geological Survey of Canada, Open File 1763, scale 1:100 000.
Thurston, P.C., Chivers, K.M., 1990. Secular variation in greenstone sequence development
emphasizing Superior Province, Canada. Precambrian Res. 46, 21 58.

70

�Possible implications of a non-Archean Grand Marais Ridge, western Lake Superior
WOODRUFF, L.G. 1, and GRAUCH, V.J.S. 2
1

U.S. Geological Survey, 2280 Woodale Drive, St. Paul, MN, 55112
U.S. Geological Survey, MS 973, Federal Center, Denver, CO, 80225

2

The Grand Marias Ridge (GMR) is a gravity low but a structural high hidden beneath the waters of western
Lake Superior. It has been interpreted as a preserved basement block of low-density Archean granite that
remained a positive topographic high as adjacent volcanic basins subsided (Allen et al., 1997). Recent
geophysical analysis (Grauch and Heller, 2021, this volume), however, suggests that the GMR likely
comprises a significant volume of anorthosite, possibly mixed with felsic rocks. This part of the
Midcontinent Rift System (MRS) in western Lake Superior is an area where many unusual features occur,
including extraordinarily large concentrations of rapidly intruded mafic intrusions of the Duluth and Beaver
Bay Complexes (DC and BBC), and a high percentage of felsic rocks in the North Shore Volcanic Group
(NSVG) compared to other MRS volcanic sections. The thick basalt and overlying sedimentary packages
in western Lake Superior also occur in a series of sag basins rather than the graben-like basins that
characterize the MRS in the nearby St. Croix horst and the western arm extending away from Lake Superior.
Here we address implications of recent modeling results and speculate on the potential significance of a
GMR composed of anorthosite and felsic rocks, as well as the evolution of the MRS in this unique part of
the Lake Superior region. Perhaps the most challenging aspect of this new compositional interpretation is
how the GMR came to be a topographic high if it is not a block of remnant Archean basement.

1)What is the origin of anorthosite in the GMR?
Option 1. Anorthosite represents pre-MRS basement rocks (e.g., Allen et al., 1997). This age is possible
but unlikely as the regional Archean basement is granite-greenstone with little reported major units of
anorthosite, and thus does not match the observed geophysical characteristics.
Option 2. Anorthosite is part of the large complex suite of plagioclase-rich cumulate intrusions of the
DC. Anorthosite intrusions are widespread throughout the DC, from the exposed western margin to where
it disappears under the younger BBC and the NSVG. It is plausible that anorthosite in the GMR is an
eastern extension of the DC, although it is challenging to determine how an older, deeper DC anorthosite
pluton would now represent a high structural block.
Option 3. The striking presence of abundant and, in places, very large anorthosite inclusions in the BBC
Beaver River gabbro has been attributed to incorporation at depth of older DC anorthosite (Miller and
Chandler, 1997). A recent paleomagnetic intensity study by Zhang (2020) found that anorthosite
inclusions and host Beaver River diabase have similar paleomagnetic poles, which suggests that
inclusions could be related to the BBC rather than the slightly older DC. Thus, anorthosite in the GMR
could be products of BBC igneous events. In either case, anorthosite inclusions appear to be related to
the MRS rather than pre-MRS basement and may be evidence of significant anorthosite accumulation at
some depth near the GMR.

2)What is the origin of the felsic component in the GMR?
Option 1. Archean granitic rocks that were intruded by plagioclase-rich magma during MRS time.
Option 2. Partial melting of older basement rocks caused by staging of mafic magmas at depth during
MRS time would lead to large accumulations of felsic magma (Vervoort and Green, 1997). Felsic magma
could have been incorporated into an anorthosite cumulate melt and intruded higher in the crust.
Option 3. The GMR is located just offshore of two of the largest rhyolite lava or ash flows in the NSVG
(Green and Fitz, 1993), all temporally related to the DC. Nicholson et al. (1997) suggested that the
proximity of large felsic flows on land and the GMR was not coincidental. It is possible that the GMR
was a felsic volcanic center during DC time that erupted these large lava flows along with other regional
felsic volcanics.

71

�3)What dynamic processes could have created the GMR anorthosite/felsic structural high?
Option 1. Anorthosite and layered troctolite-gabbro plutons were intruded as inclined sheets between a
footwall of Paleoproterozoic Animikie Group sedimentary rocks and Archean granites and a hangingwall of the NSVG (Miller et al., 2002). Thus, an Archean GMR would have to have been a topographic
block within the Animikie Basin, as suggested by Allen et al. (1997). This basement structure could have
been intruded by one of the many anorthositic igneous bodies generated during DC magmatic events as
well as by felsic magmas derived from partial melting of some basement rocks.
Option 2. Recent high precision 206Pb/238U zircon dates show that multiple intrusions of DC were
emplaced together around 1096 Ma within less than 1 million years (Swanson-Hysell et al., 2020),
suggesting that magma supply from deep crustal chambers for both intrusions and overlying volcanics
was effectively continuous. Rapid, repetitive magmatic pulses would have elevated crustal temperatures
around DC feeder zones and crustal magma chambers. Vervoort and Green (1997) suggested that the
large rhyolite flows of the NSVG were products of crustal melting produced by the large thermal flux of
DC magmatism. Perhaps remnants of a felsic volcanic center are located above a now crystallized
plagioclase-rich magma chamber in the GMR, although the relative geometry of a middle-crust
anorthosite intrusion, an upper crust felsic center, and a resulting GMR topographic high is perplexing.
Option 3. A large volcanic sag basin just offshore from the BBC is bounded on the northeast by the GMR
and on the southwest by the Archean (probable) structural block of White’s Ridge. The ~14 km-thick
basalt section that fills this bowl-shaped basin, which is not fault-bounded as shown by Grant-Norpac
legacy seismic profiles, was likely erupted from the curvilinear Beaver River diabase dike and related
sheets that acted as major conduits for igneous activity (Miller and Chandler, 1997). Loading by a rapid
succession of relatively dense basalt flows into an initially thermally subsiding basin could create an
unstable environment (e.g., Mukherjee et al., 2020) where less dense underlying plagioclase-rich
cumulates could be forced upward into a zone of weakness created by earlier high temperature felsic
volcanism. This scenario, however, would require ductile behavior relatively high in the crust, but could
explain how MRS anorthosite and felsic rocks became a topographic high as adjacent volcanic basins
subsided. Perhaps localization of magmatic events over a short duration in this area created this seemingly
implausible scenario.
Allen, D. J., Hinze, W. J., Dickas, A. B., Mudrey, M. G., Jr., 1997, Integrated geophysical modeling of the North
American Midcontinent Rift System: New interpretations for western Lake Superior, northwestern Wisconsin,
and eastern Minnesota: Geol. Soc. Amer. Special Paper 312, 47-72.
Grauch, V.J.S., Heller, S., 2021, Integration of geophysical evidence indicates that anorthosite composes a significant
portion of Grand Marais ridge, an inferred basement high in western Lake Superior: this volume.
Green, J.C., Fitz, T.J., III, 1993, Extensive felsic lava and rheoignimbrites in the Keweenawan Midcontinent Rift
plateau volcanics, Minnesota: petrographic and field recognition: Jour. Volcan. Geotherm. Res., 54, 177-196.
Miller, J.D., Jr., Chandler, V.W., 1997, Geology, petrology, and tectonic significance of the Beaver Bay Complex,
northeastern Minnesota: Geol. Soc. Amer. Special Paper 312, 73-96.
Miller, J.D., Jr., Green, J.C., Severson, M.J., Chandler, V.W., Hauck, S.A., Peterson, D.M., Wahl, T.E., 2002, Geology
and mineral potential of the Duluth Complex and related rocks of northeastern Minnesota: Minn. Geol. Sur.
Report Invest. 58, 207 p.
Mukherjee, A.B., Das, S., Sen, D., Bhattacharya, B., 2020, Buoyant rise of anorthosite from a layered basic complex
triggered by Rayleigh-Taylor instability: Insights from a numerical modeling study: Amer. Min., 105, 437-446.
Nicholson, S.W., Shirey, S.B., Schulz, K.J., Green, J.C., 1997, Rift-wide correlation of 1.1 Ga Midcontinent rift
system basalts: implications for multiple mantle sources during rift development: Can. Jour. Earth Sci., 34, 504520.
Swanson-Hysell, N.L., Hoaglund, S.A., Crowley, J.L., Schmitz, M.D., Zhang, Y., Miller, J.D., Jr., 2020, Rapid
emplacement of massive Duluth Complex intrusions within the North American Midcontinent Rift: Geol., 49,
185-189.
Vervoort, J.D., Green, J.C., 1997, Origin of evolved magmas in the Midcontinent rift system, northeastern Minnesota:
Nd-isotope evidence for melting of the Archean crust: Can. Jour. Earth Sci., 34, 521-535.
Zhang, Y., 2020, Pairing paleointensity results with coercivity spectra: providing support for selection criteria: Inst.
Rock Mag. Quar., 30, 2-4.

72

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="19">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="16970">
                  <text>Institute on Lake Superior Geology</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18734">
                <text>Institute on Lake Superior Geology: Proceedings 2021</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18735">
                <text>Institute on Lake Superior Geology. Virtual meeting. May 11, 14, 18, 21, 2021. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18736">
                <text>Institute on Lake Superior Geology. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18737">
                <text>2021</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18738">
                <text>PDF</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18739">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="3064" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="3394">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/2a68819a1e25dd2404b13b697c48995d.jpg</src>
        <authentication>fc485f89bac4e9bbfee39db68c9fbf57</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="18">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="16969">
                  <text>Cairine Budner fonds</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18740">
                <text>High Jump during track meet 1927</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18741">
                <text>Sports</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18742">
                <text>Black and white photograph of a high jump event during a track meet at John Palo's field on Central Avenue, Intercity Port Arthur and Fort William, Spectators are lined up watching the event&#13;
&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18743">
                <text>1927</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18744">
                <text>Donor Onni Airola (Wikluno)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18745">
                <text>Public domain</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18746">
                <text>Photograph</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18747">
                <text>Still image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18748">
                <text>PHIII-0011c (viii) scan # BUD-0153</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="2597">
        <name>Central Avenue</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="42">
        <name>Fort William</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="2327">
        <name>High jump</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="2578">
        <name>Intercity</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="2575">
        <name>John Palo</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="44">
        <name>Port Arthur</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="2336">
        <name>spectators</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="1806">
        <name>track &amp; field</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="3065" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="3395">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/510cb007425b491ba7aff7adac92a5bd.jpg</src>
        <authentication>d5ae772391e916c0ec33f2d7ba035b29</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="18">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="16969">
                  <text>Cairine Budner fonds</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18749">
                <text>Women athletes posing on a field&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18750">
                <text>Sports</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18751">
                <text>Black and white photograph of four women athletes posing in a field. L to R 1. Lempi Paavilainen (St Armand), 2. Signe (Laakso) Maki, 3. Tyne Randen, 4. Mamie Luoma (Paavi).</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18752">
                <text>Public domain</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18753">
                <text>Photograph</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18754">
                <text>Stil image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18755">
                <text>PHIII-0011c (xii) scan# BUD-0154</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="2326">
        <name>athletes</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="2505">
        <name>Lempi Paavilaine</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="2516">
        <name>Maimi Paavi</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="2598">
        <name>Signe Maki</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="2599">
        <name>Tynne Randen</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="2157">
        <name>women's group</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="3066" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="3396">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/1290e2562af8c8aab045758d32e83c92.jpg</src>
        <authentication>d5958c1882cda05556f8a2cc9a94e81d</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="18">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="16969">
                  <text>Cairine Budner fonds</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18756">
                <text>Track &amp; Field competitors at Port Arthur Stadium</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18757">
                <text>Sports</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18758">
                <text>Black and white photograph of track &amp; field competitors at Port Arthur Stadium. L to R 1. Raimo Salmela, 6. Niilo Pehkonen, 7. Waino Ropponen, 8. Risto Saari. Male athletes are lined up on the field posing for the photograph</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18759">
                <text>Donor Salmela</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18760">
                <text>Public domain</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18761">
                <text>Photograph</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18762">
                <text>Still image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="18763">
                <text>PHIII-011c (xxxiv) scan# BUD-0155</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
    <tagContainer>
      <tag tagId="2326">
        <name>athletes</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="2319">
        <name>competition</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="2601">
        <name>Niilo Pehkonen</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="2600">
        <name>Port Arthur Stadium</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="2345">
        <name>Raimo Salmela</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="2603">
        <name>Risto Saari</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="1806">
        <name>track &amp; field</name>
      </tag>
      <tag tagId="2602">
        <name>Waino Ropponen</name>
      </tag>
    </tagContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
