<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/items?output=omeka-xml&amp;page=141" accessDate="2026-04-09T06:08:40+00:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>141</pageNumber>
      <perPage>10</perPage>
      <totalResults>13078</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="13016" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="16050">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/6b7449d2f9af1ec5e6f53ee6d8c5baca.jpg</src>
        <authentication>2c0e97cd5e4c66ab582bb7096527dd4c</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="4">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="618">
                  <text>Lakehead University Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="619">
                  <text>Photographs from Lakehead University's history: people, events,  and campus. </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108045">
                <text>UG6-C-I-9</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108134">
                <text>Biologist "milking" fish</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108135">
                <text>University Life</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="108136">
                <text>People</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108137">
                <text>Biologist "milking" fish.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108138">
                <text>Lakehead University</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108139">
                <text>JPG</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108140">
                <text>Still image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="13015" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="16049">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/0bd30364007f7db22f4dcab309cb21b8.jpg</src>
        <authentication>383869f747ded35768b08b0b343fb0a9</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="4">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="618">
                  <text>Lakehead University Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="619">
                  <text>Photographs from Lakehead University's history: people, events,  and campus. </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108044">
                <text>UG6-C-I-8</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108127">
                <text>Biologist "milking" fish</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108128">
                <text>University Life</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="108129">
                <text>People</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108130">
                <text>Biologist "milking" fish.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108131">
                <text>Lakehead University</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108132">
                <text>JPG</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108133">
                <text>Still image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="13014" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="16048">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/13685d4a4b8686899c142d06c720adef.jpg</src>
        <authentication>7c881b95d5c10abd9561109223fdad66</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="4">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="618">
                  <text>Lakehead University Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="619">
                  <text>Photographs from Lakehead University's history: people, events,  and campus. </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108043">
                <text>UG6-C-I-7</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108118">
                <text>Biology - Gwen O'Reilly</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108119">
                <text>University Life</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="108120">
                <text>People</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108121">
                <text>Gwen O'Reilly Biology/Forestry, Agora Sept. 19, 1984, p. 6. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108122">
                <text>Lakehead University</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108123">
                <text>1984-09-19</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108124">
                <text>JPG</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108125">
                <text>Still image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="38">
            <name>Coverage</name>
            <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108126">
                <text>Canada - Ontario - Thunder Bay</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="13013" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="16047">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/6f0a67c708e2a9584a155337849b5097.pdf</src>
        <authentication>e82d4e8665c057b693ce17e05520361b</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="108034">
                    <text>Memo To Industry:

//

BIG GOVT. GRANTS
NOW AVAILABLE FOR PLANTS
IN NORTH.WEST ONTARIO

U.S. A

UNDER ITS NEW "EQUALIZATION OF INOUSTRIAL OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM" THE ONTARIO
GOVERNMENT PROVIDES INTEREST-FREE,
FORGIVABLE LOANS TO A MAXIMUM OF
$500,000 FOR NEW OR EXPANDING INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES IN NORTH-WESTERN ONTARIO.

THE GRANTS ARE BASED ON NEW BUILDINGS
AND NEW EQUIPMENT AND RANGE FROM
ONE-THIRD TO ONE-QUARTER OF THE TOTAL
CAPITAL OUTLAY. MORE DETAILS ARE FOUND
INSIDE THIS BROCHURE. NOW IS THE TIME TO
INVESTIGATE FURTHER.

NORTHWESTERN

ONTARIO

DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL
201 -202 NEWS CHRONICLE BUILDING

PORT ARTHUR, ONTARIO.

REPRINTED FROM THE DECEMBER, 1968, ISSUE OF TRADE AND COMMERCE MAGAZINE

�Ill

Production:

• •
stat1st1cs
on
northwestern
•
ontar10
The Land

miles
miles
miles
miles

Forest Lands:
Productive Forest Area ..... .............. 45,644 s·q. miles
Non-Productive Forest Area ............ 5,133 sq. miles
Principal Rivers: Nipigon, Albany, Winisk, English, Winnipeg, Rainy, Kaministiquia, Attawapiskat, Severn, Ogoki.
Principal Lakes: Superior, Nipigon, Lake of the Woods,
Rainy, Red, St. Joseph, Long, des Mille Lacs, Seul.
The People:

Population, 1968 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 233,000
Population, 1958 .......................... ••••••••••••••••••••• 196,000
Number of Cities: .... .. .. ....... .. ...... ....... .... ............. ... ... 2
Fort William, Port Arthur.
Number of Towns . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Kenora, Fort Frances, Dryden, Sioux Lookout, Geraldton, Keewatin, Rainy River.
Number of Townships ..................................... :....... 27
Ignace, Jaffray and Mellick, Machin, Alberton, Atikokan, Atwood, Blue, Chapple, Dilke, Erno, La Vallee, McCrosson and Tovell, Morley and Patullo, Morson, Worthington, Conmee, Gillies, Longlac, Neebing, Nipigon, O'Connor, Oliver, Paipoonge, Red
Lake, Schreiber, Shuniah, Terrace Bay.
Number of Improvement Districts .......................... . 10
Balmertown, Barclay, Sioux Narrows, Kingsford,
Beardmore, Dorion, Manitouwadge, Marathon, Nakina, Red Rock.
Transportation:
Railways-Main and branch lines of C.P .R. and C.N.R.
traverse whole area with marshalling yards at Lakehead.
Highways - Mileage totals approximately 5,400 miles,
Queen's highways total 1,300 of which 1,100 miles
are paved .
Air Lines-Including Air Canada, TransAir Ltd., North
Central Airlines, Northwestern Aviation Ltd., and
Austin Airways Limited.
Lake Shipping-Lakehead ports westerly terminus of deep
waterway, greatest grain storage and shipping centre
in the world. Twin ports handle up to 18 million
tons of cargo annually. About three-quarters of this
is composed of wheat and iron ore.

2

T &amp; C RESEARCH DEPT.

---

•

Area: Kenora and Patricia ..................... 153,220 sq.
Thunder Bay District .................... 52,471 sq.
Rainy River District ........ ................ 7,276 sq.
Total Area ............................................ 212,967 sq.

Manufacturing .............. .. ............ 1967 $ 320,000,000
241,300,000
1957
259,829,000
Forest - based Industries .. .. ....... .. 1967
173,371,000
1957
Agriculture ..... ............................ 1967
9,200,000
4,530,000
1957
..
I
M1n1ng ....................................... 1967
120,000,000
47,157,567
1957
Fishing ...................................... 1967
1,477,000
900,400
1957
Fur ................................ ............ 1967
927,000
1957
1,408,000
Construction (Value of Residential
Building Permits) ............ 1967
8,834,000
1957
7,084,000
Construction (Value of NonResidential Building
Permits) ......... ................ 1967
25,998,000
1957
13,083,000
Construction (Total value, all
permits) ......................... 1967
34,832,000
20,167,000
1957
Number of Manufacturing Plants .. 1968
225
1958 not given

PRINCIPAL TRADING AREAS OF NORTHWESTERN ONTARIO

HUDSON BAY

ARIAi

FIATU ■ ID
See Pages 6 and 7

Atikokan
Balmertown-Red Lake
Dryden
Fort Frances
Fort William
Port Arthur
Geraldton

JAMES
BAY

Keewatin
Kenora
Longlac
Nipigon
Rainy River
Sioux Lookout

Business Activity

Retail Trade . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 1967
277,556,000
1957 171,414,000
Labour Income . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . .. .. . . . . . 1967 280,860,000
1957 187,874,000
Average Personal Income ............. 1966
4,446
3,701
1961
Average Labour Income Per Capita 1967
3,901
1957
3,093
113.78
Average Weekly Wages and Salaries 1967
78.95
in Manufacturing
1957
Cheques Cleared Through Local
Clearing Centres . . . .. . . . . . . . . 1967 1,360,395,000
725,225,000
1957
Cheques Cashed . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . 1967 1,564,454,250
1957 834,009,900
Motor Vehicle Registrations ........ . 1967
73,141
42,755
1957
Passenger Car Registrations . .. . . . . .. 1967
54,549
33,672
1957
Communications:
Telephone in Service ...... ............ . 1967
1957
Number of Radio Stations ........... . 1968
1958
Number of Television Stations .... . 1968
1958
Number of Newspapers (Daily) .... . 1968
1958
Number of Newspapers (Weekly) .. 1968
1958
Education:
Lakehead University-full time
students ........................ .
-part time students
Teachers College
Manpower Retraining Program .....
Confederation College-Full time
students ....... .. ............... . .
Part time students ....... ... .

DENSITY OF POPULATION
Areas shown in red ... 228,000
Areas shown in white ... 5.000
Total

(Oecember1968) •••••••

233,000

81,180
42,229
6

5
1
1
5
3

8
7

1968
1968
1968
1968

2,025
900
254
800

1968
1968

471
6

3

�$500,000 INCENTIVE GRANT AVAILABLE
THE ONTARIO GOV'T WILL HELP
BUILD YOUR NORTHWEST PLANT
f

In the first year of operation, the Ontario-sponsored industrial incentives program
assisted new or expanding enterprises to the extent of more than $1 million. Ten
concerns in Northwestern Ontario were aided to enlarge, to modernize, to create
new jobs.
LARGE-SCALE GRANTS ARE CONSIDERED FOR:
I) Secondary manufacturing companies establishing new facilities or making approved additions.
2) Warehouses and other concerns of a closely related nature which have a direct
relationship with secondary manufacturing .

---

3) Tourist developments which will effectively raise the occupancy levels of local
establishments.
THE NEW GRANT FORMULA WILL BE APPLIED AS FOLLOWS:
1) 33- 1/ 3 per cent of the first $250,000 of the approved capital cost of new build.
ings and equipment.
2) 25 per cent of the balance of the approved cost of these facilities.

.... .......,

3) The maximum grant will be limited to $500,000 .

HERE IS HOW THE PROGRAM WORKS:
At the end of the first year, one-tenth of the loan will be forgiven, a further onetenth of the loan at the end of the second year, and so on until the end of the fifth
year. At the end of the sixth year, provided the company has performed satisfac.
torily, the balance of the loan will be forgiven.
Here is real opportunity for enterprising industry to locate in Central Canada, a
resources-rich region with trans -continental roil, highway and air transport services
and deep water ports to continental and overseas markets. It has low-cost electric
power and natural gas, fine communities, an expanding university and a new college
of applied arts and sciences. Great place to live.

FOR MORE DETAILS ON THE INDUSTRY INCENTIVES PROGRAM, please contact the
administering authority.

ONTARIO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

950 Yonge Street
Toronto 5, Ontario.

...,,---

--------

.. ---

~~~
NORTHWESTERN ONTARIO DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL
201 NEWS-CHRONICLE BUILDING, PORT ARTHUR, ONTARIO

�STATISTICS ON MAJOR CITIES AND TOWNS IN NORTHWESTERN ONTARIO
Grose Income
of Population

Population

City or Town

1958

1968

1967

Groae Income
of Trading
Are a Population

Trading Area
Population

1957

1968

1958

To al
Constr ction

1957

1967

164,446,536

110,669,204

149, 900, 000

88,307,000

301

124

178, 294, 032

$

$

$

254,857

201,304

537,199,000

294, 830, 000

23,244,190

Kenora ....................

11, 107

10,256

29,489,760

16,693,000

59, 535

52,000

96,520,000

62,840,500

2,242,437

Fort France• •••...........•

9,620

8,854

16,300,000

10,200,000

Balmertown-Red Lake .......

7,150

5,823

14,500,000

Dryden ....................

6,735

4,935

12,480,000

Atikokan ...................

6,178

6,430

11,250,000

7,250,000

6,700

6,600

12,750,000

8,000,000

3,021,975

Geraldton ...........•....••

3,558

3,269

6,235,777

5,173,624

12,000

11,500

20,100,000

15,850,000

71,998

3,451

3,162

Sioux Lookout ..........•...
Nipigon ....................

Keewatin ...................

6,750,000

2,769

2,783
2,012

5,560,000

3,920,000

5,425,000

1,980

20, 150

6,500

3,250,000

3,985,000

10,300

54,000

37,500,000

4,300

8,500

2,970,000

17,800,000

12,200,000

5,300

14,320,000

49,000

92,500,000

1,235,011

69,900, 150

12,521,425

24,744,510

14,560,000

27

31

34,563,375

20,185,475

8,250,000

4,4ao,ooo

871,818

17,299,245

15,704,965

17,200,000

12,000,000

8

6

16,800,000

5,800,000

6,200,000

not given

784,815

236,638

3,974,919

2,119,366

16,000,000

8,900,000

11

6

26,300,000

14,888,457

6,000.000

3,600,000

2,778,766

1,278, 671

11,701,655

5,890,975

14,200,000

8,750,000

6

2

35,875, 750

13,500,000

9. 295,000

3,600,000

1, 773, 782

7,044,751

6,478, 525

8,120,000

3,560,000

4

3

45,380,000

37,700,000

7,920,000

4,750,000

500,000

3,157,870

not given

7,375,000

4,300,000

10

8

35,017,250

29,300,000

14,600,000

11,350,000

2,913,595

3,351,311

5,860,000

3,730,000

3

4

2,000,000

not given

750,000

not given

2,610,937

1,753,030

3,750,000

2,500,000

2

2

1,900,000

not given

500,000

not given

58,600

not given

1,939, 595

2,694,533

1,690,000

1,080,000

Nil

2

not given

1, 669, 535

1,074,401

2

1

645,837

625,037

3

2

10,800,000

I

146,800

5,420,000

not given
198,000

438,320

6,500,000
60,300,000

Longlac ....................

1,339

943

2,460,000

1,250,000

11,000

10,000

18,400,000

13,650,000

93, 150

Rainy River .......•....•.•.

1,087

1,290

2,500,000

1,350,000

3,000

3,500

8,000,000

900,000

150,000

60,000

Total

Serviced

Railways

Fort William-Port Arthur ..

4,225

3,225

1,050

CPR and CNR

Kenora •.•.......•.•..•..

1, 115

400

50

............

150

125

25

Balmertown-Red Lake •.•.•

17

13

4

Dryden .......•.•..•.•..•

3,850

1,925

1,800

City or Town

Fort Frances

.

Transportation

Unoccupied

Airports

Truck
Linea

Nos. 11, llA, 17,
17Aand61

1

17

CPR

Trans-Canada and
Great River Road

2
(1 sea)

CNR and DWP

Nos. 11 &amp; 71,
us 11, 53 &amp; 71

Nil
C.P.R.

Highways

88

3

Geraldton .... , .... , ......

45

45

Sioux Lookout ......•.•...

6

unlimited

unlimited

Nipigon ..................

500

100

Keewatin .................

103

18

Longlac ........ , ...... ...

50

Rainy River ..............

47

..
40

--1,750,000

. ..

. ..

...

---

...

---

50,000

Util

Electricity

ies

Radio
(Domiciled)

Gas

T.V.
(Domiciled)

T win City Gas Co, Ltd.

Forest products, sulphate, iron ore, silver
and precious metals. Sand, gravel, crushed
rock, zinc. Grain and by-products, edible
oils, malt, fish.

CFPA, CJLX,
CKPR

5

Kenora Hydro Electric Commiuion and Hydro Electric
Power Commission of Ontario

Northern Ontario Natural
Gas Co. Ltd.

Forest products; commercial fishing:
minerals • gold, silver, nickel, copper,
lead, zinc, molybdenum: kasolite (uranium)

CJRL

@
CBC Satellite
Station

1

5

Public Utilities Commission

Nil

Forest products, commercial fishing, fur,
gold, iron, copper, nickel, agricultural.

CFOB

CBC repeater

Nos. 105, 125, 618

2

3

Hydro Electric Power Commission of Ontario

Nil

Forest products, commercial fishing, gold,
silver, iron ore and other base metals.

CBC Satellite
Station

CBC Satellite
Station

Trans-Canada #17

2
(l sea)

4

Dryden Hydro Electric
Commission and Ontario
Hydro Commission

Twin City Gas Co.

Forest products, commercial fishing,
agricultural, crushed rock, gravel, etc.,
magnetite iron ore, nickel, gold, silver,
copper, lead, cesium, molybdenite, zinc,
lithium, soapstone, mineral gallium.

CKDR

CBC Satellite
Station

CNR

Voyageur Highway #11

5
(4 eea)

2

Atikokan Hydro Electric
Commission

Twin City Gas Co. Ltd.,
and Atikokan Propane

Iron ore, pulpwood, timber, gravel, fish
and game.

CBC Booster
Station

CBC Micro•
wave, Nor-Video

CNR

No. 11

..

2

Ontario Hydro Electric
Commission

Twin C:ity Gas Co. Ltd,,

Natural resources, timber, precious and
non precious minerals.

CBC Low
Power Relay

CBC Satellite
Station

50

CNR Transcontinental

No.72

4
(3 sea)

1

Ontario Hydro Electric
Commission

30

CNR and CPR

Noa. 11 and 17
Trane-Canada

..

l

Nipigon Hydro Electric
CommiBBion

CPR

Trane-Canada #17

21

Cl'IR

Trana-Canada #11

--

4

Ontario Hydro Electric
CommiBBion

15

CNR

Ontario #11

..

2

Rainy River Public Utilities
CommiHion

88

..

..

(Kenora) (Kenora)

130,000

20,000

25,000

Communication a

Raw Materials

Port Arthur Public Utilities
Commission and
Fort William Hydro Electric

•
Atikokan .................

--2,750,000

---

...

INFORMATION

GENERAL
Industrial Sites • Acreage

1957

1,170,760

28,400,000

12,000,000

23,799,921

18,595,352

$

6,950

44,720,077

$

181, 925, 250

8,400

$

109,921,000

1957

$

$

9,000,000

$

1967

$

247,166,327

48,500,000

1967

$

1958

$

93,295

23,800

1957

$

1968

$

109,511

Manufac~ring
Payroll

1967

1957

1968

1967

Manufacturing
Value

1967

Fort William-Port Arthur ....

28,800

Number of
Industrial
Plant•

Retail Trade
Volume

Aseeesment

Corp. of the Town of Kenora

Nil
Twin City Gas Co. Ltd,
Nil
Northern &amp; Central
Nil

CKPR-TV

Newaoanere
Weeklies

Dailies

News Chronicle
and Times Journal

Canadian Uutiaet

..

Kenora Daily Miner
and News
Fort Frances Daily
Bulletin

..

Fort

France ■

Time•

Red Lake District
News

..

Dryden Obeerver

..

Atikokan

..

Times Star

Progre ■■

Forest products, gold, iron, molybdenite,
fish, furs, water.

..

..

Daily Bulletin

Forest product• and minerals.

..

..

..

Nipigon Gazette

Forest products for pulp and paper, fish
for processing and packaging, minerah.

..

-.

..

..

Wood and water.

..

..

..

..

Limited aupply of timber, livestock.

.-

-.

.-

-·

Rainy River Record

7

�Maior Proiects Underway
FIRM

COMMUNITY

INVESTMENT
CAPITAL

International Nickel

She bandowan

35,000,000

Ontario Hydro

Northwest Ontario

26,500,000

Corporation of Port Arthur

Port Arthur

Ontario Hydro

Northwest Ontario

Lakehead Developers
Lakehead Harbour Commission

Shunish
Port Arthur

2,000,000
3,500,000

Lakehead University
Confederation College

Port Arthur
Fort William

3,000,000
600,000

Bell Telephone Company
Aquativity Limited
Municipality of Drtden
Port Arthur Shipbuilding Co.

Northwest Ontario
Kenora
Dryden
Port Arthur

Quetico Centre

Lake Eva

Arctic Enterprises Inc.

Rainy River

Colenso Lumber Co.
Ontario Government
B rayshaws Steel Limited

Red Lake Highway
Lakehead area
Port Arthur

Noralta Peat Products
(Ontario) Limited
Federal Government

Barwick
Kenora

9,500,000
20,000,000

10,000,000
2,000,000
200,000
5,000,000

100,000
350,000
15,000,000
750,000
300,000
700,000

REMARKS
Development of new
nickel mine.
Transmission line to
connect with Manitoba.
First phase of 15-year
urban renewal program.
Linkup between northern &amp;
southern power systems.
15-store shopping complex.
Major expansion of Keefer
terminal cargo facility.
University extension centre.
Initial phase of new college
construction program.
Microwave system.
New hotel on Lake of the Woods.
Airport development.
Conversion of bulk freighter
to self-unloader.
Final phase of $1 . 2 million
expansion program.
Building &amp; equipment for
new manufacturing plant.
New saw and chipper mill.
Lakehead expressway.
Steel fabricating plant
expansion.
Peat moss processing plant.
Building to house federal
departments.

I

Maior Proiects Proposed
FIRM

COMMUNITY

INVESTMENT
CAPITAL

Corporation of Fort William
Superior Brick &amp; Tile Co.
Trans -Canada Pipelines

Fort William
Lakehead area
Regional

14,100,000
300,000
70,000,000

Boise Cascade Corporation
Trans-Canada Pi~lines

Fort Frances area
Rainy River area

12,000,000

Ontario-Minnesota Pulp &amp;
Paper

Fort Frances

Great Lakes Nickel

Pardee

4,000,000

REMARKS
Urban renewal program
Brick-making plant
36-inch line traversing
Northwest to Nipigon.
Forest products plant
Gas transmission line to
serve Rainy River District.
Plant improvement and
anti-pollution program.
Multi-million base metal
mine development.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108035">
                <text>Memo to Industry: advertising brochure</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108036">
                <text>Business and Industry</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108037">
                <text>Reprint of advertising from December 1968 Trade and Commerce Magazine, produced by the Northwestern Ontario Development Council. "Memo to Industry: Big Govt. Grants Now Available for Plants in Northwest Ontario." </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108038">
                <text>Northwestern Ontario Development Council</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108039">
                <text>1968</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108040">
                <text>PDF</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108041">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108042">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="13012" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="16036">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/48e51db0bb2e418314f7486dafcfffeb.mp3</src>
        <authentication>6cb4b14d2ca8d5fbae9231cbc658a490</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="16037">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/69e8869a1ac2947d741f28b8c5ce31c2.mp3</src>
        <authentication>da71513b3e620379221b167a2d9021c2</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="16038">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/9f17bb53191f22a079c4a7510425925b.mp3</src>
        <authentication>a1e3c50cc379354da2e88d054a78d763</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="16039">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/ff2e04bad3230c43314465e9b43fcf30.mp3</src>
        <authentication>e77faf496e85689e695d892eaa583460</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="16040">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/44613ca5d38eecfbbd89172f474c39cb.mp3</src>
        <authentication>abe289d2bd46dbfc3a3edc7762c15e6d</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="16041">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/25aedd586747948a9ff1b9162263fe47.mp3</src>
        <authentication>1f7a1c3c7b2a622c6b85eb9b166833f9</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="25">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="51851">
                  <text>Anishinaabemowik - Indigenous Languages Program Historical Documents</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="51852">
                  <text>Faculty of Education, Native Language Instructors Program</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108018">
                <text>Advanced Ojibwe: Audio Files</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108019">
                <text>Universities</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="108020">
                <text>Indigenous Language</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108021">
                <text>Accompanying audio file for Advanced Ojibwe (Tom Beardy). There are six audio files: click on each to play or download in .mp3 format.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108022">
                <text>Native Language Instructor Program, Faculty of Education, Lakehead University</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108023">
                <text>Faculty of Education, Lakehead University&#13;
&#13;
</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108024">
                <text>2001-07-01</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108025">
                <text>Faculty of Education, Lakehead University.&#13;
&#13;
The print version of this text and accompanying audio files are available at Lakehead University Libraries (Chancellor Paterson and Education Libraries) library.lakeheadu.ca&#13;
&#13;
This text has been scanned as part of the Anishinaabemowik - Indigenous Languages Program Historical Documents Digitization Project, Faculty of Education, Education Library (Thunder Bay Campus), Lakehead University.&#13;
&#13;
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercialNoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/&#13;
&#13;
Please contact the Faculty of Education, Office of the Dean, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario Canada for additional information or permissions. 807-343-8010 (ext. 8520)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108026">
                <text>mp3</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108027">
                <text>Ojibwe</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108028">
                <text>Audio</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="13011" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="16042" order="1">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/b753497c9dcb24ac5d8bf1b87daf24fa.pdf</src>
        <authentication>92df58bde718fb3ae621adaaaee2e3c8</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="108029">
                    <text>Lakehead
UNIVERSITY

�Qreetings from

LAKEHEAD UNIVERSITY

Congratulations to you, our graduating class of 20251

Congratulations and Power to the Class of 2025

As you cross the stage at your convocation ceremony, I invtte you to
reflect on this transformational moment.

Your class is in the unique posttion of graduating into a world that is
suffering from extremely negative uses of Power and Privilege. Power
is used now to wage trade and armed wars. Power is used now to
attack education, health, the press, and the arts. Power is used now to
belttlle and demean individuals, groups, and countries.

You are not simply walking across the stage to a roar of applause from
your friends, family, and supporters; no, this milestone is much more
profound. Crossing the stage and obtaining your hard-earned degree
signifies stepping into the next phase of your bright and brilliant future.
Whether your goal is to begin working in your chosen field or to
continue your education by pursuing advanced studies, completing
your degree at Lakehead University has bestowed upon you the gifts
of choice and opportunity.
From this moment forward, the key to unlocking your future is in your
hands. I know that your journey from the first day of orientation to
convocation was not easy. You have grown as a person, you have
expanded your mind, built your skill sets, and you are well-prepared
for what comes next.
On behalf of our faculty and staff, and alongside your friends, family,
and supporters, I offer my heartfelt congratulations. The entire
Lakehead community is proud of all you have accomplished, and we
are honoured to be part of your life's story.
Dr. Gillian Siddall
President and Vice-Chancellor
Lakehead University

However, class of 2025, you are in an equally unique position to
counter these negative forces, and I have every confidence that you
will. I join you in thanks for the power given to you by your support
teams of family and friends. You are Empowered, and will continue
to cultivate your partnerships of faculty and classmates. You are
Empowered by your scholarship and abilities to find real solutions
to real problems. You are Empowered by understanding the urgent
need for truth and reconciliation, and by your active compassion for
the demeaned. You are Empowered by your crucial involvements in
education, health, the arts, and your love of Canada.
You are ready and need not be afraid. Greetings. Congratulations.
Thank you.
Rita Shelton Deverell
Chancellor
Lakehead University

�Thursday, May 29, 2025 - 9am

ORDER OF PROCEEDINGS
Graduate and Undergraduate Credentials to be Conferred:
Faculty of Business Administration, Faculty of Engineering, Bora Laskin Faculty of Law

Prelude

Joe Petch

Processional - Pomp and Circumstance by E. Elgar

Joe Petch, Ted Vaillant, Damian Rivers-Moore, Erik Hongisto,
Dr. Darlene Chepil-Reid

The audience is asked to stand as the Academic Procession enters
OCanada

Robert Perrier

Honour Song

Elder Audrey DeRoy

Invocation

Elder Audrey DeRoy

The Chancellor - "I hereby declare this Convocation open."

Chancellor Rita Shelton Deverell

Introduction of the Platform Party

Dr. David Richards, Interim Provost &amp; Vice-President (Academic)

Greetings from Fort William First Nation

Chief Michele Solomon, Fort William First Nation

President's Address

Dr. Gillian Siddall, President &amp; Vice-Chancellor

Conferring of the Honorary Degree Candidate

Dr. Erin Pearson, Chair, Senate Honorary Degree Committee
Chancellor Rita Shelton Deverell
Dr. Gillian Siddall, President &amp; Vice-Chancellor

Convocation Address

Dr. Jean Paul Gladu

Message from the Class of 2025

Krish Khokhani

Musical Interlude

Ashley Belluz-Gerolami

Presentation of the Candidates for the Conferring of
Credentials and Medals/Awards

Dr. Rhonda Koster, Deputy Provost and Vice Provost (Teaching &amp; Leaming)

Credentials Granted in Absentia

Andrea Tarsitano, Vice-Provost (Students) &amp; Registrar

Message from the Alumni Association

Paul Popo-Ola, President, Lakehead University Alumni Association

Chancellor's Remarks &amp; Closing
"I hereby declare this Convocation closed."

Chancellor Rita Shelton Deverell

Recessional

Jacob Wolframe

The audience is asked to kindly wait until the graduates have exited the Auditorium and to then make their way to the Lakehead University campus
for refreshments, photos, and conversation.

Follow along as we acknowledge our graduates
and this year's medal recipients.

~

�Lakehead
UNIVERSITY

The Arms of the University were granted by the Earl
Marshal, the Duke of Norfolk, on June 20, 1959.
The heraldic description is:
Coat of Arms
"Barry wavy of six Argent and Azure on a Chief
Gules in front of a rising Sun issuant from the base
of the Chief Or between two Candles enflamed
proper each surmounted of an open Book also proper
edged and bound Gold a Portcullis chained Sable"
Crest
"On a Wreath Or and Azure on Water Barry wavy
Argent and Azure in front of a Rock growing therefrom
a Pine Tree a Canoe paddled by an Indian Brave and
Canadian Trapper."
Motto
Ad agusta per angusta
Achievement through effort

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
      <file fileId="16043" order="2">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/f637452a010d5d18f393fe53571396c2.pdf</src>
        <authentication>3c5e4d5155f7099cae45275324808220</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="108030">
                    <text>����</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
      <file fileId="16044" order="3">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/d2e7b921e90ae43fb49420b387409f5e.pdf</src>
        <authentication>6ba98768a3d39ee8f0359a8a3a3f11f2</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="108031">
                    <text>����</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
      <file fileId="16045" order="4">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/979a92d7f44b01fd51ac962abfcbad8f.pdf</src>
        <authentication>d7c85792f2a179adabb14f7241e42d90</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="108032">
                    <text>Lakehead
UNIVERSITY

�Qreetings from

LAKEHEAD UNIVERSITY

Congratulations to you, our graduating class of 2025!

Congratulations and Power to the Class of 2025

~

Your class is in the unique pos~ion of graduating into a world that is
suffering from extremely negative uses of Power and Privilege. Power
is used now to wage trade and armed wars. Power is used now to
attack education, health, the press, and the arts. Power is used now to
belittle and demean individuals, groups, and countries.

you cross the stage at your convocation ceremony, I invite you to
reflect on this transformational moment.

You are not simply walking across the stage to a roar of applause from
your friends, family, and supporters; no, this milestone is much more
profound. Crossing the stage and obtaining your hard-earned degree
signifies stepping into the next phase of your bright and brilliant future.
Whether your goal is to begin working in your chosen field or to
continue your education by pursuing advanced studies, completing
your degree at Lakehead University has bestowed upon you the gifts
of choice and opportunity.
From this moment forward, the key to unlocking your future is in your
hands. I know that your journey from the first day of orientation to
convocation was not easy. You have grown as a person, you have
expanded your mind, built your skill sets, and you are well-prepared
for what comes next.
On beha~ of our faculty and staff, and alongside your friends, family,
and supporters, I offer my heartfelt congratulations. The entire
Lakehead community is proud of all you have accomplished, and we
are honoured to be part of your life's story.

Dr. Gillian Siddall
President and Vice-Chancellor
Lakehead University

However, class of 2025, you are in an equally unique position to
counter these negative forces, and I have every confidence that you
will. I join you in thanks for the power given to you by your support
teams of family and friends. You are Empowered, and will continue
to cultivate your partnerships of faculty and classmates. You are
Empowered by your scholarship and abilities to find real solutions
to real problems. You are Empowered by understanding the urgent
need for truth and reconciliation, and by your active compassion for
the demeaned. You are Empowered by your crucial involvements in
education, health, the arts, and your love of Canada.
You are ready and need not be afraid. Greetings. Congratulations.
Thank you.

Rita Shelton Deverell
Chancellor
Lakehead University

�Thursday, June 5, 2025-11am

ORDER OF PROCEEDINGS
Graduate and Undergraduate Credentials to be Conferred:
Faculty of Business Administration, Faculty of Education, Faculty of Engineering*, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences,
Faculty of Science and Environmental Studies*, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities
*includes graduates from the Lakehead University-Georgian College Partnership

Prelude

Orillia Silver Band

Processional - Pomp and Circumstance by E. Elgar

Orillia Silver Band

The audience is asked to stand as the Academic Procession begins
OCanada

Milli Kent

Honour Song

Honour Song by local Drum Group

Invocation

Elder Lorraine McRae

The Chancellor - "I hereby declare this Convocation open."

Chancellor Rita Shelton Deverell

Introduction of the Platform Party

Dr. David Richards, Interim Provost &amp; Vice-President (Academic)

Greetings from the Chief of the Chippewas of Rama First Nation

Chief Ted Williams, Chippewas of Rama First Nation

President's Address

Dr. Gillian Siddall, President &amp; Vice-Chancellor

Recognition of the Recipients of the Emeritus Title

Dr. David Richards, Interim Provost &amp; Vice-President (Academic)

Conferring of the Honorary Degree Candidate

Brandon Rheal Amyot, Senate Honorary Degree Committee
Chancellor Rita Shelton Deverell
Dr. Gillian Siddall, President &amp; Vice-Chancellor

Convocation Address

Dr. Ligaya Byrch

Conferring of the Title of Fellow of the University

Cathy Tuckwell, Chair of Lakehead University's Board of Governors

Presentation of the Civitas Award

Dr. Linda Rodenburg, Principal

Message from the Class of 2025

Elizabeth Adams

Presentation of the Candidates for the Conferring of
Credentials and Medals/Awards

Dr. Sonia Mastrangelo, Assistant Dean, Faculty of Education

Credentials Granted in Absentia

Andrea Tarsitano, Vice-Provost (Students) &amp; Registrar

Greetings from Georgian College

Dr. Yael Katz, Vice President, Academic

Message from the Alumni Association

Paul Popo-Ola, President, Lakehead University Alumni Association

Chancellor's Remarks &amp; Closing Remarks
"I hereby declare this Convocationn closed."

Chancellor R~a Shelton Deverell

Recessional

Paul Connell
The audience is asked to kindly wait until the graduates have exited the venue and to then make their way to the reception
for refreshments, photos, and conversation.

Follow along as we acknowledge our graduates
and this year's medal recipients.

~

�Lakehead
UNIVERSITY

The Arms of the University were granted by the Earl
Marshal, the Duke of Norfolk, on June 20, 1959.
The heraldic description is:

Coat of Arms
"Barry wavy of six Argent and Azure on a Chief
Gules in front of a rising Sun issuant from the base
of the Chief Or between two Candles enflamed
proper each surmounted of an open Book also proper
edged and bound Gold a Portcullis chained Sable"
Crest
"On a Wreath Or and Azure on Water Barry wavy
Argent and Azure in front of a Rock growing therefrom
a Pine Tree a Canoe paddled by an Indian Brave and
Canadian Trapper."
Motto
Ad agusta per angusta
Achievement through effort

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
      <file fileId="16019" order="5">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/92f143ce41d4983139f695a4266e2c66.pdf</src>
        <authentication>648f5e88f9b18a9085d117ad4a060c51</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="108013">
                    <text>Graduating Class of 2025
Ceremony 1 - Thursday May 29, 2025 (9:00 am)
Hello. We are delighted to welcome you, your families, and friends,
as we celebrate your achievements at Lakehead University.
Today we celebrate the success of your academic achievements!
We are please to announce the following list of graduates
from the following Faculties:
•

Faculty of Business Administration

•

Faculty of Engineering

•

Bora Laskin Faculty of Law

~
Faculty of Business Administration
Master of Business Administration
FARRISH, Allison Joanne Katherine
FOURCAUDOT, Joseph Daniel
ROONEY, Jared Reece
VENERUZZO, Christian Dominic
Honours Bachelor of Commerce
BANJAW, Debora Daniel
Business Economics
*BELCAMINO, Marco Pasquale
Marketing
*BOARDMAN, Quinn Mary
General Management

Page | 1

�*BUSNIUK, Kassandra Mary
Human Resources Management/Industrial Relations
Minor in Marketing
*BUSNIUK, Nicole Ann
Human Resources Management/Industrial Relations
Minor in Marketing
*CARANGI, Isabella Angelina
Finance
*CARUSO, Carmine
Accounting
*CASE, Darci Faith
Business Analytics and Information Systems
Minor in Human Resources Management/Industrial Relations
CHIODO, Ethan Joseph
Finance
CHONY, Evan Jakob
Business Analytics and Information Systems
*CHOWDHURY, Labwa Afifa
Business Analytics and Information Systems
*CIESLIK, Alec Henry
Accounting
COLLIER, Carla Dawn
Accounting
*FALLA, Jhon Jader
Accounting
*GHORI, Henilkumar Prakashbhai
Accounting
*GOODWIN, Chaneelia
Human Resources Management/Industrial Relations
Minor in Marketing
*GOUNDREY, Alysha Lillian
Marketing
HANSON, Hunter McKenna Marie
Accounting
*HARDING, Nolan John
Accounting
*HEEREMA, Kevin Jackson
Marketing
Minor in Business Analytics and Information Systems

Page | 2

�JACOBSON, Cassidy Yamile
Marketing
JONES, Jacob G
Finance
*KOZLOWSKI, Jessica Heather
Accounting
*LEBLANC, Kara Maureen
Marketing
*LEHTO, Noah Alexander
Finance
*LENARDON, Spencer Michael
Human Resources Management/Industrial Relations
MACCHI, Michael Xavier
Finance
MAKELA, Erik Paul
Marketing
Minor in Human Resources Management/Industrial Relations
MENARD, Ewan Gregory McCrindle
Marketing
*OIKONEN, Damon William Thomas
Finance
OLOYA, Peter Onen
Business Analytics and Information Systems
PAQUETTE, Zachary Ian
Accounting
PONSINGH, Amos Jere Robert
Finance
RAMESH KUMAR, Rajeev Kannan
Finance
*REID, Laura
Accounting
*RIVARD, Kilee Elise
Finance
*ROMANELLO, Blake Paul
Marketing
*ROPPONEN, Jasmiina
General Management

Page | 3

�RYAN, Matthew James Michael
Accounting
*SADHWANI, Aarya
Finance
Minor in Business Analytics and Information Systems
SHUKLA, Vibhuti Vishnubhai Vishnu
International Business
Minor in Marketing
*SINGH, Chahatpreet
Accounting
Minor in Finance
SINGH, Gauraang
Business Analytics and Information Systems
Minor in Finance
SOUSA, Brandon Michael
Accounting
Minor in Finance
*TETLOCK, Taylor Lee
Human Resources Management/Industrial Relations
Minor in Marketing
TWEEDIE, Parker George
Finance
Minor in Economics
WILLS, Amy Lee
Finance
Bachelor of Commerce 4 Year
KEENE, Owen Reed
Finance
LIAO, Rongfei
International Business
Minor in Accounting
LLOYD, Jared Sydney
Marketing
MACK, Joseph Jakob
General Management
MUSHTAQ MOHAMMED, Fathima Hafsa
General Management
OJAJUNI, Timilehin Moyosore
International Business
Minor in Marketing

Page | 4

�OLATUNJI, Usman Olamilekan
Finance
PRADEEP, Adith
Business Analytics and Information Systems
WATTS, Gwendolyn Octavia
Finance
Minor in Human Resources Management/Industrial Relations
XUN, Bo
General Management
Bachelor of Administration
ADAMSON, Tristan James
*AHMED, Saad
BHATIA, Harshit Kumar
BLACKWELL, Spencer David
HAYES, Carter Nicolas
MEENA, Ridhima
*ROUKEMA, Alicia Ann
*SAINNAWAP, Harvey Matthew
SHI, Chong
WILLISCROFT, Bryce Thomas

Faculty of Engineering
Doctor of Philosophy
ABDELHAMED, Mostafa
Civil Engineering
Dissertation: Long Bolted HSS to HSS Connection for Modular Structures: A Solution for
Indigenous Housing Challenges
ABU MAHADY, Islam
Electrical and Computer Engineering
Dissertation: Improving Performance of NOMA &amp; RSMA Systems with Improper Gaussian
Signaling
AL-CHALABI, Raghdah
Civil Engineering
Dissertation: Advancing Wind Load Assessment of Low-rise Buildings: CFD &amp; Wind Tunnel
Approaches

Page | 5

�Master of Science
CHAKMA, Soumik
Environmental Engineering
Thesis: Thesis: Water Decontamination Using Magnetic Biochar Produced from Biomass and
Mineral Processing Waste
CHINEDU, Nnaemeka
Chemical Engineering
EDIGA, Yashank Adithya
Civil Engineering
EKEH, Uchenna Francis
Chemical Engineering
GE, Mingyou
Mechanical Engineering
GHANOUNI, Farbod
Mechanical Engineering
Thesis: Noise Attenuation &amp; Energy Harvesting Using Helmholtz Resonator Connected to
Rectangular Cavity
GHILDIYAL, Manan
Civil Engineering
HAAVE, Nikolas
Mechanical Engineering
Thesis: Estimating High-Pressure Hydrogen Storage Required to Refuel Heavy-Duty Vehicles
HONG, Kang
Electrical and Computer Engineering
JAHADIHOSSEINI, Seyedreza
Electrical and Computer Engineering
JAYASUNDARA MUDIYANSELAGE, Nadun Eranda Medamarandawela
Mechanical Engineering
KAMRAN, Maham
Mechanical Engineering
Thesis: Computational Investigations of Integrated Vortex-Odor Dynamics in the Wake of
Fish for Underwater Sensing
KIRTHIPATI, Mohith Sai Varma
Electrical and Computer Engineering
KISHORE, Siddharth
Electrical and Computer Engineering
Thesis: Leveraging the Use of Liquid Metal Channels to Reconfigure Atennas' Impedance and
Radiation Performance
MALEKSABET, Zahra
Mechanical Engineering
Thesis: Aerodynamic and Flow Structure Analysis of Iced Wind Turbine Airfoil

Page | 6

�MOJEDDI, Mohadeseh
Environmental Engineering
OKRAH, Gracious Korkor
Environmental Engineering
OMIYALE, Adedoyin Olufemi
Civil Engineering
OSAZUWA, Joseph
Environmental Engineering
PADHIARY, Swagat
Environmental Engineering
PAEZ, Juan Camilo
Chemical Engineering
Thesis: Demethylation of Sulfobutylated Kraft Lignin and its Application as PhenolFormaldehyde Adhesives
PAN, Jiaqi
Civil Engineering
PATEL, Adilkumar Lalitkumar
Electrical and Computer Engineering
PATEL, Harsh Shaileshkumar
Environmental Engineering
PATEL, JEET KUMAR
Civil Engineering
PATEL, Maitri Brijeshkumar
Electrical and Computer Engineering
PATEL, Priyanshi
Electrical and Computer Engineering
RAGHURAMAN, Lithika
Environmental Engineering
RAMAZIFARAHANI, Aida
Environmental Engineering
SAMEEFAR, Mohsen
Environmental Engineering
SHAH, Aashray Axay
Civil Engineering
SHAIKH, Usama Zaheer Ahmed
Civil Engineering
SHAMS, Kimia
Environmental Engineering

Page | 7

�SHANMUGANATHAN, Annamalai
Electrical and Computer Engineering
SOLANKI, Rajankumar Yashvantbhai
Civil Engineering
SONY, Soumya
Environmental Engineering
SOUTHGATE, Jeffery Robert
Electrical and Computer Engineering
Thesis: Traveling Wave-Based Fault Location in Power Grids Using Neural Networks
SUNDARALINGAM, Harish
Electrical and Computer Engineering
Thesis: Advancing Object Detection Models: An Investigation Focused on Small Object
Detection in Complex Scenes
SURESH, Tharrengini
Electrical and Computer Engineering
Thesis: Enhancing Semantic Segmentation: Architectural Innovations and Strategies for
Label-efficient Learning
TAYEBAN TAYEBA, Seyed Amirmohammad
Mechanical Engineering
VASILOPOULOS, Stephen Thomas
Civil Engineering
Thesis: Optimization of Tall Buildings Subjected to Wind Load Using Genetic Algorithm and
Image-Based Machine Learning
WANG, Shijing
Electrical and Computer Engineering
YADA, Nihal
Electrical and Computer Engineering
YANG, Kaiwen
Electrical and Computer Engineering
Thesis: A Novel Current Source Converter-Based Ultra-High-Power Offshore Wind Energy
Conversion System
ZONG, Haoyang
Electrical and Computer Engineering
Bachelor of Engineering
ABITONA, Alyssa Carla
Civil
ADEDIJO, Temiloluwa Akintayo
Mechanical
Minor in Mathematics
AHMED, Abdulrahman Saeed Ahmed
Mechanical

Page | 8

�AKOUM, Tamer
Mechanical
ALAJNAF, Abdulbary Naje
Electrical
*ALBAKHEET, Sofyan
Electrical
*ALLENDER, Rebecca Anne
Mechanical
Minor in Mathematics
Co-operative Option
AMEERDEEN, Bilal
Electrical
*ANABTAWI, Karam
Mechanical
BABAJIDE, Adelani Olasupo
Mechanical
Co-operative Option
BALI, Akash
Electrical
*BEER, Aron
Mechanical
BELACHEW, Surafel Adera
Mechanical
BHATIA, Shubham Ranjit
Mechanical
BORBELY, Brendon Alexander
Civil
*BOYKO, Grant Alexander Shigeyuki
Mechanical
Co-operative Option
*BULANKULAME, Maithri Mevinka
Chemical
Co-operative Option
CAI, Jiayi
Electrical
CHAHAL, Ravinder Singh
Electrical
CHANDRA, Jason Leon
Electrical

Page | 9

�*CHAUDHARI, Charvin
Civil
*CHISHOLM, Maxwell Rowan
Civil
COULTER, Jill Aleksandra Przybylo
Civil
COX, Charles Brett
Civil
CURTIS, Christopher James
Electrical
*DE FRANCESCA, Fernando Branco
Electrical
*DOYLE, Zackary Patrick
Civil
*DRUMMOND, Elian Jean
Civil
DUONG, Chan Hung
Software
EASTERBROOK, Lucas Daniel
Civil
*EATON, Benjamin Lawrence Bouw
Electrical
EHIOGHAE, Goodness Enoma
Electrical
*EL HENAWY, Ahmed Mohamed Hanafi Hassan
Mechanical
*ELIGH, Matthew Patrick
Mechanical
*ELMEHRIKI, Nadine
Civil
FARAWI, Ahmad Wael
Civil
*FARRISH, Allison Joanne Katherine
Mechanical
*FELIX, Jesna
Software

Page | 10

�*FLEURY, Carter Andrew William
Mechanical
FOURCAUDOT, Joseph Daniel
Electrical
*FRANCIS, Kuruvila
Mechanical
Minor in Mathematics
*FUNK, Ethan
Civil
*GAUDINO, Grace Catherine
Mechanical
GAZZOLA, Patric Thomas
Electrical
GIANG, Joshua Tuong
Electrical
*GJOKA, Ardaela
Civil
HALL, Michael Graham
Electrical
*HEROUX, Julien Leon
Chemical
*HOPKO, Andrew Gordon Peter
Civil
HOUNKANRIN, Agossa Laurens
Civil
*HUNCHAK, John Owen Hillman
Mechanical
HYSON, Conner John
Electrical
IBRAHIM, Mubashar
Civil
*ILOTT, Marlies Jamena
Chemical
IMAMVERDI, Amin
Mechanical
*ISSO, Ahmad Hannan
Civil

Page | 11

�ITURRALDE, Christia Leah
Civil
*KAMPHOF, Ethan Michael
Mechanical
*KASEKAMP, William Anthony
Mechanical
KAUSHAL, Abhishek
Civil
*KHOKHANI, Krish Manish
Mechanical
KIFORDU, Benedict Ifeanyinachukwu
Mechanical
*KNEZEVIC, Braydon Michael
Software
*KOCH, Scott
Civil
*KOETS, Owen Graham-Urquhart
Civil
*KOONAMA HENNADIGE, Uvindu Hashara
Mechanical
*KOVACIC, Nicole Sage
Civil
KOZHICHIRA, Jafrin George
Mechanical
Minor in Mathematics
*LAHTI, Hanna Sarah
Software
*LARIVIERE, Gabriel Alain
Mechanical
LAWAL, Oluwasegun Emmanuel
Electrical
Co-operative Option
LAWSON, Pablo Matias
Mechanical
Co-operative Option
LECLAIR, Justin Eric
Civil
LEGGE, Kameron Austin Kenneth
Electrical

Page | 12

�LEUNG, Connor
Civil
LIU, Hongbo
Civil
LIU, Runfa
Electrical
*LLAMAS, Phoebe Gwyne
Civil
MADDESS, Shawn Samuel Benjamin
Civil
MARION, Jeremiah
Mechanical
MCCABE, Joseph David Sanderson
Civil
*MCRAE, Veronica Ann
Civil
Minor in Mathematics
MEGHOWALIA, Rahul
Mechanical
MOFTAKHARI KAMRANI N, Amirali
Civil
NIELSEN, Michael Peter
Electrical
NIEMI, Saige Patricia
Electrical
ODIOH, Divine Favour Martins Favour
Electrical
OFNER, Craig Conrad
Civil
OPOKU, Michelle
Civil
ORLUKWU, Ebube
Software
*PACHOLCZAK, Amanda Isabel
Chemical
*PAQUETTE, Nycholas Daniel
Electrical
Co-operative Option

Page | 13

�*PATEL, Charmish Arvindbhai
Mechanical
Co-operative Option
Minor in Mathematics
*PATEL, Milan Shamji
Civil
PATEL, Smit Kamleshkumar
Mechanical
*PHAM, Minh Tien
Electrical
*PORTEOUS, Bruce Henderson
Mechanical
Co-operative Option
*PURI, Ritik
Chemical
RAMDASS, Kendell
Civil
*RATHOD, Harsh Mitesh
Mechanical
Minor in Mathematics
ROLLER, Kilian Patrik
Mechanical
*ROONEY, Jared Reece
Mechanical
*SAAD, Mahmoud Medhat Mahmoud Hussein
Mechanical
SADEQ, Zaid Mohamad
Civil
SADLER, Griffin Wilson
Electrical
SALAH, Mohamud Mohamed
Chemical
*SAMUEL, Clifton George
Software
SANDHU, Harmanpreet Singh
Civil
*SEPA, Dejan
Mechanical

Page | 14

�*SHAAYA, Shahad Shahar
Civil
SHAH, Dhruval Harshilkumar
Software
SHEN, Jia-Wei
Electrical
SIDDIQUI, Muhammad Saad
Chemical
SIDHU, Gavin
Mechanical
SIMARD, Jonathan Eric
Mechanical
SINGH, Baldeep
Mechanical
Co-operative Option
SINGH, Birendra Bahadur
Civil
*SINGH, Harmandeep
Civil
*SINGH, Shivdeep
Civil
SMITH, Darian Christopher
Electrical
SOLANO, Jonathan Marco
Civil
STRICKLAND, Matthew A
Electrical
STUPALO, Joseph Alexander
Electrical
TA, Ngoc My Duyen
Chemical
USSHER, Ebenezer O
Civil
*VADAPALLI, Nihita
Mechanical
Minor in Mathematics
*VANDENHAAK, Matthew William
Civil

Page | 15

�*VENERUZZO, Christian Dominic
Mechanical
VIJH, Pratyaksh
Mechanical
*VREUGDENHIL, Joshua Anno
Civil
WALSH, Burke Daniel
Mechanical
WAYLAND, Jordan Cole
Chemical
WAYRYNEN, Maximilian Leo
Civil
*WEBB, Christopher Paul
Mechanical
*YOHANNES, Amanual Habtegebriel
Civil
*ZHOU, Jinjia
Civil
Diploma in Engineering Technology
ADHIKARI, Apurva
Civil
AJAYI, Faramade Olamide
Civil
AWINI, Philip Wintima
Software
BARTEN, Charlie Benjamin Gary
Electrical
BOND, Paul David
Electrical
*CAZA, Christian Michel
Civil
DAVE, Harshi Mittal
Chemical
DOBSON, Tye Ian
Electrical
*DUONG, Chan Hung
Software

Page | 16

�*ELMEHRIKI, Nadine
Civil
FUNK, Isabella Grace
Civil
GRASLEY, Jamie Jordan
Software
*GUILERA, Eva
Electrical
HARRIS, Jackson James
Mechanical
*JAIN, Chaitanya
Electrical
*KUOPPA-AHO, Cory Andrew Allan
Mechanical
LAHTI, Hanna Sarah
Software
*LEVEQUE, Ryan Patrick Michael
Mechanical
*LONGHURST, Jeremy Daniel
Civil
MATHEW, Lois Elsa
Software
*MEANY, Joseph Malcolm
Mechanical
*MOLYNEAUX, Josiah Wayne
Civil
MOORE, Erikson
Mechanical
OGBONNA, Daniella Somtochukwu
Electrical
ORLUKWU, Ebube
Software
PATEL, Krish Kalpeshbhai
Mechatronics
PIASKOWSKI, Kalyn Grace
Civil
*PONKA, Benjamin Heikki
Mechatronics

Page | 17

�RAJA, Eugene Ethan Yohannan
Mechanical
RILEY, Lucas Tom
Mechanical
SANDBERG, Anders Kristopher
Mechanical
SINDREY, Connor Don
Mechanical
*TREMELLING, Mathew Thomas
Civil
UBA, Franca Noella
Software
VISINTIN, David Michael
Mechanical
WARYWODA, Lynden Patrick
Mechanical

Bora Laskin Faculty of Law
Juris Doctor
ABDULLE, Amal M
ANDERSON, Nicholas
Specialization in Aboriginal and Indigenous Law
BAKSH, Bryanna Shana
BALDASSINI, Josiah Diamante
Specialization in Aboriginal and Indigenous Law
*BAXTER, David George
Specialization in Aboriginal and Indigenous Law
BECK, Connor Douglas Wil
Specialization in Aboriginal and Indigenous Law
BERNIER, Stefanie Ann
Specialization in Aboriginal and Indigenous Law
BRUNT, Jenna Erin
Specialization in Aboriginal and Indigenous Law
BULA, Alexandra Maria

Page | 18

�CHAPMAN, Jennifer June
Specialization in Aboriginal and Indigenous Law
COMPEAU, Gabrielle Marie
Specialization in Aboriginal and Indigenous Law
*COSTELLO, Caitlin Jane Woodley
Specialization in Aboriginal and Indigenous Law
DEMIANIUK, Cameron James
DESCHEEMAEKER, Devyn Grace
*DEW, Emmaleigh Irene
Specialization in Aboriginal and Indigenous Law
DOMSKI, Megan Kristen
EGGETT, Jacob James
Specialization in Aboriginal and Indigenous Law
FAMULARI, Joseph Piero
FANK, Alexandra
Specialization in Aboriginal and Indigenous Law
FANK, Daniel Joseph Mouro
*FEDORUK, Lauren Nicole
*FISHER, Simon
Specialization in Aboriginal and Indigenous Law
FLEMING, Eliza C
GILL, Diljot Kaur
Specialization in Aboriginal and Indigenous Law
GUIDOLIN, Renato Justin
Specialization in Aboriginal and Indigenous Law
HAYES, Hailey Kendall
HOOPER, Bradley Allen
Specialization in Aboriginal and Indigenous Law
HOSSEIN ZADEH, Aida
Specialization in Aboriginal and Indigenous Law
KENEFORD, Ella Clarice
LATINA, Natasha
*LAWSON-RIMMER, Kaitee Patricia
MACKENZIE, Hunter Benjamin

Page | 19

�MADIO, Nathan Joel
MALLEY, Shaun Alexander
Specialization in Aboriginal and Indigenous Law
MCCARTNEY, Tiffany Leah
MCKENZIE, Francine Faith
Specialization in Aboriginal and Indigenous Law
NEVRENCAN, Maiya Marie Zivka
Specialization in Aboriginal and Indigenous Law
OGDEN, Laura Kathleen
ORFALI, Katherine
PADDON, Andrew James
PANCHBHAYA, Farah Salim
PANJU, Zahra Fatema Mohamed Akbarali
PERSIA, Cara Marie
PLATANITIS, Joshua Michael
Specialization in Aboriginal and Indigenous Law
PRINGLE, Alvin Shane
Specialization in Aboriginal and Indigenous Law
*QUAN, Ethan
Specialization in Aboriginal and Indigenous Law
SALESKI, Alexa Margaret
Specialization in Aboriginal and Indigenous Law
SHARMA, Raman
Specialization in Aboriginal and Indigenous Law
SHAULE, Erika Hilja
Specialization in Aboriginal and Indigenous Law
SKYNNER, Sydney Caroline
Specialization in Aboriginal and Indigenous Law
SLESSOR, Emily Nicole
Specialization in Aboriginal and Indigenous Law
SORAMAKI, Samantha Vaughn Candice
SPADE, Cassandra Neebin Lauren
Specialization in Aboriginal and Indigenous Law

Page | 20

�SPENCE, Tamara Helen
*STEWART, Mason Donald
SWEDAK, Grant Forsyth
THIRUNAVUKARASU, Vaisnavi
THOMPSON, Aundrea Leigh
Specialization in Aboriginal and Indigenous Law
VERBEEK, Johannes Herbertus
Specialization in Aboriginal and Indigenous Law
VIZI, Karlee M

Page | 21

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
      <file fileId="16020" order="6">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/d3b62a6d3be3a36e9f71c7faa2b41970.pdf</src>
        <authentication>6d8fb7027fc8169f19fe0d372aa2e92a</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="108014">
                    <text>Graduating Class of 2025
Ceremony 2 - Thursday May 29, 2025 (2:00 pm)
Hello. We are delighted to welcome you, your families, and friends,
as we celebrate your achievements at Lakehead University.
Today we celebrate the success of your academic achievements!
We are please to announce the following list of graduates
from the following Faculties:
•

Faculty of Education

•

Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences

~
Faculty of Education
Master of Education
ADDO, Solomon
Educational Studies
ADOKWU, Iveren Tseayo
Educational Studies
AJRI, Nilofar
Educational Studies
ALLEN, Deborah Ruth
Education for Change
Specialization in Social Justice Education
AMANKWAH, Mavis
Educational Studies
BAI, Duning
Educational Studies

Page | 1

�BELLAVANCE, Jadyn Martina
Education for Change
Specialization in Indigenous Education
CARRIERE, Caelan Ames
Education for Change
Specialization in Social Justice Education
CHAUVIN GARANT, Hope Mae Marie
Education for Change
Specialization in Indigenous Education
Thesis: In the Interest of Reconciliation in Education - Inclusive Indigenous Content and
Modifications to the Ontario Social Studies and History Curriculum from 1998 to 2023
CHEN, Huiting
Educational Studies
CHENG, Ting
Educational Studies
CHU, Hui
Educational Studies
CLAYTON, Victor Andrei
Education for Change
Specialization in Social Justice Education
DARKEY, Lucy
Education for Change
Specialization in Environmental and Sustainability Education
DHILLON, Ramanpreet Kaur
Educational Studies
ERTL, Aryn Marissa
Educational Studies
GE, Yuqi
Educational Studies
GEHRS-WHYTE, Emma
Education for Change
Specialization in Social Justice Education and Environmental and Sustainability Education
GUNAWARDANA, Denipitiyage Wathsala Lakmali
Educational Studies
GYASI, Stephen
Educational Studies
KAUR, Harleen
Educational Studies

Page | 2

�KOMOLAFE, Ranmilowo
Education for Change
Specialization in Social Justice Education
KOSTROSKY-WAREHAM, Nicole
Education for Change
Specialization in Indigenous Education
KRISHNA DEVI, Krishna Devi
Educational Studies
LALONDE, Debra Lynn
Education for Change
Specialization in Social Justice Education
LEROUX, Sarah
Education for Change
Specialization in Indigenous Education and Environmental and Sustainability Education
LIU, Mei
Educational Studies
MAUNULA, Alyssa
Education for Change
Specialization in Indigenous Education and Environmental and Sustainability Education
MCINRUE, Erin Nicole
Education for Change
Specialization in Indigenous Education
NA, Johnsy
Educational Studies
PAUCAR RESTREPO, Juliana
Education for Change
Specialization in Social Justice Education and Gender and Women’s Studies
Thesis: Mapping my Latinx body in Canada: Challenging internalized anti-fat bias
QI, Lin
Educational Studies
RAISA, Rawnak Rafa
Educational Studies
ROJAS URREA, Maria Del Mar
Education for Change
Specialization in Social Justice Education
SCOTT, Neil
Educational Studies
SGAMBELLURI, Isabella Grace
Educational Studies

Page | 3

�SIDDIQ, Md Abu Bakar
Education for Change
Specialization in Social Justice Education
SMITH, Sadie-Ellen Dell
Educational Studies
SUMANDEEP KAUR, Sumandeep Kaur
Educational Studies
SUN, Feihan
Educational Studies
TYAGI, Anita
Education for Change
Specialization in Social Justice Education
WANG, Yingying
Educational Studies
XIE, Yonghong
Educational Studies
YANG, Tianrong
Educational Studies
ZHANG, XIAOMING
Educational Studies
ZHAO, Chang
Education for Change
Specialization in Social Justice Education
Bachelor of Education – Professional Program
*ANSARI, Ali Hassan
*ANTON PARAMANAYAGAM, Karolina A
*BENJAMIN, Ryan Asher
*BLACKWELL, Amy Elizabeth
*BOHONOS, Brenna Carol
*BROWNING, Siobhan Eva May
*BULLER, Cole Luke
CALABRESE, Jacklyn Toni
CARR, Erica Lynne
CARRIGAN, Stephane Michel

Page | 4

�*CHAGNON, Kaitlyn Marie
CHARLTON, Cameron Issac
*CODERRE, Grace Christine
*COLE, Alexandria Laurinne
*DAVENPORT, Andi Noel Marie
DAVIS, Morgan Danielle
*DECORTE, Aidyn Thomas Joseph
DIPIETRO, Luke Anthony
*DOWHOS, Nikolaos
FEDORUK, Alexandria Johanna Maria
*FINLEY, Malorie Ruth
*FLETCHER, Carl
*FORSYTH, Kit Nathaniel C
*FORTNER, Olivia Claire
*GARRETT, Larisa
*GHAWALI, Sabina
*GHAWALI, Sarina
*GIBSON, Victoria Ashley
*GILES, Renee Katelynn
*GREEN, Brynn Elizabeth
*HARDER, Alyssa Chelsea Helene
*HISCOX, Emma Renee Victoria
*HOUSTON, Rachel Lynn
ISENOR, Ryan Taylor
*JACKSON, Emily Elizabeht Anne
*JACOBSON, Jenna Patricia
*JAIN, Rachita
*JOHNSON, Delaney Loryle

Page | 5

�*KALYTA, Viktoria Madison
KANDANCHATHA, Bhagyasree
KATSIGIANNIS, Eva
*KONTIO, Regan Alysa
KUTOK, Jordan Alexandria
*LAMPO, Tia Kristin
*LEISHMAN, Abigail Rose Margaret
LIM, Seongjun
*LORUSSO, Gabriel Donovan
*LOREY, Sarah Lisel
MACDONALD, Madison
*MACIAS, Vanessa Hope
MALLON, Ryan John
*MAROK, Jasmine Kaur
*MCKAY, Jennifer
*MIHALJEVIC, Makayla Nicole
*MORTLEY, Enya Nicole
*MURPHY, Joelle Michele
*NICHOLL, Natasha Patricia
*OWUSU-AFRIYIE, Vanessa
PATTERSON, Eden Frances
*PELTONEN, Kari Brian Walter
*PEREIRA, Natalia Kathleen
RAMDHARRY, Shalini Beverley
*RAWN, Jenna Anne
*REIBLING, Lauryn Jennifer
*ROBBINS, Sydney Marion Ghislaine
*ROJIK, Alexis Faith

Page | 6

�*ROSS, Ryan Ronald Rejean
*ROSS, Shannon Lois
SCHMIDT, Mark D
*SCHOALES, Sarah Angela
*SEABY, Rebecca Anne
*SHORTREED, Pasquel Grace Irene
SIMPSON, Emma Zhoulin
*SKRIPKARIUK, Nicole Jessica
*STANLEY, Keaghan Iris
*SWIFT, Hayley Joan
TETREAULT, Vanessa
TROY, Daniel
*TYKOLIS-HORST, Mikayla
*WALSH, Matthew
*WELSH, Ryan Ramond
*WHENT, Caitlyn Rochelle
WILKINSON, Kyle Jacob
*WISE, Izabella Sarah
ZIVOLAK, Jacob Patrick
Bachelor of Education Concurrent with the Faculty of Health and Behavioural
Sciences
BROCK, Elizabeth Kathleen Melody
*DAROSA, Victoria Marie
*GRIEVE, Sarah Erin
*KOK, Abbie Jane
*MARR, Daria Blaze
NEWTON, Natalie Faith
*POPOVIC, Tatyana

Page | 7

�*TRAPPER, Taryn
WALSH, Kaitlyn Elizabeth
Bachelor of Education Concurrent with the Faculty of Science and Environmental
Studies
DAI, Yiran
*JIANG, Shujing
*LI, Haoran
*TANG, Yufei
*TRAER, Heidi Caroline
*WANG, Zhenni
*XING, Pei Zhi
Bachelor of Education Concurrent with the Faculty of Social Sciences and
Humanities
*AIELLO, Baldino Jordan
*ARELLA, Sarah Elizabeth
BENNETT, Liadan
*BJORKLUND, Tara
CAMPBELL, Miranda
CASASANTA, Isabella Victoria
*CHASSE, Alyson Aisling Marie
*CRONK, Julianna
*FARIA, Julia Isabelle
*FERGUSON, Kira Bettie
*FERNANDES, Vanessa Pacheco
*FORTIN, Maxime Nicholas
*FREDRICKSON, Riley Elizabeth
*GAUTHIER, Joshua
*GEROLAMI, Ashley Alexandra Lynne

Page | 8

�*GILCHRIST, Ashley Elizabeth
HARRIS, Zachary Warren
*HARTLEY, Katherine
*JEWELL, Julianna Emily
*LAMBERT, Brynne Vawn
*LARRETT, Hailey Anastasia
*LEHTO, MacKenzie Lea
*LINDER, Ashley
MACDOUGALL, Jessica Kayla
MARTIN, Haley Alicia
*MAYER, Jillian Amelia
*MCGIRR, Juliet Elizabeth
MIDWOOD, Andrew Frederick Donald
MOYER, Samuel Dalton Arthur
*PATTERSON, Justyne Rose Frances
PETSNICK, Helene Ruth
*PLANT, Shayleigh Marion
ROBERTS, Skyler Montbrun
SCHIRA, Shelby-Lin Annette
SIMMONS, Bryanne Sarah
SLUGGETT, Rachel Kate
*SOBERING, Tyler Alexander
ST JACQUES, Natalie Helanna
*STROMNESS, Emily Anne
*TASSONE, Sarah Katelyn
*VISSER, Caitlan May
Diploma in Technological Education
*HULS, Shawn Oliver

Page | 9

�*SAFAR, Justin Michael
Indigenous Language Teacher Diploma
NAKOOCHEE, Jane Dorothy

Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences
Doctor of Philosophy
BENSON, Alycia
Health Sciences
Dissertation: A spirit-led journey to relational accountability – a visiting approach to
understanding interconnections between substance use, healing pathways, and minobimaadiziwin: conversations with anishinabek
Master of Health Sciences
MENLAH, John
Thesis: Housing Crisis and International Students' Health - A Case Study at Lakehead
University
Master of Public Health
EDWARDS, Jaqueline
Public Health
Specialization in Social-Ecological Systems, Sustainability and Health
GOBA, Rikki Michelle
Public Health
Specialization in Nursing
GUTIERREZ, Raquel E
Public Health
Specialization in Social-Ecological Systems, Sustainability and Health
HUDASEK, Josselyn Marie
Public Health
Specialization in Gerontology
KLIMENKO, Maria
Public Health
Specialization in Social-Ecological Systems, Sustainability and Health
LEAVENS, Cheryl Ann
Public Health
MAGSI, Madiha
Public Health

Page | 10

�PAUL, Bethany
Public Health
Specialization in Social-Ecological Systems, Sustainability and Health
RAPOSO, Katie Teresa
Public Health
Specialization in Specialization in Indigenous and Northern Health
TUTT, Jason
Public Health
Specialization in Epidemiology
Master of Science
CARUSO, Justin Ian
Kinesiology
WADHWA, Aaila Arora
Kinesiology
Master of Social Work
JAGGER, Kimberly Noelle
PANONTIN, Jenna Lee
WILSON, Christine Margaret
Thesis: The Apology Mosaic: Sexual Assault Survivors’ Experience in Receiving an Apology
From the Perpetrator as a Form of Accountability
Honours Bachelor of Arts
*ADINEH, Shahla
Psychology Specialized Honours
*ALEXANDROV, Martin
Psychology Specialized Honours
Minor in Criminology
*BENNARDO, Elizabeth Jane
Psychology
Minor in Criminology
BOBYK-GOHEEN, Hope Evagayle
Psychology
Minor in Criminology
*BOUCHARD, Beau Travis
Psychology Specialized Honours
*D SOUZA, Melinda Pamella
Psychology Specialized Honours
Minor in Aging and Health

Page | 11

�*GOUVEIA, Jia-Li
Psychology Specialized Honours
Minor in English
GREEN, Mikalea Sydney Marie
Psychology
*HALL, Kiera Sage
Psychology
Minor in Criminology
HARGREAVES, Tessa-Lee Elizabeth
Psychology
*HOARD, Tanner Jarrell
Psychology Specialized Honours
Minor in Philosophy
*JARVIS, Emily Joanne
Psychology
KELLY-SAMPLE, Haley Marie
Psychology
*KOK, Abbie Jane
Psychology
MARR, Daria Blaze
Psychology
*MCQUEEN, Mackenzie Faith Shirley
Psychology Specialized Honours
Minor in Philosophy
*MCMENEMY, Jeffrey
Psychology Specialized Honours
*MELOCHE, Abbegayle Catherine Elaine
Psychology
MIRONSKY, Ilana Mary
Psychology
Minor in Criminology
NWIZU, Ifeatu
Psychology
*NYSTROM, Levi Osiris
Psychology and Gender and Women's Studies
*PANETTA, Cheyenne
Psychology Specialized Honours
Minor in Criminology

Page | 12

�POPOVIC, Tatyana
Psychology
RANTA-DIEGEL, Alexandria Tessa Mirjam
Psychology
STEPHENSON, Tiffany Alice
Psychology
Bachelor of Arts
BONFIGLIO, Emily Riane
Psychology
*BOUKOURIS, Natasha Louise
Psychology
BROCK, Elizabeth Kathleen Melody
Psychology
CHARTERS, Richard James
Psychology
*GILLESPIE, Jasmine Evelyn
Psychology
GIVEN, Micheal John
Psychology
GRIEVE, Sarah Erin
Psychology
HATFIELD, Brooke Isabella
Psychology
JEWELL, Julianna Emily
Psychology
KATARIA, Ayush
Psychology
KUBER, Aaradhya Mahesh
Psychology
*LANTZ, Brittan Patricia
Psychology
MASSIE, Noah
Psychology
NEWTON, Natalie Faith
Psychology
TRAPPER, Taryn
Psychology

Page | 13

�Honours Bachelor of Kinesiology
BASHARI, Paniz
*BUCHAN, Julia Rose
*CHOW, Harrison Grant
*DAROSA, Victoria Marie
*DEAGAZIO, Brianna
Minor in Psychology
*DORION, Victoria Ann
DOWHOSZYA, Colton Richard John
*GIANCOLA, Veronica Ruth
GRAY, Hannah Michelle
*GROSHEVA, Sofia Aleksandrovna
HICKLIN, Olivia Peyton
HOWELL, Morgan Blaze
*JEDRUCH, Isabella Maria
*JENSSON, Corissa Maxine
*JOHNSTON, Emma Rae
Minor in Aging and Health
*JOY, Priya
LEBANO, Noah Michael
LINDSAY, Madison Kathleen
*MAKIN, Samantha Anne
Minor in Psychology
*MARION, Fionnuala
Minor in Indigenous Learning
*MIGAY, Samuel Rudy Stuart
*NELSON, MacKenzie Kate
NICOL, Mackenzie Evelyn

Page | 14

�*OPPEDISANO, Aiden McIntyre
Minor in Mathematics
ORIECUIA, Noah Johnathan
PAVLETIC, Megan Hope Batista
PETTINGER, Jessica Kathleen
PRADHAN, Shreya
*PYHTILA, Ethan Christopher
*ROBINSON, Peter-Paul
*RYDER-METHOT, Lana
Minor in Aging and Health
*SCHULZ, Sarah Katherine
Minor in Criminology
SHAH, Sanya Sheetal
SKERRITT, Steve Strait
WALSH, Kaitlyn Elizabeth
WEBSTER, Aiden Alexander
WHYNOT, Maren Lee
*WILLIAMSON, Alleigh-Jane Elizabeth
Bachelor of Kinesiology 4 Year
GERULA, Erika
HARGREAVES, Carter Roger
QUEDENT, Michelle Leigh Dawn
SCHMITT, Colton James Patrick
Minor in English
Honours Bachelor of Science
*DASILVA, Aly Mya
Psychology
Minors in Criminology and Biology
*HANLEY, Scarlett Rose
Psychology
Minor in Biology
JAMEUS, Noah Nicholas
Psychology

Page | 15

�JOSEPH, Irine
Psychology
*KNOX, Brianna
Psychology Specialized Honours
MELGAR, Daniela
Psychology
*NAEEM, Muhammad Ahmad
Psychology Specialized Honours
PUGLIESE, Naleah Paige
Psychology
Minor in Criminology
*SOORIYAKUMAR, Thanusan
Psychology Specialized Honours
*WHITE, Sydney Rae
Psychology
Minor in Biology
Bachelor of Science
*CORMIER, Kendall Gibson
Psychology
DOYLE, Owen Robert
Psychology
KNIGHT, Vincent
Psychology
STOVER, Tristan Rian
Psychology
Bachelor of Science in Nursing
*ADENI, Oluwadamilola Oluwadara
ADLER, Alexander Vladimir
*AHMED, Fareedah Asabi
*AKANNE, Nebechi Nwabuonu
*AKANNE, Raluchi Nwadiuto
ALBERTSON, Emma Grace
ALLEN, Mikayla Justice
ALVES, Victoria Madison

Page | 16

�*AMANKONA, Prince Kwadwo
ANVAR, Maryam
AROWOSAFE, Aanuoluwa Gift
ARPIN, Sydney Alyssa
ARTHUR, Philip Kwakye
*BADMUS-OREKAN, Taiwo
BAPTISTE, Dominique Danielle
BARNEY, Ryan David
*BARNSLEY, Shannon Rae Marjorie
*BIH, Marldel Awah
BOLAND, Seth Claude
BOND, Avery Makenna
*BOULANGER, Anne Lucille
BOWERS, Isabella Vittoria
BRUGGEMAN, Victoria Amaya Diaz
*CAHILL, Grace Michaela
CAMBLY, Mackenzie Cora
CAMERON, Sadie Anjolina Brooke
Minor in Psychology
*CHAHAL, Simrun
CHAU, Maya
CLEMENT, Sydney Shyanne
COCCIMIGLIO, Noah Roberto
*COOK, Alexander Philip John
CROSS, Rhiannon Eva Rose
DICKSON, Bryn Arianna Taylor
*DOMINIC, Prince
DORE, Fatoumata Teta

Page | 17

�DROTAR, Isaac Christopher
DUPUIS, Devan Alexander
DUROJAIYE, Elizabeth Oluwatomisin
*EDGAL, Omolua Stephanie
EHIZOMWANGIE, Claudia Efia
EKANEM, Daniel Ekong
ENASHE, Addisu
*EQUBEZGIE, Surafel Mebratu
*EZIE, Sussan Akudo
FARRELL, Sydney Lynn
*FEIR, Michael Francis
*FERNANDO, Shehan Mark
FLOYDE, Jordyn
*FOOTE, Hannah Grace
FORBES, Spencer Andrew
FREITAS, Abigail Nicole
*FRYKAS-MONTGOMERY, Samantha Sue
GADI, Jemima Charles
*GANJOSA, Chaltu Abedi
GEORGE, Betty Babu
GIERTUGA, Dawson Joseph
GINGERA, Hannah Elizabeth
*GONZALEZ VALVERDE, Emily Victoria
*GRANHOLM, Lukas William
GRAVELLE, Payton Rae
GREBTSOV, Dmitry
GREBTSOVA, Liudmila

Page | 18

�GREEN, Amber Rose
Minor in Criminology
GULUTZEN, Kelsey Sandra
Minor in Aging and Health
GUTHRIE, Emma Beatrice Irene
GUTIERREZ, China Danielle Maglalang
HAGARTY, Taya Elizabeth Marie
HARBI, Nasro Aden
*HARVEY, Paige Colleen
HAYWARD, Stefanie
HIGGINS, Samantha Doris Alyssa
*HOANG, My Ngoc
*HOEKSTRA, Tiffany Jacqueline
*HOPF, Simone
Minor in Psychology
HOPKINS, Jendaya Carol Rose
*HUNT, William James
HUYLER, Naasson Zarrusho
*IRVINE, Meaghan Rachel
JAMES, Steffi Ann
JANSEN, Morgan Carley Grace
JAREMEY, Kailee Lynn
JEON, Jaehyeon
KAJORINNE, Kyra Veronica
KAVCAR, Brittany Amber
KIM, Thomas Dongchan
KRUITWAGEN, Lindsay Claire
*LACHIMEA, Ella Shea Marie
LAI, Jasmine Boi

Page | 19

�LAZINSKI, Abigail Marie
LEHTO, Taylor Andrew Doran
LENNSTROM, Laurisa Anne Celine
LEONARD, Elise Kristin Paivi
Minor in Psychology
MA, Chong
MADIMBU, Regina Tendaishe
MAKSYMIU, Sydne Valerie
MARCHAND, Sarah Emilee
METANAD, Michelle Danille
*MICELI, Tyler Alton
MIGLIAZZA, Lucianna
*MODHAVADIYA, Sanjay Punjabhai Punjabhai
MOHAMMADI, Parsa
MUIR, Jenny Marie
NADEAU, Jayda Sarah Abigail
NEBESKY, Isabelle Jean
NEVES, Mercedes Castellani
NGUYEN, Chau Phuc Minh
*NOAH, Uduak Ema
OGUNLANA, Oluwatobi Rebecca
*OGUZIE, Sochima Raphael
OKOKPUJIE, Akpotobore
OKOLI, Stanley Chinweikpe
OLAWUMI, Deborah Damilola Oluwatosin
*ONOVIRAN, Salma Chinwe
*ONYANGO, Linda Awiti
ORMSTON, MacKenzie Reese

Page | 20

�*OZERKEVICH, Rachael Amanda
PAAVOLA, Haiden Maddox
PACATANG, Angelica Cudiera
*PARK, Siyoung
*PATWARDHAN, Anuradha N
*PEDERSEN, Kennedi Lynn
PEREZ, Kurt Aaron Surbano
POLLOCK, Brianna Marie
*POLLOCK, Matthew Fowler
PRESTIDGE, Paige Joan
*PUENTES, Spencer Brady
*RATTE, Melissa Kathryn
ROBINSON, Josie Ann
ROSS, Zachary Blaise
RUDDERHAM, Julia Elizabeth
Minor in Psychology
SALDANHA, Deenal Sabeena
SANAL, Ben Tom
*SANDERSON, Robert Forest Beck
SANNI, Aneezat
*SCOCCHIA, Natalie
*SCULLY, Katherine
*SHEPHERD, Sarah Nathalie
SINCLAIR, Jordyn Margrete
*SIVER, Julia Elizabeth
SMITH, Amanda Jayne
Minor in Psychology
SO, Hyerim
SPEERS, Rhiannon Rose

Page | 21

�STEIN, Astrid Kadjia Ann
STEWART, Ewan Murray Angus
STRICKLAND, Tiffiney Eunica Star
*TANG, Tran Thuy My
TANNAHILL, Tayla Faith
*TAYLOR, Hannah Ruth
*THIBOUTOT, Miera Elizabeth
TRAN, Phuong Thi Minh
*TROMBLEY, Kyle Jordan
UMEH, Chizoba Loveth
*VO, Hoai Thuong
VOCA, Andrra
*WAFULA, Grivinson Wanjala
WARD, Mikaela Tatum Railyn
WHITE, Kendaaz Jon Paul
*WIITALA, Kiira Dawn
*WILLIAMS, Camryn Alexandra
WILSON, Mika Elisabeth
WYVILLE, Cassandra Kathleen
YOUNES, Selena Tilda
*ZARETZKY, Zoe Amber Marie
ZECHNER, Mylee Ann Rose
Honours Bachelor of Social Work
BEGALL, Mandy Lynn
*CARTER, Elizabeth April
CONWAY, Samantha Marie
*DESBIENS, Alyssa Mae
DOLISKA, Kayla Marie

Page | 22

�*EDWARDS, Lisa Marie
*GLOUSHER, Jillian Paige
Concentration in Indigenous Learning
GOODE, Tyler Patrick
Minor in Indigenous Learning
GOVIER, Keira Valerie
*HEMINGWAY, Chloe Michelle
*HILL, Ricki Anne
HOOKE, Olivia Katherine Ann
Minor in Political Science
*ILLSON, Lindsey Dawn
Minor in Psychology
JOSHY, Aleena Mary
KAPLANIS, Ashleigh Lauren
Minor in History
*KILGOUR, Hannah Bethany
LANGTRY, Kelsey Grace
LAPLANTE, Sarah Mariah
LEACH, Denver Jerald
Minor in Psychology
*MAKI, Destiny Dawn
SUNIL, Sayona
SWANSON, Amy Morgan
*WYMAN, Jennifer Dawn
Gii Gashkatoon Gii Kendaaswin Mazina'igan: Indigenous Nurses Entry Program
LYON, Nikita

Page | 23

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
      <file fileId="16021" order="7">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/e78d6ce40d3846e28be4ccb9b7f31c65.pdf</src>
        <authentication>a84253c6c6d00888e51e160895f50aee</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="108015">
                    <text>Graduating Class of 2025
Ceremony 3 - Friday May 30, 2025 (9:00 am)
Hello. We are delighted to welcome you, your families, and friends,
as we celebrate your achievements at Lakehead University.
Today we celebrate the success of your academic achievements!
We are please to announce the following list of graduates
from the following Faculties:
•

Faculty of Natural Resources Management

•

Faculty of Science and Environmental Studies

•

Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities

~
Faculty of Natural Resources Management
Doctor of Philosophy
LAVIGNE, Jonathan
Forest Sciences
Dissertation: Industrial Residuals in Land Reclamation - Enhancing Soil Recovery and
Ecological Function in Disturbed Glacial Soils
ONIRETI, Olaronke Omotayo
Forest Sciences
Dissertation: Interactive effects of photoperiod, soil moisture and carbon dioxide on
ecophysiological traits of yellow birch (betula alleghaniensis)
Master of Forest Management
AMIHERE, Antoinette
DANSOA, Josephine
FOKUO, Tabitha
GURUNG, Manisha

Page | 1

�JEBAMONY KALAMARY, Mersha Jeslin
JOHN KENNEDY, Celestina
JUI, Homaira
MEHDINASAB, Azamalsadat
MANJALY, Bibin Paul
NASIR, Turabi
Master of Science in Forestry
STARR, Sam
Thesis: The Effect of Land Conversion from Forest to Agriculture on Soil Health Indicators in
Rainy River, Ontario
Honours Bachelor of Science in Environmental Management
*CRIBBY, Katelyn
Specialization in Wildlife Conservation and Management
*DE LA MOTHE, Sam Michael
Specialization in Wildlife Conservation and Management
DEVERELL, Caden John
Specialization in Wildlife Conservation and Management
GATT, Sabrina Rose
Specialization in Wildlife Conservation and Management
*GIROUX, Luke Joseph
Specialization in Wildlife Conservation and Management
*GODDEN, Brooke Emily
Specialization in Wildlife Conservation and Management
MCCHRISTIE, Nathan Ryan
Specialization in Wildlife Conservation and Management
RANDALL, Eric Alexander
Specialization in Wildlife Conservation and Management
*THOMSON, Ethan Garret Rolf
Specialization in Conservation Planning and Management
Honours Bachelor of Science in Forestry
*BILOSKI, Scotia Rae
Specialization in Forest Health and Protection
BOUGHN, Samuel Lorne Brown
Specialization in Forest Health and Protection

Page | 2

�CLARK, Taylor
Specialization in Forest Management
*DAVIDSON, Stephanie Ann
Specialization in Forest Management
*GILBERDS, Damien Bruce Lee
Specialization in Forest Management
JONES, Dorsey Atkin
Specialization in Forest Products and Marketing
KIM, Beom
Specialization in Forest Health and Protection
LEAR, Caden Matthew
Specialization in Forest Health and Protection
*MACEWEN, Wyatt William
Specialization in Forest Health and Protection
*PLOURDE, Sarah Mylene
Specialization in Forest Management
RAFIQ, Haider Jamal
Specialization in Forest Management
*SWINN, Madeline
Specialization in Forest Health and Protection
WU, Guyue
Specialization in Forest Health and Protection
YIN, Qingshan
Specialization in Forest Products and Marketing
Faculty of Science and Environmental Studies
Doctor of Philosophy
AFRA, Behrooz
Biotechnology
Dissertation: Flow Control of Low-Reynolds Number Airfoils Using Morphing Surface
KAUR, Navneet
Chemistry and Materials Science
Dissertation: Photonic Sensor Based on Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering for the
Detection of Trace Chemicals
MAO, Yang
Chemistry and Materials Science
Dissertation: Development of Small Molecules Targeting GPCRs (PAR2 &amp; LPA1) for Potential
Use in Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy

Page | 3

�VARSHA, Varsha
Chemistry and Materials Science
Dissertation: Development of Mid-IR Laser
Master of Arts
AHMAD, Md Mustak
Economics
BILLO, Anwirin Joy
Economics
JAMES, Oowo Laura
Economics
KHAN, Mithun
Economics
MAHUVE, Heavenlight
Economics
TREHAN, Jasleen
Economics
Co-operative Option
UMUTONIWASE, Nice
Economics
Master of Science
BHOGARAJU, Vamsi
Computer Science
BOOMINATHAN, Arvind Chidambaram
Computer Science
Thesis: Integrating Multi-omics Data via Latent Space Construction for Breast &amp; Bladder
Cancer Analysis
CHACKO, Renjith Eettickal
Computer Science
CHAKRAVARTY, Aniruddha
Computer Science
DUTTA, Anik
Computer Science
FAKHAR, Usman
Computer Science
Thesis: GraphSAGE-based Approach for Age-specific Multi-omics Biomarker Identification
in Bladder
GOPI, Rithika
Computer Science

Page | 4

�HATKAR, Tanmay Sunil
Computer Science
ISHAQUE, Samia
Computer Science
KAKIMOV, Rustem
Computer Science
Thesis: Upward Book Embeddings of DAGs: Constraint-Based Methods and Embeddability
Analysis
KOMPELLA YAJNA, Sai Santosh
Computer Science
KORUKONDA, Vivek
Computer Science
KOSHY, Jithin Reji
Computer Science
KUNDURU, Sai Asritha
Computer Science
KUSHAL, Kushal
Computer Science
LAUREIJS, Olivia Pauweliena Alde
Archaeological Science
Thesis: The radial wrist as a morphological and functional unit in extant African apes and
humans
LINGAREDDY, Nalini Gururaddi
Computer Science
LIU, Yanxu
Computer Science
NAGARAJAN THIRUPPATHI, Thanesh
Computer Science
NAMINENI, Sai Vishal
Computer Science
ORDOÑEZ AGUERO, Carlos Alberto
Computer Science
PALA, Gowthami Sai Sree Pooja
Computer Science
PAREKH, Aayush Nehal
Computer Science
PATHARE, Pooja
Computer Science

Page | 5

�RAMIGANI, Tharun Reddy
Computer Science
SEKAR, Tharun
Computer Science
SERRACIN MARTINEZ, Abel
Computer Science
SHAIK, Nethan
Computer Science
SHANKAR, Supprethaa
Computer Science
SHUBHAM, Shaksham
Computer Science
SINGH, Amandeep
Computer Science
SINGH, Jaspreet
Computer Science
SINGH, Sukhjeet
Computer Science
SINGH, Yuvraj
Computer Science
SIRASANAGANDLA, Vamsi
Computer Science
TOUGH, Georgina
Biology
Thesis: Investigating the use of paper mill residuals as agricultural soil amendments in
Thunder Bay, Ontario
VENKATRAMAN, Santosh
Computer Science
VINODH KUMAR, Tarun
Computer Science
WARNAKULASURIYA, Nimasha
Computer Science
YU, WEI
Computer Science
Honours Bachelor of Arts
*BLAKELY, Joanna
Geography
Minor in History

Page | 6

�*DOWLING, Meilan
Anthropology
HENDERSON, Amanda Mae
Anthropology
Minor in Sociology
*MOOREY, Paige Raven
Anthropology
*PHILLIPS, Darion
Economics and Political Science
RAINFORD, Megan Elizabeth
Anthropology
*TRAER, Heidi Caroline
Mathematics
Bachelor of Arts
*CALDER, Spencer Jason
Economics and Political Science
*GURBANLI, Ruhiyya
Economics
MASSIE, Dylan Paul
Economics
*TURPIN, Tyler Jordan
Economics
Honours Bachelor of Environmental Science
*BROSSEAU, Marissa Krista
Biology
HARRIS, Paige Ellisa
Biology
MEYER, Rianna C
Biology
*WILSON, Natalie Theresa
Biology
Honours Bachelor of Environmental Studies
*ESSEX, Keira Lyn
Geography

Page | 7

�Honours Bachelor of Science
ARRIL, Beth Anna
Biology
*BHABA, Kartik
Computer Science
BHATT, Kshitij Kiran
Computer Science
*BLAGDEN, John Angelo
Computer Science
*BOSCH, Isabella Chiara
Biology with Concentration in Neuroscience
BRUNSON, Adaire
Computer Science
Co-operative Option
*BUXTON, Adrien
Applied Life Sciences
*CANCADE, Alexis Bryn
Biology
*CHILAKALA, Sai Ajay
Computer Science
*CHUDASAMA, Drashtant
Computer Science
Co-operative Option
*CLARA, Benjamin David
Biology
COATS, Cameron Angus
Geology
*COCEANCIC, Sandra Kirsten
Biology with Concentration in Biodiversity and Conservation
DEV, Gaurav
Computer Science
*DIGIUSEPPE, Matteo John
Applied Life Sciences with Concentration in Biomedical Sciences
*DOBSON, Jett Evan
Physics with Concentration in Biomedical Physics
*DOUGLAS, Aislyn Rose Lorraine
Applied Life Sciences with Concentration in Biomedical Sciences

Page | 8

�*GABRIELE, Jordan Ellis
Anthropology
*GILES, Garrett Raymond
Computer Science
GRAHAM, Kyle Bruce
Computer Science
Co-operative Option
*HARDER, Mackenzie Renee
Applied Life Sciences with Concentration in Biomedical Sciences
*HASNAIN, Mahmood Shah Ashfaqul
Computer Science
Specialization in Game Programming
Minor in Mathematics
HUNNY, Fnu
Computer Science
*JACKSON, Parker Logan
Computer Science
Specialization in Game Programming
JOHN, Isiah Sydney
Geology
*LAWSON, Benjamin John
Chemistry with Concentration in Medical Sciences
Minor in Biology
*LE, Gia Hieu
Computer Science
Minor in Mathematics
LE, Tam Minh
Biology with Concentration in Neuroscience
*LEHTO, Aiden Peter William
Chemistry with Concentration in Medical Sciences
*LELOND, Shanna Maria
Biology
*LOMBARDO, Claudia Emma
Biology
*LYONS-BARNEY, Isaac
Computer Science
*MARTIN, Emily
Biology

Page | 9

�*MCDONAGH, James William Xiang
Computer Science
Specialization in Game Programming
MEMON, Samir Anwar
Computer Science
*MISHRA, Abhinav
Computer Science
*MOTIYANI, Harshkumar Kamleshbahai
Mathematical Physics
Minor in Mathematics
*MURRAY, Bayze Telford
Geology
OLIVARES HERRERA, Malakai Nadya
Biology with Concentration in Biodiversity and Conservation
*ORIECUIA, Nicholas Matthew
Biology and Chemistry
*PALAHNUK, Emily Ann
Biology with Concentration in Biodiversity and Conservation
PAREIRA, Carron
Computer Science
Minor in Mathematics
*PARKER, Emily MacKenzie
Applied Life Sciences with Concentration in Biomedical Sciences
*PARMAR, Shikha Shashi
Computer Science
*PATEL, Havan Mukeshkumar
Computer Science
*PATEL, Janviben
Computer Science
PATEL, Om Nileshkumar
Computer Science
*PRINCE, Taylor Aspen
Biology and Chemistry
PUTMAN, Daniel Robert
Geology
RAJALATHAN, Prishaa Kajalucksmi
Applied Life Sciences with Concentration in Biomedical Sciences

Page | 10

�RAYNOR, Hamish Pierson Hope
Geoarchaeology
RICHARDS, Grace Victoria
Biology
*ROBINSON, Marjorie Louise Jane
Biology with Concentration in Biodiversity and Conservation
*SANTAMARIA RODRIGUEZ, Emilio Daniel
Computer Science
*SHAW, Timothy Michael
Computer Science
Minor in Mathematics
*SLAUBAUGH, Sierra Danielle
Chemistry
SONANI, Janvi Maheshbhai
Computer Science
*STEVENS, Lauren Marie
Biology with Concentration in Neuroscience
*STEWART, Jennah Eliza
Anthropology
*TANG, Yufei
Mathematics
*TAYLOR, Sarah
Biology with Concentration in Plant Sciences
*TRINH, Henry Cong
Applied Life Sciences
VAISHNAV, Gyan
Computer Science
*VARGAS RUIZ, Paulina
Biology with Concentration in Neuroscience
*VATAMANELU, Angelina Maria
Biology with Concentration in Biodiversity and Conservation
WEISE, Emily Darlene
Chemistry
WILLMORE, Ethan James
Applied Life Sciences
WRONOWSKI, Megan Ann
Biology with Concentration in Animal Sciences

Page | 11

�Bachelor of Science 4 Year
AJITH, Anagha
Applied Life Sciences with Concentration in Biomedical Sciences
KAINEMBABAZI, Joanna
Geology
ZENIA, Shaheen
Applied Life Sciences with Concentration in Biomedical Sciences
Bachelor of Science
AMBALIYA, Tanvi Rasikbhai
Computer Science
BARAIYA, Hirva Hiteshbhai
Computer Science
BEALS, Keelin Bryn
General Program
*CERVI, Dante Alexander
General Program
CORDONE, Amanda Kimberley
General Program
*DAI, Yiran
Mathematics
GHOJOGH, Aydin
Computer Science
GIGI, Gia
Biology
GILES, Garrett Raymond
Mathematics
HARRI, Cameron William Stanley
General Program
HRIDY, Redowana Rashid
Computer Science
JAIN, Angelena Sara
Biology
*JIANG, Shujing
Mathematics
KAHAR, Dhrumil Motilal
Computer Science

Page | 12

�KHAN, Tawhid Ashfaq
Computer Science
*KHOKHANI, Krish Manish
Mathematics
*LI, Haoran
Mathematics
MACLEAN, Guinevere Theodosia
Physics
*MCDONAGH, James William Xiang
Mathematics
MCTAVISH, Rachel Lynn
Natural Science
MISTRY, Kamal Balvant
General Program
O'HARE, Payton Colleen
Natural Science
PINTO, Royston Allwyn
General Program
POTLAPALLY, Abhinaya
Computer Science
*SCOTT, Emma-Lee Jane Clare
Geography
*SEMPLAY, Sunil
Computer Science
SUTHERLAND, Callie Frances
General Program
TAMRU, Abel Mickial
Computer Science
TOMS, Mariza
Biology
VORA, Chaitya Nishit
Computer Science
*WANG, Zhenni
Mathematics
*XING, Pei Zhi
Mathematics

Page | 13

�Gii Gashkatoon Gii Kendaaswin Mazina'igan: Indigenous STEM Access Program
ARNAQJUAQ, Haily
RILEY, Daneille

Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities
Master of Arts
APPIAH, Evangelina
Social Justice Studies
BOUCHARD, Jennifer Ann May
Social Justice Studies
CAMPBELL, John Farley
History
DUBE, Trista Mary Arlene
Social Justice Studies
GLEDHILL, Danielle Gloria
Social Justice Studies
GREENBERG, Shannon
Social Justice Studies
Specialization in Gender and Women’s Studies
HELMER, Tiffany Rose
English and Cultural Studies
Specialization in Gender and Women’s Studies
JOKINEN-PACKER, Nikos
History
KADOLPH, Mitchell Peter
History
KAKEGAMIC, Rachel
History
MANNING-MAYFIELD, Brianna Yvonne
Social Justice Studies
MENSAH, Beatrice Pokuaa
Sociology
Specialization in Social Justice Studies
MIREAULT, Heather
Social Justice Studies

Page | 14

�MOK, Vivian
Social Justice Studies
MONTALBAN, Jocelyn Nicole
Social Justice Studies
NICHOLS, Jason Robert Paul
History
NOGARD, Hali
History
OVERSBY, Maya Mairead
Social Justice Studies
OWCA, Preston Jonathon
Social Justice Studies
ROGERS, Hilary Ann
Social Justice Studies
SABOURIN, Patrick
Sociology
Specialization in Social Justice Studies
SAPKOTA, Dirgha Narayan
English and Cultural Studies
SHANTO, Arafat Alamgir
History
WILKINSON, Scott
Sociology
WINGROVE, Alyssa Jaimee
English and Cultural Studies
WOODS, Stefani Nadine
Social Justice Studies
Honours Bachelor of Arts
ARELLA, Sarah Elizabeth
English
*ARIFIN, Katya Margaret
English
Minor in Indigenous Learning
ARMSTRONG, Kirsten Elizabeth
Political Science (Pre-Law)
Minor in Criminology
*BEEBE, Darrah Ashleigh Paige
History

Page | 15

�*BHOLA, Tristan Krishna Bhikam
Political Science (Pre-Law)
BJORKLUND, Tara
French
*BOARDMAN, Eve Adele
Political Science (Pre-Law)
BRITT, Brandon Joseph
Political Science
*EXCE, Ossman Danger
Philosophy
Minor in Indigenous Learning
FERGUSON, Kira Bettie
History
FORTIN, Maxime Nicholas
French
*FREDRICKSON, Riley Elizabeth
Gender and Women's Studies
*GARCIA RODRIGUEZ, Gianella
Political Science (Pre-Law)
*GAUTHIER, Joshua
French and History
GRAHAM, Dawson August Grant
History
*HAMAR, Katerina
Political Science (Pre-Law)
*HARTLEY, Katherine
Music
JIANG, Yuxin
History
*JUTILA, Emma Lynn
English
LABONTE, Shantay Leena
Political Science (Pre-Law)
LAMBERT, Brynne Vawn
English
LARRETT, Hailey Anastasia
History
Minor in English

Page | 16

�LEHTO, MacKenzie Lea
English
*LINDER, Ashley
Sociology
LISI, Orion
English
MACDOUGALL, Jessica Kayla
English
MARTIN, Haley Alicia
History
MAYER, Jillian Amelia
English
Minor in History
MCGIRR, Juliet Elizabeth
Sociology
MIDWOOD, Andrew Frederick Donald
History
*NEILL, Franca Anne
Political Science (Pre-Law)
Minor in Gender and Women's Studies
OLIVER, Carter Richard Douglas
History and Political Science
PAGE, Kristofer Connor
History
*PARKIN, Owen Gregory
Political Science (Pre-Law)
Minor in History
PATTERSON, Justyne Rose Frances
English
*PFEIFER, Kendra Diane
Political Science (Pre-Law)
Minor in Sociology
POILE, Zachery Joseph
Political Science (Pre-Law)
RICHARDSON, Cohen
Political Science (Pre-Law)
ROBERTS, Skyler
English and History

Page | 17

�*ROWAT, Andrew Kenneth
Sociology and Gender and Women's Studies
*RUSNAK, Eric Michael
History and Philosophy
SANTERRE, Nicole Gisele
Political Science (Pre-Law)
*SCHIRA, Shelby-Lin Annette
Music
SLUGGETT, Rachel Kate
History
SOBERING, Tyler Alexander
English
Minor in Philosophy
SOLOMON, Michele Bernadette
Indigenous Learning
ST JACQUES, Natalie Helanna
Music
*TALBOT, Madison Grace
Political Science and Gender and Women's Studies
*TASSONE, Sarah Katelyn
French
Minor in History
VISSER, Caitlan May
History
Minor in Psychology
WESLEY, Erin Kelly
English
*WETENDORF, Joshua Nicholas
History
*WOOD, Olivia Justine
History
Minor in Philosophy
*YAU SHENG, Chin
Political Science
Bachelor of Arts
AIELLO, Baldino Jordan
Sociology

Page | 18

�*ANDRESEN, Matthew Ivar
History
*ANGUS, Alyssa Marcela
Indigenous Learning
ANSTEY, Lilya Erin
Sociology
BANNING, Izzabella
General Program
BENNETT, Liadan
History
BOLAND, Sylvia Anne
Sociology
BROWN, Ava-Mae Doris
Political Science (Pre-Law)
CAMPBELL, Madelyn Louise
French
CAMPBELL, Miranda
Sociology
*CARON, Alyssa Augustine Diane
Political Science (Pre-Law)
CARRASCO, Tait Josiah David
Political Science (Pre-Law)
*CLENDENNING, Calie
Indigenous Learning
*CLOWES, Danica Marie
General Program
CORY, Hayleigh Beth
General Program
*DELICATE, Adira Rachel
History
*DUGUAY, Ethan James
General Program
FARIA, Julia Isabelle
French
*FAYE, Robin Skya
Indigenous Learning

Page | 19

�FLEMING, Sheri Leah
General Program
FOREST, Anne Shiona
General Program
*GILBERT, Jade
Visual Arts
GILCHRIST, Ashley Elizabeth
French
GOODMAN, Josephine Mary Ann
General Program
HARDY, Cameron Anthony
Sociology
HOLFORD, Cicely Jacqueline
General Program
*HUNTER, Katherine Elizabeth
Sociology
KAKEPETUM, Darlene Lou
General Program
KARDACZ-FILOGRANA, Cassandra Sophia Elizabeth
General Program
KINGSTON, Dylan Tod
General Program
*MACLAURIN, Kyle Douglas
Political Science (Pre-Law)
*MACLEOD, Hailey Juila
General Program
MAO, Ruohui
Sociology
MARTYNYUK, Oskar-Arsen Arsen
General Program
MAWAKEESICK, Nancy
General Program
*MEGAN, Melissa
General Program
*MILLETTE, Emilie Josee
General Program

Page | 20

�*MYLLYMAA, Katia Joan Alexandra
General Program
NASH, Hannah Rae
Political Science
OBILAJA, Ifeoluwa Uzochgoziri
General Program
*OLSON, Paige Elizabeth
Philosophy
PLANT, Shayleigh Marion
History
RAD, Ezekia
Indigenous Learning
RENN, Noah
Political Science
RIPLEY, Tanisha
General Program
*ROBINSON, Gillian Enid
Political Science (Pre-Law)
SIMMONS, Bryanne Sarah
History
SKEAD, Wanda
Indigenous Learning
SOFEA, Jada Breeze
Indigenous Learning
STANTON, Grace Genevieve
General Program
STIENKE, Cassie Veronica
General Program
STROMNESS, Emily Anne
Sociology
*TALPADE, Simran
Political Science (Pre-Law)
TROULINOS, Haralambos
Philosophy
TURNER, Allison Karen
French

Page | 21

�UPADHYAY, Krushali
General Program
WALKOSKI-FAETZ, Taylor Lynn
Gender and Women's Studies
WILLIAMS, Jestina
History
Honours Bachelor of Fine Arts
BEAUVAIS, Veritie Anna
*CHASSE, Alyson Aisling Marie
*GEROLAMI, Ashley Alexandra Lynne
Minor in English
*GILBERT, Sara Mae Marie
*KIM, Alannah Narae
Honours Bachelor of Music
*CLARK, Sarah
LEUTSCHAFT, Matthew Victor Johnathan
*PICARD, Ailiin Vivien
Honours Bachelor of Outdoor Recreation
CASASANTA, Isabella Victoria
*CRONK, Julianna
*FERNANDES, Vanessa Pacheco
HARRIS, Zachary Warren
Minor in History
*KELSO, Jared Bryan
MACLEOD, Jillian Christina
*MCTAVISH, Rachel Lynn
MOYER, Samuel Dalton Arthur
*PAUL, Cassandra Janine
*PETSNICK, Helene Ruth
SKINKLE, Jack Michael
WALKOSKI-FAETZ, Taylor Lynn

Page | 22

�Gii Gashkatoon Gii Kendaaswin Mazina'igan: Indigenous Transition Year
Program
ELLMAN-BIG GEORGE, Jason
HANSEN, Augustina
HARPER, Tessa
KAABESTRA-WHITE, Ashlen
KUSZNIER, Destiny
LITTLEPOPLAR, Kayla
MAWAGEESICK, Malakai
MCKAY, Creedence
MEEKIS, Breanne
MEEKIS, Dunesheia
MORRISEAU, Valen
MOWEGEJICK, Raven
SERGERIE-SUTHERLAND, Faybel
STEVENSON, Ashley
SUGANAQUEB, Jericho
WILLOUGHBY, Athena
YELLOWHEAD, Kyle

Page | 23

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
      <file fileId="16046">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/0cf79f8e362372b2d127514a5612fac1.pdf</src>
        <authentication>4601a55070a41c21899040b7f79890f7</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="108033">
                    <text>Graduating Class of 2025
Thursday June 5, 2025 (11:00 am)
Hello. We are delighted to welcome you, your families, and friends,
as we celebrate your achievements at Lakehead University.
Today we celebrate the success of your academic achievements!
We are please to announce the following list of graduates
from the following Faculties:
•

Faculty of Business Administration

•

Faculty of Education

•

Faculty of Engineering*

•

Faculty of Health &amp; Behavioural Sciences

•

Faculty of Science and Environmental Studies*

•

Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities
*includes graduates from the Lakehead University-Georgian
College Partnership.

~
LAKEHEAD-GEORGIAN PARTNERSHIP
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
Bachelor of Engineering
ANNECCA, Ryan John
Electrical
BALACHANDRAN, Maathulan Latha
Electrical
BRANT, Parker James
Electrical

Page | 1

�DREW, Mitchell Joseph Delmar
Electrical
HASSAN, Mohammad Mohtasim
Electrical
JONAS, Krista Irene
Electrical
LANCIONE, Alyssa Kaley
Electrical
*O'LEARY, Tanner Dean
Electrical
TENOSO, Willy Rex Oliver
Electrical
FACULTY OF SCIENCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Honours Bachelor of Arts and Sciences
*HESSER, Paula Marie
Environmental Sustainability
*HOEPP, Liam Eric
Environmental Sustainability
KIRBY, Bronwyn Annemiek Tiessinga
Environmental Sustainability
*MCELROY, Colleen Lily
Environmental Sustainability
NGUYEN, Danh Hiep
Environmental Sustainability
*SCHAT, Brin Fiona Prinzen
Environmental Sustainability
SHRUM, Matthew Robert
Environmental Sustainability
*SIMPSON, Cheyenne Rose
Environmental Sustainability
Bachelor of Arts and Sciences 4 Year
BAKER, Jordyne
Environmental Sustainability
PRESSEY, Ethan John
Environmental Sustainability

Page | 2

�Honours Bachelor of Science
*BECK, Preston Glenn
Computer Science
*BEREZHNOY, Michael
Computer Science
CUMMINS, John
Computer Science
FLORES, Xavier Christobal
Computer Science
*GOMBERG, Idan
Computer Science
*HAUTH, Corbin Anthony
Applied Life Sciences
*HILES, Connor Edwin
Applied Life Sciences
JOHNSTON, Lindsay Lorraine
Applied Life Sciences
*KAMAL, Yama
Computer Science
*KROPF, Desmond Lavon
Computer Science
LA CHANCE, Mystique Mary
Applied Life Sciences
LENTINI, Andreas
Computer Science
*MCELROY, Connor Stevens
Computer Science
MERDZIK, Dominik Tomasz
Computer Science
MILES, Tyler Harke
Computer Science
*MOLCZANSKI, Paul Jacob
Computer Science
*PALMER, Akeem
Computer Science
REDMOND, Colton Jessie
Applied Life Sciences

Page | 3

�*ROSANELLI, Michael Luca
Computer Science
*SOUVANLASY, Andrew Pachara
Computer Science
STEVENSON, Quinlan Monroe
Computer Science
VALENTINE, Rebecca Alexandria
Applied Life Sciences
*VAN, Tuany
Computer Science
Minor in Environmental Sustainability
VAN WIERINGEN, William Gregory
Computer Science
*VEILLEUX, Christopher John
Computer Science
*WYER, Tyler
Computer Science
*ZHLEZNOV, Aleksandr
Computer Science
Bachelor of Science 4 Year
OERTEL, Samantha Jean Angelikia
Applied Life Sciences

ORILLIA CAMPUS
FACULTY OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Honours Bachelor of Commerce
ALEJANDRO, Ma Shane Angela Patane
Business Administration
*COLLINS, Noah Samuel
Business Administration
EAKINS, Daniel Reid
Business Administration
GONZALEZ CHACALTANA, Nicolas Alejandro
Business Administration
Minor in Finance

Page | 4

�*GOWSELL, Owen Braden Paul
Business Administration
Minor in Finance
HAMDAN, Hadi
Business Administration
Minor in Finance
*HUMMEL, Sarah Ann
Business Administration
Minor in Finance
HURLEY, Sarah Anne
Business Administration
MCLEAN, Matthew Jacob
Business Administration
*MIEBAI, Hephzibah Tarefegha Amira
Business Administration
Minor in Finance
*NING, Xiaoying
Business Administration
*PATEL, Aaisha Dilawar
Business Administration
*RYAN, Emma Ann
Business Administration
Minor in Finance
*SHEPPARD, Jack Gordon Donald
Business Administration
Minor in Finance
*TOMAS, Rene Joseph
Business Administration
Minor in Finance
Bachelor of Administration
KHANANISHO, Samantha
*PROTHMANN, Evangeline Victoria
WONG, Trevor
ZHOU, Siyu
Management

Page | 5

�FACULTY OF EDUCATION
Master of Education
BELLAND, Samantha
Education for Change
Specialization in Social Justice Education
CERVO, Adrianna Ermelinda
Education for Change
Specialization in Indigenous Education
DA SILVA, Nicoletta Teresa Sophia
Educational Studies
DE PASS, Shaenice
Education for Change
Specialization in Social Justice Education
ELKHALIL, Sheema
Educational Studies
IAMPIERI, Shannon Esther
Educational Studies
JANISSE, Karly
Education for Change
Specialization in Social Justice Education
KLOBUCAR, Rosemarie
Educational Studies
LO, Adrian Edward
Educational Studies
MCNISH, Shy-Anne
Education for Change
Specialization in Social Justice Education
PALACIOS, Stephanie
Education for Change
Specialization in Social Justice Education
SAPRA, Chirag Vishu
Educational Studies
SARGENT, Lindsay Michelle
Education for Change
Specialization in Environmental and Sustainability Education
SEVERN, Melissa Caitlin
Education for Change
Specialization in Indigenous Education

Page | 6

�THOMPSON, Tatiana
Education for Change
Specialization in Social Justice Education
Thesis: Spaces of Possibility – Transmasculine Representation in Contemporary Media
Bachelor of Education
*AARTS, Hayley Maria
*ADRIAN, Jessica Charis
ALEXANDER, Stephanie
*ALLIN, Justine Katherine
*ANDRADE, Andrew
Technological Education
*ANJUM, Liala
*ANTIC, Alexander
*ARBID, Mariamna
*ASGARI, Salomeh
*ASHLEY, Adam Wilkinson
Technological Education
*ASIF, Anusha
*ATKINS, Isobel Pearl
*AUCOIN, Lauren Victoria
AUDET, Ashton William Lee
*AUSTIN, Jessica Margaret
AZAM, Momil
*BABCOCK, Lindsay Sharon
*BADER, Emily Margaret
BAGRI, Gurdeep Singh
*BAHEERATHAN, Magisha
*BAIANO, Zelda Eden
*BAKER, Jessica M
*BALAS, Deanne Louise
*BALL, Katelyn Janine

Page | 7

�*BARACH, Parker Shirleigh Skelding
*BARTLETT, Jennifer Elizabeth
BASIL, Diya
BATOOL, Zahra
*BECK, Jack Joseph
*BELAIRE, Taryn Nicole
*BELANGER, Barbara Lynn
Technological Education
*BELANGER, Brendan
*BENGERT, Daniel Jacob
*BENNETT, Vanessa Jo
*BENVENUTO, Angelica Maria
*BERNARD, Diandra Elaine
*BERROA, Jaylen Marlis
*BERTINATO, Mikayla Rose
*BETTENCOURT, Darren
*BIAMONTE, Sabrina Maria
*BIEMANN, Sarah Theresia
*BIGGS, Jade
*BISHOP, Abigail Hardy
*BLACK, Madison Victoria
*BLOGG, Adrian Donald
*BLY, Jessica Kathlena
*BOURBON, Samantha Juliana
*BOYD, Ashleigh Justine
*BOZOLASCO, Bettina Maribel
BRANCH, Nicole
BRIERLEY, Hannah Frances

Page | 8

�BROUILLARD, Taylor Ashton
BROWN, Addisan
*BROWN, Izabelle Eleanor
*BROWN, MacKenzie Paige
*BROWN, Sheridan Taylor
*BRUSBY, Lauren Elizabeth
*BUGAI, Olena
*BULLOCK, Kelsey Grace
*BURKE, Graydon Brian James
*BURTON-VULOVIC, Margaret
CADIEUX, Megan
*CANNONS-HURLEY, Elizabeth Gwendolyn
CARTER, Lara Grace Fisher
*CASSAR, MacKenzie
*CASTELLANO, Jennifer
*CAVALLO, Julia
*CEA-BERRY, Christina Marie
CEKIC, Zeynep
*CERDA, Emelyn Jeralee
*CHERNISHENKO, Natasha Janine
*CHINN, Lauren Delaney
CINO, Alessandro Stefano
*CIPRESSI, Alisa Nicole
*COLASANTI, Esther Joanna
*COOK, Esme Amelia
COOMBS, Ethan Jose-Manuel
*COVER, Alaina Rose
*CRAIG, Lisa Melody

Page | 9

�*DASILVA, Michael Paul
DAVIDSON, Aidan William
*DAWSON, Camryn June
*DE JESUS, Mikaela Cidalia
DE SILVA, Kaluhara Dewni Lakna
*DEGEER, Allison Eve
*DELABBIO, Sarah Jane
*DELAIRE, Nicole Allyn
*DELUCA, Patricia Amanda
*DI TULLIO, Benjamin Joseph
*DINSMORE, Jackalyn Eva
*DIRVARIU, Francesca Ioana
*DISTEFANO, Julia Gaspera
*DMITRUK-COOK, Samuel Joel
*DOBKO, Kevin Jaime
*DOBSON, Sydney
DONALD, Courtney Lorraine
*DOSMAN, Sarah Michelle
*DOUGHERTY, Lisa Donna Nicole
*DOUCETTE, Rebecca
*DOWLING, Joseph Tyler
*DOYLE, Kobe Kaden
DULAY, Anit
*DURETTE, Michaela Ann
*DWINNELL, Kristoffer Robert
EDGAR, Blake William
*EL-CHAMI, Rachel
*ELLIOTT, Lauren Louise

Page | 10

�ELSON, Calvin Mark
*EROCHKO, Matthew John
*ESPLANA, Elizabeth Ann
*EVANS, Emily Catherine
*EVANS, Natalie Catherine
*FARID, Salma
*FAZEKAS, Megan Paige
*FEDERICO, Jaida
*FIRTH, Nicholas James
*FONTES, Paula Eduarda
*FOSTER, Bethany Dianne
*FRANCIS, Grace
*FRANZIN, Joseph Jack
FURYK, Sarah Elizabeth
*GABRYS, Aura Marija
*GALLIMORE, Tory Lynne
*GALVEZ, Tran
*GANTER, Bradley Peter
GARD, Joseph Jack
GARFORTH, Sasha Paige
*GASCHO, Kyle Ian Scott
*GATES, Ryley
*GAUTHIER, Brooklyn Elizabeth
*GEORGES, Joanna
*GERRITSEN, Nashoba Johannes
*GERVAIS, Alyse Michelle
*GIBSON, Sarah Jordan
*GIDGE, Luca Caroline

Page | 11

�*GILL, Jasmeen Kaur
*GIRARDO, Daniel Joseph Primo
*GODDARD, Emma Rebekah
*GOLDSWORTHY, Megan Ann
*GORI, Jacqueline Marie
*GRANGER, Simon Radford Hall
*GRANT, Rory Samantha
GRANT, Jennifer Leah
*GREGORIO, Jessica Danielle Franco
*GREGORIS, Meaghan Anne
*GRIECO, Julia Francesca
*GUTIERREZ, Justin Thomas
*HAHN, Adam William
*HALL, Haley Marie
HARMANTAS, Alexander
*HARRINGTON, Elizabeth Ellen
*HARRISON, Martina Betty
*HARTOG, Sierra Seantel
*HAWKER, Kate Dianne
*HAWKINS, Hunter Stewart
*HELIOTIS, Vivian Kristina
HELLYER, Hayden Miller
HENDERSON, Rylee Frances
*HILDRED, Emma Ainsley
*HINKSMAN, Kate-Lynne Emma
*HODGINS, Jacob W
*HOEHNER, Anastasia Toula
*HOLDSWORTH, Kyleigh

Page | 12

�*HORLINGS, Mackenzie Madison
*HUSKA, Dina
*HUTTON-WALKER, Shianne Madison
*ILES, Emma Noreen
*JACK, Kassidy Lynne
*JACKSON, Amanda Elizabeth
JANSSEN, Camille Marie
*JAREMKO, Holly Dawn
*JAVANAINEN, Alana Kyra
JOHANNINK, Paige Brittany
*JOHN, Prashanth George
JOHNS, James
*JOHNSTON, Olivia Hope
*JUHASZ, Adam Steven
KAHLER, Connor Jacob
*KANE, Danielle Amelia Rose
*KEARNEY, Meaghan Catherine Loveday
*KELL, Jennifer Ann
*KELLY, Tracy Lyn
*KENNEPOHL, Sophie Marie
*KHAN, Marwah Ayub
*KILEY, Kaci Loretta-Mae
*KNUFF, Caelyn Sandrea
*KOCH, Kevin Andrew
*KRUL, Olivia Kimberley
*LA PORTE, Kalanie Hilda Helene
*LALANDE, Taliah Marie Lyn
*LALONDE, Rachel Teresa

Page | 13

�*LALONDE, Renee Claire
*LANC, Greggory
*LATKOLIK, Emily
*LATOSKI, Lauryn Margaret
*LAWSON, Erin Lynn
*LECLAIR, Ashley
LEBLANC, Gillian Grace
*LEDSHAM, Megan Marlene
*LEIS, Caitlin Dawn
*LEONARD, Hannah Faith
*LEONARD, Jordan Lee
*LIMA, Megan Constance
*LINHARES, Jacklyn Ponte
*LINK, Kennedy
LO, Dustin Lok Man
*LUTZ, Caleb Jaiden
*LYNCH, Emma Jane Charlotte
*MABLEY, Holly Emma
*MAC FARLANE, Doris Paige
*MACINTYRE, Kendyl Elizabeth
MACLAG, Christian Samuel
*MACLEOD, Sean Elizabeth Jeanne
*MANKOO, Parleen Kaur
*MARAVI, Kendra Charlize
*MARK, Hanna Mabel
*MARSH, Anne Elizabeth
MARTIN, Jane
*MARTIN, Krista Lee

Page | 14

�*MASTROPAOLO, David
*MATTHEWS, Tobias Christopher
*MAUCA, Jennifer Lee
*MCAULEY, Kathleen Taylor
*MCFADDEN, Shelby Lorraine
*MCKEEGAN, Kathryn
*MCLEAN, Evelyn
MCNEIL, Alec Steele
*MCPHEE, Riley Alan Fredrick
MEDEIROS, Nicholas Anthony
*MESCHINO, Matthew
*MICALLEF, Ashlyn Marie
*MICKOSKI, Thomas
*MILLIGAN, Averie Lynn
*MILNE, Thomas Edmund MacKenzie
*MIRRLEES, Emma Elizabeth Ann
*MISSEL, Amadore Karen
*MLINAREVIC, Kristina
*MOHAMMAD ZADEH YAGHCHI, Shahnaz
*MOORE, Jessica Lynn
*MORRIS, Shayna Rebecca
*MORRIS, Stephanie Francoise
*MORTLEY, Rachael Elizabeth
*MULUGETA, Zacharias Soressa
*MURRAY, Chelsea
*MUSSMACHER, Natasha Paige
NAVA, Arianna
*NELLES, Bridget

Page | 15

�*NG, Cheska Nicole
*NIXON, Heather
*NORTHEY, Tyne Emaleen
*NYE-PETRONE, Tyrone Edward
*O'FLAHERTY, Margaret Mary
OBADA, Abdullah Ali
*OKE, Lindsay Marie
*OUELLETTE, Bethany Margaret
*PACITTO, Midiana
*PALUMBO, Martina Rose Cornelia
*PANCZENKO, Nicholas Serhiy
*PAOLUCCI, Michael Joseph
*PARENT, Jacob Neil
*PASCHKOWIAK, Christine Mary
*PECCHIA, Domenic
*PETERSON, Elizabeth Catherine
*PHILLIPS, Lauren Julia
*PIGEON, Bria Isabel
*PILEGGI, Nicolai Fernando
Technological Education
*PITRE, Cole Ronald
PITTARI, Anthony David
*PLATER, Morgan Elizabeth
*PONFERRADA, Kyla Jennelle
*PONTONI, Lauren Melissa
*POOLE, Janice Linda
*POZZOBON, Victoria Nikole
PREM, Aneeta

Page | 16

�*PRIDMORE, Julia Sophie
*PRINCE, Kathryn
*PRZESIECKI, Evan Robert
*PSIHOGIOS, Megan Kayla
*PYKE, Jennifer Lynn
*RAHEJA, Saniya
*RAHMON, Nicholas Anthony
*REDMOND, Isabella Christine
*REYNOLDS, Sabrina Nicole
*RICHARDS, Ashley Sarah Elizabeth
*RIVAIT, Jasmyn Jaide
*RIZZUTO, Paul
*ROBERTS, Taylor Louise
*ROCHA, Natasha Marie
RODGER, Weston James Nathaniel
ROGERS, Shane Michael
*ROLEFF, Alicia Daila Anne
*ROMEIRO, Ashley
*ROSART MARTIN, Rachel Elise
*ROSIELLO, Isabelle Carol Anne
*RUTH, Kaitlyn Emma Kilburn
*SAHIDSAHID, Taylor Maureen
*SAWYER, Robyn Yvonne
*SCARFONE, Michael
*SCHIAVI, Aliya Rosanna
*SCHINCAGLIA, Lola Adrianna
SCHONEWILLE, Isaac Carson
*SCHUCK, Danielle Catherine

Page | 17

�*SCHULZ, Brittany Lynn
*SEQUEIRA, Sabrina Marlene
*SERRATORE, Alexander Patrick
SHEI, Evan Yi-En
*SHEARS, Simone Verna
Technological Education
*SHEPPARD, Sienna Lee
*SHI, Ivy
*SHOREMAN, Maggie
*SILVA, Melanie
*SIMARD, Sarah Anne
*SIMAS, Michelle Melo
*SIMON, Carson Emily Rachel
*SINGH, Kumari Meenakshi
*SKELLETT, Cooper Ireland Sanchez
*SMEATON, Emerald Mary
SMIT, Skylar Raymes
*SMITH, Michelle Darlene Grace
*SOLDIUK, Michelle
*SOUSA, Krysta Manuela
*SPADAFORA, Katarina Rosetta
*SPAN, Willem Aaron
*SPENCER, Abigail Rose
*STAINTON, Marie
*STANTON, Cassandra Marie
*STEADMAN, Katherine Christine
*STERLING, Kristen Lisa
*STEWART, Sarah Alyse

Page | 18

�*STONE, Blayne David
*STRADER, Nicole Alison
*STREET, Cory Damita Brown
*STRIKWERDA, Lucas Andrew
*TANSELLA, Selena Elizabeth
*TANWAR, Prachi
*TELFORD, Stephanie Anne
*TENAGLIA, Daniela Christina
*TERESO SAMPAIO, Catarina Susana
*TERRY, Drew Paul
*THANGTHONG, Joann Malyporn
*THOMAS, Beena Annet Hans
*THOMAS, Emma Caroline
*THOMPSON, Coral Sandra
*THOMPSON, Kendra Janine
THOMPSON, Madeline Ann Spencer
*THOMPSON, Mary Elizabeth
*THOMSON, Laine Margaret
*THORNTON, Erin Taylor
*TITUS, Lucas Anthony
*TRAM, Nancy
*TUCKER, Tracey Anne
*TUCKETT, Evan Robert William
*TURNBULL, Taryn
*VAN HULST, Marijke Irene
*VAN RASSEL, Andrew John
VAN VLAANDEREN, Cooper Dante
*VANHOUCKE, Laura Jane

Page | 19

�*VANMEER, Nicole Leslie
*VANRY, Nicole Lauren
*VASSILIADIS, Danae Adelia
*VIEIRA, Vanessa
VIGARS, Jack Ryan
*WAGENAAR, Kristen Karlie
*WALTON, Emily Lauren Blanche
*WAREHAM, Matthew Jeffrey Ralph
*WARFORD, Brianne Rose
*WATSON, Kaiya Lynne
*WEEL, Hannah Estel
*WEIMAN, Sarah Victoria
*WENZOWSKI, Emily Grace
*WEST, Emma Elizabeth Ann
*WHEELER, Dalton Robert
*WHEELER, Janine Marie
*WHITE, Kassidy Marie
*WILKINS, Omega Michelle
*WILSON, Hanna Leigh
WINN, Justin Collins
*WRIGHT, Taylor May
*YALLEN, Norman
*YANG, Chen
*YI, Sandy See-Gar
YOO, Duwon
*YOUNG, Brett Garrett James
*ZHANG, Jing Yi
*ZIPPEL, MacKenzie Joy

Page | 20

�Diploma in Technological Education
BELIWICZ, Eliza Marie
*BOYLE, Dana Lynn
BUCKLEY, Mark Jason
*ELLIOT, Shaun David
*HARDING, Benjamin Brian
*HARRISON, Jordyn R
*HEFFERNAN, Daniel John Robert
*HOVIUS, Melissa
*LODGE, Ryan James
MILLER, Daniel Sean
*NEILSON, Blair Edward
STEEVES, Jill Monique
THURGOOD, Melanie Louise
*VAN NIEKERK, Kevin Barry
*WHITTAKER, Russell John
FACULTY OF HEALTH AND BEHAVIOURAL SCIENCES
Master of Social Work
SMITH, Taylor Anne
WRAY, Rebecca Mary
WALSHAW, Madeleine Sophie Audrey
Honours Bachelor of Arts
*LALONDE, Julie
Psychology
Honours Bachelor of Social Work
*BIENVENUE, Eunisse
Minor in Sociology
*BLANCHARD, Rebecca-Mae Marie
*BLOOMER, Stephannie Nicole

Page | 21

�*BONAVOTA, Vincenzo
CHANT, Hannah Francis
*CHURCHILL, Rebekah
*CORBIERE, Carey Lynn
Specialization in Gender and Women’s Studies
Minor in Criminology
*CROOKSTON, Ashleigh Mariah
*DIMAKOS SHEVCHENKO, Dini
*DOLSTRA, Connie Annette
Minor in Psychology
*EVE, Kathryn
FARAGHER, Brooke
*FERREIRA, Brian Conde
*HENRY, Dawn Marie
*HUDSON, Jordan Marie Georgette
Minor in Criminology
*LECLERC, Saige Elizabeth
*LUCIANI, Victoria Gina Maria
*MCCANN, Olivia Christine
*MCCAW, Shelby Kaitlyn
*MOYANO, April
*POLKO, Robert Andrew Louis
*SMITH, Ryan Patrick
SPATARO, Shauna Lee
*TRAVERS, Claire Margaret
*TREMBLETT, Tiffany Kayla
Minor in Sociology
*VASINA, Anna

Page | 22

�FACULTY OF SCIENCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Master of Science
KOORNNEEF, Karen Lynn
Biology
Thesis: Wetlands as Filters of Heavy Metals - A Study in Temperate Fens of Central Ontario
Honours Bachelor of Arts
*CZECH, Genevieve Sara Gabrielle
Anthropology
Honours Bachelor of Arts and Sciences
*DENOMME, Emma Carolyn Joan
Environmental Sustainability
DWINNELL, Kristoffer Robert
Geography
MOASE, Abbey Lauren
Geography
Minor in History
*OLIVARES ESPINOSA, Tania
Environmental Sustainability
RATHOD, Vraj
Environmental Sustainability
TUCKER, Tracey Anne
Environmental Sustainability
*VEENSTRA, Jenna Rita-Maria
Geography
Minor in Indigenous Learning
WEISS, Kirsten Marlene
Environmental Sustainability
Honours Bachelor of Science
*GOULD, Allison Violet
Applied Life Sciences
Minor in Psychology
PANDYA, Mugdha Haresh
Applied Life Sciences
SHANTZ, Jessica Davie
Applied Life Sciences
Minor in Psychology

Page | 23

�SINGH, Gurleen
Computer Science
SREEDHARAPANICKER, Neeraja
Applied Life Sciences
Bachelor of Science 4 Year
PANJABI, Phalguni
Applied Life Sciences
Bachelor of Science
CHANNA, Gurtaj Singh
General Program
FUKSBRUMER, Jonathan
General Program
LIU, Xiaodai
General Program
KAUR, Lavinder
General Program
PATEL, Sonali Sureshkumar
Applied Life Sciences
PATEL, Vansh Dharmendra
General Program
ROBINSON, Hannah Kate
General Program
FACULTY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES
Honours Bachelor of Arts
ADAMS, Elizabeth Dolorese Nadine
English
*BARRETT, Allan Douglas
Political Science
*DASILVA, Daniel Anthony
Political Science
DAVIES, Kaitlyn Alyssa
English
*DOOLITTLE, Kendra Jade
English
Minor in Indigenous Learning

Page | 24

�FOSTER, Bethany Dianne
English
*GANTER, Bradley Peter
History
Minor in English
*HARTLEY, Kaitlin Barbaralynne
Political Science
Minor in History
*HOEHNER, Anastasia Toula
English
HORLINGS, Mackenzie Madison
English
KEMPER, Hailey Margaret
English
NYHOF, Kyle
Political Science
PETERSON, Elizabeth Catherine
English
SCOTT, Tyler Mitchel
Political Science
*SNOW, Ashley
Political Science (Pre-Law)
Minor in Criminology
STEFANOVIC, Tayler Dianne Chantal
English and History
TREBBLE, Avery Madigan
Sociology
*VARANO, Vito
History
Bachelor of Arts
AULD, Ryan David James
History
COOMBS, Ethan Jose-Manuel
History
CRIGHT, Kenzie Patricia
General Program
Fernandez-Sardina, Tai Alexander
General Program

Page | 25

�FORAGE, Aidan Alexander
General Program
FRETTER, Jayna Reese
General Program
GATES, Ryley
English
GIBSON, Sarah Jordan
English
GIRARDO, Daniel Joseph Primo
History
GIURIN, Anna Marina
History
JACK, Kassidy Lynne
English
*LEMBO, Lauren Anne
General Program
LILLY, Megan Christina Margaret
English
*MACKINLAY, Marguerite Grace
History
MCEACHERN, Alisa Ana Maria
Sociology
*MCGILL, Ryan James
History
NICHOLSON, Hunter Jade
General Program
ROMEO, Matthew Armando
History
*SPRUCE, Kerwood Allen
General Program
Honours Bachelor of Arts and Sciences
ALLOUZ, Zahra
Criminology
*ARORA, Devansh
Media, Film and Communications
Minor in Writing

Page | 26

�AUL, Sarah
Criminology
BASQUE, Vivian
Criminology
BECK, Jack Joseph
Interdisciplinary Studies
BELANGER, Brendan
Interdisciplinary Studies
*BIGGAR, Chloe Alyssa
Criminology
*BISHOP, Abigail Hardy
Interdisciplinary Studies
*BROWN, Carter
Criminology
Minor in Political Science
BROWN, Izabelle Eleanor
Interdisciplinary Studies
CARTER, Lara Grace Fisher
Interdisciplinary Studies with Concentration in Human Nature
*CASSELLS, Ashley Erin
Criminology
Minor in Psychology
CLEMENT, Joslyn Aubree
Interdisciplinary Studies with Concentration in Social Justice
*CONNELL, Amber Rose
Criminology
Minor in Psychology
COUSINEAU-CARRICK, Wade John
Interdisciplinary Studies
DOYLE, Eric Thomas Leo
Interdisciplinary Studies
DURETTE, Michaela Ann
Interdisciplinary Studies
ESHIE, Selina Mary
Criminology
GAUTHIER, Brooklyn Elizabeth
Interdisciplinary Studies

Page | 27

�GLIDDON, Paisley Aleaha
Criminology
GOMEZ-ZAPATA, Isabela
Media, Film and Communications
Minor in Anthropology
*GRATRIX, Kelly Lauren
Interdisciplinary Studies
GRAY, Ella Rose
Interdisciplinary Studies
*GRUNIG-BAYNTON, Hailey Lorraine
Criminology
Minor in Political Science
HINKSMAN, Kate-Lynne Emma
Interdisciplinary Studies with Concentration in Human Nature
JARADAT, Kareem Othman
Media, Film and Communications
KNEESHAW, Nicole Jean Marie
Criminology
KREISEL, Wren Leutzinger
Criminology
LAKE, Sara
Interdisciplinary Studies with Concentration in Social Justice
LEBLANC, Gillian Grace
Interdisciplinary Studies
LEIGHTON, Danika Lynn
Criminology
LEIS, Caitlin Dawn
Interdisciplinary Studies
LUCK, Brittney L
Criminology
MACINTYRE, Kendyl Elizabeth
Interdisciplinary Studies
MEKALA, Rochanaa
Criminology
Minor in Psychology
MORRIS, Stephanie Francoise
Interdisciplinary Studies

Page | 28

�OKUMURA, Shinowa
Media, Film and Communications
OTTAVIANI, Isabella Nicole
Criminology
*OUELLETTE, Bethany Margaret
Interdisciplinary Studies
PENA VILLARROEL, Juan Jose
Criminology
*PERRONS, Alexandria Lynn
Criminology
PISKUN, Andrew Jonathan
Criminology
PRAGNELL, Ethan Dwayne
Criminology
*PRICE, Kieran Douglas
Criminology
POOLE, Rachel Lynn
Criminology
RIVAIT, Jasmyn Jaide
Interdisciplinary Studies
REDDICK, Samantha Carrie
Criminology
*RUSSELL, Jaedyn Patricia
Criminology
Minor in Psychology
SEQUEIRA, Sabrina Marlene
Interdisciplinary Studies
*SHEWFELT, Lindsey Ann
Criminology
SMIT, Skylar Raymes
Interdisciplinary Studies
*STREET, Cory Damita Brown
Interdisciplinary Studies
*STREETER, Shawn Kyle
Media, Film and Communications
SURUJBALI, McKayla Cianna
Criminology

Page | 29

�*TAYLOR, Christian David
Criminology
TEMPLE, Grace Marie
Criminology
*THOMAS, Emma Caroline
Interdisciplinary Studies
THOMPSON, Coral Sandra
Interdisciplinary Studies
TOMARIN, Jacob
Media, Film and Communications
*TOMS, Kassidy Mary Ellen
Criminology
WEST, Emma Elizabeth Ann
English
WHEELER, Dalton Robert
Interdisciplinary Studies
WHITE, Kassidy Marie
Interdisciplinary Studies
*WILLIAMS, Jessica R
Criminology
*WILSON, Keely Spencer
Criminology
Bachelor of Arts and Sciences 4 Year
BOU-ZEID, Alexandra Joselyne
Criminology
Bachelor of Arts and Sciences
AJILEYE, Adesuyi Babatunde
Interdisciplinary Studies
AMYOT, Brandon Rheal
Interdisciplinary Studies
BERROA, Jaylen Marlis
Interdisciplinary Studies
BLY, Jessica Kathlena
Interdisciplinary Studies
DOOLEY, Ayden Ross
Interdisciplinary Studies

Page | 30

�EVANS, Emily Catherine
Interdisciplinary Studies
*FERREIRA-LOPES, Ashley
Interdisciplinary Studies
HENDERSON, Rylee Frances
Interdisciplinary Studies
*HOLDSWORTH, Kyleigh
Interdisciplinary Studies
LALANDE, Taliah Marie Lyn
Interdisciplinary Studies
*LECLAIR, Ashley
Interdisciplinary Studies
*POLLOCK, Breanna Laurel Ann
Interdisciplinary Studies
*SPICER, Ryan Scott
Interdisciplinary Studies
TERRY, Drew Paul
Interdisciplinary Studies
THOMPSON, Mary Elizabeth
Interdisciplinary Studies
WALKER, Amanda Grace
Interdisciplinary Studies
ZIPPEL, MacKenzie Joy
Interdisciplinary Studies

Page | 31

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="4">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="618">
                  <text>Lakehead University Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="619">
                  <text>Photographs from Lakehead University's history: people, events,  and campus. </text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108005">
                <text>2025 Convocation Programmes</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108006">
                <text>Universities</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108007">
                <text>Programme and list of graduates for Convocations held May 29 and May 30, 2025. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108008">
                <text>Lakehead University</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108009">
                <text>2025-05</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108010">
                <text>PDF</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108011">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108012">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="13010" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="16017">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/99c083bfbf57b97590b6050acae4bd4e.pdf</src>
        <authentication>f1d247daa107d03ceffc4ef05679054d</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="107996">
                    <text>71st Annual Meeting

Proceedings Volume 71
Part 1 – Program and abstracts
Mountain Iron, Minnesota, May 14-17, 2025

�71st Annual Meeting
Institute on Lake Superior Geology
Mountain Iron, Minnesota
May 14-17, 2025
Meeting Co-Chairs
Amy Radakovich, Allison Severson, Eric Nowariak, Stacy Saari, Aaron
Hirsch

Proceedings Volume 71
Part 1: Program and Abstracts
Edited by Co-Chairs

i

�71st Institute on Lake Superior Geology
Volume 71 consists of:
Part 1: Program and Abstracts
Part 2: Field Trip Guidebook
Trip 1: Transect of the Quetico subprovince
Trip 2: Drill Core from three Cu-Ni deposits of the Duluth Complex
Trip 3: How do you make iron and/or manganese in Proterozoic Iron Formation?
Trip 4: New Geological Insights into the genesis of iron ores at Lake Vermillion – Soudan Underground
Mine State Park
Trip 5: Neoarchean alkalic intrusions in the Wawa and Quetico subprovinces
Trip 6: Unique Keweenawan inclusion (Colvin Creek) in the Duluth Complex
Trip 7: Classic outcrops of Northeastern Minnesota
Trip 8: Glacial Lake Norwood and the Koochiching Lobe
Reference to material in Part 1 &amp; 2 should follow the examples below:
Authors, 2025, Title in Institute on Lake Superior Geology, 71st Annual Meeting, Mountain Iron, Minnesota, Part
1 - Abstracts and Program, v. 71, part 1, p. xx-xx.
Authors, 2025, Field Trip title in Institute on Lake Superior Geology, 71st Annual Meetings, Mountain Iron,
Minnesota, Part 2 – Field Trip Guidebook, v. 71, part 2, p. xx-xx.
Proceedings Volume 71, Part 1: Program and Abstracts and Part 2: Field Trip Guidebook are published by the
71st Institute on Lake Superior Geology and distributed by the Institute Secretary:
Peter Hollings
Department of Geology
Lakehead University
Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1
CANADA
peter.hollings@lakeheadu.ca
Some figures in this volume were submitted by authors in color but are printed black and white. Full color
imagery will appear in the digital version of the volume when it is available on-line at:

http://www.lakesuperiorgeology.org
ISSN 1042-99

ii

�Table of Contents
Table of Contents ..................................................................................................................................... iii
Institutes on Lake Superior Geology, 1955-2025 .................................................................................... iv
Sam Goldich and the Goldich Medal ...................................................................................................... vii
Goldich Medal Guidelines ....................................................................................................................... ix
Goldich Medalists .................................................................................................................................... xi
Citation for the 2025 Goldich Medal Recipient ...................................................................................... xii
Honoring the Pioneers of Lake Superior Geology ................................................................................. xiv
Pioneers of Lake Superior Geology ....................................................................................................... xiv
2025 Citation for Robert Bell (1841-1917)............................................................................................. xv
Eisenbrey Student Travel Awards ........................................................................................................... xx
Joe Mancuso Student Research Awards ................................................................................................. xxi
Doug Duskin Student Paper Awards ..................................................................................................... xxii
Board of Directors ................................................................................................................................ xxiii
2025 ILSG Meeting Volunteers ........................................................................................................... xxiv
2025 ILSG Meeting Session Chairs ..................................................................................................... xxiv
Field Trip Leaders and Guidebook Authors .......................................................................................... xxv
Mine to Mountain Bike Mecca: ........................................................................................................... xxvi
Report of the chairs of the 70th annual meeting .................................................................................. xxvii
Donations to Support the Annual Meeting ........................................................................................... xxxi
TECHNICAL PROGRAM ................................................................................................................ xxxiii
ABSTRACTS........................................................................................................................................ xliii

iii

�Institutes on Lake Superior Geology, 1955-2025

#
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

Date
1955
1956
1957
1958
1959
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975

Place
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Houghton, Michigan
East Lansing, Michigan
Duluth, Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Madison, Wisconsin
Port Arthur, Ontario
Houghton, Michigan
Duluth, Minnesota
Ishpeming, Michigan
St. Paul, Minnesota
Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan
East Lansing, Michigan
Superior, Wisconsin
Oshkosh, Wisconsin
Thunder Bay, Ontario
Duluth, Minnesota
Houghton, Michigan
Madison, Wisconsin
Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario
Marquette, Michigan
iv

Chairs
C.E. Dutton
A.K. Snelgrove
B.T. Sandefur
R.W. Marsden
G.M. Schwartz &amp; C. Craddock
E.N. Cameron
E.G. Pye
A.K. Snelgrove
H. Lepp
A.T. Broderick
P.K. Sims &amp; R.K. Hogberg
R.W. White
W.J. Hinze
A.B. Dickas
G.L. LaBerge
M.W. Bartley &amp; E. Mercy
D.M. Davidson
J. Kalliokoski
M.E. Ostrom
P.E. Giblin
J.D. Hughes

�#
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56

Date
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010

Place
St. Paul, Minnesota
Thunder Bay, Ontario
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Duluth, Minnesota
Eau Claire, Wisconsin
East Lansing, Michigan
International Falls, Minnesota
Houghton, Michigan
Wausau, Wisconsin
Kenora, Ontario
Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin
Wawa, Ontario
Marquette, Michigan
Duluth, Minnesota
Thunder Bay, Ontario
Eau Claire, Wisconsin
Hurley, Wisconsin
Eveleth, Minnesota
Houghton, Michigan
Marathon, Ontario
Cable, Wisconsin
Sudbury, Ontario
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Marquette, Michigan
Thunder Bay, Ontario
Madison, Wisconsin
Kenora, Ontario
Iron Mountain, Michigan
Duluth, Minnesota
Nipigon, Ontario
Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario
Lutsen, Minnesota
Marquette, Michigan
Ely, Minnesota
International Falls, Minnesota

57
58
59
60
61
62

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016

Ashland, Wisconsin
Thunder Bay, Ontario
Houghton, Michigan
Hibbing, Minnesota
Dryden, Ontario
Duluth, Minnesota

v

Chairs
M. Walton
M.M. Kehlenbeck
G. Mursky
D.M. Davidson
P.E. Myers
W.C. Cambray
D.L. Southwick
T.J. Bornhorst
G.L. LaBerge
C.E. Blackburn
J.K. Greenberg
E.D. Frey &amp; R.P. Sage
J. S. Klasner
J.C. Green
M.M. Kehlenbeck
P.E. Myers
A.B. Dickas
D.L. Southwick
T.J. Bornhorst
M.C. Smyk
L.G. Woodruff
R.P. Sage &amp; W. Meyer
J.D. Miller &amp; M.A. Jirsa
T.J. Bornhorst &amp; R.S. Regis
S.A. Kissin &amp; P. Fralick
M.G. Mudrey &amp; Jr., B.A. Brown
P. Hinz &amp; R.C. Beard
L. Woodruff &amp; W.F. Cannon
S. Hauck &amp; M. Severson
M. Smyk &amp; P. Hollings
A. Wilson &amp; R. Sage
L. Woodruff &amp; J. Miller
T.J. Bornhorst &amp; J. Klasner
J. Miller, G. Hudak, D. Peterson
M. Jirsa, P. Hollings &amp; T.
Boerboom,
P. Hinz &amp; M.Smyk
T. Fitz
P. Hollings
T.J. Bornhorst &amp; A. Blaske
J. Miller &amp; M. Jirsa
R. Cundari &amp; P. Hinz
J. Miller, C. Schardt &amp; D.
Peterson

�#
63

Date
2017

Place
Wawa, Ontario

64

2018

Iron Mountain, Michigan

65
66

2019
2020

Terrace Bay, Ontario
Meeting cancelled

67
68
69

2021
2022
2023

Virtual meeting
Sudbury, Ontario
Eau Claire, Wisconsin

70

2024

Houghton, Michigan

71

2025

Mountain Iron, Minnesota

vi

Chairs
A. Pace, A. Wilson &amp; T.J.
Bornhorst
L. Woodruff, W. Cannon &amp; E.K.
Stewart
P. Hollings &amp; M.C. Smyk
Cancelled by the COVID-19
pandemic
M. Jirsa, M. Smyk &amp; P. Hollings
R.M. Easton &amp; W. Bleeker
R. Lodge, E.K. Stewart, &amp; C.
Ames
T.J. Bornhorst, E. Vye, P. Cobin,
&amp; J. Degraff
A. Radakovich, A. Severson, E.
Nowariak, S. Saari, A.C. Hirsch

�Sam Goldich and the Goldich Medal
Sam Goldich received an A.B. from the University of Minnesota in 1929, a M.A. from Syracuse University in
1930, and a Ph.D. from the University of Minnesota in 1936. During World War II Sam worked for the U.S.
Geological Survey in mineral exploration. In 1948, Sam returned to the University of Minnesota, and became
Professor and Director of the Rock Analysis Laboratory the following year. He rejoined the U.S. Geological Survey
in 1959 and was appointed as the first Branch Chief of the Branch of Isotope Geology. Sam returned to academia
in 1964 when he went to Pennsylvania State University. He left PSU in 1965 and moved to the State University of
New York at Stony Brook, where he stayed for 3 years. Restless yet again, he moved to Northern Illinois University
in 1968 where he was a professor until his retirement in 1977. Sam’s final move was to Denver where he became
an emeritus at the Colorado School of Mines. Sam died in 2000, less than a month before his 92nd birthday.
In the late 1970s, Geological Society of America Special Paper 182, which included seminal geochronological
studies by Sam Goldich and coworkers on the Archean rocks of the Minnesota River Valley, was nearing
completion. At this time various ILSG regulars began discussing the possibility of recognizing Sam for his
pioneering work on the resolution of age relationships and thus the geology of Precambrian rocks in the Lake
Superior region. Three members, R.W. Ojakangas, J.O. Kalliokoski, and G.B. Morey, presented the idea to the
ILSG Board of Directors in 1978. The Board approved the creation of an award, provided funding could be
obtained. It was suggested that collecting one or two dollars at registration for a dedicated account would provide
resources for striking the medal. A general request was made to the ILSG membership for donations and Sam
himself offered a challenge grant to match the contributions. In total, $4,000 was collected and thus began the
work of creating the Goldich Medal.
The initial Goldich Award was presented to Sam by G.B. Morey in 1979 and consisted of a large paper
proclamation. For the actual medal, G.B. Morey consulted with the foundry on production details, while Dick
Ojakangas and Jorma Kalliokoski worked on the design of the award, suggesting that it be given for “outstanding
contributions to the geology of the Lake Superior region.” Simultaneously, a committee of J.O. Kalliokoski, W.F.
Cannon, M.M Kehlenbeck, G.B. Morey, and G. Mursky developed the Award Guidelines that were approved by
the ILSG Board. By 1981 all the elements of the Goldich Award had come together, and the second recipient, Carl
E. Dutton, Jr., received the Goldich Medal for 50 years of significant contributions to the understanding of the
geology of the Lake Superior region. Since the beginning, the Awards Committee has consisted of individuals
representing industry, government and academia, with each member of the Committee serving for three years. The
medal is now awarded every year at the annual ILSG meeting.
Reference:
Morey, G.B. and Hanson, G.N. (editors). 1980. Selected studies of Archean gneisses and Lower Proterozoic rocks,
southern Canadian Shield. Geological Society of America, Special Paper 182, 175 p.

Prepared by various Goldich Medal Awardees, 2007

vii

�Institute on Lake Superior Geology Goldich Medal

viii

�Goldich Medal Guidelines
(Adopted by the Board of Directors, 1981; amended 1999)

Preamble
The Institute on Lake Superior Geology was born in 1955, as documented by the fact that the 27th annual
meeting was held in 1981. The Institute’s continuing objectives are to deal with those aspects of geology
that are related geographically to Lake Superior; to encourage the discussion of subjects and sponsoring
field trips that will bring together geologists from academia, government surveys, and industry; and to
maintain an informal but highly effective mode of operation.
During the course of its existence, the membership of the Institute (that is, those geologists who indicate
an interest in the objectives of the ILSG by attending) has become aware of the fact that certain of their
colleagues have made particularly noteworthy and meritorious contributions to the understanding of Lake
Superior geology and mineral deposits.
The first award was made by ILSG to Sam Goldich in 1979 for his many contributions to the geology of
the region extending over about 50 years. Subsequent medalists and this year’s recipient are listed in the
table below.
Award Guidelines
1) The medal shall be awarded annually by the ILSG Board of Directors to a geologist whose name is
associated with a substantial interest in, and contribution to, the geology of the Lake Superior region.
2) The Board of Directors shall appoint the Goldich Medal Committee. The initial appointment will be
of three members, one to serve for three years, one for two years, and one for one year. The member
with the briefest incumbency shall be chair of the Nominating Committee. After the first year, the
Board of Directors shall appoint at each spring meeting one new member who will serve for three
years. In his/her third year this member shall be the chair. The Committee membership should reflect
the main fields of interest and geographic distribution of ILSG membership. The out-going, senior
member of the Board of Directors shall act as liaison between the Board and the Committee for a
period of one year.
3) By the end of November, the Goldich Medal Committee shall make its recommendation to the Chair
of the Board of Directors, who will then inform the Board of the nominee.
4) The Board of Directors normally will accept the nominee of the Committee, inform the medalist,
and have one medal engraved appropriately for presentation at the next meeting of the Institute.
5) It is recommended that the Institute set aside annually from whatever sources, such funds as will be
required to support the continuing costs of this award.

Nominating Procedures

ix

�1) The deadline for nominations is November 1. Nominations shall be taken at any time by the Goldich
Medal Committee. Committee members may themselves nominate candidates; however, Board
members may not solicit for or support individual nominees.
2) Nominations must be in writing and supported by appropriate documentation such as letters of
recommendation, lists of publications, curriculum vitas, and evidence of contributions to Lake
Superior geology and to the Institute.
3) Nominations are not restricted to Institute attendees but are open to anyone who has worked on and
contributed to the understanding of Lake Superior geology.
Selection Guidelines
1) Nominees are to be evaluated on the basis of their contributions to Lake Superior geology (sensu
lato) including:
a) importance of relevant publications;
b) promotion of discovery and utilization of natural resources;
c) contributions to understanding of the natural history and environment of the region;
d) generation of new ideas and concepts; and
e) contributions to the training and education of geoscientists and the public.
2) Nominees are to be evaluated on their contributions to the Institute as demonstrated by attendance
at Institute meetings, presentation of talks and posters, and service on Institute boards, committees,
and field trips.
3) The relative weights given to each of the foregoing criteria must remain flexible and at the discretion
of the Committee members.
4) There are several points to be considered by the Goldich Medal Committee:
a) An attempt should be made to maintain a balance of medal recipients from each of the three
estates—industry, academia, and government.
b) It must be noted that industry geoscientists are at a disadvantage in that much of their work
in not published.
5) Lake Superior has two sides, one the U.S., and the other Canada. This is undoubtedly one of the
Institute’s great strengths and should be nurtured by equitable recognition of excellence in both
countries.

x

�Goldich Medalists
1979

Samuel S. Goldich

1998

Zell Peterman

2016

Mark A. Jirsa

1980

not awarded

1999

Tsu-Ming Han

2017

Philip Fralick

1981

Carl E. Dutton, Jr

2000

John C. Green

2018

Val W. Chandler

1982

Ralph W. Marsden

2001

John S. Klasner

2019

Mark Severson

1983

Burton Boyum

2002

Ernest K. Lehmann

2020

not awarded

1984

Richard W. Ojakangas

2003

Klaus J. Schulz

2021

Alan MacTavish

1985

Paul K. Sims

2004

Paul Weiblen

2022

Terrence J. Boerboom

1986

G.B. Morey

2005

Mark Smyk

2023

Peter Hollings

1987

Henry H. Halls

2006

Michael G. Mudrey

2024

Suzanne W. Nicholson

1988

Walter S. White

2007

Joseph Mancuso

2025

Robert Michael Easton

1989

Jorma Kalliokoski

2008

Theodore J. Bornhorst

1990

Kenneth C. Card

2009

L. Gordon Medaris, Jr

1991

William Hinze

2010

William D. Addison &amp;

1992

William F. Cannon

1993

Donald W. Davis

2011

Dean M. Rossell

1994

Cedric Iverson

2012

James D. Miller

1995

Gene La Berge

2013

Tom Waggoner

1996

David L. Southwick

2014

Laurel Woodruff

1997

Ronald P. Sage

2015

Rodney J. Ikola

Gregory R. Brumpton

2025 GOLDICH MEDAL RECIPIENT

Robert Micheal Easton
Goldich Medal Committee
Serving through the meeting year shown in parentheses.
Dean Peterson (2022-2025) Big Rock Exploration, Industry Member (Committee Chair)
Marcia Bjornerud (2023-2026) Lawrence University, Academic Member
Robert Cundari (2025 - 2028) OGS, Government Member

xi

�Citation for the 2025 Goldich Medal Recipient
Robert Michael Easton
It is a great pleasure and honor to present the 2025 Goldich Medal to
Dr. Robert Michael Easton, a highly respected senior scientist at the
Ontario Geological Survey, in Sudbury, Ontario. Michael Easton, or
‘Mike’ as we know him, has been and is, without any doubt, among
the leading and most productive geoscientists at the Geological
Survey of Ontario (OGS) where he has spent much of his geological
career (1982–2025). His curriculum vitae and publication list
provide evidence for &gt;600 publications and significant contributions
— way too many to cite here. Even a short list of publications most
relevant to the interests of the Institute and the geology of the
Midcontinent Rift (MCR) spans four pages. The highlights include:
•
•

•
•

a large number of peer-reviewed papers and reports;
numerous extended abstracts in ILSG Proceedings volumes
spanning the years from 1985 to 2023;
meticulous editing of various ILSG Proceedings volumes; and
the writing and editing of several comprehensive ILSG field trip guidebooks.

In 2022, Mike co-lead and co-organized the 68th ILSG meeting in Sudbury, the first post-“peak
COVID” meeting. We had proposed organizing this Sudbury meeting years earlier, an idea cooked up
at another ILSG meeting in Terrace Bay, … but then COVID hit! It was a pleasure to organize this
highly successful meeting with Mike, as one can always be 100% sure Mike will come through with
everything. Although it was a joint effort, Mike took care of all the editing of both Proceedings
volumes (Part I and II), and a fair bit of the local logistics.
Born and raised in Ontario, Mike started his geology career with a BSc Honours degree (1976) at the
University of Western Ontario, London, with a thesis titled "Geobotanical Studies in the Back River
Volcanic Complex, NWT." He then moved on to the University of Hawaii, Honolulu, where he
graduated (1978) with an MSc thesis on the "Stratigraphy and Petrology of the Hilina Formation: The
oldest exposed lavas of Kilauea Volcano, Hawaii". In the late 1980s, I remember studying a treatise and
guidebook on volcanology that was influential at the time, and this was authored by Mike Easton and
his wife Monica (Easton &amp; Easton, 1985)!
Mike completed his graduate studies with a PhD from Memorial University (1982), in Newfoundland,
with a thesis titled "Tectonic Significance of the Akaitcho Group, Wopmay Orogen, NWT." These
studies brought him to the Slave craton of northern Canada, and its western active margin, the
Paleoproterozoic Great Bear Magmatic Zone. His studies of these ancient terranes, sponsored in part by
the Geological Survey of Canada, prepared him well for the complex geology of the Canadian Shield in
Ontario. He then joined the OGS, where over the years he has taken on more and more senior roles but
never gotten away from doing fieldwork. At the OGS, Mike has mentored and supervised numerous
students and junior colleagues, including a good number of them working in areas along the northern
xii

�shore of Lake Superior. He has also taken on more and more editorial roles for various OGS
publications, maps, and datasets. From 2002 to 2007, Mike was one of the scientific leads of the Lake
Nipigon Geoscience Initiative (LNGI), and provided oversight on OGS mapping projects in the region.
He was directly involved in some of the mapping, and particularly the geochronology sampling. He
handled numerous publications for this large project and was a guest-editor on the final volume that
published many of the LNGI results (Easton et al., 2007). Since then, Mike has been a frequent
collaborator on other projects either directly or indirectly relevant to Lake Superior area geology.
In the early 1990s, together with Terry Carter, Mike investigated the basement geology beneath the
Paleozoic cover in SW Ontario (e.g., Easton &amp; Carter, 1991, 1994, 1995), using geophysical data, and
drill cores and cuttings, to locate the Grenville Front and the extension of the MCR in Ontario and into
Michigan. Notably, they found that the Grenville Front was located some 100 km to the east of where
previous interpretations had located it, and that metamorphosed equivalents of MCR rocks were likely
present in the Grenville Front tectonic zone in Essex County. They were among the first to hypothesize
that the final stages of MCR rifting and inversion were connected to the main tectonic phases of the
Grenville orogeny.
From 2002 to 2010, Mike was involved with the MCR digital data and publication collaboration
between the OGS, the Minnesota Geological Survey, and the United States Geological Survey,
specifically the compilation of Ontario geological, mineral deposit, geochemical, and geochronological
data in GIS-compatible formats to allow incorporation into the USGS-led cross-border compilation for
the Midcontinent Rift. In addition, also in 2010, he was a co-organizer and editor of four guidebooks
for the 11th International Platinum Symposium (June 2010, Sudbury), a meeting that had a strong focus
on the MCR, including a week-long field trip visiting deposits around Lake Superior. None of this
would have ever happened without Mike’s efforts and contributions. Among his many other
contributions to ILSG over the years, Mike also served (and still serves) as a board member for the
Institute (2022-2025).
After spending the last 53 summers doing fieldwork and research in the Grenville, the Southern
Province, the Lake Superior area, or elsewhere in Ontario, Mike retired in March 2025. Given his
outstanding accomplishments and amazing productivity over the years, either for the OGS or for
various extra-curricular projects such as ILSG meetings, leading field trips, time-consuming editorial
jobs, teaching as an adjunct professor, or supervising and mentoring many students (and never missing
a beat!), it is a great honour to present Mike with the Goldich Medal
Citation by:

Wouter Bleeker, Senior Research Scientist, Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa

xiii

�Honoring the Pioneers of Lake Superior Geology
(Adopted by the Board of Directors, 2016)

Preamble
At the suggestion of Gene LaBerge, the 2016 executive board agreed to implement a program to
recognize historic pioneers in the understanding of geology in the Lake Superior region. Beginning with
the 2017 annual meeting, nominations will be accepted from the membership for geologists whose work
was conducted primarily before the inception of the Institute in 1955. Biographical sketches of those
pioneers will be presented at future annual meetings so that all may appreciate the value of their
contributions. Selection of nominees will be decided in part by the organizing committee of each year's
annual meeting, in consultation with the Board, to ensure equitable geographic representation in the
selection process.
Award Guidelines
1) Nominations from the membership will be submitted via the Institute web site and forwarded to the
Chair of the next Annual Meeting. The nominations will be no more than half a page in length and
will summarize the contribution of the nominee.
2) The Organizing Committee will select one or two individuals to be highlighted at the next Annual
meeting and submit those names to the Board for approval.
3) The nominator will be requested to prepare a brief presentation to be given during the next annual
meeting with a summary to be included in the Proceedings volume.
4) Unsuccessful nominations will be kept by the Secretary for two years and forwarded to the next
meeting Chair; these nominations may be resubmitted at a later date.
The Board will review this award every five years.

Pioneers of Lake Superior Geology
2017 Douglass Houghton (1809-1845)
2018-20 not presented
2021 Newton Horace Winchell (1839-1914)
2022 Thomas Leslie Tanton (1890-1971)
2023 Thomas Benton Brooks (1836-1900)
2024 Roland Duer Irving (1847-1888)
2025 Robert Bell (1841-1917)

xiv

�2025 Citation for Robert Bell (1841-1917)
Pioneer of Lake Superior Geology

Robert Bell had a decided taste for the natural sciences, especially for
geology. In 1856, at the age of 15, he secured a temporary position with the
Geological Survey of Canada. He assisted Sir William Logan, the Survey’s
Director, beginning an illustrious career with the GSC that would span half a
century. While working summers for the Survey, Bell graduated in 1861 from
McGill College and received the Governor General’s Medal. Two years later,
after study at the University of Edinburgh, he joined the faculty of Queen’s
College. All the while, he spent summers with the GSC and was made a
permanent officer in 1869, named Assistant Director in 1877, Chief
Geologist in 1890, and, finally, Acting Director in 1901. He also earned a
medical degree in 1878 so that he was prepared for any mishap in the field.
Bell is best-remembered for his extensive explorations in northern Quebec,
Ontario, Manitoba and the eastern Arctic in the 1870s and 1880s. He mapped the rivers between
Hudson Bay and Lake Superior and reconnoitred part of the route that would be adopted for the
National Transcontinental Railway. In 1859, Bell assisted in mapping the north shore of Lake Huron
and first visited the Lake Superior region in 1860, west of Sault Ste. Marie. His Report on the Geology
of the Northwest Side of Lake Superior and of the Nipigon District was published in 1870. In 1870 and
1871, he continued to work north of Lake Superior. In 1872 and 1873, he assisted GSC Director Alfred
Selwyn on a preliminary exploration westward from Lake Superior to Fort Garry (now Winnipeg). In
1876, Bell examined the eastern shore of Lake Superior, as well as the Garden River and Echo Lake
areas and the northeastern shore of Georgian Bay. A reconnaissance survey was undertaken between
Parry Sound and the Ottawa River. In 1881, Bell carried out additional surveys in the Hudson Bay
basin and in the Lake Superior region. During 1883 and 1884, Bell continued work near Lake of the
Woods. In 1887, he continued a survey, started in 1886, between the Montreal River and Lake Huron to
clarify the nature of the Huronian, especially in connection with its mineral deposits. He served as a
member of the Royal Commission on the Mineral Resources of Ontario from 1888 to 1889. Between
1888 and 1892, Bell mapped the Sudbury and French River areas. His 1890 paper, On Glacial
Phenomena in Canada, was regarded as the most significant advance in Canadian glaciology since
Logan’s first acceptance of glacial action in Canada in 1847. Bell was the first to recognize ice
streaming in the Laurentide ice sheet and also noted the occurrence of diamonds in glacial drift from
Ohio through Indiana, Michigan and Wisconsin, suggesting a possible provenance in Ontario.
Of particular interest to the ILSG is Bell’s involvement on a Special Committee created in 1903 on the
nomenclature and correlation of the Lake Superior region geology of the United States and Canada. Its
findings led to the first joint report by geologists of the two countries. The Committee comprised C.R.
Van Hise and C.K. Leith of the United States Geological Survey, A.O. Lane, State Geologist of
Michigan; Robert Bell and Frank D. Adams of the GSC, and W.G. Miller, Provincial Geologist of
Ontario. In August, 1904, the committee met in the Marquette district, and, during the six weeks
following, visited the Gogebic, Mesabi, Vermilion, Rainy Lake, Lake of the Woods, Animikie, and
xv

�Huronian districts. As a result, both countries adopted a common stratigraphy and nomenclature that
served as a basis for later iterations and our current stratigraphic framework.
Bell also made field notes on flora and fauna, forests, climate, soil, indigenous people, ethnology and
resources. He performed much of his field work without maps and had to do topographical surveys as
he went along. It is estimated that Bell named over 3000 geographical features, prompting colleagues
to call him the “Father of Canadian Place-Names”. Bell authored 32 GSC reports, 111 journal papers,
17 solo-authored geological maps, 46 other geological, topographical, and cadastral maps as senior
author, and 38 maps as junior author. He gave numerous lectures to natural history, historical, and
charitable societies.
In 1865, at the age of 23, he was elected a fellow of the Geological Society of London. A chartermember of the Royal Society of Canada (1882), he became a fellow of the Royal Society of London in
1897. In 1903, he was made a companion of the Imperial Service Order and in 1906 was awarded both
the Patron’s Medal of the Royal Geographical Society of London and the Cullum Geographical Medal
of the American Geographical Society of New York.
Bell retired from the GSC in 1908. His career exemplified the wide-ranging reconnaissance work
performed by the government geologist in the late 19th century. He was a generalist who valued field
work over more detailed, specialized study. Few could match Bell’s travels, eclectic interests, and
length of service. As Ami (1927) memorialized, “Bell was especially fond of investigating and
exploring regions hitherto untraversed. Pioneer work of this nature can scarcely be appreciated today,
when newer and more up-to-date methods of examining a hitherto-unknown territory are employed.”
Citation by: Mark Smyk (Lakehead University / Ontario Geological Survey (retired))
References
Adams, F.D., Bell, R., Lane, A.C., Leith. C.K., Miller, W.G. and Van Hise, C.R. 1905. Report of International
Committee on Lake Superior Geology; Journal of Geology, February-March, 1905; in Precambrian
nomenclature; Ontario Bureau of Mines, Report for 1905, v.4, part 1, 1905, pp.269-277.
Ami, H.M. 1927. Memorial of Robert Bell. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, v.38, pp. 18-33; PLS.
1- https://archive.org/details/sim_geological-society-of-americabulletin_1927_38/page/n41/mode/2up?view=theater
Brookes, I.A. 2016. All that glitters… The Scientific and Financial Ambitions of Robert Bell at the Geological
Survey of Canada; Geoscience Canada, v. 43, pp. 147–158;
http://www.dx.doi.org/10.12789/geocanj.2016.43.098.
Waiser, W.A. 1998. Robert Bell. Dictionary of Canadian Biography, v. XIV (1911-1920),
https://www.biographi.ca/en/bio/bell_robert_1841_1917_14E.html.

xvi

�In Memoriam

James M. Franklin
(November 9, 1942 – June 19, 2024)
We note the passing, on June 19, 2024, of long-term member and
former SEG President (2000) James (Jim) M. Franklin. Jim had a
long and productive career in academia, government, and industry.
He made landmark scientific contributions to our understanding of
volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS) deposits, black smokers and
sea-floor massive sulfide (SMS) deposits, and the metallogeny of the
Precambrian orogenic belts.
Jim’s work with the Ontario Department of Mines in 1966 along the
north shore of Lake Superior led to his PhD study of the Proterozoic
geology and metallogeny of the Thunder Bay area. He was the first Professor of Economic Geology at
Lakehead University (1970–1976) and was later named as a Fellow of Lakehead University in 2017 in
recognition of his many contributions to that institution and to its fledgling Geology Department. He
then spent more than 20 years at
the Geological Survey of Canada where he led the marine minerals program and ongoing work on
VMS deposits on land, such as at Sturgeon Lake. Late in his career at the GSC, he was Chief Scientist
and responsible for the day-to-day scientific direction of the organization and helping to inform and
educate politicians and bureaucrats on the importance of science to the economy and well-being of
Canada.
In 1998, after retiring from the GSC, he established Franklin Geosciences and had a highly successful
career as a consultant and contributed to the discovery of mineral resources globally, while serving as a
director and advisor to numerous companies and scientific organizations, including SEG.
Jim was very generous with his time and provided guidance and mentorship to students and
professionals alike. He received numerous recognitions for his contributions, including Fellow of the
Royal Society of Canada, member of the Canadian Mining Hall of Fame, and recipient of the Logan
Medal recipient the Geological Association of Canada and the R.A.F. Penrose Gold Medal from SEG.
He supported ILSG as field trip leader, Proceedings editor and banquet speaker.

xvii

�In Memoriam
Jorma “Joe” Kalliokosk
(November 23, 1923 – June 3, 2024)
Jorma “Joe” Kalliokoski passed away on June 3, 2024, at age 100.
He was born in Harma, Finland on Nov 23, 1923. In 1931 his family
moved to Sudbury, ON, and later to Timmins, ON. He graduated
from Western University in London, ON, and later received his PhD
from Princeton University.
Joe started as a geologist with the Geological Survey of Canada and
later worked for Newmont Exploration. He was hired by Princeton’s
Department of Geology in 1956. In 1968, he moved to Michigan Tech as a Professor and Head of the
Department of Geology and Geological Engineering, where he remained until his retirement in 1988.
He was very proud of the department’s growth in research papers and in research funding during his
tenure. During his long geology career, he had many travel adventures from the wilds of Canada, to
remote areas of South America, and various locations in Europe. He had the ability to make new
friends everywhere he went.
Joe was a Fellow of SEG for a noteworthy 60 years, from 1958 to 2018. He served the Society in a
number of volunteer positions, including SEG Councillor (1972–1974) and SEG President (1980). He
served as Trustee of SEG Foundation, Associate Editor for Economic Geology, and Business Editor
(1971–1977) and Director for the Economic Geology Publishing Company (PUBCO), the company
that was established to publish the journal and later merged with SEG.
Joe was also an active member and supporter of ILSG, serving as its Secretary-Treasurer and Chair of
the Goldich Medal Committee. He delivered papers at ILSG on various topics, including unconformitytype Proterozoic uranium deposit potential in northern Michigan; the Jacobsville sandstone and tectonic
activity; and new Precambrian geology mapping of the Upper Peninsula. He Chaired the 1972 meeting
in Houghton and was awarded the Goldich Medal in 1989.

xviii

�In Memoriam
James Alexander Grant
(October 3, 1935 — October 3, 2024)
James Alexander Grant died on October 3, 2024 – coincidentally
also his birthday – at the age of 89.
James “Jim” Grant was born in Inverness, Scotland, in 1935. After
graduating from the University of Aberdeen, he left Scotland for
Canada where he earned his M.S. at Queens University and then
his Ph.D. at the California Institute of Technology (Caltech).
After graduating from Caltech, Jim took a job in Minneapolis as a
geology professor with the University of Minnesota. Jim and his family moved to Duluth in 1969 and
he joined the geology department at the University of Minnesota-Duluth, where he would work with
his beloved colleagues and students for the next 35 years. In the early 1970s, he helped launch UMD’s
still-running geology summer field camp in Park City, Utah, bringing undergrad students out to the
mountains for many years. Jim’s groundbreaking work in the 1980s on the isocon diagram is now used
by geologists the world over.
Over the course of his career, Jim made substantial contributions to the geology of the Lake Superior
region. His seminal mapping of the Minnesota River Valley subprovince is still referenced today by the
dozens who have since worked in the region. Jim taught hundreds of students over the course of his
career who have gone on to contribute in many ways to the geology of the Lake Superior region.
Among the most memorable experiences for his students were Jim’s metamorphic petrology trips
through Michigan’s Upper Peninsula.

xix

�Eisenbrey Student Travel Awards
The 1986 Board of Directors established the ILSG Student Travel Awards to support student participation
at the annual meeting of the Institute. The name “Eisenbrey” was added to the award in 1998 to honor
Edward H. Eisenbrey (1926-1985) and utilize substantial contributions made to the 1996 Institute
meeting in his name. “Ned” Eisenbrey is credited with discovery of significant volcanogenic massive
sulfide deposits in Wisconsin, but his scope was much broader - he has been described as having unique
talents as an ore finder, geologist, and teacher. These awards are intended to help defray some of the
direct travel costs of attending Institute meetings, and include a waiver of registration fees, but exclude
expenses for meals, lodging, and field trip registration. The number of awards and value are determined
by the annual Chair in consultation with the Secretary and Treasurer. Recipients will be announced at the
end of the annual meeting.
The following general criteria will be considered by the annual Chair, who is responsible for the selection:
1) The applicants must have active resident (undergraduate or graduate) student status at the time of
the annual meeting of the Institute, certified by the department head.
2) Students who are the senior author on either an oral or poster paper will be given favored
consideration.
3) It is desirable for two or more students to jointly request travel assistance.
4) In general, priority will be given to those in the Institute region who are farthest away from the
meeting location.
5) Each travel award request shall be made in writing to the annual Chair, and should explain need,
student and author status, and other significant details.
Successful applicants will receive their awards during the meeting.

xx

�Joe Mancuso Student Research Awards
The 2005 Board of Directors established the ILSG Student Research Fund with $10,000 US from the
Institute’s general fund to encourage student research on the geology of the Lake Superior region. A
minimum of two awards of $500 US each for research expenses (but not travel expenses) will be made
each year. Students are expected to present their research orally or during a poster session at an ILSG
meeting. The award winners will also be automatically eligible for the Eisenbrey Travel Awards. To allow
the fund to grow, the Fund will receive one-half of any additional proceeds from each annual meeting,
after all other commitments and expenses are covered.
• The ILSG Board of Directors will be responsible for selecting a minimum of two awards each year.
The ILSG Treasurer will issue the awards.
• The ILSG Student Research Fund is available for undergraduate or graduate students working on
geology in the Lake Superior region.
• The applications are due to the ILSG Secretary by August 31st of each year. Awards will be made
by October 1st of each year.
• Names of the award recipients will be announced at the next annual meeting and posted on the
ILSG website.
• Details of the application process can be found on the ILSG web site.
• The proposal will need to be signed by the researcher’s supervisor.
The 2012 Board of Directors approved modification of the fund’s name, adding “Mancuso” to reflect the
many contributions of Joseph Mancuso to the organization and sizeable donations made in his name.
“Doc Joe,” as he was known by his students, taught geology for 36 years at Bowling Green State
University, Ohio. He advised many graduate students in field-oriented research, and frequently brought
them to Institute meetings. Joe was the 2007 Goldich Medalist.
In fall 2024, the ILSG Board of Directors selected two students to be granted research funding of $500
each from the Joe Mancuso Student Research Fund. The awardees were:

Zsuzsanna P. Allerton, University of Minnesota- Twin Cities
Omar Khalil Droubi, University of Wisconsin - Madison

xxi

�Doug Duskin Student Paper Awards
Each year, the Institute selects the best of student presentations and honors the presenters with a monetary
award. Funding for the award is generated from registrations of the annual meeting, and from generous
donations to the fund in honor of Doug Duskin—an exploration geologist and long- time friend of the
Institute. The 2012 ILSG Board of Directors approved adding Doug’s name to the award to acknowledge
his contributions and distribute those donations in a manner that would have pleased him. The Duskin
Student Paper Committee is appointed by the Meeting Chair. Criteria for best student paper—last
modified by the Board in 2001—follow:
1) The contribution must be demonstrably the work of the student.
2) The student must present the contribution in-person.
3) The Student Paper Committee shall decide how many awards to grant, and whether or not to give
separate awards for poster vs. oral presentations.
4) In cases of multiple student authors, the award will be made to the senior author, or the award will
be shared equally by all authors of the contribution.
5) The total amount of the awards is left to the discretion of the meeting Chair in conjunction with the
Secretary, but typically is in the amount of about $500 US (increase approved by Board, 10/01).
6) The Secretary maintains, and will supply to the Committee, a form for the numerical ranking of
presentations. This form was created and modified by Student Paper Committees over several years
in an effort to reduce the difficulties that may arise from selection by raters of diverse background.
The use of the form is not required but is left to the discretion of the Committee.
7) The names of award recipients shall be included as part of the annual Chair’s report that appears
in the next volume of the Institute.
Student papers will be noted on the Program.
2025 Student Paper Awards Committee
Aaron Hirsch – Minnesota Geological Survey (Committee Chair)
Carsyn Ames – Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey
Paula Leier-Englehardt – HydroGeo Solutions LLC, Wisconsin
Ross Salerno – United States Geological Survey
Esther Stewart – Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey
Nick Swanson-Hysell – University of Minnesota

xxii

�Board of Directors
Amy Radakovich, Chair (2025-2028) - Minnesota Geological Survey
Peter Hollings, Secretary (2019-2027) — Lakehead University
Mark A. Jirsa, Treasurer (2022-2025) — Minnesota Geological Survey
Mike Easton (2022-2025) — Ontario Geological Survey
Carysn Ames (2023-2026) — Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey
Theodore J. Bornhorst, (2024-2027) — Michigan Technological University

Board members serve through the close of the meeting year shown in parentheses.

xxiii

�2025 ILSG Meeting Volunteers
Angela Sipila - Mesabi Range Geological Society
Henry Djerlev - Mesabi Range Geological Society
Kim Berry - Mesabi Range Geological Society
William Daniels - Mesabi Range Geological Society
Ann Marie Prue - MN Department of Natural Resources

2025 ILSG Meeting Session Chairs

Aaron Hirsch, Minnesota Geological Survey
Robert Lodge, University of Wisconsin, Eau Claire
Eric Nowariak, Minnesota Geological Survey
Amy Radakovich, Minnesota Geological Survey
Stacy Saari, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Lands and Minerals
Allison Severson, Minnesota Geological Survey

xxiv

�Field Trip Leaders and Guidebook Authors
Field trips have been the mainstay of the ILSG since its inception 71 years ago. We give special thanks
to the field trip leaders and guidebook authors who volunteered their time and talent in carrying that
tradition forward.
Trip 1: Transect through the Quetico subprovince of northern Minnesota – Eric Nowariak (Minnesota
Geological Survey), Mark Jirsa (Minnesota Geological Survey, retired)
Trip 2: Drill Core from three Cu-Ni deposits of the Duluth Complex - Mark Severson (Natural Resources
Research Institute, Teck Retired), Cullen Phillips (New Range Copper Nickel), Kevin Boerst (Twin
Metals Minnesota)
Trip 3: How do you make iron and/or manganese in Proterozoic Iron Formation? - Alex Steiner (Big
Rock Exploration), Latisha Brengman (University of Minnesota, Duluth), Dean Peterson (Big Rock
Exploration)
Trip 4: New Geological Insights into the genesis of iron ores at Lake Vermillion – Soudan Underground
Mine State Park - George J. Hudak (University of Minnesota, George Hudak Geosciences P.L.L.C.),
Zsuzsanna P. Allerton (University of Minnesota), Annia Fayon (University of Minnesota)
Trip 5: Neoarchean alkalic intrusions in the Wawa and Quetico subprovinces - Terry Boerboom
(Minnesota Geological Survey, retired), Amy Radakovich (Minnesota Geological Survey)
Trip 6: Unique Keweenawan inclusion (Colvin Creek) in the Duluth Complex - Mark Severson (Natural
Resources Research Institute, Teck, retired), Allison Severson (Minnesota Geological Survey), Lauri
Severson (Earth Science teacher, retired)
Trip 7: Classic outcrops of Northeastern Minnesota - Dean M. Peterson (Big Rock Exploration), George
J. Hudak (University of Minnesota, George Hudak Geosciences P.L.L.C.)
Trip 8: Glacial Lake Norwood and the Koochiching Lobe - Phillip Larson (Vesterheim Geoscience PLC),
Andrew Breckinridge (University of Wisconsin-Superior), Howard Mooers (University of Minnesota,
Duluth)

xxv

�Mine to Mountain Bike Mecca:
The story of the Redhead Mountain Bike Park
Pete Kero
PE, Senior Environmental Engineer
Barr Engineering Co.

Pete Kero, PE, is an environmental engineer and Vice President with Barr Engineering Co. He has
over 30 years of experience in mine permitting, water management, reclamation, and repurposing
across the United States. He was the visionary behind the award-winning Redhead Mountain Bike Park
in Chisholm, Minnesota which repurposed several former iron mine pits and stockpiles into a
destination-quality regional park for mountain biking, hiking, water recreation and all-terrain vehicles.
The project has been featured by Outside Magazine, the Sierra Club and the nation-wide documentary
film Biketown. Pete’s book Minescapes: Reclaiming Minnesota’s Mined Lands, which was published
by the Minnesota Historical Society Press, won a 2024 Minnesota Book Award.
This talk will describe the transformation of ten idled open pit iron ore mines in northeastern Minnesota
into a world-class recreation destination for mountain biking, hiking and paddling. In addition to
describing how and why the trails were built, the presentation will include technical details on
sustainable trail design, the concept of intermediate recreational use, changes to mine pit fencing laws
that allow for government-sanctioned recreational use of mine lands and the early results and benefits
from the first 5 years of the park’s operation.

xxvi

�Report of the Chairs of the 70th Annual Meeting
Theodore J. Bornhorst, Erika C. Vye and Patrice F. Cobin
Houghton, Michigan
The 70th Institute on Lake Superior Geology (ILSG) was held May 15 to 18, 2024 in Houghton,
Michigan, with the meeting headquartered at the Memorial Union Building on the campus of Michigan
Technological University. The meeting was sponsored by the A. E. Seaman Mineral Museum, the Great
Lakes Research Center, and the Department of Geological and Mining Engineering and Sciences - all
units of Michigan Technological University. The meeting was co-chaired by Ted Bornhorst (principal cochair), Erika Vye, Patrice Cobin, and Jim DeGraff; all co-chairs are affiliated with Michigan
Technological University. In addition to being a co-chair Patrice Cobin and Julie Stark served as registrars
for the 70th annual meeting. The institute was attended by a total of 182 participants of which 40 were
students.
The meeting consisted of two full days of technical sessions from Thursday morning 16th of May through
Friday afternoon 17th of May, and two days for field trips, pre-and post-meeting. A total of 57
presentations were subdivided into 8 technical sessions; 6 technical sessions for 30 oral presentations (of
which 5 were presented by students), and 2 poster technical sessions with a total of 27 poster
presentations (of which 16 were presented by students). Three presentations were withdrawn. Since past
meetings have not included a dedicated technical session for poster presentations, the chairs opted to
include two poster sessions for the 70th meeting. We believe this facilitated more time for attendees to
review the posters and facilitated interaction between the authors of posters and attendees. The technical
sessions of the 70th annual meeting of ILSG were published in 2024 as Part 1 of Proceedings Volume 70
(111 pages).
As is customary with ILSG meetings, the field trips were a highlight of the 70th ILSG. The meeting
offered 7 field trips with 3 pre-meeting on Wednesday May 15, and 4 post-meeting trips on Saturday
May 18. Overall, the field trips were well attended. There were 145 registrants for the 5 field trips that
were able to be run. Demand for 4 of the trips exceeded capacity resulting in wait lists.
Pre-meeting trip 1 was led by Ted Bornhorst (Michigan Tech) and focused on Mesoproterozoic
“Midcontinent Rift-filling Strata and Native Copper Deposits of the Keweenaw Peninsula, Michigan.”
Pre-meeting trip 2 was led by Tom Wright (Quincy Mine Hoist Association) and Jim DeGraff and
Katherine Langfield (Michigan Tech) and focused on the “Mining History and Geology of the Quincy
Mine, Keweenaw Peninsula Native Copper District, Michigan.” Pre-meeting trip 3 focusing on
“Geoheritage of Buffalo Reef: Industrial Impact on Land, Culture, and Fish Sovereignty” was scheduled
to be led by Erika Vye, Charlie Kerfoot (Michigan Tech), Stephanie Swart (Michigan Department of
Environmental Quality), and Dione Price and Evelyn Ravindran (Keweenaw Bay Indian Community).
However, the trip could not be run because of low water levels and shifting sediment impeding access to
the harbor.
xxvii

�Post-meeting trip 4 was led by Jim DeGraff, Katherine Langfield, and Dan Lizzadro-McPherson
(Michigan Tech) and focused on “Keweenaw Fault Geometry and Kinematics: Clues to Its Nature and
Origin.” Post-meeting trip 5 was led by Matt Portfleet (Adventure Mining Company) and Ted Bornhorst
(Michigan Tech) and focused on the “Adventure Mine, Ontonagon County, Michigan: Geology and
History of a Native Copper Mine.” Post-meeting trip 6 led by Chad Deering (Michigan Tech) ventured
outside of the Keweenaw rift to investigate “Southern Complex Granitoids, Gneisses, and Migmatites:
New Data, Discoveries, and Perspectives.” Field trip 7 led by Stan Vitton and Mohammad Sadeghi
(Michigan Technological University) was scheduled to investigate “Landslides in the Glacial Lake
Ontonagon Sediments,” but had to be cancelled due to lack of registrations. Field trip guides were
published in 2024 as Part 2 of the Proceedings Volume 70 (194 pages).
Five Doug Duskin Best Student Paper Awards were given for student oral and poster presentations as
judged by the 2024 Student Paper Awards Committee chaired by Stacy Saari (Minnesota Department of
Natural Resources). Zsusanna Allerton was awarded the best oral presentation. The best graduate student
poster presentation was awarded to Yirou Xu. The best undergraduate student poster presentation was
awarded to Lyndsie Vickers. Alice Martin and Alexander Lawrence were awarded the runner-up for
graduate student poster and for undergraduate student poster respectively.
The 70th ILSG awarded 14 Student Travel and Participation Awards to help defray the cost of
presentations of their research and participation in the ILSG professional meeting. The eligibility of costs,
as designated by the Eisenbrey Award, were expanded for the 70th ILSG Student Travel and Participation
Awards. We thank the donors for supporting the student awards. The awards were made possible by the
generous financial support from our corporate sponsor Eagle Mine – Lundin Mining, the Geological
Society of Minnesota, and 23 individual donors. The awardees were Zsuzsanna Allerton, Farhan Ahmed
Bhuiyan, Andrea Paola Corredor Bravo, Kevin Mexia Duran, Trent Ediger, Alex Lawrence, Jordan
Peterzon, Lucas Robarg, Daniel Shakked, Vlad Sheshnev, Demily Thibodeau-Bello, Adam Vanderkin,
Lyndsie Vickers, and Yiruo Xu. There were 6 Michigan Tech students whose registration fees were
waived because they volunteered with logistics for the meeting.
The ILSG social and banquet was hosted at the Memorial Union Building on Thursday evening May 15.
There were 120 people at the annual banquet. Ted Bornhorst served as master of ceremonies for the postbanquet program. After the introductions, Peter Hinz gave a short presentation about a geological
excursion to Hawaii. Amy Radovich announced the location of the 2025 meeting as Mountain Iron. The
program continued with ILSG awarding the prestigious Goldich Medal to Suzanne W. Nicholson
(recently retired from the U.S. Geological Survey). Laurel Woodruff (U.S. Geological Survey and
Goldich Medalist in 2014) provided the citation for Suzanne. The co-chairs and the A. E. Seaman Mineral
Museum recognized Ted Bornhorst with a plaque for his distinguished service to ILSG. A highlight of
the banquet was the keynote presentation by Robert Hazen (Carnegie Institution for Science), an
internationally recognized and distinguished mineralogist. His thought-provoking presentation was on
“Mineral Informatics: A New Frontier in Understanding Earth.” The keynote presentation ended the
banquet program. Hazen’s presentation was made possible by joint funding between the 70th ILSG and
the A. E. Seaman Mineral Museum of Michigan Tech. Hazen gave a second presentation on Friday
evening for the general public and as a bonus for ILSG participants. This presentation was the A. E.
xxviii

�Seaman Mineral Museum’s 2024 Edith D. and E. Wm Heinrich Lecture titled “Mineral Evolution: A case
study of a new natural law.”
The first presentation of the technical sessions was given by Jim Miller (Goldich Medalist in 2012) who
gave the citation for Roland Duer Irving as the 2024 Pioneer of Lake Superior Geology. Irving is the 5th
person to be recognized for their contributions to Lake Superior Geology prior to the initiation of the
ILSG.
The Institute’s Board of Directors met on Thursday May 16, 2024 to discuss ILSG business and approve
the 2025 meeting location. The meeting was attended by Ted Bornhorst (Board Chair), Carysn Ames,
Mark Smyk, Peter Hollings (Secretary), and Mark Jirsa (Treasurer). Guests at the meeting were the
meeting co-chairs Patrice Cobin, Erika Vye, and Jim DeGraff, and Amy Radakovich (Assistant Treasurer)
and also the Chair of the proposed 2025 Mountain Iron meeting (approved by the board see below). Stacy
Saari, Alli Severson, Eric Nowariak, and Aaron Hirsch were additional guests supporting the proposed
Mountain Iron 71st ILSG.
Institute’s Board of Directors meeting notes were taken by ILSG Secretary Hollings, which are as
follows:
Accepted report of the Chairs for the 69th ILSG, as published in the Proceedings volume, and
minutes of last Board meeting, May, 2023 (Hollings).
2. Received, discussed, and accepted 2023-2024 ILSG Financial Summary (Jirsa).
3. Received, discussed, and accepted 2023-2024 report of the Secretary (Hollings).
4. Approved Ted Bornhorst as on-going ILSG Board member and Amy Radakovich as Chair.
5. Discussed and approved replacing Dorothy Campbell as the “member from government” on
Goldich Committee (end of term 2024) with Robert Cundari.
6. Approved Mt Iron as the site for the 71st annual ILSG meeting. The meeting will be Chaired by
Amy Radakovich and hosted by the Minnesota Geological Survey.
7. A number of future meeting locations were discussed. Peter Hinz has offered Kenora as a
future site, while Mark Puumala has offered Thunder Bay.
8. The confusion over the appointment of the Board Chair was discussed and it was agreed we
would follow the Constitution with the incoming Meeting Chair assuming the role of Board
Chair.
9. It was agreed that the purchase of additional safety equipment would be postponed for now.
10. The Secretary agreed to revamp the boilerplate material for the volumes to make it easier for
the organisers of subsequent meetings. Carsyn agreed to revamp the Eisenbrey and Mancuso
award applications. Bornhorst agreed to rewrite the Eisenbrey award document for Board
consideration. The allowable expenses will be broadened so the award will be more than travel.
11. Discussed and approved renewal of Pete Hollings as Institute Secretary (end of term 2027).
This was later approved by a vote of the membership.
12. Hollings mentioned that the ILSG proceeding volumes standing order sales remain the same as
the recent past with only 5 institutions receiving them plus one sent to GeoRef.
1.

xxix

�13. The co-Chairs would like to thank all those who helped make the 70th annual meeting a success
such as judging student papers, chairing sessions, leading field trips, driving for field trips,
staffing the registration desk, caring for the projectors, general logistics and more. A special
thank you goes to Julie Stark, who played a key role in online and onsite registration.
The 70th ILSG was a milestone for a professional organization, as noted by Pete Hollings in a recently
published article on ILSG in the Lake Superior Magazine - “not a lot of groups hang around 70 years.”
Forty years ago, Ted Bornhorst chaired the annual meeting and Board of Directors. At this time the board
had serious concerns about the survival of the organization. We are happy to report that ILSG continues
to thrive and has done so by being a small, but vibrant organization. We believe that the combination of
collegial, friendly, and open discussion and exchange of ideas on geology of the Lake Superior region
between government, industry, and academic geologists has played a major role in ILSG’s survival for
70 years. We strongly believe that field relations are the foundation of geologic interpretation. The depth,
breadth, and quality of ILSG field trips is another reason ILSG continues to thrive. What makes ILSG
field trips special is that trip leaders are open to debate on their interpretation of an outcrop. Open - but
not competitive - discussion is a hallmark of both ILSG field trips and technical sessions. Lastly, meetings
would not be possible without people willing to serve as chair or co-chair and people willing to organize
the annual conference, to lead field trips, and to serve on local committees. Chairing an ILSG meeting
involves personal time, extra work, and a bit of extra stress as attested to by anyone who has risen to this
challenge in past years. One of us (Bornhorst) has been principal chair for 6 meetings over 41 years,
from 1983 to 2024. He agreed to be Chair one last time to mentor Erika and Patty with the hope that one
day, one or both of them, will chair a future annual meeting, contributing to the continuation of ILSG.
We hope that ISLG survives for many decades and into the next century and beyond.
We are gratified by the positive comments by participants and are happy to have served the Lake Superior
geological community. We look forward to the 2025 Mountain Iron ILSG meeting when we can be much
more relaxed!
Respectfully submitted,
Theodore (Ted) Bornhorst, Erika Vye, and Patrice (Patty) Cobin
Co-chairs, 70th Institute on Lake Superior Geology

xxx

�Donations to Support the Annual Meeting of the
Institute on Lake Superior Geology

A special thank you to our individual contributors

Roger Anderson
Allan MacTavish
Dave Dahl
xxxi

�Donations to Support Student Participation at the Annual Meeting of the
Institute on Lake Superior Geology
A special thank you to our individual contributors

Kate Clover

Jim and Isagel DeGraff

Tom Erickson

Tom Fitz

Aaron Hirsch

Paula Leier-Engelhardt

Bob Mahin

Vince and Susan Mathews

Jim Miller

Allison Severson

Mark and Lauri Severson

John Verhoeven

Gerry White

xxxii

�TECHNICAL PROGRAM

xxxiii

�Wednesday May 14, 2025
All field trips begin and end at the Mountain Iron Community Center
Pre-meeting Field Trips May 14, 2024
8:00 am - 5:00 pm PRE-MEETING FIELD TRIPS
Trip 1: Transect through the Quetico subprovince of northern Minnesota – Eric Nowariak (Minnesota
Geological Survey), Mark Jirsa (Minnesota Geological Survey, retired)
Trip 2: Drill Core from three Cu-Ni deposits of the Duluth Complex - Mark Severson (Natural Resources
Research Institute, Teck Retired), Cullen Phillips (New Range Copper Nickel), Kevin Boerst (Twin
Metals Minnesota)
Trip 3: How do you make iron and/or manganese in Proterozoic Iron Formation? - Alex Steiner (Big
Rock Exploration), Latisha Brengman (University of Minnesota, Duluth), Dean Peterson (Big Rock
Exploration)
Trip 4: New Geological Insights into the genesis of iron ores at Lake Vermillion – Soudan Underground
Mine State Park - George J. Hudak (University of Minnesota, George Hudak Geosciences P.L.L.C.),
Zsuzsanna P. Allerton (University of Minnesota), Annia Fayon (University of Minnesota)

Wednesday evening May 14, 2025
5:00 pm - 8:00 pm Registration (Mountain Iron Community Center)
6:00 pm - 8:00 pm Poster Setup and Viewing (Mountain Iron Community Center)
6:00 pm - 8:00 pm Welcoming Reception (Mountain Iron Community Center)

* Denotes a student eligible for Best Student Paper Award. To be eligible students must have graduated
no more than one month before the ILSG meeting, be first author, and present the paper at the meeting
+ Denotes author that will present the paper if different than the first author.

Thursday - May 15, 2025
7:15 am – 12:00 pm

8:00 am.

Registration (Mountain Iron Community Center)

Opening remarks (Mountain Iron Community Center)
Amy Radakovich, Allison Severson, Eric Nowariak, Stacy Saari, Aaron C. Hirsch
Co-Chairs, 2025 ILSG

xxxiv

�TECHNICAL SESSION I – ORAL PRESENTATIONS
Session Chair: Amy Radakovich
8:20 Mark SMYK
Robert Bell - Pioneer of Lake Superior geology
8:40 William J. HINZE and Mark B. LONGACRE
Revisiting Gravity and Magnetic Anomalies of the Baraboo Range
9:00 Huifang XU and Tianyu ZHOU
Battle between the bands: competitive precipitations lead to bands in banded
iron formations
9:20 Howard MOOERS, Mark SEVERSON, Peter JONGEWAARD, and Phillip LARSON
US Steel Corporation / Ralph W. Marsden iron ore collection
9:40 Matt CARTER
Updates on the Minnesota Department of Natural Resource’s Drill Core Library
10:00 END OF TECHNICAL SESSION I
10:00-10:20

COFFEE BREAK

TECHNICAL SESSION II – ORAL PRESENTATIONS
Session Chair: Stacy Saari
10:20 Alan AUBUT
A Contrarian View: Thoughts on the Genesis of the Tamarack Ni-Cu Deposit
10:40Cory PALIEWICZ and Joyashish THAKURTA
Lithogeochemical Characterization of Manganese Mineralization at the Cuyuna Range, Central
Minnesota
11:00 Guy N. EVANS and William E. SEYFRIED JR.
Experimental Reproduction of Acidic Mafic-Ultramafic Hydrothermal Fluids with Implications for
Linking Seafloor Lithology to Ore Mineral Solubility and Novel Geochemical Trapping
Mechanisms
11:20 Wyatt BAIN, James TOLLEY, and Peter HOLLINGS
An overview of the geology, tectonic setting, and occurrence of sulphide mineralization in the Lac
Des Iles Intrusive Suite
11:40 Thomas BUCHHOLZ, Alexander FALSTER, and William SIMMONS
A complex F-rich alkalic pegmatite in the pyroxene syenites of the stettin complex, Wausau
Complex, Marathon county, Wisconsin
12:00

END OF TECHNICAL SESSION II
xxxv

�12:00-1:30 LUNCH BREAK and ILSG BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING
- Buffet lunch provided-

TECHNICAL SESSION III- POSTER PRESENTATIONS
Session Chair: Robert Lodge
1:30-3:00

AUTHORS PRESENT AT THEIR POSTERS

2:40-3:00

COFFEE BREAK

3:00

END OF TECHNICAL SESSION III

TECHNICAL SESSION IV – ORAL PRESENTATIONS
Session Chair: Allison Severson
3:00 James V. JONES, Ross SALERNO, William F. CANNON, and Pau O’SULLIVAN
Geologic implications of detrital zircon U-Pb ages from Archean and Paleoproterozoic strata in
central Minnesota and the Gogebic Range of Wisconsin and Michigan, USA
3:20 R. SALERNO, W.F. CANNON, A. SOUDERS, J.M. THOMPSON, and J. VERVOORT
Constraining the timing of crustal exhumation following the Penokean orogeny using U-Pb, SmNd, and Lu-Hf geochronology and microstructural analysis
3:40 James DeGRAFF, Chad DEERING, and James JONES III
The Archean Carney Lake gneiss complex in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula: Preliminary
subdivisions with age constraints
4:00 *Omar Khalil DROUBI, Erik SCHOONOVER, Mona-Liza SIRBESCU, Joshua GARBER,
and Chlo BONAMICI
Geochronology of lithium mineralization in the Florence pegmatite field, WI, USA
4:20

END OF TECHNICAL SESSION IV

xxxvi

�Thursday evening May 15, 2024
5:30 pm

RECEPTION AND CASH BAR (Mountain Iron Convention Center)

6:30 pm

ANNUAL BANQUET (Mountain Iron Convention Center)

2025 Goldich Medal Recipient: Robert Michael Easton
Banquet Speaker: Pete Kero, Mine to Mountain Bike Mecca:
The story of the Redhead Mountain Bike Park

Friday - May 16, 2025
8:15 INTRODUCTORY REMARKS AND UPDATES (Mountain Iron Community Center)
Amy Radakovich, Allison Severson, Eric Nowariak, Stacy Saari, Aaron C. Hirsch; Co-Chairs, 2025
ILSG

TECHNICAL SESSION V – ORAL PRESENTATIONS
Session Chair: Aaron Hirsch
8:20 Wouter BLEEKER, Michael HAMILTON, and Sandra KAMO
Paleoproterozoic mantle plume tracks shaping the southern margin of the Superior craton and the
geology of the Lake Superior region
8:40 Max ROHRMAN
Plume control on the initiation of Mid-Continent Rift breakup using Unconformities: Implications
for the Tectono-magmatic evolution and mineral deposits
9:00 James TOLLEY, Pete HOLLINGS, Kevin MEXIA DURAN, and Myles HARDING
Evaluating Ni in Olivine as a Prospectivity Indicator for Magmatic Ni-Cu-(PGE) Deposits: A
Preliminary Study from the Midcontinent Rift System.
9:20 James TOLLEY, Jacob HANLEY, James CROWLEY, Sasha TSAY, Zoltan ZAJACZ, and
Pete HOLLINGS
A Porphyry in a Rift? Constraining the Petrogenesis of the Jogran Porphyry, Mamainse
Point, Ontario, Canada: Insights from Zircon and Melt Inclusion Geochemistry
9:40 Nicholas SWANSON-HYSELL, Eben B. HODGIN, Tadesse ALEMU, Anthony FUENTES,
Yiming ZHANG, Sarah SLOTZNICK, and Luke FAIRCHILD
Midcontinent Rift extension ceased and the rift inverted due to the Grenvillian orogeny
10:00

END OF TECHNICAL SESSION V
xxxvii

�10:00-10:20

COFFEE BREAK – Sponsored by MRGS

TECHNICAL SESSION VI – POSTER PRESENTATIONS
Session Chair: Robert Lodge
10:00-11:30

AUTHORS PRESENT AT THEIR POSTERS

11:30 END OF TECHNICAL SESSION VI

11:30-1:00
LUNCH BREAK
- Buffet lunch provided-

TECHNICAL SESSION VII – ORAL PRESENTATIONS
Session Chair: Eric Nowariak
1:00 Steven D.J. BAUMANN
Pembine-Wausau Terrane as an Icelandic style island overthrust onto Archean basement, instead
of an island arc or continental fragment accretion
1:20 Jiří1 ŽÁK, Filip TOMEK, Václav KACHLÍK, František VACEK, Martin SVOJTKA, and
Lukáš ACKERMAN
Broadly coeval but migrating deformation, plutonism and deposition in the northeastern Superior
Province, Québec: evidence of hot accretionary orogeny and oroclinal folding in the late Archean?
1:40 Mark SMYK, Pete HOLLINGS, Riku METSARANTA, Robert CUNDARI, Stephen KISSIN,
and Colleen KURCINKA
Basaltic rocks of the Animikie Group in Ontario: Geochemical characteristics and tectonic
significance
2:00 W. F. CANNON, M. Rebecca STOKES, Ross A. SALERNO
Micromineralogy and textures in the Sudbury impact layer on the Mesabi Iron Range, Minnesota:
record of processes in the proximal-distal ejecta transition zone
2:20

END OF TECHNICAL SESSION VII

2:20 COFFEE BREAK

xxxviii

�TECHNICAL SESSION VIII – ORAL PRESENTATIONS
Session Chair: Amy Radakovich
2:40 J.D. VERHOEVEN and Tim ZOWADA
Origin of magnetic black sand found on the south Shore of Lake Superior
3:00 Erika VYE and Daniel LIZZADRO-MCPHERSON
Geospatial Learning Resources to Explore Relationships with Keweenaw Geology
3:20 Allan MACTAVISH, Peter HINZ, +George HUDAK, Phil LARSON, Allan AUBUT, Terry
BOERBOOM, Vern CHILTON, Jim DeGRAFF, Tom ERICKSON, Barb
FAULKNER, Isabel SERRANO, Larry and ZANKO
An informal review of the ILSG field trip to Hawaii: January and February 2025
4:00 END OF TECHNICAL SESSION VIII
4:00 Presentation of Student Awards
Best Student Paper Awards – Student award committee
Student Travel/Participation Awards – Amy Radakovich
MRGS Awards – Mark Severson

4:30

Concluding Remarks and Field Trips
Amy Radakovich, Allison Severson, Eric Nowariak, Stacy Saari, Aaron C. Hirsch; Co-Chairs, 2025
ILSG

END OF TECHNICAL SESSIONS OF THE 71st ANNUAL MEETING

xxxix

�Saturday May 17, 2025
Field trips begin and end at the Mountain Iron Community Center
8:00 am – 5:00 pm POST-MEETING FIELD TRIPS
Trip 5: Neoarchean alkalic intrusions in the Wawa and Quetico subprovinces
Terry Boerboom (Minnesota Geological Survey, retired); Amy Radakovich (Minnesota Geological
Survey)
Trip 6: Unique Keweenawan inclusion (Colvin Creek) in the Duluth Complex
Mark Severson (Natural Resources Research Institute, Teck, retired); Allison Severson (Minnesota
Geological Survey); Lauri Severson (Earth Science teacher, retired)
Trip 7: Classic outcrops of Northeastern Minnesota
Dean M. Peterson (Big Rock Exploration); George J. Hudak (University of Minnesota, George Hudak
Geosciences P.L.L.C.)
Trip 8: Glacial Lake Norwood and the Koochiching Lobe
Phillip Larson (Vesterheim Geoscience PLC); Andrew Breckinridge (University of Wisconsin-Superior);
Howard Mooers (University of Minnesota, Duluth)

xl

�POSTER PRESENTATIONS
* Denotes a student eligible for Best Student Paper Award. To be eligible students must have graduated
no more than one month before the ILSG meeting, be first author, and present the paper at the meeting
+ Denotes author that will present the paper if different than the first author.
Numbered Posters and Abstracts are in sequential order
1. *Zsuzsanna ALLERTON, George HUDAK, Guy EVANS, Xinyuan ZHENG, and Christian
TEYSSIER
Geochemical analyses of banded iron formations and formerly mined iron ore in the Lake
Vermilion-Soudan Underground Mine State Park, NE Minnesota
2. *Madelyn BANKS, Latisha BRENGMAN, Athena EYSTER
Linking whole rock geochemical data with micro-scale mineral characterization of oxidation
reactions in the Biwabik Iron Formation, MN, USA
3. Howard MOOERS, Mark SEVERSON, Peter JONGEWAARD, and Phillip LARSON
US Steel Corporation / Ralph W. Marsden iron ore collection
4. *Sarah JAROZEWSKI, Paige DUFFY, Cole BARRÉ, Latisha BRENGMAN, and Athena
EYSTER
Mapping oxidation reactions in iron-rich rocks from northeast Minnesota, USA.
5. *Celia L. CORTOPASSI, Zsuzsanna P. ALLERTON, Joshua M. FEINBERG
Alteration of magnetic mineralogy in the Giants Range Batholith by the Duluth Complex
6. *Samara GRIES, Robert W.D. LODGE, Sara HANEL, and Robert HOOPER
Rare-element Geochemistry of the Eau Claire River Complex Pegmatites
7. *Linsey HULA and Dyanna CZECK
Emplacement of the Mesoproterozoic Wausau Syenite Complex, Wisconsin
8. *Renee O. JEUTTER and Robert W.D. LODGE
Geology and Geochemistry of the Mesoproterozoic Round Lake Intrusion and associated TiMineralization, Northern Wisconsin
9. *Bekah R. THOMPSON and Robert W.D. LODGE
Ni-Cu-PGE Mineralization at the Mineral Lake Intrusive Complex, northern Wisconsin
10. *Lyndsie A. VICKERS and Robert W.D. LODGE
Zircon Petrochronology of the Eau Claire Volcanic Complex in the Marshfield Terrane of the
Penokean Orogen, Northcentral Wisconsin
11. *Andrew A. CASPER and Robert W.D. LODGE
R Geology and Mineralization of the Plover Au Prospect, Marathon County, Wisconsin
xli

�12. William FITZPATRICK
Textural and chemical analysis of sphalerite ores from the Highland Subdistrict, Upper Mississippi
Valley Zinc-Lead District, Wisconsin
13. *Haley P. JOHANNESEN and Robert W.D. LODGE
Geology and Geochemistry of the Ritche Creek Cu-Zn deposit, North central Wisconsin
14. *Aidan O. KWIATKOWSKI and Robert W.D. LODGE
Zircon Petrochronology of Wisconsin’s Volcanogenic Massive Sulfide Deposits, Northcentral
Wisconsin
15. Sara PEARSON, Nolan GAMET, Molly SHALIFOE, Ashley QUIGLEY, and Robert MAHIN
Michigan Geological Survey’s Contributions to the USGS Earth MRI National Mine Waste
Inventory Effort
16. Ashley K. QUIGLEY, Robert A. MAHIN, and Nolan G. GAMET
Critical Mineral Potential of the Northern Margin of the Watersmeet Gneiss Dome, MI USA
17. *MaryElizabeth SHALIFOE and Peter VOICE
Identifying Abandoned Mine Surficial Features Using Mask R-CNN, Upper Peninsula Michigan.
18. Sophie CHURCHLEY and Philip FRALICK
Unusual early diagenetic structures in the Paleoproterozoic Gunflint Formation, Ontario, Canada
19. Gordon MEDARIS Jr. and Dave MALONE
Post-Penokean and Pre-Yavapai Magmatism and Sedimentation in Central Wisconsin (Southern
Lake Superior Region)
20. Esther K. STEWART, Michael TAPPA, Ann BAUER, Latisha BRENGMAN, and Anthony
PRAVE
Sedimentologic and geochemical evidence of marine incursion to the Oronto Group basin,
southern Lake Superior region, at ca. 1.08 Ga
21. Carsyn AMES and Brad GOTTSCHALK
High resolution thin-section scanning and metadata capture- WGNHS Data Preservation Project
2024 early efforts
22. Nate DANIELS, Grace MCELLISTREM, Raeann VOGEL, and Michael BRAUNAGEL
Architecture of the Douglas Fault damage zone, northwest Wisconsin
23. Mark B. LONGACRE and William J. HINZE, William
Geologic Interpretation of Filtered Gravity and Magnetic Anomalies of the Baraboo Range
24. Jack MALONE, David MALONE, Raymond ANDERSON, Ryan CLARK
Refining the Age and Occurrence of Basement Rocks in Northwest Iowa: Implications for
Precambrian Tectonics and Magmatic Evolution of the Laurentian Midcontinent

xlii

�ABSTRACTS

xliii

�Geochemical analyses of banded iron formations and formerly mined iron ore in the Lake
Vermilion-Soudan Underground Mine State Park, NE Minnesota
ALLERTON, Zsuzsanna1, HUDAK, George1,2,3, EVANS, Guy1, ZHENG, Xinyuan1, and
TEYSSIER, Christian1
1

Earth &amp; Environmental Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN 55812, USA
3
George Hudak Geosciences P.L.L.C., Duluth, MN 55804, USA
2

The Lake Vermilion-Soudan Underground Mine State Park in northeastern Minnesota is
known for its underground tours in the former iron mine that was operational between 1884-1962
(Klinger, 1960). The mine contains lenticular-shaped ore bodies enclosed in variably altered
banded iron formations (BIFs) that were upgraded to massive hematite iron ore during
replacement-style hydrothermal alteration (Gruner, 1926; Klinger, 1960; Thompson, 2015). The
timing of ore mineralization is constrained to 1.8-1.6 Ga (Allerton, 2024b). The widely accepted
simplified genetic model for these ore deposits involves hydrothermal fluids that leached silica
from BIFs and concentrated iron as hematite. Here we utilize historic and recently acquired
whole rock major, trace and rare earth element lithogeochemical analyses to perform mass
balance evaluations via the isocon method (Grant, 2005) and iron stable isotope geochemistry to
propose a new hydrothermal model to better constrain the transition from BIF to iron ore.
Eight BIF and twelve ore samples from Thompson (2015) were utilized for this study.
BIFs show varying degrees of alteration adjacent to the orebodies, whereas iron ore samples
comprise massive hematite ± chlorite. Our data include eight additional samples; four least
altered and two hematite-altered BIFs collected from surface outcrops, and two iron ore samples
that are 1) high-grade hematite ore with primary phase microcrystalline hematite-martite (MCHMT) with minimal chlorite and 2) lower grade ore with abundant secondary quartz and
microplaty hematite (MPH; Allerton, 2024b). The Fe isotope analysis incorporates variably
deformed gabbroic rocks and chlorite schist adjacent to the ore bodies as well.
Lithogeochemical analyses of 14 BIFs and 14 iron ore samples indicate inverse
correlation between SiO2 and Fe2O3(total); BIF has high SiO2 and low Fe2O3(total) contents, whereas
iron ore displays low in SiO2 and Fe2O3(total). Statistical evaluations suggest that high strength
field elements (HFSE) are immobile and therefore have been selected for isocon analysis.
Utilizing a HFSE ‘best fit’ isocon, the system shows almost complete SiO2-loss (99%) and 54%
Fe2O3-loss from least altered BIF to high-grade ore (Fig. 1A), suggesting that greater loss of
silica relative to iron has resulted in a net concentration of iron. Moreover, there is secondary
quartz and MPH in the lower grade ore based on petrography, indicating the lower-grade ore
postdates the high-grade ore. Isocon analysis shows SiO2-gain and continued Fe3O2-loss from
high-grade to lower grade ore (Fig. 1B). The Fe stable isotope results attest to this by presenting
higher δ56Fe values for BIFs that decrease from less to more altered BIF. MCH-MT in highgrade ore displays even lower δ56Fe values, and chlorite within fractures of high-grade ore shows
similar values to secondary quartz and MPH in heterogeneous ore, suggestive of paragenesis of
two different hematite phases and gangue minerals (Fig. 2).
Our new hydrothermal model proposes continuous removal of Fe, entailing coeval Si
mobilization and removal from BIF to high-grade MCH-MT ore and re-deposition into lower
grade MPH ore. These hypotheses are supported by detailed analyses of lithogeochemistry,
mineral textures, and Fe stable isotopes.

1

�Figure 1: A)
Diagram displays
major oxides of
least altered BIF
(x-axis) against
MCH-MT ore (yaxis) and B) MCTMT ore (x-axis)
against MPH ore
(y-axis). Ratios
show gains and
losses are
calculated based on
the slope of HFSE
best fit isocons.

Figure 2: Diagram
shows decreasing
δ57Fe/ δ56Fe values of
less and more BIFs,
MCH-MT and MPH
ore samples, and
lithologies adjacent
to
the ore bodies in
Soudan; foliated
gabbro, gabbroderived schist,
chlorite schist. Values
are calibrated to
BHVO-2 iron
standard commonly
used in Fe stable
isotope geochemistry.

REFERENCES
Allerton, Z., Hudak, G., Teyssier, C., Fayon, A., Daniŝik, M., Courtney-Davies, L, and Larson, P., 2024b.
Geochronology and geochemistry of hematite ore in northeastern Minnesota: Institute on Lake
Superior Geology, Proceedings Volume 70, Part 1 – Program and Abstracts, p. 4-5.
Grant, J.A., 2005. Isocon analysis: A brief review of the method and applications: Physics and Chemistry
of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, v. 30, p. 997–1004, doi: 10.1016/j.pce.2004.11.003.
Gruner, J. W., 1926. Hydrothermal alteration of iron ores of the Lake Superior type—a modified theory:
Economic Geology, v. 32, p.121-130.
Klinger, F.L., 1960. Geology and ore deposits of the Soudan mine, St. Louis County, Minnesota [thesis].
Thompson, A., 2015. A hydrothermal model for metasomatism of Neoarchean Algoma-Type banded iron
formation to massive hematite ore at the Soudan Mine, NE Minnesota [thesis].

2

�High resolution thin-section scanning and metadata capture- WGNHS Data Preservation
Project 2024 early efforts
AMES, Carsyn1 and GOTTSCHALK, Brad1
1
Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey, UW-Madison, 3817 Mineral Point Rd, Madison, WI
53704 USA

The Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey (WGNHS) has recently
undertaken an effort to scan approximately 3800 of the 4800 historical thin sections held in
WGNHS collections as part of the USGS-National Geological and Geophysical Data
Preservation Program (NGGDPP). This work builds upon a number of previous projects
including: a 2011 NGGDPP project to inventory all thin sections in the WGNHS collections, an
internal project to catalog fields notebooks and refine locations of recorded samples, a pilot study
to develop a workflow for scanning and editing high resolution photos of thin sections, and a
project to inventory and collect metadata from an extensive collection of samples donated to
WGNHS by Gene LaBerge (UW-Oshkosh). Building on the lessons learned from these prior
studies and methods outlined in Leung and Mcdonald (2023), we have developed a workflow to
scan thin sections using a Plustek OpticFilm 8200i film scanner (Figures 1a and 1c) and
SilverFastSE Plus software with settings shown in Figure 1b. Forty-eight-bit raw images are
produced in both plane, non-polarized light and cross-polarized light (Figure 2). Images are
edited post scanning in Adobe Lightroom to enhance the sharpness and exposure to better
replicate what users see when viewing thin sections with a petrographic microscope. Scanning
and editing images takes approximately 10 minutes per thin section. Photos are stored in TIFF
format and are intended to be served on the WGNHS Dataviewer for public access.
Thin sections included in this project capture a wide range of lithologies from several
Wisconsin counties. Many samples represent some of the first efforts to survey the natural
resources and map the geology of northern Wisconsin. The original data associated with the thin
sections is archived in historic field notebooks archived at the WGNHS and includes
documentation of geomorphology, bedrock and glacial geology, and magnetic susceptibilities of
encountered bedrock units. Locations are recorded in Public Land Survey System (PLSS)
notation. Samples with at least section level location information were included in this project;
many of the locations given in the field notes can be narrowed down to quarter-section
designation with certainty. In the initial phase of this ongoing project we have focused on
scanning and entering metatdata for samples in and around Florence County, Wisconsin.
Precambrian iron formation in this area was mined from 1880-1931 to produce some three
million tons of hematite and limonite ore (Brown B., 2021). This project has focused on
capturing lithological information from samples in this area, which is characterized by complex
Precambrian stratigraphy and structure. Upon project completion, high resolution thin section
images will be made publicly available online using the WGNHS Dataviewer. Additionally, all
metadata will be uploaded to the USGS’s ReSciColl collection and the WGNHS internal
database (Geobase).

3

�Figure 1: A) Plustek Optic Film 8200i
scanner and acompyning film tray. B)
Scanner settings to be used during the
proposed project. Note the 600 ppi
preset and further 7,200 ppi
adjustable resolution. Thin sections
are scanned in 48-bit HDR Raw C)
Tray with card stock paper cut to
better hold thin sections. Note the two
slots on the right are fitted with linear
polarizing screens that sandwich the
thin sections. The polarized screens
are oriented to cross polarize the light
when scanning.

Figure 2: High resolution thin section
images scanned as part of the pilot
project. A. and C. were scanned using
plane, non-polarized light; B. and D.
were scanned using cross polarized
light.

REFERENCES

Brown, B., 2021. Florence Iron Mine: Historical Maps Showing Location of Surface Development,
Regional Setting, and Underground Workings. Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey
WOFR2018-03: 5.
Leung, D. D.V., and Mcdonald, A.M., 2023. Picture-perfect petrography: affordable thin-section scanning
for geoscientists in the digital era. The Canadian Journal of Mineralogy and Petrology, 61: 10451050.

4

�A Contrarian View: Thoughts on the Genesis of the Tamarack Ni-Cu Deposit.
AUBUT, Alan1
1
Sibley Basin Group Ltd., PO Box 304, Nipigon, ON P0T 2J0.Canada

The Tamarack Ni-Cu deposit has been attributed as being of intrusive origin (Goldner, 2021;
Taranovic et al., 2018). There are many nickel deposits hosted by ultramafic bodies that display
clear evidence of being the product of extrusive flows, often exhibiting the same key features
used to invoke an intrusive origin (e.g. Arndt, 1975; Hill et al., 1995; Hubbert and Sparks, 1985;
Marston et al.,1981).
This includes the nickel deposits of the Kambalda district of Australia, Pechenga in the Kola
Peninsula of western Russia, Raglan in northern Quebec and Thompson in northern Manitoba.
All have been, or currently are, attributed to the intrusion of ultramafic sills (e.g. Bleeker, 1990;
Marston et al., 1981; Melezhik et al., 1994). Key evidence in support of this model is that the
ultramafic bodies typically exhibit at least some differentiation and are sub-concordant to the
host sediments. This tendency to default to an intrusion model now includes the Tamarack
deposit in Minnesota even though an extrusion model is more valid.
The major komatiite hosted nickel deposits listed above share common features: 1) the nickel
mineralisation is hosted by ultramafic rocks; 2) the sulphides are at the stratigraphic base of the
host ultramafics; 3) the ultramafic rocks are hosted by, or in contact with, sulphidic and
carbonaceous argillaceous rocks; 4) the ultramafic bodies are stratabound and generally
conformable to the host lithology; and 5) they are hosted within extensional basins usually with a
significant sedimentary component with Kambalda being the one exception.
But there is a density “problem” in that ultramafic magmas are typically denser than the host
rocks, especially when they are sedimentary. When rocks melt, they become about 10% less
dense. In the case of ultramafic rocks, the average density is about 3.0 g/cc (Nisbet et al., 1993)
while the crust has a density of 2.7 g/cc or less. To move upward from the mantle through the
crust there must have been a mechanism other than buoyancy.
“Overpressure” is a valid explanation (Sleep, 1974, 1992). Magma plumes in a mantle plume
move upward due to buoyancy to the Mantle-Crust boundary. There it collects and then moves
laterally thus creating extensional forces in the overlying crust. This accumulating magma would
be constrained by the overlying lithostatic load and in doing so would build up overpressure. If
the crust thins enough vertical fractures can form allowing the trapped magma to escape due to
the built-up overpressure exceeding the lithostatic load. At surface the hot, dense ultramafic
magma would then flow over, and into, deep water sediments where the magma would
mechanically and thermally erode and assimilate sulphide rich sediments.
Tamarack shows all the same characteristics as other Ni-Cu deposits associated with rift basins
and features that are more easily explained by extrusive flow of komatiitic magma. As such the
intrusive emplacement model currently favoured should be reviewed and serious consideration
given to emplacement by extrusion of a high-density magma driven by overpressure.

5

�REFERENCES
Arndt, N.T., 1975. Ultramafic rocks of Munro Township and their volcanic setting; Unpub. Ph.D. Thesis,
Univ. Toronto.
Bleeker, W., 1990. New Structural-Metamorphic constraints on Early Proterozoic oblique collision along
the Thompson Nickel Belt, Manitoba, Canada; In Lewry, J.F. and Stauffer, M.R., eds., The Early
Proterozoic Trans-Hudson Orogen of North America: Geological Association of Canada, Special
Paper 37, p. 57-73.
Goldner, B.D., 2011. Igneous Petrology of the Ni-Cu-PGE Mineralized Tamarack Intrusion; Unpub.
M.Sc. Thesis, Univ. Minesota.
Aitkin and Carlton Counties, Minnesota; Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 44, 1087-1110.
Hill, R.E.T., Barnes, S.J., Gole, M.J. and Dowling, S.E., 1995. The volcanology of komatiites as deduced
from field relationships in the Norseman-Wiluna greenstone belt, Western Australia; Lithos 34, p.
159-188.
Huppert, H.E. and Sparks, R.S.J., 1985, Komatiites I: Eruption and Flow; Journal of Petrology, Vol. 26,
Part 3, pp. 694-725.
Marston, R.J., Groves, D.I., Hudson, D.R. and Ross, J.R., 1981, Nickel sulfide deposits in Western
Australia: a review; Economic Geology, Vol. 76, pp. 1330-1363.
Melezhik, V.A., Hudson-Edwards, K.A., Skuf'in, P.K and Nilsson, L.P., 1994a, Pechenga Area, Russia Part 1: geological setting and comparison with Pasvik, Norway; Transactions of Institution of
Mining and Metallurgy (Sect. B: Applied Earth Science), Vol. 103, p B129-B145.
Nisbet, E. G., Cheadle, M. J., Arndt, N. T., &amp; Bickle, M. J. (1993). Constraining the potential temperature
of the Archaean mantle: a review of the evidence from komatiites. Lithos, 30(3-4), 291-307.
Sleep, N. H., 1974. Segregation of Magma in the Ascending Mantle. The Journal of Geology, 82(2), 131–
142.
Sleep, N. H., 1992. Time Dependence of Kilauea Volcano Structure from Hotspots to Trench Due to
Overpressure in the Asthenosphere. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 97(B8), 11773–
11782.
Taranovic, V., Ripley, E.M., Li, C. and Shirey, S.B., 2018. S, O, and Re-Os Isotope Studies of the
Tamarack Igneous Complex: Melt-Rock Interaction During the Early Stage of Midcontinent Rift
Development; Economic Geology, v. 113, no. 5, pp. 1161-1179.

6

�An overview of the geology, tectonic setting, and occurrence of sulphide mineralization in
the Lac Des Iles Intrusive Suite
BAIN, Wyatt1, TOLLEY, James 2, and HOLLINGS, Peter 2
1
Department of Earth Sciences, Western University, 1151 Richmond St, London, ON N6A 5B7 Canada
2
Department of Geology, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Road Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1 Canada

The Lac des Iles (LDI) mafic-ultramafic complex hosts a world-class platinum group
element (PGE) deposit and is spatially associated with a suite of mafic-ultramafic satellite
intrusions (i.e. the LDI-intrusive suite; LDI-IS). The intrusions are hosted in the crystalline rocks
of the Wabigoon subprovince, along its eastern contact with the sedimentary and volcanic rocks
of the Quetico subprovince. Previous work identified textural and geochemical similarities
between the LDI-IS and the mineralized rocks of the LDI complex that likely reflect a temporal
and genetic association, and perhaps a similar degree of prospectivity for PGE mineralization
(Stone et al., 2003). Here, we present an overview of the geology and setting of the LDI-IS, as
well as new geochronology, isotopic data, and parental melt modelling.
The LDI-IS (Tib Lake, Legris Lake, Wakinoo Lake, Demars Lake, Dog River, Taman
Lake, and Buck Lake; Fig. 1a) are mostly leucogabbro to gabbronorite in composition but
commonly include hornblende gabbro, hornblendite, and minor peridotite and pyroxenite. Zircon
U-Pb ages for mineralized gabbro from the Buck Lake (2698.1 ± 1.6 Ma), Wakinoo Lake
(2696.6 ± 0.8 Ma), Demars Lake (2694.1 ± 1.5 Ma), Legris Lake (2690.6 ± 0.8 Ma), Dog River
(2689.9 ± 0.7 Ma), and Tib Lake (2685.9 ± 1.6 Ma) intrusions show a spatial trend of younging
to the north and demonstrate a temporal association with the Lac des Iles Mine Block intrusion
(2689.0±1.0 Ma; Stone, 2010; Fig 1 b).
Trace element profiles for modelled parental melts are similar across most of the LDI-IS
and are consistent with an arc setting and a common parental magma source reservoir. However,
modelled REE profiles for some cyclic units in the Tib lake intrusion were more evolved and
enriched in light rare earth elements. Similar patterns are reported in modelled parental melts
from North LDI and are consistent with mixing between primitive and more evolved, siliceous
magmas (Djon et al., 2017). Though magma mixing influenced the geochemical evolution of the
Tib lake intrusion, cyclic units with more evolved signatures were not significantly mineralized.
Whole rock εNdT values of gabbroic rocks from the LDI-IS and the Lac des Iles complex
overlap with the tonalitic rocks of the Wabigoon subprovince in older intrusions and trend
toward increasingly negative values in younger intrusions (Fig. 1c). This suggests assimilation of
Wabigoon tonalite by LDI-IS parental magmas early in the formation of this magmatic system,
and greater degrees of contamination by Quetico metasediment over time.
Magmatic sulphides from the Legris Lake intrusion have δ34S values that overlap the
mantle range but trend toward the composition of Wabigoon tonalite (Bain et al., 2023). This
suggests that external S or Si addition from the tantalite drove sulphide saturation during its
formation. However, a comparison of whole rock S/Se and Cu/Pd ratios of mineralized
lithologies across the LDI-IS suggest that sulphide melt retention during emplacement was a
more crucial control on the occurrence of PGE-bearing sulphide mineralization than the source
of S or the timing of sulphide saturation.

7

�Figure 1: a. Regional geologic map showing locations of Thunder Bay, the Lac des Iles mine (in red), and
the Lac des Iles intrusive suite (in blue). b. U-Pb ages for individual intrusions in the Lac des Iles
intrusive suite. c. Whole-rock εNdT values for the LDI intrusive suite and host rock lithologies. North LDI
and South LDI data from Brügmann et al. 1997

REFERENCES

Bain, W.M., Hollings, P.N., Djon, M.L., Brzozowski, M.J., Layton-Matthews, D., Dobosz, A., and Stern,
R.A., 2024. Geochemical evolution and parental magma of the Lake Legris mafic-ultramafic
complex, Ontario. Mineralium Deposita 59:85-108
Brügmann, G.E., Reischmann, T., Naldrett, A.J., and Sutcliffe, R.H., 1997. Roots of an Archean volcanic
arc complex: The Lac des Iles area in Ontario, Canada. Precambrian Research, 81: 223−239.
Djon, M.L., Olivo, G.R., Miller, J.D., and Peck, D.C., 2017. Stratiform platinum-group element
mineralization in the layered northern ultramafic center of the Lac des Iles Intrusive Complex,
Ontario, Canada. Ore Geology Reviews, doi: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2017.03.011.
Stone, D., Lavigne, M.J., Schnieders, B., Scott, J., and Wagner, D., 2003. Regional geology of the Lac
des Iles area. Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Report 6120: 15–25.
Stone, D. 2010. Precambrian geology of the central Wabigoon Subprovince area, northwestern Ontario.
Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Report 5422:1-130.

8

�Linking whole rock geochemical data with micro-scale mineral characterization of
oxidation reactions in the Biwabik Iron Formation, MN, USA
BANKS, Madelyn1, BRENGMAN, Latisha1, EYSTER, Athena2
1

Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Minnesota Duluth, Heller Hall, 1114
Kirby Drive, Duluth, MN 55812, USA
2
Department of Earth and Climate Sciences, Tufts University, Lane Hall, 2 North Hill Road, Medford,
MA 02155, USA

Oxidation and hydration reactions in iron-rich chemical sedimentary rocks are of critical
interest because they signify post-depositional changes often linked to later weathering and fluid
alteration. Evaluating oxidation and hydration reactions present in iron formations is therefore
required to separate out depositional signals in mineralogical and geochemical data from those
that link to post-depositional mineral reactions and enrichment processes (Geymond et al., 2022).
The Biwabik iron formation is a part of a well-preserved, sub-greenschist lithologic assemblage
containing three major meta-sedimentary formations known together as the Animike Group (e.g.
Severson, 2009 and references therein). Previous work (e.g. Duncanson et al., 2024 and
references therein) demonstrated the preservation of numerous mineral reactions in the Biwabik
iron formation, making it an ideal location to test how mineral reactions link directly to whole
rock geochemical signals. To evaluate the relative timing of different oxidation and hydration
reactions and how they link to whole rock geochemical data, we integrate core, petrographic, and
scanning electron microscope observations with whole rock digestion ICP-MS geochemical
datasets from core LWD-99-01 (n = 60) of the Biwabik iron formation.
Two key oxidation reactions identified in this work include (1) magnetite to hematite and
(2) carbonate to magnetite. Mineral reactions are documented by cross-cutting relationships
(Figure 1A-D). The mineral reaction of magnetite to hematite (possibly via the recrystallization
of metastable maghemite, 2(αFe3O4) + H2O ↔ 3(γFe2O3) + H2); Geymond et al., 2023) is present
in all four informal lithologic subunits of the Biwabik iron formation, occurring in 48% (n = 23)
of samples (n = 48) across these units. The mineral reaction of carbonate to magnetite (3FeCO3
+H2O → Fe3O4 + 3CO2 + H2, Duncanson et al., 2024) is also present in all four informal
lithologic subunits of the Biwabik Iron Formation, occurring in 77% (n = 37) of samples (n = 48)
across these units. Based on 64 EDS point analyses of 4 representative samples from each
subunit of the Biwabik iron formation, dominant carbonate minerals range from siderite at the
base of the stratigraphy, to ankerite, dolomite, and calcite towards the top.
Combined, carbonate compositional variability and zonation indicate element exchange
during multiple generations of post-depositional fluid alteration, and cross-cutting relationships
between carbonate-magnetite, and magnetite-hematite indicate post-depositional oxidation via
fluid interaction with pre-existing reduced iron phases. Dissolution of carbonate may have
created porosity providing pathways for oxidizing fluids, and further oxidation. Despite these
later oxidation reactions, whole rock geochemical data preserves lithology specific signals of
oxic vs. anoxic conditions, independent of the presence of the post-formational reactions outlined
above. Lower stratigraphic units preserve oxic signals even with ferrous iron phases like siderite
and greenalite preserved, while upper stratigraphic units preserve anoxic signals, despite the
presence of hematite. Overall, bulk geochemical data from lithologic subunits of the Biwabik
Iron Formation do not preserve clear signals associated with post-depositional mineral
assemblage modification and oxidation documented by detailed petrographic work.

9

�Figure 1: LWD-99-01 reflected light photomicrographs documenting cross-cutting relationships between
mineral phases. A. Upper Slaty sample MIR-17-15 carbonate granule cross-cut by euhedral magnetite
(mag) in 20x. B. Lower Cherty sample MIR-19-14 carbonate granule (carb) cross-cut by euhedral
magnetite (mag) in 5x. C. Upper Cherty sample MIR-19-15 magnetite crystal (mag) cross-cut by platy
hematite (hem) in 20x. D. Lower Slaty sample U-05 magnetite crystals (mag) crosscut by platy hematite
(hem) at the edge of a silicate granule in 10x.

REFERENCES

Duncanson, S., Brengman, L., Johnson, J., Eyster, A., Fournelle, J., Moy, A., 2024. Reconstructing
diagenetic mineral reactions from silicified horizons of the Paleoproterozoic Biwabik Iron
Formation, Minnesota. American Mineralogist, 109, 339-358.
Geymond, U., Briolet, T,. Combaudon, V., Sissmann, O., Martinez, I., Duttine, M., Moretti, I., 2023.
Reassessing the role of magnetite during natural hydrogen generation. Front. Earth Sci., 11,
1169356.
Geymond, U., Ramanaidou, E., Lévy, D., Ouaya, A., Moretti, I., 2022. Can Weathering of Banded Iron
Formations Generate Natural Hydrogen? Evidence from Australia, Brazil and South Africa.
Minerals, 12, 163.
Severson, M., Heine, J., Patelke, M., 2009. Geologic and Stratigraphic Controls of the Biwabik Iron
Formation and the Aggregate Potential of the Mesabi Iron Range, Minnesota. University of
Minnesota Duluth, Natural Resources Research Institute, Technical Report NRRI/TR- 2009/09,
173, 37 plates.

10

�Pembine-Wausau Terrane as an Icelandic style island overthrust onto Archean basement,
instead of an island arc or continental fragment accretion
BAUMANN, Steven D.J.
Midwest Institute of Geosciences and Engineering

Since at least the 1960s, we have thought of the Pembine-Wausau Terrane (PWT) as an island arc
or continental fragment accretion, smashed between the Superior Craton to the north and the
Marshfield Terrane to the south. We all have seen a fault zone appear on geologic maps of the
border between the Upper Peninsula of Michigan and northeast Wisconsin called the Niagara
Fault Zone (NFZ). There is only one major problem, no one has ever found the NFZ. It doesn’t
outcrop anywhere, it does not appear in well records, nor clearly on gravity maps, or magnetic
maps. Often where it is inferred it can be interpreted other ways. And the NFZ isn’t reflected in
any smaller chronostratigraphically equivalent structures that do outcrop.
I have found white unbaked quartzite pebbles (the Sturgeon Quartzite) north of the NFZ (fig. 1).
The host rock of these pebbles according to maps, are metamorphic rocks that supposedly have
an igneous protolith. I find that very hard to reconcile with present modeling. As I have looked
at the highly deformed rocks of the Florence Wisconsin, Iron Mountain Michigan, and Norway
Michigan areas, I have come to the conclusion that many rocks mapped as metaigneous, are in
fact, metasedimentary. I have been working on a local cross section for several years with my
observations. I am coming to the conclusion that the mafic rocks and metasediments to the
north of where the NFZ has traditionally been mapped, are more or less continuous and
correlative to the mafic and metasedimentary rocks to the south of it. Interpretation of the rocks
is understandably very difficult as the rocks are highly metamorphosed and deformed.
This work is preliminary. My interpretations could change. But this is where the evidence is
leading me thus far. So, if the area that is mapped as the NFZ is not a fault zone, what is it? I
see it as one of two possibilities. It could be more of a shear zone formed from a more lateral
accretion of a volcanically active, partially rifted Archean sliver, similar in appearance to Baja
California. Sheering would be hard to see expressed in the rocks, just as it is for other covered
shear zones further north. The second possibility is that the PWT was originally an Icelandic
style island on a spreading center that would eventually become subducted under the Superior
Craton, similar to the East Pacific Rise, before subduction switched to the south as the
Marshfield Terrane approached. Its suspected Archean basement could be explained by a thin
skinned over thrusting of the PWT over a small sliver of Archean crust, while volcanism was
ongoing. The age of the xenocryst zircons expected to be Archean are only 2,607+22 Ma
(VanWyck and Johnson. 1997). This is similar to many Archean ages of the Superior Craton. It
is still a possibility the Penokean was a continental fragment like the Marshfield Terrane, only far
more incomplete and still covered with younger deposits, but this cannot be the default without
understand the nature of the NFZ, if it even exists. The Archean basement of the PWT could
also be some sort of an extension of nearly in situ Superior Craton, that hosted the PWT as it
formed, or it was overridden by the PWT.
I am currently favoring the second interpretation. In this case no NFZ is needed to explain
anything observed, at least locally. Everything can be explained by dominantly ductile
deformation, at least in the upper crust. This is really reflected in the rocks at Piers Gorge and in
the local Michigamme Formation, which locally do not express any Penokean aged faults of any

11

�significance. It also would explain the contemporaneous crustal thinning to the east in the
Sudbury area if we had a subducting rift. This is something that forearc extension and island arc
accretion cannot explain on their own. This would also put the continental suture further south,
at the Eau Claire Sheer Zone.
Figure 1:

Adapted from Baumann, 2021

REFERENCES

Baumann, S.D.J., 2021. The Misunderstood Penokean Orogeny. Midwest Institute of Geosciences and
Engineering, publication G-102021-1A
VanWyck, N. and Johnson, C.M., 1997. Common lead, Sm-Nd, and U-Pb constraints on petrogenesis,
crustal architecture, and tectonic setting of the Penokean orogeny (Paleoproterozoic) in Wisconsin.
GSA Bulletin; July 1997; v. 109; no. 7; p. 799–808; 8 figures, 2 tables

12

�Paleoproterozoic mantle plume tracks shaping the southern margin of the Superior craton
and the geology of the Lake Superior region
BLEEKER, Wouter1, HAMILTON, Michael 2, and KAMO, Sandra 2
1

Geological Survey of Canada, 601 Booth Street, Ottawa, ON K1A 0E8, Canada;
wouter.bleeker@canada.ca
2
Jack Satterly Geochronology Laboratory, Department of Earth Sciences, University of Toronto, 22
Ursula Franklin Street, Toronto, ON M5S 3B1, Canada

All Archean cratons are fragments of late Archean “supercratons”, i.e. the larger
landmasses to which these craton fragments trace their origin (Bleeker, 2023). At least two large
independent supercratons, Superia and Sclavia, named after their well-preserved internal
fragments, had formed by the late Archean and underwent progressive breakup during the early
Paleoproterozoic, from ca. 2.2 Ga to 1.9 Ga. Based on well-populated apparent polar wander
paths, these supercratons moved independently; hence, the mythical notion of a single, longlived, late Archean supercontinent “Kenorland” is incorrect, aside from being untestable. Craton
fragments can be correlated and put back together again by matching distinctive basement
geology, by correlating overlying pre-breakup basin stratigraphies, and by correlating remnants
of pre- to syn-breakup large igneous provinces, particularly their dyke swarms (Bleeker and
Ernst, 2006). Of all the dispersed Archean craton fragments, more than 10 trace their origin back
to supercraton Superia, representing “nearest neighbour” fragments to the Superior: Karelia,
Kola, Wyoming, Hearne, Kaapvaal, Pilbara, Yilgarn, Zimbabwe, North Atlantic craton, and
possibly Dharwar. Kaapvaal-Pilbara joined a growing Superia late in the game, at ca. 2650 Ma,
separating again ~600–700 Myr later, leaving the ancient Minnesota River Valley terrane behind.
With a robust reconstruction of Superia, numerous other important insights follow,
including that of ancient mantle plume tracks (Figure 1). Here we discuss evidence for two major
plume tracks that shaped the southern margin of the Superior craton, the 2480-2440 Ma
“Matachewan” plume track, and the 2125-2050 Ma “Marathon” plume track. Both these plume
tracks started within Superia’s core, before crossing over to then-contiguous crust of “greater
Karelia” and Kaapvaal, respectively. The Matachewan plume track was initiated in the Sudbury
area with a suite of 2480-2472 Ma mafic layered intrusions emplaced at the base of the Huronian
Supergroup. It then triggered the ca. 2461 Ma giant Matachewan dyke swarm, which converge to
a magmatic centre well to the south. At ca. 2450 Ma, the plume crossed over to then-contiguous
“greater Karelia” (Davey et al., 2020) where it spawned additional dyke swarms and a flare-up of
large layered intrusions, some as young as 2440 Ma. The much younger Marathon plume was
initiated at ca. 2125 Ma with a giant radiating mafic dyke swarm, the Marathon dykes, with a
focal point in the eastern Lake Superior area. It then spawned progressively younger mafic dyke
swarms to the southwest before crossing over to the contiguous Kaapvaal craton where it
spawned carbonatites at 2060 Ma, and finally the emplacement of the Bushveld Complex at 2056
Ma, the long axis of which is aligned with the plume track (Figure 1). Both plume tracks show
well-defined age progressions indicating plate velocities of ~1–5 cm/yr.
SOME REFERENCES
Bleeker, W., 2003. The late Archean record: a puzzle in ca. 35 pieces. Lithos 71(2-4): 99-134.
Bleeker, W. and Ernst, R.E., 2006. Short-lived mantle generated magmatic events and their dyke swarms:
The key unlocking Earth's palaeogeographic record back to 2.6 Ga. In: Hanski, E., Mertanen, S.,

13

�Rämö, T., Vuollo, J. (Eds.) Dyke Swarms—Time Markers of Crustal Evolution, AA Balkema,
Rotterdam, p. 3-26.
Davey, S.C., Bleeker, W., Kamo, S.L., Vuollo, J., Ernst, R.E., and Cousens, B.L., 2020. Archean block
rotation in Western Karelia: Resolving dyke swarm patterns in metacraton Karelia-Kola for a
refined paleogeographic reconstruction of supercraton Superia. Lithos 368: 105553.
Fiorentini, M.L., O’Neill, C., Giuliani, A., Choi, E., Maas, R., Pirajno, F., and Foley, S., 2020. Bushveld
superplume drove Proterozoic magmatism and metallogenesis in Australia. Scientific Report 10(1):
19729.

Figure 1. Paleogeographic reconstruction of late Archean–early Paleoproterozoic supercraton Superia,
involving &gt;10 of the better-known Archean craton fragments from around the world, with the wellpreserved Superior craton as its signature internal fragment. Vaalbara and several other cratons (e.g.,
Wyoming) formed a single, large, ancient superterrane that collided with the southern margin of growing
Superia at ca. 2650 Ma. After a period of stasis, supercraton Superia underwent progressive rifting and
breakup from ca. 2.2 Ga to 1.9 Ga. Selected Paleoproterozoic mafic magmatic events are shown, with a
focus on two well-defined mantle plume tracks, the “Matachewan” plume track (bold grey arrow) and the
“Marathon” plume track (bold purple arrow), both with clear age progression. The Marathon plume
track, which initiated at 2125 Ma with a giant radiating dyke swarm, crossed over into the adjacent
Kaapvaal craton where it culminated in the emplacement of the Bushveld Complex. The actively rifting
Superia plate was likely at a stand-still at Bushveld time (ca. 2056 Ma), allowing the plume tail to erode
and dramatically thin the Kaapvaal lithosphere and setting up the conditions for the emplacement of
Earth’s largest mafic layered intrusive complex. Ponding of voluminous sublithospheric plume magma
resulted in outflow to distal localities (dashed arrows), possibly as far as Karelia-Kola (e.g., Kevitsa,
2058 Ma) and the Yilgarn (e.g., Mount Weld, ca. 2060 Ma; cf. Fiorentini et al., 2020).

14

�A COMPLEX F-RICH ALKALIC PEGMATITE IN THE PYROXENE SYENITES OF
THE STETTIN COMPLEX, WAUSAU COMPLEX, MARATHON COUNTY,
WISCONSIN
BUCHHOLZ, Thomas1, FALSTER, Alexander2, and SIMMONS2, William
1
1140 12th Street North, Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin 54494, 2MP2 Research Group, Maine Mineral and
Gem Museum, PO Box 500, 99 Main Street, Bethel, Maine 04217, USA

The Stettin Complex is the oldest (1565 +3-5 Ma, Van Wyck 1994) and most alkalic of
the four intrusions that comprise the Wausau Syenite Complex, and is composed of various
syenite phases. This abstract is an update to a study of this dike in ILSG 2024.
The sub-horizontal pegmatite is weathered, mineralogically and texturally zoned, and
includes numerous syenite screens. Thin 2-3 cm reaction zones are common at contacts, with
small miaroles, scattered patches of abundant, tiny pink zircons, fergusonite-(Y), and other
minerals. Small miarolitic cavities are common throughout the dike. Overall mineralogy is
complex, typical for fractionated alkalic pegmatites.
Pyroxenes are largely absent except for highly altered replacements and sparse
unaltered remnants of hedenbergite. Early formed pyroxene(s) appear to have been destabilized
by later oxidation, altering Fe2+-rich pyroxenes to quartz and smectite-group clays ± goethite
with sparse remnants of hedenbergite, and allowing crystallization of more oxidized (Fe3+ rich)
magnetite and arfvedsonite. Similar reactions may have altered early-crystallizing chevkinite(Ce) (or a similar LREE-Ti species) and possibly aeschynite-(Ce), to an unidentified Ti-Ce4+-Fe
phase: relatively common soft, pale yellow to creamy to brown grains of varying morphologies
typically containing high Ti-Ce-Fe contents with traces of other elements. Cerium is likely
present as Ce4+ based on the absence of associated LREE3+ (La, Nd, Pr). Alteration under
oxidizing conditions may have removed LREE3+, Si and other elements, leaving immobile Ti,
Ce4+, minor Fe3+ and trace amounts of other elements. Fluorapatite occurs as abundant
hexagonal prisms in intermediate zones of the dike; generally highly altered with elevated to
very high LREE (Ce-dominant) and Si contents, while similar reddish crystals in pegmatite units
near the lower contact show more typical very low LREE contents. This may be the result of
alteration/partial replacement of fluorapatite by fluorbritholite as discussed by Betkowski et al
(2016). Work also continues on a rare unidentified Ba-silicate mineral, where lack of Al
precludes Ba-feldspars.
Several small-volume units and isolated occurrences contain minerals not normally
found in alkalic pegmatites, including cassiterite, Hf-enriched zircons (up to 5.5 wt.% HfO2, vs
1.48 wt. % HfO2 in pegmatite margin zircons), fluorcalciomicrolite (D-site occupancy Ta 1.05,
Nb 0.65, Ti 0.30; Σ 2), tantalite-(Mn), and barite. Sphalerite in unweathered lower portions of the
dike is notable in containing about 0.7 wt. % Indium.
Later oxidizing conditions are evident in late crystallization of siderite (now goethite),
and LREE fluocarbonates. Crystallization of fergusonite-(Y) (to date Nb-dominant, ≈Nb 1.96, Ta
0.04; Σ 2), being rich in MREE and HREE and lacking redox sensitive Ce, appears to have
continued throughout dike crystallization.

15

�REFERENCES

Betkowski, Wladyslaw B., Harlov, Daniel E. and Rakovan, John F., 2016. Hydrothermal mineral
replacement reactions for an apatite-monazite assemblage in alkali-rich fluids at 300-600° C and
100 MPa, American Mineralogist 101, 2620-2637.
Van Wyck, N. 1994. The Wolf River A-type magmatic event in Wisconsin: U/Pb and Sm/Nd constraints
on timing and petrogenesis (abstract): Institute on Lake Superior Geology, 40th Annual Meeting,
Part 1, Program and Abstracts, 81-82.
Aeschynite-(Ce)
Albite
Anorthoclase
Barite
Bavenite(?)
Bertrandite
Calcite
Cassiterite
Columbite-(Fe)
Fayalite
Fergusonite-(Y)
Fluoro-arfvedsonite
Fluorannite
Fluorapatite
Fluorite
Fluorcalciomicrolite
Fluorcalciopyrochlore
Graphite
Hedenbergite
Ilmenite
K-feldspar
Kainosite-(Y)
Magnetite
Molybdenite
Monazite-(Ce)
Niocalite?
Phenacite
Quartz
Siderite
Sphalerite
Thorite
Titanite
Zinnwaldite
Zircon
Zircon (metamict)

(Ce,Ca,Fe,Th)(Ti,Nb)2(O,OH)6
NaAlSi3O8
(Na,K)AlSi3O8
BaSO4
Ca4Be2Al2Si9O26(OH)2
Be4(Si2O7)(OH)2
CaCO3
SnO2
Fe2+Nb2O6
Fe2+2SiO4
YNbO4
[Na][Na2][Fe2+4Fe3+]Si8O22F2
KFe2+3(Si3Al)O10F2
Ca5(PO4)3F
CaF2
(Ca,Na)2(Ta,Nb)2O6F
(Ca,Na)2(Nb, Ti)2O6F
C
CaFe2+Si2O6
Fe2+TiO3
KAlSi3O8
Ca2(Y,Ce)2(Si4O12)(CO3) · H2O
Fe2+Fe3+2O4
MoS2
Ce(PO4)
(Ca,Nb)4(Si2O7)(O,OH,F)2
Be2SiO4
SiO2
FeCO3
ZnS
Th(SiO4)
CaTi(SiO4)O
KFe22+Al(Al2Si2O10)(OH)2
to KLi2Al(Si4O10)(F,OH)2
Zr(SiO4)
Zr(SiO4)

Table 1. Dike Mineralogy

16

Common
Rock-forming
Rock-forming
Rare
Rare
Rare
Common
Uncommon
Rare
Rare
Common
Rock-forming
Rock-forming
Common
Common
Rare
Rare
Rare
Uncommon
Common
Uncommon
Rare
Common
Uncommon
Common
Rare
Rare
Rock forming
Common
Rare
Rare
Uncommon
Uncommon
Very common
Common

�Micromineralogy and textures in the Sudbury impact layer on the Mesabi Iron Range,
Minnesota: record of processes in the proximal-distal ejecta transition zone
CANNON, W. F., STOKES, M. Rebecca, SALERNO, Ross A.
U.S. Geological Survey, Geology, Energy &amp; Minerals Science Center, Mail Stop 954, Reston, VA
20192
The Sudbury Impact Layer (SIL) (1849 Ma), deposited here within hours of the giant
meteor impact at Sudbury, Ontario, is known from drill core at four locations on the Mesabi Iron
Range (Fig. 1) along a trajectory distance as great as 980 kilometers from the impact point. It
records an instant of high energy deposition of about one meter of mixed ejecta and local
bedrock within an otherwise quiescent sequence of siltstone and iron formation. Optical,
scanning electron microscope, and Raman spectroscopy data provide details of the SIL that
reveal some of the complexities of ejecta transport and deposition. Data presented here are from
the Nashwauk occurrence where four drill holes provide continuous samples across the layer.
Figure 1. Geologic map of the Mesabi Iron
Range showing the four locations where the
Sudbury Impact Layer (SIL) has been observed:
Coleraine (Huber, et al., 2014; Nashwauk
(Cannon, et al., 2017, this study); Eveleth
(Addison, et al., 2005, this study); Erie (this
study).

The SIL on the Mesabi Iron Range consists of millimeter-scale ejecta particles expelled
from the large crater near Sudbury, and coarser fragments, of sedimentary rocks, some greater
than 3 cm diameter, which were derived locally. The ejecta can be subdivided into two
categories: A- devitrified glass (Fig. 2), and B- millimeter-scale mineral grains and rock
fragments displaying shock metamorphic features (Fig. 3).

Figure 2. A-microtektite in matrix of coarse secondary dolomite. Original glass devitrified to K-mica.
Vesicles are filled with dolomite. B-delicate bubble structures preserved in secondary dolomite. Bubble
walls are mostly K-mica and chlorite. C-angular fragment of flattened vesicular glass, now mostly
chlorite. D-rounded particle composed of fine K-mica.

Spheres of vesicular glass and their fragments are common (Fig. 2A), including thinwalled hollow structures (Fig. 2B). They are now composed of micron-scale K-mica and
chlorite. Irregularly shaped glass shards, mostly composed of chlorite, are also abundant (Fig.
2C). Many are larger than typical spherules and are probably far-flung bits of impact melt rather
than broken spheres. Most are flattened into bedding. Also common are rounded grains
composed of sub-micron K-mica with relict vesicles (Fig. 2D). These are distinct in having been

17

�sufficiently strong to have avoided flattening. Other glass particles are molded around them.
They were likely droplets of melt with very uniform K-Al-Si composition.
Quartz and feldspar grains with multiple sets of planar deformation features and zones of
devitrified impact glass attest to the intense shock unique to meteor impacts. Small rock
fragments with intense shock features are also common (Fig. 3).

Figure 3. A-quartz with one well-developed set of planar deformation features and two weaker sets (red
lines). B- intensely shocked quartz with “toasted” appearance and zones of devitrified glass. Ccathodoluminesence image of B showing complex shock-induced internal features. D-intensely shocked
polycrystalline orthoquartzite fragment.

Abundant glass spherules in the Nashwauk ejecta appear to be microtectites. Such
particles are widely interpreted to form by condensation from impact vapor plumes above the
atmosphere and can be distributed worldwide. At Nashwauk they are mixed with small rock and
mineral particles from the outermost margins of the impact ejecta curtain. These were
transported either (or both) on ballistic trajectories, or by intense impact-generated winds beyond
the ejecta curtain. Many have strongly developed shock features attesting to their derivation by
crater excavation near Sudbury. Notably missing from the SIL on the Mesabi Iron Range are
accretionary lapilli, a hallmark of more proximal sites where ballistic ejecta and ground surges
were the dominant transport mechanism for ejecta. The SIL at Nashwauk is very similar to that at
the three other occurrences along the Mesabi Iron Range which, together, document a broad
transition zone, between about 900 to 1000 kilometers from the impact point. Here the most
distal ballistic ejecta persisted as millimeter-scale grains into a zone where ejecta plume material
was becoming dominant. Along the Mesabi Iron Range ejecta was deposited in a shallow sea
where fine-grained laminated silt and chert were being deposited, both before and after the
impact. Strong impact-generated tsunamis reworked the ejecta and underlying sediments within
hours or days of the impact to produce the intermixing of fine-grained ejecta particles with much
coarser rip-up clasts from the pre-impact seabed.
REFERENCES

Addison, W.D., Brumpton, G.R., Vallini, D.A., McNaughton, Davis, D.W, Kissin, S.A., Fralick, P.W., and
Hammond, A.L., 2005, Discovery of distal ejecta from the 1850 Ma Sudbury impact
event. Geology, v. 33, p.193–196. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/G21048.1
Cannon, W.F., Woodruff, L. J., Jirsa, M., and Everett, W, 2017, New observations on distal ejecta from the
Sudbury impact in the central Mesabi Iron Range, northern Minnesota, Institute on Lake Superior
Geology, v. 63, Proceedings Part 1, Program with abstracts, p. 19-20.
Huber, M.S., McDonald, I. and Koeberl, C., 2014, Petrography and geochemistry of ejecta from the
Sudbury impact event, Meteoritic and Planetary Science: v. 49. p. 17491768. https://doi.org/10.1111/maps.12352
Jirsa, Mark, Chandler, V.W., and Lively, R. S., 2005, Bedrock geologic map of the Mesabi Iron Range
Minnesota, Minnesota Geological Survey Miscellaneous Map Series map M-163.

18

�Updates on the Minnesota Department of Natural Resource’s Drill Core Library
CARTER, Matt1
1
Minnesota Department of Natural Resource, Division of Lands and Minerals, 1525 3rd Ave E, Hibbing,
MN, 55746 USA

The Minnesota Department of Natural Resource’s (DNR) Drill Core Library (DCL) in
Hibbing, MN is the only state-owned facility for archiving drill cores and other geological
materials from Minnesota. The DCL was first established in 1972 when Building 1 (B1) was
constructed. It was expanded in 1979 when Building 2 (B2) was constructed. Building 3 was first
constructed in 1989 and expanded in 1995 and 2009. The facility currently stores around 3.5
million linear feet of drill core and contains material and/or data for over 20,000 drillholes. In
2023, it was identified that original shelving units installed in B1 and B2 needed to be replaced,
and other safety issues needed to be resolved.
The DNR diligently prepared to move all drill cores and other noncore geological
materials from B1 to replace the shelving units. This was accomplished by assessing materials
for deaccession, creating a box index of its holdings, applying barcodes to over 38,000 drill core
boxes, as well as inventorying and barcoding noncore materials. Boxes were moved box by box
by hand onto roller tables to an intake station where tracking information and digital images
were captured. Boxes were then palletized and placed into temporary storage, which involved
712 pallets and 40 storage containers. The captured digital images have created a new and
accessible digital record for B1 cores. Once the original shelving units were removed from B1,
the DNR upgraded its lighting, and a new racking system was installed. Reverse flow of
materials to B1 is anticipated to be completed by the end of May.
Similar preparation activities are being applied on materials in B2. Instead of placing
materials into temporary storage, rack space will be freed up through deaccession activities and
materials will be rearranged within B2 to create new egress space. Over 210,000 iron ore boxes
will be repackaged and moved onto new rack units. Lighting upgrades have been implemented in
portions of B2, with the remaining lights to be replaced later this year. The DCL remains
partially open to visitors, but users should be aware that materials from B1 and B2 may be
unavailable until the project is completed on or before June 30, 2026.
The DCL is nearing its facility-wide storage capacity and there is very limited space to
accept additional materials. The DNR is only accepting deliveries on a case-by-case basis, and it
is expected that any materials turned over to the state will become public upon delivery. In 2017,
recognizing that the DCL was rapidly filling up, the DNR designed and actively sought funding
for a fourth building to double the facility-wide storage capacity and quadruple view room space.
This project is shovel-ready, but construction remains on hold until funding is legislatively
secured.

19

�20

�Geology and Mineralization of the Plover Au Prospect, Marathon County, Wisconsin
CASPER, Andrew A.1, LODGE, Robert W.D.1
1

Department of Geology and Environmental Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, Eau Claire,
WI 54701 USA

The Plover Au Prospect, located in Marathon County, WI, is hosted in Paleoproterozoic
metaandesites, schist, and felsic/mafic intrusive units of the Wausau Volcanic Complex
(LaBerge &amp; Myers, 1983). Gold prospects in this region are bound to the southeast and
northwest by large faults within the Eau Claire Deformation zone and the Wolf River Batholith
(Lynott et al, 2022) (Figure 1). Rocks have undergone potassic and sericite alteration, greenschist
to amphibolite grade metamorphism, and multiple stages of deformation. Research on the
formational history of gold mineralization, in combination with its geochemical footprint, is
essential for establishing a regional geologic setting of gold-forming events. Previous mineral
exploration on this area has focused on exploring high concentrations of gold (Au) within
volcanic units and sulfide vein networks at the Reef Deposit (Figure 1). With its proximity to the
larger Reef Deposit, a more complete understanding of the Plover Prospect can add to a better
regional context to the Au mineralizing system and potentially improve mineral exploration
models.
For this study, two holes (PL-76-1 &amp; PL-76-4), totaling ~1,180 linear feet of core were
chosen based on their relative locations and lithologic variation to fully characterize the range of
units hosting mineralization. Representative volcanic strata and intrusive rocks were sampled and
characterized through petrographic and geochemical analyses. The Plover deposit is primarily
composed of andesitic/basaltic volcanics and gabbro/diorite intrusive units deposited
sequentially showing sharp and, in some cases, brecciated contacts with one another. Brittleductile deformation is indicated by zones of brecciation present within the volcanic units. These
structures include vein networks containing boudins and vugs containing sulfides and calcitechlorite alteration. It is probable that multiple deformational events occurred due to veins crosscutting foliation locally, and variation in the internal composition of veins. Hydrothermal
alteration is suggested based on the presence of potassic alteration within the basaltic foliation
and sericite-chlorite alteration in layers. Pyrite, chalcopyrite and pyrrhotite occur within vein
networks. Since high Au concentrations are typically present within massive/semi-massive
sulfide veins which contain brittle to brittle-ductile deformation, this mineralization likely
occurred after Penokean deformation and metamorphism that formed the primary structural
fabric in the rocks.
The Reef gold-copper deposit has been researched extensively by various exploration
companies since the 1990’s (Lynott et al, 2022). The deposit is located &lt;1 mi east of the Plover
deposit and has shown significantly higher Au concentrations. The deposit has been broadly
classified as orogenic in origin and is claimed to have produced shear hosted vein-type gold and
copper occurrences. Gold/copper mineralization occurs within stacked and relatively thin zones
of quartz-sulfide veins and lenses; and sericite alteration within vein selvage typically
accompanies gold mineralization within these areas. The primary lithology between the two
deposits is similar, however, the Reef deposits proximity to the Wolf River batholith potentially
influenced the degree of deformation and sericite, talc, tremolite, and pyrrhotite alteration. Future
research should focus on more detailed comparisons between the Reef and Plover gold systems
to better constrain potential genetic links between them.

21

�Figure 1. The relative geographic locations of the Plover and Reef deposits in the Penokean Volcanic
Belt (PVB), central Wisconsin. Plover Au prospect is bounded to the east by the Eau Claire fault zone and
the Wolf River Batholith. Figure has been adapted from Dematties (2022) and Lynott et al, (2022).

REFERENCES

LaBerge, G.L., and Myers, P.E., 1983a, Precambrian geology of Marathon County, Wisconsin:
Information Circular, v. 45.
Lynott, J.S., and Dematties, T.A., 2022, An Evaluation of the Reef Gold-Copper Deposit, Marathon
County, Wisconsin, USA, NI 43-101 Technical Report, 402p.
DeMatties, T.A., 2022, Exploration-resource assessment of productive felsic volcanic centers in the
paleoproterozoic penokean volcanic belt of northern Wisconsin, Michigan and East-central
Minnesota, USA: Ore Geology Reviews, v. 141, p. 104489.

22

�Unusual early diagenetic structures in the Paleoproterozoic Gunflint Formation, Ontario,
Canada
CHURCHLEY, Sophie1, FRALICK, Philip2
1
Ontario Geological Survey, 435 James St S, Suite B002, ON P7E 6S7 Canada
2
Department of Geology, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Road, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1 Canada

Newly identified microbial and diagenetic structures in the Gunflint Formation from the Thunder
Bay area provide additional information to further our understanding of the environment in
which these sediments were deposited and the diagenetic processes that affected them. Along the
Current River, a horizon of carbonate lenses outcrop within a shale sequence. The structures are
oblate in shape and range from approximately 0.5-1 m in diameter and 20-30 cm in height.
Internally, the lenses are mostly calcite that displaces fine-grained siliciclastic laminae and
preserves several interesting structures including cone-in-cone, inverted cuspate fenestrae and
feather-like and braided fabrics. Some faces also display features that are more ‘fern-like’ in
appearance and migrate up and across the surface of the oblate carbonate pods. We propose that
these are oblate carbonate concretions formed via carbonate precipiation during diagenesis
within a sequence of organic-rich laminated shales and siltstones. Several important features
observed in the Gunflint Formation suggest that these structures formed via diagenetic processes
including the similarities in stratigraphic placement within organic-rich shaley horizons and the
light δ13Сcarb values recorded in the carbonate fraction.
Cone-in-cone structures have been identified in both hand sample and thin section, displaying
similarities to structures described from other locales (Figure 1A,B). Cone-in-cone structures
occur in calcite-cemented sandstones or at the edges of disc-like to ellipsoidal concretions
ranging in size from decimeters to meters long within shale beds in Erfoud, Morocco (Lugli et al.
2005). This stratigraphic positioning and size is consistent with what has been observed in the
Gunflint Formation oblate concretions that host the cone-in-cone layers. Likewise, jagged ‘sawtoothed’ draping laminae that were identified in the Gunflint Formation are similar in appearance
to those identified from cone-in-cone structure in the Devonian Middle Timan Formation in
Russia (Figure 1C,D) (Shumilov 2020).
The formation of cone-in-cone structure is still not well understood and numerous hypotheses
have been proposed (see Lugli et al. 2005 and references therein). It is commonly associated
with concretions and organic-rich sediments. The oblate carbonate horizons are located
stratigraphically within a sequence of carbonaceous black shales near the base of the Upper
Member of the Gunflint Formation with abundant evidence of microbially induced sedimentary
structures (MISS) (Fischer and Fralick 2020). δ13Сcarb analyzed from the carbonate fraction in
the Gunflint Formation samples displayed light values ranging from -12.29‰ to -0.17‰ with
most values clustering near -10‰. These values are coincident with precipitation occurring in the
zones of Fe, Mn, and/or sulfate reduction with relatively low rates of organic-carbonate oxidation
and are consistent with ferruginous, reducing conditions (Mozley and Burns 1993).

23

�Figure 1. A. 1-3 cm scale cone-in-cone structure consisting of beige fibrous calicite draped by thin black
siliciclastic films. B. Thin section close up of cone-in-cone structure from Permian carbonates in
Thailand that is similar in appearance to those observed in the Gunflint Formation (see figure 3C;
Chenrai et al. 2022). C. Hand sample of a carbonate-rich horizon displaying jagged ‘saw-toothed’
laminae near the top. D. Close-up image of similar jagged laminae from the Devonian Middle Timan
Formation in Russia (see figure 9A; Shumilov 2020). At this location, the jagged laminae are associated
with cone-in-cone structure.

References

Chenrai P., Assawincharoenkij T., Warren J., Sa-nguankaew S., Meepring S., Laitrakull K. and Cartwright
I. (2022) The Occurrence of Bedding-Parallel Fibrous Calcite Veins in Permian Siliciclastic and
Carbonate Rocks in Central Thailand. Front. Earth Sci. 9:781782. doi: 10.3389/feart.2021.781782.
Fischer, S. and Fralick, P. (2020) Biological mats in siliciclastic sediments of the Paleoproterozoic
Gunflint Formation, northwestern Ontario, Canada. Can. J. Earth Sci. 57: 947–953.
Lugli, S., Reimold, W. and Koeberl, C. (2005). Silicified Cone-in-Cone Structures from Erfoud
(Morocco): A Comparison with Impact-Generated Shatter Cones. doi: 10.1007/3-540-27548-7_3.
Mozley, P.S. and Burns, S.J. (1993) Oxygen and carbon isotopic composition of marine carbonate
concretions: an overview. Journal of Sedimentary Research 63, 73–83.
Shumilov I.Kh. (2020) Сone-in-cone structure: New data. Litosfera, 20(1), 76-92. doi: 10.24930/16819004-2020-20-1-76-92.

24

�Alteration of magnetic mineralogy in the Giants Range Batholith by the Duluth Complex
CORTOPASSI, Celia L., ALLERTON, Zsuzsanna P., FEINBERG, Joshua M.
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Minnesota, Suite 150, 116 Church St SE,
Minneapolis MN 55455

During the Midcontinent Rift event (ca. 1.1 Ga) of the North American craton, the Duluth
Complex (DC), a large mafic igneous intrusion, was emplaced into the Neoarchean Giants Range
Batholith (GRB; ca. 2.7 Ga) in northeastern Minnesota, thermally altering the granitic country
rock (Allison, 1925).The basal mineralized zone of the DC has been well-studied with regard to
sulfide deposits, but the extent of alteration within the GRB footwall has not been as well
constrained. Previous research has indicated the presence of sulfides at the DC-GRB contact,
extending about hundred meters into the GRB (Steiner, 2014), and prior petrographic analysis
has revealed textures consistent with contact metamorphism that diminish with distance from the
contact (Pardi, 2024). This project seeks to define the magnitude of alteration within the GRB
and to further characterize the orientation of the intrusion.
This project utilizes a profile of 13 outcrop samples from the GRB that were collected
systematically at distances between 100 and 4500 meters from the DC-GRB contact. We
characterize changes in magnetic mineralogy as a function of distance from the DC-GRB contact
using measured optical microscopy, electron microscopy, and magnetic properties (susceptibility
and parameters calculated from hysteresis loops and backfield curves). These data reveal a
distinguishable and consistent pattern in magnetic properties as a function of distance from the
contact and distinct zones of textural alteration in oxide minerals (Figure 1). Patterns in smallscale magnetic properties broadly align with the large-scale trends seen in aeromagnetic data
(Minnesota Geological Survey, n.d.), including changes in magnetic properties co-located with
mapped faults (Jirsa et al., 2011).
The orientation of the DC-GRB contact was examined using information from
previously-drilled exploration drill holes (Minnesota Department of Health, n.d.) that penetrated
through the DC and into the GRB. These observations, as well as outcrop measurements of
modal layering and igneous foliation within the DC (Minnesota Geological Survey, 2023),
constrain the orientation of the present-day DC-GRB contact to between 16-24° towards the east.
The original depth of the modern day exposure of the DC-GRB remains unknown, as does any
component of subsidence that occurred since the Midcontinent Rift event.
Future work may include the collection of oriented samples for paleomagnetic studies,
which would help constrain both the extent of thermal reheating of the GRB and postemplacement subsidence. Thermal modeling of the subsurface DC-GRB contact at various
depths, alongside observed patterns in oxide mineral textures, could produce estimates of the
extent of subsurface contact metamorphism. With these methods, we hope to better understand
the conditions under which the DC was emplaced and accommodated, as well as estimate the
thickness of Precambrian rock that has since been eroded away.

25

�Figure 1. A: Distribution of identified textures (A-E) as a function of distance from the DC-GRB contact.
B: Measured magnetic properties as a function of distance from the DC-GRB contact.
REFERENCES
Allison, I. S.,1925. The Giants Range Batholith of Minnesota. The Journal of Geology, 33(5), 488–508.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/30057863.
Jirsa, M., Boerboom, T., Chandler, V. W., Mossler, J., Runkel, A., &amp; Setterholm, D., 2011. S-21
Geologic Map of Minnesota-Bedrock Geology. https://conservancy.umn.edu/items/96de8d96-46ba441c-94ca-41080b4335be
Minnesota Department of Health, n.d.. Minnesota Well Index (MWI).
https://mnwellindex.web.health.state.mn.us/.
Minnesota Geological Survey, n.d.. Collection of aeromagnetic data from Minnesota.
https://doi.org/10.5066/P14LP38P.
Minnesota Geological Survey, 2023. D-06, Structure Database. https://arcg.is/jfCLD.
Pardi, L., 2024. Petrographic Analysis of the Giants Range Batholith in Northeastern Minnesota.
Steiner, R. A., 2014. Genesis of sulfide mineralization within the granite footwall of the Maturi deposit of
the South Kawishiwi intrusion, Duluth Complex, NE Minnesota.
https://hdl.handle.net/11299/169376.

26

�Architecture of the Douglas Fault damage zone, northwest Wisconsin
DANIELS, Nate, MCELLISTREM, Grace, VOGEL, Raeann, and BRAUNAGEL, Michael
Department of Earth &amp; Environmental Sciences, University of Minnesota Duluth, 1114 Kirby Drive
Duluth, MN 55812 USA

Major faults in the upper crust can be divided between the fault core, where most of the
displacement is accommodated, and a surrounding damage zone (Faulkner et al., 2010). Fracturing
in this damage zone occurs across a range of scales and intensity, varying from regularly spaced
joint or deformation band sets to pervasive pulverization of the host rock. As such, fault damage
zones can serve as fluid pathways, which control the migration of hydrothermal fluids and can
alter the frictional strength of seismogenic fault systems. A number of processes are responsible
for formation and evolution of a fault’s damage zone, including microfracturing within the process
zone during fault propagation, localized wear along irregular fault surfaces, and volumetric
changes associated with dynamic rupture propagation (Mitchell &amp; Faulkner, 2009). As each
process leaves a unique record in the fault system, the distribution and intensity of fault damage
zones can provide insight into past fault activity and its relationship to fluid flow in the crust
(Blenkinsop, 2008). This study presents preliminary observations of the fault-related damage
surrounding the Douglas Fault from Amnicon and Pattison State Parks in northwestern Wisconsin.
The Douglas Fault was activated during structural inversion of the Midcontinent Rift and previous
work estimates its vertical displacement at ≳10 km (Grant, 1901; Cannon, 1994; Nicholson et al.,
2006; Hodgin et al., 2024). At our study sites, the fault places basalts of the mid-continental rift
Chengwatana volcanic group over post-rift siliciclastic sandstones of the Bayfield Group.
Field and thin section observations along the fault system reveal pronounced damage zone
asymmetry, with a hanging wall damage zone that is several times the width of the damage zone
in the footwall. Chengwatana volcanics in the hanging wall are intensely fractured at the grain
scale and cut by multiple generations of primarily calcite-filled opening mode veins. These veins
and fractures broadly show two distinct orientations; one set striking generally NE to SW and the
second characterized by NW to SE strikes. The damage-zone width is constrained by identifying
changes in the slope of cumulative damage frequency plots, which shows high deformation
frequency as a steep slope within an inner damage zone and less deformation decaying to
background levels as a gentle slope in the outer damage zone of the Douglas Fault. Collectively,
the full thickness of the hanging wall damage zone is &gt;100 m (Grant, 1901). In contrast, sandstones
of the Bayfield Group in the footwall exhibit lower frequency fracturing at the outcrop scale, no
apparent grain-scale fracturing in thin section, and compressional deformation bands defined by
porosity reduction. Bayfield sandstones in the footwall at these sites are also deformed by faultpropagation and drag folding that extend for tens of meters beyond the fault contact (Hodgin et al.,
2024). Field and thin section scale observations of fault damage in both units are consistent with
ultrasonic pulse velocities measured in samples collected from the fault zone with a Proceq Pundit
Lab system.

27

�REFERENCES

Blenkinsop, T.G., 2008. Relationships between faults, extension fracture and veins, and stress. Journal of
Structural Geology, 30 (5), 622-632.
Cannon, W.F., 1994. Closing of the Midcontinent Rift - A far-field effect of Grenvillian compression.
Geology, 22 (2), 155-158.
Faulkner, D.R., Jackson, C.A.L., Lunn, R.J., Schlische, R.W., Shipton, Z.K., Wibberley, C.A.J., and
Withjack, M.O., 2010. A review of recent developments concerning the structure, mechanics and
fluid flow properties of fault zones. Journal of Structural Geology, 32 (11), 1557-1575.
Grant, U.S., 1901. Preliminary report on the copper-bearing rocks of Douglas County, Wisconsin (No. 3).
Hodgin, E.B., Swanson-Hysell, N.L., Kylander-Clark, A.R.C., Turner, A.C., Stolper, D.A., Ibarra, D.E.,
Schmitz, M.D., Zhang, Y., Fairchild, L.M., and Fuentes, A.J., 2024. One billion years of stability in
the North American midcontinent following two-stage Grenvillian structural inversion. Tectonics,
43 (9).
Mitchell, T.M., and Faulkner, D.R., 2009. The nature and origin of off-fault damage surrounding strikeslip fault zones with a wide range of displacements: A field study from the Atacama fault system,
northern Chile. Journal of Structural Geology, 31 (8), 802-816.
Nicholson, S.W., Cannon, W.F., Woodruff, L.G., and Dicken, C., 2006. Bedrock geologic map of the Port
Wing, Solon Springs, and parts of the Duluth and Sandstone 30’x60’ Quadrangles, US
Geological Survey.

28

�The Archean Carney Lake gneiss complex in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula: Preliminary
subdivisions with age constraints
DeGRAFF, James1, DEERING, Chad1, and JONES III2, James
1

Department of Geological &amp; Mining Engineering &amp; Sciences, Michigan Technological University, 1400
Townsend Drive, Houghton, MI 49931 U.S.A.
2
U.S. Geological Survey, Alaska Science Center, 4210 University Drive, Anchorage, AK 99508 U.S.A.

Much of the Precambrian bedrock in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula was last mapped at
1:24000 scale prior to modern tectonic concepts and advances in understanding related structural,
magmatic, and metamorphic processes. A later decline in base and ferrous metal mining in the
region reduced interest in commercial and scientific investigations, however recent concerns about
the supply of critical minerals has renewed interest in developing an improved geologic framework
for ore deposit exploration. The Archean Carney Lake gneiss complex (CLGC) and other granitegneiss complexes south of the Great Lakes tectonic zone are in the Minnesota River Valley
subprovince of the southern Superior craton (Sims and Day, 1993). The CLGC, like the other
complexes, is surrounded by Paleoproterozoic continental margin strata, partly older than and
partly coeval with Penokean orogenesis (~1.85 Ga) that deformed the region (Schulz and Cannon,
2007). Bayley et al. (1966) describe the CLGC as predominantly felsic gneiss but with ~10% mafic
inclusions and ~5% younger granodiorite and syenite intrusions by area.
Mapping funded by the USGS Earth MRI program has revealed a wider variety of rocks
than previously reported, differences in metamorphic grade, and new structural relationships
(DeGraff et al., 2023). Felsic intrusions with little to no foliation are more abundant and varied
than previously thought, ranging from granitic to tonalitic to locally syenitic. The original
classification of gneiss based on mineralogy has been revised by also considering fabric
characteristics. Consequently, we have identified an older EW-elongate core of thickly banded (≥2
cm) poly-deformed gneiss characterized by tightly folded banding, discordant banding across
shear zones, and dismembered mafic pods (Fig. 1, area 1). Younger, less deformed, Archean rocks
flank the older terrane, except on the north, and include the widespread felsic intrusions and thinly
banded (≤1 cm), quartzo-feldspathic, gneissic rocks. The latter have quasi-planar, laterally
continuous banding and local textures resembling cross-bedding and relict grains, suggesting
derivation from a siliciclastic protolith. Boundaries between the older deformed gneiss terrane, the
younger gneissic terrane with relict features, and areas with felsic intrusions are not yet well
defined nor is their nature well understood. In addition to the above, at least four generations of
mafic to ultramafic magmas have intruded the CLGC up to the late Mesoproterozoic.
Our results, combined with those of others, indicate a long and complex tectonomagmatic
history for the CLGC and adjacent rock units. The poly-deformed gneiss terrane includes rocks
with inherited zircon cores dated at ca. 3750 Ma (Eoarchean) and recrystallized zircons and
overgrowths dated at ca. 2750 Ma, the latter having formed during a Neoarchean thermal event
(Ayuso et al., 2018). Neoarchean metamorphism of the Eoarchean gneiss, and perhaps much of its
deformation, was accompanied by widespread felsic intrusions based on new zircon LA-ICPMS
U-Pb dates ranging from ca. 2810 Ma to 2670 Ma (8 sites). Zircon trace-element analysis indicates
that these magmas came from a hydrous oxidizing source and were contaminated while passing
through a relatively thick crust, as is typical of magma generated during modern subduction. At
the northern and eastern margins of the CLGC, relatively undeformed gneissic rocks were
probably derived in part from siliciclastic protoliths of Neoarchean age. At the northern margin,

29

�however, NE-dipping beds of Paleoproterozoic Sturgeon Quartzite are parallel to well-defined
layers of quartzo-feldspathic gneissic rocks along strike to the east. Field relationships and detrital
zircon analysis suggest two scenarios: 1) a lateral facies change within Sturgeon Quartzite from
meta-arkose on the east to meta-sandstone on the west, or 2) an onlapping relationship between
younger quartzite and its parent Neoarchean meta-arkose.

Figure 1: Preliminary
subdivisions of the Archean
Carney Lake gneiss complex
(CLGC = 1, 2a, 2b, 3, Agu_clg).
1 = poly-deformed; 2 = metaigneous, 3 = meta-sedimentary;
Agu_clg = undifferentiated;
Xmrs = Paleoproterozoic
Marquette Range Supergroup;
Pz = Paleozoic clastic strata.
Study area outlined in purple.

REFERENCES

Ayuso, R.A., Schulz, K.J., Cannon, W.F., Woodruff, L.G., Vazquez, J.A., Foley, N.K., and Jackson, J.,
2018. New U-Pb zircon ages for rocks from the granite-gneiss terrane in northern Michigan:
evidence for events at ~3750, 2750, and 1850 Ma. Institute on Lake Superior Geology, 64th Annual
Meeting Proceedings, Part 1-Program and Abstracts, 64: 7-8.
Bayley, R.W., Dutton, C.E., and Lamey, C.A., 1966. Geology of the Menominee Iron-Bearing District,
Dickinson County, Michigan and Florence and Marinette Counties, Wisconsin. U.S. Geological
Survey, Professional Paper 513: 1-96.
DeGraff, J.M., Gannon, I.M., Deering, C.D., Smirnov, A.V., 2023. Bedrock geology of southeastern
Dickinson County, Michigan: Vulcan 7.5’ quadrangle and adjacent parts of the Carney Lake,
Cunard, Faithorn, Felch, Foster City, and Waucedah 7.5’ quadrangles. Michigan Geological
Survey, Bedrock Geologic Map, 1:25,000 scale map sheet with explanatory text.
Schulz, K.J. and Cannon, W.F., 2007. The Penokean orogeny in the Lake Superior region. Precambrian
Research, 157: 4-25.
Sims, P.K. and Day, W.C., 1993. Great Lakes tectonic zone – revisited. U.S. Geological Survey, Bulletin
1904-S: S1-S11.

30

�Geochronology of lithium mineralization in the Florence pegmatite field, WI, USA
DROUBI, Omar Khalil1, SCHOONOVER, Erik2, SIRBESCU, Mona-Liza3, GARBER,
Joshua2, BONAMICI, Chloë1

Department of Geoscience, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1215 W. Dayton Street, Madison,
Wisconsin, 53706, USA
2
Department of Geosciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
3
Geology Department, Central Michigan University, 314 Brooks Hall, Mount Pleasant, MI 48859, USA
1

Global and national progression toward decreasing reliance on fossil fuels will correlate
with increasing the supply of mineral resources that contain high concentrations of elements like
lithium, copper, or rare earth elements– “critical minerals” deemed essential for building low-CO2
technologies. Lithium-cesium-tantalum (LCT) pegmatites are a significant component of global
lithium production; despite their importance, the tectonomagmatic mechanisms by which these
pegmatites form are not completely understood. The two main models for LCT pegmatite
formation are 1) as late-stage fractionation products of nearby peraluminous granites
(“fractionation origin”) (e.g., Černý, 1991) or 2) directly from partial melts of Li-bearing highgrade metamorphic rocks (“anatectic origin”) (e.g., Knoll et al., 2023; Koopmans et al., 2023).
These models have implications for LCT pegmatite exploration (i.e., mapping outward from
plutons or anatectic zones in mountain belts) and testing them requires precise age estimates for
the pegmatites and their neighboring magmatic and metamorphic rocks.
This study provides new age constraints for models of LCT pegmatite mineralization in
Florence County, WI, USA. (Falster et al., 2005; Falster et al., 1996; Sirbescu et al., 2008) by
applying LA-ICP-MS U-Pb geochronology and trace-element analysis to apatite crystallized
within the LCT pegmatites and titanite in the proximal wall rock and a separate, non-mineralized
granitic pegmatite located &gt;1.8 km away (Figure 1). The Florence LCT pegmatites were emplaced
&lt;2.5 km south of the Niagara Fault Zone and are hypothesized to be fractionated products from
the nearby Bush Lake granite (undated, but hypothesized ~1835 Ma; Sims et al., 1985) or anatectic
melts of the wall rock, the metavolcanic/metasedimentary Quinnesec Fm. (~1866 Ma; Sims et al.,
1985). These models suggest pegmatite emplacement is broadly bracketed in space and time by
the end of the Penokean orogeny (~1835 Ma) and Yavapai arc accretion (~1750–1700 Ma) (Figure
1). The apatite grains from the King’s X and Animikie Red Ace LCT pegmatites have U-Pb dates
of 1446 ± 6 [29] Ma and 1432 ± 4 [29] Ma, respectively. The targeted apatite grains, which
nucleated in the pegmatite chilled margin at the wall rock contact, are interpreted as magmatic
based on oscillatory cathodoluminescence zoning (Sirbescu et al., 2009). Xenoblastic titanite from
the Quinnesec Fm., sampled at distances &lt;1 cm to ~150 m from the pegmatites, have U-Pb ages
of 1473 ± 7 [29] Ma (&lt;1 cm), 1466 ± 7 [29] Ma (&lt;5 m), 1436 ± 13 [29] Ma (60 m), and 1471 ± 8
[29] Ma (150 m), but euhedral titanite grains from the non-mineralized granitic pegmatite have a
U-Pb age of 1811 ± 10 [36] Ma. Our data indicate that the Florence LCT pegmatites did not result
from fractionation of the Bush Lake granite nor anatexis during the Penokean or Yavapai orogenies
and are instead coeval with emplacement of the ~1476 Ma Wolf River batholith further south. A
revised age model for lithium mineralization in northern WI suggests involvement of the Wolf
River batholith or far-field influence of the Mesoproterozoic Pinware-Baraboo-Picuris orogeny.

31

�Figure 1. Conceptual cross section (not to scale) showing age constraints for the Florence pegmatite
field. Hypothesized ages based on the following references: Bush Lake granite and Quinnesec Fm. (Sims
et al., 1985), metagabbro (Guice et al., 2023). U-Pb dates reported as: date ± internal 2s [external
uncertainty=2% of date].

REFERENCES

Bradley, D.C., McCauley, A.D., and Stillings, L.M., (2017), Mineral-deposit model for lithium-cesiumtantalum pegmatites: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2010–5070–O, 48 p.,
https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20105070O.
Černý, P., 1991, Rare-element Granitic Pegmatites. Part II: Regional to Global Environments and
Petrogenesis: Geoscience Canada, v. 18, p. 68–81,
Falster, A. U., Simmons, W.B., and Webber, K.L. (2005), Origin of the pegmatites in the Hoskin Lake
pegmatite field, Florence Co., Wisconsin, in Crystallization Processes in Granitic Pegmatites,
International Meeting in Cavoli, Elba Island, Italy, May 23–28, 2005, edited by F. Pezzotta, Mineral.
Soc. of Am., Chantilly, Va.
Falster, A. U.; Simmons, Wm. B.; and Webber, K. L. (1996) The Mineralogy and Geochemistry of the
Animikie Red Ace Pegmatite, Florence County, Wisconsin. In Pandalai, S. G., ed., Recent Research
Developments in Mineralogy, 7-67.
Guice, G. L., Viete, D. R., Holder, R. M., &amp; Roy, S. (2023). A c. 1900 Ma Tethyan-type ophiolite in the
Penokean Orogen, Pembine, Wisconsin (USA): Insights from the volcanic stratigraphy. Precambrian
Research, 399, 107223.
Knoll, T., Huet, B., Schuster, R., Mali, H., Ntaflos, T., &amp; Hauzenberger, C. (2023). Lithium pegmatite of
anatectic origin-A case study from the Austroalpine Unit Pegmatite Province (Eastern European
Alps): geological data and geochemical model. Ore geology reviews, 105298
Koopmans, L., Martins, T., Linnen, R., Gardiner, N.J., Breasley, C.M., Palin, R.M., Groat, L.A., Silva, D.,
and Robb, L.J., (2023). The formation of lithium-rich pegmatites through multi-stage melting.
Geology.
Sims, P. K., Peterman, Z. E., &amp; Schulz, K. J. (1985). The Dunbar Gneiss-granitoid dome: Implications for
early Proterozoic tectonic evolution of northern Wisconsin. Geological Society of America
Bulletin, 96(9), 1101-1112.
Sirbescu, M. L. C., Hartwick, E. E., &amp; Student, J. J. (2008). Rapid crystallization of the Animikie Red Ace
Pegmatite, Florence county, northeastern Wisconsin: inclusion microthermometry and conductivecooling modeling. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 156, 289-305.
Sirbescu, M. L. C., Leatherman, M. A., Student, J. J., &amp; Beehr, A. R. (2009). Apatite textures and
compositions as records of crystallization processes in the Animikie Red Ace pegmatite dike,
Wisconsin, USA. The Canadian Mineralogist, 47(4), 725-743.

32

�Experimental Reproduction of Acidic Mafic-Ultramafic Hydrothermal Fluids with
Implications for Linking Seafloor Lithology to Ore Mineral Solubility and Novel
Geochemical Trapping Mechanisms
EVANS, Guy N.1 and SEYFRIED JR., William E.1
1
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Minnesota, 116 Church St SE,
Minneapolis, MN, 55455, United States

Ultramafic-hosted seafloor massive sulfide (UM-SMS) deposits constitute a distinct class of CuZn-Co-Ni-Au-rich seafloor hydrothermal deposits (Fouquet et al., 2010). However, ultramafichosted volcanogenic massive sulfide (UM-VMS) deposits have been historically overlooked, in
part because the formation of UM-VMS deposits differs from traditional VMS genetic models
based on basalt-hosted SMS deposits (Pattern et al., 2022). Adding to this complexity,
ultramafic-hosted seafloor hydrothermal fluids span nearly the full range of pH and metal
concentrations observed at active seafloor hydrothermal vents, from highly acidic (pH= 2.8),
metal-rich (Fe &gt; 20 mmol/kg) fluids observed at Rainbow Hydrothermal Field (Douville et al.,
2002), to alkaline (pH = 10.5), metal-poor (Fe &lt; .02 mmol/kg) fluids observed at Lost City
Hydrothermal Field (Kelley et al., 2005; Evans et al., 2024).
Here, we present results from recent experiments conducted at the University of Minnesota that
for the first time reproduce acidic hydrothermal fluids from mixed mafic-ultramafic source
minerals. The observed acidity of these fluids results from temperature-dependent fluid-rock
reactions and superimposed geochemical and physical processes. We further highlight the
implications of these findings for UM-VMS deposit models, including novel geochemical
trapping mechanisms potentially relevant in areas exhibiting significant ultramafic
volcanic/intrusive rocks. Regional examples include the Newton Belt (northeast Minnesota),
Shebandowan Belt (northwestern Ontario), and Kidd-Monroe assemblage (eastern Ontario and
Quebec).
REFERENCES

Douville, E., et al., (2002). The rainbow vent fluids (36 14′ N, MAR): the influence of ultramafic rocks
and phase separation on trace metal content in Mid-Atlantic Ridge hydrothermal fluids. Chemical
Geology, 184(1-2), 37-48.
Evans, G. N. et al. (2024). Transition metals in alkaline Lost City vent fluids are sufficient for early-life
metabolisms. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 385, 61-73.
Fouquet, Y. et al. (2010). Geodiversity of hydrothermal processes along the Mid‐Atlantic Ridge and
ultramafic‐hosted mineralization: A new type of oceanic Cu‐Zn‐Co‐Au volcanogenic massive
sulfide deposit. Diversity of hydrothermal systems on slow spreading ocean ridges, 188, 321-367.
Kelley, D. S. et al. (2005). A serpentinite-hosted ecosystem: the Lost City hydrothermal
field. Science, 307(5714), 1428-1434.
Patten, C. G. et al. (2022). Ultramafic-hosted volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits: an overlooked subclass of VMS deposit forming in complex tectonic environments. Earth-Science Reviews, 224,
103891.

33

�34

�Textural and chemical analysis of sphalerite ores from the Highland Subdistrict, Upper
Mississippi Valley Zinc-Lead District, Wisconsin
FITZPATRICK, William1
1

Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey, 3817 Mineral Point Rd. Madison, WI, USA

Lead + zinc ± barite ± copper deposits are widespread in Ordovician carbonate rocks of
southwestern Wisconsin and the bordering areas of Illinois and Iowa, commonly referred to as
the Upper Mississippi Valley zinc-lead district (UMVD). Sphalerite, the primary zinc ore
mineral in the UMVD, is known from other mining districts to contain valuable byproduct
commodities as trace elements such as gallium, germanium, cadmium and silver. Several
previous studies have examined sphalerite from the UMVD, but focused on samples from the
southern part of the district (Hall and Heyl, 1968, McLimans and others, 1980). Zinc ores from
other areas of the UMVD have received less attention, and little is known of their textural
character and trace element content. This study presents new trace element data and textural
observations of sphalerite ores from the Highland Subdistrict, the northernmost mining center in
the UMVD. Two hand-picked sphalerite concentrates and thirty-five bulk ore samples were
analyzed by whole rock geochemical methods, complemented by 282 in situ electron microprobe
analyses on six thin sections from a mix of vein and disseminated ores. Textures in the sphalerite
ores were also documented through scanning electron microscopy with the aim of understanding
mechanisms that localized sulfide mineralization.
Sphalerite from the Highland Subdistrict is characterized by alternating sequences of
lighter, honey-colored bands and darker, reddish-brown bands in both the disseminated and vein
hosted ores (Fig. 1). Microprobe analysis shows that darker bands tend to localize elevated iron
and lower cadmium relative to lighter bands (Fig. 1). Silver content is variable, but tends to be
higher in lighter bands, especially in the cores of disseminated grains. Comparing results from
the whole rock and microprobe analyses from the Highland Subdistrict to sphalerite analyzed
elsewhere in the UMVD, iron and cadmium are within known ranges, but silver is enriched to a
significant degree (Hall and Heyl, 1968). Gallium and germanium abundances were too low to
be detected in microprobe analyses, but whole rock analysis indicates they are towards the low
end of the range observed in sphalerite from the UMVD (Hall and Heyl, 1968).
Scanning electron microscope observation discovered abundant, texturally early
framboidal pyrite intergrown with marcasite that is enveloped by later sphalerite. Framboidal
pyrite has a well-documented association with sulfate reducing bacteria (e.g. Maclean and others,
2008), indicating bacterial processes were likely important in creating a reservoir of reduced
sulfur within the carbonate host rocks. This in turn may have acted as a chemical trap for metals
in migrating connate brines to form the zinc deposits.
REFERENCES

Hall, W.E., and Heyl, A.V., 1968, Distribution of Minor Elements in Ore and Host Rock, IllinoisKentucky Fluorite District and Upper Mississippi Valley Zinc-Lead District. Economic Geology,
63, 655-670.
Maclean, L., Tyliszczak, T., Gilbert, P., Zhou, D., Pray, T., Onstott, T., and Southam, G., 2008, A high
resolution chemical and structural study of framboidal pyrite formed within a low-temperature
bacterial biofilm. Geobiology, 6, 471-480.
McLimans, R.K., Barnes, H.L., and Ohmoto, H., 1980, Sphalerite Stratigraphy of the Upper Mississippi
Valley Zinc-Lead District, Southwest Wisconsin. Economic Geology, 75, 351-361.

35

�Figure 1. Plots of iron, cadmium and silver along linear traverses through banded sphalerite crystals
from the Highland Subdistrict. Top panel shows scans of the thin sections analyzed and locations of the
analyses. Note the concentrically zoned disseminated grain (left) vs vein (right).

36

�Rare-element Geochemistry of the Eau Claire River Complex Pegmatites
GRIES, Samara1, LODGE, Robert W.D1, HANEL, Sara1,2, HOOPER, Robert1
1
Department of Geology and Environmental Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, Eau Claire,
WI 54701 USA
2
Current Affiliation: Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Minnesota Twin
Cities, Suite 150, 116 Church St. SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455

Minerals, such as monazite and xenotime, are an important source of rare earth (La, Ce,
Nd) and high field strength (Th, Nb, Zr) elements which are essential for modern energy,
communication, and military technologies. These critical minerals are often sourced in
pegmatites and are important exploration targets worldwide (Haque et al, 2014). The
Paleoproterozoic Eau Claire Volcanic Complex (ECVC) is intruded by granitic pegmatite dikes
that postdate peak metamorphism (Lodge et al, 2023), indicating they are unrelated to Penokeanaged orogenic events. The ECVC pegmatites are highly fractionated, garnet bearing, and contain
a high concentration U, Th, La, Ce, and other rare earth elements. Based on major and trace
element associations, the pegmatites in the ECVC are classified as NYF family pegmatites that
contain Nb&gt;Ta, REE, U, Th, Zr and are A- to I- types with peralkaline relationship (Cerny and
Ercit, 2005).
This study collected bedrock samples from several locations across the ECVC (Little
Falls, North Fork, Muskeg Creek) (Figure 1). The pegmatite dikes can range in size from a few
meters to 100 m in width near the North Fork of the Eau Claire River. They mainly intrude
foliated and metamorphosed Paleoproterozoic to Archean tonalites, amphibolites, and gneisses.
Samples from these pegmatites were analyzed for whole rock and mineral chemistries. Whole
rock chemistry was analyzed on XRF and ICPMS whereas mineral chemistry was determined
using SEM-EDS.
All three locations have quartz, feldspar, plagioclase, biotite, and muscovite. The main
mineralogy of Little Falls samples are albite and muscovite. Trace mineralogy of the Little Falls
samples include Fe- and Mn-garnet, samarskite, columbite, zircon, and xenotime. Muskeg Creek
samples contains both orthoclase and albite with biotite instead of muscovite. Trace mineralogy
of the Muskeg Creek samples includes xenotime, monazite, and barite. The North Fork samples
mainly contain albite with minor orthoclase and biotite. Trace mineralogy of the pegmatites in
the North Fork area include in Fe- and Mn-garnets, monazite, xenotime, and thorite.
The pegmatites from the ECVC are all low in Ca and have trace minerals with rare earth
elements. They all contain with albite with low quantities of orthoclase and almost no anorthite.
The North Fork and Muskeg Creek samples have more barium-rich minerals than Little Falls,
which may be the result of fractionation of feldspars and plagioclase (Yu et al, 2007). Ba-rich
minerals can also be a product of hydrothermal activity (Hanor, 2000), but there is no evidence
of syn- to post-hydrothermal alteration of the pegmatites. Mn-rich garnets at Little Falls and
North Fork indicate a higher degree of fractionation relative to Fe-garnets at Muskeg Creek
(Hernández-Filiberto et al, 2021). North Fork and Muskeg Creek also had the largest crystals
reaching over 20 cm in size. The North Fork is enriched in the heavy rare earth elements, U, and
Th. In comparison, Little Falls has more light rare earth elements. Muskeg is also enriched in
light rare earth elements in addition to an increased enrichment of heavy rare earth minerals like
Gd and Dy. All three locations contain other metals such as Nb, Zr, Hf.

37

�Figure 1. Bedrock geologic map of the Eau Claire Volcanic Complex with site locations. North Fork
depicts a pink pegmatite intruding into a grey tonalite. Muskeg Creek depicts a 6 m pegmatite dike with
zoning. Little Falls shows a 13 m pegmatite dike. Map from Mudrey &amp; Brown (1982).

REFERENCES

Cerny, P., and Ercit,T., 2005. The classification of granitic pegmatites revisited. The Canadian
Mineralogist, 43: 2005-2026.
Hanor, J.S., 2000, Barite-celestine geochemistry and environments of formation. In Alpers, C.N., Jambor,
J.L., Nordstrom, D.K., eds. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 40: p. 193-275
Haque, N., Hughes, A.., Lim, S., Vernon, C., 2014, Rare Earth Elements: Overview of Mining,
Mineralogy, Uses, Sustainability, and Environmental Impact: Resources, 3, p. 614-635
Hernández-Filiberto, L., Roda-Robles, E., Simmons, W.B., Webber, K.L., 2021, Garnet as Indicator of
Pegmatites from the Oxford Pegmatite Field (Maine, USA): Minerals, 11(8), 802
Lodge, RWD, Weber, EM, Hooper, RL, 2023, Precambrian Geology of the Eau Claire River Valley: Rediscovering the Eau Claire Volcanic Complex. in Lodge, RWD (Ed.), Institute on Lake Superior
Geology Proceedings, 69th Annual Meeting, Eau Claire, Wisconsin, Part 2 – Field Trip
Guidebooks. v.69, part 2, p.47-70.
Mudrey, M.G., Jr., Brown, B. A., Greenberg, J. K., 1982, "Bedrock Geologic Map of Wisconsin."
Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey, scale 1:1,000,000
Yu, J.-H., O’Reilly, S. Y., Zhao, L., Griffin, W. L., Zhang, M., Zhou, X., Jiang, S.-Y., Wang, S.-Y.,
Wang, R.-C., 2007, Origin and evolution of topaz-bearing granites from the Nanling Range, South
China: a geochemical and Sr-Nd-Hf isotopic study: Minerology and Petrology, 90, p. 271-300

38

�Revisiting Gravity and Magnetic Anomalies of the Baraboo Range
HINZE, William J.1 and LONGACRE, Mark B.2
1
Purdue University, 30 Brook Hollow Ln., West Lafayette, IN 47906
2
MBL, Inc., 51 Captain Perry Dr., Phippsburg, ME 04562

The efficacy of gravity and magnetic methods of geological exploration have increased greatly
since they were first used to investigate the Baraboo Synclinorium of Wisconsin nearly 75 years
ago (Ostenso, 1953; Hinze, 1959). These methods and their associated technology are used for the
first time since then to investigate the geology of the Mesoproterozoic Baraboo Synclinorium, its
regional basement, and to illustrate the importance of modern data sets and analysis and
interpretation methods. The latter are the result of computers for analysis, interpretation, and
presentation of anomalies that were unavailable when the geophysical methods were first applied
to mapping the Synclinorium. Analysis and interpretation of current gravity and magnetic anomaly
data sets (Figure 1) indicate that the negative gravity anomaly associated with the Baraboo
Synclinorium is not unique to the Synclinorium but is the southern termination of the Wisconsin
Gravity Minimum (WGM) that covers a large portion of central Wisconsin including the Wolf
River Batholith (WRB). The WGM is derived largely from felsic plutons in the upper crust
extending outward from the ~1.5 Ga WRB. The lower density of the plutons compared to the
metamorphosed orogenic rocks of the upper crust is the likely source of the negative gravity
anomaly. The Synclinorium, located along an east-northeast trending gravity and magnetic
lineament within the Yavapai orogenic province, occurs in a syncline of largely felsic volcanic
rocks (Figures 2 and 3), the Sauk Syncline, that was likely deformed along with the Baraboo
Synclinorium by south and southeast-verging thrusting during the Mazatzal and Picuris-BarabooPinware Orogenic events. Variations in thrusting has led to significant differences in the eastern
and western portions of the Baraboo Synclinorium.
Key results of the gravity and magnetic anomaly data analysis of the Synclinorium include: (1)
The Baraboo Synclinorium’s negative gravity anomaly originates in upper crustal Yavapai and
Wolf River Batholith felsic plutons that are the source of the Wisconsin Gravity Minimum. (2)
The Synclinorium occurs within a synclinal structure resulting from deformation related to
generally south-verging, thin-skinned thrust faulting that also produced the Baraboo Synclinorium.
(3) The structure of the eastern and western portions of the Baraboo Synclinorium differ likely as
a result of variations in the direction and intensity of thrusting during the Mazatzal and PicurisBaraboo-Pinware Orogenies (~1.63-1.41 Ga).
REFERENCES

Hinze, W.J., 1959. A gravity investigation of the Baraboo Syncline region. The Journal of Geology,
67(4), 417-446.
Ostenso, Ned, 1953. Magnetic studies of the Baraboo Syncline. Unpublished M.A. thesis, University of
Wisconsin-Madison.

39

�Figure 1. Gravity and magnetic anomaly maps of the Baraboo Synclinorium. Reduced to pole (RTP) total
magnetic intensity anomaly map (right) eliminates the effect of the inclined earth’s magnetic field on the
induced magnetization of the crustal rocks and the vertical gradient Bouguer gravity anomaly map of the
Baraboo Synclinorium region (left) minimizes the regional gravity anomaly. The boundaries of the counties
are indicated and the outline of the boundary of the Baraboo Synclinorium is the dashed white line. The
white line interior to the Synclinorium is the boundary of the Freedom Formation. Color coding of both
figures is non-linear.

Figure 2. Tilt derivative of the Bouguer gravity anomaly map of the Baraboo Synclinorium region showing
the outline of the Sauk Syncline in thick dashed white lines interpreted from the gravity and magnetic
anomaly maps. The outline of the Baraboo Synclinorium is the thin dashed white line. The white line interior
to the Synclinorium is the boundary of the Freedom Formation. Color coding is non-linear.

Figure 3. High pass 10-km RTP magnetic anomaly map of the Baraboo Synclinorium region showing the
outline of the Sauk Syncline in thick dashed white line interpreted from the gravity and magnetic anomaly
maps. The outline of the Baraboo Synclinorium is the thin dashed white line. The white line interior to the
Synclinorium is the boundary of the Freedom Formation. Color coding is non-linear.

40

�Emplacement of the Mesoproterozoic Wausau Syenite Complex, Wisconsin
HULA, Linsey1 and CZECK, Dyanna1
1

Department of Geosciences, University of Wisconsin Milwaukee, Lapham Hall, Room 366,
3209 N. Maryland Ave. Milwaukee, WI 53211

The Wausau Syenite Complex (WSC) in Marathon County, Wisconsin is an intrusive
complex of granitoids emplaced approximately 1.5 Ga (Dewane and Van Schmus, 2007). It is
traditionally considered part of a major anorogenic ferroan granite magmatic event that affected
the southern margin of Laurentia circa 1.4 Ga. Recent studies have recognized a Laurentian-scale
accretionary margin between 1520-1340 Ma (Fig. 1), including the Pinware Orogeny in the
northeast, the Picuris Orogeny in the southwest, and the most recently attributed section, the
Baraboo Orogeny centered in Wisconsin (Daniel et al., 2023). This new hypothesis provides
intriguing opportunities to reconsider the origin and tectonic setting of WSC emplacement as
well as other Mesoproterozoic granitoids in Wisconsin, including the larger 1.4 Ga Wolf River
Batholith (Dewane and Van Schmus, 2007). This research project will use the orientation of
magnetic fabrics within the WSC to better understand how the batholith was emplaced.

Figure 1: Simplified geologic map of Precambrian crustal provinces including the Mesoproterozoic
accretionary margin of the Picuris, Baraboo, and Pinware Orogenies. The 1.48-1.35 Ga ferroan granites,
including the Wolf River Batholith, are highlighted in white and the ~1.5 Ga Wausau Syenite Complex is
added. Modified from Medaris et al., 2021, originally based on (Whitmeyer and Karlstrom, 2007).

The project will consist of an anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS) survey and
thin section analysis of each granitoid within the WSC. With these data, the magmatic flow
directions and any subsequent tectonic overprint can be determined, which can be used to
constrain the location of the magmatic feeder and the tectonic environment of emplacement. For
the purpose of this abstract, three possible outcomes are proposed:

41

�1. Radial magmatic fabrics are preserved, indicating that the WSC was emplaced and cooled
prior to the Baraboo Orogeny, with deformation accommodated by the surrounding weaker
country rock (Fig. 2A).
2. Magmatic fabrics show a preferential flow pattern parallel to the tectonic margin caused by
differential stress from the Baraboo Orogeny, suggesting syntectonic emplacement (Fig. 2B).
3. Only solid-state deformation fabrics are present, implying that the WSC was emplaced before
or at the onset of the Baraboo Orogeny and had fully cooled before significant deformation
occurred (Fig. 2C).
By focusing on these oldest known Mesoproterozoic ferroan granites in the region, we can learn
about the timing and geometry of the earliest Baraboo orogenesis. This study will address the
question of how these enigmatic granites fit into the overall tectonic history of the Great Lakes
Region.

Figure 1: Schematic diagram of the WSC showing three possible outcomes of the AMS study. A) Radial
magmatic fabric. B) Magmatic fabric with preferential flow parallel to the tectonic boundary. C) Solid
state fabric.

REFERENCES

Daniel, C.G., Indares, A., Medaris Jr., L.G., Aronoff, R., Malone, D., and Schwartz, J., 2023. Linking the
Pinware, Baraboo, and Picuris orogens: Recognition of a trans-Laurentian ca. 1520–1340 Ma
orogenic belt, in Whitmeyer, S.J., Williams, M.L., Kellett, D.A., and Tikoff, B. eds., Laurentia:
Turning Points in the Evolution of a Continent, Geological Society of America, 175–190.
Dewane, T.J., and Van Schmus, W.R., 2007. U–Pb geochronology of the Wolf River batholith, northcentral Wisconsin: Evidence for successive magmatism between 1484Ma and 1468Ma:
Precambrian Research, 157, 215–234.
Medaris, L.G., Singer, B.S., Jicha, B.R., Malone, D.H., Schwartz, J.J., Stewart, E.K., Van Lankvelt, A.,
Williams, M.L., and Reiners, P.W., 2021. Early Mesoproterozoic evolution of midcontinental
Laurentia: Defining the geon 14 Baraboo orogeny: Geoscience Frontiers, 12, 101174.
Whitmeyer, S.J., and Karlstrom, K.E., 2007. Tectonic model for the Proterozoic growth of North
America: Geosphere, 3, 220–259.

42

�Mapping oxidation reactions in iron-rich rocks from northeast Minnesota, USA.
JAROZEWSKI, Sarah1, DUFFY, Paige1, BARRÉ, Cole1, BRENGMAN1, Latisha, EYSTER2,
Athena
1
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Minnesota Duluth, Heller Hall, 1114
Kirby Drive, Duluth, MN 55812, USA
2
Department of Earth and Climate Sciences, Tufts University, Lane Hall, 2 North Hill Road, Medford,
MA 02155, USA

Aqueous alteration and post-depositional mineral assemblage modification in
Precambrian terranes are ubiquitous, but clear accounting of the relative timing of oxidation
reactions at the landscape scale is limited. Here we synthesize observations of oxidation and
hydration reactions in three iron-rich lithologies in northeast Minnesota, the Soudan Iron
Formation, the Cuyuna Iron Formation, and the Partridge River Intrusion of the Duluth complex
to contribute to building a compiled relative mineral redox history for the landscape.
The Soudan Iron Formation (~2.7 Ga) is a greenstone-hosted metamorphosed chemical
sedimentary unit primarily composed of alternating bands of magnetite, hematite and
microquartz affected by at least two Archean deformation events, and later fluid alteration
(Thompson, 2015). The Soudan Iron Formation primarily consists of mm-scale bands of
authigenic microquartz and iron oxides that preserve in outcrop samples distal to the ore zone,
and within the ore horizon at Soudan underground mine. Reflected light petrography of oxides in
outcrop samples reveals magnetite replacement by hematite (Figure 1A). Within ore zone
samples, complete hematite replacement and large platy hematite is common, similar to previous
observations (Thompson, 2015). Clear metamorphic minerals that could indicate high
temperatures, pressures, and P-T-path histories are absent from the unit. The younger Cuyuna
Iron Formation (~1.9 Ga) is part of an intensely folded metamorphosed sedimentary sequence
deformed during the Penokean orogeny (Schmidt, R.G., 1963). Combining new observations and
previous data from historic samples (Melcher et al., 1996), oxidation of magnetite is prevalent
but limited in samples from the Gloria drill hole (Figure 1B). Metamorphic stilpnomelane is
common in the Cuyuna iron formation in contrast to the Soudan Iron Formation. Documented
differences in metamorphic silicate mineralogy between these two iron formations may indicate
key differences in precursor phases, as both units were affected by significant metamorphic
deformation events. Yet, for both, oxidation of magnetite and replacement by hematite indicate
both iron formations are similarly affected by post-depositional fluid alteration and oxidation.
The Partridge River Intrusion (PRI) is part of the layered series troctolitic intrusions that
form the base of the Duluth complex (Tyson and Chang, 1984). In its present geometry, the
magmatic layered series PRI now intersects the current land surface. Clear evidence of aqueous
alteration in the first few hundred feet of drill core 17700 includes mineral transformation of
biotite and olivine to hydrous ferric oxides and secondary iron silicates (Figure 1C). These
replacement reactions are limited in scale, and primary igneous mineralogy is still preserved.
Leveraging cross-temporal comparisons of current iron-rich bedrock outcrop exposures and drill
cores in north-east Minnesota to identify formational vs. post-formational mineralogy will allow
for landscape-scale mapping of oxidation reactions and their extent in the subsurface.

43

�Figure 1. Reflected light
photomicrographs of the
Soudan iron formation, Cuyuna
Iron formation and back-scatter
electron image (BSE) of the
Patridge River Intrusion of the
Duluth complex. (A) Magnetite
is partially replaced by
hematite in the Soudan iron
formation. (B) Magnetite
oxidation to hematite in the
Cuyuna iron formation. (C)
Back-scatter electron image of
altered olivine in the Partridge
River Intrusion from the UMTC EPMA lab, CHARFAC
facility..

REFERENCES
Melcher, F., Morey, G. B., McSwiggen, P. L., Cleland, J. M., &amp; Brink, S. E. 1996. RI-46
Hydrothermal Systems in Manganese-Rich Iron-Formation Of the Cuyuna North Range,
Minnesota: Geochemical and Mineralogical Study of the Gloria Drill Core. Report of
Investigations 46, ISSN 0076-9177, 1 - 45.
Schmidt, R. G. 1963. Geology and ore deposits of the Cuyuna North range, Minnesota. U.S.
Geological Survey Professional Paper 407, p. 96.
Taylor, Richard B., 1964. Geology of the Duluth Gabbro Complex near Duluth, Minnesota.
Bulletin No. 44. Minnesota Geological Survey, University Digital Conservancy.
Thompson, A. 2015. A hydrothermal model for metasomatism of neoarchean Algoma-Type
banded iron formation to massive hematite ore at the Soudan Mine, NE Minnesota.
University of Minnesota, Duluth. P. 1-59.
Tyson, R. M., and Chang, L, L, Y. 1984. The Petrology and sulfide mineralization of the
Partridge River Troctolite, Duluth Complex, Minnesota. Canadian Mineralogist, v. 22, p
23-38.

44

�Geology and Geochemistry of the Mesoproterozoic Round Lake Intrusion and associated
Ti-Mineralization, Northern Wisconsin
JEUTTER, Renee O.1, LODGE, Robert W.D.1
1
Department of Geology &amp; Environmental Science, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, 105 Garfield
Avenue, Eau Claire, WI 54701, USA

Modern technology and renewable energy require large amounts of metals that are
currently imported, and there is a tremendous effort to domesticate our mineral extraction and
processing. Several of these critical minerals, such as Ti, are found in Wisconsin, but little data is
available to guide future mineral exploration efforts. The Mesoproterozoic Mid-Continent Rift
and its satellite intrusions are known to host Ti-Fe oxide mineralization and Ni-Cu-PGE
magmatic sulfide deposits (Woodruff, 2020). During the development of the Mid-Continent Rift,
there is a temporal evolution of occurrences of mineral deposits. The plateau stage typically
created Ni-Cu-PGE sulfide deposits, layered Ti-Fe oxide deposits, and alkalic hosted U-Nb
deposits. The Round Lake Intrusion, like other intrusions discovered through a strong
aeromagnetic anomaly (Mudrey et al. 2003), is an example of a layered Ti-Fe oxide deposit.
Anorthosite layers alternate with magnetite troctolite layers approximately every 100 ft.
Fractional crystallization throughout the evolution of the magma created the alternating “layers”
of plagioclase rich and plagioclase poor segments but has minimal additional differences in
mineral composition and presence (Stuhr, 1976).
This study describes the petrology and geochemistry of the Round Lake intrusion and Timineralization using historic drill cores stored at the Wisconsin Geological and Natural History
Survey core repository. Two holes were relogged, totaling ~1787 feet, and representative
samples were obtained of host intrusive phases and mineralization types. The intrusion was
characterized via transmitted-light petrography and whole rock geochemistry was determined via
WD-XRF. Mineral chemistry of the intrusion and mineralization was determined using SEDEDS. The intrusion segregated into layers: anorthosite, upper magnetite troctolite, middle
magnetite troctolite, magnetite, and lower magnetite troctolite, crosscut by an intrusive gabbro
dike (Stuhr, 1976).
The main intrusion hosting mineralization magnetite-ilmenite rich troctolite, ranging
from 35-60% intergrown magnetite-ilmenite and 5-20% coarse grained plagioclase laths (Figure
1). Movement and flow of magmas during emplacement are indicated trachytic flow textures of
aligned plagioclase crystals. The anorthosite has 55-90% euhedral plagioclase, 10-15%
magnetite, and 5-15% clinopyroxene. The magnetite-ilmenite rich troctolite and anorthosite are
crosscut by fine-grained gabbroic dikes. Within the magnetite-ilmenite troctolite unit, magnetitetitanomagnetite and lesser ilmenite assumes interstitial growth between silicates (Figure 1).
Apatite is variably present. Olivine is variably altered to iddingsite and serpentine strips of
magnetite forming within fractures in the crystal.
Both the Round Lake intrusion and Clam Lake intrusion are intrusions rich in magnetite
associated with the Mid-Continent Rift, and both are likely to be hosts of Ti-Fe ± V deposits and
are known to contain large amounts of titanomagnetite with approximately 1.5% V (Woodruff,
2020). Future work is recommended on the Round Lake Intrusion and Ti-mineralization to better
constrain the layering and economic potential of Ti-mineralization.

45

�Figure 1: (A) Geologic map of Northwestern Wisconsin region surrounding the Round Lake Intrusion,
Digitized from Stuhr (1976). (B) Image of Magnetite-Ilmenite rich troctolite core sample showing textures
and magnetite matrix filling features. (C) Image from SEM showing major magnetite and olivine textures
within a sample. Magnetite matrix filling texture and fracture filling within olivine fractures.

REFERENCES

Stuhr, S. W., 1976, Geology of the Round Lake Intrusion, Sawyer County, Wisconsin [Master’s Thesis]:
Madison, University of Wisconsin, 148 p.
Woodruff, L. G., Schulz, K. J., Nicholson, S. W., Dicken, C. L., 2020, Mineral Deposits of the
Mesoproterozoic Midcontinent Rift system in the Lake Superior region – A space and time
classification: Ore Geology Reviews, v. 126, p. 1-21.
Mudrey Jr., M.G., Ervin, C.P., Olmsted, J.F., 2003, Middle Keweenawan Basin Evolution Inferred from
Geophysical Analysis of a Strongly Magnetic Intrusion, Clam Lake, Wisconsin: Wisconsin
Geological and Natural History Survey, Open-file Report 2003-04, 17 p.

46

�Geology and Geochemistry of the Ritche Creek Cu-Zn deposit, North central Wisconsin
JOHANNESEN, Haley P. 1, LODGE, Robert W.D.1
1
Department of Geology and Environmental Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, Eau Claire,
WI 54701 USA

The Ritchie Creek deposit is a Volcanogenic Massive Sulfide (VMS) deposit located
within the Paleoproterozoic Penokean Volcanic Belt (PVB) of northcentral Wisconsin (Figure 1).
Mineral exploration efforts have demonstrated that the VMS mineralization at this site is
concentrated on the western edge of a felsic volcanic center that is interpreted to have formed in
a back arc or intra-arc rift environment within bimodal volcanic sequences (DeMatties, 1990).
These interpretations were based on physical descriptions of units intersected in drill core and
comparisons to other VMS deposits regionally and globally. Like many VMS deposits in the
PVB, little research has been done at the Ritchie Creek prospect to link petrogenesis with largerscale VMS environments.
This research aims to characterize and refine the geological and geochemical
characteristics of the Ritchie Creek Cu-Zn deposit by re-examining historic drill core and
representative volcanic stratigraphic units and provide a more comprehensive understanding of
the tectonic environment that influenced mineralization. The study involved logging 1,000 linear
feet of historic drill core from two holes and collecting 22 core samples from representative
stratigraphic units for petrographic and geochemical characterization. The four sampled units
include: (1) a medium grey, fine grained quartz mica schist with alternating coarse-grained
quartz and K-feldspar bands and disseminated sulfides including pyrite and chalcopyrite, (2) a
light green quartz mica schist, strongly altered by sericite and chlorite, containing disseminated
chalcopyrite and pyrite, (3) an intermediate metafelsite unit, characterized by sericite and biotite,
that grades into a rhyolitic tuff with angular felsic fragments, localized sulfide blebs, and quartz
veins, and (4) a semi-massive to massive sulfide unit consists mainly of pyrite with minor
chalcopyrite, in a sheared and brecciated matrix.
Major and trace element geochemical data was generated via WD-XRF at the Material
Science Center at the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire. Major element geochemistry is highly
variable because of varying degrees of hydrothermal alteration. Therefore, immobile trace
elements are used to classify protoliths and discriminate tectonic settings. Least-altered volcanic
strata were chemically classified as mafic volcanics (based on low Zr/Ti, high Cr), intermediate
volcanics (based on elevated Zr/Ti), and felsic volcanics (based on high Zr/Ti). Mafic volcanic
strata have high Zr, consistent with calc-alkalic magmatic affinities. Felsic volcanic strata are FII type felsic magmas and have low Nb and Y consistent with volcanic-arc felsic magmas. The
quartz-sericite altered rocks have trace element chemistry consistent with the intermediate
volcanic strata and alteration indices indicate a potassic-dominated alteration. These
characteristics suggest an oceanic arc-backarc bimodal-mafic petrochemical association (Piercey,
2011) and provide a more comprehensive understanding of VMS mineralization in the PVB.

47

�(A)

(B)

Figure 1. (A) A regional
map of the Ritche Creek
VMS Deposit located in
North Central Wisconsin. (B)
A Cross-section view of the
Ritche Creek VMS deposit,
showing drill hole locations
and stratigraphic units,
faulting and alteration zones.
This cross section focuses on
(RC5) a drill holes that
intersects significant sericite
alteration and massive
sulfide mineralization zones.

REFERENCES

DeMatties, T.A., (1990), The Ritchie Creek Main Zone: A Lower Proterozoic CopperGold Volcanogenic Massive Sulfide Deposit in Northern Wisconsin. Economic Geology Vol. 85,
1990, pp.
DeMatties, T.A., (2018), Effects of paleoweathering and supergene activity on volcanogenic massive
sulfide (VMS) mineralization in the Penokean Volcanic Belt, northern Wisconsin, Michigan and
east- central Minnesota, USA: Implications for future exploration: Ore Geology Reviews, v. 95, p.
216–237.
DeMatties, T.A., (2022), Exploration-resource assessment of productive felsic volcanic centers in
the Paleoproterozoic Penokean Volcanic Belt of northern Wisconsin, Michigan, and east-central
Minnesota, USA: Ore Geology Reviews, v. 141, p. 104489.
Piercey SJ (2011) The setting, style, and role of magmatism in the formation of volcanogenic massive
sulfide deposits. Mineralium Deposita 46:449-471.

48

�Geologic implications of detrital zircon U-Pb ages from Archean and Paleoproterozoic
strata in central Minnesota and the Gogebic Range of Wisconsin and Michigan, USA
JONES, James V.1, SALERNO, Ross2, CANNON, William F.2, and O’SULLIVAN, Paul4
1

U.S. Geological Survey, Anchorage, AK 99508, USA jvjones@usgs.gov
U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA 20192, USA; 3 U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO 80225, USA
4
GeoSep Services LLC, Moscow, ID 83843, USA
2

Archean and Paleoproterozoic metasedimentary successions in the Lake Superior region
of the northern United States record the assembly and breakup of southern Superia and the
subsequent transition to long-lived accretionary orogenesis along the southern Laurentia margin.
The successions are difficult to correlate for reasons that include contrasts in thickness, facies,
and variable amounts of erosion, similarities in depositional environment through hundreds of
millions of years of sedimentation, and variable overprinting by younger tectonic events. Detrital
zircon U-Pb geochronology is useful for correlating siliciclastic strata and for identifying
provenance patterns that reflect past tectonic and sedimentary interactions. We present new data
for samples collected from ca. 2.6–1.8 Ga strata from across the Lake Superior region that
provide key insights into regional correlations and local to global tectonic histories.
In the eastern Gogebic Range of Michigan, Archean volcanic and volcaniclastic rocks are
mapped in a fault-bounded panel between the Watersmeet gneiss dome to the southeast and
Neoarchean Puritan batholith to the northwest. One new sample of Archean metagraywacke
from within the supracrustal succession yielded only Neoarchean detrital zircon with age
populations ranging from ca. 2740 to 2590 Ma, indicating derivation from nearby gneisses but
not from older sources such as the early Paleoarchean Watersmeet gneiss. A younger succession
of Paleoproterozoic metavolcanic and metasedimentary rocks near Lake Gogebic overlies the
Archean gneisses and supracrustal rocks. One sample of fine- to medium-grained slate and
metagraywacke from the Copps Formation yielded a mixture of Archean and Paleoproterozoic
detrital zircon dates. Archean grains were minor and included age populations of ca. 2649 and
2553 Ma that match the nearby Neoarchean metagraywacke and gneiss domains. Paleoproterozoic grains defined a ca. 1846 Ma age peak and a maximum depositional age of ca. 1829
Ma. We also collected samples of the Paleoproterozoic Palms and Tyler Formations that overlie
Archean domains in the western part of the Gogebic Range. Fine-grained gray quartzite of the
Palms Formation yielded detrital zircon age populations ranging from ca. 2976 to 2458 Ma and a
prominent peak at ca. 2675 Ma. The age spectrum indicates input and (or) recycling of Archean
sources and an absence of coeval magmatic sources in the region. In contrast, fine-grained
argillaceous sandstone of the overlying Tyler Formation contained mostly Paleoproterozoic
detrital zircon with major age peaks at ca. 1863 and 1827 Ma together with minor older age
populations ranging from ca. 2780 to 1953 Ma.
In central Minnesota, new samples were collected from the Paleoproterozoic Denham and
Little Falls Formations. The Denham Formation sample was collected on the northern side of the
McGrath gneiss dome and consisted of fine-grained biotite argillite with 1-2 mm horizons of
coarser sandstone. The sample yielded chiefly Archean detrital zircon with a dominant age
population at ca. 2603 Ma and minor older populations ranging from ca. 3409 and 2789 Ma.
Archean age populations match previously published data from nearby samples of basal arkose
and dolomitic arkose from the same unit (Craddock et al., 2013). However, that basal arkose also
contained a distinct ca. 2101 Ma age population that established a potential correlation between
the Denham Formation and the East Branch Arkose of the Dickinson Group in Michigan. The

49

�Little Falls Formation sample of garnet-staurolite-biotite schist was collected from the southern
side of the McGrath dome, and it predominately contained Paleoproterozoic detrital zircon that
define a dominant unimodal age population at ca. 1846 Ma. The age spectrum for the Little Falls
sample is nearly identical our data from the Copps Formation and is also like our Tyler
Formation data and to previously published data for other parts of the upper Animikie Group.
The marked difference in the proportion of Archean and Paleoproterozoic grains between
the Little Falls and Denham Formations suggests a major change in provenance across their
contact. The Denham Formation appears to have been derived from the underlying Archean
gneiss dome with lesser contribution from older gneisses elsewhere in the region. Circa 2.1 Ga
sources are rare in the region but are found locally to the east in Dickinson County, Michigan.
The Paleoproterozoic age population that dominates the Little Falls Formation indicates
derivation from the Wisconsin magmatic terrane that was approaching from the south (present
coordinates) prior to collision that defines the Penokean orogenic cycle in the region.
Additionally, our data indicate a maximum depositional age of ca. 1846 Ma for the Little Falls
Formation that contrasts with the inferred ca. 2101 Ma age of the underlying Denham Formation
reported by Craddock et al. (2013). Published observations suggest a gradational contact between
schist of the Little Falls Formation and dolomitic marble of the underlying Denham Formation
(Boerboom and Chandler in Bauer et al., 2022). Boerboom and Chandler (2022) noted a 1-meter
graphitic/carbonaceous argillite at the base of the Little Falls Formation that could represent a
hiatus and then a major change in depositional environment above the arkosic conglomerate and
dolostone. We previously reported similar geologic and provenance patterns from the Dickinson
Group approximately 600 km to the east in Michigan (Jones et al., 2024). In that area, the East
Branch Arkose contains a similar distribution of DZ ages: a mixture of Archean detrital zircon
and a distinctive ca. 2099 Ma age population interpreted to have been derived from local granitic
sources. The overlying Solberg Schist is made up of biotite-staurolite schist that contains
prominent ca. 1.86–1.84 Ga age populations together with minor ca 2.5 and 2.3 Ga age
populations. More work is needed to better constrain the stratigraphic position of the depositional
age and provenance shifts in both successions and to better understand the tectonic setting and
significance of the subtle unconformities and pronounced shift in zircon sources. Preliminary
observations and data suggest that the two successions are regionally similar but also distinct
from surrounding strata. Thus, the Denham and Little Falls Formations may provide a distinctive
and unique record of the transition from Superia rifting to Penokean orogenesis.
REFERENCES

Bauer, Emily J; Chandler, V.W.; Boerboom, Terrence J; Knaeble, Alan R; Nguyen, Maurice K; Lively, R.
S.; Setterholm, Dale R; Steenberg, Julia R. (2022). C-52, Geologic Atlas of Aitkin County,
Minnesota. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy,
https://hdl.handle.net/11299/253808.
Craddock, J.P., Rainbird, R.H., Davis, W.J., Davidson, C., Vervoort, J.D., Konstantinou, A., Boerboom,
T., Vorhies, S., Kerber, L., and Lundquist, B., 2013, Detrital zircon geochronology and provenance
of the Paleoproterozoic Huron (~2.4-2.2 Ga) and Animikie (~2.2-1.8 Ga) basins, southern Superior
Province: Journal of Geology, v. 121, p. 623–644, https://doi.org/10.1086/673265.
Jones, J., Cannon, B., Drenth, B., and O’Sullivan, P., 2024, Geologic and tectonic implications of detrital
zircon U-Pb age from the Dickinson Group in the western Upper Peninsula of Michigan, USA:
Institute on Lake Superior Geology, “Institute on Lake Superior Geology: Proceedings,
2024,” Archives &amp; Digital Collections at Lakehead University Library, accessed April 9,
2025, https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/items/show/10352.

50

�Zircon Petrochronology of Wisconsin’s Volcanogenic Massive Sulfide Deposits,
Northcentral Wisconsin
KWIATKOWSKI, Aidan O. 1, LODGE, Robert W.D.1
1
Department of Geology and Environmental Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, Eau Claire,
WI 54701 USA

Northern Wisconsin’s Paleoproterozoic Penokean Orogen, one of the classic Precambrian
orogenic belts in North America, is known to host multiple volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS)
deposits which are important sources of Cu, Zn, Pb, Ag, and Au globally. Despite known large
and potentially economic VMS deposits, limited outcrop exposure has hindered detailed
reconstructions of the VMS-hosting environment to guide future exploration. Historic U-Pb
geochronology indicates that volcanism occurred between 1889-1835 Ma (Sims et al. 1989) with
the majority of VMS-hosting strata constrained between 1875-1873 Ma (Quigley 2016). Schultz
&amp; Cannon (2007) attribute the main VMS forming event ca. 1875 Ma to extension in a
developing back arc basin, with a second later magmatic pulse around 1830 Ma being attributed
to post-tectonic stitching plutons. However, a newer model by Zi et al. (2022) shows two VMS
forming events around 1875 Ma and 1845 Ma suggesting a regime consisting of alternating
compressional and extensional environments caused shifting subduction angles.
Zircon petrochronology (U/Pb, Lu/Hf isotopic data and trace elements) can not only
better constrain the timing of VMS formation but can also allow for a more complete
understanding of the geological evolution and metallogeny of Wisconsin VMS deposits. This
study sampled felsic igneous rocks from several VMS deposits to determine the timing and
tectonic settings of VMS environments in the western Penokean Orogen. Samples were studied
from the Flambeau, Eisenbrey, and Lynne deposits of the Ladysmith-Rhinelander Volcanic Belt
(Figure 1a). Samples from the Flambeau and Eisenbrey deposits consist of felsic volcaniclastic
units associated with sulfide mineralization and the sample from the Lynne deposits consists of a
granodiorite which has intruded into the VMS deposit and volcanic strata. Samples were
pulverized and heavy mineral separates were obtained by various magnetic and density
separation techniques. The zircon mineral grains were imaged by cathodoluminescence prior to
isotopic (U/Pb, Lu-Hf) and trace element analyses via LA-ICPMS at the Mineral Exploration
Research Centre at Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario. U/Pb isotopic data constrains
timing of magmatism. Trace elements and Lu-Hf data constrain the tectonic setting and crustal
architecture.
Preliminary results indicate two distinct VMS-forming magmatic events during the
Penokean Orogeny that have similar tectonic and magmatic styles. All samples show a bimodal
distribution of U/Pb ages centered on 1830-1835 Ma and 1870-1875 Ma (Figure 1). Trace
element geochemistry of zircons reveals little petrogenetic difference between the magmatic
events. Negative ƐHf(i) values, indicating interaction with Archean basement, is consistent
amongst all samples and between magmatic events. The VMS-forming extensional event at ca.
1835 Ma contradicts the Schulz and Cannon (2007) model where collisional tectonics are
dominant at this time. While the timing of VMS-formation more closely aligns with the Zi et al.
(2022) model, the accordion-like tectonics cannot explain the lack of variation in magmatic
setting or crustal architecture observed in our data. Therefore, additional data is needed to fully
understand the tectonic and metallogenic significance of this younger extensional event.

51

�Figure 1. A) Generalized geologic map of the Penokean Orogen illustrating major tectonostratigraphic
subdivisions and the location of sampled and major VMS occurrences. Figure modified from Schulz and
Cannon (2007) and DeMatties (1994). Subdivisions of Pembine-Wausau terrane from DeMatties (1994,
2018). LRVC = Ladysmith-Rhinelander volcanic complex. B) U/Pb concordia diagram of older magmatic
zircons. C) U/Pb concordia diagram of younger magmatic zircons interpreted to be crystallization age of
sample. D) Weighted mean diagram distribution of ages and analyzed grains. Inset image shows
frequency distribution of ages in samples.

REFERENCES

DeMatties TA (1994) Early Proterozoic volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits in Wisconsin: An overview.
Econ Geol 89: 1122-1151.
DeMatties TA (2018) Effects of paleoweathering and supergene activity on volcanogenic massive sulfide
(VMS) mineralization in the Penokean Volcanic Belt, northern Wisconsin, Michigan and east-central
Minnesota, USA: Implications for future exploration. Ore Geol Rev 95: 216-237.
Quigley A (2016) Setting of the volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits in the Penokean Volcanic belt, Great
Lakes region, USA. Colorado School of Mines, Masters Thesis. 95 p.
Schulz KJ, Cannon WF (2007) The Penokean orogeny in the Lake Superior region. Precambrian Res 157:
4-25.
Sims PK, Van Schmus WR, Schulz KJ, Peterman ZE (1989) Tectonostratigraphic evolution of the Early
Proterozoic Wisconsin magmatic terranes of the Penokean orogen. Can J of Earth Sci 26: 2145-2158.
Zi J-W, Sheppard S, Muhling JR, Rasmussen B (2021) Refining the Paleoproterozoic tectonothermal
history of the Penokean Orogen: New U/Pb age constraints from the Pembine-Wausau terrane,
Wisconsin, USA. Geol Soc Am Bull 134: 776-790.

52

�Geologic Interpretation of Filtered Gravity and Magnetic Anomalies of the Baraboo Range
LONGACRE, Mark B.1 and HINZE, William J.2
1

MBL, Inc., 51 Captain Perry Dr., Phippsburg, ME 04562
Purdue University, 30 Brook Hollow Ln., West Lafayette, IN 47907

2

Investigations over the past decade have made significant advances in our geologic knowledge of
the Mesoproterozoic Baraboo Synclinorium and adjacent region of south-central Wisconsin (e.g.,
Medaris, Jr. et al., 2021; Stewart et al., 2021; Marshak et al., 2023). To further the geologic
information of this feature and nearby region we have filtered their gravity and magnetic anomaly
maps to identify geologic formations and structures in the crystalline basement. The filtered maps
isolate specific attributes of the anomaly fields which are useful in interpretation especially when
combined with constraining geological information. These maps have identified a buried geologic
structure to the east of and immediately adjacent to and along strike of the Sauk Syncline (Figures
1 and 2) which encompass the Baraboo Synclinorium. The buried structure is a near mirror image
of the Sauk Syncline and thus is referred to as the Twin Syncline. Unlike the Sauk Syncline and
the Baraboo Synclinorium the eastern structure is south rather than north of a geological lineament
within the Yavapai orogenic province that marks the southern boundary of the Wisconsin Gravity
Minimum. The Twin Syncline is notable in the magnetic anomaly map because of the positive
anomaly associated with a magnetite-rich formation that is likely an extension of the lower portion
of the Freedom Formation of the Baraboo Synclinorium. The elliptical trace of this anomaly and
the steep gradients of the outer margin support the synclinal nature of the structure. We interpret
this structure to be a result of south-verging thrusting with steeply dipping thrusts along the
northern and southern margins of the Twin Syncline similar to the situation of the Sauk Syncline.
This structure is not as tightly folded as the Baraboo Synclinorium suggesting that the thrusting to
the east of Baraboo Synclinorium was less intense. The Syncline can be identified on the filtered
maps as can other quartzite synclinoriums of the region by the subdued geophysical anomalies of
the underlying felsic volcanic rocks because of their burial beneath the non-magnetic quartzite.
The magnetic anomalies of the magnetic lower half of the Freedom Formation are also a useful
marker for detailing the structure within the Baraboo Synclinorium and defining the limits of the
Freedom Formation within it. Additionally, two parallel intrusives on strike with the Denzer
Diorite that crops out along the southwestern margin of the Synclinorium extend northnortheasterly within the sub-quartzite basement across the western portion of the Synclinorium.
They are associated with anticlines within the Synclinorium that may have resulted from
differential deformation caused by variations in the rheology of the basement rocks. These and
other interpretations of the filtered gravity and magnetic anomalies suggest that revisiting the
studies of basement rocks of Wisconsin and adjacent regions is in order using the available
improved analysis, interpretation, and presentation methods and modern data gravity and magnetic
data sets.
REFERENCES

Marshak, S., Wilkerson, M.S., and DeFrates, J., 2023. Kinematic and tectonic implications of crenulation
cleavage, kink bands, and mesoscopic folds in the Baraboo Syncline, Wisconsin (∼1.45 Ga Picuris
Orogen). Journal of Structural Geology, 178, 105007.
Medaris, Jr, L.G., Singer, B.S., Jicha, B.R., Malone, D.H., Schwartz, J.J., Stewart, E.K., Van Lankvelt, A.,
Williams, M.L., and Reiners, P.W., 2021. Early Mesoproterozoic evolution of midcontinental
Laurentia: Defining the geon 14 Baraboo orogeny. Geoscience Frontiers,12(5), 101174, 17 p.

53

�Stewart, E.K., Brengman, L.A., and Stewart, E.D., 2021. Revised provenance, depositional environment,
and maximum depositional age for the Baraboo (&lt; ca. 1714 Ma) and Dake (&lt; ca. 1630 Ma)
Quartzites, Baraboo Hills, Wisconsin. The Journal of Geology, 129, 1-31.

Figure 1. Total horizontal derivative of the RTP total magnetic anomaly map of south-central Wisconsin.
The outlines of the Sauk (left) and Twin (right) Synclines are shown by the thin dashed white lines and the
Baraboo Synclinorium by a dashed white line. The Baraboo Lineament of the Yavapai province is shown
by the wide broadly dashed line. Color coding is non-linear.

Figure 2. Tilt derivative of the Bouguer gravity anomaly map of south-central Wisconsin that emphasizes
the short wavelength components. The outlines of the Sauk (left) and Twin (right) Synclines are shown by
the dashed white lines and the Baraboo Synclinorium by a thin dashed white line. The Baraboo Lineament
of the Yavapai province is shown by the wide broadly dashed line. Color coding is non-linear.

54

�An Informal Review of the ILSG Field Excursion to Hawaii, January – February, 2025
MACTAVISH, Allan1, HINZ, Peter1, HUDAK, George1, LARSON, Phil1, AUBUT, Allan1,
BOERBOOM, Terry1, CHILTON, Vern1, DeGRAFF, Jim1, ERICKSON, Tom1, FAULKNER,
Barb1, SERRANO, Isabel1, and ZANKO, Larry1
1
Members of the 2025 ILSG Field Trip to Hawaii, 2025

Between January 24, 2025 and February 5, 2025, twelve members of the Institute on
Lake Superior Geology participated in a geological field excursion to investigate the geology of
the island of Hawaii, with a focus on observing field relationships, outcrop characteristics and
geomorphology to better understand the characteristics of modern basaltic volcanism in a hotspot environment. The field excursion was led by Allan MacTavish, Peter Hinz, George Hudak
and Phil Larson. A new field trip guidebook and glossary of geological terms (MacTavish and
Hudak, 2024) was prepared and utilized during the thirteen-day long trip.
This presentation will review key features and take-aways from the excursion, which
included investigations of five of the seven volcanoes associated with the island of Hawaii.
Investigations took place via examinations of various outcrops, hikes through the Hawaiian
wilderness, and a helicopter tour. Various eruption types, volcano types, coherent (lava flow) and
volcaniclastic deposit types and features, different types of volcanic products and hydrothermal
alteration facies, and observations of historical and cultural artifacts and natural phenomena will
be discussed. Challenges and surprises associated with field studies of Hawaii will also be
presented.
REFERENCES

MacTavish, A., and Hudak, G., 2024, The Volcanoes of the Island of Hawaii – Field Trip Guide: Institute
on Lake Superior Geology Special Publication 3, 200 p.

55

�56

�Refining the Age and Occurrence of Basement Rocks in Northwest Iowa: Implications for
Precambrian Tectonics and Magmatic Evolution of the Laurentian Midcontinent
MALONE, Jack1, MALONE, David2, ANDERSON, Raymond1, CLARK, Ryan1
1
Iowa Geological Survey, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
2
Geography-Geology, Illinois State University, Normal, Illinois 61790

Precambrian basement rocks in northwest Iowa reveal an Archean and two
Paleoproterozoic tectonic sutures (Figure 1; 1.9-1.8 Ga Trans-Hudson/Penokean and 1.8-1.7 Ga
Yavapai; Bickford et al., 1986; Holm et al., 2007). Here we present four new U-Pb (LA-ICPMS)
ages for drill cores of basement rocks along the Transcontinental Arch in northwest Iowa, USA
(Figure 2). The cores are on repository at the Iowa Geological Survey. The Camp Quest
migmatite gneiss was sampled at a depth of 1,078 ft from the Camp Quest D-21 core (W25498;
z=38). The weighted mean and Concordia ages were both 1845 Ma, which is the first TransHudson/Penokean age recognized in Iowa. This core is located south of the Spirit Lake tectonic
zone (SLTZ) which is interpreted as the suture between Yavapai terrane rocks to the south and
Archean Superior province rocks to the north. Nine inherited zircons are mostly Archean in age
and interpreted as xenocrysts, indicating Archean crust occurs at depth south of the SLTZ.
Granite was also sampled at a depth of 660 ft from the Hawarden D-7 core (W27270; z=35). The
zircon age spectrum reveals three age clusters at ~2895, ~2683, and ~1800 Ma. The older,
inherited age clusters are consistent with ages of the Minnesota River Valley terrane and the
greater Superior Province, respectively. The ~1800 Ma age is similar to the nearby 1803-1810
Ma Matlock “keratophyre” and the distant 1805 Ma Humboldt granite (northern Michigan),
representing the initiation of north-directed Yavapai subduction and granitic melt production into
Archean and previously accreted Trans-Hudson/Penokean rocks north of the SLTZ (Kilburg,
2024). Granodiorite was sampled at a depth of 915 ft from the Harris D-13 core (W27270; z=41).
The weighted mean and Concordia ages are ~1780 Ma, suggesting that Yavapai rocks intrude
older Trans-Hudson/Penokean or Archean rocks north of the SLTZ. A late-stage granitic dike
was sampled at a depth of 1,611 ft from the Spencer BX-2 core (W16223; z=7), which is from a
tabular noritic body within the Spencer intrusive complex just south of the SLTZ. The sampled
interval yielded sparse zircons; however, the weighted mean age of 1238 Ma is the first Grenville
age recognized in Iowa. This age suggests an obscure early Grenvillian thermal resetting or
reactivation in the upper Midcontinent which postdates anorthositic/noritic magnetism
concentrated along the SLTZ at Spencer.
New complementary whole rock WDXRF major oxide and ICP-OES trace element
geochemical analyses (n=163) from Precambrian units in northwest Iowa reveal a complex
tectonic and crustal growth configuration. Intermediate to felsic intrusions are generally LREEenriched and have I-type volcanic arc-like trace element patterns. The origin of anorthositic to
mafic-ultramafic occurrences are less straightforward but are characterized by slight to
significant Ce, Sm, Eu, and Lu anomalies, indicating basaltic to mantle fractionation, differential
partial melting at depth, and/or derivation from Fe-rich residual melts. These new results provide
significant insight into the tectonomagmatic evolution of the southernmost Superior Province
during the final assembly of the Laurentian craton.

57

�Figure 1: Geological map of Precambrian
basement rocks in the northern midcontinent
and northwest Iowa. Top: Red dots indicate
previously published U-Pb ages and white dots
are new (this study). Bottom: New
geochronologic ages indicated with stars are
CQ = Camp Quest, HW = Hawarden, HA =
Harris, SP = Spencer.

Figure 2: Weighted mean, probability density, and Concordia plots of newly dated Precambrian units in
northwest Iowa.

REFERENCES

Bickford, M.E., Van Schmus, W.R., and Zeitz, I., 1986. Proterozoic history of the midcontinent region of
North America. Geology, 14(6), 492-496.
Holm, D.K., Anderson, R., Boerboom, T.J., Cannon, W.F., Chandler, V., Jirsa, M., Miller, J., Schneider,
D.A., Schulz, K.J., &amp; Van Schmus, W.R., 2007. Reinterpretation of Paleoproterozoic
accretionary boundaries of the north-central United States based on a new aeromagnetic-geologic
compilation. Precambrian Research, 157(1-4), 71–79.
Kilburg, N., 2024. Age and petrogenesis of the Matlock ‘Keratophyre’ in northwest Iowa [M.S. Thesis]:
Iowa City, University of Iowa, 129 p.

58

�Post-Penokean and Pre-Yavapai Magmatism and Sedimentation in Central Wisconsin
(Southern Lake Superior Region)
MEDARIS, Gordon Jr.1 and MALONE, Dave2
1
Dept. of Geoscience, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706
2
Dept. of Geography, Geology, and the Environment, Illinois State University, Normal, IL 61790

The principal Precambrian domains in Wisconsin are the Penokean Province, consisting of the
Marshfield Terrane, Wausau-Pembine Terrane, and Craton margin, which include 2450-1770 Ma
craton margin and foreland basin sediments and 1890-1830 Ma volcanic arc associations, 1760
Ma rhyolite and granite of the Yavapai Province, &lt;1643 Ma quartzite of the Baraboo Interval,
1484-1468 Ma granitic rocks of the Wolf River batholith, and 1109-960 Ma igneous and
sedimentary rocks of the Midcontinent Rift (Fig. 1).
In addition to these five major domains, small outcrops of post-Penokean and preYavapai igneous and sedimentary rocks are scattered across central Wisconsin, which have been
investigated in detail at Hamilton Mounds (Medaris et al., 2007), Biron Dam (Holm et al., 2020),
and Brokaw (this report) (Fig. 1).
Two sedimentary successions occur at Hamilton Mounds: an older arkose and a younger
quartzite correlative with the Baraboo quartzite. The arkose is a gray, fine- to medium-grained,
feldspathic sandstone (CIA = 59.0; Fig. 2). Detrital monazite in arkose yields a total Pb median
age of 1850 Ma, with the youngest detrital grain at 1757 Ma, signifying post-Penokean
deposition of the arkose. An upper age for the arkose is provided by the intrusion of 1762 ± 7 Ma
granite (Yavapai), whose age is within error of the youngest detrital monazite grain. Muscovite
in the younger quartzite yields a 40Ar/39Ar plateau age of 1470 ± 11 Ma, reflecting the
widespread thermal effect of the Wolf River batholith throughout central and southern
Wisconsin.
At Biron Dam, trachybasaltic diabase dikes (Fig. 2) intruded Archean gneiss and
Penokean tonalite, granodiorite, and granite. Zircon grains in three samples of diabase yield
207
Pb/206Pb ages within error of each other, with a weighted mean age of 1817 ± 2 Ma, which
demonstrates post-Penokean and pre-Yavapai emplacement of the dikes. The diabase dikes have
been metamorphosed under amphibolite-facies conditions; hornblende in metadiabase yields a
40
Ar/39Ar plateau age of 1672 ± Ma, possibly representing a Mazatzal influence.
At Brokaw, polymictic conglomerate, feldspathic sandstone (CIA = 59.0; Fig. 2) and
siltstone were intruded by rhyolite, which contains inherited zircon with ages between 2125 Ma
and 3565 Ma. The sandstone contains detrital zircon with a 207Pb/206Pb median age of 1850 Ma
and an age of 1810 Ma for the youngest subset of grains with overlapping errors, demonstrating
post-Penokean deposition of the Brokaw sedimentary rocks. Primary structures and textures of
the Brokaw igneous and sedimentary rocks have been preserved on the macroscopic scale, but
such rocks have been pervasively recrystallized to greenschist-facies mineral assemblages on the
microscopic scale, as seen for example in rhyolite, in which plagioclase was replaced by albite
and epidote, and hornblende, by epidote (Fig. 3). The age of such recrystallization has not yet
been determined, but is presumed to be related to the nearby Wolf river batholith.
It is now recognized that igneous rocks were emplaced and sedimentary rocks were
deposited over much of central Wisconsin in the interval 1817-1757 Ma after the Penokean
orogeny, perhaps as a precursor to the Yavapai orogeny.

59

�Figure 2. Chemical compositions of Biron Dam
diabase, Brokaw rhyolite and sandstone, and
Hamilton Mounds sandstone in terms of
Al (Al2O3), Ca* (CaO), N (Na2O), and K (K2O);
CIA: Chemical Index of Alteration.
Figure 1. Map of the major Precambrian
geological units in the southern Lake
Superior region. Star symbols: Brokaw (BK),
Biron Dam (BD), and Hamilton Mounds
(HM) localities; B: Baraboo Interval
sedimentary rocks.

Figure 3. Photomicrograph (crossed polarizers)
of recrystallized Brokaw rhyolite;
ab, albite; ep, epidote
REFERENCES
Medaris, L.G. Jr., Van Schmus, W.R., Loofboro, J., Stonier, P.J., Zhang, X., Holm, D.K., Singer, B.S.,
and Dott, R.H. Jr., 2007. Two Paleoproterozoic (Statherian) siliciclastic metasedimentary sequences
in central Wisconsin. Precambrian Research, 157, 188-202.
Holm, D., Medaris, L.G. Jr., McDannell, K.T., Schneider, D.A., Schulz, K., Singer, B.S., and Jicha, B.R.,
2020. Growth, overprinting, and stabilization of Proterozoic Provinces in the southern Lake
Superior region. Precambrian Research, 339, Article 105587.

60

�US Steel Corporation / Ralph W. Marsden iron ore collection
MOOERS, Howard1, SEVERSON, Mark2, JONGEWAARD, Peter3, LARSON, Phillip4
1
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, MN 55812
2
2122 W 22nd St., Duluth, MN 55811, USA
3
7009 Three Lake Rd., Canyon, MN 55717, USA
4
1613 14th Ave. East, Hibbing, MN 55746, USA

By the time Ralph W. Marsden joined Oliver Iron Mining Division of US Steel Corporation
(USSC) in 1951 he was already one of the World’s experts on iron ore. From 1953-1964 he
managed the Geologic Investigations Unit in Duluth, MN. During this time, Ralph was one of
the co-founders of the Institute on Lake Superior Geology in 1954. In 1964 Ralph was
transferred to the Pittsburgh corporate office as Manager of Geologic Investigations, Iron Ore,
however, Ralph wanted to return to Minnesota, and in 1967 he left USSC and moved to the
University of Minnesota Duluth (UMD) Department of Geology as Professor and Head.
USSC had an active, worldwide exploration program for iron ore from the 1920s into the 1960s,
and a large number of the samples collected were housed in Duluth, MN. When USSC closed its
Duluth, MN, office, this iron ore sample collection was to be discarded. Ralph “rescued” the
collection of iron ore samples and moved them to the University of Minnesota Duluth. In 1986,
Ralph died suddenly while attending the Geological Society of America Annual Meeting in San
Antonio, TX. The collection of iron ore samples sat in a service tunnel at UMD for 40 years.
This globally significant collection of iron ore samples was recently inventoried, photographed,
and placed in storage containers that are readily accessible. The inventory of the 483 samples,
complete with photographs, is cataloged on the University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy
(https://hdl.handle.net/11299/265081). Many of these samples are from localities that are no
longer accessible, are from closed mines, or are from areas of the World that simply cannot be
visited because of political and social issues.
This collection of iron ore samples dates from 1926 to the 1960s and has samples from 25
countries and 30 US states and Canadian provinces. The individual sample boxes are labeled,
and many have great detail on the origin of the samples. Most of the samples are also
individually labeled, with sample numbers and descriptions. There are photographs of the
contents of each box, and where possible supporting documents are shown in the photos.
For further information or to request access to samples contact the Department of Earth and
Environmental Sciences, University of Minnesota Duluth or Howard Mooers
(hmooers@d.umn.edu).

61

�Countries represented: USA, Angola, Australia,
Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Congo, Costa
Rica, Cuba, Gabon, Germany, Guatemala,
Honduras, India, Ivory Coast, Liberia, Mexico,
Nicaragua, Namibia, Portugal, South Africa,
Sudan, Sweden, Venezuela.
US States and Canadian Provinces
represented: Alabama, Alberta, Arizona, British
Columbia, California, Idaho, Illinois,
Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri,
Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico,
New York, Newfoundland, North Carolina, North
Dakota, Ontario, Oregon, Puerto Rico, Quebec,
South Dakota, Utah, Virginia, Washington,
Wisconsin, Wyoming.

Figure 1. Example of samples from Liberia, West
Africa, with supporting documentation.
REFERENCES
University Digital Conservancy, University of Minnesota Duluth, (2024). List of Samples for US Steel
Corporation / Ralph W. Marsden Iron Ore Collection. Retrieved from the University Digital
Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/266399.

62

�Lithogeochemical Characterization of Manganese Mineralization at the Cuyuna Range,
Central Minnesota
PALIEWICZ, Cory1, THAKURTA, Joyashish1
1
Natural Resources Research Institute (NRRI), University of Minnesota Duluth, 5013 Miller Trunk Hwy,
Duluth, MN 55811

The Paleoproterozoic Cuyuna Range of central Minnesota contains elevated levels of manganese
when compared to other Banded Iron Formations in the Lake Superior region. The total tonnage
is estimated at 49 million metric tons at 7.84 percent Mn (Kilgore and Thomas, 1982). The
Cuyuna Range consists of a Penokean fold-and-thrust belt divided into the Emily District, North
Range, and South Range. These are separated by structural and stratigraphic discontinuities
which make each area geologically distinct (Southwick et al., 1988; Morey, 1990). Although
prior work has documented a variety of textural and sedimentary associations, this study will
provide new lithogeochemical data to further characterize the manganese-bearing lithologies
across the Cuyuna Range in support of ongoing research for manganese and other critical
minerals in Minnesota as part of the USGS Earth MRI program.
A total of 201 drill core samples were collected from 37 drill holes across the Emily
District, North Range, South Range, and Glen Lake Sulfide Deposit (Figure 1). To date, all
samples have been studied in hand-sample and sent for bulk geochemical analysis, 40 samples
have been analyzed in thin section, and whole-rock geochemical results of 60 samples from 16
drill holes have been received from the USGS. Although lithologic features of both ironformations and non-iron-formations are variable across the range, the deposits also share many
attributes. As such, we find it useful to texturally classify the collected samples into granular,
banded, and irregular types while still recognizing the special characteristics of each individual
mineral association.
This study will present petrographic and whole-rock geochemical data, with particular
emphasis on rocks from the Emily District, which from past studies is known to be mostenriched in Mn-content. In addition, Mn-bearing country rocks throughout the Cuyuna Range are
also characterized and compared to historic drill logs and prior work (e.g., Morey et al., 1991,
Dahl et al., 1992). In this way, new insights on lithological variation, manganese distribution, and
other potential critical minerals at the Cuyuna Range may further be addressed and incorporated
during the Earth MRI program.

63

�Drill Hole Sampled
Figure 1: Regional geologic map of the Cuyuna Range showing approximate drill hole locations sampled
for this study. Modified from Southwick et al., 1988 and Cleland et al., 1996.
REFERENCES
Dahl, L.J., Brink, S.E., Blake, R.L., Tuzinski, P.A., and Adamson, N.R., 1992, Site characterization of
Minnesota manganese deposits to evaluate the potential for in-situ leach mining: Littleton,
Colorado, Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration, Inc. Preprint 92-243, 31 p.
Cleland, J.M., Morey, G.B., and McSwiggen, P.L., 1996, Significance of tourmaline-rich rocks in the
North Range Group of the Cuyuna Iron Range, east-central Minnesota: Economic Geology, v. 91,
no. 7, p. 1282-1291
Kilgore, C.C., and Thomas, P.R., 1982, Manganese availability-Domestic: U.S. Bureau of Mines
Information Circular 8889, 14 p.
Morey, G.B., 1990, Geology and manganese resources of the Cuyuna iron range, east-central Minnesota:
Minnesota Geological Survey Information Circular 32, 28 p.
Morey, G.B., D.L. Southwick, and S.P. Schottler, 1991, “Manganiferous Zones in Early Proterozoic Iron
Formation in the Emily District, Cuyuna Range, East Central Minnesota.” Minnesota Geological
Survey Report of Investigations 39. 42 pp.
Southwick, D.L., Morey, G.B., and McSwiggen, P.L., 1988, Geologic map (scale 1:250,000) of the
Penokean orogen, central and eastern Minnesota, and accompanying text: Minnesota Geological
Survey Report of Investigations 37, 25 p., 1 pl.

64

�Michigan Geological Survey’s Contributions to the USGS Earth MRI National Mine Waste
Inventory Effort
PEARSON, Sara1, GAMET, Nolan2, SHALIFOE, Molly 1, QUIGLEY, Ashley2, and MAHIN,
Robert2
1
Michigan Geological Survey, Western Michigan University, 5272 W. Michigan Ave. Kalamazoo, MI
49009
2
Michigan Geological Survey, Western Michigan University, 416 Avenue C Gwinn, MI 49841

In the mid-19th century, the discovery of rich copper and iron deposits in Michigan’s
Upper Peninsula (U.P.) led to intense mining, resulting in hundreds of abandoned mine waste
sites. Both published and unpublished geological literature suggests that some of these legacy
mine waste sites have the potential to host critical minerals, such as manganese and graphite, that
were previously overlooked during production. The Michigan Geological Survey (MGS) is
contributing to the United States Geological Survey’s (USGS) national effort to build a
comprehensive national inventory of mine wastes, their compositions, and potential critical
minerals.
The MGS team has completed an inventory and submitted 120 mine waste sites from 6
counties across the western U.P. to the USGS for a final review and inclusion in the national
mine waste database (Figure 1). These 120 sites are further subdivided into 216 individual mine
waste features that met the minimum 2,000m2 size requirement. Finalized point and polygon
layers for each mine site were accompanied by corresponding geology, resource, and reference
attribute tables. The process consisted of creating an ArcGIS Pro project, adding all available
mine-related state and federal datasets, LiDAR-derived DEMs (digital elevation models),
published maps, and an ArcGIS geodatabase template containing feature classes and related
attribute tables required by the USGS. Initial mine waste inventory work focused on searching
for and digitizing mine waste features throughout the western U.P that exceeded the 2,000m2 size
requirement. The MGS team originally located and digitized 441 mine waste features by utilizing
LiDAR-derived, 1-meter DEMs, 2024 ESRI areal imagery, and published geologic maps. This
process is depicted by a simplified workflow shown in Figure 2. The mine waste features were
then filtered based on their size. Those smaller than 2,000m2 were omitted from the master
dataset. Corresponding attribute tables were then populated with data from publicly available
literature, websites, state and federal datasets, and information archived in the state’s drill core
repositories. The final databases will ultimately comprise the most up-to-date record of the
volume, tonnage, grade, and mineralogy of Michigan’s legacy mine waste sites.
Future MGS work within the scope of the Earth MRI Mine Waste Cooperative
Agreement is a mine waste characterization effort, which aims to sample and evaluate nonfuel
mine waste sites that potentially contain critical minerals. This project will begin in 2025 and
continue through 2026.

65

�Figure 1. Map displaying all mine waste features inventoried and submitted to the USGS for the fiscal
year 2023 Priority 1 funding represented as purple points and polygons.

Figure 2. Simplified process to locate and digitize the mine waste features using ArcGIS Pro coupled with
online sources. A.) ESRI imagery (Esri, 2024); B.) Bedrock geology of central Dickinson County, MI
(James and others, 1961); C.) 1-m QL2 LiDAR DEM model; D.) Digitization of mine waste features.

REFERENCES

Esri, 2024, World imagery: Esri, https://services.arcgisonline.com/ArcGIS/rest/services/
World_Imagery/MapServer.
James, H.L., Clark, L.D., Lamey, C.A., and Pettijohn, F.J., 1961, Geology of central Dickinson County,
Michigan, U.S. Geological Survey, Professional Paper 310, 1:24,000.

66

�Critical Mineral Potential of the Northern Margin of the Watersmeet Gneiss Dome, MI
USA
QUIGLEY, Ashley K.1, MAHIN, Robert A. 1, and GAMET, Nolan G. 1
1
Michigan Geological Survey, Western Michigan University, 416 Avenue C Gwinn, MI 49841

Precambrian gneisses and schists on the northern margin of the Watersmeet Dome in
Michigan have been shown to be unusually enriched in rare earth elements, fluorite and
incompatible elements including U, Th, Hf, and Zr (Barovich et al., 1991; Sims, 1990). The area
is within two Earth Mapping Resources Initiative (EMRI) critical mineral focus areas for
IOCG/IOA and magmatic REE deposits (Dicken and others, 2022). To further assess the
potential for critical minerals, the Michigan Geological Survey (MGS) is conducting detailed
geologic mapping and sampling, as well as collecting geophysical and geochronological data.
The project area is roughly 36 square kilometers on the border of Gogebic and
Ontonagon Counties and 10 kilometers northwest of the town of Watersmeet, MI. Field work
began in July of 2024 with a projected completion date in early 2026.
During the 2024 field season, the MGS mapped, described and recorded 620 outcrops in
the project area using ArcGIS Field Maps and submitted 124 samples for whole rock and trace
element geochemistry. An RS-230 BGO gamma-ray spectrometer was used to take over 600
total gamma (K/U/Th) measurements from outcrop. Additionally, a drone-borne, high resolution
magnetic survey was flown over areas where permission was granted by landowners.
Preliminary field observations include the presence of fluorite in outcrop spatially
associated with magnetic and gamma count anomalies. The results of the lithogeochemistry
show a strong spatial correlation between fluorine, uranium, thorium, and total REEs. When rare
earth element concentrations were converted to industry standard rare earth oxides (REOs), 14
samples had total rare earth oxide (TREO) values greater than 1,000 ppm (Hellman and Duncan,
2018). Geophysical, analytical, and field data also identified an anomalous magnetic high
approximately 500m x 300m associated with previously undescribed REE-bearing, magnetic,
fine-grained schists.
In 1982, Rocky Mountain Energy (RME) conducted exploration drilling for uranium
based on anomalous gamma radiation in outcrop. A reexamination of the core found chalcopyrite
in close association with fluorite. The presence of anomalous F, Cu, U, REE and magnetite is
suggestive of an IOA/IOCG footprint (Hitzman, 2000). This will be investigated using IOCG
discrimination diagrams such as Montreuil and others (2013).
Barovich et al. (1991) observed that the elevated REEs, fluorite and incompatible
elements were tied to a gneiss and schist unit with an interpreted Paleoproterozoic age between
1.9 and 1.7 Ga, much younger than the Archean aged rock units that make up most of the
Watersmeet gneiss dome. Because of the apparent link between rock age and critical minerals,
confirming existing ages with modern U-Pb dating techniques, as well as adding ages from new
locations, is an important piece of this study. Five samples were submitted for U-Pb
geochronology of zircon grains. Results are pending.

67

�REFERENCES

Barovich, K.M., Patchett, P.J., Peterman, Z.E., and Sims, P.K., 1991. Neodymium Isotopic Evidence
for Early Proterozoic Units in the Watersmeet Gneiss Dome, Northern Michigan. U.S. Geological
Survey Bulletin 1904-G: G1-G7.
Dicken, C.L., Woodruff, L.G., Hammarstrom, J.M., and Crocker, K.E., 2022, GIS, supplemental data
table, and references for focus areas of potential domestic resources of critical minerals and related
commodities in the United States and Puerto Rico (ver. 2.0, April 2024): U.S. Geological Survey
data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P9DIZ9N8.
Hellman, P.L. and Duncan, R.K., 2018, Evaluating Rare Earth Element Deposits. ASEG Extended
Abstracts. 2018. 1. 10.1071/ASEG2018abT4_3E.
Hitzman, M.W., 2000, Iron oxide-Cu-Au deposit: What, where, when, and why, in Porter, T.M., ed.,
Hydrothermal iron oxide copper-gold and related deposits a global perspective: Adelaide,
Australian Mineral Foundation, p.9–26.
Montreuil J-F., Corriveau L., Grunsky E., 2013. Compositional data analysis of IOCG systems, Great
Bear magmatic zone, Canada: To each alteration types its own geochemical signature. Geochem.
Explor. Environ. Anal. 13:219–247.
Sims, P.K., 1990, Geologic map of Precambrian rocks, Marenisco, Thayer, and Watersmeet 15-minute
quadrangles, Gogebic and Ontonagon counties, Michigan, and Vilas County, Wisconsin: U.S.
Geological Survey Miscellaneous Investigations Series Map I-2093, scale 1:62,500.

68

�Plume control on the initiation of Mid-Continent Rift breakup using Unconformities:
Implications for the Tectono-magmatic evolution and mineral deposits
ROHRMAN, Max1
1
DECAN Geosolutions, PO Box 131148, Houston, TX 77219

Regional unconformities from the stratigraphic record interpreted on existing Multi
Channel Seismic (MCS) data obtained by Grant Norpac/Argonne (red numbered) and the
GLIMPCE program (red lettered) (Figure 1A), are used for temporal and spatial control on MidContinent Rift (MCR) evolution. This allows identification of key events in the evolution of the
rift, whereas potential field data, seismic refraction and Rayleigh waves, help constrain spatial
and quantitative constraints. Based on magmatic stage definition, two regional unconformities
were interpreted from MCS data: MU (Magmatic Unconformity), at the top of the Main stage (~
1100 – 1089 Ma), signaling the end of major flood basalt magmatism, and BU (Breakup
Unconformity) representing the Latent stage (~ 1104 – 1100 Ma). The latter is observed as a
sequence at Mamainse Point (Figure 1), rather than an unconformity, stressing the importance of
spatial control on events. Magmatic crustal thicknesses and lower crustal seismic velocities
obtained from MCS and refraction data (Shay and Trehu, 1993) are used to constrain relative
importance of important parameters in melt production, such as: potential temperature, active
mantle upwelling and lithospheric thinning. Together, these data suggest that the MCR
originated from an earlier NW-SE pre- or proto-rift (blue, Figure 2A) recognized from outcrop
(Figure 1A) and MCS, further reconstructed by aligning Archean granitic blocks such as White
Ridge (WR), Grand Marais (GM) and Wawa-Abitibi (purple, WA) from gravity lows (Figure
1B, 2A). The area was affected by a plume constrained by a Rayleigh Wave Low Velocity
Anomaly (RWLVA) (Foster et al., 2020) (Figure 1A). This generated uplift in central Lake
Superior focused on a region around the Coldwell Complex (Figure 1A). Subsequently, Earlystage (~ 1110 - 1104 Ma) magmatism in the proto-rift generated by NE-SW extension along
strike slip faults such as the Thiel Fault (TF) (Figure 1A), in the central and eastern arm of the
MCR.
By the end of the Early-stage, the plume was deeply embedded in the lithosphere and
initiated the start of a thick N-S crustal ridge or proto-hotspot track in central Lake Superior
during the late Early- to Latent stage (Figure 2B,C). After a break in activity recorded by the
Breakup Unconformity (BU), the plume moved relatively southward during the Main-stage and
possibly influenced stress re-orientation to N-S (Figure 2D). This locked the eastern arm and
locally, new thick oceanic crust formed along the syncline in central Lake Superior, generating
the western rift arm. However, magmatism and breakup terminated shortly after as a result of
Grenvillian compression, evidenced by the Magmatic Unconformity (MU).
During the Main stage, active upwelling and anomalously thick oceanic crust formation
was highest on the crustal ridge (black dash-dot line, Figure 2D), measured at line A, just north
of the WA block (purple arrow, Figure 2D) and decreasing toward line C (purple arrow). Further
west, at St Croix, upwelling rates approach unity and no oceanic crust formation took place.
Pulsing and waning of the plume stem/conduit through time (Figure 2) is recorded in the
unconformities, suggesting a drop in potential temperature and upwelling rate around BU time
(Latent stage) (Figure 2C).

69

�Figure 1: A. Geological map with seismic lines (red). Numbering refers to onshore geological sections. B.
Gravity map. Abbreviations: MB Marquette Basin, KP Keweenaw Peninsula, HVB High Velocity Body.

Figure 2: Tectono-magmatic evolution. South shore (between yellow cubes) is mobile, North shore is kept
fixed. EPC Early Plume center, LPC Latent Plume Center, MPC Main Plume Center.

REFERENCES
Foster, A., Darbyshire, F., and Schaeffer, A., 2020. Anisotropic structure of the central North American
Craton surrounding the Mid-Continent Rift: evidence from Rayleigh waves. Precambrian Research,
342: 105662.
Shay, J., and Trehu, A., 1993. Crustal structure of the central graben of the Midcontinent Rift beneath
Lake Superior. Tectonophysics, 225: 301-335.

70

�Constraining the timing of crustal exhumation following the Penokean orogeny using U-Pb,
Sm-Nd, and Lu-Hf geochronology and microstructural analysis
SALERNO, R.,1 CANNON, W.F.,1 SOUDERS, A.,2 THOMPSON, J. M.,2 VERVOORT, J.,3
1
U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA 20192, 2U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO 80225, 3Washington
State University, Pullman, WA 99164.
Precambrian terranes in the Lake Superior region have complex igneous, metamorphic,
and deformational histories spanning the Eoarchean to the Neoproterozoic. In this sequence, the
Penokean orogeny (1880–1830 Ma) is the first collisional event in a long-lived subduction system
on Laurentia’s southern margin, marking a transition in the style of Laurentian assembly from the
amalgamation of disparate Archean cratons to growth by accretion of juvenile arcs. The
metamorphic and structural history of the corridor of Archean gneiss domes south of Lake Superior
is typically attributed to the Penokean orogeny. However, recent 40Ar/39Ar geochronology calls
this relationship into question as ~1760 Ma cooling ages across the region indicate the deformation
and metamorphism coincident with dome uplift is markedly younger (Schneider et al., 2004;
Tinkham and Marshak, 2004; Holm et al., 2005; Schulz and Cannon, 2007). To correctly
distinguish the effects of the Penokean orogeny and more accurately reconstruct the
Paleoproterozoic tectonic history of the Upper Midwest, we present new U-Pb, Sm-Nd, and LuHf geochronology and microstructural analyses for a suite of metamorphosed and deformed rocks
within and adjacent to several gneiss domes (Fig. 1).
Titanite U-Pb ages and trace element compositions reflect Archean metamorphism at
2550 ± 46 Ma (2SE), and variable degrees of recrystallization in the Paleoproterozoic (Fig. 2).
Apatite and monazite U-Pb ages, along with garnet Lu-Hf ages of metamorphosed supracrustal
rocks directly outside of domes, record the onset of peak conditions by 1837 ± 7 Ma that continued
beyond the end of the Penokean orogeny until 1782 ± 15 Ma. The garnet Sm-Nd ages of several
samples are ~70 Ma younger than the Lu-Hf ages, reflecting a period of cooling and exhumation
between 1752 ± 10 and 1738 ± 9 Ma. This exhumation interval overlaps with the U-Pb ages of synkinematic titanite at 1713 ± 32 Ma and the 1750 ± 6 Ma Lu-Hf age of re-equilibrated pre-kinematic
garnets. U-Pb ages of apatite in one sample reflect much later reheating of the system at 1592 ± 26
Ma. These data show that deformation and metamorphism related to the uplift of gneiss domes in
the Lake Superior region can only be partially linked to tectonic events between 1880–1830 Ma.
Peak metamorphic conditions lasting until 1782 Ma indicate the persistence of thick orogenic crust
well after the end of the Penokean orogeny—perhaps supported by continued convergence or an
unrecognized collisional event along the margin. Exhumation beginning at 1752 Ma coincided
with subduction farther south during the Yavapai orogeny (1760-1720 Ma), whereas uplift may be
related to crustal extension above the downgoing slab, aided in part by gravitational forces acting
on overthickened crust. Extension during this time would also have played a role in the generation
and spatial accommodation of Yavapai-age granite intrusions across the region (e.g., East-Central
Minnesota batholith). The youngest apatite U-Pb age at 1592 Ma likely represents distal thermal
effects of the Mazatzal orogeny (1650–1600 Ma) farther south. These data reveal the gneiss dome
structures in the Upper Midwest are the result of a protracted history including several
Paleoproterozoic metamorphic, deformational, and uplift events spanning more than 70 m.y..

71

�Figure 1: Left, geologic
map showing gneiss
domes in northern
Michigan with
geochronology sample
sites. Cities shown –
Marquette (M),
Watersmeet (W),
Republic (R), and
Hardwood (H). Modified
from Tinkham and
Marshak (2004).

Figure 2: Right, ages at 2SE
precision. Vertical bars represent
the timing of the Sacred Heart
(S), Penokean (P), Yavapai (Y),
and Mazatzal (M) orogenies.
Hatched fields represent
durations of metamorphic
prograde and cooling intervals.
Sm-Nd ages of UPMI 10 23 and
UPMI 8 23 have high
uncertainties from mineral
inclusions that could not be
removed prior to analyses and
therefore are not used to define
the duration of the cooling
interval. Diagrams below show
the Archean-Mesoproterozoic
tectonic evolution of southern
Laurentia. Yellow star shows
study area location.

REFERENCES
Holm. D., Van Schmus, W., MacNeill, L., Boerboom, T., Schweitzer, D., Schneider, D., 2005, U-Pb zircon
geochronology of Paleoproterozoic plutons from the northern mid-continent, USA: Evidence for
subduction flip and continued convergence after geon 18 Penokean orogenesis: Geol. Soc. Am. Bull.
117, 259-275.
Schneider. S., Holm. D., O’Boyle. C., Hamilton. M., Jercinovic. M., 2004, Paleoproterozoic development
of a gneiss dome corridor in the southern Lake Superior region, USA: GSA Special Paper 380, 339357.
Schulz. K., Cannon. W., 2007, The Penokean orogeny in the Lake Superior Region: Precambrian Research,
157, 4-5.
Tinkham. D., Marshak. S., 2004, Precambrian dome and keel structure in the Penokean orogenic belt of
northern Michigan, USA: GSA Special Paper 380, 321-338.

72

�Identifying Abandoned Mine Surficial Features Using Mask R-CNN, Upper Peninsula
Michigan.
SHALIFOE, MaryElizabeth1, VOICE, Peter1
1
Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences and Michigan Geological Survey, Western
Michigan University, 1903 W Michigan Ave, Kalamazoo MI, 49008-5241, USA

From the 1840s to the 1980s, iron, and copper mining in Michigan's Upper Peninsula
thrived, leaving behind numerous surficial features from the early underground mining practices.
Even today the Eagle Mine located in Marquette County is still active Mining both copper and
nickel. Today's demand for rare earth minerals has sparked interest in exploring locations near
these primary ores including the tailing piles (Demas A., 2023). Mapping old mine features using
optical satellite imagery is challenging in Michigan's Upper Peninsula due to dense vegetation and
snow cover – instead we need to use techniques that allow us to see through this cover.
This study aims to assess the performance of object detection Deep Learning Models
(DLMs) in mapping potential mine features using high-resolution terrain data (LIDAR-derived 1meter Digital Elevation Models) produced through the 3D Elevation Program. Dickinson County
was chosen as the study area due to its rich history of 52 known abandoned mines within the East
Menominee Iron Range (Figure 1). This study targeted various features, such as prospect pits, open
pits, lateral ditches, and waste piles, resulting in a total of 946 identified features used for training
the DLMs.
The object detection methods available within ArcGIS software were evaluated including
Feature Classifier, Faster R-CNN, and Mask R-CNN. Our initial evaluation has shown that Mask
R-CNN performed better than the other methods, due to the Mask R-CNN method that enables
pixel-level segmentation in addition to object detection (Maxwell A. E., et al., 2020. Our ongoing
work is focused on the refinement of the model parameters to better locate surface features related
to historic mining. Once the model is completed, it will be tested on various locations in northern
Michigan within the mining ranges of the Marquette Iron Range, Menominee Iron Range, Gogebic
Iron Range, and the Copper Ranges within Ontonagon and through the Keweenaw. This will then
be ground-truthed, by going out into the field to verify the locations of the features or using
historical topographic maps to verify the existence of features that may be inaccessible.
REFERENCES

Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy, (2024) EGLE Geowebface; mining and minerals,
State of Michigan, https://www.egle.state.mi.us/geowebface/#btnToolNavInfo
Demas A. (2023). Bipartisan Infrastructure Law Funds Geologic Mapping in Michigan, by Bipartisan
Infrastructure Law Investments, USGS, https://www.usgs.gov/special-topics/bipartisaninfrastructure-law-investments/news/bipartisan-infrastructure-law-funds-6
Maxwell, A. E., Pourmohammadi, P., &amp; Poyner, J. D. (2020). Mapping the Topographic Features of
Mining-Related Valley Fills Using Mask R-CNN Deep Learning and Digital Elevation Data.
Remote Sensing, 12(3), 547. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12030547

73

�Figure 1: Study Area in Dickinson County, showing the distribution of underground mines (Department
of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy, 2024).

Figure 2: Mine Features located near East Central Vulcan Mine in Dickinson County, DEM sourced
USGS TNM, 2016. (Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy, 2024).

74

�Basaltic rocks of the Animikie Group in Ontario: Geochemical characteristics and tectonic
significance
SMYK, Mark1,3, HOLLINGS, Pete1, METSARANTA, Riku2, CUNDARI, Robert3, KISSIN,
Stephen1 and KURCINKA, Colleen3
1
Department of Geology, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Road, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1 Canada
2
Ontario Geological Survey, Ministry of Mines, 933 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, ON P3E 6B5 Canada
3
Ontario Geological Survey, Ministry of Mines, 435 James St. South, Thunder Bay, ON P7E 6S7 Canada

The Paleoproterozoic Animikie Group in Ontario records a history of continental sedimentation
and minor volcanism on the southern margin of the Superior Craton between ca. 1.88 Ga and
1.82 Ga. Both the chemical sedimentary rock-dominated Gunflint Formation and overlying,
siliciclastic sedimentary rock-dominated Rove Formation contain significant intervals of tuffs
and basalt flows. Copper-bearing amygdaloidal basalts were noted in Crooks and Blake
townships (Coleman 1900); basalt flows and tuffs were identified by Gill (1925) and Goodwin
(1960) in the Mink Mountain area, and by Tanton (1931) in Oliver Township. Tanton (1936)
mapped “Rove basalt” in Devon Township. In 2022, a 774 m diamond drill hole (DDH ST-2201), completed by Metal Energy Corp. in Hartington Township, provided a complete section
from Rove Formation into Archean basement. New geochemical, petrographic and stratigraphic
data gleaned from this drill core and recent field work have provided insights into the nature of
the basaltic rocks.
The lowermost volcanic unit occurs in the middle of the Gunflint Formation, exposed near Mink
Mountain; its base is ~53 m above Archean basement. Approximately 21 m thick, it consists of
several distinctive, typically massive, locally pillowed, vesicular/spherulitic basalt flows. An
isolated outcrop of amygdaloidal basalt in Oliver Township, approximately 40 km northeast of
Mink Mountain, shares similar petrographic characteristics, stratigraphic position and
geochemistry. Limited geochemical data gleaned from amygdaloidal basalts in Crooks Township
are similar to those of the aforementioned Gunflint lavas. Further work is required to elucidate
the nature and stratigraphic position of these flows.
Basaltic flows, exposed on top of Rove shales and wackes in Devon Township (Cundari, 2010)
had recently been considered part of the Mesoproterozoic Midcontinent Rift, based mainly on a
Keweenawan reversed paleomagnetic mean direction and equivocal stratigraphic constraints
(Cundari et al., 2012). However, a mafic interval, approximately 510 m above Archean basement
and ~4 m thick, occurs within DDH ST-22-01 and displays a variolitic, chilled basal contact and
spherulitic, vesicle-like features, similar to those displayed by the lowermost Devon flows.
Similar trace element geochemistry further supports the contention that the mafic rocks
intersected in drilling may be correlative with the Devon basalts and with other, similar rocks
exposed in an isolated outcrop in Hardwick Township, ~30 km northwest of the Devon basalts.
The Gunflint basalts are characterized by moderate La/SmCN ratios (~1.9 to 3.9), negative Nb-Ta
and Ti anomalies and relatively flat Gd/YbCN ratios (~1.3 to 1.7). The Devon basalts are
characterized by moderate La/SmCN ratios (~2.8 to 3.5), negative Nb and Ti anomalies and
moderate Gd/YbCN ratios (~3.0-3.6).
In a Penokean tectonic context, the Gunflint basalts may represent limited back-arc volcanism
(cf. Kissin and Fralick, 1994), contemporaneous with the older phase of volcanism in the
Pembine domain of the Pembine-Wausau terrane (PWT; ca. 1875 Ma, Zi et al. 2022). The Devon
basalts may represent relatively deeply sourced, crustally contaminated, OIB-like magmas
generated after ca. 1840 Ma, at the same time as renewed volcanism in the PWT.

75

�REFERENCES

Coleman, A.P. 1900. Copper and iron regions of Ontario; in Ninth Report of the Bureau of Mines, 1900;
Ontario Bureau of Mines, Annual Report, pp.143-191.
Cundari, R. 2010. Geology and Geochemistry of the Devon volcanics, south of Thunder Bay, Ontario;
unpublished HBSc. thesis, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, 68p.
Cundari R., Piispa, E., Smirnov, A.V., Pesonen, L.J., Hollings P. and Smyk, M. 2012. Geochemistry and
paleomagnetism of the Devon township basalt, Ontario, Canada; in Mertanen, S., Pesonen, L. J. and
Sangchan, P. (eds.). Supercontinent Symposium 2012 – Programme and Abstracts; Geological
Survey of Finland, Espoo, Finland, p.30-31.
Gill, J. E. 1925. Gunflint iron-bearing formation; Geological Survey of Canada, Summary Report 1924,
pt.C, pp.28-88; https://doi.org/10.4095/103167.
Goodwin, A.M. 1960. Gunflint iron formation of the Whitefish Lake area; Ontario Department of Mines,
Annual Report, vol.69, pt.7, pp.41-63.
Kissin, S.A. and Fralick, P.W. 1994. Early Proterozoic volcanics of the Animikie Group, Ontario and
Michigan, and their tectonic significance; 40th annual Institute on Lake Superior Geology,
Houghton, MI, Proceedings, vol.40, pp.18-19.
Tanton, T.L. 1936. Pigeon River area, Thunder Bay District; Geological Survey of Canada, Map 354A,
sheet 1, scale 1:63 360; https://doi.org/10.4095/107549.
Tanton, T. L. 1931. Fort William and Port Arthur, and Thunder Cape map areas, Thunder Bay District,
Ontario; Geological Survey of Canada, Memoir, 167, 222. https://doi.org/10.4095/100799.
Zi, J.-W., Sheppard, S., Muhling, J.R. and Rasmussen, B. 2021. Refining the Paleoproterozoic
tectonothermal history of the Penokean Orogen: New U-Pb age constraints from the PembineWausau terrane, Wisconsin, USA; GSA Bulletin; March/April 2022; v. 134; no. 3/4; p. 776–790;
https://doi.org/10.1130/B36114.1; 8 figures; 1 supplemental file. published online 1 July 2021.

76

�Sedimentologic and geochemical evidence of marine incursion to the Oronto Group basin,
southern Lake Superior region, at ca. 1.08 Ga
STEWART, Esther K.1, 2, TAPPA, Michael 1, BAUER, Ann1, BRENGMAN, Latisha3, and
PRAVE, Anthony 4
1
Department of Geoscience, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53705
2
Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey, University of Wisconsin-Madison Division of
Extension, Madison, Wisconsin 53705
3
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Minnesota-Duluth, Duluth, Minnesota
55812
4
School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of St. Andrews KY16 9TS, Scotland/UK

The late Mesoproterozoic Oronto Group (Copper Harbor Conglomerate, Nonesuch, and
Freda Formations), Wisconsin and Michigan, preserves a continuous record of depositional
environment and related microbial habitat. Over three kilometers of siliciclastic sediments with
minor authigenic, molar tooth calcite record physical and biogeochemical processes acting
within the Oronto Group basin at the time of deposition and early diagenesis. Combined
sedimentologic and geochemical evidence motivates reevaluation and refinement of evolving
depositional conditions (Stewart, 2025). Sedimentary facies indicate a shallow marine, tidal
influence on deposition, requiring marine incursion to the Laurentian interior at ca. 1.08 Ga
(Stewart et al., 2024). The degree of marine connectivity is investigated using C, O, and Rb-Sr
isotope compositions of calcite microspar in molar tooth structures and carbonate laminae of the
Nonesuch Formation. Molar tooth structures and laminae were milled from thick sections, and
one split of sample powder was analyzed for C and O isotopes while the other underwent a
multistep chemical separation process to isolate Rb-Sr isotopes from calcite. Carbon isotope
(δ13C) values (-3.9 to -2.0‰) of earliest diagenetic calcite reflect organic matter remineralization
driven by in situ microbial carbon cycling (e.g. Gilleaudeau and Kah, 2013). Values of δ18O (-6.7
to -3.6‰) measured in the calcite microspar of molar tooth structures overlap the isotopic
signature of marine carbonates from other late Mesoproterozoic evaporative marine basins (e.g.
Kah, 2000). The 87Sr/86Sr of least-altered calcite (~0.7068 to 0.7069) reflects marine mixing with
continental runoff. Combined, these data reflect deposition within a restricted-marine epeiric
setting. In addition to isotopic evidence for marine connectivity, conditions of salinity, redox,
and productivity are evaluated using whole rock geochemistry of fine-grained siliciclastics and
rare earth element + yttrium (REY) distributions of calcite microspar. Whole rock geochemistry
was compiled from published sources and new data was collected from two cores in Wisconsin.
Calcite REY distributions were analyzed from aliquots of the same sample material processed
for Rb-Sr isotopes. Shale geochemistry, including Mo and U enrichment and stratigraphic trends
in proxies for detrital input (Zr, Al), redox (S, TOC) and productivity (Ba, P) reveal deposition
within an oxidized basin with a deep, fluctuating chemocline and expansion of anoxic and
euxinic conditions during maximum flooding and base level lowstand. REY distributions of
calcite microspar preserve an early diagenetic estuarine signal characterized by muted, positive
La and Y/Ho anomalies and heavy REE enrichment. Shale geochemistry and carbonate REY
distributions bring into focus the prevalence of particle shuttling between the water column and
shallow sediments that likely enhanced and focused nutrient P bioavailability, analogous to
modern estuarine nutrient cycling. Collectively, these data provide a richer understanding of late
Mesoproterozoic environmental conditions that influenced early eukaryote ecology.

77

�Figure 1: Images from core (A, C-D, F) and thin section (B, E) of the Nonesuch Formation highlighting
sedimentary structures indicative of tidal influence and molar tooth calcite microspar targeted for
geochemistry. A &amp; C: photos and line drawings showing close association of fine-grained sandstone
(light color) and shale (dark color). Note mud drapes on bi-directional ripple laminae (red arrows, A),
flame structures (red arrow, C), and structureless mud layers indicative of fluid mud deposits. B:
Photomicrograph (cross-polarized light) showing bedding deflecting around molar tooth structure
(arrow) and brittle deformation of molar tooth structures (1 displaced from 2). D: molar tooth structure
(MT) cross-cutting carbonate-rich layers (CR) in drill core. E: Photomicrograph (plane-polarized light)
highlighting characteristic molar tooth microspar texture. F: Core photo showing ~2 cm diameter mud
ball with subangular rhyolite clast at its core. Scale bars are 1 cm unless otherwise noted.

REFERENCES
Gilleaudeau, G. J., and Kah, L. C., 2013. Carbon isotope records in a Mesoproterozoic epicratonic sea:
carbon cycling in a low-oxygen world. Precambrian Research, 228, 85-101.
Kah, L. C., 2000. Depositional δ18O signatures in Proterozoic dolostones: constraints on seawater
chemistry and early diagenesis. SEPM Special Publication 67, 346 – 360.
Stewart, E. K., Bauer, A. M., and Prave, A. R., 2024. End-Mesoproterozoic (ca. 1.08 Ga) epeiric seaway
of the Nonesuch Formation, Wisconsin and Michigan, USA. Geological Society of America
Bulletin, 136, 7-8, 2940-2960. https://doi.org/10.1130/B37060.1
Stewart, E.K., 2025. Sedimentologic and geochemical markers of marine incursion to the interior
Laurentian Oronto Group basin at ca. 1.08 Ga. Ph.D. dissertation, University of WisconsinMadison.

78

�Midcontinent Rift extension ceased and the rift inverted due to the Grenvillian orogeny
1
2
3
SWANSON-HYSELL, Nicholas , HODGIN, Eben B. , ALEMU, Tadesse , FUENTES,
4
2
5
4
Anthony , ZHANG, Yiming , SLOTZNICK, Sarah and FAIRCHILD, Luke
1

Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
Department of Earth, Environmental and Planetary Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
3
Department of Geology and Environmental Science, University of Wisconsin, Eau Claire, WI, USA
4
Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
5
Department of Earth Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
2

The cessation of rifting within the Midcontinent Rift was a key event in the evolution of the Lake
Superior region. If rifting had continued and led to the formation of an ocean basin, the
subsequent geologic and paleogeographic history would have been profoundly different. In a
1994 paper, Bill Cannon used emerging geochronology from the Midcontinent Rift and the
Grenville orogen to conclude that the closing of the Midcontinent Rift was a far-field effect of
compression associated with the Grenvillian orogeny (Cannon, 1994). An alternative proposal
was put forward by Stein et al. (2014) who proposed that the Midcontinent Rift is an abandoned
rift segment associated with successful rifting along Laurentia’s margin. In this contribution, we
leverage improved chronostratigraphy within the volcanics and sedimentary rocks of the
Midcontinent Rift (e.g. Fairchild et al., 2017; Hodgin et al., 2024) combined with rich new
records of metamorphic chronology associated with the Grenvillian orogeny (reviewed in
Swanson-Hysell et al., 2023) to revisit this question and gain fresh insight.
The transition from active rift extension to post-rift thermal subsidence is recorded by the
Brownstone Falls angular unconformity in northern Wisconsin. The thinning of the Copper
Harbor Conglomerate from &gt;2,200 m thick on the Keweenaw Peninsula of Michigan to pinching
out against the unconformity implies topographic relief at the onset of post-rift sedimentation
that is comparable to that in the modern-day East African rift. The end of active extension (ca.
1090 to 1085 Ma) is coincident with early prograde metamorphism associated with the
Grenvillian orogeny, whose metamorphic imprint extends from the Blue Ridge inliers of the
eastern US up through the Grenville Province of eastern Canada. This timing is consistent with
the onset of continent-continent collision resulting in the cessation of extension in the rift.

Figure 1: The start and end of Midcontinent Rift extension compared with U-Pb dates from Grenville
Province metamorphic chronometers (blue diamonds: zircon; red pentagons: monazite). The rift
developed during an interval of tectonic quiescence on the margin. Extension ceased with the onset of
the Grenvillian orogeny and the rift contractionally inverted during the peak of the Ottawan stage.

79

�Following the end of Midcontinent Rift extension, deposition of the Oronto Group continued
until ca. 1045 Ma (Hodgin et al., 2024; Fuentes et al, in review). This deposition resulted from
post-rift thermal subsidence prior to contractional deformation associated with the Grenvillian
orogeny propagating into the continental interior. Paleomagnetic records from the Oronto Group,
including recently published data from the Nonesuch Formation (Slotznick et al., 2024) and new
unpublished data from the upper Freda Formation, reveal that Laurentia’s plate motion
dramatically slowed coincident with the onset of Grenvillian orogenesis. Preceding rapid motion
was associated with ocean basin closure leading up to continent-continent collision that changed
the force balance and slowed the plate.
Oronto Group deposition ended when contractional deformation associated with the Grenvillian
orogeny propagated into the Midcontinent. This deformation occurred in two phases with major
exhumation occurring during the peak of the Ottawan phase of the Grenvillian orogeny and a
second more minor phase of ca. 1000 to 980 Ma contraction associated with the Rigolet phase
(Hodgin et al., 2024). This final interval of contraction is associated with the ca. 990 Ma
deposition of the Jacobsville-Bayfield Group (Hodgin et al., 2022; Alemu et al., 2023).
Following 130 Myr of tectonic excitement from ca. 1110 to 980 Ma, stability returned to
Laurentia’s Midcontinent region. While the comings and goings of inland seas and the
occasional impact crater have left their mark on the geological record, there has been only very
minor tectonism over the past billion years.
REFERENCES

Alemu, T.B., Hodgin, E.B., and Swanson-Hysell, N.L., 2023. Grooving in the midcontinent: A tectonic
origin for the mysterious striations of L’Anse Bay, Michigan, USA. Geosphere, 19(5), 1291–1299.
Cannon, W.F., 1994. Closing of the Midcontinent Rift—A far-field effect of Grenvillian compression.
Geology, 22(2), 155–158.
Fairchild, L.M., Swanson-Hysell, N.L., Ramezani, J., Sprain, C.J., and Bowring, S.A., 2017. The end of
Midcontinent Rift magmatism and the paleogeography of Laurentia. Lithosphere, 9(1), 117–133.
Hodgin, E.B., Swanson-Hysell, N.L., DeGraff, J.M., Kylander-Clark, A.R.C., Schmitz, M.D., Turner,
A.C., Zhang, Y., and Stolper, D.A., 2022. Final inversion of the Midcontinent Rift during the
Rigolet Phase of the Grenvillian orogeny. Geology, 50(5), 547–551.
Hodgin, E.B., Swanson-Hysell, N.L., Kylander-Clark, A.R.C., Turner, A.C., Stolper, D.A., Ibarra, D.E.,
Schmitz, M.D., Zhang, Y., Fairchild, L.M., and Fuentes, A.J., 2024. One billion years of stability in
the North American Midcontinent following two-stage Grenvillian structural inversion. Tectonics,
43(9).
Slotznick, S.P., Swanson-Hysell, N.L., Zhang, Y., Clayton, K.E., Wellman, C.H., Tosca, N.J., and
Strother, P.K., 2024. Reconstructing the paleoenvironment of an oxygenated Mesoproterozoic
shoreline and its record of life. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 136(3–4), 1628–1642.
Stein, C.A., Stein, S., Merino, M., Keller, R.G., Flesch, L.M., and Jurdy, D.M., 2014. Was the
Midcontinent Rift part of a successful seafloor-spreading episode? Geophysical Research Letters,
41(5), 1465–1470.
Swanson-Hysell, N.L., Rivers, T., and van der Lee, S., 2023. The late Mesoproterozoic to early
Neoproterozoic Grenvillian orogeny and the assembly of Rodinia: Turning point in the tectonic
evolution of Laurentia. In: Whitmeyer, S.J., Kellett, D.A., Tikoff, B., and Williams, M.L. (Eds.),
Laurentia: Turning Points in the Evolution of a Continent. Geological Society of America Memoir
220, 337–356.

80

�Ni-Cu-PGE Mineralization at the Mineral Lake Intrusive Complex, northern Wisconsin
THOMPSON, Bekah R. 1, LODGE, Robert W.D.1
1
Department of Geology &amp; Environmental Science, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, 105 Garfield
Avenue, Eau Claire, WI 54701, USA

The Mineral Lake Intrusive Complex (MLIC), near Mellen, Wisconsin, is a 1.1 Ga
layered and differentiated mafic intrusive complex within the Mesoproterozoic Mid-Continent
Rift in the Lake Superior region (Siefert et al., 1992). This intrusive complex hosts Ni-Cu-PGE
mineralization discovered in the 1960’s via electromagnetic geophysical surveys and at least 16
drill holes were completed (Bakheit, 1981). With an increase in demand for domestic critical
minerals to supply metals for energy, communication, and military infrastructure, underexplored
prospects like the Mineral Lake Ni-Cu-PGE prospect are increasingly important. This project
aims to describe the mineralogy of the sulfide inclusions and the host intrusion geochemistry to
better understand the geological characteristics of PGE-mineralization within the MLIC.
Two drill holes were re-logged (WIS-12 and WIS-11), totaling ~950 linear feet of core,
and sixteen samples were collected from representative intrusive phases and mineralization
types. Micron-scale PGE-bearing mineral phases are described using the SEM-EDS. Whole rock
geochemistry of the MLIC was completed via X-ray Fluorescence (WD-XRF). Silicate and
sulfide mineralogy was determined by transmitted and reflected light petrography.
Mineralization is hosted in either medium-grained, equigranular olivine gabbro, olivine
norite and troctolite phases of the intrusion and are found as mm-scale sulfide segregations
composing 1-10% of the rock. Weak foliation and alteration along fractures are observed along
brittle-ductile shears resulting in serpentinization of olivine. Contacts between intrusive phases
are generally gradational over a few centimeters. Sulfide inclusions contain varying amounts of
chalcopyrite, pyrrhotite, and pentlandite and are not obviously correlated with any specific
intrusive phase. Graphite, both fracture-associated and matrix-associated, were observed in the
Troctolite and Olivine norite phases.
Sulfide inclusions are comprised of primarily pyrrhotite with variable amounts of
chalcopyrite and pentlandite. Analysis on the SEM-EDS has shown PGE mineralization is
commonly hosted as micron-scale inclusions within pyrrhotite and pentlandite. These PGEbearing mineral phases include rhenium-bearing molybdenite (Mo,Re)S2, padmaite (PdBiSe)
(found within silicates), argentopentlandite Ag(Fe,Ni)8S8 , sperrylite (PtAs2), rhenite (ReS2),
naldrettite (Pd2Sb). PGE minerals are typically ~5 microns. Notably large, 30-micron sperrylite
(PtAs2) grains and 25-micron rhenite (ReS2) grains were observed (Figures 1C and 1D). PGE’s
are most abundant hosted in sulfide minerals whereas the notable critical elements (Bi, Mo, Sb,
Te, Ob, Se) tend to be hosted in the silicates.
These results are comparable to other conduit-type and contact-type MCR intrusions,
although the age of the MLIC is coeval with contact-type mineralization. Dunka road of the
Duluth complex is a contact type Ni-Cu-PGE sulfide deposit. Phases include norite-hosted
disseminated sulfides, troctolite-hosted disseminated sulfides, PGE-rich disseminated sulfides,
and chalcopyrite rich disseminated sulfides (Theriault and Barnes, 1998). Since the MLIC is a
large, differentiated intrusion that is coeval with other contact-type mineralization in the MCR,
future exploration efforts and research should focus on the lower parts of the intrusion where
dense sulfides may accumulate.

81

�Figure 1. (A) Regional map of Mineral Lake area. Map modified from Cannon and Ottke (1999). Inset
map from Mudrey &amp; Brown (1982). (B) Rhenium-bearing molybdenite (Mo,Re)S2 (white) under SEMEDS, (C) Rhenite (ReS2) (white) under SEM-EDS, (D) Sperrylite (PtAs2) under SEM-EDS (white).

REFERENCES

Bakheit, A.K., 1981. Petrography of Cu-Ni mineralization in the Mineral Lake area, Ashland County,
Wisconsin. Unpublished M.S. thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Cannon, W.F. and Ottke, D., 1999. Preliminary digital geologic map of the Penokean (Early Proterozoic)
continental margin in northern Michigan and Wisconsin (No. 99-547). The Geological Survey of
America.
Middlemost EAK (1994) Naming materials in the magma/igneous rocks system. Earth Sci Rev 37:215–
224. doi:10.1016/0012-8252(94)90029-9
Siefert, K.E., Peterman, Z.E., Thieben, S.E. 1992. Possible crustal contamination of the Midcontinent Rift
igneous rocks: examples from the Mineral Lake intrusions, Wisconsin. Canadian Journal of Earth
Science, 29. 1140-1153.
Thériault, R.D., Barnes, S.-J., 1998. Compositional variations in Cu-Ni-PGE sulfides of the Dunka Road
deposit, Duluth complex, Minnesota: the importance of combined assimilation and magmatic
processes. Can. Mineral. 36, 869–886

82

�A Porphyry in a Rift? Constraining the Petrogenesis of the Jogran Porphyry, Mamainse
Point, Ontario, Canada: Insights from Zircon and Melt Inclusion Geochemistry.
TOLLEY, James1, HANLEY, Jacob2, CROWLEY, James3, TSAY Sasha4, ZAJACZ Zoltan4,
and HOLLINGS, Pete1
1

Department of Geology, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Road, Thunder Bay, ON, P7B 5E1, Canada.
Department of Geology, Saint Mary’s University, 923 Robie Street, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3L 2Y5,
Canada.
3
Isotope Geology Lab, Department of Geosciences, Boise State University, 1910 University Drive, Boise,
Idaho, 83725-1535, USA.
4
Department of Earth Sciences, University of Geneva, Rue des Maraichers 13, Geneva, 1205,
Switzerland.
2

The Jogran quartz-monzonite porphyry, located near Mamainse Point, Ontario, Canada, on
the northeastern shoulder of the ~1.1 Ga Midcontinent Rift System (MRS), hosts unique porphyrystyle Cu-(Mo) mineralization in an intra-plate, rift-related large igneous province setting (Perelló
et al., 2020). Combining high precision zircon geochronology with zircon and melt inclusion (MI)
geochemistry refines the timing of emplacement and offers constraints on the crystallization
temperature, oxygen fugacity (fO2), and melt composition (including ore metal tenor) during the
magmatic evolution of the deposit.
A new high precision 206Pb/238U zircon age of 1090.90 ± 1.27 Ma (CA-TIMS) constrains
the formation of the Jogran porphyry to the waning of the main Rift Stage (1102-1090 Ma) and
synchronous with the transition to the Late-Rift stage (1090-1083 Ma), as defined by Woodruff et
al., (2020). Zircon geothermometry (Crisp et al., 2023) and oxybarometry (Loucks et al., 2020)
suggest crystallisation conditions of 900-670 °C and a fO2 range of ∆FMQ = -1.3 to +0.6. As
temperatures decrease, ΔFMQ values increase along a trend subparallel to the SO₂-H₂S buffer. The
presence of sulfide inclusions in zircon, confirms sulfide saturation during crystallization.
The analysed zircon crystals are zoned. They display an increase in [Yb/Gd]n ratios (1220) and concomitant depletion in Th/U (1.0-0.4) in the rims relative to the cores ([Yb/Gd]n = &lt;12;
[Th/U] = &gt;1). This zonation infers that the parental magma underwent a single stage of
fractionation and crystallisation upon emplacement. Melt inclusions (MIs) range in composition
from 65-70 wt.% SiO₂ with 5.5-8.3 wt.% K₂O and K₂O/Na₂O ratios of ~1.5-3.5, suggesting the
parental melt was alkalic to shoshonitic. Low Cs concentrations, coupled with high Rb, Ba, and
Nb, in MIs indicate minimal crystal fractionation of a near-primitive, mantle-derived composition.
In contrast, whole-rock data show lower alkali contents (4.0 wt.% K2O) and have a subalkalic
affinity, suggesting crustal contamination or alteration obscured the primitive magmatic signature.
A new, precise U-Pb zircon age constrains the felsic magmatism and porphyry-style
mineralization at Jogran to the period of maximum lithospheric weakening/crustal thinning during
the shift from extensional tectonics to thermal subsidence in the late stages of the MRS. This study
suggests that early partitioning of metals and sulfur into magmatic fluids played a key role in ore
formation. However, the conditions required remain ambiguous, as the tectonic environment at
Jogran differs markedly from the subduction-related settings upon which most porphyry models
are based. Porphyry deposits are increasingly recognised across a broader range of tectonic settings
(e.g., southeast China [Richards, 2021]; and central Europe [Drew, 2006]). Jogran highlights the
potential for porphyry-style mineralisation in non-subduction tectonic contexts and underscores
the need to better understand metallogenic pathways beyond the traditional subduction models.

83

�Quartz-Feldspar Porphyry (K-Ar)

1

Tribag Breccia (K-Ar)

2

Mamainse Point Rhyolites (Rb-Sr)

3

Mamainse Point Volcanics (U-Pb)

4

Mamainse Point Tuff (U-Pb)

5

Jogran Porphyry

Error bars represent the
reported uncertainties
in respective studies.

Satellite Mineralisation (Re-Os)

6

Porphyry Stock Mineralisation (Re-Os)

6

References
1
Norman and Sawkins (1985)
2
Roscoe (1965)
3
Van Schmus (1971)
4
Davies et al. (1995)
5
Swanson-Hysell et al. (2014)
6
Perelló et al. (2020)

Figure 1: New U-Pb zircon age (1090.90 ± 1.27 Ma) for the Jogran porphyry (diamond), published age
data (circles) and MRS stages defined by Woodruff et al., (2020) – Early (green), 1109–1104 Ma; Latent
(orange), 1104–1098 Ma; Main (blue), 1098–1090 Ma; and Late (purple), 1090–1083 Ma.

REFERENCES

Drew, L.J. (2005). A tectonic model for the spatial occurrence of porphyry copper and polymetallic vein
deposits - Applications to central Europe: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report
2005-5272.
Crisp, L. J., Berry, A. J., Burnham, A. D., Miller, L. A. &amp; Newville, M. (2023). The Ti-in-zircon
thermometer revised: The effect of pressure on the Ti site in zircon. Geochimica et Cosmochimica
Acta 360, 241–258.
Loucks, R. R., Fiorentini, M. L. &amp; Henríquez, G. J. (2020). New magmatic oxybarometer using trace
elements in zircon. Journal of Petrology, 61, egaa034.
Perelló, J., Sillitoe, R. H. &amp; Creaser, R. A. (2020). Mesoproterozoic porphyry copper mineralization at
Mamainse Point, Ontario, Canada in the context of Midcontinent rift metallogeny. Ore Geology
Reviews, 127, 103831.
Richards, J.P, (2021). Porphyry copper deposit formation in arcs: What are the odds? Geosphere, 18, 130–
155.
Woodruff, L. G., Schulz, K. J., Nicholson, S. W., and Dicken, C. L. (2020). Mineral deposits of the
Mesoproterozoic Midcontinent Rift system in the Lake Superior region - A space and time
classification. Ore Geology Reviews, 126, 103716.

84

�Evaluating Ni in Olivine as a Prospectivity Indicator for Magmatic Ni-Cu-(PGE) Deposits:
A Preliminary Study from the Midcontinent Rift System.
TOLLEY, James1, HOLLINGS, Pete1, MEXIA DURAN, Kevin1 and HARDING, Myles1
1
Department of Geology, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Road, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1, Canada.

Nickel content of olivine [(Mg,Fe)2SiO4] can serve as an important petrogenetic marker in
mafic igneous systems. Nickel’s concentration in olivine is controlled by several factors,
including: (1) the Ni content of the parental magma; (2) the partition coefficient of Ni between
olivine and the silicate melt; and (3) variable parameters such as temperature, pressure and fO2 of
the melt (Li et al., 2007). More recently, Ni content in olivine has been studied as a potential
fertility indicator for magmatic Ni-Cu sulfide deposits as well as providing information about the
original composition of the magma. Olivine crystallizing from sulfide-saturated magmas will
exhibit lower Ni contents relative to olivine crystallized from sulfide-undersaturated melts. This
premise was assessed by Barnes et al. (2023) across Ni-Cu-(PGE) deposits globally, but there was
a notable paucity of olivine data from Ni-Cu deposits within the Midcontinent Rift System (MRS).
This study presents 700 new electron probe microanalyses (EPMA) of Ni and other major
elements in olivine from five magmatic Ni-Cu-(PGE) deposits in the MRS: Sunday Lake,
Steepledge, Escape, Current and Hele. These data have been integrated with published datasets
from the mineralised Seagull, Eagle and East Eagle intrusions to produce the first regional-scale
dataset of olivine chemistry from the MRS. Curation of this data aims to assess: (1) the deposit
scale variability of olivine chemistry across the MRS; (2) the utility of Ni in olivine as a regional
prospectivity indicator for Ni-Cu deposits within the MRS; and (3) the implications for primary
melt evolution across the MRS.
Preliminary results show that olivine forsterite (Fo) contents (i.e., 100*Mg/[Mg+Fetotal],
mol %) range from Fo72.5-85 across most intrusions, except for the Hele intrusion, which has a
much wider range (Fo44.0-82.5; Fig. 1). Across the entire dataset, Ni concentrations in olivine
vary significantly (600-2500 ppm) and generally increase with higher Fo values. The range of Ni
in olivine values can be vary up to 1000 ppm from a single deposit, over a narrow Fo range (e.g.,
Current Intrusion – Fo79.7-81.7). Furthermore, concentric zoning between Mg-rich cores relative
to the Mg-depleted rims is frequently observed – most notably at Eagle East, where an average
core analysis displays Fo80 vs. average rim value of Fo77.
This preliminary compilation of olivine compositions across the MRS both reveals the
variability of olivine compositions within a single intrusive complex and highlights fractionation
trends regionally. The integration of the MRS data with the global compilation of Barnes et al.
(2023) highlights the similarities between the signatures of unmineralized and mineralized
intrusions and that there is no universal evidence for consistent Ni depletion in olivine from
mineralised deposits. Placing the MRS olivine data within the context of other Ni-Cu-(PGE)
systems may elucidate previously unrecognized potential within the MRS, and similarly these data
can contribute to the global understanding of magmatic processes that culminate in economically
viable deposits.

85

�Figure 1: Ni concentrations (ppm) in olivine as a function of forsterite content (Fo#) from a suite of maficultramafic Ni-Cu intrusions located in the Midcontinent Rift System. Grey field denotes the global array of
‘barren’ intrusions as defined by Barnes et al. (2023). Published datasets comprise: (1) Eagle and East
Eagle Intrusion – Ding et al. (2010); (2) Seagull Intrusion – Heggie (2005); (3) Coldwell, Two Duck
Gabbro – Good (1992); (4) Coldwell, Eastern Gabbro – Shaw (1997).

REFERENCES

Barnes, S. J., Yao, Z. S., Mao, Y. J., Jesus, A. P., Yang, S., Taranovic, V., &amp; Maier, W. D. (2023). Nickel
in olivine as an exploration indicator for magmatic Ni-Cu sulfide deposits: A data review and reevaluation. American Mineralogist, 108, 1-17.
Ding, X., Li, C., Ripley, E. M., Rossell, D., &amp; Kamo, S. (2010). The Eagle and East Eagle sulfide ore‐
bearing mafic‐ultramafic intrusions in the Midcontinent Rift System, upper Michigan:
Geochronology and petrologic evolution. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 11(3).
Good, D.J. (1992). Genesis of copper-precious metal sulphide deposits in the Port Coldwell Alkalic
Complex, Ontario; unpublished Ph.D. thesis, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, 203p.
Heggie, G.J. (2005). Whole rock geochemistry, mineral chemistry, petrology and Pt, Pd mineralization of
the Seagull Intrusion, northwestern Ontario. Unpublished M.Sc. thesis, Lakehead University,
Thunder Bay, Ontario, 156.
Li, C., Naldrett, A. J. &amp; Ripley, E. M. (2007). Controls on the Fo and Ni Contents of Olivine in Sulfidebearing Mafic/Ultramafic Intrusions: Principles, Modeling, and Examples from Voisey’s Bay. Earth
Science Frontiers 14, 177–183.
Shaw, C. S. (1997). The petrology of the layered gabbro intrusion, eastern gabbro, Coldwell alkaline
complex, Northwestern Ontario, Canada: evidence for multiple phases of intrusion in a ring dyke.
Lithos, 40(2-4), 243-259.

86

�Origin of magnetic black sand found on the south Shore of Lake Superior
Verhoeven, J.D1., and Zowada, Tim2
1 Iowa State University, Emeritus Prof., Iowa State University, Levering MI 49755, jver@iastate.edu,
2 Custom Knifemaker, Boyne Falls, MI, timzowada@gmail.com

Many of the beaches on the shores of Lake Superior contain black sand which is magnetic. This
sand can be smelted into iron using the ancient bloomery process which produces small chunks
of iron called blooms. They consist of iron containing a low level of carbon. The chunk of iron
is filled with cavities containing remnant slag produced in the smelting process. Recent
experiments [1] have shown that often but not always the resultant iron of the blooms contain
significantly levels of Ti and that one of the microconstituents in the slag is the mineral
ulvöspinel. The authors of [1] had assumed that the magnetic black sand came from erosion of
banded hematite-magnetite iron formations (BIF) which are the source of the iron mined in the
Lake Superior region. Finding Ti in some of the blooms shows that there is likely an alternate
source of the iron in the black sands, namely the Fe–Ti oxide-bearing ultramafic intrusions
(OUIs) deposited in the lake bottom from the 1.1Ga Midcontinent Rift (MCR) that runs through
the lake region. This talk presents a comparison of the composition of the ulvöspinel constituent
found in bloom slags of black sand smelts with the composition of the ulvöspinel constituents
found in a recent study [2] of drillings from the Coldwell Complex region located at the north
central region of Lake Superior which contain Fe-Ti magnetite-ilmenite intergrow deposits from
the MCR. The results present strong evidence that the some of the magnetic black sand on Lake
Superior’s shores comes from source rocks of MCR deposits in the Coldwell Complex and some
from BIF deposits in the lake bottom. Additional evidence that the Fe-Ti source rock is the
Coldwell Complex is that the location of the black sand used in the study is in the same region of
the south shore of Lake Superior near White Fish Point where yooperlite rocks have been found.
Literature data [3] shows that the source rock of the yooperlite is the Coldwell Complex.
REFERENCES

1 Zowada T., Straszheim W., Chumbley S. and Verhoeven. J.D., 2025. A study of the carbon distribution
and alloy composition of iron blooms made from two different batches of black sand collected from
Lake Superior, accepted for publication in JMMA.
2 Brzozowski M.J., Samson I.M., Gagnon J.E., Linnen R.L. and Good D.J., 2021. Effects of fluid-induced
oxidation on the composition of Fe–Ti oxides in the Eastern Gabbro, Coldwell Complex, Canada:
implications for the application of Fe–Ti oxides to petrogenesis and mineral exploration, Mineralium
Deposita 56, 601–618.
3 Laughlin, R. and Carlson A., 1987. A new find of fluorescent sodalite, Mineral News 34, no 5.

87

�88

�Zircon Petrochronology of the Eau Claire Volcanic Complex in the Marshfield Terrane of
the Penokean Orogen, Northcentral Wisconsin
VICKERS, Lyndsie A.1, LODGE, Robert W.D.1
1
Department of Geology and Environmental Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, Eau Claire,
WI 54701 USA

The Eau Claire Volcanic Complex (ECVC) serves as a type locality for Penokean-age
magmatism and volcanism associated with the Marshfield terrane in the Penokean Orogeny
(Figure 1A). This volcanic event is central to tectonic models that describe the collision of the
Pembine-Wausau oceanic arc terrane and Archean crustal fragments of the Marshfield terrane
with the southern margin of the Superior Craton (Shultz and Cannon 2007). A defining feature of
these models is the proposed "double" subduction zone system, which is thought to have
overprinted the Archean Marshfield terrane with younger Penokean volcanism and magmatism
during ocean closure. Newer tectonic models suggesting accordion-like tectonics (Zi et al, 2022)
still rely on historic interpretations of the ECVC where only physical outcrop descriptions in the
literature (Myers et al, 1980). Despite its significance, the ECVC has remained understudied due
to extensive Paleozoic and Quaternary cover which obscures outcrops and little mineral
exploration and drilling. To address these challenges, this study focused on remote outcrops of
the ECVC along the Eau Claire River in Wisconsin, aiming to better constrain tectonic models
and clarify terrane boundaries in the southern Penokean Orogen.
Field mapping yielded samples that were processed to isolate zircon grains for U/Pb
radiometric dating and petrochronological analyses. These zircons were analyzed using a Laser
Ablation Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometer (LA-ICP-MS) at Laurentian
University, providing the only modern geochronological and petrochronological data (U/Pb,
Lu/Hf, zircon trace elements) from this region in the orogen. The results challenge long-standing
interpretations of the area’s stratigraphy. Rocks previously classified as Paleoproterozoic
volcanic units have Archean U/Pb ages and are now redefined as part of an Archean greenstone
belt, significantly altering the geological narrative of the region. This study confirmed the
presence of Paleoproterozoic intrusions (Figure 1C), but Lu-Hf isotopic analyses revealed that
magmas did not have isotopic inheritance from the Archean basement (Figure 1D). This suggests
the Paleoproterozoic magmas are in structural contact with Archean rocks. Additionally,
Paleoproterozoic metasedimentary samples exhibited a diverse array of sedimentary sources
(Figure 1-B), including Penokean, Marshfield, and a 2.2 Ga provenance, hinting at potential links
to the Chocolay and Huronian groups which are continental rift assemblages formed during the
breakup of an Archean supercontinent (Shultz &amp; Cannon, 2007).
As the first comprehensive petrochronological dataset from the Penokean Orogen, this
study not only redefines the age and origin of key outcrops but also shows the complexity of the
region’s tectonic and magmatic evolution. The discovery of previously unrecognized Archean
basement rocks necessitates a reassessment of regional stratigraphy, particularly for classic
outcrops historically attributed to Paleoproterozoic activity. Furthermore, the potential
connection between the Marshfield terrane’s sedimentary sources and those of the Superior
Craton’s rift assemblages raises questions about the terrane’s origins, suggesting it may represent
a southernmost fragment of the Superior Craton.

89

�Figure 1: (A) Geologic map of the North Fork of the Eau Claire River adapted from Brown (1988). (B)
Histogram displaying the distribution of zircon ages from a metasedimentary sample (C) Weighted mean
diagram for intrusive sample showing a uniform range of zircon 207Pb/206Pb ages. Grey bars represent
outliers and were excluded from age calculation. (D) ƐHf(i) versus 207Pb/206Pb age comparing ECVC
intrusion to other Penokean intrusions in the Marshfield Terrane (Weber et al., 2023).

REFERENCES

Brown, B.A., 1988. Bedrock Geology Map of Wisconsin (Regional Map Series: West-Central Sheet),
University of Wisconsin-Extension Geological and Natural History Survey, Scale: 1:250,000.
Schulz K.J., Cannon W.F., 2007. The Penokean orogeny in the Lake Superior region. Precambrian
Research 157:4-25.
Weber, E.M., Lodge, R.W.D., Marsh, J.H., 2023. U/Pb geochronology and zircon petrochronology of
Paleoproterozoic magmas from the Marshfield terrane, Penokean Orogen, Wisconsin. Institute on
Lake Superior Geology Proceedings, 69th Annual Meeting, Eau Claire, Wisconsin, Part 1-Program
and Abstracts, p. 97-98.
Zi, J.W., Sheppard, S., Muhling, J.R., and Rasmussen, B., 2021. Refining the Paleoproterozoic
Tectonothermal History of the Penokean Orogen: New U-Pb Age Constraints from the PembineWausau terrane, Wisconsin, USA: GSA Bulletin, v. 134, p. 776–790.
Myers, P. E., Cummings, M. L., and Wurdinger, S. R., 1980. Precambrian geology of the Chippewa
Valley, Wisconsin, Institute of Lake Superior Geology 26th Annual Meeting, Eau Claire,
Wisconsin, Field Trip Guidebook 1, 123 p

90

�Geospatial Learning Resources to Explore Relationships with Keweenaw Geology
VYE, Erika1, and LIZZADRO-MCPHERSON, Daniel2
1
Great Lakes Research Center, Michigan Technological University, 1400 Townsend Drive, Houghton,
MI, 49931, United States
2
Geospatial Research Facility, Michigan Technological University, 1400 Townsend Drive, Houghton, MI,
49931, United States

The globally significant geologic processes and features of the Keweenaw have fostered
relationships with land and water for millennia. We have created three geospatial, digital
resources that express the deep relationships between the underpinning geology and the
scientific, educational, cultural, economic, and aesthetic significance of publicly accessible
geosites in the Keweenaw region. These geospatial resources serve as living databases that will
evolve over time in order to support formal and informal learners in understanding the
fundamental role geology plays in our varied relationships with land and water. All resources are
hosted and shared publicly on the Geospatial Research Facilities’ Enterprise Geospatial Research
Portal at Michigan Technological University.
1) The Keweenaw Coastal Geoheritage StoryMap was created as a teaching and
learning resource for local K-12 educators to explore the rock types of the Keweenaw at geosites
along the shores of Lake Superior (Fig. 1). This resource: a) provides an overview of the main
lithologies in the Keweenaw region, b) shares where federal, state, local government, and
nonprofit organizations are working to preserve the rich geologic landscape and fragile wetlands
of the Keweenaw, and c) provides a virtual learning experience to explore over 30 geologically
significant sites along Lake Superior (Lizzadro-McPherson &amp; Vye, 2023).
2) The Keweenaw Geoheritage Geoatlas is a knowledge directed exploration geospatial
data hub that integrates physiographic landscape-wide feature coverages with a variety of
downloadable GIS datasets. The repository of maps and data articulate the geoheritage of the
region; the data hub supports educators, students, the scientific community, local tourist entities,
land use planners, and the broader public in learning more about specific geosites in the
Keweenaw region (Cowling, et al., 2024).
3) The Keweenaw Geoheritage geodatabase and web-viewer provide an innovative
way of exploring the relationships between the bedrock geology and how this influences current
and future education, conservation, and sustainable economic development initiatives in the
Keweenaw region (Fig. 2). Each site expresses: a) a brief description of how the site contributes
to the rich geoheritage of the Keweenaw, b) a 360-photo, and c) a description of the scientific
(specific to the geologic phenomena), educational, cultural, economic, and aesthetic significance
of the site (Lizzadro-McPherson &amp; Vye, 2024).
These resources are intended to support the co-stewardship of cultural heritage,
restoration of legacy mining sites, conservation issues, and the development of sustainable
economic opportunities based on the region’s globally significant geologic underpinnings.
Further, they serve as the foundation for an evolving community participatory geoheritage
mapping project in the Keweenaw. Through innovative, interactive geospatial resources we
aspire to engage the broader public in sharing and exploring their relationships with the
Keweenaw landscape (e.g. stories, valued geosites, photos, and curiosities).

91

�REFERENCES

Cowling, R., Lizzadro-McPherson, D.J., Verissimo, L. &amp; Vye, E.C. (2023). Keweenaw Geoheritage
Geoatlas. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30945.28005
Lizzadro-McPherson, D.J., and Vye, E.C. (2024). Keweenaw Geoheritage Geodatabase. Michigan State
Geological Survey; U.S. Geological Survey, National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program
(Award #G23AC00285 FY23).
Lizzadro-McPherson, D. J. &amp; Vye, E.C. (2023). Keweenaw Coastal Geoheritage StoryMap. DOI:
10.13140/RG.2.2.12680.74242

Fig. 1: Keweenaw Coastal Geoheritage StoryMap

Fig. 2: Keweenaw Geoheritage Viewer

92

�Battle between the bands: competitive precipitations lead to bands in banded iron
formations
Xu, Huifang, and Zhou, Tianyu
Department of Geoscience, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA

Banded iron formations (BIFs) are massive chemical deposits composed of alternating layers of
chert and iron-rich minerals (such as hematite, magnetite and siderite), with three scales of
bandings: microbands, mesobands (1 mm - 10 cm) and macrobands. Their abundance in the
Archaean/early Proterozoic era and their absence thereafter suggest that chemical conditions and
iron transport pathways on the early Earth surface were different from those after 1.7 billion
years ago. Thermodynamic calculations show that Fe-silicate metal complex can be generated by
hydrothermal leaching of low-Al oceanic crustal rocks such as komatiites, which suggest that the
presence of low-Al ultramafic rocks (for example, komatiitic rocks) in the early oceanic crust
were the reason for both the formation of BIFs and their abundance in the Archaean/early
Proterozoic era (Wang et al., 2009). This is consistent with the findings that the ages of
komatiites are correlated strongly, at the 99% confidence level, with the ages of BIFs (Isley and
Abbott, 1999).
We used the PHREEQC geochemical modeling package was used to test the chemical reactions
that may have led to the banding pattern in the BIFs based on competitive precipitation of
ferrihydrite (precursor of hematite and magnetite) and silica gel (precursor of chert) (Zhou et al.,
2024). After aqueous ferrous silicate decomposition in O2-sufficient condition (pO2 ≥ 10-4), the
faster Fe2+ oxidation and precipitation rate led to Fe-rich layer preceding Si-rich layer with
ferrihydrite and amorphous silica as the precursor to the hematite and quartz, respectively.
Episodic Fe(H3SiO4)2 input resulted in successive cycles of layering (Fig. 1). O2-deficient
environments (pO2 &lt; 10-4) results in jaspilite (no bands). The kinetic model also works well for
the formation of siderite bands under O2-deficient environments when pCO2 is high. In
summary, the precipitation process model proposed in this study offers an alternative abiotic
explanation for the formation of distinct bands within the BIFs.

93

�Figure 1: Schematic depositional model of felsic volcanism associated BIF-like Iron Formations under
different surface oxygen levels in a shallow hot spring lake (O2-deficient: pO2 &lt; 10-4; O2-sufficient: pO2 ≥
10-4). When the O2 level is high, the mix of aerobic lake water and Fe(H3SiO4)2-bearing spring fluid leads
to the ferrihydrite-rich layer and amorphous silica-rich layer precipitating successively. But ferrihydrite
and silica coprecipitate when O2 is deficient and there is no layering. The ferrihydrite-rich layer would
convert to hematite-rich layer and amorphous silica-rich layer transforms into Si-rich layer. The surface
water level is regulated by precipitation, evaporation and seepage from surrounding rock without visible
inflow or outflow. DOI:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2024.122091)

REFERENCES

Isley, A. E. &amp; Abbott, D. H., 1999. Plume-related mafic volcanism and the deposition of banded iron
formation. J. Geophys. Res. 44, 15461-15477.
Wang Y., Xu, H., Merino, E., and Konishi, H., 2009. Generation of banded iron formations by internal
dynamics and leaching of oceanic crust. Nature Geoscience, 2, 781-784.
Zhou, T., Hill, T., Roden, E. E., and Xu, H., 2024. The Felsic Volcanism Associated BIF-like Iron
Formations: Their Origin and Implication for BIFs. Chemical Geology, 656, 122091.

94

�Broadly coeval but migrating deformation, plutonism and deposition in the
northeastern Superior Province, Québec: evidence of hot accretionary orogeny
and oroclinal folding in the late Archean?
ŽÁK, Jiří1, TOMEK, Filip 1, 2, KACHLÍK, Václav 1, VACEK, František 1, 3
SVOJTKA, Martin 2, and ACKERMAN, Lukáš 2
1
Institute of Geology and Paleontology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Albertov 6,
Prague, 12843, Czech Republic 2 Institute of Geology of the Czech Academy of Sciences,
Rozvojová 269, Prague, 16500, Czech Republic 3 Czech Geological Survey, Klárov 3, Prague,
11821, Czech Republic

The James Bay Road in Québec provides a unique crustal-scale transect across several
principal lithotectonic belts of the northeastern Superior Province. From north to south,
these belts are Bienville (plutonic), La Grande (ʽgrayʼ gneisses, metaplutonic),
Opinaca–Némiscau (metasedimentary), and Opatica (mostly volcano-plutonic). This
assemblage has been controversially interpreted to record non-plate vertical tectonics
driven by mantle plume activity or as resulting from the step-wise accretion of these
belts to the northerly proto-cratonic core. We present here new structural and
anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS) data from all the units along the James
Bay Road transect. The data indicate a multistage fabric evolution: (1) an early fabric
F1 is preserved only in isolated domains across the La Grande and Opinaca belts and is
at a high angle to boundaries between the individual belts; (2) the F2 fabric seems to
record a progressive reorientation (folding) towards an E–W direction; (3) the
regionally dominant F3 fabric indicates regional NNE–SSW shortening across all units
and is coeval with pluton emplacement and anatexis; (4) the last major ductile event is
represented by localized dextral shear zones. The AMS indicates that magnetic
foliations in general match well the mesoscopic foliations, whereas magnetic lineations
vary from steeply plunging to subhorizontal, interpreted as recording a transition from
vertical stretching during folding to horizontal stretching during shearing. The latter
interpretation is further supported by a more detailed analysis of the ca. 2712–2697 Ma
Radisson pluton, which is a syntectonic intrusion at the Bienville–La Grande boundary.
Its magmatic to solid-state fabrics analyzed through the AMS also suggest a strain
evolution from vertical magma stretching during regional shortening overprinted by
later dextral shearing. In conjunction with the previously published U–Pb
geochronology, the structural data suggest a short time span and north-to-south
migration of plutonism, deposition, and contractional/transpressional deformation,
altogether favoring a modern-style plate tectonics operating in the NE Superior
Province in the late Archean. Furthermore, the relict F1 and F2 fabrics overprinted by
F3 are interpreted as being compatible with changing block/microplate convergence
vectors and crustal-scale folding of the outboard La Grande and Opinaca–Némiscau
belts. In conclusion, the northeastern Superior Province may have been assembled as
large, hot accretionary supra-subduction orogen, oroclinally folded, and finally
dextrally sheared. Were this interpretation correct, a key question arises what was the
geodynamic cause and mode of the oroclinal folding, whether with or without hard
collision, taking the Alaskan terrane wreck or Mongolian orocline as prime examples,
respectively.

95

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
      <file fileId="16018">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/772524cda5601210f7360a628832f9e3.pdf</src>
        <authentication>ed3bb63e47c2b1557a98f43e22c97dfb</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="108004">
                    <text>Volume 71, Part 2

71st ANNUAL MEETING

Mountain Iron, Minnesota, May 14-17, 2025

PART 2—Field Trip Guidebook

�Meeting Co-Chairs
Amy Radakovich, Allison Severson, Eric Nowariak, Stacy
Saari, Aaron Hirsch

Special thanks to field trip leaders:
Zsuzsanna Allerton
Terry Boerboom
Kevin Boerst
Latisha Brengman
Annia Fayon
George Hudak
Mark Jirsa
Phil Larson
Dean Peterson
Cullen Phillips
Laurie Severson
Mark Severson
Alex Steiner

i

�71st Institute on Lake Superior Geology
Volume 71 consists of:

Field Trip 1 – Transect of the Quetico Subprovince ................................................................................... 1
Field Trip 2 – Drill Core from three Cu-Ni Deposits of the Duluth Complex .......................................... 15
Field Trip 3 – How Do You Make Iron and/or Manganese Ores in Proterozoic Iron Formation?............ 46
Field Trip 4 – New Geological Insights into the Genesis of Iron Ores at Lake Vermilion – Soudan
Underground Mine State Park..................................................................................................................... 74
Field Trip 5 – Neoarchean Alkalic Intrusions in the Wawa and Quetico Subprovinces ......................... 108
Field Trip 6 – Unique Keweenawan Inclusion (Colvin Creek) in the Duluth Complex ......................... 136
Field Trip 7 – Classic Outcrops of Northeastern Minnesota ................................................................... 151
Field Trip 8 – Glacial Lake Norwood and the Koochiching Lobe…. ..................................................... 188

ii

�Trip 1 – Quetico

FIELD TRIP 1
Transect of the Quetico Subprovince
Eric Nowariak1 and Mark Jirsa (retired)1
1

Minnesota Geological Survey, College of Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota, 2609
Territorial Road, St. Paul, MN 55114

Introduction
This trip will examine exposures of the metasedimentary, migmatitic, and intrusive rocks of the
Neoarchean Quetico subprovince from north of Mountain Iron to near Crane Lake and along part of the
Echo Trail. It will attempt to “unpack” the primary components of deposition, magmatism, deformation,
and metamorphism that likely spanned 40 million years (~2700-2660 Ma). The latter is based in part on
newly acquired geochronologic analyses (Jirsa and others, 2020; Salerno, 2017). The trip will also address
the challenge of creating meaningful geologic maps of this and similarly complex terranes, and the apparent
lithologic and temporal link between Quetico metasediments and those associated with successor basins in
the region.

Figure 1-1. Complex migmatite exposed at field trip stop # 3.

1

�Trip 1 – Quetico

Figure 1-2. Geologic Map of Central St. Louis County. This draft version of the St Louis County Precambrian bedrock
map (superceded by Jirsa, 2020) portrays parts of the Neoarchean Wawa and Quetico subprovinces of Superior
Province, and the approximate location of field trip stops. Wawa subprovince colors: greens=volcanic and
volcaniclastic rocks; blues=metasedimentary rocks (primarily metagraywacke); reds=iron-formation; pinks=granitoid
rocks; yellows=epiclastic and volcaniclastic sedimentary rocks. Quetico subprovince is labeled: BS=biotite schist
(metagraywacke); SM=schist-rich migmatite; GM=granite-rich migmatite; TM=tonalite-rich migmatite. Pale pink
Lac La Croix granite is more magnetic, darker pink is less so. Bold line marks the approximate boundary between
subprovinces—a fault in some places, an inferred unconformity in others.

2

�Trip 1 – Quetico

GEOLOGIC SETTING
The Quetico is one of a number of east-trending, largely metasedimentary subprovinces in the
Superior Province. It is bounded on the south by the Wawa volcanoplutonic subprovince, and on the north
by the Wabigoon subprovince. It consists of schist derived from turbiditic sedimentary rocks and a complex
suite of granitic intrusions and associated migmatite. In northeastern Minnesota, the subprovince displays
a roughly symmetrical distribution of metasedimentary rocks on the north and south, that grade irregularly
through zones of schist-rich migmatite, to a central axial zone composed largely of polyphase granitoid
migmatite and younger granite. To some extent, metamorphic grade mimics this symmetry, with generally
higher grade rocks in the central axis and lower grade near the bounding volcanoplutonic subprovinces.
The accretionary prism model of Williams (1990) implies deposition of sediment shed from the craton to
the north, and the subducting island arc to the south by submarine fans and abyssal turbidites. The Rainy
Lake-Seine River Fault zone at the southern margin of the Wabigoon subprovince is thought to mimic the
subduction front. The southern boundary against the Wawa subprovince is interpreted as an unconformity
in some locales, and a fault in others.
DEPOSITIONAL HISTORY
Timing of deposition of the clastic sedimentary rocks of the Quetico subprovince in Minnesota has
been constrained by populations of the youngest detrital zircons at 2690 +/- 12 Ma (Salerno, 2017).
Similarly, geochronologic studies of the Quetico metasedimentary sequences in Canada has been
constrained to 2698 Ma near Atikokan, ON (Davis and others, 1990) and &lt;2690 according to Zaleski and
others (1999) near the Manitowage Greenstone Belt of the Wawa subprovince. Zaleski and others (1999)
also proved deposition of graywacke units within the Manitowage Greenstone Belt were contemporaneous,
if not genetically related. A similar temporal and possible genetic link between the metasedimentary rocks
of the Lake Vermilion formation and turbiditic metasediments of the Quetico in Northern Minnesota,
wherein immature, volcaniclastic rocks of the Lake Vermilion formation gave way to silicic, clastic
sedimentation observed in the Quetico subprovince as the basin evolved from alluvial fan deposits to a
deep-water, active margin depocenter as the Quetico basin developed (Davis and others, 1990). In addition
to Neoarchean zircons, small populations of older zircons including Mesoarchean zircons have also been
recognized (Salerno, 2017; Davis and others, 1990). Probable sources of these older zircons have identified
from multiple terranes in the southern Superior province and a proximal source for the sediments is inferred.
The composition of the Quetico metasedimentary rocks suggests the source region was shedding sediment
from a mixture of sialic plutonic terranes and lesser juvenile volcanic terranes. In addition to the clastic
metasedimentary rocks that dominate the bulk of the Quetico subprovince, thin, discontinuous amphibolitic
layers are found interbedded in many areas; likely representing volcanoclastic deposits and rare flows from
active volcanism occurring near the margins of the subprovince.
VERMILION GRANITIC COMPLEX
The migmatitic and plutonic rocks in the axial zone are known collectively in Minnesota as the
Vermilion Granitic Complex (Southwick and Sims, 1980). Southwick and Ojakangas (1979) subdivided
migmatite for mapping purposes as schist-rich and granite-rich components, depending on the ratio of
paleosome to neosome. Subsequent mapping by Jirsa (2011) and Jirsa and others (2014), applied the same
terms, based instead on the extent to which the predominant fabric in the rock is controlled by neosome vs.
paleosome and further distinguished units based on neosome composition. In this nomenclatural system,
schist-rich migmatite is schist containing intrusions of granitoid neosome as both delaminating and crosscutting bodies; granite-rich migmatite is neosome with inclusions of paleosome. These can be equated
generally with the terms metatexite (low degree of partial melting) and diatexite (nearly complete fusion),
respectively, of Sawyer, (2008). Field relationships within the complex (Southwick, 1991) indicate that
earliest granitoid phases are leucogranite, tonalite, granodiorite, and trondhjemite, which make up the
leucosome of a broad area of migmatite across the western portion of the Vermilion Granitic Complex. For
this field trip guide, these granitoids, broadly of TTG affinity, are referred to as “neosome 1”. The
3

�Trip 1 – Quetico
migmatite is interlayered at all scales with paleosomes of biotite schist, paragneiss, orthogneiss, and
amphibolite and often carries an internal fabric similar to the paleosome. Salerno (2017) obtained a
discordant U-Pb zircon age of a granodiorite phase of neosome 1 at 2684 +/- 23 Ma.
The migmatite is cut by poorly to non-foliated dikes, sills, and irregular masses of two mica
leucogranite with accessory garnet, and a slightly younger biotite granite and pegmatite that contain minor
magnetite. The presence of magnetite within the granitic rocks related pegmatites has proved to be an
important mapping tool as these intrusive bodies create conspicuous aeromagnetic anomalies (Fig. 3b). The
latter forms a large granitic mass, known as the Lac La Croix granite nearest the US/Canadian border, and
apophosial intrusions that flare and pinch westward, producing aeromagnetic anomalies that highlight broad
fold structures. These intrusive “fingers” generally decrease in thickness and continuity westward,
suggesting that the western portion of the complex may represent the roof- or floor-zone of the batholith
cored by massive granite. For simplicity within this field guide, the leucogranitic and granitic rocks of the
Lac La Croix granite are referred to as “neosome 2” and represents the youngest granitic intrusive units of
the Vermilion Granitic Complex. Geochronologic analyses of leucogranite and granite of the Lac La Croix
granite has dated the crystallization of this unit with U-Pb zircon ages of 2658.71 +/- 0.47 Ma and 2668 +/10 Ma (Jirsa and others, 2014; Salerno, 2017).
a

b

Figure 1-3. Maps of the Crane Lake and Brule Narrows 30’X60’ quadrangles (US and Canada) illustrating the
connections between attributes of structure, lithology, topography, and magnetite content in this area of abundant
near-surface bedrock. (a) 30m lidar land surface topographic grid; low areas darker. Topography defines major
fold structures, and massive granitic vs. foliated orthogneissic and schistose bedrock. Prominent NNW-trending
linear low areas are fault and fracture systems, many of which are occupied by rivers and lakes (named). (b) First
vertical derivative map of aeromagnetic data. Magnetic highs (lighter colored) typically are more granitic; lows,
more schist-rich. Like the topographic map, the magnetic data identify folds and faults. Linear, NW-trending
highs are normally polarized diabase dikes of the Paleoproterozic Kenora-Kabetogama dike swarm. Linear lows
are coincident with topographic lows, implying oxidation by meteoric, or more likely hydrothermal fluids along
fractures. Some field evidence indicates that rock adjacent to fractures is chemically weathered, and hence more
easily eroded. The subparallelism of dikes with fractures may indicate that oxidizing hydrothermal fluids were
temporally related to dike emplacement.

Neosome 1 and neosome 2 are readily distinguished in the field based on mineralogy and textural
characteristics described above. Day and Weiblen (1986) used simple geochemical plots and CIPW
normative mineralogy to visualize these differences (Fig. 1-4). Both plutonic suites are characterized as
calc-alkaline, metaluminous to weakly peraluminous, magnesian granitoids. Neosome 1 tonalitetrondhjemite-granodiorite intrusions are inferred to have been sourced from partial melting of mafic crust.
4

�Trip 1 – Quetico
Geochemical evidence indicates that the early neosome 2 migmatite was derived from partial melting of a
metasedimentary protolith (Day and Weiblen, 1986). Southwick (1991) and Day and Weiblen (1986)
suggested that the younger Lac La Croix-type granite of neosome 2 may represent further distillation of
granitic liquid from partial melting of the combined older migmatite and metasedimentary rocks.
Figure 1-4. From Day and Weiblen
(1986). (A) CIPW normative
mineralogy for Vermilion Granitic
Complex. Q – quartz; Pl –
albite+anorthite; Or – orthoclase.
“Early Plutonic Suite” is equivalent to
neosome 1 of this guidebook. (B)
AFM diagram of same data (Irvine and
Baragar, 1971).

DEFORMATION AND METAMORPHIC HISTORY
The Quetico subprovince has undergone a complex deformation history over a relatively contracted
tectonic history between deposition of sediments ca. 2690 Ma and intrusion of the Lac La Croix Granite
related pegmatite dikes ca. 2658 Ma. As summarized by Bauer and others (2011), three main phases of
deformation have been recognized. D1 produced tight to isoclinal, recumbant folds plunging to the
southwest and locally overturned to the southeast and produced a weak, bedding parallel axial planar
foliation. Hinges of these recumbent folds are rare, and recognition of this event are often limited to
overturned bedding and bedding-parallel foliation that is crenulated by subsequent deformational events.
This event may locally have produced recumbent folds over a broad region (Bauer, 1985; Poulsen and
others, 1980). It occurred shortly after deposition and involved burial to produce metamorphic conditions
of moderate pressure and temperature (Valli and others, 2004). Fralick and others (2006) suggested D1
deformation was contemporaneous with development of the Quetico basin as an accretionary wedge.
D2 deformation was synchronous with peak regional metamorphism to upper greenschist facies in
the Wabigoon subprovince and amphibolite facies in the adjacent Quetico subprovince, and produced the
dominant structural grain observed in the Minnesota segment of the Quetico subprovince. Folding
associated with D2 deformation produced tight to isoclinal upright folds that plunge to the E-NE 10-30°.
The intrusion of neosome 1 occurred slightly prior to or contemporaneous with D2 as veins of neosome 1
are commonly folded and occupy gently to moderately plunging D2 related fold hinges. Peak
metamorphism presumed to be contemporaneous with D2 deformation within the Vermilion Granitic
Complex has been dated by U-Pb monazite geochronology by Salerno (2017) and has constrained to ca.
2675 Ma.
Continued contractional and transpressional deformation during D3 has been noted as ductile, eastnortheast trending transpressional shear zones and coaxial refolds of D2 related structures. Folding
associated with D3 deformation is better developed near plutons of the Lac La Croix granite and related
granitoids, suggesting early stages of neosome 2 intrusions were contemporaneous with deformation or
used these structures as conduits (Bauer and others, 1992). D2-D3 is interpreted to be a result of the
accretion of the Quetico subprovince to the Wabigoon subprovince to the north. Metamorphic indicator
minerals within the Vermilion Granitic Complex including garnet, sillimanite, and locally cordierite have
been well documented (Day, 1990; Tabor, 1988; Salerno, 2017). Limited thermobarometric studies have
determined peak metamorphism reached amphibolite facies in the axial core of the Minnesota segment of
the Quetico subprovince and upper greenschist facies along the northern margin of the subprovince, with
garnet-biotite thermometry revealing metamorphic temperatures between 500-600°C and 430-475°C,
5

�Trip 1 – Quetico
respectively (Bauer and others, 1992; Salerno, 2017). It is unknown whether the intrusion of the Lac La
Croix granite and other neosome 2 intrusions produced a significant metamorphic overprint, however Tabor
(1988) recognized kyanite in metamorphic assemblages of the Quetico subprovince along its northern
boundary along the Rainy Lake-Seine Fault; which may represent an earlier, relatively higher pressure
metamorphic regime prior to intrusion of the Lac La Croix granite.
Subsequent deformation including brittle-ductile faulting with associated planar fabrics developed
locally near fault zones and minor open folds reorienting existing structures has been ascribed to continued
contraction post-dating metamorphism and major plutonism has been ascribed to D4 deformation. One of
the most prominent and through-going features of the Quetico subprovince in Minnesota is the Vermilion
Fault—a northwest-trending structure that truncates metamorphic zones and folds that are apparent on
aeromagnetic maps is likely a product of late D3 and/or D4 deformation. Based largely on geophysical
maps, dextral offset along this fault is on the order of 40 km. The fault can be traced from the extreme NW
corner of the state for some 250 miles southeastward to near Ely, Minnesota. There it appears to veer to
the northeast, manifest as a complexly splayed, post-metamorphic thrust-system known collectively as the
Burntside Lake Fault. A summary of the deformational and metamorphic features observed in the
Minnesota segment of the Quetico subprovince is shown in Table 1-1 below.
Event

General Features

Associated Fabrics

Metamorphic
Features

Timing

Source(s)

D1

Recumbant folds

Bedding parallel foliation

N/A

ca. 2690 Ma

Fralick and others
(2006), Bauer (1985)

D2

Upright to inclined tight
to isoclinal folds, axes
plunge to the northeast
and southwest

Axial planar cleavage,
strong hinge-parallel
lineation

Upper greenschist
to amphibolite
facies

ca. 2675 Ma

Bauer and others
(1992) and
references therein,
Salerno (2017)

D3

Upright tight to isoclinal
folds – coaxial to D2
folding, east-northeast
trending shear zones

Axial planar cleavage,
strong hinge-parallel
lineation, shear fabrics
proximal to fault zones

Amphibolite
Facies

2675-2668
Ma

Bauer and others
(1992) and
references therein,
Jirsa (2014)

D4

Brittle-ductile faulting,
broad folding

Planar fabrics proximal to
shear zones

Hydrothermal
alteration along
fault zones

&lt;/=2668 Ma

Bauer and others
(1992), Recent
unpublished mapping

Table 1-1. Summary of deformational and metamorphic features observed in the Quetico subprovince within
Minnesota.

CONSIDERATIONS FOR GEOLOGIC MAPPING
Complex geologic terranes recording multiple, interdependent geologic processes including
sedimentation, multiple phases of deformation, and diverse polyphase intrusive histories like that of the
Quetico subprovince represent a unique challenge in creating meaningful, consistent geologic maps and
map units. Multiple attempts to properly portray the complicated geology of the Minnesota segment of the
Quetico subprovince have used varied approaches, which have proved to require the incorporation field
observation, petrography, aeromagnetic and gravity anomalies, LiDAR and aerial photography, and
magnetic susceptibility measurements.
Early iterations of geologic maps in the area focused on the proportional differences between the
paleosomatic and neosomatic components of the migmatitic rocks within the subprovince to distinguish
geologic units (Southwick and Ojakangas, 1979), while other authors have decided to incorporate the
textural, compositional, and petrophysical characteristics of paleosomes and neosomes to further
distinguish coherent map units (Jirsa, 2011; Jirsa and others, 2014). In addition to traditional field
observations, thousands of magnetic susceptibility measurements recorded for units across the subprovince
have been used to varied effect (Chandler and Lively, 2014). While petrophysical characteristics of the host
6

�Trip 1 – Quetico
rocks are not sufficient to determine many units, the extent and morphology of some distinct units, namely
late magnetite bearing granites and pegmatites, have been found to correlate with higher magnetic
susceptibilities and resultant aeromagnetic anomalies (Fig. 1-3b).
The structural complexities observed in this trip are preserved from the outcrop to map-scale. Many
map-scale structures are discernable in aeromagnetic derivative maps and have been used in conjunction
with the magnetic characteristics described above to outline geometric and temporal relationships between
deformation and intrusive intervals where outcrop exposure is insufficient. Careful observations at
individual outcrops has been found to be beneficial in comparison to regional lithologic mapping. Many
geologic structures may be more readily identified by field checking and correlating the roughness and
patterns of exposed outcrops using lidar and aerial photos. Recognition of post-intrusive faults visible in
LiDAR derived maps and as linear magnetic lows in aeromagnetic maps have also helped reconcile locales
where map patterns would be otherwise difficult to align with the known structural character of the area.

FIELD TRIP STOP DESCRIPTIONS
It should be noted that this trip derives from several years of field work to produce two geologic
maps of the western-most exposed portions of the Quetico subprovince in Minnesota (Jirsa, 2011; Jirsa and
others, 2014); and refinement by more recent field work to create maps of St. Louis and Koochiching
Counties (Jirsa and others, 2020; Nowariak and others, in preparation). Mapping focused largely on
structural and magnetic attributes that could yield a “meaningful” geologic map of this very complex
terrane, and little analytical work was conducted; though ongoing work in Koochiching county has begun
to tackle this. As a result, this field trip lacks details of metamorphism, petrology, and geochemisty.
Instead, the focus was largely structural, in an attempt to reconcile prominent geophysical anomalies and
topographic trends with field observations. The associated maps incorporate structural data, field
relationships, and thousands of magnetic susceptibility measurements to ascertain the connections between
lithology and magnetite content. Because glacial sediments are thin to absent in much of the area, mapping
was also influenced by 10-meter (and subsequent 1-meter, for more recent mapping) LiDAR imagery (Fig.
1-3a). Mapping in the Quetico subprovince on which this field trip is based was supported by grants from
the U.S. Geological Survey STATEMAP element of the National Geologic Mapping program, and by the
Minnesota Environmental and Natural Resources Trust Fund.
NOTE: All locations are denoted in UTM coordinates, NAD 83, Zone 15N
STOP 1 – Feldspathic graywacke of the Lake
Vermilion Formation
Location: 526342E/5288565N, (47.74991°, 92.64856°), Highway 53 Northbound, 0.4 miles north
of Heino Road (County 467)
Description: This stop examines the feldspathic
metasedimentary and meta-volcanogenic sediments of
the Lake Vermilion formation, formally part of the
Wawa Subprovince. Here, the Lake Vermilion
formation is composed of feldspathic graywackes and
tuffaceous slates and wackes. The stratigraphy Figure 1-5. Pavement exposure of laminated
feldspathic metagraywacke of the Lake Vermilion
generally tops to the north and is folded, with locally
formation.
well-developed axial planar cleavage and thin shear
bands. This stop serves as a reference in comparing the composition and character of the metasedimentary
7

�Trip 1 – Quetico
rocks of the uppermost units of the Wawa subprovince and the metasedimentary rocks of the Quetico
subprovince.
Directions: From the Mountain Iron Community Center, head east on highway 169 and turn north onto
highway 53, continue north 20 miles and pull-off on the right side of the highway.
STOP 2 – Alkalic and Lamprophyric Intrusive Rocks, Gheen Pluton Area
Location: 515162E/5306034N (47.74992°, -92.64856°) (2a); 514380E/5306809N (-92.80754°,
47.91444°) (2c); Highway 53, ~6.5 miles northwest of Cook, MN
Description: This series of outcrops examines
exposures of alkalic granitoids and lamprophyric
rocks intruded into metasediments of the Quetico
Subprovince. Stop 2a (515162E/5306034N): This
outcrop preserves outstanding porphyritic textures
within pyroxene syenite and syenodiorite of the
Gheen Pluton (Fig. 1-6). Evidence for multiple
phases of intrusion and magma mingling are
observed throughout. Very coarse phenocrysts
exhibit compositional zoning and local magmaticflow features. The main phase of syenite and
syenodiorite contains inclusions of, and is cross-cut
by medium grained, amphibole-phyric gabbro and
pyroxenite. Late aplitic and pegmatitic dikes
represent the youngest intrusive components of the Figure 1-6. Porphyritic syenodiorite with abundant
outcrop. Chloritic slickensides are apparent on feldspar phenocrysts at stop 2a.
fracture
faces,
locally.
Stop
2b
(514530E/5306605N): This outcrop of the west side of the highway, USE CAUTION WHEN
CROSSING THE ROAD. Here, pyroxene-biotite phyric lamprophyric rocks are exposed (Fig. 1-7).
Beyond the dominant biotite and pyroxene, the mineralogy includes prismatic hornblende, feldspar, apatite,
and trace chalcopyrite. Limited work to characterize these rocks has determined they are best described as
augite bearing kersantites and spessartites (Le Bas, 2007). The mineralogy and texture vary within the

a

b

Figure 1-7. Representative examples of lamprophyric rocks exposed at stops 2b-2d. (a) Biotite-pyroxene bearing
kersantite with inclusions of wallrock. (b) Pyroxene-hornblende phyric spessartite with plagioclase dominated
groundmass. Blocky, prismatic pyroxene dominates the modal mineralogy here.

8

�Trip 1 – Quetico
outcrop at multiple scales, where complex structural and intrusive relationships juxtapose and include
multiple mineralogic and lithologic phases. Stop 2c (514380E/5306809N): This outcrop, on the east side
of the highway, is composed of similar lamprophyric rocks as stop 2b, but include blocks of lamprophyric
rocks of varied composition and the schist wall-rock. The schist here is commonly altered and is cross-cut
by small dikes and veinlets of lamprophyric mineralogy. Schist inclusions become more abundant to the
north. Stop 2d (514262/5306920): Continuing to the north from stop 2c, the dominant lithology transitions
to well foliated biotite-muscovite schist cross-cut by sulfide bearing quartz veins and discontinuous dikes
and veinlets of lamproid parallel to and cross-cutting foliation.
Directions: From the Stop 1, continue north along highway 53, continue north ~14 miles and pull-off on
the side of the highway.
STOP 3 – Polyphase, granitoid rich migmatite
Location: 512642E/5316320N, (48.00005°, -92.83053°), Highway 53, ~2.5 miles north of Gheen Corner

Figure 1-8. Multiphase migmatite at stop 3 showing representative intrusive relationships between the host biotite
schist (dark-grey to black), tonalitic neosome 1 (grey),and granitic neosome 2 (tan-pink). Schist preserves crude
structural grain.

9

�Trip 1 – Quetico
Description: This extensive roadcut exhibits the complex features common throughout much of the
migmatitic core of the Quetico subprovince. Here, we will observe and discuss the structural and intrusive
relationships and geophysical properties between the metasedimentary quartz-biotite schist paleosome,
early granodioritic and tonalitic neosome 1 intrusions, and granitic neosome 2 intrusions. The complexity
observed here begs the question of how to create coherent geologic maps in similarly complex regions
across the central Quetico Subprovince. Stop 3a (512642E/5316320N) Here, paleosomes of biotite schist
have been strongly recrystallized and exhibit a granoblastic texture with faint foliation defined by biotite
orientation. Multiple phases of neosome intrusions, both mafic and felsic, include lenses and irregular,
blobby bodies of biotite-hornblende granodiorite ascribed to neosome 1 affinity. All units are cross-cut by
pink, coarse-grained biotite granite and syenogranite with abundant pegmatitic veins and segregations. The
intrusive relationships seen here generally apply to the regional evolution of magmatic rocks within the
Vermilion Granitic Complex and Quetico Subprovince, at large. Stop 3b (512645E/5316400N) The
agmatic migmatite here includes mafic and silicic paleosome blocks which are disaggregated by the
intrusion of both neosome 1 and neosome 2 (Fig. 1-8). Although intrusive phases of the migmatite dominate
the outcrop, the structural grain of the paleosomes is preserved as relict bedding and faint foliations. One
may note that the paleosomes of differing compositions are difficult to distinguish on the outcrop. Silicic,
quartz-biotite schist paleosomes are strongly recrystallized and exhibit an almost massive granular texture.
Mafic paleosomes are locally present and are characterized by poorly foliated hornblende (+/- pyroxene)
bearing assemblages along with coarsened biotite. Mafic paleosomes seen here may represent thin layers
of primary, mafic protoliths or may be restitic components of in-situ melting of the migmatitic host rock.
The exposure here is representative of many of the outcrops within the migmatitic core of the Quetico
subprovince and highlights the difficulty of creating meaningful geologic maps in the region. How would
you map this outcrop? Stop 3c (512644E/4135316N) Small, biotite-pyroxene lamproid intrusion, similar
to those inspected at stop 2. Here, acicular, prismatic pyroxene is supported in potassium feldspar-rich
segregations (Fig. 1-9). Chalcopyrite is present in
trace amounts. Stop 3d (512645E/5316450N)
Throughout the core of the Quetico Subprovince,
migmatites are locally associated with pyroxenite and
pyroxene-hornblende rich gabbroic dikes. Here, a set
of pyroxenite dikes with sheared, biotite rich margins
crosscut the biotite schist and neosome 1 wallrock
and have mutually cross-cutting relationships with
granitic neosome 2 intrusions. Stop 3e
(512612E/5316833N) On the northern end of the
roadcut, the complex multi-stage migmatite gives
way to bedded biotite schist with graded beds and
crosscutting dikes of late neosome 2 granite and
Figure 1-9. Acicular, prismatic pyroxene within
pegmatite. Beds here are stratigraphically facing up,
potassium feldspar-rich matrix at stop 3c. This small
based on fining upward sequences in graded beds,
intrusion is similar to alkalic rocks observed at stop 2.
and dip 45 to the south-southeast.
Directions: From stop 2, continue north along highway 53, continue north ~6.5 miles and pull-off on the
right side of the highway.

10

�Trip 1 – Quetico
STOP 4 – Schist and schist-rich rich migmatite near Myrtle Lake
Location: 523750E/5324590N, (-92.68116°, 48.07414°), Highway 23, ~7.5 miles east of Orr
Description: Here, quartz-feldsparbiotite schists and schist-rich migmatite of
the Quetico subprovince are exposed. This
outcrop preserves moderately dipping beds
(30° to the E-SE) of turbiditic
metasedimentary rocks with graded beds.
Though obscured by metamorphism,
bedding here is interpreted to be upright
with graded beds observed as decimeter
scale, subtle, rhythmic changes in the
amount of micaceous minerals. The base of
individual beds is marked by coarse grained
sandy layers, which transition to biotite rich
schist marking the top of the beds. Fine
grains of garnet are present locally in beds
Figure 1-10. Biotite schist with faint, relict bedding intruded by
with appropriate composition. The schist is
boudinaged and lit-par-lit dikelets of tonalitic neosome 1.
intruded by boudinaged dikes and veins up
to 1 meter thick and lit-par-lit injections of tonalitic and granitic neosome 1 (Fig. 1-10). Rare dikes of
coarse-grained to pegmatitic, pink, granitic neosome 2 crosscut bedding and dominant fabric of the outcrop
and mark the latest intrusive event.
Directions: From stop 3, continue north on Highway 53 to the town of Orr and make a right turn on OrrBuyck Road (Highway 23) and continue 7.5 miles east to the roadcut.
LUNCH AND STOP 5 – Vermilion Falls ***No Hammers***
Location: 531860E/5345460N, (48.26155°, -92.57072°), Picnic area off Vermilion Falls Rd (USFS 491)
Description: This picturesque waterfall cuts through quartz-plagioclase-biotite schist and schist rich
migmatite. Both upstream and downstream of the falls, the Vermilion River runs parallel to the dominant
regional fabric defined by the orientation of the underlying bedded and foliated metasedimentary rocks and
generally foliation parallel intrusions of neosome 1 before draining into Crane Lake. Vermilion Falls
occupies a N-NW trending, post-metamorphic and post-intrusive fracture and fault zone orthogonal to the
dominant internal fabric of the Precambrian bedrock (Fig. 1-3, Fig. 1-11). These fracture and fault networks
are ubiquitous throughout the Vermilion Granitic Complex and the Quetico Subprovince and strongly
influence the surface topography and outcrop exposure in the area. Little is known about the timing and
relative offsets along these fault zones, though correlation of map units on either side of these features
suggests only minor relative motion.
Near the upper portion of the falls, tonalitic neosome 1 dikes and sills delaminate the schist along bedding
and sub-parallel foliation planes and occupy mesoscopic fold hinges. Downstream, tonalitic neosome 1
dikes are discordant and cross-cut the dominant fabric in the rock.

11

�Trip 1 – Quetico

Figure 1-11. Geologic map of the Vermilion Falls area, after Jirsa and others (2011) draped over LiDAR hillshade.
NW trending, post-metamorphic and post-intrusive fractures and faults have been highlighted with dashed lines.
"GM" - granite rich migmatite, "SM” – schist rich migmatite, “LLC” – Lac La Croix granite, “TTG” – tonalitetrondhjemite-granodiorite gneiss.

Directions: From Stop 4, continue east on Orr-Buyck Road (Highway 23) for 8.5 miles, continue straight
along Crane Lake Road (Highway 24) at the village of Buyck for 9.5 miles, turn left onto Vermilion
Falls Road (USFS 491) for 5.6 miles, turn left onto single-lane access road to turnaround at the
picnic area.
STOP 6 – Echo Lake Quarry
Location: 549810E/5324630N, (48.07300°, -92.33132°), Quarry off USFS 200
Description: NOTE: This is an active quarry, permission to access this site needs to be granted from the
quarry operator prior to visiting.
The photogenic exposures at this dimension stone quarry include washed, glacially scoured outcrops and
fresh blast faces of taxitic, red-pink to pinkish grey granitic gneiss and granite with abundant mafic
inclusions (Fig. 1-12). This unit is mapped as a gneissic phase of the Lac La Croix of the Vermilion Granitic
Complex, temporally related to neosome 2 seen at other stops (Jirsa, 2011). Gneissic layering here is chaotic
and boundaries between gneissic phases are diffuse. Abundant mafic inclusions and schlieren ranging from
a few centimeters to multiple meters in size and are randomly oriented. Mafic inclusions are delaminated
along planar features and have diffuse, fringed boundaries. Increases in the abundance of biotite and

12

�Trip 1 – Quetico
hornblende on the margins of mafic inclusions represent restitic rinds developed during assimilation and
interaction with the host granitic melt.
Directions: From Stop 5, return to Crane Lake Road (Highway 24) along Vermilion Falls Road (USFS
491) and turn right. Continue southward on Crane Lake Road (Highway 24) for 5.5 miles and turn
left onto Echo Trail. Continue along Echo Trail for 8.3 miles and turn right onto USFS 200 for 5
miles. Turn Left onto unnamed forest road near Gustafson Lake.
RETURN TO MOUNTAIN IRON COMMUNITY CENTER

Figure 1-12. Gneissic granitoid with partially digested amphibolite inclusion.

Directions: From Stop 6, return to Echo Trail via USFS 200 and turn left on Crane Lake Road. Continue
south on Crane Lake Road/Orr-Buyck Road to the town of Orr. Turn left onto Highway 53 and continue
44.1 miles to the Highway 169 exit ramp. Turn left onto Enterprise Drive.

13

�Trip 1 – Quetico

REFERENCES
Bauer, R.L., 1985, Correlation of early recumbent and younger upright folding across the boundary between an
Archean gneiss belt and greenstone terrane, northeastern Minnesota: Geology, v. 13, p. 657-660.
Bauer, R.L., Czeck, D.M., Hudleston, P.J., and Tickoff, B., 2011, Structural geology of the subprovince boundaries
in the Archean Superior Province of northern Minnesota and adjacent Ontario: Geological Society of America
Field Guide 24, p. 203-241.
Bauer, R.L., Hudleston, P.J., and Southwick, D.L., 1992, Deformation across the western Quetico subprovince and
adjacent boundary regions in Minnesota: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 29, p. 2087-2103.
Chandler, V.W., and Lively, 2014, Rock Properties Database; Minnesota Geological Survey web-accessible file data
(http://www.mngs.umn.edu/).
Davis, D.W., Pezzutto, F. and Ojakangas, R.W., 1990. The age and provenance of metasedimentary rocks in the
Quetico Subprovince, Ontario, from single zircon analyses: implications for Archean sedimentation and
tectonics in the Superior Province. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 99(3), pp.195-205.
Day, W.C., 1990, Bedrock geologic map of the Rainy Lake area, northern Minnesota: U.S. Geological Survey
Miscellaneous Investigations Series I-1927, scale 1:50,000.
Day, W.C. and Weiblen, P.W., 1986. Origin of late Archean granite: geochemical evidence from the Vermilion
Granitic Complex of northern Minnesota. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 93(3), pp.283-296.
Fralick, P., Purdon, R.H., and Davis, D.W., 2006, Neoarchean trans-subprovince sediment transport in southwestern
Superior Province: sedimentalogical, geochemical, and geochronological evidence: Canadian Journal of Earth
Sciences, v.43, p. 1055-1070.
Jirsa, M.A., 2011, Bedrock geology of the Crane Lake and Brule Narrows 30’X60’ quadrangles, northern
Minnesota: Minnesota Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Map M-192, scale 1:100,000.
Jirsa, M.S., Block, A.R., Boerboom, Chandler, V.W., and Peterson, D.M., 2020, Bedrock geology of St. Louis
County, Minnesota: Minnesota Geological Survey County Geologic Atlas C-51, Part A, Plate 2—Bedrock
Geology; scale 1:200,000. [contains ancillary digital files including geophysics and geochronology]
Jirsa, M.A., Boerboon, T.J., and Chandler, V.W., 2014, Bedrock geology of the International Falls-Little Fork
30’X60’ quadrangles, northern Minnesota: Minnesota Geological Survey Miscellaneous Map M-197, scale
1:100,000.
Le Bas, M., 2007. Igneous rock classification revisited 4: Lamprophyres. Geology Today, 23(5), pp.167-168.
Poulsen, K.H., Borradaile, G.J., and Kehlenbeck, M.M. 1980. An inverted Archean succession at Rainy Lake,
Ontario: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 17, p. 1358-1369
Salerno, R.A., 2017. Neoarchean Deposition, Metamorphism, And Intrusion In Rapid Succession, Vermilion
Granitic Complex, Superior Province Of Northern Minnesota. Master's thesis, University of Minnesota – Duluth.
Sawyer, E.W., 2008. Atlas of migmatites (Vol. 9). NRC Research press.
Southwick, D.L., 1991, On the genesis of Archean granite through two-stage melting of the Quetico accretionary
prism at a transpressional plate boundary: Geological Society of America Bulletin v. 103, p. 1385-1394.
Southwick, D.L., and Ojakangas, R.W., 1979, Geologic map of Minnesota, International Falls sheet: Minnesota
Geological Survey, scale 1:250,000.
Southwick, D.L., and Sims, P.K., 1980, The Vermilion Granitic Complex—A new name for old rocks in northern
Minnesota: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1124A, p. A1-A11.
Tabor, J.R., 1988, Deformational and metamorphic history of Archean rocks in the Rainy Lake District, Northern
Minnesota, [Ph.D. thesis]: Minneapolis, University of Minnesota, 224 p.
Valli, F., Guillot, S., and Hattori, K.H., 2004, Source and tectono-metamorphic evolution of mafic and pelitic
metasedimentary rocks from the central Quetico metasedimentary belt, Archean Superior Province of Canada:
Precambrian Research, v. 132, p. 155-177.
Williams, H.R., 1990, Subprovince accretion tectonics in the south-central Superior Province: Canadian Journal of
Earth Sciences, v. 27, p. 571-581.
Zaleski, E., van Breemen, O. and Peterson, V.L., 1999. Geological evolution of the Manitouwadge greenstone belt
and Wawa-Quetico subprovince boundary, Superior Province, Ontario, constrained by U-Pb zircon dates of
supracrustal and plutonic rocks. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 36(6), pp.945-966.

14

�Trip 2 – Cu-Ni Duluth Complex

FIELD TRIP 2
Drill Core from three Cu-Ni Deposits of the Duluth Complex
Mark Severson1,2 (retired), Cullen Phillips3, and Kevin Boerst4
1

(1988–2012) Natural Resources Research Institute, University of Minnesota, Duluth, 5013 Miller Trunk
Hwy, Duluth, MN 55811
2
(2013–2018) Previously Teck American, then Teck Resources Unlimited, now NewRange (joint venture
between Teck and PolyMet Mining Inc.)
3
NewRange Copper Nickel, 6500 Kensington Dr., Hoyt Lakes, MN 55750
4
Twin Metals Minnesota, 400 Miners Drive East, P.O. Box 329, Ely, MN 55731

Diagram from Peterson (2010) modified from plots of Eckstrand and Hulbert (2007).

This guidebook is modified and updated from a guidebook published in 2016 for the 62nd
Institute on Lake Superior Geology (pdf).
Severson, M., Ware, A., Boerst, K., and Geerts, S., 2016, Cu-Ni-PGE Deposits of the Duluth
Complex. Proceedings of the Institute on Lake Superior Geology, Volume 62, Part 2-Field
Trip Guidebook, Trip 3, P. 27-78
15

�Trip 2 – Cu-Ni Duluth Complex

INTRODUCTION
The Duluth Complex, located in northeastern Minnesota, is a series of tholeiitic intrusions of
Keweenawan age (1.1 billion years ago) that formed with coeval flood basalts along a portion of the
Midcontinent Rift. The Midcontinent Rift system developed during crustal extension during the
Mesoproterozoic era and is traceable in a broad arc that begins in northeastern Kansas extending northward
through the axis of Lake Superior and then southeastward into Michigan. The Duluth Complex and
associated Keweenawan intrusions constitute one of the largest mafic complexes in the world. These rocks
cover an arcuate area over 3,000 square miles (5,000 square kilometers) extending from the city of Duluth
northward 170 miles (275 km) to the Canadian border. The northwest, convex edge of the complex defines
its basal contact, which dips to the southeast towards the rift. Along this contact the complex is successively
underlain by Neoarchean granites (Giants Range granitic rocks) and greenstones (Vermilion District) to the
north, and Paleoproterozoic sediments (Virginia Formation and Biwabik Iron Formation) to the south. Roof
rocks to the Duluth Complex consist of Mesoproterozoic intrusive and volcanic rocks of the Beaver Bay
Complex and North Shore Volcanic Group, respectively. Once recognized as a single large lopolithic
intrusion, the complex has since been established to be collectively comprised of numerous smaller subintrusions (Figure 2-1) that were episodically emplaced into the base of a comagmatic volcanic edifice
between 1108 and 1098 million years ago.

Figure 2-1. Generalized geologic map of northeastern Minnesota (modified from Miller et al., 2002).

16

�Trip 2 – Cu-Ni Duluth Complex
The Duluth Complex hosts several known large low-grade disseminated Cu-Ni occurrences (Figure
2-2), all of which are located within the basal portions of the Partridge River (PRI), Bathtub (BTI) and
South Kawishiwi (SKI) sub-intrusions. A cursory study by Listerud and Meineke (1977) estimated 4.4
billion tons of material averaging 0.66% Cu and 0.20% Ni, using a 0.5% Cu cutoff, in at least nine deposits.
Five of these Cu-Ni deposits have recent NI 43-101 reports that estimate a combined mineral inventory
well over that amount using lower cutoff values. Known resources (Measured and Indicated, and Inferred)
for several of the deposits in Duluth Complex are shown in Table 2-1. Copper-to-nickel ratios generally
range from 3:1 to 4:1. Primary mineralization is magmatic. Sulfur source is probably both local (from the
footwall sediments) and magmatic. Sulfur isotope studies indicate that most of the sulfur was derived from
the Virginia Formation. Most of the mineralization is in the basal portions of these intrusions but there are
also local disseminated zones higher in the intrusions. The latter tend to be much more discontinuous except
for
continuous
mineralized
horizons,
termed “Magenta” style
mineralization, that are
present at NorthMet and
Mesaba, and to a lesser
degree, at South Filson
Creek.
The
mineralization styles at
each of the Cu-Ni
deposits are varied. The
general geology and
mineralization of the
Partridge River, Bathtub,
and South Kawishiwi
intrusions, as well as the
deposits that they host,
are presented below.

Figure 2-2.
Distribution of Cu-NiPGE deposits (in red)
and potential titaniumenriched ultramafic
pipes (OUIs in blue) in
the Partridge River,
Bathtub, and South
Kawishiwi intrusions.
Note that the Mesaba
deposit is mostly
contained in the
Bathtub intrusion.

17

�Trip 2 – Cu-Ni Duluth Complex

Table 2-1. Known Resources for the Various Duluth Complex Cu-Ni-PGE Deposits at various Cut-Offs. Average
values for Co and Ag are available for some of the deposits but are not shown in the table.
Deposit

Tons (st)
millions

Cu
%

Ni
%

Pd
ppb

Pt
ppb

Au
ppb

Maturi –
Measured and Indicated

1,233

0.58

0.19

334

147

80

0.30%
Cu

Twin Metals
Minnesota

43-101
AMEC
Oct-14

Maturi –
Inferred

563

0.49

0.16

305

134

68

0.30%
Cu

Twin Metals
Minnesota

43-101
AMEC
Oct-14

Birch Lake –
Indicated

100

0.52

0.16

515

235

115

0.30%
Cu

Twin Metals
Minnesota

43-101
AMEC
Oct-15

Birch Lake –
Inferred

239

0.46

0.15

370

180

87

0.30%
Cu

Twin Metals
Minnesota

43-101
AMEC
Oct-14

480

0.43

0.16

0.30%
Cu

Twin Metals
Minnesota

43-101
AMEC
Oct-14

425

0.41

0.14

0.20%
Cu

Encampment
Resources

Non 43101 Amax
1979

NorthMet –
Measured and indicated

702
Open Pit

0.25

0.07

234

67

34

0.20%
Cu

New Range
Cu-Ni

43-101F1
M3/HRC
Dec-22

NorthMet –

441
Open Pit

0.25

0.07

243

67

34

0.20%
Cu

/New Range
Cu-Ni

43-101F1
M3/HRC
Dec-22

Mesaba – Measured
and Indicated

2,207
Open Pit

0.43

0.10

97

34

25

NSR
$12/ton

New Range
Cu-Ni

43-101F1
IMC/JDS
Nov-22

Mesaba –
Inferred

1,423
Open Pit

0.37

0.09

143

43

26

NSR
$12/ton

New Range
Cu-Ni

43-101F1
IMC/JDS
Nov -22

Spruce Road – Inferred
Serpentine

Inferred

Cut-Off

Company

Source

Partridge River intrusion
The Partridge River intrusion (PRI) is exposed in an arc-shaped area ~10x20 miles (16x32 km) that
extends from the southern edge of the Mesaba deposit on the northeast to the Water Hen deposit on the
southwest as shown in Figure 2-2. Footwall rocks include the Virginia Formation and very locally the
Biwabik Iron Formation. The basal stratigraphic section (Figure 2-3) was first described by Severson and
Hauck (1990) and is briefly summarized below.
Unit I (PR1)
The lowest troctolitic unit of the PRI consists of intermixed troctolite and augite troctolite that
locally grade to olivine gabbro. Most of the unit is sulfide-bearing with a PGE-bearing horizon at the top
(Red Horizon of Geerts, 1991, 1994). Unique to PR1 are extreme variations in modal mineral percentage
and average grain size. Due to this heterogeneous texture, numerous internal contacts divide PR1 into
several subunits that are probably related to continuous magma replenishment. Hornfels inclusions of the
Virginia Formation are most commonly present within PR1. Near the basal contact the intrusive rocks of
PR1 have undergone silica contamination and norite and gabbronorite are often the dominant rock type in
the bottom zone.
Unit II (PR2)
This unit is characterized by sulfide-poor, texturally-homogenous, troctolite that locally grades to
augite troctolite and leucotroctolite. PR2 grades downward into a persistent ultramafic horizon(s) defined
by melatroctolite, with local peridotite zones, that generally exhibits a sharp contact with PR1.
18

�Trip 2 – Cu-Ni Duluth Complex

Figure 2-3. Stratigraphy of the Partridge River intrusion at the Mesaba, NorthMet, Wetlegs, and Wyman
Creek deposits (note that the Bathtub intrusion is denoted by the BT-series units in the lower right corner).
From Severson and Hauck (2008).

Unit III (PR3)
Unit III is the most distinctive “marker bed” of the PRI at the NorthMet, Wetlegs, and southern
Mesaba deposits. This unit is fine-grained and is characterized by leucotroctolite that locally grades to
troctolite and augite troctolite. In all cases, the rock presents a mottled appearance due to the presence of
very coarse-grained (&gt;2 cm) olivine oikocrysts that are irregularly distributed throughout the rock. This
mottled-texture and fine-grained nature make PR3 unique relative to all the other units of the PRI. PR3
exhibits variable thicknesses at each of the Cu-Ni deposits and pinches out to the west of Wetlegs and to
the southeast of Mesaba. The extreme thickness range for PR3 and its physical attributes (poikilitic) have
suggested to several geologists that it may be associated with an earlier Anorthositic Series intrusive phase.
In this scenario, PR3 may have been intruded earliest along the Virginia Formation-North Shore Volcanic
contact and was later underplated by PR1 and PR2 in an early-formed magma chamber subject to
continuous magma replenishment.
Unit IV (PR4)
Unit IV of the PRI is characterized by thick intervals of texturally-homogeneous troctolite and/or
augite troctolite. In many areas, PR4 grades upward into a persistent zone of augite-rich augite troctolite
and olivine gabbro, which in turn, grades upward into leucotroctolite that is characteristic of PR5. At its
base, PR4 has a semi-persistent ultramafic horizon that contains one or more melatroctolite and/or peridotite
layers. In some areas a thin semi-massive oxide layer containing very fine-grained chromium
titanomagnetite is present immediately above the upper contact of PR3.
Unit V (PR5)
Unit V is generally an easily recognizable unit in that it is characterized by thick intervals of
texturally-homogeneous, medium- to coarse-grained leucotroctolite (dominantly anorthositic troctolite).
Another feature that aids in distinguishing PR5 is a highly gradational bottom contact into augite troctolite
at the top of PR4. The upper contact of PR5 is sharp against one or more ultramafic horizons that mark the
base of the overlying PR6.
19

�Trip 2 – Cu-Ni Duluth Complex
Unit VI (PR6)
Leucotroctolite (anorthositic troctolite to troctolitic anorthosite) is the most common rock type in
PR6. However, near equal amounts of troctolite and augite troctolite are more common in some drill holes
at Mesaba. Overall, PR6 becomes more heterogeneous, consisting of multiple rock types, toward the
southern and eastern margins of the Mesaba deposit. The base of PR6 is usually marked by a fairly persistent
ultramafic horizon.
Unit VII (PR7)
This unit consists almost wholly of homogeneous leucotroctolite at the NorthMet deposit, but it is
characterized by a potpourri of rock types at Mesaba with leucotroctolite being slightly more common.
Overall, PR7 becomes more heterogeneous, consisting of multiple rock types, toward the southern and
eastern margin of the Mesaba deposit. PR7 contains a basal ultramafic horizon(s) in most drill holes.
Unit VIII (PR8)
The uppermost PRI unit that has been drilled at Mesaba is referred to as PR8 that consists of a
multitude of rock types with no consistent pattern except that leucotroctolite is slightly more dominant.
PR3-like inclusions are excessively common to this unit.
Oxide-bearing Ultramafic Intrusions (OUIs)
Several plug-like, late-stage, oxide-bearing ultramafic intrusions have been delineated in the PRI,
the Bathtub intrusion (BTI), and elsewhere within the Duluth Complex (Figure 2-4). The OUIs are intrusive
into all units of the PRI and BTI and range in size from large bodies (&gt;200 feet thick, &gt;60 meters thick) to
small bodies/lenses (&lt;30 feet thick, &lt;9 meters thick). Rock types are characterized by coarse- to very
coarse-grained peridotite and dunite to pegmatitic clinopyroxenite and locally minor orthopyroxenite.
These rock types contain varying amounts of ilmenite and titanomagnetite ranging from 5% to massive
oxide zones (&gt;80% oxides). The OUIs are in sharp contact with the surrounding troctolitic rocks and are
clearly younger. In almost all instances the OUIs are spatially arranged along linear trends suggesting that
structural control was important to their genesis.
Two of the OUIs are currently being evaluated for their titanium potential and include: 1. Longnose
with a NI 43-101 inferred resource of 65.3 million tonnes of 16.4 TiO2; and 2. Titac with a NI 43-101
inferred resource of 45.1 million tonnes of 15% TiO2 (Farrow, 2012). A third OUI, Skibo, is being evaluated
for its high-grade Cu-Ni-PGE potential where two vein stockwork zones have been identified by historic
drill holes (Inco – up to 6.42% Ni in a 1 foot-thick massive sulfide and other intervals in the hole) and
recent drilling by Encampment Minerals (Green Bridge Metals press release, Feb. 6, 2024 at
www.greenbridgemetals. com).

NorthMet Deposit (NewRange Copper Nickel)
The NorthMet deposit is located in the PRI as shown in Figures 2-2 and 2-5. This deposit was
initially drilled by United States Steel Corporation (USSC) at what they called the Dunka Road deposit.
More recent drilling was conducted by PolyMet Mining Incorporated at the now renamed NorthMet deposit
that is being developed by NewRange Copper Nickel (Glencore and Teck joint venture). The geology of
the deposit consists of seven igneous units, originally defined by Severson and Hauck (1990) as shown in
Figure 2-6.

20

�Trip 2 – Cu-Ni Duluth Complex

Mineralization Trends at NorthMet
Two open pits are currently planned at
the NorthMet deposit - an East Pit and a West Pit
(shown in Figure 2-7). The majority of economic
mineralization at NorthMet occurs in three
scenarios: 1. All of Unit I is mineralized at the
East Pit (see cross-section in Figure 2-8); 2.
mostly the upper portion of Unit I is the best
mineralized in the West Pit (see cross-section in
Figure 2-9) and the bottom portions of Unit I will
not be mined; and 3. the cross-cutting Magenta
Zone (Figs. 2-9 and 2-10) is located well above
the basal contact. Grades are generally highest at
the top of Unit I and decrease going down hole.
However, there are exceptions, and the middle of
Unit I contains the highest grades in the center of
the deposit.
PGE-enriched zones at NorthMet
Geerts (1991, 1994) found that the top of
Unit I often hosts a PGE-bearing zone that he
referred to as the Red Horizon (also referred to
as Red Zone) which was determined to be
approximately 10 meters thick with an average
of 0.57% Cu and 986 ppb Pt+Pd. Geerts also
found two more PGE-bearing zones within Unit
I referred to as Orange and Yellow horizons. All
three of these horizons are positioned beneath
ultramafic layers suggesting that they are the
result of recharge events and magma mixing
whereby a new influx of primitive, PGE-bearing
magma was injected into the chamber creating
Figure 2-4. Distribution of the Oxide-bearing Ultramafic
the ultramafic layers (crystal settling) before
Intrusions (OUIs) within the Partridge River, Western
mixing with the resident magma (sulfideMargin and Boulder Lake intrusions. Note the linear
bearing) and forming the PGE-enriched zones
arrangement of OUI along various trends.
beneath them. The continuity of these three
PGE-bearing
zones
in
more
recent
PolyMet/NewRange drilled holes is unknown and the three zones are not specifically mentioned in any NI
43-101 reports or field trip guidebooks. It is important to note that the Red Horizon/Zone has been
documented to be present at the top of PR1 at Mesaba (Severson and Hauck, 2003).
Mineralized Magenta Zone at NorthMet
In addition to the Red Horizon, at the top of PR1, there is another PGE-bearing horizon that has
been referred to as the Magenta Horizon (or Magenta Zone). This zone is unique in that it crosses several
lithologic contacts and progressively downcuts through Units 6, 5, 4, and 3 in a northerly direction (Figure
2-10). The total resource volume of the Magenta zone relative to the rest of the deposit has not been
documented in any NI 43-101 reports. Initially, Geerts (1991, 1994) found the Magenta Zone in six holes
wherein it averaged about 0.72% Cu and 1,488 ppb Pd+Pt in an over 8 meters thick zone. Cu:Ni ratios in
the Magenta Zone are reported to be 3.9-4.1:1. More recent drilling by PolyMet and NewRange has
documented the presence of the PGE-enriched Magenta Zone in additional drill holes that are positioned in
21

�Trip 2 – Cu-Ni Duluth Complex
the western half of the deposit as shown in Figure 2-8. The Magenta Zone is also present in the PRI along
the southern edge of Mesaba deposit to the east where it is referred to as the PRU zone by NewRange CuNi.

Figure 2-5. Location and geology of the NorthMet deposit relative to the nearby Mesaba deposit. Modified
from combined maps of Miller and Severson (2005) and Severson and Miller (2005).

Mesaba Deposit and the Bathtub intrusion (NewRange Copper Nickel)
In 1990, the Natural Resources Research Institute (NRRI) was the first to define and describe the
igneous stratigraphy of the PRI (Severson and Hauck, 1990). This same stratigraphy was documented to be
present in portions of the Mesaba deposit in 1995 (then referred to as the Babbitt deposit). However, this
stratigraphy applied to only the deep drill holes along the extreme southern portion of Mesaba and all

22

�Trip 2 – Cu-Ni Duluth Complex

Figure 2-6. Igneous stratigraphic section recognized by NewRange Copper Nickel at their NorthMet deposit (not
that these same units are also present along the southern margin of the Mesaba deposit where they are referred to as
PR1, PR2, PR3 etc.)

23

�Trip 2 – Cu-Ni Duluth Complex

Figure 2-7. Geologic map of the NorthMet deposit showing outlines of the two planned open pits. The location of
the mineralized Magenta zone is present in the southern half of the West Pit.

Figure 2-8. Cross-section illustrating mineralization trends in NorthMet’s East Pit. Note that all of Unit I is
mineralized down to the footwall Virginia Formation.

24

�Trip 2 – Cu-Ni Duluth Complex

Figure 2-9. Cross-section illustrating mineralization trends in NorthMet’s West Pit. Note that the top portion of Unit
I will be mined as it exhibits the best mineralization. Note also that the Magenta mineralized zone is present in a
downcutting relationship in Units 5, 4, and 3.
Figure 2-10. Typical
cross-section at
NorthMet (facing east)
showing mineralized
zones and modeled
units. The “Upper Zone
Mineralization” in this
diagram is also referred
to as the Magenta zone.
Note how this zone
progressively transects
downward into the
lower geologic units in
a northerly direction.

25

�Trip 2 – Cu-Ni Duluth Complex

Figure 2-11. Geologic map (circa 2015) showing distribution of major igneous units in the Bathtub intrusion (BTI)
and adjacent Partridge River intrusion (PRI) of the Mesaba deposit.

attempts to carry this stratigraphy to the north into the majority of Mesaba were not conclusive. Through
several iterative follow-up logging campaigns by the NRRI, the Bathtub intrusion (BTI) was finally
recognized as a separate intrusion (Severson and Hauck, 2008). A geologic map of the Mesaba deposit
showing the geologic units (per the igneous stratigraphy) is shown in Figure 2-11. At least five criterions,
listed below and discussed in Severson and Hauck (2008), were initially used to help separate the PRI from
the newly named BTI:
1. Abrupt terminus of the PR3 Unit (major marker bed in the PRI) northward into the BTI at the
Mesaba deposit
2. Thicker sections of heterogeneous-textured rock in the BTI relative to the adjacent PRI
3. Lack of PGE-enrichment at the top of a specific unit in the BTI (BT1 Unit) relative to PGEenrichment at the top of a similar unit (PR1) in the adjacent PRI
4. The best mineralization at Mesaba is near the base of the BTI (base of the BT1 unit) where it is
characterized by high Cu grades associated with pyrrhotite- and cubanite-rich zones. In contrast,
the best mineralization at the majority of the NorthMet deposit is present at the top of the PR1
unit where it is associated with chalcopyrite-rich zones
5. Use of a hornfels-rich zone, termed the Hidden Rise, was used to help separate the BTI from the
PRI.
The current igneous stratigraphy of the Bathtub intrusion, as defined by the NRRI, is summarized
in Figure 2-12, and is described in the sections below.
26

�Trip 2 – Cu-Ni Duluth Complex

Figure 2-12. Stratigraphic section at the Mesaba deposit showing the relationships between major units (and their
corresponding subunits) in the BTI and PRI. Modified from Severson and Hauk (2008).

BT1 Unit
The lowest unit of the BTI consists of intermixed troctolite and augite troctolite with localized
leucotroctolite zones. Unique to BT1 are extreme variations in modal mineral percentage and average grain
size; both change rapidly over zones that vary from a few feet to tens of feet thick. Due to this
heterogeneous texture, numerous internal contacts subdivide the BT1 into several subunits that often cannot
be correlated from drill hole to drill hole. Thus, BT1 is a mixture of various troctolitic subunits that are
probably related to continuous magma replenishment. Most of this unit is sulfide bearing. Hornfels
inclusions of Virginia Formation are common within the BT1 Unit, especially closer to the basal contact.
The BT1 Unit has been further subdivided into several internal subunits based on the dominant presence of
one rock type over other rock types. Contacts between these rock types vary from highly gradational to
abrupt with locally measurable sharp contacts. The various subunits of the BT1 Unit, and hornfels-rich
zones in the BT1, are presented in Figure 2-12 and some are briefly discussed below.
•

BT1-c – At the base of the BT1 unit there is significant silica contamination of the magma, due
to assimilation of the footwall rocks, and orthopyroxene rather than olivine crystallized to
produce noritic rocks. Thus, rock types that dominate in the BT1-c subunit range from norite to
gabbro norite; especially near either the basal contact or surrounding common hornfels
inclusions. Overall, the BT1-c subunit spatially occurs as a rind or coating along the basal contact
of the BTI where it ranges anywhere from a foot-thick to over 650 feet-thick.

•

“The Rise” – along the extreme northern edge of the entire Mesaba deposit, the basal contact of
the BTI rises steeply toward the surface. However, in one area, called “The Rise,” the basal
contact actually subcrops at the surface and then drops off again in a northerly direction beneath
the South Kawishiwi intrusion (see Figure 2-11 for location); A pyrrhotite-rich and graphite-rich
unit within the Virginia Formation in “the Rise” has been informally termed the Bdd Po or BDPO
unit.

•

The “Hidden Rise” – the “Hidden Rise” unit is a loosely-defined zone situated along the crest of
the Local Boy anticline (Figures 2-11, 2-12 and 2-13) wherein scattered hornfels inclusions, and
associated noritic rocks, are fairly common. Like the BT1-c unit, the Hidden Rise shows evidence
27

�Trip 2 – Cu-Ni Duluth Complex
of mixing and contamination with the Virginia Formation. This unit is indicative of strong
magma contamination and assimilation of what once may have been a magma chamber wall
initially separating the BTI and PRI. Thus, the Hidden Rise is used to both define this hornfelsbearing zone and to artistically, and conveniently, divide the BTI from the PRI.

Figure 2-23. Projected distribution of the Hidden Rise at Mesaba relative to structural features. The projected
location of the shaft and drifts of the Local Boy ore zone are shown in red. The southern edge of the Hidden Rise is
approximated due to a paucity of drill holes.

BT4 Unit
The uppermost unit of the Bathtub intrusion is referred to as the BT4 Unit. It was originally
correlated with PR4 of the PRI. However, BT4 is distinctly different from PR4 in that the BT4 Unit is
heterogeneous-textured at all scales (though less heterogeneous than BT1 overall), composed of many
alternating rock types, and is locally sulfide-bearing. The BT4 Unit appears to grade into thicker, more
homogenous troctolitic packages toward the extreme east of the deposit. The BT4 Unit has been further
subdivided into several more internal subunits based on the dominant presence of one rock type over other
rock types. All these various subdivisions of the BT4 Unit are shown Figure 2-12 and are discussed below.
•

“± Picrite – the base of the BT4 is defined by a semi-persistent ultramafic layer and/or package,
consisting of melatroctolite to peridotite ± troctolitic beds that is referred to as the "± Picrite.”
The "± Picrite is present in about 60% of the drill holes in the Bathtub Intrusion and acts as a
local horizon that defines the BT1-BT4 contact; however, in many instances the "± Picrite is
absent and the BT1-BT4 contact is arbitrarily chosen based on its presence in nearby drill holes.

28

�Trip 2 – Cu-Ni Duluth Complex
•

Bathtub Layered Interval (BTLI) – this subunit designates zones (see Figures 2-12 and 2-14)
where ultramafic layers are extremely common within the BT4 Unit. The ultramafic layers may
represent repetitious cyclic layers and can be correlated in drill holes as an overall rock package.
The inclination of internal contacts and modal bedding associated with the ultramafic layers are
highly variable, ranging from 5° to 80° (even within a single drill hole). Individual ultramafic
beds cannot be traced with certainty between drill holes; however, correlations of packages of the
BTLI can be traced. This dichotomy for individual ultramafic beds indicates that the bedding
relationships are extremely complex in the third dimension and may be related to rapid pinch-out
of individual beds. In addition, the BTLI package fades out to the north with increased distance
away from the Hidden Rise. If the Hidden Rise represents a magma chamber wall, the BTLI may
have crystallized against it via either a static crystallization method or by current-driven crystal
settling against the wall.

Figure 2-34. Spatial distribution of the BTLI (in solid green hatch) relative to Bathtub syncline and the Hidden Rise
(cross-hatched zone). This map is circa 2015 and changes have been made by NewRange Copper Nickel based on
newer information.

29

�Trip 2 – Cu-Ni Duluth Complex
Footwall Rocks
The footwall rock types at both the NorthMet and Mesaba deposits consist mainly of the Virginia
Formation, Biwabik Iron Formation (BIF), and very locally the Pokegama Quartzite. All are
Paleoproterozoic in age (approximately 1.9-1.8 billion years ago) and collectively comprise the Animikie
Group. The rock types of the Virginia Formation and BIF have undergone metamorphism and partial
melting that was produced during emplacement of the Duluth Complex. The metamorphic variants of the
footwall rocks are schematically portrayed in Figure 2-15 but are not discussed individually herein.

Figure 2-45. General Relationships of the Metamorphosed Footwall Rocks beneath the Duluth Complex at the
Mesaba, NorthMet, Wetlegs, and Serpentine Deposits. See Severson and Hauck (2008) for more information.

Structural Features
There are several prominent structural features at Mesaba that were important to formation of the
BTI and possibly to mineralization trends. These major features are shown in Figure 2-16 and discussed
below (features such as the Rise and the Hidden Rise have been discussed previously).
Local Boy anticline and Bathtub syncline
The most prominent structural features at the Mesaba deposit are a pair of east-west trending
parallel folds, defined by contouring the top of the footwall Biwabik Iron Formation (Figure 2-17), that are
informally referred to as the Local Boy anticline and Bathtub syncline. Both of these folds probably exerted
strong controls on the style of emplacement of the BTI and its basal contact mimics the form of the anticline
and syncline. The trend of the Hidden Rise, the possible wall once separating the BTI and PRI, also
correlates with these two fold axes. The structural history regarding the Local Boy anticline and Bathtub
syncline appears to be extremely complicated and long lived.
Grano Fault
Along the far eastern edge of the Mesaba deposit is the north-trending Grano Fault (Fig. 2-16), so
named for the abundant and sometimes voluminous amounts of associated late granitoid lenses and OUIs
that are associated with the fault zone (Severson, 1994). Both types of late intrusive lenses are interpreted
to be steeply oriented and to have been injected along subsidiary fault zones parallel to, and immediately
west of the Grano Fault. These late intrusives cross-cut the troctolitic rocks and thus, demonstrate that the
30

�Trip 2 – Cu-Ni Duluth Complex

Figure 2-56. Major structural features at the Mesaba deposit. Note the orange-outlined zone to the immediate west
of the Grano Fault is a zone wherein late stage subvertical lenses of granitoid and OUI (cyan outlines) commonly
cross-cut the troctolitic rocks of the PRI and BTI. OUI (outlined in cyan) are also common along the inferred trace
of the South Minnamax Fault.

Figure 2-67. Contoured top of the footwall beneath the Mesaba deposit relative to sea level. The contour interval is
100 feet. Note that the contoured lines in this map are derived from Severson and others (1994) and do not take into
account any of the more recent drill holes; however, the overall trends would remain basically the same.

31

�Trip 2 – Cu-Ni Duluth Complex
fault was active during and after emplacement of the PRI, BTI and SKI. The Grano Fault is thought to be a
primary feeder structure for the BTI and possibly the massive sulfides at the Local Boy ore zone (Severson
and Hauck, 2008).
South Minnamax Fault
The South Minnamax Fault is an east-west trending fault along the extreme southern edge of the
Mesaba deposit. Several OUIs occur at the surface along the trend of the fault (Figure 2-16). Displacement
of the fault, based on correlations and projections of units between only six drill holes, is generally 100200 feet (30-61 meters), but in one area a displacement of over 400 feet (122 meters) is indicated.
Mineralization
The Mesaba deposit is characterized by disseminated sulfide mineralization that occurs most
commonly as fine- to coarse-grained, intercumulus disseminations of chalcopyrite, cubanite, pentlandite,
and pyrrhotite. The most important continually mineralized zone at Mesaba is a basal zone with
disseminated sulfides that is present within all or portions of the BT1 unit, and locally in the bottom of the
BT4 unit (Figure 2-18). This zone commonly ranges between 200 and 600 ft (61 to 183 m) in thickness.
Higher in the intrusive package, often overlapping the BT1-BT4 unit boundary, are thinner, secondary
zones of erratic and discontinuous, disseminated sulfide mineralization referred to as “cloud zones.”
Increased sulfide contents with depth are obvious in drill core and are manifested mainly by
increasing amounts of pyrrhotite and cubanite. This dramatic increase in pyrrhotite and cubanite with depth
appears to be related to contamination from the footwall rocks and has been classified as occurring mainly
in the basal contaminated BT1-c unit but there are exceptions.
Talnakhite [Cu9(Fe,Ni)8S16] is present in numerous holes coincident with the axis of the Bathtub
syncline (and north of the Hidden Rise), as well as, in the massive sulfides at Local Boy, as shown in Figure
2-19. Talnakhite occurs as exsolution lamellae with chalcopyrite and cubanite. Talnakhite is difficult to
distinguish from chalcopyrite in freshly drilled core. However, talnakhite tarnishes rapidly, sometimes
within 10-15 minutes depending on the relative humidity, to a purplish brown or peacock blue similar to
bornite (orange-brown color in polished sections).

Figure 2-78. Typical
cross-section at the
Mesaba deposit
showing
mineralization
throughout most of
BT1 and in portions of
BT4. Note the
discontinuous “cloud
zone” occurrences in
the upper portions of
the BT4 unit.

32

�Trip 2 – Cu-Ni Duluth Complex

Figure 2-89.
Distribution of
holes that
contain
significant
amounts of
Talnakhite
based on
tarnished
relationships
observed on
drill core. This
map is circa
2015. Note that
the Local Boy
ore zone,
shown in lower
right red ovoid,
also contains
significant
talnakhite.

Massive Sulfides at the Local Boy Ore Zone of the Mesaba Deposit
Cu-rich massive sulfides near the basal contact of the Complex are locally present at the Mesaba
deposit in a small zone referred to as the Local Boy ore zone. In 1976, AMAX Inc. completed a 1,700foot-deep exploratory shaft (Minnamax shaft), and in 1977, completed four drifts (A, B, C, and D; Figures
2-20 and 2-21). Underground Fan drilling (217 holes) was completed in 1978 to further define the massive
sulfide distribution. Potential ore resources for Local Boy are presented in Table 2-2; high PGE values (up
to 11 ppm Pd and up to 8 ppm Pt) are locally present in the ore. Sulfide minerals include pyrrhotite,
pentlandite, chalcopyrite, talnakhite, cubanite, maucherite (nickel arsenide), sphalerite, bornite, late
mackinawite, chalcocite, covellite, godlevskite, and native silver (Severson and Barnes, 1991).
Table 2-2. Grade/tonnage data for Cu and Ni in the Local Boy ore zone. These values are for geologic resources, not
mineable ore. From Severson and Barnes, 1991.

The Local Boy ore zone is also situated over the Local Boy anticline. The majority of massive
sulfide ore zones, hosted mainly by the Virginia Formation (Severson and Barnes, 1991), are broadly
33

�Trip 2 – Cu-Ni Duluth Complex
coincident with the axis of the anticline. The contoured top of the BIF in the Local Boy area is shown in
Figure 2-20 (left). Similar anticline geometries are also present for the basal contact as shown in Figure 220 (right). All the data indicate that an EW-trending anticline is the major structural feature present within
the footwall rocks of the Local Boy area.

Figure 2-20. Contoured top of the Biwabik Iron Formation at Local Boy (left) and the contoured top of the basal
contact between the Virginia Formation and the intrusive rocks at Local Boy (right).

Mineralization Trends in the Massive Sulfide at the Local Boy Ore Zone
The vast majority of massive sulfides at Local Boy are contained within the Paleoproterozoic
Virginia Formation. Even though the massive sulfides straddle the basal contact, most of the massive
sulfides are associated with either hornfelsed sedimentary inclusions above the contact or with footwall
rocks below the contact while the interfingering intrusive rocks (mostly norite) are relatively barren of
massive sulfides (Severson and Barnes, 1991). This suggests that the massive sulfide ores were not formed
in this area by the gravitational settling of sulfides, but rather, the ores formed by injection of an immiscible
sulfide melt into structurally prepared areas within the footwall rocks along the Local Boy anticline in a
vein-like setting. A similar mechanism is proposed for the Norilsk-Talnakh deposits in Russia.
Even though the basal contact of the Complex with the Virginia Formation is highly undulatory,
the massive sulfides exhibit a definite top and bottom. Figure 2-21 is an attempt to show, in plan view,
where massive sulfide zones are present. Also shown in the figure are the different massive sulfide types
(ranging from pyrrhotite-dominant to Cu-rich) relative to structural features. The relationships shown in
Figure 2-21 indicate that the massive sulfides show a progressive change in an east-to-west direction from
Cu-poor massive sulfides to Cu-rich massive sulfides in the vicinity of the Local Boy anticline. These
relationships suggest that the injected immiscible sulfide melt underwent fractional crystallization and
progressively became more Cu and PGE enriched as it moved through the footwall rocks in an east-to-west
direction.

34

�Trip 2 – Cu-Ni Duluth Complex

Figure 2-29. Potential distribution of semi- massive to massive sulfide types (Cu-poor versus Cu-rich) at the Local
Boy ore zone (left); and an isopach map of cumulative thickness of the massive sulfides (right). Note that the
massive sulfides are not present as a continuous blanket, but rather, as one or more stacked disjointed/separated
multiple horizons near the basal contact.

A possible feeder vent for the sulfide injection event may have been the Grano Fault, which was
repeatedly reactivated during emplacement of the Complex. Other data that indicates that the Grano Fault
was a potential feeder vent include: 1) the massive sulfides are more common, and thicker (Figure 2-21
right), close to the Grano Fault (feeder) and along the axis of the Local Boy anticline (structurally-prepared
site); 2) the VirgSill, at the base of the Virginia Formation, rarely contains significant amounts of
disseminated sulfides – except near the Grano Fault; and 3) the Biwabik Iron Formation rarely contains
sulfides – except near the Grano Fault.
In summary, the massive sulfides at the Local Boy ore zone are interpreted to be structurally
controlled in that they are situated along the axis of the Local Boy anticline. The massive sulfides are Curich (5-25% Cu) and are almost exclusively hosted by the Virginia Formation. Sulfide textures suggest that
the massive sulfides were injected as an immiscible sulfide melt into the footwall rocks. The overall pattern
of sulfide types and PGE contents suggest that the sulfides formed via a process of fractional crystallization
of an immiscible sulfide melt as it migrated into the footwall rocks. The Grano Fault is inferred to represent
the potential feeder zone in this scenario.

35

�Trip 2 – Cu-Ni Duluth Complex

Wetlegs Deposit
The Wetlegs deposit (Figures 2-2 and 2-3) was drilled by Bear Creek (13 holes) and Exxon (12
holes). Exxon determined that there were 38 million tons of material at a 0.57% Cu equivalent (files at
DNR) but details regarding their cursory calculations are unknown. Most of the igneous units that are
present at NorthMet are also present at Wetlegs except: Unit II thins down to a single ultramafic horizon
positioned immediately below Unit III (Figure 2-3), and Unit I contains abundant ultramafic layers that are
referred to as the Wetlegs Layered interval (Miller and others, 2002). The top of Unit I (aka Red Horizon
of the NorthMet deposit) contains scattered anomalous concentrations of PGEs up to 3,132 ppb Pd+Pt
(Severson and Hauck, 2003). The Magenta Zone is also present at Wetlegs, but is only known in one drill
hole (A4-11) with up to 6,072 ppb Pd+Pt. No work has been conducted on this property since 1998.

Wyman Creek Deposit (Encampment Minerals)
The Wyman Creek deposit (Figures 2-2 and 2-3) is located at a turning point in the basal contact
of the PRI – the contact trends northeast to the east of Wyman Creek and then exhibits a drastic change to
a north-south orientation to the south of the deposit. This area was initially drilled by Bear Creek, followed
by more extensive drilling (21 holes) by United States Steel Corp. (USSC), and very limited drilling by
Exxon. USSC determined (literally a back-of-the-envelope calculation) an open pit potential of 14 million
tons of material containing 0.30% Cu and 0.18% Ni (Severson and Heine, 2007).

South Kawishiwi intrusion
The South Kawishiwi intrusion (SKI) is exposed in an arc-shaped area ~5x20 square miles (8x32
square km) that extends from the Serpentine deposit on the southwest to the Spruce Road deposit on the
northeast as shown in Figure 2-2. Footwall rocks include the Virginia Formation, Biwabik Iron Formation,
and granitic rocks of the Neoarchean Giants Range granitic complex; the latter is the dominant footwall
rock type. The basal stratigraphic section (shown in Figure 2-22) is known in detail from studies of historic
drill core (Severson, 1994; Zanko and others, 1994) and is divided into 17 different units that are present
over a strike-length of 19 miles (31 kilometers).

Figure 2-102. Generalized igneous stratigraphy of the basal zone of the SKI (Severson, 1994). The Lowermost
units are BAN = Basal Augite Troctolite and Norite; BH = Basal Heterogeneous; U3 = Ultramafic 3; PEG =
Pegmatitic unit of Foose (1984); U2 = Ultramafic 2; U1 = Ultramafic 1; AT-T = Anorthositic Troctolite to
Troctolite; UW = Up dip Wedge; Main AGT = Main Augite Troctolite; AN-G Group = Anorthositic Series
inclusion with internal gabbroic lenses.

36

�Trip 2 – Cu-Ni Duluth Complex
The lowermost units are unevenly distributed along the strike-length of the intrusion in a
compartmentalized fashion, suggesting a complicated intrusive history. The stratigraphy, as defined by
Severson (1994), has been documented to be present in all the holes drilled recently by Twin Metals
Minnesota (TMM) at the Birch Lake and Maturi deposits but it has since been simplified by TMM.
According to Severson and Hauck (2008), a few salient features of the SKI include:
•

•
•

•

•

The vast majority of sulfide mineralization is confined to the BH, BAN, and U3 units - all of
these are collectively referred to as BMZ by TMM at the Maturi deposit). The PEG unit,
though not particularly mineralized except locally, is also included in the BMZ by TMM
Major marker beds include three horizons that contain abundant ultramafic layers (U1, U2
and U3) and a pegmatite-bearing unit (PEG unit – originally recognized by Foose, 1984).
The U3 unit is unique in that it contains several massive oxide pods (titanomagnetite-rich and
locally Cr-bearing) as well as recognizable inclusions of bedded Biwabik Iron Formation.
The spatial correspondence between the U3 unit and footwall iron-formation suggests that
most of the massive oxide pods are iron-rich “restite” produced by assimilation and a high
degree of partial melting of the iron-formation. This relationship is the most prevalent at
Birch Lake
The U3 unit contains the vast majority of high PGE values; however, high PGE values are
locally present in the overlying PEG unit. High PGE values are also present well above the
base of the SKI at the South Filson Creek deposit
A large inclusion of anorthosite of formidable size (3,500 feet thick) is present at Maturi and
was referred to as the AN-G Group by Severson (1994). Peterson (2001) suggested that the
high PGE contents within the BMZ unit (beneath the inclusion) formed as a result of confined
turbulent magma flow, and thus an increased R-factor, beneath a “pillar” of anorthosite.
Peterson (2001) further hypothesized that a portion of a Nickel Lake Macrodike, which
served as a feeder to the nearby Bald Eagle intrusion, may have projected beneath the Maturi
deposit and also served as a feeder to the SKI

Four of the Cu-Ni deposits within the SKI historically held by TMM are shown in Figure 2-23.
These four deposits and others within the SKI are discussed in the following sub-sections. The information
given for each of the deposits is based on various NI 43-101 reports, field trip guidebooks (Patelke and
others, 2009; and Severson and others, 2016), various NRRI reports, oral presentations at professional
meetings, and personal knowledge.

Maturi Deposit (Twin Metals Minerals)
The very first exploration drill hole in search of Cu-Ni deposits in the Duluth Complex was cored
in the Maturi deposit by Fred S. Childers (prospector) and Roger V. Whiteside (investor) in 1951.
Eventually, the International Nickel Company (Inco) picked up the property and outlined a sizeable, but
low grade, Cu-Ni deposit. A shaft was sunk on the property during 1966 to 1967 to collect material for
metallurgical tests. Inco took their bulk sample from pyrrhotite-rich material, which is more prevalent near
the basal contact, and decided the grade was too low to support an underground mine. Three other
companies (Bear Creek, Duval and Newmont) put down several scattered drill holes on the periphery of
the deposit and intersected good mineralization at great depth but also determined it was too low grade to
support an underground mine.

37

�Trip 2 – Cu-Ni Duluth Complex

Figure 2-113. Twin Metals Minnesota (TMM) deposits and Resource Classification.

Mineralization at Maturi, and an extension referred to as Maturi SW, is present in the lower portion
of the South Kawishiwi intrusion (SKI) in what TMM refers to as the Basal Mineralized Zone (BMZ). Note
that the BMZ collectively consists of the PEG, U3, BH and BAN units of Severson (1994). While the
Severson units are recognized by TMM at Maturi they are not consistently present throughout the deposit
and for simplicity-sake TMM combined them into the BMZ unit.
In 2008, Dean Peterson from Duluth Metals (the original company from which TMM was created)
theorized that the initial SKI magmas at Maturi were intruded as sulfide-bearing, crystal-laden (olivine- and
plagioclase-rich), crystal slurries. Based on this new interpretation, TMM combined Severson’s (1994)
basal units into the BMZ unit that they believed originated by physical sorting of the crystal slurries
(possibly top down) and by melting of the footwall granitic rocks (bottom up) to create the heterogeneous
lithologies and textures of the BMZ as is shown in Figure 2-24.
Mineralization at the Maturi deposit consists of a tabular sheet of disseminated Cu-Ni-Fe sulfides
that averages 215 feet thick (65 meters) with a range of 5 to 865 feet thick (1.5 to 260 meters) with the
thickest range towards the north end of the deposit. Dips of the BMZ vary from 35 to 55 degrees with a
N60E plunge along the contact. Higher grades are concentrated in the upper 100 feet (30 meters) of a zone
that has been traced laterally by drilling for approximately 2.2 miles (3.5 km) and open at depth. While
mineralization is mostly restricted to the BMZ, exceptions are locally present in the overlying PEG unit and
in the footwall granitic rock. TMM reports that mineralization within the footwall granite occurs in appr38

�Trip 2 – Cu-Ni Duluth Complex

Figure 2-124. Simplified crystal-liquid slurry model for the SKI in the Maturi area.

oximately one-quarter of the holes drilled to date with about 80% of these holes showing mineralization in
the overlying BMZ that continues directly downward into the footwall mineralization with little or no
breaks.
Mineralization typically consists of 1-5% disseminated chalcopyrite, talnakhite, cubanite,
pyrrhotite, and pentlandite. Bornite, covellite, and millerite occur in subordinate amounts. Better grades of
Cu, Ni and PGE are associated with more mafic units located near the top of the BMZ. Modeling of the ore
deposits by Duluth Metals, TMM, and AMEC indicated that the mineralization at Maturi can be
characterized by several distinct patterns as shown in Figure 2-25.

Figure 2-135. Mineralization trends of the BMZ and adjacent rocks within the Maturi area.

39

�Trip 2 – Cu-Ni Duluth Complex
The three stages of mineralization within Maturi’s BMZ zone include:
•

Stage 1 Mineralization (S1, with top and bottom zones): barren to very low-grade mineralization
showing low variability.

•

Stage 2 Mineralization (S2, with top and bottom zones): moderate grade mineralized intervals
showing low variability. Cu:Ni ratios are 3.0 to 3.2:1. Cu-sulfides are the dominant sulfide but
pyrrhotite becomes increasingly present with depth. Cubanite and pentlandite decrease in
abundance with depth. Normalized chalcopyrite/chalcopyrite+cubanite ratios are approximately
0.61 to 0.65 (Hoffmann and others, 2015).

•

Stage 3 Mineralization (S3): higher grade mineralized intervals that are commonly bounded by
low grade selvages and, interestingly, contains ultramafic units (aka U3 unit of Severson, 1994).
Cu:Ni ratios are 3.0 to 3.2:1. Cu-sulfides are the dominant sulfide. Normalized
chalcopyrite/chalcopyrite+cubanite ratios are approximately 0.58 to 0.67 (Hoffmann and others,
2015).

Birch Lake Deposit (Twin Metals Minerals)
The Birch Lake deposit lies to the south of Maturi (Figures 2-2 and 2-23), with mineralization also
hosted at the bottom of the SKI. The area was first drilled by Duval in the 1970s but remained dormant
until high PGE values were found in drill hole Du-15 by state agencies in the mid-1980s (Sabelin and
Iwasaki, 1985). This discovery marked the start of serious PGE exploration in the Duluth Complex. Ernest
Lehmann formed several joint ventures, the last known as Franconia Minerals LLC or Beaver Bay Joint
Venture, and several holes were drilled on the property intermittently during 1988 through 2010. TMM
acquired the property in 2011 and drilled 30 holes from 2011 to 2012. A total of 114 holes have been drilled
at Birch Lake (excluding 154 wedge holes that were drilled mainly to obtain material for metallurgical
testing).
The geology is very similar to Maturi except for the common occurrence of more (and often thicker)
ultramafic layers, assimilated BIF inclusions, and discontinuous oxide-rich horizons/pods that are inferred
to represent BIF “restites”, all of which are present in the U3 unit. The continuity of these U3 rock types is
extremely heterogeneous in 3D as revealed by wedge drilling. Mineralization is associated with what TMM
also refers to as the BMZ which consists of the U3, BH, and BAN units of Severson (1994). The BMZ
averages about 100 feet thick (30 meters) but is as thick as 515 feet (157 meters). The main footwall unit
at Birch Lake is the Neoarchean Giants Range granitic complex, but Paleoproterozoic rocks are exposed at
the surface in the Dunka Pit mine located &lt;1 km to the southwest. The four inferred mineralization types at
Birch Lake in the BMZ and GRB are shown in Figure 2-26 (non-mineralized material below the GRB_M
is identified as GRB_B for barren footwall rocks).

Figure 2-26. Igneous
stratigraphy according to
mineralization trends at
Birch Lake.

40

�Trip 2 – Cu-Ni Duluth Complex
Mineralization trends at Birch Lake are very similar to Maturi, with four inferred types:
1. Melatroctolite / BL_MT Unit (similar to S3 at Maturi and U3 unit of Severson): an upper
melatroctolite to mafic troctolite unit that hosts the highest grade mineralization and is
correlative across the deposit. The top and bottom of this unit are typically based on high Mg
contents with values generally greater than 6% Mg. The Cu:Ni ratio is about 3.3. The base of
the BL_MT unit is gradational downward into the BL_T unit. Almost all of the significant
Cu-Ni and precious metal mineralization is hosted by this unit but the total volume, or
percentage of the mineral resource, has not been published
2. Troctolite / BL_T Unit (similar to S1 at Maturi and BH and BAN units of Severson): a
lower troctolitic unit with lower grades that is also correlative across the deposit. Mg contents
are in the 3.5-4.5% range. Locally the top of BL_T is more mineralized and there are small,
mineralized zones near the base
3. Basal Hybrid Zone / BL_HX: a basal hybrid rock sequence, with localized oxide-rich
layers, that shows similarities to both BL_T and underlying metasomatized Giants Range
granitic rocks. This hybrid sequence is marked by an abrupt increase in P and erratic Sr, Ba,
Mg, and V concentrations. Iron ranges from 2% Fe to upwards of 45% Fe (largely because of
assimilated BIF inclusions)
4. Mineralized GRB / GRB_M: consists locally of mineralized Giants Range granitic rocks as
well as locally mineralized Virginia Formation and BIF. Average grade is about 0.28% Cu
and 0.16% Ni with a Cu:Ni ratio of about 2.3. Local massive sulfide bodies are present and
contribute significantly to the average grade
The thickness of the four units is quite
variable, but the stratigraphic succession does
not vary across the deposit. Any one or more of
the units, however, can be missing locally from
a specific drill hole. Geologic modeling
indicated that there is a sinuous, channel-like
body of persistent and higher Cu grades that
traverse the length of the deposit and follows
the thickest portion of the BL_MT unit as
shown in Figure 2-27. The origin of the channel
is not well understood but it may be related to
a magma conduit.

Spruce Road Deposit (Twin Metals
Minerals)
The Spruce Road deposit lies to the
northeast of Maturi (Figures 2-2 and 2-23).
Mineralization is also present at the base of the
SKI. It was at this deposit that the first good
indications of Cu-Ni mineralization were
uncovered while constructing a forest access
road in 1948. From 1954 to 1971, Inco drilled
the deposit on 200-foot centers (61 meters) for
a total of 232 holes (the vast majority of which
are no longer preserved after they were
destroyed in a fire at Sudbury, Ontario). In
1997, Inco’s subsidiary, American Copper and

Figure 2-147. Birch Lake magma channel superimposed
on average copper grade base map.

41

�Trip 2 – Cu-Ni Duluth Complex
Nickel Company (ACNC), joint ventured the property with Wallbridge Mineral Company Limited (from
which Duluth Metals was eventually created). Wallbridge eventually drilled two holes on the property
during 1999 to 2000 in search of high-grade footwall veins but failed to find significant mineralization in
the footwall rocks. In 2002, Franconia Minerals Corp. entered into an agreement with Beaver Bay Joint
Venture to acquire the Spruce Road and Maturi properties from ACNC but conducted no work. TMM
acquired the property in 2011 and drilled 57 drill holes totaling 65,635.5 ft between September 2012 and
January 2014 and a prefeasibility study technical report was issued on the TMM project in August 2014.
The geology at Spruce Road is vastly different than at either Maturi or Birch Lake. Publiclypreserved core from historic drill holes are extremely limited for this deposit in that only six Inco holes are
preserved along with two Wallbridge holes. From this limited data, Severson (1994) determined that most
of the igneous units that typify the SKI elsewhere are not present at Spruce Road. Rather, the mineralization
appears to be present in a much thicker BH unit (also referred to as the BMZ unit by TMM) consisting of
a heterogeneous mix of troctolitic rocks with common hornfelsed inclusions of basalt (North Shore
Volcanic Group). Also present are extremely localized noritic rocks associated with hornfelsed sedimentary
rocks (Virginia Formation and Biwabik Iron Formation) and at the basal contact with the Giants Range
granitic complex. The U3 unit and massive oxide zones are also locally present. Mineralization does not
appear to correlate with any specific igneous lithology and there are no known marker horizons. Historic
drill logs indicate that there may be an igneous mega-breccia unit that is referred to as “Spruce Road
breccia.”

South Filson Creek Deposit (Encampment Minerals)
The South Filson Creek deposit, located to the east of Spruce Road, as previously presented in
Figure 2-2, was initially drilled by the Hanna Mining Company (23 holes) in the late 1960s. There, the CuNi mineralization is hosted by troctolitic rocks (AT&amp;T unit of Severson, 1994), both in outcrop and in the
tops of several drill holes situated well above the basal contact. In 1987, encouraging high PGE values
(&gt;1.0 ppm) were reported in these “cloud” zone sulfides by Steve Hauck of the NRRI. A subsequent study
of the PGE mineralization (Kuhns and others, 1990) indicated that the PGE were concentrated by a latestage hydrothermal event that concentrated the PGE in extremely fine, discontinuous, microscopic veinlets
that were inferred to be associated with a NE-trending fault zone. Encampment Minerals drilled an
additional 27 holes on the property, but results are largely unknown.

Serpentine Deposit (Encampment Minerals)
The Serpentine deposit, shown in Figure 2-26, is located to the north of the Mesaba deposit. The
deposit was initially discovered by Bear Creek Mining Company in 1967 as part of a follow-up drilling
campaign of an airborne electromagnetic conductor (Kulas, 1979).
The name “Serpentine” was chosen for this deposit due to the presence of a sinuous-trending
massive sulfide located at the base of the SKI. When the next owner, Amax, began working on the deposit,
they calculated that the deposit contained 250 million tons of resources (not NI 43-101 compliant) grading
0.41% Cu, 0.14% Ni and 1.96% S at a 0.20% copper cut-off, with a higher-grade portion of over 7 million
tons, at a 0.60% copper cut-off, with a grade of 0.88% Cu, 0.30% Ni and 5.67% S (Kulas, 1979, Zanko and
others, 1994).
The presence of such voluminous pyrrhotite-rich massive to semi-massive sulfide at the basal
contact at Serpentine makes this an unusual deposit (Figure 2-29). There, the massive sulfide is closely
related to the BDPO which provided a local sulfur source. Empirical evidence in drill core is evidenced by
partially melted BDPO (present in the footwall and in inclusions) that transitions upwards and downwards
into massive sulfide near the basal contact. The massive sulfide is also located close to the projected location
of the Grano Fault that may have played a role in its origin. Another feature that may be related to the Grano
Fault at Serpentine is a northerly-trending zone wherein subvertical olivine-rich ultramafic dikes were emp42

�Trip 2 – Cu-Ni Duluth Complex
-laced in the troctolitic host rocks while the host rocks were still solidifying. Encampment Minerals drilled
eight holes at the Serpentine deposit, but no data are known regarding their results.

Figure 2-168. Location of the Serpentine deposit in relation to the Mesaba deposit. Note drill holes posted in
red are holes that intersected massive sulfides at or slightly above the basal contact (larger red dots
intersected significantly more and thicker massive sulfide zones).

Figure 2-159. Trend of BDPO unit relative to basal massive sulfide mineralization at the Serpentine deposit
(from Zanko and others, 1994).

43

�Trip 2 – Cu-Ni Duluth Complex

Field Trip Stops
Drill core will be displayed at NewRange’s Babbitt core facility, for both the NorthMet and Mesaba
deposits, and at Twin Metals Ely office for the Maturi deposit. Cross-sections displaying the geology will
be posted, as well as Cu-Ni-PGE grades, for the appropriate holes. At this point in time, the core displayed
will be determined by the companies.
NewRange core facility: 578810 / 5284970, (47.71330°, -91.94930°)
Twin Metals Ely office: 585230 / 5306550, (47.90661°, -91.85949°)

References
Barber, J., Parker, H., Frost, D., Hartley, J., White, T., Martin, C., Sterrett, R., Poeck, J., Eggleston, T., Gormely, L.,
Allard, S., Annavarapu, S., Radue, T.,Malgensini, M and Pierce, M., 2014:, Twin Metals Minnesota Project, Ely,
Minnesota, USA: NI 43-101 Technical Report on Pre-feasibility Study prepared by AMEC E&amp;C Services, Inc.
for Duluth Metals Limited, October 2014, Project 176916.
Bennett, A., Dempers, N., Neff, D., Radue, P.E., Roth, D., Schwering, R., Tahija, L., Uble, J.S. and Welhener, H.E.,
2022, NorthMet Copper-Nickel Project, Feasibility Update National Instrument 43-101F1 prepared for PolyMet
Minerals Corp. by M3 Engineering and Technology Corp., Project M3-PN220283, Dec. 30th, 2022, 248 p.
Eckstrand, 0.R., and Hulbert, L.J., 2007, Magmatic Nickel-Copper-Platinum Group Element Deposits; in
Goodfellow,W.D., ed., Mineral Deposits of Canada: A synthesis of Major Types, District Metallogeny, The
Evolution of Geological Provinces, and Exploration Methods: Geological Association of Canada, Mineral
Deposits Division, Special Publication No.5, p. 205-222.
Farrow, D, and Johnson, M, 2011, January 2012 National Instrument 43-101 Technical Report on the Titac Ilmenite
Exploration Project, Minnesota, USA. SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc. SRK Project Number 2CC031.004.
Cardero Resources Corp.
Farrow, D, and Johnson, M, 2012, January 2012 National Instrument 43-101 Technical Report on the Longnose
Ilmenite Exploration Project, Minnesota, USA. SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc. SRK Project Number
2CC031.004. Cardero Resources Corp.
Foose, M., 1984, Logs and correlation of drill holes within the South Kawishiwi intrusion, Duluth Complex,
northeastern Minnesota: United States Geological Survey, Open-file Report 84-14
Geerts, S.D., 1991, Geology, stratigraphy, and mineralization of the Dunka Road Cu-Ni prospect, northeastern
Minnesota: Natural Resources Research Institute, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, MN, Technical
Report NRRI/TR-91/14, 63 p.
Geerts, S.D., 1994, Petrography and geochemistry of a platinum group element-bearing horizon in the Dunka Road
prospect, (Keweenawan) Duluth Complex, northeastern Minnesota: University of Minnesota Duluth,
Unpublished M.S. thesis, 100 p.
Kuhns, M.P, Hauck, S.A, and Barnes, R.J, 1990, Origin and occurrence of platinum group elements, gold and silver,
in the South Filson Creek copper-nickel deposit, Lake County, Minnesota: Natural Resources Research Institute,
University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, MN, Technical Report NRRI/GMIN-TR-89-15, 60 p.
Kulas, J.E., 1979, Serpentine Reserve – Minnamax project: unpublished AMAX Company report on file at the
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Lands and Minerals Division, Hibbing, MN, 5 p.
Listerud, W.H., and Meineke, D.G., 1977, Mineral resources of a portion of the Duluth Complex and adjacent rocks
in St. Louis and Lake Counties, northeastern Minnesota: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Div. of
Minerals, Hibbing, MN, Report 93, 49 p.
Miller, J.D., Jr., Green, J.C., Severson, M.J., Chandler, V.W., and Peterson, D.M., 2001, Geologic Map of the
Duluth Complex and Related Rocks: Minnesota Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Map Series, Map M-119.
Miller, J.D., Jr., Green, J.C., Severson, M.J., Chandler, V.W., Hauck, S.A., Peterson, D.M., and Wahl, T.E., 2002,
Geology and mineral potential of the Duluth Complex and related rocks of northern Minnesota: Minnesota
Geological Survey, Report of Investigations RI-58, 207 p.
Miller, J.D., and Severson, M.J., 2005, Bedrock Geology of the Babbitt Southwest Quadrangle, St. Louis County.
Minnesota: Minnesota Geological Survey, University of Minnesota, Miscellaneous Map Series, M-161.

44

�Trip 2 – Cu-Ni Duluth Complex
Patelke, R, Peterson, D, Severson, M, Jefferson, T, and Lehmann, E., 2009, Cu-Ni-PGE Deposits of the Duluth
Complex, Geology and Development; 55th Annual Institute on Lake Superior Geology, Ely, MN, Part 2 Field
Trip Guidebook, p. 1-80.
Peterson, D.M., 2001, Development of a conceptual model of Cu-Ni-PGE mineralization in a portion of the South
Kawishiwi Intrusion, Duluth Complex, Minnesota: Laurentian University – Society of Economic Geologists,
Second Annual PGE Workshop, Sudbury, Ontario.
Peterson, D.M., 2010, The Nokomis Cu-Ni-PGE Deposit, Minnesota. Prospectors and Developers Association of
Canada. Annual Meeting, Powerpoint presentation.
Sabelin, T., and Iwasaki, I., 1985, Metallurgical evaluation of chromium-bearing drill core samples from the Duluth
Complex (Contract report of Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Division of Minerals): Minerals
Resources Research Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 58 p.
Sabelin, T., and Iwasaki, I., 1986, Evaluation of platinum group metal occurrence in Duval 15 drill core from the
Duluth Complex: Internal report, Minerals Resources Research Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis,
MN, 23 p.
Severson, M.J., 1994, Igneous stratigraphy of the South Kawishiwi intrusion: Duluth Complex, northeastern
Minnesota: Natural Resources Research Institute, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, MN, Technical
Report NRRI/TR-93/34, 210 p.
Severson, M.J. and Barnes, R.J., 1991, Geology, mineralization and geostatistics of the Minnamax/Babbitt Cu-Ni
deposit (Local Boy area), Minnesota, Part II: Mineralization and geostatistics: Natural Resources Research
Institute, University of Minnesota, Duluth, Technical Report, NRRI/TR-91/13b, 216 p.
Severson, M.J. and Hauck, S.A., 1990, Geology, geochemistry, and stratigraphy of a portion of the Partridge River
intrusion: Natural Resources Research Institute, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, MN, Technical Report
NRRI/GMIN-TR-99-11, 236 p.
Severson, M.J. and Hauck, S.A., 1997, Igneous stratigraphy and mineralization in the basal portion of the Partridge
River intrusion, Duluth Complex, Allen Quadrangle, Minnesota: Natural Resources Research Institute,
University of Minnesota Duluth, Technical Report NRRI/TR-97/19, 102 p.
Severson, M.J. and Hauck, S.A., 2003, Platinum group elements (PGEs) and platinum group minerals (PGMs in the
Duluth Complex, Natural Resources Research Institute, University of Minnesota Duluth, Technical Report
NRRI/TR-2003/37. 296 p.
Severson, M.J. and Hauck, S.A., 2008, Finish Logging of Duluth Complex Drill Core (And a Reinterpretation of the
Geology at the Mesaba (Babbitt) Deposit): Natural Resources Research Institute, University of Minnesota
Duluth, Duluth, MN Technical Report NRRI/TR-2008/17, 68 p. + 94 plates.
Severson, M.J. and Heine, J.J., 2007, Data compilation of United States Steel Corporation (USSC) exploration
records in Minnesota; Natural Resources Research Institute, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, MN,
Technical Report NRRI/TR-2007/25, 98 p.
Severson, M.J. and Miller, J.D., 2005, Bedrock Geology of the Babbitt Quadrangle, St. Louis County. Minnesota:
Minnesota Geological Survey, University of Minnesota, Miscellaneous Map Series, M=159.
Severson, M.J., Patelke, R.L., Hauck, S.A., and Zanko, L.M., 1994, The Babbitt copper-nickel deposit, Part B:
Structural datums: Natural Resources Research Institute, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, MN,
Technical Report NRRI/TR-94/21b, 48 p.
Severson, M, Ware, A, Boerst, K, and Peterson, D, 2016, Cu-Ni-PGE Deposits of the Duluth Complex, Geology and
Development; 62nd Annual Institute on Lake Superior Geology, Duluth, MN, Part 2 Field Trip Guidebook, p,
27-78.
Welhener, H. and Crowie, S.T., 2022, NI 43-101F1 Technical Report on Mesaba Project, Mineral Resource
Statement prepared for PolyMet Mining Corp. by Independent Mining Consultants, Inc. and JDS Energy and
Mining, Inc., November 2022
Zanko, L.M., Severson, M.J., and Ripley, E.M., 1994, Geology and mineralization of the Serpentine copper-nickel
deposit, Duluth Complex, Minnesota: Natural Resources Research Institute, University of Minnesota Duluth,
Duluth, MN, Technical Report NRRI/GMIN-TR93-52, 90 p.

45

�Trip 3 – Proterozoic Fe &amp; Mn Formations

FIELD TRIP 3
How Do You Make Iron and/or Manganese Ores in Proterozoic Iron
Formation?
Dean Peterson1, Alex Steiner1, and Latisha Brengman2
1

Big Rock Exploration, 2505 W. Superior St., Duluth, MN 55806
Earth and Environmental Sciences, Swenson College of Science and Engineering, University of
Minnesota, Duluth, 1114 Kirby Dr., Heller Hall 229, Duluth, MN 55812

2

Introduction
Iron formations are among the most important rocks for our modern industrial world. Their
extraordinary iron content facilitates the manufacture of steel, while their manganese content is of crucial
importance as a steel-alloy product and a critical component of battery technologies. Fueling modern
technology requires efficient production of iron resources, exploration of manganese resources, and
determination of enrichment processes that lead to ore formation. This field trip will explore ore-formation
processes that turn otherwise uneconomic iron formations into valuable resources of iron and manganese.
The trip may include an optional stop at the Hibbing Core Library where participants will examine drill
core of the Biwabik taconite ores. Participants will explore sedimentary features, diagenetic reactions, and
weathering reactions that contribute to iron grade and iron distribution within ore-horizons of the Biwabik.
We will then travel to the North Star Manganese/Electric Metals core logging facility in Emily, MN to look
at four recent (2023 drilling) drillholes where we will discuss the formation and subsequent redistribution
of manganese within the Emily Iron Formation. Participants will have the opportunity to observe highgrade manganese oxide drill core, primary iron-manganese carbonate facies iron formation, and breccia
horizons possibly associated with the 1.85 Ga. Sudbury impact. The trip will then proceed to the Mary Ellen
mine, a former natural ore pit, where the oxidation and weathering of the Biwabik was central to ore
formation and early mining efforts on the range. Participants can observe primary features such as
stromatolites and sedimentary structures as well as oxidation-weathering features. If time allows, we will
wrap up the trip at the Biwabik outcrops in Virginia near the new Highway 53 bridge over the historic
Rouchleau natural ore (hematite) mine before heading back to Mountain Iron.

Regional Geologic Setting
To gain a true understanding of the geology and origin of the high-grade Paleoproterozoic iron and
manganese resources of the Mesabi and Cuyuna Ranges of northern Minnesota (Fig. 3-1), it is best to start
with an understanding of the regional-scale geologic setting and its contained ferrous mineral resources.
These Paleoproterozoic iron ranges include several categories of marine chemocline mineral systems
outlined in recent USGS publications (Schulz et al., 2017 and Hofstra and Kreiner, 2020). These categories
include:
1) Superior-iron deposits (Mesabi Iron Range and the Emily District of the Cuyuna Iron Range) and
2) Algoma-type iron-manganese deposits (Cuyuna North and South Iron Ranges).

Superior Type Iron Resources of the Mesabi Iron Range
Superior type iron formation resources of Minnesota are exemplified by the long-standing mining
of iron resources of the Biwabik Iron Formation along the length of the Mesabi Iron Range. The Mesabi
Iron Range is largely located in St. Louis and Itasca counties and has been the most important iron ore
district in the United States since ~1900. The Mesabi Iron Range is 120 miles long, averages one to two
miles wide, and is comprised of rocks of the Paleoproterozoic Animikie Group. The Animikie Group on
46

�Trip 3 – Proterozoic Fe &amp; Mn Formations
the Mesabi Iron Range consists of three major conformable formations: Pokegama Formation at the base;
Biwabik Iron Formation in the middle; and the overlying Virginia Formation. On the Mesabi Iron Range,
these three formations generally dip gently to the southeast at angles of 3-15 degrees.

Figure 3-1. Location map of identified ferrous mineral resources in Minnesota.

Since the early 20th century, the Biwabik Iron Formation has been subdivided into four informal
members referred to as (from bottom to top): Lower Cherty member, Lower Slaty member, Upper Cherty
member, and Upper Slaty member (Wolff, 1917). The cherty members are typically characterized by a
granular (sand-sized) texture and thick-bedding (beds ≥ several inches thick); whereas the slaty members
are typically fine-grained (mud-sized) and thin-bedded (≤1 cm thick beds). The cherty members are largely
composed of chert and iron oxides (with zones rich in iron silicate minerals), while the slaty members are
composed of iron silicates and iron carbonates with local chert beds. Both cherty and slaty iron-formation
47

�Trip 3 – Proterozoic Fe &amp; Mn Formations
types are interlayered at all scales, but one rock type or the other predominates in each of the four informal
members, and they are so-named for this dominance Severson et. al. (2009).
Leached and iron enriched direct ores (or natural ores) were the first materials mined, with the first
shipments beginning in 1892, from strongly oxidized pockets along fault and fracture zones and the blanket
oxidation of the iron formation at the surface. Taconite, which is the material that is mined today using
magnetic separation methods, constitutes most of the iron formation and pertains to the hard, non-oxidized
portions of the iron-formation. Production has been dominantly controlled by vertically integrated
steelmakers since 1901, and therefore the mining and utilization of these ores have been dictated largely by
US ironmaking capacity and demand.
Taconite typically contains 30-35% iron and 40-50% SiO2, plus other components (Morey, 1992).
The Biwabik Iron Formation is around 175-300 feet thick in the extreme eastern end of the Mesabi Iron
Range at Dunka Pit, 730-780 feet thick in the central Mesabi Iron Range/Virginia Horn area near Eveleth,
around 500 feet thick in the western Mesabi Iron Range near Coleraine, and eventually exhibits a “nebulous
ending about 15 miles southwest of Grand Rapids” (Marsden et al., 1968) on the extreme western end of
the Mesabi Iron Range. Maps of currently active taconite mining operations on the Mesabi Iron Range are
presented in Figure 3-2 and compiled grade/tonnage ore reserve calculations for these operations are given
in Table 3-1.
Table 3-1. Reported grade/tonnage of active taconite mines. operations.

Geology of the Cuyuna Iron Range
The Cuyuna iron range is about 160 km west-southwest of Duluth in Aitkin, Cass, Crow Wing, and
Morrison Counties (Fig. 3-1). It is part of an Early Proterozoic geologic terrane which occupies much of
east-central Minnesota. The Cuyuna iron range is traditionally divided into three districts, the Emily district,
the North range, and the South range (Fig. 3-3). The Emily district extends from the Mississippi River
northward through Crow Wing County and into southern Cass County and comprises an area of about 1,165
square kilometers. Although exploration drilling has been extensive in the Emily district, mining never
commenced. The North range, a much smaller area about 19 km long and 8 km wide, is near the cities of
Crosby and Ironton in Crow Wing County.

48

�Trip 3 – Proterozoic Fe &amp; Mn Formations

Figure 3-2. Bedrock geology and iron mining features of the Mesabi Iron Range.

49

�Trip 3 – Proterozoic Fe &amp; Mn Formations

Figure 3-3. Bedrock geologic map of the Cuyuna Iron Range of Minnesota, illustrating the locations of the Emily
District, North Range, and South Range.

Since their discovery in 1904, it has been recognized that the iron-formations and associated ore
deposits of the Cuyuna iron range in east-central Minnesota contained appreciable quantities of manganese,
and large quantities of manganese were extracted as ferromanganese ores from several mines on the North
range from 1911 to 1984. The presence of this manganese resource sets the Cuyuna range apart from other
iron-mining districts of the Lake Superior region.
Although relatively small, the North range was the principal site of mining activity (Fig. 3-4), which
had largely ceased by 1970. The South range, where one small open pit and only a few underground mines
were operated, in the 1910s and 20s, comprises an area of northeast-trending, generally parallel belts of
iron-formation extending from near Randall in Morrison County northeast for about 100 km. In addition to
the three named districts, numerous linear magnetic anomalies occur east of the range proper, and may
indicate other, but currently poorly defined, beds of iron-formation.
Three major insights regarding the geology of the Cuyuna range have emerged from the geologic
mapping (Schmidt, 1963) and associated studies which utilized geophysical and drilling data (Southwick
et al., 1988). First, there is clear evidence that iron sedimentation occurred at several different times and
under varying geological conditions. This observation invalidates the stratigraphic premises of Morey
(1978). Major iron-formations are associated stratigraphically with volcanic rocks in the South range, with
black shale, argillite and rare volcanic rocks in the North range, and with shallow-water deposits of
sandstone and siltstone in the Emily district.

50

�Trip 3 – Proterozoic Fe &amp; Mn Formations

Figure 3-4. Bedrock geology and open pit Fe-Mn mine map of the North Range of the Cuyuna Iron Range.

Second, the iron-rich strata of the Emily district are correlative with the Biwabik Iron Formation
of the Mesabi Range, as inferred by Marsden (1972) and Morey (1978). However, they and the other
sedimentary rocks of the well-known Animikie Group occur above a major deformed unconformity that
cuts across previously deformed, somewhat older sedimentary and volcanic rocks of the North range. There,
a prominent iron-rich unit named the Trommald Formation, as well as several other units beneath the
unconformity, forms part of a locally twice-deformed sequence. Therefore, the rocks of the North range
and the Emily district cannot be correlative but are separate stratigraphic entities. Because the stratigraphic
succession of folded sedimentary rocks on the North range comprises a distinct stratigraphic entity,
Southwick et al., (1988) referred to it informally as the North Range group with the understanding that a
formal name may be justified later. As defined by Schmidt (1963), the stratigraphic sequence in the North
range consists of a quartz-rich lower sedimentary unit named the Mahnomen Formation, a middle iron- and
locally manganese-rich sequence assigned to the Trommald Formation, and an upper greywacke shale
interval called the Rabbit Lake Formation.
Third, Southwick et al., (1988) recognized several geophysically defined structural discontinuities
in the southern part of the Cuyuna iron range, within and southeast of the South range. These discontinuities
are marked by demonstrable contrasts in metamorphic grade, by differing structural styles, and by different
lithic components. One of the most pronounced of these, the Serpent Lake structural discontinuity, passes
along the south edge of the North range. This discontinuity is interpreted as a tectonic boundary, probably
involving major thrust faults between slices of folded rocks. Thus, it seems certain that the iron-rich strata
of the South range are not correlative with either the Trommald Formation of the North range or the ironrich strata of the Emily district. The fact that iron-formation occurs within three different stratigraphic and
structural contexts in the Cuyuna iron range is of considerable importance to the ultimate development of
manganese resources. Since we now recognize that the Emily district, the North range, and the South range
are separate entities, we can no longer develop regional syntheses that extrapolate mineralogical and
structural attributes from one entity to another.

51

�Trip 3 – Proterozoic Fe &amp; Mn Formations

Cuyuna Iron Range Manganese Resources
Several attempts have been made over the last 70 years to estimate the size of the manganese
resources of the Cuyuna iron range. For example, Lewis (1951) estimated that 455 million metric tons of
manganiferous iron-formation containing from 2 to 10 percent manganese were available to open-pit
mining to a depth of 45 meters. Dorr et al., (1973) used that estimate to establish that the Cuyuna range
contains approximately 46 percent of known manganese resources in the United States. US Steel geologist
Richard Strong (1959) estimated iron and manganese resources from several well-drilled deposits in the
Emily District and Beltrame et al., (1981) estimated a minimum of 170 million metric tons of
manganiferous rock with an average grade of 10.46 weight percent manganese.
All historic grade/tonnage estimates (Lewis, 1951, Strong, 1959, and Beltrame et al., 1981) should
be considered with a certain amount of skepticism for at least two reasons. First, the manganese data used
to make these estimates were, for the most part, by-products of data that were acquired originally by various
mining companies as they explored for iron. Second, the various estimates were prepared for different
reasons at different times, using different databases and different methodologies. Therefore, the results of
these estimates are neither comparable, nor do they necessarily reflect the actual resource. A table listing
the grade and tonnage from properties that Strong (1959) and Beltrami et al. (1981) estimated manganese
resources is given in Table 3-2 and a location map of these properties is presented in Figure 3-5.
Table 3-2. Manganese grade and tonnage estimates from reports by Strong (1959) and Beltrame et al. (1981).

52

�Trip 3 – Proterozoic Fe &amp; Mn Formations
Despite their problematic nature, the estimates of Lewis (1951) and Beltrame et al., (1981) do show
that the Cuyuna range contains a large, but low- to moderate-grade manganese resources remaining. This
large size, combined with the fact that the manganese deposits are in an established mining district, makes
the Cuyuna range an ideal place to study geological and technological factors needed to evaluate this and
other sedimentary manganese deposits in the United States. Especially important are studies of the geologic
habit of the manganese and the controls on its distribution and subsequent concentration into deposits of
minable size.

Figure 3-5. Bedrock geology and location map of properties outlined in reports by Strong (1959) and Beltrame et al.
(1981) that includes manganese grade-tonnage estimates. Labeled parcels correlate with the MAP ID column in
Table 3-2 and are those with an estimated resource greater than 100,000,000 pounds of manganese metal.

53

�Trip 3 – Proterozoic Fe &amp; Mn Formations

Penokean Orogeny
The Penokean orogeny began at about 1880 Ma when an oceanic arc, the Paleoproterozoic
Pembine–Wausau terrane, collided with the southern margin of the Archean Superior (Laurentia) craton
marking the end of a period of south-directed subduction. The docking of the buoyant craton to the arc
resulted in a subduction jump to the south and development of back-arc extension both in the initial arc and
adjacent craton margin to the north. Synchronous extension and subsidence of the Laurentia craton resulted
in the development of broad shallow seas overlapping the Archean craton. The classic Superior-type banded
iron-formations of the Lake Superior District, including those in the Marquette, Gogebic, Mesabi, and
Gunflint Iron Ranges, formed in that sea. The newly established subduction zone caused continued arc
volcanism until about 1850 Ma when a fragment of Archean crust, now the basement of the Marshfield
terrane, arrived at the subduction zone.
The convergence of Archean blocks of the Superior and Marshfield cratons resulted in the major
contractional phase of the Penokean orogeny. Rocks of the Pembine–Wausau arc were thrust northward
onto the Superior craton causing subsidence of a foreland basin in which sedimentation began at about 1850
Ma in the south (Baraga Group rocks) and 1835 Ma in the north (Rove Formation). A thick succession of
arc-derived turbidites constitutes most of the foreland basin-fill along with lesser volcanic rocks. In the
southern fold and thrust belt, tectonic thickening resulted in high-grade metamorphism of the sediments by
1830 Ma. At this same time, a suite of post-tectonic plutons intruded the deformed sedimentary sequence
and accreted arc terranes marking the end of the Penokean orogeny. A regional geologic map of the
Penokean orogen, modified from Schulz and Cannon (2007), is given in Figure 3-5.

Figure 3-5. Generalized geologic map of the Penokean orogen. Abbreviations: ECMB - East-central Minnesota
batholith; EPSZ - Eau Pleine shear zone; MD - Malmo discontinuity; NFZ - Niagara fault zone. Modified from
Schulz and Cannon, 2007.

The Penokean deformation in Minnesota includes a southern intensely and complexly deformed
series of thrust panels (Cuyuna North, Cuyuna South, Moose Lake, McGrath-Little Falls panels) that gives
way northward to progressively more weakly and simply deformed rocks (Emily District) across a belt
54

�Trip 3 – Proterozoic Fe &amp; Mn Formations
about 100 km wide. Farther north strata in the Mesabi and Gunflint Iron Ranges are essentially undeformed
(Holst, 1991). It should be noted that the “more weakly and simply deformed rocks” of the Emily District
have been shortened ~250% into a series of shallowly east-plunging anticlines and synclines. Substantial
progress has been made in deciphering the structure of the poorly exposed rocks of the Minnesota foreland
through the use of aeromagnetic and gravity data and drillhole information. Southwick and Morey (1991)
and Southwick et al. (1988) have presented syntheses of this information.
The complex thrust panels on the south, like comparable structures in Michigan, appear to be thinskinned slices without Archean basement. However, as in Michigan, this area of thin-skinned thrusting is
also the area where Archean-cored gneiss domes developed during post orogenic collapse of the Penokean
orogen (Holm and Lux, 1996; Schneider et al., 2004). Farther north, basement-cover relations are not well
known except for the Mesabi Range where Paleoproterozoic strata are mostly nearly flat lying above an
undisturbed unconformity with Archean basement rocks. A schematic north-south geologic cross section
of the Penokean orogeny in Minnesota, modified from Southwick and Morey (1991) is presented in Figure
3-6.

Figure 3-6. Schematic diagram illustrating the interpreted tectonic setting of the Penokean orogen in Minnesota. A)
continental margin sedimentation, and B) thin-skinned thrusting and deformation related to the Penokean orogeny.
Modified from Southwick &amp; Morey, 1991.

Post Penokean Weathering and Erosion
Perhaps the most important component in the formation of the high-grade iron and manganese ores
on the Mesabi and Cuyuna ranges is the vast amount of time (measured in hundreds of millions of years)
upon which the newly-formed and uplifted Penokean mountains of the southern Laurentia craton weathered
and eroded. As plate tectonic forces moved Laurentia across the globe to its current position on planet Earth,
there were long periods of time when it resided within the tropical weathering zone (+30° to -30° latitude)
near the Earth’s equator. It is believed that the supergene enrichment of iron (to &gt;60 wt.% elemental Fe)
and manganese (to &gt;50 wt.% elemental Mn) on the Mesabi and Cuyuna largely formed during the protracted
periods of time that the area resided within the tropical weathering zone. A paleogeographic reconstruction
of the location of Laurentia on planet Earth is given in Figure 3-7.
55

�Trip 3 – Proterozoic Fe &amp; Mn Formations

Figure 3-7. Paleogeographic reconstruction of the Laurentia craton from the Paleoproterozoic to present times.

FIELD TRIP STOPS
Four field trip stops have been selected to showcase selected geological features associated with
supergene weathering of primary Paleoproterozoic Superior-type iron formation into high-grade of Fe and
Mn ores. The locations of the field trip stops are shown in Figure 3-8 and briefly described below.
1) DNR drillcore library in Hibbing: Drillcore review of unoxidized Biwabik Iron Formation,
2) Emily deposit core shed: Drillcore review of high-grade supergene Mn ores, primary Mn-Fe
carbonate-facies iron formation, Overlying Sudbury Impact breccias &amp; accretionary lapilli?
3) Mary Ellen Mine: Walk into a historic natural-ore (hematite) open pit iron mine, sampling of the
classic Mary Ellen stromatolites, and
4) Large roadcut of the partially oxidized Biwabik Iron Formation adjacent to the historic naturalore Rouchleau Mine Complex.

Stop 1: DNR Drillcore Library, Hibbing Minnesota
Longitude/Latitude: 47.432412°N, -92.941811E
UTM NAD 83 Zone 15N: 504388E, 5253220N
At our first stop on this field trip, we will examine sections of two different drill cores of the Biwabik iron
formation to directly compare depositional features to post-depositional features. The Drill Core Library is
maintained by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Lands and Minerals Division, and provides
direct access for visitors to examine publicly owned geologic materials and exploration data. This incredible
56

�Trip 3 – Proterozoic Fe &amp; Mn Formations

Figure 3-8. Location map of field trip stops and the collar location of the two drill holes looked at Stop 1.

repository contains over 7,000 mineral exploration cores, 1,500 roadway and bridge foundation cores, and
500 cores collected during scientific, governmental, and academic research, and their curation activities
support researchers, exploration geologists, and engineers from around the world.
Depositional features and mineralogy in Precambrian chemical sedimentary rocks like iron
formations have long been of interest to the scientific community as they may record information about
Earth’s early surface conditions. However, recovering data that links to depositional conditions requires the
reconstruction of post-depositional mineral reactions and quantification of geochemical exchange. For this
reason, the original mineralogy and geochemistry of iron formations has been the subject of numerous
investigations.
Critical early investigations recognized the mineral greenalite - postulating its authigenic origin as
a “chemical oceanic precipitate”, and hypothesizing its role in forming the iron ore deposits in Minnesota,
USA (Irving, 1886; Irving and Van Hise, 1892; Leith, 1903; Van Hise and Leith, 1911; Aldrich 1929;
Gruner, 1946; Tyler, 1949; James, 1954; White, 1954; Goodwin, 1956; Gundarson and Schwartz, 1962;
LaBerge; 1964). Key initial evidence for a primary or early origin for greenalite in the Superior craton
included: (1) its abundance in low temperature, well-preserved assemblages, and comparative absence in
metamorphosed iron formations in the same region (LaBerge, 1964); (2) the existence of submicroscopic
57

�Trip 3 – Proterozoic Fe &amp; Mn Formations
greenalite in the cores of circular to elliptical sand-sized grains as either the main mineral phase, &lt;0.05 mm
spherules, or as dusty nano-scale (submicroscopic) particles (Goodwin, 1956); intergranular relationships
between phases where greenalite is crosscut by other phases in the same sample; (LaBerge, 1964; French,
1973; Klein and Fink, 1976), and even distribution throughout primary bedding (LaBerge, 1964). Recent
mineralogical investigations (e.g, Duncanson et al., 2024, Muhling et al., 2025 and references therein)
highlight that the earliest forming minerals in iron formation are commonly found within silica-cemented
horizons, where abundant chert cement silicified the sediments at or near the sediment water interface. Such
silica-cemented horizons preserve incomplete reactions and allow for identification of direct mineral
relationships and local element exchange. Common mineral reactions observed in the Biwabik iron
formation include the transformation of greenalite to minnesotaite, minnesotatite to stilpnomelane,
greenalite to magnetite, siderite to magnetite, and magnetite to hematite. Of the mineral reactions that
commonly occur in iron formation, transformations of Fe2+-containing silicates like greenalite to mixed
valence state minerals like magnetite and further oxidation of magnetite to hematite, contributed to
formation of iron ores in the Biwabik.
To illustrate some of the many post-depositional reactions that occur in iron formations worldwide,
we will examine a small section of two drill cores, MGS 8 from the western end of the Mesabi iron range,
and LWD-99-01 from near the Virigina horn area (see Figure 3-8 for locations). LWD-99-01 clearly
preserves depositional features, while MGS-8 documents abundant post-depositional oxidation throughout.

Stop 2: North Star Manganese Inc Drillcore Shed, Emily Minnesota
Longitude/Latitude: 46.753571°N, -93.973496E
UTM NAD 83 Zone 15N: 425650E, 5178240N
Historic exploration and drilling in the 1940’s and 1950’s by Pickands Mather and US Steel
identified iron and manganese-bearing mineralization within the Emily Iron Formation. US Steel developed
but did not implement a preliminary mine plan for mining of the Emily Deposit. Following approximately
50 years of inactivity, Cooperative Mineral Resources (subsidiary of Crow Wing Power) pursued a pilot
mining operation using pressurized water that was ultimately unsuccessful. As a follow up investigation
into the outcomes of pilot mining, a small-scale drill program was accomplished in 2010-2012.
A drilling program was designed and executed by Big Rock Exploration, LLC, in 2022-2023. A
total of 29 drill holes were completed to extend mineralization and refine the previous resource estimates.
A total of 13,107 feet of drilling was completed for this program. Data collected for this project includes
lithological, structural, geotechnical, geochemical and geophysical data from the drill core.
Through interpretation of legacy, recent and new drilling data, Big Rock Exploration identified
coherent zones of high-grade manganese mineralization (30 to ≥40 wt.% Mn) over a 1.25-kilometer strike
length. Mineralization is comprised of horizons of secondary manganese oxide minerals, as well as locally
present primary iron-manganese carbonate mineralization. An ore deposit model has been developed that
incorporates the oxidation of primary thin-bedded manganese-iron carbonates into massive manganese
oxide through early folding and prolonged periods of weathering, oxidation, and erosion. This ore deposit
model and associated geological model have been used to support an updated and expanded mineral
resource estimate (Table 3-3) for the Emily Deposit that was completed and published by Forte Dynamics
(Hulse et al., 2024) on May 24, 2024.
We’ll first begin the review of important geological features revealed in the four Emily Mn deposit
drillholes on display in the core shed by elucidating our current understanding of the geology and structure
for the whole Cuyuna Iron Range and then focus specifically on the stratigraphy and ore-forming processes
at Emily through a series of figures and descriptive text written into a technical report (Steiner et al., 2024)
and orally presented at the 2024 ILSG conference (Peterson and Steiner, 2024).
58

�Trip 3 – Proterozoic Fe &amp; Mn Formations

Table 3-3. Mineral resource estimate for the Emily Manganese deposit.

Figure 3-9. Continent-scale initial condition framework of Paleoproterozoic iron formations of Minnesota.

Initial Conditions
Deposition of Paleoproterozoic iron formations of the Lake Superior district all owe their origins
to the ~2.4 – 2.1 Ga. rifting of the Wyoming Province craton off of the southern Superior Province craton
(Figure 3-9). This rifting set the stage for the development of environments of deposition conducive to the
formation of thick sequences of both Algoma- and Superior-type iron formations (Figure 3-10).
During the Penokean orogeny (see Figure 3-6) these variable environments of iron formation
deposition were transposed northwestward via thin-skinned tectonics into a fold &amp; thrust belt (Cuyuna
North and South range thrust panels) over a series of thrust-front folds (Emily District) that was bounded
by a basal decollement. Outcomes of the Penokean orogeny in the Cuyuna Range of central Minnesota are
shown in an idealized cross sectional view Figure 3-11 and how ~1.8 billion years of erosion has left it
today in Figure 3-12.

59

�Trip 3 – Proterozoic Fe &amp; Mn Formations

Figure 3-10. Schematic model for the variable environments of deposition of Paleoproterozoic iron formations of
the Cuyuna and Mesabi ranges of Minnesota.

Figure 3-11. Idealized cross section of Minnesota’s Penokean Mountains of central Minnesota approximately 1.83
billion years ago.

Figure 3-12. Schematic representation of the results of deep weathering and erosion of the Penokean Mountains in
central Minnesota.

60

�Trip 3 – Proterozoic Fe &amp; Mn Formations
Geologic Maps
Geologic maps are the foundation upon which geologists interpret Earth processes and depict on a
piece of paper the final outcomes of such processes in plan form. As such, the authors have added annotated
bedrock geology map of the Cuyuna Range in Figure 3-13 and more specifically for the Emily District of
the Cuyuna Range in Figure 3-14.

Figure 3-13. Annotated bedrock geologic map of a portion of the Cuyuna Range, central Minnesota. Clipped from
the map of Peterson (2022).

Figure 3-14. Annotated bedrock geologic map of the Emily District, Cuyuna Range, central Minnesota. Modified
after Peterson, 2022.

61

�Trip 3 – Proterozoic Fe &amp; Mn Formations

Figure 3-15. Schematic stratigraphic section through the Emily Manganese deposit, after Peterson &amp; Steiner, 2024.

Stratigraphy
Relogging of historic drill core and logging of new core drilled during the 2023 exploration drilling
program has led to the identification of a predictable stratigraphic sequence at the Emily Deposit (Fig. 315).
The four formations recognized at the Emily Deposit include three units of the Paleoproterozoic
Animikie Basin unconformably overlain by Quaternary glacial drift. Descriptions of these stratigraphic
units from the oldest to youngest are given below:
1. Pokegama Formation – White-grey, tan, or cream-colored indurated argillite and quartzite. The
Pokegama formation at the Emily deposit is typically a clayey siltstone, though mudstones and
quartz-arenites are common. Bedding is quite variable ranging from massive siltstones and quartzarenites to thick, medium, and thin bedded or even finely laminated clayey-siltstones and mudstones.
The Pokegama formation does not host significant manganese mineralization but when observed
manganese minerals occur in trace amounts in veinlets or as small patches with iron oxides.
2. Emily Iron Formation – See below for subdivision descriptions.
3. Virginia Formation – Grey-brown in color, red when oxidized, fine-grained, well bedded clastic
sediments commonly forming turbidite sequences. Fine-scale bedding, graded beds, and sandy
lenses are common. Thin horizons of lean iron formation (subunit Pvif) composed of ferruginous
chert occur locally. The basal 20-40 feet is characterized by highly disrupted and fragmented
turbidite clasts sed in a poorly sorted massive matrix. This horizon has been hypothesized to be
landslides associated with the Sudbury Impact.
4. Glacial Overburden – Unconsolidated glacial material including well sorted sands, lacustrine clays,
and unsorted glacial till. The preservation of earthy hematite and saprolitic materials immediately
below the basal angular unconformity indicates that overlying Laurentide ice sheet was not eroding
its base in the immediate deposit area. Composition of the overburden is inferred from drill returns
during tri-cone drilling.
Emily Iron Formation is further divided into five sub-units. Criteria for subunit designation requires
that a given interval be sufficiently distinctive in petrologic character to be easily identified, and laterally
extensive enough to be intercepted in multiple boreholes. Distinctive petrologic characteristics may be
texture (e.g., banded or granular iron formation, composition (e.g., chert, carbonate), or unique
62

�Trip 3 – Proterozoic Fe &amp; Mn Formations
characteristics such as stromatolites. The subdivisions of the Emily Iron Formation are as follows from
bottom to top:
1. Peif1 – This unit is located as the base of the Emily Iron Formation lies conformably atop the
Pokegama quartzite. The base is commonly cherty or stromatolitic before giving way to grain stones.
The majority of the unit is a red-brown to black, granular iron formation (GIF) or ferruginous
quartzose sandstone. The upper part (above the Peif1r marker, see below) is granular iron formation
composed of silicious, hematitic granules that range from &lt;1 to 2mm in size. Granular iron
formation is weakly bedded. The lower part of Peif1 (below the Peif1r marker horizon) contains
abundant quartzose sands cemented by iron oxides giving the rock a purple appearance. Sands are
composed of well-rounded fine-grained quartz and are interbedded with granular iron formation.
Manganese oxide mineralization is most intense within the Peif1 unit. Manganese oxides occur in
multiple styles including massive Mn-oxide that replaces all original textures (may be within a bed
or cross bedding), interstitial to grains (replacing the original iron cement?), and as veinlets. The
most intense manganese oxide mineralization within Peif1 occurs adjacent to (above and below) the
Peif1r marker horizon, though mineralization may occur throughout the unit. The lower Peif1
commonly exhibits a pock-mark texture when strongly mineralized. A thin stromatolite horizon
(Peifbs) typically occurs at the base of Peif1.
2. Peif1r – This unit is located within the Peif1 unit. Usually &lt;3m thick, the Peif1r is composed of finegrained hematite-chert banded iron formation. The base of the Peif1r hosts distinctive digitate
stromatolites.
3. Peif2 – This unit lies conformably atop Peif1, usually gradually transitioning from granular iron
formation (Peif1) to banded iron formation (Peif2) over a meter. The Peif2 is characterized by finegrained well-bedded banded iron formation though the composition of the iron formation is variable.
The most common composition for Peif2 is a hematite-chert banded iron formation, though this
appears to be a secondary, altered composition. The primary composition is iron-manganese
carbonate facies type iron formation. The carbonate facies are cream to greenish and gradually
becomes red with increased oxidation. Fresh carbonate facies contain much more manganese than
oxidized material, with the manganese found in rhodochrosite. This represents a very different
manganese host than the oxide mineralization found in the granular iron formation units (Peif1 and
Peif3).
4. Peif3 – Peif3 is characterized by interbedded medium to fine grained GIF and fine grained, narrow
BIF lenses. This unit lies conformably atop Peif2 where the contact is a graduation from BIF to GIF
dominant facies. Both GIF and BIF are weakly to moderately strongly bedded and silicious in
composition. Peif3 is commonly mineralized manganese oxides, only subordinate in manganese
endowment to Peif1.
5. Peif4 – White to grey, massive chert with mottled patches of iron-oxides. The sharp basal contact
with the underlying Peif3 is often “sheared” possibly from bedding parallel slip. Some parts of the
massive chert contain faint outlines of granules while most is simply massive white chert. The
mottled iron oxides include large irregular pods and stringers, sometimes reaching a meter in width.
Manganese is rarely found within the oxide pods.
6. Peif5 – Well-bedded banded iron formation consisting of 2-5cm beds of chert and iron oxide in
gradational contact with the underlying Peif4 massive chert. This unit is the least spatially consistent,
due to a lack of drillhole intercepts and difficulty identifying it as a result of intense oxidation.

Supergene Enrichment of Manganese
The unique manganese endowment of the Emily Iron Formation is attributed to the primary
deposition of Mn-carbonates in a shallow water environment (Figures 3-10, 3-16 and 3-17). However,
63

�Trip 3 – Proterozoic Fe &amp; Mn Formations
subsequent weathering, erosion, and oxidation has redistributed much of the manganese from the carbonate
unit to other areas. The majority of the manganese mineralized material at the Emily deposit is composed
of manganese oxides including manganite, jacobsite, and cryptolomene/hollandite. However, these phases
are not the stable manganese phase predicted by geochemical modelling of early oceans (Mitra et al., 2022).
Instead, manganese carbonates are the predicted stable phase. Therefore, the manganese oxide minerals that
constitute the majority of the orebody must have formed at a later stage. The tectonics during and
immediately after deposition of the Animikie basin sediments provide a plausible explanation for the
extremely high-grade manganese oxide formation.

Figure 3-16. Carbonate facies iron formation where the gradual oxidation of primary carbonates can be observed
from left to right. Note the increasingly hematite rich BIF from left to right.

Primary silicate and carbonate minerals in iron formations are well documented to be unstable
under oxidizing, near surface conditions. For example, the formation of direct ship ores of the Biwabik Iron
Formation on the Mesabi Iron Range has been ascribed to deep weathering of primary Fe-minerals (e.g.,
greenalite and siderite) over hundreds of millions or a billion years. The direct ship ores were composed of
hematite and goethite. The Emily Iron Formation, having been deposited contemporaneously with the
Biwabik Iron Formation, would have endured at least as much weathering over that period. The weathering
and subsequent supergene enrichment of manganese is related to the hydrogeologic and geochemical
interaction between interbedded banded (BIF) and granular (GIF) iron formation. Manganese in the Emily

Figure 3-17. Emily deposit drill core that seemingly documents that the oxidation of carbonate-facies
(rhodochrosite-siderite-chert) BIF generates classic thin-bedded hematite-jasper BIF as well as being the primary
source of Mn3+ that forms the massive manganese oxide zones in permeable GIF horizons.

64

�Trip 3 – Proterozoic Fe &amp; Mn Formations
Iron Formation was originally co-precipitated with iron carbonate minerals (rhodochrosite MnCO3 and
siderite FeCO3) within the banded iron formation lithotype (Peif2 subunit). Primary carbonates are observed
at various stages of oxidation in several boreholes (e.g., NSC-23005). Like the Biwabik Iron Formation,
the Emily Iron Formation underwent a protracted period of weathering and oxidation. Exposure of
carbonate facies iron formation to oxidizing waters over that period is hypothesized to be the causative
mechanism for supergene manganese enrichment at the Emily deposit. Oxidized meteoric water percolating
through the carbonate iron formation reacts with and dissolves the carbonates, liberating manganese from
rhodochrosite and converting siderite to hematite. The restite lithology appears very similar to hematiterich banded iron formation (Fig. 3-17). The now manganese enriched waters redistribute manganese
downslope to other subunits of the Emily Iron formation.
The second important litho-type, granular iron formation, is recognized as the primary manganeseoxide ore hosts at the Emily Deposit. Granular iron formation is composed of granules of varying
compositions (e.g., Fe-silicate, chert, Fe-carbonates) with pore space found between the granules. That pore
space creates permeability that drives fluid flow through the granular iron formation thereby moving and
redepositing manganese from the enriched waters leaving the carbonate facies banded iron formation. The
observations from drillcore logging at Emily indicate that manganese oxides are not found in significant
concentrations within the banded iron formations, but manganese oxides are abundant in the granular iron
formation.
The migration of manganese-rich waters from the banded iron formation into the granular units is
the primary redistribution mechanism for manganese. Once manganese enriched waters enter the granular
units, it is unclear by what mechanism the precipitation of manganese occurs. However, manganese oxide
minerals are observed in the interstices between granules indicate direct precipitation from the pore fluids.
It is unclear whether this interstitial manganese is the result of filling otherwise empty pore space if it is the
result of replacement of prior GIF matrix. Additionally, pock marked textures in manganese-rich units
suggest that granules may be replaced by the manganese-rich fluids, though the mechanism by which this
may occur is unclear due to a lack of mineralogical constraints.

Stratigraphic and Structural Controls on the Distribution of Secondary Manganese
The compression associated with the Penokean Orogen uplifted the rocks Emily deposit. Folding
and subsequent uplift of these originally shallow water subaqueous rocks into the Penokean mountains has
important hydrogeological implications by greatly lowering the water table and exposing the Emily Iron
Formation to oxidizing meteoric waters.
The Emily deposit is on the northernmost anticline of the Penokean fold and thrust belt, specifically
within a parasitic syncline along the norther limb of the larger anticline. The structural geometry established
during the Penokean provides a hydrogeologic “slope” that meteoric waters can migrate down under the
influence of gravity. In particular, the parasitic syncline that hosts the Emily Deposit (see Figure 3-14),
likely acted like a funnel or gutter that focused fluid flow through the rocks that now constitute the deposit.
A schematic stepwise ore genesis model for the Emily deposit is presented in Figure 3-18.
On a deposit scale and within this structural setting, the two major litho-types play an important
role in the movement of fluids due to their contrasting hydrogeological characteristics. In particular, the
Peif1r stromatolite horizon represents an aquitard that seemingly focused fluid along its margins. The
focusing of fluids along these margin manifests as exceptionally high Mn-grades (often massive manganese
oxides) at the upper and lower contacts with flanks GIF of Peif1. Similarly, but to a lesser extent, the basal
contact with the Pokegama formation and the contact between Peif2 and Peif3 represent areas of contrasting
hydrogeologic characteristics that may concentrate mineralizing fluids. Both areas are observed to host
massive manganese oxide mineralization, supporting such a relationship.

65

�Trip 3 – Proterozoic Fe &amp; Mn Formations

Figure 3-18. Emily deposit Mn-Oxide ore deposit model that incorporates stratigraphy, permeability, processes, and
time, after Peterson &amp; Steiner, 2024.

Drillholes on Display
Four drillholes from the 2023 exploration program at Emily will be on display for the 2025 ILSG field trip.
These holes include:
1) NSC-23002A - high-grade Mn-oxide ores at the bedrock interface in Peif1,
2) NSC-23004 - an almost complete stratigraphic section through the Emily IF,
3) NSC-23005 - Peif2 with carbonate facies IF and Sudbury Impact breccias in unit Pvf, and
4) NSC-23050 – The Western-most drillhole, nearly complete section of the Emily IF.
A detailed bedrock geology and drillhole location map of North Star Manganese Inc’s Emily Project is
presented in Figure 3-19, and striplogs of the four holes on display are given in Figures 3-20, 3-21, 3-22,
and 3-23.

66

�Trip 3 – Proterozoic Fe &amp; Mn Formations

Figure 3-19. Detailed bedrock geology and drillhole location map of North Star Manganese Inc’s Emily project.
Note that the collar location of the four drillholes on display are highlighted by the small yellow circles. Modified
after Steiner et al., 2024.

67

�Trip 3 – Proterozoic Fe &amp; Mn Formations

Figure 3-20. Striplog for drillhole NSC-23002A.

Figure 3-21. Striplog for drillhole NSC-23004.

68

�Trip 3 – Proterozoic Fe &amp; Mn Formations

Figure 3-22. Striplog for drillhole NSC-23005.

Figure 3-23. Striplog for drillhole NSC-23050.

69

�Trip 3 – Proterozoic Fe &amp; Mn Formations

Stop 3: Mary Ellen Mine, Biwabik Minnesota
Longitude/Latitude: 47.527677°N, -92.366645E
UTM NAD 83 Zone 15N: 547675E, 5264000N
The historic natural ore Mary Ellen mine (Figure 3-24) near Biwabik is probably most well-known
today as the source of Mary Ellen Jasper, a world-class type-locality of Precambrian stromatolites. Rocks
and polished slabs of stromatolites from the Mary Ellen mine can be found in natural history museums
throughout the world, and you’ll get to find and take-home pieces yourself during this field trip. According
to several annual mining directories, the Stanley Iron Mining Company operated the Mary Ellen Mine
between 1924 and 1928, with stockpile shipments occurring in 1929 and 1930. It actively mined the
property again between 1948 and 1951. Beginning in 1952, the Pioneer Mining Company worked the mine,
continuing to do so through 1961. The Pittsburgh Pacific Company operated it for one final year, in 1962.
Its cumulative output of natural ore was 4,574,973 long tons, again according to an annual mining directory.
An interesting quote from the 2015 book titled: Stromatolites Ancient, Beautiful and EarthAltering, by Bruce Stinchcomb &amp; Bob Leis copied below strongly hints that some oxidation-related
processes that formed the high-grade earthy hematitic iron ores were similar to those outlined for the highgrade manganese oxide ores at Emily. The quote is as follows, "In the early days of iron mining in
Minnesota, the location of stromatolite material would indicate that an iron rich vein was close. The Mary
Ellen Stromatolite material could be as much as 15 feet thick and would have to be removed before mining
could commence. To the miners this material was considered a nuisance and a waste product."

Figure 3-24. Simplified bedrock geology and iron mine map of the Mary Ellen mine area.

70

�Trip 3 – Proterozoic Fe &amp; Mn Formations

Stop 4: Rouchleau Mine Complex Bridge, Virginia Minnesota
Longitude/Latitude: 47.516178 °N, -92.518663 E
UTM NAD 83 Zone 15N: 536240 E, 5262640 N
The Thomas Rukavina Memorial Bridge carries U.S. 53 over the Rouchleau Mine pit connecting
Virginia, Minnesota with other cities to the south. U.S. 53 continues through Virginia to International Falls
and Canada; International Falls is about 100 miles (160 km) north of Virginia. The bridge, opened in 2017,
was named after Tom Rukavina in 2021 following his death in 2019. Rukavina was a state legislator from
the Iron Range. At 204 feet tall, it is the tallest bridge in Minnesota. This bridge carries a traffic volume of
about 22,200 cars per day, making it one of the most-traveled highway segments on the Iron Range. The
bridge also features a bike lane and pedestrian walkway (the Mesabi Trail) that leads to trails connecting
Gilbert and Virginia.
In 1960, the state of Minnesota and the mining companies in the area came to an agreement that
allowed the construction of U.S. 53 across lands held by the mining company without the state paying
anything for the land. The agreement stipulated that after 1987, the state would be responsible for the costs
involved with moving the roadway to allow for mining after given advance notice by the mining companies.
The two owners of the land notified MnDOT of their intent to mine the site in 2010 which gave the state
until 2017 to move the roadway. Cliffs Natural Resources, which had a nearby active mine, hoped to begin
mining the site by 2017. After evaluating several more expensive options that involved longer bridges or
routing US 53 across an active mine pit, an alignment was selected that resulted in the highest bridge in
Minnesota. A route on level ground away from the mining formation was identified as too disruptive to
development patterns in the area. The entire project estimated to cost $220 million with $159 million for
construction of the bridge and diverted roadway. The bridge crosses the Rouchleau Mine pit.[9] The water
filled pit also serves as Virginia's water supply. The final cost was $230 million with $30 million coming
from the federal government and the remaining from the state. To prevent the need to move the bridge in
the future, the state purchased the mineral rights for the land beneath roadway for $15 million.

References
Aftabi, A., Atapour, H., Mohseni, S., and Babaki, A., 2021, Geochemical discrimination among different types of
banded iron formations (BIFs): A comparative review, Ore Geology Reviews, Volume 136.
Aldrich, H. R., 1929, The geology of the Gogebic Iron Range of Wisconsin: Wisconsin Geol. Survey Bull. 21, 279
p.
Beltrame, R.J., Holtzman, R.C., and Wahl, T.E., 1981, Manganese resources of the Cuyuna range, east-central
Minnesota: Minnesota Geological Survey Report of Investigations 24, 22 p.
Berg, T., Peterson, D.M., and Sweet, G., 2022, The Emily Manganese Deposit, Crow Wing County, Minnesota: A
mineral resource evaluation for North Star Manganese Inc, Big Rock Exploration technical report BRE-TR2022-02, 33 pages, 3 appendices.
Dorr, J.VN., II, Crittenden, M.D., Jr., and Worl, RG., 1973, Manganese, in Probst, D.A., and Pratt, W.P., eds.,
United States Mineral Resources: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 820, p. 385-399.
Duncanson S and 5 coauthors (2024) Reconstructing diagenetic mineral reactions from silicified horizons of the
Paleoproterozoic Biwabik Iron Formation, Minnesota. American Mineralogist 109: 339-358, doi: 10.2138/am2022-8776.
Goodwin, A.M., 1956, Facies relations in the Gunflint iron-formation: Ecox. GEOL., v. 51, p. 565-595.
Gruner, 1946, Mineralogy and geology of the Mesabi range: Iron Range Resources and Rehabilitation, St. Paul,
Minn., 127 p.
Gunderson, J. N., and Schwartz, G. M., 1962, The geology of the metamorphosed Biwabik iron-formation, Eastern
Mesabi District, Minnesota: Minnesota Geol. Survey Bull. 43, 139 p.
Hofstra, A.H., and Kreiner, D.C., Systems-Deposits-Commodities-Critical Minerals Table for the Earth Mapping
Resource Initiative: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2020-1042, 24 p.
Holm, D.K., Lux, D.R., 1996, Core complex model proposed for gneiss dome development during collapse of the
Paleoproterozoic Penokean orogen, Minnesota, Geology 24, 343–346.

71

�Trip 3 – Proterozoic Fe &amp; Mn Formations
Holst, T.B., 1991, The Penokean orogeny in Minnesota and Upper Michigan, U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1904D, 10 pages.
Hulse, D.E., Irons, A., and Malhotra, D., 2024, Electric Metals (USA) Limited Emily Manganese Project, NI 43-101
Technical Report, Project No. 219001, Forte Dynamics, 89 pages.
Irving, R. D., 1886, Origin of the ferruginous schists and iron ores of the Lake Superior region: Am. Jour. Sci., v. 32
p, 255-272.
Irving and Van Hise, C. R., 1892, The Penokee iron-bearing series of Michigan and Wisconsin: U.S. Geol. Survey
Mon. 19, 534 p.
James, H. L., 1954. Sedimentary facies of iron-formation. Economic Geology, 49(3), 235–293.
Klein, C., and Fink, R.P., 1976, Petrology of the Sokoman Iron Formation in the Howells River area, at the western
edge of the Labrador trough: Economic Geology, v. 71, p. 453–487.
LaBerge, G.L., 1964, Development of magnetite in iron-formations of the Lake Superior Region: Econ. Geol., V.
59, p. 1313-1342.
Leith, C. K., 1903, The Mesabi iron-bearing district of Minnesota: U.S. Geol. Sur. Mono. 43, 316 p.
Lewis, W.E., 1951, Relationship of the Cuyuna manganiferous resources to others in the United States, in Geology
of the Cuyuna Range Mining Geology Symposium, 3rd, Hibbing, Minnesota, Proceedings: Minneapolis,
University of Minnesota, Center for Continuation Study, p. 30-43.
Marsden, R.W., 1972, Cuyuna district, in Sims, P.K., and Morey, G.B., eds., Geology of Minnesota: A centennial
volume: Minnesota Geological Survey, p. 227-239.
Marsden, R.W., Emanuelson, J.W., Owens, J.S., Walker, N.E., and Werner, R.F., 1968, The Mesabi Iron Range,
Minnesota, in Ridge, J.D. (ed.), Ore Deposits of the United States, 1933-1967: New York, American Institute of
Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, Inc., The Grafton-Sales Volume, v. 1, p. 518-537.
Mitra, Kaushik, Eleanor L. Moreland, Greg J. Ledingham, and Jeffrey G. Catalano, 2023, Formation of manganese
oxides on early Mars due to active halogen cycling, Nature Geoscience 16, no. 2, p. 133-139.
Morey, G.B., 1978, Lower and Middle Precambrian stratigraphic nomenclature for east-central Minnesota:
Minnesota Geological Survey Report of Investigations 21, 52 p., 1 pIate.
Morey, G.B., 1992, Chemical composition of the eastern Biwabik Iron Formation (Early Proterozoic), Mesabi Iron
Range, Minnesota: Economic Geology, v. 87, p. 1649-1658.
Muhling, J., Brengman, L., &amp; Johnson, J. Greenalite (2025, June issue): Cryptic mineral of ancient ferruginous
oceans. Elements: Greenalite - Tiny crystal with a big story, Elements (in press).
Peterson, D.M., 2022, Bedrock geology and manganese mineral resource assessment map of the Emily Manganese
Deposit, Big Rock Exploration map BRE-MAP-2022-02, 1:50,000 scale.
Peterson, D.M., and Steiner, A., 2024, The geology, history, and ore deposit model of the high-grade Emily
Manganese Deposit, Cuyuna Range, Minnesota: Oral presentation, Institute on Lake Superior Geology
conference, Houghton, Michigan.
Schmidt, R.G., 1963, Geology and ore deposits of Cuyuna North range, Minnesota: U.S. Geological Survey
Professional Paper 407, 96 p.
Schneider, D.A., Holm, D.K., O’Boyle, C., Hamilton, M., Jercinovic, M., 2004, Paleoproterozoic development of a
gneiss dome corridor in the southern Lake Superior region, U.S.A. In: Whitney, D.L., Teyssier, C., Siddoway,
C.S. (Eds.), Gneiss Domes in Orogeny. Geol. Soc. Am. Spec. Pap. 380, pp. 339–357.
Schulz, K.J. and Cannon, W.F., 2007, The Penokean orogeny in the Lake Superior region, Precambrian Research,
157, p. 4–25.
Schulz, K.J., DeYoung, J.H., Jr., Seal, R.R., II, and Bradley, D.C., eds., 2017, Critical mineral resources of the
United States - Economic and environmental geology and prospects for future supply: U.S. Geological Survey
Professional Paper 1802, 797 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1802.
Severson, M.J., Heine, J.J., and Patelke, M.M., 2009, Geologic and Stratigraphic Controls of the Biwabik Iron
Formation and the Aggregate Potential of the Mesabi Iron Range, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Duluth,
Natural Resources Research Institute, Technical Report NRRI/TR- 2009/09, 173 p. + 37 plates.
Southwick, D.L. and Morey, G.B., 1991, Tectonic imbrication and foredeep development in the Penokean orogen,
east-central Minnesota; an interpretation based on regional geophysics and results of test drilling, U.S.
Geological Survey Bulletin 1904-C, pp. C1–C17.
Southwick, D.L., Morey, G.B., and McSwiggen, P.L., 1988, Geologic map (scale 1:250,000) of the Penokean
orogen, central and eastern Minnesota, and accompanying text: Minnesota Geological Survey Report of
Investigations 37, 25 p., 1 pIate.

72

�Trip 3 – Proterozoic Fe &amp; Mn Formations
Steiner, A., Peterson, D.M., Berg, E., Solie, J., Larson, M., Schaefbauer, E., and Sweet, G., 2024, The North Star
Emily Manganese Deposit: Observations, Interpretations, and Recommendations Following the Initial 2023
Drilling Campaign, Big Rock Exploration Technical Report BRE-TR-2023-01, 47 pages, 4 appendices, 1 plate.
Strong, R., 1959, Report on Geological Investigation of the Cuyuna District, Minnesota, 1949-1959, US Steel
Internal Report, 318 pages.
Tyler, S.A., 1949, Development of Lake Superior soft iron ores from metamorphosed information: Geol. Soc. Am.
Bull., v. 60, p. 1101-1024.
Van Hise, C. R., and Leith, C. K., 1911, Geology of the Lake Superior region. U.S. Geol. Survey Mon. 52, 641 p.
White, D. A., 1954, The stratigraphy and structure of the Mesabi Range, Minnesota: Minnesota Geol. Survey Bull.
38, 92 p.
Wolff, J.E., 1917, Recent geologic developments on the Mesabi Iron Range, Minnesota: American Institute of
Mining and Metallurgical Engineers, Transactions, v. 56, p. 229-257.

73

�Trip 4 – Soudan

FIELD TRIP 4
New Geological Insights into the Genesis of Iron Ores at Lake Vermilion –
Soudan Underground Mine State Park
George J. Hudak1,2,3, Zsuzsanna P. Allerton1, and Annia Fayon1
1

Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, 116 Church
Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455
2
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Minnesota Duluth, 1114 Kirby Drive,
Duluth, MN 55812
3
George Hudak Geosciences P.L.L.C., Duluth, MN 55804

Introduction
The Vermilion District of northeastern Minnesota contains one of the classic greenstone belts in
the United States. The district comprises the southwestern part of the Wawa-Abitibi Terrane (Stott et al.,
2007; Stott and Mueller, 2009) which encompasses Neoarchean metavolcanic, metasedimentary, and metaintrusive rocks that extend northeastward through northwestern Ontario and Quebec (Figure 4-1). In
Canada, this terrane hosts numerous volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits (e.g. Winston Lake, Geco,
Noranda), gold-rich volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits (Horne (Noranda camp), Bousquet 2 – LaRonde
1, LaRonde-Penna; Mercier-Langevin et al., 2010), as well as a large number of lode (orogenic) gold
deposits (for example, in the Hemlo, Timmins, and Kirkland Lake camps). The Vermilion District is known
for its numerous, previously mined massive hematitic iron ore deposits (including the Pioneer Mine in Ely
and the Soudan Mine in Soudan) which locally occur within regional extensive Algoma-type banded iron
formations cut by Neoarchean shear zones. To date, no volcanogenic massive sulfide, gold-rich
volcanogenic massive sulfide, or lode gold deposits have been discovered in the Vermilion District,
although several studies (Peterson and Jirsa, 1999; Peterson, 2001; Hudak et al., 2002a; Peterson and
Patelke, 2003; Hoffman, 2007; Hudak et al., 2007; Hudak et al., 2012; Lodge et al., 2013; Lodge et at.,
2015; Thompson, 2015) have indicated that evidence for volcanic, hydrothermal, and structural processes
associated with these types of mineral deposits is present throughout the Vermilion District.
The Vermilion District’s iron ore mining heritage is currently preserved at Lake Vermilion / Soudan
Underground Mine State Park located near Soudan, Minnesota as well as within several historic mines west
of and within Ely, Minnesota. The Soudan mine operated from 1882 until December, 1962 and produced
approximately 15.5 tons of hematic iron ore. With the donation of land and infrastructure associated with
the former Oliver Iron Mining Division’s Soudan Mine by United States Steel to the State of Minnesota in
1965, Soudan Underground Mine State Park was established. This state park currently preserves the
historical surface and underground workings from, as well as the wilderness adjacent to, Minnesota’s oldest
iron ore mine, the Soudan Mine. The mine previously hosted several underground physics laboratories,
including: 1) Soudan 1 (23rd level) which studied neutrino decay; 2) Soudan 2 (27th level), also to study
neutrino decay; and 3) the MINOS (Main Injector Neutrino Oscillation Search) lab, which was built on the
27th level adjacent to Soudan 1 and studied the decay of neutrinos within the earth as they passed from
Fermilab to Soudan. This popular tourist site continues to be the focus of a wide variety of research related
to geology, geochemistry, hydrogeology, biology, biochemistry and physics.
Lake Vermilion/Soudan Underground Mine State Park is Minnesota’s newest state park. In 2008,
Minnesota State Legislature set aside $20 million in bonding authority to buy, plan, and develop the park,
which is located immediately east of the former Soudan Underground Mine State Park. Lake
Vermilion/Soudan Underground Mine State Park was established in June 2010 after over 3,000 acres land
was purchased from U. S. Steel Corporation (Bakst, 2013). At the present time, considerable development
74

�Trip 4 – Soudan

Figure 4-1. Regional geology of the Lake Superior region illustrating the wide variety of mineral deposit types
(modified from Hudak and Peterson, 2014; D.M. Peterson, personal communication, 2013).

has taken place in the eastern part of the park, including the establishment of trails, roads, and campsites.
The park boasts a rich natural and human history, including a wide variety of ~2.7 billion year old rocks
that were formed by a wide variety of genetic process, abundant wildlife, as well as archaeological evidence
for human habitation dating back over 6,000 years. Additionally, considerable evidence for recent (within
the past 140 years) mineral exploration efforts can be readily identified in the park.
Since the late 1990’s considerable geological research has been conducted in the region between
Tower, MN (in the west) to Ely, MN (in the east) within the Vermilion District. Much of this research has
been conducted to better understand the stratigraphy, structural geology, and economic geology of the belt.
This research is summarized in several recent Institute on Lake Superior Geology (ILSG) field trips (Hudak
et al., 2004; Jirsa et al., 2004; Peterson and Patelke, 2003; Larson and Mooers, 2009; Peterson et al., 2009a;
Jirsa and Hillman, 2009; Peterson et al., 2009b), as well as in a few recent journal publications (Lodge et
al., 2013; Lodge et al., 2015). In 2010 and 2011, students and faculty from the University of Minnesota
Duluth Precambrian Research Center conducted new, 1:5000 scale mapping of this park and several maps
and reports were produced (Radakovich et al., 2010; Vallowe et al., 2010; Heim et al., 2011; Baumgardner
et al., 2013; Hudak et al., 2016; Peterson et al., 2016). These findings are summarized in Hudak et al., 2014.
In addition, geologists from the Natural Resources Research Institute (NRRI), the Minnesota Geological
Survey (MGS), and the University of Wisconsin Eau Claire produced a 1:10000-scale map of the park as
well as a project report and accompanying spatial databases (Peterson et al., 2016; Hudak et al., 2016). Over
the past several years, students and faculty from the University of Minnesota Twin Cities Advanced Field
Camp have refined the geological map in an area approximately one-half mile east of the Soudan Mine
headframe.

75

�Trip 4 – Soudan
The results of these studies have provided a solid foundation for geological research that is currently
taking place in Lake Vermilion/Soudan Underground Mine State Park (e.g.). Recent masters and doctoral
studies from the University of Minnesota Duluth (Thompson, 2015) and the University of Minnesota Twin
Cities (Allerton, in prep.; Allerton et al., 2024a; Allerton et al., 2024b; Allerton et al., in review) have
focused their research on understanding the absolute age of massive hematite mineralization at the Soudan
Mine. This is a problem that has baffled geoscientists for over a century (e.g. Gruner, 1926; Klinger, 1960).
In addition, students and faculty from the University of Minnesota Twin Cities Advanced Field Camp have
conducted more recent geological mapping (1:5000 scale) in an area approximately one-half mile east of
the Soudan Mine headframe for the past several years. This mapping has led to minor reinterpretations of
the geology in the central part of Lake Vermilion/Soudan Underground Mine State Park that was depicted
by Peterson et al. (2016).
Recently, a grant from the Leaonardt Foundation was awarded to one of the co-authors (Fayon) to
develop a new trail in the park that will focus on public education related to the ancient geology and
geological processes that have taken place in the park. K-12 teachers are playing a major role in developing
the curriculum and lessons that will be part of this trail project.
The goals of this field guide are to illustrate to field trip participants the wide variety of geological
processes that have taken place within Lake Vermilion/Soudan Underground Mine State Park. Morning
field trip stops will focus on understanding the stratigraphy, structure, hydrothermal alteration and
mineralization closely associated with the Soudan iron orebodies. The afternoon will focus on observing
both geological features of the massive hematite orebodies, as well as recent advances in our geochemical
and geochronological understanding of these iron ore deposits in the Montana stope, located on the 27th
level of the Soudan Mine.

Figure 4-2. Simplified correlation map of Neoarchean assemblages in Minnesota and northwestern Ontario (after
Peterson et al., 2001; Hudak and Peterson, 2014). Inset map illustrates location of the Wawa-Abitibi Terrane in
Minnesota and northwestern Ontario (Stott et al., 2007). The Leach Lake structural discontinuity is illustrated in red.
The red star symbols indicate location of Lake Vermilion State Park.

76

�Trip 4 – Soudan

Regional Geologic Setting
A simplified regional geological map of the Neoarchean terranes of northeastern Minnesota and
adjacent Ontario is presented in Figure 4-2. Supracrustal rocks in the Vermilion district consist of volcanicdominated stratigraphic sequences of the Wawa Abitibi Terrane within the Superior Province of the
Canadian Shield. Rocks of the Wawa Abitibi Terrane in northern Minnesota are divided based on
stratigraphic and structural setting into: (1) the Soudan belt, to the south, and (2) the Newton belt, to the
north (Jirsa et al., 1992; Southwick et al., 1998). The boundary between these contrasting structural panels
can be traced geophysically across the width of Minnesota and was informally designated the Leech Lake
structural discontinuity (Jirsa et al., 1992). In the region west and north of Lake Vermilion/Soudan
Underground Mine State Park, the Leech Lake structural discontinuity occurs along the Mud Creek shear
zone (Hudleston et al., 1988), small segments of the Vermilion and Wolf Lake faults (Sims and Southwick,
1985), and the Bear River fault (Jirsa et al., 1992).
The Soudan belt (Figure 4-3) contains large, broad generally east-west trending folds involving
calc-alkalic and tholeiitic volcanic strata overlain by, and locally interlayered with, turbiditic rocks. In
contrast, the Newton belt consists of elongate, northeast-trending, and mostly northward-younging volcanic
and volcaniclastic sequences. Volcanic rocks of the Newton belt differ from those of the Soudan belt in
containing locally abundant komatiite/basaltic komatiite flows and peridotite sills. The two belts are faultbounded, and the relationships between stratigraphic units within each belt are largely conformable
(although faults obscure contacts locally). In its eastern extension, the Soudan belt is continuous with the
Saganagons assemblage in Ontario and terminates against the Saganaga pluton and Northern Light Gneiss.
The Newton belt extends discontinuously eastward into the Shebandowan District of Ontario to form the
Greenwater and Burchell assemblages. Intrusive rocks in both belts vary from gabbroic and felsic
porphyries demonstrably related to volcanism, to large plutons emplaced post-tectonically. Both districts
contain unconformable, Timiskaming-type sequences composed of calc-alkalic volcanic rocks,
conglomerates, and finer grained sedimentary rocks.
Lithostratigraphic units in the western Vermilion district (Table 4-1) include: (1) the Lower
member, Soudan Iron-Formation member, and Upper member (Upper Ely) of the Ely Greenstone
Formation, the Lake Vermilion Formation (including the informally named Britt and Gafvert Lake
sequences), and the Knife Lake Group of the Soudan belt; (2) the Bass Lake sequence (Peterson and Jirsa,
1999) and the Newton Lake Formation of the Newton belt; and, (3) syn- to post-tectonic granitoid intrusions
of the Giants Range batholith, and a suite of post-tectonic alkalic stocks and plutons. Contacts between the
different units are typically conformable, although considerable overlap in time and space is documented
between volcanic and sedimentary sequences (Southwick, 1993). Regional chronostratigraphic correlations
between the Vermilion district, the Wawa Greenstone (northwestern Ontario) and the Abitibi greenstone
belt (eastern Ontario and Quebec) are indicated in Figure 4-4.
Geochronological information for supracrustal and intrusive lithologies in the Vermilion District is
relatively sparse (Figure 4-4). Peterson et al. (2001) obtained a U-Pb zircon age date of 2722 ± 0.9 Ma from
a quartz-phyric rhyolite dome in the Fivemile Lake Sequence of the Lower Member of the Ely Greenstone
Formation. Lodge et al. (2013) obtained a U-Pb zircon date of 2689.7 ± 0.8 Ma for a Gafvert Lake Sequence
dacitic tuff breccia that occurs approximately 2m north of the contact with the Soudan Iron-Formation
member of the Ely Greenstone Formation. As well, Lodge et al. (2013) obtained detrital zircon dates
ranging from 2680-2690 Ma from greywackes that comprise the Lake Vermilion Formation. This date
confirms the source of the detritus in the Lake Vermilion Formation was derived locally from the
volcaniclastic rocks comprising the Gafvert Lake Sequence. Jirsa et al. (2012) obtained a U-Pb age of
2690.7 ± 0.6 Ma for synvolcanic intrusions that cross-cut volcaniclastic rocks that comprise the Knife Lake
Group. The upper part of the Knife Lake Group includes conglomerates which contain clasts derived from
Table 4-1. Lithostratigraphic units within the western Vermilion District (modified after Peterson and Jirsa, 1999;
Peterson et al., 2009; Hudak et al., 2012).

77

�Trip 4 – Soudan
Intrusive Rocks
Late Intrusions

Plutons and stocks of syenite, monzonite, diorite, and lamprophyre. A
U-Pb zircon age date of a non-foliated feldspar porphyry intrusion in the
Newton belt is 2683 ± 1.4 Ma (Peterson et al., 2001).

Vermilion Granitic Complex

Granite, schist, amphibolite, and schist-rich migmatite

Giants Range Batholith

Granite, granodiorite, monzodiorite, and schist-rich migmatite. U-Pb
zircon dates indicate a crystallization age ranging from 2640-2777Ma
(Allerton et al., 2024a).

Supracrustal Rocks
Newton Belt
Newton Lake Formation

Tholeiitic and komatiitic basalt lava flows, intrusions, and clastic strata
(deep subaqueous?)

Bass Lake Sequence

Tholeiitic basalt lava flows, iron-formation, and felsic porphyries (deep
subaqueuous)

Soudan Belt
Knife Lake Group

Graywacke, slate, conglomerate, and sheared equivalents

Lake Vermilion Formation

Graywacke, slate, dacitic tuff, minor conglomerate. Detrital zircons from
planar bedded, normal-graded resedimented volcaniclastic rocks have UPb age dates of 2680-2690 Ma (Lodge et al., 2013; subaerial to
subaquous)

Gafvert Lake Sequence

Dacitic to rhyodacitic tuff, lapilli-tuff, tuff-breccia, and iron-formation.
Basal dacite tuff-breccia deposits in Lake Vermilion State Park have UPb age date of 2689.7 ± 0.8 Ma (Lodge et al., 2013; subaerial to
subaqeous)

Britt Sequence

Tholeiitic basalt lava flows (deep subaqueous?)

Upper Member – Ely Greenstone

Tholeiitic basalt lava flows and iron-formation (deep subaqueous?)

Soudan Member – Ely Greenstone

Oxide-facies iron formation with intercollated basalt lava flows and
felsic volcaniclastic rocks (deep subaqueous)

Lower Member – Ely Greenstone

Calc-alkaline and tholeiitic basalt-rhyolite lava flows, tuffs, epiclastic
rocks, and minor iron-formation (shallow- to deep subaqueous)

Central Basalt Sequence

Calc-alkaline to tholeiitic sparsely amygdaloidal basalt and minor
basaltic andesite lava flows with MORB-like or back arc basin-like
chemical affinities within 100-200 meters of the overlying Soudan
Member iron-formation; FII- and FIIIa-type felsic volcanic and
volcaniclastic rocks (transition from shallow- to deep water
environment)

Fivemile Lake Sequence

Calc-alkaline to transitional moderately to highly vesicular basalt and
andesite lava flows and volcaniclastic rocks with arc-like chemical
affinities: FI-, FII-, and FIV-type felsic volcanic and volcaniclastic
rocks. Rhyolite dome at near Fivemile Lake has U-Pb age date of 2722.6
± 0.9 Ma (Peterson et al., 2001). Epithermal-like zinc stringer
mineralization is present near Fivemile Lake (Hudak et al., 2002a;
interpreted as shallow subaqueous environment).

Eagles Nest Sequence

Algoma-type iron formation, basalt-andesite lava flows, hydrothermal
exhalites, felsic tuffs.

78

�Trip 4 – Soudan

Figure 4-3. Generalized geology of the Soudan belt in the vicinity of the Tower-Soudan anticline (modified after
Peterson, 2001; Hudak et al., 2014; Hudak and Peterson, 2014). Locations, ages, and sources of U-Pb ages dates
within the district are noted in the callout boxes. Generalized lithologies for each of the groups, formations or
sequences are also noted. The outline of the Lake Vermilion section of Lake Vermilion/Soudan Underground Mine
State Park is shown in green.

79

�Trip 4 – Soudan

Figure 4-4. Regional chronostratigraphic correlations between the Vermilion district (Minnesota), the Wawa
greenstone belt (northwestern Ontario), and the Abitibi greenstone belt (eastern Ontario and Quebec; after Ayer et
al., 2010).

the Saganaga Tonalite, which has been dated by Driese et al. (2011) at 2690.83 ± 0.26 Ma. Peterson et al.
(2001) also dated a non-foliated feldspar porphyry intruded into Newton Belt strata at 2683.1 +1/-4 Ma.
This date provides a minimum age for the regional D2 deformation event that is described below.

Structural Geology
The structural geology of the Vermilion District has been well described by Peterson et al. (2009).
Periods of generally N-S directed compression resulted in three major regional deformation events in the
Neoarchean terranes of northern Minnesota. The earliest deformation event (D1) produced broad, locally
recumbent folds within the Soudan belt and major fault zones throughout the region. In the Newton belt,
D1 was accommodated by thrust imbrication of large crustal blocks, resulting in mainly northward
stratigraphic facing. Field relationships indicate that uplift, faulting, and the deposition of Timiskamingtype clastic sedimentary sequences in local fault-bounded basins occurred late in D1 deformation (Jirsa,
2000). A large, map-scale structure related to D1 deformation in the western Vermilion District is the
Tower-Soudan Anticline, which is a west-plunging anticline within which the axis and plunge changes
orientation along strike from nearly vertical in basalts to shallow NE plunging in the western sedimentary
rocks. Axial-planar cleavage associated with this early fold typically is lacking, although Bauer (1985),
Hooper and Ojakangas (1971), Hudleston (1976), and Jirsa et al. (1992) have described early cleavage (S1)
locally.
A second deformation event (D2) associated with synchronous regional metamorphism resulted in
foliation development and structures exhibiting dominantly dextral asymmetry. D2 is constrained in the
Vermilion District to the time period 2674 to 2685 Ma (Boerboom and Zartman, 1993), and between about
2680 and 2685 Ma in the Shebandowan (Corfu and Stott, 1998). Because D2 deformation affected all the
supracrustal rocks in the area and is reasonably constrained by geochronology, the regional foliation (S2)
can be used in the field to temporally relate other structural, intrusive, and deformation events. The
relationship between S2 fabric and shear structures indicates that most shearing occurred relatively late in
the D2 event. Major shearing that produced the Mud Creek and related shear zones is attributed to the late
stages of D2 dextral transpression (Peterson, 2001; Hudak et al., 2004; Peterson et al., 2009).
80

�Trip 4 – Soudan
The third deformation event (D3) is believed to be associated with the juxtaposition of the Wawa
Abitibi and Quetico terranes (Peterson and Patelke, 2003). Structures associated with D3 include abundant
NE- and NW-trending faults that dissect the stratigraphic assemblages and include the NE-trending Waasa
and Camp Rivard faults east of the Soudan Mine area, and the WNW-trending, crustal-scale Vermilion and
related faults that form the Wawa-Quetico Subprovince boundary.

Geology of Lake Vermilion/Soudan Underground Mine State Park
Lake Vermilion State Park contains a variety of supracrustal and intrusive lithological units (Figure
4-5). Supracrustal rocks that can be observed in the park include the Lower Member of the Ely Greenstone
Formation (both the Fivemile Lake and Central Basalt Sequences), the Soudan Member of the Ely
Greenstone Formation, and the Gafvert Lake Sequence of the Lake Vermilion Formation. Additionally, a
wide variety of syn- and post-volcanic mafic and felsic intrusive rocks and several varieties of sheared rocks
crop out in the park (Peterson and Patelke, 2003; Radakovich et al., 2010; Heim et al., 2011; Hudak et al.,
2016; Peterson et al., 2016). These various lithologies are described below.
Lithology
Supracrustal rocks in Lake Vermilion/Soudan Underground Mine State Park were described by Hudak et
al. (2016) based on lithological types rather than lithostratigraphic members and/or formations. Their
lithological descriptions are included below.
A summary of mafic supracrustal rocks that occur within the park include:
• undivided mafic volcanic rocks, including gray-green to green massive basalt, pillow basalt, basalt
tuff, bedded scoria tuff and lapilli-tuff, and foliated basalt rocks
• massive basalt comprising green to dark green, aphyric to sparsely plagioclase-phyric basalt
•
•
•
•

pillow basalt, including gray-green to green bun, mattress, and lobe morphologies using the pillow
lava classification of Dimroth et al., (1978)
basalt tuff, including green, massive to bedded, aphyric to sparsely plagioclase-phyric tuff.
bedded scoria tuff and lapilli-tuff, composed of green, thin- to very thick-bedded, poorly-sorted,
typically poorly-graded tuff and lapilli-tuff containing up to 65% &lt;1-20cm scoria lapilli
foliated basaltic rocks, made up of green, fine-grained, moderately to strongly foliated basalt
comprising anastomosing bands of chlorite-rich phyllite separating domains of less deformed basalt

Felsic volcanic rocks within the park include:
•

•
•

•

epiclastic, intermediate-felsic volcanic-derived sedimentary rocks, composed of light gray to
brownish gray polymict volcaniclastic matrix-supported conglomerates and sandstones
containing clasts of felsic volcanic and volcanic strata, oxide facies iron formation, and chertrich iron formation.
laminated felsic tuff, made up of white to dark gray, laminated- to very thinly bedded, aphyric
to sparsely quartz- ± plagioclase-phyric dacite to rhyolite tuff.
felsic tuff breccia, comprising light gray, very thickly bedded to massive, matrix-supported
quartz- and plagioclase-phyric polymict dacite to rhyodacite tuff breccia containing 10-20% 110 cm quartz and plagioclase-phyric coherent dacite lapilli and blocks, 5-7% lens-shaped
quartz- and plagioclase-phyric pumice lapilli up to 3 cm in diameter, 1% light- to dark-gray
chert lapilli up to 3 cm in diameter, and 1-3% 0.5-5.0cm diameter black to dark gray to red
magnetite-rich, hematite-rich, or jasper-rich banded iron formation lapilli.
massive felsic lava flows composed of light gray to greenish gray, fine-grained, massive,
aphyric to quartz-phyric rhyodacite to rhyolite lava flows.

81

�Trip 4 – Soudan

Figure 4-5. Geologic map of Lake Vermilion/Soudan Underground Mine State Park (after Peterson et al., 2016). Detailed maps showing locations of field trip
stops are provided in Figure 4-8, and optional stops are shown in Figure 4-12.

82

�Trip 4 – Soudan

Figure 4-6. Regional stratigraphic correlations across the Vermilion District (after Hudak et al., 2012; Hudak et al., 2014; Hudak and Peterson, 2014). The
sections are hung on the base of the Soudan Member of the Ely Greenstone Formation

83

�Trip 4 – Soudan
•

felsic tuff, made up of gray to tan, fine-grained, aphyric to quartz ± plagioclase-phyric
rhyodacite to rhyolite tuff.

Clastic sedimentary rocks within the park include:
• graywacke-slate, made up of light gray, fine- to medium-grained, thin- to medium-bedded
graywacke containing up to 3% &lt;1-2mm quartz and plagioclase grains that are interbedded with
dark gray, laminated to thin-bedded mudstone/slate.
• graphitic argillite, composed of dark gray to black, laminated to thin-bedded graphite-bearing
argillite
Chemical sedimentary rocks that occur in the park include:
• oxide-facies iron formation, made up of black (magnetite-rich), dark gray (magnetite- and/or
hematite-rich, red (jasper-rich or hematite-rich), or gray (chert-rich) laminated to medium-bedded,
planar bedded to chaotically soft-sediment folded, banded iron formation. Hydrothermal alteration
of the oxide-facies iron formations has resulted in the genesis of the massive hematite ores that
make up the numerous iron ore lenses of the Soudan Mine (Gruner, 1926; Klinger, 1960;
Thompson, 2015; Allerton, 2024a, 2024b).
• chert-rich iron formation, composed of light gray to black laminated to very thin bedded chert that
is locally interbedded with subordinate laminated to very thin bedded oxide facies iron formation
Both mafic and felsic intrusive rocks have been identified in the park. Mafic intrusive rocks include:
• lamprophyre intrusions, including 1) massive gray-green intrusions containing scoria, chert and
granite clasts within a fine- to medium-grained groundmass composed of up to 85% acicular
amphibole; and 2) black, fine-grained massive hornblende-plagioclase-bearing intrusions
containing up to 15% fine-grained hornblende needles and local rounded granite blocks greater
than 25cm in diameter in a fine-grained gray-black to red groundmass (Peterson and Patelke, 2003).
Felsic intrusive rocks in the park include:
• diorite, comprising gray to gray-green, fine- to medium-grained, plagioclase- and hornblendephyric equigranular diorite (actinolite pseudomorphs of hornblende are common)
• granodiorite, made up of whitish-pink to green-gray, medium-grained granodiorite and hornblende
granodiorite that locally contains xenoliths of oxide-facied banded iron formation, chert, felsic
epiclastic rocks, and mafic volcanic and volcaniclastic rocks
• feldspar porphyry, composed of white to whitish-pink, medium-grained, holocrystalline dacite with
5-12% 1-4mm subhedral to euhedral tabular plagioclase feldspar phenocrysts, and locally, 2-5% 13mm dark green actinolite pseudomorphs of hornblende (Radakovich et al., 2010)
• quartz feldspar porphyry, characterized by white to whitish-pink, light gray to pale green-gray
porphyritic dacite and rhyodacite that contains 20-25% 1-5mm diameter subhedral to euhedral
plagioclase feldspar phenocrysts and 5-15% 1-3mm diameter subhedral to euhedral pale gray to
gray-blue quartz phenocrysts
Sheared rocks that crop out in Lake Vermilion/Soudan Underground Mine State Park include:
• chlorite-dominant schist, composed of dark green very fine- to fine-grained chlorite phyllite and
schist (Peterson and Patelke, 2003)
• sericite-dominant schist, made up of pale yellow to yellow-gray to yellow-green very fine- to finegrained sericite-bearing phyllite and schist (Peterson and Patelke, 2003)
• green mica (fuchsite)-dominant schist, comprising pale yellow to yellow gray, very fine- to finegrained sericite-bearing phyllite that contains up to 20% emerald green disseminated
porphyroblasts of green mica that are up to 5mm in length
• Schist ‘n’ BIF, an enigmatic unit made up of interlayered chlorite-dominant phyllite and schists
and sericite-dominant phyllites and schists that contain lens-shaped clasts of oxide facies iron
formation ranging from 1mm – 1 meter in length
84

�Trip 4 – Soudan
Stratigraphic correlations across the central part of the Vermilion district are illustrated in Figure 4-6
(Hudak et al., 2012).
Structure
Three distinctive types of fault zones have been identified during geological mapping within Lake
Vermilion/Soudan Underground Mine State Park. These structures include:
•

•

•

Synvolcanic fault zones (D0), which formed at the time of volcanism associated with the
genesis of the volcanic rocks in the State Park, and which possess higher concentrations of
synvolcanic hydrothermal alteration mineral assemblages proximal to the synvolcanic
structures (see Gibson et al. (1999) and Hudak et al. (2014) for a detailed explanation of
synvolcanic fault zones). Two potential synvolcanic fault zones have been described in the
north-central part of the former Lake Vermilion State Park by Hudak et al. (2014);
Shear zones that are associated with the regional D2 deformation, and are characterized by
linear zones of sheared rocks including chlorite-dominant schist, sericite-dominant schist,
fuchsite (green mica)-dominant schist, and schist ‘n’ BIF. The Mine Trend and Murray shear
zones (Peterson and Patelke, 2003; Peterson et al., 2016; Table 4-2) are examples of D2associated shear zones within the bounds of Lake Vermilion/Soudan Underground Mine State
Park.
Late faults are characterized by brittle deformation and associated offset of adjacent
lithological units. Within Lake Vermilion/Soudan Underground Mine State Park, these D3associated structures are commonly expressed as northwest- to northeast-trending, minor
displacement (generally less than one meter) brittle faults that offset sedimentary bedding and
/ or contacts between adjacent lithological units (D3-associated faults are clearly evident at
field trip stop 1).

Table 4-2. Calculated displacements among the Mine Trend and Murray Shear zones (Peterson and Patelke, 2003).
Ranges of values were calculated geometrically by using the average plunges of lineations associated with the shear
zones, and two measured lines of possible correlative stratigraphy offset by the bounding shear zones. See Peterson
and Patelke (2003) for further details.

Measurements of other planar (e.g. bedding orientation, orientations of geological contacts,
foliation measurements) and linear (e.g. mineral lineations, glacial striations) geological structures were
recorded during field mapping, and are included on the new geologic map of Lake Vermilion/Soudan
Underground Mine State Park (Peterson et al., 2016; see Figure 4-5).
Geochronology
Geochronological information for supracrustal and intrusive lithologies in the Vermilion District is
relatively sparse (refer back to Figure 4-4). Peterson et al. (2001) obtained a U-Pb zircon age date of 2722
± 0.9 Ma from a quartz-phyric rhyolite dome in the Fivemile Lake Sequence of the Lower Member of the
Ely Greenstone Formation. Allerton et al. (2024a) obtained a crystallization age of 2708 ± 25 Ma for the
Purvis Pluton, which intrudes the Eagles Nest Succession of the Lower Ely Member and has been
interpreted as a synvolcanic intrusion (Peterson, 2001). The age of the Upper Member of the Ely Greenstone
formation is currently unknown. Jirsa (2016) obtained an age of 2715.74 ± 0.50 Ma for a felsic volcanic
85

�Trip 4 – Soudan
unit within the Newton Lake Formation (Boerboom, T. J., 2020). Lodge et al. (2013) obtained a U-Pb zircon
date of 2689.7 ± 0.8 Ma for a Gafvert Lake Sequence dacitic tuff breccia that occurs approximately 2 meters
north of the contact with the Soudan Iron-Formation member of the Ely Greenstone Formation. As well,
Lodge et al. (2013) obtained detrital zircon dates ranging from 2680-2690 Ma from greywackes that
comprise the Lake Vermilion Formation. This date confirms the source of the detritus in the Lake Vermilion
Formation was derived locally from the volcaniclastic rocks comprising the Gafvert Lake Sequence.
The age of the orebodies at the Soudan Mine has eluded geologists for nearly a century. The genesis
of the massive hematite orebodies was previously interpreted to be syn- or post-depositional to the
formation of the Soudan Member of the Lower Ely Greenstone Formation (Gruner, 1926; Klinger, 1960;
Thompson, 2015). Gruner (1926) believed the ores could be as young as the Mesoproterozoic Duluth
Complex. Klinger (1960) found abundant evidence for post-iron formation depositional genesis of the
massive hematite ores, but he could not determine a specific date for mineralization and concluded the
orebodies were formed along with or after shear zones that are spatially associated with the ores. Thompson
(2015) speculated based on geological, structural, and lithogeochemical data, that the ores were formed
during the D2 deformation, but could not determine a specific date for the massive hematite mineralization.
Recent U/Pb and (U-Th)/He radiometric dating of hematite by Allerton (2024b) suggests the massive
hematite orebodies at Soudan formed during Paleoproterozoic time (1640.8 ± 47.2 Ma – 1740.4 ± 72.5 Ma)
and have been overprinted by a Mesoproterozoic hydrothermal event at approximately 1100 Ma (1093.1 ±
16.4 Ma).
Terminology Used for This Field Trip
The terminology used on this field trip will be consistent with the terminology used by Hudak et al. (2014)
for their “Walk in the Park” ILSG field trip and is described below.
All stop locations for this field trip are given in Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinates,
Zone 15N, using the North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83) as well as latitude/longitude. Section
subdivisions read from smallest to largest quarter (e.g., “NW, SE” should be read “NW quarter of the SE
quarter”). A geologic map with stop locations is given in Figure 4-8. A map of optional field trip stops is
given in Figure 4-12.
It is important to note the terminology utilized in this field trip guide for: 1) volcaniclastic rocks;
and 2) bedding characteristics. Use of consistent terminology is required to facilitate consistent and
accurate describe these geological features.
Volcaniclastic rocks contain abundant volcanic material irrespective of their origin or depositional
environment (Fisher, 1966). Such rocks can form directly from volcanic eruptions (whether subaerial or
subaqueous), resedimentation of non-lithified volcanic deposits (for example, resedimentation of pyroclasts
prior to lithification), or weathering and resedimentation of pre-existing lithified volcanic rocks.
Primary (juvenile) volcaniclastic particles result directly from eruptive processes, and are of three types:
•
•

•

Pyroclasts, which form by explosive fragmentation of magma into particles (including ash, highly
vesiculated glass (pumice, scoria), crystals and crystal fragments, and lithic fragments);
Hydroclasts, which form by explosive interaction with external water (via phreatic (steam only)
and/or phreatomagmatic (steam and magma) explosions) or by non-explosive quenching and
granulation of lava (for example, the formation of hyaloclastite fragments on the margins of
submarine lava flows or intrusions into wet sediments); and
Autoclasts, which form by frictional breakage of moving viscous lava flows (for example, to form
carapace breccias on the margins of subaerial lava flows).

Based on these different types of fragmentation, four types of primary volcaniclastic deposits have been
identified by White and Houghton (2006):
86

�Trip 4 – Soudan
•

•

•

•

Pyroclastic deposits, which are generated from volcanic plumes and jets or pyroclastic density
currents as particles first come to rest. Deposition mechanisms associated with these processes
include suspension settling, traction, or en masse freezing;
Autoclastic deposits, which are generated during effusive volcanism when lava cools and fragments
as a result of thermal processes, or recently cooled lava breaks during flow. Deposition for these
types of rocks is under the influence of continued lava flowage;
Hyaloclastite deposits, which are generated during effusive volcanism when magma or flowing
lava is chilled and fragmented due to contact with water. Deposition of such deposits is is
influenced by the continued emplacement of the lava in the presence of water, and the thicknesses
of the hyaloclastite deposits can be dictated by the temperature of the magma, the effusion rate, and
the distance from the volcanic vent (Cas and Wright, 1987; Gibson et al., 1999; Newkirk et al.,
2001); and
Peperite deposits, which are generated when magma intrudes into unconsolidated clastic material
and mingles with (generally wet) debris to form a volcaniclastic deposit (McPhie et al., 1993).
Deposition of peperite deposits takes place essentially in-situ.

Secondary volcaniclastic particles are known as epiclasts:
•

Epiclasts are lithic clasts and/or crystals derived from physical weathering and erosion of preexisting lithified rocks. Epiclasts are volcaniclasts when the pre-existing rocks are volcanic.

The terminology for volcaniclastic rocks has historically been somewhat confusing because many
different classification schemes have been developed (for example Fisher, 1961; Fisher 1966; Schmid,
1981; Cas and Wright, 1987; McPhie et al., 1993; White and Houghton, 2006), and different classification
schemes are preferentially used in different parts of the world. As a result, the terminology relating to
volcaniclastic rocks is commonly misused or misinterpreted. Four classification schemes that have been
used most in the recent geological literature include:
•
•
•
•

Fisher (1961, 1966) – Classification based on particle size, particle formation, or particle
fragmentation mechanism;
Schmid (1981) – Particle type within the deposit;
Cas and Wright (1987) – Mode of fragmentation and deposition; and
McPhie et al. (1993) – Transport and deposition mechanisms.

According to R. V. Fisher (1998), the difficulties with volcaniclastic rock classification can be understood
because “volcaniclastic rocks are essentially igneous on the way up and sedimentary on the way down”. In
fact, Fisher’s thesis advisor, when observing the volcaniclastic rocks that were the focus of his thesis
studies, indicated that they were “the ugliest and most undistinguished rocks I’ve seen in my 30 years of
petrology!” Classification is also especially difficult in ancient volcaniclastic rocks because key aspects of
classification can be obscured by subsequent hydrothermal alteration, metamorphism and/or structural
deformation (e.g. particle type, particle size) or because genetic processes cannot be ascertained
unambiguously (e.g. transport and deposition mechanism, fragmentation mechanisms).
For this field trip guidebook, we will utilize Fisher’s (1966) classification (Figure 4-7) for
volcaniclastic rocks. This classification scheme is based on the relative proportions of ash-sized material
(&lt; 2mm), lapilli-sized material (2-64mm), and blocks/bomb sized material (&gt;64mm) in the rock. Both
Gibson et al. (1999) and Mueller and White (2004) suggest that this classification be used for field-based
rock classification (mapping, diamond drill core logging, petrography) of ancient volcaniclastic deposits
for the following reasons:
87

�Trip 4 – Soudan
•

•
•

The classification scheme is “field-user friendly” because it accommodates both the historically
important pyroclastic rock names and enables comparison at both the hand sample and thin section
scale (Mueller and White, 2004);
It is a Wentworth-based scale, and thus enables comparison of volcaniclastic deposits to
sedimentary deposits; and
Rock classification does not require knowledge of the specific transport mechanism or depositional
processes involved with the genesis of the deposit.

More recently, White and Houghton (2006) have developed a modified version of Fisher’s (1966)
volcaniclastic classification scheme (Figure 4-7). The scheme is essentially equivalent to the Fisher (1966)
scheme, with the exception that the lapill-tuff field in the White and Houghton (2006) classification
comprises the lapilli-tuff and lapillistone fields of Fisher’s (1966).

Figure 4-7. Volcaniclastic rock classification schemes of Fisher (1966) and White and Houghton (2006). This field
trip guidebook will classify volcaniclastic rocks using Fisher’s (1966) classification scheme.

Specific terms for bedding thicknesses are also used in this guidebook. The terminology for bedding
thickness has been adopted from McPhie et al. (1993) and includes:
•
•
•
•
•
•

Laminated
Very thinly bedded
Thinly bedded
Medium bedded
Thickly bedded
Very thickly bedded

&lt;1 centimeters thick
1-3 centimeters thick
3-10 centimeters thick
10-30 centimeters thick
30-100 centimeters thick
&gt;100 centimeters thick

88

�Trip 4 – Soudan

FIELD TRIP OVERVIEW
NOTE: This field trip will require hiking along trails and through the bush in Lake Vermilion/ Soudan
Underground State Park and includes observations on the 27th level of the Soudan Mine. Hiking boots and
safety eyewear are strongly encouraged as traverses in the park may encounter slippery conditions and
vegetation which can cause eye injuries. Field trip participants should plan to wear a jacket and gloves
while underground as the temperatures in this location are typically around 50°F (10°C).
Upon arriving at Lake Vermilion/Soudan Underground Mine State Park, we will park in the main
parking lot located near the Park Manager’s office. After a coffee break, we will strap on our hiking boots
and spend the remainder of the morning making field trip stops in the central part of Lake Vermilion/Soudan
Underground Mine State Park along a more-or-less north-south traverse. These field trip stops (Figure 4-8)
will illustrate the stratigraphy, structural, and hydrothermal alteration features associated with the massive
hematite ores at the Soudan Mine. We will then head back to the visitor center and have lunch overlooking
one of the original Soudan Mine ore pits.
After lunch, we plan to continue the field trip by going underground. We will proceed to the mine
shaft and travel 2341 feet underground to the 27th Level of the Soudan Mine. We will board a train
(converted ore cars) and travel west for approximately three-quarters of a mile to the Montana Stope, the
last active part of the mine. At this point we will climb vertically approximately 30 feet using a very tight
spiral staircase. One in the Montana Stope, we will observe the massive hematite ore, the transitional region
of non-ore iron formation, and will observe massive chlorite-rich schists associated with approximately
east-west-trending D2-associated shear zones. Here we plan to discuss recent geological research that has
been conducted to determine the absolute age of the massive hematite ores that reside there (Allerton et al.,
2024a, 2024b; Allerton et al., in review). At the end of the tour we will proceed back down to the 27th level
drift, board the train, and head back east through the drift to the shaft station where we will proceed back
to the surface.
Field trip participants may not be able to access the 27th level of the Soudan Mine due to flooding
that occurred during summer, 2024. Should this happen, afternoon field trip stops will investigate outcrops
that illustrate the rarely exposed geological contact between the Soudan Member iron formation and Gafvert
Lake Sequence tuffs, lapilli-tuff and tuff-breccias, Gafvert Lake Sequence tuffs and lapilli-tuffs, and
subvolcanic intrusive rocks related to the Gafvert Lake Sequence that occur in the northeastern part of Lake
Vermilion/Soudan Underground Mine State Park. Descriptions of these outcrops are included in a section
below called “Optional Outcrop Stops” which have been taken from a recent ILSG field trip titled “Field
Trip 2 - A Walk in the Park: Neoarchean Geology of Lake Vermilion State Park” (Hudak et al., 2014).
Following the completion of the field trip, we will board the vehicles and proceed back to the
Mountain Iron Community Center, where the field trip will end.

FIELD TRIP
From the Mountain Iron Community Center, proceed 0.2west on Enterprise Drive S to Emerald
Avenue. Turn north on Emerald Avenue and go 0.05 miles to Highway 169. Turn east on Hwy 160 and
proceed 1.5 miles to the turn off for Hwy 169/Hwy 53N. Take Hwy169/Hwy53 approximately 6.1 miles,
bear right, and continue north on Hwy1/169 toward Ely. Continue north/northeast on Hwy 1/169 for
approximately 23.75 miles to the first turn-off to Soudan (this will be Main Street and you will see an ore
car and a sign for the Soudan Mine at the intersection). Proceed north for 0.4 miles on Main Street, turn
right, and continue on Main Street for approximately 0.9 miles until it intersects 1st Ave./Stuntz Bay Road.
Turn north on 1st Ave/Stuntz Bay Road and proceed for approximately 0.4 miles until you see the dirt road
(McKinley Park Road) that is the east entrance to the Soudan Mine. Turn west on the dirt road, go about
0.05 miles, and park near the Lake Vermilion/Soudan Underground Mine State Park Manager’s office. Here
89

�Trip 4 – Soudan
we will check in with the Manager. Turn left (south) on the dirt road and follow it around the old mine
infrastructure, parking near the intersection of McKinley Park Road and Stuntz Bay Road (approximately
0.1 miles). From our vehicles parked at the intersection of Mckinley Park Road and Stuntz Bay Road, we
will walk north approximately 175 meters up 1st Ave/Township Highway 4598 to field trip stop 1. Please
walk against traffic as we proceed to and from this location.

Stop 1: Soudan Member Banded Iron Formation
Longitude/Latitude: 47.820074°N, -92.2365908°E
UTM NAD 83 Zone 15N: 557144E, 5296585N
(NOTE: From Peterson et al., 2009A; Hudak and Peterson, 2014)
The Soudan Member of the Ely Greenstone Formation is dominantly composed of laminated to
thinly bedded Algoma-type oxide facies banded iron-formation, with subordinate, locally interstratified,
sparsely amygdaloidal massive to pillowed basalt lava flows and resedimented felsic tuff deposits.
Regionally, the stratigraphic thickness of the Soudan Member of the Ely Greenstone Formation varies from
50-3,000 meters, with an average stratigraphic thickness of approximately 700 meters (Peterson et al.,
2009). Within Lake Vermilion State Park, the Soudan Member ranges in stratigraphic thickness from
approximately 300 – 680 meters in thickness. Individual horizons of oxide-facies iron formation range
from approximately 70-345 meters thick, whereas the Soudan basalt lava flow units range from
approximately 60-300 meters in thickness.
This classic exposure of the Soudan member of the Ely Greenstone Formation lies on the north
limb of the Tower-Soudan anticline approximately 75 meters north of the stratigraphic contact with the
Lower member of the Ely Greenstone. The outcrop displays two generations of tight folding in delicate
laminae of chert (creamy white), chert-hematite jasper (red), and magnetite-chert (black to silver-colored).
The second generation of folds (F2) is tectonic in origin, having subvertical axial surfaces that trend east,
and steeply plunging axes. Most display Z-asymmetry. The earlier folds (F0-1) appear to have been sharply
refolded to produce complex interference patterns. Lundy (1985) studied folding at this locality and
concluded that some of the apparent interference structures are the product of early-formed sheath folds
that did not involve refolding by D2. The F1 structures are predominantly intrafolial, and exhibit a great
variety of styles and orientations; implying they formed by layer-parallel, soft-sediment slumping (Fig. 49). Lundy’s mapping of this outcrop is an interesting demonstration of how unraveling details at a single
outcrop that led to recognition that D1 deformation was not systematic here, but likely the result of soft
sediment folding.
It is interesting to observe the rhythmic microlaminae (1 mm or so thick) in various cherty beds
exposed here and speculate about the paleoenvironment - that is, whether these represent daily
heating/cooling, tidal, climatic, annual, or some other repetitive influence (e.g. waxing/waning of a
hydrothermal system) in the depositional environment. What is known about units of iron-formation in the
Ely Greenstone, of which there are many, is that deposition occurred in deep water (below wave base)
during periods of relative volcanic and tectonic quiescence by the slow subaqueous precipitation of
chemical sediments.
The deep excavations in this area are the early workings of the Soudan iron mine, the first in
Minnesota. The mine produced about 16 mt of high-grade hematite ore (60-63 percent ironconverted to a
park. Although some early production came from open pits, most of the ore was extracted from underground
workings that began here in 1900, and which now can be visited on guided tours. The mine previously
housed several underground physics research facilities. These include Soudan 1 (23rd level) which studied
neutrino decay; 2) Soudan 2 (27th level), also to study neutrino decay; and 3) the MINOS (Main Injector
90

�Trip 4 – Soudan

Figure 4-8. Geologic map of the central part of Lake Vermilion/Soudan Underground Mine State Park (after Peterson et al., 2016) illustrating locations of field
trip stops. See Figure 4-5 for the description of map units.

91

�Trip 4 – Soudan

Figure 4-9. Outcrop map showing bedding trajectories and multiple generations of folds and faults (from Lundy,
1985). F1 folds are non-systematic and include both nappe- and sheath fold geometries.

Neutrino Oscillation Search) lab, which was built on the 27th level adjacent to Soudan 1 and studied the
decay of neutrinos within the earth as they passed from Fermilab to Soudan.
Follow the field trip leaders south along First Avenue/Township Highway 4598 to the blacktop-paved
Mesabi Trail. Turn to the east and walk along the paved Mesabi trail for approximately 800m. There, turn
north and proceed up the unpaved trail approximately 350 meters, where the trail intersects another trail
that goes northeast. Turn right and proceed northeast along the trail for about 90 meters. We will then
head into the bush and hike approximately 200 meters northeast to field trip stop 2.

Stop 2: Soudan Member Basalt Pillow Lavas
Longitude/Latitude: 47.82544775°N, -92.22434651°E
UTM NAD 83 Zone 15N: 558055E, 5297191N
Detailed mapping in the park by Peterson and Jirsa (1999), Peterson and Patelke (2003), Hoffman
(2007), Radakovich et al. (2010), Vallowe et al. (2010), Heim et al. (2011), and Baumgardner et al. (2013)
has shown that the Soudan member is dominantly composed of oxide facies iron formation horizons that
are locally interlayered with massive and pillowed mafic lava flows and associated volcaniclastic rocks
(e.g. pillow breccias). Basalt lava flows associated with the Soudan Member of the Lower Ely Greenstone
Formation are characterized by a medium green to dark green color. They are typically aphyric- to sparsely
plagioclase ± pyroxene (now actinolite)-phyric. Plagioclase phenocrysts vary from subhedral to euhedral
tabular in morphology, are typically less than or equal to 1mm in length and are locally present in
abundances up to 3%. Locally, 5-7% dark green actinolite pseudomorphs of pyroxene phenocrysts may be
present. Where amygdaloidal, the unit contains up to 7% oval to round, light gray quartz-filled amygdules
ranging from &lt;1-4mm in diameter.
At this outcrop we will observe well-preserved 0.5-2m long, aphyric- to sparsely plagioclasephyric, massive- to sparsely amygdaloidal bun- and mattress-shaped pillow lavas. These pillows dip steeply
to the north and strike approximately east-west. Interpillow hyaloclastite is locally well-preserved and is
92

�Trip 4 – Soudan
composed of &lt;1-5mm chlorite-rich cuspate shards that are pseudomorphs of original volcanic glass formed
by quenching of the mafic magma by water.
These pillow lavas share many characteristics with the underlying Central Basalt Sequence mafic
lava flows that comprise the uppermost part of the Lower Ely Member of the Ely Greenstone Formation.
Such characteristics include exceptional preservation of primary volcanic textures, medium- to dark green
color, sparsely plagioclase ± pyroxene-phyric, and low vesicularity. Based on these features, the Soudan
Member pillow basalts at this location and are interpreted to have formed in a “deep water” (e.g. below
wave based) volcanic environment.
Proceed approximately 200 meters southwest to the northeast-southwest trending trail. Walk approximately
90 meters southwest to intersect the main north-south trail that intersects the Mesabi Trail. Walk
approximately 350 meters south back to the paved Mesabi Trail. Turn to the east and follow the field trip
leaders through the bush for about 140 meters to field trip stop 3.

Stop 3: Soudan Member Oxide Facies Banded Iron Formation
Longitude/Latitude: 47.82139974°N, -92.225809591°E
UTM NAD 83 Zone 15N: 557990E, 5296775N
Within Lake Vermilion/Soudan Underground Mine State Park, the Soudan Member oxide-facies
banded iron-formation is generally planar laminated to medium-bedded, with black magnetite-rich
horizons, light gray to black chert horizons, red to blueish-black hematite-rich horizons, and red jasper
horizons defining the bedding. Locally, very tight, chaotically oriented folds, resulting from syndepositional soft sediment deformation and subsequent tectonic deformation, are present. As indicated
above, these iron formation deposits are locally intimately interbedded with basalt lava flows such that
mapping individual iron-formation and basalt horizons is often impossible at 1:5000 scale (Peterson and
Patelke, 2003; Hudak and Peterson, 2014; Hudak et al., 2016).
This outcrop is composed of slightly- to moderately hematite-altered Soudan member oxide facies
banded iron formation. The rock varies from locally non-magnetic to slightly magnetic due to alteration of
magnetite to hematite/martite. Such alteration is common in areas within a few hundred meters of massive
hematite ore and is commonly found in close proximity to D2-associated shear zones. The closest previously
mined massive hematite orebody was located approximately 250 meters west-southwest of this location in
an existing mine pit. D2-associated shear zones have been identified approximately 25 meters north and
south of this outcrop.
Here, the oxide-facies banded iron formation comprises interlayered planar horizons of gray oxiderich (hematite ± magnetite), red jasper-rich, and pale white (silica (chert)-rich that are laminated, thinly
bedded, and locally medium bedded. Bedding orientations generally strike more or less east-west, although
locally contorted layers may vary significantly in strike direction. Dips are generally steep (&gt;75°) to the
north, although locally dips may be steep to the south.
Follow the field trip leaders southwest for about 85 meters to field trip stop 4.

Stop 4: Mine Trend Shear Zone “Schist ‘n’ BIF”
Longitude/Latitude: 47.82126659°N, -92.22607876°E
UTM NAD 83 Zone 15N: 557725E, 5296740N
The “Schist ‘n’ BIF” units at this location (Figure 4-10) are composed of sheared rocks comprising
chlorite schist that are interlayered with, and locally contain fragments of red, jasper-rich banded iron
formation and light gray to white chert. The chlorite schist is fine-grained (&lt;1 mm) with a tan (chloriteankerite) to green (chlorite-rich) weathered surface. Common minerals include chlorite, ankerite, sericite,
93

�Trip 4 – Soudan

Figure 4-10. Photographs of outcrop exposures at Stop 4. A) Image is showing the southern face of the “Schist ‘n’
BIF” unit. The greenish tan rock is chlorite schist, and the red and white layers are banded iron formation. B) This
image is north of image A and is the near horizontal exposure of the “Shist ‘n’ BIF” outcrop. The dark red inset in
this figure is the location of the photographic in Figure 4-10C. C) This image shows a sigma clast of banded iron
formation enclosed by chorite schist. Although the banded iron formation pieces are locally broken off, the clast can
be traced, and a sketch of the clast is shown in Figure 4-10D). D) Sketch of a somewhat intact banded iron formation
clast (dark pink) surrounded by silicates and other chert fragments (light pink) and enclosed by green and tan
chlorite ± ankerite schist.

and siderite. Banded iron formation fragments occur as clasts or thin bedded layers between foliation planes
of the schist. The foliation here strikes east-west and dips near-vertically. The previously mentioned D2
associated shearing has a dextral or right lateral sense of shear that is approximately east-west trending on
a regional scale, although locally sinistral shear sense indicators are present locally.
This outcrop is located southwest of the previously visited oxide facies banded iron formation.
The construction of a new paved road in 2020 exposed the now southern face of the unit (Figure 4-10A),
providing access to three planes for structural measurements. The shear plane (Figure 4-10B) contains
banded iron formation/chert clasts that serve as kinematic indicators and are located conveniently under our
feet due to the dip of the schist layers. Outcrop-scale kinematic indicators of sigma and delta clasts (Figures
4-10C and 4-10D) trend mostly east-west with dextral sense of shear, mimicking regional deformation
trends.
Follow the field trip leaders and walk west-southwest for approximately 800 meters along the paved Mesabi
back to First Avenue/Township Highway 4598. We will then proceed back to the vehicles and head to the
94

�Trip 4 – Soudan
main parking lot for the Soudan Mine. We will eat lunch at the Soudan Mine visitors’ center (bathrooms
are available in the visitors’ center).

Stop 5: Soudan Underground Mine Shaft
Longitude/Latitude: 47.82126659°N, -92.22607876°E
UTM NAD 83 Zone 15N: 556765E, 5296536N
Following lunch, we will watch a short video, pick up hard hats from state park staff, and proceed
to the Soudan Mine shaft. Make sure to bring a jacket and gloves underground as the temperature
there is approximately 50°F (10°C). Once in the cages, we will travel 2341 feet underground to the 27th
Level of the Soudan Mine. After exiting the cage we will board a train (converted ore cars) and travel west
for approximately three-quarters of a mile to the Montana Stope, the last active part of the mine. It is
important for everyone’s safety to stay in the train car for the duration of the trip, and to not raise
your hands while traveling in the train car. At this point we will exit the train, and after a short walk,
climb vertically approximately 30 feet using a very tight spiral staircase to the Montana Stope.
The Montana Stope is the last active part of the Soudan Mine. Thompson (2015) conducted detailed
mapping of the Montana ore zone (Figure 4-11) and noted the presence of several rock types, including:
•
•
•
•
•
•

•

Chlorite-dominant schist, which locally replaces sericite-dominant schist proximal to the ore (unit
5c)
Chlorite + sericite schist, which locally replaces sericite-dominant schist (unit 5cs)
Sericite-dominant schist composed of sericite + paragonite ± pyrophyllite that has a mylonitic
texture and occurs intermediate to ore breccia zones (unit 5s)
Sericite-dominant schist that is locally silicified and occurs in well foliated zones at the margins of
ore bodies that locally contain disseminated iron-rich chlorite domains (unit 5sc)
Hematite ore, predominantly composed of specular hematite with microplaty hematite occurring
locally within fractures and vugs (unit 4o)
Hematite ore breccia, composed of hematite-rich banded iron formation and brecciated massive
hematite ore with abundant milky “bull” quartz and disseminated sulfides (pyrite ± chalcopyrite;
unit Fbx)
Hematite-jasper banded iron formation, which retains many of its primary sedimentary textures and
represents an intermediate rock between fresh Soudan Member oxide facies banded iron formation
and the altered hematite-rich iron ore (unit 4a)

The absolute age and geological processes associated with the genesis of the Soudan (and other
Vermilion district) massive hematite ores have baffled geoscientists for over a century (e.g. Gruner, 1926;
Klinger, 1960). Gruner (1926) proposed that massive hematite mineralization occurred after deposition and
lithification of the Soudan Member oxide facies banded iron formation and proposed that the mineralization
occurred resulted from alteration of the original banded iron formation by ascending upwelling
hydrothermal solutions that oxidized most of the iron, dissolved quartz, and precipitated secondary
carbonates and sulfides. He did not specify an exact age for this mineralization process.
Klinger (1960) noted the close association of massive hematite ore zones at the Soudan Mine to
faults (shear zones) within the mine. He states that “the orebodies occur in the iron formation and their
dimensions are controlled by its structure”. He also noted that the massive hematite ores showed little
evidence of deformation and concluded that “a second generation of hematite appears to post-date structural
movements which occurred after the main ore-forming period. These movements, and later hematite, are
95

�Trip 4 – Soudan

Figure 4-11. Geological map of the Montana stope (modified from Thompson, 2015).

both later in time than a sericite rock that has been dated at 1.67 billion years by the A40/K40 method”. He
also indicated that “at least some of the hematite is younger than 1.67 billion years” and concluded that the
ores were “post-Huronian to pre-Keewenawan” in age.
Recent masters and doctoral studies from the University of Minnesota Duluth (Thompson, 2015)
and the University of Minnesota Twin Cities (Allerton, in prep.; Allerton et al., 2024a; Allerton et al.,
2024b; Allerton et al., in review) have focused their research on understanding the absolute age of massive
hematite mineralization at the Soudan Mine.
Based on detailed mapping, petrographic studies, and lithogeochemical studies, Thompson (2015)
suggested that the massive hematite ores at Soudan were formed from a multi-stage process involving
alteration of the original oxide-facies banded iron formation by a fluid-dominated synvolcanic sea-floor
hydrothermal system followed by interaction with hydrothermal metamorphic fluids associated with the
subduction of strata within the Vermilion district. Therefore, his model for the genesis of the Soudan
massive hematite ores suggests a Neoarchean age ranging from the time of the original deposition of the
oxide-facies banded iron formations (~2720 Ma) to the time spanning the D2 deformation (2674-2685 Ma
(Boerboom and Zartman, 1993) which is likely associated transpression and the development of the D2
shear zones in which the ores occur.
New research (Allerton et al., in review) utilizing petrographic observations and electron
microprobe analyses shows that the massive hematite ore can be divided further into two distinct ore
96

�Trip 4 – Soudan
textures comprising: 1) homogenous microcrystalline hematite-martite; and 2) heterogenous
microcrystalline hematite. The fine-grained microcrystalline hematite-martite (martite comprises hematite
pseudomorph replacing magnetite) locally contains minute vug spaces and larger fractures that are filled
by microplaty hematite and silicates. The heterogeneous ore contains a minor amount of metallic and/or
earthy microcrystalline hematite, but is predominantly composed of coarser-grained microplaty hematite
and silicates. Microcrystalline hematite-martite predates microplaty hematite and silicates based on
crosscutting relationships. U-Pb radiometric dating of hematite was used to establish the timing of ore
mineralization at ca. 1.8-1.6 Ga. Our new model for the genesis of Soudan massive ore suggests that
hydrothermal alteration related to mineralization is coeval with orogenic events generated by Proterozoic
terrain accretion and associated magmatism.
Additional geochemical analyses involving mass-balance calculations and Fe stable iron isotopes
indicate that the upgrade of BIF to hematite ore was a two-stage process. Dense microcrystalline hematitemartite matrix yielding a homogeneous texture was produced during the first stage. The second stage
resulted in the formation of a heterogeneous texture containing microplaty hematite and silicates in larger
vugs and fractures in the microcrystalline hematite-martite ore.
At the end of this stop, we will proceed back to the 27th level drift using another tight spiral staircase. We
will board the train and proceed east back to the shaft station where we will board the cages and return to
the surface. At the surface, we will reboard the vehicles and proceed back to the Mountain Iron Community
Center via the directions below.
From our parking spot at Soudan Mine, proceed down the hill on McKinley Park Road for approximately
0.4 miles to the intersection with Main Street. Turn south and drive for approximately 0.4 miles to the
intersection with Hwy 1/169. Turn west and Hwy 1/169 and drive for about 23.7 miles and merge onto Hwy
53/169 South. Follow Hwy 1/169 the intersection with Hwy 53/Hwy 169. Merge on to Hwy 169 south and
proceed for 1.5 miles to Emerald Avenue. Turn south and proceed on Emerald Avenue for approximately
0.1 mile. Turn east and proceed for approximately 0.2 miles back to the Mountain Iron Community Center.

OPTIONAL OUTCROPS
The following field trip stop descriptions have been taken from the 2014 ILSG Field Trip 2 “A Walk in the
Park – Neoarchean Geology of Lake Vermilion State Park” (Hudak et al., 2014). A map showing the
locations of the optional field trip stops is shown in Figure 4-12.
From the original parking spot near the Manager’s office at Soudan Mine, proceed approximately 0.2 miles
south on Stuntz Bay Road/1st Avenue to the intersection with Jasper Street. Go southeast on Jasper Street
for about -.5 miles to the intersection of Hwy 1/169. Proceed east on Hwy 1/169 for 0.75miles to Vermilion
Park Drive (this is the eastern entrance to Lake Vermilion/Soudan Underground Mine State Park and
allows access to campsite near Cable Bay). Turn north on to Vermilion Park drive and proceed for 2.9
miles to Old Hwy 169. Turn west (left) on to Old Hwy 169 and follow it for 0.8 miles to Vermilion Ridge
Road. Turn west on Vermilion Ridge Road and proceed for approximately 0.5 miles. Turn right and park
near the restroom east of Cable Bay.
We will depart the vehicles here and walk across the street to the Crosscut Trail. walk southeast along the
Crosscut Trail for about 2200 meters. We will then take a short hike (approximately 30 meters) up the hill
to Stop 6o.

97

�Trip 4 – Soudan

Figure 4-12. Geologic map of the northeastern part of Lake Vermilion/Soudan Underground Mine State Park (after Peterson et al., 2016) illustrating locations of
optional field trip stops. See Figure 4-5 for the description of map units.

98

�Trip 4 – Soudan

Stop 6o (Optional)” Contact” Between Soudan Member Banded Iron Formation and
Gafvert Lake Sequence Rhyodacite Polymict Lapilli-tuff/Tuff-breccia
Longitude/Latitude: 47.834710°N, -92.211647°E
UTM NAD 83 Zone 15N: 558,995E / 5,298,230N
Here we will see one of the few places where the nature of the contact between the Soudan IronFormation Member oxide facies iron-formation and the overlying dacitic to rhyodacitic volcaniclastic rocks
associated within the informally named Gafvert Lake Sequence can be observed (Figure 4-13). The Gafvert
Lake Sequence (mapped as the “Upper Sequence” by Peterson and Patelke, 2003; Radakovich et al., 2010:
and Heim et al., 2011) comprises dacitic to rhyodacitic volcaniclastic and epiclastic rocks that are locally
interbedded with Algoma-type banded iron-formation and chert deposits. This sequence is part of the Lake
Vermilion Formation. Within Lake Vermilion State Park, the overall stratigraphic thickness of the Gafvert
Lake Sequence is up to approximately 1300 meters thick, with individual felsic volcaniclastic deposits
having stratigraphic thicknesses ranging from approximately 75 – 400 meters thick, and individual Algomatype oxide facies banded iron formations and associated massive- to bedded chert deposits ranging from
25-250 meters and up to 175 meters in stratigraphic thickness, respectively. Northwest of the Soudan Mine,
the Gafvert Lake Sequence is locally interlayered with, and overlain by, greywacke deposits associated
with the Lake Vermilion Formation.
Within Lake Vermilion State Park, several lithofacies comprise the Gafvert Lake Sequence. The
basal member of this sequence comprises massive, very-thickly bedded, quartz- and plagioclase-phyric
polymict dacitic to rhyodacitic tuff, lapilli-tuff, and tuff-breccia deposits. These light gray, non-sorted, nongraded, matrix-supported deposits contain 3-8% 1-2mm (rare 3mm) pale gray anhedral to subhedral quartz
phenocrysts, 10-15% &lt;1-2mm subhedral to euhedral tabular plagioclase phenocrysts, and a wide variety of
lapilli- to block-sized clasts including: 1) 10-20% 1-10 cm quartz- and plagioclase-phyric coherent dacite
to rhyodacite lapilli and blocks; 2) 5-7% &lt;3cm diameter pale gray-green lens-shaped, locally quartz- and
plagioclase-phyric pumice lapilli; 3) up to 1% dark gray to light gray angular chert lapilli ranging from 0.53cm in diameter; and 4) 1-3% 0.5-5cm dark gray to black to red magnetite-rich, hematite-rich, or jasperrich banded iron formation lapilli. These deposits are overlain by, and interbedded with, light gray, matrixsupported, non-sorted and non-graded quartz- and plagioclase-phyric dacitic to rhyodacitic tuff deposits
(Figure 4-14) which contain 10-25% 1-3mm subhedral to euhedral tabular plagioclase phenocrysts, 1-3%
1-3mm subhedral to anhedral, commonly broken, quartz phenocrysts, as well as 10-15% subangular quartzand plagioclase-phyric coherent dacite to rhyodacite lapilli and up to 5% locally quartz- and plagioclasephyric pumice lapilli. Spectacular felsic epiclastic deposits comprising polymict volcaniclastic
conglomerates and lithic sandstones are also present in the Gafvert Lake Sequence and crop out west of
Lake Vermilion State Park in Stunz Bay (Radakovich et al., 2010).
Based on regional mapping, Sims and Southwick (1980), Southwick (1993), and Southwick et al.
(1998) have suggested that the contact between the underlying Soudan Iron-Formation Member of the Ely
Greenstone Formation and the overlying Lake Vermilion Formation is locally an unconformity.
Geochronological work in the Vermilion District (Peterson et al., 2001. Lodge et al., 2013), combined with
detailed field mapping in the limited number of locations where the contact between the Soudan IronFormation Member and the Lake Vermilion Formation occurs, bears out this interpretation. Based on field
relationships recognized by Radakovich et al. (2010), Lodge et al. (2013) collected a sample of the basal
part of the Gafvert Lake polymict dacite- to rhyodacite lapilli-tuff / tuff-breccia deposits that occur at this
outcrop in order to determine the age of volcanism of the Gafvert Lake Sequence relative to the ages of the
Lower and Soudan Iron-Formation members of the Ely Greenstone Formation. Zircons from the sample of
polymict rhyodacite tuff-breccia from this outcrop approximately 2m north of the contact with the Soudan
Iron-Formation Member at this field trip stop produced a high precision U-Pb date of 2689.7 ±0.8 Ma using
99

�Trip 4 – Soudan

Figure 4-13. Detailed (1:5000 scale) map (after Hudak et al., 2014) illustrating the disconformable contact between
the Soudan Member Algoma-type banded iron-formation (unit S4a) and the Gafvert Lake Sequence quartz- and
plagioclase-phyric polymict dacite-rhyodacite tuff-breccia / lapilli-tuff deposits (unit US2eh). We will start our
investigation where Stop 6o is indicated, and traverse along the bedding and are locally folded. path indicated by the
red dashed line over a series of outcrops. We will assemble on the two-track trail where indicated by the star symbol
before proceeding to Stop 7o.

Figure 4-14. Quartz- and plagioclase-phyric polymict dacite-rhyodacite tuff-breccia / lapilli-tuff from the Gafvert
Lake Sequence. A) Typical appearance of very thickly bedded quartz- and plagioclase-phyric polymict daciterhyodacite lapilli-tuff. B) Close-up of unit illustrating tannish-white subhedral to euhedral tabular plagioclase
phenocrysts, gray to gray-blue anhedral quartz phenocrysts, and 1cm diameter angular accidental fragment
composed of jasper-rich banded iron formation.

100

�Trip 4 – Soudan
hermal ionization mass spectrometry (Lodge et al., 2013). Given that the basal Gafvert Lake Sequence
deposits contain angular intraclasts of chert and banded iron formation, and that there appears to be no
intense structural fabric in either the Soudan Iron-Formation Member or the Gafvert Lake volcaniclastic
rocks, Lodge et al. (2013) interpreted the contact here to represent a disconformity, a type of unconformity
characterized by strata that are essentially parallel on either side of the erosional or non-depositional surface.
Several outcrops occur at this location (refer back to Figure 4-13). The largest part of the outcrop,
which extends east up the hill, is composed of laminated to medium bedded Soudan Iron-Formation
Member. Alternating magnetite-rich horizons, chert horizons, and jasper horizons display planar bedding
and are locally folded. Moving toward the northwest part of this outcrop, we observe a small break in the
outcrop exposure. This break occurs directly above the contact between the Soudan Member iron formation
(to the south) and the Gafvert Lake volcaniclastic rocks (to the north). In this area, note the lack of
deformation in both lithological units. The lack of structural deformation at this contact, as well as
geochronological data obtained from the Gafvert Lake volcaniclastic rocks near this contact (Lodge et al.,
2013), supports the interpretation of a disconformity.
Moving to the northwest, we observe the basal several meters of the Gafvert Lake Succession
volcaniclastic rocks. Here, the rock is composed of a very thickly bedded quartz- and plagioclase-phyric
polymict dacite-rhyodacite tuff-breccia / lapilli-tuff. The rock is characterized by up to 5% 1-3mm diameter
subhedral to euhedral gray to blue-gray quartz phenocrysts and locally, 5-10% subhedral to euhedral light
gray to tan tabular plagioclase phenocrysts set in a fine-grained quartzo-felspathic matrix that is locally
sericite altered. Accidental fragments comprising laplli-sized light gray to grayish black angular to
subangular chert, gray to dark gray subangular to angular banded iron formation (Figure 4-14), and rare
angular to subangular reddish brown jasper fragments are present. As well, juvenile fragments comprising
lapilli- to locally block-sized pumice are present. Lapilli- to block-sized accessory fragments of quartz- and
plagioclase-phyric coherent dacite and rhyodacite are also present, in abundances up to 5%. As we move
northwest then north down the hill, we will traverse several outcrops composed of Gafvert Lake Sequence
tuff-breccia and lapilli-tuff deposits.
We will traverse northwest then north down the hill (as shown in Figure 4-13) for about 80 meters back to
the Crosscut Trail. We will then head northeast along the Crosscut Trail for approximately 900 meters. We
will then traverse southeast through the bush for about 45 meters to Stop 7o.

Stop 7o (Optional): Gafvert Lake Sequence Tuffs and Lapilli -tuffs
Longitude/Latitude: 47.838875°N, -92.202496°E
UTM NAD 83 Zone 15N: 559,675E / 5,298,700N
We will stop here to observe several small outcrops of the Gafvert Lake Sequence tuffs and lapillituffs. These deposits comprise very thickly bedded, light gray, quartz- and plagioclase-phyric dacitic to
rhyodacitic tuffs and lapilli-tuffs. The light gray recrystallized matrix generally contains 10-15% &lt;1-2mm
subhedral to euhedral tabular plagioclase phenocrysts which locally appear to be broken, as well as 3-8%
&lt;1-2mm pale gray anhedral, locally broken, anhedral to subhedral quartz phenocrysts. Various types of
lapilli may be observed, including: 1) 10-20% 1-3cm diameter quartz- and plagioclase-phyric coherent
dacite to rhyodacite lapilli; 2) 5-7% &lt;3cm diameter pale gray green, lens-shaped, locally quartz- and
plagioclase-phyric pumice lapilli; 3) &lt;1mm dark gray to light gray angular chert lapilli ranging from 0.53cm in diameter; and 4) 1-3% 0.5-5cm dark gray to black magnetite-rich banded iron formation lapilli.
We will traverse northwest for about 45 meters back to the Crosscut Trail. We will then proceed northeast
along the Crosscut Trail for approximately 750 meters, then turn north for about 35 meters to Stop 8o.

101

�Trip 4 – Soudan

Stop 8o (Optional): Quartz- ± Plagioclase-phyric Rhyodacite Sill (informally named the
Gafvert Lake Intrusive Complex)
Longitude/Latitude: 47.843117°N, -92.197887°E
UTM NAD 83 Zone 15N: 560,015E / 5,299,175N
At this location we will observe a spectacular light gray, massive, quartz- ± plagioclase-phyric coherent
rhyodacite which, based on regional mapping (Peterson and Jirsa, 1999; Peterson, 2001; Hudak et al.,
2002b; Heim et al., 2011) comprises a sill-dike complex that extends from the northern extents of Lake
Vermilion State Park over 20km eastward to Mitchell Lake. This intrusion is most prevalent in the vicinity
of Gafvert Lake, where it comprises several sills and dikes that intrude into the thickest section of Gafvert
Lake Sequence volcaniclastic rocks. Based on the distribution of sills and dikes, coherent-facies Gafvert
Lake Sequence deposits, and an abundance of coarse polymict breccias in this region, Peterson (2001) has
interpreted this area to be the remnants of a stratovolcano that produced the Gafvert Lake Sequence dacitic
to rhyodacitic volcaniclastic rocks. For this reason, this unique quartz-feldspar porphyry intrusion has been
informally named the Gafvert Lake Intrusive Complex (GLIC). Lithogeochemical work recently completed
at the University of Wisconsin Eau Claire (Schwierske et al., 2014; Figure 4-15) indicates that the GLIC
and Gafvert Lake volcaniclastic rocks have very similar major, trace and rare earth element characteristics
suggesting that they may be genetically related. However, geochronological studies will need to be
performed to determine unambiguously if the GLIC and Gafvert Lake volcaniclastic rocks are indeed
genetically related.
The GLIC comprises light gray, massive, quartz ± plagioclase-phyric coherent rhyodacite. The light
gray aphanitic groundmass contains 3-7% gray to light blue subhedral rounded to euhedral square quartz
phenocrysts that range from 3-10mm in diameter, and 2-10% pale gray to tan, subhedral to euhedral tabular
plagioclase phenocrysts ranging from 1-4mm in length. A variety of xenoliths may be found in this
intrusion, including: 1) brown mudstone lapilli; 2) green to gray-green massive and/or amygdaloidal basalt
lapilli; and 3) light gray aphyric coherent rhyodacite lapilli. In the field, the presence of large 5mm-10mm
diameter gray to blue gray quartz phenocrysts distinguishes the GLIC from other quartz-feldspar-porphyry
intrusions in the Vermilion District.

102

�Trip 4 – Soudan

Figure 4-15. Chemical classification of various lithologies within Lake Vermilion State Park (Schwierske et al.,
2014) using the immobile element classification scheme of Winchester and Floyd (1977). Open triangles represent
samples from a quartz- ± plagioclase-phyric rhyodacite/dacite sill in the northeastern part of Lake Vermilion State
Park. The black squares, large black diamonds, and small black diamonds represent various Gafvert Lake
Succession volcaniclastic and epiclastic rock units.

We will return to the Crosscut Trail and proceed northeast on the trail back to the vehicles.
Upon loading the vehicles, we will return to the Mountain Iron Community Center. Travel east on Vermilion
Ridge Road for approximately 0.5 miles to the intersection with Old Highway 169. Turn right (south) and
continue east on Old Highway 169 for 0.8 miles. Turn south at the intersection with Vermilion Park Drive
and proceed south for 2.9 miles to the intersection with Hwy 1/169. Turn west and Hwy 1/169 and drive for
about 25.4 miles and merge onto Hwy 53/169 South. Follow Hwy 1/169 the intersection with Hwy 53/Hwy
169. Merge on to Hwy 169 south and proceed for 1.5 miles to Emerald Avenue. Turn south and proceed on
Emerald Avenue for approximately 0.1 mile. Turn east and proceed for approximately 0.2 miles back to the
Mountain Iron Community Center.

END OF FIELD TRIP

103

�Trip 4 – Soudan

Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Jim Essig (Manager, Lake Vermilion/Soudan Underground Mine State
Park), James Pointer (former Interpretive Supervisor, Lake Vermilion/Soudan Underground Mine State
Park), and Jim DeVries (Assistant Manager, Lake Vermilion/Soudan Underground Mine State Park) for
their assistance over the past two decades while the authors have conducted research, teaching, and
numerous field trips within the park.

References
Allerton, Z., in prep., Thermal and Hydrothermal Effects of Proterozoic Events in the Archean Terrain of
Northeastern Minnesota: unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, University of Minnesota Twin Cities.
Allerton, Z., Hudak, G., Teyssier, C., Fayon, A., Daniŝik, M., Courtney-Davies, L, and Larson, P., 2024b,
Geochronology campaign in northeastern Minnesota: Institute on Lake Superior Geology, Proceedings Volume
70, Part 1 – Program and Abstracts, p. 2-3.
Allerton, Z., Hudak, G., Teyssier, C., Fayon, A., Daniŝik, M., Courtney-Davies, L, and Larson, P., 2024b,
Geochronology and geochemistry of hematite ore in northeastern Minnesota: Institute on Lake Superior
Geology, Proceedings Volume 70, Part 1 – Program and Abstracts, p. 4-5.
Allerton, Z. P., Courtney-Davies, L., Daniŝik, M., Hudak, G. J., Teyssier, C., Mitchell, J. T., and Larson, P., in
review, Hematite double-dating defines Proterozoic mineralization and thermal history of Archean banded iron
formations, NE Minnesota, USA: submitted to Geology.
Ayer, J. A., Goutier, J., Thurston, P. C., Dube, B., and Kamber, B. S., 2010, Tectonic and Metallogenic Evolution of
the Abitibi and Wawa subprovinces: Summary of Field Work and Other Activities, 2010, Ontario Geological
Survey Open File Report 6260, p. 3-1 – 3.6.
Bakst, B., 2013, Minnesota’s Lake Vermilion State Park evolving at a cautious pace: TwinCities.com, Pioneer Press,
http://www.twincities.com/localnews/ci_23939683/lake-vermilion-state-park-minnesotas-newest-evolving-at.
Bauer, R. L., 1985, Correlation of early recumbent and younger upright folding across the boundary between an
Archean gneiss belt and greenstone terrane, northeastern Minnesota: Geology, v. 13, p. 657-660.
Baumgardner, M., Brown, N., Jacobson, A., Kendall, J., Ostwald, C., Schriner, N., White, J., and Peterson, D., 2013,
Bedrock geologic map of the Gafvert Lake area, St. Louis County, northeastern Minnesota: Precambrian
Research Center Map Series, PRC/Map-2013-04, 1:10,000 scale.
Boerboom, T. J., 2020, D-07, Geochronology Database: Minnesota Geological Survey – Open Data Site,
https://mngsumn.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/d7903b83244a4878bcfb31f362bf5787_0/explore?location=46.147285%2C92.317888%2C7.04.
Boerboom, T. J., and Zartman, R. E., 1993, Geology, geochemistry, and geochronology of the central Giants Range
Batholith, northeastern Minnesota: Canadian Journal of Earth Science, v. 30, p. 2510-2522.
Cas, R. A. F., and Wright, J. V., 1987, Volcanic Successions – Modern and Ancient: George Allen and Unwin,
London, 528 p.
Corfu, F. and Stott, G. M., 1998, Shebandowan greenstone belt, western Superior Province: U-Pb ages, tectonic
implications, and correlations: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 110, p. 1467-1484.
Dimroth, E., Cousineau, P., Leduc, M., and Sanschagrin, Y., 1978, Structure and organization of Archean
subaqueous basalt flows, Rouyn-Noranda area, Quebec: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 15, p. 902-918.
Driese, S. G., Jirsa, M. A, Ren, M., Brantley, S. L., Sheldon, N. D., Parker, D., and Schmitz, M. D., 2011,
Neoarchean paleoweathering of tonalite and metabasalt: Implications for reconstructions of 2.69 Ga early
terrestrial ecosystems and paleoatmospheric chemistry: Precambrian Research, v. 189, p. 1-17.
Fisher, R. V., 1961, Proposed classification of volcaniclastic sediments and rocks: Geological Society of America
Bulletin, v. 72, p. 1409-1414.
Fisher, R. V., 1966, Rocks composed of volcanic fragments and their classification: Earth Science Reviews, v. 1, p.
287-298.
Fisher, R. V., 1998, Out of the Crater: Princeton University Press, 180 p.
Gibson, H. L., Morton, R. L., and Hudak, G. J., 1999, Submarine volcanic processes, deposits, and environments
favorable for the location of volcanic-associated massive sulfide deposits: Reviews in Economic Geology, v. 8,
p. 13-51.

104

�Trip 4 – Soudan
Gruner, J. W., 1926, Hydrothermal alteration of iron ores of the Lake Superior type – a modified theory: Economic
Geology, v. 32, p. 121-130.
Heim, N., Scott, H., Kilduff, R., Rahtz, C., Vial, A., Young, S., Mahr, C., and Hudak, G., 2011, Preliminary bedrock
geology map of the eastern part of Lake Vermilion State Park, St. Louis County, NE Minnesota: Precambrian
Research Center Map Series Map PRC/Map – 2010-01, 1:5000 scale.
Hoffman, A. T., 2007. Lithostratigraphy, Hydrothermal Alteration, and Lithogeochemistry of Neoarchean Rocks in
the Lower and Soudan Members of the Ely Greenstone Formation, Vermilion District, NE Minnesota:
Implications for Volcanogenic Massive Sulfide Deposits: unpublished M. S. thesis, University of Minnesota –
Duluth, 295 p.
Hooper, P., and Ojakangas, R., 1971, Multiple deformation in the Vermilion District, Minnesota: Canadian Journal
of Earth Sciences, v. 8, p. 423-434.
Hudak, G. J., Heine, J., Hocker, S. M., and Hauck, S., 2002b, Geological mapping of the Needleboy Lake – Sixmile
Lake area, northeastern Minnesota: a summary of volcanogenic massive sulfide potential: Natural Resources
Research Institute Report of Investigation NRRI/RI-2002/14, 15 p.
Hudak, G.J., Heine, J., Jirsa, M.A., and Peterson, D.M., 2004, Field Trip 1 - Volcanic stratigraphy, hydrothermal
alteration, and VMS potential of the Lower Ely Greenstone, Fivemile Lake to Sixmile Lake area: 50th Annual
Meeting, Institute on Lake Superior Geology, Proceedings Volume 50, Part 2 – Field Trip Guidebook, p. 1-45.
Hudak, G. J., Heine, J., Lodge, R. W. D., and Jansen, A., 2012, Recent developments understanding the volcanic,
magmatic, tectonic, and metallogenic evolution of the Ely Greenstone Formation, Vermilion District, NE
Minnesota: Geological Association of Canada – Mineralogical Association of Canada, Abstracts and Program, v.
35, p. 59.
Hudak, G. J., Heine, J., Newkirk, T., Odette, J., and Hauck, S., 2002a, Comparative geology, stratigraphy, and
lithogeochemistry of the Fivemile Lake, Quartz Hill, and Skeleton Lake VMS occurrences, Vermilion district,
NE Minnesota: A report to the Minerals Coordinating Committee, DNR, Minerals Division, State of Minnesota:
Natural Resources Research Institute Technical Report NRRI/TR-2002/03, 390 pages.
Hudak, G. J., Hoffman, A. T., Peterson, D. M., and Heine, J., 2007, Recent developments understanding the
volcanic, magmatic, tectonic, and metallogenic evolution of the Ely Greenstone Formation, Vermilion District,
NE Minnesota: 53rd Annual Meeting, Institute on Lake Superior Geology, Proceedings Volume 53, Part 1 –
Program and Abstracts, p. 42-43.
Hudak, G. J., and Peterson, D. M., 2014, Non-Ferrous Mineralization Associated with the Wawa-Abitibi Terrane
and Duluth Complex Cu-Ni-PGM Deposits, Northeastern Minnesota: Society of Economic Geologists,
Guidebook Series, v. 47, 150 p.
Hudak, G. J., Peterson, D. M., Radakovich, A, Pignotta, G., Schwierske, K., and the students from the 20120-2013
Precambrian Research Center Field Camp, 2016, Bedrock Geology of Lake Vermilion/Soudan Underground
Mine State Park: Natural Resources Research Institute Technical Report NRRI/TR-2016-20, 23 p.
Hudak, G. J., Radakovich, A., Pignotta, G., and Schwierske, K., 2014, Field Trip 2 – A Walk in the Park –
Neoarchean Geology of Lake Vermilion State Park: Institute on Lake Superior Geology, Proceedings Volume
60, Part 2 – Field Trip Guidebook, p. 37-75.
Hudleston, P. J., Schultz-Ela, D., and Southwick, D. L., 1988, Transpression in an Archean greenstone belt, northern
Minnesota: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 25, p. 1060-1068.
Hudleston, P.J., 1976, Early deformational history of Archean rocks in the Vermilion district, north-eastern
Minnesota: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 13, p. 579-592.
Jansen, A. C., Hudak, G. J., Heine, J. J., and Peterson, D. M., 1999, Lithogeochemical evaluation of Neoarchean
mafic volcanic rocks comprising the footwall to the Soudan Member of the Ely Greenstone Formation,
northeastern Minnesota: 55th Annual Meeting, Institute on Lake Superior Geology, Proceedings Volume 55, Part
1 – Program and Abstracts, p. 46-47.
Jirsa, M. A., 2000. The Midway sequence: a Timiskaming-type pull-apart basin deposit in the western Wawa
Subprovince, Minnesota: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 37, p. 1-15.
Jirsa, M.A., 2016, Preliminary geologic maps of Lake and St. Louis counties, northeastern Minnesota: Minnesota
Geological Survey Open File Report OFR 16-4, https://conservancy.umn.edu/items/a68ec090-cf02-463a-8fcbe3c05926d80e.
Jirsa, M. A., Boerboom, T. J., Green, J. C., Miller, J. D., Morey, G. B., Ojakangas, R. W., and Peterson, D. M.,
2004, Field Trip 5 – Classic outcrops of northeastern Minnesota: 50th Annual Meeting, Institute on Lake
Superior Geology, Proceedings Volume 50, Part 2 – Field Trip Guidebook, p. 129-169.

105

�Trip 4 – Soudan
Jirsa, M., and Hillman, M., 2009, Field Trip 4 – Pioneer Mine (Miners Lake) Canoe Excursion: 55th Annual
Meeting, Institute on Lake Superior Geology, Proceedings Volume 55, Part 2 – Field Trip Guidebook, p. 110115.
Jirsa, M. A., Starns, E. C., and Schmitz, M. D., 2012, Bedrock geologic map of the 2006 Cavity Lake forest fire
area, Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness, northeastern Minnesota: Minnesota Geological Survey
Miscellaneous Map M-193, 1:24,000 scale.
Jirsa, M.A., Southwick, D.L., and Boerboom, T.J., 1992, Structural evolution of Archean rocks in the western Wawa
subprovince, Minnesota: refolding of precleavage nappes during D2 transpression: Canadian Journal of Earth
Sciences 29:2146-2155.
Klinger, F. L., 1960, Geology and ore deposits of the Soudan Mine, St. Louis County, Minnesota: unpublished Ph.
D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 96 p.
Larson, P., and Mooers, H., 2009, Field Trip 2 – Glacial geology of the Vermilion Moraine: 55th Annual Meeting,
Institute on Lake Superior Geology, Proceedings Volume 55, Part 2 – Field Trip Guidebook, p. 81-99.
Lodge, R.W.D., Gibson, H. L., Stott, G. M., Franklin, J. M., and Hudak, G. J., 2015, Geodynamic setting, crustal
architecture, and VMS metallogeny of ca 2720 Ma greenstone belt assemblages of the northern Wawa
Subprovince, Superior Province, Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 52, p. 196 – 214.
Lodge, R. W. D., Gibson, H. L., Stott, G. M., Hudak, G. J., Jirsa, M. A., and Hamilton, M. A., 2013, New U-Pb
geochronology from the Timiskaming-type assemblages in the Shebandowan and Vermilion greenstone belts,
Wawa Subprovince, Superior Craton: Implications for the Neoarchean development of the southwestern
Superior Province: Precambrian Research, v. 235, p. 264-277.
Lundy, J. R., 1985, Clues to structural history in the minor folds of the Soudan Iron Formation, northeastern
Minnesota: Unpublished M. S. thesis, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 144 p.
McPhie, J., Doyle, M., and Allen, R., 1993, Volcanic Textures: A Guide to the Interpretation of Textures in
Volcanic Rocks: CODES Key Centre, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, 198 p.
Mercier-Langevin, P., Hannington, M. D., Dubé, B., and Bécu, V., 2010, The gold content of volcanogenic massive
sulfide deposits: Mineralium Deposita, v. 46, p. 509-539.
Mueller, W. U., and White, J. D. L., 2004, 4.2 – Terminology of Volcanic and Volcaniclastic Rocks: in Eriksson, P.
G., Altermann, W., Nelson, D. R., Mueller, W. U., and Catuneanu, O., (eds.), The Precambrian Earth: Tempos
and Events: Developments in Precambrian Geology, v. 12, Elsevier, Amsterdam, p. 273-277.
Newkirk, T., Hudak, G. J., and Hauck, S. A., 2001, Preliminary lava flow morphology studies at the Five Mile Lake
VMS prospect, Vermilion District, NE Minnesota: Implications for volcanic processes, volcanic
paleoenvironments, and VMS exploration [abstract/poster]: Geological Society of America Abstracts and
Programs V. 33, No. 6.
Peterson, D. M., 2001, Development of Archean lode-gold and massive sulfide deposit exploration models using
geographic information system applications: targeting mineral exploration in northeastern Minnesota from
analysis of analog Canadian mining camps: unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, University of Minnesota, Duluth,
Minnesota, 503 p.
Peterson, D. M., Gallup, C., Jirsa, M. A., and Davis, D. W., 2001, Correlation of Archean assemblages across the
U.S.- Canadian border: Phase I geochronology: 47th Annual Meeting, Institute on Lake Superior Geology,
Proceedings Volume 47, Part 1 – Programs and Abstracts, p. 77-78.
Peterson, D.M., Hudak, G.J., Radakovich, A., Pignotta, G., and Schwierske, K., 2016, Geologic Map of Lake
Vermilion/Soudan Underground Mine State Park: Precambrian Research Center Map PRC/Map-2016-01,
1:10,000 scale.
Peterson, D. M., and Jirsa, M.A., 1999, Bedrock geologic map and mineral exploration data, western Vermilion
district, St. Louis and Lake Counties, northeastern Minnesota: MGS Miscellaneous Map M-98, scale 1:48,000.
Peterson, D., Jirsa, M., and Hudak, G., 2009a, Field Trip 7 – Architecture of an Archean Greenstone Belt:
Stratigraphy, Structure, Mineralization: 55th Annual Meeting, Institute on Lake Superior Geology, Proceedings
Volume 55, Part 2 – Field Trip Guidebook, p. 178-215.
Peterson, D. M., and Patelke, R. L., 2003, National Underground Science and Engineering Laboratory (NUSEL):
Geological site investigation for the Soudan Mine, northeastern Minnesota: Natural Resources Research Institute
Technical Report NRRI/TR-2003/29, 88 p.a
Peterson, D. M., and Patelke, R. L., 2004, Field Trip 7 – Economic geology of Archean gold occurrences in the
Vermilion District, northeast of Soudan, Minnesota: 50th Annual Meeting, Institute on Lake Superior Geology,
Proceedings Volume 50, Part 2 – Field Trip Guidebook, p. 200-226.

106

�Trip 4 – Soudan
Peterson, D. M., Pointer, J., and Marshak, M., 2009b, Field Trip 3 – Soudan Iron Mine and Physics Lab Tour: 55th
Annual Meeting, Institute on Lake Superior Geology, Proceedings Volume 55, Part 2 – Field Trip Guidebook,
p. 100-109.
Radakovich, A. L., Parent, C. T., Partridge, M. E., Ritts, A. D., Pierce, R., and Hudak, G. J., 2010, Reconnaissance
bedrock geological map of the northern part of Soudan Underground Mine State Park and the northwestern part
of Lake Vermilion State Park, St. Louis County, Minnesota: Precambrian Research Center Map Series Map
PRC/Map – 2010-04, 1:5000 scale.
Schmid, R., 1981, Descriptive nomenclature and classification of pyroclastic deposits and fragments;
recommendations of the IUGS subcommission on the systematics of igneous rocks: Geology, v. 9, p. 41-43.
Schwierske, K.L., Pignotta, G. S., and Hudak, G. J., 2014, The 2.7 billion year old Mt. St. Helens of northern
Minnesota: Petrography, geochemistry, and economic significance of the Neoarchean Gafvert Lake Sequence:
60th Annual Meeting, Institute on Lake Superior Geology, Proceedings Volume 60, Part 1 – Programs and
Abstracts, p. 113-114.
Sims, P. K., and Southwick, D. L., 1985, Geologic map of Archean rocks, western Vermilion district, northern
Minnesota: U. S. Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Investigations Map I-1527, scale 1:48,000.
Southwick, D. L., (compiler), 1993, Bedrock geologic map of the Soudan-Bigfork area, northern Minnesota:
Minnesota Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Map M-79, scale 1:100,000.
Southwick, D. L., Boerboom, T. J., and Jirsa, M. A., 1998, Geologic setting and descriptive geochemistry of
Archean supracrustal and hypabyssal rocks, Soudan-Bigfork area, northern Minnesota: implications for metallic
mineral exploration: Minnesota Geological Survey, Report of Investigations 51, 69 p.
Stott, G., Corkery, T., Leclair, A., Boily, M., and Percival, J., 2007, A revised terrane map for the Superior Province
as interpreted from Aeromagnetic Data: 53rd Annual Meeting, Institute on Lake Superior Geology, Proceedings
Volume 53, Part 1 – Program and Abstracts, p. 74-76.
Stott, G. and Mueller, W., 2009, Superior Province: The nature and evolution of the Archean continental
lithosphere: Precambrian Research, v. 168, p. 1-3.
Thompson, A., 2015, A Hydrothermal Model for Metasomatism, of Neoarchean Algoma-Type Banded Iron
Formation to Massive Hematite Ore at the Soudan Mine, NE Minnesota: unpublished M. S. Thesis, University of
Minnesota Duluth, 59 p.
Vallowe, A. M., Thalhamer, E. J., Rhoades, D. L., and Peterson, D. M., 2010, Surface and subsurface geologic maps
of the Soudan Underground Mine State Park, St. Louis County, northeastern, Minnesota: Precambrian Research
Center Map Series Map PRC/Map – 2010-01, 1:2500 and 1:5000 scale.
White, J. D. L., and Houghton, B. F., 2006, Primary volcaniclastic rocks: Geology, v. 34, no. 8, p. 677-680.
Winchester, J. A., and Floyd, P. A., 1977, Geochemical discrimination of different magma series and the
differentiation products using immobile elements: Chemical Geology, v. 20, p. 325-343.

107

�Trip 5 – Alkalic plutons

FIELD TRIP 5
Neoarchean Alkalic Intrusions in the Wawa and Quetico Subprovinces
Terry Boerboom (retired)1 and Amy Radakovich1
1

Minnesota Geological Survey, College of Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota, 2609
Territorial Road, St. Paul, MN 55114
This field trip will visit several alkalic intrusions that have been mapped from a combination of
outcrop, drilling, and geophysical data. Refer to Figure 5-1 for the pluton names and generalized regional
geology. The stop descriptions are very brief, but a more thorough description of each pluton (as well as
others not visited on this trip) are contained in the introductory text.
These plutons were emplaced mainly into the Lake Vermilion Formation which is composed of
volcanogenic sedimentary rocks sourced from Gafvert Lk rhyodacite tuff (2689.7±0.8 Ma) and also likely
from felsic tuffs at the south limb of the Britt structure (2689.6±0.5 Ma). The Linden pluton has an age
of 2681.00±0.29 Ma, and the Lost Lake pluton an age of 2675.1±0.5 (Boerboom et al., 2022). These ages
are slightly older than the large Shannon Lake granite (2674±5 and 2674±27; Boerboom and Zartman
1993), and straddle two ages obtained on the Britt granodiorite (2681±4 and 2685±4 Ma; Boerboom and
Zartman 1993). The Idington pluton is intruded by the Shannon Lake granite, consistent with the
aforementioned age dates. The suite of alkalic plutons we will visit are located mainly in the Wawa
subprovince but one (Gheen) is in the Quetico subprovince and will include the Side Lake, Morcom,
Linden, Gheen, Idington, and Lost Lake plutons (Figure 5-1). All of these intrusions are similar in
mineralogy with varied ratios of perthitic to antiperthitic feldspar and Na-plagioclase, hence are divided
into those that are more syenitic vs. monzodioritic. All contain Na-rich aegirine/aegirine-augite with
variable proportions of primary and secondary-deuteric hornblende, titanite, biotite, and minor oxides and
apatite. Textures vary from uniformly medium-coarse grained to strongly and coarsely porphyritic, and
they typically exhibit a flow-foliation defined by feldspar and subprismatic pyroxene and/or hornblende.
All except the Linden are multi-phase with variations from ultramafic pyroxenite/hornblendite to
intermediate syenite/monzodiorite, with relatively minor late-phase felsic phases; where multi-phase they
generally show complex and conflicting intrusive relationships between the various phases.
The following discussion, modified from Minnesota Geological Survey Report of Investigations
43 (Boerboom, 1994), covers the plutons we will visit as well as others that we will not visit. Note that
some of the ideas presented in this report may have been modified or discredited based on newer
geochronological data.

108

�Trip 5 – Alkalic plutons
ALKALIC PLUTONS OF NORTHEASTERN MINNESOTA
Minnesota Geological Survey Report of Investigations 43
By
T. Boerboom
ABSTRACT
A series of alkalic plutons in northeastern Minnesota intrude metamorphosed sedimentary and
volcanic rocks in the Wawa and Quetico subprovinces of the Archean Superior Province. The plutons
generally fall into one of three categories-a syenitic clan, a monzodioritic clan, and a granitic clan. The
main rock phases of the syenitic and monzodioritic clans are strongly porphyritic, coarse-grained, green
and pink, quartz-poor syenite and diorite. Na-rich pyroxene is the predominant mafic mineral in these
intrusions, and titanite is prominent in hand sample. Some of the syenitic intrusions contain melanite garnet,
and at least one contains the feldspathoids nepheline and cancrinite. The granitic intrusions consist of
variably porphyritic, coarse-grained, pink granite and monzonite, with hornblende as the dominant mafic
mineral. Whereas these granitic plutons tend to be uniform in texture and composition, the syenite and
monzodiorite plutons are characterized by abrupt internal variations in rock type ranging from dark-colored
pyroxenite to light-pink leucocratic granite, syenite, and trondhjemite.
The alkalic plutons range in size from 1.5 to 60 mi2 (3.9 – 155 km2) are oval to amoeboid in shape
and elongate to the northeast, and are eroded to middle and upper levels. All of the alkalic plutons produce
positive aeromagnetic anomalies; outcrops, although limited, confirm that these anomalies reflect the
shapes of the plutons. Several unexposed plutons, whose shapes are inferred from aeromagnetic data, have
been verified by test drilling. Field relationships show that these plutons are post-tectonic.
Although chemical data are not available for all of the plutons, those with analyses plot as alkalic in
terms of Na2O + K2O vs SiO2, but as mainly calc-alkalic on an AFM diagram. The syenitic and
monzodioritic clans are generally neither nepheline-normative to neither quartz- nor nepheline-normative,
with the exception of minor leucocratic phases. All are characterized by steep REE patterns and
exceptionally high concentrations of Ba and Sr.
INTRODUCTION
Recent mapping in northern and northeastern Minnesota, including the Koochiching-ItascaBeltrami County area (Jirsa and Boerboom, 1990) and western St. Louis County (Jirsa and others,
1991), has delineated several previously unrecognized subalkalic to alkalic plutons. This report
summarizes the lithological and intrusive relationships of several of these alkalic intrusions and briefly
summarizes their geochemical characteristics. Some plutons in this group, such as the Snowbank and
Kekekabic stocks and the Daisy Bay and Dead River plutons have been previously described (Geldon,
1972; Sims and Mudrey, 1972) and are not included in this report. Others (Coon Lake, Linden, Lost
Lake plutons) have been briefly described in the literature (Sims and others, 1970, 1972; Sims and
Mudrey, 1972), but are detailed here, as are others which have no published information or were
unknown (Fig. 5-1A). Alkalic rock complexes similar to these are well known in Ontario (for example
Sage, 1988a, 1988b, 1988c), but few have been described from Minnesota. Several other small alkalic
plutons are inferred from aeromagnetic data, but are not exposed or have not been drilled (Jirsa and
others, 1991).

109

�Trip 5 – Alkalic plutons
Characteristics of the Alkalic Rock Suite
The alkalic intrusions fall into three general categories – a syenitic group comprising the Coon
Lake, Linden, Gheen, and Baudette plutons; a monzodioritic group including the Side Lake, Morcom,
Idington, and Cook plutons; and a granitoid group containing the Bello Lake, Stingy Lake, and Rice River
plutons (Fig. 5-1). Although most classify into one of the three clans, the many phases in each pluton (Table
5-1) produce considerable overlap. The syenitic and monzodioritic intrusions consist mainly of medium- to
coarse-grained, porphyritic, pink and green syenite and monzodiorite, whereas the granitoid intrusions are
typically medium-grained, variably porphyritic, pink quartz monzonite or granodiorite. The syenite and
especially the monzodiorite plutons contain multiple erratic melanocratic to felsic phases with aegirineaugite as the predominant mafic mineral, whereas the granitoid plutons generally lack multiple phases, are
more uniform in texture, and contain mainly hornblende as the mafic phase.
Most of the alkalic plutons intrude metamorphosed volcanic and sedimentary rocks in the western Wawa
subprovince, but some are within the Quetico subprovince (Card and Ciesielski, 1986; Fig. 5-1A). All were
emplaced in the latest stages of the last major regional deformational event (Jirsa and others, 1992) or after
it. Several of the alkalic plutons are cut by northwest-trending Late Proterozoic diabase dikes of the KenoraKabetogama swarm, which have been dated al 2,125 Ma (Rb-Sr; Beck, 1988) [NOTE: more recent U-Pb
geochron ages of ca. 2067 -2070 Ma (Chamberlain and others, 2015; Schmitz and others 2006; Wirth and
others , 1995). The plutons are exposed at various levels, and many, such as the Gheen, Side Lake, and Lost
Lake, are exposed close to their roof zones. All of the alkalic plutons produce positive aeromagnetic
anomalies which generally conform to the pluton shape (Fig. 5-1B).
The major-element geochemistry of the alkalic plutonic rocks varies greatly as a result of their
diverse mineralogy. However, except for minor proportions of felsic differentiates, they are low in SiO2
(49-62 wt. % for syenites, 47 to 58 wt. % for monzodiorites, 61-70 wt. % for granites; Table 5-2), and
are mostly metaluminous to weakly peralkalic in composition (Fig. 5-2). The syenitic and
monzodioritic rocks are generally quartz-free to nepheline-normative, whereas the granite from the
Bello Lake pluton is mostly quartz-normative (Fig. 5-3). Except for one of the granites and a leucocratic
differentiate of the Idington pluton, all plot as alkalic in terms of Na20 + K20 vs Si02, but as calc-alkalic
to weakly alkalic on an AFM diagram. In all the plutons, Ba and Sr are in general highly enriched, but
vary between the different phases. However, the Coon Lake pluton although slightly enriched, is
surprisingly low in Ba and Sr, considering its extremely alkalic composition. The Linden pluton is
extremely enriched in Ba and Sr, with Ba values of up to 13,000 ppm and Sr values up to 8,100 ppm
reported from company drill cores. Chondrite-normalized REE patterns for the syenites and
monzodiorites are fairly consistent, with moderately steep slopes and negligible Eu anomalies (Fig. 5 6). No REE data are available for any of the granitoid plutons.

Table 5-1 (next page). Modal analyses of alkalic plutonic rocks; results in volume percent.
Linden analyses from Sims and others (1972, p. 161); samples with KIB and CD prefixes from
drill cores, all others from outcrops. Pyroxene includes aegirine to augite; n, points counted;
est, estimate

110

�Trip 5 – Alkalic plutons
Sample
Quartz
K-feldspar
Plagioclase
Pyroxene
Hornblende
Biotite
Muscovite
Chlorite
Epidote
Apatite
Sphene
Opaques
Calcite, Fl*
Nepheline
Cancrinite
Melanite
n

KIB-7
20
43
32
2
1
tr
tr
tr
2

est

Bello Lake
Coon Lake
KIB-39 KIB-40 DL-61 KIB-6
3
32
46
50
79
53
40
9
tr
8
5
2
1
8
1
tr
tr
tr
1
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
tr
1
tr
tr
tr
3
3
tr
tr
tr
33
15
2
2
2
est
est
1143
est

Gheen
Idington
Linden
C027 C029 C551X C552B C650 C561A Gnw7A Msw2A Gnw7-2
tr
41
2
tr
8
61
26
3
tr
3
77.6
56.2
37.1
21
7
29
55
32
88
1.9
5.6
0.4
12
31
49
16.8
25.9
57.1
46
19
8
6
7
5
7
4.1
0.4
4

4

1
1
tr
tr

2
3
2
5

2
2

1368

1114

989

2 Fl*

1157

tr
tr
2
2
tr

999

1
1
1

0.8
2.9

1.1
3.7
3.4

2.7
2.3

946

Side Lake satellites
Morcom
Stingy Rice R. Cook
Side Lake
Linden L-Sat
Sample
Gnw-7B CD-4 1242 C706B C533A C534A C543A C564A C603A CD-7** CD-7 CD-9 CD-17 CD-19
Quartz
26
13
K-feldspar
56.3
28
31
tr
13
2
28
1
29
7
20
22
30
Plagioclase
0.9
52
30
65
47
33
55
44
20
54
55
47
43
67
Pyroxene
27.1
16
17
22
26
30
47
21
5
Hypersthene
14
8
Hornblende
2
34
16
9
3
8
8
3
6
Biotite
9
7
4
1
3
20
1
7
10
1
Muscovite
1
14
3
1
1
4
Chlorite
Epidote
5
1
1
1
2
183
Apatite
5.2
1
tr
tr
2
2
1
1
0.5
tr
Sphene
1.5
2
2
I
1
1
0.5
1
0.5
tr
Opaques
1
1
tr
0.5
tr
Calcite
1
n
1166 1151
est
976 1188 947 1115 1137 988 1152 836
960
est
* Fluorite in sample C552B; ** Poikilitic and non-poikilitic phases, sample CD-7; L-Sat is intrusion beween Linden and Gheen

111

�Trip 5 – Alkalic plutons

Figure 1-1.

112

�Trip 5 – Alkalic plutons
SYENITIC PLUTONS
Most of the syenitic plutons are northwest of the other plutons (Fig. 5-1A). The Gheen and
Baudette plutons are within the Quetico subprovince, the Coon Lake pluton is in the Wawa subprovince,
and the Linden pluton straddles the subprovince border.
These plutons are distinguished by a preponderance of K-rich perthite, typically as trachytic,
blocky phenocrysts in an aegirine-rich groundmass, or an amphibole-rich groundmass in the case of
the Gheen pluton. . The Gheen and Linden plutons contain quartz, chlorite, apatite, epidote, titanite,
opaque oxides, and pyrite as ubiquitous but generally minor constituents. The Coon Lake pluton differs
from all others in that it contains substantial nepheline and cancrinite; the Baudette pluton lacks both
feldspathoids and quartz. Melanite garnet is present in the Coon Lake and Baudette plutons, and in
some phases of the Linden. A distinctive phase of spotted monzodiorite with centimeter-size poikilitic
feldspar enclosing pyroxene, hornblende, plagioclase, biotite, and sphene is present in both the Linden
and Gheen plutons and in plutons of the monzodiorite clan. Although the Gheen and parts of the Linden
plutons are texturally similar to rocks of the monzodiorite clan, they differ by having phenocrysts of
pink perthite instead of gray antiperthite.
Trachytic fabric in the syenitic intrusions conforms to the pluton edges and dips steeply toward
the pluton centers. However, outcrops are generally limited to the pluton borders, and the Baudette
and Linden satellite intrusions are seen only in drill core. Aeromagnetic signatures correspond with
intrusion shapes, whether it be a consistent oval like the Baudette, Coon Lake, and Linden plutons, or
irregular and amoeboid like the Gheen and Linden satellite plutons (Fig. 5-l B).
Coon Lake Pluton
The Coon Lake pluton (Fig. 5-l; Jirsa, 1990; Jirsa and Boerboom, 1990) is a 48-mi2 subcircular
pluton which intrudes mafic to felsic volcanic rocks metamorphosed to greenschist grade. A narrow
aureole of amphibolite-grade metamorphism accompanied pluton emplacement. The pluton has a
strongly magnetic border and internal lithological zonation is indicated by a circular, weakly positive
magnetic anomaly within the pluton. Its north and northeast edges are exposed in scattered outcrops, and
a single 10-foot-long vertical drill core was obtained from the pluton center (Boerboom and others,
1989).
The main rock type in the exposed and cored portions of the Coon Lake pluton is pink to gray,
medium- to very coarse grained, slightly to strongly porphyritic nepheline syenite, 50-79%
microperthite, 15-33% nepheline {Ne76-80) 2-5% aegirine (Ac23Wo18En7Fs52), and as much as 9%
plagioclase, 2% cancrinite, and 3% melanite, together with accessory sphene, apatite , biotite,
magnetite, muscovite , and zircon (Tables 5-1 and 5-3, Fig. 5-7). Minor proportions of pyroxenite
occur in ill-defined dikelets. String- and braid-textured microperthite forms rectangular crystals with
minor inclusions of aegirine, sphene, cancrinite, and nepheline. Nepheline is typically anhedral but
locally euhedral, up to 2 mm in size, and ranges from fresh to moderately altered to an unknown fibrous
mineral of low birefringence. Prismatic, grass- green aegirine formed early in the crystallization
sequence and is trachytic. Plagioclase and cancrinite are interstitial, the latter as colorless, highly
birefringent fibrous grains. Melanite garnet forms subhedral, dark-brown grains up to 1 cm across
with inclusions of aegirine and altered feldspar. In places the syenite consists of trachytic, purplishbrown, rectangular perthite crystals up to 7 cm in length, with minor nepheline, melanite, biotite, and
aegirine. A syenite dike that cuts mafic volcanic rocks outboard of the main pluton contains an
estimated 1% scolecite and a trace of blue corundum. Netlike anastomosing veinlets of white nepheline
parallel to the vertical trachytic fabric of the feldspar in drill core from the center of the pluton imply
that a late influx of volatiles affected the magnetic signature of the pluton's interior.

113

�Trip 5 – Alkalic plutons
Table 5-2. Major- and select minor-element geochemical analyses of alkalic rocks [Major elements in wt%
oxides, minor elements in ppm, blank – nod determined. See Boerboom 1994 for more information.
Bello Lake
Coon Lake
Gheen
Morcom
Sample

KIB-7

KIB-40

SiO2
Al2O3
CaO
MgO
Na2O
K2O
Fe2O3t
FeO
Fe2O3c
MnO
TiO2
P2O5
LOI
Total
Rb
Sr
Y
Zr
Nb
Ba
Ni
Cu
Zn
Cs
La
Ce
Pr
Nd
Sm
Eu
Gd
Tb
Dy
Ho
Er
Tm
Yb
Lu
Hf
V
Cr
Li
B

69.7
15.7
1.87
0.51
5.67
3.51
1.84
0.4
1.4
0.04
0.2
0.09
0.7
100.2
165
1210
&lt;10
90
&lt;10
1340

63.9
17.4
2.16
1.28
6.13
4.47
3.32
1
2.21
0.07
0.35
0.18
0.77
100.4
135
1340
41
303
14
1470

F

KIB39

60.2
17.2
3.55
1.85
6.3
4.4
3.94
1
2.83
0.08
0.42
0.32
1
99.8
129
2180
17
253
14
1970

KIB-6

CLP-1

I-561A

DL-61

C029

C027

12, IC-2

CD-7

57.7
17.8
5.45
0.42
5.75
5.8
2.71
0.3
2.38
0.07
0.26
0.11
2.77
99.6
100
3700
81
64
15
2530

62.3
18.9
0.33
0.35
5.32
9.3
2.18
1.6
0.76
0.05
0.18
0.02
0.85
100.1
246
1300
&lt;10
118
24
676
8
8.7
70.3
9
17.5
33

60.3
22.4
1.69
0.28
7.1
4.13
2.54
1.7
1.78
175 ppm
0.19
&lt;10 ppm
1.31
100.1
132
806
10
404
27
500
&lt;l
9.8
46.3
3
79.3
130
12.8
39.7
5.5
1.45
3.9
0.5
2.6
0.49
1.4
0.5
1.4
0.19
9
45
29
74
41

55.65
21.88
1.65
1.01
8.12
7.28
3.67
6.08
5
0.08
0.44
0.08
0.37
100.38
100
926
2
119

49.2
9.52
12.3
10.5
1.51
2.4
10.2

49.65
9.27
13.08
8.89
2.38
1.71
11.76

58.5
l5.4
5.01
3.58
5.9
3.8
5.22

0.16
0.88
0.33
2.39
99.5
60
290
14
84
13
697
94
40.8
80.1
2
20.8
46

0.56
0.89
0.06
1.99
99.93
79
1470
&lt;10

0.1
0.48
0.29
1.08
99.7

215
7
16
30
4.5
27
58

56
14.1
6.48
2.55
3.57
6.56
6.19
3.2
1.66
0.12
0.71
1.03
1.85
99.9
120
2520
47
331
24
3710
78
5.5
84.5
1
130
328

33
5.1
1.21

186
34.7
9.3

24
5.7
1.9

0.4

2.3

0.7

0.65
0.1
4

2.3
0.2
8

1.7
0.2
3

11
39
&lt;10

67
&lt;10
&lt;10

630
&lt;10
&lt;10

160

850

11.2
8.18

11
1.7
0.4
&lt;0.5

22

26

36

&lt;10

0.2
&lt;0.1
4
20
10
18
30

114

Cs

�Trip 5 – Alkalic plutons
Idington
Sample

C552B

SiO2
Al2O3
CaO
MgO
Na2O
K2O
Fe2O3t
FeO
Fe2O3c
MnO
TiO2
P2O5
LOI
Total
Rb
Sr
y
Zr
Nb
Ba
Ni
Cu
Zn
Cs
La
Ce
Pr
Nd
Sm
Eu
Gd
Tb
Dy
Ho
Er
Tm
Yb
Lu
Hf
V
Cr
Li
B
F

74.5
14.8
0.08
0.09
8.8
1.08
0.51

0.03
0.03
0.02
0.16
100.1
97
43
&lt;10
36
30
81
&lt;1
1.5
28.6
7
5.9
10
&lt;5
0.2
0.2
&lt;0.5

&lt;0.2
&lt;0.1
2
&lt;10
4
&lt;10
20

10, IC2- 11, IC-2

47.27
6.99
20.49
9.18
1.91
0.89
9.15
5.44
3.1
0.3
0.67
1.62
1.33
99.28

50.27
7.61
13.87
7.92
2.41
3.63
10.68
7.04
2.86
0.2
1.51
1.46
0.84
99.91

Linden

L’ndn
Sat

Side
Lk-Sat

Side Lake

Cook

C650A

C551X

8, IC-2

MN-10

CD-4-92

C564A

1242

C706B

CD-19

48.3
7.24
16.6
9.58
2.12
1.23
IO.IO
6
3.43
0.19
1
1.25
0.77
98.6
59
772
37
262
15
817
76
185
125
9
164
348
41.4
171
27.9
6.99
18.2
2
8.8
1.46
3.2
0.3
2.6
0.32
7.6
256
140
231
14
2900

54
13.1
8.16
4.56
4.24
3.86
7.05
3.3
3.38
0.13
0.96
0.75
1.23
98.5
57
1770
26
181
9
1830
64
54.9
120
1
134
278
30.8
124
19.2
5.14
11.8
1.3
6.4
1.01
1.9
0.2
1.6
0.22
5
148
120
76
14
1400

60.21
16.28
4.76
2.21
3.78
6.32
4.29
1.62
2.49
0.08
0.56
0.23
0.73
99.76

57.1
10.2
10.1
4.43
2.64
6.52
6.51
2.83
3.36
0.15
0.64
1.07

62.2
15
4.09
1.62
6.57
4.73
3.98
1.4
2.42
0.09
0.48
0.24
0.54
99.9
94
510
10
246
14
2290

52.2
11.7
9.89
7.08
4.04
2.22
10.3

55.2
14.6
7.38
6.89
3.42
2.95
7.93

0.19
0.81
0.45
1.08
100.2
67
1080
&lt;10
102
21
985
57
108
128
2
50.6
101

0.14
0.77
0.39
0.23
100.2
60
1030
20
30
10
1220

53.5
15.4
7.68
6.25
3.79
2.21
8.37
5.7
2.04
0.15
0.76
0.39
0.47
99.3
31
1190
20
82
2
1530
61
20.4
108
1
43.2
88
11.3
48.8
9.3
2.81
6.4
0.8
4.1
0.73
1.8
0.2
1.6
0.23
2.2
208
180
26
&lt;10
680

53.6
17.7
7.59
3.26
5.4
1.79
7.07
2.6
4.18
0.13
0.71
0.36
1.54
99.5
39
1950
&lt;10
110
15
882

99.1
164
2924

3574

406
183
28.1
6.62
16.6

46
8.9
2.4
0.6

1.53
0.262

115

1.4
0.2
4
210
80
84
&lt;10

�Trip 5 – Alkalic plutons

Figure 5-3. Modal (A) and normative (B)
compositions of the alkalic plutonic rocks.
Compositional fields from Streckeisen (1973), except
“P” corner, which consists of albite and anorthite, used
here to emphasize variations in K content. Q, quartz;
F, feldspathoids; A, alkali feldspars; P, plagioclase.
Circled symbols are feldspathoidal, not quartz.

Figure 5-4. Geochemical discrimination diagrams. (A)
Alkalic versus subalkalic discrimination diagram;
modified from Irvine and Baragar (1971). (B) AFM
diagram for the alkalic plutonic rocks; modified from
Barker and Arth (1976).

Figure 5-5. Harker diagrams for the alkalic plutonic
116 rocks, in wt % oxides recalculated to no loss on ignition.

�Trip 5 – Alkalic plutons

Figure 5-6. Chondrite-normalized rare-earth-element patterns for the alkalic plutonic rocks for which
analyses are available.

Figure 5-7. Pyroxene compositions from the Coon
Like and Linden plutons. Pyroxene compositions
from Poohbah Lake (Sage, 1988a) and compositions
of pure aegirine (Deer and others, 1966, p. 107) shown
for comparison.

117

�Trip 5 – Alkalic plutons
Table 5-3. Microprobe analyses of minerals from the Coon Lake and Linden plutons. [Linden results from Sims and others (1972). Chemical analyses
in weight percent oxides. Cancrinite totals low due to abundance of volatiles. Table is continued on next page.
Biotite

Aegirine
Coon Lake

Linden

Coon Lake

Sphene
Linden

Coon Lake

Linden

SiO2

51.49

51.62

51.8

53

46.85

37.16

35.69

44

43

30.01

30.65

31

TiO2

0.58

0.54

0.48

0.5

2.13

2.66

3.13

0.5

0.5

37.17

34.62

31

Al2O3

1.35

1.34

1.38

1

2.5

13.96

12.34

11

13

0.55

0.57

3.5

FeO

25.43

25.36

25.74

14.8

16.97

21.02

18.42

18

14

2.06

2.34

3

MnO

0.33

0.41

0.44

0.31

1.13

1.11

0.01

0.06

MgO

1.96

2.00

1.85

8.6

8.17

9.32

10.03

0.02

0.02

CaO

6.74

6.92

6.29

18.8

17.85

0

0.01

26.51

25.44

29

Na2O

9.74

9.51

9.88

3.5

2.49

0.14

0.22

1

1

0.29

0.33

3.3

K2O

0.00

0

0.00

0.5

0.5

9.21

9.34

10.5

11.5

0.01

0.01

Cr203

0.00

0.02

0.00

nd

0.01

0

0.00

0

Total

97.62

97.70

97.85

99.84

94.60

90.28

96.62

94.04

100.80

100.7

Number of cations based on 6 oxygen

14

99.0

16.2

99.20

Number of cations based on 24 oxygen

Si

2.1

2.1

2.1

2.02

1.88

6.31

6.33

6.96

6.71

4.89

5.11

4.91

Ti

0.02

0.02

0.01

0.01

0.06

0.34

0.42

0.06

0.06

4.55

4.34

3.69

Al

0.06

0.06

0.07

0.04

0.12

2.79

2.58

2.05

2.39

0.11

0.11

0.65

Fe

0.87

0.86

0.87

0.47

0.57

2.98

2.73

2.38

1.83

0.28

0.33

0.40

Mn

0.01

0.01

O.D2

0

0.01

0.16

0.17

0.00

0.01

Mg

0.12

0.12

0.11

0.49

0.49

2.36

2.65

3.3

3.77

0.01

0.01

Ca

0.29

0.3

0.27

0.77

0.77

0

0.00

0.00

0.00

4.63

4.54

4.92

Na

0.77

0.75

0.78

0.26

0.19

0.05

0.08

0.31

0.3

0.09

0.11

1.01

K

0

0

0

0.02

0,03

1.99

2.1I

2.12

2.29

0.00

0.00

Cr

0

0

0

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

118

�Trip 5 – Alkalic plutons
Table 5-3 continued
Exsolved
albite

Perthite

Nepheline

Coon Lake

Linden

Cancrinite

Coon Lake

Coon Lake

SiO2

72.37

63.422

66.725

67.493

66.235

61.5

46.153

46.641

48.068

46.297

45.345

37.455

37.613

37.472

Al2O3

19.868

15.347

17.527

18.889

18.612

19

33.061

34.701

35.152

34.217

33.123

28.053

26.956

28.416

BaO

0.000

0.000

0.132

0.000

0.104

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.028

0.000

0.122

0

0

CaO

0.031

0.000

0.018

0.001

0.000

0.5

0.084

0.076

0.116

0.102

0.484

5.583

5.432

5.348

Na2O

10.58

0.646

3.055

3.785

0.716

1.5

15.947

14.848

13.198

15.917

13.574

18.776

18.468

18.201

K 2O

1.268

12.139

12.521

12.016

15.932

15.8

6.186

6.211

5.877

6.133

6.068

0.04

0.052

0.206

Total

104.118

91.553

99.977

102.185

101.598

99.8

101.43

102.476

102.412

102.693

98.594

90.029

88.52

89.643

Number of cations based on 8 oxygen

Number of cations based on 32 oxygen

No. of cations based on 12 O

Si

3.03

3.13

3.04

3

3.01

2.92

8.67

8.62

8.79

8.59

8.70

3.02

3.08

3.02

Al

0.98

0.89

0.94

0.99

1

1.06

7.33

7.56

7.58

7.48

7.49

2.67

2.6

2.7

Ba

0

0

0.01

0

0.01

0

0

0

0.01

0

0.01

0

0

Ca

0

0

0

0

0

0.03

0.02

0.02

0.02

0.02

0.10

0.48

0.48

0.46

Na

0.86

0.06

0.27

0.33

0.06

0.14

5.81

5.32

4.68

5.72

5.05

2.94

·2.93

2.85

K

0,07

0.76

0.73

0.68

0.92

0.96

1.48

1.46

1.37

1.45

1.49

0

0.01

0.02

119

�Trip 5 – Alkalic plutons

Linden Pluton
The Linden pluton [2681.00±0.29 Ma] and its smaller satellite to the east intrude mafic
to felsic volcaniclastic and sedimentary rocks that are metamorphosed to the sillimanite grade
at the north edge of the pluton and to chlorite grade at the southern edge. A narrow
amphibolite-grade metamorphic aureole surrounds the pluton (Jirsa and others, 1992), as is
evident in drill core LF-1 (Fig. 5-1). In this core, thin syenitic dikelets cut biotite-amphibole
schist that has centimeter-thick green bands dominated by bright-green sodic amphibole and
brown bands dominated by biotite. The country rock here is of sillimanite grade, and the
aureole along the north edge of the Linden pluton may reflect retrogression. Sims and others
(1972), who describe amphibolite-grade contact metamorphism of mafic volcanic rocks
adjacent to the western margin of the pluton, suggest that the foliation at a high angle to the
regional fabric is the result of forcible pluton emplacement.
The Linden pluton is roughly 54 mi2 in size and elongate to the northwest, whereas the
satellitic intrusion is about 4.5 mi2 in size and elongate to the northeast (Fig. 5-1). Exposures are
limited to the pluton edges, but ten drill cores from the pluton were obtained by various private
and governmental agencies. Records of these cores and the cores themselves are on file at the
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Division of minerals in Hibbing. A summary of the
cores is given in Table 5-4. The LP-series of drill cores were subsequently examined by
Himmelberg (1973), and thin sections from these cores were briefly reexamined in conjunction
with this report. The LP-series descriptions are directly from company logs, and the OB­ series
descriptions are from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Division of Minerals
(Martin and others, 1988). The target of company drilling is not known, but complete metals
analyses, together with Na, K, Al, Ca, Ba, and Sr abundances, were obtained by the
explorationists. The satellite intrusion is not exposed, but one short drill core was obtained by the
Minnesota Geological Survey (Meints and others, 1993).
The main Linden pluton is generally uniform in composition within the exposed
portions and in the drill cores. The typical phase consists of trachytic, variably porphyritic,
salmon-pink and greenish-black, medium-to coarse-grained aegirine-augite syenite with
conspicuous dark-brown sphene and centimeter-scale elliptical pyroxenite clots. As reported by
Sims and others (1972), and confirmed here, the dominant minerals of the syenite are braidtextured perthite and dark-green aegirine-augite (Ac7Wo41En26Fs25, Table 5-3 and Fig. 5-7),
with variable but lesser amounts of plagioclase, sphene, apatite, biotite, hornblende, magnetite,
and epidote. Modal analyses and compositions of selected minerals are summarized in Tables 51 and 5-3. Complete descriptions of exposures are given in Sims and others (1972), and the drill
cores are summarized in Table 5-4.
Textures in the groundmass of drill holes CD-13 (Meints and others, 1993) and LF-2 are
suggestive of cataclasis, yet other features in these cores, such as tabular plagioclase, blocky
pseudomorphic biotite and epidote (presumably after pyroxene), and euhedral diamond-shaped
sphene, show no evidence of brittle deformation. Thus the granoblastic fabric of the groundmass
is most likely the result of plastic flow deformation of a viscous, mostly crystallized magma, in
conjunction with late deuteric fluids. Drill hole CD-4 in the Linden satellite also contains zones
of moderately sheared syenite characterized by rounded, rolled feldspar phenocrysts, suggestions
of C­ S fabric, and streaky pink and gray segregations. Shear bands &lt;I inch to 10 feet thick are
foliated parallel to the trachytic fabric of unsheared portions, and the mineralogy of the sheared
rock in thin section is identical to that of the undeformed portions (Table 5-1). As is the case in
the Linden pluton proper, the annealed texture implies that deformation occurred in a hot,
120

�Trip 5 – Alkalic plutons
semiplastic state, under near-magmatic temperatures. These submagmatic deformation features
are also present in the Idington and Coon Lake plutons.
Gheen Pluton
The Gheen pluton, some 3 miles east of the Linden pluton, intrudes sillimanite-grade
metasedimentary rocks. It is currently exposed at a high level, and its magnetic signature
conforms to the long, sinuous, northeast­ elongate shape deduced from scattered outcrops
along the length of the body. Local trachytic fabric defined by tabular perthite phenocrysts is
steep and subconformable to the pluton contacts and the pluton shape at both map and outcrop
scale is subcordant to the schistosity of the host supracrustal rocks.
The pluton is chiefly mesocratic, pink and dark-green, porphyritic syenite and ranges to
dark-greenish-black, coarse-grained pyroxenite and leucocratic, pink, coarse­ grained alkalifeldspar syenite. Conflicting internal intrusive relationships are common, with melanocratic
phases occurring both as inclusions and as dikes in the porphyritic phase. However, pink
leucosyenite dikelets cross all other phases. Mesocratic syenite phases contain 1- to 3-cm
tabular perthite phenocrysts in a groundmass of fibrous amphibole, euhedral sphene, blocky
oxides, stubby prismatic apatite, and minor calcite and epidote. Trace amounts of dark-green
pyroxene are present, but most has been deuterically altered to bright-green fibrous amphibole.
Calcite occurs both in irregular veinlets with amphibole and as magmatic, interstitial grains against
sharp comers of feldspar phenocrysts. The melanocratic monzodiorite phase consists predominantly
of relict pale-green pyroxene up to 2.5 mm across and lesser amounts of sericitized plagioclase, finegrained, euhedral sphene, and apatite. The pyroxene is variably replaced by euhedral, pale-green
hornblende. Biotite occurs as brown books within hornblende, and is slightly altered to chlorite.
Unaltered microperthite occupies a late anhedral interstitial position.
Sills of pink, leucocratic, coarse-grained syenite up to 10 feet wide emanate from the Gheen
pluton and cut adjacent metasedimentary rocks. This phase is characterized by irregular
microcline phenocrysts in a seriate groundmass of macroscopically identified, pink microcline,
fine-grained biotite, and minor white albite. Local planar miariolitic cavities lined with K-feldspar
crystals are consistent with the interpretation that the pluton is exposed at a high level.
The Gheen pluton differs from the other alkalic intrusions by its pervasive deuteric alteration and
relatively abundant chalcopyrite. Modal analyses of the melanocratic and porphyritic mesocratic
phases are listed in Table 5-1 and shown on Figure 5-3.

121

�Trip 5 – Alkalic plutons
Table 5-4. Descriptions of cores from the Linden pluton; Dominant lithology in bold type.
Drill
Description
Hole
Pink, slightly porphyritic, medium-grained homogeneous leuco alkalifeldspar syenite. Trachytic foliation defined by aligned mafic minerals.
LF-2
Feldspar varies from coarse blocky phenocrysts with recrystallized edges
to granoblastic groundmass.
LF-3

LF-4
LF-5

Dark-gray, slightly porphyritic, fine- to medium-grained heterogeneous
poikilitic syenite to monzonite. Poikilitic feldspar encloses pyroxene,
biotite, and sphene. Weak trachytic fabric defined by aligned pyroxenes
and feldspar oikocrysts. Feldspathic dikelets and aegirine veinlets.
Light-grayish-white, medium-grained, granular to hypidiomorphic
hornblende monzonite with 1-cm mafic segregations. Deuteric pyroxene
alteration.
Light-pinkish-gray, medium- to coarse-grained, moderately porphyritic
syenite; 2- to 4-cm mafic segregations of slightly porphyritic, euhedral
aegirine in groundmass of feldspar, hornblende, sphene, etc.

Mineralogy
Perthite, biotite, muscovite, aegerine, melanite,
sphene, calcite, epidote, oxides, pyrite.

Microperthite that grades to antiperthite, pyroxene,
biotite, sphene, apatite
Perthite, antiperthite, hornblende-biotite-oxide
clusters after pyroxene, epidote, sphene, apatite,
calcite in brittle veinlets.
Perthite, aegirine, sphene, apatite, oxides,
hornblende, biotite, chlorite.
Perthite, aegirine-augite, biotite, sphene,
apatite, oxides.
Red-stained perthite, fine granular plagioclase,
stilpnomelane after biotite, chlorite after hornblende
or pyroxene, leucoxene after sphene.
Very coarse feldspar, 7-80% aegirine, sphene. Not
described.

OB-207

Pinkish-gray, coarse-grained, trachytic, aegirine syenite.

OB-212

Coarse-grained, green and pink, trachytic syenite. Deuteric alteration of
mafic minerals.

LP-1

Pink, coarse-grained syenite with erratic distribution of mafic minerals.
Contains a 1-foot-wide dike of melasyenite (biotite pyroxene-carbonate).

LP-2

Upper 20 feet, leucosyenite with 75-90° dipping trachytic fabric; rest is
pink and green mesocratic syenite with biotite segregations.

Not described

CD-13

Pink and green, coarse-grained, weakly trachytic syenite with annealed
cataclastic texture. Microperthite phenocrysts, pyroxene altered to tabular
clusters of biotite plus epidote. Foliated matrix of fine-grained
plagioclase.

Microperthite, plagioclase, biotite, epidote,
melanite, sphene, sericite.

CD--4
Linden
Satellite

Gray, coarse-grained, trachytic, porphyritic syenite with narrow pink and
green, fine-grained shear bands. Granoblastic-recrystallized texture in
shear bands grades into unsheared rock, contains rolled feldspar
phenocrysts. Sheared portions of same mineralogy as unsheared.

In unsheared portion, tabular perthite rimmed by
granular plagioclase, zoned euhedral aegirine-augite
rimmed by pale-green fibrous amphibole. Apatite,
chlorite, sphene, allanite, oxides.

122

�Trip 5 – Alkalic plutons
Baudette pluton, Lake of the Woods County
The Baudette pluton is not exposed, but is seen in a drill core obtained by the Minnesota Geological
Survey (hole 1986-CUSMAP-1; Mills and others, 1987). It is located 8 miles south of the town of Baudette,
in Lake of the Woods County, and intrudes felsic schists. As judged from geophysical data, the pluton is
approximately 1 mile long and half a mile wide, but the best resolution of available geophysics is only
1:250,000 (USGS data in Chandler, 1991).
The core consists of coarse-grained, green and pink, porphyritic garnet-biotite syenite. Trachytoid
phenocrysts of pink perthite up to 2 cm long with irregular granular borders are in a groundmass of green
biotite, melanite garnet, plagioclase, lesser epidote, sphene, and aegirine­ augite, and accessory apatite and
zircon or monazite. The brownish-yellow melanite varies from small euhedral crystals to large granular
masses enclosed within coarser green biotite. The biotite varies greatly in grain size from fine-grained mats
to medium-grained books with a decussate intergrown fabric.
MONZODIORITE CLAN
The monzodioritic group includes the Side Lake, Morcom, Idington, Lost Lake, and Cook
plutons, as well as the Daisy Bay pluton (Sims and Mudrey, 1972), which is shown on Figure 5-1 but
not discussed here. All are within the Wawa subprovince, adjacent to the north edge of the Shannon
Lake granite phase of the Giants Range batholith (Jirsa and others, 1991).
These plutons tend to be irregular in shape and elongate to the northeast, parallel to the regional
D2 fabric (Jirsa and others, 1992) of the supracrustal country rocks. The rock is largely pink and green
porphyritic monzodiorite, but varies erratically to dark-green pyroxenite and pink granite,
granodiorite, and Na-rich trondhjemite. The pyroxenite tends to occur in small irregular pods and
segregations, whereas the felsic differentiates occur in thin, straight dikes and in larger segregations.
In addition, the monzodiorite group contains minor dark-green poikilitic phases in which antiperthite is
grown over pyroxene, sphene, apatite, and hornblende.
Porphyritic phases typically have strong trachytoid fabrics, defined by aligned feldspar
phenocrysts that are subconformable to the borders but more erratic in the centers of the intrusions.
The typical porphyritic phase is characterized by coarse, blocky, pink to gray phenocrysts of Na-rich
antiperthite in a groundrnass of predominantly fine-grained euhedral aegirine-augite, along with
sphene, perthite, polygonal plagioclase, lesser proportions of hornblende, biotite, apatite, epidote,
chlorite, opaque oxides, and rare quartz. Feldspar phenocrysts are typically antiperthitic, but range from
albitic plagioclase to strongly perthitic K-feldspar. The normative composition is commonly midway
between the K-rich and Na-rich end members in contrast to the compositions implied by point counting,
because of difficulties in properly quantifying modal abundances of the strongly exsolved feldspars
(Fig. 5-3B).
Idington Pluton
The Idington pluton is located in west-central St. Louis County near the former village of Idington.
Its irregular horseshoe shape, roughly 8 mi2 in size, is elongate to the northeast (Fig. 5-1). Trachytic
foliations are predominantly northeast-oriented, subcordant to the pluton boundary, and dip generally more
than 70°. However, exposures are limited to central parts of the pluton, where trachytic fabrics are less
likely to conform to the pluton shape. The pluton has a rather irregular magnetic anomaly (Fig. 5-1), but
the magnetic pattern has been somewhat obscured by a 150-foot-wide, strongly magnetic diabase dike and
possibly by late north-trending brittle faults. No contact relationships with country rocks were observed,
except at the southwestern edge of the pluton, where it is intruded by the 2,674-Ma Shannon Lake granite
of the Giants Range batholith (Jirsa and others, 1991; Boerboom and Zartman, 1993).

123

�Trip 5 – Alkalic plutons
Rock types in the Idington pluton are consistent in mineralogy but extremely erratic in modal
proportions. Mesocratic, porphyritic pyroxene monzonite predominates, but dark-green aegirine-augite
pyroxenite is common, and a small proportion of pink, sodic leucotrondhjemite occurs in aplopegmatite
dikes 1 to 10 cm wide in the heart of the pluton. A mappable segregation of leucotrondhjemite exposed
at the pluton's northeast corner contains minor flat-lying vuggy fractures lined with purple fluorite and
a dark brown translucent tetragonal mineral tentatively identified as zircon or cassiterite.
Modal analyses from four samples of the Idington pluton (porphyritic phase-C.551.X,
pyroxenite phase­ C.650.A, and two felsic differentiates-C.552.B and C.561.A) are listed in Table 51. In the porphyritic phase, feldspar phenocrysts are mostly gray, rectangular, 1- to 4- cm crystals of
coarsely exsolved antiperthite, but small intergrown polygonal grains of plagioclase and perthite also
are abundant in the groundmass. Aegirine-augite crystals are prismatic, weakly pleochroic, and zoned
with darker green rims. Apatite inclusions are common near the edges of pyroxene crystals. Euhedral,
dark-brown sphene is prominent in hand sample and is microscopically associated with biotite.
Melanocratic diorite is medium to coarse grained, with trachytically aligned aegirine-augite prisms in
a groundmass dominated by fresh, zoned, anhedral plagioclase. Hornblende in this phase occurs as
dark-green patches of secondary origin within pyroxene and as larger subpoikilitic grains with
inclusions of apatite, pyroxene, and plagioclase. Green biotite forms clusters of euhedral blocky grains
aligned parallel to the trachytic fabric. Sphene is mostly euhedral, but locally is subpoikilitic-anhedral
and partially encloses pyroxene and other mafic minerals. Accessory minerals include allanite and
secondary chlorite, calcite, and epidote. The leucocratic differentiate contains albitic feldspar as large
as 40 cm across, which is characterized by graphic Intergrowths with quartz. Aplitic parts of the
leuco-phase contain radial-plumose sheaves of albite as long as 3 cm.
The erratic distribution between phases, which typifies exposures of this intrusion, can be
documented on an outcrop scale to have formed by filter-pressing of a mafic liquid out of a feldsparphenocryst slurry. The groundmass in the porphyry is identical to the melanocratic pyroxenite, which
occurs as irregular amoeboid to net-vein segregations as large as several feet. However, at the
southwestern end of the pluton, cumulus modal layering is also present in the form of melanocratic
layers tens of centimeters thick interlayered with mesocratic, porphyritic diorite. This diorite itself
shows layering by changes in phenocryst size and abundance and trachytoid foliation parallel to
layering. The layering and trachytic fabric have been drag-folded into widely spaced, crosscutting
ductile shear bands, which lack cleavage or schistosity, but instead have an annealed, granoblastic habit
similar to that in the Linden pluton. Pink granite pegmatite dikelets (Shannon Lake granite?)
commonly occupy these shear planes. In these bands, elliptical deformed relict feldspar phenocrysts are
recrystallized into granoblastic aggregates, and the pyroxenes have been replaced by bright-green
hornblende. The annealed textures and lack of through-going fabric development imply that ductile
deformation, recrystallization, and annealment, caused by self-induced strain during emplacement or
the last vestiges of regional deformation, occurred while the rock was still hot.
In a series of exposures along Highway 53 at the south edge of the Idington pluton a sharp line of
demarcation exists whereby outcrops of Shannon Lake granite have inclusions only of Idington
monzodiorite north of an east-west line, and those south of it have inclusions only of granodiorite
derived from the Britt pluton, an early, D2-deformed intrusion (Jirsa and others, 1991, 1992). This
implies that the earlier intrusive contact of the Idington pluton into the Britt granodiorite was
overprinted but preserved by upward stoping of the Shannon Lake granite (Boerboom and Zartman,
1993).
Side Lake Pluton
The long, arcuate Side Lake pluton, roughly 27 mi2 in dimension, extends eastward from Side Lake
in western St. Louis County. The pluton crops out only at its very western and eastern limits. Two exposed
satellitic plugs off the eastern tip of the main pluton (Fig. 5-1) are identical in mineralogy to, and
124

�Trip 5 – Alkalic plutons
conterminous with, the eastern end of the Side Lake pluton. These satellites have complex intrusive
relationships with the country rocks, and are described in a separate section below. The main pluton intrudes
metamorphosed basaltic volcanic and felsic sedimentary rocks along most of its length. It is just north of
the Shannon Lake granite, but intrusive relationships with the granite are unknown because of lack of
exposure. Crosscutting Proterozoic diabase dikes have lowered the magnetism along their length, in contrast
to the Idington pluton, where the diabase dikes have enhanced the magnetism.
Rocks from the exposures of the Side Lake pluton range from mesocratic biotite-hyperstheneclinopyroxene diorite on the west to hornblende monzodiorite on the east Trachytic fabrics in most outcrops
are generally conformable to the margins of the pluton. Segregations of melanocratic pyroxenite to
hornblendite occur throughout the intrusion, but are more abundant to the west, where they occur as
irregular dikelets, segregations, and small inclusions in mesocratic diorite. In addition, dikes of diorite and
pyroxenite up to 150 feet wide, which emanate from the western margin of the pluton, are parallel to the
pluton boundary and intrude metabasaltic rocks. These dikes are clearly discordant to the regional
metamorphic fabric in the intruded basalts; some of them contain wispy felsic stringers parallel to their
walls produced by flow segregation. Thin, straight, late-stage pink granitic to syenitic dikelets are
common within and adjacent to the pluton.
Mesocratic, medium-grained, pinkish-gray diorite, which predominates at the western end, contains
5-10% tiny euhedral grains of pleochroic pale-pink to green hypersthene, and at least 20% euhedral, palegreen clinopyroxene with light-colored rims. These pyroxenes range in size from less than 1 to 3 mm; the
hypersthene is generally finer grained, and the clinopyroxene is variably phenocrystic. Plagioclase is the
predominant feldspar. A sample from the pluton 200 feet from the western contact contains strongly zoned,
subhedral, trachytic plagioclase, with fuzzy grain boundaries. Another thin section 500 feet from the contact
has fine-grained granoblastic plagioclase, orthoclase, and quartz between larger augite phenocrysts. Apatite
is abundant as fine-grained euhedral prismatic grains included within pyroxene and feldspar. Oxides occur
both within augite as wormy blebs of apparent secondary origin and as scattered blocky, fine-grained
crystals. Sphene is rare or lacking at the western end. Brown biotite is a generally minor component at the
western end of the pluton, but in some outcrops composes up to 5% of the rock. It locally forms vertically
oriented poikilitic plates that are up to 2 cm long and oriented parallel to the trachytic fabric of the
monzodiorite.
The eastern outcrops consist of moderately heterogeneous, medium- to coarse-grained, pink and
green pyroxene-hornblende monzodiorite. Here moderately developed trachytic foliation plunges 2030° to the souL'1west, down the axis of the pluton. Fine-grained, centimeter-sized, angular cognate
xenoliths of mafic monzodiorite, in addition to dark-green mafic stringers, are common.
Side Lake Pluton Satellites
Two small plugs are exposed northeast of the Side Lake pluton. One, about 1/4 mile east of the
Side Lake pluton, is round and 3/4 mile in diameter. It consists of medium- to coarse-grained, trachytic,
weakly porphyritic, green and pink hornblende-pyroxene monzodiorite. Subhedral 5-mm orange-white
antiperthite and scattered 2-mm aegirine-augite phenocrysts are set in a fine-grained groundmass of
green prismatic pyroxene, fine-grained anhedral feldspar of unknown composition, minor hornblende,
and brownish-green biotite mostly replaced by chlorite. Apatite, biotite, opaques (oxides and pyrite), and
sphene each compose about 1% (Table 5-1). Clots and irregular segregations of pyroxenite are
common, as are late dikelets of pink syenite up to 10 cm wide which cut across trachytic fabrics. The
trachytic fabric is locally variable and inconsistent in orientation, but generally has a shallow southwest
plunge toward the main Side Lake pluton.
The next satellite is a horseshoe-shaped body, 0.75 mi2 in size, located 1.5 miles east of the Side
Lake pluton (Fig. 5-1). Its linear trachytic fabrics are subconformable to the edges of the plug, and again
plunge shallowly southwest toward the Side Lake pluton. This small intrusion is highly varied in
125

�Trip 5 – Alkalic plutons
texture and mafic content, but dark-green poikilitic diorite and white leucocratic monzodiorite with
small inclusions of pyroxenite predominate. The poikilitic diorite has 1-cm, oval-shaped antiperthitic
to perthitic poikilitic feldspar with inclusions of aegirine-augite, biotite, sphene, and apatite. The long
axes of the poikilitic feldspars and prismatic pyroxenes are parallel and define a primary trachytic
fabric. The dark poikilitic phase is sharply cut by sills of the white monzodiorite. However at one
location, the two rocks are commingled in a pillow-like fashion that suggests mixing of immiscible
liquids. Thus the field relationships, as well as mineralogy, indicate that the dark poikilitic and
leucocratic phases are comagmatic.
Relationship of Satellitic Intrusions to the Side Lake Pluton
Their similar lithological and textural attributes and aligned trachytic fabrics imply that the Side
Lake pluton and the two satellites are derived from a common source at depth to the west. Further evidence
of comagmatism is the presence of numerous thin anastamosing sills of white monzodiorite, identical to the
white phase in the small plugs, which are parallel to the schistosity of the surrounding metasedimentary
country rocks and intercalated with them. The intercalated monzodiorite and schist define a mappable unit
along a discrete zone (dashed area on Fig. 5-1 that links the two satellitic plugs to the Side Lake pluton.
This zone continues past the eastern satellite for at least 2.5 miles, where it merges back into a magnetic
anomaly interpreted as another alkalic intrusion (Jirsa and others, 1991).
At the intersection of Highway 73 and the Sturgeon River east of the Side Lake pluton, the
intercalated monzodiorite and metasedirnentary rocks are transected by a late, north-trending brittle shear
zone, which has minimal offset but has reduced the rocks to a fine-grained cataclasite.
Morcom Pluton [Thin section CD-7]
The Morcom pluton is just north of the Side Lake pluton and may be related to it at depth,
because a large positive gravity anomaly underlies the area between the two. The Morcom pluton,
which intrudes metasedimentary rocks, has a bulbous shape with a long narrow appendage to the east
(Fig. 5-1). Scattered outcrops exist at the eastern limit of the pluton, and a drill core was obtained from
the western end, near the north side. Trachytic foliation near the southeast edge dips 80°N, and at the
eastern tip plunges 40°SW. In the drill core the foliation dips 40-45°, presumably toward the pluton
center. Rock types are similar in the Morcom pluton, the eastern Side Lake pluton and its satellites, and
the Idington pluton. However, the major-element geochemistry of the Morcom is very similar to that
of the Linden pluton (Fig. 5-5). The drill core consists of multiphase, medium-grained, weakly
porphyritic biotite-hornblende-pyroxene monzodiorite, with a trachytoid foliation defined by
alignment of plagioclase phenocrysts and prismatic mafic minerals. Dark-green, poikilitic
monzodiorite occurs in the core as 15-cm inclusions or layers; small miariolitic cavities lined with
fine-grained crystalline biotite, pyroxene, and pyrite are also present. Late brittle slickensided faults
and fractures, oriented obliquely to foliation, locally transect the core. Feldspar compositions vary
from clean plagioclase with narrow twin lamellae to untwinned plagioclase, and from antiperthite to
perthite, the latter confined to anhedral grains in the groundmass. Euhedral, light-green, aegirine-augite
has hornblende rims and alteration patches; hornblende is also present as subhedral to prismatic,
brownish- to bluish-green grains with patchy color zonation and rare deuteric overgrowths of colorless
actinolite. Biotite is dark green and pleochroic, and is associated with hornblende. Accessory minerals
include sphene, allanite, apatite, epidote, calcite, and minor secondary oxides within pyroxene. The
nonpoikilitic and poikilitic phases have similar mineralogy (Table 5-1).
Exposures at the eastern tip of the pluton consist of pink to gray, medium-grained monzodiorite
with abundant 5- to 10-cm, elongate xenoliths of foliated felsic to pelitic schist, together with cognate
xenoliths of fine-grained melanocratic monzodiorite. Some of the intrusive-breccia xenoliths are
themselves an intrusive breccia. Pink monzonitic dikelets are abundant and cut all the earlier intrusive
phases and xenoliths. The monzodiorite contains scattered sericitized plagioclase phenocrysts in a fine­
grained groundmass consisting of up to 5% quartz intergrown with granular K-feldspar and plagioclase,
126

�Trip 5 – Alkalic plutons
along with hornblende, actinolite, sphene, chlorite, apatite, and minor oxides and secondary calcite.
Melanocratic clots are of similar mineralogy but with a higher proportion of mafic minerals. Elsewhere
at the eastern terminus, the rock lacks xenolithic inclusions but is still heterogeneous and cut by late,
pink felsic differentiates. This inclusion­ free monzodiorite has a trachytic fabric defined by aligned
feldspars and mafic clots, and is similar in mineralogy to the core from the western end of the pluton.
Lost Lake Pluton (2675.1±0.5 Ma)
The Lost Lake pluton, the "pluton southwest of Lost Lake" of Sims and Mudrey (1972), was
described as a circular pluton composed of heterogeneous syenite with a local, conspicuously
porphyritic facies, a pegmatitic facies with miariolitic cavities, and small bodies of pyroxene­ biotite
lamprophyre. They noted that the borders of the pluton tend to be quartzose and contain small angular
inclusions of metagraywacke and slate of the Lake Vermilion Formation.
Based on detailed remapping, the authors have redefined the shape of the pluton as a long,
sinuous and bulbous, northeast-trending body that is 1 mile or less wide but approximately 9 mi2 in
size. The eastern tip of the pluton lies 1/4 mile south of Lost Lake, and the western terminus is just
south of Angora on State Highway 53, about half a mile north of the Idington pluton (Fig. 5-1). The
uniform magnetic signature of the pluton has been lowered locally by late, north-south, brittle faults
which have minimal offset. The western end of the Lost Lake pluton is not exposed and its shape is
inferred from aeromagnetic data, whereas the central portion is well exposed, and scattered outcrops
exist over the eastern end, mainly adjacent to more resistant crosscutting Proterozoic diabase dikes.
Two mappable intrusions of quartz monzonite 1/4 mile in diameter occur adjacent to the main body
(Jirsa and others, 1991). These small plugs are similar in composition to leucocratic dikes within the
main pluton, and are related to the pluton.
Subvertical trachytic fabric, which is defined by both phenocrysts and elongate poikilitic
feldspar, strikes generally northeast, subparallel to the length of the intrusion. The small, separate
bodies of pink monzonite also possess a northeast-oriented trachytic fabric, defined by orbicular clots
of biotite, disseminated biotite, or aligned feldspar crystals.
The Lost Lake pluton is mineralogically similar to the Idington and eastern Side Lake plutons,
but contains a higher proportion of pink leucocratic phases. The main rock types range from pink and
green, porphyritic monzodiorite to dark-green, poikilitic biotite-pyroxene monzodiorite to pink
monzonite, syenite, and quartz monzonite. Pyroxenite occurs in small segregations, in the same fashion
as in the Idington pluton. In general, the poikilitic and porphyritic phases are earliest and are cut by the
pink rock varieties. Small dikes of pink granitic pegmatite cut all other rock types, but it is unclear
whether these dikes are related to the pluton or are from an external source, such as the Shannon Lake
granite of the Giants Range batholith. The pink monzodiorite and syenite differentiates are medium
grained, equigranular to weakly porphyritic, and commonly aplitic to pegmatitic, with pyroxene,
hornblende, and biotite as the predominant mafic phases.
The two small felsic plugs of quartz monzonite to granodiorite contain a mafic mineral assemblage
of varied proportions of biotite, chlorite, and hornblende, and up to 30% quartz. The margins of these plugs
contain abundant inclusions of felsic volcanic country rocks up to 15 feet across which were clearly
deformed prior to incorporation, and small dikes emanating from these plugs cut across fold axes in the
supracrustal rocks. One of the plugs contains a unique medium-grained, pink, orbicular granodiorite with
trachytically aligned discs of black, concentrically foliated biotite that are as much as 0.5 cm thick and 5
cm long. The biotite orbs which contain intergrown sphene, apatite, plagioclase, quartz, and magnetite,
compose as much as 15% of the rock. The orbicular rock grades into a non-orbicular phase with the same
proportion of biotite, but as medium-grained, uniformly disseminated flakes. In addition to the typical
phases, related rocks in the small plugs include coarse-grained, dark-green biotite-hornblende lamprophyre;
green poikilitic monzodiorite; and pink monzonitic pegmatite.
127

�Trip 5 – Alkalic plutons
Cook Pluton
The Cook pluton (Cook Airport pluton on Southwick, 1993), 1 mile south of the town of Cook
(Fig. 5-1), is inferred from aeromagnetic data to be 1.5 mi2 in size, elongate to the east. No outcrops
of this pluton are known, but a drill hole in the western margin of the pluton recovered core of uniformly
coarse-grained, peppery, dark-greenish-black and light-green, epidote-altered hornblende-biotite
diorite. Strong trachytic foliation, which is defined by tabular plagioclase and mafic minerals, dips 50°
from horizontal. One fine-grained cognate xenolith, 1 cm x 3 cm in size, is present near the bottom of
the 10-foot core. The rock has a primary hypidiomorphic-granular texture, but pervasive, small
euhedral crystals of secondary epidote are overprinted on all primary minerals, preferentially in the cores of
plagioclase, and as fine-grained granular masses in biotite. Pale-green hornblende is rimmed by green
biotite, and zoned plagioclase is clean and well-twinned, despite the pervasive epidote alteration.
Accessory minerals include apatite, sphene, oxides, calcite, and interstitial orthoclase. Scattered late,
brittle fractures which dip as much as 20° from horizontal are lined with coarse, lineated chlorite, pinkaltered feldspar, and a crust of epidote and white carbonate. The pristine trachytic igneous texture and
lack of metamorphic fabric indicate that the pervasive epidotization is the result of deuteric alteration,
rather than regional metamorphism.
GRANITOID PLUTONS
The granitoid group includes the Stingy Lake, Rice River, and Bello Lake plutons, all within the
Wawa subprovince. These plutons tend to be oval in shape and elongate to the northeast. Rocks in this
group are characterized by substantial quantities of quartz and are vaguely to strongly porphyritic and
trachytic. Hornblende is the predominant mafic phase, along with biotite and rare pyroxene. These plutons
are considered part of the alkalic group on the basis of their similarity to the other alkalic plutons in size,
shape, high Ba and Sr content, magnetic signature, and trachytic fabric.
Stingy Lake Pluton
The Stingy Lake pluton is a 9 mi 2 circular pluton located 3 miles south of Sturgeon Lake,
adjacent to the Giants Range granite, and is inferred to intrude mafic volcanic rocks (Fig. 5-1).
Although unexposed, its round shape is well defined by its aeromagnetic anomaly (magnetic rim and
nonmagnetic core). A 10-foot drill core was obtained from the northwest side of the pluton (Meints and
others, 1993). The intrusion is cut by two Proterozoic diabase dikes.
The rock in the core is uniformly coarse-grained, porphyritic, pink granodiorite to quartz
monzodiorite. Tabular phenocrysts of string-and-braid microperthite up to 7 mm long, together with weakly
zoned plagioclase up to 2 mm long having narrow twin lamellae and weakly sericitized cores, define
the 45°-dipping trachytoid foliation. The perthite contains small blocky plagioclase inclusions, and the
areas between abutting perthite grains are also stuffed with small blocky plagioclase grains. Lightgray anhedral interstitial quartz with shadowy extinction has been recrystallized into coarse
polycrystalline aggregates. Hornblende is mostly altered to green biotite, epidote, and granular oxides;
however, fresh, dark-green, euhedral hornblende is locally preserved within quartz and feldspar.
Accessory minerals include blocky primary oxides, sphene, zircon, and apatite (Table 5-1). Late
closely spaced, vertical brittle fractures lined with epidote and chlorite are pervasive in the 10-foot core.
Rice River Pluton
The Rice River pluton, about 5 miles west of Cook, intrudes metamorphosed sedimentary rocks.
It is inferred to be approximately 15 mi2 in size, although its magnetic signature (Fig. 5-1B) of
magnetic rim and nonmagnetic core is irregular and overprinted at the western edge by a north­ trending
Proterozoic diabase dike. A drill hole in the magnetic eastern rim of the pluton recovered core of gray,
coarse-grained, porphyritic quartz monzonite to monzodiorite. Steeply inclined trachytic foliation is
128

�Trip 5 – Alkalic plutons
defined by euhedral, strongly zoned, 1- to 2-cm perthite phenocrysts and small elliptical melanocratic
clots that are fine-grained cognate xenoliths. Groundmass to the phenocrysts consists of 3- to 6-mm
subhedral microcline, zoned plagioclase, hornblende, and anhedral interstitial quartz; the phenocrysts
are rimmed by fine-grained plagioclase and myrmekitic quartz-feldspar intergrowths. Plagioclase
grains are heavily sericitized, preferentially in the cores. Hornblende is weakly zoned and slightly altered
to biotite, chlorite, and opaques. Euhedral sphene, allanite rimmed by epidote, and secondary calcite
occur in minor proportions. Scattered chlorite-pyrite veinlets dip 5-10° from horizontal and occupy
brittle fractures; some have slickensides that dip shallowly in the fracture planes.
Bello Lake Pluton
The Bello Lake pluton (Jirsa, 1990; Jirsa and Boerboom, 1990) is just southwest of the Coon
Lake pluton. It is approximately 60 mi2 in size, elongate to the northeast parallel to the regional strike
of the mafic to felsic supracrustal rocks that it intrudes. The Bello Lake pluton is unexposed, but three
10-foot drill cores were obtained by the Minnesota Geological Survey, two near the western end, and
one near the eastern end of the pluton (Fig. 5-1). The intrusion is magnetically quiet relative to the mafic
volcanic rocks around it, but the pluton margins are strongly magnetic locally.
As judged from the cores, the Bello Lake pluton is uniform in color and texture, but moderately
variable in composition, ranging from pyroxene monzonite to hornblende granite. The pyroxenebearing phase occurs close to the pluton margin, whereas the hornblende monzonite occurs near the
center of the pluton at its western end, and the hornblende granite is near the eastern end of the
pluton. Data are insufficient to properly judge spatial variation of rock types, but the observed
distribution suggests that the pluton may be zoned from a pyroxene-bearing phase at the rim, to a
more differentiated, quartz-bearing phase near the center.
Pyroxene monzodiorite near the pluton border (KIB-39; Table 5-1) is green and pink,
medium grained, and seriate in texture with a strong trachytic fabric defined by rectangular, zoned
plagioclase and subhedral, weakly uralitized augite crystals. Accessory oxides, sphene,
hornblende, chlorite, biotite, and apatite all formed late in the crystallization sequence, and tend
to occur together.
Green and pink, medium-grained, slightly porphyritic hornblende monzonite (KIB-40;
Table 5-1) on the western side of the pluton contains subhedral-prismatic hornblende and small
phenocrysts of grayish-pink, blocky microperthite in an allotriomorphic-granular to weakly
seriate groundmass of plagioclase, perthite, and minor quartz. This rock is similar to the pyroxene
monzodiorite in hole KIB-39, except that hornblende occupies the position of pyroxene.
Hornblende granite from the eastern part of the pluton (drill hole KIB-7; Table 5-1) is
characterized by strongly zoned, blocky plagioclase with sericitized cores surrounded by poikilitic
microperthite. Myrmekitic feldspar-quartz intergrowths occur along perthite-plagioclase grain
boundaries. Quartz is coarse and anhedral interstitial, and hornblende forms dark-green, irregular
grains with abundant tiny quartz inclusions near the edges and granular oxide inclusions in the
cores. Accessory green biotite, epidote, and chlorite are associated with hornblende as alteration
products, and blocky apatite crystals are associated with mafic phases.
PETROGENETIC AND GEOCHRONOLOGICAL STUDIES
Arth and Hanson (1975), using data on major, trace, and rare earth elements, and isotopic
data from the Linden pluton, concluded that the magma formed from 5 to 10% partial melting of
a mixed eclogite and garnet peridotite source at mantle depth. Stern and others (1989) believe that
the Linden originated by partial melting of a LILE­ enriched mantle peridotite at shallow depths
under hydrous conditions created by mantle metasomatism from rapid subduction of oceanic
129

�Trip 5 – Alkalic plutons
lithosphere. However, they have lumped the Linden pluton in with the "sanukatoid suite," a very
broad suite of rocks of variable size, timing, and associations throughout the Superior Province.
The age of D2 deformation of t h e supracrustal rocks at the southern edge of the area from
Cook to Side Lake (Jirsa and others, 1991) was bracketed by U-Pb zircon geochronology to
between 2,685 and 2,669 Ma (Boerboom and Zartman, 1993). The alkalic plutons lack significant
D 2 fabrics, and thus could not have been emplaced until approximately 2,669 Ma. [NOTE: This
has been discredited by the new ages of 2681.00±0.29 Ma on the Linden and 2675.1±0.05 Ma on the Lost
Lake plutons – Boerboom and others, 2022] The Idington pluton is intruded by a granite pegmatite inferred
to have originated from the Shannon Lake granite, which was dated by Boerboom and Zartman
(1993) at 2,674 ± 5, or a minimum of 2,669.
Catanzaro and Hanson (1971) obtained a discordant Pb207/Pb206 age of 2,740 ± 10 Ma on
sphene f r o m the Linden pluton. Prince and Hanson (1972) obtained a similar age of 2,740 Ma,
based on a Rb/Sr isochron through apatite and two whole-rock samples. These older ages on the
Linden pluton relative to the younger age implied for the ldington pluton indicate that the syenitic
rocks may be slightly older than the monzodioritic group, or that pluton emplacement may have
progressed from north to south. Clearly, modern high-precision U-Pb zircon dates on the alkalic
plutons are needed. [NOTE: Recent age of 207Pb/206Pb 2681.00±0.29 Ma (Boerboom and others, 2022)]
CONCLUSIONS
The alkalic intrusions in northern Minnesota can be generally subdivided into a syenitic
group, a monzodioritic group, and a granitoid group. The syenitic plutons are somewhat north of
the monzodioritic intrusions, whereas the granitoid plutons are interspersed with the
monzodiorites. Although these groups differ in mineralogy, they are all similar in terms of size,
texture, map pattern, geochemistry (e.g., high Ba and Sr), aeromagnetic signature, and timing of
emplacement All of the alkalic plutons have porphyritic textures, and the syenitic and
monzodioritic plutons typically contain abrupt phase transitions from predominantly mesocratic,
porphyritic rocks to dark-green pyroxenites and pink felsic differentiates. The granitoid plutons are
more uniform in composition and texture.
The plutons are eroded to various levels. The northeastward-elongation and en-echelon map
pattern of the Gheen and Lost Lake plutons and the eastern Side Lake pluton and its satellites indicate
exposure at high levels, whereas the broad, rounded map shapes of the Linden, Coon Lake, and Bello
Lake plutons indicate a deeper level of erosion. The map patterns of the relatively well exposed Side
Lake, Idington, and Lost Lake plutons indicate a similar style of emplacement, in which the plutons
have penetrated the supracrustal rocks to different levels. The Side Lake pluton plunges to the west,
as indicated by the deeper level of erosion at the western end of the pluton and the west-plunging linear
trachytic fabrics in the Side Lake satellites. This westward plunge may be either a primary
emplacement feature or the result of tilting of the pluton prior to unroofing.
Several other plutons of alkalic affinity are suggested by the aeromagnetic data, but they are not
exposed and their existence has not been verified by drilling.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Field work and geochemical analyses for this project were funded by the Minerals Diversification
Program administered by the Minerals .Coordinating Committee for the Minnesota Legislature.
The Minerals Division of the Minnesota Natural Resources Research Institute (also supported by
the Minerals Diversification Program) coordinated the analytical work for several of the geochemical
samples.
130

�Trip 5 – Alkalic plutons
FIELD TRIP STOPS

These stop descriptions are brief – see introductory section for more detail about the individual
plutons.
Directions: To stop 1: Drive west on Highway 169 to Highway 5 at Chisholm • go ~15 miles north on
Hwy. 5 to road 915/McCarthy Beach road the •go west on McCarthy Beach road between Side and Sturgeon
Lakes, this turns into Link Lake trail—stay on for a total of ~7 miles to small trail (491988, 5283636) •
walk SW on trail ~ 1000’ / 300m and go W-SW to ridge where there are some peeled outcrops. Work your
way back NE along top of ridge for more outcrop back to road.
Stop 1. (NAD83: 491723, 5283344) (47.70606°, -93.10680°) Side Lake pluton – multiphase Side Lake
Pluton ultramafic to felsic.
NEXT: Head back east on Link Lake Trail • at about one mile turn left on Beatrice Lake road at sharp bend
in trail. • Take Beatrice Lake road ~1.7 miles to intersection with Snake Trail and turn right. • Follow Snake
Trail ~2.5 miles to Hwy. 5. • Go right/south on Hwy. 5 for ~1.8 miles. • Go left on Hwy. 65/Perch Lake
road for 1.7 miles then • take a left / north on Dean Forest Road (268). • Follow Dean Forest Road (276)
~4.6 miles through a series of jogs to a small road on the right / south (Mud Hole Road # 276). • Drive
~500 feet and park next to knob on the west side of the road (504781, 5284935), go up on outcrop knob to
east. Multiple peels.
Stop 2. (NAD83: 504781, 5284935) (47.71778°, -92.93625°) Roof zone of Side Lake Pluton. Many dikes
of multiphase monzonitic rocks cut high-grade garnet-staurolite-sillimanite bearing metasedimentary rocks
of the Lake Vermilion Formation. Some dikes may be unrelated tonalite. One smaller outcrop near road
along south edge of knob has 3-5 x 7-15 cm mafic enclaves in quartz tonalite to monzonite. This lies in
what is interpreted as the roof zone of the Side Lake Pluton.
NEXT: Go back to road # 276 • turn right / east and drive ~3.4 miles to Highway 73. • Turn left / north on
Hwy 73 for 4 miles to Hwy. 22 • turn left / west for 3 miles to road 931. • Turn left / south on 931 for 0.5
miles to crest of small hill, outcrop in the east side of road.
Stop 3. ***Private Property please be respectful*** (NAD83: 504882, 5290921) (47.77164°, -92.93484°)
Morcom Pluton – Monzdioritic intrusive breccia of widely variable grain size bearing many inclusions of
different phases of itself that range from intermediate-porphyritic to ultramafic. One thin section was made
from this outcrop and in it the mafic phase is dominantly hornblende, in contrast to samples from other
parts of the pluton which contain abundant green Na-pyroxene in addition to hornblende. Sphene,
magnetite, and apatite are also relatively abundant.
This pluton is not well exposed with only a few outcrops in this vicinity on the east end and a drill hole on
the west end; extent outlined via aeromag data.
NEXT: Head back east to Hwy. 73 • turn left / north for 5 miles to Highway 1 • Turn left / west on Hwy.
1 for 3.4 miles to large outcrop ridge and find a safe place to park...
Stop 4. Linden Pluton (NAD83: 504222, 5301045) (47.86273°, -92.94355°)
(2681.00±0.29 Ma)
Brownish-pink medium- to coarse-grained, strongly foliated, moderately porphyritic pyroxene
syenite. Tabular crystals of gray perthite and prismatic dark green pyroxene phenocryst are surrounded
by a pink groundmass composed mainly of fine granular albitic plagioclase. The foliation (and weak
subvertical lineation), interpreted as magmatic, is defined by the phenocrysts of microcline and
131

�Trip 5 – Alkalic plutons
pyroxene, and dips steeply to the northwest parallel to the pluton margin. The syenite also contains
cm-scale ellipsoidal ultramafic pyroxenite enclaves that are flattened parallel to the main foliation.
Dominantly composed of perthitic alkali feldspar, albitic plagioclase, and dark-green prismatic
aegirine-augite (Ac7Wo41En26Fs25, Table 5-3 and Fig. 5-7), with lesser amounts of sphene, apatite,
biotite, hornblende, magnetite, and epidote. Relatively coarse reddish-brown titanite/sphene is readily
visible in hand sample. Plagioclase is generally restricted to the groundmass as very fine-grained
granoblastic grains.
In thin section the pyroxene is very fresh, bright green, sub-euhedral, and weakly zoned with roundish
lighter green cores. Sphene forms small euhedral crystals, apatite forms thick irregular to subprismatic
crystals, and minor proportions of biotite form strongly pleochroic light brown to deep brownish-green
irregular books commonly intergrown with or included in pyroxene. Strongly aligned perthitic
orthoclase forms blocky-rectangular crystals up to 7mm in length that are commonly Carlsbadtwinned. The groundmass matrix between the orthoclase and pyroxene is composed of fine-grained
granoblastic feldspar that appears to have undergone brittle deformation; however within this
granulated matrix are pristine pyroxene, sphene, and apatite crystals that show no evidence of shearing
or rotation. This coupled with the apparent lack of shear bands on the outcrop implies that the
granulation of the groundmass may have occurred during emplacement by semi-plastic deformation
during upward flowage of the magma.
Just north of the highway at the lowermost east end of this outcrop is an old adit that goes straight into
the hillside; not sure as to when or why this was made.
NEXT: Head back east on Hwy. 1 to Hwy. 73 • turn left / north for 5.2 miles to Highway 53. • Hang a right
(go SW) on Hwy. 53 for 2 miles to where there are outcrops on the northeast side of the road. There is a
driveway adjacent to this outcrop (on the north end) that would be a good place to park.
Stop 5. ************WATCH OUT FOR TRAFFIC THIS IS A BUSY ROAD************
Gheen Pluton (NAD83: 515162, 5306034) (47.90745°, -92.79711°)
The Gheen pluton is a spectacular example of multi-phase magma mingling textures. Strongly and
coarsely porphyritic pyroxene syenite grades into, is cut by, and has inclusions of, medium-grained
dark green hornblende gabbro to pyroxenite. Pink aplite and pegmatite forms the latest phase as small
dikes that cross the other phases, and seems to have preferentially permeated the more mafic phases.
Bluish chloritic slickenside surfaces look similar to those in the Linden pluton.
The phenocrysts in the porphyritic phase at this stop are composed of braid-textured perthite to
antiperthite in a matrix of bluish-green hornblende and prismatic actinolitic amphibole, abundant
sphene, magnetite, and apatite, and anhedral to subpoikilitic saussuritized plagioclase. The aphyric
mafic phases are composed varied combinations of pale green augite magmatic hornblende, secondary
actinolitic amphibole, biotite, and accessory sphene, apatite, magnetite, and calcite.
NEXT: Continue southeast on Hwy. 53 for about 14 miles, through the town of Cook, to County Road
467. • Turn left / east for 0.6 miles then veer right to stay on 467. Continue on 467 to railroad crossing;
from there go another 0.75 miles to Forest Road 258D • Either drive or walk south on this road for 0.5 mile
to an outcrop on the left / east in an overgrown clearcut, next to a logging trail that goes east.
Stop 6. Idington Pluton (NAD83: 529108, 5287200) (47.73752°, -92.61175°)
132

�Trip 5 – Alkalic plutons
The Idington (eye-ding-ton) pluton as not been dated, but it is intruded by the 2,674-Ma Shannon Lake
granite along the southwestern margin of the pluton.
This pluton is characterized by its coarsely porphyritic character as dramatically shown at this stop,
and the phenocrysts are typically aligned by magmatic flow (trachytoid) in a crystal mush. In places
the phenocrysts are randomly oriented, and in others oriented in a circular fashion that implies they
were caught in an eddy. The mafic matrix is composed dominantly of aegirine or aegirine-augite and
commonly has been squeezed out (i.e. filter-pressed) of the crystal mush to form small to large (10’s
of meters) zones of an ultramafic phase. White ‘aplite’ dikes and some larger segregations cut the
syenite and pyroxenite phases; these are interpreted as late residual differentiated melts that were
squirted around through the semi-solid pluton.
Very fine, delicate compositional zonation is visible in some of the phenocrysts here at this stop, where the
rock is properly weathered.
For a more thorough description of the pluton as a whole refer to the appropriate section of the introduction.
The strikingly porphyritic syenite at this stop is typical of the Idington pluton although the phenocrysts are
larger than normal. The phenocrysts are composed of perthite / antiperthite and
NEXT: Go back north to the main road (467) and head east for 2.25 miles then follow road around bend
to north (turns into County road 381) • Continue on 381 for 2.75 miles to Highway 1 • Turn right / east on
Hwy. 1 for 3.25 miles to County Road 361 • Turn left / north and drive 1.5 miles to a small flat outcrop in
the east ditch. There are also outcrops along the road on the way here one can stop at.
Stop 7. Lost Lake Pluton (NAD83: 537263, 5293105) (47.79023°, -92.50248°) 2675.1±0.5 Ma
The Lost Lake pluton is an irregularly-shaped intrusion that elongate to the east-northeast.
The small outcrop in the road ditch shows mafic pyroxene-rich enclaves in pink syenitic phase. Outcrops
nearby in the woods to the east demonstrate many different phases ranging from uniform pink to coarsely
porphyritic to dark green and ultramafic.
The ultramafic phases/enclaves in the road ditch outcrop are composed primarily of deep green (in thin
section) aegirine as small equant to subprismatic crystals, a lesser proportion of larger blocky to subpoikitic
biotite, and accessory sphene and apatite in a groundmass of poikilitic calcite (it fizzes) and minor sodic
plagioclase. The pink portion is composed of allotriomorphic-granular mosaic of anhedral sodic
plagioclase, perthite to antiperthite (commonly poikilitic), prismatic green aegirine, apatite, biotite, and
interstitial calcite.
At this stop we also will display some drill core from the Lost Lake pluton which demonstrates the multiple
phases and diversity within this unit.
NEXT: End of trip. Go back south to Highway 1 then east to Highway 169, then south back to Mountain
Iron. Thank you for attending.

133

�Trip 5 – Alkalic plutons

REFERENCES CITED
Arth, J.G., and Hanson, G.N., 1975, Geochemistry and origin of the early Precambrian crust of northeastern
Minnesota: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, v. 39, p. 325-362.
Barker, J.G., and Arth, J.G., 1976, Generation of trondhjemite-tonalite liquids and Archean bimodal
trondhjemite-basalt suites, Geology, v. 4, p. 596-600.
Beck, J.W., 1988, Implications for Early Proterozoic tectonics and the origin of continental flood basalts,
based on combined trace element and neodymium/strontium isotopic studies of mafic igneous rocks of the
Penokean Lake Superior belt, Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Michigan: Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation,
University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Boerboom, T.J., Jirsa, M.A., Southwick, D.L., Meints, J.P., and Campbell, F.K., 1989, Scientific core drilling
in parts of Koochiching, Itasca, and Beltrami Counties, north-central Minnesota, 1987-1989: Summary of
lithological, geochemical, and geophysical results: Minnesota Geological Survey Information Circular 26,
159 p.
Boerboom, T.J., and Zartman, R.E., 1993, Geology, geochemistry, and geochronology of the central Giants Range
Batholith, northeastern Minnesota: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 30, p. 2510-2522.
Boerboom, T.J., Block, Amy Radakovich, Jirsa, M.A., Chandler, V.W., and Peterson, D.M., 2022, Bedrock
Geology, pl. 2 of Jirsa, M.A., project manager, Geologic Atlas of Lake County, Minnesota: Minnesota
Geological Survey County Atlas C-54, pt. A, 6 pls., scale 1:200,000
Card, K.D., and Ciesielski, A., 1986, DNAG #1. Subdivisions of the Superior Province of the Canadian Shield:
Geoscience Canada, v. 13, p. 5-13.
Catanzaro, E.J., and Hanson, G.N., 1971, U-Pb ages for sphene in northeastern Minnesota-northwestern
Ontario: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 8, p. 1319-1324.
Chamberlain, K.R., Boerboom, T.J, and Bleeker, W., 2015: 2070 Ma dyke of southern Superior Province: a test of
the radiating dyke model for the Kenora-Kabetogama/Fort Frances swarm, in Reconstruction of supercontinents
back to 2.7 Ga using the large igneous province (LIP) record: with implications for mineral deposit targeting,
hydrocarbon resource exploration, and earth system evolution; Supercontinent.org report number A194, 9 p.
Chandler, V.W., 1991, Aeromagnetic map of Minnesota: Minnesota Geological Survey State Map Series S-17, scale
1:500,000.
Deer, W.A., Howie, R.A., and Zussman, J, 1966, An introduction to the rock-forming minerals: London, Longman
Group Limited, 528 p.
Geldon, A.L., 1972, Petrology of the larnprophyre pluton near Dead River, in Sims, P.K., and Morey, G.B., eds.,
Geology of Minnesota: A centennial volume: Minnesota Geological Survey, p. 153-159.
Himmelberg, G.R., 1973, Geologic descriptions of drill core from greenstone belts in northeastern Minnesota:
Minnesota Geological Survey Open-File Report
Irvine, T.N., and Baragar, W.R.A., 1971, A guide to the chemical classification of the common volcanic rocks:
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 8, p. 523-548.
Jirsa, M.A., 1990, Bedrock geologic map of northeastern Itasca County, Minnesota: Minnesota Geological Survey
Miscellaneous Map M-68, scale 1:48,000.
Jirsa, M.A., and Boerboom, T.J., 1990, Bedrock geologic map of parts of Koochiching, Itasca, and Beltrami
Counties, north-central Minnesota: Minnesota Geological Survey Miscellaneous Map series M-67, scale
1:250,000 /
Jirsa, M.A., Boerboom, T.J., Chandler, V.W., and McSwiggen, P.L., 1991, Bedrock geologic map of the Cook
to Side Lake area, St. Louis and Itasca Counties, Minnesota: Minnesota Geological Survey Miscellaneous
Map Series M-75, scale 1:48,000.
Jirsa, M.A., Southwick, D.L., and Boerboom, T.J., 1992, Structural evolution of Archean rocks in the western
Wawa subprovince Minnesota: Refolding of pre­ cleavage nappes during D2 transpression: Canadian
Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 29, p. 2146-2155.
Martin, D.P., Meyer, G.N., Lawler, T.L., Chandler, V.W., and Malmquist, K.L., 1988, Regional survey of
buried glacial drift geochemistry over Archean terrane in northern Minnesota: Minnesota Department of
Natural Resources, Division of Minerals Report 252, V. 1, 74 p.; V. 2, 386 p.
Meints, J.P., Jirsa, M.A., Chandler, V.W., and Miller, J.D., Jr., 1993, Scientific core drilling in parts of Itasca,
St. Louis, and Lake Counties, northeastern Minnesota, 1989-1991: Summary of lithologic, geochemical,
and geophysical results: Minnesota Geological Survey Information Circular 37, 159 p.

134

�Trip 5 – Alkalic plutons
Mills, SJ., Southwick, D.L., and Meyer, G.N., 1987, Scientific core drilling in north-central Minnesota:
Summary of 1986 lithologic and geochemical results: Minnesota Geological Survey Information Circular
24, 48 p.
Prince, L.A., and Hanson, G.N., 1972, Rb-Sr isochron ages for the Giants Range granite, northeastern
Minnesota: Geological Society of America Memoir 135, p. 217-225.
Ruotsala, A.P., and Tufford, S.P., 1965, Chemical analyses of igneous rocks: Minnesota Geological Survey
Information Circular 2, 87 p.
Sage, R.P., 1988a, Geology of carbonatite-alkalic rock complexes in Ontario: ·Poohbah Lake alkalic rock
complex, district of Rainy River: Ontario Geological Survey Study 48, 68 p.
Sage, R.P., 1988b, Geology of carbonatite-alkalic rock complexes in Ontario: Sturgeon Narrows and Squaw Lake
alkalic rock complexes, district of Thunder Bay: Ontario Geological Survey Study 49, 117 p.
Sage, R.P., 1988c, Geology of carbonatite-alkalic rock complexes in Ontario: Wapikopa Lake alkalic rock complex,
district of Kenora: Ontario Geological Survey Study 52, 63 p.
Schmitz, M.D., Bowring, S.A., Southwick, D.L., Boerboom, T.J., and Wirth, K.R., 2006, High-precision U-Pb
geochronology in the Minnesota River Valley subprovince and its bearing on the Neoarchean to
Paleoproterozoic evolution of the southern Superior Province: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 118, p.
82-93.
Sims, P.K., and Mudrey, M.G., Jr., 1972, Syenitic plutons and associated lamprophyres: in Sims, P.K., and Morey,
G.B., eds., Geology of Minnesota: A centennial volume: Minnesota Geological Survey, p. 140-152.
Sims, P.K., Morey, G.B., Ojakangas, R.W., and Viswanathan, S., 1970, Geologic map of Minnesota, Hibbing Sheet:
Minnesota Geological Survey, scale 1:250,000.
Sims, P.K., Sinclair, D., and Mudrey, M.G., Jr., 1972, Linden pluton: in Sims, P.K., and Morey, G.B., eds., Geology
of Minnesota: A centennial volume: Minnesota Geological Survey, p. 160-162.
Southwick, D.L., 1993, Geologic map of Archean bedrock, Soudan to Bigfork area, northern Minnesota: Minnesota
Geological Survey Miscellaneous Map Series M-79, scale 1:100,000.
Stern, R.A., Hanson, G.N., and Shirey, S.B., 1989, Petrogenesis of mantle-derived LILE-enriched Archean
monzodiorites and trachyandesites (sanukitoids, in southwestern Superior Province: Canadian Journal of Earth
Sciences, v. 26, p. 1688-1712.
Streckeisen, A.L., 1973, Plutonic rocks: Classification and nomenclature recommended by the IUGS
Subcommission on the Systematics of Igneous Rocks: Geotimes, v. 18, no. 10, p. 26-30.
Wirth, K.R., Vervoort, J.D., and Heaman, L.M., 1995, Nd isotopic constraints on mantle and crustal contributions to
2.08 Ga diabase dykes of the southern Superior Province (abstract), Program &amp; Abstracts for the Third
International Dyke Conference, Sept. 4-8, 1995, Jerusalem, Israel, A. Agnon, G. Baer, 84, 1995.

135

�Trip 6 – Colvin Creek

FIELD TRIP 6
Unique Keweenawan Inclusion (Colvin Creek) in the Duluth Complex
Mark Severson (retired)1,2, Allison Severson3 and Laurie Severson (retired)4
1

(1988–2012) Natural Resources Research Institute, University of Minnesota, Duluth, 5013 Miller Trunk
Hwy, Duluth, MN 55811
2
(2013–2018) Previously Teck American, then Teck Resources Unlimited, now NewRange (joint venture
between Teck and PolyMet Mining Inc.)
3
Minnesota Geological Survey, College of Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota, 2609
Territorial Road, St. Paul, MN 55114
4
Earth Science Teacher, Woodland Middle School, ISD 709, Duluth, MN 55811

In memory of Richard Patelke
1957-2011

“Well, it ain’t my truck”
136

�Trip 6 – Colvin Creek

INTRODUCTION
Magnetic basalt inclusions within the Duluth Complex were first described by Bonnichsen (1974).
Most of that description pertained to limited outcrops in what is now informally referred to as the South
Colvin Creek Hornfels (Fig.6-1). Later, Tyson (1976) looked at four basalt inclusions including three nonmagnetic basalt inclusions in railroad cuts to the north, as well as the South Colvin Creek Hornfels. He
concluded that the South Colvin Creek Hornfels was different and theorized that the magnetic basalts were
derived from weathered and oxidized basalt flows, correlative with the North Shore Volcanic Group, and
metamorphosed by the Duluth Complex. This field trip will visit the North Colvin Creek Hornfels (NCCH),
shown in Figure 6-1, which is better exposed, contains several internal mappable units, and was first
described by Severson and Hauck (1990). There they found a unique very fine-grained and cross-bedded
unit, of gabbroic composition, within the inclusion. They initially theorized that the NCCH was formed as
a result of magmatic currents (a concept they no longer support). It was also theorized that the cross-bedded
unit represents a portion of a shear zone (Ojakangas and Holst, pers. com., sited in Patelke (1996)). This
theory is also no longer deemed viable. Lastly, Patelke (1996) mapped and described the NCCH in more
detail and proposed that it was an inclusion containing both metavolcanic and metasedimentary rocks that
can be correlated with the North Shore Volcanic Group. This field trip will visit the NCCH which is referred
to simply as the Colvin Creek Inclusion for the remainder of this guide. The thesis by Patelke (1996) is the
source of almost all of this guide.

GEOLOGIC SETTING
The Colvin Creek inclusion is a large inclusion (2,500 X 800 meters), associated with a magnetic
high, that has been rotated to a near vertical position and exhibits stratigraphic tops to the northwest as
defined by pipe amygdules, sheeted amygdules, local convoluted flow bases and flow tops, and crossbedding. Patelke (1996) subdivided the inclusion into five major mappable units that include: two
granoblastic, fine-grained metavolcanic units; two gabbroic sill units that bound the inclusion on the north
and south; and a 350-meter-thick, cross-bedded, granoblastic, fine-grained metasedimentary unit of
gabbroic composition. Overall, the inclusion strikes about N60°E with dips of 70-90° to the northwest. The
entire inclusion has been metamorphosed to pyroxene grade facies and rotated to a subvertical position by
the Duluth Complex. According to Miller and Severson (2005), the Colvin Creek inclusion is situated near
the bottom of a “heterogeneous upper troctolitic cumulate” of the Partridge River intrusion (PRI).
Geochemical work by Patelke (1996) indicate that metamorphism of the magnetic metabasalt units
was isochemical and that they are probably equivalent to intermediate olivine tholeiites of the North Shore
Volcanic Group (NSVG). The metasedimentary rocks are more problematic in that they are not analogous
to any of the interflow sandstones of the NSVG as described by Jirsa (1980, 1984). At about 350 meters
thick they are as thick as the total measured section of the NSVG interflow sedimentary rocks and show:
no rock fragments; NO quartz, no conglomeratic horizons, and no intercalated volcanic rocks. Patelke
(1996) suggested that the cross-bedded rocks were most likely deposited in a restricted basin as an eolian
sediment that was derived from a strictly basaltic terrain – thus no quartz. Similar inclusions of crossbedded sediments with a gabbroic composition have been found at six locations within the Duluth Complex
(i.e., geologic maps of the Babbitt SE and Babbitt SW quadrangles). Patelke (1996) thought that the
informal “Phantom Lake sandstone,” an inclusion in the Whyte Quadrangle to the north of Two Harbors,
was the most similar to the sediments in the Colvin Creek inclusion. While Patelke (1996) felt that these
two units were similar, he concluded that neither of them can be strictly correlated with any other of the
interflow sandstones in the Keweenawan system.

137

�Trip 6 – Colvin Creek

Figure 6-1. Generalized geologic map of a portion of the Partridge River intrusion showing locations of the
Colvin Creek Hornfels inclusions (gray) relative to the known Cu-Ni deposits. Base map from Miller and others
(2001).

GEOLOGY OF THE COLVIN CREEK INCLUSION
Patelke (1996) mapped six major units associated with the Northern Colvin Creek Hornfels
inclusion (exposed in Sections 27, 28, 33, and 34, T.59N., R.13W.). These units are briefly described below,
and their distribution is shown in the geology map of Figure 6-2. The six units are, from south to north (also
stratigraphically younging to the north) labeled as: MCC, AMG, AA, XBB, and GOG. These names are
acronyms for field textures observed by Severson and Hauck (1990), and while these are not appropriate
rock names, Patelke (1996) retained them in his thesis.
MCC (Massive Colvin Creek unit)
The MCC unit is a plagioclase-augite-oxide (titanomagnetite&gt;ilmenite) rock, with local
orthopyroxene and/or olivine, that under Phinney’s classification system (1972) is an oxide-bearing gabbro
to augite troctolite. The MCC displays a massive, fine- to medium-grained texture similar to the units that
stratigraphically overlie it but also shows primary decussate igneous texture. It is variably ophitic, and
locally porphyritic. Granoblastic triple point junctions are reasonably well developed where the feldspar is

138

�Trip 6 – Colvin Creek

Figure 6-2. Geology of the Northern Colvin Creek inclusion from Patelke, 1996.

equant. Locally, there are ovoid clots of granular plagioclase that could be interpreted as amygdule
infillings. The bottom contact of the MCC unit is not exposed. The upper contact with the AMG unit
consists of rock types attributable to both MCC and AMG units within a 3-meter zone. For this reason,
Patelke (1996) suggests that the MCC was injected sill-like and was mixed into the AMG while both were
in a plastic state. Unfortunately, this particular exposure will not be visited during this trip.
AMG (Amygdaloidal Gabbro unit)
The AMG is stratigraphically above the MCC unit and is interpreted to be a subaerial metavolcanic
unit with recrystallized amygdules. The rock is classed as an oxide melagabbro to augite troctolite. In the
vast majority of the exposures, it is fine- to medium-grained and composed of plagioclase, augite, and oxide
(titanomagnetite&gt;ilmenite) with local orthopyroxene and poikilitic olivine. The AMG unit shows a
persistent fine-grained, polygonal-granoblastic, sugary texture. In a few instances this texture is interrupted
by clusters of plagioclase and by rounded to amoeboidal clot-like segregations of augite; both of which are
lengthened parallel to the overall strike of bedding. These layers of pyroxene-rich segregations are
interpreted to be recrystallized amygdules within relict volcanic flowtops. In areas of outcrop with common
pyroxene-rich layers, the spacing of layers indicates flow thicknesses of 0.5 to 3.5 meters. The upper contact
with the AA unit is exposed in only one outcrop (Fig. 6-3 - not visited this trip) wherein a black pyroxenemagnetite rich convoluted flowtop of the AMG is overlain by the base of a flow in the AA unit.

139

�Trip 6 – Colvin Creek

Figure 6-3. Contact between the AMG (bottom, dark) and AA (top, light) units. The dark portion of the image is
related to increased pyroxene and oxide content and interpreted to be a rubbly flow top that is abruptly overlain
by the AA unit.

MGC (Medium-Grained Gabbro unit)
The MGC is a sill of very limited extent in the SW end of the Colvin Creek inclusion (Fig. 6-2).
The rock is a medium- to coarse-grained orthopyroxene-bearing anorthositic gabbro according to the
classification system of Phinney (1972). The sill crosscuts only the AMG unit, exhibits apparent chilled
margins, and is estimated to be about two meters thick. Exposures of this unit will not be visited.
AA (Amoeboidal Augite unit)
The AA unit overlies the AMG unit and is also a fine- to medium-grained, massive, granoblastic
magnetic basalt unit. At the outcrop scale, the AA is distinguished from the AMG by increased amounts
pyroxene-filled avoids (amygdules) and by elongate pyroxene segregations that are interpreted as
recrystallized pipe amygdules. Petrographically, the AA and AMG are very similar. Mineralogy consists
of plagioclase, diopsidic augite, and titanomagnetite&gt;ilmenite with local orthopyroxene (a major
constituent in one outcrop). Plagioclase has a bimodal grain distribution consisting of fine-grained equant
to stubby grains (0.25-1 mm) and patchy distributed laths (2-7 mm).
The modal layering within this unit is defined by pyroxene stringers and ovoid clots that are
interpreted to define both lava flow bases and amygdaloidal tops. Individual flows range from 0.5 to several
meters thick. Elongate pyroxene masses lying perpendicular to strike are thought to be recrystallized pipe
amygdules near the flow base (Fig. 6-4).

140

�Trip 6 – Colvin Creek

Figure 6-4. Two flow units in the AA unit. Base of a single flow (6 inches to left of hammer head) with
recrystallized, coalescing upward-trending pipe vesicles. Black wavy lines in extreme upper right of photo is the
base of a third lava flow. The location of this outcrop is not documented.

“Pyroxene interval”
At the very top of the AA unit is a 0-2 meter thick, black, melagabbro unit, or “pyroxene interval”
as mapped by Patelke (1996) in a few scattered outcrops. This unit consists of fine- to coarse-grained
ferrosalite pyroxene and plagioclase. At one locality this unit contains: 1-10% brown garnet, 2-5%
ilmenite&gt;&gt;titanomagnetite, and trace amounts of cordierite and hercynite. At one exposure (Fig. 6-5 – to
be visited), there are several “veins” of potassium feldspar masses (up to 20-40 cm long by 1-10 cm wide),
or tension gashes according to Patelke (1996). These “veins” are perpendicular to, and truncated by, the
upper contact with the overlying XBB unit. The base of the XBB unit often exhibits a trough-like
morphology downwards towards these feldspar masses. At several locations where this “pyroxene interval”
is present, Patelke (1996) thought that there was some evidence of left-lateral tectonic movement. The
tension gashes are one of his lines of evidence. Overall, Patelke (1996) thought that the “pyroxene interval”
represents a deeply weathered flow top or soil developed on the AA unit and the effects of faulting are
secondary.

141

�Trip 6 – Colvin Creek
At another outcrop along the contact between the AA and XBB units (Stop 5 - to be visited), the
“pyroxene interval” is absent. In its place are several sigmoidal-shaped pyroxene-rich lenses. Patelke (1996)
thought that these lenses were developed along a bedding parallel fault.

Figure 6-5. “Pyroxene Interval” (bottom 2/3rds of photo) between the AA and XBB units. Note convolute
contact and k-spar-filled “tension gashes” as described by Patelke (1996).

Figure 6-6. Typical cross-bedding exhibited by the XBB unit in a flat-laying outcrop.

142

�Trip 6 – Colvin Creek
XBB (Cross-Bedded Belt)
To the north of, and overlying the magnetic basalt units, is the Cross-Bedded Belt unit of roughly
gabbroic composition. The rock is composed of fine-grained (1mm average) plagioclase-diopsideorthopyroxene-titanomagnetite&gt;ilmenite with minor amount of orthopyroxene, hematite, hercynite, and
geikielite. The rock exhibits beautiful bedding, cross-bedding (Fig. 6-6), density graded modal layering,
and concave upward cross-beds along with scour and fill structures. Throughout the unit are localized minor
biotite. There are several intervals, 0.5-3.0 meters thick, that are located near the base of the XBB that
contain poikiloblastic pyroxene, up to several inches long (Fig. 6-7) that appear to have grown along
bedding planes.
The density graded modal layering consists of oxide- and pyroxene-rich basal layers grading
upward into plagioclase-rich layers. Grain size for any individual mineral (1 mm) remains constant
throughout the bed thickness. Angles of bedding and cross-bedding change over short distances in most
outcrops. In some areas, the bedding exhibits a weak convolution or deformation (Fig. 6-7); possibly due
to either soft sediment deformation and/or partial melting by the Duluth Complex.
GOG (Gabbro-Olivine Gabbro unit)
A gabbro to olivine gabbro unit, labelled as GOG, bounds the Colvin Creek inclusion at its upper
(northwest) contact. The GOG was classed as a unit of the inclusion because it contains contact parallel
layering (as does the inclusion) and shares strike-length and general tabular form with the other units of the
inclusion. The GOG is medium to coarse-grained and composed of plagioclase (37-72%), augite (9-42%),
olivine (0-23%), ilmenite (3-12%), and titanomagnetite (2-8%).
The GOG unit is best exposed at the northwest end of the Colvin Creek inclusion where four
contact-parallel zones were described by Severson and Hauck (1990) and by Patelke (1996). These zones
(Fig. 6-2) are: A. weakly modally layered granular-textured augite troctolite zone with a plagioclase
foliation B. phenocryst-rich gabbroic zone with anorthositic inclusions up to 5 inches across; C. a zone of
heterogeneous gabbroic rocks with local inch-scale layering and cross-bedding (Fig. 6-8) indicative of
magmatic
currents; and D. a
zone
of
anorthositic
gabbro grading
upward to gabbro
with
olivine
gabbro interbeds.
The trend of all of
these
zones
parallel
the
contact trends of
the
underlying
Colvin
Creek
inclusion.
Unfortunately,
this unit is too far
away
to
bushwhack
to
Figure 6-7. Poikiloblastic pyroxene (black squares) in XBB unit. Note strange
gain access and
convolutions of bedding.
visit during this
trip.
143

�Trip 6 – Colvin Creek

Common Characteristics of Colvin Creek Hornfels
Listed below are characteristics common to all
rock types of the Colvin Creek Hornfels:
• All of the units are strongly magnetic and
microscopically exhibit polygonal/granoblastic
triple point junctions
• Thin veins and later pods of pyroxene and/or
massive magnetite are locally common. They are
arranged in both parallel sets and discontinuous
cross-cutting stringers
• Thin, brown hornblende and/or orthopyroxene
rims around titanomagnetite are commonly seen in
thin-section
• Sericitized plagioclase is seldom seen
• Olivine, where present, is usually fresh and never
serpentinized
• Biotite is generally absent except in the XBB just
above the “pyroxene interval”
• The titanomagnetite is titanium-rich and the
ilmenites are magnesium-rich.
Figure 6-8. Rhythmic layering in GOG unit (subzone
C) consisting of alternating olivine-rich and olivinepoor layers. Upper massive gabbro (hammer) truncates
bed sets.

FIELD TRIP STOPS
Access starting from Mountain Iron will be heading south on Highway 53 through Virginia. Shortly
after crossing the Tony Rukavina Bridge, over the Rouchleau Mine, turn and head east on Road 135 through
the towns of Gilbert, Biwabik, and Aurora. Within Aurora, turn right at the stop sign and head south on
CSAH 100, cross the railroad tracks, proceed to a stop sign and turn left on CSAH 110. Proceed to Hoyt
Lakes on this highway. Within Hoyt Lakes continue straight through two stop signs and head out of town
on Highway 110 (also called Skibo Vista Road). for about 4 miles. Just after passing the Bird Lake
Recreation area, turn left onto road UT9235 (also called 569/Skibo Rd). Proceed down this road about 2.7
miles, cross the railroad tracks and continue east for another 1.9 miles. Turn left (north) on forest road 113
(yellow “share the road” sign at this intersection). Go 5.9 miles north on 113 to an unmarked logging road
(another yellow ”share the road” sign at this intersection). Turn left on unmarked logging road (Figure 69) and head west about 1.5 miles depending on road conditions. Turn vehicles around, park as best as
possible, and walk about 0.2 miles to the west (through an old beaver pond) to the first stop. Locations of
the trip stops are shown in Figures 6-9 and 6-10.

144

�Trip 6 – Colvin Creek

Figure 6-9. Access to Colvin Creek hornfels area and trip stops via remote logging road.

Figure 6-10. Field trip stops (black dots) relative to mapped geology (modified from Patelke, 1996).

145

�Trip 6 – Colvin Creek
Stop 1: MCC (Massive Colvin Creek unit) (NAD83: 577246E/5268002N) (47.56084°, -91.97315°)
The MCC unit at this exposure is enigmatic. The rock is massive, lacks modal layering and regular
concentrations of minerals. It is classed as a gabbro to augite troctolite composed of plagioclase, augite,
orthopyroxene, olivine, and oxide (titanomagnetite&gt;ilmenite). It is fine- to medium-grained with
granoblastic triple point junctions. Locally, there are clots of granular plagioclase that could be interpreted
as amygdule infillings, as in the overlying basaltic units. However, the MCC also displays primary
decussate igneous textures, is variably ophitic, and locally porphyritic. For this reason, the distinction
between the MCC and overlying AMG are often unclear. Patelke (1996) felt that the portions of the MCC
were injected sill-like into the base of the inclusion while they were both in a plastic state.
Directions: Continue down the road for about 2 minutes to a flagged trail off to the north. Follow the trail
for another 5 minutes to Stop 2.
Stop 2: AMG (Amygdaloidal Gabbro unit) (NAD83: 577230E/5268130N) (47.56199°, -91.97334°)
At first glance, the AMG unit at this exposure is similar to the previous stop in that it consists
mostly of massive, fine- to medium-grained “oxide gabbro.” However, within this exposure are several
localized dark-gray, very fine-grained internal patches of basalt, that contain unquestionable plagioclasefilled amygdules. These patches exhibit gradational contacts with the surrounding medium-grained “oxide
gabbro.” Thus, both fine-grained basalt and medium grained “gabbro” are present here (best seen after
peeling a large area of the exposure). It is unknown whether these basalt patches represent true inclusions
or are remnant unmetamorphosed patches in a rock that has undergone various degrees of partial melting
to produce the “gabbroic” portions.
Directions: Return to fork in flagged trail and continue north a few minutes to Stop 3.
Stop 3: AA (Amoeboidal Augite unit) (NAD83: 577094E/5268083N) (47.56159°, -91.97515°)
The AA unit overlies the AMG unit and is also a fine- to medium-grained, massive, granoblastic
magnetic basalt unit. At the outcrop scale, the AA is similar to the AMG except for zones that contain
common pyroxene-filled ovoids (recrystallized amygdules) and by pyroxene-rich horizons that are
interpreted as sheeted amygdules and/or flow tops. Petrographically, the AA and AMG are very similar.
Mineralogy consists of plagioclase, diopsidic augite, and titanomagnetite&gt;ilmenite. Several basalt flows
can be distinguished in portions of this outcrop based on massive flows grading upward (northward) into
amygdule-rich basalt that in turn grades into pyroxene-rich flow tops. Individual flows range from over
several meters to less than one meter thick. Note the presence of a cluster of coarse-grained pyroxene with
minor K-spar (similar features will be seen at stop 6).
Directions: Return to road and proceed further west for about 1-2 minutes to another flagged trail leading
to the north. The Stop 4 exposure is about 100 feet north of the road on this trail.
Stop 4: XBB Unit (Cross-Bedded Belt) (NAD83: 577065E/5268019N) (47.56101°, -91.97555°)
To the north of, and overlying the magnetic basalt units, is the Cross-Bedded Belt unit of roughly
gabbroic composition. This is the first of several exposures of the XBB unit that will be viewed during this
trip. The rock is composed of fine-grained (1mm average) plagioclase-diopside-orthopyroxenetitanomagnetite&gt;ilmenite. The rock exhibits beautiful bedding, cross-bedding, density graded modal
layering, and concave upward cross-beds along with scour and fill structures. Note that NO quartz has ever
been noted in this unit!
146

�Trip 6 – Colvin Creek
There appears to be small-scale convolutions in the bedding trends that may be related to either
soft-sediment slump or folding during intrusion of the Duluth Complex and subsequent rotation of the
Colvin Creek inclusion. The location of this exposure along a curved mapped contact (Fig. 6-9) suggests
that there is a small open fold between the AA and XBB units as suggested by Patelke (1996).
Directions: Return to the road and head 3 minutes to the west to Stop 5 (about 50 feet north of the road).
Stop 5: Contact of XBB and AA units (below photo) (NAD83: 576907E/5267935N) (47.56028°, 91.97767°)
Both the AA and XBB units are present in this exposure. At the southern end of the exposure is a
massive basalt unit that grades upward (northward) into a rock that contains abundant pyroxene-filled
amygdules, which in turn, contains several pyroxene-rich lenses that represent sheeted amygdules and flow
tops. Several flows are defined in the outcrop and the contact with the XBB unit is well defined (see Fig.
6-11). The overlying XBB unit consists of a fine-grained gabbroic rock with bedding planes similar to the
previous stop but actual cross-bedding is not as striking. In regard to the contact between the two units, the
intervening “pyroxene interval” is largely absent except for thin irregular pyroxene-rich lenses that display
sigmoidal shapes. Patelke (1996) thought that sigmoidal-shaped pyroxene-rich lenses were developed along
a bedding parallel fault with left-lateral movement. At the extreme north end of the exposure is an irregular,
cross-cutting, massive oxide vein up to 3 inches wide.

Figure 6-11. Contact between AA (left) and XBB (right) units with very poorly defined “pyroxene interval” in
the contact zone. Note sigmoidal shapes of pyroxene layers at the contact. To the left of the contact (not in
photo) are 2-3 trough-shaped zones (less than 2x3 feet) that contain bedded sediments similar to the XBB unit.
Whether these zones are sedimentary interbeds or enfolded patches is unknown.

147

�Trip 6 – Colvin Creek
Directions: Return to the road and proceed further west for about 10 minutes to Stop 6 on the southern
edge of the road. On the way to Stop 6 there are numerous pavement road-crop exposures that consist
mostly of massive magnetic basalt with local amygdules.
Stop 6: AA (Amoeboidal Augite Unit) (NAD83: 576560E/5267549N) (47.55684°, -91.98234°)
This outcrop is situated about 2,000 feet down the road from Stop 5 and serves more as a rest and
regrouping stop. At this locale, the unit is massive and grades upwards (toward the road) into typical
amygdaloidal basalt.
Directions: Proceed down the road 350 feet and follow a flagged trail through the woods for about 840 feet
westward (10 minutes).
Stop 7: Contact of XBB &amp; underlying AA unit (NAD83: 576259E/5267482N) (47.55628°, -91.98636°)
This is the best exposure of “pyroxene interval” along the contact (see Figure 6-5 and description
in text). Perpendicular to the contact, and wholly within the “pyroxene interval,” are at several “vein-like”
potassium feldspar veins (up to 20-40 cm long by 1-4 cm wide) and a mass about 4 ft long by 1.5 ft wide.
Patelke (1996) felt that the veins are tension gashes formed by lateral movement along the contact. The
contact between the XBB and “pyroxene interval” exhibits some folding (soft-sediment?) with small-scale
V-shaped troughs projecting downward into the “pyroxene interval.” Some of these troughs exhibit
truncated bedding of the XBB against the “pyroxene interval” At one of the “V’s”, biotite, garnet and
cordierite have been identified by Patelke (1996). At the extreme east end of the exposure, it appears that a
bed of the XBB is folded(?) downward into the “pyroxene interval.” Patelke (1996) thought that the
“pyroxene interval” represents a deeply weathered flow top or soil developed on the AA unit.
Directions: At the west end of the Stop 7 exposure proceed northward for short distances (&lt;100 feet) to
several outstanding outcrops of the XBB unit of Stop 8.
Stop 8: XBB Unit (Cross-Bedded Belt) (NAD83: 576248E/5267546N) (47.55685°, -91.98649°)
Numerous exposures of beautifully cross-bedded XBB unit are present on the top of this hill. The
rock is a very fine-grained granoblastic rock with a general modal composition of oxide-bearing
anorthositic gabbro to gabbroic anorthosite. It is composed of plagioclase, diopsitic augite, and various
iron-titanium-manganese oxides making up to 8-15% of the rock, NO quartz has ever been documented.
As shown in Figures 6-6, 6-7 and 6-11, the rock is bedded and cross-bedded, exhibits density graded modal
layering, concave upward cross beds, and scour and fill features. Some of the cross-beds show an unusually
high angle of repose over very short distances possibly related to the environment of deposit (aeolian).

148

�Trip 6 – Colvin Creek

Figure 6-12. Classic exposure of the XBB unit. Bedding tops to the north (right).

Directions: Return to Stop 7 and proceed west for about 5 minutes to large exposures of the XBB and AA
units. Note that between stops 8 and 9 is a glacial erratic of the GOG unit with stupendous inch-scale
layering. This erratic is a good example of the GOG unit (otherwise inaccessible on this field trip).
Stop 9: AA (Amoeboidal Augite Unit) (NAD83: 576167E/5267425N) (47.55578°, -91.98759°)
After crossing over a large outcrop of the XBB unit, proceed southward a short distancer to a large
tip over exposure (uprooted and wind-fallen tree) of the AA unit consisting of multiple basalt flows with
ropey tops. This outcrop is present near the upper contact of the unit and small exposures of the XBB are
present to the north and west. Pipe vesicles are present in one small area of the AA unit. Also present is a
very small exposure of the “pyroxene interval.”
Directions: Return to vehicles. Return to Mountain Iron Community Center (47.51869°, -92.58997°).

References
Bonnichsen, B., 1972, Southern Part of the Duluth Complex. In: Sims, P.K. and Morey, G.B. (eds), Geology of
Minnesota – A Centennial Volume, Minnesota Geological Survey, p. 361-388.
Jirsa, M.A., 1980, The Petrology and Tectonic Significance of Interflow Sediments in the North Shore Volcanic
Group, Northeastern Minnesota, unpublished M.S. Thesis, University of Minnesota Duluth, 125 pages.
Jirsa, M.A., 1984, Interflow Sedimentary Rocks in the Keweenawan North Shore Volcanic Group, Northeastern
Minnesota: Minnesota Geological Survey, Report of Investigations 30, 20 p.

149

�Trip 6 – Colvin Creek
Miller, J.D., Green, J.C., Severson, M.J., Chandler, V.W., and Peterson, D.M., 2001, Geological map of the Duluth
Complex and related rocks, Northeastern Minnesota; Minnesota Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Map M119,
scale 1:200,000.
Miller, J.D., Jr. and Severson, M.J., 2002, Geology of the Duluth Complex in Miller, J.D., Jr., Green, J.C., Severson,
M.J., Chandler, V.W., Hauck, S.A., Peterson, D.M., and Wahl, T.E., 2002a, Geology and mineral potential of the
Duluth Complex and related rocks of northeastern Minnesota: Minnesota Geological Survey Report of
Investigations RI-58, p. 106-143.
Miller, J.D., Jr. and Severson, M.J., 2004, Geology and Mineralization of the Western Contact of the Duluth
Complex, Partridge River and South Kawishiwi intrusions, Northeastern Minnesota: Institute on Lake Superior
Geology, 50th Annual Meeting, Duluth, MN, Part II: Field Trip Guidebook, p. 227-258.
Miller, J.D., Jr. and Severson, M.J., 2005,
Patelke, R.L., 1996, The Colvin Creek Body, A Metavolcanic and Metasedimentary Mafic Inclusion in the
Keweenawan Duluth Complex, northeastern Minnesota: unpublished M.S. Thesis, University of Minnesota, 232
p.
Phinney, W.C., 1972, Duluth Complex, history and nomenclature, in Sims, P. K., and Morey, G. B., eds., Geology
of Minnesota: A Centennial Volume: Minn. Geol. Survey, pp. 333-334.
Severson, M.J., and Hauck, S.A., 1990, Geology, geochemistry, and stratigraphy of a portion of the Partridge River
intrusion: Natural Resources Research Institute, University of Minnesota-Duluth, Technical Report,
NRRI/GMIN-TR-89-11, 236p. (with plates).
Tyson, R. M., 1976, Hornfelsed Basalts in the Duluth Complex: unpublished M.S. Thesis, Cornell University,
Ithaca, New York, 85 p.

150

�Trip 7 – Classic Outcrops

FIELD TRIP 7
Classic Outcrops of Northeastern Minnesota
Dean M. Peterson1 and George J. Hudak2,3
1

Big Rock Exploration, 2505 W. Superior St., Duluth, MN 55806
George Hudak Geosciences P.L.L.C., Duluth, MN 55804
3
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, 116 Church
Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455
2

Introduction
This field trip will investigate a wide variety of Neoarchean, Paleoproterozoic and Mesoproterozoic
rocks that illustrate the diversity of Precambrian rocks in northeastern Minnesota. The field trip is an
updated version of “Field Trip 5 – Classic Outcrops of Northeastern Minnesota” that was run during the
50th Annual Meeting of the Institute on Lake Superior Geology that took place in Duluth, Minnesota during
May, 2004. As such, several of the field trip stop descriptions in this guidebook are derived from this earlier
field trip guide, with updates based on recent geological studies.

Generalized Stratigraphy of Northeastern Minnesota
Neoarchean Vermilion District
Supracrustal rocks in the Vermilion district consist of volcanic-dominated stratigraphic sequences
of the Wawa-Abitibi Terrane within the Superior Province of the Canadian Shield. Rocks of the WawaAbitibi Terrane in northern Minnesota are divided on the basis of stratigraphic and structural setting into:
(1) the Soudan belt, to the south, and (2) the Newton belt, to the north (Jirsa et al., 1992; Southwick et al.,
1998). The boundary between these contrasting structural panels can be traced geophysically across the
width of Minnesota and was informally designated the Leech Lake structural discontinuity (Jirsa et al.,
1992). In the region west and north of the Lake Vermilion State Park, the Leech Lake structural
discontinuity occurs along the Mud Creek shear zone (Hudleston et al., 1988), small segments of the
Vermilion and Wolf Lake faults (Sims and Southwick, 1985), and the Bear River fault (Jirsa et al., 1992).
A simplified regional geological map of the Neo-Archean terranes of northeastern Minnesota and adjacent
Ontario is presented in Figure 7-1.
The Soudan belt (Figures 7-1 and 7-2) contains large, broad folds involving calc-alkalic and
tholeiitic volcanic strata overlain by, and locally interdigitated with, turbiditic rocks. In contrast, the Newton
belt consists of elongate, northeast-trending, and mostly northward-younging volcanic and volcaniclastic
sequences. Volcanic rocks of the Newton belt differ from those of the Soudan belt in containing locally
abundant komatiitic flows and peridotitic sills. The two belts are fault-bounded, and the relationships
between stratigraphic units within each belt are largely conformable (although faults obscure contacts
locally). In its eastern extension, the Soudan belt is continuous with the Saganagons assemblage in Ontario
and terminates against the Saganaga pluton and Northern Light Gneiss. The Newton belt extends
discontinuously eastward into the Shebandowan District of Ontario to form the Greenwater and Burchell
assemblages. Intrusive rocks in both belts vary from gabbroic and felsic porphyries demonstrably related
to volcanism, to large plutons emplaced post-tectonically. Both districts contain unconformable,
Timiskaming-type sequences composed of calc-alkalic volcanic rocks, conglomerates, and finer grained
sedimentary rocks.
Lithostratigraphic units in the western Vermilion district (Table 7-1) include: (1) the Lower
member, Soudan Iron-Formation member, and Upper member (Upper Ely) of the Ely Greenstone
151

�Trip 7 – Classic Outcrops

Figure 7-1. Simplified correlation map of Neoarchean assemblages in Minnesota and northwestern Ontario (after
Peterson et al., 2001). Inset map illustrates location of the Wawa-Abitibi Terrane in Minnesota and northwestern
Ontario (Stott et al., 2007). The Leach Lake structural discontinuity is illustrated in red.

Figure 7-2. Generalized geology and geochronology of the Vermilion District in the vicinity of the Tower-Soudan
anticline (modified after Peterson, 2001; Hudak et al., 2014).

152

�Trip 7 – Classic Outcrops
Formation, the Lake Vermilion Formation (including the informally named Britt and Gafvert Lake
sequences), and the Knife Lake Group of the Soudan belt; (2) the Bass Lake sequence (Peterson and Jirsa,
1999, Peterson, 2001) and the Newton Lake Formation of the Newton belt; and, (3) syn- to post-tectonic
granitoid intrusions of the Giants Range batholith, and a suite of post-tectonic alkalic stocks and plutons.
Contacts between the different units are typically conformable, although considerable overlap in time and
space is documented between volcanic and sedimentary sequences (Southwick, 1993). Regional
chronostratigraphic correlations between the Wawa Greenstone (northwestern Ontario) and the Abitibi
greenstone belt (eastern Ontario and Quebec) are indicated in Figure 7-3.
Geochronological information for supracrustal and intrusive lithologies in the Vermilion District is
relatively sparse (Figure 7-3). Peterson et al. (2001) obtained a U-Pb zircon age of 2722 ± 0.9 Ma from a
quartz-phyric rhyolite dome in the Fivemile Lake Sequence of the Lower Member of the Ely Greenstone
Formation. Allerton et al. (2024a) obtained a crystallization age of 2708 ± 25 Ma for the Purvis Pluton,
which intrudes the Eagles Nest Succession of the Lower Ely Member, and has been interpreted as a
synvolcanic intrusion (Peterson, 2001). The age of the Upper Member of the Ely Greenstone formation is
currently unknown. Jirsa (2016) obtained an age of 2715.74 ± 0.50 Ma for a felsic volcanic unit within the
Newton Lake Formation (Boerboom, T. J., 2020). Lodge et al. (2013) obtained a U-Pb zircon age of 2689.7
± 0.8 Ma for a Gafvert Lake Sequence dacitic tuff breccia that occurs approximately 2m north of the contact
with the Soudan Iron-Formation member of the Ely Greenstone Formation. As well, Lodge et al. (2013)
obtained detrital zircon ages ranging from 2680-2690 Ma from greywackes that comprise the Lake
Vermilion formation. These dates confirm the source of the detritus in the Lake Vermilion Formation was
derived locally from the volcaniclastic rocks comprising the Gafvert Lake Sequence.

Figure 7-3. Regional chronostratigraphic correlations between the Vermilion district (Minnesota), the Wawa
greenstone belt (northwestern Ontario), and the Abitibi greenstone belt (eastern Ontario and Quebec; after Ayer,
2010).

Table 7-1. Lithostratigraphic units within the western Vermilion District (modified after Peterson and Jirsa, 1999;
Peterson et al., 2009; Hudak et al., 2012).

153

�Trip 7 – Classic Outcrops
Intrusive Rocks
Late Intrusions

Plutons and stocks of syenite, monzonite, diorite, and lamprophyre. A
U-Pb zircon age date of a non-foliated feldspar porphyry intrusion in the
Newton belt is 2683 ± 1.4 Ma (Peterson et al., 2001).

Vermilion Granitic Complex

Granite, schist, amphibolite, and schist-rich migmatite

Giants Range Batholith

Granite, granodiorite, monzodiorite, and schist-rich migmatite. U-Pb
zircon dates indicate a crystallization age ranging from 2640-2777Ma
(Allerton et al., 2024a).

Supracrustal Rocks
Newton Belt
Newton Lake Formation

Tholeiitic and komatiitic basalt lava flows, intrusions, and clastic strata
(deep subaqueous?)

Bass Lake Sequence

Tholeiitic basalt lava flows, iron-formation, and felsic porphyries (deep
subaqueous)

Soudan Belt
Knife Lake Group

Graywacke, slate, conglomerate, and sheared equivalents

Lake Vermilion Formation

Graywacke, slate, dacitic tuff, minor conglomerate. Detrital zircons from
planar bedded, normal-graded resedimented volcaniclastic rocks have UPb age dates of 2680-2690 Ma (Lodge et al., 2013; subaerial to
subaqueous)

Gafvert Lake Sequence

Dacitic to rhyodacitic tuff, lapilli-tuff, tuff-breccia, and iron-formation.
Basal dacite tuff-breccia deposits in Lake Vermilion State Park have UPb age date of 2689.7 ± 0.8 Ma (Lodge et al., 2013; subaerial to
subaqueous)

Britt Sequence

Tholeiitic basalt lava flows (deep subaqueous?)

Upper Member – Ely Greenstone

Tholeiitic basalt lava flows and iron-formation (deep subaqueous?)

Soudan Member – Ely Greenstone

Oxide-facies iron formation with intercalated basalt lava flows and felsic
volcaniclastic rocks (deep subaqueous)

Lower Member – Ely Greenstone

Calc-alkaline and tholeiitic basalt-rhyolite lava flows, tuffs, epiclastic
rocks, and minor iron-formation (shallow- to deep subaqueous)

Central Basalt Sequence

Calc-alkaline to tholeiitic sparsely amygdaloidal basalt and minor
basaltic andesite lava flows with MORB-like or back arc basin-like
chemical affinities within 100-200 meters of the overlying Soudan
Member iron-formation; FII- and FIIIa-type felsic volcanic and
volcaniclastic rocks (transition from shallow- to deep water
environment)

Fivemile Lake Sequence

Calc-alkaline to transitional moderately to highly vesicular basalt and
andesite lava flows and volcaniclastic rocks with arc-like chemical
affinities: FI-, FII-, and FIV-type felsic volcanic and volcaniclastic
rocks. Rhyolite dome at near Fivemile Lake has U-Pb age date of 2722.6
± 0.9 Ma (Peterson et al., 2001). Epithermal-like zinc stringer
mineralization is present near Fivemile Lake (Hudak et al., 2002a;
interpreted as shallow subaqueous environment).

Eagles Nest Sequence

Algoma-type iron formation, basalt-andesite lava flows, hydrothermal
exhalites, felsic tuffs.

154

�Trip 7 – Classic Outcrops
The upper part of the Knife Lake Group includes conglomerates which contain clasts derived from
the Saganaga Tonalite, which has been dated by Driese et al. (2011) at 2690.83 ± 0.26 Ma. Jirsa et al. (2012)
obtained a U-Pb age of 2690.7 ± 0.6 Ma for synvolcanic intrusions that cross-cut volcaniclastic rocks that
comprise the Knife Lake Group. Peterson et al. (2001) also dated a non-foliated feldspar porphyry intruded
into Newton Belt strata at 2683.1 +1/-4 Ma. This date provides a minimum age for the regional D2
deformation event that is described below.
The age of the orebodies at the Soudan Mine were previously interpreted to be syn- or postdepositional to the precipitation of the Soudan Member of the Lower Ely Greenstone Formation (Gruner,
1926; Klinger, 1960; Thompson, 2015). Recent U/Pb and (U-Th)/He radiometric dating by Allerton
(2024b) suggest the massive hematite orebodies at Soudan formed during Paleoproterozoic time (1640.8 ±
47.2 Ma – 1740.4 ± 72.5 Ma) and have been overprinted by a Mesoproterozoic hydrothermal event at
approximately 1100 Ma (1093.1 ± 16.4 Ma).
Structural Geology
The structural geology of the Vermilion District has been well described by Peterson et al. (2009)
and is reproduced below.
Periods of generally N-S directed compression resulted in three major regional deformation events
in the Neoarchean terranes of northern Minnesota. The earliest deformation event (D1) produced broad,
locally recumbent folds within the Soudan belt and major fault zones throughout the region. In the Newton
belt, D1 was accommodated by thrust imbrication of large crustal blocks, resulting in mainly northward
stratigraphic facing. Field relationships indicate that uplift, faulting, and the deposition of Timiskamingtype clastic sedimentary sequences in local fault- bounded basins occurred late in D1 deformation (Jirsa,
2000). A large, map-scale structure related to D1 deformation in the western Vermilion District is the
Tower-Soudan Anticline, which is a west-plunging anticline within which the axis and plunge changes
orientation along strike from nearly vertical in basalts to shallow NE plunging in the western sedimentary
rocks (Figure 7-2). Axial-planar cleavage associated with this early fold typically is lacking, although Bauer
(1985), Hooper and Ojakangas (1971), Hudleston (1976), and Jirsa et al. (1992) have described early
cleavage (S1) locally.
A second deformation event (D2) associated with synchronous regional metamorphism resulted in
foliation development and structures having largely dextral asymmetry. D2 is constrained in the Vermilion
District to the time period 2674 to 2685 Ma (Boerboom and Zartman, 1993), and between about 2680 and
2685 Ma in the Shebandowan (Corfu and Stott, 1998). Because D2 deformation affected all of the
supracrustal rocks in the area and is reasonably constrained by geochronology, the regional foliation (S2)
can be used in the field to temporally relate other structural, intrusive, and deformation events. The
relationship between S2 fabric and shear structures indicates that most shearing occurred relatively late in
the D2 event. Major shearing that produced the Mud Creek and related shear zones is attributed to the late
stages of D2 dextral transpression.
Structures related to the third deformation event (D3), which led to juxtaposition of the Wawa
Abitibi and Quetico terranes (Peterson and Patelke, 2003) include abundant NE- and NW-trending faults
that dissect the stratigraphic assemblages. Named structures related to D3 include the NE-trending Waasa
and Camp Rivard faults east of the Soudan Mine area, and the WNW-trending, crustal-scale Vermilion and
related faults that form the Wawa-Quetico Subprovince boundary.
Paleoproterozoic Superior Type Iron Resources of the Mesabi Iron Range
Superior type iron formation resources of Minnesota are exemplified by the long-standing mining
of iron resources of the Biwabik Iron Formation along the length of the Mesabi Iron Range. The Mesabi
Iron Range is largely located in St. Louis and Itasca counties and has been the most important iron ore
district in the United States since ~1900. The Mesabi Iron Range is 120 miles long, averages one to two
miles wide, and is comprised of rocks of the Paleoproterozoic Animikie Group. The Animikie Group on
155

�Trip 7 – Classic Outcrops
the Mesabi Iron Range consists of three major conformable formations: Pokegama Formation at the base;
Biwabik Iron Formation in the middle; and the overlying Virginia Formation. On the Mesabi Iron Range,
these three formations generally dip gently to the southeast at angles of 3-15 degrees.
Since the early 20th century, the Biwabik Iron Formation has been subdivided into four informal
members referred to as (from bottom to top): Lower Cherty member, Lower Slaty member, Upper Cherty
member, and Upper Slaty member (Wolff, 1917). The cherty members are typically characterized by a
granular (sand-sized) texture and thick-bedding (beds ≥ several inches thick); whereas the slaty members
are typically fine-grained (mud-sized) and thin-bedded (≤1 cm thick beds). The cherty members are largely
composed of chert and iron oxides (with zones rich in iron silicate minerals), while the slaty members are
composed of iron silicates and iron carbonates with local chert beds. Both cherty and slaty iron-formation
types are interlayered at all scales, but one rock type or the other predominates in each of the four informal
members, and they are so-named for this dominance Severson et. al. (2009).
Leached and iron enriched direct ores (or natural ores) were the first materials mined, with the first
shipments beginning in 1892, from strongly oxidized pockets along fault and fracture zones and the blanket
oxidation of the iron formation at the surface. Taconite, which is the material that is mined today using
magnetic separation methods, constitutes most of the iron formation and pertains to the hard, non-oxidized
portions of the iron-formation. Production has been dominantly controlled by vertically integrated
steelmakers since 1901, and therefore the mining and utilization of these ores have been dictated largely by
US ironmaking capacity and demand. The taconite typically contains 30-35% iron and 40-50% SiO2, plus
other components (Morey, 1992). The Biwabik Iron Formation is around 175-300 feet thick in the extreme
eastern end of the Mesabi Iron Range at Dunka Pit, 730-780 feet thick in the central Mesabi Iron
Range/Virginia Horn area near Eveleth, around 500 feet thick in the western Mesabi Iron Range near
Coleraine, and eventually exhibits a “nebulous ending about 15 miles southwest of Grand Rapids” (Marsden
et al., 1968) on the extreme western end of the Mesabi Iron Range.
Maps of currently active taconite mining operations on the Mesabi Iron Range are presented in Figure 7-4.
Mesoproterozoic Duluth Complex
The Duluth Complex and associated intrusions of Keweenawan age (~1.1 billion years) in northeastern
Minnesota constitute one of the largest mafic intrusive complexes in the world, second only to the Bushveld
Complex of South Africa (Miller et al., 2002). These rocks cover a 2,200 square mile (5,700 square km)
arcuate area associated with the two strongest gravity anomalies (+50 and +70 milligals) in North America,
implying intrusive roots over 8 miles (13 km) deep (Allen and others, 1997). The comagmatic flood basalts
and intrusive rocks underlying much of northeastern Minnesota were emplaced during development of the
Mesoproterozoic Midcontinent rift, which can be traced geophysically from exposures in the Lake Superior
region along a 1250 mile (2,000 km) long, segmented, arcuate path to Kansas and Lower Michigan. The
Duluth Complex is defined as the more or less continuous mass of mafic to felsic plutonic rocks that extends
for &gt;170 miles (275 km) in an arcuate fashion from Duluth nearly to Grand Portage (Figure 7-5). It is
bounded by a footwall of Paleoproterozoic sedimentary rocks and Archean granite-greenstone terranes
(Peterson and Severson, 2002), and a hanging wall largely of comagmatic, rift-related flood basalts and
hypabyssal intrusions of the Beaver Bay Complex. In genetic terms, the Duluth Complex is composed of
multiple discrete intrusions of mafic to felsic tholeiitic magmas that were episodically emplaced into the
base of a volcanic edifice between 1108 and 1098 Ma.
The geology of the Duluth Complex and adjacent areas has been described in two major
publications by the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS). These include a 1:200,000 scale regional bedrock
geological map of northeastern Minnesota (Miller et al., 2001), and a comprehensive written description of
the geology depicted on this map (Miller et al., 2002), commonly referred to as the “bible” by geologists
working on Duluth Complex geology. Within the nearly continuous mass of intrusive igneous rock forming
the Duluth Complex, four general rock series are distinguished on the basis of age, dominant lithology,
internal structure, and structural position within the complex.
156

�Trip 7 – Classic Outcrops

Figure 7-4. Bedrock geology and iron mining features of the Mesabi Iron Range.

Felsic series—Massive granophyric granite and smaller amounts of intermediate rock that occur as a semicontinuous mass of intrusions strung along the eastern and central roof zone of the complex, that were
emplaced during early-stage magmatism (~1108 Ma).
Early gabbro series—Layered sequences of dominantly gabbroic rocks that occur along the northeastern
contact of the Duluth Complex, emplaced during early-stage magmatism (~1108 Ma).
157

�Trip 7 – Classic Outcrops
Anorthositic series—Structurally complex suite of foliated, but rarely layered, plagioclase-rich gabbroic
anorthosite emplaced throughout the complex during main stage magmatism (~1099 Ma).
Layered series—Suite of stratiform troctolitic intrusions that comprises at least 11 variably differentiated
mafic layered intrusions that occur mostly along the base of the Duluth Complex. These intrusions were
emplaced shortly after the Anorthositic series (~1099 Ma).
South Kawishiwi Intrusion
The South Kawishiwi intrusion (SKI), together with the similar sized Partridge River intrusion
(PRI) immediately to the south, are most renowned for hosting the largest tonnage of Cu-Ni sulfide
mineralization in the world (Naldrett, 1997). The realization that the SKI hosts vast quantities of Cu-Ni
mineralization over 50 years ago has led to the publication of numerous geologic maps, (Green et al., 1966,
Bonnichsen, 1974, Foose and Cooper, 1974, Miller et al., 2001, Peterson, 2002e, f, Peterson et al., 2004,
Peterson, 2006b, Peterson et al., 2006), articles (Bonnichsen et al., 1980, Weiblen and Morey, 1980, Ripley,
1986, Chandler and Ferderer, 1989, Lee and Ripley, 1996, Hauck et al., 1997, Peterson, 2001b) theses
(Weiblen, 1965, Vislova, 2003, Marma, 2003, Gal, 2008, White, 2010), and reports (Phinney, 1969,
Phinney, 1972, Listerude and Meineke, 1977, Morey and Cooper, 1977, Foose, 1984, Dahlberg, 1987,

Figure 7-5. Geologic map of northeastern Minnesota.

158

�Trip 7 – Classic Outcrops
Dahlberg et al., 1989, Kuhns et al., 1990, Severson, 1994, Zanko et al., 1994, Hauck et al., 1997, Peterson,
1997, Peterson, 2001c, Miller et al., 2002, Peterson, 2002d, Patelke, 2003, Severson and Hauck, 2003).
The SKI is shallow dipping (~20º to the east-southeast) sill-like intrusion dominantly composed of
troctolitic cumulates that are exposed in an 8 x 32-km arcuate band along the northwestern margin of the
Duluth Complex. Footwall rocks include the Paleoproterozoic Virginia Formation in the Serpentine and
Dunka Pit deposits, the Paleoproterozoic Biwabik Iron Formation in the Dunka Pit and Birch Lake deposits,
and the Archean Giants Range batholith from the northern Birch Lake deposit north to the Spruce Road
deposit. The presence of shallow-dipping Biwabik Iron Formation inclusions as far north as the Spruce
Road deposit indicates that the majority of Paleoproterozoic units were assimilated and removed from the
footwall during emplacement of the SKI, leaving the Giants Range batholith as the dominant footwall rock
type. Alternately, the Virginia and Biwabik Iron Formations may simply have been largely eroded prior to
the development of the Mid-Continent Rift. Also present as inclusions in the SKI are mafic volcanic
hornfels (North Shore Volcanic Group), quartz sandstone hornfels (either the Puckwunge or Nopeming
sandstones), and anorthosite (of the Anorthosite series). Anorthositic series rocks about the SKI on the
northeast – and enclose an interpreted SKI feeder dike (the NLM) that extends farther northeast – the PRI
forms the southern sidewall of the SKI, and the BEI and Anorthositic series rocks overlie the SKI to the
east. On the regional Duluth Complex map of Miller et al. (2001), the SKI is subdivided into five major
map units. These are, from the base upward,
1. Heterogeneous sulfide-bearing troctolite, gabbro, and norite with localized hornfels inclusions,
2. A thick unit of subophitic to ophitic augite troctolite,
3. Discontinuous and localized layers of poikilitic leucotroctolite,
4. A thick homogeneous sequence of ophitic troctolite, and
5. A thick uppermost sequence of homogeneous troctolite that contains numerous anorthositic
layers.
Severson (1994) and Zanko et al. (1994) further subdivided the SKI into 17 different
lithostratigraphic units that are present in over 180 drill holes over a strike length of 31 kilometers. Sulfide
mineralization is confined to the BH, BAN, UW, and U3 units near the base of the intrusion, and to a lesser
extent the U1, U2, and PEG units. Major marker horizons that are correlated in drill holes include three
horizons with abundant cyclic ultramafic layers (U1, U2, and U3 units) and a pegmatite-bearing unit (PEG
unit) that was initially recognized by Foose (1984). The understanding of the significance of a large
anorthositic inclusion, originally intersected in six deep drill holes east of the Maturi deposit, and its role
in magma dynamics of the SKI has been a key feature in the development of an exploration model for
Duluth Metals Limited’s Maturi Extension deposit (Peterson, 2001c).

Terminology
It is important to note the terminology utilized in this field trip guide for: 1) volcaniclastic rocks;
2) bedding characteristics; and 3) description and unit coding of outcrops in the Duluth Complex. Use of
consistent terminology is required in order to accurately describe these geological features.
Volcaniclastic rocks contain abundant volcanic material irrespective of their origin or depositional
environment. Such rocks can be formed directly from volcanic eruptions (whether subaerial or subaqueous),
result from resedimentation of non-lithified volcanic deposits (for example, resedimentation of pyroclasts
prior to lithification), or result from weathering and resedimentation of pre-existing lithified volcanic rocks.
Primary (juvenile) volcaniclastic particles result directly from eruptive processes, and are of three types:
•

Pyroclasts, which form by explosive fragmentation of magma into particles (including ash, highly
vesiculated glass (pumice, scoria), crystals and crystal fragments, and lithic fragments);
159

�Trip 7 – Classic Outcrops
•

•

Hydroclasts, which form by explosive interaction with external water (via phreatic (steam only)
and/or phreatomagmatic (steam and magma) explosions) or by non-explosive quenching and
granulation of lava (for example, the formation of hyaloclastite fragments on the margins of
submarine lava flows or intrusions into wet sediments); and
Autoclasts, which form by frictional breakage of moving viscous lava flows (for example, to form
carapace breccias on the margins of subaerial lava flows).

Based on these different types of fragmentation, four types of primary volcaniclastic deposits have been
identified by White and Houghton (2006):
•

•

•

•

Pyroclastic deposits, which are generated from volcanic plumes and jets or pyroclastic density
currents as particles first come to rest. Deposition mechanisms associated with these processes
include suspension settling, traction, or en masse freezing;
Autoclastic deposits, which are generated during effusive volcanism when lava cools and fragments
as a result of thermal processes, or recently cooled lava breaks during flow. Deposition for these
types of rocks is under the influence of continued lava flowage;
Hyaloclastite deposits, which are generated during effusive volcanism when magma or flowing
lava is chilled and fragmented due to contact with water. Deposition of such deposits is is
influenced by the continued emplacement of the lava in the presence of water, and the thicknesses
of the hyaloclastite deposits can be dictated by the temperature of the magma, the effusion rate, and
the distance from the volcanic vent (Cas and Wright, 1987; Gibson et al., 1999; Newkirk et al.,
2001a, 2001b); and
Peperite deposits, which are generated when magma intrudes into unconsolidated clastic material
and mingles with (generally wet) debris to form a volcaniclastic deposit (McPhie et al., 1993).
Deposition of peperite deposits takes place essentially in-situ.

Secondary volcaniclastic particles are known as epiclasts:
•

Epiclasts are lithic clasts and/or crystals derived from physical weathering and erosion of preexisting rocks. Epiclasts are volcaniclasts when the pre-existing rocks are volcanic.

The terminology for volcaniclastic rocks has historically been somewhat confusing because many
different classification schemes have been developed (for example Fisher, 1961; Fisher 1966; Schmid,
1981; Cas and Wright, 1987; McPhie et al., 1993; White and Houghton, 2006), and different classification
schemes are preferentially used in different parts of the world. As a result, the terminology relating to
volcaniclastic rocks is commonly misused or misinterpreted. Four classification schemes that have been
used most in the recent geological literature include:
•
•
•
•

Fisher (1961, 1966) – Classification based on particle size, particle formation, or particle
fragmentation mechanism;
Schmid (1981) – Particle type within the deposit;
Cas and Wright (1987) – Mode of fragmentation and deposition; and
McPhie et al. (1993) – Transport and deposition mechanisms.

According to R. V. Fisher (1998), the difficulties with volcaniclastic rock classification can be
understood because “volcaniclastic rocks are essentially igneous on the way up and sedimentary on the way
down”. In fact, Fisher’s thesis advisor, when observing the volcaniclastic rocks that were the focus of his
thesis studies, indicated that they were “the ugliest and most undistinguished rocks I’ve seen in my 30 years
of petrology!” Also, classification is especially difficult in ancient volcaniclastic rocks because key aspects
160

�Trip 7 – Classic Outcrops
of classification can be obscured by subsequent metamorphism and/or structural deformation (e.g. particle
type, particle size) or because genetic processes cannot be ascertained unambiguously (e.g. transport and
deposition mechanism, fragmentation mechanisms).
For this field trip guidebook, we will utilize Fisher’s (1966) classification (Figure 7-6) for
volcaniclastic rocks. This classification scheme is based on the relative proportions of ash-sized material
(&lt; 2mm), lapilli-sized material (2-64mm), and blocks/bomb sized material (&gt;64mm) in the rock. Both
Gibson et al. (1999) and Mueller and White (2004) suggest that this classification be used for field-based
rock classification (mapping, diamond drill core logging, petrography) of ancient volcaniclastic deposits
for the following reasons:
•

•
•

The classification scheme is “field-user friendly” because it accommodates both the historically
important pyroclastic rock names and enables comparison at both the hand sample and thin section
scale (Mueller and White, 2004);
It is a Wentworth-based scale, and thus enables comparison of volcaniclastic deposits to
sedimentary deposits; and
Rock classification does not require knowledge of the specific transport mechanism or depositional
processes involved with the genesis of the deposit.

Figure 7-6. Volcaniclastic rock classification schemes of Fisher (1966) and White and Houghton (2006). This field
trip guidebook will classify volcaniclastic rocks using Fisher’s (1966) classification scheme.

More recently, White and Houghton (2006) have developed a modified version of Fisher’s (1966)
volcaniclastic classification scheme (Figure 7-6). The scheme is essentially equivalent to the Fisher (1966)
scheme, with the exception that the lapill-tuff field in the White and Houghton (2006) classification
comprises the lapilli-tuff and lapillistone fields of Fisher’s (1966).
Specific terms for bedding thicknesses are also used in this guidebook. The terminology for bedding
thickness has been adopted from McPhie et al. (1993) and includes:
•
•
•
•

Laminated
Very thinly bedded
Thinly bedded
Medium bedded

&lt;1 centimeters thick
1-3 centimeters thick
3-10 centimeters thick
10-30 centimeters thick
161

�Trip 7 – Classic Outcrops
•
•

Thickly bedded
Very thickly bedded

30-100 centimeters thick
&gt;100 centimeters thick

Figure 7-7. The classification scheme used to describe and code mafic intrusive rocks within the Duluth Complex,
modified after Phinney, 1972.

Classification of outcrops and map units within the Duluth Complex have relied on the early work of
William Phinney (Green et al., 1966; Phinney 1969, and Phinney, 1972) and is given in Figure 7-7.

162

�Trip 7 – Classic Outcrops

FIELD TRIP STOPS
Table 7-2. Simplified description of the twenty-field trip stops presented in this guidebook. Also included are the
coordinates (UTM, Nad83, Zone 15N and Lat-Long), mileage along the route to the stop, and the age of features that
will be observed and discussed on the outcrops.

Stop 1: Laurentian Divide at Confusion Hill
Longitude/Latitude: 47.51868699°N, -92.58996713E
UTM NAD 83 Zone 15N: 530870E, 5262888N
Exposed near this wayside and in road cuts on both sides of the highway is an array of variably
layered intrusions having both tonalitic (white) and dioritic (black) compositions. A cursory look shows
intrusive relationships that conclusively demonstrate that diorite was emplaced into tonalite at one locality,
and at another, tonalite was emplaced into diorite. In detail, all compositions intermediate between the two
end members are also present locally. Although the dioritic component is abundant here, the bulk of the
mapped unit is tonalitic. Emplacement of this unit, now known as the Lookout Mountain tonalite, probably
involved some degree of magma mingling. Dikes of tonalite that cut the adjacent high-grade supracrustal
rocks of the Minntac sequence contain metamorphic fabrics, yet little evidence of metamorphic origin can
be seen in the interior of the body, implying it is syntectonic with respect to D2 deformation. U-Pb zircon
dates (Boerboom and Zartman, 1993) of two components of the batholith exposed to the north bracket the
age of D2 deformation between about 2674 and 2682 Ma. Exposures at Confusion Hill are a small part of
the Giants Range batholith, which forms the core bedrock of the Laurentian (drainage) divide. The batholith
is a 40-mile wide belt of intrusions that can be traced on geophysical maps and outcrop east to the
Mesoproterozoic Duluth Complex, and west beyond the western border of Minnesota. It separates Archean
supracrustal sequences in the Virginia horn from those of the Tower-Soudan area - making stratigraphic
correlation between the two districts speculative.
Return to bus.
163

�Trip 7 – Classic Outcrops

Figure 7-7. Simplified bedrock geology map overlain by the field trip stops and traveled route.

Stop 2: Pike River Dam Greywackes
Longitude/Latitude: 47.57736062°N, -92.54367719E
UTM NAD 83 Zone 15N: 534317E, 5269428N
This glacially scoured outcrop exposes a nearly perfect cross-section of straight-bedded, variably
graded, feldspathic graywacke and black slate. The feldspar-rich, dacitic composition of sandy textured
beds is presumed to represent derivation from the Gafvert Lake felsic volcanic sequence exposed to the east
in the Soudan area. Regionally, a series of outcrops from Gafvert Lake westward shows an irregular
transition from proximal, possibly subaerial deposition on the east, to distal submarine turbiditic fan
deposition to the west. The beds contain numerous "soft-sediment" deformation features including load
structures, flames, intrafolial slump folds, and possibly some of the cross-stratal faulting. Bedding is nearly
vertical, and graded beds indicate stratigraphic younging to the south. This topping direction, and the
presence of a weak D2 cleavage that is left of bedding, indicate westward structural facing in the cleavage;
consistent with a position on the south limb of a large, south-overturned, regional, D1 fold structure—the
western extension of the Tower–Soudan Anticline. Northeast-trending kink bands, fault zones, and raised
quartz veins traversing the outcrop.
One of the truly classic outcrops of greywacke of the Lake Vermilion Formation is beautifully
exposed at this stop. Prior to about the 1950s, no depositional mechanism could satisfactorily explain the
coincidence in graywacke of; 1) coarse sand derived from a source many kilometers distant and having an
altered clayey matrix; 2) interbedded black slate; and 3) the lack of evidence for reworking in shallow water
(indicative of deposition below wave base). This was changed when the concept of turbidity currents was
introduced to the geological profession by Kuenen and Migliorini (1950). Despite widespread publication
on turbidites in more modern geologic settings through the 1950s and 1960s, the facies model was not
164

�Trip 7 – Classic Outcrops
refined and applied to Archean and Proterozoic strata in the Lake Superior region until somewhat later
(Morey, 1965; Ojakangas, 1966).
Return to bus.

Stop 3: Gafvert Lake Sequence Volcaniclastic Rocks
Longitude/Latitude: 47.80135914°N, -92.28615141E
UTM NAD 83 Zone 15N: 553454E, 5294469N
This relatively new roadcut (approximately 15 years old) exposes rhyodacitic to dacitic
composition Gafvert Lake Sequence lapilli tuffs and tuff breccias. The deposits have tentatively been
interpreted to represent mass flow units produced by slumping of volcanic and volcaniclastic material from
the Gafvert Lake volcano into an adjacent, probably submarine basin.
Close inspection of the unit indicates the presence of a variety of lapilli and blocks including: 1)
subrounded to subangular plagioclase ± quartz-phyric coherent dacite to rhyodacite; 2) subrounded to
subangular pumice; 3) angular carbonate-rich fragments; 4) angular chert fragments; and 5) local
subangular to angular massive sulfide fragments. Locally, abundant (up to 10%) &lt;1mm euhedral pyrite
cubes are disseminated in the matrix. The presence of both carbonate and massive sulfide fragments, as
well as plagioclase- and quartz phyric coherent rhyodacite to dacite lapilli, may suggest the slumps are
derived from a Gafvert Lake sequence subaqueous lava dome that was affected by local hydrothermal
alteration and the deposition of chemical exhalates (e.g. carbonate, chert and massive sulfide fragments).
Structurally, this outcrop occurs on the southern margin of an east-southeast – west-northwest
trending D2-associated structure that extends from Pike Bay (northwest) to south of Putnam Lake
(southeast). Here one can observe a strong, steeply dipping E-NE foliation and a well-developed lineation
that plunges approximately 70° E.
Return to bus.

Stop 4: Soudan Member Banded Iron Formation
Longitude/Latitude: 47.820074°N, -92.2365908E
UTM NAD 83 Zone 15N: 557144E, 5296585N
(NOTE: Modified from Peterson et al., 2009 and Hudak and Peterson, 2014.)
This classic exposure of the Soudan iron-formation member of the Ely Greenstone Formation lies
on the north limb of the Tower-Soudan anticline approximately 75 meters north of the stratigraphic top of
the volcanic sequences known collectively as the Lower member of the Ely Greenstone. The outcrop
displays two generations of tight folding in delicate laminae of chert (creamy white), chert-hematite jasper
(red), and magnetite-chert (black to silver-colored). The second generation of folds (F2) is tectonic in origin,
having subvertical axial surfaces that trend east, and steeply plunging axes. Most display Z-asymmetry.
The earlier folds (F0-1) appear to have been sharply refolded to produce complex interference patterns.
Lundy (1985) studied folding at this locality and concluded that some of the apparent interference structures
are the product of early-formed sheath folds that did not involve refolding by D2. The F1 structures are
predominantly intrafolial and exhibit a great variety of style and orientation; implying they formed by layerparallel, soft-sediment slumping (Fig. 7-8). Lundy’s mapping of this outcrop is an interesting demonstration
of unraveling details at a single outcrop that led to recognition that D1 deformation was not systematic here,
but likely soft sediment. Furthermore, it is a microcosm of regional-scale deformation.
165

�Trip 7 – Classic Outcrops
It is interesting to observe the rhythmic microlaminae (1 mm or so thick) in various cherty beds
exposed here and speculate about the paleoenvironment—that is, whether these represent daily
heating/cooling, tidal, climatic, annual, or some other repetitive influence (e.g waxing/waning of a
hydrothermal system) in the depositional environment. What is known about units of iron-formation in the
Ely Greenstone, of which there are many, is that deposition occurred in deep water (below wave base)
during periods of relative volcanic and tectonic quiescence by the slow subaqueous “rain” of chemical
precipitates.
The deep excavations in this area are the early workings of the Soudan iron mine, the first in
Minnesota. The mine produced about 16 mt of high-grade hematite ore (60-63 percent iron converted to a
park. Most of the production came from underground workings that began here in 1900, and which now
can be visited on guided tours. The mine previously housed several underground physics research facilities.
These include Soudan 1 (23rd level) which studied neutrino decay; 2) Soudan 2 (27th level), also to study
neutrino decay; and 3) the MINOS (Main Injector Neutrino Oscillation Search) lab, which was built on the
27th level adjacent to Soudan 1 and studied the decay of neutrinos within the earth as they passed from
Fermilab to Soudan (Peterson et al., 2009b).

Figure 7-8. Outcrop map showing bedding trajectories and multiple generations of folds and faults (from
Lundy, 1985). F1 folds are non-systematic and include both nappe- and sheath fold geometries.

Return to bus.

Stop 5: Murray Shear Zone Along Hwy 1/169
Longitude/Latitude: 47.81809993°N, -92.20694376E
UTM NAD 83 Zone 15N: 559366E, 5296388N
A series of roadcuts along Highway 169 expose a transect through the northern edge of the Murray
Shear Zone, which is one of the most striking Neoarchean structural features in the Tower-Soudan area
166

�Trip 7 – Classic Outcrops
(Peterson and Patelke, 2003). This series of outcrops perfectly display a classic feature of Neoarchean
ductile (shear zone) structures - strain partitioning (Figure 7-9). A close look at these outcrops also gives
one hints of broader economic geology implications via the presence of carbonate alteration of the chlorite
schists. The carbonate (ankerite and/or ferro-dolomite) strain hardens the ductile deformed schistose rocks
and allows for subsequent brittle deformation (and perhaps orogenic gold mineralization in cross-cutting
quartz-ankerite-sulfide veins.
On the larger scale, the D2 Murray shear zone transposes rocks 3-5 km eastwards in the zone
bounded by its northern and southern strain partitioned boundaries. The overall geometry of this panel of

Figure 7-9. Scanned image of the field sheet used to map outcrop OC-567. On the right are digital
photographs of outcrop OC-567: A) the overall outcrop view looking WNW; B) view to the north of steeply
east plunging, lineated and rod-shaped pillowed andesite (rock hammer 68cm for scale); and C) close-up view
of rock sample S-604, taken from the west side of the outcrop (bright zone on the left side of picture A). Data
from Peterson &amp; Patelke, 2003.

167

�Trip 7 – Classic Outcrops
rocks is like the geometry of “wedge-shaped shear zones” described in detail by Ramsey and Huber (1987).
Peterson’s mapping and collection of structural data in the Murray shear zone panel is largely confined to
a series of outcrops along the northern edge of the zone. Field observations of these outcrops indicate that
the strain symmetry along this boundary is largely constrictional, with a dominant steeply east-dipping,
elongate and rod-shaped structural fabric. A stereonet projection of planar and linear structural features
within the Murray panel is shown in Figure 7-10. The mean value of the strike and dip of planar features
is 282°/82°, and the trend and plunge of linear features has a mean orientation of 87°/71°. The overall mapscale internal geometry of the Murray panel clearly shows dextral asymmetry, with a strong sigmoidal
wrapping of iron-formation (see field trip geologic maps) to the northeast.

Figure 7-10. Stereonet projections of foliation, shear fabrics, and linear features from the Murray shear zone.

An estimate of the amount of displacement of the rocks within the panel of rocks bounded by the
Murray shear zone is given in Table 7-3. These values were calculated geometrically by using the average
plunge of measured lineations (71°) and two measured lines of possible correlative stratigraphy offset by
the bounding shear zones. The calculated total displacement values (net slip) are quite large (up to 13.8
km, or 43,000 feet of net slip), but the displaced rocks would still fall within the range of depth generally
associated with greenschist facies metamorphism.
Table 7-3. Calculated displacement along the Murray shear zone
Strike Slip
Lineation Plunge
Dip Slip

Net Slip

71°

4.5

13.1

13.8

71°

3.0

8.7

9.2

Return to bus.

168

�Trip 7 – Classic Outcrops

Stop 6: Lower Ely Member (Central Basalt) Sheet and Pillowed Flows
Longitude/Latitude: 47.8306566°N, -92.17157352E
UTM NAD 83 Zone 15N: 561999E, 5297811N
(NOTE: Modified from Field Trips of Hudak et al., 2004, 2014; Peterson et al., 2005, 2009).
This classic outcrop has been visited during field trips associated with the 2004, 2009 and 2014
ILSG conferences (Hudak et al., 2004; Peterson et al., 2009; Hudak et al., 2014). This is a no-hammer
outcrop, as the preservation of the delicate textures here rivals those observed in other classic
Neoarchean camps in the Superior Province containing well-preserved volcanic textures such as
Noranda, Quebec and Timmins, Ontario. The description and figure below have been modified from
Peterson et al. (2009) and Hudak et al. (2014).
The Central Basalt sequence (Peterson and Patelke, 2003, Peterson, 2005) comprises a steeply
north-dipping (75°- vertical), north-facing sequence of sparsely amygdaloidal pillowed and massive lava
flows of basalt andesite to basalt composition that are believed to be correlative with the tholeiitic
Armstrong Lake volcanic sequence mapped in the Eagles Nest quadrangle (Jirsa et al., 2001),
approximately 11km to the east. Hudak et al. (2007), Jansen et al. (2009), and Hudak et al. (2012) have
shown that the lowermost sections of the Central Basalt Sequence are composed of submarine basaltic
andesite to basalt lava flows that have rare earth element lithogeochemical patterns similar to mafic rocks
in oceanic volcanic arcs. However, locally, submarine basalt lava flows that occur within 50-200m
stratigraphically below the contact between the Central Basalt Sequence and the overlying Soudan Member
of the Ely Greenstone Formation illustrate MORB-like or back-arc basin-like lithogeochemical patterns.
This change in rare earth element characteristics may be interpreted to indicate a change from an oceanic
arc to back-arc environment immediately prior to the deposition of the Soudan Member. Relative to massive
and pillowed basalt and andesite flows in the Fivemile Lake sequence, Central Basalt sequence lava flows
are notably less amygdaloidal, and lack multiple pillow rind structures. In addition, the Central Basalt
sequence lacks the thick sequences of scoria-rich basalt-andesite lapilli tuffs that are commonly
interstratified with lava flows in the Fivemile Lake sequence. These characteristics of the Central Basalt
sequence indicate eruption and deposition in a deeper submarine environment than the stratigraphically
older Fivemile Lake sequence and suggest overall increasing water depth during the temporal development
of the Lower Ely. Deepening of the water column could be accommodated by extensional tectonics and
normal faulting associated with the development of the proposed back-arc environment.
At this stop, the outcrop comprises two east-southeast striking massive basalt flows, ranging from
at least five to nine meters in thickness, that are separated by a ten-meter-thick flow unit comprising pillows
and pillow lobes (Fig. 7-11). All three lava flows at this vicinity illustrate tholeiitic, MORB-like
lithogeochemistries (Hudak et al., 2007).
Flow 1, at the southern part of the outcrop, is composed of a pale- to dark green, faintly feldspar-phyric
(~10% 0.5-1 mm laths), sparsely amygdaloidal, basalt sheet flow that locally exhibits tortoise-shell jointing
formed in response to contraction during cooling. The uppermost 10-40 cm of the coherent part of Flow 1
is generally silicified and epidotized. Petrographic observations indicate that this section of the flow also
contains up to 70% &lt;0.1 cm round spherulites. An irregular contact occurs between the coherent basalt flow
and an overlying one- to two-meter-thick unit of dark green, exceptionally well-preserved perlitic in-situ
hyaloclastite and associated self-peperite (c.f. Batiza and White, 2000).
The hyaloclastite formed from non-explosive fracturing of the basalt glass developed on the flow
top due to quenching by water, whereas the perlite formed following deposition by hydration of volcanic
glass. An irregular contact occurs between the hyaloclastite and Flow 2, which is composed of north-facing
mattress- to bun- shaped pillow lavas and pillow lobes with numerous “neck and knob” structures.
Individual Pillow structures have well developed perlitic hyaloclastite margins that range from 1-4 cm in
169

�Trip 7 – Classic Outcrops

Figure 7-11. Detailed geological map of sheet flows, pillow lavas, and associated hyaloclastite deposits at Field Trip
3, Stop 1 (after Hudak et al., 2014; Hudak and Peterson, 2014).

width. Pillow buds indicate propagation from east to west, suggesting the volcanic vent was located east of
this location. The coherent pillows and lobes are overlain by up to 2.5 meters of hyaloclastite breccia that
contains 20-40% subrounded to subangular pale gray green basalt lapilli in a jigsaw puzzle-fit dark green
perlitic hyaloclastite matrix. The upper contact of Flow 2 and the overlying basalt sheet flow (Flow 3) is
irregular, and is marked by thin (1-8 cm thick), sheet- like basalt fragments that are up to 1.6 meters in
length. These fragments locally appear to be isoclinally folded about an east-west-trending fold hinge.
Although the genesis of this structure is currently not well understood, it may be due to syneruptive
deformation of either thin slabs of hot, basal flow margin crust from the overlying flow, or thin injections
of basalt magma into the hyaloclastite from either the underlying pillows or the overlying sheet flow. Flow
170

�Trip 7 – Classic Outcrops
3 comprises an at least ten-meter-thick pale green-gray, slightly feldspar-phyric, sparsely amygdaloidal
sheet flow. Steep, NNE-trending west dipping D3 joints are well developed in this unit, as are lens-shaped
psuedo-pillows that are up to 50 cm in diameter.
Return to the bus by walking back down the hill.

Stop 7: Mud Creek Shear Zone
Longitude/Latitude: 47.87440908°N, -92.14025702E
UTM NAD 83 Zone 15N: 585753E, 5309482N
This outcrop shows highly strained rocks in the Mud Creek shear zone. The rock type is a quartziron carbonate-sericite schist, having quartz and tourmaline knots, abundant pyrite, and trace amounts of
gold. Its protolith is unknown, because of the intense deformation, but could be any of several rock types
in the region, including quartzofeldspathic porphyry, basaltic metavolcanic rocks, or graywacke. The shear
fabric trends east-northeast, and lineations plunge at shallow angles to the east. Development of this shear
zone, which occupies most of the valley of Mud Creek, is a product of largely dextral transpressive
deformation that has been partitioned into discrete zones, presumably late in D2 deformation. It is generally
believed that gold-bearing mineralization was introduced during these later deformation events, and the
Mud Creek shear zone and environs have attracted considerable attention as a gold target (Peterson, 2001,
Peterson and Patelke, 2004a, 2004b). The Mud Creek shear is a broad, anastomosing zone that forms the
boundary between rocks of the Ely Greenstone and Lake Vermilion Formation on the south, and volcanic
and iron formation-bearing rocks known informally as the Bass Lake sequence on the north. The Bass Lake
rocks may be equivalent to parts of the Newton Lake Formation exposed north of Ely, but a complex series
of faults in the intervening area makes this correlation speculative.
Return to bus.

Stop 8: Newton Lake Formation Variolitic Pillow Lavas and Hyaloclastite
Longitude/Latitude: 47.93291301°N, -91.85191152E
UTM NAD 83 Zone 15N: 585753E, 5309482N
(NOTE: Modified from Field Trip Stop 5-16 (Jirsa et al., 2004), and Field Trip Stop ET-1 (Peterson
et al., 2009)).
The Neoarchean Newton Lake Formation is composed primarily of tholeiitic and komatiitic
pillowed mafic lava, diabasic gabbro, differentiated mafic-ultramafic sills, intermediate-mafic pyroclastic
rocks and siliceous marble with minor felsic-intermediate volcaniclastic rocks and lava flows. This
formation is approximately 2,350 m thick. The unit overlies the Knife Lake Group in central part of the
Vermilion district and the Lake Vermilion Formation in western part of Vermilion district (USGS National
Geologic Map Database, https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/Geolex/UnitRefs/NewtonLakeRefs_9525.html).
The Newton Lake Formation differs from the Ely Greenstone Formation in that the former contains
a high proportion of mafic-ultramafic sills and lava flows, abundant diabasic sills and rare iron-formation.
Lava flows in the Newton Lake Formation typically have larger MgO and incompatible element contents
than those of the Ely Greenstone Formation, and some are classified as komatiites and komatiitic basalt
(Schulz, 1980; Jirsa et al., 2004; Grotte and Hudak, 2014). The Newton Lake Formation (and possibly
equivalent Bass Lake sequence) appears to be younger than the Lower Ely Member (~2723 MA; Peterson
et al., 2001) with an age date of ~2715 MA (Jirsa, 2016) and was previously interpreted to be the youngest
Archean supracrustal sequence in the Vermilion district until the Gafvert Lake Sequence was dated at
171

�Trip 7 – Classic Outcrops
approximately 2689 MA (Lodge et al., 2013). Rocks having nearly identical composition and
stratigraphic/structural setting occur in Itasca County some 80 kilometers to the west (Jirsa, 1990; Jirsa et
al., 2004).
A sequence of exceptionally well-preserved steeply-dipping, south-topping, lower greenschist
facies metamorphosed Newton Lake Formation variolitic pillow lavas is exposed along a series of outcrops
located on the west side of the road approximately one-half mile north of CR-88 on the Echo Trail.
Variolites are defined as “a spherulite-like radiating aggregate composed of feathery, needle-like crystals
of plagioclase and pyroxene that occur in mafic volcanic rocks (typically basalt). Variolites may result from
devitrification but are commonly believed to be formed in subaqueous rocks by quench-induced
crystallization (Cas and Wright, 1987, p. 420). According to Arndt and Fowler (2004), variolites result from
either magma mingling or blotchy alteration, or they are a type of plagioclase spherulite.
A generalized cross-section through these pillows from a detailed field and petrographic study of
this outcrop (Grotte and Hudak, 2014) is presented in Figure 7-12A. Pillows vary from “bun-” to “mattress” shaped (Dimroth et al., 1978) and range from &lt;1 to &gt;2.5 meters in diameter.
Pillow shapes, as well as the local occurrence of quartz-filled vacuoles within individual pillows,
indicate younging directions to the south. Pillow cores tend to be dark green to pale yellow-green in color
depending upon the abundance of secondary epidote alteration. The pillow cores commonly contain
massive, globular variolites with local &lt;1cm diameter spherical variolites., and are locally variolitic (Figure
7-12B). Pillow selveges are well preserved and commonly contain concentric zones globular to spherical

Figure 7-12. Summary of field and petrographic observations of Newton Lake Formation variolitic pillow
lavas at this location (from Grotte and Hudak, 2014). A) Generalized cross-section through a Newton Lake
Formation pillow lava at this location. B) Outcrop photo of the margin of a pillow lava at this location noting
the transition from well-preserved interpillow hyaloclastite into a variolitic pillow selvege. C) Thin section
scan illustrating the well preserved cuspate, angular shards comprising the interpillow hyaloclastite. Dark
spherical shapes on the right half of the photo are variolites.

172

�Trip 7 – Classic Outcrops
variolites that mimic individual pillow shapes. Interpillow hyaloclastite is extremely well preserved and is
composed of jigsaw-puzzle-fit angular cuspate shards that were originally glass but are now composed of
fine-grained alteration minerals (Figure 7-12C).
Petrographic observations (Grotte and Hudak, 2014) indicate that variolites in this exceptional
exposure of Newton Lake Formation pillow lavas are dominantly composed of rounded to oval, radiating
plagioclase spherulites with rare, axiolitic plagioclase spherulites locally present. The presence of needlelike to acicular skeletal plagioclase crystals and absence of phenocrysts suggest that the pillow lava flows
at this location erupted at temperatures above the liquidus and experienced relatively large degrees of
undercooling before undergoing rapid crystallization on the Neoarchean seafloor.
As indicated in Jirsa et al. (2004), the Newton Lake is separated from the Ely Greenstone to the
south by a complex zone of faulting (Shagawa Lake and Sibley faults) developed within sedimentary rocks
of the Knife Lake Group. Although relatively undeformed conglomerate and sedimentary rocks of the Knife
Lake Group are exposed just a few miles to the east, they are typically so sheared and altered in this area
as to obscure lithologic and sedimentary interpretations.
Return to bus

Stop 9: Giants Range Batholith
Longitude/Latitude: 47.81587746°N, -91.79083789E
UTM NAD 83 Zone 15N: 590518E, 5296544N
(NOTE: Modified from Hudak and Peterson, 2014).
Footwall rocks to the northern part of the South Kawishiwi Intrusion are part of the Neoarchean
Giants Range batholith (GRB). At this exposure along Highway 1, the GRB consists of porphyritic
hornblende quartz monzonite that contains distinctive 1-2cm diameter potassium feldspar phenocrysts. One
may also observe a distinctive foliation represented by alignment of black to dark green amphiboles and
locally dark brown biotite.
The massive nature of this unit creates an excellent footwall for Duluth Complex-associated
intrusions and associated Cu-Ni-PGE deposits as the GRB lacks bedding and thus rare (if ever) gets
incorporated into the mineralized zone as barren xenoliths. Additionally, melting of the GRB beneath longlived magma channels (Peterson and Boerst, 2013) at the base of the Maturi deposit has contaminated the
South Kawishiwi intrusion, inducing additional sulfide immiscibility and the genesis of Ni- and Co-rich
massive sulfide bodies.
Return to bus

Stop 10: Maturi SW Roadcuts of BH and U3 Units
Longitude/Latitude: 47.78505228°N, -91.79056387E
UTM NAD 83 Zone 15N: 590592E, 5293118N
Classic roadside exposures of heterogeneous sulfide-bearing troctolite and layered melatroctolite
of Severson’s (1994) Basal Heterogeneous (BH) and Ultramafic 3 (U3) units of the SKI. A large core-stone
is well exposed in the weakly saprolitic heterogeneous troctolite outcrop. Several small xenoliths of finegrained troctolite can be observed on top of the outcrop and are interpreted as Stage 1 chilled margin
autoliths (Peterson and Boerst, 2013). Within the exposure of the overlying U3 layered melatroctolite,
olivine layers strike 17° and dip steeply 51° to the ESE. The steep dip is apparently associated with two
173

�Trip 7 – Classic Outcrops
defined north-south trending faults east of these exposures. Recent drilling by Twin Metals Minnesota in
this area has led to the definition of the Maturi SW deposit.
Return to bus

Stop 11: SKI Magmatic Slurry Igneous Breccia
Longitude/Latitude: 47.780584°N, -91.79273111E
UTM NAD 83 Zone 15N: 590437E, 5292619N
At this stop, we’ll examine perhaps the best exposure of Severson’s (1994) BH unit in the whole
of the SKI. The heterogeneous troctolitic rocks at this stop are generally poorly mineralized and thus lack
a gossanous saprolitic weathering profile which lets one see the true nature of the heterogeneity within the
troctolite. We believe that all geologists who log drill core within the Cu-Ni-PGE deposits of the Duluth
Complex (or who attempt to model such deposits for mine planning purposes) should be required to spend
several days examining the rocks within the area around both Stops 10 and 11. All participants should
imagine a drill core cutting this exposure and how they would interpret the geology of that core without
first examining this outcrop. Such thoughts are why the Precambrian Research Center’s field camp had for
many years its students complete a 1:5,000-scale bedrock geology map of this area.
Return to bus

Stop 12: Main AGT
Longitude/Latitude: 47.81303067°N, -91.73468023E
UTM NAD 83 Zone 15N: 594727E, 5296295N
Recent road cut along the south side of Minnesota Highway #1 of massive, extremely homogeneous
augite troctolite of the Main AGT unit of Severson (1994). Troctolite of the Main AGT unit differs from
the Middle and Upper SKI troctolite in two distinctive ways: 1) ophitic augite crystals are black, distinctly
associated with Fe-Ti oxides + apatite, and occur as high-density ophitic crystals from 1 to 3 inches in
diameter. In the Middle and Upper SKI, ophitic augite crystals are brown, not associated with Fe-Ti oxides,
and occur as large (up to 15 inches) low-density grains; and 2) The Main AGT is never layered. Geologists
at Duluth Metals interpret the units’ homogeneity and lack of layering as evidence that the Main AGT
magma lacked phenocrysts of olivine and plagioclase and represents the end product of topdown and
bottom-up solidification of a basaltic liquid. We currently interpret the Main AGT as the solidification of
much of the “carrier liquid” of the underlying sulfide-bearing BMZ magmatic slurry.
Return to bus

Stop 13: Spruce Road Bulk Sample Site/Discovery Burrow Pit
Longitude/Latitude: 47.83271644°N, -91.67864227E
UTM NAD 83 Zone 15N: 598885E, 5298553N
Beginning in the late 1940s, the U.S. Forest Service utilized locally derived glacial tills and
weathered bedrock gossans as road building materials during the construction of the Spruce Road. As we
take a short hike into one of these borrow pits, we will walk by the 1973 INCO bulk sample site in the
Spruce Road deposit and visit several outcrops with fresh Cu-Ni sulfide minerals. This short stop will
examine the bottom of an old borrow pit where participants can walk on and sample sulfide-bearing
174

�Trip 7 – Classic Outcrops
troctolite gossans. Please note the friable nature of the rocks in the weakly saprolitic exposure and look for
rounded core-stones where weathering over the eons was less intense.
Return to bus

Stop 14: Nickel Lake Macrodike
Longitude/Latitude: 47.83079527°N, -91.63760896E
UTM NAD 83 Zone 15N: 601959E, 5298393N
The Nickel Lake Macrodike (NLM) is a northwest to southwest-trending, steeply dipping,
asymmetric troctolitic and gabbroic intrusion interpreted to be a feeder dike for the northern portions of the
SKI. The macrodike is interpreted to be located within a major rift-parallel normal fault (down to the
southeast) now obscured by intrusion of NLM igneous rocks. Regional southward tilting (based on the deep
level of erosion of the northern Bald Eagle Intrusion directly east of this area) leads to the interpretation
that the southwest end of the NLM (near Omaday Lake) is structurally higher than the northeastern portion
of the dike, and represents the location where magma flow changed from dike-like to sill-like, as it exited

Figure 7-13. Bedrock geology map of the southwestern end of the Nickel Lake Macrodike.

175

�Trip 7 – Classic Outcrops
the dike – thus the magma velocity slowed – and entered the growing SKI magma chamber. Excellent
potential exists for Ni-Cu rich massive sulfide at the basal contact where the dike enters the SKI (Section
31, T62N, R10W).
The 6.5km long by 1.0 km wide macrodike is composed of three main units: 1) inclusion-rich,
locally sulfide-bearing, heterogeneous troctolite (unit Mpth) along the northwestern margin; 2) layered
troctolite, melatroctolite, and dunite (unit Mltmt) along the southeastern margin; and 3) a late, cross-cutting,
coarse-grained to pegmatitic oxide-rich, olivine-gabbro to melagabbro (unit Mxog) traversing generally
through the center. Small (&lt; 1m) to large (hundreds of meters long) xenoliths include Mesoproterozoic
Anorthositic Series wall rocks (unit Mai) and North Shore Volcanic Group basalts (unit Mhb), and
Paleoproterozoic Biwabik Iron Formation (unit Pifs) and Virginia Formation (unit Pvf). For this field trip
we are simply going to take some walks in the bush, mostly along logging roads and snowmobile trails as
time allows and look at numerous outcrops of the NML and adjacent rocks and discuss geology as we see
it. Numerous detailed bedrock geology maps, reports, and presentations of the NLM and adjacent areas
have been published over the last couple of decades (Peterson, 2002a, 2002b, 2002c, 2006a, 2006b, 2006c,
2008, Peterson and Albers, 2007) and a compilation of detailed geologic mapping data for the southwestern
NLM is given in Figure 7-13.

Return to bus
Stop 15: Remnant Saprolite, Middle SKI
Longitude/Latitude: 47.77089981°N, -91.66297244E
UTM NAD 83 Zone 15N: 600176E, 5291703N
A short field trip stop to examine locally layered troctolitic rocks of the Upper SKI of Peterson and
Boerst (2013). This outcrops in this area epitomizes the “Sea of Troctolite” that occurs throughout the vast
majority of the SKI (Middle and Upper SKI of Peterson and Boerst, 2013). Careful attention will be given
to an outcrop next to the bus where spheroidal weathering of the troctolite is forming rounded core stones
of troctolite, which we’ll see once again at stop 18.
Return to bus

Stop 16: Anorthosite Series Roadcut
Longitude/Latitude:: 47.75915521°N, -91.64719916E
UTM NAD 83 Zone 15N: 601381E, 5290418N
Large, glacially polished roadside outcrop of the gabbroic and troctolitic anorthosites of the
Anorthositic Series of the Duluth Complex. At this location these anorthositic rocks form the eastern
sidewall of the SKI and are cut by a series of northeast-striking valleys. The valleys were interpreted by
geologists of Duluth Metals Limited as steeply west-dipping reverse faults that were formed by
emplacement of the SKI immediately to the west. Approximately 2.5 km to the southwest of this roadcut
Cold Spring Granite Company quarries a large gabbroic anorthosite xenolith similar to this stop in their
Mesabi Black quarry.
Return to bus

176

�Trip 7 – Classic Outcrops

Stop 17: Bald Eagle Intrusion
Longitude/Latitude: 47.7385175°N, -91.6405279E
UTM NAD 83 Zone 15N: 601921E, 5288133N
A quick stop to observe a roadside outcrop of troctolite of the Bald Eagle Intrusion (BEI). The BEI
is a large (4.5 to 16.5 km x 31 km) troctolitic to gabbroic body that was emplaced partially within
Anorthositic series rocks, the SKI, and the Greenwood Lake Intrusion (see BEI on Figure 7-7). Weiblen
(1965) mapped the well-exposed northern portion of the intrusion and showed that it is funnel-shaped and
consists of an outer zone of troctolite and an inner zone of olivine gabbro. In the poorly exposed
southwestern portions of the intrusion, field mapping by Green et al., (1966) and Foose and Cooper (1978)
showed the BEI and SKI in direct conformable contact. Steep foliation and modal layering (Weiblen, 1965,
Green et al., 1966) integrated with a distinct gravity anomaly over the northern BEI imply that the northern
part of this intrusion is funnel shaped and necks down to a steep feeder dike. Weiblen and Morey (1980)
interpreted the limited cryptic variation (Weiblen, 1965), the steep dip of lamination and layering, and
adcumulate nature of the BEI as indicative of its being an open conduit to higher intrusions and perhaps
volcanic flows.
Petrologic observations and geophysical interpretations (Chandler, 1990, Chandler and Ferderer,
1989) suggest that the BEI and SKI were emplaced by successive overplating of magmas from a common
feeder centered on the northern BEI and extending along the trace of the NLM that links the BEI and SKI.
In a related analogy, Cartwright and Møller-Hansen (2006) have shown that interconnected sill complexes
transect the middle to upper crust over a vertical distance of 8-12 km offshore of Norway. The geometry of
the gravity and magnetic anomalies of the BEI, as well as the overall Midcontinent Rift is very similar to
the pattern of the seismic reflections profiles of active ridge systems (Vislova, 2003). In detail, the
geophysical expressions of the BEI have the same shape and dimensions as the “bulls’ eye” pattern of low
velocity seismic reflection anomalies along the East Pacific Rise. These anomalies are interpreted to define
regions of melt concentrations, i.e., active magma chambers. These data suggest that the BEI could be a
“frozen” dynamic magma chamber (Weiblen et al., 2005, Peterson and Hauck, 2005).
Eight exploration holes drilled by Duluth Metals Limited in 2011 revealed several new distinct
features of the BEI. All of these holes encountered chromitite layers within horizontally layered troctolites
with many of the chromitite horizons occurring as “rip up” clasts within troctolites. Duluth Metals Limited’s
hole LOD-06, drilled 12km SSW of this field trip stop, encountered flowing gas at a depth of 1,778 feet.
The gas was analyzed and found to contain &gt;10% helium. This is the site where Pulsar is currently exploring
with the aim of producing helium gas.
Return to bus

Stop 18: Vermilion Moraine
Longitude/Latitude: 47.6918526°N, -91.81063993E
UTM NAD 83 Zone 15N: 589247E,5282737N
In common with most of the high latitude regions of North America, northeastern Minnesota was
repeatedly glaciated during the ice ages of the Pleistocene Epoch. Glaciogenic sediments and landforms in
this 2025 ILSG field trip area are associated with the Rainy Lobe of the Laurentide ice sheet. While there
are a number of possible definitions of what constitutes the Rainy Lobe – sedimentological, textural,
compositional, and association with particular geomorphic features – a definition rooted in glacial dynamics
perhaps works best. In this sense, the Rainy Lobe refers to that portion of the Laurentide ice sheet lying
northwest of Lake Superior (occupied by the Superior Lobe), and east of the Winnipeg Basin and Red River
Valley (occupied by the Red River Lobe). In common, Rainy Lobe landforms and glaciogenic sediments
177

�Trip 7 – Classic Outcrops
reflect a general northeast to southwest ice flow direction, and a Labradoran (northeastern) sediment
provenance.
In common with much the Canadian Shield, glacial erosion has nearly completely stripped
preglacial regolith from bedrock north of the Laurentian Divide. However, preglacial saprolites are a
common occurrence underlying glaciogenic sediments in central and western Minnesota; the nearest such
occurrences are exposed in open pit mines of the Mesabi Range, on the south flank of the Giant’s Range.
Approximately 12,400 years ago, the retreating Rainy Lobe made a last stand in northern Minnesota
to form the West-Northwest to East-Southeast trending Vermilion Moraine. This stop includes a quick
walk over the end of the Vermilion Moraine and a view to the south over a glacial lake plain (Fig. 7-14).

Return to bus

Figure 7-14.
Annotated lidar
digital
elevation model
showing
glaciogenic
landforms in
the stop 18
area.

Stop 19: Contaminated Basal SKI, Dunka Pit Area
Longitude/Latitude: 47.69423099°N, -91.85803438E
UTM NAD 83 Zone 15N: 585687E, 5282948N
The recently permitted extension of Cliffs Natural Resources Northshore mine required the
rerouting of St. Louis County Road 623 to the north. The building of the new road resulted in the exposure
of rocks of the ~1.85 Ga. Biwabik Iron Formation and the 1.1 Ga. South Kawishiwi intrusion. This short
stop will include the examination of three new roadside outcrop areas, including: 1) Metamorphosed
Biwabik Iron Formation, 2) Sulfide-poor gabbroic rocks, and 3) Sulfide-rich (pyrrhotite-dominant)
178

�Trip 7 – Classic Outcrops
contaminated noritic rocks. Geochemical analyses of rock samples from these three outcrop areas
(completed by Duluth Metals in 2012) are given in Table 7-4.
Table 7-4. Geochemical analyses of rock samples taken from the roadside outcrops of Stop 19.
Sample ID

DMR0446

DMR0447

DMR0164

DMR0165

DMR0448

DMR0449

DMR0450

DMR0451

Rock Type

Iron
Formation

Iron
Formation

Olivine
Gabbro

Biotitic
Gabbro

Sulfidic
Norite

Sulfidic
Norite

Sulfidic
Norite

Sulfidic
Norite

Outcrop #

1

1

2

2

3

3

3

3

Cu (ppm)

4

0

357

218

3960

2630

4380

4270

Ni (ppm)

0

0

82

87

1230

761

1030

1120

Co (ppm)

2

13

44

53

191

117

168

183

Pt (ppb)

5

1

1

1

9

20

6

16

Pd (ppb)

1

3

1

2

53

40

58

60

Au (ppb)

1

1

1

1

18

15

23

23

S (%)

-0.01

-0.01

0.02

-0.01

2.61

1.62

1.58

1.79

SiO2 (%)

51.35

38.71

48.14

47.28

42.67

51.62

41.25

43.53

Al2O3 (%)

0.25

0.45

15.21

15.06

15.02

17.56

13.81

13.71

Fe2O3 (%)

40.11

55.01

15.64

16.35

21.04

11.98

22.12

21.34

CaO (%)

6.07

3.33

7.87

8.00

7.51

5.39

6.29

6.90

MgO (%)

1.93

1.52

4.93

5.47

7.15

5.13

6.01

6.97

Na2O (%)t

0.06

0.06

2.90

2.62

2.25

2.72

1.99

2.34

K2O (%)

0.01

0.01

1.12

1.10

0.68

2.54

0.56

0.63

Cr2O3 (%)

-0.01

-0.01

0.02

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.02

0.02

TiO2 (%)

-0.01

0.05

3.12

3.47

1.77

0.76

1.90

2.31

MnO (%)

0.97

0.51

0.19

0.20

0.16

0.08

0.14

0.18

P2O5 (%)

0.06

0.07

0.43

0.34

0.23

0.05

0.26

0.26

-0.95

-1.37

0.05

-0.09

1.25

1.80

5.13

1.02

LOI (%)

Photographs of the Biwabik Iron Formation (outcrop #1) and sulfidic norite of the South
Kawishiwi intrusion (outcrop #3) are presented in Figure 7-15.

179

�Trip 7 – Classic Outcrops

Figure 7-15. Field photographs of roadside outcrops of stop 5. (A) outcrop of the Biwabik Iron Formation, (B)
closeup shot of bedding in granular iron formation (GIF), (C) rusty weathering and gossanous outcrop of the basal
mineralized zone of the South Kawishiwi intrusion, and (D) pyrrhotite-rich norite.

Return to bus
Stop 20: Giants Range Batholith Migmatite/Pyroxenite-Lamprophyre Dike
Longitude/Latitude: 47.68689429°N, -92.05199159E
UTM NAD 83 Zone 15N: 571144E, 5281936N
This field trip ends where we began, within the Neoarchean Giants Range Batholith. This roadside
outcrop of the Embarrass tonalite, an early phase of the GRB that was first mapped by Griffin and Morey
(1969) and later remapped by Terry Boerboom in 2015. The outcrop, as mapped by Terry Boerboom,
consists of intermixed migmatitic biotite-schist and tonalitic gneiss crosscut by a lamprophyre/pyroxenite
dike. Approximately 4-miles to the west of this outcrop the Embarrass Tonalite was originally dated by UPb zircon at 2718 ± 67 Ma by Peterman in Southwick (1994). This data has been superseded by a second
U-Pb zircon age of 2687 ± 0.6 Ma by Jirsa (2016).

RETURN TO MOUNTAIN IRON COMMUNITY CENTER
180

�Trip 7 – Classic Outcrops

Acknowledgements
Characterizing and evaluating the detailed geology of northeastern Minnesota has been a team
effort involving former NRRI geologists, former and current Minnesota Geological Survey geologists and
geophysicists, personnel from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and students and faculty
from the Precambrian Research Center Field Camp, the University of Minnesota Duluth, the University of
Minnesota Twin Cities, and the University of Wisconsin Eau Claire. Their efforts are appreciated. As well,
permission to map private properties that was granted by local landowners and mineral exploration/mining
companies is much appreciated. The authors would like to thank Jim Essig (Manager, Lake Vermilion /
Soudan Underground Mine State Park) and James Pointer (Interpretive Supervisor, Lake Vermilion /
Soudan Underground Mine State Park) from the MDNR for their support, assistance, and guidance while
planning and conducting detailed geological mapping by the NRRI geologists during the DUSEL project
and PRC students and faculty in Lake Vermilion State Park in 2010 and 2011. Funding from the Minerals
Coordinating Committee, the University of Minnesota Permanent University Trust Fund, the National
Science Foundation, the University of Minnesota Duluth Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program,
the University of Minnesota Duluth Graduate School, The University of Wisconsin Oshkosh StudentFaculty Research Program, and many mineral exploration companies also enabled geological research in
northeastern Minnesota.

References
Allen, D.J., Hinze, W.J., Dickas, A.B., and Mudrey, M.G., Jr., 1997, Integrated geophysical modeling of the North
American Midcontinent rift system: New interpretations for western Lake Superior, northwestern Wisconsin,
and eastern Minnesota, in Ojakangas, R.W., Dickas, A.B., and Green, J.C., eds.: Middle Proterozoic to Cambrian
rifting, central North America: Geological Society of America, Special Paper 312, p. 47-72.
Allerton, Z., Hudak, G., Teyssier, C., Fayon, A., Danisik, M., Courtney-Davies, L, and Larson, P., 2024a,
Geochronology campaign in northeastern Minnesota: Institute on Lake Superior Geology, Proceedings Volume
70, Part 1 – Program and Abstracts, p. 2-3.
Allerton, Z., Hudak, G., Teyssier, C., Fayon, A., Danisik, M., Courtney-Davies, L, and Larson, P., 2024b,
Geochronology and geochemistry of hematite ore in northeastern Minnesota: Institute on Lake Superior
Geology, Proceedings Volume 70, Part 1 – Program and Abstracts, p. 4-5.
Arndt, N., and Fowler, A., 2004, Textures in komatiites and variolitic basalts: in Erikson et al., The Precambrian
Earth – Tempos and Events, Elsevier, p. 298-311.
Ayer, J. A., Goutier, J., Thurston, P. C., Dube, B., and Kamber, B. S., 2010, Tectonic and Metallogenic Evolution of
the Abitibi and Wawa subprovinces: Summary of Field Work and Other Activities, 2010, Ontario Geological
Survey Open File Report 6260, p. 3-1 – 3.6.
Batiza, R., and White, J. D. L., 2000, Submarine lavas and hyaloclastite: in Sigurdsson, H., Encyclopedia of
Volcanoes: Academic Press, San Diego, CA, p. 361-381.
Bauer, R. L., 1985, Correlation of early recumbent and younger upright folding across the boundary between an
Archean gneiss belt and greenstone terrane, northeastern Minnesota: Geology, v. 13, p. 657-660.
Boerboom, T. J., 2020, D-07, Geochronology Database: Minnesota Geological Survey – Open Data Site,
https://mngsumn.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/d7903b83244a4878bcfb31f362bf5787_0/explore?location=46.147285%2C92.317888%2C7.04.
Boerboom, T. J., and Zartman, R. E., 1993, Geology, geochemistry, and geochronology of the central Giants Range
Batholith, northeastern Minnesota: Canadian Journal of Earth Science, v. 30, p. 2510-2522.
Bonnichsen, B., 1974, Geology of the Ely–Hoyt Lakes district, northeastern Minnesota: Minnesota Geological
Survey, Open-File Report, 29 p.
Bonnichsen, B., Fukui, L.M., and Chang, L.Y., 1980, Geologic setting, mineralogy, and geochemistry of magmatic
sulfide deposits, Duluth Complex, U.S.A.: Proceedings, 5th quadrennial International Association on the Genesis
of Ore Deposits Symposium, Stuttgart, Germany, p. 545-565.
Cartwright, J., and Møller Hansen, D., 2006, Magma transport through the crust via interconnected sill complexes:
Geology, v. 34, no. 11, p. 929-932.

181

�Trip 7 – Classic Outcrops
Cas, R. A. F., and Wright, J. V., 1987, Volcanic Successions – Modern and Ancient: George Allen and Unwin,
London, 528 p.
Chandler, V.W., 1990, Geologic interpretation of gravity and magnetic data over the central part of the Duluth
Complex, northeastern Minnesota: Economic Geology, v. 85, no. 4, p. 816-829.
Chandler, V.W., and Ferderer, R.J., 1989, Copper-nickel mineralization of the Duluth Complex, Minnesota-A
gravity and magnetic perspective: Economic Geology, v. 84, no. 6, p. 1690-1696.
Corfu, F. and Stott, G. M., 1998, Shebandowan greenstone belt, western Superior Province: U-Pb ages, tectonic
implications, and correlations: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 110, p. 1467-1484.
Dahlberg, E.H., 1987, Drill core evaluation for platinum group mineral potential of the basal zone of the Duluth
Complex: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Division of Minerals, Report 255, 60 p.
Dahlberg, E.H., Peterson, D.M., and Frey, B.A., 1989, Drill core repository projects (1988-1989): Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources, Division of Minerals, Reports 255-1, 265, and 266, 316 p.
Dimroth, E., Cousineau, P., Leduc, M., and Sanschagrin, Y., 1978, Structure and organization of Archean
subaqueous basalt flows, Rouyn-Noranda area, Quebec: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 15, p. 902-918.
Driese, S. G., Jirsa, M. A, Ren, M., Brantley, S. L., Sheldon, N. D., Parker, D., and Schmitz, M. D., 2011,
Neoarchean paleoweathering of tonalite and metabasalt: Implications for reconstructions of 2.69 Ga early
terrestrial ecosystems and paleoatmospheric chemistry: Precambrian Research, v. 189, p. 1-17.
Fisher, R. V., 1961, Proposed classification of volcaniclastic sediments and rocks: Geological Society of America
Bulletin, v. 72, p. 1409-1414.
Fisher, R. V., 1966, Rocks composed of volcanic fragments and their classification: Earth Science Reviews, v. 1, p.
287-298.
Fisher, R. V., 1998, Out of the Crater: Princeton University Press, 180 p.
Foose, M.P., 1984, Logs and correlation of drill holes within the South Kawishiwi intrusion, Duluth Complex,
northeastern Minnesota: U.S. Geological Survey, Open-File Report 84-14, variously paged, 1 pl.
Foose, M.P., and Cooper, R.W., 1978, Preliminary geologic report on the Harris Lake area, northeastern Minnesota:
U.S. Geological Survey, Open-File Report 78-385, 24 p., 1 pl., scale 1:12,000.
Gal, B., 2008, The South Filson Creek deposit, a Masters of geology thesis: Eotvos Lorand University, Budapest,
Hungary.
Gibson, H. L., Morton, R. L., and Hudak, G. J., 1999, Submarine volcanic processes, deposits, and environments
favorable for the location of volcanic-associated massive sulfide deposits: Reviews in Economic Geology, v. 8,
p. 13-51.
Green, J.C., Phinney, W.C., and Weiblen, P.W., 1966, Geologic map of Gabbro Lake quadrangle, Lake County,
Minnesota: Minnesota Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Map Series, Map M-2, scale 1: 31,680.
Griffin, W.L., and Morey, G.B., 1969, The geology of the Isaac Lakes quadrangle, St. Louis County, Minnesota:
Minnesota Geological Survey Special Publication SP-8, 57p.
Grotte, M., and Hudak, G., 2014, A field and petrographic study of Neoarchean variolitic pillow lavas, Newton Belt,
Vermilion District, NE Minnesota [abstract/poster]: Institute on Lake Superior Geology, v. 60, Part 1, p. 53-54.
Gruner, J. W., 1926, Hydrothermal alteration of iron ores of the Lake Superior type – a modified theory: Economic
Geology, v. 32, p. 121-130.
Hauck, S., Severson, M., Ripley, E., Goldberg, S., and Alapieti, T., 1997, Geology and Cr-PGE mineralization of the
Birch Lake area, South Kawishiwi intrusion, Duluth Complex: University of Minnesota Duluth, Natural
Resources Research Institute, Technical Report, NRRI/TR-97/13, 32 p.
Hauck, S.A., Severson, M.J., Zanko, L.M., Barnes, S.-J., Morton, P., Aliminas, H.V., Foord, E.E., and Dahlberg,
E.H., 1997, An overview of the geology and oxide, sulfide, and platinum-group element mineralization along the
western and northern contacts of the Duluth Complex, in Ojakangas, R.W., Dickas, A.B., and Green, J.C., eds.,
Middle Proterozoic to Cambrian rifting, central North America: Geological Society of America Special Paper
312, p. 137-185.
Hooper, P., and Ojakangas, R., 1971, Multiple deformation in the Vermilion District, Minnesota: Canadian Journal
of Earth Sciences, v. 8, p. 423-434.
Hudak, G. J., Heine, J., Newkirk, T., Odette, J., and Hauck, S., 2002a, Comparative geology, stratigraphy, and
lithogeochemistry of the Fivemile Lake, Quartz Hill, and Skeleton Lake VMS occurrences, Vermilion district,
NE Minnesota: A report to the Minerals Coordinating Committee, DNR, Minerals Division, State of Minnesota:
Natural Resources Research Institute Technical Report NRRI/TR-2002/03, 390 pages.
Hudak, G. J., and Peterson, D. M., 2014, Non-Ferrous Mineralization Associated with the Wawa-Abitibi Terrane
and Duluth Complex Cu-Ni-PGM Deposits, Northeastern Minnesota: Society of Economic Geologists,
Guidebook Series, v. 47, 150 p.

182

�Trip 7 – Classic Outcrops
Hudak, G. J., Heine, J., Lodge, R. W. D., and Jansen, A., 2012, Recent developments understanding the volcanic,
magmatic, tectonic, and metallogenic evolution of the Ely Greenstone Formation, Vermilion District, NE
Minnesota: Geological Association of Canada – Mineralogical Association of Canada, Abstracts and Program, v.
35, p. 59.
Hudak, G. J., Hoffman, A. T., Peterson, D. M., and Heine, J., 2007, Recent developments understanding the
volcanic, magmatic, tectonic, and metallogenic evolution of the Ely Greenstone Formation, Vermilion District,
NE Minnesota: 53rd Annual Meeting, Institute on Lake Superior Geology, Proceedings Volume 53, Part 1 –
Program and Abstracts, p. 42-43.
Hudak, G. J., Radakovich, A., Pignotta, G., and Schwierske, K., 2014, Field Trip 2 – A Walk in the Park –
Neoarchean Geology of Lake Vermilion State Park: Institute on Lake Superior Geology, Proceedings Volume
60, Part 2 – Field Trip Guidebook, p. 37-75.
Hudak, G.J., Heine, J., Jirsa, M.A., and Peterson, D.M., 2004, Field Trip 1 - Volcanic stratigraphy, hydrothermal
alteration, and VMS potential of the Lower Ely Greenstone, Fivemile Lake to Sixmile Lake area: 50th Annual
Meeting, Institute on Lake Superior Geology, Proceedings Volume 50, Part 2 – Field Trip Guidebook, p. 1-45.
Hudleston, P. J., Schultz-Ela, D., and Southwick, D. L., 1988, Transpression in an Archean greenstone belt, northern
Minnesota: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 25, p. 1060-1068.
Hudleston, P.J., 1976, Early deformational history of Archean rocks in the Vermilion district, north-eastern
Minnesota: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 13, p. 579-592.
Jansen, A. C., Hudak, G. J., Heine, J. J., and Peterson, D. M., 2009, Lithogeochemical evaluation of Neoarchean
mafic volcanic rocks comprising the footwall to the Soudan Member of the Ely Greenstone Formation,
northeastern Minnesota: 55th Annual Meeting, Institute on Lake Superior Geology, Proceedings Volume 55, Part
1 – Program and Abstracts, p. 46-47.
Jirsa, M. A., 2000. The Midway sequence: a Timiskaming-type pull-apart basin deposit in the western Wawa
Subprovince, Minnesota: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 37, p. 1-15.
Jirsa, M. A., Boerboom, T. J., and Peterson, D. M., 2001, Bedrock geological map of the Eagles Nest Quadrangle,
St. Louis County, Minnesota: Minnesota Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Map M-114, scale 1:24,000.
Jirsa, M. A., Boerboom, T. J., Green, J. C., Miller, J. D., Morey, G. B., Ojakangas, R. W., and Peterson, D. M.,
2004, Field Trip 5 – Classic outcrops of northeastern Minnesota: 50th Annual Meeting, Institute on Lake
Superior Geology, Proceedings Volume 50, Part 2 – Field Trip Guidebook, p. 129-169.
Jirsa, M.A., 1990, Bedrock geologic map of northeastern Itasca County, Minnesota: Minnesota Geological Survey,
Miscellaneous Map M-68, scale 1:48 000.
Jirsa, M.A., 2016, Preliminary geologic maps of Lake and St. Louis counties, northeastern Minnesota: Minnesota
Geological Survey Open File Report OFR 16-4, https://conservancy.umn.edu/items/a68ec090-cf02-463a-8fcbe3c05926d80e.
Jirsa, M.A., and Boerboom, T.J., and Peterson, D.M., 2001, Bedrock Geologic Map of the Eagles Nest Quadrangle,
St. Louis County, Minnesota: Minnesota Geological Survey Miscellaneous Map M-114, scale 1:24,000.
Jirsa, M.A., Southwick, D.L., and Boerboom, T.J., 1992, Structural evolution of Archean rocks in the western Wawa
subprovince, Minnesota: refolding of precleavage nappes during D2 transpression: Canadian Journal of Earth
Sciences 29:2146-2155.
Klinger, F. L., 1960, Geology and ore deposits of the Soudan Mine, St. Louis County, Minnesota: unpublished Ph.
D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 96 p.
Kuenen, P.H., and Migliorini, C., 1950, Turbidity currents as a cause of graded bedding: Journal of Geology, 58:91127.
Kuhns, M.J., Hauck, S.A., and Barnes, R.J., 1990, Origin and occurrence of platinum group elements, gold and
silver in the South Filson Creek copper-nickel mineral deposit, Lake County, Minnesota: University of
Minnesota Duluth, Natural Resources Research Institute, Technical Report NRRI/GMIN-TR-89-15, 60 p., 3 pls.
Lee, I., and Ripley, E.M., 1996, Mineralogic and oxygen isotopic studies of open system magmatic processes in the
South Kawishiwi intrusion, Spruce Road area, Duluth Complex, Minnesota: Journal of Petrology, v. 37, no. 6, p.
1437-1461.
Listerud, W.H., and Meineke, D.G., 1977, Mineral resources of a portion of the Duluth Complex and adjacent rocks
in St. Louis and Lake Counties, northeastern Minnesota: Hibbing, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources,
Division of Minerals, Report 93, 74 p.
Lodge, R. W. D., Gibson, H. L., Stott, G. M., Hudak, G. J., Jirsa, M. A., and Hamilton, M. A., 2013, New U-Pb
geochronology from the Timiskaming-type assemblages in the Shebandowan and Vermilion greenstone belts,
Wawa Subprovince, Superior Craton: Implications for the Neoarchean development of the southwestern
Superior Province: Precambrian Research, v. 235, p. 264-277.

183

�Trip 7 – Classic Outcrops
Lundy, J. R., 1985, Clues to structural history in the minor folds of the Soudan Iron Formation, northeastern
Minnesota: Unpublished M. S. thesis, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 144 p.
Marma, J.C., 2003, Magmatic and hydrothermal PGE mineralization of the Birch Lake Cu-Ni-PGE deposit in the
South Kawishiwi intrusion, Duluth Complex, northeastern Minnesota: Unpublished M.S. thesis, University of
Wisconsin: condensed version, University of Minnesota Duluth, Natural Resources Research Institute, Technical
Report, NRRI/TR-2003/39, 112 p.
Marsden, R.W., Emanuelson, J.W., Owens, J.S., Walker, N.E., and Werner, R.F., 1968, The Mesabi Iron Range,
Minnesota, in Ridge, J.D. (ed.), Ore Deposits of the United States, 1933-1967: New York, American Institute of
Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, Inc., The Grafton-Sales Volume, v. 1, p. 518-537.
McPhie, J., Doyle, M., and Allen, R., 1993, Volcanic Textures: A Guide to the Interpretation of Textures in
Volcanic Rocks: CODES Key Centre, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, 198 p.
Miller, J.D., Green, J.C., Severson, M.J., Chandler, V.W., and Peterson, D.M., 2001, Geological map of the Duluth
Complex and related rocks, Northeastern Minnesota, Minnesota Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Map M119,
scale 1:200,000.
Miller, J.D., Jr., Green, J.C., Severson, M.J., Chandler, V.W., Hauck, S.A., Peterson, D.M., and Wahl, T.E., 2002,
Geology and mineral potential of the Duluth Complex and related rocks of northeastern Minnesota: Minnesota
Geological Survey Report of Investigations RI-58, 207 p.
Morey, G.B., 1965, The sedimentology of the Precambrian Rove Formation in northeastern Minnesota (abs.):
Institute on Lake Superior Geology, 11th Annual Meeting, St. Paul, Minnesota, Proceedings p. 25-26.
Morey, G.B., 1992, Chemical composition of the eastern Biwabik Iron Formation (Early Proterozoic), Mesabi Iron
Range, Minnesota: Economic Geology, v. 87, p. 1649-1658.
Morey, G.B., and Cooper, R.W., 1977, Bedrock geology of the Hoyt Lakes–Kawishiwi area, St. Louis and Lake
Counties, northeastern Minnesota: Minnesota Geological Survey, Open-File Report, scale 1:48,000.
Mueller, W. U., and White, J. D. L., 2004, 4.2 – Terminology of Volcanic and Volcaniclastic Rocks: in Eriksson, P.
G., Altermann, W., Nelson, D. R., Mueller, W. U., and Catuneanu, O., (eds.), The Precambrian Earth: Tempos
and Events: Developments in Precambrian Geology, v. 12, Elsevier, Amsterdam, p. 273-277.
Naldrett, A.J., 1997, Key factors in the genesis of Noril’sk, Sudbury, Jinchuan, Voisey’s Bay and other world-class
Ni-Cu-PGE deposits: Implications for exploration: Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 44, no. 3, p. 283-315.
Newkirk, T., Hudak, G. J., and Hauck, S. A., 2001a, Preliminary lava flow morphology studies at the Five Mile
Lake VMS prospect, Vermilion District, NE Minnesota: Implications for volcanic processes, volcanic
paleoenvironments, and VMS exploration: Institute on Lake Superior Geology, 47th Annual Meeting,
Proceedings Volume 47, Part 1- Program and Abstracts, p. 69-70.
Newkirk, T., Hudak, G. J., and Hauck, S. A., 2001b, Preliminary lava flow morphology studies at the Five Mile
Lake VMS prospect, Vermilion District, NE Minnesota: Implications for volcanic processes, volcanic
paleoenvironments, and VMS exploration: Geological Society of America Abstracts and Programs Volume 33,
No. 6, p. A-398.
Ojakangas, R.W., 1966, Precambrian stratigraphy and structure of the Tower, Minnesota quadrangle (abs): Institute
on Lake Superior Geology Proceedings, 12th Annual Meeting, Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan, Proceedings p. 17.
Patelke, R.L., 2003, Exploration drill hole lithology, geologic unit, copper-nickel assay, and location database for
the Keweenawan Duluth Complex, northeastern Minnesota: University of Minnesota Duluth, Natural Resources
Research Institute, Technical Report, NRRI/TR-2003/21, 97 pages, 1 CD.
Peterson, D.M., 1997, Ore deposit modeling of the footwall mineralization of the Duluth Complex: Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources, Division of Minerals, Project 317, 55 p., 46 pls.
Peterson, D.M., 2001, Development of Archean lode-gold and massive sulfide deposit exploration models using
geographic information system applications: targeting mineral exploration in northeastern Minnesota from
analysis of analog Canadian mining camps: unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, University of Minnesota, Duluth,
Minnesota, 503 p.
Peterson, D.M., 2001b, Development of a conceptual model of Cu-Ni-PGE mineralization in a portion of the South
Kawishiwi intrusion, Duluth Complex, Minnesota: Society of Economic Geologists, Second Annual PGE
Workshop, Sudbury, Ontario, 3 p.
Peterson, D.M., 2001c, Copper-Nickel-PGE mineral potential of the eastward extension of the Maturi Cu-Ni
deposit, Duluth Complex, Lake County, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Duluth, Natural Resources
Research Institute, Confidential Report of Investigations NRRI/RI-2001-02, 29 pages, 15 plates, 1 CD.
Peterson, D.M., 2002a, 3-Dimensional view through a mineralized system: the South Kawishiwi intrusion, Duluth
Complex: Institute on Lake Superior Geology, 48th Annual Meeting, Thunder Bay, Ontario, v. 48.

184

�Trip 7 – Classic Outcrops
Peterson, D.M., 2002b, Cu-Ni-PGE mineralization in the South Kawishiwi intrusion, northeastern Minnesota,
Variation due to magmatic processes: Institute on Lake Superior Geology, 48th Annual Meeting, Thunder Bay,
Ontario, v. 48.
Peterson, D.M., 2002c, Variation in the Cu-Ni-PGE mineralization in the South Kawishiwi intrusion, Duluth
Complex, northeastern Minnesota: 9th International Platinum Symposium, Billings, Montana, USA, July 21-25.
Peterson, D.M., 2002d, Copper-Nickel grade maps for the Spruce Road deposit, South Kawishiwi intrusion, Duluth
Complex: University of Minnesota Duluth, Natural Resources Research Institute, Report of Investigations
NRRI/RI-2002/03, 99 p.
Peterson, D.M., 2002e, Shaded relief map of the basal contact of the South Kawishiwi intrusion, Duluth Complex,
northeastern, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Duluth, Natural Resources Research Institute, Map Series
NRRI/MAP-2002-01, scale 1:75,000.
Peterson, D.M., 2002f, Bedrock geology, sample location, and property position maps of the west Birch Lake area,
South Kawishiwi intrusion, Duluth Complex, northeastern, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Duluth, Natural
Resources Research Institute, Map Series NRRI/MAP-2002-02, scale 1:10,000.
Peterson, D.M., 2005, Bedrock Geologic and Volcanogenic Massive Sulfide Deposit Mineral Potential Map of the
Lower Ely Greenstone and Adjacent Areas: Soudan, Eagles Nest, and Bear Island 7.5° Quadrangles, St. Louis
County, Northeastern Minnesota: Unpublished geological map, North-Central Section of the Geological Society
of America Meetings, Minneapolis, 1:20,000 scale.
Peterson, D.M., 2006a, 3D Visualizations of mafic Intrusions in the Duluth Complex, northeastern Minnesota,
Institute on Lake Superior Geology, 52nd Annual Meeting, Sault Ste Marie, Ontario, May 8-12, 2006,
Minnesota, v. 52.
Peterson, D.M., 2006b, Digital base for geological mapping within the northern South Kawishiwi intrusion: Lake
and St. Louis Counties, northeastern Minnesota: University of Minnesota Duluth, Natural Resources Research
Institute, Map Series NRRI/MAP-2006-01, scale 1:20,000.
Peterson, D.M., 2006c, New ideas on mineralization in the Duluth Complex, Oral presentation and online pdf file to
the Mesabi Range Geological Society, December 20, 66 pages.
Peterson, D.M., 2008, Bedrock geologic map of the Duluth Complex in the northern South Kawishiwi intrusion and
surrounding area, Lake and St. Louis Counties, Minnesota: Natural Resources Research Institute, Map Series
NRRI/MAP-2008-01, scale 1:20,000.
Peterson, D.M. and Albers, P.B., 2007, South Kawishiwi Intrusion Cu-Ni-PGE mineralization in association with
the Nickel Lake Macrodike, Institute on Lake Superior Geology, 53rd Annual Meeting, Field Trip Guidebook,
Lutsen, Minnesota, Volume 53.
Peterson, D.M., Albers, P.B., and White, C.R., 2006, Bedrock geology of the Nickel Lake macrodike and adjacent
Areas, Lake County, northeastern Minnesota: University of Minnesota Duluth, Natural Resources Research
Institute, Map Series NRRI/MAP-2006-04, scale 1:10,000.
Peterson, D.M. and Boerst, K., 2013, Twin Metals Minnesota’s Maturi Deposit, in Severson, M.J., Peterson, D.M.,
Ware, A., and Boerst, K., 2013, Cu-Ni-PGE Deposits of the Duluth Complex, Geology and Development:
Precambrian Research Center, Workshop on the Copper, Nickel, Platinum Group Element Deposits of the Lake
Superior Region, October 6-13, 2013, Field Trip Guidebook, pp. 45- 57.
Peterson, D.M., Gallup, C., Jirsa, M.A., and Davis, D.W., 2001, Correlation of Archean assemblages across the
U.S.-Canadian border: Phase I geochronology (abs): Institute on Lake Superior Geology, 47th Annual Meeting,
Madison, Wisconsin, Proceedings v. 47, Part 1, p. 77-78.
Peterson, D.M., and Hauck, S.A., 2005, Visualization of "Frozen" dynamic magma chambers in the Duluth
Complex, northeastern Minnesota: Eos Trans. AGU 86(52), Fall Meet. Suppl., Abstract V23A-0680.
Peterson, D.M., and Jirsa, M.A., compilers, 1999, Bedrock geologic map and mineral exploration data, western
Vermilion district, St. Louis and Lake Counties, northeastern Minnesota: Minnesota Geological Survey
Miscellaneous Map M-98, scale 1:48,000.
Peterson, D.M., Jirsa, M. A., and Hudak, G. J., 2005. Field Trip 9: Architecture of an Archean Greenstone Belt:
Stratigraphy, Structure and Mineralization: in Robinson, L., ed., 2005, Field Trip Guidebook for Selected
Geology in Minnesota and Wisconsin: Minnesota Geological Survey Guidebook 21, p. 154-180.
Peterson, D.M., Jirsa, M., and Hudak, G., 2009, Field Trip 7 – Architecture of an Archean Greenstone Belt:
Stratigraphy, Structure, Mineralization: 55th Annual Meeting, Institute on Lake Superior Geology, Proceedings
Volume 55, Part 2 – Field Trip Guidebook, p. 178-215.
Peterson, D.M., and Patelke, R. L., 2003, National Underground Science and Engineering Laboratory (NUSEL):
Geological site investigation for the Soudan Mine, northeastern Minnesota: Natural Resources Research Institute
Technical Report NRRI/TR-2003/29, 88 p.

185

�Trip 7 – Classic Outcrops
Peterson, D.M., and Patelke, R. L., 2004a, Bedrock Geology and Lode Gold Prospect Data Map of the Mud Creek
Road Area, Northern St. Louis County, Minnesota: Natural Resource Research Institute Geologic Map
NRRI/MAP-2004/01, 1:12,00 scale, available for free download at
http://www.nrri.umn.edu/egg/REPORTS/MAP200401/MAP200401.html.
Peterson, D.M., and Patelke, R. L., 2004b, Field Trip 7 – Economic geology of Archean gold occurrences in the
Vermilion District, northeast of Soudan, Minnesota: 50th Annual Meeting, Institute on Lake Superior Geology,
Proceedings Volume 50, Part 2 – Field Trip Guidebook, p. 200-226.
Peterson, D.M., Patelke, R.L., and Severson, M.J., 2004, Bedrock geology map and Cu-Ni mineralization data for
the basal contact of the Duluth Complex west of Birch Lake, St. Louis and Lake Counties, northeastern
Minnesota: University of Minnesota Duluth, Natural Resources Research Institute, Map Series NRRI/MAP2004-02, scale 1:10,000.
Peterson, D.M., Pointer, J., and Marshak, M., 2009b, Field Trip 3 – Soudan Iron Mine and Physics Lab Tour: 55th
Annual Meeting, Institute on Lake Superior Geology, Proceedings Volume 55, Part 2 – Field Trip Guidebook, p.
100-109.
Peterson, D.M. and Severson, M.J., 2002, Chapter 4, Archean and Paleoproterozoic rocks forming the footwall of
the Duluth Complex, in Geology and mineral potential of the Duluth Complex and related intrusions of
northeastern Minnesota, Minnesota Geological Survey, Report of Investigations 58, pp. 76-93.
Phinney, W.C., 1969, The Duluth Complex in the Gabbro Lake quadrangle, Minnesota: Minnesota Geological
Survey, Report of Investigations 9, 20 p.
Phinney, W.C., 1972, Duluth Complex, history and nomenclature, in Sims, P. K., and Morey, G. B., eds., Geology
of Minnesota: A Centennial Volume: Minn. Geol. Survey, pp. 333-334.
Phinney, W.C., 1972, Northwestern part of Duluth Complex, in Sims, P.K., and Morey, G.B., eds., Geology of
Minnesota: A centennial volume: Minnesota Geological Survey, p. 335-345.
Ramsey, J.G., and Huber, M.I., 1987, The Techniques of Modern Structural Geology, Academic Press Inc. (London)
Ltd.
Ripley, E.M., 1986, Origin and concentration mechanisms of copper and nickel in Duluth Complex sulfide zones – a
dilemma: Economic Geology, v. 81, p. 974-978.
Schmid, R., 1981, Descriptive nomenclature and classification of pyroclastic deposits and fragments;
recommendations of the IUGS subcommission on the systematics of igneous rocks: Geology, v. 9, p. 41-43.
Schulz, K.J., 1980, The magmatic evolution of the Vermilion greenstone belt, NE Minnesota: Precambrian Research
11:215-245.
Severson, M.J., 1994, Igneous stratigraphy of the South Kawishiwi intrusion, Duluth Complex, northeastern
Minnesota: University of Minnesota Duluth, Natural Resources Research Institute, Technical Report NRRI/TR93/34, 210 p., 15 plates.
Severson, M.J., and Hauck, S.A., 2003, Platinum-group elements (PGEs) and platinum-group minerals (PGMs) in
the Duluth Complex: University of Minnesota Duluth, Natural Resources Research Institute, Technical Report,
NRRI/TR-2003/37, 296 p., 1 CD.
Severson, M.J., Heine, J.J., and Patelke, M.M., 2009, Geologic and Stratigraphic Controls of the Biwabik Iron
Formation and the Aggregate Potential of the Mesabi Iron Range, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Duluth,
Natural Resources Research Institute, Technical Report NRRI/TR- 2009/09, 173 p. + 37 plates.
Sims, P. K., and Southwick, D. L., 1985, Geologic map of Archean rocks, western Vermilion district, northern
Minnesota: U. S. Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Investigations Map I-1527, scale 1:48,000.
Southwick, D. L., (compiler), 1993, Bedrock geologic map of the Soudan-Bigfork area, northern Minnesota:
Minnesota Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Map M-79, scale 1:100,000.
Southwick, D. L., Boerboom, T. J., and Jirsa, M. A., 1998, Geologic setting and descriptive geochemistry of
Archean supracrustal and hypabyssal rocks, Soudan-Bigfork area, northern Minnesota: implications for metallic
mineral exploration: Minnesota Geological Survey, Report of Investigations 51, 69 p.
Stott, G., Corkery, T., Leclair, A., Boily, M., and Percival, J., 2007, A revised terrane map for the Superior Province
as interpreted from Aeromagnetic Data: 53rd Annual Meeting, Institute on Lake Superior Geology, Proceedings
Volume 53, Part 1 – Program and Abstracts, p. 74-76.
Thompson, A., 2015, A hydrothermal model for metasomatism of Neoarchean Algoma-type banded iron formation
to massive hematite ore at the Soudan Mine, NE Minnesota: unpublished M. S., thesis, University of Minnesota
Duluth, 59 p.
Vislova, T., 2003, Petrology of the Bald Eagle intrusion and associated rocks and its relevance to crystallization in
dynamic magma chambers in the Midcontinent Rift: Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Minnesota.

186

�Trip 7 – Classic Outcrops
Weiblen, P.W., 1965, A funnel-shaped, gabbro-troctolite intrusion in the Duluth Complex, Lake County Minnesota:
Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Minnesota, 161 p.
Weiblen, P.W., Morey, G. B., 1980, A summary of the stratigraphy, petrology, and structure of the Duluth Complex:
American Journal of Science, vol. 280A, Part I, p 88-133.
Weiblen, P.W., Peterson, D.M., and Vislova, T., 2005, Implications of Midcontinent Rift and oceanic ridges
analogies and 3-D interpretations of the subsurface structure of the Bald Eagle intrusion in the Duluth Complex
and the East Pacific Rise: Institute on Lake Superior Geology, 51st Annual Meeting, Sault Ste Marie, Ontario, v.
51, 3 p.
White, C., 2010, The Nokomis Deposit, a Masters of Geology thesis: University of Minnesota, Duluth.
White, J. D. L., and Houghton, B. F., 2006, Primary volcaniclastic rocks: Geology, v. 34, no. 8, p. 677-680.
Wolff, J.F., 1917, Recent geologic developments on the Mesabi range, Minnesota: American Institute of Mining and
Metallurgical Engineers Transactions, v. 56, p. 142-169.
Zanko, L.M., Severson, M.J., and Ripley, E.M., 1994, Geology and mineralization of the Serpentine copper-nickel
deposit: University of Minnesota Duluth, Natural Resources Research Institute, Technical Report NRRI/TR93/52, 90 p., 3 pls.

187

�Trip 8 – Glacial

FIELD TRIP 8
Glacial Lake Norwood and the Koochiching Lobe
Phil Larson1, Andrew Breckinridge2, and Howard Mooers3
1

Vesterheim Geoscience PLC
Natural Sciences Department, University of Wisconsin Superior, 202 Barstow Hall, Superior, WI 54880
3
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Minnesota Duluth, 1114 Kirby Drive,
Duluth, MN 55812
2

Introduction
The region north of the Giants Range is draped by sediment deposited during the final retreat of
the Laurentide ice sheet from northeastern Minnesota. These sediments record the retreat of the Rainy Lobe
ice margin to the northeast, the formation of Glacial Lake Norwood (GLN), two successive advances of the
Koochiching Lobe from the northwest, and the opening of a western outlet of GLN and its succession by
Glacial Lake Agassiz, all over the span of a few thousand years.
Historically, the Quaternary geology of this region has received scant attention. However, recent
work integrating varve chronology, high resolution LiDAR digital terrain models, till geochemistry,
rotasonic drilling, and mapping has resulted in substantially improved and nuanced understanding of the
sedimentary processes active, and the sequence of events, during deglaciation. A key finding is that GLN
was of significantly longer duration than previously believed, and consequently a stronger control on
sediment and landform distribution in the region.
Within the footprint of GLN, there is scant evidence for preservation of glacigenic sediments
predating the Late Wisconsinan. Interbedded till and glaciolacustrine sediment thicknesses up to 70 m thick
preserve evidence of extremely high sedimentation rates in a dynamic sediment system. High rates of
sediment delivery by the Koochiching Lobe and analogues from the west served as the dominant sediment
source, while intense reworking by wave action in GLN was a dominant control on sediment distribution.

Historical Background
The earliest formal studies of glacial deposits in northeastern Minnesota were conducted by Upham
(1894) who identified a series of moraines across Minnesota. He identified the Vermillion moraine as the
12th moraine in the deglaciation sequence, although he did not define its entire length. Elftman (1898)
suggested two lobes for the northeastern portion of Minnesota because of observed till differences and
provenances; he named these the Superior and Rainy lobes; the Rainy lobe referring to the ice flowing from
the Rainy River areaWinchell (1899) compiled Upham, Elftman, and his own observations into a map of
large portions of northeastern Minnesota and description of the surficial deposits. Winchell (1900)
described evidence for glacial lakes in Minnesota, including naming Glacial Lake Norwood. Notably, he
did not recognize the full extent of Glacial Lake Norwood, assigning portions of the Norwood basin to other
glacial lakes.
Leverett (1932), based mostly on the work of his predecessors, proposed that northeastern
Minnesota was glaciated by three separate lobes of ice. He recognized that the earliest drift in the area was
the result of ice flowing from the Patrician [Labradoran] ice center located in the Hudson Bay Lowlands
between the Keewatin and Labradorean ice accumulation centers.

188

�Trip 8 – Glacial

Figure 8-1. Extent of Glacial Lake Norwood (light green-blue). The lack of modern lakes (blue) in the GLN basin
highlight area of significant glaciolacustrine sediment thickness. Major Rainy lobe recessional moraines (brown lines).
Proglacial Lake Northofnashwauk is the high-level (elev. &gt;1500’) proglacial lake predating GLN dammed by the St.
Louis sublobe.

Modern understanding of the surficial geology of northeastern Minnesota began with Wright
Wright (1956), who was the first to conduct systematic fieldwork in the area between the border lakes and
Lake Superior. Wright and Watts (1969) reconstructed the postglacial vegetational history of northeastern
Minnesota, and established the first regional deglaciation chronology, including use of radiocarbon dates
to establish absolute ages to deglaciation. These early efforts were summarized in the comprehensive
general glacial geologic framework of Minnesota Wright (1972).
The United States Geological Survey conducted a comprehensive study of surficial geology and
groundwater availability on the Mesabi Iron Range. An initial map (Cotter, Young, and Winter 1964) was
later followed by additional publications on the glaciation sequence (Winter 1971) glacial sediment
composition (Winter, Cotter, and Young 1973), and groundwater hydrology in glacial drift-hosted aquifers
(Winter 1973).
Hobbs (1983) provided the first comprehensive account of Glacial Lake Norwood’s extent and
history. At that time, he rechristened GLN as Glacial Lake Koochiching, not recognizing the continuity
with Winchell’s (1900) definition of GLN. In this respect he was hampered by the paucity of well-defined
strandlines for the upper levels of GLN in the rocky meltout till underlying much of the southern portion
of the basin. He also posited a late, lower elevation outlet for Glacial Lake Koochiching southward along
the Prairie River; recent (2012) LiDAR elevation data (MNDNR 2012) combined with a better defined
isostatic rebound reconstruction (Breckenridge 2015) suggest the existence of a southern outlet to GLN
untenable. Significantly, Hobbs recognized that Glacial Lake Norwood expanded westward, ultimately
establishing an outlet via the McIntosh Channel into Glacial Lake Climax. Continued retreat of the Red
River lobe ice margin resulted in coalescence of Glacial Lake Climax and GLN into Glacial Lake Agassiz
at the Herman level at 13.9±0.3 cal kyr BP (Lepper et al. 2007).
189

�Trip 8 – Glacial
Björck (1990) expanded Wright and Watts (1969) pioneering work by collecting radiocarbon dates
north of the Giants Range. He obtained basal radiocarbon dates from Sabin Lake (located in the outflow to
GLN) of 10,230±230 and 10,320±170 14C kyr BP. Bjorck’s oldest date was 12,100±150 14C kyr BP from
Heikkila Lake, located within the Big Rice moraine. Lowell et al. (2009) reported a radiocarbon date from
north of the Vermilion moraine of 12,000±85 14C kyr BP, assigning a minimum age to the Vermilion phase
and the moraines to the south of 13.9±0.2 cal kyr BP. These dates establish that Glacial Lake Norwood and
drainage through the Embarrass Gap persisted long after the Laurentide ice sheet margin retreated from the
Vermilion moraine.
Johnson et al. (2016) assigned the glacigenic deposits in northeastern Minnesota to a formal
statewide lithostratigraphic framework.
Essentially all the aforementioned published work was opened to critical re-examination and
revision upon release of 1m resolution LiDAR-derived digital terrain models in the spring of 2012 (MDNR
2012). This data provides resolution orders of magnitude greater than previous topographic models,
allowing for vastly improved recognition of some classes of glacigenic landforms, and recognition for the
first time of entire new classes of landforms. These advances allowed for significant refinement in mapping
of glacial landforms, interpretation of sediment-landform relationships, and development of deglaciation
process models.
Breckenridge (2015) mapped glacial lake strandlines and developed an isostatic rebound model for
much of northern Minnesota, including much of the Glacial Lake Norwood basin, demonstrating the
previously unrecognized widespread extent of both Glacial Lake Norwood and the early, high levels of
Glacial Lake Agassiz. Bauer et al. (2022) published a surficial geologic map and Quaternary stratigraphic
interpretation of much of the GLN basin, relying primarily on the lithostratigraphic mapping approach
favored by the Minnesota Geological Survey, but also incorporating landform interpretation based on the
2012 LiDAR data.

Glacial History
Northeastern Minnesota was continuously covered by ice from the earliest Late Wisconsin ice
advance approximately 28 kyr bp until about 11 kyr bp by the Rainy lobe of the Laurentide ice sheet
(Clayton and Moran 1982); (Mooers and Lehr 1997)). Although the Glacial Lake Norwood basin was
subjected to multiple glacial cycles, the vast majority of glacigenic sediment was deposited during the last
retreat of the Laurentide ice sheet during the Late Wisconsinan (&lt;15 kyr bp). The Pleistocene stratigraphic
record therefore principally reflects retreat of the ice sheet, and is composed of glacigenic sediment
deposited at or near the ice margin.
Bedrock Geology and Preglacial Regolith
The GLN basin underlain by greenstone (metavolcanic and metasedimentary rocks) and granitoids
of the ~2.7 Ga Wawa-Shebandowan Subprovince. The craton was intruded by mafic intrusives of the 2076
Ma Kenora-Kabetogama dike swarm (Southwick and Halls 1987; Buchan, Halls, and Mortensen 1996),
while contact relationships indicate the Archean craton was peneplained by the time arenites, ironformation, greywacke, and argillite of ~1.85 Ga Animikie Basin were deposited to the south. Minor mafic
dikes related to the 1.1 Ga Midcontinent Rift are known to intrude the Archean craton north of the Giants
Range; it is probable that additional similar intrusives have yet to be recognized or mapped.
Subsequent to cessation of the Midcontinent Rift, Precambrian bedrock in the GLN basin was
subject to a nearly 1 billion year period of chemical weathering and saprolite formation. Saprolite formation
was preferentially, but not necessarily, focused along joints, faults, and less weathering-resistant lithologies,
forming deep linear weathering pendants beneath a more widespread blanket of saprolite.
Commencement of glaciation at the beginning of the Pleistocene ~3 Ma subjected the Superior
craton to significant physical erosion for the first time in nearly a billion years. Successive glacial cycles
190

�Trip 8 – Glacial
preferentially eroded unconsolidated saprolite, removing first the extensive saprolite blanket, and then
excavating saprolite from deep weathering pendants. To the southwest of the GLN basin (central
Minnesota), the preglacial saprolite is largely intact beneath Pleistocene glacigenic sediment. To the
northeast (northwestern Ontario), preglacial saprolite has been essentially completely removed. Here, the
rugged ‘glacially sculpted’ shield terrain characteristic of this region is better explained as the unweathered
bedrock surface forming the base of the preglacial saprolite; bedrock has undergone relatively little actual
glacial weathering.
In the GLN basin proper, preglacial saprolite removal by glacial erosion is incomplete, leaving
patchy remnants of unconsolidated preglacial saprolite on the bedrock surface. Saprolite is occasionally
intercepted in boreholes. Saprolite and incipient pendant weathering have been encountered associated with
joints and fractures as deep as 100 m.
Pre-Late Wisconsinan
The overlying preglacial saprolite was removed by repeated cycles of erosion and deposition during
the Pleistocene. Saprolite eroded as the ice sheet grew (relative early in a glacial cycle) was transported to
the margin. The remnant saprolite was blanketed by glacigenic sediment as the ice margin receded (late in
the glacial cycle. Subsequent glacial cycles removed both the older glacigenic sediment and additional
saprolite.
Winter (1971) and Winter, Cotter, and Young (1973) described a dark-colored, sandy-silty
calcareous till in exposures in open pit mines on the Mesabi Iron Range. Since this till, where present,
occurred immediately above bedrock, they referred to it as the “basal till”. Stark (1977) and (Lehr and
Hobbs 1992) described occurrences of Winter’s basal till in exposures in the Dunka Mine. The matrix of
Winter’s basal till is calcareous, and the pebble fraction contains carbonate clasts in addition to the granitic
and metamorphic lithologies typical of Rainy lobe tills. A northeast-southwest pebble fabric in Winter’s
basal till strongly supports a northeastern provenance for this till, indicating the carbonate in pebbles and
till matrix is derived from Paleozoic carbonates in the Hudson Bay Lowlands (HBL). A distinctive
greywacke lithology (Prest, Donaldson, and Mooers 2000) associated with carbonate-bearing tills has been
recovered from glacigenic sediments north of the Giants Range (this author), indicating older carbonatebearing glacigenic sediment was actively reworked during the last retreat of the Laurentide ice sheet.
Additional occurrences of this calcareous basal till have been intercepted in boreholes elsewhere in the
GLN basin, indicating patchy remnants of preglacial saprolite and older (carbonate-bearing) glacigenic
sediment are present beneath the relatively continuous blanket of glacigenic sediment deposited between
ca. 15 kyr bp and 10 kyr bp during the last retreat of the Laurentide ice sheet.
Post-Last Glacial Maximum – Rainy Lobe
Recession of the Laurentide ice sheet margin following its last glacial maximum extent at ca. 20
kyr bp was characterized by rapid melting of ice during summer months followed by stabilization and minor
re-advance during the winter. This process formed a series of small, annual recessional moraines, spaced
25-75 m apart, reflecting the long-term retreat rate of the ice sheet.
To a significant degree, glacigenic sediment deposited by the Rainy lobe of the Laurentide ice sheet
during retreat of its margin from the southwest to northeast is the oldest Pleistocene sediment preserved in
the GLN basin. Post-LGM Rainy lobe sediments are typically comprised predominantly of sediment eroded
locally from Archean greenstone and granitoid lithologies; this results in significant lithologic and
geochemical compositional variability(Larson, 2004; Larson &amp; Mooers, 2004). Lodgment tills are
commonly ~2 m thick, while sand and gravel deposited in subaqueous recessional moraines commonly
form sharp-crested ridges 5-40 m thick. Distal glaciolacustrine sand and silt commonly drapes older basal
lodgment tills and recessional moraines.

191

�Trip 8 – Glacial
This process of gradual ice margin retreat was punctuated by surges, episodes of major re-advance
and stagnation. These surges resulted in deposition of moraines significantly broader and thicker than
annual recessional moraines. The surges may not reflect re-advance of the ice sheet as a whole, but were
likely restricted to sectors of the ice margin on the order of 100s of km. They may therefore not be a direct
physical reflection of climate fluctuations, but rather reflect internal ice sheet dynamics.
Most of the area exposed by ice margin retreat from the Giants Range was inundated in proglacial
lakes, successively by Glacial Lake Nashwauk, Glacial Lake Norwood, and finally by Glacial Lake
Agassiz. The extended interval between ice margin retreat, lake drainage, and establishment of terrestrial
vegetation over most of this area significantly hinders the ability to establish a precise deglaciation
chronology (compare Björck (1990)).
Allen Phase
The oldest major surge-stagnation moraine recognized in the GLN basin is the Allen moraine,
which forms a WNW-ESE trending belt of stagnation topography (ice-walled lake plains, meltout tills,
etc.), passing through the Embarrass Gap. Ice flow during the Allen phase was generally toward the SSW
(bearing 190°).
Ice margin retreat from the Allen moraine and opening of meltwater drainage through the
Embarrass Gap was the event that by definition resulted in formation of Glacial Lake Norwood. Further ice
margin recession and deposition of annual recessional moraines suggests about 150 years before the next
major surge-stagnation event.
Big Rice and Wahlsten Phases
The second major surge-stagnation moraine recognized in the GLN basin is the Big Rice moraine,
a W-E trending belt of thick meltout till and stagnation topography. Ice flow during the Big Rice phase was
generally toward the SSW (bearing 190°).
The third major moraine recognized in the TMM AOI is the Wahlsten moraine, an E-W trending
belt of thick meltout till and stagnant ice topography. Ice flow during the Wampus phase was generally
toward the S (bearing 180-190°), reflecting a significant reorientation in ice flow of the Laurentide ice
sheet.
Annual recessional moraines associated with the Wampus and Wahlsten phases consist of both
subaqueous moraines composed of sand, gravel, and meltout tills deposited in Glacial Lake Norwood, and
subaerial moraines predominantly composed of meltout tills.
Vermilion Phase
The fourth and final major moraine recognized in the GLN basin is the Vermilion moraine, a 40 m
high, 1-2 km wide, WNW-ESE trending belt of thicker meltout till, stagnant ice topography, and
subaqueous debris flow fans. Ice flow during the Vermilion phase was generally toward the SSW (bearing
195-205°). The Vermilion moraine truncates the eastern extent of the Wahlsten moraine, reflecting a further
significant reorientation in ice flow of the Laurentide ice sheet. The next moraine formed by a major surgestagnation event lies &gt;100 km to the northeast, suggesting an interval of &gt;1000 years of gradual ice margin
retreat after the Vermilion phase.
Glacial Lake Norwood
Retreat of the Rainy lobe margin north of the continental height of land at the Giants Ridge
dramatically changed the character of sedimentation associated with the Laurentide ice sheet. South of the
divide, meltwater generally flowed downslope away from the margin, depositing outwash in channels and
as outwash plains with intervening rolling plains of subglacial lodgment till or moraines composed of
hummocky supraglacial meltout till. Immediately upon marginal retreat north of the divide, ponding of
meltwater against the ice sheet formed the first of a nearly continuous succession of proglacial lakes. Glacial
192

�Trip 8 – Glacial
meltwater and other precipitation ponded against the ice sheet overflowed to the south through a series of
successively lower outlets over the height of land, a process that continued until final collapse of the ice
sheet in Hudson Bay.
Initially, a series of ephemeral lakes formed in stagnant ice north of the divide. These lakes were
dammed in part by the advance of the St. Louis Sublobe into the Glacial Lake Upham I basin (see Knaeble
et al. (2005) and Larson et al. (2014)) Associated strandlines and meltwater channels are only poorly
defined, and meltwater likely drained southward through stagnant Rainy lobe ice karst and St. Louis sublobe
ice. Once the active Rainy lobe ice margin receded to the Allen moraine, a stable, relatively long-lived
meltwater outlet was established through the Embarrass Gap.
By definition, the first proglacial lake located north of the Laurentian Divide that drained through
the Embarrass Gap is referred to as Glacial Lake Norwood. Three well-developed outlets to Glacial Lake
Norwood are recognized, corresponding to relatively stable, long-lived lake levels. These are herein
referred to as Glacial Lakes Norwood I, II, and III, corresponding to successively older and lower lake
levels.
The initial stable lake level (Glacial Lake Norwood I) was controlled by an outlet channel with a
modern floor elevation of about 450 m amsl. This channel was bounded by the Giants Range ridge to the
south, and the Allen moraine to the north. The Allen moraine at this location is a major recessional moraine,
approximately 500 m wide with in excess of 15 m of vertical relief above the meltwater channel.
The ice-cored Allen moraine formed an effective barrier to meltwater drainage blocking most of
the Embarrass Gap until after the ice sheet margin retreated from the Vermilion moraine, a time interval of
100s to 1000s of years. Incision of the Glacial Lake Norwood I outlet was inhibited during this time interval
in part because the channel was graded to its downstream inlet into Glacial Lake Upham II; only after
drainage of this lake was further significant erosion and channel incision in the Embarrass Gap initiated
(Larson and Mooers 2009).
Gradual collapse of the Allen moraine due to ice melt led to resulted in an episode of collapse and
downcutting of the moraine dam, and establishment of a second, lower stable outlet level for Glacial Lake
Norwood II in the Embarrass Gap at a modern floor elevation of about 443 m amsl. Paleoislands of outwash
and esker sediment located in Glacial Lake Norwood considerable distances north of the Vermilion moraine
display well-developed shoreline features corresponding to this outlet, indicating that the downcutting
episode occurred well after ice margin retreat from the Vermilion moraine, and that Glacial Lake Norwood
II stood at this stable lake level for a relatively long time interval.
A second collapse and downcutting episode through the Big Rice moraine led to establishment of
the third, and final, lower stable outlet level corresponding to Glacial Lake Norwood III in the Embarrass
Gap. An outlet with a modern floor elevation of about 433 m amsl corresponds to a second, lower welldeveloped strandline on esker and outwash paleoislands to the north.
During its relatively long history, Glacial Lake Norwood expanded along the receding ice margin
to form a lake that ultimately extended ~400 km E-W and in excess of 100 km N-S. The lake experienced
two major ice re-advances into its western arm, evidenced by thick (&gt;70 m) accumulations of
glaciolacustrine sediment and till. The large fetch of the lake resulted in vigorous wave erosion along its
shoreline and the considerable fraction of the lakebed situated above wave base. Final drainage of Glacial
Lake Norwood III occurred when a western outlet (the McIntosh spillway) flowing into an early (Herman)
level of Glacial Lake Agassiz formed in the vicinity of Trail, MN, 260 km to the west of the Embarrass
Gap.

193

�Trip 8 – Glacial

Figure 8-2. Outline of maximum extent of Glacial Lake Norwood in northern Minnesota. The lake extended over 350
km from east to west. The final outflow was westward into Glacial Lake Climax near Trail, MN.

Glacial Lake Norwood sediments generally consist of gravels and sands in littoral (shallow)
environments, reflecting local reworking of till and outwash by wave action, and silt and clay in benthic
environments, reflecting settling of suspended fine-grained sediment from the water column. In general,
Glacial Lake Norwood sediment sequences fine upward, reflecting diminished wave erosion and the
increasing distance of the primary sediment source (the receding ice margin).
Koochiching Lobe
Subsequent to retreat of the Rainy lobe from the Vermilion moraine, Koochiching lobe (KL) ice
re-advanced into the Glacial Lake Norwood basin, this time from the west and the Red River lobe (Meyer,
1993). In marked contrast to the sandy-textured till and glaciofluvial sediment associated with the Rainy
lobe, KL diamicton is calcareous, and distinctly finer grained than Rainy lobe till; these sediments are
placed in the Blackduck Formation in the MGS lithostratigraphic framework (Johnson et al., 2016). Based
on rotosonic drilling, diamictons associated with at least two distinct advances into the GLN basin are
present in the field trip area, separated by fine-grained glaciolacustrine sediment. The genesis of these
diamictons – till or subaqueous debris flow – are enigmatic; fine-grained lacustrine sediment may grade
upward into normally consolidated diamicton, which may grade upward into overconsolidated diamicton
of similar composition.
The Koochiching lobe advances overran older Rainy lobe landforms, including the Vermilion
moraine. There is little evidence for erosion and entrainment of older glacigenic sediment by the KL, and
no well-defined moraines or other landforms define the limits of the advances. Sediment was deposited
from suspended sediment plumes or debris flows in the proglacial GLN, or as subglacial lodgment till.
Although KL ice thickness is unknown, it was sufficiently thick relative to the depth of GLN to preclude
development of a calving margin.

194

�Trip 8 – Glacial
The majority of sediment shed by the advancing Koochiching lobe was deposited as
glaciolacustrine sediment in GLN, and subject to a high degree of reworking in the lacustrine environment.
Bedrock highs – shallow areas in GLN – are typically devoid of either older Rainy lobe or KL sediments.
In places, a thin boulder lag containing limestone and dolomite clasts attests to the former presence of KL
diamicton. In contrast, thicknesses of up to 70 m of till and glaciolacustrine sediment have been reported
in intervening bedrock lows.
Two distinct till compositions attesting to two distinct source areas have been reported in KL
sediments. The younger, overlapping KL till bears greater similarity to calcareous Red River and Des
Moines lobe tills elsewhere in Minnesota. In contrast, an older KL till is characterized by a distinctly higher
Na2O content, similar to tills exposed at surface in Hubbard and Wadena Counties.
Even as the Laurentide ice sheet margin was broadly retreating from Minnesota, both from the Red
River Valley and from the Arrowhead, the advances of the Koochiching lobe into the GLN served to block
development of meltwater outlets to the north and west. Ultimately, stagnation and wasting of the KL led
to westward propagation of GLN until development of the McIntosh spillway. The massive sediment
accumulations associated with the KL – up to 70 m in places as previously noted – were deposited over a
time interval on the order of 1000 years.

Description of Field Trip Stops
Stop 1: Glacial Lake Norwood strandline
498550E/5283740N (UTM Zone 15, NAD83)
(47.70704, -93.0193)
Side Lake 7.5’ USGS Quadrangle
This site is located on the uppermost relatively well-developed
beach associated with Glacial Lake Norwood. A well-developed boulder
lag and wave-cut notch attest to a relatively long-lived stable lake at this
level characterized by energetic wave action. To the south, ice collapse
pits in the subaqueous deposited Big Rice moraine evidence long lived
stagnant ice along this moraine trend. Locally, the Big Rice and other
moraines served as ice-cored dams preventing southern outflow.
Stop 2: Gravel pit in minor Rainy lobe recessional moraine
498480E/5294980N (UTM Zone 15, NAD83)
(47.80817, -93.0203014)
Bear River 7.5’ USGS Quadrangle
Here a small, sharp-crested subaqueous deposited recessional
moraine has been developed into a gravel pit. The flanks of the moraine
are draped by fine-grained glaciolacustrine sediment deposited in
Glacial Lake Norwood.

195

�Trip 8 – Glacial
Stop 3: Gravel pit in large Rainy lobe recessional moraine
495260E/5302290N (UTM Zone 15, NAD83)
(47.8739285, -93.0633884)
Bear River 7.5’ USGS Quadrangle
This gravel pit is developed in a large subaqueous ice marginal
fan(?) deposited at the margin of the retreating Rainy lobe. The fan was
of sufficient height that its surface was above the GLN wave base,
precluding deposition of finer-grained glaciolacustrine sediment. The
presence of limestone and dolomite boulders on the fan surface indicate
that this area was overrun by Koochiching lobe ice.
Stop 4: Wave-washed bedrock high
492880E/5301180N (UTM Zone 15, NAD83)
(47.8639194, -93.095198)
Bear River 7.5’ USGS Quadrangle
This wave-scoured bedrock high evidences the intensity of
wave action in Glacial Lake Norwood. Rainy lobe sediment has been
almost completely washed away, no Koochiching lobe sediment is
preserved, and no glaciolacustrine sediment has been deposited. The
very large boulder – a Rainy lobe erratic - attests to the ‘minimum’
particle size of this ‘boulder lag’.
Stop 5: Glacial striae and grooves
489180E/5304010N (UTM Zone 15, NAD83)
(47.8893303, -93.1447397)
Rauch 7.5’ USGS Quadrangle
Glacial striae and grooves on outcrop on either side of the road
at this stop preserve evidence of ice flow directions for both the Rainy
lobe (bearing 190° and 205°) and the later Koochiching lobe (bearing
140°). This indicates that Rainy lobe sediment was largely stripped from
bedrock highs by wave action in Glacial Lake Norwood prior to advance
of the Koochiching lobe from the west.

196

�Trip 8 – Glacial
Stop 6: Borrow pit in reworked calcareous Koochiching lobe drift
490750E/5305460N (UTM Zone 15, NAD83)
(47.9024009, -93.1237689)
Silverdale 7.5’ USGS Quadrangle
This small borrow pit on the margin of a wave-scoured bedrock
high contains abundant carbonate pebbles and cobbles. These originated
from calcareous Koochiching lobe till deposited on the bedrock high and
later eroded by wave action.

Stop 7: Slumping Koochiching lobe till and Glacial Lake Norwood
491460E/5311020N (UTM Zone 15, NAD83)
(47.9524357, -93.114379)
Silverdale 7.5’ USGS Quadrangle
This site exposes a sequence of interbedded Koochiching lobe
diamicton (till and debris flows(?)) and fine-grained glaciolacustrine
sediment adjacent to the Littlefork River. The slope, already prone to
slumping by stream erosion at the toe, was further destabilized by
construction of the road. In the near vicinity to the southwest, an
exploration rotosonic borehole intercepted around 70 m of such
sediment.
Stop 8: Samuelson Park
492580E/5310600N (UTM Zone 15, NAD83)
(47.9459716, -93.0993661)
Silverdale 7.5’ USGS Quadrangle
Bedrock underlying the small waterfall in the Littlefork River
has been striated by the Rainy lobe (bearing 196°). In the upstream
direction, boulders eroded from the basal Rainy lobe lodgment till are
visible in the stream bed and banks. Such bedrock and boulder lags serve
as knickpoints defining the bed of the Littlefork River; steep and
commonly slumping slopes adjacent to the river attest to the significant
erosion of Koochiching lobe and Glacial Lake Norwood sediment
during the Holocene.

197

�Trip 8 – Glacial
Stop 9: Embarrass Gap
9A: 551980/5270340N (UTM Zone 15, NAD83)
(47.583892, -92.3087077)
9B: 552150/5272700N (UTM Zone 15, NAD83)
(47.6056089, -92.3061663)
9C: 552760/5272950N (UTM Zone 15, NAD83)
(47.6078088, -92.2980211)
Biwabik 7.5’ USGS Quadrangle
These three stops are in the three successive major outlet channels for Glacial Lake Norwood. Stop
9A (elevation 450 m) is in a meltwater channel developed at the margin of the Rainy lobe, perhaps against
an active ice margin. Stops 9B (elevation 443 m) and 9C (elevation 433 m) are two successively lower
major outlets formed as the ice-cored Allen moraine collapsed over a time interval on the order of 1000
years. The outlet at 9C served as the stable outlet to Glacial Lake Norwood until opening of its final lower
outlet to the west, through the McIntosh spillway in the vicinity of Trail, Minnesota.

198

�Trip 8 – Glacial

REFERENCES
Bauer, Emily J., Mark A. Jirsa, Amy Radakovich Block, Terrence J. Boerboom, Val W. Chandler, Dean M
Peterson, Kaleb G. Wagner, Elizabeth L. McDonald, Jennifer M. Dengler, Gary N. Meyer, and Jacqueline
D. Hamilton. 2022. “Geologic Atlas of St. Louis County, Minnesota.” Minnesota Geological Survey
County Atlas Series C–51.
Björck, Svante. 1990. “Late Wisconsin History North of the Giants Range, Northern Minnesota, Inferred
from Complex Stratigraphy.” Quaternary Research 33:18–36.
Breckenridge, Andrew J. 2015. “The Tintah-Campbell Gap and Implications for Glacial Lake Agassiz
Drainage during the Younger Dryas Cold Interval.” Quaternary Science Reviews 117:124–34.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2015.04.009.
Buchan, Kenneth L., Henry C. Halls, and James K. Mortensen. 1996. “Paleomagnetism, U-Pb
Geochronology, and Geochemistry of Marathon Dykes, Superior Province, and Comparison with the Fort
Frances Swarm.” Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 33:1583–95.
Clayton, Lee, and Stephen R. Moran. 1982. “Chronology of Late Wisconsinan Glaciation in Middle North
America.” Quaternary Science Reviews 1:55–82.
Cotter, Ralph D., H.L. Young, and Thomas C. Winter. 1964. “Preliminary Surficial Geologic Map of the
Mesabi-Vermilion Iron Range Area, Minnesota.” USGS Miscellaneous Geologic Investigations Map I-403.
Elftman, A.H. 1898. “The Geology of the Keweenawan Area in Northeastern Minnesota, Part I.” The
American Geologist 21:90–109.
Hobbs, Howard C. 1983. “Drainage Relationships of Glacial Lakes Aitkin and Upham and Early Lake
Agassiz in Northeastern Minnesota.” Edited by James T. Teller and Lee Clayton. Geological Association
of Canada Special Paper 26:245–59.
Johnson, Mark D., Roberta S. Adams, Angela S. Gowan, Kenneth L. Harris, Howard C. Hobbs, Carrie E.
Jennings, Alan R. Knaeble, Barbara A. Lusardi, and Gary N. Meyer. 2016. “Quaternary Lithostratigraphic
Units of Minnesota.” Minnesota Geological Survey Report of Investigations 68:262.
Knaeble, Alan R., Gary N. Meyer, Lisa M. Marlow, Phillip C. Larson, and Howard D. Mooers. 2005.
“Deposits and Landforms in the Region Glaciated by the St. Louis Sublobe.” In Field Trip Guidebook for
Selected Geology in Minnesota and Wisconsin, edited by Lori Robinson, Guidebook, 40–79. Minneapolis:
Minnesota Geological Survey.
Larson, Phillip C., Alan R. Knaeble, Howard D. Mooers, and Lisa M. Marlow. 2014. “The St. Louis
Sublobe and Glacial Lake Upham.” Institute on Lake Superior Geology Field Trip Guidebook 60:102–18.
Larson, Phillip C., and Howard D. Mooers. 2009. “Glacial Geology of the Vermilion Moraine.” Institute
on Lake Superior Geology Field Trip Guidebook 55 (2): 81–99.
Lehr, James D., and Howard C. Hobbs. 1992. “Glacial Geology of the Laurentian Divide Area, St. Louis
and Lake Counties, Minnesota.” Minnesota Geological Survey Guidebook 18:82.
Lepper, Kenneth, Timothy G. Fisher, Irka Hajdas, and Thomas V. Lowell. 2007. “Ages for the Big Stone
Moraine and the Oldest Beaches of Glacial Lake Agassiz : Implications for Deglaciation Chronology.”
Geology 35 (7): 667–70. https://doi.org/10.1130/G23665A.1.
Leverett, Frank. 1932. “Quaternary Geology of Minnesota and Parts of Adjacent States.” USGS
Professional Paper 161:149.

199

�Trip 8 – Glacial
Lowell, Thomas V., Timothy G. Fisher, Irka Hajdas, K. Glover, Henry M. Loope, and T. Henry. 2009.
“Radiocarbon Deglaciation Chronology of the Thunder Bay, Ontario Area and Implications for Ice Sheet
Retreat
Patterns.”
Quaternary
Science
Reviews
28
(17–18):
1597–1607.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2009.02.025.
MNDNR. 2012. “LiDAR Elevation, Arrowhead Region, NE Minnesota, 2011.” Minnesota Department of
Natural
Resources.
ftp://ftp.gisdata.mn.gov/pub/gdrs/data/pub/us_mn_state_mngeo/elev_lidar_arrowhead2011/metadata/meta
data.html.
Mooers, Howard D., and James D. Lehr. 1997. “Terrestrial Record of Laurentide Ice Sheet Reorganization
during Heinrich Events.” Geology, no. 11, 987–90.
Prest, Victor K., J. Allan Donaldson, and Howard D. Mooers. 2000. “The Omar Story: The Role of Omars
in Assessing Glacial History of West-Central North America.” Géographie Physique et Quaternaire
54:257–70.
Southwick, David L., and Henry C. Halls. 1987. “Compositional Characteristics of the Kenora-Kabetogama
Dyke Swarm (Early Proterozoic), Minnesota and Ontario.” Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 24:2197–
2205.
Stark, James R. 1977. “Surficial Geology and Ground-Water Geology of the Babbitt-Kawishiwi Area,
Northeastern Minnesota with Planning Implications.” M.S. Thesis. M.S. Thesis, University of Wisconsin.
Upham, Warren. 1894. “Preliminary Report of the Field Work during 1893 in Northeastern Minnesota,
Chiefly Relating to the Glacial Drift.” Geological and Natural History Survey of Minnesota Annual Report
22:18–86.
Winchell, Newton H. 1899. “The Geology of the North Part of St. Louis County.” Geological and Natural
History Survey of Minnesota 4:222–65.
———. 1900. “Glacial Lakes of Minnesota.” Geological Society of America Bulletin 12:109–28.
Winter, Thomas C. 1971. “Sequence of Glaciation in the Mesabi-Vermilion Iron Range Area, Northeastern
Minnesota.” USGS Professional Paper 750–C:C82–88.
———. 1973. “Hydrogeology of Glacial Drift, Mesabi Iron Range, Northeastern Minnesota.” USGS Water
Supply Paper 2029-A:31.
Winter, Thomas C., Ralph D. Cotter, and H.L. Young. 1973. “Petrography and Stratigraphy of Glacial
Drift, Iron Range Area, Northeastern Minnesota.” USGS Bulletin 1331–C:50.
Wright, Herbert E. 1956. “Sequence of Glaciation in Eastern Minnesota.” Geological Society of America
Guidebook 3:1–24.
———. 1972. “Quaternary History of Minnesota.” In Geology of Minnesota: A Centennial Volume, edited
by Paul K. Sims and G.B. Morey, 515–47. St. Paul, Minnesota.
Wright, Herbert E., and William A. Watts. 1969. “Glacial and Vegetational History of Northeastern
Minnesota.” Minnesota Geological Survey Special Publication 11.

200

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="19">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="16970">
                  <text>Institute on Lake Superior Geology</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="107997">
                <text>Institute on Lake Superior Geology: Proceedings, 2025</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="107998">
                <text>Institute on Lake Superior Geology. Mountain Iron, Minnesota. May 14-17, 2025.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="107999">
                <text>Institute on Lake Superior Geology</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108000">
                <text>2025-05-14</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108001">
                <text>PDF</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108002">
                <text>English</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="108003">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="13009" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="16030">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/f60f8524d72135600172038674c524f1.mp3</src>
        <authentication>0fa0ad973e706936c1f3f94a46399960</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="16031">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/5d2d31b86eedd61a4469ec00cd71fa9e.mp3</src>
        <authentication>e16f63a0c3160e621319b69c1832b768</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="16032">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/f27096f6006c1b718b9a801499c8d09c.mp3</src>
        <authentication>a9c10067842f80b7ab5d82128fcd7bda</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="16033">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/cf14f52d35d6f8a032f45cffc9f8fa24.mp3</src>
        <authentication>d82e33e90ee2917c7d38e7ca4312a627</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="16034">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/15151ba10b48502cd5cbbb9b07c6a10f.mp3</src>
        <authentication>ba8b9996b4f669cdba78a93bf31c9510</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="16035">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/d168f002bdf67fc3465bb06cb06330a9.mp3</src>
        <authentication>9e891dd324ea33044ddd293675c7bfea</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="25">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="51851">
                  <text>Anishinaabemowik - Indigenous Languages Program Historical Documents</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="51852">
                  <text>Faculty of Education, Native Language Instructors Program</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="107986">
                <text>Intermediate Ojibwe: Audio Files</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="107987">
                <text>Universities</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="107988">
                <text>Accompanying audio file for Intermediate Ojibwe (Tom Beardy). There are six audio files: click on each to play or download in .mp3 format.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="107989">
                <text>Native Language Instructor Program, Faculty of Education, Lakehead University</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="107990">
                <text>Faculty of Education, Lakehead University</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="107991">
                <text>2001-07-01</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="107992">
                <text>Faculty of Education, Lakehead University.&#13;
&#13;
The print version of this text and accompanying audio files are available at Lakehead University Libraries (Chancellor Paterson and Education Libraries) library.lakeheadu.ca&#13;
&#13;
This text has been scanned as part of the Anishinaabemowik - Indigenous Languages Program Historical Documents Digitization Project, Faculty of Education, Education Library (Thunder Bay Campus), Lakehead University.&#13;
&#13;
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercialNoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/&#13;
&#13;
Please contact the Faculty of Education, Office of the Dean, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario Canada for additional information or permissions. 807-343-8010 (ext. 8520)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="107993">
                <text>mp3</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="107994">
                <text>Ojibwe</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="107995">
                <text>Audio</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="13008" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="16024">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/09efa4e9665de124e8e09e48a4bc59d1.mp3</src>
        <authentication>daf64dd5333c4275e71423caac9f27d4</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="16025">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/949d26dfa066ffe8a2ede9577c7d57ff.mp3</src>
        <authentication>4f79f736cd06266d8dfad6c45015b3fd</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="16026">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/0befdabf7dd9f3b9f4c609a75e125265.mp3</src>
        <authentication>276ee563a404b9c61ef6ebb710aaeb4b</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="16027">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/e37f0c282a2bf00d51d83d223b6424ba.mp3</src>
        <authentication>451b4c94be6d975ec51f63e3867475e7</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="16028">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/3f9af5d3aa8a604f33a0271e8d25656f.mp3</src>
        <authentication>0aeebdbf09a65335fa7648547bf9c7e7</authentication>
      </file>
      <file fileId="16029">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/ca08c7aef8b244194c85215f4a89abd0.mp3</src>
        <authentication>5eb2bbc3cd5b1233355182ae668aa161</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="25">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="51851">
                  <text>Anishinaabemowik - Indigenous Languages Program Historical Documents</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="51852">
                  <text>Faculty of Education, Native Language Instructors Program</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="107976">
                <text>Introductory Ojibwe: Audio Files</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="107977">
                <text>Universities</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="108017">
                <text>Indigenous Language</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="107978">
                <text>Accompanying audio files for Introductory Ojibwe (Tom Beardy). There are six audio files: click on each to play or download in .mp3 format. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="107979">
                <text>Native Language Instructor Program, Faculty of Education, Lakehead University</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="107980">
                <text>Faculty of Education, Lakehead University</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="107981">
                <text>2001-07-01</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="107982">
                <text>Faculty of Education, Lakehead University.&#13;
&#13;
The print version of this text and accompanying audio files are available at Lakehead University Libraries (Chancellor Paterson and Education Libraries) library.lakeheadu.ca&#13;
&#13;
This text has been scanned as part of the Anishinaabemowik - Indigenous Languages Program Historical Documents Digitization Project, Faculty of Education, Education Library (Thunder Bay Campus), Lakehead University.&#13;
&#13;
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercialNoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/&#13;
&#13;
Please contact the Faculty of Education, Office of the Dean, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario Canada for additional information or permissions. 807-343-8010 (ext. 8520)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="107983">
                <text>mp3</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="107984">
                <text>Ojibwe</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="107985">
                <text>Audio</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="13005" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="16009">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.lakeheadu.ca/files/original/cf4c39f67816efeda83eeb47420d26e9.jpg</src>
        <authentication>76ec36c08e0849c189caca4b77ebc0df</authentication>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="107788">
                <text>NODA_N-199-29</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="107876">
                <text>Business and Industry</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="107877">
                <text>Forest Products Industry</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="107878">
                <text>Communities in Northwestern Ontario</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="107879">
                <text>JPG</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="107880">
                <text>Still image</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="107961">
                <text>Worker on forestry harvesting machine</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="107962">
                <text>Worker on forestry harvesting machine: may be early version of NESCO Slashmobile. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
